Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
Introduction
Computational Developments
Introduction
Motivation
Essential to fully capture both the complicated detail in the crack and the impact
on the wider system
Continuum Molecular mechanics (MM) Quantum mechanics (QM)
Motivation
QM
Region
Motivation
QM
Region
Motivation
QM
Region
Motivation
QM
Region
10
Mass Conservation
Energy Conservation
11
Mathematical Formulation
for Coupling
12
Coupling Schematic
Insertion of molecules
CFDMD
Boundary
condition
Consistent
Framework
MDCFD
Boundary
condition
13
14
15
Molecular Equivalent
16
Selecting Functions
In a molecular simulation
equal to
is never exactly
A finite volume with fluxes and forces acting over its surfaces
Mass Conservation
Energy Conservation
18
Mass
Momentum
Energy
19
Or in words
20
Or in words
21
22
Mass Conservation
Momentum Balance
Energy Conservation
23
Mass Conservation
Momentum Balance
Energy Conservation
The difference
between two control volume
functions for i and j
24
Momentum Balance
Accumulation
Advection
Forcing
25
Consistent
Framework
CFDMD
Boundary
condition
MDCFD
Boundary
condition
27
Consistent
Framework
CFDMD
Boundary
condition
MDCFD
Boundary
condition
29
Non-unique solution
Used in the first fluids coupling scheme (OConnell and Thompson 1995)
30
No energy added to the system when applied correctly (i.e. with the CV function)
31
Consistent
Framework
CFDMD
Boundary
condition
MDCFD
Boundary
condition
32
Coupling Results
Increasing
time
33
Computing Developments
34
Phase diagrams
35
cmplesd xmm1,xmm0
movsd xmm0,xmm2
andpd xmm0,xmm1
37
38
39
Fully parallelised using MPI (halo cells) with good scalability in benchmark tests
CPL_LIBRARY Overview
16 CFD Processors
Framework is general
32 MD Processors
Setup
Exchange
Enquiry
CFD9
MD20 MD24
MD19 MD23
42
CPL_LIBRARY Schematic
43
CPL_Library results
8 CFD Processors
32 MD Processors
44
CPL_Library results
Conclusions
Computational developments
46
References
References
J. H. Irving and J. G. Kirkwood, J. Chemical.
Phys. 18(6), 817 (1950).
R.J. Hardy J. Chem. Phys. 76, 1 (1998)
P. Schoeld and J. R. Henderson, Proc. R.
Soc. London A 379, 231 (1982).
J. F. Lutsko, J. Appl. Phys 64(3), 1152 (1988)
S. T. OConnell and P. A. Thompson, Phys.
Rev. E 52, R5792 (1995).
B. D. Todd, D. J. Evans, and P. J. Daivis,
Physical Review E 52(2), 1627 (1995).
J. Cormier, J. Rickman, and T. Delph, J. Appl.
Phys 89-1, 99 (2001).
W.A. Curtin, R. E. Miller. Mod Sim. Mater.
Sci. Eng. 11 R33 (2003)
M. Han and J. Lee, Phys. Rev. E 70, 061205
(2004).
R. Delgado-Buscalioni and P. V. Coveney,,
Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 362, 1369 (2004)
A. Joshua A., C. D. Lorenz & A. Travesset. J.
Comp. Phys 227.10 (2008)
Acknowledgements:
Dr Daniele Dini
Dr Tamer Zaki
Mr David Trevelyan
Extra Material
48
Momentum Balance
Forcing
Advection
49
Momentum Balance
Advection
Forcing
50
Momentum Balance
Accumulation
Advection
Forcing
51
52
53
54
Two key forms in common use Volume Average (Lutsko, 1988) and Method of
Planes (Todd et al 1995)
55
56
57
Continuum Analytical
Molecular Dynamics
58
Continuum Analytical
Molecular Dynamics
59
Simulation setup
60
61