RPP-CALC-44193, Rev.

Evaluation of the Temporary Tent Cover Truss

System, AP Primary Vent System

M.A.Haq
Washington River Protection Solutions LLC
Richland, WA 99352
U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC27-08RV14800
EDT/ECN:
Cost Center:
B&R Code:

823438
7GllO
N/A

UC: N/A
Charge Code:
Total Pages:

200065
26

Key Words: AP tank farms, Central Exhaust Station Enclosure, Tent Cover, Tubular Truss System

Abstract: The purpose of this calculation is to evaluate a temporary tent cover truss system. This system
will be used to provide weather protection to the workers during replacement of the filter for the Primary
Ventilation System in AP Tank Farm. The truss system has been fabricated utilizing tubes and couplers,
which are normally used for scaffoldings.

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name,
trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or
favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or subcontractors.

DATE:
STA:

Date

'i

10:

Release Stamp

Approved For Public Release

A-6002-767 (REV 2\

Calculation Review Checklist.

Calculation Reviewed: RPP-CALC-44193 RO
Scope of Review: Entire Calculations
(e.g., document section or portion of calculation)
Engineer/Analyst: M. A. Hag
~'o.:..M ~
Organizational Manager: M. A. Robert~~

/0

Date: I 2 /3 0
'1
Date: IZ/X>/zc:o f

This document consists of ~ pages and the following attachments (if applicable):
ATTACH. A: Photos of Tent Cover Truss System
ATTACH B: Sketch for the Tent Cover truss System
ATTACH C: Field Sketch for Typical Tent Cover Truss
ATTACH 0: Density of Snow Cover Info.!
ATTACH E: Alternate Calc. to veify the Strl Integrity of the Truss System during Hoisting &
Rigging
Yes No NA*
[x] []
[] 1. Analytical and technical approaches and results are reasonable and
appropriate.
[ ] 2. Necessary assumptions are reasonable, explicitly stated, and supported.
[x] [ ]
[] 3. Ensure calculations that use software include a paper printout, microfiche,
[x] []
CD-ROM, or other electronic file of the input data and identification to the
computer codes and versions used, or provide alternate documentation to
uniquely and clearly identify the exact coding and execution process.
Input data were checked for consistency with original source information.
[
]
4.
[x] [ ]
Key
input data (e.g., dimensions, performance characteristics) that may
[x] [ ]
[ ] 5.
affect equipment design is identified.
[x] [ ]
[ ] 6. For both qualitative and quantitative data, uncertainties are recognized and
discussed and the data is presented in a manner to minimize design
interpretations.
[ ] 7. Mathematical derivations were checked, including dimensional consistency
[x] [ ]
of results.
[ ] 8. Calculations are sufficiently detailed such that a technically qualified person
[x] [ ]
can understand the analysis without requiring outside information.
[x] [ ]
9. Software verification and validation are addressed adequately.
[]
[ ] 10. Limits/criteria/guidelines applied to the analysis results are appropriate and
[x] [ ]
referenced. Limits/criteria/guidelines were checked against references.
Conclusions
are consistent with analytical results and applicable limits.
[x] [ ]
[ ] 11.
[x] [ ]
[ ] 12. Results and conclusions address all points in the purpose.
[x] [ ]
[ ] 13. Referenced documents are retrievable or otherwise available.
[x] [ ]
[ ] 14. The version or revision of each reference is cited.
[x] [ ]
[ ] 15. The document was prepared in accordance with Attachment A, "Calculation
Format and Preparation Instructions."
Impacts on requirements have been assessed and change documentation
[x]
16.
[]
[]
initiated to incorporate revisions to affected documents, as appropriate.
[x] [ ]
[ ] 17. All checker comments have been dispositioned and the design m~dja f.
matches the calculations. t:) Y I'll' -1- +-,0<-- ~4 ~ b~ "'- CA"I./-4? ~__

.A1~ c k l!'-- ~-r ~4/L~;(

Checker (printed'llarne and signature) / . ./.

---r;c

* If No or NA is chosen, an explanation must be provided on or attached to this form.

Item 16: No impact to requirements and no change documentation is required.

