You are on page 1of 81

North America

Retail and Foodservice


CJ Fraleigh
CEO NA Retail and Foodservice
Philippe Schaillee
SVP and Chief Marketing Officer

1
Agenda

1. Formula for sustained growth

2. Marketing effectively & efficiently

2
Formula for sustained growth

TRACK RECORD of Success

2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost

A Clear ALGORITHM for Growth

3
Formula for sustained growth

TRACK RECORD of Success

2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost

A Clear ALGORITHM for Growth

4
Supported by a track record of success:
Adjusted operating segment income growth

NA Retail ($ in millions) NA Foodservice ($ in millions)

+38%

260
+21%
189
160
132

FY08 FY09 FY08 FY09

Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
5 reconciliation to reported numbers.
Supported by a track record of success:
Adjusted sales growth

NA Retail ($ in millions) NA Foodservice ($ in millions)

+6%

2,767

2,613 +1%

2,092
2,073

FY08 FY09 FY08 FY09

Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
6 reconciliation to reported numbers.
Our brands are leading their categories

Brand Category Share Chg vs. 2005

Protein breakfast +9.8

Breakfast sausage +3.3

Lunch meat +2.0

Smoked sausage +3.7

Cocktail sausage +8.2

Hot dogs +4.5

Source: IRI, FDMx + Wal-Mart, 52 wk ending 6/28/09; Chg vs 52 Wks Ending 9/18/2005
7 *Change vs Nielsen ScanTrack data ending 2/25/2006
We outpaced the food industry in Retail

% Change vs. YA

Dollar Sales Change


4.6
3.9 Unit Sales Change
3.0 3.1
2.6
2.2 2.0 2.0
0.8 0.2
-0.8 -0.5 -0.7 -1.2
-2.1
-2.8
-3.1
-4.2
-5.0
-5.4
-6.4
-7.3

Total Store General Sara Lee HJ Heinz Hormel Kellogg Nestle ConAgra PepsiCo Campbell's Kraft
Mills

8 Source: IRI, Infoscan Review, 52 wk ending 6/28/09


And in Foodservice

Company Sales Growth Company Income Growth


ConAgra 14% Sara Lee 21%*
Kellogg’s 6% ConAgra 14%
Hormel 3% Hormel 4%
Kraft 2% General Mills 3%
Tyson 2% Kraft 2%
General Mills 1% Kellogg’s 6%
Sara Lee 1%* Heinz -16%
Heinz -3% Tyson -17%

Source: public company earnings releases. Uses closest reporting segment to Sara Lee’s North American Foodservice.
*For Sara Lee, change is adjusted sales and adjusted operating segment income. “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial
9 measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a reconciliation to reported numbers.
Our margins are approaching our peer group

Trailing 4 Quarters
Adj. Operating Margin

Peer range -0.6 to 16.4%

Peer average 10.5%

KFT Convenient Meals 10.3%

CAG Consumer Foods 11.2%

Sara Lee NA Retail 9.4%

Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
10 reconciliation to reported numbers.
And are showing more consistency

Adjusted Operating Margin


Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
FY09 FY09 FY09 FY09 FY09 B/(W) FY08

Retail 8.1% 10.1% 10.2% 9.1% 9.4% +220 bps

Foodservice 5.1% 10.3% 6.3% 8.7% 7.7% +130 bps

Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
11 reconciliation to reported numbers.
Formula for sustained growth

TRACK RECORD of Success

2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost

A Clear ALGORITHM for Growth

12
Packaged meat is a large category
FDMx $ Sales Million

1. Beer & Wine $15,293


2. Carbonated Beverages $13,741
3. Milk $11,736
4. Packaged Meat $10,627
5. Fresh Bakery $10,221
6. Salty Snacks $8,983
7. Cheese $7,781
8. Cereal $6,631
9. Frozen Dinners & Entrees $6,428
10. Bottled Water $5,078

13 Source: IRI InfoScan Reviews; 52 Weeks Ending 7/26/2009


And very profitable for the retailer

Retailer gross profits ($ in billions)

4.9

3.8
3.5
3.0
2.7

0.9

Bread Cereal Salty Packaged Beer Carb Bev


Snacks Meat

33% 65% 67% 37% 69% 69%


Top 2 manufacturer combined dollar share

14 Source: Willard Bishop Grocery SuperStudy 2009 & IRI InfoScan Reviews
We play in the growing
segments of large categories

