Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Londonistan
(Little Pakistan)
Omar Butt
Londonistan
(Little Pakistan)
Omar Butt
Contents (3)
List of diagrams (5)
Introduction The rule of Muslims (7)
Chapter 1 -The religion of Islam in the UK (9)
1.1 Biology
1.2 Religion
1.3 Religious practice
1.4 Religious affiliation
1.5 20,40
Chapter 2 The religion of Islam in the UK and the USA (34)
2.1 Outright
2.2 Baby names
2.3 The filter
2.4 The religion of Islam in USA
2.5 The future statistical convergence of Muslim and Christian
populations in UK and USA
2.6 How will the world manage?
List of diagrams
Figure 1: 2011 Muslim religious affiliation in London boroughs
Figure 2: The possible overtaking of Islam over all religions in America
(outright 2- Muslim congregants are shown in millions against Christian)
Figure 3: Maximum Muslim England
Figure 4 : Unlike Christians, Muslims have in the UK, millions of congregants per
week
Figure 5: Most popular name by region 2012
Figure 6: Filter 1: Left-side showing religious practice of families and right-side
showing surveyed humanist measures
Figure 7: Filter 2: Two distinct stages. Firstly the incorporation of ethics in
American life as philosophically from Christianity although practice may be
different; and secondly, the three stages of secondary filter or 2020 vision (or 2040
or 2060), which prove America is a Muslim country
Figure 8: American Judeo-Christianity- hundreds of millions of people who are as
of yet unconnected to anything.
Figure 9: Islam in the USA- mere millions of people, heavily interactive at the
personal, social, political, religious levels.
Figure 10: Americans may have big circles as above but there is an insignificant
intersection between faith, religion, family life and of course, practice.
Figure 11: The middle intersection of American Christians- 10 m.
Figure 12: The middle intersection of Muslim Americans- 11 m.
Figure 13: Muslim majority UK in non-Muslim ruled land
Figure 14: The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in UK in 2061 (in
millions)
Figure 15: Muslim majority America in non-Muslim ruled land
Figure 16: The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in America in 2060
(in millions). Assuming Christians excludes Catholics and adherents are measured
by number of congregants.
Figure 17: Proportion in economic activity
Figure 18: Table showing China as the new head of economically developed
countries
Figure 19: The rise of the Islamic faith in America- Millions of congregants per
week
Figure 20: The rise of the Islamic faith in Britain - Millions of congregants per
week
Figure 21: Extrapolated 2011 Census table of daily/ weekly worshippers in London
places of worship who are Muslim or Christian.
Figure 22: Christians are a relative minority in London and Muslims far exceed
Christians as per both daily and weekly worshippers (New survey)
Introduction
The rule of Muslims
Given UK as a whole has millions of Pakistanis whereas London hasnt, it
is natural to include Little Pakistan here as including Bangladeshis too.
This gives half a million. Perhaps a million with Indians too. In fact a
relative majority by 20 to 30 years will be indeed considered an absolute
majority if we include Indians.
The moment that the white British become a minority will symbolize a huge
transfer of power
-
Marriage
Kinship and social structures
Sexual intercourse as sanctioned by revelatory ethics
Heterosexual norms
Punishments for sexual deviants
10
and paedophilia have caused moral decay and demise of the system of
reproduction of humanity. Perhaps it is because of the warbent policy of
the warmongering armies who war in foreign lands: If they kill innocent
fathers of Muslim children, it lends for them to destroy the role of father
within families.
The death of man/ the father
Fathers take care of families of a society. If they lose this place in societies
of foreign communities it will have an effect at home, here in the UK too.
Fatherless children are already more common in the USA, for example
than children with both parents, that is who live with and grow up with
both biological parents.
In Afghanistan, millions of martyrs have meant for (due to there being
family sizes of 5-10) millions of orphans over the years of Soviet and US
invasion. It is no surprise out of under a hundred million American
children, similarly tens of millions dont live with both parents. Of just
under a million children born in UK hospitals in 2015, half will not live
with both parents.
Biological replacement and reproduction
The study looks at both aspects of biological maladjustment, biological
non-replacement and biological non-reproduction. First I will deal with
non-replacement:
We should look at the change from one generation to another. An average
age at child-rearing age should be used as a yardstick for the length of
study of population change.
To calculate this we take the average age of child rearing add the average
age of having the last child and divide by two:
(28.1+30.1)/2=29.1 so three census periods. We will choose the last three,
1991 to 2011.
So, a rate of non-replacement can be studied. This is the change in birth
rate or the fertility rate. Specifically, the negativity of our non-Muslim
11
religions birth and fertility rates. Birth rate is defined as number of live
births per 1000 of population whereas fertility rate is taken to mean the
change in the crude birth rate annual figure.
Replacement theory concerns itself with Muslim population having high
birth rates and high fertility rates. Conversely, non-replacement is the
negativity of other religions birth rate, and non-reproduction is the
negativity of other religions fertility rates.
Here, we deduct from total population, atheist populations, assuming all
the rest are of other religions. The growth with Islam is compared, and
interestingly, there is a significant difference in all the last three censuses.
Over the generation the Muslim ummah outgrows non-Muslim religions
by net 13,695 million. Over two million from Muslims born in the period
and over eleven million due to decline in kafir religions numbers.
The generation after this one (ie the next one after 1981-2011) will no doubt
see more Muslims than all other religions combined. So that would be
about 2041, there will be more Muslims than non-Muslim religionists.
Now, I will deal with non-reproduction:
Assuming wedlock is the only appropriate form for marital relations,
children born out of wedlock will be taken as a percentage for nonreproduction:
So America has a half, Ireland a third and England a quarter of all live
births are to unmarried mothers. No doubt in all Muslim countries there is
no figure for this and it is deemed inappropriate and therefore
insignificant. Muslims are reproducing whereas non-Muslims it would
seem are non-reproducing.
Birth rates, fertility rates and employment rates
In conclusion, to this chapter, we could have taken the fertility rate to mean
the rate of change of the birth rate, instead I have deducted the atheists
from the total and taken that to mean non-Muslim religions. Including
those who say they have no religion would be an unfair estimate to
compare for religions.
12
New ideas are there in the sense that Muslim fertility is seen as the total (ie
gross) growth in the Muslim population in a year. The ideas of nonreplacement and non-reproduction too are new. Combining the two ideas,
of non- Muslims being both non-replacing and non-reproducing gives us
potentially a ratio of not how many are affiliated with Islam or not, nor
how many are married against single-parent families but how many from
Islam and from disbelievers collectively excluding atheists, are what I will
term reproductive religious believers. This rate is attained by multiplying
the rate of Muslims by the rate of legal marriages or the rate of disbelievers
by the number of non-single-parent families.
