Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FINAL REPORT
Group 10
Name
Student ID
Lorena Gallardo
Yuxiang Ma
Harry Smithers
Andre Costa
Tengku Azrai Redza
613776
630337
391880
647254
368816
ENEN90011
Final Report
ABSTRACT
This report investigates the barriers and opportunities to exploiting geothermal energy in New
Zealand as a renewable energy source for producing electricity. The report includes relevant
background information regarding geothermal energy as well as summarized technical
information about geothermal energy generation.
The report applies the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) method of considering the social,
environmental and economic aspects of geothermal energy in order to evaluate its
sustainability and viability for further development. It is shown that from an economic
perspective, geothermal energys capital costs are mostly related to the high risk it represents
and the long periods of time taken to obtain revenues. However, geothermal electricity has
low operational costs and therefore, it is cheap to use, it is also reliable, provides funds for
taxes and generates employment. From a social point of view, geothermal energy represents
an opportunity to enhance equity in the New Zealand population. The revenues obtained from
this activity can provide benefits to local and indigenous communities such as the Maori.
Also, as New Zealand is a world leader in geothermal energy, this acquired knowledge is a
form of human capital that brings positive outcomes to the society. Finally, from an
environmental perspective, geothermal energy has low or almost zero carbon emissions
compared to fossil fuel energy sources which contributes to the reduction of greenhouse
gases emissions and therefore, to minimizing climate change. Nevertheless, geothermal
energy plants can cause environmental impacts such as water pollution and subsidence in
land. Therefore, it is necessary to use the available and appropriate technology to avoid these
impacts. At the end of the report, recommendations and conclusions are presented which are
essential to take into account to understand the importance of geothermal energy in producing
electricity in New Zealand.
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
Table of Contents
ABSTRACT................................................................................................................................................ 0
1.
AIM .................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.
INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 3
3.
4.
The opportunity to lead the world The potential for New Zealand to become a world leader in
Geothermal ................................................................................................................................... 20
Geothermal: Delivering benefits locally........................................................................................ 22
Impacts on Culturally Significant Sites .......................................................................................... 24
5.
RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................... 25
6.
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 26
REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................................... 27
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
1. AIM
The aim of the report is to identify all barriers and opportunities in regards to operation of
geothermal plants used to utilize the aforementioned source of renewable energy into
meeting New Zealands populations electricity demand. Taken into consideration are the
externalities, production efficiency and quantity of the energy source, specifically in the
chosen country. With the results from the analysis, it is hoped that this report will
determine the feasibility of geothermal energy in New Zealand, and whether or not
further growth for the renewable source is to be encouraged.
2. INTRODUCTION
With the rise in anthropogenic climate change and increasing greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions, it is becoming essential to shift the reliance of producing electricity via fossil
fuel to renewable energy sources. Currently, 74 percent of electricity used in New
Zealand is generated from renewable sources. 11 percent of it originates from geothermal
energy.
This report involves a sustainability analysis of geothermal energy in New Zealand by
applying the Triple Bottom Line method. The 3 main components of economic effects,
social impacts and environment effects applicable to geothermal energy are extensively
discussed. The perspectives and roles of all parties both directly and indirectly affected by
geothermal energy usage and development are included in the discussion build up.
Comparisons are drawn between other energy sources, namely fossil fuels, wind turbines
and hydropower.
A description of the technical aspects and application of geothermal energy is presented
to provide sufficient background information to assist with the feasibility analysis as well
as introducing the technology. Finally, a conclusion for geothermal energys future in
New Zealand is drawn from the TBL investigation which also encompasses
recommendations for efforts to further develop the energy source if it is considered to be
a viable source of energy to the country.
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
shorter periods of time, and usually a lower initial capital investment is involved. Moreover,
direct geothermal energy uses not only the high temperature resources but can also use the
lower ones; hence, it is easier to apply around the world (Fridleifsson and Freeston, 1994b).
Electricity generated from geothermal energy can be obtained by direct intake or condensing
plants. The least expensive and simplest form is the direct-intake non-condensing cycle.