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS
Subject: Evaluation of the Tern or
Tent Cover Truss S stem AP Prim
Originator: M. A. Ha
~~,-".,
Checker: TC Macke
Organizational Mgr..J.M~A~...lR~o~b~e:rJrt~s&~~~~==1.0

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

--.!~~~?!3:.~

Objective/Purpose:

The purpose of this calculation is to evaluate the tent cover truss system (see Atttach. A for the photos of
this sytstem). This system will be used to provide weather protection to the workers during replacement of
the filter for the Primary Ventilation System in AP Tank Farm. The truss system has been fabricated
utilizing tubes and couplers, which are normally used for scaffoldings. This system, presently located near
the Primary Ventilation System, consists of 23 feet wide wide trusses, with their bottom chord members
extending 26 feet wide, and is 36 feet long (see Attach. B for the field dimensions of the typical truss).
This truss system will be lifted from the ground, and placed on top of the concrete walls of Central Exhaust
Station Enclosure (see drawings H-2-90456, and H-2-90457, Sh 1 for the enclosure), as a temporary roof
structure. The shorter side of the truss system, 23 feet wide, will be sitting on the east-west concrete
walls (see Plan, dwg H-2-90456 for concrete walls, located with dimension of 23'-3", outer face of east wall
to outer face of west wall). The truss system will overhang approximately 8' - (9-1/2)" beyond the south
walli. The overhang portion of the truss system will be supported on two posts. The arrangement of the
truss support system has been shown in Attach.B. Once installed, the truss system will be covered with
tarp, for weather protection.
2.0
Results/Conclusions:

