STUDENTS' NAME

(OPTIONAL)

PATSON P.OPIDO

SEX

AGE

Male

33

HIGHEST
EDUCATIONAL
ATTAINMENT

SCHOOL

Ph.D. Candidate
Cabatuan East Central School

NO. OF
YEARS
TEACHING

HOW DID YOU KNOW

THE GDCE (DepEd
Circular, TV/Print/Radio,
Online, Direct Invitation
from NCCA,
Fellow/Former GDCE
Scholar,Others)

recommendation of LGU

Position/Rank

Teaching
Assignme Province and
nt (Year
Region
level)

Teacher 3

KINDERGARTEN
Isabela, Region 02

ADMINISTRATIVE: Please rate the qua

What made you join the

training? ( )Work
Requirement
( )For
Promotion
( )For
Professional Development
( )Others

for promotion

INCLUSIVENESS AND EFFECTIVENESS IN TERMS OF APPLICATI

Comprehensiven
ess of Admission
requirement
details on
distributed
communication
materials
5

Efficiency of the
Application and
Admission
Procedures
5

Organizers strict
enforcement of the
Admission Guidelines
and Requirements
5

se rate the quality of the program. Kindly check the number closest to your re

N TERMS OF APPLICATION AND ADMISSION

Clarity of Program
Orientation
(Including relating
objectives to
activities, house
rules etc.)
5

Conducive
Equal
venuefor
Accessibili
opportunities/Fairness in learning and ty to
accessing the program creativity
hometown Food
4
4
2
2

LOGISTICS

ber closest to your response per item by using the scale below: 5-Excellent 4-V
LOGISTICS

RELEASE OF STIPEND

Facilities/E
quipment
used for
the
training
Materials and
On time
distribute writeshop Availability of
release of
d
sessions accommodation stipend
4
3
1
1

Efficient
procedures of
releasing of
stipend
1

scale below: 5-Excellent 4-Very Good

A.1. Please enumerates issues

you encountered regarding
release of stipend:

too late release

3- Good 2-Needs Improvement

A.2 Please enumerate the

STRENGTHS of the program terms
of Application and Admission and
Logistics:

approchable program coordinators

1-Poor

Needs Improvement

1-Poor

NA Not Applicable

A.3 Please enumerate the WEAKNESS of the

PCEP GDCE in terms of Application and
Admission and Logistics:

A.4. Please give

RECOMMENDATIONS on how to
further improve the program in
terms of Application and
Admission,

no transcript and diploma issued upon graduationissue exit credentials to scholars

ARVIN VILLALON
LOCAL CULTURAL MA

S
tu

d
en

am

LO
N

(o
p
ti

on

ap
p
in
g

V
IL
LA

ra
l

C
u
lt

A
R
V
IN

al
)

S
tu

d
en

am

(o
p
ti

on

al
)

RESO

PATSON P. OPIDO

Availability of
curriculum or
syllabus presented
at the beginning of
the course, with
well-defined course
learning
competencies and
objectives (Please
answer YES or NO)

YES

Availability of
assessment
strategies vis--vis
course target
competencies and
learning
outcomes/objectives
presented at the
beginning of the
course (please
answer YES or NO)

YES

RESOURCE PERSONS/FACULTY CAPACITIES A. Please rate the quality of the

5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Goo

Availability of
reference materials
given to students
(Please answer YES
or NO)

YES

Ability to effectively
orient students on
the target learning
competencies of the
course and its
relationship to
activities (learning
experiences),
assessment
strategies etc.

Ability to effectively
orient students on the
target learning
objectives of the course
and its relationship to
activities (learning
experiences),
assessment strategies
etc.

Knowledge of
subject matter

e the quality of the program. Kindly check the number closest to your response per item by
Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable

Ability to
present
organized
lectures

Ability to use
multidisciplinary/i Ability to address Ability to
nterdisciplinary
questions/clarifica encourage
approaches to
tions
participation
teaching

Use of
instructional
aids

ponse per item by using the scale below:

Rapport with
participants

Pedagogical
innovativeness

A. STRENGTH
OF THE
FACULTY:

B. ISSUES AND
CHALLENGES
ENCOUNTERED:

the Batad
5
experience
culture guru
would have been more productive should it were planned w

A. Please rate t

C.
RECOMMENDATION:

continue inspiring others

Clear course learning

competencies and
learning objectives
(outcomes) clearly
articulated in the
course
curriculum/syllabus

Appropriateness
and sufficiency of
content/topics and
activities to the
course's learning
competencies and
learning objectives

SUBJECT DESIGN AND INSTRUCTIO

A. Please rate the quality of the program. Kindly check the number closest to y
5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement
.

