You are on page 1of 56

BAR EXAMINATION 2009

LEGAL ETHICS AND PRACTICAL EXERCISES


04 October 2009

2 P.M. - 5 P.M.
INSTRUCTIONS

This questionnaire is in TWO (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained
in four (4) pages; and Part II with ten (10) questions (numbered XI-XX), contained in four (4) pages,
for a total number of eight (8) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.
Answer the questions directly and concisely. Do not repeat the questions. Write legibly.
HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.
GOOD LUCK!

_____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
CHAIRPERSON
2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS COMMITTEE

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS NINE (9) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE)

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE


LEGAL ETHICS AND PRACTICAL EXERCISES
PART I
I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. The Bangalore Draft, approved at a Roundtable Meeting of Chief Justices held at The
Hague, is now the New Code of Judicial Conduct in the Philippines.
b. An attorney ad hoc is a lawyer appointed by the court to represent an absentee defendant in

a suit in which the appointment is made.


c. A charging lien, as distinguished from a retaining lien, is an active lien which can be
enforced by execution.
d. A lawyer cannot refuse to divulge the name or identity of his client.
e. A notary public is disqualified from performing a notarial act when the party to the document
is a relative by affinity within the 4th civil degree.
II
a. What is the object of the bar examinations? Explain. (2%)
b. What are the three (3) tests to determine conflict of interest for practicing lawyers? Explain
each briefly. (3%)
III
a. May a party appear as his own counsel in a criminal or in a civil case? Explain. (3%)
b. What is the student practice rule? (2%)
IV
a. In a case for homicide filed before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Presiding Judge Quintero
issued an order for the arrest of the accused, granted a motion for the reduction of bail, and
set the date for the arraignment of the accused. Subsequently, Judge Quintero inhibited
himself from the case, alleging that even before the case was raffled to his court, he already
had personal knowledge of the circumstances surrounding the case. Is Judge Quinteros
inhibition justified? Explain. (3%)
b. After being diagnosed with stress dermatitis, Judge Rosalind, without seeking permission
from the Supreme Court, refused to wear her robe during court proceedings. When her
attention was called, she explained that whenever she wears her robe she is reminded of
her heavy caseload, thus making her tense. This, in turn, triggers the outbreak of skin
rashes. Is Judge Rosalind justified in not wearing her judicial robe? Explain. (3%)
V
Cliff and Greta were law school sweethearts. Cliff became a lawyer, but Greta dropped out. One day,
Cliff asked Greta to sign a marriage contract. The following day, Cliff showed Greta the document
already signed by an alleged solemnizing officer and two witnesses. Cliff then told Greta that they
were already married and Greta consented to go on a honeymoon. Thereafter, the couple cohabited
and begot a child. Two years later, Cliff left Greta and married a Venezuelan beauty. Incensed, Greta
filed a disbarment complaint against Cliff. Will the case prosper? Explain. (4%)
VI

Atty. Sabungero obtained a notarial commission. One Sunday, while he was at the cockpit, a person
approached him with an affidavit that needed to be notarized. Atty. Sabungero immediately pulled
out from his pocket his small notarial seal, and notarized the document. Was the affidavit validly
notarized? Explain. (3%)
VII
Atty. Manuel is counsel for the defendant in a civil case pending before the RTC. After receiving the
plaintiffs Pre-Trial Brief containing the list of witnesses, Atty. Manuel interviewed some of the
witnesses for the plaintiff without the consent of plaintiffs counsel.
a. Did Atty. Manuel violate any ethical standard for lawyers? Explain. (3%)
b. Will your answer be the same if it was the plaintiff who was interviewed by Atty. Manuel
without the consent of plaintiffs counsel? Explain. (2%)
VIII
Court of Appeals (CA) Justice Juris was administratively charged with gross ignorance of the law for
having issued an order "temporarily enjoining" the implementation of a writ of execution, and for
having issued another order for the parties to "maintain the status quo" in the same case. Both
orders are obviously without any legal basis and violate CA rules. In his defense, Justice Juris
claims that the challenged orders were collegial acts of the CA Division to which he belonged. Thus,
he posits that the charge should not be filed against him alone, but should include the two other CA
justices in the Division. Is the contention of Justice Juris tenable? Explain. (3%)
IX
Alexander Sison, resident of 111 Libertad St., Sampaloc, Manila, engages your services as lawyer.
He tells you that a certain Mr. Juan Jamero of 222 Juan Luna St., Tondo, Manila, owes him
P1,000,000.00; that the debt is long overdue; and that, despite repeated demands, Jamero has
failed to comply with his obligation. He also shows you a promissory note, executed on January 3,
2008, wherein Jamero promises to pay the amount of P1,000,000.00, with 12% interest per annum,
within one (1) year from date of note. Sison agrees to pay you attorneys fees in the amount of
P75,000.00, and a fee of P3,000.00 for every appearance in court.
As Sisons lawyer, prepare the complaint that you will file in court against Juan Jamero. (10%)
X
Given the same facts in No. IX above, assume that summons had been served on Jamero, but no
responsive pleading was filed within the reglementary period.
Prepare a motion to declare Jamero in default. (4%)
PART II
XI

TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. The duty of a lawyer to his client is more paramount than his duty to the Court.
b. It is ethical for a lawyer to advise his client to enter a plea of guilty in a criminal case if the
lawyer is personally convinced that he cannot win the case for his client.
c. There is no presumption of innocence or improbability of wrongdoing in an attorneys favor
when he deals with his client concurrently as lawyer and as businessman.
d. The satisfaction of a judgment debt does not, by itself, bar or extinguish the attorneys liens,
except when there has been a waiver by the lawyer, as shown by his conduct or his passive
omission.
e. A companion or employee of the judge who lives in the judges household is included in the
definition of the "judges family."
XII
Write the complete text of the attorneys oath. (5%)
XIII
Atty. Hyde, a bachelor, practices law in the Philippines. On long weekends, he dates beautiful
actresses in Hong Kong. Kristine, a neighbor in the Philippines, filed with the Supreme Court an
administrative complaint against the lawyer because of sex videos uploaded through the internet
showing Atty. Hydes sordid dalliance with the actresses in Hong Kong.
In his answer, Atty. Hyde (1) questions the legal personality and interest of Kristine to institute the
complaint and (2) insists that he is a bachelor and the sex videos relate to his private life which is
outside public scrutiny and have nothing to do with his law practice.
Rule on the validity of Atty. Hydes defenses. (5%)
XIV
Marlyn, a widow, engaged the services of Atty. Romanito in order to avert the foreclosure of several
parcels of land mortgaged by her late husband to several creditors. Atty. Romanito advised the
widow to execute in his favor deeds of sale over the properties, so that he could sell them and
generate funds to pay her creditors. The widow agreed. Atty. Romanito did not sell the properties,
but paid the mortgage creditors with his own funds, and had the land titles registered in his name.
Atty. Romanito succeeds in averting the foreclosure. Is he administratively liable? Reasons. (3%)
XV
Atty. Wilmar represented Beatriz in a partition case among heirs, and won. When Wilmar demanded
payment of attorneys fees, Beatriz refused to pay. Wilmar sued Beatriz for the unpaid attorneys
fees and obtained a favorable judgment. Thereafter, Beatriz filed an administrative complaint against

Wilmar claiming that he lied when he stated in his claim for attorneys fees that the subject of the
partition case involved the entire estate of the deceased when, in fact, it covered only 50% thereof.
Wilmar set up the defenses that (1) Beatriz filed the complaint only to delay the execution of the
judgment ordering her to pay attorneys fees and (2) Beatriz engaged in forum-shopping. Are the
defenses of Atty. Wilmar tenable? Explain. (4%)
XVI
Atty. Simeon persuaded Armando, Benigno and Ciriaco to invest in a business venture that later
went bankrupt. Armando, Benigno and Ciriaco charged Atty. Simeon with estafa. Simultaneously,
they filed an administrative complaint against the lawyer with the Supreme Court.
a. If Simeon is convicted of estafa, will he be disbarred? Explain. (3%)
b. If Simeon is acquitted of the estafa charge, will the disbarment complaint be dismissed?
Explain. (3%)
XVII
When Atty. Romualdo interviewed his client, Vicente, who is accused of murder, the latter confessed
that he killed the victim in cold blood. Vicente also said that when he takes the witness stand, he will
deny having done so. Is Atty. Romualdo obliged, under his oath as lawyer, to inform the judge that
[a] his client is guilty and [b] his client will commit perjury on the witness stand? Explain. (4%)
XVIII
On a Saturday, Atty. Paterno filed a petition for a writ of amparo with the Court of Appeals (CA).
Impelled by the urgency for the issuance of the writ, Atty. Paterno persuaded his friend, CA Justice
Johnny de la Cruz, to issue the writ of amparo and the notice of hearing without the signature of the
two other Justices-members of the CA division. Are Atty. Paterno and Justice de la Cruz guilty of
unethical conduct? Explain. (4%)
XIX
Romeo Hacendero wants to authorize Juanito Ahente to sell, on cash basis, for a price not lower
than P500,000.00, a parcel of land, situated in Muoz, Nueva Ecija, and covered by Transfer
Certificate of Title No. 123456, in the Register of Deeds of Nueva Ecija. Prepare a Special Power of
Attorney granting such authority. (4%)
XX
From the affidavits and the death certificate submitted during the preliminary investigation, the
following facts are established: At 6:00 oclock in the evening of September 13, 2009, at the corner
of Dapitan and Dos Castillas Sts., Sampaloc, Manila, Edgar Bastonero, alias Bugoy, and Carlos
Tirador, alias Pogi, accosted Johnny Escolar, a student, and demanded the latters cellular phone
and wrist watch. Because Johnny resisted, Bastonero pulled out a knife and stabbed Johnny several
times in the chest, causing instantaneous death. Bastonero and Tirador then ran away. The
affidavits were executed by William Tan and Henry Uy, classmates of Johnny, who witnessed the
entire incident. The death certificate was issued by Dr. Jose Cabra who conducted the autopsy on

Johnny.
As Assistant City Prosecutor in Manila, prepare the appropriate criminal information to be filed in
court. (10%)
-NOTHING FOLLOWSBAR EXAMINATION 2009
REMEDIAL LAW
04 October 2009

8 A.M. - 12 P.M.
INSTRUCTIONS

This questionnaire is in TWO (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained
in six (6) pages; and Part II with nine (9) questions (numbered XI-XIX), contained in five (5) pages,
for a total number of eleven (11) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.
Answer the questions directly and concisely. Do not repeat the questions. Write legibly.
HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.
GOOD LUCK!

_____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
CHAIRPERSON
2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS COMMITTEE

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS TWELVE (12) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE)

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE


REMEDIAL LAW
PART I

I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. The Vallejo standard refers to jurisprudential norms considered by the court in assessing the
probative value of DNA evidence.
b. The One-Day Examination of Witness Rule abbreviates court proceedings by having a
witness fully examined in only one day during trial.
c. A suit for injunction is an action in rem.
d. Under the doctrine of adoptive admission, a third party's statement becomes the admission
of the party embracing or espousing it.
e. Summons may be served by mail.
II
Angelina sued Armando before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila to recover the ownership
and possession of two parcels of land; one situated in Pampanga, and the other in Bulacan.
a. May the action prosper? Explain. (2%)
b. Will your answer be the same if the action was for foreclosure of the mortgage over the two
parcels of land? Why or why not? (2%)
III
Amorsolo, a Filipino citizen permanently residing in New York City, filed with the RTC of Lipa City a
Complaint for Rescission of Contract of Sale of Land against Brigido, a resident of Barangay San
Miguel, Sto. Tomas, Batangas. The subject property, located in Barangay Talisay, Lipa City, has an
assessed value of P19,700.00. Appended to the complaint is Amorsolo's verification and certification
of non-forum shopping executed in New York City, duly notarized by Mr. Joseph Brown, Esq., a
notary public in the State of New York.
Brigido filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the following grounds:
a. The court cannot acquire jurisdiction over the person of Amorsolo because he is not a
resident of the Philippines; (2%)
b. The RTC does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of the action involving real
property with an assessed value of P19,700.00; exclusive and original jurisdiction is with the
Municipal Trial Court where the defendant resides; (3%) and
c. The verification and certification of non-forum shopping are fatally defective because there is
no accompanying certification issued by the Philippine Consulate in New York,

authenticating that Mr. Brown is duly authorized to notarize the document. (3%)
Rule on the foregoing grounds with reasons.
IV
Pedrito and Tomas, Mayor and Treasurer, respectively, of the Municipality of San Miguel, Leyte, are
charged before the Sandiganbayan for violation of Section 3 (e), Republic Act No. 3019 (Anti-Graft
and Corrupt Practices Act). The information alleges, among others, that the two conspired in the
purchase of several units of computer through personal canvass instead of a public bidding, causing
undue injury to the municipality.
Before arraignment, the accused moved for reinvestigation of the charge, which the court granted.
After reinvestigation, the Office of the Special Prosecutor filed an amended information duly signed
and approved by the Special Prosecutor, alleging the same delictual facts, but with an additional
allegation that the accused gave unwarranted benefits to SB Enterprises owned by Samuel. Samuel
was also indicted under the amended information.
Before Samuel was arraigned, he moved to quash the amended information on the ground that the
officer who filed the same had no authority to do so. Resolve the motion to quash with reasons. (3%)
V
Frank and Gina were married on June 12, 1987 in Manila. Barely a year after the wedding, Frank
exhibited a violent temperament, forcing Gina, for reasons of personal safety, to live with her
parents. A year thereafter, Gina found employment as a domestic helper in Singapore, where she
worked for ten consecutive years. All the time she was abroad, Gina had absolutely no
communications with Frank, nor did she hear any news about him. While in Singapore, Gina met
and fell in love with Willie.
On July 4, 2007, Gina filed a petition with the RTC of Manila to declare Frank presumptively dead,
so that she could marry Willie. The RTC granted Gina's petition. The Office of the Solicitor General
(OSG) filed a Notice of Appeal with the RTC, stating that it was appealing the decision to the Court
of Appeals on questions of fact and law.
a. Is a petition for Declaration of Presumptive Death a special proceeding? Why or why not?
(2%)
b. As the RTC judge who granted Gina's petition, will you give due course to the OSG's Notice
of Appeal? Explain. (3%)
VI
Arrested in a buy-bust operation, Edmond was brought to the police station where he was informed
of his constitutional rights. During the investigation, Edmond refused to give any statement.
However, the arresting officer asked Edmond to acknowledge in writing that six (6) sachets of
"shabu" were confiscated from him. Edmond consented and also signed a receipt for the amount of
P3,000.00, allegedly representing the "purchase price of the shabu." At the trial, the arresting officer
testified and identified the documents executed and signed by Edmond. Edmond's lawyer did not
object to the testimony. After the presentation of the testimonial evidence, the prosecutor made a

formal offer of evidence which included the documents signed by Edmond.