J:~1r:;621~o7tj6
~ ~~,;,.e~~t
~r~~-~j~~~:t
~~~~ ~~M ~~De-~(. ~;~~Y~~IT ~re(OmmC~./o,
=rile;<'i~'-~:
trr RtlH;~o~e;;~a~aFd5Ioad&-ifl;eeoFdaAee-b
,~~
C

-4-

VlytO{rc

witt:l TFC ENG ~TC 08 (Ret. 3) tGr QC 1 itr' I"t' 1{9 However, the temporary truss system is restricted ~ ~ /
for snow loading (up to 3/8" thick fresh snow). The truss system has to be cleared off snow, if
~ I~ ~
snow exceeds more than 3/8" . The tarp, covering the truss system, has not been evaluated for wear
and tear due to snow or ice loadings.
No seismic analysis has been performed, since this is a temporary structure. Moreover, based on
engineering judgement, it is expected that wind loading will govern.
Alternate calculations have been done to check the integrity of the truss system framing (see Attach E).
Add clamps over the horizontal member couplings (where the tubular members are connected to
each other). The truss system can be lifted by using the following two options:
a. Use four pick points on east and west sides of the truss system.
b. In case two interior pick points are used for lifting, add bracings (as shown on the Sketch on pg E-3).
Double clamp the added bracings or use double bracings.
3.0
Input Data:
a. Dimensions of the truss system were obtained from the field (See Attach. C). The components of the
truss system consist of 2" diameter tubes, and couplerss, normally used by Safway Scaffoldings.
b. Tent Cover Truss System weight is 3100 Ibs. This weight was taken in the field by lifting the truss
system from the ground, using a dynamometer. If proposed bracings, as shown on the Sketch on pg. E-3
are added, it will add approximately 400 Ibs to the truss system.
c. The truss system assembly has been analyzed as PC-1 per TFC-ENG-STD-06 (Ref. 3).
~ W\",cJ

+0

<)

\o\..l

~ (z-/3 o /

Page 1

VI~C"

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

Subject: Evaluation of the Temporary Tent Cover Truss System, AP Primary Vent. System
Originator: M. A. Hag
~i;1,"'?1r#'b
Date: 12/22/09
Checker: TC Mackey
Date: /2./30/09
Organizational Mgr.. M A. Robertstth,-.f- ~
Date: iz/>ofz-J1
4.0

Assumptions:

None
5.0

Method of Analysis

Manual calculations are used for this analysis using MathCAD. The truss system is analyzed for wind
loading per ASCE 7-05 (Ref. 1)
Design Wind Force
The wind loads are determined from ASCE 7-05 (Ref. 1) Method 1, Simplified Procedure.
V =85 mph ( Table 3, Ref. 3)
Evaluation of the Truss System
a). Evaluation of the Truss System Portion Positioned on the Concrete Walls
Slope of the roof truss (based on tan

=4'-0"/11 '-6" from Attach. B) =18.8 degrees

Using Fig. 6-2, pg 37 (Ref. 1), the maximum wind force in the longitudinal direction for a wind velocity of
85 mph, with angle roof of 20 degrees, Zone E (vertical pressure) is 13.8 pst. Note: Fig. 6.2 is based on a
structure height of 30 feet, however the adjustment factor 'A. for this height, according to table on pg 40 of
Ref. 1 is 1.

WI := 13.8psf

Uplift pressure on the truss system

Length of truss system
Total length of the truss system

L 2 := 36ft

Width of the truss system

WI := 23ft
VI := wlL1,W 1

Total uplift force on the truss system

VI = 8.57 x 10 lbf
Total weight of the truss system.

Wtruss := 31001bf

Weight of truss system, positioned on the

concrete walls. Note: 27 feet length of truss
system is being supported on concrete walls
3

wtrussl = 2.325 x 10 lbf

Net uplift on the truss system (positioned on the
concrete walls)

Vnet1

= 6.245 x

10 Ibf
Page 2

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS

Unet!
Uconcblockl := - 4 -

