Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
STUDY REPORT
ON
USE OF COAL ASH
IN
RAILWAY EMBAKMENT
REPORT NUMBER GE: 0 S005
February-2006
Geo-technical Engineering Directorate,
Research Designs and Standards Organisation
Manak Nagar, Lucknow 11
PREFACE
(Nand Kishore)
Executive Director/Geotech. Engg,
INDEX
S. NO.
TITLE
PAGE NO.
Introduction
Definition
IRC Recommendation
4-6
6-22
10
Case Histories
24-28
11
28-29
12
Conclusion
29
13
References
30
2-3
23
ANNEXURE
1
Test Results
31-36
1.0 INTRODUCTION
There is a shortage of topsoil in most urban areas for filling lowlying areas, as well as for constructing road/rail embankments. The
other option is to use waste materials arising from different sectors
such as domestic, industrial and mining etc. In this report, the focus
is on the use of industrial solid waste like coal ash as a fill material
for construction of railway embankment
2.0
DEFINITION
The term fill is used to describe ground that has been formed by
material deposited by man. Thus fill or made ground, as it is some
time called, results from human activity in contrast to natural soil,
which has its origin in geological processes. The fill material can
be classified as below:-
2.1
2.2
Engineered fill
Engineered fill is a fill that has been selected, placed and
compacted to an appropriate specification in order to achieve some
required engineering performance. Thus the fill is designed and
built with a specific use in mind
2.3
PFA
Pulverised fuel ash is formed of silt-sized particles, which are
carried from the furnace of a coal-fired power station with the flue
gases.
3.0
3.1
Pond Ash
This refers to the ash stored in ash ponds by the hydraulic fill
method. Usually, it is a mixture of bottom ash and fly ash at most
thermal power plants in India.
3.2
Fly Ash
Fly ash is a finely divided residue resulting from the combustion of
pulverised coal in boiler and collected from electrostatic
precipitators. It is a pozzolanic material, which in the presence of
water reacts with lime and forms cementitious materials.
3.3
Bottom Ash
This category of ash is collected at the bottom of boiler furnace as
a resultant of coal burning activity. This is a comparatively coarse
material characterized by better geotechnical properties. This is an
excellent material for fill embankment and road construction but its
availability are very less.
4.0
5.0
Address
P.O. Shaktinagar Distt. Sonebhadra U.P.
P.O. Pragati Nagar, Korba ( West)
Distt.Korba
P.O. Jyoti Nagar Distt. Karmnagar
Andhra Pradesh.
P.O. Nabarun Distt. Murshidabad West
Bengal
P.O. Vindhyanagar Distt. Sidhi M.P.
P.O. Rihand Nagar Distt.Sonebhadra
U.P.
P.O. Vidyut Nagar Dadri, Dhaulana
Road, Distt. Gautam Budha Nagar U.P.
P.O. Unchahar, Distt.Rae Barreilly U.P.
6.0
7.0
IRC RECOMMENDATIONS
The design of fly ash embankment is basically similar to design of
soil embankment. The design process for embankments involves
the following steps:
Site investigations
Characterisation of materials
Detailed design
7.1
Site investigations
The following information concerning the site and surrounding
areas must be collected:
Topography
Hydrology
Subsoil investigations
PARAMETER
RANGE
Sp. GRAVITY
1.90-2.55
PLASTICITY
NP
MDD
0.9-1.6
OMC
38.0-18.0%
COHESION
NEGLIGIBLE
ANGLE OF INTERNAL
30-40
FRICTION
COEFFICIENT OF
1.75X10-5-2.01X10 -3
2
CONSOLIDATION Cv (cm /sec)
COMPRESSION INDEX
0.05-0.4
Cc
PERMEABILITY
8X10-6-7X10-4
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
CLAY
1-10%
SILT
8-85%
SAND
7-90%
GRAVEL
0-10%
COEFFICIENT OF UNIFORMITY 3.1-10.7
7.4
7.5
8.0
8.1
Dr. Vimal Kumar and other in their paper on fly ash in road &
embankment published in National Seminar cum Business Meet
on use of fly ash in Roads & embankment advocated that the fly
ash is better material than soil in construction of road embankment.
The brief details of their paper are given below:
Application areas of fly ash in road embankment
The use of fly ash / pond ash for road and embankment
applications can be classified as follows:
Fly ashes have permeability in the range of 10-6 to 10-4 cm/sec. Its
high permeability ensures free & efficient drainage. After rainfall,
water gets drained out freely, which means its workability is better
than soil, especially, during the monsoon. Work on fly ash fills /
embankments can be re-started within a few hours of rain while in
case of soils, one is required to wait for much longer periods.