Edmond's lawyer objected to the admissibility of the documents for being the "fruit of the poisoned
tree." Resolve the objection with reasons. (3%)
VII
Cresencio sued Dioscoro for collection of a sum of money. During the trial, but after the presentation
of plaintiff's evidence, Dioscoro died. Atty. Cruz, Dioscoro's counsel, then filed a motion to dismiss
the action on the ground of his client's death. The court denied the motion to dismiss and, instead,
directed counsel to furnish the court with the names and addresses of Dioscoro's heirs and ordered
that the designated administrator of Dioscoro's estate be substituted as representative party.
After trial, the court rendered judgment in favor of Cresencio. When the decision had become final
and executory, Cresencio moved for the issuance of a writ of execution against Dioscoro's estate to
enforce his judgment claim. The court issued the writ of execution. Was the court's issuance of the
writ of execution proper? Explain. (2%)
VIII
On July 15, 2009, Atty. Manananggol was served copies of numerous unfavorable judgments and
orders. On July 29, 2009, he filed motions for reconsideration which were denied. He received the
notices of denial of the motions for reconsideration on October 2, 2009, a Friday. He immediately
informed his clients who, in turn, uniformly instructed him to appeal. How, when and where should
he pursue the appropriate remedy for each of the following: (10%)
a. Judgment of a Municipal Trial Court (MTC) pursuant to its delegated jurisdiction dismissing
his client's application for land registration?
b. Judgment of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) denying his client's petition for a Writ of Habeas
Data?
c. Order of a Family Court denying his client's petition for Habeas Corpus in relation to custody
of a minor child?
d. Order of the RTC denying his client's Petition for Certiorari questioning the Metropolitan Trial
Court's (MeTC's) denial of a motion to suspend criminal proceedings?
e. Judgment of the First Division of the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) affirming the RTC decision
convicting his client for violation of the National Internal Revenue Code?
IX
Modesto sued Ernesto for a sum of money, claiming that the latter owed him P1-million, evidenced
by a promissory note, quoted and attached to the complaint. In his answer with counterclaim,
Ernesto alleged that Modesto coerced him into signing the promissory note, but that it is Modesto
who really owes him P1.5-million. Modesto filed an answer to Ernesto's counterclaim admitting that
he owed Ernesto, but only in the amount of P0.5-million. At the pre-trial, Modesto marked and
identified Ernesto's promissory note. He also marked and identified receipts covering payments he

made to Ernesto, to the extent of P0.5-million, which Ernesto did not dispute.
After pre-trial, Modesto filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, while Ernesto filed a motion for
summary judgment on his counterclaim. Resolve the two motions with reasons. (5%)
X
Upon termination of the pre-trial, the judge dictated the pre-trial order in the presence of the parties
and their counsel, reciting what had transpired and defining three (3) issues to be tried.
a. If, immediately upon receipt of his copy of the pre-trial order, plaintiff's counsel should move
for its amendment to include a fourth (4th) triable issue which he allegedly inadvertently
failedto mention when the judge dictated the order. Should the motion to amend be granted?
Reasons. (2%)
b. Suppose trial had already commenced and after the plaintiff's second witness had testified,
the defendant's counsel moves for the amendment of the pre-trial order to include a fifth
(5th) triable issue vital to his client's defense. Should the motion be granted over the
objection of plaintiff's counsel? Reasons. (3%)
PART II
XI
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. The accused in a criminal case has the right to avail of the various modes of discovery.
b. The viatory right of a witness served with a subpoena ad testificandum refers to his right not
to comply with the subpoena.
c. In the exercise of its original jurisdiction, the Sandiganbayan may grant petitions for the
issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.
d. An electronic document is the equivalent of an original document under the Best Evidence
Rule if it is a printout or output readable by sight or other means, shown to reflect the data
accurately.
e. The filing of a motion for the reconsideration of the trial court's decision results in the
abandonment of a perfected appeal.
XII
Mike was renting an apartment unit in the building owned by Jonathan. When Mike failed to pay six
months' rent, Jonathan filed an ejectment suit. The Municipal Trial Court (MTC) rendered judgment
in favor of Jonathan, who then filed a motion for the issuance of a writ of execution. The MTC issued
the writ.

a. How can Mike stay the execution of the MTC judgment? Explain. (2%)
b. Mike appealed to the Regional Trial Court (RTC), which affirmed the MTC decision. Mike
then filed a petition for review with the Court of Appeals (CA). The CA dismissed the petition
on the ground that the sheriff had already executed the MTC decision and had ejected Mike
from the premises, thus rendering the appeal moot and academic. Is the CA correct?
Reasons. (3%)
XIII
a. Continental Chemical Corporation (CCC) filed a complaint for a sum of money against
Barstow Trading Corporation (BTC) for the latter's failure to pay for its purchases of industrial
chemicals. In its answer, BTC contended that it refused to pay because CCC
misrepresented that the products it sold belonged to a new line, when in fact they were
identical with CCC's existing products. To substantiate its defense, BTC filed a motion to
compel CCC to give a detailed list of the products' ingredients and chemical components,
relying on the right to avail of the modes of discovery allowed under Rule 27. CCC objected,
invoking confidentiality of the information sought by BTC. Resolve BTC's motion with
reasons. (3%)
b. Blinded by extreme jealousy, Alberto shot his wife, Betty, in the presence of his sister, Carla.
Carla brought Betty to the hospital. Outside the operating room, Carla told Domingo, a male
nurse, that it was Alberto who shot Betty. Betty died while undergoing emergency surgery. At
the trial of the parricide charges filed against Alberto, the prosecutor sought to present
Domingo as witness, to testify on what Carla told him. The defense counsel objected on the
ground that Domingo's testimony is inadmissible for being hearsay. Rule on the objection
with reasons. (3%)
XIV
The Republic of the Philippines, through the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)
filed with the RTC a complaint for the expropriation of the parcel of land owned by Jovito. The land is
to be used as an extension of the national highway. Attached to the complaint is a bank certificate
showing that there is, on deposit with the Land Bank of the Philippines, an amount equivalent to the
assessed value of the property. Then DPWH filed a motion for the issuance of a writ of possession.
Jovito filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that there are other properties which
would better serve the purpose.
a. Will Jovito's motion to dismiss prosper? Explain. (3%)
b. As judge, will you grant the writ of possession prayed for by DPWH? Explain. (3%)
XV
a. Florencio sued Guillermo for partition of a property they owned in common. Guillermo filed a
motion to dismiss the complaint because Florencio failed to implead Hernando and
Inocencio, the other co-owners of the property. As judge, will you grant the motion to
dismiss? Explain. (3%)
b. Mariano, through his attorney-in-fact, Marcos, filed with the RTC of Baguio City a complaint

for annulment of sale against Henry. Marcos and Henry both reside in Asin Road, Baguio
City, while Mariano resides in Davao City. Henry filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on
the ground of prematurity for failure to comply with the mandatory barangay conciliation.
Resolve the motion with reasons. (3%)
XVI
a. After the prosecution had rested and made its formal offer of evidence, with the court
admitting all of the prosecution evidence, the accused filed a demurrer to evidence with
leave of court. The prosecution was allowed to comment thereon. Thereafter, the court
granted the demurrer, finding that the accused could not have committed the offense
charged. If the prosecution files a motion for reconsideration on the ground that the court
order granting the demurrer was not in accord with the law and jurisprudence, will the motion
prosper? Explain your answer. (3%)
b. A criminal information is filed in court charging Anselmo with homicide. Anselmo files a
motion to quash the information on the ground that no preliminary investigation was
conducted. Will the motion be granted? Why or why not? (3%)
XVII
Having obtained favorable judgment in his suit for a sum of money against Patricio, Orencio sought
the issuance of a writ of execution. When the writ was issued, the sheriff levied upon a parcel of land
that Patricio owns, and a date was set for the execution sale.
a. How may Patricio prevent the sale of the property on execution? (2%)
b. If Orencio is the purchaser of the property at the execution sale, how much does he have to
pay? Explain. (2%)
c. If the property is sold to a third party at the execution sale, what can Patricio do to recover
the property? Explain. (2%)
XVIII
Pinoy died without a will. His wife, Rosie, and three children executed a deed of extrajudicial
settlement of his estate. The deed was properly published and registered with the Office of the
Register of Deeds. Three years thereafter, Suzy appeared, claiming to be the illegitimate child of
Pinoy. She sought to annul the settlement alleging that she was deprived of her rightful share in the
estate.
Rosie and the three children contended that (1) the publication of the deed constituted constructive
notice to the whole world, and should therefore bind Suzy; and (2) Suzy's action had already
prescribed.
Are Rosie and the three children correct? Explain. (4%)
XIX
a. Distinguish the two (2) modes of appeal from the judgment of the Regional Trial Court to the

Court of Appeals. (3%)


b. What is the writ of amparo? How is it distinguished from the writ of habeas corpus? (2%)
c. What is the writ of habeas data? (1%)
-NOTHING FOLLOWSBAR EXAMINATION 2009
CRIMINAL LAW
20 September 2009

2 P.M. - 5 P.M.
INSTRUCTIONS

This questionnaire is in two (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained in
six (6) pages; and Part II with nine (9) questions (numbered XI-XIX), contained in five (5) pages, for
a total number of eleven (11) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.
Answer the questions directly and concisely. Do not repeat the questions. Write legibly.

HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.


GOOD LUCK!

_____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
CHAIRPERSON
2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS COMMITTEE

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS TWELVE (12) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE).

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE

CRIMINAL LAW
PART I
I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. Amado, convicted of rape but granted an absolute pardon by the President, and one year
thereafter, convicted of homicide, is a recidivist.
b. The creditor who resorts to forced labor of a child under the pretext of reimbursing himself
for the debt incurred by the childs father commits the crime of slavery.
c. The use of an unlicensed firearm in homicide is considered a generic aggravating
circumstance which can be offset by an ordinary mitigating circumstance.
d. A person who, on the occasion of a robbery, kills a bystander by accident is liable for two
separate crimes: robbery and reckless imprudence resulting in homicide.
e. A policeman who, without a judicial order, enters a private house over the owners opposition
is guilty of trespass to dwelling.
II
Antero Makabayan was convicted of the crime of Rebellion. While serving sentence, he escaped
from jail. Captured, he was charged with, and convicted of, Evasion of Service of Sentence.
Thereafter, the President of the Philippines issued an amnesty proclamation for the offense of
Rebellion. Antero applied for and was granted the benefit of the amnesty proclamation.
Antero then filed a petition for habeas corpus, praying for his immediate release from confinement.
He claims that the amnesty extends to the offense of Evasion of Service of Sentence. As judge, will
you grant the petition? Discuss fully. (4%)
III
Rigoberto gate-crashed the 71st birthday party of Judge Lorenzo. Armed with a piece of wood
commonly known as dos por dos, Rigoberto hit Judge Lorenzo on the back, causing the latters
hospitalization for 30 days. Upon investigation, it appeared that Rigoberto had a grudge against
Judge Lorenzo who, two years earlier, had cited Rigoberto in contempt and ordered his
imprisonment for three (3) days.
a. Is Rigoberto guilty of Direct Assault? Why or why not? (3%)
b. Would your answer be the same if the reason for the attack was that when Judge Lorenzo
was still a practicing lawyer ten years ago, he prosecuted Rigoberto and succeeded in
sending him to jail for one year? Explain your answer. (3%)

