Professional Documents
Culture Documents
approach
of skeletal open bite
Rolf Frllnkel
Zwichau,
and Christine
German
Democratic
to treatment
Frlnkel
Republic
In general
orthopedics
the relationship
between
postural
behavior
and skeletal
deformities
has long been
recognized.
The primary
therapeutic
problem
in functional
orthopedics
is to overcome
functional
disorders.
In this
article the applicability
of this functional
concept
to orofacial
orthopedics
is discussed
on the basis of a
longitudinal
study of skeletal
open bite. A comparison
of a series of lateral cephalograms
of thirty patients
with
skeletal
open bite who were treated with functional
regulators
developed
by Frankel
and those of eleven
untreated
open bite cases suggests
that some dentofacial
deformities
in the skeletal
open bite cases can be
corrected
to the average
norms.
In addition,
as a result of overcoming
the poor postural
pattern
of the orofacial
musculature
and re-establishment
of a competent
lip seal, a considerable
change
in the soft-tissue
profile
occurred.
Key words:
keletal open bite is produced by a combination of dental and skeletal irregularities, the latter of
which is the more dominant. The facial morphology of
this dysplasia is characterized primarily by striking
vertical disproportions caused by abnormal ratios between anterior and posterior facial heights (AFH/PFH)
and between upper and lower anterior facial heights
(UFH/LFH). A short ramus and an increased gonial
angle also contribute to the hyperdivergent skeletal pattern. As there is normal biologic variation, so each
dentofacial malformation has its own characteristics
and uniqueness. Therefore, the type of skeletal open
bite must be defined by various additional parameters.
The skeletal pattern of such a severe dysplasia as
skeletal open bite is difficult to change by means of
conventional orthodontic appliances. Some clinicians
have warned against any orthodontic treatment and,
instead, recommend corrective measures such as surgical and prosthetic intervention. It is not surprising,
therefore, that the hyperdivergent pattern of this dysplasia is assumed to be primarily the expression of inherited vertical proportions. This view is substantiated
by the results of Hunters investigations which support
the hypothesis that vertical dimensions of the craniofacial skeleton are more genetically controlled than are
anteroposterior dimensions. However, as claimed by
Dullemeijer, all structures are genetically and environmentally influenced. In view of the character of
This study is part of an investigation entltled Functional Aspects of Skeletal
Open Bite submitted by Christine Frlnkel in fulfillment of the requirements
for the doctoral degree at the University of Jena, German Democratic Republic.
54
It was Edward Angle,4 the founder of modem orthodontics. who emphasized the morphogenetic relevance
approach
55
Volume 84
Number I
Functional
I. Average changes between the initial and final cephalometric measurements in the nontreated group
N (n = 11) and the treated group T (n = 30) and a comparison of the differences by analysis of variance
and by the paired t test and Fisher-Behrens test
Table
7 ,ziLgfor------Angles
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
(degrees)
SN-MP
SN-PP
PP-MP
Go
z
6. AFH-PFH
quotient (Jarabak)
7. Ratio UFH-LFH
(Nahoum)
Significance:
**p < 0.01 (t value 2.70).
***p < 0.001 (t value 3.56).
Fisher-Behrens
test f = 11.2633.
t 0.05:
+ 2.32
-0.36
+ 2.68
+0.23
+2.68
-5.47
+2.30
-1.42
-6.37
-5.12
-0.32
-0.018
+5.40
+0.053
D$erences
1.19
2.66
10.10
6.60
8.40
5.72
0.071
F value
I per&
Signijicuncx~
2.92
2.09
1.54
1.35
3.70
3.54
5.24
3.95
5.54
7-.- 4
**
***
***
***
**
2.72
I .09
6.96
4.67
***
***
11 = 2.20.
Functional
Volume 84
Number 1
Table
Angles
{degrees)
SN-MP
SN-PP
PP-MP
Go
B (Jarabak)
Quotient
(Jarabak)
to treatment
AF
Case A
Case B
Case C
45.0
4.0
41.0
129.0
405.0
43.5
6.0
37.5
134.5
403.0
44.5
4.0
40.5
132.5
404.0
56.5%
56.0%
56.0%
AND METHODS
i:;:;I;I
II1I
11
of skeletal
approach
AFH
open
bite
57
/ PFH
!i
II !i
IIII
**
IIII
!I!I
II II
II li
iI
I
I
Ii
I
i
I
I l
I I
GO
I
I i
J.
