Professional Documents
Culture Documents
93
ABRASIVE W E A R O F I O N - P L A T E D T I T A N I U M N I T R I D E C O A T I N G S
O N P L A S M A - N I T R I D E D STEEL S U R F A C E S *
E. H. SIRVIO AND M. SULONEN
Laboratory of Metal Formmg and Heat Treatment, Helsmkt Umverstty of Technology, Vuorzmlehentte
2 A, 02120 Espoo 12 (Finland)
H. SUNDQUIST
Metals Laboratory, Technical Research Centre of Fmland, Revontulentle 7, 02100 Espoo 10 (Fmland)
(Received March 9, 1982, accepted Aprd 5, 1982)
1. INTRODUCTION
H a r d titanium nitride coatings have recently been used successfully as wearresistant coatings for metal cuttmg and forming tools. The development of plasmaenhanced deposition processes has made It possible to deposit titanium nitride onto
tool steels using low deposition temperatures 1'2. In metal cutting m a n y work
materials contain particles of phases which have a much higher hardness than that of
the workplece as a whole. M a n y of these secondary particles are harder than the
matrix m high speed tools and retain their hardness to higher temperatures. Such
matermls in the work material may cause abrasion, especially on steel tools, under
conditions of seizure as well as under sliding conditions, and m most published
papers on cutting tool wear the majority of flank wear, in particular, is attributed to
abrasion 3.
* Paper presented at the Internatmnal Conference on Metallurgical Coatings and Process Technology,
San Diego, CA, U S A,, Aprd 5-8, 1982
0040-6090/82/0000-0000/$02.75
94
Ti
NITRIDE COATINGS
95
to study the effect of the initial surface roughness on the abrasive wear of thin
coatings. Also a series of spectmens were prepared to study the effect of subsurface
hardening, by using plasma nitridlng as a pretreatment.
The reported hardnesses of the quartz sand used in the sand-wheel tests varies
between 800 and 1200 HV, and the hardness of ion-plated titanium nitride coatings
between 2000 and 3000 HV. Hence the ratio of the hardness of the wear surface to
that of the abrasive varies from 1.7 to 3.5, and a very low wear rate is to be expected
as long as the base material is not exposed.
3.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
F~g 1 Scanning electron mJcrograph of an Ion-plated t~tanlum intrude coating on hardened tool steel
(speclrnen 1 3)
96
Fig. 2 Optical mlcrograph of a plasma-nltrlded and tltanlum-nltrlde-coated tool steel surface (Nltal
etched, specimen 3 5)
The test specimens were made of AISI D3 tool steel in a hardened and tempered
(450 C) condition. Three different surface roughnesses were machined for each
case. The R a values of the surface roughnesses used varied from 0.06 to 11.6 gm The
properties of the specimens and the wear test results are given in Table I.
3.2. Wear tests
Specimen
number
Treatment
Bulk
hardness
(HRC 150)
Surface
roughness
Ra (~tm)
Wear
(mg)
Relative
wear
11
12
13
21
22
23
31
32
33
34
35
36
Coated
54
57
58
53
55
54
57
57
56
54
58
58
95
11
0 06
95
!.3
0 06
11 6
35
14
14
007
0 07
31
8
6
121
97
107
62
37
34
32
24
31
0 23
0 06
0 04
0 90
0 72
0 79
0 46
0 27
0 25
0 24
0 18
0 23
Reference
samples
Uncoated
135
Plasma
nltnded
Coated and
nltrlded
56 58
0 1-12
97
HOPPER
QUA R]Z SAND
WEIONTS
RUBBER LINED WHEEL
Fig 3 Schematic view of the set-up used for the dry sand-rubber wheel wear test
300 g m m - 1) a b r a d e s the test surface. The specimens were weighed before a n d after
the test, a n d the loss m mass was recorded.
T h e tests were m a d e a c c o r d i n g to an A S T M s t a n d a r d 8 with s o m e modific a t i o n s The d~fferences from s t a n d a r d p r o c e d u r e s were as follows (the values of the
c o r r e s p o n d i n g s t a n d a r d test p a r a m e t e r s are in brackets). The d i a m e t e r of the r u b b e r
wheel was 185 m m (228.6 ram) a n d the n u m b e r of r e v o l u t i o n s used in each test was
420 (100). This gives a sliding distance of 244 m (71 8 m).
T h e force on the specimen was the same as that specified in the s t a n d a r d , i.e.
