Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Capital Program addresses New Castle Countys needs relating to the acquisition, expansion, and
rehabilitation of long-lived facilities and systems. Because of the length of time required to plan, design, and
construct the various projects, the Capital Program encompasses historic and anticipated future costs for each
project. Specifically identified are the anticipated costs for the current fiscal year (the Capital Budget), and each of
the five succeeding fiscal years. These six years, coupled with the historic costs and anticipated costs to be incurred
in the seventh and subsequent years, provide the total estimated cost of each project.
This long-term cost projection, along with the reviews and controls set forth herein, enable the County to
identify, prioritize and forecast the financial impact (capital and operating) on both a project and Countywide basis.
Appropriations are legislated at the project level and continue through the life of the project. Project charges
are limited to the cumulative available appropriation. All amendments to appropriations must be approved by the
Council through an ordinance and resolution.
The following pages of the Capital Budget Section include graphic comparisons of the six-year Capital
Program, detailed project descriptions including the impact on the operating budget, and the relationship between
the Capital projects and Operating Budget. In all cases, in conformance with Key Financial Policy #5 (see Policy
Initiatives Section, Page 49), each agency shall submit a three-year operating budget impact for personnel service
costs, other operating expenses and debt service costs with each project request submitted.
Claymont Library
205
The New Castle County Reorganization Act requires that the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) annually
prepare a Capital Program and Budget under the direction of the County Executive. In Fiscal 1989 the Budget
Office within the Office of Finance became the principal agency responsible for assisting the CAO in the
coordination and preparation of the Capital Program and Budget.
The basic purpose of a Capital Improvements Program is to coordinate physical and fiscal planning in order
that maximum benefits may be realized from the Countys financial resources. Through capital programming, a
hierarchy of desired public improvements is established by
assigning a needs priority to each project. This ranking is then
related to the Countys ability to pay for them. By this process,
a schedule of needed and affordable capital improvements or a
capital program is created.
No later than the first day of April of each year, the
County Executive shall recommend to the County Council, a
Capital Program for the ensuing six years and a Capital Budget
for the ensuing year. No later than the date that the program is
submitted to County Council, the County Executive shall
submit it to the Department of Land Use for its review and
recommendations to County Council. The County Executive
shall also submit it to the Planning Board for the sole purpose of determining if it is in accordance with the
Comprehensive Development Plan.
No later than the first day of June of each year the County Council is required to approve a Capital Program
and adopt a Capital Budget. The program shall detail each capital project. Each project shall show the amount of
appropriations that have been expended or are to be expended and the funding sources for each of the fiscal years
presented in the program. The Capital Budget Ordinance shall show in detail the capital expenditures to be made
or incurred in accordance with the Capital Program.
County Council may not amend the Capital Program as submitted to it by the County Executive, until it has
received from the County Executive his recommendations with respect to the proposed amendment. County
Council shall not be bound by such recommendations and may act without them if they are not received within 15
days from the date they are requested.
206
doption of the Capital Budget represents an appropriation of funds for the fiscal year. These funds are
appropriated vis--vis the annual capital budget ordinance. After County Council adoption, project
appropriations are budgeted in the appropriate capital projects funds for spending. Capital project numbers are
approved at this time to account for the individual project expenditures. Carryover funding does not have to be
reappropriated in the current budget in accordance with State Code. Such appropriations are cumulative from
year-to-year until the project is completed, abandoned, or sunset.
Other positive consequences that result from the Capital Program and Budget process include:
207
o provide guidance in the preparation of the Capital Budget and Program requests, the policy sets were
developed. They are intended to define some of the criteria which may be utilized in the evaluation,
recommendation and adoption processes.
Selected criteria utilized in evaluating the Capital Budget and Program in its entirety include:
Maintenance or improvement of the ratio of debt service to the total operating budget.
Protection of the Countys investment in existing facilities to avoid the higher cost of
rehabilitation and/or replacement associated with deferment.
Authorization of new projects is dependent upon need, and each departments ability to complete
prior authorized projects.
208
GUIDELINES
While maximization of intergovernmental funding (Federal, State, Municipal and private) has always been
policy at New Castle County, issuing General Obligation Bonds is the major source of funding for capital
improvements in the approved Capital Budget and Program.
