Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A PROJECT REPORT
Submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering
in the FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
May 2006
11
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
AND
MANAGEMENT
IN
LARGE
CONSTRUCTION
COMPANIES is the bonafide work of Mr. V.SUBBURAJ. who carried out the research
under my supervision. Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the work
reported herein does not form part of any other project report or dissertation on the basis
of which a degree or award was conferred on earlier occasion on this or any other
candidate.
12
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1
IMPORTANCE OF EQUIPMENTS
With the advent of heavy construction equipment and the approach of large
construction company of converting the construction sector to a more mechanized and
in turn an organized sector has made it mandatory for maintaining the fleet of
equipments to perform to its optimum.
Since machinery and equipment which have become an integral part of any
construction activity and plants and machinery now constitute a substantial portion of
the construction cost in a project (in tune of 10 to 30 percent of total project cost
depending upon the extent of mechanization), has to be maintained to turn the project
into a profit making center for any organization. And also because the cost of
maintenance of any equipment is in tune of 200 to 250 percent of cost of equipment it
has become imperative for going in for maintaining the equipment during its expected
life cycle.
13
technical and speedy construction and at the same time for economical and timely
completion of project.
1.2
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this thesis is (i) To study the various maintenance management
practices that are currently being employed by large construction sector. (ii) To identify
the best practices for effective maintenance management. This study will help to
understand the maintenance phenomenon and factors responsible for better efficiency
and less operating cost of owning and operating by reducing the downtime of
equipment. In addition to the above mentioned objective the study will specifically aim
at following aspects.
Maintenance budget allocation system,
Using software package, Creating a database for carrying out preventive
maintenance as per schedule, as well as for maintaining daily status report of
equipment deployed at site.
Quality and safety in maintenance,
Study of management of spare parts and inventory control,
Identifying the best practices of maintenance for the Indian scenario.
ii
1.3
1.3.1
Reactive maintenance
a) 67 percent Reactive
b) 31 percent Preventive
c) 2 percent Predictive
iii
1.3.2
Predictive Maintenance
iv
1.2.3
Preventive Maintenance
vi
1.2.4
Proactive Maintenance
While predictive maintenance uses online condition monitoring to help
predict when a failure will occur, it doesn't always identify the root cause of the
failure. That's where proactive maintenance comes in. Proactive maintenance relies
on information provided by predictive methods to identify problems and isolate the
source of the failure.
According to major industries throughout the world, its time to throw out
your old ideas on machine maintenance. The cost-saving trend is toward a
maintenance program that targets the root causes of machine wear and failure.
Because proactive maintenance methods are currently saving industries of all sizes
thousands, of rupees on machine maintenance every year. In many companies it
often exceeds annual net profit
vii
1.3
1.3.1
Questionnaire
1.3.2
Software package
1.4
METHODOLOGY
Step 2: List out various books required for reference and related to topic, collect
literature and carry out desk research.
viii
Step 5: Visit site for data collection and details of maintenance methodology adopted
in actual.
Step 6: Analyse the data collected at site and compare it with the standard procedure
of maintenance.
Step 7: Identifying the best practices and recommend a model for effective
equipment maintenance management.
1.5
The main limitations and constraints for this research study are the paucity of
the time and crunch of finance/fund. So, the research is restricted to limited number
of case studies. Of course the study has all the limitations of the sampling method
and the weaknesses of analytical tools used for the analysis of data collected.
CHAPTER 2
2.1
INTRODUCTION
ix
construction plant and equipment has become integral part of every project. In
construction, plant and equipment contribute a great deal towards speed, quality,
safety and efficiency of a project.
2.2
Use of machines helps in speedy construction and thereby the project facility
starts to give returns earlier as compared to manual construction, which
consumes much more time.
Economic considerations of early completion such as reduction in overheads, less
escalation etc.
Machines are capable of handling tough work and can be expected with a fair
degree of effectiveness.
While the availability of human labor is sometimes uncertain, machines are
dependable and are unaffected by social and economic conditions of the region.
Where the work involved includes large quantities to be handled for long
distances, machines work out to be cheaper.
Machines performance can be assessed more accurately than that of the human
resource and thereby adherence to schedules is easier.
Use of mechanical equipment has long range benefit in creating technical knowhow and skilled workmen who could prove assets in the countrys technical
development.
Use of indigenous machines reflects on the manufacturing industry and faster
industrialization of the country.
Use of equipment results in dependence for supply of spare parts and specialists
services of manufacturers. The non-availability of these things causes downtime
and financial losses by way of lost working time.
xi
Often the overall cost of working of machines has been found to be more than the
first estimates showed. Some machines consume spare parts costing as much as
200 percent of original estimates.
Sometimes the delay caused in procurement, trans-shipment, installation and
commissioning may be more than offset the gain in time expected as a result of
using equipment.
The disposal of the equipment profitably after completion of a project may prove
difficult, resulting in capital loss to the project. Similarly, disposal of large
quantities of spare parts for obsolete models may pose serious problems.
Where work can be successfully accomplished by manual labor, use of machines
aggravates extent of unemployment and creates social problems.
The gross value of equipment used in India also increased since independence. In
1950, India had 95 machines valued at Rs.0.421 crores, in 1960 it had 934
xii
xiii
Year
Machines (Nos.)
