Cuba-US relations: "sense of reality", whose? What for?

They do not say spokesmen and "analysts"

rubn ramos
You can read the Spanish version with pictures by link at:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7a4Do1gKE7UTjk0VUNfT3lnWWM/view?
usp=sharing
Content:
1. USA: Isolated?
2. "Cuba and the US can invest and trade": The TISA and PPPs
3. Cuba: "A temporary issue." And now, integration?
4. Tourism "unrestricted"
5. "The US has recognized the government of Raul Castro"
6. The return to the fold
On July 23 last, Contrainjerencia (http://www.contrainjerencia.com) reproduced an
article that the Cuban diplomat and head of the Cuba Interests Section in Washington,
Jorge Bolaos, wrote to La Jornada of Mexico. Nothing particular. Except for a while
now, both government spokespersons Cuba as "analysts" are struggling to find
"arguments" to justify or explain the last government's attitude regarding its Island US
pair.
Trying to put together a case that actually relying on value judgments or statements of
intent, it produces a kind of language, on paper or in speeches, full of ambiguities and
contradictions that is unavoidable comment.
For Bolaos, restoring Cuba-US relations, "sense of reality". Their "arguments" and my
observations are:
1. "Never has a country been so isolated from the international community and the
United States on the issue of the blockade." Isolated Is America? Please. Take a
statement institution since the end of World War II guarantees the Zionist hegemony of
the American empire, it is simply to ignore history. USA has ignored the statements of
its colonies grouped at the UN and has even banned, or just made fun of the decisions
of the Security Council.
The UN will continue to be functional to their interests. Guantanamo and continue the
blockade, are compelling realities of the domain that the US exercised over Cuba. That
is one of its military bases and not just one of its centers of torture and imprisonment.
That's the reality. No matter how many statements more out of this cave that brings
together the governors of the world under the leadership of the devil himself, as
symbolically referring to US President Hugo Chavez.
2. "Now Cuba and the US, to trade and invest." What will invest US Cuba? And even
could, if allowed, what would be the impact or change that this would result in that
country? Conversely, US investments in Cuba will dust the conquests of the
Revolution. Not only economically, but politically and ideologically. Intending to deny
the close correspondence between these three dimensions of a social structure it is
placed at the end of revisionism.
Mr. Bolaos, as former Ambassador and representative of the business of Cuba in
Washington to better understand the meaning and scope of the global Zionist strategy

of imperial domination in the XXI Century has to confront Russia USA and China in the
Caribbean and Latin America. Part of that strategy is the one that has to do with foreign
investment already installed and to be installed in our countries, including Cuba under
the new framework that facilitates the resumption of relations "diplomatic".
Supported by new forms of usurpation of rich energy resources and mining territories,
but also aquifers, forest and sea, among others, that "new" strategy has been
expressed in the secret agreement subscribing 50 states of the world, between victims
and perpetrators, called Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), recently released by
Wikileaks.
The elites of the economic-financial and commercial power have created this
framework to ensure its investments through Public-Private Partnerships calls, in which
the private to the public is engulfed. These partnerships do not come alone. Induces,
implements and ensures the evil trilogy BM-IDB-USAID with their respective groups of
"banks" under the command of the IMF. "Understood economists" and other "analysts"
have expressed the desire that Cuba open arms to these understood.
As I said the other weighted "analyst" Peter Kornblu, in his statements to La Jornada,
on 20 July, what comes is "prove to Cuba that we were wrong in the past" ... "The
Obama He has made it clear and said that we're not in the business of regime change.
But he also said that we have goals to help Cuba evolve into a different society, and we
will no longer use the previous tactics, we will have a different relationship framework
for regime change by other means ". Tautology? No way!
"Indeed, (adds Kornblu, you just visited Cuba), we have this same position with most of
those countries with whom we have relationships and have systems with which we
disagree ...". He was referring, no doubt, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, the Balkan
countries of the former Soviet Union. To all these, "the same position" that the US now
has with Cuba, turned them into "failed states", condemned to endure the terror of what
is called "hybrid war" or war for extermination.
That "same position" that the US is now trying to Iran. Although here the "sense of
reality" warns that after more than three decades of sanctions and blockade, they are
crumbling alone for the changes following the strategic alliance between Iran and
Russia and China and the multipolarity that is generated with the presence of the
BRICS and Shanghai Cooperation Organization. True that Cuba is not Iran. But, it
seems that Cuba's current leaders have lost the new "sense of reality" that involves
multipolarity. Will the distance? I doubt it. The island has economic and cultural
agreements with China and Russia. What, then, his "sense of reality"?
(For information: Peter Kornblu is "analyst" and director of the project on Cuba's National
Security Archive US institution that integrates the dark US intelligence was interviewed for La
Jornada, the once daily progressive Mexico, for her.. US correspondent, David Brooks,
spokesman and propagandist of the conservative right wing in this country).

3. Bolaos recalls that in 1963, a reporter asked the US Secretary of State Dean Rusk
why America traded with the Soviet Union and Cuba did not do it; Rusk replied "...
because the USSR is a permanent government and Castro's Cuba is a temporary
issue."
Fifty-two years have passed since then and the "sense of reality" has not lost USA.
This actually realize the strategic position that Cuba has for that country. Not only to
ensure its hegemony in the Caribbean, but in Central and South America.

