Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ON
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
(NTPC, SHAKTINAGAR, SINGRAULI)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
CONTENTS
NTPC-Introduction
NTPC Limited (formerly National Thermal Power Corporation) (BSE: 532555, NSE: NTPC)
is the largest Indian state-owned electric utilities company based in New Delhi, India. It is listed
in Forbes Global 2000 for 2012 ranked at 337th in the world. It is an Indian public sector
company listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange in which at present the Government of India
holds 84.5% (after divestment of the stake by Indian government on 19 October 2009) of its
equity. With an electric power generating capacity of 41,184 MW, NTPC has embarked on plans
to become a 128,000 MW company by 2032. It was founded on 7 November 1975.
On 21 May 2010, NTPC was conferred Maharatna status by the Union Government of India.
NTPC's core business is engineering, construction and operation of power generating plants and
providing consultancy to power utilities in India and abroad.
The total installed capacity of the company is 36,514 MW (including JVs) with 16 coal based
and 7 gas based stations, located across the country. In addition under JVs(Joint Venture), 6
stations are coal-based, and another station uses naphtha/LNG as fuel. By 2017, the power
generation portfolio is expected to have a diversified fuel mix with coal based capacity of around
27,535 MW, 3,955 MW through gas, 1,328 MW through Hydro generation, about 1400 MW
from nuclear sources and around 1000 MW from Renewable Energy Sources (RES). NTPC has
adopted a multi-pronged growth strategy which includes capacity addition through green field
projects, expansion of existing stations, joint ventures, subsidiaries and takeover of stations.
NTPC has been operating its plants at high efficiency levels. Although the company has 19% of
the total national capacity it contributes 29% of total power generation due to its focus on high
efficiency. NTPCs share at 31 Mar 2001 of the total installed capacity of the country was
24.51% and it generated 29.68% of the power of the country in 200809. Every fourth home in
India is lit by NTPC. As at 31 Mar 2011 NTPC's share of the country's total installed capacity is
17.18% and it generated 27.4% of the power generation of the country in 201011. NTPC is
lighting every third bulb in India. 170.88BU of electricity was produced by its stations in the
financial year 20052006. The Net Profit after Tax on 31 March 2006 was 58.202 billion. Net
profit after tax for the quarter ended 30 June 2006 was 15.528 billion, which is 18.65% more
than that for the same quarter in the previous financial year. It is listed in Forbes Global 2000 for
2011 ranked it 348th[3] in the world.
Pursuant to a special resolution passed by the Shareholders at the Companys Annual General
Meeting on 23 September 2005 and the approval of the Central Government under section 21 of
the Companies Act, 1956, the name of the Company "National Thermal Power Corporation
Limited" has been changed to "NTPC Limited" with effect from 28 October 2005. The primary
reason for this is the company's foray into hydro and nuclear based power generation along with
backward integration by coal mining.
(Source-wikipedia)
NTPC Singrauli-Introduction
Approved capacity
Installed Capacity
Location
Coal Source
Water Source
Beneficiary States
Approved Investment
Unit Sizes
Units Commissioned
International Assistance
2000MW
2000 MW
Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh
Jayant/Bina Mines
Rihand Reservoir
Uttar Pradesh, Uttranchal ,Rajasthan, Punjab,
Haryana, Delhi and Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal
Pradesh, Chandigarh
Rs. 1190.69 Crore
Stage - I: 5x 200 MW
Stage -II: 2x 500 MW
Unit -I 200 MW February 1982
Unit -II 200 MW November 1982
Unit -III 200 MW March 1983
Unit -IV 200 MW November 1983
Unit -V 200 MW February 1984
Unit -VI 500 MW December 1986
Unit -VII 500 MW November 1987
IDA
KWF
VISION
To be the worlds largest and best power producer, powering Indias growth.
MISSION
Develop and provide reliable power, related products and services at competitive prices,
integrating multiple energy sources with innovative and eco-friendly technologies and contribute
to society.
Business Ethics
Customer Focus
Enterprising
Devoted
(Source-www.ntpc.co.in)
Competence building, Commitment building, Culture building and Systems building are the four
building blocks on which our HR systems are based.
HR Vision
"To enable our people to be a family of committed world class professionals."
Recruitment
NTPC believes in the philosophy of 'Grow your own timber'. Their 'Executive Trainee' scheme
was introduced in 1977 with the objective of raising a cadre of home grown professionals. First
Division Graduate Engineers/ Post graduates are hired through nation-wide open competitive
examinations and campus recruitments. Hiring is followed by 52 weeks of fully paid induction
training.