Value (Crores)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
1940
1945
1950
1955
1960
1965
1970
1979
1984
1998
1999
2000
2
2
95
238
934
2197
643
16048
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.0074
0.0040
0:421
1.62
12.04
38.71
21.06
297.54
408.44
6600.00
8000.00
9870.00
xiv
This goal can be achieved only by mechanized construction as only modern high
performance construction machinery can ensure process control in real time for
achieving end product quality conforming to design specifications. For speedy
construction works to complete the project within a fixed time frame, deployment of
adequate and appropriate machinery has to be ensured. Moreover, mechanized
construction aims at technology up gradation. Table 2.2 is referred from
Construction equipment Industry in India by Mr. Ramesh Babu in the year 2003
xv
Equipment
Number
1.
Mobile
15000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Mini
Wheeled
Crawler
Crawler
Crawler
Wheeled
Backhoe
Skid-Steer
Rough
Dump Trucks
Motor
Motor
Mobile
Asphalt
Compaction
Total
200
200
1 2000
8000
160
6000
15000
130
90
10000
750
200
8100
1400
22000
99230
xvi
Equipment
No.
Year
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1.
Mobile Cranes
585
600
615
650
690
2.
Mini Excavators
80
90
120
150
180
3.
Wheeled Excavators
10
4.
Crawler Excavators
1950
2100
2250
2400
2550
5.
Crawler Dozers
350
360
375
395
415
6.
Crawler Loaders
7.
Wheeled Loaders
400
420
480
530
580
8.
Backhoe Loaders
3500
3300
3000
3200
3500
9.
Skid-Steer Loaders
70
85
100
125
150
10.
11.
Dump Trucks
385
405
418
430
455
12.
Motor Graders
160
220
300
350
420
13.
Motor Scrapers
14.
Mobile Compressors
1680
1850
2000
2250
2400
15.
Asphalt Finishers
150
175
210
250
300
16.
Compaction Equipment
770
865
960
1130
1500
Total
10068
10478
10839
11876
13166
xvii
Table 2.3 is referred from Construction equipment and job planning by Deodhar.
S.V in 2nd edition 2001
TABLE 2.4 DEMAND PROJECTIONSROAD MACHINERY(YEARS 2000-15)
Product
2005/6
2010/11
2015/16
Hydraulic Excavator
6225
9350
14000
10450
15700
Excavator
Loaders 6960
(Wheeled) TMB
Front end Loaders
3225
4837
7255
1630
2450
3675
3870
5805
1340
2345
Dozers
and Crawler)
Vibratory Rollers (6-10 760
tons) Soil & Asphalt
Road Rollers (Static)
1000
1200
1400
300
400
500
130
160
200
125
150
175
700
800
200
250
Hydrostatic
Motor Graders
T
Above 20 T
150
xviii
Table 2.4 is referred from Construction equipment and job planning by Deodhar.
S.V in 2nd edition 2001
2.4
The type of equipment selected for removal of soil usually depends upon soil
and valley conditions and upon the characteristics of material to be handled. The
number and size of machines selected depend upon the magnitude of work, working
days available and number of shifts worked in a day. Size matching of all equipments
working in a group is vital. The procurement plan must be in line with the
construction schedule. Also, planned with equipment procurement should be the
spare parts for it and supplies of fuels, oils, lubricants etc. for its operation. Suitable
service facilities are vital to realize the planned output rate of equipments.
Availability of operation and maintenance staff having adequate quality and number
for the operation of equipment is essential to obtain full production. The use of
mathematical models of the operation of equipment can be used for planning and
selection of construction equipment.
xix
2.5
SELECTION OF EQUIPMENT
xx
involves initial heavy investments. In the long run, equipment adds to the
profitability by reducing the overall costs, provided the equipment is properly
planned, technically scrutinized, economically procured and effectively managed.
Poor selection and bad management of equipment are generally attributed to task
mismatch, unplanned requirement forecasts, hasty purchase decisions, inadequate
repairs and spares supply, and lack of maintenance. The rapid development in
equipment technology during the past several decades has brought in to market wide
range of equipment making their selection more and more difficult.
2.5.1
Task Considerations
xxi
2.5.2
Site Constraints
Accessibility to location.
Maneuverability at site.
Working space restrictions.
Altitude and weather conditions.
Working season and working hours.
Availability of local resources of manpower, materials and equipment.
Availability of equipment hiring. Repair and maintenance facilities, locally.
Availability of fuel, oil and lubricants.
2.5.3
Equipment Suitability
xxii
2.5.4
Operating Reliability
Manufacturers reputation.
Equipment components, engine-transmission, brakes, steering operators cabin.
Use of standard components.
Warranties and guarantees.
Vendors after sale service.
Operators acceptability, adaptability and training requirements.
Structural designs.
Preventive maintenance programme.
Safety features.
Availability of fuel, oil and lubricants.
Maintainability:
Ease of repair and maintenance.
Vendors after sales and service, repairs, spares and maintenance.
Availability of spare parts.
Standardization consideration.
2.5.5
Economic Considerations
Owning costs.
xxiii
Operating costs.
Re-sale or residual value after use.
Replacement costs of existing equipment.
Unit cost of production.
2.5.6
Commercial Considerations
2.6
xxiv
This is a job, which needs the exact balance between availability of spares
and low inventory cost. On one hand it should provide proper assurance for
availability of desired spare parts in proper time and quantity. And on other hand
xxv
2.6.3
xxvi
2.7
xxvii
2.7.1
Ownership Cost
The ownership costs are in the nature of fixed costs, as they have to be
incurred irrespective of the quantum of use. These are real costs as far as an
organization is concerned but they are notional for a site. They are also called as
Performa charges.