--abe
----Case
.-.--case
B
c
Me
56%
Jarabak
56%
56.5 %
- Quotient
58
Friinkel
and Friinkel
AFH
/ PFH
II
II
I l
II
Ii
ii
i
53. ! . 63%
63.5%
Jarsbak
- Quotient
Fig. 2. The polygons
and the ratios
AFH/PFH
of untreated
Case A and treated
cases
B and C exhibit
a marked
developmental
difference
in skeletal
pattern.
The quotient
(Jarabak)
expressing
the ratio AFH/PFH
worsened
in Case A in the observation
period of 6 years 6 months,
while it was in a normal
range (norm = 62 percent)
in the final cephalograms
of Case B
8 years
2 months
out of retention
and of Case C 4 years
1
month out of retention,
demonstrating
stability
of the treatment
results.
Fig. 3. The
observation
polygons
(see solid
of untreated
lines in Figs.
Case A before
1 and 2).
and
after
volume 84
Number 1
Functional
approach
UFH I LFH
UFH I LFH
-\
.i
59
Z (Jarabak)
Quotient
(Jarabak)
Case
A
Case
B
Case
c
52.0
3.5
48.5
130.5
412.5
36.0
8.0
28.0
130.0
395.5
38.0
8.0
30.0
121.0
398.0
53.5%
63.5%
63.5%
The average time interval between the first and last radiographs
measured was 8 years 0 months in the nontreated group N and 7 years 11
months in the treated sample T.
B indicates the total sum of the angles between S-N, S-Ar, Ar-Go,
and Go-Me.
60
Friinkrl
and
Friinkel
OS
O!
mm---
.--m--SN
.--e.-------PP
\
1
PP
----w-w-
+4
(W-+95)
MP
\
\
palatal plane, and the mandibular plane with the vertical coordinate of the occipital reference cross are used
for cephalometric analysis and statistical evaluation of
the differences between the two groups (Figs. 6 to 8).
With reference to the angles formed by the sella-nasion
line, the palatal plane, and the mandibular plane with
the vertical coordinate (that is, the true vertical as determined by the first registration of the natural head
posture being transferred to the subsequent radiographs), there is no marked difference between untreated Case A and Case B. By comparison, in Case C
the inclination of sella nasion and particularly of the
palatal plane was initially quite different. The upward
canting of the palatal plane suggests that in Case C the
vertical disproportions are also manifested in the middle face. Our investigations using the occipital reference system confirm the statements of Nahoum and
co-workerszl that, in a cephalometric appraisal of the
hyperdivergent pattern, the contribution of the palatal
plane to the ratio of upper facial height to lower facial
height must be emphasized. Its position and inclination
provide valuable information on the nature of the differential growth in the middle and lower face, respectively . Nahoum and co-workerG found that the distance
from the first maxillary molar to the palatal plane was
not significantly different from that of the normal subjects. This contradicts the findings of others who reported excess eruption of maxillary posterior teeth.
Functional
Volume 84
Number I
OS
approach
61
+0,5
de
(76,5+77)
Fig. 8. Angular
changes
of treated
Case C showing
that PP
dropped
anteriorly
more than in Case 6 (Fig. 7). In contrast,
a
slight upward
canting
of PP occurred
in untreated
Case A.
Fig. 9. Tracings
of the first and last radiographs
sponding
polygons
of Case A (see text).
62
Friinkel
and Friinkrl
the lateral
horizontal.
radiographs
of Case
A su-
Volume 84
Number 1
Functional
from
on Frankfort
the lateral
horizontal.
radiographs
of Case
approach
63
B su-
64
Friinkel
und
Friinkcl
the lower anterior face height (LFH) was a phenomenon regularly observed in all cases of skeletal
open bite when, after treatment with FRs, a competent
oral seal was established. This is also due to cases of
severe skeletal open bite where molars had been extracted.
Wessberg and associates,28 on the basis of their
clinical experience, proposed application of a functional approach. They suggested that an occlusal
programming feedback mechanism within the central
nervous system mediates the compensatory autorotation of the mandible following surgical superior repositioning of the maxilla. We agree to the suggestion that
the significance of vertical dentoalveolar growth on the
pattern of mandibular rotation may be appraised only
by a functional analysis (that is, by incorporation of the
musculature suspending the mandible). Therefore, the
possible influence of vertical molar positions on the
pattern of mandibular rotation should not be interpreted
as a wedge effect separating the developing vertical
relations between the jaws. Rather, occlusal contacts
may be regarded a factor programming the neuromuscular system determining the mandibular rest position.
Thus, the erupting tooth as an occlusal programming
factor may influence the postural performance pattern
of the suspending musculature. Conversely, the
postural behavior of the musculature determining the
mandibular position may, as a result of feedback,
influence the positional changes of the erupting teeth as
well.