Quality of Work-Life
NTPC is proud of its systems for providing a good quality of work-life for its
employees. In addition to providing beautiful and safe work places, NTPC
encourages a culture of mutual respect and trust amongst peers, superiors
and subordinates. Away from hectic city life, NTPC townships provide an
environment of serenity, natural beauty and close community living.
Numerous welfare and recreation facilities including schools, hospitals and
clubs are provided at the townships to enhance quality of life & the well
being of employees and their families. An entire range of benefits, from child
care leave to post retirement medical benefits are extended to employees to
meet any exigency that may arise in a person's life.
To meet the academic aspirations of employees and match them with the needs of the
organisation, NTPC has tie-ups with institutes of repute like MDI, Gurgaon; IIT Delhi; BITS
Pilani, etc. NTPC sponsors batches of employees who are inducted into these courses based on
their performance rating in the company and their performance in the entrance exam conducted
by the respective institute. Unlike other study leave and sabbaticals, employees undergoing these
courses do not forego their salary or growth during the duration of the course.
Seeking Feedback
NTPC actively seek and encourage employee feedback to ensure that our HR
interventions and practices remain relevant and meaningful. We regularly
conduct Employee Satisfaction and Organisational Climate Surveys.
Awards
NTPC derive immense satisfaction from the awards we receive and the resulting recognition they
bestow. The awards are key indicators and milestones on our HR journey, and reinforce our HR
philosophy and practices. NTPC has been awarded No.1, Best Workplace in India among large
organisations for the year 2012, by the Great Places to Work Institute, India Chapter in
collaboration with The Economic Times.
(source-www.ntpc.co.in)
AGM(HR-EDC)
AREA:EDC
MANAGER(HR)
Asstt.MANAGER(HR)
Area:ER/CISF/ES/EW/SCHOOLS/RT
I/ESTATE OFFICER/CANTEENS
Area:ES/EW/SCHOOLS
Sr.MANAGER(HR)
Area:ER/ES/EW/TA/HINDI/C
SR/PR
MANAGER(HR)
Area:TA/HINDI/CSR/PR/GUEST
HOUSE/FIELD.HOSTEL
Sr.MANAGER(HR)
Area:EB/HRD/IE
Asstt.MANAGER(LAW)
Area:LAW/LISIONING
MANAGER(TRG)
MANAGER(TRG)
MANAGER(HR)
Area:EDC
Area:EDC
Area:EB/TO/PMS
Asstt.MANAGER(HR)
Area:TA/GUEST/HOUSE/FI
ELD.HOSTEL
Asstt.MANAGER(
Rajb.)
Area:HINDI/CSR
OFFICER(CSR)
Area:CSR
Asstt.MANAGER(PR)
Area:PR
HR POLICY
Pay scales
Pay fixation rules
Dearness allowance
Non - practicing allowance for medical executives
Locational allowances
House rent allowance rules
Rules relating to company leased residential accommodation for executives
Cafeteria approach
Travelling allowance rules
Compensation for working on overtime to the employees in workman category at
projects/stations where one or more units have been commissioned
k) Miscellaneous allowances
l) Negative pay advance
3) EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
4) SOCIAL SECURITY
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
5) ADVANCES
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
b) Promotion policy
c) Employee development scheme
d) Scheme for acquiring qualifications required for promotions of employees in the
supervisory grade of s4 to the executive grade of E1 (non-technical)
e) NTPC scheme of facilities for higher studies1
f) Scheme for job rotation and career growth path
g) Scheme for acquiring energy auditor certificate (bee) for ntpc executives
h) Scheme for facilitating ntpc employees with its qualification to acquire diploma in
engineering
i) Scheme for certification program for project management professionals
j) NTPC open competition for executive talent
k) System of mentoring ankur in NTPC
l) NTPC leadership development system
m) Training system in NTPC
n) System for management games business minds in NTPC
o) Honorarium for faculty on training and management development
p) Programmes & honorarium to external experts for selection interviews
q) Guidelines for conduct of survey
r) HR audit system
9) EMPLOYEE SERVICES
a) Allotment of residential accommodation rules
b) Guidelines for providing various fittings and white/colour washing of company
quarters at project sites/ townships
c) Guidelines on providing accommodation to outside agencies
d) NTPC guest house rules
e) Recoveries
f) Procedure to be followed in case company's vehicle meets with an accident
g) Norms for stationery items, furniture & office space etc.
h) System for disposal of old personal computers / laptops and peripherals
i) NTPC scheme for reimbursement of litigation expenses to executives in cases arising
out of motivated false complaints against them
j) NTPC policy on HIV-aids at workplace.