Geothermal well steam is passed through a turbine and released to the exterior: the turbine
outlet does not count with any condenser (Barbier, 2002). The reason is because these cycles
use around 15 to 25 kg of steam per kWh generated. If the amount of non-condensable gases
in the steam is very high (more than 50% in weight) then it is recommendable to use these
systems. Also, due to the high energy demand to remove the gases from the condenser, the
non-condensing cycle is preferred when the gas content exceeds 15% (Barbier, 2002). On the
other hand, when the gas content of the steam is lower than 15%, then the condensing plants
are more adequate. They have condensers at the outlet of the turbine and the cooling towers
consume less steam with values that fluctuate around 6 to 10 kg of steam per kWh generated
(Barbier, 2002).
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
Where
is the produced power given in watts (Joules/second),
is the efficiency of
the electrical generator,
is the efficiency of the turbine, and Hg is the speed at which
thermal energy is delivered to the turbine (Glassley, 2010).
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
Financial Barriers
Factors contributing to hamper the progress of geothermal energy come from multiple
sources both globally and locally within New Zealand. Identifying these sources will allow a
thorough understanding of the reasons behind the technologys stunted growth and will assist
in producing an answer to whether geothermal energys development is to be pursued.
On a local scale, the role of the New Zealand government and its stand on the technology is
analysed. The government (enforced by Ministry for the Environment) first introduced the
New Zealand Emission Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) in 2008. The plan serves the purpose of
representing New Zealands primary response to global climate change (Ministry for the
Environment 2013). NZ ETS operates by putting value on greenhouse gases (GHG) to
provide an incentive for industries to reduce GHG emissions. However, as stated by Ministry
for the Environment (2013), geothermal energy is considered as stationary energy sector and
is obligated to surrender New Zealand Units (NZU: value of GHG emissions) to the
government and does not receive any allocation of NZUs. This is mainly due to the fact that
products derived from geothermal energy such as power and heat are not entitled to a
premium that can be levied nor enable production of niche products (EGEC 2013).
Furthermore, NZUs are priced at $25 per NZU which contributes to the cost of operating a
geothermal plant (Ministry of Environment 2013).
The global economy is a major factor towards geothermal energys progress as it
significantly influences the financing of the technology. Salmon et al. (2011) has pointed out
that the global credit crunch and economic contraction which started in 2008 had adverse
effects on the renewable energy financing field. The amount of loan losses and bankruptcies
increased which in turn caused many financial providers to be more risk averse, as
geothermal energy is a high-risk venture it was particularly susceptible. This will be
discussed later in this section. Limited financing for geothermal energy in New Zealand has
caused reduced funding of research and development as well as construction of new
geothermal plants in New Zealand in the same period (NZGA 2010). The government shifted
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
its priority of developing renewable energy sources to hydro power and wind turbines due to
its higher potential output in the country. However, after managing to identify electricity
demand shortages due to dry years which heavily impacted hydro power output in 2010,
the government has once again reconciled with the plan to develop geothermal energy to
become a more prominent renewable energy source and encourages more financial
institutions to invest (NZGA 2010).
New Zealand utilizes an array of renewable energy source to meet the countrys electricity
demand. Therefore it is understandable to draw comparisons between geothermal to hydro
power and wind turbines as the other main energy source used by New Zealand. Capital cost
on average for all three energy source are as follows:
a) Geothermal energy = $3500/kW - $5000/kW (NZGA 2010)
b) Wind Turbines = $1700/kW $2150/kW (IRENA 2012)
c) Hydropower = $1000/kW $2550/kW (Oils, D 2013)
It is apparent that geothermal energy has the highest capital cost of all renewable energy
sources on average. However, other factors must be taken into account such as reliability of
energy output. Wind turbines and hydropower for example does not have the consistency in
generating power as compared to geothermal energy as they are both affected by
environmental factors such as low wind conditions and dry season respectively (East Harbour
Energy LTD. 2011).
The most prominent reason of requiring financial investors for geothermal energy is its high
capital cost. Geothermal energy sources have potential to generate output ranging between
3.5 and 5 million dollars of capital cost per MWe (NZGA 2010). The high capital cost is due
to the 3 earliest and highest risk development phases (exploration phases) which consists of
resource identification, resource evaluation and test-well drilling (Salmon et al. 2011). These
are the project phases that differ geothermal from oil and gas exploration. Obtaining
financing for these phases is difficult because it does not guarantee returns to the investors.