By comparing reproductive religious believers in all faith groups it is
possible to know, specifically with regard to social convention and the
future, which group has surpassed the rest, if it is Islam or not.
I will name this ratio the reproductive religious believers ratio.
Accordingly, it is very hard to show Islam doing badly as America, as an
example, has its Christian figure augmented for Religious and
Believer in God as well as having single-parent families taken out. It
gives us a figure for religious practice where the 50% of Christians, only
25% are practising, based on attendance (number of congregants). This
becomes 12.5% are religious, which becomes 6.25% believers and only 3%
reproductive religious believers due to the illegitimacy of half of the
children. Muslims then are dominant as of 5% of the population translates
into 4% reproductive religious believers in most states, all of whom are
living with both parents, believers, religious and who practise.
The figure is similar to a productive religious believers percentage where
unemployed persons are deducted and employed believers percentage is
given.
For brevitys sake I will include my calculations for just a few countries:
Islam vs Christianity
UK---4%/0.5%
London----10%/5%
USA----4%/3%
13
Ireland----- 1%/2%
The figures show how due largely to non-replacement and nonreproduction of Christians, in the UK, as in the US, the number of Muslims
is not only growing but doubling very quickly, for example between 1990
and 2010 (twenty years) and again between 2010 and 2030 it is projected to
do the same.
Further, the rate of growth, taken as a percentage is too doubling, in the
UK, every twenty years, displaying exponential growth.
The American data shows firstly that the non-Muslim birth rates
worldwide are lower and secondly that the predicted rates are falling
below zero eventually. Non-replacement corresponds to the first point,
that the Muslim birth rates are significantly above the non-Muslim ones,
and non-reproduction corresponds to the second point, that the overall
non-Muslim rate is not only heading below zero but that that means the
total population is decreasing.
Just to reiterate, non-replacement and non-reproduction of disbelievers
means that they have a negative birth rate relatively (to the Muslim birth
rate) and absolutely (to their own previous years rates). It also means that
their numbers are falling whereas ours are rising and that their rate of
decline is rising whilst our numbers increase exponentially.
What we then need to look at instead of just birth rates being preferred
over population figures as a whole; is the religious practices and how they
develop into the future based on current trends.
14
1.2 Religion
Here, in the UK, Muslims are some 35% of the total population in certain
London boroughs. As we are (or at least our parents and grandparents
were) reproducing at disproportionately higher rates than our Christian
counterparts, sometimes we are tripling our population where theirs is
levelling off, we expect to become a majority over them within a few
decades, in their own eyes.
Perhaps, what is not relevant is the monarchy or the official religion of the
country (or countries) but that within a few decades, given that the
population change (largely due to our population explosion) is going to
effect not only schools and so on but the so-called establishment of the
church and so on (eg. Universities and so on) is that Islam needs to be
mobilised to replace churches with mosques, secular education with
religious education and so on as well as Christians with Muslims.
In fact, unless the legal institutions arent replaced with more humane and
equal ones, they will not stand as they will fail to bare the weight of a
country where people go to mosque more often than church.
If children go to madrassa or have a Molvi come home to teach why
should we expect them to settle with Jesus or Trinity college in Oxford
or Cambridge? If the Muslim population explosion yields a quadrupling
within if not 20 years then however many years (30 years then) we must
assume that since Catholicism is not allowed ascension to the throne yet
churches are often Catholic, due to their presumed higher level of
attendance, that Muslims must follow the same path. The 1,500 or so
mosques in the UK accommodate a maximum of, (times 500) 750,000
worshippers, congregations have to be doubled per service. Should the
population double, will they quadruple? Should mosque-building take
place so that, like catholics (and church of England established churches)
there are tens of thousands?
If there are more Muslim congregants in the UK in mosques (Muslim
places of worship) there should be more in a daily and weekly basis, than
there are Christian congregants in the UK in churches (Christian places of
worship), there should be more mosques than churches or at least more
mosques should be built than churches.
15
London boroughs
Camden
City of London
Hackney
Hammersmith and
Fulham
Haringey
Islington
Kensington and
Chelsea
Lambeth
Lewisham
Newham
Southwark
Tower Hamlets
Wandsworth
Westminster
Barking and Dagenham
Barnet
Bexley
Brent
Bromley
Croydon
Ealing
Enfield
Greenwich
Harrow
Havering
Hillingdon
Hounslow
Kingston upon Thames
Merton
Redbridge
Richmond upon
Thames
Sutton
Waltham Forest
Total or average
Muslims
26,643
409
34,727
Muslim
% age
12.09%
5.55%
14.10%
182,493
254,926
206,125
18,242
36,130
19,521
10.00%
14.17%
9.47%
158,649
303,086
275,885
307,984
288,283
254,096
306,995
219,396
185,911
356,386
231,997
311,215
309,392
363,378
338,449
312,466
254,557
239,056
237,232
273,936
253,957
160,060
199,693
278,970
15,812
21,500
17,759
98,456
24,551
87,696
24,746
40,073
25,520
36,744
5,645
58,036
7,841
29,513
53,198
52,141
17,349
29,881
4,829
29,065
35,666
9,474
16,262
64,999
9.97%
7.09%
6.44%
31.97%
8.52%
34.51%
8.06%
18.27%
13.73%
10.31%
2.43%
18.65%
2.53%
8.12%
15.72%
16.69%
6.82%
12.50%
2.04%
10.61%
14.04%
5.92%
8.14%
23.30%
186,990
190,146
258,249
8,173,941
6,128
7,726
56,541
1,012,823
3.28%
4.06%
21.89%
12.39%
Population
220,338
7,375
246,270
16
17
18
Theirs shall be an abode of peace with their Sustainer; and He shall be near unto
them in result of what they have been doing.
According to Abu Hanifa, considered to be the originator of the concept,
the two requirements for a country to be part of Dar al-Islam are:
1. Muslims must be able to enjoy peace and security with and within
this country.
2. It has common frontiers with some Muslim countries.
If the former does not apply then physical means such as Jihad can be used
to correct the situation and in the latter case, individuals are required to do
hijra to where they can practise their religion.
Other followers of Hanbali madhab have said:
There are only two, Dar al Islam and Dar al Kufr. Any Dar (domain) where
Islamic law is dominant is Dar al Islam, and any domain where Kufr law is
dominant is Dar al Kufr, there are only these two camps.
- Ibn Muflih (died 884 AH)
There is not much explanation in the Holy Quran itself, of the concept of
Dar Al Islam, nonetheless, the term is used widely by the scholars. Sayyed
Qutb, even talks of Dar al Islams opposite being Dar al Harb. Others
mention Dar al Hijra, pointing out that this began when Rasulallah (SWS)
migrated away from Mecca. As opposed to Dar al Jihad, stands Dar al
Ahd. Others have equated Dar al Islam with Dar al Muslimeen.