Depreciation
Interest
xxviii
2.7.2
Operating Cost
The operation costs are directly related to the quantum of use and efficiency
of the equipment. These costs are normally incurred by the sites and are too apparent
and real.
xxix
and adjustment, small repairs in the field, major repairs and overhaul in main
workshops and proper is of laid-up machine. The objective of maintenance would be:
To maximize availability of machinery and facilities needed for smooth
production.
To minimize downtime due to breakdown of machinery.
To ensure long life of the machinery to avoid high rate of depreciation of capital.
xxx
CHAPTER 3
3.1.
INTRODUCTION
TO
THE
THEORY
AND
PRACTICE
OF
xxxi
3.2.
Dos
Do keep the equipment clean.
Do processes operation and maintenance manuals and be thorough with
equipment manufacturers instruction.
Do pay particular attention to lubrication.
Do use only genuine spares.
Do keep all nuts and bolts tight.
Do examine engine oils and radiator water daily, before starting equipment.
Do attend periodic preventive maintenance.
Do take steps to keep all meter and safety device working.
Donts
Dont overload engine and equipment.
Dont run engine if black smoke is coming out of exhaust.
Dont use cotton waste, while cleaning engine parts.
Dont mix different brands of oils.
Don t observe economy only in cost of maintenance
Dont store fuel, oil in galvanized containers.
xxxii
During maintenance
Only authorized persons should be allowed to attend to the maintenance of
equipment.
Store attachments in safe place and restrict unauthorized persons to go close to it.
While working under machine take care that the equipment is placed on firm
level ground.
Do not carry out maintenance with engine running, if it is necessary then take
care that the operator is seated to stop the machine in case of emergency.
Take care that no tools are left as it is inside the machine by mistake.
xxxiii
Take care that the mechanics are provided with personal protective equipments.
Repair should be carried out as soon as abnormality is reported.
Precaution should be taken while handling fuel, high-pressure hoses, highpressure oils, and while carrying out maintenance at high temperature.
3.4
3.4.1 Introduction
The Plant and Machinery (P&M) workshops are the places wherein the
maintenance is carried out and therefore it is necessary that the projects are provided
with a well planned and equipped P&M workshop. These workshops should be
designed to meet the requirement of Inspection, Maintenance and Repair of
equipments. A well-equipped workshop with well-trained technical manpower will
develop confidence in the project team to complete the project in time.
xxxiv
The field repair workshops (Type B) are generally located in zonal areas of
the company giving repair and maintenance cover to the projects in and around that
zone. These workshops are semi-state with full range of repair and maintenance
equipments. The workshop is stocked with adequate spares and assemblies for
replenishing the light repair workshops..
3.5
xxxv
The spares required for repair are drawn from the stores and old spares returned
to stores.
The shop foreman carries out a preliminary test on the repaired equipment and
then sends the equipment to the inspection team in R & I section for final testing.
The Receipt and Inspection(R & I) team finally carries out the inspection of the
equipment and endorses fitness certificate on the repair card.
The Receipt and Inspection (R & I) section closes the repair card after final tests
and records all repairs carried out and spares fitted in
equipment.
In case of major repairs beyond the scope of the workshop, the equipment is sent
to the next higher workshop by the inspection team after the approval of the
workshop officer.
The inspection team also determines the final classification of equipments based
on usage and major repairs.
3.6
xxxvi
Best practice
Range
1.5 - 5.0%
total output
Total maintenance cost / 2.3%
Estimated
2.0 - 5.0%
Replacement
Value
Maintenance labor cost /
1.5%
0.6 - 2.1%
0.8 - 2.4%
total output
xxxvii
/ total output
www.assetweb.com
Maintenance Performance
Best Practice
Range
95%
80 - 95%
Scheduled compliance
>70%
35 - 70%
Preventive maintenance
95%
80 -100%
Planned work
95%
65 - 95%
Uptime
>78%
48 - 78%
Predictive
preventive 25%
10 - 25%
maintenance by operators
40%
Predictive
maintenance
hours/total
hours
preventive
labor
maintenance
18-40%
xxxviii
www.assetweb.com
3.6.2
Measurable results
xxxix
Any worthwhile change should add value to the operation whether that
value takes the form of reduced labor, longer equipment service life, less frequent
repairs to specific instruments, improved product quality, or greater plant throughout.
The implementation team should therefore establish goals and a way to measure
progress toward them.
xl
CHAPTER 4
EQUIPMENT
DETAILS
OF
THE
TWO
CONSTRUCTION
COMPANIES
4.1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter involves the equipment details and its usage in a month for both
the construction companies i)M/S Larsen & Toubro Ltd (L & T)
ii)
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd (CCCL). After the collection of data and
calculating and comparing them, the overall maintenance cost and its percentage
over the total expenditure of each equipment are found out.
Table 4.1 shows the list of equipments in L&T and their capacity and
identification.
Table 4.2 shows the list of equipments in CCCL and their capacity and
identification.
Table 4.3 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost of each equipment
and its details for both the companies
Table 4.4 and 4.5 show the usage of equipments in a particular month for
various projects and manually calculated breakdown maintenance cost, breakdown
working hours, total maintenance cost, percentage maintenance cost and average
working hours for L & T and CCCL companies respectively.
xli
Table 4.6 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost and its percentage
for concrete mixing equipments in both the companies.