Further, fly ash gets consolidated at a faster rate and primary
consolidation gets over very quickly. So, it has low compressibility
& shows negligible subsequent settlements. Thus, it can be used in
bridge abutments also. Further, fly ash provides better bonding
with geogrid material, as it has more friction angle as compared to
soil. Hence, it provides a better & steeper RE wall as compared to
soil.
Fly Ash in Sub Base and Base Course
Fly ash can be usefully employed for construction of sub base/base
course. Mixing of soil and fly ash in suitable proportions improves
the gradation as well as plasticity characteristics in the mix, thereby
improving the compacted strength.
Fly ash (preferable) / Pond ash can be used for sub base and base
course construction and stabilization. The fly ash is usually used in
combination with lime to form the matrix that cements the
aggregate particles together. Generally clay soils are stabilized with
fly ash alone whereas silty soils respond well to stabilization with
fly ash and lime or cement.
Physical, Chemical and Geo-Technical Properties of Fly Ash in
India
Physical Properties of Fly ash vs. Natural Soil .
Properties
Bulk Density (gm/cc)
Specific Gravity
Plasticity
Shrinkage Limit
Grain size
Clay content
Fly Ash
0.9 1.6
1.6 2.4
Very low
or non plastic
Very low
Silty/Sandy
-
Natural Soil
1.3 1.8
2.55 2.75
Low to high
Low to high
Clay size present
Could be much higher
Very low
Sandy silt to silty sand
Variable
Variable
Water Holding
Capacity
(WHC) per cent
30-60
20-60
Range
Specific Gravity
1.6 - 2.4
Plasticity
Non-Plastic
0.9 - 1.6
18.0 38.0
cent)
Cohesion (kN/m2 )
Negligible
30 - 42
Coefficient of Consolidation Cv
(cm/sec)
Compression index Cc
0.05 0.4
Permeability (cm/sec)
8 X 10-6 7 X 10-4
1 10
8 85
7 90
0-10
Coefficient of Uniformity
3.1-10.7
10
11
12
8.2
13
14
15
16
Local
Sand
Bottom ash
from BudgeBudge
Thermal
Power Plant
20
Pond ash
from
Kolaghat
Thermal
Power
Plant
65
Percentage material
passing 75 Sieve
Modified Proctor test
Maximum Dry Density
(gm/cc)
Optimum moisture
content (%)
Permeability
( cm./ sec)
Liquid Limit (%)
Plasticity Index
Direct Shear Test
Cohesion C kg/ cm2
02
Local
Soil
29
1.71
1.17
1.33
2.15
12.2
31.0
25.0
9.4
3.11x 10-3
6.26x10-3
7.2x10-4
NP
NP
NP
35.4
15.7
0.23
17
Angle of internal
friction ()
32
30
34
25
Fill material
Soil
Pond Ash
Soil
Pond Ash
18
19
20
21
9.0
23
24
25
flyash are fixed as 98% and 95% of modified proctor test ( IS2720) respectively. Figure below shows typical compaction vs
moisture content curve for soil and flyash.
Description of work
The project site is situated in national capital of Delhi near
Kashmere Gate, ISBT in the flood planes of river Yamuna and
within the eastern marginal bund or Shahdara marginal bund. The
work was started in Oct.1998 and full site was under standing
water of a few cm to 1.0 m. Large scale dewatering by high
discharging pumps and a network of drains was planned to make
the ground dry. The top layer of soil having vegetation or poor soil
was removed and ground was compacted by sheep foot roller of 10
to 12 tons with 8 to 10 passes so as to achieve a minimum dry
density 95% of modified dry density. After the base layer of soil
was laid and compacted in layer thickness of 15 cm, 98% of
modified dry density was achieved. Base soil layer of 1.2 m to 1.6
m was laid before starting laying of flyash layer of 15 cm thickness
each. The embankment designed as shown in figure above was
completed by laying layers of soil and flyash as per the
requirement of design.
Problems faced and solutions found:
27
Quality control
A self contained fully equipped soil-testing laboratory was
established before starting the work. Some of the tests were Sieve
analysis, Moisture content determination, Modified proctor test as
per IS 2720, Liquid Limit and Plastic Limit. Following were the
main considerations as part of the quality assurance programme Each source of soil flyash was decided and approved before
bringing the material at site.
Field control on compaction was achieved by ensuring moisture
contents near OMC, adequate plain and vibro passes of
compactor and compaction level by core cutter method were
ensured.
.
11.0 GUIDELINE FOR EMBANKMENT
(As per BIS 10153-1982)
Studies have shown the suitability of fly ash as a fill material for
the construction of embankments. The properties to be kept in view
are grain size, density; shear strength, compaction characteristics &
permeability. The fly ash has to be compacted at OMC, which is
normally in range of 15-30 percent. Because of low density the
28
-----------------
29
REFERENCES
30
Annexure-I
Ash Samples Properties
S.No.
