Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Agenda
2
Formula for sustained growth
2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost
3
Formula for sustained growth
2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost
4
Supported by a track record of success:
Adjusted operating segment income growth
+38%
260
+21%
189
160
132
Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
5 reconciliation to reported numbers.
Supported by a track record of success:
Adjusted sales growth
+6%
2,767
2,613 +1%
2,092
2,073
Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
6 reconciliation to reported numbers.
Our brands are leading their categories
Source: IRI, FDMx + Wal-Mart, 52 wk ending 6/28/09; Chg vs 52 Wks Ending 9/18/2005
7 *Change vs Nielsen ScanTrack data ending 2/25/2006
We outpaced the food industry in Retail
% Change vs. YA
Total Store General Sara Lee HJ Heinz Hormel Kellogg Nestle ConAgra PepsiCo Campbell's Kraft
Mills
Source: public company earnings releases. Uses closest reporting segment to Sara Lee’s North American Foodservice.
*For Sara Lee, change is adjusted sales and adjusted operating segment income. “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial
9 measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a reconciliation to reported numbers.
Our margins are approaching our peer group
Trailing 4 Quarters
Adj. Operating Margin
Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
10 reconciliation to reported numbers.
And are showing more consistency
Note: “Adjusted” numbers are non-GAAP financial measures. See table at the end of this presentation deck for a
11 reconciliation to reported numbers.
Formula for sustained growth
2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost
12
Packaged meat is a large category
FDMx $ Sales Million
4.9
3.8
3.5
3.0
2.7
0.9
14 Source: Willard Bishop Grocery SuperStudy 2009 & IRI InfoScan Reviews
We play in the growing
segments of large categories
Mainstream
Premium
$ Share = 28%
+3% +15%
Price/Lb = $4.40 Price/Lb = $6.90
Mainstream
Premium
$ Share = 31%
+6% +10%
Price/Lb = $2.30 Price/Lb = $3.40
Refrigerated
#1 private label
Dough 20% refrigerated dough
$1.7 billion
17 Source: J. Smiley Bakery Landscape, Wyoming Research Associates, Westport Data. Refrigerated Dough: IRI
Formula for sustained growth
2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost
18
Our brands are strong
Source: IRI, FDMx + Wal-Mart, 52 wk ending 6/28/09; Chg vs 52 Wks Ending 9/18/2005
20 *Change vs Nielsen ScanTrack data ending 2/25/2006
Our selling organization is an advantage
Retail
Sara Lee growth is outpacing total food in
8 of our top 10 Customers
Dollar % Chg vs YA
10.8%
Total Food Sara Lee 10.9% 10.6%
3.6%
3.2% 3.0%
2.4%
2.0%
0.1%
-1.2%
-1.9% -1.8%
-3.0%
Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer Customer
A B C D E F G H I J
20%
14%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Frozen protein
Frozen protein Jimmy Dean
Jimmy Dean
breakfast category
breakfast category
1 Tyson
2 PepsiCo
3 General Mills
4 Coca-Cola
FY09
Metric
Performance
Distressed products -31%
Inventory -5%
Improvement vs.
Sales forecast accuracy
last year
Behind last year
Safety & environmental
Schedule adherence
24
And are developing an industry
leading cost position
Competitor B Competitor C
Competitor A
Plants
Sara Lee
Kansas City
Plant Sara Lee
25
Formula for sustained growth
2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost
26
We have an algorithm for growth
Retail FY05-FY09
FY09
25%
Innovation
40%
Core growth
FY05
15% (3)%
Managing
inflation and Consumer
23% commodities investment
Getting the
basics right
27
We have an algorithm for growth
Retail FY09-FY12
FY12
70%
Innovation
FY09
30%
25% (25)%
Consumer Core volume
Managing investment growth
inflation and
commodities
28
We have an algorithm for growth
Foodservice FY09-FY12
FY12
40%
Innovation
FY09
20%
50% (10)% Core volume
growth
Managing
inflation and Operator
commodities investment
29
Our approach
G
O Drive sustainable shareholder value;
A top quartile NA food company performance
L
1. Operating profit
2. Sales
3. Cash flow
4. Market share
30
Our approach
• Categories • Capital
• Brands • Capabilities
31
And we have a lot of room to grow
Protein Protein
Lunch Meat Hot Dogs Bkfst Frozen Bkfst Fresh
83.3
79.4
59.1
31.5 32.1
27.7 25.2
18.9
32
Agenda
33
Marketing effectively and efficiently
We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow
34
Marketing effectively and efficiently
We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow
35
The world is changing
36
The world is changing
Then… …Now!