Furthermore, upfront capital investments also include installation of plant and equipment
(Hughes G & Diogo W, 2004). Hughes and Diogo (2004) states that geothermal projects
usually require a lengthy period of time before generating revenue which usually cause
investors considerable concern with any risks of project delay. Many large (50MWe or
larger) geothermal projects takes up to 10 years before it is fully developed (Harvey C 2013).
High capital cost is mainly due to geothermal projects being a high-risk investment. Harvey
(2013) states that many of the risks are identical to those faced for any grid-connected power
project but there are additional factors specifically associated to geothermal projects which
further impacts on willingness of investors to fund them. The following section will discuss
geothermal related risks as the main contributor to capital cost.
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
Risk Evaluation
Geothermal energy is low-emission, scalable and cost competitive. Its potential for new
investment opportunities is very appealing to the current industry. The investors and
governments all provide the fundamental infrastructure and services to develop and deploy
geothermal technologies. However, the increasing investment in geothermal energy also
brings demands for the highest standards of engineering design, construction and
management. Therefore, evaluating the risks of the project is necessary.
Based on the research, there are two primary types of investors for geothermal energy
projects. One is large traditional energy service companies that have the financial ability to
support their investment. While another one is some small developers who are seeking
investment for project funding. Although, these two types of investors evaluate risks
differently, they both require the access to the infrastructure and returns on the
capitals.(Deloitte, 2008)
In order to do this, there are several fundamental risks that they must analyse. Firstly,
geothermal projects often contain high risks in design and construction phase. For example,
there is a high possibility of drilling a dry hole causing the transmission system built for the
geothermal resources not to be put to use. These risks all can change the project schedule
significantly. Secondly, the regulations made by governments can have a serious impact on
the investment. For example, most of the geothermal resources are located in remote areas,
which are owned by the federal government. The land leasing procedure for developing such
projects can be difficult especially when conflicting with other land use. Lastly, there are also
market risks associated with procurement. For instance, the cost for drilling and materials
used in power plants fluctuates all the time due to changes in exchange rates and other market
forces. Another risk is inefficient management strategies during operation, which can cause
financial losses if productivity of geothermal energy plant declines. The following figure
represents the level of risk corresponding to the stages/activities involved during
development of a typical geothermal project.
FINAL REPORT
ENEN90011
Final Report
Likelihood
Not likely
Low
Medium
High
Expected
Consequence
Catastrophic
Significant
Moderate
Minor
Negligible
FINAL REPORT
10
ENEN90011
Final Report
Risk Mitigation
This section discusses risk mitigation steps to provide fiscal security for investors to
encourage them to invest in geothermal projects. All mitigation steps will be aimed to reduce
impacts of identified risks related to all phases of geothermal projects development. Key
components of risk mitigation are (ESMAP 2012):
a) Availability of sufficiently accurate geothermal resource data and other relevant
information
b) Access to suitable financing and funding structure
c) Condition of project management
Geothermal resource data is deemed vital as the chances of drilling a dry-hole is possible as
discussed in the previous section. Based on Figure 2, it is also identified that the early
exploring phase (Site survey, exploration, test-drilling) carries the highest risk throughout the
project development. Substantial data of the proposed site is crucial in order to minimize this
risk. A proposed mitigation method by Allen (2013) is to establish a database or portfolio of
previous geothermal projects for reference. Information provided should include methods of
drilling and geothermal identification used in order for future development teams to be able
to identify the best methods required to produce a successful geothermal project.
The financing risks involved in geothermal projects, like any other projects with high capital
cost, is extensive. Financing risk is applicable throughout the projects lifecycle. Risk
mitigation is mainly achieved through an interlocked system of contracts between the project
sponsor and all other implementing parties (Battocletti, L 1999). Contractual agreement must
specify responsible parties when any project risks do occur, and whether the projects cash
flow is sufficient to compensate them for the risks they are being asked to bear.