LUNCHMEAT: $3.9B PREMIUM LUNCHMEAT: $1.1B

Mainstream

Premium
$ Share = 28%

Value Sara Lee


$ Shr = 33%

+3% +15%
Price/Lb = $4.40 Price/Lb = $6.90

15 Source: IRI FDMx 52 Weeks Ending 6/28/2009


We play in the growing
segments of large categories

HOT DOGS: $1.7B PREMIUM HOT DOGS: $0.6B

Mainstream

Premium
$ Share = 31%

Value Sara Lee


$ Shr = 43%

+6% +10%
Price/Lb = $2.30 Price/Lb = $3.40

16 Source: IRI FDMx 52 Weeks Ending 6/28/2009


Foodservice contains strong businesses
in large segments

Category Size Sara Lee Share Source of Competitive Advantage

Bakery #1 share in foodservice


10% frozen bakery
$5 billion

Meat Value of our retail equities


9% in foodservice
$7 billion

#1 liquid coffee and


Beverage exclusive rights to
12%
$5 billion Dunkin’ brand

Refrigerated
#1 private label
Dough 20% refrigerated dough
$1.7 billion

17 Source: J. Smiley Bakery Landscape, Wyoming Research Associates, Westport Data. Refrigerated Dough: IRI
Formula for sustained growth

TRACK RECORD of Success

2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost

A Clear ALGORITHM for Growth

18
Our brands are strong

Sara Lee $ sales $0.8B $0.7B $0.4B

3-year sales growth +27% +45% +39%

3-year share growth +1.1 pts +9.4 pts +2.2 pts

Price gap to key


+$0.23 +$0.37 +$0.13
competitor

19 Source: IRI FDMx; 52 Weeks Ending June 28, 2009


Our brands are leading their categories

Brand Category Dollar Share Position

Protein breakfast 51% #1

Breakfast sausage 27% #1


Fully cooked
sausage
33% #1

Lunch meat 12% #2

Smoked sausage 29% #1

Cocktail sausage 69% #1

Hot dogs 22% #1

Source: IRI, FDMx + Wal-Mart, 52 wk ending 6/28/09; Chg vs 52 Wks Ending 9/18/2005
20 *Change vs Nielsen ScanTrack data ending 2/25/2006
Our selling organization is an advantage
Retail
Sara Lee growth is outpacing total food in
8 of our top 10 Customers

Dollar % Chg vs YA

10.8%
Total Food Sara Lee 10.9% 10.6%

8.1% 8.4% 8.4%


8.1%
7.3%
6.5%
5.2%

3.6%
3.2% 3.0%
2.4%
2.0%
0.1%

-1.2%
-1.9% -1.8%
-3.0%

Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer
A B C D E F G H I J

21 Source: IRI FDMx; 52 Weeks Ending 8/9/2009;


Category management drives
Sara Lee and customers’ results

Retailer X category shelf reset


$ sales % change vs. LY
23%
25%

20%
14%
15%

10%

5%

0%
Frozen protein
Frozen protein Jimmy Dean
Jimmy Dean
breakfast category
breakfast category

22 Source: IRI, 24wks ending 7/26/09


Our selling organization is an advantage
Foodservice

Top 5 Elite Manufacturer as ranked by foodservice operators

1 Tyson
2 PepsiCo
3 General Mills
4 Coca-Cola

5 Sara Lee • 2008 Gold Award Supplier


to Sysco
6 Kraft
• 2009 Convenience Store
7 ConAgra Decisions Magazine Reader’s
Choice Award Winner
8 Schwan’s
9 Nestle
10 Kellogg’s

23 Source: Foodservice Elite Study, Cannondale/Cognitio, 9/2008


We have driven significant operational
efficiencies

FY09
Metric
Performance
Distressed products -31%

Fill rates 98.7%

Inventory -5%
Improvement vs.
Sales forecast accuracy
last year
Behind last year
Safety & environmental

Food safety & quality

People & organization

Schedule adherence

24
And are developing an industry
leading cost position

Lunch meat industry conversion cost overview

Competitor B Competitor C
Competitor A
Plants

Sara Lee
Kansas City
Plant Sara Lee

25
Formula for sustained growth

TRACK RECORD of Success

2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost

A Clear ALGORITHM for Growth

26
We have an algorithm for growth
Retail FY05-FY09
FY09

25%
Innovation

40%
Core growth
FY05

15% (3)%
Managing
inflation and Consumer
23% commodities investment

Getting the
basics right

27
We have an algorithm for growth
Retail FY09-FY12
FY12

70%

Innovation
FY09

30%
25% (25)%
Consumer Core volume
Managing investment growth
inflation and
commodities