Table 4.7 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost and its percentage
for earth moving equipments available in both the companies.
Figure 4.1 shows the comparison of the total number of concrete mixing
equipments available in both the companies.
Figure 4.2 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost for each equipment
of the various concrete mixing equipments for both the companies. It is clear that
L&T spends more for maintaining all the concrete mixing equipments in general and
particularly more for concrete pumps (200% more than CCCL).
Figure 4.3 shows the comparison of the total number of earth moving
equipments available in both the companies.
Figure 4.4 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost for each equipment
of the various earth moving equipments for both the companies
Table 4.8 which is the final stage in this chapter gives the overall
maintenance cost in both the companies and also the overall percentage maintenance
cost per month.
xlii
S No
Nos
Capacity
Identification
Dozers
BEML(D155)
Dozers
12
BEML(D80)
Motor Graders
27
155HP
BEML(GD 605R2)
Motor Graders
10
155HP
KOMATSU
Wheel Loaders
22
1.7cum
HM20-21
Wheel Loaders
1.7cum
Excavator
13
900Lit
L&T Proclain
Back Hoe(Loader)
1.00cum
JCB
Back Hoe(Loader)
14
1.00cum
10
Vibratory Rollers
40
10 Tonnes
L&T Vibromax
11
Vibratory Rollers
13
2.7Tonnes
Bomag
12
Heavy Crane
250 Tonnes
American
13
Heavy Crane
750 Tonnes
Link Belt
14
Crane(18LPH)
56
75 Tonnes
TATA 955
15
Crane(8LPH)
69
18 Tonnes
TATA 320
16
Crane(6LPH)
10
20 Tonnes
COLES 620
17
Crane(4LPH)
70
8 Tonnes
ESCORTS
18
Truck
70
10 Tonnes
Ashok Leyland
xliii
19
Mini Truck
18
6 Tonnes
TATA(407)
20
Tipper
76
6cum
TATA
21
Tipper
119
6cum
Ashok Leyland
22
Water Tankers
47
10000Lit
Ashok Leyland
23
Batching Plant
30
30cum
STETTER
24
Batching Plant
24
30cum
MILLERS
25
Concrete pump
44
56cum
STETTER
26
120 Tonnes
LINHOFF
27
135 Tonnes
MARINI
28
90 Tonnes
Condecup
29
WMM Paver
60 Tonnes
Gujarat Apollo
xliv
TABLE 4.2.
S no
Capacity/hp
equipment
Make
identification
Crane
20 MT
Komatsu
Crane
30 MT
Tfi
Crane
75 MT
Tata
Crane
20 MT
Navin
Concrete
30 cum/hr
Greaves
52 cum/hr
Schwing
pumps
6
Mobile
concrete
pumps
Wheel dozers
2 MT
Tata
Wheel dozers
10
2 MT
Hindustan
Wheel dozers
3 cum
Volvo
10
Excavator
0.9 cum
Cater pillar
11
Excavator
200 hp
Cater pillar
12
Excavator
200 hp
Samsung
13
Excavator
300 hp
Daewoo
xlv
14
JCB
0.6 cum
Escort
15
JCB
0.6 cum
Tata
16
Motor graders
120 hp
Komatsu
17
Motor graders
13
120 hp
Cater pillar
18
Vibratory
10
10 MT
Greaves
10 MT
Escorts
10 MT
Kirloskar
rollers
19
Vibratory
rollers
20
Vibratory
rollers
21
Water tankers
41
10 KL
Tata
22
Water rankers
12 KL
Ashok Leyland
23
Tandem rollers 5
10 MT
Escorts
24
Tandem rollers 4
4 MT
Escorts
25
Tipper truck
110
10 MT
Tata
26
Tipper truck
20
25 MT
Ashok Leyland
27
Concrete paver 2
Wirtgen
28
Texturing and 2
wirtgen
curing
machine
xlvi
TABLE 4.3.
EQUIPMENTS
TOTAL
NAME
TOTAL
NOS
MAINTENANCE
COST(Rs)
FOR
EACH
EQUIPMENT(Rs)
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
TIPPER
130
195
135200
276900
0.70%
1.07%
1040
1420
EXCAVATOR
12
13
37308
54560
1.38%
5.08%
3109
4127
BACK
16
5810
37280
1.04%
4.70%
830
2330
16
37
67360
364450
2.23%
10.85%
4210
9850
44
3450
154000
0.50%
3.92%
1150
3500
24
53
25200
106000
1.59%
3.78%
1050
2000
46
47
56580
66740
3.09%
1.72%
1230
1420
CRANE
205
7200
282900
4.22%
8.80%
800
1380
WHEEL
19
17
315096
26860
12.56%
1.995
16585
1580
HOE(JCB)
MOTOR
GRADERS
CONCRETE
PUMPS
VIBRATORY
ROLLERS
WATER
TANKERS
xlvii
DOZERS
TABLE 4.6.
