You are on page 1of 92

Week 3: Structuring a Research Project

Researching the User


Effective Web Design and Strategy

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Taxonomy, Revisited

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Small Group
Closed Sort
3-5 groupings

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Small Group
Discussion

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Group
Presentations

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Affinity
Groups

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Papers

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Papers
• No 10s for the written paper
• No 16s for the presentations
• Average of 7 on reaction papers
• Average of 11 on presentations
• That’s a c- for the class
• We’re going to get better

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Proofing Marks (my style)


• ¶: Paragraph Break
• ^: Insert
• → ←[arrows]:Transpose or move
• Delete/Remove
• w.c.—word choice
• w.w.—wrong word
• ref. or unc. ref—unclear referent
• p.v. or passive—passive verb
• trans.—weak or missing transition
• prep.—prepositional ending or clause /Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Proofing Marks (my style)


• : Pre-writing or start here
• agree—agreement (n/v or tense)

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Overall Writing/Presenting Concerns


• Basic Grammar
• Agreement
• Hyphenated Terms
• Prepositional clauses (multiple/stacked, and buried adjectives)
• Passive verbs
• Strong, sentences that do their work
• Argument structure
• Sentences
• Paragraphs
• Thesis. Organizing Principle(s). POV /Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Basic Grammar
• Noun/Verb Agreement
• “Size guides allows the user to convert UK sizes to...American
sizes.”
• Hyphenated Terms
• Two or more adjectives before a noun that act as one idea
(one-thought adjectives) are connected with a hyphen.
• stress free experience
• stress-free experience
• multiple step process
• multi-step process /Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Basic Grammar
• Referents
• A word that refers to another
• He
• She
• It
• Hers
• This

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Prepositional Clauses
• Prepositions. What are they?
• Locators in time and place
• Of, to, in, aboard, below, above, at, behind, beyond,

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Prepositional Clauses
• In place of a modifier
• Adobe also improved the way InDesign sends alerts about
problems with the layout...”
• Adobe also improved the way InDesign sends alerts about
layout problems
• Adobe also improved InDesign’s layout alerts
• “A large tent at the main entrance to the stadium
• A large tent at the main stadium entrance

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Passive Verbs
• Forms of the verb “to be”
• Present Tense
• I am/We are
• You are
• He/She/It is
• Past Tense
• I was/We were
• You were
• He/She/It was
/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Passive Verbs
• Active verbs form more efficient and more powerful sentences than
passive verbs
• Examples
• The professor is teaching the students.
• The professor teaches the students
• “There were also other changes I quickly saw.”
• I quickly noticed other changes.
• “Reviews of the new edition lamented that there was nothing
groundbreaking.”
• Reviews of the new edition lamented the lack of
groundbreaking updates.” /Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Argument Structure
• Meta Paper/Argument Structure
• What I’m going to tell you
• I tell you
• What I told you
• Argument Structure
• Thesis > Support/Pt. 1 > Support/Pt. 2 > Support/Pt. 3 > Conclusion
• Introduction > Para > Para > Para > Conclude
• Paragraph Structure
• Logical transition, introduce paragraph thesis
• Support paragraph thesis through sentences /Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Comp 101

Argument Structure
• Clauses are the building blocks of sentences
• Sentences are a unit of idea, and are the building blocks of
paragraphs
• Paragraphs are a single unit or idea, and are the building blocks of
arguments/opinions/papers/presentations
• Make sure you are arguing something, making a point, saying
something:
• In your papers
• In your presentations
• In your experience designs
/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


STRUCTURING A RESEARCH
PROCESS

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Website Development Process


• Morville & Rosenfeld suggest:

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Website Development Process


• Morville & Rosenfeld suggest:
• Research
• Strategy
• Design
• Implementation
• Administration

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Website Development Process

Discovery Strategy
+ + Design Development
Research Definition & Integration

Training,
Runtime
Optimization Deployment Migration,
Management
Testing

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Process: Phase 1

Discovery
• Goals and Output
+ • Expectation Setting and Relationship Building
Research
• Audience, Brand, and Business Deep-Dive

• Definition of Goals, Objectives, Success Metrics

• Competitive Analysis and Benchmarking

• Baselining

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Process: Phase 2

Strategy • Goals and Output


+
• Long-Term Development Strategy
Definition
• User Experience Definition

• Technical Strategy and Specification

• Platform Identification and Selection

• UX Requirements and Specifications

• Content and Editorial Strategy

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Process: Phase 3
• Goals and Output
Design • Content Development
• Aesthetic Development (Look and Feel)