Types of Dar (and ways of judging a land as Muslim or not)
1. Dar al Islam Are muslim religious worshippers in the majority?
2. Dar al Harb Are Muslims struggling militarily and persevering in their
fight in the land?
3. Dar al Aman - Is there safety and security?
4. Dar al Hijra Is this a land of immigration? A land for the Muslim
Ummah to emigrate to?
5. Dar al Ahd Are covenants kept? Are human rights met?
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
"O believers, save yourselves and your family from the Hellfire whose fuel
is men and stones"
Surah e Tahrim, Verse 6
It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth
to manifest it over all religion. And sufficient is Allah as Witness.
THQ 48:28
A movement for the Islamic conquest of Britain will seek to answer the
question of Muslim political participation as well as rule. Why is it our
holiday is not accepted in the public holidays of the public, and yet the
matter is not in the public eye?
The reason outright domination is twofold is that people do not complain:
1. That Islamic conquest is all-of-a-sudden
2. That the Islamic conquest of UK is relative No, It is a fact!
There are scientific, or statistical reasons. So we can make it clear, that over
the last 50 years, the incremental 100 and something mosques that have
been built are just the beginning. We NEED thousands of more by twenty
years time. Otherwise we will pray in the streets! We are going to be
millions more Muslims, in London.
In 20 years from now, Eid will be (inshallah) observed 4 or 5 times more
than xmas or easter on their own. The philosophy of replacement of UK
Christianism with Islam comes with the transference of political power
from Christianism to Islam (The rise of Islam is helped by the death of
Christianity in Britain). What is interesting is that 35-40% is the percentage
of UK Muslims who are Pakistani. Surely then UK is itself subject to the
philosophy of Pakistaniat. It is itself a little Pakistan.
What is this philosophy? It is that, you know when you pick up a musical
instrument for the first time and play a wrong note? It reminds us of
somehow China or India, or we hope of American music or something?
In the enlightened miracle of Pakistan (ie in the future), without the
intervention of Pakistani popular music, that off-key chord will remind us
26
27
3.More Muslims will be recorded in the next census after the coming one,
than Christians.
Admittedly, situation 3 is one which is still not an absolute majority and so
the Monarchy and the legal institutions remain in the hands of the enemy.
Nonetheless it has been situation 1 for over a decade now, and situation 2
has recently come true.
What we now await is a situation 4:
4. More Muslims than Non-Muslims in the UK seat of power (London).
We expect this to happen by the next census afterwards (ie 2051).
Is one whose heart Allah has opened to Islam, so that he has received
Enlightenment from Allah, (no better than one hard-hearted)? Woe to those whose
hearts are hardened against celebrating the praises of Allah. they are manifestly
wandering (in error)!
The Holy Quran 39:22
Unfortunately the wicked Christians of these Islands have been falsely
claiming that they are children of Abraham, when a cursory look at the
Bible reveals Abraham came from Iraq originally so his progeny are the
Iraqis. The progeny of his childrens were settled in Palestine, so their
children were Palestinians.
On what grounds do these unholy warmongers, America, Britain and
Israel lay claim to Abraham (PBUH) as their father we might ask? That
they, instead of honouring the poor of the respected countries, talk of war
instead of peaceful or Islamic reasons for their and anyone elses honour.
This has got to stop!
In fact when we look at how the world has suffered in the modern world it
is due largely to the menace of Judeo-Christianity and its need for
committing genocide.
Judeo- Christianity is part of history, a legacy, it is of no use. Let us be
merciful and not vengeful by committing genocide the way they do. Let us
28
allow UKs Christians to commit political suicide in front of our very eyes
on our British Isles. Our by virtue of our being the conquering generation.
Allah ta Ala tells us in the Holy Quran:
"Those who believe, and whose hearts find satisfaction in the remembrance of
Allah. for without doubt in the remembrance of Allah do hearts find satisfaction.
The Holy Quran Surah Ar Rad Verse 28
Inteqaliat (transference or transition) of UK power from Christian to
Muslim hands
Given that a Muslims life and property are a sacred trust in every other
Muslims hands, Christians are wrongfully assuming the right of life over
the Muslim Jesus. For this reason they are all committing a major sin and
are like murderers or far worse.
For this reason, we as Muslims must:
1. Take the power they have back for ourselves
2. Fight them and their forces with our full effort
3. Realise that a rush and a push and the land that we stand on is ours.
Once we are just and mujahideen in the cause of Allah Almighty, we need
to adopt a certain effort to have a strategy or policy, whereby we accept
that regarding the UK and the British throne, we are nearly there, and
regarding political power in the houses of parliament and the houses of
Lords, we are getting there.
29
30
31
32
33
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Islam
Christianity
2020
2040
2060
2080
34
35
2. Jamhouri (Democratic)
3. Jamhouriat (Persian for republic)
What is clear from the sources of Islaamic law is that democracy is not so
much a trickle-down from ijma, or consensual opinion of scholars, but that
it is from the very idea of dar al islam. In other words the ideas of
democracy and republic come from the ideas of:
1. Muslim countries
2. Muslim majority nations
Jamhour itself means majority or democracy. Therefore, The Islamic
Republic of Great Britain, is Britain as we now know it, where the majority
practice Islam and the only democratic ideology is one of the Muslims,
Islam.
Interestingly, the right and left wing of American politics too, democratism
and republicanism, stem from these concepts of democracy and before that
majority.
Perhaps there is a lack of education about the meaning of, or the
significance of having a Muslim majority. Indeed Great Britain having a
Muslim majority implies it is an Islamic (Democratic) Republic. This
Islamic Democratic Republicanism is logically possible because of the
majority Muslim demography.
Legislation is only from Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). There is no
legislation that is not for Allah and His Messenger (PBUH). If the ideology
of the British republic and democracy is pressed it therefore cannot yield to
monarchy or anarchy. The religion of Islam informs us of the superiority of
Muslims and Muslim rule over non-Muslims (who have no right to rule).
Officially, in the capital, London, the white British of the British Isles are
now a minority. The label of Black and minority ethnicity then applies no
longer. It is a majority (Islam) who are dominant.
36
37
38
hands, upon the Queens abdication. As head of the failed Church surely
this is her responsibility, to ensure replacement takes place. These three
terms express Islams need to take over the British Isles. No one should
ignore the desire of all for the transference of sovereignty of UK from
Christian to Muslim hands.
Indeed a political change is taking place in favour of Muslims in Britain.
This is a transfer of power and this we call transference. It is not simply
practicability, where there is an admission en masse of the overall
ascendance of Islam and Muslims over other religions (which is pertinent
to the future of this and other European countries). Nor is it a merely
biological view of Islam and Christianity.