EQUIPMENTS
TOTAL
NAME
NUMBER
CONCRETE
TOTAL
% MAINTENANCE
OF MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
COST FOR EACH
EQUIPMENTS
COST(Rs)
EQUIPMENT(Rs)
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
44
3450
154000
0.50%
3.92%
1150
3500
24
53
25200
106000
1.59%
3.78%
1050
2000
13000
24000
3.8%
3.6%
4350
4800
PUMPS
VIBRATORY
ROLLERS
HOT
MIX 3
PLANT
COMPARISON OF NO OF EQUIPMENTS
60
50
40
NUMBERS 30
CCCL
L&T
20
10
0
CONCRETE VIBRATORY
PUMPS
ROLLERS
HOT MIX
PLANT
xlviii
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
COST(Rs) 2500
CCCL
2000
L&T
1500
1000
500
0
CONCRETE
PUMPS
VIBRATORY
ROLLERS
HOT MIX
PLANT
NAME OF EQUIPMENT
Figure 4.2 Comparison of maintenance cost for each concrete mixing equipment
xlix
TABLE 4.7
EQUIPMENTS
TOTAL
NAME
NUMBER
TIPPER
EXCAVATOR
TOTAL
OF MAINTENANC
MAINTENANCE
COST
MAINTENANCE
FOR
EACH
EQUIPMENTS
E COST(Rs)
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
130
195
135200
27690 0.70%
1.07
1040
1420
54560 1.38%
5.08
3109
4127
830
2330
12
13
37308
EQUIPMENTS(Rs)
%
BACK
HOE(JCB)
16
5810
37280 1.04%
4.70
%
200
180
160
140
120
No.of Equipment 100
CCCL
80
L&T
60
40
20
0
Tipper
Excavator
Back Hoe
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
COST(RS)
CCCL
2000
L&T
1500
1000
500
0
TIPPER
EXCAVATOR
BACKHOE
li
PARAMETERS
CCCL
L&T
Rs 653204.00
Rs 1369690.00
Rs 21775.00
Rs45655.00
3.04
4.65
CHAPTER 4
EQUIPMENT
DETAILS
COMPANIES
4.2
INTRODUCTION
OF
THE
TWO
CONSTRUCTION
lii
This chapter involves the equipment details and its usage in a month for both
the construction companies i)M/S Larsen & Toubro Ltd (L & T)
ii)
Consolidated Construction Consortium Ltd (CCCL). After the collection of data and
calculating and comparing them, the overall maintenance cost and its percentage
over the total expenditure of each equipment are found out.
Table 4.1 shows the list of equipments in L&T and their capacity and
identification.
Table 4.2 shows the list of equipments in CCCL and their capacity and
identification.
Table 4.3 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost of each equipment
and its details for both the companies
Table 4.4 and 4.5 show the usage of equipments in a particular month for
various projects and manually calculated breakdown maintenance cost, breakdown
working hours, total maintenance cost, percentage maintenance cost and average
working hours for L & T and CCCL companies respectively.
Table 4.6 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost and its percentage
for concrete mixing equipments in both the companies.
Table 4.7 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost and its percentage
for earth moving equipments available in both the companies.
Figure 4.1 shows the comparison of the total number of concrete mixing
equipments available in both the companies.
Figure 4.2 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost for each equipment
of the various concrete mixing equipments for both the companies. It is clear that
liii
L&T spends more for maintaining all the concrete mixing equipments in general and
particularly more for concrete pumps (200% more than CCCL).
Figure 4.3 shows the comparison of the total number of earth moving
equipments available in both the companies.
Figure 4.4 shows the comparison of the maintenance cost for each equipment
of the various earth moving equipments for both the companies
Table 4.8 which is the final stage in this chapter gives the overall
maintenance cost in both the companies and also the overall percentage maintenance
cost per month.
S No
Nos
Capacity
Identification
Dozers
BEML(D155)
Dozers
12
BEML(D80)
liv
Motor Graders
27
155HP
BEML(GD 605R2)
Motor Graders
10
155HP
KOMATSU
Wheel Loaders
22
1.7cum
HM20-21
Wheel Loaders
1.7cum
Excavator
13
900Lit
L&T Proclain
Back Hoe(Loader)
1.00cum
JCB
Back Hoe(Loader)
14
1.00cum
10
Vibratory Rollers
40
10 Tonnes
L&T Vibromax
11
Vibratory Rollers
13
2.7Tonnes
Bomag
12
Heavy Crane
250 Tonnes
American
13
Heavy Crane
750 Tonnes
Link Belt
14
Crane(18LPH)
56
75 Tonnes
TATA 955
15
Crane(8LPH)
69
18 Tonnes
TATA 320
16
Crane(6LPH)
10
20 Tonnes
COLES 620
17
Crane(4LPH)
70
8 Tonnes
ESCORTS
18
Truck
70
10 Tonnes
Ashok Leyland
19
Mini Truck
18
6 Tonnes
TATA(407)
20
Tipper
76
6cum
TATA
21
Tipper
119
6cum
Ashok Leyland
22
Water Tankers
47
10000Lit
Ashok Leyland
23
Batching Plant
30
30cum
STETTER
24
Batching Plant
24
30cum
MILLERS
25
Concrete pump
44
56cum
STETTER
lv
26
120 Tonnes
LINHOFF
27
135 Tonnes
MARINI
28
90 Tonnes
Condecup
29
WMM Paver
60 Tonnes
Gujarat Apollo
lvi
TABLE 4.2.