37
Marketing effectively and efficiently
We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow
38
The Sara Lee way of building brands
Consumer Insights
• Focused portfolio
• Targeted marketing
• Strategic pricing
• Robust innovation performance
39
Portfolio prioritization drives focus and growth
3 Year CAGR
Op Segment Consumer
% of Sales Revenue Investment
Income
100%
Strategic Investment +15% +35% +15%
32.3%
80%
40%
+3% +29% -28%
Sustain
33.5%
20%
Shopper
+100%
Marketing
Coupons
-10% MAP
FY06 FY09
41
Marketing spending efficiencies
allowing more for less
3.8
2.7
1.9
1.7 1.7
1.0 0.9
0.6
0.3
Gaming
Extension
On-line
Events on-line
On-line/print event
Online events
Brand
ambassador
44
Making it the #1 hot dog in America
Market share
#2 competitor 20.9
19.0 19.2
18.4 18.3 18.0
Print Television
In-store
On-line
PR
Website
46
Continuing to drive Jimmy Dean growth
30.3%
Pricing
Architecture
48
Improved margins and brand reinvestment
Reinvestment
Incremental
margin
Pricing to value
Commodity price recovery
49
Example: Optimizing Jimmy Dean breakfast
sandwiches
50
Our innovation track record is strong
Sara Lee has focused on larger innovations that drive
category growth
8%
17%
30%
67%
61%
16%
$663
$608
$526
$457
$399
52
And Foodservice
9% 11% 18%
91% 89%
82%
We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow
54
The result is we are winning
$ share change
+0.3 +1.7 +1.8 +0.6 0.0
vs YA
Penetration
+1.9 +0.4 +2.5 +1.3 +1.1
change vs YA
Likelihood to
38% 52% 45% 35% 45%
recommend
55 Source: IRI FDMx 52 weeks ending 7/26/09; IRI All Outlet Panel; MaPS Brand Health Tracking, July 2009
Marketing effectively and efficiently
We are
Wewinning with the
are winning consumer
with the & And we still have
customer
consumer & customer a lot of room to grow
56
Which we will do in three ways
57
Hillshire Farm is our next $1 billion brand
Increase Introduce
Sausage frequency of value added
consumption meal solutions
58
Consumers are migrating to premium
lunchmeat, where we are winning
$3.3B $3.9B
8%
HF = 1/3 of
28% segment
92%
72%
2004 2009
Mainstream Lunchmeat Premium Lunchmeat
Price/unit
Sara Lee
Pre-sliced deli
Hillshire Farm
Deli Select tub
Hillshire Farm
Deli Select peg
Contribution
margin
60
VIDEO IN PROGRESS
Hillshire Farm “Go Meat – Auctioneer”
Consumer insights drive incremental
innovation
Initial results
• Drove 50% of
Hillshire Farm
links growth
• Share growth
of +2.1pts
62
We’re driving Jimmy Dean’s growth of a
compelling consumer insight
63
And we trade consumers up through wellness
and convenience
Price/unit
Jimmy Dean
Breakfast Sausage
Contribution
margin
64
VIDEO IN PROGRESS
Jimmy Dean “Blue Rainbow”
“Student Driver” and “Meeting”
Ball Park continues to migrate consumers
to higher quality hot dogs
Price/unit
Contribution
margin
66
We trade foodservice operators up through
convenience and quality superiority
Price/unit
Premium quality
liquid coffee
High volume
liquid coffee
Premium roast
& ground coffee
Contribution
margin
67
The Sara Lee way of building brands
Consumer Insights
• Focused portfolio
• Targeted marketing
• Strategic pricing
• Robust innovation performance
68
Formula for sustained growth
2 3
OPPORTUNITY ADVANTAGE
• Large, profitable, SUSTAINED • Brands
fragmented • Selling
GROWTH
categories
• Cost
69
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP
Measures to Reported Numbers
70
Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008 Results
North American Retail
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (14) $ 13 $ - $ (13) $ 13
Transformation/Accelerate charges - 1 (1) - (1) 1
Impairment charge - (20) 20 - (20) 20
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 64 $ 77 $ (13) (17.2)% $ 260 $ 189 $ 71 37.7%
71 71
Fiscal 2009 vs. Fiscal 2008 Results
North American Foodservice
Net sales $ 454 $ 537 $ (83) (15.5)% $ 2,092 $ 2,186 $ (94) (4.3)%
Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates $ - $ 1 $ (1) $ - $ 5 $ (5)