As a community here in the UK, we must stop trying to be relevant by
saying either that we are a culture or a civilisation, ie. an ethnicity or ethnic
minority or that we are a religion which is older than Judaism or
Christianity. We are neither a culture as opposed to nature nor a minority
as opposed to a majority. Indeed we will struggle to put forward an
argument that we are trying to in some circles where we are saying directly
to the ahl e kitab that no you are not ahl e qitaal, you are ahl e dhimmi. We
are risking an air of conceit, superiority and illness of temperance should
we do this.
We have a very real chance here of obliterating the British empire, the
Roman empires main child, after America, in modern international
politics. Nevertheless we must see our hand is better than theirs. We must
acknowledge they are not our slaves, neither will they ever be. But they are
our beggars. Our equals in humanity who WILL bequeath the right to rule
as a religion over Britain and its dominion.
We will not invade Britain in a military sense. But in a society where there
is ongoing political transference (where the big players, be they white,
British or Christian) in the political lives of Muslims who by every right
desire the power, economic power or coming to power. We Muslims must
accept that we should expect more power.
39
40
Capacity of Masjid
Number of
Masjids
Number of congregants
41
Greeks, the Spanish and Portugese etc. in the Muslim Spain and the English
in the British empire, were all European or Western barbarians in history.
They all achieved an impact on history and were indeed a force on other
peoples.
It is the Muslim outright domination of this last group or ethnicity, ie. the
emerging statistical religious majority of Muslims here in Britain which is of
such great significance as it is the only means by which, where historically
only the Muslims of London were granted Dar al Islam, now all of these
groups, all of Europe and indeed all of the world can come into the fold of
Islam.
At present European Islam is largely in the Balkan areas of the various dar
al Islam countries of Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania, already mentioned. This
historical analysis then says, should it move into Spain, UK, Italy and
Greece, it will truly be a force to be reckoned with. In fact, if Britain should
be conquered, given Spain is still Muslim in the sense of dar al Islam, only
the barbaric tribes of the Romans and Greeks would remain as a historic
force in Europe and the West.
42
Name
North East
Jack
North West
Harry
Yorkshire and The Humber Harry
East Midlands
Harry
West Midlands
Harry
East
Harry
London
Muhammad
South East
Harry
South West
Harry
Wales
Jacob
Figure 5: Most popular name by region 2012
Source: Office for National Statistics
There must be a ceding of power where schools are taught why, for
example Muhammad is our (as Britons) most popular name. This is
replacement theory. A theory of the actual and unexpected precedence and
supercession of the religion of Islam on Judeo- Christian heritage of Europe
and America, non-Muslim ruled lands. It is a biological view of Islam
overcoming Christianity.
We have a sort of democracy, we know how practical Islam is in our lives,
now we must believe in practicability. By practicability, I mean the
relevance of Islam in the West and that it is the only religion that can be
implemented fully. In other words that beyond Zahir (overt religion) and
Batin (esotericism) is something else that cannot be achieved outside of the
religion. Another word for megareligiousity. You can call it the unofficial
religion, or the religion in practice.
43
In din, when you are on the road, you must believe in freedom for
Palestine, not in Israel. In practice, in Pakistan not in Great Britain; in Urdu
not in English. Ultimately in the Holy Quran to read not in the Bible. In
ourselves as Muslims not in Christians. Indeed, we must believe in India
not America. We must accept our fard (duty) as Muslims not just talk about
Islam, religion and domination.
Briefly, the Ummah in Britain has an identity which is like a political party
with no doubt a power of lobby and veto. We believe in a scholarly
consultation and concensus through the Shariah and the Holy books.
Muslims are freedom fighters and unitarianists. Not terrorists or
trinitarianists.
At the moment, democratism is associated with dar al Islam, whereas if we
consider the potential we have for swamping the Western base of electoral
voters, it should be a little more right wing. In fact it is this view that
Britain brings with it our Islam, our Holy book, our Divine Sources, that is
the problem. We must return to being Muslim even if that means being
conservative or republican or basically fighting our way out. We must
learn to neglect our society if we can still manage to remember the present,
past and future governments and kingdoms on earth are only made by the
heavenly people. Half of the people of heaven will be from Ummah of the
Prophet (SWS). This tells us how being an Ummati of the Prophet (SWS) is
the right way to be.
To reiterate, our politics advocates Islamic socialism, much like the
Pakistan Muslim League (PML) in Pakistan. This may lead to a struggle
with enemies and we may claim to have earnt a hard fought victory from
the fight. Nevertheless, we must advocate a pure, unadulterated Islam. Not
a version of it, Not a vision of it, not a social form of it, and not a
utilitisation of it nor a utilisation of it will be acceptable let alone the halfway house we see today; a utilitarian Islam, immersed in science to the
neglect of religion, art to the neglect of The Creator, faith to the neglect of,
and this is the real reason Islam is coming to overpower all other faiths,
religious practice. Islam is a very practical religion. It is also the real
44
45
Ethics
Christianity
Figure 6:
Filter 1: Left-side showing religious practice of families and right-side
showing surveyed humanist measures
The above filter shows how not only is Christianity failing in America but
the faith has very little faith in its roots. The left side shows how it is
impracticable for the future and the right how it is faithless and irreligious.
Together the two sides give four more dimensions to religion other than
plain affiliation. We could decide which religion the person is by affiliation
but these measures show also how much the religion is practised and also
how much that person really believes or how religious the person is.
46
The next diagram shows instead of the left and right filters, the primary
and secondary filters. Left and right show how religious practice and belief
systems are interwoven. Only if you have a right side (ie beliefs, attitudes,
values etc) can you rely on the left side. In Filter 2, the primary filter shows
religion and ethics become ultimately religious practice whereas the
secondary filter has the middle intersection, pictured below giving us
religious praxis.
Ethics
Christianity
Single-parent families
47
This is the vision for 2020, the 2020 vision, or 2040 or 2060. That, in Britain,
France, Germany, America etc, Islam will overtake and replace Christianity
as the religion of the masses, the ethical praxis for life in the west.
48
Religious
Believer
Dualparent
49
Religious
Believer Dualparent
50
Religious
Dual-parent
families
Believer
In God
Figure 10: Americans may have big circles as above but there is an
insignificant intersection between faith, religion, family life and of course,
practice.
This tells us eventually Muslims will be in the majority as it gives a good
idea as to the trend of how the situation will change in the future.
This reveals the reproductive, believing, religious, practitioners of religions
in America are more often Muslim than not. Islam then is a sort of
maximum if not a majority.
Americas demise.....
2015 is indeed a year in which the UN agencies admit China may well have
overtaken America in the size of its economy. Nevertheless, the habits of
the Irish are a good example of the failings of the established church in
Britain, which applies well to moral and ethical life in America. In the
51
seventies, in Ireland, 90% of the people were Christian, 90% of whom were
regularly church-going.
Now, 40 years later only 25% of Ireland go to church this Sunday. USA
shows a similar low attendance.