28
We have an algorithm for growth
Foodservice FY09-FY12
FY12

40%

Innovation

FY09
20%
50% (10)% Core volume
growth
Managing
inflation and Operator
commodities investment

29
Our approach

G
O Drive sustainable shareholder value;
A top quartile NA food company performance
L

1. Operating profit
2. Sales
3. Cash flow
4. Market share

30
Our approach

Drive sustainable competitive advantage through the


consolidation of fragmented categories by:
• Creating greater demand through superior brand building
and strategic selling
• Creating lowest cost position in strategic categories

Focus and prioritize within:

• Categories • Capital
• Brands • Capabilities

31
And we have a lot of room to grow

Protein Protein
Lunch Meat Hot Dogs Bkfst Frozen Bkfst Fresh

83.3
79.4

59.1

31.5 32.1
27.7 25.2
18.9

Category HH Penetration Branded HH Penetration

32
Agenda

1. Formula for sustained growth

2. Marketing effectively & efficiently

33
Marketing effectively and efficiently

The Sara Lee way


The World is changing
of building brands

We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow

34
Marketing effectively and efficiently

The Sara Lee way


The World is changing
of building brands

We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow

35
The world is changing

1. Consumers continue to • Value proposition is more


adjust to the economy important than ever
“Two thirds seek out new
meal ideas that help them
save money”

• Selective trading up &


trading down
“Over half seek out new
meals that provide specific
benefits beyond cost
savings…”

36
The world is changing

2. Consumer is • Media fragmentation


increasingly difficult
to reach
• In-store more important
than ever

Then… …Now!

37
Marketing effectively and efficiently

The Sara Lee way


The World is changing
of building brands

We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow

38
The Sara Lee way of building brands
Consumer Insights

• Focused portfolio
• Targeted marketing
• Strategic pricing
• Robust innovation performance

39
Portfolio prioritization drives focus and growth
3 Year CAGR
Op Segment Consumer
% of Sales Revenue Investment
Income
100%
Strategic Investment +15% +35% +15%
32.3%
80%

Support & Grow +8% +4% -


60%
31.6%

40%
+3% +29% -28%
Sustain
33.5%
20%

Manage for Cash +2% - -13%


0% 2.6%
40
Consumer targeting changes
our marketing mix

Retail Total Consumer Spending +3%

Shopper
+100%
Marketing

Coupons

-10% MAP

-20% Agency fees

FY06 FY09
41
Marketing spending efficiencies
allowing more for less

Number of GRP’s and Spending

3.8

2.7

1.9
1.7 1.7

1.0 0.9
0.6
0.3

Jimmy Dean Hillshire Farm Ball Park


FY07 FY08 FY09 JD Cost per GRP HF Cost per GRP BP Cost per GRP

42 Source: Starcom Media Group


VIDEO IN PROGRESS
Walmart Shopper Marketing
Ball Park brand
360° activation targeting teens

Gaming
Extension
On-line
Events on-line

NEW: Adds strong multi-


cultural tie-in

AA & Hispanic initiative

On-line/print event

Online events
Brand
ambassador
44
Making it the #1 hot dog in America

Market share

#2 competitor 20.9

19.0 19.2
18.4 18.3 18.0

FY07 FY08 FY09

45 Source: IRI FDMx: 52wks ending 6/28/09, value share.


FSI

Print Television

In-store

On-line
PR

Website

46
Continuing to drive Jimmy Dean growth

Jimmy Dean dollar share


33.4%
33.0%

30.3%

FY07 FY08 FY09

47 Source: IRI FDMx; 52 Weeks Ending 6/28/2009;


Strategic pricing allows us to drive efficiency

Value based 6C’s Brand spend


pricing analysis mix

Pricing
Architecture

Promotion Trade terms


effectiveness architecture

48
Improved margins and brand reinvestment

Reinvestment

Incremental
margin

Pricing to value
Commodity price recovery

49
Example: Optimizing Jimmy Dean breakfast
sandwiches

ROS Household penetration SKU reduction


+2.5x +13% -27%

50
Our innovation track record is strong
Sara Lee has focused on larger innovations that drive
category growth
8%
17%

30%

67%

61%

16%

Food & Beverage Industry Sara Lee NA Retail


<$20MM $20 - $50MM $50 - $100MM $100MM+
Size of Innovation
51 Source: IRI Pacesetters, New Food/Bev 2006 & 2007: 916 Launches
In Retail…