$48,625,000
0
State
3,356,000
General
4,075,000
Impact Fees
64,000
Other
2,266,000
Total
$58,386,000
Operating Budget
Replacement of County sewer vehicles, specialized sewer equipment, capital improvements and purchases of
equipment are included in the operating budget on a pay-as-you-go basis. The Countys FY 2015 Operating
Budget also provides for debt service and operating expenses associated with the capital projects included in the
Capital Budget and Program.
209
210
Amount
$218,264.36
169,706.66
(3,608.00)
$384,363.02
Amount
$89,936.16
72,361.86
(149,758.17)
$12,539.85
Amount
$35,947.91
5,860.14
(77.00)
$41,731.05
Amount
$28,425.30
37,314.78
(50,682.00)
$15,058.08
Amount
$0.00
0.00
0.00
$0.00
Amount
$779,967.21
441,084.20
(486,907.43)
$734,143.98
Amount
Balance 6/30/2013
Revenue
Expenditures
Balance 6/30/2014
$352,027.38
83,090.90
0.00
$435,118.28
Amount
Balance 6/30/2013
Revenue
Expenditures
Balance 6/30/2014
$64,410.08
35,003.83
0.00
$99,413.91
$7,229.89
1,734.38
0.00
$8,964.27
Amount
Amount
$16,989.86
15,606.76
0.00
$32,596.62
Amount
$1,119,733.10
407,699.62
(67,333.06)
$1,460,099.66
Amount
$181,629.45
121,678.74
(251,232.00)
$52,076.19
The Operating Budget is directly impacted by the approval of the Capital Budget and its Capital Project
components. The Operating Budget must absorb the debt service costs of all bond issues related to the Capital
Budget plus the operating/maintenance costs for each facility and improvement. Generally, these increased costs
for personnel services and contractual services must be borne by the tax and sewer rates. This years debt service
costs included in the Operating Budget consist of $20,452,624, for the General Fund and $18,974,845 for the
Sewer Fund. This includes the $2,194,506 Revolving Fund Loan payable to the State of Delaware for Sewer and
Stormwater projects. These costs are associated with capital projects approved in prior years.
Additionally, the Operating Budget is impacted by the operating/maintenance costs associated with each
facility or improvement. Operating expenses are anticipated to increase in the amount of $4,037,516 upon
completion of the capital projects included in the FY 2015 Capital Budget only. To assist with the measurement
focus, quantifying these operating costs, a series of standards were developed for each facility, ball field, parkland,
etc. Some of these examples are as follows:
Although many projects cause an increase in operating expenses, there are some projects such as the
backwater valve project that can provide a positive impact on the operating budget. The installation of backwater
valves on sewer lines in flood prone areas will not only save constituents from sewer backups, but will save
County personnel costs associated with the required clean up after flooding occurs.
A schedule of the annual Operating Budget impact of the Fiscal Year 2015 Capital Budget only is included on
the following page.
Carousel Park
211
Appropriations
Personnel
Service
Costs
Special Services
Community Services
Public Safety
Administration
$36,227,000
12,921,000
5,624,000
3,614,000
$21,190
0
0
0
$4,750
0
0
0
$2,594,221
800,250
413,841
203,264
$2,620,161
800,250
413,841
203,264
Total
$58,386,000
$21,190
$4,750
$4,011,576
$4,037,516
Department
Other
Operating
Costs
Debt
Service
Costs
Total
Measurement of the FY 2015 Capital Budget impact upon the Annual Operating Budget by fund is presented
below:
General Fund
Sewer Fund
See the Departmental Profiles for a discussion of the individual capital project impact upon the Operating
Budget.
212
A Long-Range component - The New Castle County updated Comprehensive Development Plan
(20-25 years).
A Short-Range component - The Annual Capital Budget and the Annual Profile (1 year).
Long-Range
The Comprehensive Development Plan (the long-range element) is not an end-state plan, but a component
of a planning process, (i.e., a generalized model of the future which expresses policy direction for a 20-25 year
period). It contains background information, a land use concept map, implementation considerations, and goals
and policies with which to address the following issues:
Growth Management
Natural Resources
Transportation
Housing
Agriculture
Economic Development
Community Facilities
Intergovernmental Coordination
While the goals and policies must, of necessity, be pursued individually and in concert with the agencies
(Federal, State, and Municipal) and County departments responsible for implementing them, the overall
planning process synthesizes and coordinates them. The development of specific objectives are the results of
more detailed analyses (long-range, mid-range and short-range issues) prepared by each County operating
department.
