Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reddy
Professor,
Department of Engineering
Science and Mechanics,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
and State University,
Blacksburg, Va. 24061
Mem. ASME
Introduction
The classical theory of plates, in which it is assumed that
normals to the midplane before deformation remain straight
and normal to the plane after deformation, underpredicts
deflections and overpredicts natural frequencies and buckling
loads. These results are due to the neglect of transverse shear
strains in the classical theory. The errors in deflections,
stresses, natural frequencies, and buckling loads are even
higher for plates made of advanced composites like graphiteepoxy and boron-epoxy, whose elastic modulus to shear
modulus ratios are very large (e.g., of the order of 25 to 40,
instead of 2.6 for typical isotropic materials). These high
ratios render classical theories inadequate for the analysis of
composite plates. An adequate theory must account for
transverse shear strains.
Many plate theories exist that account for transverse shear
strains. Of these, the theories based on assumed displacement
fields provide a background for the present theory [1-8]. In
Reissner-Mindlin type-theories, the displacement field accounts for linear or higher-order variations of midplane
displacements through thickness (see [1-8]). In higher-order
theories, an additional dependent unknown is introduced into
the theory with each additional power of the thickness
coordinate. In addition, these shear deformation theories do
not satisfy the conditions of zero transverse shear stresses on
the top and bottom surfaces of the plate, and require a shear
correction to the transverse shear stiffnesses. The threedimensional theories of laminates, in which each layer is
treated as homogeneous anisotropic medium (see Green and
Naghdi [9], Rehfield and Valisetty [10], and Pagano and Soni
[11]), are intractable as the number of layers becomes
moderately large. Thus, a simple two-dimensional theory of
Contributed by the Applied Mechanics Division and presented at the Winter
Annual Meeting, New Orleans, La., December 9-14, 1984 of THE AMERICAN
SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS.
Kinematics
The present theory uses a displacement approach, much like
in the Reissner-Mindlin type theories. However, the
where
dy
dz
(2)
Jh2
(--*-)
(4)
u, = u + z
"2
'
dw
H(I)V^)]
e2+z(K2+Z2K22)
=0
e4
c
= 64+z
f0
4- 7
By
dx
dj<y
dx '
(6)
d w\
dxdy >
dx
Constitutive Equations
For a plate of constant thickness h and composed of thin
layers of orthotropic material, the constitutive equations can
be derived as discussed in [6]. Under the assumption that each
layer possesses a plane of elastic symmetry parallel to the x-y
plane, the constitutive equations for a layer can be written as
*1
.=
o2
6
"2..
2,2
m_
Qn
Qn
266
" 244
_ 0
0 "
255 .
h
.
(S
UJ
(8)
o2
(5)
u, = w
This displacement field is the same as that chosen by
Levinson [13] (the inplane displacements were not considered
by Levinson), but is different from that derived by Murthy
[14]. Except for the similarity between the form of the
displacement field in equation (5) and that of Levinson [13]
and Murthy [14], the remaining development, especially the
derivation of the equilibrium equations for laminated plates,
is novel with the present study.
The strains associated with the displacements in equation
(l)are
e,=e?+z(/c?+z2/c2)
e2 =
dv,
dx
(7)
dw \
h2
( dy
3h2 V
" 21
<t\
v + z\
~~dyT~
dw \
^^y~)
~h2
Hx~
^5 J
f,=0
dy
~w
dy
(3)
+
Jh2 (^ **)>
*,+
d"p
du 3
dw
+
=h+2zy + 3z2L +
4
dz
dy
Setting 65{x,y, h/2) and t4{x,y, h/2) to zero, we obtain
Sx=-
3h
dw
du->
x=0,
(V
dw
4 =
dx
dx
&W\
dx2 J
\ dx
2 = -
dy
4 (Wx
d2W
e^ =
(1)
o4(x,y, j =0
K2
o5(x,y, j = 0 ,
dx
e?