Uconcblockl

= 1.561 x

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

Uplift on each concrete block. Each corner of the

truss system, positioned on the concrete walls, is
to be tied with a a concrete block on the ground,
using a guy wire or rope.
3

10 Ibf

wconcblockl := 36001bf

Weight of the concrete block, 2' x 6' X 2' (depth)

wconcblockl > Uconcblockl

Okay

Fslidingl := Uconcblockl

Horizontal sliding force, assuming that the guy

wire from the truss system is attached to the
concrete block at 45 degrees.

llconcrblockl := 0.5

Coefficient of friction between concrete block and

gravelled surface (see pg C-3, Ref. 2)

Fresist! := llconcrblocklwconcblockl

Frictional force resisting sliding force

Fresist!

= 1.8 x

10 Ibf

Fresist! > Fsliding 1

Okay

w' f?.,. ~ ~j ~ L~.){+(_'I..;.~-",{p,-I-"-)<~:....;"t~),---------::'-=-4--L...l.o<(2:....!'?,,-,5~1f_~

~

Sizing concrete block size, in case the concrete block has to be positioned up to 45 degrees
from its position to avoid interferances on the grade

Uconcblock3 := Uconcblockl cos(45deg)

Net uplift from the truss system on the concrete

block, in case it is orientated 45 degrees in the
plan from its position 1/,/ [r IS 1:"- ~~ -5"Q'vv\.-e'

W concblock3

"'-So okv-<:.

~ /z./sa/o'l

Uconcblock3 = 2.208 x 10 Ibf

Il-/~Q/aj

Weight of the concrete block, 2.5' x 5' x 2'.5'

:= 46001bf

wconcblock3 > Uconcblock3

Okay

Fsliding3 := Uconcblock3

Horizontal sliding force, assuming that the guy

wire from the truss system is attached to the
concrete block at 45 degrees.

llconcrblock3 := 0.5

Coefficient of friction between concrete block and

gravelled surface (see pg C-3, Ref. 2)
Page 3

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

Subject: Evaluation of the Temporary Tent Cover Truss System, AP Primary Vent. System
Originator: M. A. Hag
't1I"!1Pb
Date: 12/22/09
Checker: TC Mackey
Date: 12/3 17/ oJ
Organizational Mgr.. M A. Roberts /U-~
Date: /2&7101

"'71\

Fresist3 := Ilconcrblock3,wconcblock3
Fresist3

= 2.3 x

Frictional force resisting sliding force

10 Ibf

Fresist3 > Fslidingl

Okay

~se Concrete Block, 2.5' x 5' x 2.5, in case the concrete block has to be rotated up to 45

~egrees (in the plan) to miss interferances on the grade (see Sketch on pg B-2 for cone. blocks,

~600 Ibs).

Check Size of Guy Wire

Guy wire or rope will be attached from each corner of the truss system (positioned on the walls) to the
concrete blocks as shown in Attach. B.
Uconcblock3
sin(45.deg)

p . .= - - - -

WIre'

Pwire

Tension force on the wire

= 3.122 x 10 Ibf

Pcapacity:= lO.72kip

Tensile capacity of 1/2" <p, 6 x 19 Fiber Core Wire

Rope (See pg A-13, Ref.2)

Pcapacity
FOS wire := --"---":"
Pwire
FOS wire = 6.854

Okay

b. Evaluation of the Truss System portion, positioned on the Posts

Using figure 6-2, pg 37 (Ref. 1), the maximum wind force in longitudinal direction for wind velocity of
85 mph, with angle roof 20 degrees, Zone E (vertical pressure) is 13.8 psf.
~:=

13.8psf

Uplift force on the truss system

Length of truss system

,4,:=
~:=

36ft
23ft

Total length of the truss system

Width of the truss system

Page 4

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS

Subject: Evaluation of the Temporary Tent Cover Truss System, AP Primary Vent. System
Originator: M. A. Hag
'/A
Date: 12/22/09
Checker: TC Mackey
Date: 1'2.-/30/ oj
Organizational Mgr.. M A. Roberts/1t"e~~ tf'~~
Date:p-IJo/<::'01.

-Tt#t

Total uplift force on the truss system

U2 = 2.857 x 10 lbf
~:=

Total weight of the truss system.

3100lbf