213
Linkage (Continued)
Mid-Range
As a result of system-wide changes identified by the annual profiles and the analysis of the probable impacts
of those changes, the mid-range program can be updated in terms of trends, goals and policies, capital projects,
and implementation programs within the context of the long-range issues.
One of the basic purposes of capital improvement programming is to coordinate physical and fiscal planning
in order that the greatest possible benefits can be realized from the Countys existing and anticipated financial
resources. In order to accomplish this, a ranking of desired public improvements is established by assigning a
need-based priority to each project. This ranking is then related to the Countys ability to pay for the projects over
time. By this procedure, a prioritized sequence of projects (the program itself) is established.
Other positive results of the Capital Program process include:
The possibility of guiding private development so that it occurs in a way that is in conformity with
the Comprehensive Development Plan.
The coordination of the capital projects of all County departments so that they will further the
implementation of the Comprehensive Development Plan.
Enabling the County Executive and the County Council to better understand long-term cash needs
and better plan the financing necessary for both capital and operating activities.
Short-Range
One element of the short-range component of the planning process is the annual profile which is the
culmination of the previous years monitoring of demographic data, developmental trends, changing regulatory
and environmental conditions, and the impact of all these factors on future programs. This analysis provides the
basis for the next years plan of action primarily as will be embodied in the Capital Budget.
The Annual Profile, then, serves three basic purposes:
P
214
Linkage (Continued)
P
Provides an update, via the modification of objectives, to the mid-range component of the planning
process, and hence, to the long-range component thus completing the cycle.
Summary
Linkage between the Comprehensive Development Planning process and the Capital Program and Budget is
accomplished with general policies or strategies which are utilized in developing the Capital Program:
*
Maintenance or improvement of the ratio of debt service to the total Operating Budget, with the life of
specific issues paralleling the life (10-year minimum) of respective assets ($15,000 minimum),
utilizing the analytical tool of constant principal repayment.
Maximization of intergovernmental funding (Federal, State, Municipal and private) of activities which
are in conformance with New Castle Countys Comprehensive Development Plan.
Protection of the Countys investment in existing facilities, where appropriate, to avoid the higher cost
of rehabilitation and/or replacement associated with deferment.
Authorization of new projects only as consistent with each departments ability to complete prior
authorized projects.
Utilization (where appropriate) of user fees as a revenue source to offset (in full or in part) the
operating and debt service expenses resulting from capital projects when completed.
Promotion of economic development and its inherent contributions (leverage; private sector
investment; expansion of existing job market).
The continuous refinement of goals and policies in order to address change and provide direction to
fiscal and development-related decisions.
Ensuring the interrelationship of capital programming and budgeting with the Comprehensive
Development Plan.
Ensuring the Capital Program and Budget are in conformity with the State of Delawares Quality of
Life legislation.
215
During the fiscal year, the Chief Financial Officer and members of the Budget Office meet quarterly with
Departments, to review and monitor the status of all approved capital projects and programmed capital projects. A
status report summary of all capital projects is issued at the end of each review forum. The quarterly review is held
with each County agency that has authorized capital projects or programmed capital projects to determine:
Financial liquidity
Conformance with the Countys Comprehensive Development Plan and, if applicable, the agencys
Comprehensive Plan
Project acceptability
Fiscal planning
The table on Page 212 presents the impact of the FY 2015 Capital Budget upon the annual Operating Budget.