A competent management team is considered an integral part of risk mitigation. The team is
fundamentally responsible for the development of the project within the timeframe specified
which in turn greatly minimise the cost that is caused by risks. These risks include cost
overruns, construction delays, increased construction costs and finance cost increase
(Battocletti 1999). The management team is usually assisted or consist of consultants, service
providers, contractors and construction companies.
Risk mitigation is inexhaustible, similar to the number of risks, and are also unique to each
geothermal projects. However, the main goal of minimising risk impacts can still be
achieved. With a superior risk mitigation plan, geothermal projects will not have any issues to
obtain funding and attracting investors.
FINAL REPORT
11
ENEN90011
Final Report
Financial Benefits
With the rapid growth in the geothermal energy industry, New Zealand has become one of
the worlds largest geothermal markets and is known globally for having the highest
geothermal energy production capacity. (Research and Markets, 2013) The major application
of geothermal energy is either to generate electricity or to be used directly to provide heat. It
plays a significant part in New Zealand energy mix and also brings several benefits to the
local economy.
First and for most, the cost of using geothermal energy to generate electricity is relatively
low, comparing with using other energy like fossil fuel and nuclear power. The latest
geothermal power plant can generate electricity for between $0.05 per kWh and $0.08 per
kWh.(NGC, 2013) Also, the costs for electricity generation by geothermal is not dependent
on the changeable market. Therefore, customers are able to have a stable price. Also,
developing geothermal energy can help the country to reduce the amount of fuel imported
from overseas and diversify the mix of fuels relied on.
Furthermore, geothermal resources are more reliable and safer with higher efficiency. Unlike
other renewable energy source like wind and solar power that generate electricity
intermittently, geothermal energy can provide a long-term sustainable solution for electricity
generation. Geothermal power plants are available to operate nearly 95% of time, while the
typical hydro and wind power plants can only operates approximately 50% of time. (EIU,
2012) The Wairakei geothermal power station built in 1958 is the oldest operating
geothermal power station in the world and can still provide a load factor of more than 90%.
(Research and Markets, 2013)
The tables below lists the power consumption and supply of the three main renewable energy
sources in New Zealand, which are hydro, wind and geothermal power.
Consumption (%
of total)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Hydro
11.7
11.6
11.7
11.1
11.1
11.1
Geothermal
21.1
25.2
25.1
29.0
28.9
28.8
Solar/Wind/Other
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
Table 2: The electricity consumption for renewable energy in New Zealand (EIU, 2012)
FINAL REPORT
12
ENEN90011
Final Report
Capacity (mWe)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Hydro
5388
5398
5408
5418
5428
5438
Geothermal
633
738
738
863
863
863
Solar/Wind/Other
646
646
646
821
821
821
Table 3: The electricity supply from renewable energy in New Zealand (EIU, 2012)
From the table, it is clear that geothermal energy consumes the majority renewable power.
Although, other renewable energy sources such as hydro, solar and wind power face
limitations in abnormal weather conditions hence contribution to the total energy production
during these periods is fairly limited. Hydro, geothermal and wind generation account for
over a significant portion of New Zealands electricity supply. The new NZ $1 billion
investment in Ngatamriki and Te Mihi geothermal power plants will add 200 MW of capacity
and increase the geothermal generation to over 1000 MW. (NZTE, 2013) The government
expects that by the year 2025, geothermal energy will produce up to 22% of the electricity in
New Zealand. (Underhill, 2013)
Last but not least, geothermal resources can provide sufficient funds to the local governments
in forms of property taxes and royalty payments. Geothermal power plants are one of the
largest taxpayers in New Zealand. There are almost 70 companies with geothermal expertise
across the value chain, from the design phase to the construction and management phase. For
example commercial development projects such as greenhouses have paid millions of dollars
in tax every year. It also brings job opportunities. There are approximately 400 full-time
employees and hundreds of professional contract workers that are needed for a large scale
geothermal power plant. (NGC, 2013)
The geothermal industry in New Zealand presents an exciting situation and is recognised
globally. As a key member of Geothermal Implementing Agreement, New Zealand also helps
other countries to develop geothermal energy and provide innovative solutions to develop the
downstream industries commercially.
