Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Informed Consent, The Right To Choose or REFUSE, & Silencing The Debate

    Uploaded by

    Occupy Prohibition
    95 views4 pages
    *Informed Consent, The Right to Choose or REFUSE, & Silencing the debate #FirstDoNoHarm Informed Consent: An Ethical Obligation or Legal Compulsion? http://goo.gl/dara2r Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php­URL_ID=31058&URL_DO= DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html First They Came for the Anti­Vaxxers https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/04/bretigne­shaffer/first­they­came­for­the­anti­ vaxxers/ Tag Photo Like Comment The Nuremberg Code (1947) http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ­ *The Nuremberg Code The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over­reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an apriori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181­182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949. ­ The Ethics of Vaccines and the Nuremburg Trials for Crimes Against Humanity http://www.collective­evolution.com/2014/09/12/the­ugly­tr

    Original Title

    Informed Consent, The Right to Choose or REFUSE, & Silencing the Debate

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    *Informed Consent, The Right to Choose or REFUSE, & Silencing the debate #FirstDoNoHarm Informed Consent: An Ethical Obligation or Legal Compulsion? http://goo.gl/dara2r Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php­URL_ID=31058&URL_DO= DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html First They Came for the Anti­Vaxxers https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/04/bretigne­shaffer/first­they­came­for­the­anti­ vaxxers/ Tag Photo Like Comment The Nuremberg Code (1947) http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ­ *The Nuremberg Code The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over­reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an apriori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181­182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949. ­ The Ethics of Vaccines and the Nuremburg Trials for Crimes Against Humanity http://www.collective­evolution.com/2014/09/12/the­ugly­tr

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    95 views4 pages

    Informed Consent, The Right To Choose or REFUSE, & Silencing The Debate

    Uploaded by

    Occupy Prohibition
    *Informed Consent, The Right to Choose or REFUSE, & Silencing the debate #FirstDoNoHarm Informed Consent: An Ethical Obligation or Legal Compulsion? http://goo.gl/dara2r Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php­URL_ID=31058&URL_DO= DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html First They Came for the Anti­Vaxxers https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/04/bretigne­shaffer/first­they­came­for­the­anti­ vaxxers/ Tag Photo Like Comment The Nuremberg Code (1947) http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/ ­ *The Nuremberg Code The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over­reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that, before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject, there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person, which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury. No experiment should be conducted, where there is an apriori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment. During the course of the experiment, the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end, if he has reached the physical or mental state, where continuation of the experiment seemed to him to be impossible. During the course of the experiment, the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgement required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject. "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10", Vol. 2, pp. 181­182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949. ­ The Ethics of Vaccines and the Nuremburg Trials for Crimes Against Humanity http://www.collective­evolution.com/2014/09/12/the­ugly­tr

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 4

    Like

    Comment
    OccupyProhibition
    *InformedConsent,TheRighttoChooseorREFUSE,&Silencingthedebate
    #FirstDoNoHarm
    InformedConsent:AnEthicalObligationorLegalCompulsion?http://goo.gl/dara2r
    UniversalDeclarationonBioethicsandHumanRights
    http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.phpURL_ID=31058&URL_DO=
    DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
    FirstTheyCamefortheAntiVaxxers
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2015/04/bretigneshaffer/firsttheycamefortheanti
    vaxxers/

    TagPhoto

    TheNurembergCode(1947)
    http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/

