Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/269518778
CITATIONS
79
1 AUTHOR:
Erik Johansson
Lund University
15 PUBLICATIONS 295 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Abstract
There are few studies on the microclimate and human comfort of urban areas in hot dry climates. This study investigates the
inuence of urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort by comparing an extremely deep and a shallow street canyon in Fez,
Morocco. Continuous measurements during the hot summer and cool winter seasons show that, by day, the deep canyon was
considerably cooler than the shallow one. In summer, the maximum difference was on average 6 K and as great as 10 K during the
hottest days. Assessment of thermal comfort using the PET index suggests that, in summer, the deep canyon is fairly comfortable
whereas the shallow is extremely uncomfortable. However, during winter, the shallow canyon is the more comfortable as solar
access is possible. The results indicate that, in hot dry climates a compact urban design with very deep canyons is preferable.
However, if there is a cold season as in Fez, the urban design should include some wider streets or open spaces or both to provide
solar access.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Urban geometry; Thermal comfort; Microclimate; Urban cool island; Urban heat island; Urban design
1. Introduction
Due to rapid urbanization in developing countries,
environmental issues have gained increased attention in
cities with tropical climates. As a consequence, the
interest in the microclimate around buildings in urban
areas has increased because it affects, among other
things, outdoor and indoor thermal comfort, energy use
for heating and cooling, and the dispersion of air
pollution. In the urban environment, a comfortable
climate is important for well-being and to attract people
to public spaces. The best known characteristic of urban
climate is that air temperatures are higher than those in
the surrounding rural areas at night. Nocturnal urban
heat islands as high as 12 K have been found in dense
centres of large cities [1,2]. By day, most studies show
small urbanrural differences. Other typical characterTel.: +46 46 2224263; fax: +46 46 2228181.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
E. Johansson / Building and Environment 41 (2006) 13261338
1327
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1328
3. Methodology
3.1. Selection of measurement sites
An area in the old and another in the new city were
chosen for the measurement campaign in order to give
two extremes of urban geometry. The studied area in the
old city, situated at the core of the medina, has a
compact urban form. Buildings occupy the whole plot,
with the exception of space used for courtyards, and
streets are narrow (Fig. 3). The residential part of the
neighbourhood (locations 24 in Fig. 3) is one of the
most densely built in the old city; three to four storey
buildings are separated by 1.52.5 m wide alleys (Fig. 5).
In the bazaar area (locations 1 and 5 in Fig. 3), however,
streets are somewhat wider and the buildings are only
one or two storeys. The studied area in the new city was
recently built and has a dispersed urban form. This
planned neighbourhood is very uniform in terms of
Fig. 3. Site map from the studied area in the old city (the Seffarine
district).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
E. Johansson / Building and Environment 41 (2006) 13261338
1329
Fig. 4. Site map from the studied area in the new city (the Adarissa
district).
Table 1
Geometric characteristics of the measurement locations in the two
neighbourhoods
Neighbour- Location Average Distance H/W ratio Orientation
hood
building between
height
buildings
Old
A
1
2
3
4
5
13.6
4
13
13
11
6.5
1.4
3.0
2.3
2.3
1.0
11
10
1.3
a
6
11
0.6
EW
EW
NS
EW
NS
NS
New
A
1
2
3
4
5
10.5
10
12
10
11
19
18
17
20
10
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.5
1.1
NESW
NESW
NWSE
NESW
NWSE
b
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1330
Fig. 6. A street in the new neighbourhood (close to measurement location A in Fig. 4).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
E. Johansson / Building and Environment 41 (2006) 13261338
1331
Fig. 9. Section of the shallow (A) and deep (B) canyon showing the points of measurement within the street and above the roof.
Table 2
Measurement periods
Site
Neighbourhood
Continuous
Instantaneous
26 Feb. 2000
2630 June 2000
15
Old
New
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1332
Table 3
Measurement instruments
Location
Measured parameter
Instrument
15
PT100 sensor
Rotronic OP100A
Swema SWT 28
Swema SWA31 (hot wire anemometer)
4. Results
4.1. Air temperature
The measured air temperatures in the two canyons
(location A, Figs. 3 and 4) are shown in Figs. 1013
together with the temperature at the airport which is
assumed to be representative of the surrounding
countryside. The results are shown for the warm
summer period and the cool winter period. The summer
period is dened on the basis of air temperature at the
airport as being between 29 May and 16 September
2000. Over this period the maximum daily temperature
consistently exceeded 30 1C with few exceptions. The
winter period is dened as February and December 2000
and January 2001.