Religious
Believer
Dualparent
Religious
Believer Dualparent
52
I dont prophesise a new Israel in the Islam of the USA, rather a new
America. With only 5% or 10% nationals as Muslims, all of whom are
devout, faithful, mosque-going (or at least are or will be), and most
important of all, from stable families, America will be more Muslim than
Jewish or Christian.
American politics is relevant to here in the UK as well. Republicanism, the
right-wing, described as neo-conservative, responsible for enforcing war
on the blessed poor across the world tells us it is enforcing democracy.
Given that the left-wing of American politics informed them to continue
warring, successive governments of Obama have failed to fulfil promises
to end their false-flag wars.
The Muslim peoples of USA can be a Muslim majority, associated with the
political right; or a Muslim country, associated with the political left, in the
eyes of the very same crusaders.
It is not the conservatism that Mr Bush, enemy of the respected people of
the land of Prophet Abrahams birth, shoved down our throats. Rather it is
the democratism which is nearer, for now to what is Islamic. Wherever
Muslims live in the world, first we must do away with the Tony Blairs and
Barack Obamas then live according to Shariah. Having done that, it may
become important for us to denounce, in the UK, the Queen and the
institution of royalty, and only then can we become a Muslim country
where the word of God is utmost. Foremost is that the political will of the
respected peoples is carried out.
As for the accusation that Muslims are fanatical terrorists, in the last
century, only Christians had the monopoly on Fascism, Nazism (and
indeed Communism). Terrorists were born in Ireland we all know. As
Muslims we dont ask for democracy to be given to us on a plate nor for
the Queen to abdicate, rather we are associated with left-wing political
views. Indeed the whole argument only gives precedence to the fact that
should we become majority what would we do with the legal institutions if
we were right-wing or conservative?
53
54
innocent people in different countries of the world and get away with it,
and no one seems to want to do anything about it.
What needs to be said from here is that what prevails in America is in fact,
a perversion of Muslim culture. Like slavery.
The filter shows how, because half of the populous is lost in each stage of
the filter for Christianity, it is actually a great big lie. 40 something percent
will say that they attend their Church regularly when the attendance
doesnt figure- only half of that are at Church according to their figures in
the week.
Thus 50%, becomes 25% are practising weekly, which becomes 12.5% are
from nuclear families, which becomes 6.25% are considered believers,
which becomes 3.125% are considered religious. So only 10m are in fact
considered religious believers from regularly practising families (should
the overall US population reach 350 m and the figures dont deteriorate).
For Muslims, almost all (In fact 80%) are going through the filter. At each
stage, if 7 million in 2001 becomes 14 million for 2014, should this double
again, about 11m are in fact considered religious believers from regularly
practising families.
When will Americans practise the religion of Islam more than Christianity?
It can be expected of areas like Illinois, Florida, California or New Jersey to
have as many more practitioners in the Islamic faith than any other by
2020, but what about for America as a whole?
Well if the Muslim population doubles and redoubles it would mean
mosque numbers would have to be ten times as big. In such a situation, for
Islam to have more faithful in America, they would need to double
congregations, with mosques offering two or more services at each prayer.
This could be as soon as in our lifetimes. With the spread of secularism
across Europe likely to contaminate the figures for the states, Islam is most
likely to take over Christianity in this generation. The 50 million Sunday
worshippers could be replaced by Friday worshippers, as Christian
55
56
in Allah and His messengers. And do not say, "Three"; desist - it is better
for you. Indeed, Allah is but one God. Exalted is He above having a son. To
Him belongs whatever is in the heavens and whatever is on the earth. And
sufficient is Allah as Disposer of affairs. (The Holy Quran 4:171)
These points show two distinct stages. Firstly the incorporation of ethics in
American life as philosophically from Christianism although, in practice it
may be different. Secondly, the three points of the chasm between the
claims (the lies) and the facts (the truth) prove, in their economic, social
and political implications that America is to be a Muslim country.
Briefly the two angles I mentioned are indicative of praxis. What is praxis?
How is it different from lay ethics or general psychology? Can American
christianism based in non-catholicism be transferred into and replaced by
militant, political and intellectual Islam. Yes, in a matter of decades.
The idea of praxis is a concept which says that well, if the US army or
armed forces do XYZ and the church says its wrong, it is deemed wrong
but nothing will happen of it unless and until it is not prevented from
materialising into action. Unless the ethics is action, there is no praxis.
Let me explain. Modern USA has a shelf life, a sell-by date: 2080. The UK
will be relatively majority Muslim by 2060. The USA too, similarly, will
have more mosque-goers than non-catholic church-goers by 2080.
Why??
Non-reproductiveness.
We all say Americanism is destructive, obsessed with consumerism, no
longer the worlds biggest production power-house. Now? America is
home to non-reproduction. No, its not to do with the inequality of
distribution or economic resource allocation on its own. Its a simple fact,
they are either:
Gay
Divorced
57
Porn addicts
Premaritally sexually active
Celibate
Paedophiles
Adulterous
Use birth control
Etc.
When it comes to the ethics of reproduction and reproductive biology, it
can be seen that knowing which religious grouping is sexually
reproductive is something like knowing which religious group will
ultimately survive over the other.
The units of the human being as an organism tell us increasingly more
about the members of the human race: The family, the individual and the
religious grouping or circle. The greater the overlap, the higher the chance
of ultimate survival. The first question is one of reproductive biology, the
second is one of religiousness and the third is one of religious faith in a
Supreme Being. All of these point to one question, who actually practises
more? If our national religious holiday is equated with figures for
affiliation, we can see Muslim or Christian is in a sense, a question of Eid
or Christmas. In Londonistan, Christianism is mere culture as outright 1
and 2, are more in the religion of Islam in the UK, very soon.
Ethics comes from revelatory ethics and from ethics we derive law.
However the Holy Book of Divine guidance for Americans by 2080 will be
the Holy book of The Holy Quran, Gods last revelation to humanity,
revealed to Prophet Muhammad (SWS) and not the Bible....
58
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Islam
Christian
Total
59
50
40
30
Islam
20
Christianity
10
0
2020
2040
2060
2080
Figure 16: The statistical overtaking of Islam over all religions in America
in 2060 (in millions). Assuming Christians excludes Catholics and
adherents are measured by number of congregants.
It is probable the next census will reveal more practising Muslims than
Christians in the UK. Further it is possible by 2041 or 2051 the census will
show more lay Muslims than lay Christians. I am assuming the Muslim
population continues its trend over the last three censuses to double, again.
60
61
62
63
countries. Through a battle against deprivation and not just the unjust
assertion of the religion of the Muslim Pakistanis was formed the nation of
Pakistan, and so Pakistans creation till now we, as Muslim Pakistanis seek
to save ourselves from deprivation and not to unnecessarily assert
religious rights of self or other.