CONTENT

Appropriateness
and Sufficency of
assessment
strategies to course
learning
competencies and
objectives
(outcomes)

Relevance of
Practical
Logical
content/topics to applications of
Spacing of
chronology of
the teachers
the topics to
lectures
topics
needs
teaching career

DESIGN AND INSTRUCTION:

k the number closest to your response per item by using the scale below:
2-Needs Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable
.

METHODOLOGIE

Sufficiency and
Appropriatenes
Coordination
s of reference
Time
Activities/Exercises/
of topics(no
materials given Lectures/D
allocation/cours
Workshops
repetition of
to student vis- iscussion
e duration
(Writeshops)
lessons)
-vis learning
competencies
and objectives

III. PARTICIP
A. Please rate the level of participation of the teac
response per item by using the scale below: 5-E
Improvement

METHODOLOGIES

Exposure/Immersio
n Trips

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATI
ONS (Strength, weakness,
what else were missed out
by the course in terms of
contents, expactations vis-vis outcomes etc.)

CLASS

Perceived
quality of
output
Please specify the
required from
outputs submitted
the
participants

the mapping activity was so practical

Cultural Mapping
on Different
heritage

III. PARTICIPANTS ENGAGEMENT

of participation of the teachers in the training. Kindly check the number closest to your
using the scale below: 5-Excellent
4-Very Good
3- Good
2-Needs
Improvement
1-Poor NA Not Applicable

CLASS PARTICIPATION

Quality of
discussions
initiated by
the
participants

Quality of
participation in
group work

Over-all
engagement
of the
participants

COMMENTS

5 great

Please rate the level

of improvement of
your KNOWLEDGE at
the end of the course Please list down the most significant cognitive
(5-Excellent 4Very Good 3- Good
2-Needs Improvement
1-Poor NA Not
Applicable)

competencies/cognitive learning outcomes you

learned from the course that will help you in
your classroom teaching application.

Identifying local cultural heritage

Please rate the

improvement of your
SKILLS at the end of Please list down the most significant
psychomotor (behavioural/skills)
the course
competencies/ skills learning
(5outcomes you learned from the course
Excellent 4-Very Good that will help you in your classroom
3- Good 2-Needs
teaching application.
Improvement 1-Poor
NA Not Applicable)

process of cultural mapping

Please indicate the most

significant attitudinal/affective
learning competencies (or
attitudinal learning outcomes)
you learned from the course

appreciation on the importance of cultural mapping

LORELIE AGCANAS
Media-based Cul Doc
2

S
tu

d
en

am

(o
p
ti

w
ee
k

C
ou
rs

FA
C
U
LT
Y

on

al
)

S
tu

d
en

am

ee
k

(o
p
ti

on

al
)

RESOURCE PERSONS/FACULTY

PATSON P. OPIDO

Availability of
Availability of
assessment
curriculum or syllabus strategies vis--vis
presented at the
course target
beginning of the
competencies and
course, with welllearning
defined course learning outcomes/objectives
competencies and
presented at the
objectives (Please
beginning of the
answer YES or NO)
course (please
answer YES or NO)
YES

YES

E PERSONS/FACULTY CAPACITIES A. Please rate the quality of the program. Kindly check the
5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement 1

Availability of
reference materials
given to students
(Please answer YES
or NO)

YES

Ability to effectively
orient students on the
target learning
competencies of the
course and its
relationship to activities
(learning experiences),
assessment strategies
etc.

Ability to effectively
orient students on
the target learning
objectives of the
course and its
relationship to
activities (learning
experiences),
assessment
strategies etc.

