Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sometime around four weeks the final thesis submission the responsible internal
examiner together with the responsible chair shall organize a pass/Fail Review. Directly
after this presentation the external advisor, the internal advisor and the responsible
chair have to decide on Pass/fail and conditional passes for each individual student. All
students will be informed about this decision no later than three days after the pass/fail
Review. In the case of a conditional pass, a written statement has to be given to the
student and conditions have to be set, under which the student will pass his/her thesis
project.
The thesis can be repeated once in the coming year if a student does not pass the
review or the final thesis review.
A pass in the pass/fail review does not guarantee a pass in the final thesis defense.
Architectural Design
Structural Design
Sanitary System Design
Data system Design
Electrical and/or energy system Design
Building Material and Construction System Design
Preliminary Cost Estimation
NB: The student together with his/her advisor(s) should develop a working schedule that
helps them deliver these expected outputs.
Architectural Design
Study scale of 1:1 1:200
Physical size of the project is decided based on the nature of the project and in
consciences between the student and the advisor(s)
A process that navigates from thesis/hypothesis formation until realization designs
Level of complexity:
o Sustainability (social, economic, environmental)
o Urban contextual Understanding
o Climatic and environmental response
o Permanence vs Temporality
o Mega vs Mini
o Understanding of prevailing multiple issues
o Formulating Consistent solutions in design
o Understanding and responding to historic and cultural complex realities
o Both pragmatic, solution oriented approaches and projective, futuristic
tendencies can prevail
o Bottom Up vs Top Down approaches
o Challenging trends and showing progressive means and technology
FORMAT
The following general format is suggested as minimum requirement:
- 8 to 12 plans (A1 portrait format, character Arial) with the most important
information about the project in plans, section, 3D-Drawtings, axonometric
drawings, sketches, texts, etc.
- Presentation models and working models in an appropriate scale and amount(to
be discussed with the internal advisor )
- A research booklet (no less than 30 pages, A4 format, portrait) describing the
hypothesis and documenting the design process as well as the final product. This
booklet has to be submitted with the final master thesis.(3 copies).
THESIS DEFENSE:
The date for the public thesis defense session has to be announced in the during the
first four weeks of the thesis semester by the Bachelor Program Director and the
session will be conducted by an examining board consisting of:
- Internal Examining Unit (Competence Centre Architecture and Architectural
Design Examining Unit)
- Internal Advisor from the responsible chair
- External Advisor
- Director of study programs EiABC
- Invited Jury Members (could be a faculty member to the EiABC or an outside
professional) (optional)
Only if the top four members are present, the reviews can be conducted. It is the
students obligation to select the external advisors latest within the four week of the
thesis semester in close coordination with and approval from the responsible chair.
Grading:
The thesis should be graded directly after thesis defense by using the following criteria:
- Quality of oral presentation
- Quality of analytical work
- Quality of applied concept/strategy methodology
- Quality of design process and final product
- Quality of visual presentation(Graphics/Mode)
- Quality of research booklet
The grading of the
- Internal Examining Unit will grade 60%
- The advisor of the responsible chair will grade 25%
- External advisor will grade 15%
The final mark shall be announced not later than 14 days after the thesis defense.
In case of a medical or other unforeseen problem during the thesis period, the
internal advisor in coordination with the Program Director and the examining unit can
consider an extension of the deadline after sufficient evidence is presented by the
student (see EiABC regulations for sick leaves).