Citigroup predict, in 2050:
GDP (PPP):
1. India: $85.97 trillion
2. China: $80.02 trillion
3. United States: $39.07 trillion
4. Indonesia: $13.93 trillion
5. Brazil: $11.58 trillion
6. Nigeria: $9.51 trillion
7. Russia: $7.77 trillion
8. Mexico: $6.57 trillion
9. Japan: $6.48 trillion
10. Egypt: $6.02 trillion.
Followed by: Korea/Taiwan/Hong Kong/Singapore (4 Asian Tigers)
Vietnam
Philippines
Bangladesh
Pakistan
GDP per capita:
64
65
66
Size of an economy
Figure 17: Proportion in economic activity
That means the new world order should be rephrased as the top 3
economies of today reverse their positions. So USA, China.... become
China, India and America.
2014
2012
2013
2014
1.CHN
China
14,789,517
16,173,272
17,617,321
2.USA
America
16,163,150
16,768,050
17,418,925
3.IND
India
2,343,802
2,511,439
2,676,081
4.JPN
Japan
4,543,204
4,685,286
4,750,771
Figure 18: Table showing China as the new head of economically
developed countries
67
The obligation to, the fairness for the poor and the rights of all of society,
and then all of the world should not be ignored. Further there should be
wealth for all continents in the world, Nigeria and Indonesia, for example
should spread wealth to Africa and so on. Wealth should not be restricted
to Europe on its own.
The subjugation and domination of even all European and American
peoples by the religion of Islam is possible too.
The superceding of China, in its population size over other countries,
particularly India (for some two hundred years) and its recent overtaking
of all other countries in terms of its economic power (particularly over the
States), inspite of the European and American countries having more
economic power (GDP) in terms of the individuals in those countries,
shows how Islam is rising to do the job of the subjugation and domination
of European and American peoples.
It is the dar al Islam and religious majority in some parts of Europe
(Bosnia, Kosovo and Albania) and is also now a religious majority in other
countries in Europe when participative measures of religion are taken.
Very soon, in a matter of decades, USA too, will have a religious majority
similar to UKs (when adherents or congregants are measured) where an
Islamic religious majority and thus dar al Islam are emerging or have
emerged already.
Indeed, the supercession of the religion of Islam in the USA (which will
take place in a handful of decades) will mean al Islam has taken over as the
outright religion of the world and has in other words spread throughout
the world.
Living here in Britain it is of less use, to involve ourselves in Dengs
economic reforms or the peaceful rise of China. No doubt the economic
success over the last decades and for this decade and for the coming
decades in China is immense, a greater historical achievement than
European or American economics ever made. Nevertheless the
68
69
70
50
40
30
Islam
20
Christianity
10
0
2020
2040
2060
2080
Figure 19: The rise of the Islamic faith in America- Millions of congregants
per week
71
knows has invaded Iraq and Afghanistan for periods of around 10 years. In
both cases in fact they are still there. The world wars combined lasted for
shorter than these wars individually.
This asymmetric war-bent people are obsessed with cold, world, just,
permanent, perpetual war. What is less well known is that they being
evangelical and neo-conservative should have invaded Britain, at least that
way, the UK would have more Christians than Muslims.
This is obviously their only interest, religious terrorism. Logically, Fascism
comes from Catholics and Nazism from Protestants. So they, Americans
are Nazis, well, failed Nazis. As it is Britain has been conquered by the
Islamic faith. In France and Germany too, the main religion being practised
is Al Islam. The top three American allies then have been proselytised into
Al Islam. America itself has been declared as the height of all evil and the
greatest threat to humanitys survival as well as the systems of economic
production and biological reproduction.
15
10
Christianism
Islam
1980
1990
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
Figure 20: The rise of the Islamic faith in Britain - Millions of congregants
per week
Saudia Arabia and Pakistan, countries which are 100% Muslim, are left, as
well as Japan, to serve on the list of Americas allies as Imperialists. Other
72
than this, Turkey, which is no longer an ally of Israel and instead MPs
wear Muslim hijab and so on, may well be the only major power which
doesnt fight America or doesnt try to hamper American interests.
3.2 The insignificance of Christianism
The practical denunciation of the Christianist faith by Great Britain and
therefore the common wealth, have served to enforce a slogan of no
war on the poor. War is the health of the States and its cause is the wealth
that it has usurped from the rest of the respected peoples of the world.
Not only are there many countries who subscribe to the imperialist design
(eg. in Africa, the Carribean and the Pacific) but of the top 20 richest
countries of the world half are part of British dominion.
Nevertheless, the number of active Muslims in London, for example, is
much greater than the number of Christians. Scores more on a daily basis,
almost twice as many on a weekly basis, if C of E is considered on its own,
and no less on a monthly or annual basis. Why then are we not allowed to
be Earls, Viscounts or Dukes? Why then, the Queen and Western and
other institutions? Why do the people use this absurd calendar or pray for
daily bread (from the lords prayer) when it is statistically absurd to
occupy and continue occupying these, as well as other lands?
I read recently about a British public school banning bearded pupils. This
meant their being coerced to shave (ie. threatened) and eventually barred
from outside contact (ie from classroom) for the 6 and a half hours
duration of the school day. Its not as if you are allowed to ask them why
they dont worship God Almighty with compassion instead of the false
Jesus, after all, Fascism and Nazism is all they own. They act as if, as
Muslims we have a monopoly on terror. No sir! As Christians you have the
monopoly on Fascism and Nazism. Thats historical fact.
And why? Because of your religious fanaticism or fundamentalism, ie.
Violent extremism. Christ, you say died a bloody death! Why dont you
sympathise with communists or do something nice for once? That would
make a bloody change!
73
Every soul will taste death, and you will only be given your [full]
compensation on the Day of Resurrection. So he who is drawn away from
the Fire and admitted to Paradise has attained [his desire]. And what is the
life of this world except the enjoyment of delusion.
The Holy Quran 3:185
74
75
3.4 Colonialism
Colonialism (Al Istemar in Arabic) is defined by slavery as well as the
invasion and occupation of foreign lands by the so-called European
peoples. In fact they have no real linguistic, cultural nor religious right on
Europe itself, although we are not only dealing with this point here.
The best example of the colonial dream and the worst example of
humanity was the cause of the starved generation of the Pak-indo subcontinent before the creation of Pakistan.
Even today the people of the sub-continent are dropping like flies by the
million due to enforced famine and starvation. When Pakistan was created
in 1947 with a population of around 30 million, some 50 million had
already perished due to the British enforced famine through the invasion
and occupation of the British over the preceding two centuries.