Knowledge of
subject matter

. Kindly check the number closest to your response per item by using the scale below:
s Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable

Ability to
present
organized
lectures

Ability to use
multidisciplinary/i Ability to address Ability to
nterdisciplinary
questions/clarifica encourage
approaches to
tions
participation
teaching

Use of
instructional
aids

e scale below:

Rapport with
participants

Pedagogical
innovativeness

A. STRENGTH
OF THE
FACULTY:

B. ISSUES AND
CHALLENGES
ENCOUNTERED:

keen technical know how

lethargic lectures

A. Please rate t

C.
RECOMMENDATION:

Clear course learning

competencies and
learning objectives
(outcomes) clearly
articulated in the
course
curriculum/syllabus

more strict classroom management

Appropriateness
and sufficiency of
content/topics and
activities to the
course's learning
competencies and
learning objectives

SUBJECT DESIGN AND INSTRUCTIO

A. Please rate the quality of the program. Kindly check the number closest to y
5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement
.

CONTENT

Appropriateness
and Sufficency of
assessment
strategies to course
learning
competencies and
objectives
(outcomes)

Relevance of
Practical
Logical
content/topics to applications of
Spacing of
chronology of
the teachers
the topics to
lectures
topics
needs
teaching career

DESIGN AND INSTRUCTION:

k the number closest to your response per item by using the scale below:
2-Needs Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable
.

METHODOLOGIE

Sufficiency and
Appropriatenes
Coordination
s of reference
Time
Activities/Exercises/
of topics(no
materials given Lectures/D
allocation/cours
Workshops
repetition of
to student vis- iscussion
e duration
(Writeshops)
lessons)
-vis learning
competencies
and objectives

III. PARTICIP
A. Please rate the level of participation of the teac
response per item by using the scale below: 5-E
Improvement

METHODOLOGIES

Exposure/Immersio
n Trips

CLASS

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATI
ONS (Strength, weakness,
what else were missed out
by the course in terms of
contents, expactations vis-vis outcomes etc.)

step by step procedure

Perceived
quality of
output
Please specify the
required from
outputs submitted
the
participants

VIDEO, brochure

III. PARTICIPANTS ENGAGEMENT

of participation of the teachers in the training. Kindly check the number closest to your
using the scale below: 5-Excellent
4-Very Good
3- Good
2-Needs
Improvement
1-Poor NA Not Applicable

CLASS PARTICIPATION

Quality of
participation in
group work

Quality of
discussions
initiated by
the
participants

Over-all
engagement
of the
participants

COMMENTS

more varied activities

Please rate the level

of improvement of
your KNOWLEDGE at
the end of the course Please list down the most significant cognitive
(5-Excellent 4Very Good 3- Good
2-Needs Improvement
1-Poor NA Not
Applicable)

competencies/cognitive learning outcomes you

learned from the course that will help you in
your classroom teaching application.

Video documentation and use of media based instruction in teaching

Please rate the

improvement of your
SKILLS at the end of Please list down the most significant
psychomotor (behavioural/skills)
the course
competencies/ skills learning
(5outcomes you learned from the course
Excellent 4-Very Good that will help you in your classroom
3- Good 2-Needs
teaching application.
Improvement 1-Poor
NA Not Applicable)

Video documentation and use of media based instruction in teaching

Please indicate the most

significant attitudinal/affective
learning competencies (or
attitudinal learning outcomes)
you learned from the course

significance of the use of media based presentation

DAYLINDA BANZON
ISSUES IN CUL ED
3

S
tu

d
en

am

(o
p
ti

w
ee
k

C
ou
rs

FA
C
U
LT
Y

on

al
)

S
tu

d
en

am

ee
k

(o
p
ti

on

al
)

RESOURCE PERSONS/FACU

PATSON P. OPIDO

Availability of
assessment
Availability of curriculum or strategies vis--vis
syllabus presented at the
course target
beginning of the course,
competencies and
with well-defined course
learning
learning competencies and outcomes/objectives
objectives (Please answer presented at the
YES or NO)
beginning of the
course (please
answer YES or NO)
YES

YES

CE PERSONS/FACULTY CAPACITIES A. Please rate the quality of the program. Kindly check th
5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement

Availability of
reference materials
given to students
(Please answer YES
or NO)

YES

Ability to effectively orient

students on the target
learning competencies of
the course and its
relationship to activities
(learning experiences),
assessment strategies etc.