Weight of truss system, supported by the posts.

Note: 9 feet length of truss system is being
. supported by the two posts
W truss 2

= 775 lbf

Net uplift on the truss system (supported on the

posts)
3
Unet2 = 2.082 x 10 lbf

U net2
Uconcblock2:= - 4 -

Uconcblock2 = 520.4 lbf

Uplift on each concrete block. Each corner of

the truss system, positioned on the concrete
walls, is to be tied with a a concrete block on
the ground, using a guy wire or rope.
V'

Weight of the concrete block, 3' x 3' x 1 (depth)'

wconcblock2:= 1350lbf
wconcblock2 > Uconcblock2

Okay

Fsliding2 := Uconcblock2

Horizontal sliding force, assuming that the guy wire

from the truss system is attached to the concrete
block at 45 degrees.

flconcrblock2 := 0.5

Coefficient of friction between concrete block and

gravelled surface (see pg C-3, Ref.)

Fresist2 := flconcrblock2,wconcblock2

Frictional force resisting sliding force

Fresist2 = 675 lbf

Fresist2 > Fsliding2
1lr

_~_---:---::,...,....-....,.-...,..),:,,1:...<[7?~----,

Qse Concrete Block, 3' x 3' x

1'1 J

ZO 0

Okay

wT, g e-p;d__

Check Post for supporting the Truss System (see Attach B)

~_7Z0

t:("'-K:?)= lGO ~
-aJ{

l't/~aj(J'
Page 5

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS
Subject: Evaluation of the Tern
Originator: --eM~.~A=... .:H:.=.a=.::;L._ _~'-----'-~--C-.f':Checker: TC Mackey
Organizational Mgr..M A. Robertsl%v2.l<~
Try tubular size 2"

<I>

0.75.in

4
)Jost := 0.29in
Spost:= .31O.in

stem AP Prima
---'==':"~~=T=-

(normally used by Safway Scaffolding)

Properties of tubular post 2"

~ost :=

RPP-CALC-44193. RO

'PO"'~ J~ost
r,o~

<I>

(See pg A-12, Ref. 2):

Area of the post

Moment of inertia of the post

Section modulus of the post

Radius of gyration of the post

rpost = 0.622 in
Lpos t := 8ft + 3in

Height of the post

~ost:= 1

Effective length factor of post, pg 3-5, Ref. 4

Fy := 36ksi

Yield stress of steel

3
E := 29.10 .ksi

Elastic modulus of steel

Effective slenderness ratio of the post

~osfLpost

~-~-

159.209

rpost

Cc = 126.099

Page 6

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

Subject: Evaluation of the Temporary Tent Cover Truss System, AP Primary Vent. System
Originator: M. A. Hag
~ wlJio,'b
Date: 12/22/09
Checker: TC Mackey
Date: I 7./~t:'7Q'
Organizational Mgr..M A. RobertsA:t-o/i tI~;fr
Date:tz.iJ.oh,q'

'9

12rc E

F a := - - - - - - -

Allowable Axial Stress per Eq E2-2,

pg 5-42, Ref. 4

23.(~ost.LpostJ2
fpost

3
Fa = 5.891 x 10 psi

Load on the post

wtarp := 5001bf

Assume weight of the tarp on truss

~:=

Weight of truss

31001bf

Total weight of the truss system

w:= wtruss + w tarp

Dead load on the post

3
Pd eadl oad:= (w. L
L ...!..J
2 ...!..
2
1
Pdeadload = 300 Ibf

Wsnow := 20psf

Snow load, Sect. 3.5.2, Ref. 3

.= (WsnowL3Wl) ...!..
P snow

Snow load on the post

Ppost := Pdeadload + Psnow

Total load on the post

Ppost = 1.335 x 10 Ibf

Axial Stress on the post

f "= Ppost
a

~ost

Okay
pse Tubular or Pipe with 2" ep

I
Page 7

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS
stem AP Prima

Vent. S stem

Originator: -"'M=.:. . :.Ao.. =. . H=a"l--_-+_---O....:~-b--------------=Dc..:::a=te:.:..: -"'1-=72/:..::2=2:....;./O~9

Checker: TC Macke
Date: I Z JO/o'J
Organizational Mgr.,.:.=.M=..=A....:.:....;.R=ob::e..e~rt;.:;:s"""-.:....::....:=---..c.::><l~"'-~D:..::a:.:;te::.:.:.:....:(2.-'-/=50-'-I_itr:::..
Evaluation of the Typical Truss for Snow Loading
There are 10 trusses in the truss system, spaced at 4 feet clc, as shown on the sketch on pg. B-2
W

Weight of a typical truss

w truss 3:= 9

'= wtruss 3

russ