Even before Chavez, Lula, Kirchner, Correa, Morales; and construction of a

commercial and economic, but also political integration institutions such as ALBA,
PetroCaribe, MERCOSUR, UNASUR, CELAC (despite the Judas of the Pacific
Alliance, Caricom, Mercosur itself), Cuba was indeed " temporal a matter ". But the
time has come to end its temporality, carrying all the integration institutions, change
efforts in the region, and killing their leaders.
This is already underway. It began after the assassination of President Chavez and is
becoming more aggressive in the context of the resumption of Cuba-US relations.
I mean what is happening between Venezuela and the Cooperative Republic of
Guyana for the possession of the Guyana Essequibo which belongs to Venezuela.
Problem generated by the Anglo-American duo, using the puppet shift in Guyana,
David Granger. It is not just a border problem. Compromises the integrity of the territory
of Venezuela in the Orinoco, where lie the largest energy reserves in the world; and
reaches, in its implications, the entire Caribbean, including Cuba, and throughout Latin
America.
But it is not only in Venezuela where the empire has decided to strengthen its
destabilizing action through the so-called "Soft Shock". In Ecuador, institutions for
sedition and terror of the US, NGOs and funding mercenaries from around the world
come instrumentalizing and decadent conservative right in its claims to stop the
advance of the "citizens' revolution". After terrorist attacks, they have announced an
indefinite strike. His goal, to take power by the insurgency as dictated by the Manual of
"nonviolent struggle" of the Centre for Nonviolent Action and Applied (CANVAS)
published in Belgrade, Serbia, 2006 and now circulating in Ecuador through Strategy
social networks and in written form. Like the "Guide to overthrow a government in five
steps," written by Harvard Gene Sharp, the putative father of the so-called "Soft
Shock". All with financing institutions for sedition and terror, USAID and the US
Congress. (See my essay about: Venezuela: Soft Strike February 2014?)
Also in Bolivia, the cultural revolution of President Morales faces the coup of pseudo
Civic Committee Potosina (Comcipo).
In Argentina, where Zionism, with its millions of dollars, strengthens the seditious action
NGOs, decadent press, the "new leaders" (Pablo Iglesias or type Tsipras and his
"coalition"), to end the kirchernismo .
Zionist US power elites (not Obama is just their puppet) believe that we must return to
make functional the "backyard" to the interests of "Manifest Destiny".
4. "Americans to travel to Cuba without restrictions, as do the Cubans to the United
States" is another argument of Mr. Bolaos, in an effort to justify the reinstatement of
the Cuban embassy (in Washington) and US (in Havana) on 20 July.
What he really is saying is that if before agents USAID, NED, IRI, Freedom House, and
NGOs serving sedition and terror and his mercenaries, came to Cuba, despite its
services intelligence, now they will "without restriction". Not the same a Cuban who
travels to the US with the nostalgia of the Cuba of Batista and reaffirm their "belief"
about freedom and equal opportunities in the country of Donald Duck, an American
who comes to Cuba to "sightseeing "and return home realize everything I saw, did,
infiltrated, co-opted, distorted, manipulated, undermined, discredited, lied, alienated
and alienated.

5. "The restoration (of relations) is a recognition of the error and also a recognition of
the Cuban revolutionary state and its chaired by President Raul Castro government,
but, sometimes, but usually comes after the truth, we can not forget that According to
official statements by the president and officials of the US government, which changes
with respect to Cuba it is the tactic, but the strategy continues. "
US has not recognized anything, Mr. Bolaos. You say the same thing Kornblu, but
without realizing what it says. America is using its old, but revamped tactics to crush
the enemy to deal a blow to end his time of struggle, sovereignty and dignity. For
"regime change by other means". How serious are the irreversible consequences that
this rigged for all of Latin America that begins to breathe the air of freedom. A tactic that
has not ceased to be economic, political, ideological and military. That has been
renovated by civilian and military elites Zionist imperial strategists power to grant the
Southern Command and the Fourth Fleet, its absolute control. Guantnamo is one of
its bases. And it does not depend on what Obama says or promises about it, but what
those elites decide according to their functionality and convenience.
6.
I think Cuba is the wrong path to Fidel and Chavez traced to Latin America and
the Caribbean, a sub-continent of peace. I think this was based on a "sense of reality"
that has nothing to do with yield to imperialism. Build the Great Homeland is to reach
historical maturity that we can be ourselves. We have the natural, human, social,
cultural resources. We started building an alternative institutional framework to the
OAS, the FTAA, and some of our people put in place the IMF, the World Bank, IDB.
They expelled USAID and US embassies closed. Fundamental to begin to free issue.
Paradoxically, who they found the path of liberation, before others, and showed them
the road map to follow, avoiding new alternatives to the guerrilla struggle, which today
are exculpate the current "president" US and raise "thank God". Perhaps this proves
how little we have advanced in their minds, and that explains why the generations of
today, announce what will be the morning after, "thanks to Pope Francisco" Cuba has
returned to the fold.