S no
Capacity/hp
equipment
Make
identification
Crane
20 MT
Komatsu
Crane
30 MT
Tfi
Crane
75 MT
Tata
Crane
20 MT
Navin
Concrete
30 cum/hr
Greaves
52 cum/hr
Schwing
pumps
6
Mobile
concrete
pumps
Wheel dozers
2 MT
Tata
Wheel dozers
10
2 MT
Hindustan
Wheel dozers
3 cum
Volvo
10
Excavator
0.9 cum
Cater pillar
11
Excavator
200 hp
Cater pillar
12
Excavator
200 hp
Samsung
13
Excavator
300 hp
Daewoo
14
JCB
0.6 cum
Escort
15
JCB
0.6 cum
Tata
16
Motor graders
120 hp
Komatsu
lvii
17
Motor graders
13
120 hp
Cater pillar
18
Vibratory
10
10 MT
Greaves
10 MT
Escorts
10 MT
Kirloskar
rollers
19
Vibratory
rollers
20
Vibratory
rollers
21
Water tankers
41
10 KL
Tata
22
Water rankers
12 KL
Ashok Leyland
23
Tandem rollers 5
10 MT
Escorts
24
Tandem rollers 4
4 MT
Escorts
25
Tipper truck
110
10 MT
Tata
26
Tipper truck
20
25 MT
Ashok Leyland
27
Concrete paver 2
Wirtgen
28
Texturing and 2
wirtgen
curing
machine
TABLE 4.3.
lviii
EQUIPMENTS
TOTAL
TOTAL
NAME
MAINTENANCE
COST(Rs)
FOR
EACH
EQUIPMENT(Rs)
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
TIPPER
130
195
135200
276900
0.70%
1.07%
1040
1420
EXCAVATOR
12
13
37308
54560
1.38%
5.08%
3109
4127
BACK
16
5810
37280
1.04%
4.70%
830
2330
16
37
67360
364450
2.23%
10.85%
4210
9850
44
3450
154000
0.50%
3.92%
1150
3500
24
53
25200
106000
1.59%
3.78%
1050
2000
46
47
56580
66740
3.09%
1.72%
1230
1420
CRANE
205
7200
282900
4.22%
8.80%
800
1380
WHEEL
19
17
315096
26860
12.56%
1.995
16585
1580
HOE(JCB)
MOTOR
GRADERS
CONCRETE
PUMPS
VIBRATORY
ROLLERS
WATER
TANKERS
DOZERS
TABLE 4.6.
lix
EQUIPMENTS
TOTAL
NAME
NUMBER
CONCRETE
TOTAL
% MAINTENANCE
OF MAINTENANCE
MAINTENANCE
COST FOR EACH
EQUIPMENTS
COST(Rs)
EQUIPMENT(Rs)
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
44
3450
154000
0.50%
3.92%
1150
3500
24
53
25200
106000
1.59%
3.78%
1050
2000
13000
24000
3.8%
3.6%
4350
4800
PUMPS
VIBRATORY
ROLLERS
HOT
MIX 3
PLANT
COMPARISON OF NO OF EQUIPMENTS
60
50
40
NUMBERS 30
CCCL
L&T
20
10
0
CONCRETE VIBRATORY
PUMPS
ROLLERS
HOT MIX
PLANT
lx
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
COST(Rs) 2500
CCCL
2000
L&T
1500
1000
500
0
CONCRETE
PUMPS
VIBRATORY
ROLLERS
HOT MIX
PLANT
NAME OF EQUIPMENT
Figure 4.2 Comparison of maintenance cost for each concrete mixing equipment
lxi
TABLE 4.7
EQUIPMENTS
TOTAL
NAME
NUMBER
TIPPER
EXCAVATOR
TOTAL
OF MAINTENANC
MAINTENANCE
COST
MAINTENANCE
FOR
EACH
EQUIPMENTS
E COST(Rs)
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
CCCL
L&T
130
195
135200
27690 0.70%
1.07
1040
1420
54560 1.38%
5.08
3109
4127
830
2330
12
13
37308
EQUIPMENTS(Rs)
%
BACK
HOE(JCB)
16
5810
37280 1.04%
4.70
%
lxii
200
180
160
140
120
No.of Equipment 100
CCCL
80
L&T
60
40
20
0
Tipper
Excavator
Back Hoe
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
COST(RS)
CCCL
2000
L&T
1500
1000
500
0
TIPPER
EXCAVATOR
BACKHOE
lxiii
PARAMETERS
CCCL
L&T
Rs 653204.00
Rs 1369690.00
Rs 21775.00
Rs45655.00
3.04
4.65
CHAPTER 5
lxiv
A FMEA is a stable and seasoned design tool, Often called a Failure Mode
Study, this design and maintenance engineering tool has existed and matured for
some time, but is still ignored by many design teams and organizations.
While the last thing design, development and maintenance engineering needs
is another acronym, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) may be one of the
easiest concepts to understand and apply. Best of all, it delivers significant financial
returns quickly.
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis is an approach that helps identify and
prioritize potential equipment and process failures. Often used as a springboard to
establishing a Root Cause Failure Analysis program, FMEA is a logical system that
objectively ranks potential failures and provides recommendations for corrective
actions. Informal failure analysis happens every day in most plants as engineers try
to figure out why a machine unexpectedly broke down or how a part slowly came out
of tolerance.