216
FY 2015
Capital Budget
Department
Special Services
Sewer/Stormwater
Facilities/Equipment
Parks
$20,155,000
6,283,000
9,789,000
$36,227,000
Community Services
$12,921,000
Administration
$3,614,000
Public Safety
$5,624,000
$58,386,000
Funding
Bonds
Federal
State
General
Impact
Other
Total All Funding
$48,625,000
0
3,356,000
4,075,000
64,000
2,266,000
$58,386,000
217
Capital Budget
By Department/Program and Funding Source
Fiscal Year 2015
Uses of Funds
Facilities/Equipment
$6,283,000
Community Services
$12,921,000
Public Safety
$5,624,000
Administration
$3,614,000
Parks
$9,789,000
Sewer
$20,155,000
Other
Impact
State
General
$2,266,000
$64,000
$3,356,000
$4,075,000
TOTAL
$58,386,000
Bonds
$48,625,000
Sources of Funds
218
M
Total Budget
BUDGET
Department/Source of Funds
& Program
Complete
Cost
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
$36,227
$43,382
$40,877
$38,632
$33,428
$26,476
$49,250
$268,272
12,921
11,288
24,209
Public Safety
5,624
12,583
3,869
119
22,195
Administration
3,614
3,255
2,145
1,849
1,849
1,849
14,561
$58,386
$70,508
$46,891
$40,600
$35,277
$28,325
$49,250
$329,237
Bonds
$48,625
$51,019
$39,967
$32,562
$27,518
$21,418
$49,250
$270,359
Special Services
Community Services
Federal
2020
Bal. to
600
600
State
3,356
11,547
14,903
General Fund
4,075
4,181
4,529
5,173
5,138
4,970
28,066
64
32
96
2,266
3,219
2,395
2,865
2,621
1,937
15,213
$58,386
$70,508
$46,891
$40,600
$35,277
$28,325
$49,250
$329,237
Impact Fees
Other
219
FY 2016
FY 2015
Administration
6.0%
Public Safety
18.0%
Public Safety
10.0%
Community
Services
22.0%
Special
Services
62.0%
Administration
4.0%
Special
Services
62.0%
Community
Services
16.0%
Total
$70,508,000
Total
$58,386,000
FY 2018
FY 2017
Administration
5.0%
Public Safety
8.0%
Public Safety
0.3%
Administration
4.5%
Special Services
95.2%
Special Services
87.0%
Total
$40,600,000
Total
$46,891,000
FY 2020
FY 2019
Administration
5.0%
Special Services
95.0%
Total
$35,277,000
220
Administration
7.0%
Special Services
93.0%
Total
$28,325,000
$50.0
$51.1
$47.3
$44.4
$44.8
$40.0
$40.3
$35.2
$30.0
$20.0
$10.0
$0.0
2009
Executive
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
Estimated
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.5
29.8
30.9
37.4
29.3
32.3
Facilities/Equipment
3.2
2.5
6.5
4.8
1.0
5.1
Parks
3.1
0.9
2.0
3.8
1.5
2.2
Information Systems
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.6
1.0
2.2
Public Safety
1.8
0.3
0.3
0.4
1.1
2.7
Community Services
6.3
0.5
4.0
3.1
10.5
2.8
Sewer/Stormwater
221
DEPARTMENTAL PROFILES
Department of Special Services
Sanitary Sewer & Stormwater Management
County Waterfarm.
222
Available Appropriations
as of 2/28/14
$72.9 million
Recommended FY 2015
Capital Appropriations
$20.2 million
$36.0
$30.0
$24.0
,
,
$18.0
Approved FY 2015
Capital Appropriations
$20.2 million
$12.0
$6.0
$0.0
09
10
11
12
13
Fiscal Year
14
Estimated
223
Budget
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
$0
100
2,000
$0
100
4,250
300
2,000
300
500
1,500
1,000
1,000
525
Program
FY2018
FY2019
$0
100
4,250
500
$0
100
3,000
500
500
500
1,500
1,000
1,000
550
500
500
1,500
1,000
1,000
575
1,500
1,500
FY2020
Balance to
Complete
Sanitary Sewers
$500
Asset Management
Backwater Valve Improvements
1,500
Brandywine Hundred North Rehabilitation Phase I
Brandywine Hundred North Rehabilitation Phase II
1,500
Brandywine Hundred South Rehabilitation Phase I
Brandywine Hundred South Rehabilitation Phase II
1,750
Christiana River Force Main
Countywide Manhole Rehabilitation
1,000
Countywide Trenchless Rehab
500
DelDot Coordination Project II
475
General Sewer Improvement
250
Glasgow Area Sewer Improvements
Kirkwood Trunk Line Interceptor
1,500
Little Mill Basin Rehabilitation
Mill Creek Interceptor Relief
MOT Area Maintenance Base
North Delaware Interceptor System
1,000
Pike Creek Improvements
900
Pump Station Rehabilitation
1,337
Sewer Fleet Equipment
1,500
Sewer Repairs and Rehabilitation II
2,000
South Christiana Interceptor Analysis
400
Southern Sewer Service Area
2,000
Special Services Complex
1,300
Water Farm #1 Improvements
50
Wastewater Treatment Plants/Discharge Elim.
