Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TaPRA
2013
Finding Ones Own Clown
This paper examines the exchanges and transmissions taking place
between the teacher and students in the clown workshops of
Philippe Gaulier. Simon Murray suggests that the clown mask allows
students to come to terms with the more ridiculous and therefore
vulnerable dimensions of our personality (2003, pp.
63). To
The
term
ridiculous
describes
the
response
of
the
TaPRA
2013
famously acerbic words. Lynne Kendrick describes the centrality of
games and play in Gauliers pedagogy, particularly drawing on the
group games at the start of Gauliers workshops, which I know as
Balthazar says and Mr Hit (2010; 2011). While Kendrick draws on
the rules of these games for her analysis using play theory, I
understand these games to begin the process of students watching,
responding to and laughing at each other. 1 As people are out of Mr
Hit they sit and watch the game play out, laughing, groaning and
cheering the final winner. I maintain that it is the feedback of the
student audience that is prioritised in the classroom, even though
Gauliers mode of transmitting feedback gains much attention.
Students are told to listen for laughter in this workshop:
How do you find your clown? By following this saying to the
letter:
When laughter breaks out, the clown isnt far away. When
laughter dies down, the clown goes away (Gaulier 2007, p.
289)
Here the spectator knows better than the actor, and the student
must always pay attention to their (directly transmitted) feedback.
Spectators are present throughout the class and provide all the
feedback, the judgement and the meaning to the students
performance. The student on stage does not know whether he or
she has done well unless she listens to her classmates and teacher,
and takes their feedback seriously.
The language used by Gaulier and Lecoq has led some to
understand clown as a normally hidden, pre-socialized part of the
performers self. For example, One's 'clown' is inextricably related
to one's essential weakness (Leabhart 1989, p. 99), or, The
individuals clown is the repressed self, repressed because its
1 Kendrick focuses her attention on the performing students experience
of play and pleasure, though she does acknowledge that for Gaulier,
performing students must experience pleasure, but also communicate it
within the realm of the game - to fellow players, and within the theatrical
frame - to the spectator(2010, p. 121-122).
TaPRA
2013
expression would entail socially unacceptable behaviour (Felner
1985, p. 164). Here, then, there is assumed a process where the
student is psychologically or behaviourally liberated by the red nose
mask, and by extension, by the practice of clowning. Personal
weakness is connected to emotional vulnerability and the sense
that the clown performer is revealing something usually hidden by
social masks. These writers understand social masks to be removed
using the training tool of a physical mask the red nose.
Purcell Gates finds this understanding to be a logical extension of a
twentieth century understanding of the location of the self.
This shift in the language used to describe the archaeology of
the self from underneath in Freuds unconscious to behind in
Lecoq can likely be attributed to the mask work that forms the
foundation of Lecoqs pedagogy: from Neutral Mask through
Larval, Expressive and Character masks and finally the Red
Nose, the strongest signifier of the performers identityher
faceis located behind the mask, leading to a logical slippage
that positions the presence of the performers true self
behind the mask of the character she is performing. (Purcell
Gates, 2011)
If the student has been present, but hidden, behind masks thus far
in the course, it would follow that she is (almost completely)
revealed by the clown mask, which only covers a small area of the
face, leaving the eyes and mouth visible. As a result, the students
revealed self is a major part of how the clown body is understood
and discussed at Gaulier and Lecoqs schools. In her 2011 article,
Purcell
Gates
understands
the
discussion
of
clown
students
TaPRA
2013
read the students body and partially covered face to be a signifier
of authentic self, even when this self were not recognized by the
performer - the signal was external and dependent on the other
people in the room (Purcell Gates 2011, p. 239). Although the small
mask has been understood as one that reveals, leaving the clown
student distinct, idiosyncratic and personal, Purcell Gates findings
demonstrate that the revealed self does not need to be authentic,
or recognized as such by the performer; it merely needs to be
greeted with laughter by the audience.
TaPRA
2013
Despite this rejection of the red nose as mask, Davison uses the
same plastic noses in some of his own workshops, as pictured in
photography project Clown Phenomena' (2013b). Perhaps this
teacher also finds that the red nose mask has a visual function.