    *TheNurembergCode
    Thevoluntaryconsentofthehumansubjectisabsolutelyessential.
    Thismeansthatthepersoninvolvedshouldhavelegalcapacitytogiveconsentshould
    besosituatedastobeabletoexercisefreepowerofchoice,withouttheinterventionof
    anyelementofforce,fraud,deceit,duress,overreaching,orotherulteriorformof
    constraintorcoercionandshouldhavesufficientknowledgeandcomprehensionofthe
    elementsofthesubjectmatterinvolved,astoenablehimtomakeanunderstandingand
    enlighteneddecision.Thislatterelementrequiresthat,beforetheacceptanceofan
    affirmativedecisionbytheexperimentalsubject,thereshouldbemadeknowntohimthe
    nature,duration,andpurposeoftheexperimentthemethodandmeansbywhichitisto
    beconductedallinconveniencesandhazardsreasonablytobeexpectedandthe
    effectsuponhishealthorperson,whichmaypossiblycomefromhisparticipationinthe
    experiment.
    Thedutyandresponsibilityforascertainingthequalityoftheconsentrestsuponeach
    individualwhoinitiates,directsorengagesintheexperiment.Itisapersonaldutyand
    responsibilitywhichmaynotbedelegatedtoanotherwithimpunity.
    Theexperimentshouldbesuchastoyieldfruitfulresultsforthegoodofsociety,
    unprocurablebyothermethodsormeansofstudy,andnotrandomandunnecessaryin
    nature.
    Theexperimentshouldbesodesignedandbasedontheresultsofanimal
    experimentationandaknowledgeofthenaturalhistoryofthediseaseorotherproblem
    understudy,thattheanticipatedresultswilljustifytheperformanceoftheexperiment.
    Theexperimentshouldbesoconductedastoavoidallunnecessaryphysicaland
    mentalsufferingandinjury.
    Noexperimentshouldbeconducted,wherethereisanapriorireasontobelievethat
    deathordisablinginjurywilloccurexcept,perhaps,inthoseexperimentswherethe
    experimentalphysiciansalsoserveassubjects.
    Thedegreeofrisktobetakenshouldneverexceedthatdeterminedbythehumanitarian
    importanceoftheproblemtobesolvedbytheexperiment.
    Properpreparationsshouldbemadeandadequatefacilitiesprovidedtoprotectthe
    experimentalsubjectagainstevenremotepossibilitiesofinjury,disability,ordeath.
    Theexperimentshouldbeconductedonlybyscientificallyqualifiedpersons.The
    highestdegreeofskillandcareshouldberequiredthroughallstagesoftheexperiment
    ofthosewhoconductorengageintheexperiment.
    Duringthecourseoftheexperiment,thehumansubjectshouldbeatlibertytobringthe
    experimenttoanend,ifhehasreachedthephysicalormentalstate,wherecontinuation
    oftheexperimentseemedtohimtobeimpossible.
    Duringthecourseoftheexperiment,thescientistinchargemustbepreparedto
    terminatetheexperimentatanystage,ifhehasprobablecausetobelieve,inthe
    exerciseofthegoodfaith,superiorskillandcarefuljudgementrequiredofhim,thata
    continuationoftheexperimentislikelytoresultininjury,disability,ordeathtothe
    experimentalsubject.

    "TrialsofWarCriminalsbeforetheNurembergMilitaryTribunalsunderControlCouncil
    LawNo.10",Vol.2,pp.181182.Washington,D.C.:U.S.GovernmentPrintingOffice,
    1949.

    TheEthicsofVaccinesandtheNuremburgTrialsforCrimesAgainstHumanity
    http://www.collectiveevolution.com/2014/09/12/theuglytruthaboutvaccinesiscoming
    tolightinnewdevelopments/

