The Indeterminate Sentence Law is mandatory in all cases, EXCEPT if the

accused will fall in any of the following exceptions:

1. if sentenced with a penalty of death or life imprisonment
2. if convicted of treason, conspiracy, proposal to commit treason
3. if convicted of misprision of treason, sedition, rebellion or espionage
4. if convicted of piracy
5. if the offender is a habitual delinquent
6. those who escaped from prison or evaded sentence
7. those who violated the terms of conditional pardon of the chief executive
8. where the maximum term of imprisonment does not exceed 1 year
(important!)
9. if convicted by final judgement at the time of the effectivity of Act No.
4103
10. if penalized with suspension or distierro
If accused fall in any of the foregoing exceptions. DO NOT APPLY ISLAW!
ISLAW applies to offenses punished by Special Law and Revised Penal Code.
Why is ISLAW mandatory?
In the application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law the judge will get the
maximum penalty and likewise the minimum penalty. If the accused was
already able to serve the minimum term of his indeterminate sentence and
upon the approval of the Board, the accused now becomes eligible for
parole. ISLAW is favorable to the accused.
If the accused was granted parole and violated some conditions of
the parole, What will happen?
A warrant of arrest will be issued by the court and the accused will be made
to serve the rest of the remaining or unexpired portion of his sentence. (But
in probation you go back to number 1, serving of sentence will be from the
beginning)
Application of ISLAW:
How to get maximum and minimum penalty in Special Law:
1. The maximum penalty should NOT exceed the maximum provided for by
that law.
2. The minimum penalty should NOT fall below the minimum provided by
the law.

How to get maximum and minimum penalty in Revised Penal Code:

Example: In the crime of homicide, under the Revised Penal Code, the
offender is sentenced to reclusion temporal.
The maximum penalty under the Indeterminate Sentence Law is reclusion
temporal. But reclusion temporal is a divisible penalty consisting of
maximum, medium and minimum periods. Which period will we place the
maximum term of the Indeterminate Sentence?
Guide for determining the maximum penalty:
1. Determine the entire range of the penalty
2. Determine if there is mitigating or aggravating circumstance
Which period will the maximum penalty be placed?
In pursuant to art 64, when there is no mitigating and no aggravating
circumstance, it should be placed at the medium period. Thus, the
maximum penalty for the example above is reclusion temporal in the
medium period.
What is the minimum penalty now?
In getting the minimum penalty, the rule is to simply get the penalty one
(1) degree lower from the maximum penalty without taking into account the
mitigating and aggravating circumstance. Thus, the penalty one degree
lower from reclusion temporal, without taking into account any mitigating
or aggravating circumstance, is prision mayor. Prision mayor is now the
minimum penalty for our example.
Important: If your maximum penalty is wrong, it follows that the minimum
penalty will also be wrong.
Again, prision mayor is a divisible penalty. Which period can it be placed?
Under the Indeterminate Sentence Law, it would depend upon the
discretion of the court on which period to place it. Thus, the minimum
penalty is prision mayor in any of its period.
Factors that could affect the imposition of minimum penalty:
1. Age
2. Conduct during trial
3. Mental or physical condition
Suppose in the example above, 1 aggravating circumstance was proven.
What is now the maximum penalty?
It would still be reclusion temporal, but it shall be placed in the maximum
period because of the presence of 1 aggravating circumstance.

How about the minimum penalty?

It would still be 1 degree lower from reclusion temporal, which is prision
mayor. In which period? It shall be discretionary upon the court.
(More examples)
1 mitigating but NO aggravating
maximum penalty: reclusion temporal in the minimum period
minimum penalty: prision mayor in any period
2 mitigating, NO aggravating (privileged mitigating)
maximum penalty: prision mayor in the medium period
minimum penalty: prision correctional any period
The preceding example is an exception to the rule. If there is a privileged
mitigating circumstance, we take it into account first in order to obtain the
proper maximum penalty. Then, from that maximum penalty, we obtain the
proper minimum penalty by getting the penalty 1 degree lower. Same rule
applies as to the period of the minimum penalty.
Remember: It will never become a privileged mitigating circumstance if
there is an aggravating circumstance present. 8 mitigating and 1
aggravating will never become privileged mitigating circumstance.
3 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: prision mayor in the minimum period
minimum penalty: prision correctional any period
In the preceding example, there are 3 mitigating circumstance present and
no aggravating circumstance. The first two mitigating circumstance shall be
a privileged mitigating circumstance. Thus, the penalty will be reduced by 1
degree from reclusion temporal to prision mayor. The 3rd mitigating
circumstance shall place the penalty in the minimum period.
4 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: prision correctional in the medium period (2 privileged
circumstance. Thus we lower by 2 degrees)
minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period
5 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: prision correctional in the minimum period
minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period

At most we can only lower by 2 degrees. Thus, if there are 6 mitigating

circumstance and NO aggravating:
maximum penalty: prision correctional in the minimum period
minimum penalty: arresto mayor any period
How is Indeterminate Sentence Law applied in complex crimes
(Article 48)?
A complex crime is punished by the most serious offense and shall be
imposed in its maximum period.
Example: Estafa through falsification of public documents.
Under the Revised Penal Code, falsification of public documents (Article
171) is a more serious offense punished by prision mayor than estafa
(Article 315), punished only by prision correctional.
Thus, applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, the maximum penalty for
estafa through falsification of public documents shall be prision mayor in
the maximum period. Minimum penalty shall be prision correctional, any
period.
Suppose there was 1 mitigating circumstance proven. Maximum penalty
would still be prision mayor in the maximum period. In pursuant to Article
48, even if there is a mitigating circumstance present, it should still be
imposed at the maximum period.
How about if there are 2 mitigating circumstance and no aggravating?
The rule is, if it is a privileged mitigating circumstance, we lower by the
penalty by one degree but still place it at the maximum period. Thus, the
maximum penalty shall be prision correctional in the maximum period.
4 mitigating, NO aggravating
maximum penalty: arresto mayor in its maximum period