Professional Documents
Culture Documents
April 1, 2015
Gati Ltd
Rating matrix
Buy
| 279
12-18 months
29%
FY14 (9-months)
Revenues
(12.3)
EBITDA
2.4
Net Profit
143.3
EPS
141.4
FY15E
47.7
71.3
79.3
79.3
Valuation summary
FY14 (9-months)
P/E
80.8
Target P/E
103.9
EV / EBITDA
27.9
P/BV
2.5
RoNW (%)
3.0
RoCE (%)
6.1
FY15E
45.1
58.0
15.6
2.9
5.9
11.1
Stock data
Bloomberg/Reuters Code
Sensex
Average volumes
Market Cap (| crore)
52 week H/L
Equity Capital (| crore)
Promoter's Stake (%)
FII Holding (%)
DII Holding (%)
1M
-10.3
3M
-14.4
TCI
Blue Dart
3.4
0.0
-0.1
15.0
Price movement
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
Jan-14
Sep-13
May-13
Dec-12
Aug-12
Apr-12
3,000
Price (R.H.S)
| 216
Oct-14
:
:
:
:
Jun-14
Rating
Target
Target Period
Potential Upside
Nifty (L.H.S)
FY15E
1,649.1
144.1
42.0
4.8
44.9
2.9
15.5
11.1
5.9
FY16E
2,023.5
183.5
62.5
7.2
30.1
2.7
11.7
14.6
9.4
FY17E
2,397.7
232.0
84.1
9.6
22.4
2.5
9.1
17.6
11.6
Company background
Dec-13
33.9
0.1
0.2
65.8
Mar-14
38.1
0.3
0.6
61.0
Jun-14
34.9
6.5
0.3
58.3
10.0
Sep-14
38.1
8.1
0.2
53.6
8.6
8.1
8.0
Dec-14
41.4
8.6
0.2
49.8
6.5
6.0
0.1
0.2
0.3 0.6
Q4FY14
2.0
Q3FY14
4.0
0.3
0.2
0.2
FII
Q3FY15
Q2FY15
Q1FY15
DII
G A T I-KW E
70% of T otal revenues (70% ow ned)
G ati Limited
23% of T otal revenues (Standalone)
G A T I Kausar
3% of T otal revenues - (80%
ow ned)
Surface Express
(79% segment revenues)
Gati Kausar
(3% of Total revenues)
Others
(3% of Total revenues)
A ir Freight
(11% segment revenues)
E-commerce
(16% segment revenues)
Rail
(8% segment revenues)
Fuel Sales
(59% segment revenues)
Others
(2% segment revenues)
Page 2
18
11
Japan
Europe
10
US
9
13
India
0
10
15
20
Japan
World Rank
6.00
China
United States
30.00
India
14.00
39.00
Customs
3.79
2.99
3.52
2.69
Infrastructure
4.11
3.20
4.07
2.90
Ease of Shipment
3.77
3.31
3.58
3.08
Logistics Services
4.12
3.40
3.85
3.27
Ease of tracking
4.08
3.37
4.01
3.03
2.02
2.97
2.20
3.08
Timeliness
4.34
3.68
4.11
3.47
Total
4.02
3.32
3.84
3.07
9.0%
8.1%
70,000.00
Higher infrastructure spends by the government and
regulatory changes like introduction of GST are expected to
lead the growth in the sector. Hence, we expect the
industry volume to continue the growth at current levels of
~16%, with a direct correlation of 1.2x to GDP
7.0%
60,000.00
50,000.00
16390
0.00
10995
6955
7535
4640
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
23085
3.0%
15130
10995
23085
2.0%
4140
15130
9305
4530
1710
11th Plan (2007- 11th Plan (2012- 11th Plan (2017- 11th Plan (2022- 11th Plan (20272012)
2017)
2022)
2027)
2032)
Rail
Road
Other
8.0%
7.0%
5.8%
30,000.00
10,000.00
8.1%
25010
40,000.00
20,000.00
8.1%
1.0%
0.0%
% of GDP
Page 3
8%
1%
8%
6%
31%
24%
62%
60%
Road
Rail
Water
Air
Transportation
Warehousing
Freight Forwarding
Within the industry, the road transportation segment (the largest mode of
transport) is highly fragmented. However, with the changing demand and
needs of new businesses, the logistics model will need to evolve. New
transportation businesses like project logistics, outsourced warehousing,
third and fourth party logistics and cold chain have started to generate
higher value. As reflected in exhibit 9, the logistics service provider will
get higher value with a shift in services offered from freight forwarding to
third party logistics. It also compares the inefficiencies of various modes
of transportation vis--vis global capabilities. The shift from pure play
warehousing and transportation to outsourced logistics may result in
differentiated business models among various available players.