• Template Design and Production

• Build Specifications

• Production Plan and Budget

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Process: Phase 4

Development
• Goals and Output
& Integration • Site Framework Development
• Site Framework Integration

• Framework Testing

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Process: Phase 5

Training,
• Goals and Output
Migration, • Staff Training
Testing
• Site Population/Migration

• Pre-Launch Testing

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Process: Phase 6
• Goals and Output
Deployment • Installation
• User Acceptance Testing

• Beta Launch

• Documentation

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Process: Phase 7

Runtime
• Goals and Output
Management • Administration
• Optimization

• Testing

• Improvement

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Website Development Process

Discovery Strategy
+ + Design Development
Research Definition & Integration

Training,
Runtime
Optimization Deployment Migration,
Management
Testing

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Discovery and Research Process

Discovery
• Morville & Rosenfeld suggest their research framework
+
Research

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Discovery and Research Process


• Morville & Rosenfeld Framework
• Context
• Content

• Users

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Discovery and Research Process


• Wodtke and Govella Framework
• User (“User base”)
• Business Need (“Business”)

• Materials (“Technology,” “Platforms,” “Content”)

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Discovery and Research Process


• Morville & Rosenfeld Framework
• Context
• Background research

• Presentations and meetings

• Stakeholder interviews

• Technology assessment

• Content

• Users

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Discovery and Research Process


• Morville & Rosenfeld Framework
• Context
• Content

• Heuristic evaluation

• Metadata and content analysis

• Content mapping

• Benchmarking

• Users

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Discovery and Research Process


• Morville & Rosenfeld Framework
• Context
• Content

• Users

• Search log and click stream analysis

• Use cases and personas

• Surveys

• Contextual inquiry (focus groups, ethnographic study)

• User interviews and testing (interviews, card sorting,


usability testing)
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Research Process

Discovery and Research Process


Morville & Rosenfeld Wodtke + Govella Belman/JHU
• Context • Users • Business
• Content • Business • Brand

• Users • Materials • Landscape

• Competition

• Current Site

• Audience/Users

• Content

• Technology

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Discovery and Research Process


Morville & Rosenfeld Wodtke + Govella Belman/JHU
• Context • Users • Business
• Content • Business • Brand

• Users • Materials • Landscape

• Competition

• Current Site

• Audience/Users

• Content

• Technology

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users


• Users in 5 Simple Steps (Wodtke + Govella)
• Discover who the target user is
• Talk to the target user
• Design for the target user
• Test a prototype with the user
• Test the final site with the user

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users


• Users in 5 Simple Steps (Wodtke + Govella)
• Discover who the target user is
• Talk to the target user
• Design for the target user
• Test a prototype with the user
• Test the final site with the user

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users


• Two types of users or stakeholders
• Stakeholder (Boutelle): “Individuals or organizations who stand
to gain or lose from the success or failure of a system.”
• Internal or Business Stakeholders
• External or User Stakeholders

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users


• Two types of users or stakeholders
• Stakeholder (Boutelle): “Individuals or organizations who stand
to gain or lose from the success or failure of a system.”
• Internal or Business Stakeholders
• External or User Stakeholders

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users


• Posit the segmentation
• Research against posited external user segmentation
• Redefine/codify segmentation and define for design/build

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Segmentation


• Types of Segmentation (Pre-User Research, from Client, non-UCD)
• Formal/Functional Roles
• Informal/Use Roles

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Segmentation


• Types of Segmentation (Pre-User Research, from Client)
• Formal/Functional Roles (Non-profit)
• Academics (teachers, researchers, librarians)
• Business (companies, consultants, associations)
• Civil society (NGOs, foundations)
• Government
• Media
• Investors/Funders
• Informal/Use Roles

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Segmentation


• Types of Segmentation (Pre-User Research, from Client)
• Formal/Functional Roles
• Informal/Use Roles (Non-profit)
• Opinion Leaders
• Influencers
• Decision Makers
• Partners
• Public

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Segmentation


• Types of Segmentation (Pre-User Research, from Client)
• Formal Roles (For-profit)
• Current customers
• Past customers
• Prospective customers
• Informal/Use Roles