Disposition - 67 (67) - 108 (108)
Adjusted net sales* $ 454 $ 469 $ (15) (3.3)% $ 2,092 $ 2,073 $ 19 0.9%
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income (loss) from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (6) $ 5 $ 1 $ (5) $ 6
Impairment charge - (431) 431 (107) (431) 324
Disposition - - - - 2 (2)
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 39 $ 29 $ 10 30.8% $ 160 $ 132 $ 28 21.2%
72
Fiscal 2009 Q1 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q1 Results
North American Retail
Dollar Percent
(in $ millions) First Quarter Change Change
2009 2008
North American Retail
Net sales $ 680 $ 615 $ 65 10.6%
Adjusted net sales* $ 680 $ 615 $ 65 10.6%
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ 1 $ - $ 1
Transformation charges - (2) 2
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 56 $ 21 $ 35 NM
73 73
Fiscal 2009 Q2 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q2 Results
North American Retail
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ - $ - $ - $ 1 $ - $ 1
Transformation/Accelerate charges - - - - (2) 2
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 74 $ 46 $ 28 61.2% $ 130 $ 67 $ 63 96.0%
74 74
Fiscal 2009 Q3 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q3 Results
North American Retail
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ - $ 1 $ (1) $ 1 $ 1 $ -
Transformation/Accelerate charges - - - - (2) 2
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 66 $ 45 $ 21 44.8% $ 196 $ 112 $ 84 75.3%
75 75
Fiscal 2009 Q4 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q4 Results
North American Retail
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (14) $ 13 $ - $ (13) $ 13
Transformation/Accelerate charges - 1 (1) - (1) 1
Impairment charge - (20) 20 - (20) 20
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 64 $ 77 $ (13) (17.2)% $ 260 $ 189 $ 71 37.7%
76 76
Fiscal 2009 Q1 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q1 Results
North American Foodservice
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ 3 $ - $ 3
Transformation charges - - -
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 27 $ 21 $ 6 26.4%
77 77
Fiscal 2009 Q2 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q2 Results
North American Foodservice
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ 1 $ - $ 1 $ 4 $ - $ 4
Impairment charge (107) - (107) (107) - (107)
Disposition - 1 (1) - 1 (1)
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 63 $ 52 $ 11 22.3% $ 90 $ 73 $ 17 23.5%
78 78
Fiscal 2009 Q3 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q3 Results
North American Foodservice
Net sales $ 487 $ 522 $ (35) (6.7)% $ 1,638 $ 1,649 $ (11) (0.7)%
Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates $ - $ 2 $ (2) $ - $ 4 $ (4)
Disposition - 24 (24) - 41 (41)
Adjusted net sales $ 487 $ 496 $ (9) (1.8)% $ 1,638 $ 1,604 $ 34 2.1%
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (2) $ 1 $ (3) $ 2 $ 1 $ 1
Impairment charge - - - (107) - (107)
Disposition - 1 (1) - 2 (2)
Adjusted operating segment income $ 31 $ 30 $ 1 5.4% $ 121 $ 103 $ 18 18.3%
79 79
Fiscal 2009 Q4 vs. Fiscal 2008 Q4 Results
North American Foodservice
Net sales $ 454 $ 537 $ (83) (15.5)% $ 2,092 $ 2,186 $ (94) (4.3)%
Increase/(decrease) in net sales from:
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates $ - $ 1 $ (1) $ - $ 5 $ (5)
Disposition - 67 (67) - 108 (108)
Adjusted net sales* $ 454 $ 469 $ (15) (3.3)% $ 2,092 $ 2,073 $ 19 0.9%
Increase/(decrease) in operating
segment income (loss) from:
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions $ (1) $ (6) $ 5 $ 1 $ (5) $ 6
Impairment charge - (431) 431 (107) (431) 324
Disposition - - - - 2 (2)
Adjusted operating segment income* $ 39 $ 29 $ 10 30.8% $ 160 $ 132 $ 28 21.2%
80 80
Please visit the Investor Relations
section on www.saralee.com for
additional investor information.
81