IV
Charlie hated his classmate, Brad, because the latter was assiduously courting Lily, Charlies
girlfriend. Charlie went to a veterinarian and asked for some poison on the pretext that it would be
used to kill a very sick, old dog. Actually, Charlie intended to use the poison on Brad.
The veterinarian mistakenly gave Charlie a non-toxic powder which, when mixed with Brads food,
did not kill Brad.
a. Did Charlie commit any crime? If so, what and why? If not, why not? (3%)
b. Would your answer be the same if Brad proved to be allergic to the powder, and after
ingesting it with his food, fell ill and was hospitalized for ten (10) days? Explain. (3%)
V
Ponciano borrowed Rubens gun, saying that he would use it to kill Freddie. Because Ruben also
resented Freddie, he readily lent his gun, but told Ponciano: "O, pagkabaril mo kay Freddie, isauli
mo kaagad, ha." Later, Ponciano killed Freddie, but used a knife because he did not want Freddies
neighbors to hear the gunshot.
a. What, if any, is the liability of Ruben? Explain. (3%)
b. Would your answer be the same if, instead of Freddie, it was Manuel, a relative of Ruben,
who was killed by Ponciano using Rubens gun? Explain. (3%)
VI
Baldo killed Conrad in a dark corner, at midnight, on January 2, 1960. Dominador witnessed the
entire incident, but he was so scared to tell the authorities about it.
On January 2, 1970, Dominador, bothered by his conscience, reported the matter to the police. After
investigation, the police finally arrested Baldo on January 6, 1980. Charged in court, Baldo claims
that the crime he committed had already prescribed.
Is Baldos contention correct? Explain. (3%)
VII
Charina, Clerk of Court of an RTC Branch, promised the plaintiff in a case pending before the court
that she would convince the Presiding Judge to decide the case in plaintiffs favor. In consideration
therefor, the plaintiff gave Charina P20,000.00.
Charina was charged with violation of Section 3 (b) of Republic Act No. 3019, prohibiting any public
officer from directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any gift, present, percentage, or benefit in
connection with any contract or transaction x x x wherein the public officer, in his official capacity,
has to intervene under the law.
While the case was being tried, the Ombudsman filed another information against Charina for

Indirect Bribery under the Revised Penal Code. Charina demurred to the second information,
claiming that she can no longer be charged under the Revised Penal Code having been charged for
the same act under R.A. 3019.
Is Charina correct? Explain. (3%)
VIII
While Alfredo, Braulio, Ciriaco, and Domingo were robbing a bank, policemen arrived. A firefight
ensued between the bank robbers and the responding policemen, and one of the policemen was
killed.
a. What crime or crimes, if any, had been committed? Explain. (3%)
b. Suppose it was Alfredo who was killed by the responding policemen, what charges can be
filed against Braulio, Ciriaco and Domingo? Explain. (2%)
c. Suppose in the course of the robbery, before the policemen arrived, Braulio shot and killed
Alfredo following a heated disagreement on who should carry the money bags, what would
be the criminal liability of Braulio, Ciriaco and Domingo? Explain. (2%)
IX
Virgilio, armed with a gun, stopped a van along a major thoroughfare in Manila, pointed the gun at
the driver and shouted: "Tigil! Kidnap ito!"
Terrified, the driver, Juanito, stopped the van and allowed Virgilio to board. Inside the van were
Jeremias, a 6-year-old child, son of a multi-millionaire, and Daday, the childs nanny. Virgilio told
Juanito to drive to a deserted place, and there, ordered the driver to alight. Before Juanito was
allowed to go, Virgilio instructed him to tell Jeremias parents that unless they give a ransom of P10million within two (2) days, Jeremias would be beheaded. Daday was told to remain in the van and
take care of Jeremias until the ransom is paid. Virgilio then drove the van to his safehouse.
What crime or crimes, if any, did Virgilio commit? Explain. (5%)
X
To secure the release of his brother Willy, a detention prisoner, and his cousin Vincent, who is
serving sentence for homicide, Chito asked the RTC Branch Clerk of Court to issue an Order which
would allow the two prisoners to be brought out of jail. At first, the Clerk refused, but when Chito
gave her P50,000.00, she consented.
She then prepared an Order requiring the appearance in court of Willy and Vincent, ostensibly as
witnesses in a pending case. She forged the judges signature, and delivered the Order to the jail
warden who, in turn, allowed Willy and Vincent to go out of jail in the company of an armed escort,
Edwin. Chito also gave Edwin P50,000.00 to leave the two inmates unguarded for three minutes and
provide them with an opportunity to escape. Thus, Willy and Vincent were able to escape.
What crime or crimes, if any, had been committed by Chito, Willy, Vincent, the Branch Clerk of

Court, Edwin, and the jail warden? Explain your answer. (5%)

PART II
XI
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. Life imprisonment is a penalty more favorable to the convict than reclusion perpetua.
b. Voluntary surrender is a mitigating circumstance in all acts and omissions punishable under
the Revised Penal Code.
c. In a prosecution for fencing under P.D. 1612, it is a complete defense for the accused to
prove that he had no knowledge that the goods or articles found in his possession had been
the subject of robbery.
d. In the crime of libel, truth is an absolute defense.
e. For a person who transacts an instrument representing the proceeds of a covered unlawful
activity to be liable under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (R.A. 9160, as amended), it must
be shown that he has knowledge of the identities of the culprits involved in the commission
of the predicate crimes.
XII
a. In a conviction for homicide, the trial court appreciated two (2) mitigating circumstances and
one (1) aggravating circumstance. Homicide under Article 249 of the Revised Penal Code is
punishable byreclusion temporal, an imprisonment term of twelve (12) years and one (1) day
to twenty (20) years. Applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, determine the appropriate
penalty to be imposed. Explain. (3%)
b. Will your answer be the same if it is a conviction for illegal possession of drugs under R.A.
9165 (Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002), the prescribed penalty of which is also imprisonment
for a term of twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20) years? Why or why not? (3%)
XIII
Angelo devised a Ponzi Scheme in which 500 persons were deceived into investing their money
upon a promise of a capital return of 25%, computed monthly, and guaranteed by post-dated
checks. During the first two months following the investment, the investors received their profits, but
thereafter, Angelo vanished.
Angelo was charged with 500 counts of estafa and 2,000 counts of violation of Batas Pambansa
(BP) 22. In his motion to quash, Angelo contends that he committed a continued crime, or delito

continuado, hence, he committed only one count of estafa and one count of violation of BP 22.
a. What is delito continuado? (1%)
b. Is Angelos contention tenable? Explain. (4%)
XIV
Following his arrest after a valid buy-bust operation, Tommy was convicted of violation of Section 5,
Republic Act 9165. On appeal, Tommy questioned the admissibility of the evidence because the
police officers who conducted the buy-bust operation failed to observe the requisite "chain of
custody" of the evidence confiscated and/or seized from him.
What is the "chain of custody" requirement in drug offenses? What is its rationale? What is the effect
of failure to observe the requirement? (3%)
XV
Joe was 17 years old when he committed homicide in 2005. The crime is punishable by reclusion
temporal. After two years in hiding, he was arrested and appropriately charged in May 2007. Since
Republic Act 9344 (Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006) was already in effect, Joe moved to
avail of the process of intervention or diversion.
a. What is intervention or diversion? Is Joe entitled to intervention or diversion? Explain. (3%)
b. Suppose Joes motion for intervention or diversion was denied, and he was convicted two
(2) years later when Joe was already 21 years old, should the judge apply the suspension of
sentence? Explain. (2%)
c. Suppose Joe was convicted of attempted murder with a special aggravating circumstance
and was denied suspension of sentence, would he be eligible for probation under
Presidential Decree (PD) 968, considering that the death penalty is imposable for the
consummated felony? Explain. (2%)
XVI
Roger and Jessie, Municipal Mayor and Treasurer, respectively, of San Rafael, Leyte, caused the
disbursement of public funds allocated for their local development programs for 2008. Records show
that the amount of P2-million was purportedly used as financial assistance for a rice production
livelihood project. Upon investigation, however, it was found that Roger and Jessie falsified the
disbursement vouchers and supporting documents in order to make it appear that qualified
recipients who, in fact, are non-existent individuals, received the money.
Roger and Jessie are charged with malversation through falsification and violation of Section 3 (e) of
R.A. 3019 for causing undue injury to the government. Discuss the propriety of the charges filed
against Roger and Jessie. Explain. (4%)
XVII

Wenceslao and Loretta were staying in the same boarding house, occupying different rooms. One
late evening, when everyone in the house was asleep, Wenceslao entered Lorettas room with the
use of a picklock. Then, with force and violence, Wenceslao ravished Loretta. After he had satisfied
his lust, Wenceslao stabbed Loretta to death and, before leaving the room, took her jewelry.
a. What crime or crimes, if any, did Wenceslao commit? Explain. (4%)
b. Discuss the applicability of the relevant aggravating circumstances of dwelling, nocturnity
and the use of the picklock to enter the room of the victim. (3%)
c. Would your answer to [a] be the same if, despite the serious stab wounds she sustained,
Loretta survived? Explain. (3%)
XVIII
At the Maligaya Disco Club, Leoncio and Evelyn were intimately dancing a very seductive dance
number. While gyrating with their bodies, Leoncio dipped his private parts in Evelyns buttocks.
Incensed, Evelyn protested, but Leoncio continued and tightly embraced her.
a. What crime or crimes, if any, did Leoncio commit? Explain. (3%)
b. Would your answer be the same if, even after the music had stopped, Leoncio continued to
dance dirty, rubbing his private parts on Evelyns buttocks? Explain. (3%)
XIX
Delmo learned that his enemy, Oscar, was confined at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the Philippine
Medical Center. Intending to kill Oscar, Delmo disguised himself as a nurse, entered the ICU, and
saw a man lying on the hospital bed with several life-saving tubes attached to the body. Delmo
disconnected the tubes and left. Later, the resident physician doing his rounds entered the ICU and,
seeing the disconnected tubes, replaced them. The patient survived. It turned out that the patient
was Larry, as Oscar had been discharged from the hospital earlier.
Delmo was charged with frustrated murder, qualified by evident premeditation and treachery as
aggravating circumstances. Discuss the propriety of the charge. (4%)

-NOTHING FOLLOWSThe Lawphil Project - Arellano Law Foundation

BAR EXAMINATION 2009


MERCHANTILE LAW
20 September 2009

8 A.M. - 12 NN.
INSTRUCTIONS

This questionnaire is in TWO (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained
in six (6) pages; and Part II with ten (10) questions (numbered XI-XX), contained in seven (7) pages,
for a total number of thirteen (13) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.
Answer the questions directly and concisely. Do not repeat the questions. Write legibly.
HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.
GOOD LUCK!

_____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
CHAIRPERSON
2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS COMMITTEE

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS FOURTEEN (14) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE).

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE


MERCHANTILE LAW
PART I
I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. The Denicola Test in intellectual property law states that if design elements of an article
reflect a merger of aesthetic and functional considerations, the artistic aspects of the work
cannot be conceptually separable from the utilitarian aspects; thus, the article cannot be
copyrighted.
b. If the Ombudsman is convinced that there is a violation of law after investigating a complaint
alleging illicit bank deposits of a public officer, the Ombudsman may order the bank

concerned to allow in camerainspection of bank records and documents.


c. Even if the seller and the buyer in a sale in bulk violate the Bulk Sales Law, the sale would
still be valid.
d. Dividends on shares of stocks can only be declared out of unrestricted retained earnings of
the corporation.
e. A bank under receivership can still grant new loans and accept new deposits.
II
Atlantis Realty Corporation (ARC), a local firm engaged in real estate development, plans to sell one
of its prime assets --- a three-hectare land valued at about P100-million. For this purpose, the board
of directors of ARC unanimously passed a resolution approving the sale of the property for P75million to Shangrila Real Estate Ventures (SREV), a rival realty firm. The resolution also called for a
special stockholders meeting at which the proposed sale would be up for ratification.
Atty. Edric, a stockholder who owns only one (1) share in ARC, wants to stop the sale. He then
commences a derivative suit for and in behalf of the corporation, to enjoin the board of directors and
the stockholders from approving the sale.
a. Can Atty. Edric, who owns only one (1) share in the company, initiate a derivative suit? Why
or why not? (2%)
b. If such a suit is commenced, would it constitute an intra-corporate dispute? If so, why and
where would such a suit be filed? If not, why not? (2%)
c. Will the suit prosper? Why or why not? (3%)
III
Armando, a resident of Manila, borrowed P3-million from Bernardo, offering as security his 500
shares of stock worth P1.5-million in Xerxes Corporation, and his 2007 BMW sedan, valued at P2million. The mortgage on the shares of stock was registered in the Office of the Register of Deeds of
Makati City where Xerxes Corporation has its principal office. The mortgage on the car was
registered in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Manila. Armando executed a single Affidavit of
Good Faith, covering both mortgages.
Armando defaulted on the payment of his obligation; thus, Bernardo foreclosed on the two chattel
mortgages. Armando filed suit to nullify the foreclosure and the mortgages, raising the following
issues:
a. The execution of only one Affidavit of Good Faith for both mortgages invalidated the two
mortgages; (2%) and
b. The mortgage on the shares of stocks should have been registered in the Office of the
Register of Deeds of Manila where he resides, as well as in the stock and transfer book of

Xerxes Corporation. (3%)