FINAL REPORT
13
ENEN90011
Final Report
14
ENEN90011
Final Report
(Manen and Reeves, 2012). Some of the factors that can alter the existence of this kind of
species are steep soil temperature gradients, soil and water with high content of minerals,
exposure to steam, excess or lack of nutrients and extreme pH conditions (Manen and
Reeves, 2012).
Geothermal energy production, as explained above, implies extracting steam and liquid. The
steam obtained has a content of non-condensible gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen
sulphide (Barbier, 2002). Even though the first one (CO2) is the major component, its
emission into the atmosphere is still lower than the ones for natural gas, coal or oil power
station as can be seen in Error! Reference source not found. (Barbier, 2002).
Figure 3 Comparison of carbon dioxide emission from geothermal and fossil fuel-fired
power stations (Fridleifsson and Freeston, 1994a)
FINAL REPORT
15
ENEN90011
Final Report
Another gas that is emitted is sulphur but in small quantities which still needs to be
controlled. These emissions are also very low compared to other energy sources as can be
seen in Figure 3. Some removal techniques have been developed such as burning the gas and
transforming it into sulfuric acid that is a saleable product (Fridleifsson and Freeston, 1994a).
Figure 4 Comparison of sulphur emissions from geothermal and fossil fuel-fired power
stations (Fridleifsson and Freeston, 1994a)
To sum up, geothermal power plants can have the potential to cause negative environmental
impacts. It has been shown along the history of the geothermal energy development that the
lack of good technology has destroyed many unique places such as geysers in New Zealand.
Nowadays, there is enough information to prevent these impacts and different mechanisms
FINAL REPORT
16
ENEN90011
Final Report
such as the reinjection of fluids are essential. Policy makers have an important role in
protecting the geysers and hot springs. The New Zealand government made decisions that
caused a negative impact to these hydrothermal formations in the early development stage.
Nowadays, it is possible to predict and avoid such impacts especially after the experience of
New Zealand in the Rotoura and Wairakei areas (Barrick, 2007).
FINAL REPORT
17
ENEN90011
Final Report
As it can be observed in the Figure 5 the total share of electricity generated by renewable
sources fell from 77% to 73% in the time period of a year. Another thing that must be
observed is the fact that although having a significant decrease in hydropower electricity,
Geothermal kept growing as it was not affected by the low rainfall season. This enhances the
fact that geothermal as a source of electricity might be a good alternative for New Zealand as
with geothermal with a larger supply of other renewable sources, the country would not need
to rely on fossil fuels as a crucial fuel in back-load and peak supply (Ministry of Business,
2012)).
GASES
RELEASED
GEOTHERMAL
(DRY STEAM)
(lbs/MWh)
GHEOTHERMAL
(FLASH)
(lbs/MWh)
BINARY
(lbs/MWh)
NATURAL
GAS
(lbs/MWh)
COAL
(lbs/MWh)
CO2
CH4
PM2.5
PM10
SO2
N2O
59.82
0.0000
0.0002
0.0000
396.3
0.0000
0.3500
0.0000
861.1
0.0168
0.1100
0.1200
0.0043
0.0017
2200
0.2523
0.5900
0.7200
18.75
0.0367
FINAL REPORT
18
ENEN90011
Final Report
Hydropower Impacts
Hydropower is by far the biggest supplier of electricity in New Zealand as can be seen in
Error! Reference source not found.. Even though the hydropower dams are considered a
renewable source of electricity, their environmental impacts must be taken into account while
comparing to other renewable sources, in this case the geothermal.
It is important to mention that in terms of impacts to the environment, hydropower plants
have positive aspects compared to fossil fuelled plants. They serve as flood control, flow
regulation and they also provide recreation opportunities (VirginiaTech, 2007).
A big impact of hydro power plants is the land use it requires compared to geothermal
energy. They affect the water levels through the length of the river. It is estimated that around
400,000 km2 of land has been submerged worldwide due to construction of dams (Sanguri,
2013). These land impacts may vary widely in function of the topography of the land, the
flatter is the area, the biggest area that needs to be submerged which will incur in more
damage (Sanguri, 2013). Also, some animal species are have been affected with the
construction and operation of hydropower plants such as the Black Stilt, a native bird of New
Zealand which is threaten by extinction due to this hydropower development (BirdLife,
2012).
