[] []

10

6
0.93
33 [1]

24

15

NGO

50
16 2
16 36
99
99
99 15
3 2005 8.65
13%

99

[1]1 0.3048 3 0.91

5 900 1
33% 0.018% 25
55 5000
2

3 5

300 2000
42%300 400
1 100

1.16
2.83

1.26
1.36

2005
The End of Poverty 4 2005~2025 1 950
2025

The
Elusive Quest for GrowthThe White Man's Burden5

Dead Aid6

2004~2005
5 000 310 7
2003 5.7%

12%8

1 000
9 5
900

10


Half the Sky11

The Life You Can Save

12

2008 100 13

14

10

15
16 10

RCTs17

50

18

20

11

SS
S

N A1

 11 S
A1 A2 A3
B1
B2B3

12 11

A1 A2A3

A2 A1

12 L

100

2003

2010 40 240

www.pooreconomics.com
18
99

10
2004 12
2010 20
80 1985 3
2009 6
FAO 10

1
1 MDG

2008~2009 38
2%2 Rakshin
55
4 20%

13

1 2

2008

80
12

1958 4

S
11

2007~2008

10

99

18
36%~79%
53%~74%5

30%

1983
99
1% 67%6
50
3

1983
50% 50%

2
5%

25
9

2 100 2
400

20 80 2005
2005

1996
2 700 10

16
18 19 12%11

12

2 400 10%
15%
21 99

1983 17% 2004 2%

25

13
10% 4%
40%
S L 12

14
16 19

15

 20
60
16

17

18

1 400
1 200
1 400
2000 2 475 19

BMI

Bmi18.5BMI 18.5~25 BMI 25

2004~2005 33% 36%
1989 49%
83 20
21

NFHS
5

10 22
0.92 0.93
8 386 48.3 72
6
10

10

22

1.5 1.71

23

1 20%
24

25

1995 British Medical Journal

Barker Hypothesis
26

4 27

7.5%

6% 38% 24%
56%

28

7
46

51

29

25%

1966~1967

18

Hachis Parmentier


40

The
Road to Wigan Pier

New Statesman

30

31

3 400
825 40%

SACC
2002

32

DVD

70 30

DVD

18

14%
56%21%
33

70% 50%

10
34


10 8

Rakshin

3 269
1.36
0.62 7

Micronutrient
InitiativeHarvest Plus
-35

2005

[2]

900 5
5

100 32

Population service international Psi

PSI
800 0.18 6
10%
2 UNICEF 5
3
150

2008
40
74.75 10 30
7 3
10%
100 187


50%
4

The
End of Poverty

1951 5

50%6 7
8

14 5
2
30%
590 50% 14
30% 295
88

2008 13%

9 18
1%
36.8%
3.2% 80%

42%

1900~1946
10

95%11
12

20
13

12 20 70

190 4
20%

6
B

Bill & melinda Gates Foundation

190

40% 6 14
190
2 280 30
2% 6

800 0.18
48%15
98%
800
4 800
1.10 10%
700
0.16 50%16
300 0.07

TAmTAm
17

0.75

18

15% 15%
15% 5%19

47% 52%

20 44%
18

5%
3%~4%

8% 5 000 228
10 1%
26

3% 42%

1.5 2.4

21

22

34%
23

PHC

24
5

100 20
20

66% 12% 3%
25

26

27
40

6 6
100 56%

 12%

2002~2003

35% 43%28

3-3-3
3 3
3
7%

29

6
40% 60%30

5%
200 ~300

2003

77%

6% 17%

31

TAMTAM

TAMTAM
60%~70%
90%

FDA

32

33

34

2 [3]