(source-NTPC Ltd HR Policy manual )
PMS-INTRODUCTION
DESIGN AN APPRAISAL
PROGRAM
APPRAISAL PERFORMANCE
PERFORMANCE INTERVIEW
Performance management
USE APPRAISAL DATA FOR
APPROPRIATE PURPOSES
Feedback
2) Checklist
Checklist of statements on the traits of the employee and his/her job is prepared in 2
columns.
If answer positive then YES else NO.
Forwarded to HR deptt and each YES is awarded by points.
After point allocation, technique becomes a weighted checklist.
Focuses mainly certain critical behaviors of an employee that effect difference between
effective and non-effective performance of a job.
b) Future-oriented appraisals
1) MBO(Management By Objective)
i.
ii.
iii.
iv.
2) Psychological appraisals
It is slow and costly method
3) Assessment centres
4) 360o feedback
Objectives
To accomplish the overall organisational vision and mission by linking individual
performance to company objectives
To cascade companys strategic goals to individual level
To promote professional excellence
To encourage twoway communication between the executive and the reporting
officer and bring about transparency in the performance assessment process
To evaluate the potential of the executive to assume higher responsibilities in the
organisation
To provide a source of talent for meeting the organisations growth requirements
through a process of mapping the competencies and potential of executives
To translate future skill requirements of the organization into individual development
plans
To identify high performers and recognise them through rewards and incentives, and
To facilitate fulfillment of individual aspirations
Applicability
Executives who join NTPC on deputation or those retaining lien while in service of
NTPC are also covered by this scheme
Executives who join in the middle of the PMS cycle (see next section), but have served
for a minimum period of three months
NTPC executives who are on secondment or are lent on service to subsidiaries and
joint ventures with NTPC management.
PMS CYCLE
Performance Assessment year
Performance assessment years have been set up as follows:
For E6 to E7A: The performance assessment year commences from 1st April of
each year and continues until 31st March of the following year
For E1 to E5: The performance assessment year commences from 1st January of each
year and continues until 31st December of the same year.
PMS CALENDER
Stages of PACE
Performance Planning
Mid Year Review
E1 to E5
1st to 25th January
1st to 15th July
Annual Assessment
Normalization
E6 to E7A
1st to 25th April
1st to 15th October
1st to 25th April
1st to 25th May
Communication of scores
7th February
31st May
Appeal
12th February
5th June
PMS Process
Performance Planning
Performance Planning is the process of:
Defining expectations i.e. the work to be done, the results/targets to be achieved and
skills/competencies needed to achieve these objectives
Setting Measures and Targets, determining priorities and weightages of results to
be achieved
Identifying and allocating appropriate resources (such as manpower, tools, training,
budget etc.) to enable the executive to achieve the targets
While defining work objectives and measures, it is necessary to ensure that:
Goals/ Targets/ Objectives are SMART (Specific, Measurable, Agreed, Realistic
and Time bound)
Results are substantially within the executives control
Measures relate to results
Data is available for measurement
Agreement on mutually agreeable and achievable performance targets is arrived at
after sufficient discussion between reporting officer and executive has taken place.
Annual Assessment
The objectives of Annual Assessment are to:
Discuss and arrive at an assessment of performance with respect to agreed targets
Assess the competencies, potential and core values actualisation by the individual
Agree upon improvement plans and development needs for the individual.
Normalisation
The objectives of the Normalisation System in PMS are to:
Ensure parity and integrity by minimizing variation in rating by different reporting
officers across various departments and locations
Enhance objectivity and transparency in the appraisal system
To view individual performance from the perspective of organizational achievement.
Feedback
Providing feedback on performance presents the following benefits:
Creates transparency making PMS more acceptable to individuals
Reinforces good performance on time
Enables development of coaching and mentoring relationship between reporting
officer and executive
Ensures that organizational objectives are achieved to an acceptable standard and in
an acceptable form
Topic
E1E3
E4E7A
Part I
Part I
Part IA
Part IA
Details of KPA
Part IA
Part IA
Part IB
Part IB
Competency Assessment
Part II
Part II
Part IIA
Part IIA
Executive/Managerial Competencies
Part IIB
Part IIB
Core Values
Part III
Part III
Potential Competencies
-----
Part IV
Special Achievements
Part IV
Part V
Total Marks
Part V
Part VI
Part VI
Part VII
Distribution of Marks
Level
KPA
Functional/
Technical
Competenci
es
Managerial
/Executive
Competenci
es
Values
Potential
Competenci
es
Total
E1 to E3
E4
E5
E6 to E7A
80
75
65
50
10
10
10
10
5
5
10
15
5
5
5
15
---5
10
10
100
100
100
100
Objective
a) To study the PMS of NTPC Ltd, Shaktinagar, Singrauli.
b) To study the response of executive class employees on PMS survey and to examine their
satisfaction level.