Brand sales +66% since FY05

$663
$608
$526
$457
$399

FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09

52
And Foodservice

Foodservice frozen bakery innovation

9% 11% 18%
91% 89%
82%

FY07 FY08 FY09

Base revenue Innovation revenue


53
Marketing effectively and efficiently

The Sara Lee way


The World is changing
of building brands

We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow

54
The result is we are winning

Smoked Protein Fresh


Lunchmeat Sausage Hot Dogs Breakfast Breakfast

$ share change
+0.3 +1.7 +1.8 +0.6 0.0
vs YA
Penetration
+1.9 +0.4 +2.5 +1.3 +1.1
change vs YA
Likelihood to
38% 52% 45% 35% 45%
recommend

Pricing power 7% 26% 15% 3% 14%

55 Source: IRI FDMx 52 weeks ending 7/26/09; IRI All Outlet Panel; MaPS Brand Health Tracking, July 2009
Marketing effectively and efficiently

The Sara Lee Way


The World is Changing
of Building Brands

We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow

56
Which we will do in three ways

1 Trade consumers up:

2 Unaddressed consumer needs:

3 Unaddressed operator needs:

57
Hillshire Farm is our next $1 billion brand

We bring our passion for meat to every meal.

Win on quality and freshness

Drive consumer migration


Lunchmeat from mainstream & deli
to premium lunch meat

Increase Introduce
Sausage frequency of value added
consumption meal solutions

58
Consumers are migrating to premium
lunchmeat, where we are winning

$3.3B $3.9B
8%
HF = 1/3 of
28% segment

92%
72%

2004 2009
Mainstream Lunchmeat Premium Lunchmeat

59 Source: IRI FDMx; 52 Weeks Ending 7/26/2009,


Because we are creating value in the segment

Price/unit

Sara Lee
Pre-sliced deli

Hillshire Farm
Deli Select tub

Hillshire Farm
Deli Select peg

Contribution
margin
60
VIDEO IN PROGRESS
Hillshire Farm “Go Meat – Auctioneer”
Consumer insights drive incremental
innovation

Initial results
• Drove 50% of
Hillshire Farm
links growth
• Share growth
of +2.1pts

62
We’re driving Jimmy Dean’s growth of a
compelling consumer insight

“Jimmy Dean provides a lasting breakfast for a productive morning.”

COMMUNICATION INNOVATION SELLING PLATFORM

63
And we trade consumers up through wellness
and convenience

Price/unit

Jimmy Dean D-Lights


Breakfast Sandwiches

Jimmy Dean Fully


Cooked

Jimmy Dean
Breakfast Sausage

Contribution
margin
64
VIDEO IN PROGRESS
Jimmy Dean “Blue Rainbow”
“Student Driver” and “Meeting”
Ball Park continues to migrate consumers
to higher quality hot dogs

Price/unit

Ball Park Angus

Ball Park Beef

Ball Park Meat

Contribution
margin
66
We trade foodservice operators up through
convenience and quality superiority

Price/unit

Premium quality
liquid coffee

High volume
liquid coffee

Premium roast
& ground coffee

Contribution
margin
67
The Sara Lee way of building brands
Consumer Insights

• Focused portfolio
• Targeted marketing
• Strategic pricing
• Robust innovation performance

68
Formula for sustained growth

TRACK RECORD of Success

2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost

A Clear ALGORITHM for Growth

69
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP
Measures to Reported Numbers

70
Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008 Results
North American Retail

Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


(in $ millions) Fourth Quarter Change Change Full Year Change Change
2009 2008 2009 2008
North American Retail
Net sales $ 695 $ 683 $ 12 1.7% $ 2,767 $ 2,613 $ 154 5.9%
Adjusted net sales* $ 695 $ 683 $ 12 1.7% $ 2,767 $ 2,613 $ 154 5.9%

Operating segment income $ 63 $ 44 $ 19 44.6% $ 260 $ 155 $ 105 67.9%

Operating margin % 9.1% 6.4% 2.7% 9.4% 5.9% 3.5%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (14) $ 13 $ - $ (13) $ 13
Transformation/Accelerate charges - 1 (1) - (1) 1
Impairment charge - (20) 20 - (20) 20
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 64 $ 77 $ (13) (17.2)% $ 260 $ 189 $ 71 37.7%

Adjusted operating margin %* 9.1% 11.2% (2.1)% 9.4% 7.2% 2.2%

71 71
Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008 Results
North American Foodservice