5.2
HISTORY OF FMEA
lxv
The FMEA discipline was developed in the United States Military. Military
Procedure MIL-P-1629, titled Procedures for Performing a Failure Mode, Effects and
Criticality Analysis, is dated November 9th November 1949. It was used as a
reliability evaluation technique to determine the effect of system and equipment
failures. Failures were classified according to their impact on mission success and
personnel/equipment safety. The term "personnel/equipment", taken directly from an
abstract of Military Standard MIL-STD-1629, is notable. The concept that personnel
and equipment are interchangeable does not apply in the modern manufacturing
context of producing consumer goods. The manufacturers of consumer products
established a new set of priorities, including customer satisfaction and safety. As a
result, the risk assessment tools of the FMEA became partially outdated. They have
not been adequately updated since.
lxvi
Many times the three levels overlap. They often happen simultaneously,
particularly design and process FMEAs, because so much of the design depends on
how the equipment is handled, and how it gets handled depends on design.
Maintenance engineers are most often involved in process FMEAs, because
equipment is usually installed and running by the time maintenance is asked to
determine why a failure occurred. In a process FMEA, experts in other plant
functions augment maintenances equipment expertise. A team consisting of a
process engineer, a machinery operator and two maintenance people might conduct a
maintenance-oriented process FMEA.
familiarity with past systems and failures. Each team member brings in another
level of expertise.
5.4
WORKING OF FMEA
lxvii
Team must assess the severity, occurrence and detection of failures and give
those aspects different and meaningful numeric ratings. Ratings are typically
from 1 to 10, with 1 being the least severe, least occurring, or most easily
detectable. 10 would be those faults that are most severe, most catastrophic and
those hardest to detect.
5.4.1
must first isolate and describe the potential failure mode: under what conditions does
the equipment fail. In the case of a maintenance-related problem, this is often as
simple as reviewing equipment history. In a design FMEA, this could include failure
modes in the hardware, software, mechanical and system portions of the design.
Once the failure mode has been defined and the potential effects of failure
have been determined, the team must assess the severity, occurrence and detection of
failures and give those aspects numeric ratings. Severity means how serious the
failure will be. Give it a rating from one to ten, where ten is the most severe failure.
In the same way, you rate the occurrence of failure - how frequently you see
the failure. Detection indicates how easily that fault or failure can be detected. The
detection scale is the reverse of the other 2 scales, with 1 being the easiest or most
detected and 10 being the hardest or most difficult to detect. Obviously, for this
lxviii
rating system to work, its vital that all team members understand what constitutes a
failure. Each potential effect of failure is given a severity, occurrence and detection
rating. Those numbers are multiplied to produce a Risk Priority Number (RPN).
Example: One potential failure is that a worker gets his arm cut off in a
process - that's a very high severity rating, a 10. The occurrence of that is very low,
however, and is given a 1. Detection is obvious, so that also gets a 1. So the RPN is
10 (10 times 1 times 1).
Premature die wear is another example of a failure mode. Its a fair severity,
but we can catch it before it affects the customer - say it is a 6. But the frequency of
seeing that is much higher, maybe also a 6. The ability to detect this type of wear
may vary but we assume we have a good maintenance process in place and we give
this a 3. So the RPN for premature die wear is 6 times 6 times 3. (i.e)6x6x3=108.
Once the RPN is calculated, the team must develop action plans for
correcting, mitigating or eliminating the potential problem. Going through the
process of defining possible failure modes and causes of failure gives the team a
lxix
5.5 DEFINITIONS
CHARACTERISTICS:
Critical
Characteristics
are
Special
lxx
lxxi
RPN = (S) (O) (D). This number is used to place priority on items that
require additional quality planning.
SEVERITY: Severity is an assessment of how serious the Effect of the potential
Failure Mode is on the Customer.
SIGNIFICANT CHARECTERISTICS: Significant Characteristics are Special
Characteristics defined by Ford Motor Company as characteristics that
significantly affect customer satisfaction and require quality planning to ensure
acceptable levels of capability.
SPECIAL PROCESS CHARECTERISTICS: Special Process Characteristics are
process characteristics for which variation must be controlled to some target
value to ensure that variation in a Special Product Characteristic is maintained to
its target value during manufacturing and assembly.
SPECIAL PRODUCT CHARECTERISTICS: Special Product Characteristics are
product characteristics for which reasonably anticipated variation could
significantly affect a products safety or compliance with governmental standards
or regulations, or is likely to significantly affect customer satisfaction with a
product.
lxxii
lxxiii
lxxiv
Let us consider a Tower Crane as an example for FMEA process. The details of a
Tower Crane that has been used in a month for various types of projects are as
follows.
lxxv
lxxvi
More stresses beyond the rated capacity may tilt or Damage the crane
Improper inspection leads to sudden unexpected failures.
Adjustments and repair to tower cranes not done by designated persons may
again leads to the repair or failure of the crane.
Cabs and remote control station shall protect from falling objects and
materials and also from the elements.
Cab windows not constructed with transparent safety glazing material cause
invisibility to the operator.
If automatic trolley break is not available in case of trolley rope breakage
then non-stopping, uncontrollable movement occurs.
If the tower cranes operated when the wind speed is greater than 30 miles
per hour will cause uncontrollable operation.
Operation of a crane without counterweighgt trolley was found
to be
lxxvii
Improper protection in the cabs and remote control station may severely
affect the human life.
5.6.5. Causes for the failures.
Improper inspection.
Improper trained operators.
Not selecting well designated and more experienced persons.