Rule on the foregoing issues with reasons.
c. Assume that Bernardo extrajudicially foreclosed on the mortgages, and both the car and the
shares of stock were sold at public auction. If the proceeds from such public sale should be
P1-million short of Armandos total obligation, can Bernardo recover the deficiency? Why or
why not? (2%)
IV
Antarctica Life Assurance Corporation (ALAC) publicly offered a specially designed insurance policy
covering persons between the ages of 50 to 75 who may be afflicted with serious and debilitating
illnesses. Quirico applied for insurance coverage, stating that he was already 80 years old.
Nonetheless, ALAC approved his application.
Quirico then requested ALAC for the issuance of a cover note while he was trying to raise funds to
pay the insurance premium. ALAC granted the request. Ten days after he received the cover note,
Quirico had a heart seizure and had to be hospitalized. He then filed a claim on the policy.
a. Can ALAC validly deny the claim on the ground that the insurance coverage, as publicly
offered, was available only to persons 50 to 75 years of age? Why or why not? (2%)
b. Did ALACs issuance of a cover note result in the perfection of an insurance contract
between Quirico and ALAC? Explain. (3%)
V
Cecilio is planning to put up a grocery store in the subdivision where he and his family reside. To
promote this proposed business venture, he told his wife and three children to send out promotional
text messages to all the residents in the subdivision. Cecilios family members did as instructed, and
succeeded in reaching, through text messages, more than 80% of the residents in the subdivision.
Is Cecilio habitually engaged in commerce even if the grocery store has yet to be established?
Explain your answer. (3%)
VI
Lorenzo drew a bill of exchange in the amount of P100,000.00 payable to Barbara or order, with his
wife, Diana, as drawee. At the time the bill was drawn, Diana was unaware that Barbara is Lorenzos
paramour.
Barbara then negotiated the bill to her sister, Elena, who paid for it for value, and who did not know
who Lorenzo was. On due date, Elena presented the bill to Diana for payment, but the latter
promptly dishonored the instrument because, by then, Diana had already learned of her husbands
dalliance.
a. Was the bill lawfully dishonored by Diana? Explain. (3%)

b. Does the illicit cause or consideration adversely affect the negotiability of the bill? Explain.
(3%)
VII
Global Transport Services, Inc. (GTSI) operates a fleet of cargo vessels plying interisland routes.
One of its vessels, MV Dona Juana, left the port of Manila for Cebu laden with, among other goods,
10,000 television sets consigned to Romualdo, a TV retailer in Cebu.
When the vessel was about ten nautical miles away from Manila, the ship captain heard on the radio
that a typhoon which, as announced by PAG-ASA, was on its way out of the country, had suddenly
veered back into Philippine territory. The captain realized that MV Dona Juana would traverse the
storms path, but decided to proceed with the voyage. True enough, the vessel sailed into the storm.
The captain ordered the jettison of the 10,000 television sets, along with some other cargo, in order
to lighten the vessel and make it easier to steer the vessel out of the path of the typhoon. Eventually,
the vessel, with its crew intact, arrived safely in Cebu.
a. Will you characterize the jettison of Romualdos TV sets as an average? If so, what kind of
an average, and why? If not, why not? (3%)
b. Against whom does Romualdo have a cause of action for indemnity of his lost TV sets?
Explain. (3%)
VIII
Maharlikang Pilipino Banking Corporation (MPBC) operates several branches of Maharlikang
Pilipino Rural Bank in Eastern Visayas. Almost all the branch managers are close relatives of the
members of the Board of Directors of the corporation. Many undeserving relatives of the branch
managers were granted loans. In time, the branches could not settle their obligations to depositors
and creditors.
Receiving reports of these irregularities, the Supervising and Examining Department (SED) of the
Monetary Board prepared a detailed report (SED Report) specifying the facts and the chronology of
events relative to the problems that beset MPBC rural bank branches. The report concluded that the
bank branches were unable to pay their liabilities as they fell due, and could not possibly continue in
business without incurring substantial losses to its depositors and creditors.
a. May the Monetary Board order the closure of the MPBC rural banks relying only on the SED
Report, without need of an examination? Explain. (3%)
b. If MPBC hires you as lawyer because the Monetary Board has forbidden it from carrying on
its business due to its imminent insolvency, what action will you institute to question the
Monetary Boards order? Explain. (3%)
IX
When is there an ultra vires act on the part of [a] the corporation; [b] the board of directors; and [c]
the corporate officers. (3%)

X
What are the so-called exempt securities under the Securities Regulation Code? (2%)

PART II
XI
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. A loan agreement which provides that the debtor shall pay interest at the rate determined by
the banks branch manager violates the disclosure requirement of the Truth in Lending Act.
b. Under the Warehouse Receipts Law, a warehouseman loses his lien upon the goods when
he surrenders possession thereof.
c. The Howey Test states that there is an investment contract when a person invests money in
a common enterprise and is led to expect profits primarily from the efforts of others.
d. A document, dated July 15, 2009, that reads: "Pay to X or order the sum of P5,000.00 five
days after his pet dog, Sparky, dies. Signed Y." is a negotiable instrument.
e. "A bank is bound to know its depositors signature" is an inflexible rule in determining the
liability of a bank in forgery cases.
XII
Gaudencio, a store owner, obtained a P1-million loan from Bathala Financing Corporation (BFC). As
security, Gaudencio executed a "Deed of Assignment of Receivables," assigning 15 checks received
from various customers who bought merchandise from his store. The checks were duly indorsed by
Gaudencios customers.
The Deed of Assignment contains the following stipulation:
"If, for any reason, the receivables or any part thereof cannot be paid by the obligors, the
ASSIGNOR unconditionally and irrevocably agrees to pay the same, assuming the liability to
pay, by way of penalty, three percent (3%) of the total amount unpaid, for the period of delay
until the same is fully paid."
When the checks became due, BFC deposited them for collection, but the drawee banks dishonored
all the checks for one of the following reasons: "account closed," "payment stopped," "account under
garnishment," or "insufficiency of funds." BFC wrote Gaudencio notifying him of the dishonored
checks, and demanding payment of the loan. Because Gaudencio did not pay, BFC filed a collection
suit.
In his defense, Gaudencio contended that [a] BFC did not give timely notice of dishonor (of the

checks); and [b] considering that the checks were duly indorsed, BFC should proceed against the
drawers and the indorsers of the checks.
Are Gaudencios defenses tenable? Explain. (5%)
XIII
Ciriaco leased a commercial apartment from Supreme Building Corporation (SBC). One of the
provisions of the one-year lease contract states:
"18. x x x The LESSEE shall not insure against fire the chattels, merchandise, textiles,
goods and effects placed at any stall or store or space in the leased premises without first
obtaining the written consent of the LESSOR. If the LESSEE obtains fire insurance
coverage without the consent of the LESSOR, the insurance policy is deemed assigned and
transferred to the LESSOR for the latters benefit."
Notwithstanding the stipulation in the contract, without the consent of SBC, Ciriaco insured the
merchandise inside the leased premises against loss by fire in the amount of P500,000.00 with First
United Insurance Corporation (FUIC).
A day before the lease contract expired, fire broke out inside the leased premises, damaging
Ciriacos merchandise. Having learned of the insurance earlier procured by Ciriaco, SBC demanded
from FUIC that the proceeds of the insurance policy be paid directly to it, as provided in the lease
contract.
Who is legally entitled to receive the insurance proceeds? Explain. (4%)
XIV
XXX Corporation (XXX) and its sister company, YYY Corporation (YYY), are both under judicial
receivership. The receiver has the option to sell all or substantially all of the properties of YYY to
XXX, or simply merge the two corporations. Under either option, the requirements under the
Corporation Code have to be complied with.
The receiver seeks your advice on whether the Bulk Sales Law will apply to either, or both, options.
What will your advice be? Explain. (4%)
XV
After disposing of his last opponent in only two rounds in Las Vegas, the renowned Filipino boxer
Sonny Bachao arrived at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport met by thousands of heroworshipping fans and hundreds of media photographers. The following day, a colored photograph of
Sonny wearing a black polo shirt embroidered with the 2-inch Lacoste crocodile logo appeared on
the front page of every Philippine newspaper.
Lacoste International, the French firm that manufactures Lacoste apparel and owns the Lacoste
trademark, decided to cash in on the universal popularity of the boxing icon. It reprinted the
photographs, with the permission of the newspaper publishers, and went on a world-wide blitz of
print commercials in which Sonny is shown wearing a Lacoste shirt alongside the phrase "Sonny

Bachao just loves Lacoste."


When Sonny sees the Lacoste advertisements, he hires you as lawyer and asks you to sue Lacoste
International before a Philippine court:
a. For trademark infringement in the Philippines because Lacoste International used his image
without his permission; (2%)
b. For copyright infringement because of the unauthorized use of the published photographs;
(2%) and
c. For injunction in order to stop Lacoste International from featuring him in their commercials.
(2%)
Will these actions prosper? Explain.
d. Can Lacoste International validly invoke the defense that it is not a Philippine company and,
therefore, Philippine courts have no jurisdiction? Explain. (2%)
XVI
On September 15, 2007, XYZ Corporation issued to Paterno 800 preferred shares with the following
terms:
"The Preferred Shares shall have the following rights, preferences, qualifications, and
limitations, to wit:
1. The right to receive a quarterly dividend of One Per Centum (1%), cumulative and
participating;
2. These shares may be redeemed, by drawing of lots, at any time after two (2) years
from date of issue, at the option of the Corporation; x x x."
Today, Paterno sues XYZ Corporation for specific performance, for the payment of dividends on,
and to compel the redemption of, the preferred shares, under the terms and conditions provided in
the stock certificates. Will the suit prosper? Explain. (3%)
XVII
Philippine Palaces Realty (PPR) had been representing itself as a registered broker of securities,
duly authorized by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). On October 6, 1996, PPR sold
to spouses Leon and Carina one (1) timeshare of Palacio del Boracay for US$7,500.00. However, its
Registration Statement became effective only on February 11, 1998 after the SEC issued a
resolution declaring that PPR was authorized to sell securities, including timeshares.
On March 30, 1998, Leon and Carina wrote PPR rescinding their purchase agreement and
demanding the refund of the amount they paid, because the Palacio del Boracay timeshare was sold
to them by PPR without the requisite license or authority from the SEC. PPR contended that the
grant of the SEC authority had the effect of ratifying the purchase agreement (with Leon and Carina)

of October 6, 1996.
Is the contention of PPR correct? Explain. (3%)
XVIII
Triple A Corporation (Triple A) was incorporated in 1960, with 500 founders shares and 78 common
shares as its initial capital stock subscription. However, Triple A registered its stock and transfer
book only in 1978, and recorded merely 33 common shares as the corporations issued and
outstanding shares.
a. In 1982, Juancho, the sole heir of one of the original incorporators filed a petition with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the registration of his property rights over
120 founders shares and 12 common shares. The petition was supported by a copy of the
Articles of Incorporation indicating the incorporators initial capital stock subscription. Will the
petition be granted? Why or why not? (3%)
b. On May 6, 1992, a special stockholders meeting was held. At this meeting, what would have
constituted a quorum? Explain. (3%)
c. What is a stock and transfer book? (1%)
XIX
One of the passenger buses owned by Continental Transit Corporation (CTC), plying its usual route,
figured in a collision with another bus owned by Universal Transport, Inc. (UTI). Among those injured
inside the CTC bus were: Romeo, a stow away; Samuel, a pickpocket then in the act of robbing his
seatmate when the collision occurred; Teresita, the bus drivers mistress who usually accompanied
the driver on his trips for free; and Uriel, holder of a free riding pass he won in a raffle held by CTC.
a. Will a suit for breach of contract of carriage filed by Romeo, Samuel, Teresita, and Uriel
against CTC prosper? Explain. (3%)
b. Do Romeo, Samuel, Teresita, and Uriel have a cause of action for damages against UTI?
Explain. (3%)
c. What, if any, are the valid defenses that CTC and UTI can raise in the respective actions
against them? Explain. (3%)
XX
Under the Securities Regulation Code, what is the Margin Trading Rule? (2%)
-NOTHING FOLLOWSBAR EXAMINATION 2009
CIVIL LAW
13 September 2009

8 A.M. - 12 NN.

INSTRUCTIONS
This questionnaire is in TWO (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained
in five (5) pages; and Part II with ten (10) questions (numbered XI-XX), contained in five (5) pages,
for a total number of ten (10) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.
Answer the questions directly and concisely. Do not repeat the questions. Write legibly.

HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE


GOOD LUCK!!!

_____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
Chairperson
2009 Bar Examinations Committee

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS ELEVEN (11) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE).

