You are on page 1of 3

Reported wind turbine blade breaks apparently

relates to spar failures


Flaws in popular U.S. turbines blade reportedly attributed to isolated
manufacturing defects.

Share on twitterShare on facebookShare on


emailMore Sharing Services36
Posted on: 1/9/2014
High-Performance Composites

Although its rarely recorded in HPC, wind turbine blades do occasionally fail. The
magazine North American Windpower (published by Zackin Publications Inc.,
Waterbury, Conn.) recently reported on its Web site that on Nov. 20 a fourth 48.7m/160ft blade had broken off a turbine supplied by GE Wind Energy (Fairfield, Conn.). That
and three preceding breaks all occurred on GE 1.6-100 turbines; each failure happened
either during or shortly after turbine commissioning. No one was injured in any of the
failures.
Prior to the failures, the GE 1.6-100 turbine (see photo at right) was touted as the most
popular U.S. wind turbine installation in 2012 by Navigant Research (Boulder, Colo.) and
was named 2012 Turbine of the Year by Windpower Monthly (Hammersmith Media
Group Ltd., London, U.K.) for kickstarting the large-rotor trend, which, when combined
with modest generator power, has reduced the cost of energy. The turbine also helped
GE surpass Vestas Wind Systems A/S (Aarhus, Denmark) as the number one turbine
supplier in the world.
The most recent break occurred at Invenergys (Chicago, Ill.) California Ridge project in
Illinois, on turbine #134. In this case, the failed blade struck another blade, and both fell
to the ground. Three days earlier, a blade on turbine #34 at the companys Orangeville
wind farm in New York snapped near the hub, leaving a jagged stub. GE is in the
process, reports North American Windpower, of investigating the breaks. Although GE
Renewable Energy spokesperson Lindsay Theile says she cant disclose much detail, a
suspect population of 48.7m/160-ft blades has been identified, and GE is in the
process of notifying other potentially affected customers. About 1.5 percent of the total
GE wind turbine fleet of more than 22,000 could be affected, says Theile. More
information might be available when a root cause analysis of the failures is complete.
Although the first two breaks (March 11 and Nov. 7) at Michigan wind farms operated by
DTE Energy (Detroit, Mich.) occurred under similar circumstances, they looked very
different. The first break, on Echo Wind Parks #60 turbine, and the second break, on
one of 40 turbines in Thumb Wind Parks Sigel Township installation, both show
separation of the blade along its length.

This years breaks followed two others in 2012, both in Illinois (see lower left photo). On
one broken blade, at California Ridge, the carbon spar used in GEs 48.7m blades can
be clearly seen in a postbreak photo. According to a 2012 statement by GEs Theile, an
unspecified isolated manufacturing issue was the cause of the two blade fault
occurrences. The March 11 break, at DTEs Thumb Wind Park, was attributed by DTE
to a failure in the carbon fiber spar at the 19m [62-ft] mark. The reported cause was an
accidental two-hour oven shutdown during cure.
According to RechargeNews.com, the Echo Wind Park blade was made in Brazil. At the
time, Tecsis (Sorocaba, Brazil) had a $1 billion contract to supply blades to GE for U.S.
wind power projects from 2006 through 2010. In its 2012 Wind Turbine Overview for the
World Bank, GE presented its 1.6-100 turbine blade-testing overview with a photo
beside Certification Requirements titled GE-Tecsis Collaboration, indicating a close
relationship between GE and Tecsis, and it is at least possible that the six failures in
2012-2013 involved Tecsis-built blades.
Founded in 1995 by aeronautical engineer Bento Koike, Tecsis was listed in 2012 as the
second largest blade manufacturer in the world, behind LM Wind Power (Kolding,
Denmark). A 2009 article in business magazine PIB (So Paulo, Brazil) claimed Tecsis
had supplied half the blades in operation in North America and held more than 40
international patents on blade technology. Other published reports say Tecsis increased
production from 10 or 12 to 30 per day, and the blademaker also has supplied Alstom
(Levallois-Perret, France), Gamesa (Zamudio, Spain), Impsa (Buenos Aires, Argentina)
and Siemens (Hamburg, Germany). Reportedly, Tecsis 2012 production was slated at
5,500 blades.
Tecsis described its largest blade as 50m/164 ft in length (i.e., the 48.7m blade for GE),
originally weighing about 9 metric tonnes (19,840 lb), but now reduced, thanks to a
new form of carbon fiber. Indeed, GE touts its 1.6-100 turbines lower weight and lists
the blade at 6500 kg (14,330 lb). In 2008, GE showed infusing carbon fiber spar caps
separately, laying them into dry fiberglass and balsa core blade shell layups, and then
infusing the combined structures. Although Tecsis does develop materials and
processes (M&P) for blades sold to its smaller/domestic customers, its large subcontract
program M&P are specified by customers, e.g. GE, Siemens and Alstom. (Note: Tecsis
blades for the latter do not include carbon fiber.) Tecsis must complete qualification tests
before it can manufacture those blades. It seems likely that the new carbon material is
Gurits (Isle of Wight, U.K.) oven-cured Sparpreg.
GEs Katelyn Buress told HPC that it is performing thorough investigations of the recent
breaks, but wouldnt speculate about whether the breaks are related. GEs global fleet
of 22,000 turbines has over 500 million safe operating hours and it is working closely
with customers to maintain this success, she stated.
Time will tell what these blade failures might have in common, but it is clear that they are
quite different from blade failures experienced by Gamesa in 2007 and by Siemens

earlier in 2013, both of which were related to adhesive bonding issues. For Gamesa, a
defect in a 1-ft/0.3m long applicator produced an irregular line of adhesive, causing
splintering and breakage in 13 of nearly 400 blades produced at its Ebensburg, Pa.,
plant that year. Seven blade failures were first observed at the Allegheny Ridge Wind
Farm in Pennsylvania. The problem was corrected, and the blades were replaced.
Siemens responded quickly to two B53 (53m/174-ft) blade failures in its SWT-2.3-108
turbines at the Eclipse wind farm in Iowa and the Ocotillo Wind project in California. It
immediately curtailed production of that turbine, performed a root-cause analysis and
determined the cause was failure of the adhesive bond between precast root segments
and the main blade fiberglass laminate due to insufficient surface preparation. All B53
blades have been inspected, and most are back in operation. Siemens will replace a
number of blades due to delamination and will apply a minor modification in the field to
all B53 blades that are not replaced, incurring $131 million in charges on the companys
third-quarter 2013 results.

You might also like