Exhibit 9: Comparison India, US and China
India
USA
China
GDP composition
Agriculture & allied services
17%
1%
10%
Industry
18%
20%
47%
Services
65%
79%
43%
Logistics as % of GDP
13%
8.50%
18%
8.20%
5.30%
9%
Warehousing as % of GDP
3.80%
2.80%
6%
1%
Auto components, Textile,
Pharmaceuticals, Cement
Inadequate road networks
Losses during transportation
0%
Food & Beverages
E-Commerce
High employee costs
2%
Metals, Cement,
Textile, Electronics
High toll charges
Shortage of trained manpower
9.9
42.9
139.7
4.8
6.5
1173
1727
7018
64000
228513
66239
14750
8293
59331
Page 4
Service / Operations
Freight Forwarding
Express Logistics
Value configuration
Source: KPMG, ICICIdirect.com Research
Express
Coast-toCoast
Container
Haulage
CFS/ICD
MTO
Growth
Mature
Mature
Growth
Growth
Growth Capital
Intensive
Low
High
High
High
Medium
Low
5-10%
20-22%
15%
20%
35%
10-15%
3-5%
8-10%
25%
30%
40%
4-6%
Page 5
Investment Rationale
Logistics industry set to see paradigm shift!!!
The Indian logistics industry continues to remain at an underdeveloped
state compared to global players. The level of inefficiency in activity has
been very high across all modes of transport. Recent business activity
and changes in consumption pattern will demand an upgradation in the
existing set-up of infrastructure and services. With the transformation of
India into a manufacturing led economy, there would be greater demand
for various processes to manage transportation of goods and services in
innovative and cost efficient ways. An improvement in infrastructure is
expected to lead to a transformation in the logistics industry. This is
expected to lead to faster movement of goods, increase carrier speed,
increase the throughput rate and enhance the loading capacity.
Additionally, innovation in terms of warehousing would also be required
in terms of consolidation of smaller warehouses into large hubs, adoption
of global standards like modular racking & palletisation, technology
automation and value-added services around warehouse management.
With more importance given to the time, cost and efficiency of
deliverables, there is demand for specialised logistics players in the
industry. The transport industry in India can be largely segregated into
transportation, warehousing and outsourced value logistics. An expected
improvement in trade activity, higher demand from varied industries and
higher e-commerce penetration is expected to buoy package volumes
significantly. Cost efficient ways to transport goods, implementation of
GST and shift of the market towards organised player, which form less
than 50% of the industry, are expected to improve the earnings of
existing organised players.