It is commonly thought that greenhouse gases are not an impact during the operation of
hydropower plants and that these gases are only released during the construction and
operation. However, there are emissions related to the operation of dams which were not
considered before. These emissions will vary accordingly with the size of the dam and the
nature of the land flooded by the reservoir. It has been observed that depending on the
climate conditions, when the area is flooded, the vegetation and soil decomposes and release
both carbon dioxide and methane (UCSUSA, 2013). To make a comparison it is estimated
that life-cycle emissions can be over 0.5 pounds of carbon dioxide equivalent per kilowatthour against a range of 0.6 to 2.0 pounds on electricity generated by gas (UCSUSA, 2013).
In summary, it is clear that the environmental impacts of hydropower are important not only
in considering its implementation during the construction of the dams, but also during its
operation in terms of alteration of wildlife. Also, contrary to what it is commonly held,
hydropower plants release greenhouse gases during operation. The impacts usually are related
to the change in the flow of the river as well as the temperature which might cause aquatic
life to be endangered.
FINAL REPORT
19
ENEN90011
Final Report
The opportunity to lead the world The potential for New Zealand to
become a world leader in Geothermal
Since New Zealands first geothermal power plant was built at Wairakei in in 1958
businesses, scientists and engineers have gained a great amount of experience in geothermal
energy. The collective knowledge and skills accumulated constitutes a form of human capital,
which can be leveraged to bring benefits for society as a whole. It is predicted that the next
few decades will be a boom time for geothermal energy (Boxer et al, 2013) and the chance
exists for New Zealand to use and grow its knowledge.
FINAL REPORT
20
ENEN90011
Final Report
Figure 6 - Trial and error at Wairakei, New Zealand has extensive experience in
geothermal energy, taken from Thain, 1998
New Zealand is a world leader in geothermal. It boasts around 70 businesses with geothermal
expertise (NZ Trade and Enterprise, 2013). In addition, institutions such as the University of
Aucklands Geothermal Institute have educated scientists and engineers who work on
geothermal energy projects throughout the world(NZ Trade and Enterprise, 2013). The way
in which New Zealand is at the cutting edge of research and development is demonstrated by
the development technologies such as Joint Geophysical Imaging and 3D Geothermal
modelling (NZ Trade and Enterprise, 2013). Beyond its borders, New Zealands companies
have the potential to invest and gain returns from energy projects in other counties. This is
validated by New Zealand energy company Mighty Rivers investment in geothermal
exploration in Chile(Evans, 2009). In summary, more than just fulfilling its own potential for
the development of geothermal resources New Zealand is well placed to lead and assist the
rest world in exploiting geothermal energy because it has a mature geothermal industry, a
wealth of experience and established educational institutions. Thus there is the potential to
deliver great benefits for New Zealand society, by securing high skill jobs in the booming
high-technology industry.
An exploration of this opportunity can be found in modelling for a scenario labelled the
Energy Revolution by the environment organisation Greenpeace. Greenpeace has estimated
that New Zealand is in the position to reap considerable benefits by capturing a substantial
share the geothermal market. The Energy Revolution Scenario predicts that New Zealand
could capture US$85 to 114 billion of the geothermal market up to 2050 (Boxer et al, 2013).
It also predicts that power from cheap low emission renewable energies such as geothermal
FINAL REPORT
21
ENEN90011
Final Report
will help to attract energy intense industries to New Zealand, boosting the economy.
However, the modelling underlying the scenario makes ambitious assumptions about the way
in which New Zealand and the world will tackle Climate Change. The modelling makes the
bold assumption that by 2050 New Zealand will have invested NZ$62 billion in renewable
energies (Teske et al, 2013). In a similar way the assumptions made in predicting the demand
and investment in renewable technologies in the Energy Revolution Scenario should also be
scrutinised closely. The predictions are supported by the assumption that within the next
decade oil and coal production will begin to decease dramatically. The modelling sets out that
by 2050 oil production will be around a quarter of what it is today and that production of coal
will be reduced by half (Teske et al, 2013). The reasoning behind these assumptions is that
these reductions are required to avoid potentially dangerous climate change. However, given
the current lack of international consensus and action these assumptions could prove to be too
optimistic. Putting aside the specific details, the Energy Revolution Scenario nevertheless
emphasises that in an increasingly carbon conscious world, New Zealand society is likely to
prosper.