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE

CIVIL LAW
PART I
I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. The doctrine of "processual presumption" allows the court of the forum to presume that the

foreign law applicable to the case is the same as the local or domestic law.
b. In reserva troncal, all reservatarios (reservees) inherit as a class and in equal shares
regardless of their proximity in degree to the prepositus.
c. An oral partnership is valid.
d. An oral promise of guaranty is valid and binding.
e. A dead child can be legitimated.
II
Dr. Lopez, a 70-year old widower, and his son Roberto both died in a fire that gutted their home
while they were sleeping in their air-conditioned rooms. Robertos wife, Marilyn, and their two
children were spared because they were in the province at the time. Dr. Lopez left an estate worth
P20M and a life insurance policy in the amount of P1M with his three children --- one of whom is
Roberto --- as beneficiaries.
Marilyn is now claiming for herself and her children her husbands share in the estate left by Dr.
Lopez, and her husbands share in the proceeds of Dr. Lopezs life insurance policy. Rule on the
validity of Marilyns claims with reasons. (4%)
III
In December 2000, Michael and Anna, after obtaining a valid marriage license, went to the Office of
the Mayor of Urbano, Bulacan, to get married. The Mayor was not there, but the Mayors secretary
asked Michael and Anna and their witnesses to fill up and sign the required marriage contract forms.
The secretary then told them to wait, and went out to look for the Mayor who was attending a
wedding in a neighboring municipality.
When the secretary caught up with the Mayor at the wedding reception, she showed him the
marriage contract forms and told him that the couple and their witnesses were waiting in his office.
The Mayor forthwith signed all the copies of the marriage contract, gave them to the secretary who
returned to the Mayors office. She then gave copies of the marriage contract to the parties, and told
Michael and Anna that they were already married. Thereafter, the couple lived together as husband
and wife, and had three sons.
a. Is the marriage of Michael and Anna valid, voidable, or void? Explain your answer. (3%)
b. What is the status of the three children of Michael and Anna? Explain your answer. (2%)
c. What property regime governs the properties acquired by the couple? Explain. (2%)
IV
Harry married Wilma, a very wealthy woman. Barely five (5) years into the marriage, Wilma fell in
love with Joseph. Thus, Wilma went to a small country in Europe, became a naturalized citizen of
that country, divorced Harry, and married Joseph. A year thereafter, Wilma and Joseph returned and

established permanent residence in the Philippines.


a. Is the divorce obtained by Wilma from Harry recognized in the Philippines? Explain your
answer. (3%)
b. If Harry hires you as his lawyer, what legal recourse would you advise him to take? Why?
(2%)
c. Harry tells you that he has fallen in love with another woman, Elizabeth, and wants to marry
her because, after all, Wilma is already married to Joseph. Can Harry legally marry
Elizabeth? Explain. (2%)
V
Four children, namely: Alberto, Baldomero, Caridad, and Dioscoro, were born to the spouses
Conrado and Clarita de la Costa. The childrens birth certificates were duly signed by Conrado,
showing them to be the couples legitimate children.
Later, one Edilberto de la Cruz executed a notarial document acknowledging Alberto and Baldomero
as his illegitimate children >with Clarita. Edilberto died leaving substantial properties. In the
settlement of his estate, Alberto and Baldomero intervened claiming shares as the deceaseds
illegitimate children. The legitimate family of Edilberto opposed the claim.
Are Alberto and Baldomero entitled to share in the estate of Edilberto? Explain. (4%)
VI
On December 1, 2000, Dr. Juanito Fuentes executed a holographic will, wherein he gave nothing to
his recognized illegitimate son, Jay. Dr. Fuentes left for the United States, passed the New York
medical licensure examinations, resided therein, and became a naturalized American citizen. He
died in New York in 2007. The laws of New York do not recognize holographic wills or compulsory
heirs.
a. Can the holographic will of Dr. Fuentes be admitted to probate in the Philippines? Why or
why not? (3%)
b. Assuming that the will is probated in the Philippines, can Jay validly insist that he be given
his legitime? Why or why not? (3%)
VII
Ramon Mayaman died intestate, leaving a net estate of P10,000,000.00. Determine how much each
heir will receive from the estate:
a. If Ramon is survived by his wife, three full-blood brothers, two half-brothers, and one
nephew (the son of a deceased full-blood brother)? Explain. (3%)
b. If Ramon is survived by his wife, a half-sister, and three nephews (sons of a deceased full-

blood brother)? Explain. (3%)


VIII
Jude owned a building which he had leased to several tenants. Without informing his tenants, Jude
sold the building to Ildefonso. Thereafter, the latter notified all the tenants that he is the new owner
of the building. Ildefonso ordered the tenants to vacate the premises within thirty (30) days from
notice because he had other plans for the building. The tenants refused to vacate, insisting that they
will only do so when the term of their lease shall have expired. Is Ildefonso bound to respect the
lease contracts between Jude and his tenants? Explain your answer. (3%)
IX
Before migrating to Canada in 1992, the spouses Teodoro and Anita entrusted all their legal papers
and documents to their nephew, Atty. Tan. Taking advantage of the situation, Atty. Tan forged a deed
of sale, making it appear that he had bought the couples property in Quezon City. In 2000, he
succeeded in obtaining a TCT over the property in his name. Subsequently, Atty. Tan sold the same
property to Luis, who built an auto repair shop on the property. In 2004, Luis registered the deed of
conveyance, and title over the property was transferred in his name.
In 2006, the spouses Teodoro and Anita came to the Philippines for a visit and discovered what had
happened to their property. They immediately hire you as lawyer. What action or actions will you
institute in order to vindicate their rights? Explain fully. (4%)
X
Rommels private car, while being driven by the regular family driver, Amado, hits a pedestrian
causing the latters death. Rommel is not in the car when the incident happened.
a. Is Rommel liable for damages to the heirs of the deceased? Explain. (2%)
b. Would your answer be the same if Rommel was in the car at the time of the accident?
Explain. (2%)

PART II
XI
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. A clause in an arbitration contract granting one of the parties the power to choose more
arbitrators than the other renders the arbitration contract void.
b. If there is no marriage settlement, the salary of a "spouse" in an adulterous marriage
belongs to the conjugal partnership of gains.

c. Acquisitive prescription of a negative easement runs from the time the owner of the
dominant estate forbids, in a notarized document, the owner of the servient estate from
executing an act which would be lawful without the easement.
d. The renunciation by a co-owner of his undivided share in the co-owned property in lieu of the
performance of his obligation to contribute to taxes and expenses for the preservation of the
property constitutes dacion en pago.
e. A person can dispose of his corpse through an act intervivos.
XII
Emmanuel and Margarita, American citizens and employees of the U.S. State Department, got
married in the African state of Kenya where sterility is a ground for annulment of marriage.
Thereafter, the spouses were assigned to the U.S. Embassy in Manila. On the first year of the
spouses tour of duty in the Philippines, Margarita filed an annulment case against Emmanuel before
a Philippine court on the ground of her husbands sterility at the time of the celebration of the
marriage.
a. Will the suit prosper? Explain your answer. (3%)
b. Assume Emmanuel and Margarita are both Filipinos. After their wedding in Kenya, they
come back and take up residence in the Philippines. Can their marriage be annulled on the
ground of Emmanuels sterility? Explain. (3%)
XIII
Rafael, a wealthy bachelor, filed a petition for the adoption of Dolly, a one-year old foundling who
had a severe heart ailment. During the pendency of the adoption proceedings, Rafael died of natural
causes. The Office of the Solicitor General files a motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that
the case can no longer proceed because of the petitioners death.
a. Should the case be dismissed? Explain. (2%)
b. Will your answer be the same if it was Dolly who died during the pendency of the adoption
proceedings? Explain. (2%)
XIV
Rodolfo, married to Sharon, had an illicit affair with his secretary, Nanette, a 19-year old girl, and
begot a baby girl, Rona. Nanette sued Rodolfo for damages: actual, for hospital and other medical
expenses in delivering the child by caesarean section; moral, claiming that Rodolfo promised to
marry her, representing that he was single when, in fact, he was not; and exemplary, to teach a
lesson to like-minded Lotharios.
a. If you were the judge, would you award all the claims of Nanette? Explain. (3%)
b. Suppose Rodolfo later on acknowledges Rona and gives her regular support, can he compel

her to use his surname? Why or why not? (2%)


c. When Rona reaches seven (7) years old, she tells Rodolfo that she prefers to live with him,
because he is better off financially than Nanette. If Rodolfo files an action for the custody of
Rona, alleging that he is Ronas choice as custodial parent, will the court grant Rodolfos
petition? Why or why not? (2%)
XV
Sarah had a deposit in a savings account with Filipino Universal Bank in the amount of five million
pesos (P5,000,000.00). To buy a new car, she obtained a loan from the same bank in the amount of
P1,200,000.00, payable in twelve monthly installments. Sarah issued in favor of the bank post-dated
checks, each in the amount of P100,000.00, to cover the twelve monthly installment payments. On
the third, fourth and fifth months, the corresponding checks bounced.
The bank then declared the whole obligation due, and proceeded to deduct the amount of one
million pesos (P1,000,000.00) from Sarahs deposit after notice to her that this is a form of
compensation allowed by law. Is the bank correct? Explain. (4%)
XVI
Marciano is the owner of a parcel of land through which a river runs out into the sea. The land had
been brought under the Torrens System, and is cultivated by Ulpiano and his family as farmworkers
therein. Over the years, the river has brought silt and sediment from its sources up in the mountains
and forests so that gradually the land owned by Marciano increased in area by three hectares.
Ulpiano built three huts on this additional area, where he and his two married children live. On this
same area, Ulpiano and his family planted peanuts, monggo beans and vegetables. Ulpiano also
regularly paid taxes on the land, as shown by tax declarations, for over thirty years.
When Marciano learned of the increase in the size of the land, he ordered Ulpiano to demolish the
huts, and demanded that he be paid his share in the proceeds of the harvest. Marciano claims that
under the Civil Code, the alluvium belongs to him as a registered riparian owner to whose land the
accretion attaches, and that his right is enforceable against the whole world.
a. Is Marciano correct? Explain. (3%)
b. What rights, if any, does Ulpiano have against Marciano? Explain. (3%)
XVII
Rosario obtained a loan of P100,000.00 from Jennifer, and pledged her diamond ring. The contract
signed by the parties stipulated that if Rosario is unable to redeem the ring on due date, she will
execute a document in favor of Jennifer providing that the ring shall automatically be considered full
payment of the loan.
a. Is the contract valid? Explain. (3%)
b. Will your answer to [a] be the same if the contract stipulates that upon failure of Rosario to
redeem the ring on due date, Jennifer may immediately sell the ring and appropriate the

entire proceeds thereof for herself as full payment of the loan? Reasons. (3%)
XVIII
The Ifugao Arms is a condominium project in Baguio City. A strong earthquake occurred which left
huge cracks in the outer walls of the building. As a result, a number of condominium units were
rendered unfit for use. May Edwin, owner of one of the condominium units affected, legally sue for
partition by sale of the whole project? Explain. (4%)
XIX
In 1972, Luciano de la Cruz sold to Chua Chung Chun, a Chinese citizen, a parcel of land in
Binondo. Chua died in 1990, leaving behind his wife and three children, one of whom, Julian, is a
naturalized Filipino citizen. Six years after Chuas death, the heirs executed an extrajudicial
settlement of estate, and the parcel of land was allocated to Julian. In 2007, Luciano filed suit to
recover the land he sold to Chua, alleging that the sale was void because it contravened the
Constitution which prohibits the sale of private lands to aliens. Julian moved to dismiss the suit on
grounds of pari delicto, laches and acquisitive prescription. Decide the case with reasons. (4%)
XX
a. If Ligaya, a Filipino citizen residing in the United States, files a petition for change of name
before the District Court of New York, what law shall apply? Explain. (2%)
b. If Henry, an American citizen residing in the Philippines, files a petition for change of name
before a Philippine court, what law shall apply? Explain. (2%)

-NOTHING FOLLOWSBAR EXAMINATION 2009


TAXATION LAW
13 September 2009

2 P.M. - 5 P.M.
INSTRUCTIONS

This questionnaire is in TWO (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained
in six (6) pages; and Part II with ten (10) questions (numbered XI-XX), contained in five (5) pages,
for a total number of eleven (11) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.

Answer the questions directly and concisely. Do not repeat the questions. Write legibly.
HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.
GOOD LUCK!