Exhibit 12: Need for specialised logistic players
Cost reduction
81
76
71
61
Flexibility in operations
46
36
25
0
20
40
60
80
100
Page 6
1200
1000
600
467
494
515
545
595
646
400
200
852
766
800
BTKM
305
312
333
353
381
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
920
1212
1015
659
411
442
481
2005
2006
2007
521
551
2008
2009
601
626
2010
2011
668
0
Road
2012
Rail
Page 7
Compatibility
Connectedness
Total Index
1 China
9.80
6.71
6.75
8.09
2 Saudi Arabia
7.21
6.65
6.29
6.76
3 Brazil
8.48
6.06
4.93
6.71
4 Indonesia
8.94
4.95
4.94
6.70
5 India
9.24
4.51
4.68
6.66
Country
6 UAE
4.80
8.80
7.69
6.63
7 Russia
7.62
6.16
5.53
6.57
8 Malaysia
5.93
6.47
6.82
6.36
9 Mexico
7.89
4.63
5.28
6.30
10 Turkey
6.99
5.38
5.30
6.06
11 Chile
5.39
6.50
6.28
5.93
12 Qatar
4.88
8.04
5.90
5.87
13 Oman
4.14
7.63
6.54
5.70
14 Thailand
6.39
4.58
5.15
5.58
15 South Africa
5.52
4.99
5.64
5.46
Page 8
| Crores
8000
6000
5210
5660
6070
6648
7830
7050
9260
8190
6000
4830
5000
4060
4000
3000
4000
2340
2870
3420
2650
2990
3360
2000
2000
1000
0
0
2012
2013
Organised
2014
2012
2015
2013
2014
Air
Unorganised
2015
Ground
33739
30000
25000
21000
20000
17000
15000
10000
8109
7500
3900
5000
10000
5500
6700
879
0
BlueDart
Gati
Fedex India
Domestic locations
DTDC
Work force
First Flight
Page 9
2%
15%
11%
31%
8%
14%
6%
79%
Surface
Rail
Air
13%
8%
Others
Pharma
Textiles
13%
IT Hardware
FMCG
Auto ancillary
Others
Engineering
Page 10
14%
15%
18%
9%
11%
15%
52%
27%
15%
Blue Dart
Competitor 1
25%
Competitor 2
Competitor 3
Blue Dart
Others
Competitor 1
Competitor 3
Competitor 4
Others
Company Name
Transportation
Road
Air
Services
Rail
Water
Gati Limited
Yes
Yes
Blue Dart
Yes
Yes
TCI
Yes
Yes
Snowman
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
3PL
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
-
Page 11
25000
18794
20000
18006
13705
| cr
2000.0
10000
2908.0
2677.7
2637.7
FY12
FY13
2300.3
2500.0
16865
| cr
15000
3000.0
20106
1665.2
1500.0
1000.0
5000
0
482 296
835553
1051 726
965 663
823
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
Revenue
EBITDA
PAT
500.0
0.0
FY10
FY11
FY14
With KWE as the business partner, Gati is poised for growth and
expansion making informed structural changes based on advanced
analytical tools around network and route optimisation. The parents
focus on implementation of various quality improvement techniques like
KAIZEN, 5S and LEAN principles, is expected to augment the quality of
service. These efforts are to minimise the defects and achieve the next
level of quality excellence. The company incurs regular capital
expenditure in terms of automation of processes like installation of CCTV,
tablets & scanners and to reduce defects and improve efficiency of service
levels.
Page 12
60000
50400
50000
8,000
22400
20000
9100
10000
13900
5554
28.3
27.7
5,000
4,000
31.2
30
25.0
3172
20
3,000
2,000
1,000
836
1011
CY10
CY11
10
0
1500
2400
3800
0
FY12
Annual Revenue
FY13
FY14
Operating Margin
50
30000
6,000
$ million
33400
47.5
40
7,000
40000
| crore
8505
Page 13
| Lakh crore
4.6
1.9
0.8
2017E
2019E
2021E
Etailing
800
800 830
600
400
402
200
163
315 315
295
257
246 264 269
218
199
473
359
431 455
Jul-13
Sep-13
Nov-13
Jan-14
Mar-14
May-14
Jul-14
Sep-14
Nov-14
Page 14
12
20
92
88
80
80
60
40
20
0
FY12
FY16
Un-organised
FY20
Organised
Expected Growth
(%)
Dairy Products
121
Key Products
Value added Milk, Butter, Cheese
233
7
18
Segment
11
Poultry, Beef
Seafood
Packaged Products
8.4
|8000 crore
Gati Kausar is currently into the cold storage trucking business through its
current fleet size of ~200 refrigerated trucks. It caters to a variety of
industries across quick service restaurants (QSRs), pharmaceuticals, retail
and agri-food sectors. In Q2FY15, Gati Kausar raised | 150 crore from
Mandala Capital, which was structured as | 30 crore of equity and the
remaining | 120 crore of debt. Leveraging on the demand from the
current trucking clientele, the company plans to set up 10 cold storage
warehouses, comprising a capacity of ~43000 pallets, for which the land
parcels are earmarked and outlay has been decided. We expect revenues
to start contributing from Q4FY16.