2 1.83

30
7 38% 6

35

38% 80%~90%

90% 80%

36
6% 38%

77%

38%
5

37

Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness

[4]38

39

40

15% 5%

41

[2] ors
[3]
[4] 2009

2009 40
6 4

10 14

22

10

14%~50%1

IT

2000 8
2015 2015

 2005
2015
95%
3

1999~2006 54% 70%

75% 88% 1999 1.03
2006 7 300 18
99 80%
9
9
1995~2008
25% 34% 44% 51% 64%
74%4

2000

2002~2003 6

5 1

50%
5
Pratham
2005 1994

3 450
ASER 600

1 000 70

7~14 35%

 60%
30%6

1
ASER

ASER 27% 5
23%
30% 7 80%
8

2002

BPOs

5~11 5%

10

10

1994~2000

CCT

67% 75% 73%

77%11

5~20

11%
6% 12
13

10 20

18
99 6~10

1973
14

8%
15
1968
9 6

16
17
18

1.5

19

8 ASER
2008 47%
32%
LEAPS
1.5 2.5

10
20

21

ASER

10
2000 ASER
20

22
10
23

40%

26%24

13%

640
70%
33%25

2008 6
9

6%
12% 20%
5%
15%
0.4%
17%
26

27
S
S

7
12
12
7
10%
7

28

29

6.6
2.72

30


20 90
Public Report
on Basic Education Revisited

31

32
S
S

33

34

20 90

100 25

35

20 70

ABB
ABB

IT

1991 15
000

11.5
1991

65% 74%

36

37
KIPP

40%38

10

39

40
41

20
15%
42

43

2000

44

45

1981
1975 ~1977

1
20 60 1971

1976 4

1976~1977 860

1976~1977 825 650

1976 7~12 1976 21%
1977

Indira hatooindiri bachao

1977

1994
The Population Council
1990 85%
2

Common Wealth

70%
4

[5]
6.12 51
2.05

18
5
1348~1377

The Gift of the Dying

6

5.6%


20 60

20 70

10
18

11 12

13

14

15

1977 141
FPMCH

1996
30~55 1.2

1996

16

Profamilia
1965
1986
53% Profamilia

17

18 19

7 500 2 200
27%20
10

19761980 1986
21

1
0

1996 30~55
1.2

35 22
1991
1998
3.0%
3.6% 3.3%23

Profamilia
Profamilia 0.05 20 60
10% 2 0


Profamilia

10%
8.2~9.2
100
4.5%24

12~14 25
5%14% 30%

AbstainBefaithfulCondom
DieABCD

26

ABCD 170
ABCD

15~19 5


5.5%
3.7%
67%27

14% 11%

28

836

23%
38% 9~14 57%29

30

20
70 90
20 80
1970
6 50

31

2008
70%
32

1972
1978

33 1972
1972

 10% 30 33%
1978 5% 1994 34%

1996

55 000
3 600 2

2 146 34

500 5

35

20 80 New York Review of

Books 1
36

1241001991~2001

 7 105.8 100 107.8 100

2001 126.1 100122100

113.810037
6.6%7.2%

38

1978~1980

39

20


40

41

6%

42

43

44

2008

PROGRESA
65
60

45

9
9

[5]

15~44 15~49

2008
4 3~19

4
2 000 3 750
250

400
200
450 400

PUKK 1 500 2 800

18
50%
25%~98%

40%

254
354 338 137
1
1974
50% 100 2
2005~2006

18%3
21 4

2005~2008

2008

2009 2

2009 1

[6]

1998 75% 250%

12%
6
1997~1998 10%
1 000 7
26%

45%

S
61

SS

 61

27
40%
10 7

11

12
35%

20%13

14
2.5

20%15
16

10
18.75 100

80 150

20 70 17

18

2009
IT

10

MFI

2007 SKS
swayam shakti
SKS

SKS

SKS
SKS
SKS
SKS SKS
60% 50%
SKS
SKS
SKS
SKS

SKS

SKS SKS

19

 20%

2%~3%

SKS

SKS

75%

20

21

2009 SKS

SKS

10

22

[6]