130 N. T h e size of the q u a r t z s a n d particles used varied, m a i n l y (80%) between sieve
sizes 50 a n d 150 c o r r e s p o n d i n g to d i a m e t e r s from 300 to 100 I~m
4 RESULTS
la)
(b)
~c)
Fig 4 W e a r tracks on the tested htanium-mtrlde-coated specimens (a) 1 1, (b) 1 2 and (c) 1 3
98
Fig 5 Scanning electron mlcrograph of the wear surface of specimen 11 Coating Is still present at the
sites of the valleys of the m~nal surface
can be seen, coating 1.3 has hardly been worn through, and coating 1.2 has worn
through on the tops of the highest aspentles. Coating 1.1 has been worn through on
the tops of the asperities in a large area of the wear track. In spite of th~s all the valleys
of the m~tlal surface retain the coating, as can also be seen m Fig. 5 which is of the
same surface.
The new surface profile obtained as a result of abrasive wear is a mirror ~mage of
the original, as the initial valleys have changed to hps of new asperities with hard
coating on the top. On the s~te of an ininal t~p there ~s now a valley.
The wear of the test specimens and their relanve wear compared with that of
untreated specimens is presented in Table I. The wear of coated samples was
between 4% and 23% of that of the untreated specimens
The total wear increased considerably when the surface roughness R, was
increased from 1 to 10 lam. This is expected according to the wear mechanism of
hard coatings proposed earher When the surface roughness ~s 10 gin, the thickness
of the coating (6 gm) is exceeded and the wear rate is h~gh where the base material is
revealed. In this specimen most of the wear (31 rag) is wear of tool steel beneath the
initial asperities When the surface roughness is less than the film thickness, wear ~s
more moderate, and it seems that even with these low roughnesses a coating on a
smoother surface gives better wear protection.
Tt
NITRIDE COATINGS
99
4.3
(a)
(b)
Fag 6 Scanning electron mlcrographs of Vlckers lndentataons m the surface of specimens (a) 1 3 and
(b) 3 5
~ x l - - " "
05
LU
~00S
Q::
001
01
_ _ _ _ ~ L ~
05
1
5
SURFACE ROUGHNESS, Ra, lam
10
Fag 7 Relattve wear of the tested specimens as a function of the initial surface roughness x, plasma
mtrlded, C), tltamum mtrlde coated, 0, both treatments The wear is compared with that of untreated
AISI D3 steel m a hardened condmon
100
When all the results of this study are plotted in a graph (Fig 7) it can be seen
that the increase in wear of the tltanlum-nltrlde-coated samples takes place at lower
surface roughnesses than when the base material has been plasma nltrlded.
Consequently, it is suggested that, if the specimens were cooled after the plasma
nltndlng process and before coating, the wear resistance of the coating could be
further improved, particularly if the surface roughness were of the same order of
magnitude as the coating thickness.
5
CONCLUDING REMARKS
The abrasive wear of hard thin coatings is clearly dependent on the Initial
surface roughness if the coating is substantially harder than the abrasive grit The
wear of titanium nltrlde coatings on surfaces with a roughness of the same order of
magnitude as the coating thickness can be improved by subsurface hardening of the
base material, if the coating structure and adhesion are the same
Abrasive wear of hard coatings on softer substrates takes place according to the
suggested wear mechanism. Wear starts with the formation of a crater of exposed
base material. The growth in the area of the crater proceeds by fractures of the
coating at the ridges, and the growth in its depth by conventional abrasive wear
This is seen m Fig. 8, where a scratch by an abrasive particle extends to the ridge of
the crater causing fractures at impact However, no wear groove has formed on the
coating under the track of this abraswe particle beyond the crater edge, and no
ploughing or mlcrocuttlng abraswe wear has taken place
Fig 8 Track of abrading asperity on exposed base material The particle has impinged on the edge of the
wear crater, ~e the coating, causmg fractures and deformalton
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Ti
NITRIDE COATINGS
101
REFERENCES
M a t t h e w s a n d D G Teer, ThmSohdFtlms, 72(1980) 541-549
K Sun, R R Nlrnmagaddaand R F Bunshah, ThznSohdFtlms, 64(1979)191-203
M Trent, Treatise Mater Sct Technol, 13 (1979) 443-489
Buhl, H K P u l k e r a n d E Moll, ThmSohdFdm~,80(1981)265-270
R Nlmmagadda, H J Doerrand R R Bunshah, Thm SohdFtlms, 84 (1981) 303-306
Sundqmst, E H. Slrvlo and M Kurkmen, Proc Conf on lon-asststed Surface Treatments-
1
2
3
4
5
6
A
A
E
R
R
H
K -H Zum Gahr, Wear of Matertals 1981, American Society of Mechamcal Engineers, New York,
1981,pp 396 405
A S T M Stand G65-80, 1980
A S Korhonen and E H Slrvlo, Proc Int. Conf on Metallurgtcal Coatmgs and Process Technology,
San Dtego, 1982, in Thin Solid Ftlms, 96 (1982) 103
8
9