In the study by Frost and co-worker? the longterm postoperative linear measurements exhibited an
average decrease in the sella-gonion distance from 76.1
to 75.2 mm. and in the posterior nasal spine-gonion
distance from 40.1 to 39.1 mm., which means a decrease in ramus length. It seems reasonable to assume
that, after molar extraction, there would be skeletal
changes similar to those observed following maxillary
surgery, that is, a relative decrease in the lower anterior
face height with the ramus length unchanged. Theoretically, the mandibular autorotation following either
maxillary surgery or molar extractions does not necessarily require compensatory growth at the condyle.
In attempting to interpret the increase in ramus
length as a result of the treatment with the function
regulator, the possible effect of the buccal shields
should be taken into consideration (Fig. 13). Provided
that the working models were correctly trimmed, the
posterior edges of the buccal shields are deeply positioned in the sulci and provoke pressure sensation in
this area. On could argue that, with insertion of the
function regulator, the factor of occlusal programming is replaced by a factor of soft-tissue pro-
Am. J. Orthocf.
Julx 19X:\
Volume 84
Number 1
66
Friinkel
and Friinkal
Volume 84
1
Functional
Number
SUMMARY
for
We wish
his great
approach
67
to express
our thanks to Dr. James A McNamara
help in preparing
this article
in English.
REFERENCES
1. Hunter, W. S.: A study of the inheritance
of craniofacial
characteristics as seen in lateral cephalograms
of 72 like-sexed
twins,
Trans. Eur. Orthod.
Sot., pp. 59-70, 1965.
2. Dullemeijer,
P.: Concepts
and approaches
in animal morphology, B. V., Assen, The Netherlands,
1974, Van Gorcum &
co.
3. Poulton,
D. R.: Surgical-orthodontic
correction
of mandibular
deformity,
paper presented at the Third International
Conference
for Orthodontists,
Munich,
1977.
4. Angle, E. H.: Malocclusion
of the teeth, ed. 7, Philadelphia,
1907, S. S. White Dental Mfg. Co.
Straub,
W. J.: Malfunction
of the tongue.
Part I, AM. J.
ORTHOD. 46:404-424,
1960.
Straub, W. J.: Malfunctions
of the tongue. Part II, AM. J.
ORTHOD. 47:596-617,
1961.
Straub, W. J.: Malfunctions
of the tongue. Part III, AM. J.
ORTHOD. 4&486-503,
1962.
Ballard, C. F.: Variations
of posture and behavior of the lips and
tongue which determine the position of the labial segments: The
implications
in orthodontics,
prosthetics
and speech, Trans. Eur.
Orthod. Sot., pp. 67-93, 1965.
9. Frankel,
R.: The theoretical
concept
underlying
the treatment
with functional
correctors,
Trans. Eur. Orthod.
Sot. 42:233254, 1966.
10. Frinkel,
R.: Funktionskieferorthopadie
und der Mundvorhof
als Apparative
Basis, Berlin,
1967, VEB Verlag Volk und
Gesundheit
R.: The practical
meaning of the functional
matrix in
11. Frankel,
orthodontics,
Trans. Eur. Orthod.
Sot. 45207-219,
1969.
66
Friinkel
Am. J. Qrthod.
Julv 1983
und Friinkel
24.
J. ORTHOD.
65:565-585,
1974.
28. Wessberg,
G. A., Washburn,
M. C., LaBanc, J. P., and Epker,
B, N.: Autorotation
of the mandible: Effect of surgical superior
repositioning
of the maxilla on mandibular
resting posture. AM.
J. ORTHOD.
81:465-471.
1982.
78~657-669,
1980.
31. Hixon,
E., and Klein, P.: Simplified
mechanics:
A means
treatment
based on available
scientific
information,
AM.
ORTHOD.
62:113-141,
of
J.
1972.
32. Friinkel,
R.: Lip seal training in treatment of open bite, Eur. J.
Orthod.
2:219-228,
1980.
33. Moyers,
R. E.: Handbook
of Jrthodontics,
ed. 3, Chicago,
1973, Yearbook
Medical Publishers,
Inc.
34. Gershater,
M. M.: The psychological
dimension
in orthodontic
diagnosis
and treatment,
AM. J. ORTHOD. 54:327-338,
1968.
35. Gershater,
M. M.: The proper perspective
of open bite, Angle
Orthod. 42:263-272.
1972.
Reprint requests to:
Dr. Rolf Frinkel
Ulmenweg
42
95 Zwichau,
German
Democratic
Republic