6^
fe,
2l2
2l6
Ql2
222
226
2l6
226
266 _
[Sll<^
244
245
-245
255
^2
.e6
(9)
TM
J
l^5sJ
%
2
5 ts+Z
U2
K5
e6 = e6+z(K6+Z Kl)
746 / Vol. 51, DECEMBER 1984
/1/2
<
ft/2. J it
+ \ gGw dxdy
w=0
v
y b
1^=0
pro
w=
*x=M2=P2=0"
+ a (* + ^)^[-i(% + f)]
(10)
.3
| L FSDT
z-'
h
pA/2
I I
.1
.2
-.]
<7,(1^3)*
(NhMi,Pi)=\
(/=1,2,6)
-.3
J -A/2
A/2
-A/2
-.5
F i r s t - o r d e r theory (FSDT)
o4(l,z2)dz
A/2
(Qi.*i) = J - A / 2
s0,z2)dz
(ID
^HSDT
1P~V7.S ^
.1'
8u:
8v:
&w:
^ 1 + ^ = 0
dx dy
dx
dx
-.3
-.5
+^2=0
dy
d2Pt
+2
2 (
dxdy dy1
3h2 \ dx2
3h V
dMi
dM6
Qi + ^Ri
dy
dx
)-
Sfc
(12)
where T is the boundary of the plate midplane Q, and
u=unx + vny,
3M,
9x
dy
Jr
( We
2
3h \ dx
M^M^P;
Ns
Q
P
M
Mns
dP<
(14)
3P2 \
dy J
()-<
dMf,
/dP\
3h2
Hy-
.dQ2
4 /8Rt dR2\
+Q
+
-3j
-\lx-dy-)
dy
Q, = Qr h2 R,
d
(13)
(1=1,2,6)
3h2
(i=l,2)
d
d
n
* ds
ds dy
dn
dx
"Tx
and P and Pm are defined by expressions analogous to N
and Nns, respectively.
It is informative to relate the resultants defined in equation
(11) to the total strains in equation (6). From equations (6),
(9), and (11) we obtain
">
rNr
N2
Au
Mi
Al6
An
-^26
^N6J
r
An
sym.
Bu
A66
Bl6
#22
#26
sym.
"
"
Ai
- -=
M2
5i2
^M6J
-666
X>12
A6
#22
>26
sym.
P>
-
Pi
^Pe J
"
"
.1
El6
^22
E26
sym.
"
066
"[2
^ii
symmetric
Hu
f e? 1
Fn
^16
F22
^26
_ eg.
^66
sym.
^66
Hl2
-#16
H22
#26
sym.
^ L6
#66
j
(15a)
QS
G> . =
fe4]
A 44 ^4 45 >44 >45
. ^55 045
055
F 4 4 F 45
*2
sym.
*J
^55 J
8
2
^52J
= A,2
dx
hy422 -T
dy
( du
N<
dv \
(15ft)
-i:
dy
d2W
dy2 )
tyy
dy
d2W
dy2 )
hn
Q, y (l,z\z 4 )rfz
(i, y = 4,5)
(16)
(-)(
for
- ^ ( * '
Pl-Fll
i, 7 = 1,2,4,5,6
A16=A26=Dl6=D26=Fl6=F26=Hl6=H26=0
- & )
+ c
( - ^ ) ( * *
- ^ )
+Hn{-W){+-Ej-)
(17)
A45=D45=F,5=0.
Thus, the coupling between stretching and bending is zero.
The following "simply-supported" boundary conditions are
assumed (a and b are the plane-form dimensions of the plate;
see Fig. 1):
*-'""(-s0(-)
(18)
dy
+^i2^dy
d w\
^ + 2
dx ' ~ dxdy )
R2=D
{^+*)+F(-^
^P)
+
" M " W)\dxTy
- dxdy
dxdy
ted?)
by2
+F66
\tedj>
1?)