White Clay Sewer Basin Rehabilitation
$19,462
Total Sanitary Sewers
2,500
500
1,500
1,000
1,000
500
1,000
1,000
1,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
$0
100
$0
500
1,000
1,000
1,000
600
500
4,000
1,500
500
5,900
1,000
900
1,536
1,500
2,500
400
1,000
900
1,902
1,500
3,000
400
1,000
900
2,372
1,500
4,500
400
900
2,528
1,500
3,000
1,150
$23,586
50
1,000
$23,727
1,000
$23,572
3,500
$21,603
4,000
$14,944
10,500
$48,950
$93
180
600
$873
$93
180
600
$873
$93
180
600
$873
$0
$0
900
1,844
1,500
2,500
26,550
Stormwater Management
General Stormwater Improvements
New Castle Conservation District
Stormwater Basin Renovations II
Total Stormwater Management
TOTAL SEWER AND STORMWATER
$93
$93
600
$693
600
$693
$93
180
600
$873
$20,155
$24,279
$24,600
$24,445
$22,476
$15,817
$48,950
$18,325
$22,250
$22,205
$21,580
$19,855
$13,880
$48,950
1,830
$20,155
2,029
$24,279
2,395
$24,600
2,865
$24,445
2,621
$22,476
1,937
$15,817
$48,950
FUNDING SOURCES
Bonds
Federal
State
Other
Total Funding Sources
224
Category/Project
SEWER
Sanitary Sewers
Asset Management
Brandywine Hundred North Rehab Phase I
Brandywine Hundred South Rehab Phase I
Christiana River Force Main
Countywide Trenchless Rehabilitation
DelDot Coordination Project II
General Sewer Improvements
General Stormwater Improvements
Glasgow Area Sewer Improvements
Little Mill Basin Rehabilitation
Pike Creek Improvements
Pump Station Rehabilitation
Sewer Fleet Equipment
Sewer Repairs & Rehabilitation II
South Christiana Interceptor Analysis
Southern Sewer Service Area
Special Services Complex
Stormater Basin Renovation II
Wastewater Treatment Plants/Discharge
Water Farm #1 Improvements
TOTAL SEWER
FY 2015
Budget
$500,000
1,500,000
1,500,000
1,750,000
1,000,000
500,000
475,000
93,000
250,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
900,000
1,337,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
400,000
2,000,000
600,000
50,000
1,300,000
$0
$20,155,000
$0
$0
$41,250
123,750
123,750
144,375
82,500
41,250
39,187
165,000
49,500
4,125
107,250
$41,250
123,750
123,750
144,375
82,500
41,250
39,187
*
20,625
123,750
82,500
74,250
*
123,750
165,000
**
165,000
49,500
4,125
107,250
$1,511,812
$1,511,812
20,625
123,750
82,500
74,250
123,750
165,000
$0
Total
*Sewer Fund
**Capital Recovery Fee
225
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
226
Council District:
2, 8
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
2, 8
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
2, 8
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
2, 8
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
227
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
228
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
11
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
229
Description:
Council District:
12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
230
Council District:
3, 9
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
231
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Sewer Fund.
Project Appropriations:
Description:
232
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
.
Council District:
6, 7, 11, 12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
6, 12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
233
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
234
Council District:
3, 9
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Sewer Fund.
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
235
$8.0
,
$6.0
$4.0
$2.0
,
$0.0
09
10
11
12
236
13
14
Estimated
Fiscal Year
Available Appropriations
Recommended FY 2015
Approved FY 2015
as of 2/28/2014
Capital Appropriations
Capital Appropriations
$8.2 million
$6.3 Million
$6.3 Million
(In Thousands)
Category/
Project
FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT
Budget
FY2015
FY2017
$1,000
3,464
400
100
$2,000
3,812
25
500
95
25
25
500
95
$6,283
Building Rehabilitation
Fleet Equipment
General Paving
General Roof Renovations
Government Center Parking Lot
Hazardous Substances & Asbestos Abatement
Inspection of Tanks Environmental Control
Security
Vehicle Lift System
Total Facilities/Equipment
$800
2,984
Program
FY2016
Balance to
FY2018
FY2019
$2,000
4,492
500
$2,000
4,457
FY2020
$2,000
4,289
500
Complete
$0
100
200
1,904
25
500
95
25
500
95
500
95
25
95
$5,609
$6,432
$7,612
$7,077
$6,909
$300
$3,299
$2,145
$2,620
$3,120
$2,620
$2,620
$300
2,984
3,464
3,812
4,492
4,457
4,289
$6,283
$5,609
$6,432
$7,612
$7,077
$6,909
FUNDING SOURCES
$300
The following pages include a schedule of projected operating expenses associated with projects included in the
FY 2015 Capital Budget and a brief profile of each project included in the FY 2015 Capital Budget and Program.