    RICO
    http://goo.gl/a9LbQQ
    DemandDoctorsSign:
    Physician'sWarrantyofVaccineSafety
    http://goo.gl/pLcaiu
    Vaccinations:ParentsInformedChoice
    http://www.westonaprice.org/healthtopics/vaccinationsparentsinformedchoice/
    VaccinesAreTheySafe?AreYouMakingAnInformedDecisionRegardingYour
    Child'sHealth?
    http://goo.gl/K6W0ir
    Circumcision:AreYouFullyInformed?
    http://goo.gl/7YPoh1
    Doctorshaveadutytofirst,donoharmaswellastorespecttherights&personal
    boundariesdictatedbyinformedconsent.Ifthatisviolated,thenitisbattery.
    Subjectingpeopletoriskyproceduresas"preventativemeasures"violatestheoathto
    firstdonoharm,&ifdonesowithouttheirinformedconsent,it'scriminal.
    Anysortofattemptsatjustifyingthatisa#rapeapologistmentalitythatisincreasingly
    beingpushedviamedicalrapeculture...
    Silencing"TheDebate"
    http://goo.gl/t1fL0Q
    Freedom,bodilyintegrity,&informedconsent.
    Thereisnodebate.
    There'sthesidethathasalwayslied,underminedinformedconsent&pushed
    dangerous,lucrativeracketspoisoning,butchering,&misleadingthepopulacefor
    generations.
    Thenthere'sthesidethatarguesnoonehastherighttoviolatetheirbodilyintegrity,to
    force"treatments",poisons,modifications,orprocedureswithouttheirexpressconsent.
    StanfordEncyclopediaofPhilosophy
    Bioethics:InformedConsent
    http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/informedconsent/
    Youdoknowviolatinginformedconsentiskindof...#Rapey,right?
    Vaccines:MedicalRapeorPersonalChoice?
    https://youtu.be/IKee_P1uyvY

    Feelingviolatedaboutvaccines?
    http://vaxtruth.org/2014/09/coercedvaccinationandthemedicalrapist/
    AreyoubeingHarassed?
    http://vaccineinfo.net/harassment/index.shtml
    AmericanAcademyofPediatricsisnotyourFriend
    http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/americanacademypediatricsfriend/
    AMALettertoDocsAboutRefusaltoVaccinatefromtheAMA
    http://www2.aap.org/immunization/pediatricians/pdf/refusaltovaccinate.pdf
    Howtoreportadoctorforbadorunethicaltreatment
    http://www.ehow.com/how_5106471_reportbaddoctors.html
    *Bullying
    Entirenationalmediacallingondoctorstoviolatefundamentalmedicalethicsinpush
    forvaccines
    http://www.naturalnews.com/048591_mandatory_vaccinatio
    ns_medical_ethics_mainstream_media.html
    30TacticsHealthOfficialsUse
    http://www.fhfn.org/exposed30tacticshealthofficialsusetogetinnocentparentsto
    vaccinatetheirchildren/
    5PowerfulPsychologicalTriggers
    http://vactruth.com/2012/12/18/5powerfulpsychologicaltriggers/
    WhattoExpectfromyourDoctorWhenYourefuseVaccines
    http://vactruth.com/2015/01/22/expectfromdoctor/?utm_source=The+Vaccine+Tru
    th+Newsletter&utm_campaign=05fadfe51501_22_2015_exp
    ectations&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_ce7860ee8305fadfe515408240693
    HowtoResistthePediatriciansTactics
    http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/howtoresistpediatricianpro/
    Questionstoaskyourdocwhenhetriestobullyyou!!!Fantastic
    http://michaelchaddad.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/parentslearntopushback
    forcefullyagainstdoctorswhohavetakenpauloffitsbullying101/
    AFabulousLettertoaSchoolOfficialaboutBullyingteensintogettingVaccinated
    againsttheParentswishes
    http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2014/11/29/vaccinesmedicalignoranceordeceit
    oneparentwhohadenough/
    Verywellwrittenarticleaboutwhatanewmomshouldsayonherwellbabyvisit
    http://journeyboost.com/2014/10/05/whatdoisaytomydoctor/
    #Entitled#Shills#HearThisWell#FirstDoNoHarm
    #PersonalAutonomy#BodilyIntegrity
    #InformedConsent#HealthFreedom#Indoctrinated
    #MedicalRapeCulture#IatrogenicInjury
    #MedicalGaslighting#Violated#Battery#NoMeansNo
    LikeCommentShareEditJanuary16Edited

    OccupyProhibition

    You might also like