1.
2.
3.
Coal Ash
samples
Properties
NTPC
Vidhya
Nagar, M.P.
(Fly Ash)
ML
Classific ation
Grain size distribution
Gravel (%)
00
Sand (%)
20
Silt (%)
80
Clay (%)
00
Fines passing
80
75 sieve (%)
Consistency Limits (%)
Liquid Limit
NP
NTPC
Vidhya
Nagar, M.P.
(Pond Ash)
Singrauli
Super
Thermal
Power
Station
(Fly Ash)
Singrauli
Super
Thermal
Power
Station
( Bottom
Ash)
Barauni
Thermal
Power
(Fly
Ash)
Uncha
har
Thermal
Power
(Fly
Ash)
Badar
pur
Thermal
Power
( Bottom
Ash)
SM
SP-SM
ML
SP-SM,
SP,SM
00
94-95
05-06
00
05-06
00
16-30
70-84
00
70-84
00-6
80-92
03-17
00
03-17
NP
NP
SM
SM
01
72
27
00
27
06
56
38
00
38
09
84
07
00
07
00
61
39
00
39
NP
NP
NP
NP
31
SP-SM,
Kolaghat
Thermal
Power
(Fly
Ash)
4.
5.
6
7.
Plastic Limit
Plasticity
Index
OMC (%)
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
13.5
21.0
22.5
25.0
19.2
18-24.5
MDD (g
1.51
3
/cm )
Shear parameters:
C(kg/cm2)
(degree)
1.31
1.28
1.27
1.26
17.6019.45
1.6411.660
1.221.42
0.02
33.83
0.00
35.33
0.024
33.65
.0143
32.98
1.82
2.13
0.10
11.2
2.2
0.012
33.533.65
0.0-0.01
24
2.342.41
0.2086
0.2428
0.1107
0.06740.0719
C (kg/cm2)
(degree)
2.19
Specific
gravity
Consolidation test parameters:
Compression
Index (Cc)
2.06
32
Coefficient of
Consolidation
(Cv)
(cm2/min) at:
2 Kg/cm2
0.1671
0.1394
0.1196
4 Kg/cm2
0.2169
0.1466
0.1849
8 Kg/cm2
0.1702
0.2291
0.2552
PreConsolidation
Pressure (Pc)
(kg/cm2)
Initial Void
Ratio (e0)
8
Uniformity
Coefficient
( Cu)
Coefficient of
curvature (
Cc)
1.00
0.5795
0.90
0.75
0.951.02
1.1275
0.4894
1.08701.3154
3.053.38
8.5411.96
3.54-5.0
1.231.47
0.631.37
0.74-1.31
10.47
4.52
66.67
3.66
0.76
1.47
9.80
1.47
33
0.13020.3629
0.26270.3581
0.25150.3509
S.No.
1.
Coal Ash
samples
Properties
NTPC
Rihand
(Fly Ash)
NTPC
Rihand
(Bottom
Ash)
NTPC
Ramagundam
A.P
(Fly Ash)
NTPC
Ramagundam, A.P.
(Bottom
Ash)
NTPC
Ramagu
n-dam,
A.P.
(Bottom
Ash))
SP-SM
NTPC
NTPC Kahalga
Kahalga on
on
(Bottom
Ash)
(Fly
Ash)
Classification
ML
SM
ML
SP-SM
ML
SP-SM
Gravel (%)
Sand (%)
Silt (%)
Clay (%)
Fines passing
75 sieve (%)
00
01
79
20
99
00
55
45
00
45
00
07
93
00
93
03
92
05
00
05
01
91
08
00
08
00
15
85
00
85
00
94
06
00
06
Liquid Limit
Plastic Limit
Plasticity
Index
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
NP
2.
3.
34
4.
OMC (%)
MDD (g
/cm3)
15.0
1.58
20.0
1.26
16.0
1.51
27.0
1.17
27.0
1.17
15.50
1.45
27.0
1.2
5.
C(kg/cm2)
(degree)
C (kg/cm2)
(degree)
Specific
gravity
2.15
7.
Compression
Index (Cc)
Coefficient of
Consolidation
(Cv)
(cm2/min) at:
2 Kg/cm2
4 Kg/cm2
8 Kg/cm2
35
1.864
PreConsolidation
Pressure (Pc)
(kg/cm2)
Initial Void
Ratio (e0)
8
Uniformity
Coefficient
( Cu)
Coefficient of
curvature (
Cc)
7.69
14.12
3.27
3.56
3.50
0,69
3.53
0.80
1.13
0.75
36