_____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
CHAIRPERSON
2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS COMMITTEE

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS TWELVE (12) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE)

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE


TAXATION
PART I
I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. A law that allows taxes to be paid either in cash or in kind is valid.
b. When the financial position of the taxpayer demonstrates a clear inability to pay the tax, the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue may validly compromise the tax liability.
c. The doctrine of equitable recoupment allows a taxpayer whose claim for refund has
prescribed to offset tax liabilities with his claim of overpayment.
d. A law imposing a tax on income of religious institutions derived from the sale of religious
articles is valid.
e. A false return and a fraudulent return are one and the same.
II
Enumerate the four (4) inherent limitations on taxation. Explain each item briefly. (4%)
III
Melissa inherited from her father a 300-square-meter lot. At the time of her father's death on March

14, 1995, the property was valued at P720,000.00. On February 28, 1996, to defray the cost of the
medical expenses of her sick son, she sold the lot for P600,000.00, on cash basis. The prevailing
market value of the property at the time of the sale was P3,000.00 per square meter.
a. Is Melissa liable to pay capital gains tax on the transaction? If so, how much and why? If not,
why not? (4%)
b. Is Melissa liable to pay Value Added Tax (VAT) on the sale of the property? If so, how much
and why? If not, why not? (4%)
IV
International Technologies, Inc. (ITI) filed a claim for refund for unutilized input VAT with the Court of
Tax Appeals (CTA). In the course of the trial, ITI engaged the services of an independent Certified
Public Accountant (CPA) who examined the voluminous invoices and receipts of ITI. ITI offered in
evidence only the summary prepared by the CPA, without the invoices and the receipts, and then
submitted the case for decision.
Can the CTA grant ITI's claim for refund based only on the CPA's summary? Explain. (4%)
V
Jessie brought into the Philippines a foreign-made luxury car, and paid less than the actual taxes
and duties due. Due to the discrepancy, the Bureau of Customs instituted seizure proceedings and
issued a warrant of seizure and detention. The car, then parked inside a pay parking garage, was
seized and brought by government agents to a government impounding facility. The Collector of
Customs denied Jessie's request for the withdrawal of the warrant.
Aggrieved, Jessie filed against the Collector a criminal complaint for usurpation of judicial functions
on the ground that only a judge may issue a warrant of search and seizure.
a. Resolve with reasons Jessie's criminal complaint. (4%)
b. Would your answer be the same if the luxury car was seized while parked inside the garage
of Jessie's residence? Why or why not? (4%)
VI
The Sangguniang Bayan of the Municipality of Sampaloc, Quezon, passed an ordinance imposing a
storage fee of ten centavos (P0.10) for every 100 kilos of copra deposited in any bodega within the
Municipality's jurisdiction. The Metropolitan Manufacturing Corporation (MMC), with principal office
in Makati, is engaged in the manufacture of soap, edible oil, margarine, and other coconut oil-based
products. It has a warehouse in Sampaloc, Quezon, used as storage space for the copra purchased
in Sampaloc and nearby towns before the same is shipped to Makati. MMC goes to court to
challenge the validity of the ordinance, demanding the refund of the storage fees it paid under
protest.
Is the ordinance valid? Explain your answer. (4%)

VII
Kenya International Airlines (KIA) is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of Kenya. It is
not licensed to do business in the Philippines. Its commercial airplanes do not operate within
Philippine territory, or service passengers embarking from Philippine airports. The firm is
represented in the Philippines by its general agent, Philippine Airlines (PAL), a Philippine
corporation.
KIA sells airplane tickets through PAL, and these tickets are serviced by KIA airplanes outside the
Philippines. The total sales of airline tickets transacted by PAL for KIA in 1997 amounted to
P2,968,156.00. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed KIA deficiency income taxes at
the rate of 35% on its taxable income, finding that KIA's airline ticket sales constituted income
derived from sources within the Philippines.
KIA filed a protest on the ground that the P2,968,156.00 should be considered as income derived
exclusively from sources outside the Philippines since KIA only serviced passengers outside
Philippine territory.
Is the position of KIA tenable? Reasons. (4%)
VII
Kenya International Airlines (KIA) is a foreign corporation, organized under the laws of Kenya. It is
not licensed to do business in the Philippines. Its commercial airplanes do not operate within
Philippine territory, or service passengers embarking from Philippine airports. The firm is
represented in the Philippines by its general agent, Philippine Airlines (PAL), a Philippine
corporation.
KIA sells airplane tickets through PAL, and these tickets are serviced by KIA airplanes outside the
Philippines. The total sales of airline tickets transacted by PAL for KIA in 1997 amounted to
P2,968,156.00. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed KIA deficiency income taxes at
the rate of 35% on its taxable income, finding that KIA's airline ticket sales constituted income
derived from sources within the Philippines.
KIA filed a protest on the ground that the P2,968,156.00 should be considered as income derived
exclusively from sources outside the Philippines since KIA only serviced passengers outside
Philippine territory.
Is the position of KIA tenable? Reasons. (4%)
VIII
The City of Manila enacted Ordinance No. 55-66 which imposes a municipal occupation tax on
persons practicing various professions in the city. Among those subjected to the occupation tax were
lawyers. Atty. Mariano Batas, who has a law office in Manila, pays the ordinance-imposed
occupation tax under protest. He goes to court to assail the validity of the ordinance for being
discriminatory. Decide with reasons. (3%)
IX

Republic Power Corporation (RPC) is a government-owned and controlled corporation engaged in


the supply, generation and transmission of electric power. In 2005, in order to provide electricity to
Southern Tagalog provinces, RPC entered into an agreement with Jethro Energy Corporation (JEC),
for the lease of JEC's power barges which shall be berthed at the port of Batangas City. The
contract provides that JEC shall own the power barges and the fixtures, fittings, machinery, and
equipment therein, all of which JEC shall supply at its own cost, and that JEC shall operate, manage
and maintain the power barges for the purpose of converting the fuel of RPC into electricity. The
contract also stipulates that all real estate taxes and assessments, rates and other charges, in
respect of the power barges, shall be for the account of RPC.
In 2007, JEC received an assessment of real property taxes on the power barges from the Assessor
of Batangas City. JEC sought reconsideration of the assessment on the ground that the power
barges are exempt from real estate taxes under Section 234 [c] of R.A. 7160 as they are actually,
directly and exclusively used by RPC, a government-owned and controlled corporation.
Furthermore, even assuming that the power barges are subject to real property tax, RPC should be
held liable therefor, in accordance with the terms of the lease agreement. Is the contention of JEC
correct? Explain your answer. (4%)
X
ABCD Corporation (ABCD) is a domestic corporation with individual and corporate shareholders
who are residents of the United States. For the 2nd quarter of 1983, these U.S.-based individual and
corporate stockholders received cash dividends from the corporation. The corresponding
withholding tax on dividend income --- 30% for individual and 35% for corporate non-resident
stockholders --- was deducted at source and remitted to the BIR.
On May 15, 1984, ABCD filed with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue a formal claim for refund,
alleging that under the RP-US Tax Treaty, the deduction withheld at source as tax on dividends
earned was fixed at 25% of said income. Thus, ABCD asserted that it overpaid the withholding tax
due on the cash dividends given to its non-resident stockholders in the U.S. The Commissioner
denied the claim.
On January 17, 1985, ABCD filed a petition with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) reiterating its
demand for refund.
a. Does ABCD Corporation have the legal personality to file the refund on behalf of its nonresident stockholders? Why or why not? (3%)
b. Is the contention of ABCD Corporation correct? Why or why not? (3%)

PART II
XI
Raffy and Wena, husband and wife, are both employed by XXX Corporation. After office hours, they
jointly manage a coffee shop at the ground floor of their house. The coffee shop is registered in the
name of both spouses. Which of the following is the correct way to prepare their income tax

return? Write the letter only. DO NOT EXPLAIN YOUR ANSWER. (2%)
a. Raffy will declare as his income the salaries of both spouses, while Wena will declare the
income from the coffee shop.
b. Wena will declare the combined compensation income of the spouses, and Raffy will declare
the income from the coffee shop.
c. All the income will be declared by Raffy alone, because only one consolidated return is
required to be filed by the spouses.
d. Raffy will declare his own compensation income and Wena will declare hers. The income
from the coffee shop shall be equally divided between them. Each spouse shall be taxed
separately on their corresponding taxable income to be covered by one consolidated return
for the spouses.
e. Raffy will declare his own compensation income and Wena will declare hers. The income
from the coffee shop shall be equally divided between them. Raffy will file one income tax
return to cover all the income of both spouses, and the tax is computed on the aggregate
taxable income of the spouses.
XII
YYY Corporation engaged the services of the Manananggol Law Firm in 2006 to defend the
corporation's title over a property used in the business. For the legal services rendered in 2007, the
law firm billed the corporation only in 2008. The corporation duly paid.
YYY Corporation claimed this expense as a deduction from gross income in its 2008 return,
because the exact amount of the expense was determined only in 2008. Is YYY's claim of deduction
proper? Reasons. (4%)
XIII
In 1999, Xavier purchased from his friend, Yuri, a painting for P500,000.00. The fair market value
(FMV) of the painting at the time of the purchase was P1-million. Yuri paid all the corresponding
taxes on the transaction. In 2001, Xavier died. In his last will and testament, Xavier bequeathed the
painting, already worth P1.5-million, to his only son, Zandro. The will also granted Zandro the power
to appoint his wife, Wilma, as successor to the painting in the event of Zandro's death. Zandro died
in 2007, and Wilma succeeded to the property.
a. Should the painting be included in the gross estate of Xavier in 2001 and thus, be subject to
estate tax? Explain. (3%)
b. Should the painting be included in the gross estate of Zandro in 2007 and thus, be subject to
estate tax? Explain. (3%)
c. May a vanishing deduction be allowed in either or both of the estates? Explain. (3%)

XIV
Emiliano Paupahan is engaged in the business of leasing out several residential apartment units he
owns. The monthly rental for each unit ranges from P8,000.00 to P10,000.00. His gross rental
income for one year is P1,650,000.00. He consults you on whether it is necessary for him to register
as a VAT taxpayer. What legal advice will you give him, and why? (4%)
XV
Miguel, a citizen and resident of Mexico, donated US$1,000.00 worth of stocks in Barack Motors
Corporation, a Mexican company, to his legitimate son, Miguelito, who is residing in the Philippines
and about to be married to a Filipino girlfriend. Mexico does not impose any transfer tax of whatever
nature on all gratuitous transfers of property.
a. Is Miguel entitled to claim a dowry exclusion? Why or why not? (3%)
b. Is Miguel entitled to the rule of reciprocity in order to be exempt from the Philippine donor's
tax? Why or why not? (3%)
XVI
Ernesto, a Filipino citizen and a practicing lawyer, filed his income tax return for 2007 claiming
optional standard deductions. Realizing that he has enough documents to substantiate his
profession-connected expenses, he now plans to file an amended income tax return for 2007, in
order to claim itemized deductions, since no audit has been commenced by the BIR on the return he
previously filed. Will Ernesto be allowed to amend his return? Why or why not? (4%)
XVII
A final assessment notice was issued by the BIR on June 13, 2000, and received by the taxpayer on
June 15, 2000. The taxpayer protested the assessment on July 31, 2000. The protest was initially
given due course, but was eventually denied by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in a decision
dated June 15, 2005. The taxpayer then filed a petition for review with the Court of Tax Appeals
(CTA), but the CTA dismissed the same.
a. Is the CTA correct in dismissing the petition for review? Explain your answer. (4%)
b. Assume that the CTA's decision dismissing the petition for review has become final. May the
Commissioner legally enforce collection of the delinquent tax? Explain. (4%)
XVIII
A taxpayer received an assessment notice from the BIR on February 3, 2009. The following day, he
filed a protest, in the form of a request for reinvestigation, against the assessment and submitted all
relevant documents in support of the protest. On September 11, 2009, the taxpayer, apprehensive
because he had not yet received notice of a decision by the Commissioner on his protest, sought
your advice.

What remedy or remedies are available to the taxpayer? Explain. (4%)


XIX
Johnny transferred a valuable 10-door commercial apartment to a designated trustee, Miriam,
naming in the trust instrument Santino, Johnny's 10-year old son, as the sole beneficiary. The
trustee is instructed to distribute the yearly rentals amounting to P720,000.00. The trustee consults
you if she has to pay the annual income tax on the rentals received from the commercial apartment.
a. What advice will you give the trustee? Explain. (3%)
b. Will your advice be the same if the trustee is directed to accumulate the rental income and
distribute the same only when the beneficiary reaches the age of majority? Why or why not?
(3%)
XX
Masarap Food Corporation (MFC) incurred substantial advertising expenses in order to protect its
brand franchise for one of its line products. In its income tax return, MFC included the advertising
expense as deduction from gross income, claiming it as an ordinary business expense. Is MFC
correct? Explain. (3%)
-NOTHING FOLLOWSBAR EXAMINATION 2009
LABOR AND SOCIAL LEGISLATION
06 September 2009

2 P.M. - 5 P.M.
INSTRUCTIONS

This questionnaire is in TWO (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained
in six (6) pages; and Part II with eight (8) questions(numbered XI-XVIII), contained in six (6) pages,
for a total number of twelve (12) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.
Answer the questions directly and concisely. Do not repeat the questions. Write legibly.

HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE.


GOOD LUCK!

_____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
CHAIRPERSON
2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS COMMITTEE

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS THIRTEEN (13) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE)

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE


LABOR AND SOCIAL LEGISLATION
PART I
I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. An employment contract prohibiting employment in a competing company within one year
from separation is valid.
b. All confidential employees are disqualified to unionize for the purpose of collective
bargaining.
c. A runaway shop is an act constituting unfair labor practice.
d. In the law on labor relations, the substitutionary doctrine prohibits a new collective
bargaining agent from repudiating an existing collective bargaining agreement.
e. The visitorial and enforcement powers of the DOLE Regional Director to order and enforce
compliance with labor standard laws can be exercised even when the individual claim
exceeds P5,000.00.
II
a. Enumerate at least four (4) policies enshrined in Section 3, Article XIII of the Constitution
that are not covered by Article 3 of the Labor Code on declaration of basic policy. (2%)
b. Clarito, an employee of Juan, was dismissed for allegedly stealing Juans wristwatch. In the
illegal dismissal case instituted by Clarito, the Labor Arbiter, citing Article 4 of the Labor
Code, ruled in favor of Clarito upon finding Juans testimony doubtful. On appeal, the NLRC
reversed the Labor Arbiter holding that Article 4 applies only when the doubt involves
"implementation and interpretation" of the Labor Code provisions. The NLRC explained that
the doubt may not necessarily be resolved in favor of labor since this case involves the
application of the Rules onEvidence, not the Labor Code. Is the NLRC correct? Reasons.