237
Category/Project
Personnel
Service
Costs
Other
Operating
Costs
Debt
Service
Costs
Total
FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT
Building Rehabilitation
Fleet Equipment
Government Center Parking Lot
Security
Vehicle Lift System
TOTAL FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT
$800,000
2,984,000
1,904,000
500,000
95,000
$0
$6,283,000
$0
$0
$0
$66,000
157,080
41,250
7,837
$66,000
*
157,080
41,250
7,837
$272,167
$272,167
238
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Purchase of heavy equipment, off road equipment and vehicles. Funds for these purchases will
come from the General Fund.
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Repaving at various County locations, including curbs, sidewalks and drainage repairs.
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
239
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
240
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
241
he Department of Special Services has responsibility for developing and maintaining over 7,000 acres of
parkland controlled by New Castle County. Land development projects must be consistent with the
departments Comprehensive Development Plan for expansion and development of existing and new parks/recreational
facilities. Land acquisition projects must also be in conformance with the departments Comprehensive Development Plan
to expand strategic land holdings for the preservation of natural areas and the development of district and regional parks,
as approved.
Although the County has received Federal funding assistance with land acquisition and development projects in
the past, the approved six-year Capital Program for parks does not include any Federal funding. Therefore, all
programmed park projects included in the FY 2015 Capital Program will be funded with General Obligation Bonds
of New Castle County.
In the FY 2015 Capital Budget, $8,704,000 has been authorized for continued improvements to New Castle
County regional parks, game courts, play areas and general parkland improvements.
The FY 2015 Capital Budget and Program includes funding for development of active recreation facilities.
District Park #5 has been programmed for $1,000,000 in FY 2016 through FY 2018. Parkland Acquisition has been
authorized for $500,000 in FY 2015 and
programmed for $10,826,000 in FY 2016 through
FY 2020. Game Court Improvements has been
authorized in the amount of $175,000 for FY 2015
and has been programmed for $175,000 per year in
FY 2016 through FY 2020. General Parkland has
been authorized for $350,000 in FY 2015 and
programmed for $350,000 in FY 2016 through FY
2020. The Delcastle Parking Renovations project
has been authorized to receive funding in the
amount of $1,300,000 in FY 2015. Greenway
Systems has been programmed for a total of
$2,500,000 in FY 2016 through FY 2020.
Maintenance Base Renovations has been
programmed in the amount of $900,000 in FY
2016 through FY 2020. Pavilion Renovations has
been authorized for $110,000 in FY 2015 and
programmed for a total amount of $725,000 FY
2016 through FY 2020. Play Area Improvements
has an authorization of $325,000 for FY 2015 and
Carousel Park
is programmed for $325,000 per year in FY 2016
through FY 2019 and $350,000 in FY 2020.
New Castle County regional parks will receive funding in the FY 2015 Capital Budget and Program. In the FY
2015 - FY 2020 Capital Program, Glasgow Regional Park has been programmed for $1,500,000 in FY 2017 and FY
2018. Glasgow Regional Park Hermitage has been authorized for $3,554,000 in FY 2015 and programmed for
$2,800,000 in FY 2016 and $1,395,000 in FY 2017. Southern Regional Park is programmed for $1,000,000 in FY
2016 and $500,000 in FY 2017. Carousel Park has been authorized for $1,500,000 in FY 2015 and $1,068,000 in
FY 2016 and Rockwood Park has been authorized for a total of $1,500,000 in FY 2015 through FY 2017.
Additional miscellaneous projects have been authorized for $110,000 in FY 2015 and programmed for $1,175,000 in
FY 2016 and FY 2020.
The following page includes a six-year expenditure activity graph for Parks.
242
The chart shown below is a six-year expenditure activity graph for Parks. Annotated below the chart is the
amount of available appropriations at February 28, 2014; the appropriations recommended and approved for FY
2015.