1
000 51 1046.9
4.69%1
100 5.1 104.69
109.6 30
400 1 842 459 409
9 350 5
1

13
2010 7 420 420

1 000
51 10%
4 000
203

23%
18%37% 6.4%

2 52%24%
13% 5% 18
5% 10%

99
3.84% 57%

20% 99 2
3.13%

0.4%


40%~200%

20 60 80

1977
4 40%

2
20
80 40%

3
1 1

41992

4%

100 110 10%

220 120%

2% 78%5

Multiplier
Effect

20

1999 8 22
6

1988 40%
8 7
7

 20 70

1.5 ~2

2007

4.67 100%

2010 7 SKS
3.54

100~200

25%

 2~4
100%

4% 60%
12%~20% 289%~800%
2009
4% 7%
10
1.5 ~2

11

sKs

2010 10 SKS
57 sKs

SKS

12 sKs
SKS
57
SKS

2002

MBA

12 104 52

15~18

 15
5% 7%

6 13

14

2010

100 179

15

8%

16

2005

2006 3
Share

Share

5.9 3 450
2006 15%

70%

17

150 8 000

2008~2009
KAs
KAS
2010 2006


SKS
Share

7 000 320
1 460 15 000
686 30

2010


2 000
4

T
70%

18

290 34.7

40%

95%
1998
10%
9%19

20

100

99

1997
1

18
7% 8%
1%
SafeSave

The Poor and Their MoneyPortfolios of the

Poor2 250

6
1 000 17.5
580 500 50
30
500 200
150 50 20

6 2009 5
6 000
105

12 000 210
4 7
1 222

1 200
4 000
6 1 050

500 30 500 1 000

50 100

6
10%

450 5 000

10%

M-PESA

M-PESA
M-PESA
M-PESA M-PESA
M-PESA MPESA

40%
25%
4
31%

4.69% 1 000
45.75
5 5
5.23 5
0.23 10.47
15.71

15.71 9
40
6

40% 25% 5

70%
1 1.7

10%

savings and Fertilizer initiativesAFi

6ics
ICS
50%
50%

20 30
20 4 30 4 20 6
30

1
621
24% 4%
16
1

20%

81%

10

11

S 81 1999 5
12 S

81 1999 2005

S
45
P

13
10 40%

100 5
85% 1 20%
10%
14

50

20 70
MBA

4
4

2007 AL Amana

AL Amana

AL Amana

4 8

AL Amana

4
8

1982

20

15 13 100

1991 60
54 000 27 600 8
100 80% 10%
70%

2008
2 000 440

18 50%

7% 50%

12%

Billions of Entrepreneurs
2

4%

50%
9%

1 2 250 500
3

250
250 60%
4 10%~15%

10%

10%

18
0 0.57
20%

2002 15% 99
41%
2002 2005
2002 2005
5
5

11 757
730 1 859 115
15%
8
8

5 000 305 7%
6

4%
4%
4% 4%

91 OP OI
OR Production
Technology K
K K+1

 91

91 L
OOP P

10
18

 15
1.5 50%
5

300

360 50%
30 12
60 107

1
3
1 1
2
1
1 5
1
1 20
2
36
20
180
20
40
5
3
55
35
3 500
15

9
Dosas

1 5 6

27% 21%
2

10% 99
6.3% 3.7%

3%
15

250

 250
500 500

91 L
92 91 OP
OZ
OP

OZ

OP

 92

OP
OP

100

 93 OP
OR
OP OR OR

OP OR OR
OP
OR OP
OR

OR S
OR S

 93 S

8
70%
70%

100
100 1
1 25%
125 156

 195 22
40

93 M
M


2008

50

250

34%41%18%
31%
31%19%

18

99
74% 6~10 90%
44% 64%

50

10 20 60 1999

20 80 1999
10 1999
10%

11

16

2009 50
16
MCA Master In
Computer Applications MCA

1948

60%

10%
18
6% 6%
6% 10%

12

13

10

10

1996
2

13%

1 87
1

4
2010
178 143

2001
80%

Why Nations Fail 6

7

8
9

150

200

10

The Bottom Billion

Why the Poorest Countries Are Failing and What Can Be Done About It
Wars, Guns and Votes: Democracy in Dangerous
Places 60
10 11

12

13

14

15

16 70 17

18

19

20

21

1998 2001
2005

20 80

22

2010 178 110

600

27%
20%

23

24
40%

1861
1977

40% 70%

20 90

11%

25

2004
26

KDP

55
KDP 8 7

65
38
KDP

2000

27

28

80% 70%

20

29

20 90

30
2007

25% 18%31

2003
60
2004
12

13
32

33

100
1973~1993

50%

34
30% 2006 8
60%
2006 11
2007 4

30%

25%

6
38

10 8

SSA
VEc

5
92%

SSA

Pratham

SSA Pratham
65
35Pratham
65
Pratham Dipstick
ASER

Pratham
Pratham

SSA

36

2008 10%
100%
13% 17%37

38

Progresa

6 21 2000
39 Progresa

Wantchekon 2001

2006
40
2006

Progresa
PRI

1.36 3 269

2006~2008
4.5%
4 20%

50 100

99

2005