Reinventing Social realism: Materialist narrative,

rationalism and postcultural discourse

LINDA D. I. DIETRICH
DEPARTMENT OF DECONSTRUCTION, CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY

ANDREAS SARGEANT
DEPARTMENT OF LITERATURE, STANFORD UNIVERSITY

1. Pynchon and materialist narrative

The characteristic theme of Geoffreys[1] analysis of textual deconstruction

is not narrative, but neonarrative. However, semanticist appropriation holds
that narrativity is fundamentally a legal fiction, but only if truth is
interchangeable with culture.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of

subcapitalist truth. A number of theories concerning the difference between
sexual identity and society exist. Thus, in Mason & Dixon, Pynchon affirms
textual deconstruction; in Gravitys Rainbow, although, he examines
patriarchialist nihilism.

Any number of deconstructions concerning materialist narrative may be

discovered. However, if semanticist appropriation holds, we have to choose
between neodialectic discourse and structural feminism.

The premise of semanticist appropriation states that expression is created

by communication. But Lyotard promotes the use of materialist narrative to
challenge capitalism.

Dahmus[2] suggests that the works of Pynchon are reminiscent of

Burroughs. However, if semanticist appropriation holds, we have to choose
between precultural theory and dialectic nationalism.

Foucault suggests the use of materialist narrative to analyse and modify

sexual identity. Therefore, Debords essay on neocapitalist materialism
implies that the goal of the participant is social comment.

2. Semanticist appropriation and the cultural paradigm of discourse

Society is part of the paradigm of reality, says Sontag; however, according

to Humphrey[3] , it is not so much society that is part of the paradigm of
reality, but rather the fatal flaw, and subsequent paradigm, of society. The
main theme of the works of Gaiman is the failure, and thus the futility, of
subdeconstructivist class. However, Sartre promotes the use of textual
deconstruction to deconstruct class divisions.

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the distinction between

within and without. In Stardust, Gaiman deconstructs the cultural paradigm
of discourse; in Black Orchid, however, he analyses materialist narrative.
Therefore, a number of theories concerning the common ground between
society and class exist.

Sexual identity is intrinsically dead, says Debord. Textual deconstruction

suggests that the media is capable of truth. However, any number of
constructions concerning the cultural paradigm of consensus may be
revealed.

Hamburger[4] implies that we have to choose between textual

deconstruction and Derridaist reading. But a number of discourses
concerning the economy of capitalist society exist.

The subject is interpolated into a submodernist paradigm of reality that

includes truth as a totality. Thus, Baudrillard suggests the use of the cultural
paradigm of discourse to read sexual identity.

Derrida uses the term textual deconstruction to denote the role of the
writer as poet. It could be said that the without/within distinction intrinsic to
Gaimans Sandman is also evident in Neverwhere.

If the cultural paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between

Baudrillardist hyperreality and cultural construction. In a sense, the primary
theme of Camerons[5] analysis of materialist narrative is a preconceptual
paradox.

Pickett[6] holds that we have to choose between the cultural paradigm of

discourse and capitalist neodialectic theory. It could be said that the premise
of the textual paradigm of discourse implies that consensus comes from the
collective unconscious, but only if materialist narrative is invalid; if that is
not the case, culture is part of the fatal flaw of sexuality.

3. Narratives of dialectic

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the concept of

premodernist reality. The main theme of the works of Burroughs is the
difference between class and society. However, Lyotard promotes the use of
textual deconstruction to challenge the status quo.

Sexual identity is used in the service of hierarchy, says Lacan; however,

according to Brophy[7] , it is not so much sexual identity that is used in the
service of hierarchy, but rather the failure, and eventually the defining
characteristic, of sexual identity. Many discourses concerning the cultural
paradigm of discourse may be found. Therefore, Lyotard uses the term
textual deconstruction to denote a mythopoetical reality.

The subject is contextualised into a cultural paradigm of discourse that

includes culture as a whole. But the characteristic theme of Dahmuss[8]
critique of materialist narrative is the futility, and some would say the
collapse, of subsemiotic class.

The premise of textual deconstruction suggests that the raison detre of the
reader is deconstruction, given that consciousness is distinct from

narrativity. Therefore, Foucault uses the term materialist narrative to

denote the bridge between society and class.

The subject is interpolated into a textual deconstruction that includes reality

as a reality. It could be said that if the cultural paradigm of discourse holds,
the works of Burroughs are modernistic.

Cultural narrative states that the law is capable of significance. However, a

number of discourses concerning the role of the participant as artist exist.

1. Geoffrey, A. C. (1991) Materialist narrative and textual deconstruction.

University of California Press

2. Dahmus, Q. ed. (1978) Consensuses of Absurdity: Materialist narrative in

the works of Gaiman. Schlangekraft

3. Humphrey, W. A. (1991) Textual deconstruction and materialist narrative.

Loompanics

4. Hamburger, V. ed. (1975) The Expression of Dialectic: Materialist

narrative, pretextual dematerialism and rationalism. University of Oregon
Press

5. Cameron, U. Z. Y. (1986) Textual deconstruction in the works of

Burroughs. Schlangekraft

6. Pickett, G. ed. (1977) Forgetting Sartre: Materialist narrative and textual

deconstruction. OReilly & Associates

7. Brophy, J. L. H. (1988) Materialist narrative in the works of Lynch. And/Or

Press

8. Dahmus, V. ed. (1979) The Expression of Absurdity: Textual

deconstruction and materialist narrative. OReilly & Associates

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly
generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay,
follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it,
follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the

Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive
grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway.
There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 12646281 essays since

25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University

Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: On the
Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition
Networks.