1. EXPLORATORY STUDY
a.) Secondary data analysis-it includes studying the website of the company and also going
through the various articles published in different sources(magazines, books, internet,
newspapers)
DESCRIPTIVE STUDY
After carrying out initial Exploratory studies to bring clarity on the subject under study,
Descriptive study is carried out to know the actual PMS being followed at NTPC in
Shaktinagar, U.P. The knowledge of actual PMS is needed to document the process and
suggest improvements in the current system to make it more effective. The tools used to
carry out Descriptive study includes both monitoring and Interrogation.
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Neither agree nor disagree
Agree
Strongly agree
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
appraisal.
6) Any changes after normalization is clearly explain by the manager.
7) There is transparency between PMS marks and actual performance.
8) Manager takes action against poor performance.
9) There is significant impact of performance on rewards.
10) Performance gaps is effectively explain by the manager.
11) HR helps in understanding the PACE process.
12) Manager helps employees to achieve their target/best.
13) KPAs are set at the beginning of performance cycle.
14) Managers helps employees to know how their work contributes to organization goals.
15) For better understanding of PMS, regular training and reading material are provided by
HR to employees.
16) Manager motivates employees to higher levels of performance.
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
RESPONSES
QUESTIO
(1)
(2)
N NO.
1
13
25
2
10
39
3
24
44
4
8
32
5
13
42
6
29
43
7
29
41
8
13
35
9
16
31
10
14
34
11
16
23
12
17
20
13
3
2
14
10
22
15
20
44
16
10
24
17
15
20
18
25
41
19
15
31
20
12
31
21
17
32
22
15
32
Interpretation of Responses
(3)
30
38
36
43
49
30
37
44
33
45
35
50
14
41
42
34
39
31
49
37
40
46
(4)
75
56
42
63
40
39
38
54
55
48
67
53
85
64
41
64
72
48
53
58
58
54
(5)
14
14
11
11
13
16
12
11
22
16
16
17
53
20
10
25
11
12
9
19
10
10
Analysis
and
QUESTIO
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
N
NO.
1
10
11
12
(13/157)*10
0
=8.28%
(10/157)*10
0
=6.39%
(24/157)*10
0
=15.28%
(8/157)*100
=5.09%
(13/157)*10
0
=8.28%
(29/157)*10
0
=18.47%
(29/157)*10
0
=18.47%
(13/157)*10
0
=8.28%
(16/157)*10
0
=10.19%
(14/157)*10
0
=8.91%
(16/157)*10
0
=10.19%
(17/157)*10
(25/157)*10
0
=15.92%
(39/157)*10
0
=24.84%
(44/157)*10
0
=28.02%
(32/157)*10
0
=20.38%
(42/157)*10
0
=26.75%
(43/157)*10
0
=27.38%
(41/157)*10
0
=26.11%
(35/157)*10
0
=22.29%
(31/157)*10
0
=19.74%
(34/157)*10
0
=21.65%
(23/157)*10
0
=14.64%
(20/157)*10
(30/157)*10
0
=19.10%
(38/157)*10
0
=24.20%
(36/157*100
=22.92%
(43/157)*10
0
=27.38%
(49/157)*10
0
=31.21%
(30/157)*10
0
=19.10%
(37/157)*10
0
=23.56%
(44/157)*10
0
=28.02%
(33/157)*10
0
=21.01%
(45/157)*10
0
=28.66%
(35/157)*10
0
=22.29%
(50/157)*10
(75/157)*10
0
=47.77%
(56/157)*10
0
=35.66%
(42/157)*10
0
=22.92%
(63/157)*10
0
=40.12%
(40/157)*10
0
=25.47%
(39/157)*10
0
=24.84%
(38/157)*10
0
=24.20%
(54/157)*10
0
=34.39%
(55/157)*10
0
=35.03%
(48/157)*10
0
=30.57%
(67/157)*10
0
=42.67%
(53/157)*10
(14/157)*100
=8.91%
(14/157)*100
=8.91%
(11/157)*100
=7.00%
(11/157)*100
=7.00%
(13/157)*100
=8.28%
(16/157)*100
=10.19%
(12/157)*100
=7.64%
(11/157)*100
=7.00%
(22/157)*100
=14.01%
(16/157)*100
=10.91%
(16/157)*100
=10.19%
(17/157)*100
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
0
=10.82%
(3/157)*100
=1.91%
0
=12.73%
(2/157)*100
=1.27%
0
=33.75%
(85/157)*10