TaPRA
2013
students may dream or be foolish. Felner offers an interpretation
of Decrouxs neutral mask, which also applies to the way in which
Gaulier uses red noses. She says it creates a degree of abstraction
that removes mime from the literal realistic plane (Felner 1985, p.
61). If we consider this function with respect to the faces above, the
small masks indicates a removal from the literal, realistic plane as
we recognize the cultural symbol as a signifier of the intention to
make us laugh. Simultaneously, the differences between the faces,
reactions, and expressions of the students shown above are highly
visible, but removed from realism the faces are abstracted, and
made the site of fantasy. In the classroom, and in performance,
students learn to play with this distortion that does not fully
disguise. If the red nose is a mask, it does not have to suggest a
magical revealing power that will do the clowning for the student,
or make them suddenly visible in a different way. The mask serves
not only as a signifier of the cultural knowledge attached to
clowns, but also as a way of abstracting the face, distorting and
reimagining the face as a fantastic, or ridiculous, object.
of
an
externally
negotiated
self
in
clown
TaPRA
2013
performance, we can understand the clown to be presented in order
to be ridiculous, and so the students weaknesses are laughterinducing actions identified with the help of transmitted responses
from an audience. The weaknesses that Lecoq sees in a clown
student can be understood as her ridiculous side or, that about
her that makes people laugh. As a result, the personal weakness
that is understood as Lecoqs most important ingredient for clown is
focused outward, toward the audience, the observers and laughers.
Lecoq describes a transformation of weakness (a personal problem)
into ridiculousness (at which people laugh). It is the presence of
laughing student peers that enables this transformation, and the
transmission of amusement in laughter that indicates its success.
It is the audiences laughter that identifies the students ridiculous
side.2 Immediately following this observation, Lecoq provides an
example of students finding their ridiculous side, located in the
body.
there were students with legs so thin that they hardly
dared show them, but who found, in playing the clown, a way
to exhibit their skinniness for the pleasure of the onlookers. At
last they were free to be as they were, and to make people
laugh (Lecoq 2002, p. 154)
Here
the
thin-legged
body,
previously
experienced
as
TaPRA
2013
which students come to terms with an aspect of their body or
personality, but merely to allow students to find the thing with
which they can make an audience laugh.
The externally negotiated self, or ridiculous side
Both Purcell Gates externally negotiated self and the ridiculous
side described by the pedagogues and practitioners point to clown
performance skills
audience.
being
negotiated
and developed
with
an
Despite
TaPRA
2013
Bibliography
Davison, Jon, 2013a, Clown, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
- 2013b, "Clown Phenomena", http://www.jondavison.net, Accessed
31/7/2013.
Felner, Mira, 1985, Apostles of Silence: The Modern French Mimes,
Associated University Press, London and Toronto.
Gaulier, Philippe & Ewen Maclachian, 2007, The Tormentor: le jeu,
light, theatre, filmiko, Paris.
Jarmuz, Mark, 2012, Moi l'cole Philippe Gaulier, Retrieved 14 May
2013.
Kendrick, Lynne. 2010, Acting to Actuality: The impact of the ludic
on performer training, PhD Thesis, Goldsmiths College,
University of London
Kendrick, Lynne, 2011, A paidic aesthetic: an analysis of games in
the ludic pedagogy of Philippe Gaulier, Theatre, Dance and
Performance Training, 2:1, pp. 72-85.
Leabhart, Thomas 1989, Jaques Lecoq and Mummenschanz, in
Modern and Postmodern Mime, Macmillan, London, pp. 88107.
Lecoq, Jacques & David Bradby, 2002, The Moving Body, Methuen,
London.
Marteinson, Peter, 2006, On the Problem of the Comic; A
Philosophical Study on the Origins of Laughter, LEGAS, New
York, Ottawa.
Murray, Simon, 2003, Jacques Lecoq, Routledge, London.
Purcell Gates, Laura, 2011, Locating the self: narratives and
practices of authenticity in French clown training, Theatre,
Dance and Performance Training, 2:2, pp. 231-42.
Purcell Gates, Laura. 2011, Tout Bouge [Everything Moves]: The
(Re)Construction of the Body in Lecoq-based Pedagogy, PhD
Thesis, University of Minnesota
TaPRA