Ability to effectively
orient students on the
target learning
objectives of the course
and its relationship to
activities (learning
experiences),
assessment strategies
etc.

he program. Kindly check the number closest to your response per item by using the scale b
ood 2-Needs Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable

Knowledge of
subject matter

Ability to
present
organized
lectures

Ability to use
multidisciplinary/i Ability to address Ability to
nterdisciplinary
questions/clarifica encourage
approaches to
tions
participation
teaching

y using the scale below:

Use of
instructional
aids

Rapport with
participants

Pedagogical
innovativeness

A. STRENGTH
OF THE
FACULTY:

B. ISSUES AND
CHALLENGES
ENCOUNTERED:

deep philosophical does not qualify ri

A. Please rate t

C.
RECOMMENDATION:

Clear course learning

competencies and
learning objectives
(outcomes) clearly
articulated in the
course
curriculum/syllabus

avoid annoying gap fillers, (errrrrahhhh)

Appropriateness
and sufficiency of
content/topics and
activities to the
course's learning
competencies and
learning objectives

SUBJECT DESIGN AND INSTRUCTIO

A. Please rate the quality of the program. Kindly check the number closest to y
5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement
.

CONTENT

Appropriateness
and Sufficency of
assessment
strategies to course
learning
competencies and
objectives
(outcomes)

Relevance of
Practical
Logical
content/topics to applications of
Spacing of
chronology of
the teachers
the topics to
lectures
topics
needs
teaching career

DESIGN AND INSTRUCTION:

k the number closest to your response per item by using the scale below:
2-Needs Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable
.

METHODOLOGIE

Sufficiency and
Appropriatenes
Coordination
s of reference
Time
Activities/Exercises/
of topics(no
materials given Lectures/D
allocation/cours
Workshops
repetition of
to student vis- iscussion
e duration
(Writeshops)
lessons)
-vis learning
competencies
and objectives

III. PARTICIP
A. Please rate the level of participation of the teac
response per item by using the scale below: 5-E
Improvement

METHODOLOGIES

Exposure/Immersio
n Trips

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATI
ONS (Strength, weakness,
what else were missed out
by the course in terms of
contents, expactations vis-vis outcomes etc.)

CLASS

Perceived
quality of
output
Please specify the
required from
outputs submitted
the
participants

PROJECT PROPOSAL

III. PARTICIPANTS ENGAGEMENT

of participation of the teachers in the training. Kindly check the number closest to your
using the scale below: 5-Excellent
4-Very Good
3- Good
2-Needs
Improvement
1-Poor NA Not Applicable

CLASS PARTICIPATION

Quality of
participation in
group work

Quality of
discussions
initiated by
the
participants

Over-all
engagement
of the
participants

COMMENTS

Please rate the level

of improvement of
your KNOWLEDGE at
the end of the course Please list down the most significant cognitive
(5-Excellent 4Very Good 3- Good
2-Needs Improvement
1-Poor NA Not
Applicable)

competencies/cognitive learning outcomes you

learned from the course that will help you in
your classroom teaching application.

making a project proposal

Please rate the

improvement of your
SKILLS at the end of Please list down the most significant
psychomotor (behavioural/skills)
the course
competencies/ skills learning
(5outcomes you learned from the course
Excellent 4-Very Good that will help you in your classroom
3- Good 2-Needs
teaching application.
Improvement 1-Poor
NA Not Applicable)

use of project tree & conceptual frame

Please indicate the most

significant attitudinal/affective
learning competencies (or
attitudinal learning outcomes)
you learned from the course

cultural awareness

MARK A. VALLADOLID
Lesson Exemplars
4

S
tu

d
en

am

(o
p
ti

w
ee
k

C
ou
rs

FA
C
U
LT
Y

on

al
)

S
tu

d
en

am

ee
k

(o
p
ti

on

al
)

RESOURCE PERSONS/FACU

PATSON P. OPIDO

Availability of curriculum or
syllabus presented at the
beginning of the course, with
well-defined course learning
competencies and objectives
(Please answer YES or NO)

YES

RESOURCE PERSONS/FACULTY CAPACITIES A. Please rate the quality of the program.

