Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/272120672
DOWNLOADS
VIEWS
59
2 AUTHORS, INCLUDING:
Vishali Kumaraguru
SRM University
2 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Department of Chemical Engineering, SRM University, Chennai 603 203, India, Tel. +91
94438 83562
b
To cite this article: S. Vishali & R. Karthikeyan (2014): Cactus opuntia (ficus-indica): an eco-friendly alternative coagulant in
the treatment of paint effluent, Desalination and Water Treatment, DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.945487
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2014.945487
(2014) 19
www.deswater.com
doi: 10.1080/19443994.2014.945487
Department of Chemical Engineering, SRM University, Chennai 603 203, India, Tel. +91 94438 83562;
email: meet.vishali@gmail.com
b
AAMEC, Kovilvenni, Thanjavur 614 403, India, Tel. +91 9940561915; email: drrkarthi@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT
In this study, the potentiality of Cactus opuntia (ficus-indica), as a coagulant for the treatment
of simulated industrial water-based paint wastewater in terms of colour, chemical oxygen
demand (COD) and turbidity was investigated. The coagulation ability was assessed for 1 L
of effluent using the standard jar test apparatus by varying the operational variables like
eluent type (water, NaCl and BaCl2), eluent concentration (15 N), coagulant dosage (16 g),
coagulant volume (20100 mL), initial pH (511) and initial effluent concentration (3100,
4224, 5650, 6258 and 7693 mg/L named as sample number 15, respectively). The results
were maximum when 100 mL of 3 g of C. opuntia, eluted using 3 N NaCl was used as a
coagulant to treat a litre of effluent. The favourable pH to run the treatment was confirmed
as the actual pH of the sample (7.27.8). It was found that the removal efficiency increased
as the pollution load swelled. The FTIR study revealed the presence of various functional
groups, which are responsible for the coagulation process. The obtained results were compared with conventional coagulant ferric chloride. The results acknowledged that Cactus
opuntia (ficus-indica) a natural, eco-friendly coagulant, could be a strong alternative to the
conventional coagulant in the treatment of water-based paint wastewater.
Keywords: Cactus opuntia (ficus-indica) coagulation; Eluate; FeCl3; Paint effluent
1. Introduction
Paint is normally a mixture of pigment, binder,
solvent and additives. From the environment and
treatment point of view, primary solvent is a convenient way to classify paint. According to this method,
paints can be classified as water-based, organic
solvent-based or powder (dry) and without solvent.
The wastewater generated from the paint industry is
mainly through cleaning operations of mixers, reactors,
blenders, filling lines, packing machines and floor [1,2].
*Corresponding author.
The discharge of such polluted effluents into the environment damages the quality of the receiving stream,
aquatic life and enhances the toxicity. In order to
respect the environment and the law, the generated
wastewater has to be treated prior to disposal.
Researchers have reported the treatment of paint
industry wastewater by various methods such as
physicalchemical treatment [3], bio-oxidation [4],
biological treatment [5], active sludge treatment [6], microfiltration [7], coagulationflocculation processes [8],
Fenton oxidation [9], adsorption [10], electrochemical
oxidation [11] and electro-coagulation [12]. Among
these, coagulationflocculation has historically attracted
Table 1
Initial concentration and composition of simulated effluent
(made up to 1,000 mL)
Sample
number
Blue
White primer colourant
(mL)
(mL)
Initial COD
(mg/L)
1
2
3
4
5
48
46
44
42
40
3,100
4,224
5,650
6,258
7,693
2
4
6
8
10
Table 2
Physico-chemical characteristics of the simulated industrial
wastewater (sample 5)
Parameters
Value
pH at 25C
Total dissolved solids (mg/L)
Total suspended solids (mg/L)
Oil and grease (mg/L)
Chloride as Cl (mg/L)
Chemical oxygen demand (COD) (mg/L)
Sulphate as SO4 (mg/L)
Biochemical oxygen demand (mg/L)
(3 d incubated at 27C)
Iron as Fe (mg/L)
7.6
304
6,880
19
68
7,693
24
2,648
0.05
2.2. Coagulant
concentration (15 N), coagulant dosage (16 g), coagulant volume (20100 mL), initial pH (511) and initial
effluent concentration (3,100, 4,224, 5,650, 6,258 and
7,693 mg/L named as sample number 15, respectively).
To evaluate the efficacy of FeCl3 as a coagulant,
the coagulation procedure was rerun to study the
influence of amorphous coagulant dose (g), coagulant
volume (mL), initial pH (511) and initial effluent
concentration (sample number 15, mg/L) and the
settling time was kept to 10 min.
2.4. Parameters evaluation
The coagulation activity of C. opuntia was assessed
in terms of colour, chemical oxygen demand (COD)
and turbidity. All the parameters mentioned in Table 2
were measured using standard methods [30]. Colour
was measured using SL 218 double UV visible spectrophotometer (ElicoIndia) at max 612 nm. COD was
calculated using the dichromate method [30]. Turbidity was measured using digital nephelo-turbidity
meter 132 (ElicoIndia) and it was expressed in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU). pH is adjusted using
digital pH meter MK. V.I (ElicoIndia).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Characterization of Cactus opuntia (ficus-indica)
The characterization of cactus was used to differentiate the material. The FTIR spectrum of C. opuntia is
coagulant content from the C. opuntia. The lower concentration in the eluate results in a decrease in the
coagulation activity. A similar trend was observed in
the removal of congo red dye using natural coagulants
[33].
3.4. Effect of coagulant volume
Table 3
Concentration of C. opuntia and FeCl3 in jars
Jar
Volume of coagulant (mL) [prepared using 3 g
number of C. opuntia, eluted in 100 mL of 3 N NaCl]
Concentration of
C. opuntia (g/L)
1
2
3
4
5
0.58
1.15
1.69
2.22
2.72
20
40
60
80
100
20
40
60
80
100
0.014
0.027
0.040
0.052
0.064
Table 4
Comparison of the characteristics between raw effluent and treated effluents under optimum conditions
Parameters
pH at 25C
Colour
(nm)
COD
(mg/L)
Turbidity
(NTU)
Raw effluent
(sample 5)
Percentage
of removal
Percentage
of removal
7.6
0.4583
7.16
0.0533
88.37
7.52
0.0488
89.35
7,693
1,677
78.20
1,277
83.40
7,760
1,350
82.60
890
88.53
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
[31]
[32]
[33]
[34]
[35]
[36]