dxdy2
dxdy
(d*+x
00
$x =
X) A ^ c o s a x sinfly
d*+y\
\(dHx
^dxdy
(20)
m, = 1
d3w
+ 2- 2
' dx dy )
00
4>y =
L,
dx
y m sinouf cosjSy
lh
a
4
\FFu
^ +^ U F
+w ( 2 V
Fn ^ 3*+Hll
l[ dx
lx^
\-W )\^+W)+Fl2
4 \ / a3^
(
+ Hi2
a4w \
\~ W )\~dxWy
toW/
+ Dl2
dxy+D22 W
W2)\dxdy +
dx2by)
dHy
dx2dy
V+x
dy dx
+F ' 2 ^ 22
Jh2
Fl2
dxdy
d3w \ /
dy
4 \
dx
+F,12
+2
+ 2H,
d2tx
d3w \
4 \ / \j/x
2
a*2dj
Ma
; + a^/
~dx^2dy
by2dx^
(-s0(
a3^
, a
a^ 3A:
3x a>-
a4w
3A:2 a^ 2
)]
A1
(22)
<?= ]C QmnSinaxsinPy
M*4TW-P)(-ST)
(21)
ll
'M~
d2ix
7
"(-3F)( dx2
?Hy
dxdy
V?) Kdxdy'
dxdy2)+D66\
2
+ F,
dy2
d3w
dx3 )
+
dxdy)
13
f w -^
TT
12
C13
d2i<x
n
' ~dxT
12
22
C23
23
\lmrx
mn
y
- ^mn
+ =
C33
L -* mn J
(23)
I o J
d ix , d +y
a w\
+2
2
;/
( - * ) ( dy ' dxdy dxdy^
(F)2(0i2F55+^)+(^)2
3F
\P
a2
^^A/ (
+ F,
92h
dxdy
va2** +
3 3
8
c12=aA5S-~aD55
/ 4\2
+ ^ J aF55
4 3
2
2[a Fn+al3 (Fn+2F66)]
2h
DECEMBER 1984, Vol. 51 / 749
Table 1
Nondimensionalized" deflections and stresses in three-layer (0/90/0 deg) square laminates under sinusoidal loads
a/h
variable
three-dimensional elasticity
theory [16]
Present
theory
4
w
"1
"4
W
10
100
0.590
0.123
0.552
0.0938
"\
4
(whiE1\
k\ = k\ = \
1.9218
0.7345
0.1832
0.7125
0.5684
0.1033
0.4342
0.5390
0.0750
0.755
0.217
"\
1.5681
0.4475
0.1227
0.6306
0.5172
0.0735
0.4333
0.5385
0.0586
5
2
6
1.9122
0.4308
0.1793
0.6949
0.5109
0.1039
0.4340
0.5384
0.0782
1.7763
0.4369
0.1562
0.6693
0.5134
0.0915
0.4337
0.5384
0.0703
2.5769
0.4065
0.3030
0.8210
0.4993
0.1723
0.4353
0.5382
0.0117
b\
j - )l0, w = w[ , )
\ <7o '
\ 2 2 /
"H>=(
( A. h \
hl
_ (f_ A
a2 =
"2\T'Y'T/
a4 = aJ ^-,0,0)
, as = a5(o, ,o)
N2
/ q0a
V 2
/
(
h \
h2
2 /
gna2
<70
~g^
Source
Pagano [16]
Present
FSDT [18]*
Pagano
Present
FSDT
Pagano
Present
FSDT
Pagano
Present
FSDT
CPT
w
2.82
2.6411
2.3626
0.919
0.8622
0.803
0.610
0.5937
0.5784
0.508
0.507
0.5064
0.503
S"2
1.10
1.0356
0.6130
0.725
0.6924
0.6214
0.650
0.6407
0.6228
0.624
0.624
0.6233
0.623
0.119
0.1028
0.0934
0.0435
0.0398
0.0375
0.0299
0.0289
0.0283
0.0253
0.0253
0.0253
0.0252
laminate under
&4
*5
&6
0.0334
0.0348
0.0308
0.0152
0.0170
0.0159
0.0119
0.0139
0.0135
0.0108
0.0129
0.0127
0.387
0.2724
0.1879
0.420
0.2859
0.1894
0.434
0.2880
0.1896
0.439
0.2886
0.1897
0.0281
0.0263
0.0205
0.0123
0.0115
0.0105
0.0093
0.0091
0.0088
0.0083
0.0083
0.0083
0.0083
Table 3 Nondimensionalized" deflections and stresses in four-layer cross-ply (0/90/90/0 deg) square
laminates under sinusoidal transverse loads
a/h
4
10
20
100
Source
Elasticity [17]
Present theory
FSDT [18]*
Three-dimensional elasticity
Present theory
FSDT
Three-dimensional elasticity
Present theory
FSDT
Three-dimensional elasticity
Present theory
FSDT
w
1.954
1.8937
1.7100