During the afternoon, which is the warmest part of
the day, the deep canyon was markedly cooler than the
shallow one. This difference was observed all year round
(Fig. 10), but was especially pronounced during summer
(Fig. 11). During the warm season, the average
difference in maximum daytime temperatures between
the two canyons was 6 K. In general the difference was
highest on warm, sunny days (the maximum recorded
temperature difference between the canyons during the
summer period was 15 K). Fig. 12 shows that the deep
canyon was, on average, 10 K cooler for the 15 warmest
days of the summer period (all of which had temperatures at the airport exceeding 39 1C).
The reason for the large daytime cool island of the
deep canyon is related to its high height to width ratio
(H/W 9.7). By day, the lower part is in complete
ARTICLE IN PRESS
E. Johansson / Building and Environment 41 (2006) 13261338
1333
Fig. 12. Average air temperatures for the 15 hottest days in the
summer in the deep and shallow canyons as well as for the rural
station.
Fig. 13. Average air temperatures for the winter period in the deep and
shallow canyons as well as for the rural station.
Fig. 11. Average air temperatures for the summer period in the deep
and shallow canyons as well as for the rural station.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1334
Table 4
Relationship between afternoon air temperatures and H/W ratio in the old neighbourhood for a winter and a summer day (recorded at around 15:00
on 19 July and 5 December 1998)
Site
H/W ratio
0.61.3
611
N/A
Winter day
3642
3031
38
1617
1314
15
Fig. 15. Average surface temperatures for the period 211 February
2000 in the deep and shallow canyons.
Fig. 14. Average surface temperatures for June 2000 in the deep
canyon and July 2000 in the shallow canyon.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
E. Johansson / Building and Environment 41 (2006) 13261338
1335
Fig. 16. Average relative humidity for the summer period in the deep
and shallow canyons.
Fig. 17. Average relative humidity for the winter period in the deep
and shallow canyons.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1336
5. Discussion
Fig. 18. Physiologically equivalent temperatures (PET) for the
summer period in the deep and shallow canyons.
of 0.4 m/s in the deep canyon and 0.8 m/s in the shallow
canyon during both seasons.
There was a considerable difference between the two
canyons. In summer the PET values in the deep canyon
are very stable between 23 and 28 1C. These moderate
values are mainly explained by low air temperature and
low MRT. Note, however, the peak at 14:00 h: this is the
time when the solar beam reaches the street level during
the period mid-Maymid-July. In contrast for the
shallow canyon, the PET values were extremely high
in the summer exceeding 40 1C between 11:00 and
17:00 h. The reason is the combined effect of very high
ARTICLE IN PRESS
E. Johansson / Building and Environment 41 (2006) 13261338
1337
Acknowledgements
5.2. Climate-conscious urban design in a hot dry climate
The fact that urban geometry strongly inuences the
microclimate and the thermal comfort at street level has
implications for urban planning and design in a hot dry
climate. This study shows that a compact urban form
with very deep street canyons gives a good protection
during the long, hot summer period as such a design
results in lower temperatures (cool island) and provides
shade for pedestrians during the warmest part of the
day. A dispersed urban form, on the contrary, was
shown to create an extremely uncomfortable environment in the summer. However, there are also disadvantages with a compact urban form, especially the poor
thermal comfort in the winter, a season which is quite
cold in many hot dry cities.
Consequently, a climate-conscious urban design
should have a compact urban form with deep street
canyons but, for cities with a cold winter as in the case of
Fez, it should also include some wider streets or open
spaces or both to allow solar access. Such open spaces,
which function as sun-spots in the winter, require solar
protection at pedestrian level in the summer. This can be
achieved through shade trees, projection of the upper
oors, arcades or any other types of horizontal shading
device designed in such a way that they allow solar
radiation to penetrate in the winter while providing
shade in the summer. In order to keep surface
temperatures as low as possible, light-coloured paving
materials and fac- ades should be used.
A climate-conscious urban design in hot dry climates
would require a change of the currently existing urban
design practise and regulations, which favours a more
dispersed urban form [7,9]. However, a shift to a more
compact grouping of buildings would have several
consequences. The positive effects includeapart from
improved microclimatic conditionsa more comfortable indoor climate and reduced need for cooling, more
efcient land use and less expensive infrastructure.
