Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Income statement
Net sales
Cost of sales
Gross income
Depreciation
Interest expense
Operating expenses
Net income before tax
Provision for taxes
Net income after tax
243
95
148
58
19
26
45
25
39
41
25
47
18
132
511
102
409
129
670
612
160
452
129
678
826
284
542
129
778
991
433
559
129
812
1,051
553
498
129
772
1,093
663
430
129
708
Accounts payable
Short-term debt
Current portion long-term debt
Accrued expenses
Total current liabilities
Long-term debt
Deferred taxes
12
54
5
10
81
201
40
9
54
5
12
80
181
42
11
62
5
13
91
234
45
13
65
4
16
97
217
51
14
62
4
20
100
97
58
15
18
4
20
57
(0)
61
257
98
159
92
17
24
27
17
27
11
25
47
15
97
321
116
206
124
22
28
32
21
33
13
26
50
17
107
386
135
251
149
22
37
43
25
40
16
32
56
20
124
443
155
288
120
14
54
100
45
70
18
36
65
25
144
461
161
300
110
4
67
119
48
75
Balance sheet
19
38
67
25
149
07/15/2015
Shareholders' equity
Total liabilities and equity
348
670
375
678
407
778
447
812
517
772
591
708
07/15/2015
d. Prior to the restructuring, what percentage decline in earnings before interest and taxes could the company
sustain and still cover its interest expenses? What is the comparable figure after the restructuring? If you were a
well-capitalized competitor, anxious to increase market share, what do these numbers suggest might be an
interesting strategy to use against this firm?
4) In 1980 Massey-Ferguson Ltd, a multinational producer of farm machinery, industrial machinery, and diesel engines,
lost $225 million, or $12.79 per share. This capped a three year period during which the firm lost almost half a billion
dollars. Massey-Ferguson began fiscal 1981 in default on its $2.5 billion of outstanding debt and many observers were
openly speculating that the company would soon be forced to declare bankruptcy. These problems had not escaped
notice of the stock market, which at the end of October 1980 priced the company's shares at only $5.50.
a. Calculate the market value of Massey-Ferguson's equity on October 31, 1980.
b. Assuming the market value of Massey-Ferguson's debt equals 70 percent of book value, calculate the market
value of the company on October 31, 1980. (The market value of debt is well below the $2.5 billion book value
due to the prospect of bankruptcy.)
c. Is $5.50 per share the market's estimate of the liquidation value of Massey-Fergusons equity at the end of
October? Why or why not? If not, why else would an investor buy the company's stock?
5) The following information is available about Russell Brewing Company.
Stock price
Common shares outstanding
Market value of interest-bearing debt
Weighted average cost of capital
$8 per share
10 million
$75 million
14 percent.
A private-equity company is confident that by terminating Russell's money losing fruit-flavored beer coolers and by
selling the women's hosiery division free cash flow can be increased $4 million annually for the next decade. In
addition, they estimate that an immediate, special dividend of $10 million can be financed by the sale of the hosiery
division.
a. Assuming these actions do not affect Russell's cost of capital, what is the maximum price per share the investment
company would be justified in bidding for control of Russell? What percentage premium does this represent?
b. Conduct a sensitivity analysis of your answer to (a) by assuming the cost of capital is 15 percent and the increased
cash flow is only $3.5 million per year.
6) Grubb State Power and Light's free cash flow next year will be $100 million and it is widely expected to grow at a
4 percent annual rate indefinitely. The company's weighted average cost of capital is 10 percent, the market value of
its liabilities is $1 billion, and it has 20 million shares outstanding.
a. Estimate the price per share of Grubb's common stock.
b. A private equity firm believes that by selling the company 767 airplane, increasing the work day to eight hours,
and instituting other cost savings, it can increase Grubb's free cash flow next year to $110 billion and can add a full
percentage point to Grubb's growth rate without affecting its cost of capital. What is the maximum price per share
the private equity firm can justify bidding for control of Grubb?