Improper maintenance of every individual parts of a crane.
Improper footings provided on tower cranes.
Rate the occurrence of failure, (ie) how frequently the failure occurs.
Accordingly detection scale is formed with one being the easiest or most detected
and 10 being the hardest or most difficult to detect. Obviously for this rating
system to work, It is vital that all team members understand what constitutes a
failure. Each potential effect of failure is given a severity, Occurrence and
lxxviii
detection rating. Those numbers are multiplied to produce a Risk Priority Number
(RPN). Table 5.1 shows the risk priority number for Tower Crane
Therefore to find out the value of
SCALE
NO.
Parameter
1
2
Improper footings
Adjustments and repairs
not done by designated
persons.
Stresses beyond its rated
capacity
Improper inspection
cabs and remote control
stations not adequately
ventilated.
Tower cranes operated
with wind speed more
than the average speed
Operation of crane done
without counterweight
automatic trolley brake
not available
Power-controlled
lowering devices not
capable of handling rated
loads and speeds
Improperly trained
operator
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
Detection
Scale(D)
1
2
Severity
Scale(S)
5
6
Occurrence
Scale(O)
2
7
RPN
(DXSXO)
10
84
144
4
5
10
4
5
8
200
160
54
189
32
189
10
10
200
lxxix
It is observed that in a tower crane risk priority number is more for improper
inspection and improperly trained operator.
5.7
lxxx
f) Cutting force at the grounds surface is applied toward the leading end and
along the length of the blade.
g) The turning radius is about 20 feet.
h) It is used for shaping and final grading of the total roadway width.
i) It also cuts the base for the road surface but also the side slopes, back
slopes and V-shaped drainage ditches along the roadway.
j) With the attachment of a short blade, a shallow box-shaped trench can be
dug by the motor grader.
5.7.2
lxxxi
5.7.4
5.7.5
lxxxii
5.7.6
10
Parameter
Detection
Scale(D)
Abnormal setting of the 8
slope of the blade
Improper scarifier teeth 3
If blade cuts above a
1
certain level
Speed is not slow and
2
constant
Improper maintenance 5
of graders
Improper efficiency
7
Improperly trained
6
operators
4
Adjustments and
repairs not done by
designated persons
9
Old motor graders
without automatic
blade
Improper inspection
10
and lubrication
Severity
Scale(S)
5
Occurrence RPN
Scale(O)
(DXSXO)
2
80
3
2
3
10
300
20
48
180
1
10
6
9
36
540
160
378
360
It is observed that in a motor grader risk priority number is more for improperly
trained operators, which indicates that the operator must be trained properly.
lxxxiii
5.8
Concrete mixers, functions, failures, causes and severity details are to be taken as an
example for concrete mixing equipments.
5.8.1
a) Concrete mixers are used for concreting the materials to the building
construction where it requires.
b) The materials are mixed freely in a rotating drum with rapidly secured
vanes rotating independently of the drum.
c) The mixers are discharged by tripping or tilting the drum or, if it is fixed
horizontally by inserting a discharge tray into it.
d) It is necessary to tilt and lift the empty drum several times, watching
attentively it motions, examining the pneumatic drive connections and
listening to any unusual knocks or impacts in individual units.
e) When the drum is loaded from a skip, see that the skip is rapidly and
completely emptied.
f) If the concrete mix is conveyed by cyclic action vehicles, the vehicles
should be brought uninterruptedly to the point of loading, their numbers
and capacity corresponding to the output of the mixing equipment.
lxxxiv
Pouring more material than the rated capacity of the concrete mixers
may tilt or damage the mixer.
b)
Not stopping the machine even though the bearing are found
to be overheated will some times affect the human life.
d)
e)
lxxxv
f)
5.8.4
b)
c)
d)
5.8.5
b)
c)
Improper inspection.
d)
e)
f)
5.8.6
mixing equipment
Concrete mixer have been rated from 1 to 10 under detection, severity, occurrence
scale Figure 5.3 shows the risk priority number for concrete mixer.
lxxxvi
Parameter
Improper inspection on
lubrication points
Improper packing of 9
the cap oilers.
Detection
Scale(D)
8
Severity
Scale(S)
5
Occurrence RPN
Scale(O)
(DXSXO)
5
200
216
Improper checking on
all the mechanisms
12
Improperly trained
operators
Improper checking to
the skip.
Not stopping the
machine even though
bearings are found to
be overheated
Improper speed and
time
Adjustments and
repairs not done by
designated persons
Pouring more material
than the rated capacity
Not examining the bolt
and articulated joints of
a mixing machine
10
270
192
49
21
10
320
10
100
54
5
6
7
8
9
10
6.1
INTRODUCTION
lxxxvii
lxxxviii
analyzing the approach of two leading construction firms i.e. LARSEN &TOUBRO
Ltd. and CONSOLIDATED CONSTRUCTION CONSORTIUM Ltd. both well
known for owning large a fleet of equipments, the following recommendations are
suggested:
6.2.1
lxxxix
6.2.2
RECOMMENDATIONS
xc
6.3
Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA). For the present study only 10 parameters are
considered for analyzing the modes and effects of failure. But if software is used for
the analysis, more parameters can be used in the analysis thereby level of risk of
failure can be reduced and more saving in the cost of maintenance can be achieved.
REFERENCES
1. Campbell .D.H, Construction Equipment Management, Dept. of
Civil
equipment
and
xci