(3%)
III
Richie, a driver-mechanic, was recruited by Supreme Recruiters (SR) and its principal, Mideast
Recruitment Agency (MRA), to work in Qatar for a period of two (2) years. However, soon after the
contract was approved by POEA, MRA advised SR to forego Richies deployment because it had
already hired another Filipino driver-mechanic, who had just completed his contract in Qatar.
Aggrieved, Richie filed with the NLRC a complaint against SR and MRA for damages corresponding
to his two years salary under the POEA-approved contract.
SR and MRA traversed Richies complaint, raising the following arguments:
a. The Labor Arbiter has no jurisdiction over the case; (2%)
b. Because Richie was not able to leave for Qatar, no employer-employee relationship was
established between them; (2%) and
c. Even assuming that they are liable, their liability would, at most, be equivalent to Richies
salary for only six (6) months, not two years. (3%).
Rule on the validity of the foregoing arguments with reasons.
IV
Diosdado, a carpenter, was hired by Building Industries Corporation (BIC), and assigned to build a
small house in Alabang. His contract of employment specifically referred to him as a "project
employee," although it did not provide any particular date of completion of the project.
Is the completion of the house a valid cause for the termination of Diosdados employment? If so,
what are the due process requirements that the BIC must satisfy? If not, why not? (3%)
V
a. Baldo was dismissed from employment for having beenabsent without leave (AWOL) for
eight (8) months. It turned outthat the reason for his absence was his incarceration after he
was mistaken as his neighbors killer. Eventually acquitted and released from jail, Baldo
returned to his employer and demanded reinstatement and full backwages. Is Baldo entitled
to reinstatement and backwages? Explain your answer. (3%)
b. Domingo, a bus conductor of San Juan Transportation Company, intentionally did not issue
a ticket to a female passenger, Kim, his long-time crush. As a result, Domingo was
dismissed from employment for fraud or willful breach of trust. Domingo contests his
dismissal, claiming that he is not a confidential employee and, therefore, cannot be
dismissed from the service for breach of trust. Is Domingo correct? Reasons. (2%)
VI
Albert, a 40-year old employer, asked his domestic helper, Inday, to give him a private massage.

When Inday refused, Albert showed her Article 141 of the Labor Code, which says that one of the
duties of a domestic helper is to minister to the employers personal comfort and convenience.
a. Is Indays refusal tenable? Explain. (3%)
b. Distinguish briefly, but clearly, a "househelper" from a "homeworker." (2%)
VII
Johnny is the duly elected President and principal union organizer of the Nagkakaisang
Manggagawa ng Manila Restaurant (NMMR), a legitimate labor organization. He was
unceremoniously dismissed by management for spending virtually 95% of his working hours in
union activities. On the same day Johnny received the notice of termination, the labor union went on
strike.
Management filed an action to declare the strike illegal, contending that:
a. The union did not observe the "cooling-off period" mandated by the Labor Code; (2%) and
b. The union went on strike without complying with the strike-vote requirement under the Labor
Code. (2%)
Rule on the foregoing contentions with reasons.
c. The Labor Arbiter found management guilty of unfair labor practice for the unlawful dismissal
of Johnny. The decision became final. Thereafter, the NMMR filed a criminal case against
the Manager of Manila Restaurant. Would the Labor Arbiters finding be sufficient to secure
the Managers conviction? Why or why not? (2%)
VIII
Alexander, a security guard of Jaguar Security Agency (JSA), could not be given any assignment
because no client would accept him. He had a face only a mother could love. After six (6) months of
being on "floating" status, Alexander sued JSA for constructive dismissal. The Labor Arbiter upheld
Alexanders claim of constructive dismissal and ordered JSA to immediately reinstate Alexander.
JSA appealed the decision to the NLRC. Alexander sought immediate enforcement of the
reinstatement order while the appeal was pending.
JSA hires you as lawyer, and seeks your advice on the following:
a. Because JSA has no client who would accept Alexander, can it still be compelled to reinstate
him pending appeal even if it has posted an appeal bond? (2%)
b. Can the order of reinstatement be immediately enforced in the absence of a motion for the
issuance of a writ of execution? (2%)
c. If the order of reinstatement is being enforced, what should JSA do in order to prevent
reinstatement? (2%)

Explain your answers.


IX
a. What is wage distortion? Can a labor union invoke wage distortion as a valid ground to go
on strike? Explain. (2%)
b. What procedural remedies are open to workers who seek correction of wage distortion?
(2%)
X
a. State briefly the compulsory coverage of the Government Service Insurance Act. (2%)
b. Can a member of a cooperative be deemed an employee for purposes of compulsory
coverage under the Social Security Act? Explain. (2%)

PART II
XI
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. Seafarers who have worked for twenty (20) years on board the same vessel are regular
employees.
b. Employment of children below fifteen (15) years of age in any public or private establishment
is absolutely prohibited.
c. Government employees have the right to organize and join concerted mass actions without
incurring administrative liability.
d. A waiver of the right to claim overtime pay is contrary to law.
e. Agency fees cannot be collected from a non-union member in the absence of a written
authorization signed by the worker concerned.
XII
In her State of the Nation Address, the President stressed the need to provide an investor-friendly
business environment so that the country can compete in the global economy that now suffers from
a crisis bordering on recession. Responding to the call, Congress passed two innovative legislative
measures, namely: (1) a law abolishing the security of tenure clause in the Labor Code; and (2) a
law allowing contractualization in all areas needed in the employers business operations. However,
to soften the impact of these new measures, the law requires that all employers shall obtain

mandatory unemployment insurance coverage for all their employees.


The constitutionality of the two (2) laws is challenged in court. As judge, how will you rule? (5%)
XIII
Atty. Renan, a CPA-lawyer and Managing Partner of an accounting firm, conducted the orientation
seminar for newly-hired employees of the firm, among them, Miss Maganda. After the seminar,
Renan requested Maganda to stay, purportedly to discuss
some work assignment. Left alone in the training room, Renan asked Maganda to go out with him
for dinner and ballroom dancing. Thereafter, he persuaded her to accompany him to the mountain
highway in Antipolo for sight-seeing. During all these, Renan told Maganda that most, if not all, of
the lady supervisors in the firm are where they are now, in very productive and lucrative posts,
because of his favorable endorsement.
a. Did Renan commit acts of sexual harassment in a work- related or employment
environment? Reasons. (3%)
b. The lady supervisors in the firm, slighted by Renans revelations about them, succeeded in
having him expelled from the firm. Renan then filed with the Arbitration Branch of the NLRC
an illegal dismissal case with claims for damages against the firm. Will the case prosper?
Reasons. (2%)
XIV
Jolli-Mac Restaurant Company (Jolli-Mac) owns and operates the largest food chain in the country.
It engaged Matiyaga Manpower Services, Inc. (MMSI), a job contractor registered with the
Department of Labor and Employment, to provide its restaurants the necessary personnel,
consisting of cashiers, motorcycle delivery boys and food servers, in its operations. The Service
Agreement warrants, among others, that MMSI has a paid- up capital of P2,000,000.00; that it would
train and determine the qualification and fitness of all personnel to be assigned to Jolli- Mac; that it
would provide these personnel with proper Jolli-Mac uniforms; and that it is exclusively responsible
to these personnel for their respective salaries and all other mandatory statutory benefits.
After the contract was signed, it was revealed, based on research conducted, that MMSI had no
other clients except Jolli- Mac, and one of its major owners was a member of the Board of Directors
of Jolli-Mac.
a. Is the Service Agreement between Jolli-Mac and MMSI legal and valid? Why or why not?
(3%)
b. If the cashiers, delivery boys and food servers are not paid their lawful salaries, including
overtime pay, holiday pay, 13th month pay, and service incentive leave pay, against whom
may these workers file their claims? Explain. (2%)
XV
Among the 400 regular rank-and-file workers of MNO Company, a certification election was ordered

conducted by the Med-Arbiter of the Region. The contending parties obtained the following votes:
1. Union A - 70
2. Union B - 71
3. Union C - 42
4. Union D - 33
5. No union - 180
6. Spoiled votes - 4
There were no objections or challenges raised by any party on the results of the election.
a. Can Union B be certified as the sole and exclusive collective bargaining agent among the
rank-and-file workers of MNO Company considering that it garnered the highest number of
votes among the contending unions? Why or why not? (3%)
b. May the management or lawyer of MNO Company legally ask for the absolute termination of
the certification election proceedings because 180 of the workers --- a clear plurality of the
voters --- have chosen not to be represented by any union? Reasons. (3%)
c. If you were the duly designated election officer in this case, what would you do to effectively
achieve the purpose of certification election proceedings? Discuss. (3%)
XVI
The Company and Triple-X Union, the certified bargaining agent of rank-and-file employees, entered
into a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) effective for the period January 1, 2002 to December
31, 2007.
For the 4th and 5th years of the CBA, the significant
improvements in wages and other benefits obtained by the Union were:
1) Salary increases of P1,000 and P1,200 monthly, effective January 1, 2006 and January 1,
2007, respectively;
2) Vacation Leave and Sick Leave were adjusted from 12 days to 15 days annually for each
employee;
3) Medical subsidy of P3,000 per year for the purchase of medicines and hospitalization
assistance of P10,000 per year for actual hospital confinement;
4) Rice Subsidy of P600 per month, provided the employee has worked for at least 20 days
within the particular month; and

5) Birthday Leave with Pay and Birthday Gift of P1,500.


As early as October 2007, the Company and the Union started negotiations to renew the CBA.
Despite mutual good faith and earnest efforts, they could not agree. However, no union filed a
petition for certification election during the freedom period. On March 30, 2008, no CBA had been
concluded. Management learned that the Union would declare a bargaining deadlock on the next
scheduled bargaining meeting.
As expected, on April 3, 2008, the Union declared a deadlock. In the afternoon of the same day,
management issued a formal announcement in writing, posted on the bulletin board, that due to the
CBA expiration on December 31, 2007, all fringe benefits contained therein are considered
withdrawn and can no longer be implemented, effective immediately.
a. When was the "freedom period" referred to in the foregoing narration of facts? Explain. (2%)
b. After April 3, 2008, will a petition for certification election filed by another legitimate labor
union representing the rank-and-file employees legally prosper? Reasons. (3%)
c. Is managements withdrawal of the fringe benefits valid?
Reasons. (2%)
d. If you were the lawyer for the union, what legal recourse or action would you advise?
Reasons. (3%)
XVII
Alfredo was dismissed by management for serious misconduct. He filed suit for illegal dismissal,
alleging that although there may be just cause, he was not afforded due process by management
prior to his termination. He demands reinstatement with full backwages.
a. What are the twin requirements of due process which the employer must observe in
terminating or dismissing an employee? Explain. (3%)
b. Is Alfredo entitled to reinstatement and full backwages? Why or why not? (3%)
XVIII
a. Cite four (4) instances when an illegally dismissed employee may be awarded separation
pay in lieu of reinstatement. (3%)
b. Explain the impact of the union security clause to the employees right to security of tenure.
(2%)
-NOTHING FOLLOWS2009 BAR EXAMINATION
POLITICAL AND PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW

06 September 2009

8 A.M. - 12 NN
INSTRUCTIONS

This questionnaire is in TWO (2) PARTS: Part I with ten (10) questions (numbered I to X), contained
in seven (7) pages; and Part II with eight (8) questions (numbered XI-XVIII), contained in six (6)
pages, for a total number of thirteen (13) pages.
Write your answers to Part I and Part II in the corresponding portions indicated in the booklet.
Begin your answer to each numbered question on a separate page; an answer to a subquestion
under the same number may be written continuously on the same page and succeeding pages until
completed.
Answer the question directly and concisely. Do not repeat the question. Write legibly

HAND IN YOUR NOTEBOOK WITH THIS QUESTIONNAIRE


GOOD LUCK!!!

____________________________________
ANTONIO EDUARDO B. NACHURA
Chairperson
2009 Bar Examinations Committee

PLEASE CHECK THAT THIS SET CONTAINS FOURTEEN (14) PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PAGE).