Incremental addition of reefer trucks and warehousing capabilities will
provide supplementary revenues to Gati Kausar. Following this, we
expect revenues to grow 40% CAGR over 2015E-20E, with moderation to
16% CAGR over 2020E-25E.
Page 15
Goods and services tax Impetus for organised players like Gati
The Indian logistics industry is plagued by multiple levels of state and
central taxes. The product is prone to double taxation as taxes already
paid on inputs are not adjusted while calculating taxes on the final
product. There are further complications in the form of interstate
transactions, which are taxed separately, for which no input tax credit is
available. The manufacturers need their finished product to be cost
competitive. To avoid these complications, they restrict their transactions
within the state. Thus, introduction of Goods and Services Tax (GST)
remains a much awaited reform, which will simplify these complications
and benefit consumers, producers as well as the government. More than
140 markets have implemented GST in some form or the other. With
numerous benefits at both firm/consumer and economy level, GST is
expected to add over 1% to the GDP. Implementation of GST is expected
to lead to a simplified tax structure with a majority of taxes pooled under
one uniform rate, thereby resulting in more efficient tax administration
and reduction in tax seepages.
Due to multiple taxation issue, firms had resorted to setting up multiple
warehouses in different states. This was adding up to firms costs, as they
were unable to take advantage of economies of scale from using larger
but fewer warehouses. Implementation of GST will overhaul and
compress the entire transportation set-up.
Exhibit 32: Total additional space required for warehousing
2014
2019E
CAGR
Total additional
space required
(2014-2019)
Annual additions
required
Manufacturing
631
939
8%
308
61.6
Consumption
76
115
9%
39
7.8
Exim
211
386
13%
175
35
Total Warehousing
918
1440
9%
522
104.4
It is estimated that under the GST system, tax will be levied on stock
transfers and full credit will be given on inter-state transactions. The
outcome of the same will enable the manufacturer to plan the
warehousing and decisions on the basis of operational and logistics
efficiency. The current supply chain arrangements would be realigned
leading to proximity to manufacturing locales or consumption markets,
resulting into diverse hub and spoke models. Post GST, demand for
warehousing is expected to grow at an annual rate of 9% from the current
918 mn sq ft to 1440 mn sq ft.
Gati, with its widespread reach and warehousing capability, is well
positioned to seize these opportunities. Implementation of GST is
expected to lead to consolidation of widely spread warehouses. In
contrast, free movement of goods and services would necessitate tighter
logistics networks. Gati provides integrated and seamless transportation
and routing of goods through its reach of ~21000 pin codes, 16 major
hubs and 50 additional warehouses stretched across multiple locations.
Page 16
Financials
Strong revenue growth to be driven by ecommerce segment
Gati is expanding its e-commerce delivery capacity at a rapid pace. This
would enable it to grow its e-commerce revenues at a CAGR of 77% in
FY14-17E. On the other hand, its express distribution and supply chain
business under Gati KWE is expected to grow at 15.3% CAGR over FY1417E while its cold chain business under Gati Kausar is expected to grow
at 34.1% CAGR over the same period.