Parks
Expenditure Activity for 6 Years
Millions
$10.0
$8.0
$6.0
$4.0
,
,
$2.0
,
,
,
$0.0
09
10
11
12
13
14
Estimated
Fiscal Year
Available Appropriations
Recommended FY 2015
as of 2/28/2014
Capital Appropriations
$12.4 Million
$9.8 Million
Approved FY 2015
Capital Appropriations
$9.8 Million
243
Budget
FY2015
Program
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
Balance to
FY2019
FY2020
Complete
PARKS
Carousel Park
Delcastle Parking Renovations
District Park #5
Game Court Improvements
General Parkland Improvements
Glasgow Regional Park Hermitage
Glasgow Regional Park
Glasgow Regional Park Maint. Base
Greenway Systems
Land Acquisition
Maintenance Base Renovations
Middle Run Valley Reforestation
Multi-Purpose Athletic Fields
Parkland Acquisition
Pavilion Renovations
Play Area Improvements
Rockwood Park
Southern Regional Park
$1,500
1,300
$1,068
$0
$0
$0
$0
1,000
175
350
2,800
1,000
175
350
1,395
1,500
1,000
175
350
175
350
175
350
500
500
500
500
175
175
200
175
200
2,226
125
325
1,500
1,000
2,200
125
325
1,600
500
2,200
150
325
2,200
150
325
2,000
175
350
Total Parks
$9,789
$13,494
$9,845
$6,575
$3,875
$3,750
$0
Bonds
Federal
State
Other
$9,821
$13,494
$9,845
$6,575
$3,875
$3,750
$0
$9,789
$13,494
$9,845
$6,575
$3,875
$3,750
$0
175
350
3,554
1,500
(1,525)
500
110
325
2,000
500
500
1,500
175
250
$0
1,500
FUNDING SOURCES
(32)
The following pages include a schedule of projected operating expenses associated with projects in the FY 2015
Capital Budget and a brief profile of each project included in the FY 2015 Capital Budget and Program.
244
Category/Project
FY 2015
Budget
Personnel
Service
Costs
Other
Operating
Costs
$0
$0
1,955
600
19,235
4,150
$21,190
$4,750
Debt
Service
Costs
Total
PARKS
Carousel Park
Delcastle Parking Renovations
Game Court Improvements
General Parkland Improvements
Glasgow Regional Park Hermitage
Land Acquisition
Multi-Purpose Athletic Fields
Play Area Improvements
Parkland Acquisition
Pavilion Renovations
Rockwood Park
$1,500,000
1,300,000
175,000
350,000
3,554,000
1,500,000
(1,525,000)
325,000
500,000
110,000
2,000,000
TOTAL PARKS
$9,789,000
$123,750
107,250
14,437
28,875
293,205
123,750
(123,162)
26,812
41,250
9,075
165,000
$123,750
107,250
16,992
28,875
293,205
123,750
(123,162)
50,197
41,250
9,075
165,000
$810,242
$836,182
PARKS
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
245
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
246
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
11
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
11
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
247
Description:
Council District:
11
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
248
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
3, 9
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
249
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
250
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
6, 12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
251
Summer Camps
Special events
252
Library Facilities - Begin design and planning for the Route 9 Community Library. In
FY 2015, begin design and planning for
Southern Library in FY 2016.