22
ENEN90011
Final Report
FINAL REPORT
23
ENEN90011
Final Report
FINAL REPORT
24
ENEN90011
Final Report
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
From the analysis above the key recommendations are for:
FINAL REPORT
25
ENEN90011
Final Report
6. CONCLUSION
Economic aspects of geothermal energy projects presented in this report revolves mainly on
the apparent financial barriers of developing projects within New Zealand as well as the
economical benefits related to further pursuing it. Roles of implementing parties and project
investors alike were outlined in order to achieve these benefits. It is evident from the research
done that economic barriers outlined can be overcome provided sufficient support is given
from all parties. The economic benefits are substantial and have the potential to outweigh the
costs associated to financial risks, especially when risks mitigation efforts are carried out.
Benefits from further developing geothermal projects such as providing consistent electricity
at a cheaper cost will improve the livelihood of consumers, contribute to the governments
income and give fiscal profit to investors in the long run. The contribution to minimising
GHG emissions from industrial activities is also significant. It is recommended that the
development of geothermal energy in New Zealand is intensified in regards to its economic
benefits.
In terms of environment, geothermal energy development brings many benefits that need to
be considered. This type of energy has minimum greenhouse gas emissions such as CO2
which are negligible compared to the ones of fossil fuel energy sources. Therefore, this helps
to reduce and mitigate climate change. However, the process that is required to obtain the
buried thermal energy could represent a potential negative impact if it is not managed
properly. This means that technology such as reinjection of fluids to the same layer where the
energy was obtained needs to be applied in order to avoid subsidence and polluted discharges
to open water bodies.
From a social perspective the continued development of geothermal projects and technology
in New Zealand will have overwhelmingly positive impacts. The economic benefits of a
world leading geothermal industry will provide benefits which will flow through to society
by supporting employment and educational opportunities in a high technology industry. The
financial benefits Maori land trusts will receive from geothermal projects will also increase
equity and opportunity for Maori people. Consequently, investing in geothermal represents an
unprecedented opportunity for society to benefit.
Thus, the economic, social and environmental opportunities that geothermal energy presents
are significant, while the barriers and negative impacts are manageable. This makes the
continued implementation of geothermal energy projects and associated activities such as
research a very sound investment for New Zealand.
FINAL REPORT
26
ENEN90011
Final Report
REFERENCES
Allen, M 2013, Geothermal Developments: New Zealand & International, Iceland Geothermal
Conference. Available:
http://www.geothermalconference.is/files/fyrirlestrar/Iceland%20Geothermal%20Mike%20Al
len%20-%20Session%20A%201%20-%20sent%202602%202013.pdf [Accessed 22/10/2013]
BARBIER, E. 2002. Geothermal energy technology and current status: an overview. Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 6, 3-65.
BARRICK, K. A. 2007. Geyser decline and extinction in New Zealand: energy development impacts
and implications for environmental management. Environmental Management, 39, 783-805.
Battocletti, L 1999, Geothermal Financing Workbook, Bob Lawrence & Associates, Inc. Available:
http://www.bl-a.com/ECB/PDFFiles/GFW-2nded.pdf [Accessed 22/10/2013]
BIRDLIFE. 2012. Black Stilt Himantopus novaezelandiae [Online]. Available:
http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/speciesfactsheet.php?id=3103. [Accessed 20/10/2013]
BOXER ET AL, S. 2013. The Future is Here: New Jobs, New Prosperity and a New Clean Economy.
Available: http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/9c3e8878#/9c3e8878. [Accessed 22/10/2013]
British Geological Survey 2013, 'Geothermal Energy - What is it?', National Environment Research
Council. Available: http://www.bgs.ac.uk/research/energy/geothermal/# [Accessed
23/10/2013]
BURGER, J. & GOCHFELD, M. 2012. A Conceptual Framework Evaluating Ecological Footprints
and Monitoring Renewable Energy: Wind, Solar, Hydro, and Geothermal. Energy & Power
Engineering, 4, 303-314.