The dispossession of life through the dispossession of staple foods to my
people remained a constant factor in maintaining the infidel alliance
between hindus and Christians and their theft of Muslim India. Just like in
the Americas, Columbus was busy megamurdering natives and Africans
alike, the occupiers of Muslim India were slaying millions of people
indigenous to the Pak sub-continent by the dispossession of food and
water.
The starved people could only beg then to the point that the overt policy
was that we should fall with one hand on the British loins when really their
both hands were around our neck. A deliberate policy was undertaken at
government level to withhold grain and any cheap staple from Indians,
those being at the time of the invasion of the east india co. Muslim Indians
of the Muslim India too.
Of this country of some 300 million almost 20% of that had perished of the
preceding generation. These are named the starved generation. Starved to
76
death by the British. Why? So Brits could grow fat and keep England. Did
it work? NO!
It is shocking to note the statistic, that when Muslim India was invaded by
the British, it had a population of some 150 million. In 200 years, instead of
contributing to the Muslim way of life and the truth of Islam as the last
Divine religion on earth, they savagely and barbarically killed some 35% of
the first or second largest country on earth.
They brutally murdered 50 million innocent Muslim Indians when they
themselves were barely 35-40 million in number. It was a non-stop
exhibition of wanton atrocity that was, along with slavery of Africans, the
joy of colonialism.
77
78
79
1. Personal
2. Social
In our society we are taught to earn an honest wage. But are we really
deserving of it? We are obsessed with financing ourselves at the cost of
others when we should see the harmony between conventional uses of
profit such as financing and re-enacting what we do ourselves, and Zakat.
For Marx the object or commodity is an object of fetishisation, for me it is
the subject of sacrifice. Zakat, unlike the refinancing of sales can be used to
cover losses. Indeed it is a reason to have created a governing state and
works in the service of God and His creatures. Nonetheless it is a form of
magnanimity or philanthropy.
80
81
82
Muslim
Have both parents bringing them up
Pray daily and weekly in congregation
Believe conscientiously
Are religious
In countries like USA which can only be described as half-way house (or
even keel between Muslim and Christian), only half are, it is therefore not
surprising that one expects Afghanis, Pakistanis, Indians, Bengalis, etc.
who are Muslim to overtake the other religions in the west.
83
%
M%
C%
Average
Average
Average
Average
weekly
daily
weekly
daily
worshipp
ers
in
Muslim
worshipper
s
in
Muslim
places
of
worshipp
ers
in
Christian
worshippe
rs
in
Christian
places of
places of
worship
worship
worship
worship
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
places of
Camden
12.09%
33.96%
3.02%
1.51%
3.40%
1.70%
5.55%
45.34%
1.39%
0.69%
4.53%
2.27%
Hackney
14.10%
38.63%
3.53%
1.76%
3.86%
1.93%
Hammersmith and
Fulham
10.00%
54.14%
2.50%
1.25%
5.41%
2.71%
Haringey
14.17%
44.98%
3.54%
1.77%
4.50%
2.25%
Islington
9.47%
40.21%
2.37%
1.18%
4.02%
2.01%
Kensington and
Chelsea
9.97%
54.21%
2.49%
1.25%
5.42%
2.71%
Lambeth
7.09%
53.10%
1.77%
0.89%
5.31%
2.66%
Lewisham
6.44%
52.77%
1.61%
0.80%
5.28%
2.64%
Newham
31.97%
39.98%
7.99%
4.00%
4.00%
2.00%
8.52%
52.54%
2.13%
1.06%
5.25%
2.63%
34.51%
27.08%
8.63%
4.31%
2.71%
1.35%
Wandsworth
8.06%
52.96%
2.02%
1.01%
5.30%
2.65%
Westminster
18.27%
44.61%
4.57%
2.28%
4.46%
2.23%
13.73%
56.00%
3.43%
1.72%
5.60%
2.80%
Barnet
10.31%
41.21%
2.58%
1.29%
4.12%
2.06%
Bexley
2.43%
62.11%
0.61%
0.30%
6.21%
3.11%
Brent
City of London
Southwark
Tower Hamlets
18.65%
41.48%
4.66%
2.33%
4.15%
2.07%
Bromley
2.53%
60.65%
0.63%
0.32%
6.07%
3.03%
Croydon
8.12%
56.42%
2.03%
1.02%
5.64%
2.82%
Ealing
15.72%
43.75%
3.93%
1.96%
4.37%
2.19%
Enfield
16.69%
53.58%
4.17%
2.09%
5.36%
2.68%
6.82%
52.89%
1.70%
0.85%
5.29%
2.64%
12.50%
37.31%
3.12%
1.56%
3.73%
1.87%
Havering
2.04%
65.59%
0.51%
0.25%
6.56%
3.28%
Hillingdon
10.61%
49.21%
2.65%
1.33%
4.92%
2.46%
Hounslow
14.04%
42.00%
3.51%
1.76%
4.20%
2.10%
5.92%
52.91%
1.48%
0.74%
5.29%
2.65%
Merton
8.14%
56.08%
2.04%
1.02%
5.61%
2.80%
23.30%
36.83%
5.82%
2.91%
3.68%
1.84%
3.28%
55.25%
0.82%
0.41%
5.53%
2.76%
4.06%
58.42%
1.02%
0.51%
5.84%
2.92%
21.89%
48.38%
5.47%
2.74%
4.84%
2.42%
12.39%
48.42%
3.10%
1.55%
4.84%
2.42%
Greenwich
Harrow
Redbridge
Richmond upon
Thames
Sutton
Waltham Forest
84
85
London
boroughs
2,021
Muslim
M%
C%
Average
Average
Average
Average
weekly
daily
weekly
daily
worshippers
worshippers
in Christian
in Christian
places of
places of
worshippers
in
Muslim
places of
Camden
worshipper
s
in
Muslim
places
of
worship
worship
worship
worship
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
53,286
19.50%
30.30%
4.88%
2.44%
3.03%
1.52%
818