0.743
0.7147
0.6628
0.517
0.5060
0.4912
0.4385
0.4343
0.4337
Ol
0.720
0.6651
0.4059
0.559
0.5456
0.4989
0.543
0.5393
0.5273
0.539
0.5387
0.5382
a2
0.663
0.6322
0.5765
0.401
0.3888
0.3615
0.308
0.3043
0.2957
0.276
0.2708
0.2705
04
0.292
0.2389
0.1963
0.196
0.1531
0.1292
0.156
0.1234
0.1087
0.141
0.1117
0.1009
5
0.291
0.2064
0.1398
0.301
0.2640
0.1667
0.328
0.2825
0.1749
0.337
0.2897
0.1780
6
0.0467
0.0440
0.0308
0.0275
0.0268
0.0241
0.0230
0.0228
0.0221
0.0216
0.0213
0.0213
" Same nondimensionalization as used in Table 1, except &2 is evaluated at (x,y,z) (a/2, a/2, h/4).
b
Shear correction factors, k\ = k\ = 5/6.
750 / Vol. 51, DECEMBER 1984
Table 4 Nondimensionalized deflections in three-layer cross-ply (0/90/0 deg) square laminates under
uniform loading
a/h
2
4
10
20
50
100
'
Present theory
N=29
7.7661
2.9091
1.0900
0.7760
0.6838
0.6705
N=9
7.7681
2.9103
1.0903
0.7761
0.6839
0.6705
N=29
7.7661
2.9091
1.0900
0.7760
0.6838
0.6705
s i n a * sin/3y.
. ,NrvH amn'
Higher-order theory
. KX . Try
Q(x,y)- = 9 o s l n s m
F i r s t - o r d e r theory
(25)
a/b = 1 , a/h = 10
16<7o
Qn
(26)
Numerical Results
Here we present numerical results for a couple of symmetric
cross-ply plate problems, and discuss the improvement in the
prediction of displacements and stresses by the present theory.
The three-dimensional elasticity solutions of Pagano [16] and
Pagano and Hatfield [17] for simply supported rectangular
plates under sinusoidal loading are used to assess the improvement. The following four laminated plate problems are
considered:
I I cr
VE2
Fig. 3 The effect of material anisotropy on the nondimensionalized
center deflection of a four-layer [0/90/90/0 deg] square plate under
sinusoidal load
+ (3^)
[ 3 / / + a ^ ( / / , 2 +2// 6 6 )]
/ 4 \
j^[a m2+2F66)
+ pF21]
(jh )
[ci2 H
^ n+2H66)
+ pH22]
+02F +
+D66 - ^{Fu
(3^2) 2
F55
(2Hu+pH66)
+F66)+ ( A ) * (Hn
+H66)]
(e 5 ) a
- ^ 2 ( 2 F 6 6 + ?F22) + ( ~ )
(27)
-w \
2J
sdz
ro-S)*M-s-*')
DECEMBER 1984, Vol. 51 / 751
(-s-*->]
/ dw
+
\
+i4
/ dw
+
(28)
*i*2=4 *2=4-
(29)
(ax,x + xy,y)dZ
(30)
From the results in Tables 1-4, one can conclude that the
present theory, in general, gives more accurate results than the
first-order shear deformation theory when compared to the
three-dimensional elasticity solution. Although an adjustment
of the shear correction factors seem to improve the results
obtained by FSDT (see Table 1), too low a value of kx and k2
overpredicts the solution. In Problems 2-4, a value of 5/6 is
used in obtaining the FSDT results. The present theory also
gives, relatively speaking, faster convergent solution when
compared to the FSDT theory, as can be seen from Table 4.