Exhibit 33: Standalone revenue trend
500
254
149
200
79
64 41
193
141
247
203
| cr
400
100
1600
413
300
633
546
600
| cr
2000
700
302
213
117
96
1147
1200
800
1598
1354
782
400
112 55
74 48
46 42
35 45
0
0
FY14 (9 months)
Freight Forwarding
FY15E
Ecommerce
FY16E
Fuel Sales
FY14
(9 months)
FY17E
FY15E
Gati KWE
FY16E
Gati Kausar
FY17E
Others
2500.0
2021.7
| cr
2000.0
1500.0
1649.3
1116.6
1000.0
500.0
0.0
FY14 (9 months)
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
Page 17
19.1
18.5
18.0
200.0
60.0
48.1
40.0
47.8
47.8
47.8
| cr
% to sales
80.0
0.0
9.2
8.7
8.9
9.0
15.7
15.7
15.7
15.5
FY14 (9 months)
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
Employee Expense
Freight Expense
8.7
7.5
150.0
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
FY14 (9 months)
FY15E
Other Expenses
50
22.4
21.7
10
19.4
19.6
0
FY14 (9 months)
FY15E
Interest as % of EBITDA
FY16E
FY17E
Depreciation as % of EBITDA
| cr
38.6
29.1
25.6
FY16E
FY17E
EBITDA
26.2
8.0
50.0
20
10.0
84.1
30
9.7
9.1
144.1
40
183.5
6.0
100.0
20.0
12.0
232.0
19.5
90.0
80.0
70.0
60.0
50.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
3.5
3.1
2.5
2.1
23.3
42.0
62.5
84.1
FY14 (9
months)
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
PAT
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
Higher EBITDA generation and control over fixed costs would enable
strong growth in net profit. We expect consolidated net profit to grow at a
CAGR of 39% to | 82.6 crore over FY14-17E and PAT margin to improve
by 136 bps over the same period.
Page 18
100.0
% to sales
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.4
FY14 (9 months)
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
17.6
14.6
11.1
6.1
11.6
9.4
5.9
3.0
FY14 (9 months)
FY15E
ROE (%)
FY16E
FY17E
ROCE (%)
Page 19
94.8
82.7
63.2
61.9
49.5
Mar-13
Sep-13
Mar-14
Sep-14
Dec-14
Page 20
Valuation
The logistics industry in India recorded growth at ~17% CAGR in 2009-14
with growth further pegged at 1.2x of the GDP growth rate. Gatis
standalone revenues grew at 10% CQGR over seven quarters, primarily
due to an increase in e-commerce revenues from | 8 crore to | 42 crore
with volume growth of 33% in the same period. Gati, with its leading
market share of ~26%, widespread reach across the Indian geography
and one-stop logistics service provider with parent (KWE) support, is
expected to further expand its market share from the highly unorganised
market in the industry. The theme around e-tailing, cold chain and
implementation of GST is expected to play out in a phased manner and
may result in a multiplier effect on the sectors fundamentals, thereby
providing multiple re-ratings.
As the advantages will be in a phased manner, we have employed the
two phase free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) model over FY14-25E for our
discounted cash flow methodology. We believe Gati will undergo these
two phases of transformation, which will transform the company to a
matured player in the supply chain mechanism. The first phase will be the
high growth phase over FY15E-20E, where revenues will grow at a CAGR
of 18% mainly due to higher volumes from e-tailing segment, additional
revenues generated from fulfilment services and cold chain warehousing
& improvement in realisation on the back of value-added services.
Higher utilisation levels and better infrastructure management are
expected to bring in an improvement in return ratios, thereby improving
the cash flow generation. In the next phase, we have built in a stable
growth period (FY20E-25E), wherein we believe the company will achieve
a normalised growth rate of ~11% CAGR. Thereafter, it is expected to
grow at a terminal growth rate of ~4%. Finally, with a risk free rate of
7.5% and beta of 0.85 together with a market risk premium of 7.5% we
arrive at a cost of equity of 13.9%. For FCFF valuation, we have assumed
a post tax WACC of 12.4%. Our back of the envelope calculation enables
us to arrive at a target price of | 279 (upside potential of 29%) and
recommend BUY.