Reaction at the truss support for a typical truss

R truss = 200 Ibf

Width of a truss
Height of the truss

hI := 4ft

Slope of the truss

Struss = 0.348

Slope of the truss in degrees

Struss := 19.2
F

.=

top. chord .

Ftop.chord

R truss
. (S
d)
sm truss eg

= 608.149

Force in the top chord of truss (at the end of truss)

Ibf

Force in the bottom chord

Fbot.chord = 574.322 Ibf

The bottom chords of trusses, made of 2" diameter Safway tubular members is clamped with typical Safway
clamps. These clamps, CRA-19 and CSA-19, have been rated with 1000 Ibs load for new clamps, as shown
on pg B-2., Ref 2. Peter Elsabally, Safway Scaffolding (1-206-523-6560), suggested downgrading it (with a
.75 factor) for used clamps. The bottom chord at its clamped location needs to be checked for its structural
integrity, since this will be the weakest link.
P clamp := 0.7510001bf

Page 8

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS

Subject: Evaluation of the Temporary Tent Cover Truss System, AP Primary Vent. System
Originator: M. A. Hag
Date: 12/22/09
!O,
Checker: TC Mackey
Date: / Z./3 4
Organizational Mgr..M A. Roberts.delDate:/Z!?oltoo1'

"'7"""'--A"-!f>'ll'

Nvr::r.r:-:

Pclamp = 750 lbf

Okay

Pclamp > Fbot.chord

Density of fim snow (550 kg per cubic meter, see

Attach. D

2.20
d snow := 550-3
3.281

Note: 1 kg

= 2.20 Ibs,

1 meter

=3.281 feet

Density of snow in Ibs per cu ft

d snow = 34.258

Weight of snow (assuming 3/8 " thick) on the

truss in psf

snow
(3)
d
wfirn.snow:= -1-2-'

"8

wfirn.snow = 1.071

Rtruss.snow :=

23.4'Wfirn.snow.lbf
2

Reaction at the truss due to fim snow. Note that

the typical truss is 23 ft wide, and spacing of
trusses is 4 ft c/c.

Rtruss.snow = 49.246 lbf

Fbo t.chordl := Fbot.chord + Fbot.chord

Rtruss.snow
R
truss

Tension force at the bottom chord of truss by

including 3/8" thick snow

Fbo t.chordl = 715.738 Ibf

Fbot.chord 1 < Pclamp

Okay

Remove snow on the truss system, if it exceeds 3/8" in thickness

NOTE: If proposed bracings, as shown on the Sketch on pg. E-3 are added, it will add approximately 400
Ibs to the truss system, The extra weight will help in overcoming the uplift due to wind, and will make the
truss system more conservative. Therefore, there is no need to reanalyze the truss system

6.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0

References
ASCE 7-05, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings aand Other Structures, ASCE, Structural
Engineering Institute.
RPP-CALC-42370, Analysis of Existing Scaffolds at AN & AW Tank Farm Skids, Rev. 0
TFC-ENG-STD-06, Rev. C-3, Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities, CH2M Hill Hanford Group, Inc.,
Richland, Washington.
AISC, Steel construction, Allowable Stress Design, 9th Edition, American Institue of Steel
Page 9

ANALYTICAL COMPUTATIONS

RPP-CALC-44193, RO

Subject: Evaluation of the Temporary Tent Cover Truss System, AP Primary Vent. System
Originator: M. A. Hag
ry..",~q-e.~,
Date: 12/22/09
Checker: TC Mackey
Date: / z/ ~a;oCJ
Organizational Mgr..M A. Roberts.&~l<d:'---Date:{L/~(UV'l
5.0
6.0

Construction, Chicago, IIlnois.

H-2-90456, Sh 1, Structural, Central Exhaust STA Plans, Sect & Detail.
H-2-90457, Structural Central Exh Sta Sect & Det.

Page 10

~ pp_ CAt C - "t"f I '13 RI.J

ATACHMENTA
(Photos of Tent Cover Truss System)

pc,

A-I

/93/(0

p~ A-~

RPP-CALC-'iLf/93
Rev. 0

ATACHMENT B
(Sketch for Tent Cover Truss System Support)

fG.

-I

f< PP- (ALC-

4~/9..3I<O

ATACHMENT C
(Field Sketch for Typical Tent Cover Truss)

fG.

(-I

!?Pp-

CALC- 4~{q3 /(0

'J'"

\
T\'-'