Claymont Library
$10.0
$8.0
$6.0
,
$4.0
,
$2.0
$0.0
09
10
,
11
12
13
14
Estimated
Fiscal Year
Available Appropriations
Recommended FY 2015
Approved FY 2015
as of 2/28/2014
Capital Appropriations
Capital Appropriations
$13.4 Million
$12.9 Million
$12.9 Million
Budget
FY2015
Program
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
Balance to
FY2019
FY2020
Complete
LIBRARIES
Route 9 Community Library
Show Mobile
Southern Library
$12,761
160
Total Libraries
$12,921
$7,355
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,288
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$9,700
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
2,826
395
10,788
500
$12,921
$11,288
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
3,933
FUNDING SOURCES
253
Category/Project
Personnel
Service
Costs
Other
Operating
Costs
$0
$0
Debt
Service
Costs
Total
LIBRARIES
Bear Library
Claymont Library
$0
$21,780
(6,188)
$21,780
(6,188)*
12,761,000
771,458
771,458
160,000
13,200
13,200
$800,250
$800,250
$12,921,000
$0
$0
LIBRARIES
Description:
254
Council District:
4, 7, 12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
6, 12
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
255
256
Millions
Public Safety
Expenditure Activity for 6 Years
$4.0
$3.0
,
,
$2.0
$1.0
$0.0
09
10
11
12
13
14
Estimated
Fiscal Year
Available Appropriations
Recommended FY 2015
Approved FY 2015
as of 2/28/2014
Capital Appropriations
Capital Appropriations
$6.6 Million
$5.6 Million
$5.6 Million
Budget
FY2015
Program
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
Balance to
FY2019
FY2020
Complete
PUBLIC SAFETY
Computer System
Crime Fighting Platform
EMS Stations
Police Academy Renovations
Police Range
Public Safety Building Renovations
Public Safety Vest Protection Program
800 MgHZ Communications Equipment
Total Public Safety
$100
195
255
75
350
3,069
80
1,500
$5,624
$100
118
125
$0
119
$0
119
$0
$0
$0
8,400
2,300
40
1,500
$12,583
3,750
$3,869
$119
$0
$0
$0
$3,869
$119
$0
$0
$0
$3,869
$119
$0
$0
$0
FUNDING SOURCES
General Obligation Bonds
Federal
State
Other
Total Funding Sources
$5,016
471
137
$5,624
$10,592
600
759
632
$12,583
The following pages include a schedule of projected operating expenses associated with projects included in
the FY 2015 Capital Budget and a brief profile of each project included in the FY 2015 Capital Budget and
Capital Budget Summary
257
Category/Project
FY 2015
Budget
Personnel
Service
Costs
Other
Operating
Costs
$0
$0
Debt
Service
Costs
Total
PUBLIC SAFETY
Computer System
800 MgHZ Communications Equipment
Crime Fighting Platform
EMS Stations
$100,000
1,500,000
195,000
$0
123,750
10,085
$0*
123,750
10,085**
255,000
20,625
20,625***
75,000
6,188
6,188
235,193
253,193
350,000
***
3,069,000
80,000
$5,624,000
****
$0
$0
$413,841
$413,841
PUBLIC SAFETY
Description:
258
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
259
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
260
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Department of Administration
Finance
Human Resources
Law
Information Systems
Procurement
Central Services (mail, printing, records
management and storeroom)
Administration
Expenditure Activity for 6 Years
Available Appropriations
Millions
as of 2/28/2014
$4.0
$1.8 Million
$3.0
,
$2.0
,
,
Capital Appropriations
$3.6 Million
Recommended FY 2015
$1.0
Approved FY 2015
Capital Appropriations
$0.0
09
10
Fiscal Year
11
12
13
14
Estimated
$3.6 Million
261
Budget
Program
Balance to
FY2015
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019
FY2020
Complete
$3,204
410
$3,219
36
$2,109
36
$1,849
$1,849
$1,849
$0
Total Administration
$3,614
$3,255
$2,145
$1,849
$1,849
$1,849
$0
$2,464
681
$2,538
681
$1,428
681
$1,168
681
$1,168
681
$1,168
681
$0
59
410
36
36
$3,614
$3,255
$2,145
$1,849
$1,849
$1,849
$0
ADMINISTRATION
FUNDING SOURCES
Category/Project
FY 2015
Budget
Total
Administration
Information Systems Expansion
Technology Imp. Electronic Plan Review
$3,204,000
410,000
$0
$0
$203,264
$203,264
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
$3,614,000
$0
$0
$203,264
$203,264
*State Funding
**Tax Stabilization Reserve Account
262
ADMINISTRATION
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
Description:
Council District:
All
Funding Source:
Project Appropriations:
263
County Executive
Capital Budget & Program Profiles
The New Castle County Executive Office has one Capital Contingency Project. This project is budgeted to
meet increased costs of an authorized project. Generally this is done when increased costs are not in excess of
10%. When cost increases are excessive, a County ordinance is prepared to increase project appropriations.
Since expenditures are not recorded in the Contingency Projects, a six-year expenditure activity graph is not
presented. Annotated below is the amount of available appropriations as of February 28, 2014, and the FY 2015
Capital Program Summary for the County Executive.
264
Available Appropriations
Recommended FY 2015
Approved FY 2015
as of 2/28/2014
Capital Appropriations
Capital Appropriations
$0.9 Million
$0.0 Million
$0.0 million