(in $ millions) Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


Fourth Quarter Change Change Full Year Change Change
North American Foodservice 2009 2008 2009 2008

Net sales $ 454 $ 537 $ (83) (15.5)% $ 2,092 $ 2,186 $ (94) (4.3)%
Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates $ - $ 1 $ (1) $ - $ 5 $ (5)
Disposition - 67 (67) - 108 (108)
Adjusted net sales* $ 454 $ 469 $ (15) (3.3)% $ 2,092 $ 2,073 $ 19 0.9%

Operating segment income (loss) $ 38 $ (408) $ 446 NM $ 54 $ (302) $ 356 NM

Operating margin % 8.4% (75.9)% 84.3% 2.6% (13.8)% 16.4%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income (loss) from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (6) $ 5 $ 1 $ (5) $ 6
Impairment charge - (431) 431 (107) (431) 324
Disposition - - - - 2 (2)
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 39 $ 29 $ 10 30.8% $ 160 $ 132 $ 28 21.2%

Adjusted operating margin %* 8.7% 6.4% 2.3% 7.7% 6.4% 1.3%

72
Fiscal 2009 Q1 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q1 Results
North American Retail

Dollar Percent
(in $ millions) First Quarter Change Change
2009 2008
North American Retail
Net sales $ 680 $ 615 $ 65 10.6%
Adjusted net sales* $ 680 $ 615 $ 65 10.6%

Operating segment income $ 57 $ 19 $ 38 NM

Operating margin % 8.3% 3.1% 5.2%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ 1 $ - $ 1
Transformation charges - (2) 2
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 56 $ 21 $ 35 NM

Adjusted operating margin %* 8.1% 3.2% 4.9%

73 73
Fiscal 2009 Q2 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q2 Results
North American Retail

Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


(in $ millions) Second Quarter Change Change First Six Months Change Change
2009 2008 2009 2008
North American Retail
Net sales $ 746 $ 688 $ 58 8.4% $ 1,426 $ 1,303 $ 123 9.5%
Adjusted net sales* $ 746 $ 688 $ 58 8.4% $ 1,426 $ 1,303 $ 123 9.5%

Operating segment income $ 74 $ 46 $ 28 61.5% $ 131 $ 65 $ 66 NM

Operating margin % 10.1% 6.8% 3.3% 9.2% 5.0% 4.2%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ - $ - $ - $ 1 $ - $ 1
Transformation/Accelerate charges - - - - (2) 2
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 74 $ 46 $ 28 61.2% $ 130 $ 67 $ 63 96.0%

Adjusted operating margin %* 10.1% 6.8% 3.3% 9.1% 5.1% 4.0%

74 74
Fiscal 2009 Q3 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q3 Results
North American Retail

Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


(in $ millions) Third Quarter Change Change First Nine Months Change Change
2009 2008 2009 2008
North American Retail
Net sales $ 646 $ 627 $ 19 3.1% $ 2,072 $ 1,930 $ 142 7.4%
Adjusted net sales* $ 646 $ 627 $ 19 3.1% $ 2,072 $ 1,930 $ 142 7.4%

Operating segment income $ 66 $ 46 $ 20 42.6% $ 197 $ 111 $ 86 77.1%

Operating margin % 10.1% 7.3% 2.8% 9.5% 5.8% 3.7%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ - $ 1 $ (1) $ 1 $ 1 $ -
Transformation/Accelerate charges - - - - (2) 2
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 66 $ 45 $ 21 44.8% $ 196 $ 112 $ 84 75.3%

Adjusted operating margin %* 10.2% 7.2% 3.0% 9.5% 5.8% 3.7%

75 75
Fiscal 2009 Q4 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q4 Results
North American Retail

(in $ millions) Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


Fourth Quarter Change Change Full Year Change Change
2009 2008 2009 2008
North American Retail
Net sales $ 695 $ 683 $ 12 1.7% $ 2,767 $ 2,613 $ 154 5.9%
Adjusted net sales* $ 695 $ 683 $ 12 1.7% $ 2,767 $ 2,613 $ 154 5.9%

Operating segment income $ 63 $ 44 $ 19 44.6% $ 260 $ 155 $ 105 67.9%

Operating margin % 9.1% 6.4% 2.7% 9.4% 5.9% 3.5%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (14) $ 13 $ - $ (13) $ 13
Transformation/Accelerate charges - 1 (1) - (1) 1
Impairment charge - (20) 20 - (20) 20
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 64 $ 77 $ (13) (17.2)% $ 260 $ 189 $ 71 37.7%