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Segmentation


• Types of Segmentation (Pre-User Research, from Client)
• Formal/Functional Roles
• Informal/Use Roles (For-profit)
• Hard-core customer/user
• One-time customer
• Inclined customer

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Types of Segmentation (Baty)

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Types of Segmentation (Baty)
• Market Segmentation
• Experience Lifecycle
• Mental Models
• Capability Levels
• Mood
• Game Style Play

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Market Segmentation
• Based on segmenting by similar product or service needs
• Focused on purchasing/action triggers and barriers
• EX: Diapers
• Mother of 0-3 month old infant, 30-35 years old, married, 2
earners, HHI $110K+
• Mother of 0-3 month old infant, 21-25 years old, married, 1
earner, HHI $65K

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Experience Lifecycle
• Lifecycle of a consumer’s experience with a brand during a
discrete experience or across the life-long relationship
• EX: Airline Flight
• Pre-flight
• Flight
• Post-flight

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Experience Lifecycle
• Lifecycle of a consumer’s experience with a brand during a
discrete experience or across the life-long relationship
• EX: Planned Parenthood
• 17-year-old information seeker
• 17-year-old immediate-service seeker
• 21-year-old health-care service seeker (no insurance)
• 25-year-old prospective advocate
• 26-year-old advocate
• 40-year-old supporter

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Mental Models
• Focused on how users imagine or “expect” behaviors within a
context.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Capability Levels
• Different levels of expertise
• Can be interaction based
• EX: First-time user >> Novice >> Intermediate user >> Expert
• Can be knowledge-based
• EX: World Bank (Casual browser, Sophisticated Browser,
Power User)

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Mood (or frame of mind)
• Information gathering
• Comparison shopping
• Purchase intent

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• Game Style Play
• Escape
• Socialization
• Mindless entertainment
• Challenge

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users: Toward UCD Segmentation


• No one segmentation model or framework is correct
• They are only frameworks for thinking about your users.
• But the frames are important, critical
• They “frame the way we approach solving our problems.” (Baty)
• They provide a common reference point for supporting or
challenging decisions in IA, design, content, tone, technology:
everything that defines our experience design
• They start out as guides; they become yardsticks.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Audiences and Users


• Users in 5 Simple Steps (Wodtke + Govella)
• Discover who the target user is
• Talk to the target user
• Design for the target user
• Test a prototype with the user
• Test the final site with the user

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


• Or User Inquiry Exercises/Approaches/Processes

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


• Or User Inquiry Exercises/Approaches/Processes
• Surveys
• Ethnographic Research
• Focus Groups
• Interviews (1:1)
• Contextual Inquiry
• Usability Testing
• Web Analytics

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• PROS
• Provides quantitative and qualitative data
• Efficient and inexpensive
• Flexible
• CONS
• Superficial
• Respondents might not understand questions.
• Good for baselining current site
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• Similar to what you saw in the IDEO shopping cart research
• Go into the field and see what people do, not what they say
• Provides real-world insights into actions and behaviors
• Time and resource intensive

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• Small group of people (usually 5-8)
• React to ideas and designs that are shown to them.
• It’s a group process
• Value comes from participants reacting to each other’s
opinions.
• Good for quickly getting a sampling of user’s opinions and
feelings about things.
• For early in a design process. Won’t tell you if people can use a
site.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• Good for determining user wants, needs, and likes.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• Good for gaining insights into opinions, thoughts, and ideas
• Better than ethnographic studies for exploring ideas and
motivations behind actions and behaviors
• Lower cost
• Critical for internal stakeholder relationship management/
building
• Useful for understanding tasks/needs, seeking behavior,
lifecycle relationships, brand relationship

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• Combines ethnographic studies/observation with interview
questioning
• Gets participants to explain their actions
• Costly and time-consuming

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• Provides insight on site/product/value proposition and usability
• Two types of testing, says Krug
• Get It? Testing
• Show a tester a site, and see if they get it. Do they get the
value proposition, the organization, how the site works....
• Key Task Testing
• Ask the user to do something, then watch them try to
accomplish the task
• Tie tasks to audience segments and key tasks
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 •
Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• Multiple appropriate points for testing in process
• Research/Strategy
• Design
• Pre- and Post-Launch
• Different types of testing
• Low-fidelity (paper)
• Mid (wireframes, clickable prototype)
• High-fidelity (working software)
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Research Process