N

.......

~~-------,..--,.,.,-~..,),,~.

...

,.

\
\ ...

\)

\-...

,.__&.i;,t t

'-'~'r'

<

,.

tj.

._R,.
"-J
.. ~-

...

-i

P~. c- ~
iI

I< P P- CAL C -

~~ /9.3 ,fO

ATACHMENTD
(Density of Snow Cover Info.)

Pc:'. V-I

Density of Snow Cover

Page 1 of 1

;<:pp- CALC- ~~/93J?O

Density of Snow Cover

Snow Type

Density

(kg/m 3 )

Snow Depth for

One Inch Water

Wild Snow

10 to 30

9S" to 33"

Ordinary new snow immediately

after falling in still air

50 to 6.5

20" to 15"

SetHi n~~ Snow

70 to 90

14"to 11"

2S0

3.5"

350

2.S"

Average wind-toughened snow

Hard wind

sJoo

New tirn snow

400 to 550

2.5" to 1.S"

Advanced tirn snow

550 to 650

1.S" to 1.5"

Thawing tirn snow

600 to 700

1.6" to 1.4"

Slide 35 of 107

P4". lJ-'L
http://www.comet.ucar.edu/c1ass/hydromet/09_Oct13_1999/docs/c1ine/comet_snowhydro... 12/29/2009

ATACHMENT E
(Alternate Calc. to verify the Strl. Integrity of the Truss System during Hoisting & Rigging)

ANALYTICAL CALCULATIONS
Subject

srA- Te/VlEtdT;
'THI.5 ,:!,~. Aiel ALTt:~N4T.:r!Je C..{Lc..U.(ATJ:0i'l1 TClUC11.rFI/ YHE' S'II'{lAcr-u."qAt..
rf'lTf:'-~({rT\1

:::0

WU t-

of life' Ff(AMXAl(.~ CJFTHFn~uJS Fc.;>t'{

0 F T;{ u.$:CS'I S TE i'A:: ,3

H"

--;> TI~r4,v4u;
c;;
.

roo II, ~

br" Till

p~(:)pfgrJ{$~A!.~')L,L,tZf1?JS'~~..tjl':1-'

+- (<fB H)

L9-1V ( ... ,J) '"

~2

: : 8(, ,II ~/;

1]~'s\1

c.:-/f,,"
c , 0 -;>,"
'",',./

~"

;IT.....1'1 ~;, ",i).;J. '1

1-1;6~t Tr,,-I&ftej:.bk.':r:ivt.-~

J~

A."'" ~[e"'.""
. . . O...C',
'"
-, h,.

'I

,I
I::-:)(o,~<j'1- (?;,~(f~..t }f()..J- 'f ....v."7S'(?,;r) 'I:40$. t7
,

,'.,"

,=. /~ lfi/

M"""K= O. IDC' v-y/..''J.

Tor (,t-'G,l,.~l (Cm... ;JN:;~ i'c'JN) ~

r:: _

~.

'L-,

J:

C./S;{"

ISo iT'O)"'\

C~!,d (t"

reM)':

F,tAo:
'.1:, :rc.:::
(~cL

(hTfoi\~-CJ-!.oK1t

Fc>F. Le>C/tL

to~ ~

?~5,~

/oi~ (i~t)'-t

-\;-.7-S"% TNlWltT

If..,}'

8v.()t:.LrAlL-~
::r",t>TV.

10] -,t:/:

YR. u$) WGtt:I,/r:.S /,6s,.

Lo-40 oN Toj)t.- QOTtoi \,\

7/0#/.:J.
/'" == ""~,.)~(
to? >.u+l:....,
.. J7",,.

alop,J'j5~

D,~ lo<,,,,!

M...6-,..::'. If. 9''1 f"fIX i,J.5"1::~Mr

0,\>&1;: ::;

!.vr"""~;("....z-i;:C.,,

A, "o.t" EVI Fy::

/(l

~;::;)() r-S5L~;!:.:"~qJ,:=:1.i:"~ (F!:.E~l:}~_!2~!:1_.{!S:",,""

~:t:,6,::.;JII~I~J;

PI;. -1.

B0-64OO-o60.1 (071931

ANALYTICAL CALCULATIONS
Page
Subject

At:'

-TiZ\j

of

ViSA/, 5V;5T6C"P'tl Tel-IT covel'( Ho.rST:X.I\J& CA-L.L

b..&V....il~

Originator ?AJ,...,.I
Checker

LG. d:!~~k'~!

J;Lljl~

Date

. ~.-:'~~

Date

_t-._~.:..;/2..;..;8::::;.;...lo1--L-

_:.../~~;L.6-='Z-:.....~~/c.-=(/:.,.;L.'

I-f INT(;'(7...J;aK PL(/,- ~ozrl\.JT5 WIT W(;3'Ali)S tJr:(.-+-(t::.:i:; ~

.}~~tI~-

IR.~S$ vt,tl- I-tT::; Sl<:)'#';+cft-

k6::.-- . . .,. .,,,--r:#

<.l

j[ efUIi$

,ft

-'

-t-T==- '#5'1 ~sr

..

_/ot::

.J'1~"'--.~

COM B;J."'/(f,!;

f~It~1t

h-._--~

I.

N l1'.J,-zf? .

-.---'------.-.. '. __ . _. "" .-,',.c. ,_ ... -: __ "",.,"-~":"'-"""-~-~~

I3CAli).Jf.{(',.. .. C"..A/t

"
<>J,,17-f/J{-'

_,;>3-Dn~('H5I61V4.L, '5 TP-GSS 'ok {fYXNJ i:G 7-:r;ClIlf.

(]67kJf;3GN'

VI ~

f>:tc.J:::

/),0:;:,-"/7"5:.

--

Vf" oc\/~; 77$' n"

Pf./:: ) 7 5:t}to.5{tY>).

HI.:; 7 7'i#+:8.

V1

Pi? ';' 76to.9{.; t4

(J,f) HI(::

Js(",c, S-~XI,2 ~:r:MJ>1:CT, l!p,oc po, 0

IJ -' Pi<. r7-~/):::. 837, .5'71-;.. 1,.2> .J:'."." PA,'d:T

nil
.- (c,Sulo )
r,t"'..
IV'.
f{p,:; lolf~. e~-#.

SiO,ic~ 5 Ii-I 80 [r0".1I, .& 'tAuT.5 FRdA e6'~/b1;JVr::

=;20 ,l:::

5..r:

4111) ~t::.J.J~cc~",'\pr;{&':iS):ofl)
t~
.ft: -;-:: O.

-;;r*

s. g i ~ +- Tt;G-=-..0!Jt,5"
o,;l..~

;lD

Hi?'"" IIO.t] *'

~s Yo~:t.

1. D ~

80-6400-060.1 107/93)

p~,

c-3

#-