Adjusted operating margin %* 9.1% 11.2% (2.1)% 9.4% 7.2% 2.2%

76 76
Fiscal 2009 Q1 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q1 Results
North American Foodservice

(in $ millions) Dollar Percent


First Quarter Change Change
North American Foodservice 2009 2008

Net sales $ 537 $ 516 $ 21 4.1%


Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:
Disposition $ - $ 4 $ (4)
Adjusted net sales* $ 537 $ 512 $ 25 4.9%

Operating segment income $ 30 $ 21 $ 9 37.6%

Operating margin % 5.6% 4.2% 1.4%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ 3 $ - $ 3
Transformation charges - - -
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 27 $ 21 $ 6 26.4%

Adjusted operating margin %* 5.1% 4.2% 0.9%

77 77
Fiscal 2009 Q2 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q2 Results
North American Foodservice

Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


Second Quarter Change Change First Six Months Change Change
(in $ millions) 2009 2008 2009 2008

North American Foodservice


Net sales $ 614 $ 611 $ 3 0.5% $ 1,151 $ 1,127 $ 24 2.1%
Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:

Changes in foreign currency exchange rates $ - $ 2 $ (2) $ - $ 2 $ (2)


Disposition - 13 (13) - 17 (17)
Adjusted net sales* $ 614 $ 596 $ 18 3.0% $ 1,151 $ 1,108 $ 43 3.9%

Operating segment income (loss) $ (43) $ 53 $ (96) NM $ (13) $ 74 $ (87) NM

Operating margin % (7.0)% 8.6% (15.6)% (1.2)% 6.6% (7.8)%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ 1 $ - $ 1 $ 4 $ - $ 4
Impairment charge (107) - (107) (107) - (107)
Disposition - 1 (1) - 1 (1)
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 63 $ 52 $ 11 22.3% $ 90 $ 73 $ 17 23.5%

Adjusted operating margin %* 10.3% 8.7% 1.6% 7.8% 6.6% 1.2%

78 78
Fiscal 2009 Q3 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q3 Results
North American Foodservice

(in $ millions) Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


Third Quarter Change Change First Nine Months Change Change
North American Foodservice 2009 2008 2009 2008

Net sales $ 487 $ 522 $ (35) (6.7)% $ 1,638 $ 1,649 $ (11) (0.7)%
Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates $ - $ 2 $ (2) $ - $ 4 $ (4)
Disposition - 24 (24) - 41 (41)
Adjusted net sales $ 487 $ 496 $ (9) (1.8)% $ 1,638 $ 1,604 $ 34 2.1%

Operating segment income $ 29 $ 32 $ (3) (7.7)% $ 16 $ 106 $ (90) (85.1)%

Operating margin % 6.0% 6.1% (0.1)% 1.0% 6.4% (5.4)%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (2) $ 1 $ (3) $ 2 $ 1 $ 1
Impairment charge - - - (107) - (107)
Disposition - 1 (1) - 2 (2)
Adjusted operating segment income $ 31 $ 30 $ 1 5.4% $ 121 $ 103 $ 18 18.3%

Adjusted operating margin % 6.3% 5.9% 0.4% 7.4% 6.4% 1.0%

79 79
Fiscal 2009 Q4 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q4 Results
North American Foodservice

(in $ millions) Dollar Percent Dollar Percent


Fourth Quarter Change Change Full Year Change Change
North American Foodservice 2009 2008 2009 2008

Net sales $ 454 $ 537 $ (83) (15.5)% $ 2,092 $ 2,186 $ (94) (4.3)%
Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates $ - $ 1 $ (1) $ - $ 5 $ (5)
Disposition - 67 (67) - 108 (108)
Adjusted net sales* $ 454 $ 469 $ (15) (3.3)% $ 2,092 $ 2,073 $ 19 0.9%

Operating segment income (loss) $ 38 $ (408) $ 446 NM $ 54 $ (302) $ 356 NM

Operating margin % 8.4% (75.9)% 84.3% 2.6% (13.8)% 16.4%

Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income (loss) from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (6) $ 5 $ 1 $ (5) $ 6
Impairment charge - (431) 431 (107) (431) 324
Disposition - - - - 2 (2)
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 39 $ 29 $ 10 30.8% $ 160 $ 132 $ 28 21.2%

Adjusted operating margin %* 8.7% 6.4% 2.3% 7.7% 6.4% 1.3%

80 80
Please visit the Investor Relations
section on www.saralee.com for
additional investor information.

81

You might also like