CONTACTENERGY 2011. Power from the Earth DELOITTE 2008. Geothermal Risk Mitigation
Strategies Report. Department of Energy-office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
Geothermal Program.
DELOITTE 2008. Geothermal Risk Mitigation Strategies Report. Department of Energy-office of
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Geothermal Program.
Available:http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/pdfs/geothermal_risk_mitigation.pdf
[Accessed 11/10/2013].
DONOGHUE, T. 2009. Treelords deal leads to power plant plan. Dominion Post, The. EIU 2012.
Industry Report Energy: New Zealand. Energy Industry Report: New Zealand, 1-12.
EVANS, G. 2009. NZ's Mighty Rivers Invests In Chilean Geothermal Exploration. Available:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a_Wa.TSwyNB8 [Accessed
20/10/20132013].
EGEC Geothermal 2013, Financing Geothermal Energy EGEC Policy Paper, Available:
http://egec.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/EGEC-policy-paper-on-financinggeothermal_.pdf [Accessed 19/10/2013]
FINAL REPORT
27
ENEN90011
Final Report
FINAL REPORT
28
ENEN90011
Final Report
New Zealand Trade and Enterprise NZTE 2013. Geothermal Energy The Opportunity. Available:
http://www.nzte.govt.nz/media/344118/nzs-geothermal-opportunity.pdf [Accessed
14/10/2013].
O'SULLIVAN, M., GLYNN-MORRIS, T., ROSENBERG, M., BROMLEY, C., PENDER, M.,
BROCKBANK, K. & CURRIE, S. 2013. Geothermal subsidence study at Wairakei-Tauhara,
New Zealand. Geotechnical Engineering, 166, 211-223.
RESEARCH & MARKETS 2013. Research and Markets: Analyzing Geothermal Power in New
Zealand - 2013 Report Is a Complete Guide to This Rapidly Growing Industry.
ROYAL, C. 2013. Te Ara - the Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Available:
http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/maori [Accessed 20/10/2013].
Salmon, J, Meurice, J, Wobus, N, Stren, F & Duaime, M 2011, Guidebook to Geothermal Power
Finance, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Colorado. Available:
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/49391.pdf [Accessed 18/10/2013]
SANGURI, M. 2013. Negative Impacts of Hydroelectric Dams [Online]. Available:
http://www.brighthubengineering.com/geotechnical-engineering/71200-negative-impacts-ofhydroelectric-dams/ [Accessed 14/10/2013.
STEWART, C. 2012. Geothermal energy - Effects on the environment. Available:
http://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/geothermal-energy/page-5 [Accessed 20/10/2013].
TESKE ET AL, S. 2013. Energy Revolution Modelling. Available: http://www.greenpeace.org/newzealand/PageFiles/493408/TheFutureisHereModelling.pdf [Accessed 21/10/2013].
THAIN, I. A. 1998. A Brief Hitory of the Wairakei Geothermal Power Project. Available:
http://geoheat.oit.edu/bulletin/bull19-3/art1.pdf [Accessed 20/10/2013].
The Economist Intelligence Unit EIU 2012. Industry Report Energy: New Zealand. Energy Industry
Report: New Zealand, 1-12. Available: http://www.med.govt.nz/sectorsindustries/energy/energy-modelling/publications/energy-in-new-zealand-2013/Energy-inNew-Zealand-2013.pdf [Accessed 12/10/2013].
UCSUSA. 2013. Environmental Impacts of Hydroelectric Power [Online]. Available:
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/our-energy-choices/renewable-energy/environmentalimpacts-hydroelectric-power.html [Accessed 14/10/2013.
UNDERHILL, M. 2013. Development of Geothermal in New Zealand. In: AUTHORITY, E. E. A. C.
(ed.).
VIRGINIATECH. 2007. Environmental Impact of Electricity Generation and Transmission [Online].
Distributed Energy Available: http://www.dg.history.vt.edu/ch2/impact.html [Accessed
15/10/2013
FINAL REPORT
29