The results for uniform loading should serve as reference for
finite-element analyses.
Acknowledgment
The research reported in this paper was conducted under a
research grant from NASA-Langley Research Center under
Grant NG-1-459. The author is grateful to Dr. Norman
Knight, Jr. for the support. Also, it is a pleasure to
acknowledge the typing of this manuscript by Mrs. Vanessa
McCoy.
References
1 Bolle, L., "Contribution an Probleme Lineare de Flexion d'une Plaque
Elastique,"Bu//. Technique de la Suisse Romade, Parts 1 and 2, Vol. 73, 1947,
pp. 281-285; 293-298.
2 Hildebrand, F. B., Reissner, E., and Thomas, G. B., "Note on the
Foundations of the Theory of Small Displacements of Orthotropic Shells,"
IVACA Technical Note No. 1833, Mar. 1949.
3 Hencky, H., "Ober die Berucksichtgung der Schubverzerrungen in
ebenen Platten," Ing.-Arch., Vol. 16,1947.
4 Mindlin, R. D., "Influence of Rotary Inertia and Shear on Flexural
Motions of Isotropic, Elastic Plates," ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS,
Vol. 18, 1951.
5 Librescu, L., Elastostatics
and Kinetics of Anisotropic
and
Heterogeneous Shell-Type Structures, Noordhoff, Leyden, GDR, 1975.
6 Whitney, J. M., and Pagano, N. J., "Shear Deformation in
Heterogeneous Anisotropic Plates," ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS,
Vol. 37, Dec. 1970, pp. 1031-1036.
7 Whitney, J. M., and Sun, C. T., " A Higher Order Theory for Extensional Motion of Laminated Composites," J. Sound and Vibration, Vol. 30,
Sept. 1973, pp. 85-97.
8 Lo, K. H., Christensen, R. M., and Wu, E. M., " A Higher-Order Theory
of Plate Deformation, Part 2: Laminated Plates," ASME JOURNAL OF APPLIED
MECHANICS, Vol. 44, 1977, pp. 669-676.
9 Green, A. E., and Naghdi, P. M., "A Theory of Laminated Composite
Plates," IMA J. Appl. Mathematics, Vol. 29,1982, p. 1.
10 Rehfield, L. W., and Valisetty, R. R., "A Comprehensive Theory for
Planar Bending of Composite Laminates," Computers Structures, Vol. 16,
1983, p.441.
11 Pagano, N. J., and Soni, S. R., "Global-Local Laminate Variational
Model," Int. J. Solids & Struct., Vol. 19, 1983, p. 207.
12 Bert, C. W., Private Communication, June 1983.
13 Levinson, M., "An Accurate Simple Theory of the Statics and Dynamics
of Elastic Plates," Mechanics Research Communications, Vol. 7, 1980, pp.
343-350.
14 Murthy, M. V. V., "An Improved Transverse Shear Deformation Theory
for Laminated Anisotropic Plates," NASA Technical Paper 1903, Nov. 1981.
15 Reddy, J. N., Energy and Variational Methods in Applied Mechanics,
Wiley, New York, 1984.
16 Pagano, N. J., "Exact Solutions for Rectangular Bidirectional Composites and Sandwich Plates," / . Cotnp. Materials, Vol. 4, January 1970, pp.
20-34.
17 Pagano, N. J., and Hatfield, S. J., "Elastic Behavior of Multilayered
Bidirectional Composites," AIAA Journal, Vol. 10, July 1972, pp. 931-933.
18 Reddy, J. N., and Chao, W. C , "A Comparison of Closed-Form and
Finite-Element Solutions of Thick, Laminated, Anisotropic Rectangular Plates,
Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 64, 1981, pp. 153-167.
19 Phan, N. D., and Reddy, J. N., "Analysis of Laminated Composite
Plates Using a Higher-Order Shear Deformation Theory," in review.