Professional Documents
Culture Documents
POLYMER PROCESS
ENGINEERING
MAY 2015
EXPERIMENT 3: COMPOSITE
1.0
INTRODUCTION
and
few
thermoplastics.
The
reinforcements
are
glass,
graphite,metal, ceramic.
Hand lay-up is an open contact molding in one-sided molds are the lowestcost and most common processes for making fiberglass composite products and
is the most common method of producing composites materials.
Although epoxy resins are very attractive due to their high strength,
stiffness, high temperature resistance, low volatility and good adhesion to metal
and ceramic, as organic polymers, they are very vulnerable to the absorption of
surrounding media of either liquid or gasses which can diffuse into the polymer
matrix
causing
reduction
of
their
mechanical
properties.
Therefore,
OBJECTIVE
PROCEDURE
a. The mold (glass) is first waxed.
b. Fiber glass mat is cut and lay 2 pieces of fiber glass mat into the mold.
c. Epoxy with molecular weight EPOLAM 50, Mw - 700 g/mol and diamine is
mixed with MW 448 g/mol until gel time is reached.
o
d. The epoxy resin is poured onto the fibre glass and flat the composite
using roller and wait around 10 minutes.
e. The composite is cut into dimensions of 50 mm x 50 mm x 3 mm.
(Prepare at least 4 samples for two different curing temperatures).
f.
3.1
Water absorption
Mt (%) =
Wt W0
W0
x 100
4.0
Curing Temperature
120oC
120oC
RT
RT
Sample
A
C
Sample
A
C
Initial
Weight (day
Weight (day
Weight (day
Weight
5.91
5.50
1),g
6.15
5.84
2),g
7.32
6.25
3),g
7.45
6.47
Mt (%), day 1
0.041
0.062
Mt (%), day 2
0.239
0.136
Mt (%), day 3
0.261
0.176
Total Mt (%)
0.541
0.374
The results has been shown that the composite material which was curing
in temperature (120 oC), absorbed more water than the material which was
curing at room temperature. The structure of the composite material
which was curing at 120 oC, gave higher free volume to absorb than the
composite material which was curing at room temperature.
Sample
B
D
Initial
Weight (day
Weight (day
Weight (day
Weight
6.85
5.20
1),g
7.47
5.61
2),g
8.50
5.93
3),g
8.90
6.27
Mt (%), day 1
0.070
0.079
Mt (%), day 2
0.218
0.140
Mt (%), day 3
0.275
0.206
Total Mt (%)
0.563
0.425
Dimension
Sampl
e
A
C
B
D
Initial (cm)
Thickness
Width
0.1
4.9
0.1
5.9
0.1
4.5
0.1
7.4
Length
9.7
8
9.4
8.6
After one week, the size of the composites also increase showing that it held
water that absorbed.
4.2
4.4 Using the literature values, obtain the density and modulus
for DGEBA epoxy resin and fiber glass (E-Glass). Calculate the
theoretical modulus of your composite sample.(using the
known volume, and known density of epoxy, calculate the
theoretical weight of epoxy without fibers.)
5Modulus
ofof a
elasticity
resistance
stiffness
body
deformato
elastic
an
applied
force.
The
modulus
maof
measured
destructive
using
methods
tensile
like
compressive
tests
nondestructive
and
like
approaches
ultramethods.
From www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=764
Modulus
of
stiffness
resistance
body
to
elastic
of
a
deformaan
force.
applied
The
modulus
elasticity
of
mameasured
using
methods
destructive
like
tensile
tests
compressive
and
approaches
nondestructive
like
ultrasonic
methods.
4.5
compared to thermoplastic?
Thermoset polymers are better compared to thermoplastic because they
have low viscosity and thus can be introduced into fibres at low pressure.
Cross-link between the thermoset polymers form an irreversible chemical
bond, this properties eliminates the risk of the product remelting when
heat is applied.
4.6
4.7
Application
As a thermal insulator in
Explaination
Internal combustion
internal combustion
engines
Carbon fiber
limited
to
strategic
structural
components
such as aircraft body,
expensive sport goods and
biological implants
5 REFERENCES
http://www.modorplastics.com/thermoset-vs-thermoplastics
http://www.eirecomposites.com/services/thermoplastic-composites-explained
Long-Term Durability of Polymeric Matrix Composites by Kishore V. Pochiraju,
Gyaneshwar Tandon, Gregory A. Schoeppner