Exhibit 43: DCF valuation
Valuation
PV of High growth period
PV of Stable growth period
PV of Terminal value
Less: Debt
Add: Cash & Investment
Targeted Market Capitalization
No. of shares
Target Price (|)
| Cr
799.0
707.52
1322.5
(480.22)
85.03
2,433.87
8.73
279
Terminal
Growth
Rate
278.9
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
10.0%
264.1
277.8
294.6
315.8
343.2
WACC
11.0%
255.9
269.6
286.4
307.6
335.0
12.0%
248.2
261.9
278.8
299.9
327.4
13.0%
241.1
254.8
271.7
292.8
320.3
14.0%
234.5
248.2
265.1
286.2
313.7
Page 21
EBITDA (| crore)
PAT (| crore)
CY13/FY14
CY13/FY14
CY13/FY14
CY13/FY14
CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 (9 months) CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 (9 months) CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 (9 months) CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 (9 months)
Market
Cap
Debt
Gati
1884
480
1187
1273
1117
166
92
94
14.0
7.2
8.4
42
17
Snowman
1417
150
61
114
153
13
25
38
21.0
22.4
24.8
20
22
Blue Dart
17790
1495
2172
1938
202
309
212
13.5
14.2
10.9
123
191
121
Company
28
EBITDA ($ mn)
PAT ($ mn)
Company
Market
Cap
Debt
UPS
90813
9864
54127
55438
58232
1343
7034
4968
2.5
12.7
8.5
807
4372
3032
Fedex Corp
49067
4736
42680
44287
45567
3186
2551
3446
7.5
5.8
7.6
2032
1561
2097
CSX Corp
9139
5992
6080
6565
531
552
595
8.9
9.1
9.1
333
349
377
CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 CY13/FY14 CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 CY13/FY14 CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 CY13/FY14 CY11/FY12 CY12/FY13 CY13/FY14
EV/EBITDA (x)
P/B (x)
ROE (%)
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
FY15E
FY16E
FY17E
Gati
1884
48.8
30.7
22.9
16.0
11.7
9.1
3.0
2.8
2.5
5.5
9.3
11.6
Snowman
1417
34.5
28.5
19.5
15.8
12.3
9.5
1.8
1.7
1.6
5.2
5.9
8.0
Blue Dart
17790
140.4
111.3
80.6
84.5
63.4
48.2
27.3
26.1
24.6
19.4
23.4
30.5
Page 22
(| Crore)
FY 13
1,272.9
7.2
171.4
123.6
785.9
109.9
82.2
(19.1)
24.8
57.4
43.7
16.6
30.3
(71.0)
6.0
24.4
(7.1)
(7.6)
9.6
(62.3)
1.1
FY 14 #
1,116.6
(12.3)
174.8
102.7
662.7
92.3
84.1
2.4
22.1
62.0
32.5
10.6
40.2
32.4
11.8
28.3
(4.9)
23.4
16.3
2.7
FY 15E
1,649.1
47.7
258.2
144.3
961.8
140.8
144.1
71.3
36.1
108.0
41.1
13.1
79.9
99.0
20.0
59.9
(3.0)
(15.0)
42.0
111.7
4.8
FY 16E
2,023.5
22.7
317.7
180.3
1,166.7
175.2
183.5
27.3
40.1
143.4
41.4
13.8
115.8
44.9
32.4
83.4
(20.8)
62.5
39.1
7.2
FY 17E
2,397.7
18.5
371.7
216.4
1,366.4
211.3
232.0
26.4
45.7
186.3
45.2
14.6
155.7
34.5
43.6
112.1
(28.0)
84.1
34.5
9.6
(| Crore)
FY 13
FY 14 #
FY 15E
FY 16E
FY 17E
17.3
769.7
787.0
323.3
153.7
477.0
10.7
115.4
1390.1
17.5
755.4
772.8
314.9
165.3
480.2
6.1
117.3
1376.5
17.5
628.5
646.0
283.4
173.6
457.0
6.1
119.7
1228.7
17.5
672.1
689.6
269.2
190.9
460.2
6.1
122.1
1277.9
17.5
737.3
754.8
255.8
210.0
465.8
6.1
124.5
1351.2
564.1
177.0
387.1
24.3
411.4
446.9
20.2
11.8
220.3
46.4
402.9
