Professional Documents
Culture Documents
in experimental
experimental
and
control
respectively,
group.
group
SBP
was
was
87.75
132.45
and
and
86.6
129.8
determine
experimental
To
group.
To
compare
post
experimental
patients
between
and
probability
technique.
with
chest
purposive
surgery
sampling
post
group.
The
intervention
pre
mean
and
score
post
of
chest surgery.
Introduction:
Pain is a complex,
multifaceted
It
is an individual,
phenomenon.
unique
experience
Title:
difficult
for
others
to
recognize,
with
city.
chest
surgery
in
and
increased
costs.
Non
pharmacologic
3. To compare
post
changes on post-
operative pain of
surgery
experimental and
control group.
intervention
between
experimental group.
demographic
interview
schedule,
Assumptions:
profile,
0.94
undergone
and
biophysiological
parameter
chest surgery.
Research methodology:
analgesic.
55
100
No. of subjects (in %)
90
80
65
70
60
50
35
40
30
20
10
0
No pain
Mild pain
Moderate
pain
Severe pain
Worst
possible
pain
Pre intervention %
Post intervention %
Figure: Bar diagram showing pre and post intervention pain intensity in experimental group.
Distribution of pain scores and biophysiological parameters observed in the pre intervention phase in both
groups:
The pre intervention data of pain measured with Numerical Rating Scale, the mean score
of pain in control group and experimental group were 7.25 and 7.85 respectively in the pre intervention
phase. It reveals that there is statistical significance difference before intervention in both groups.
In pre intervention phase the mean score of heart rate in control and experimental group was 87.75 and
86.6 respectively, the mean score of respiratory rate in control and experimental group was 18.7 and
19.45 respectively, the mean score of systolic blood pressure in control and experimental group was
132.45 and 129.8 respectively and the mean score of diastolic blood pressure in control and experimental
was 89.5 and 87.1 respectively. It indicates that the mean score of heart rate, systolic blood pressure and
diastolic blood pressure is more in control group and the mean score of respiratory rate is more in
experimental group.
56
Median pain
6
5
3.83
0
Pre intervention
Post intervention
Pain by NRS
Figure: Bar diagram showing pre and post intervention data of pain by Numerical Rating Scale and
biophysiological parameters in experimental group.
Comparison of pre and post intervention changes on post operative pain of patients with chest surgery in
experimental group:
The pre and post intervention mean score of pain in experimental group was 7.85 and
3.892 respectively. The pre and post intervention mean score of biophysiological parameters in
experimental group was 6.25 and 4.6 respectively. It reveals that there is significant decrease in pain and
biophysiological parameters in experimental group after intervention. The p value of pain was p = 0.000**
and biophysiological parameters was p = 0.004** is less than reasonable choice i.e. less than 0.01 at 1%
level of significance. It reveals that foot and hand massage intervention is highly significant in reduction of
pain of patients with chest surgery in experimental group.
57
Median
6.375
6
4
3.833
Control
Experimental
2
0
Pre
Post
Pre
Pain by NRS
post
Biophysiological
Parameters
Figure: Bar diagram showing pre and post intervention pain and biophysiological parameters in control
and experimental group.
Comparison of post operative pain of patients
References
1. Ananth
group:
S. Health
Forum
2007:
Survey
in
pain
intensity
and
biophysiological
of
Hospitals:
Summary
of
2008.
Massage
[PubMed]
for
low-back
pin. Cochrane
Conclusion:
preliminary
study
in
men. J
Surg. 2003;197
58
Am
Coll