WARNING: NOT FOR SALE OR UNAUTHORIZED USE

POLITICAL LAW
PART I
I
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)

a. A law making "Bayan Ko" the new national anthem of the Philippines, in lieu of "Lupang
Hinirang," is constitutional.
b. Under the archipelago doctrine, the waters around, between, and connecting the islands of
the archipelago form part of the territorial sea of the archipelagic state.
c. A law that makes military service for women merely voluntary is constitutional.
d. A law fixing the passing grade in the Bar examinations at 70%, with no grade lower than
40% in any subject, is constitutional.
e. An educational institution 100% foreign-owned may be validly established in the Philippines.
II
Despite lingering questions about his Filipino citizenship and his one-year residence in the district,
Gabriel filed his certificate of candidacy for congressman before the deadline set by law. His
opponent, Vito, hires you as lawyer to contest Gabriel's candidacy.
a. Before election day, what action or actions will you institute against Gabriel, and before
which court, commission or tribunal will you file such action/s? Reasons. (2%)
b. If, during the pendency of such action/s but before election day, Gabriel withdraws his
certificate of candidacy, can he be substituted as candidate? If so, by whom and why? If not,
why not? (2%)
c. If the action/s instituted should be dismissed with finality before the election, and Gabriel
assumes office after being proclaimed the winner in the election, can the issue of his
candidacy and/or citizenship and residence still be questioned? If so, what action or actions
may be filed and where? If not, why not? (2%)
III
The Municipality of Bulalakaw, Leyte, passed Ordinance No. 1234, authorizing the expropriation of
two parcels of land situated in the poblacion as the site of a freedom park, and appropriating the
funds needed therefor. Upon review, the |Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Leyte disapproved the
ordinance because the municipality has an existing freedom park which, though smaller in size, is
still suitable for the purpose, and to pursue expropriation would be needless expenditure of the
people's money. Is the disapproval of the ordinance correct? Explain your answer. (2%)
IV
The Municipality of Pinatukdao is sued for damages arising from injuries sustained by a pedestrian
who was hit by a glass pane that fell from a dilapidated window frame of the municipal hall. The
municipality files a motion to dismiss the complaint, invoking state immunity from suit. Resolve the
motion with reasons. (3%)
V

To address the pervasive problem of gambling, Congress is considering the following options: (1)
prohibit all forms of gambling; (2) allow gambling only on Sundays; (3) allow gambling only in
government-owned casinos; and (4) remove all prohibitions against gambling but impose a tax
equivalent to 30% on all winnings.
a. If Congress chooses the first option and passes the corresponding law absolutely prohibiting
all forms of gambling, can the law be validly attacked on the ground that it is an invalid
exercise of police power? Explain your answer. (2%)
b. If Congress chooses the last option and passes the corresponding law imposing a 30% tax
on all winnings and prizes won from gambling, would the law comply with the constitutional
limitations on the exercise of the power of taxation? Explain your answer. (2%)
VI
In a criminal prosecution for murder, the prosecution presented, as witness, an employee of the
Manila Hotel who produced in court a videotape recording showing the heated exchange between
the accused and the victim that took place at the lobby of the hotel barely 30 minutes before the
killing. The accused objects to the admission of the videotape recording on the ground that it was
taken without his knowledge or consent, in violation of his right to privacy and the Anti-Wire Tapping
law. Resolve the objection with reasons. (3%)
VII
Crack agents of the Manila Police Anti-Narcotics Unit were on surveillance of a cemetery where the
sale and use of prohibited drugs were rumored to be rampant. The team saw a man with reddish
and glassy eyes walking unsteadily towards them, but he immediately veered away upon seeing the
policemen. The team approached the man, introduced themselves as peace officers, then asked
what he had in his clenched fist. Because the man refused to answer, a policeman pried the fist
open and saw a plastic sachet filled with crystalline substance. The team then took the man into
custody and submitted the contents of the sachet to forensic examination. The crystalline substance
in the sachet turned out to be shabu. The man was accordingly charged in court.
During the trial, the accused:
a. challenged the validity of his arrest; (2%) and
b. objected to the admission in evidence of the prohibited drug, claiming that it was obtained in
an illegal search and seizure. (2%)
Decide with reasons.
VIII
Congressman Nonoy delivered a privilege speech charging the Intercontinental Universal Bank
(IUB) with the sale of unregistered foreign securities, in violation of R.A. 8799. He then filed, and the
House of Representatives unanimously approved, a Resolution directing the House Committee on
Good Government (HCGG) to conduct an inquiry on the matter, in aid of legislation, in order to
prevent the recurrence of any similar fraudulent activity.

The HCGG immediately scheduled a hearing and invited the responsible officials of IUB, the
Chairman and Commissioners of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the
Governor of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP). On the date set for the hearing, only the SEC
Commissioners appeared, prompting Congressman Nonoy to move for the issuance of the
appropriate subpoena ad testificandum to compel the attendance of the invited resource persons.
The IUB officials filed suit to prohibit HCGG from proceeding with the inquiry and to quash
the subpoena, raising the following arguments:
a. The subject of the legislative investigation is also the subject of criminal and civil actions
pending before the courts and the prosecutor's office; thus, the legislative inquiry would
preempt judicial action; (3%) and
b. Compelling the IUB officials, who are also respondents in the criminal and civil cases in
court, to testify at the inquiry would violate their constitutional right against self-incrimination.
(3%)
Are the foregoing arguments tenable? Reasons.
c. May the Governor of the BSP validly invoke executive privilege and, thus, refuse to attend
the legislative inquiry? Why or why not? (3%)
IX
Warlito, a natural-born Filipino, took up permanent residence in the United States, and eventually
acquired American citizenship. He then married Shirley, an American, and sired three children. In
August 2009, Warlito decided to visit the Philippines with his wife and children: Johnny, 23 years of
age; Warlito, Jr., 20; and Luisa, 17.
While in the Philippines, a friend informed him that he could reacquire Philippine citizenship without
necessarily losing U.S. nationality. Thus, he took the oath of allegiance required under R.A. 9225.
a. Having reacquired Philippine citizenship, is Warlito a natural-born or a naturalized Filipino
citizen today? Explain your answer. (3%)
b. With Warlito having regained Philippine citizenship, will Shirley also become a Filipino
citizen? If so, why? If not, what would be the most speedy procedure for Shirley to acquire
Philippine citizenship? Explain. (3%)
c. Do the children --- Johnny, Warlito Jr., and Luisa --- become Filipino citizens with their
father's reacquisition of Philippine citizenship? Explain your answer. (3%)
X
Maximino, an employee of the Department of Education, is administratively charged with dishonesty
and gross misconduct. During the formal investigation of the charges, the Secretary of Education
preventively suspended him for a period of sixty (60) days. On the 60th day of the preventive
suspension, the Secretary rendered a verdict, finding Maximino guilty, and ordered his immediate
dismissal from the service.

Maximino appealed to the Civil Service Commission (CSC), which affirmed the Secretary's decision.
Maximino then elevated the matter to the Court of Appeals (CA). The CA reversed the CSC
decision, exonerating Maximino. The Secretary of Education then petitions the Supreme Court (SC)
for the review of the CA decision.
a. Is the Secretary of Education a proper party to seek the review of the CA decision
exonerating Maximino? Reasons. (2%)
b. If the SC affirms the CA decision, is Maximino entitled to recover back salaries
corresponding to the entire period he was out of the service? Explain your answer. (3%)

PART II
XI
TRUE or FALSE. Answer TRUE if the statement is true, or FALSE if the statement is false. Explain
your answer in not more than two (2) sentences. (5%)
a. Aliens are absolutely prohibited from owning private lands in the Philippines.
b. A de facto public officer is, by right, entitled to receive the salaries and emoluments attached
to the public office he holds.
c. The President exercises the power of control over all executive departments and agencies,
including government-owned or controlled corporations.
d. Decisions of the Ombudsman imposing penalties in administrative disciplinary cases are
merely recommendatory.
e. Dual citizenship is not the same as dual allegiance.
XII
William, a private American citizen, a university graduate and frequent visitor to the Philippines, was
inside the U.S. embassy when he got into a heated argument with a private Filipino citizen. Then, in
front of many shocked witnesses, he killed the person he was arguing with. The police came, and
brought him to the nearest police station. Upon reaching the station, the police investigator, in
halting English, informed William of his Miranda rights, and assigned him an independent local
counsel. William refused the services of the lawyer, and insisted that he be assisted by a Filipino
lawyer currently based in the U.S. The request was denied, and the counsel assigned by the police
stayed for the duration of the investigation.
William protested his arrest.
a. He argued that since the incident took place inside the U.S. embassy, Philippine courts have
no jurisdiction because the U.S. embassy grounds are not part of Philippine territory; thus,
technically, no crime under Philippine law was committed. Is William correct? Explain your

answer. (3%)
b. He also claimed that his Miranda rights were violated because he was not given the lawyer
of his choice; that being an American, he should have been informed of his rights in proper
English; and that he should have been informed of his rights as soon as he was taken into
custody, not when he was already at the police station. Was William denied his Miranda
rights? Why or why not? (3%)
c. If William applies for bail, claiming that he is entitled thereto under the "international standard
of justice" and that he comes from a U.S. State that has outlawed capital punishment, should
William be granted bail as a matter of right? Reasons. (3%)
XIII
A terrorist group called the Emerald Brigade is based in the State of Asyaland. The government of
Asyaland does not support the terrorist group, but being a poor country, is powerless to stop it.
The Emerald Brigade launched an attack on the Philippines, firing two missiles that killed thousands
of Filipinos. It then warned that more attacks were forthcoming. Through diplomatic channels, the
Philippines demanded that Asyaland stop the Emerald Brigade; otherwise, it will do whatever is
necessary to defend itself.
Receiving reliable intelligence reports of another imminent attack by the Emerald Brigade, and it
appearing that Asyaland was incapable of preventing the assault, the Philippines sent a crack
commando team to Asyaland. The team stayed only for a few hours in Asyaland, succeeded in
killing the leaders and most of the members of the Emerald Brigade, then immediately returned to
the Philippines.
a. Was the Philippine action justified under the international law principle of "self-defense"?
Explain your answer. (3%)
b. As a consequence of the foregoing incident, Asyaland charges the Philippines with violation
of Article 2.4 of the United Nations Charter that prohibits "the threat or use of force against
the territorial integrity or political independence of any State." The Philippines counters that
its commando team neither took any territory nor interfered in the political processes of
Asyaland. Which contention is correct? Reasons. (3%)
c. Assume that the commando team captured a member of the Emerald Brigade and brought
him back to the Philippines. The Philippine Government insists that a special international
tribunal should try the terrorist. On the other hand, the terrorist argues that terrorism is not
an international crime and, therefore, the municipal laws of the Philippines, which recognize
access of the accused to constitutional rights, should apply. Decide with reasons. (3%)
XIV
The Philippine Government is negotiating a new security treaty with the United States which could
involve engagement in joint military operations of the two countries' armed forces. A loose
organization of Filipinos, the Kabataan at Matatandang Makabansa (KMM) wrote the Department of
Foreign Affairs (DFA) and the Department of National Defense (DND) demanding disclosure of the
details of the negotiations, as well as copies of the minutes of the meetings. The DFA and the DND

refused, contending that premature disclosure of the offers and counter-offers between the parties
could jeopardize on-going negotiations with another country. KMM filed suit to compel disclosure of
the negotiation details, and be granted access to the records of the meetings, invoking the
constitutional right of the people to information on matters of public concern.
a. Decide with reasons.

(3%)

b. Will your answer be the same if the information sought by KMM pertains to contracts entered
into by the Government in its proprietary or commercial capacity? Why or why not? (3%)
XV
The KKK Television Network (KKK-TV) aired the documentary, "Case Law: How the Supreme Court
Decides," without obtaining the necessary permit required by P.D. 1986. Consequently, the Movie
and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) suspended the airing of KKK-TV
programs. MTRCB declared that under P.D. 1986, it has the power of prior review over all television
programs, except "newsreels" and programs "by the Government", and the subject documentary
does not fall under either of these two classes. The suspension order was ostensibly based on
Memorandum Circular No. 98-17 which grants MTRCB the authority to issue such an order.
KKK-TV filed a certiorari petition in court, raising the following issues:
a. The act of MTRCB constitutes "prior restraint" and violates the constitutionally guaranteed
freedom of expression; (3%) and
b. While Memorandum Circular No. 98-17 was issued and published in a newspaper of general
circulation, a copy thereof was never filed with the Office of the National Register of the
University of the Philippines Law Center. (2%)
Resolve the foregoing issues, with reasons.
XVI
a. Angelina, a married woman, is a Division Chief in the Department of Science and
Technology. She had been living with a married man, not her husband, for the last fifteen
(15) years. Administratively charged with immorality and conduct prejudicial to the best
interest of the service, she admits her live-in arrangement, but maintains that this conjugal
understanding is in conformity with their religious beliefs. As members of the religious
sect, Yahweh's Observers, they had executed a Declaration of Pledging Faithfulness which
has been confirmed and blessed by their Council of Elders. At the formal investigation of the
administrative case, the Grand Elder of the sect affirmed Angelina's testimony and attested
to the sincerity of Angelina and her partner in the profession of their faith. If you were to
judge this case, will you exonerate Angelina? Reasons. (3%)
b. Meanwhile, Jenny, also a member of Yahweh's Observers, was severely disappointed at the
manner the Grand Elder validated what she considered was an obviously immoral conjugal
arrangement between Angelina and her partner. Jenny filed suit in court, seeking the
removal of the Grand Elder from the religious sect on the ground that his act in supporting
Angelina not only ruined the reputation of their religion, but also violated the constitutional
policy upholding the sanctity of marriage and the solidarity of the family. Will Jenny's case

prosper? Explain your answer. (2%)


XVII
Filipinas Computer Corporation (FCC), a local manufacturer of computers and computer parts, owns
a sprawling plant in a 5,000-square meter lot in Pasig City. To remedy the city's acute housing
shortage, compounded by a burgeoning population, the Sangguniang Panglungsod authorized the
City Mayor to negotiate for the purchase of the lot. The Sanggunian intends to subdivide the
property into small residential lots to be distributed at cost to qualified city residents. But FCC
refused to sell the lot. Hard pressed to find a suitable property to house its homeless residents, the
City filed a complaint for eminent domain against FCC.
a. If FCC hires you as lawyer, what defense or defenses would you set up in order to resist the
expropriation of the property? Explain. (5%)
b. If the Court grants the City's prayer for expropriation, but the City delays payment of the
amount determined by the court as just compensation, can FCC recover the property from
Pasig City? Explain. (2%)
c. Suppose the expropriation succeeds, but the City decides to abandon its plan to subdivide
the property for residential purposes having found a much bigger lot, can FCC legally
demand that it be allowed to repurchase the property from the City of Pasig? Why or why
not? (2%)
XVIII
What are the essential elements of a valid petition for a people's initiative to amend the 1987
Constitution? Discuss. (2%)

-NOTHING FOLLOWS-

You might also like