0
=54.14%
(64/157)*10
0
=40.76%
(41/157)*10
0
=26.11%
=10.82%
(22/157)*10
0
=14.01%
(44/157)*10
0
=28.02%
0
=31.84%
(14/157)*10
0
=8.91%
(41/157)*10
0
=26.11%
(42/157)*10
0
=26.75%
(10/157)*10
0
=6.36%
(20/157)*10
0
=12.73%
(10/157)*10
0
=6.36%
(15/157)*10
0
=9.55%
(25/157)*10
0
=15.92%
(15/157)*10
0
=9.55%
(12/157)*10
0
=7.64%
(17/157)*10
0
=10.82%
(15/157)*10
0
=9.55%
(24/157)*10
0
=15.28%
(20/157)*10
0
=12.73%
(41/157)*10
0
=26.11%
(31/157)*10
0
=19.74%
(31/157)*10
0
=19.74%
(32/157)*10
0
=20.38%
(32/157)*10
0
=20.38%
(34/157)*10
0
=21.65%
(39/157)*10
0
=24.84%
(31/157)*10
0
=19.74%
(49/157)*10
0
=31.21%
(37/157)*10
0
=23.56%
(40/157)*10
0
=25.47%
(46/157)*10
0
=29.29%
(64/157)*10
0
=40.76%
(72/157)*10
0
=45.85%
(48/157)*10
0
=30.57%
(53/157)*10
0
=33.75%
(58/157)*10
0
=36.94%
(58/157)*10
0
=36.94%
(54/157)*10
0
=34.39%
(25/157)*100
=15.92%
(53/157)*100
=33.75%
(20/157)*100
=12.73%
(10/157)*100
=6.36%
(11/157)*100
=7.00%
(12/157)*100
=7.64%
(9/157)*100
=5.73%
(19/157)*100
=12.10%
(10/157)*100
=6.36%
(10/157)*100
=6.36%
Result
a) Out of 22 questions, 17 questions are answered with option 4 i.e. AGREE.
b) 47.77% executives agree that performance commitments has direct impact on their career
advancement.
c) 35.66% executives agree that feedbacks are taken at the end of the performance cycle
regularly.
d) 28.02% executives disagree that nomination requires career goals and performance gaps.
e) 40.12% executives agree that queries are answered by HR.
f) 31.21% executives do not know that there is regular documentation of individuals
work.
g) 27.38% executives disagree that changes after normalization is explain by managers.
h) 26.11% executives disagree that there is transparency between PMS marks and actual
i)
j)
k)
l)
m)
n)
o)
performance.
34.39% executives agree that manager takes action against poor performance.
35.03% executives agree that there is significant impact of performance on rewards.
30.57% executives agree that performance gaps is effectively explain by the manager.
42.67% executives agree that HR helps in understanding the PACE process.
33.75% executives agree that manager helps employees to achieve their target/best.
54.15% executives agree that KPAs are set at the beginning of performance cycle.
40.76% executives agree that managers helps employees to know how their work
Conclusion
a) PMS of NTPC Ltd can be easily studied.
b) From the above analysis it is clearly seen that there is positive response of executives for
PMS. As out of 22, 17 questions are answered as AGREE(response 4) which clearly
shows that executives are satisfied by the Performance Management System of NTPC,
Ltd.
Recommendations
From the above analysis it is clearly seen that:a) Executives disagree for question no-3,6,7,15. Proper action should be taken against these
feedbacks from the executives, so that these problems can be resolved.
b) Nomination of employees to any training should involve career goals and performance
gaps.
c) Any changes after normalization should be clearly explain by the manager.
d) There should be transparency between PMS marks and actual performance.
e) For better understanding of PMS, regular training and reading material should be
provided by HR to employees.
f) Executives neither agree nor disagree that whether individuals work is regularly
documented or not which can be referred during performance appraisal, so proper action
should be taken by management to resolve this issue.
REFERENCES
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)