5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs

Availability of
assessment
strategies vis--vis
course target
competencies and
learning
outcomes/objectives
presented at the
beginning of the
course (please
answer YES or NO)

YES

Availability of
reference materials
given to students
(Please answer YES
or NO)

YES

Ability to effectively
orient students on the
target learning
competencies of the
course and its
relationship to
activities (learning
experiences),
assessment strategies
etc.

se rate the quality of the program. Kindly check the number closest to your response per it
ent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable

Ability to effectively
orient students on the
target learning objectives
of the course and its
Knowledge of
relationship to activities
subject matter
(learning experiences),
assessment strategies
etc.

Ability to
present
organized
lectures

Ability to use
multidisciplinary/i
nterdisciplinary
approaches to
teaching

t to your response per item by using the scale below:

t Applicable

Ability to address Ability to

questions/clarifica encourage
tions
participation

Use of
instructional
aids

Rapport with
participants

Pedagogical
innovativeness

A. STRENGTH
OF THE
FACULTY:

B. ISSUES AND
C.
CHALLENGES
RECOMMENDATION:
ENCOUNTERED:

excellent in motivation, great speaker carry on amusing learners

Clear course learning

competencies and
learning objectives
(outcomes) clearly
articulated in the
course
curriculum/syllabus

SUBJECT DESIG
A. Please rate the quality of the program. Kindly check the n
5-Excellent 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Nee

CONTENT

Appropriateness
and sufficiency of
content/topics and
activities to the
course's learning
competencies and
learning objectives

Appropriateness
and Sufficency of
assessment
strategies to course
learning
competencies and
objectives
(outcomes)

Relevance of
Practical
content/topics to applications of
the teachers
the topics to
needs
teaching career

SUBJECT DESIGN AND INSTRUCTION:

e program. Kindly check the number closest to your response per item by using the scale below:
t 4-Very Good 3- Good 2-Needs Improvement 1-Poor NA Not Applicable
.

NT

Sufficiency and
Appropriatenes
Coordination
s of reference
Logical
Time
Spacing of of topics(no
materials given Lectures/D
chronology of
allocation/cours
lectures
repetition of
to student vis- iscussion
topics
e duration
lessons)
-vis learning
competencies
and objectives

A. Please rate the level of pa

response per item by using

ng the scale below:

METHODOLOGIES

Activities/Exercises/
Exposure/Immersio
Workshops
n Trips
(Writeshops)

COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATI
ONS (Strength, weakness,
what else were missed out
by the course in terms of
contents, expactations vis-vis outcomes etc.)

Perceived
quality of
output
required from
the
participants

very liberal in means and ideas

III. PARTICIPANTS ENGAGEMENT

ease rate the level of participation of the teachers in the training. Kindly check the number closest to your
sponse per item by using the scale below: 5-Excellent
4-Very Good
3- Good
2-Needs
Improvement
1-Poor NA Not Applicable

CLASS PARTICIPATION

Quality of
discussions
initiated by
the
participants

Quality of
Please specify the
participation in
outputs submitted
group work

lesson exemplar,
lesson web,
critical paper,
peregrino
template

Over-all
engagement
of the
participants

check the number closest to your

od
3- Good
2-Needs
able

Please rate the level

of improvement of
your KNOWLEDGE at
the end of the course

COMMENTS

great

(5-Excellent 4Very Good 3- Good

2-Needs Improvement
1-Poor NA Not
Applicable)

Please rate the

improvement of your
SKILLS at the end of
Please list down the most significant cognitive
the course
competencies/cognitive learning outcomes you
(5learned from the course that will help you in
Excellent
4-Very
Good
your classroom teaching application.
3- Good 2-Needs
Improvement 1-Poor
NA Not Applicable)

writing lesson exemplars

Please list down the most significant

psychomotor (behavioural/skills)
competencies/ skills learning
outcomes you learned from the course
that will help you in your classroom
teaching application.

Please indicate the most

significant attitudinal/affective
learning competencies (or
attitudinal learning outcomes)
you learned from the course

the effective use of graphic organizers the value of preparedness