Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1(a
)
Study Source A.
What is the message of this source? Explain your answer.
[5]
(b)
Study Source B.
Why do you think the report was published? Explain your answer using
details from the source and your own knowledge.
[5]
Study Source C.
How useful is the source in explaining why the USA intervened in Korea?
Explain your answer.
[6]
[6]
[8]
(c)
(d)
(e)
Source A
The view of an American historian on US intervention in the Korean War, published in
1993.
On the surface it seems odd that the attack on South Korea should have caused the
United States to respond. After all, it was not the Soviet army that moved across the
38th parallel, but the North Korean Army. They were attempting to reunify their country,
not engage in aggression against a neighbouring state. It had also been obvious for at
least a year that a war would break out in Korea. The bitterly opposing governments of
the North and South were both determined to reunify the country under their own
control.
Source B
An American report on the Korean War on 28 June 1950.
Most government officials in the non-communist world viewed the North Korean attack
as a direct Soviet challenge to the USA. The attack was widely interpreted as an
obvious attack by world communism at a soft spot in the non-Communist world. If
successful, this would undoubtedly be followed by further action against other soft
spots in the world.
Source C
A leaflet produced by South Korea that was air-dropped into North Korea in 1952. The
Korean words state: Kim Il Sung is dancing for USSRs future.
Source D
The view of an American historian on the reason for US intervention in Korea, 1998.
The Truman administration grasped its opportunity with both hands. It was taken for
granted that Stalin had ordered Kim south and thus his invasion was the first real test
of American resolve when confronted by Soviet aggression. The domino theory was
favoured; if Stalin were not stopped in Korea, he would advance and states would fall
in succession to communism. Furthermore, if Stalin went unchecked, American
promises to resist communism in Europe and Asia would turn out to be hollow;
American credibility was at stake.
Source E
An extract of Dean Achesons memoirs written in 1969. Dean Acheson was an
American politician heavily involved in the Korean War.
Clearly the invasion of South Korea was an open, undisguised challenge to Americas
internationally accepted position as the protector of South Korea. Korea is an area of
great importance to the security of American-occupied Japan. To back away from this
challenge, in view of the power of USA, would be highly destructive of our strength and
reputation.
[8]
[12]
[8]
[12]