Possible negative effects include less solar exposure in
winter, reduced accessibility for both emergency vehicles
and private cars, and overcrowding. Further studies are
needed in order to promote urban planning and design
in hot dry climates that takes microclimate and outdoor
thermal comfort into account without creating serious
side effects. Apart from revising the existing urban
This research was funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). The
measurements reported in this paper were the result of
collaboration between the National Laboratory for
Tests and Studies (LPEE), Morocco, and Housing
Development & Management (HDM) at Lund University, Sweden. I am especially grateful to Mohamed
Mraissi of LPEE and Hans Rosenlund and Karin
Grundstrom of HDM for helping in planning and
carrying out the measurements and for helpful discussions during the study. I also wish to thank those
families in Fez who gave access to their homes during
the measurement campaign. Thanks also to Ingegard
Eliasson of Physical Geography at Goteborg University
who suggested several improvements on the draft
manuscript. The text was proofread by Annette
Semadeni Davies. The line drawings were made by
Mattias Ruckert.
Appendix
In this study, the mean radiant temperature (MRT)
was calculated according to the VDI guidelines [18]:
f p ak I b 0:25
4
MRT MRT
,
ep s
where fp is the surface projection factor of a standing or
walking person, Ib the beam radiation (on a plane
perpendicular to the beam) (W/m2), ak average
(shortwave) absorptivity of the human body 0.7, ep
the emissivity of the human body 0.97, s is the
5.67 108 W/m2 K4 (the StefanBoltzmann constant).
The MRT*, which is the MRT from longwave and
diffuse shortwave radiation (not including direct beam
radiation) from all the surfaces in the canyon, was
calculated as
"
#0:25
n
X
1
a
D
k
i
MRT
ei sT 4si
,
Fi
s i1
ep
where ei is the emissivity of each surface, Tsi the
temperature of each surface (K), Di the diffuse radiation
from each surface (W/m2), Fi is the angle factor of each
surface.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1338
References
[1] Oke TR. Boundary layer climates. London: Routledge; 1987.
[2] Oke TR, Johnson GT, Steyn DG, Watson ID. Simulation of
surface urban heat islands under ideal conditions at night. Part 2.
Diagnosis of causation. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 1991;56:
258339.
[3] Arneld AJ. Two decades of urban climate research: a review of
turbulence, exchanges of energy and water, and the urban heat
island. International Journal of Climatology 2003;23:126.
[4] Evans JM, de Schiller S. Application of microclimate studies in
town planning: a new capital city, an existing urban district and
urban river front development. Atmospheric Environment
1996;30(3):3614.
[5] Eliasson I. The use of climate knowledge in urban planning.
Landscape and Urban Planning 2000;48:3144.
[6] Pearlmutter D, Bitan A, Berliner P. Microclimatic analysis of
compact urban canyons in an arid zone. Atmospheric
Environment 1999;33(2425):414350.
[7] Eben Saleh MA. The evolution of planning and urban theory
from the perspective of vernacular design: MOMRA initiatives in
improving Saudi Arabian neighbourhoods. Land Use Policy
2001;18:17990.
[8] Baker LA, Brazel AJ, Selover N, Martin C, McIntyre N, Steiner
FR, Nelson A, Musacchio L. Urbanization and warming of
Phoenix (Arizona, USA): impacts, feedbacks and mitigation.
Urban Ecosystems 2002;6:183203.
[9] Bouchair A, Dupagne A. Building traditions of Mzab facing the
challenges of re-shaping of its built form and society. Building and
Environment 2003;38:134564.
[10] Givoni B. Climate considerations in building and urban design.
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1998.
[11] Bourbia F, Awbi HB. Building cluster and shading in urban
canyon for hot dry climate. Part 1: Air and surface temperature
measurements. Renewable Energy 2004;29:24962.
[12] Ahmed KS. A comparative analysis of the outdoor thermal
environment of the urban vernacular and the contemporary
development: case studies in Dhaka. In: Etzion Y, et al., editors.
Architecture of the extremes (Proceedings of the 11th PLEA
conference, Dead Sea, Israel). Ben-Gurion University of the
Negev; 1994. p. 3418.
[13] Grundstrom K, Johansson E, Mraissi M, Ouahrani D. Climat &
urbanismeLa relation entre le confort thermique et la forme du
cadre bati. Lund: Housing Development & Management; 2003.