10.00%
43.00%
2.50%
1.25%
4.30%
2.15%
Hackney
69,454
22.00%
33.90%
5.50%
2.75%
3.39%
1.70%
36,484
16.70%
49.20%
4.18%
2.09%
4.92%
2.46%
Haringey
72,260
22.10%
39.40%
5.53%
2.76%
3.94%
1.97%
Islington
39,042
15.90%
36.70%
3.98%
1.99%
3.67%
1.84%
31,624
16.60%
49.30%
4.15%
2.08%
4.93%
2.47%
Lambeth
43,000
12.40%
49.60%
3.10%
1.55%
4.96%
2.48%
Lewisham
35,518
11.40%
49.60%
2.85%
1.43%
4.96%
2.48%
Newham
196,912
39.00%
30.30%
9.75%
4.88%
3.03%
1.52%
49,102
14.60%
48.40%
3.65%
1.83%
4.84%
2.42%
175,392
40.80%
20.10%
10.20%
5.10%
2.01%
1.01%
Wandsworth
49,492
13.90%
49.00%
3.48%
1.74%
4.90%
2.45%
Westminster
80,146
26.80%
37.70%
6.70%
3.35%
3.77%
1.89%
51,040
21.50%
49.20%
5.38%
2.69%
4.92%
2.46%
Barnet
73,488
17.10%
37.40%
4.28%
2.14%
3.74%
1.87%
City of London
Southwark
Tower Hamlets
Bexley
11,290
4.60%
60.60%
1.15%
0.58%
6.06%
3.03%
Brent
116,072
27.20%
35.00%
6.80%
3.40%
3.50%
1.75%
Bromley
15,682
4.80%
59.20%
1.20%
0.60%
5.92%
2.96%
Croydon
59,026
14.00%
52.20%
3.50%
1.75%
5.22%
2.61%
Ealing
106,396
23.90%
37.80%
5.98%
2.99%
3.78%
1.89%
Enfield
104,282
25.00%
45.90%
6.25%
3.13%
4.59%
2.30%
Greenwich
34,698
12.00%
49.50%
3.00%
1.50%
4.95%
2.48%
Harrow
59,762
20.00%
33.20%
5.00%
2.50%
3.32%
1.66%
Havering
9,658
3.90%
64.30%
0.98%
0.49%
6.43%
3.22%
Hillingdon
58,130
17.50%
44.50%
4.38%
2.19%
4.45%
2.23%
Hounslow
71,332
21.90%
36.80%
5.48%
2.74%
3.68%
1.84%
18,948
10.60%
50.00%
2.65%
1.33%
5.00%
2.50%
Merton
32,524
14.00%
51.90%
3.50%
1.75%
5.19%
2.60%
129,998
31.80%
29.90%
7.95%
3.98%
2.99%
1.50%
12,256
6.20%
53.50%
1.55%
0.78%
5.35%
2.68%
Sutton
15,452
7.50%
56.10%
1.88%
0.94%
5.61%
2.81%
113,082
30.50%
39.70%
7.63%
3.81%
3.97%
1.99%
2,025,646
18.00%
44.00%
4.50%
2.25%
4.40%
2.20%
Redbridge
Waltham Forest
86
London
boroughs
2,031
Muslim
M%
C%
Average
Average
Average
Average
weekly
daily
weekly
daily
worshippers
worshippers
in Christian
in Christian
places of
places of
worship
worship
(%)
(%)
worship
worshipper
s
in
Muslim
places
of
worship
(%)
(%)
Worshippers
in Muslim
places of
Camden
City of London
Hackney
Hammersmith and Fulham
106,572
32.60%
25.35%
8.15%
4.07%
2.53%
1.27%
1,636
18.16%
31.20%
4.54%
2.27%
3.12%
1.56%
138,908
36.06%
27.86%
9.02%
4.51%
2.79%
1.39%
72,968
28.56%
35.13%
7.14%
3.57%
3.51%
1.76%
Haringey
144,520
36.18%
31.02%
9.05%
4.52%
3.10%
1.55%
Islington
78,084
27.47%
28.68%
6.87%
3.43%
2.87%
1.43%
63,248
28.50%
35.15%
7.13%
3.56%
3.52%
1.76%
Lambeth
86,000
22.10%
34.68%
5.53%
2.76%
3.47%
1.73%
Lewisham
71,036
20.48%
34.54%
5.12%
2.56%
3.45%
1.73%
Newham
393,824
56.12%
28.56%
14.03%
7.01%
2.86%
1.43%
98,204
25.41%
34.44%
6.35%
3.18%
3.44%
1.72%
Southwark
Tower Hamlets
350,784
57.99%
21.31%
14.50%
7.25%
2.13%
1.07%
Wandsworth
98,984
24.38%
34.62%
6.10%
3.05%
3.46%
1.73%
Westminster
160,292
42.22%
30.85%
10.55%
5.28%
3.08%
1.54%
102,080
35.45%
35.90%
8.86%
4.43%
3.59%
1.79%
Barnet
146,976
29.20%
29.18%
7.30%
3.65%
2.92%
1.46%
Bexley
22,580
8.87%
38.31%
2.22%
1.11%
3.83%
1.92%
Brent
232,144
42.72%
29.32%
10.68%
5.34%
2.93%
1.47%
Bromley
31,364
9.20%
37.75%
2.30%
1.15%
3.78%
1.89%
Croydon
118,052
24.52%
36.07%
6.13%
3.07%
3.61%
1.80%
Ealing
212,792
38.60%
30.43%
9.65%
4.83%
3.04%
1.52%
Enfield
208,564
40.03%
34.89%
10.01%
5.00%
3.49%
1.74%
69,396
21.42%
34.59%
5.36%
2.68%
3.46%
1.73%
Greenwich
Harrow
119,524
33.33%
27.17%
8.33%
4.17%
2.72%
1.36%
Havering
19,316
7.53%
39.61%
1.88%
0.94%
3.96%
1.98%
Hillingdon
116,260
29.80%
32.98%
7.45%
3.72%
3.30%
1.65%
Hounslow
142,664
35.97%
29.58%
8.99%
4.50%
2.96%
1.48%
37,896
19.14%
34.60%
4.79%
2.39%
3.46%
1.73%
Merton
65,048
24.57%
35.93%
6.14%
3.07%
3.59%
1.80%
259,996
48.24%
26.92%
12.06%
6.03%
2.69%
1.35%
24,512
11.59%
35.59%
2.90%
1.45%
3.56%
1.78%
Redbridge
Richmond upon Thames
Sutton
Waltham Forest
30,904
13.98%
36.88%
3.50%
1.75%
3.69%
1.84%
226,164
46.69%
32.61%
11.67%
5.84%
3.26%
1.63%
4,051,292
33.14%
32.62%
8.28%
4.14%
3.26%
1.63%
87
Conclusion
On the presence of Islam in the British Islands. A relative not absolute
majority
The following survey would give a clear answer, to how many of the
London boroughs still have Christianity being practised in them:
London
borough
Admitted Admitted
Believes Termed
Weekly
Daily
Christianity in God themselves Mosque Practitioners
Islam
religious
attendees
Barking &
Dagenham
Newham
Redbridge
Tower
Hamlets
Waltham
forest
Figure 22: Christians are an relative minority in London and Muslims far
exceed Christians as per both daily and weekly worshippers
Perhaps in the census, this can be done to rule out Christianity by knowing
which boroughs exactly dont have outright domination in Islam.
At the moment we know, for example Tower Hamlets has a Muslim
majority and this is practised by the people in their communal and
everyday living. What we need to know by the next census is how has the
situation changed. What about Redbridge? What about Newham?
If a borough measures 3 (out of 5) from any faith, then the borough is
said to practise that faith. At the moment I can only say the scores are
88