681.5
66.3
44.2
59.4
169.9
511.6
1,390.1
571.6
192.2
379.4
38.7
418.1
446.9
54.8
11.9
241.4
30.3
373.5
657.0
73.2
43.1
84.0
200.3
456.7
1,376.5
451.6
228.4
223.3
50.0
273.3
446.9
57.5
4.5
248.5
106.5
377.2
736.8
120.2
64.7
100.8
285.7
451.0
1,228.7
501.6
268.5
233.1
50.0
283.1
446.9
60.4
5.5
304.9
192.2
350.8
853.4
148.0
97.0
120.9
365.9
487.5
1,277.9
571.6
314.2
257.4
50.0
307.4
446.9
63.4
6.6
361.3
246.2
354.3
968.4
178.2
111.6
145.1
434.9
533.5
1,351.2
Page 23
(| crore)
FY 13
17.3
5.5
24.8
36.5
13.1
(112.2)
(64.6)
(34.3)
(436.8)
(0.0)
(471.1)
15.3
427.4
442.7
(93.0)
140.1
47.0
FY 14 #
28.3
19.5
22.1
30.9
30.5
8.3
84.3
(28.8)
(0.0)
(34.6)
(63.4)
3.2
0.1
(40.4)
(37.0)
(16.1)
46.4
30.3
FY 15E
57.0
18.9
36.1
74.2
85.4
(3.4)
160.1
108.7
(2.7)
106.0
(23.2)
(166.5)
(189.8)
76.3
30.3
106.5
FY 16E
83.4
18.9
40.1
104.6
80.2
(31.0)
151.8
(50.0)
(2.9)
(52.9)
3.2
(16.5)
(13.3)
85.7
106.5
192.2
FY 17E
112.1
18.9
45.7
138.9
69.0
(60.9)
137.8
(70.0)
(3.0)
(73.0)
5.6
(16.4)
(10.8)
54.0
192.2
246.2
(Year-end March)
Per share data (|)
FY 13
FY 14 #
FY 15E
FY 16E
FY 17E
Book Value
EPS
Cash EPS
DPS
Profitability & Operating Ratios
EBITDA Margin (%)
PAT Margin (%)
Fixed Asset Turnover (x)
Inventory Turnover (Days)
Debtor (Days)
Current Liabilities (Days)
Return Ratios (%)
RoE
RoCE
RoIC
Valuation Ratios (x)
PE
Price to Book Value
EV/EBITDA
EV/Sales
Leverage & Solvency Ratios
Debt to equity (x)
Interest Coverage (x)
Debt to EBITDA (x)
Current Ratio
Quick ratio
90.9
1.1
4.0
0.6
88.6
2.7
5.2
1.8
74.0
4.8
9.0
1.8
79.0
7.2
11.8
1.8
86.5
9.6
14.9
1.8
6.5
0.8
0.9
3.2
58.7
141.9
7.5
2.1
0.8
3.9
75.5
145.7
8.7
2.5
1.3
1.0
55.0
170.0
9.1
3.1
1.6
1.0
55.0
170.0
9.7
3.5
1.8
1.0
55.0
175.0
1.6
7.1
5.4
3.0
6.1
4.9
5.9
11.1
9.2
9.4
14.6
10.9
11.6
17.6
12.9
46.0
0.6
10.6
0.7
80.5
2.4
27.8
2.1
44.9
2.9
15.5
1.4
30.1
2.7
11.7
1.1
22.4
2.5
9.1
0.9
0.6
2.4
5.8
4.0
3.9
0.6
3.3
5.7
3.3
3.2
0.7
4.4
3.2
2.6
2.6
0.7
5.4
2.5
2.3
2.3
0.6
6.1
2.0
2.2
2.2
(Year-end March)
Profit after Tax
Less: Dividend Paid
Add: Depreciation
Add: Others
Cash Profit
Increase/(Decrease) in CL
(Increase)/Decrease in CA
CF from Operating Activities
(Add) / Dec in Fixed Assets
Goodwill
(Inc)/Dec in Investments
CF from Investing Activities
Inc/(Dec) in Loan Funds
Inc/(Dec) in Sh. Cap. & Res.
Others
CF from financing activities
Change in cash Eq.
Op. Cash and cash Eq.
Cl. Cash and cash Eq.
Page 24
RATING RATIONALE
Pankaj Pandey
Head Research
pankaj.pandey@icicisecurities.com
Page 25
ANALYST CERTIFICATION
We /I, Bharat Chhoda, MBA and Ankit Panchmatia, MBA, Research Analysts, authors and the names subscribed to this report, hereby certify that all of the views expressed in this research report accurately
reflect our views about the subject issuer(s) or securities. We also certify that no part of our compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendation(s) or view(s) in this
report.
Page 26