Tools for UCD Segments & Building User Profiles


Surveys. Ethnography. Focus Groups. 1:1 Interviews. Contextual
Inquiry. Usability Testing. Analytics.
• How users are currently using the site, not how they might be
using it
• Good for optimizing today. Not good for imagining a different
tomorrow.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Deeper Dive on UCD Research:
Interviewing + Usability Testing

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Interviewing
• 1:1 Interviews (Boutelle, Beavers, Conan)
• Interviewing is both art and science (Beavers)
• Identify and recruit stakeholders, internal and external, across
• Multiple levels and departments.
• Multiple audience segments
• Interviews should provide information on brand, business,
users/tasks, and more
• Be open to add new interviews to your list
• Use an org chart as a guide, not as a list of interviews. You
need to talk to the MarCom department, but not necessarily to
the head of the department
• After interviews are over, keep stakeholders in the loop.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Research Process

Interviewing: Step-by-Step
• 1:1 Interviews (Conan)
• Prepare.
• Read Always. Read broadly. Tune your Ear
• Pre-write questions; not because you’ll use them, but
because it helps prepare you and comfort you as an
interviewer
• Keep questions short, keep the conversation moving
• Swim/drown/breathe in your material. “As you’re coming to
work, as you’re eating breakfast, as you’re drinking coffee,
think about...the interview….”
• Build your questions as a narrative, with transitions.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Interviewing: Step-by-Step
• 1:1 Interviews (Conan)
• Persevere.
• Ask for subjects to make the abstract concrete. You’re
looking to really understand.
• Follow up on questions (Conan doesn’t say this; Belman
says it). If you don’t understand something, ask again.
• If you don’t get an answer to your question, rephrase it, and
tell them you’re rephrasing it, so they don’t think you’re
repeating yourself.
• Ask difficult questions. Tell them you know it’s difficult, but it
has to be answered. “What do you do poorly?” “Where do
you, as a business, fail?” “What drives you crazy?

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Interviewing: Step-by-Step
• 1:1 Interviews (Conan)
• Be Engaged.
• “Listen incredibly carefully. “ Don’t be the notetaker. You’re
the listener. The one who is controlling, managing, driving
and steering the narrative and the conversation.
• “Listen, and they will tell you what the next question is”
• Make them feel like you are really engaged, interested, and
learning.
• Make them feel like they’ve learned through the interview
too.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Interviewing: Step-by-Step
• 1:1 Interviews (Conan)
• Be Flexible.
• “Expect to adapt and change” course in an interview.
• You’re following the narrative, the thought, the
collaboratively created path forward.
• Don’t stick blindly to your script, or you will fail.
• Improvise transitions to move through your must ask
questions.
• “You have to be willing to abandon your plans and go in a
new direction at the drop of a hat.”
• “Get rid of them at the 30.” Or, end the interview before the
hour is up.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Research Process

Interviewing: Step-by-Step
• 1:1 Interviews (Conan)
• Embrace the Role: You need to be a Charming Ringmaster.
• Keep it Civil.: If you’re managing a large group in an
interview, disagreement is useful to get to resolution, yelling
is not useful.
• “The most corrosive thing that you have to worry about….is
boredom.” Don’t let it happen:
• Pick up the pace.
• Become more entertaining and charming
• Short sharp questions
• Ask more personal questions
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
• Change tack
Research Process

Interviewing: Step-by-Step
• 1:1 Interviews (Conan)
• Get a Good Night’s Sleep
• Interviews should be scary and intellectually difficult. You
should feel exhausted after them.
• Preparation may be mechanical, but interviewing should
never be mechanical. It should be scary and exhilarating.
• Interviewing is performing. It’s not a task. It’s an art.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Usability Testing

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles


• Narrative User Profile
• Use Cases (functional)
• Personas (low and high-fidelity)

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles: Narrative

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles: Low-Fidelity Personas

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles: Low-Fidelity Personas

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles: Low-Fidelity Personas

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles: High-Fidelity Personas

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles: High-Fidelity Personas

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Research Process

Documenting User Profiles: High-Fidelity Personas

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Next Week
• Phil Kemelor presentation on analytics and usage

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Next Week
• Phil Kemelor presentation on analytics and usage

1 2 3 4

8 7 6 5

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010


Next Week
• Phil Kemelor presentation on analytics and usage

Discovery
Research

Discovery
Optimize
Research

/Belman/Spring 2010

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

You might also like