Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Verma
Manish meena
MBA(General)
Section B
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Apart from our efforts, the success of this work depends largely on the
encouragement and guidelines of many others. We take this opportunity to express
our gratitude to the people who have been instrumental in the successful
completion of this work. We are thankful for their aspiring guidance, invaluably
constructive criticism and friendly advice during the assignment work.
We are highly indebted to UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL, CHANDIGARH for
giving us an opportunity to carry out our assignment on FINANCIAL CRISIS AND
ITS IMPACT at their esteemed organization. We would like to show our greatest
appreciation to DR. TILAK RAJ, for giving us time and guidance, without whom it
would have been impossible to attain success. We would also like to thank the
people who provided us with the facilities for the assignment like the library staff.
This assignment would not have been a success without the help of all the people
mentioned above.
We would also like to thank each other as team members as we worked together
and our combined efforts lead to the completion of the project.
Akash Verma
Manish Meena
Page 2
Table of Contents
Introduction
Literature Review
Origin
5
6
Conclusion 1
Bibliography
Page 3
SUMMARY
This report is a fruit of thorough research on the subject of Subprime mortgage
crisis of 2008. Illustrations, charts, figures, data, tables and references that are
used in this report will help us to construe whether the financial crisis of 2008 could
have been averted or was it inevitable.
All the significant changes that occurred in the US economy due to the financial
crisis of 2008 have been incorporated in this report .
The report comprises of the causes and impacts of financial crisis of 2008 on the
economy of the Europe and India. All these issues have been stated section-wise for
its easy identification and indexing.
The study is based on diverse source materials consisting mainly of text books,
articles, records of various Commissions and Committees, journals and the visual
media.
Figures have been also included in order to explain the effects of financial crisis on
the employment rate, GDP growth, Global trade level and housing price graph pre
and post this financial fiasco.
We are thus confident to present this report. We have been immensely benefitted
by the work of various economists in this area.
Page 4
INTRODUCTION
In 2008, the world economy faced its most dangerous crisis, since the Great Depression of the
1930s. The contagion, which began in 2007 when sky-high home prices in the United States
finally turned decisively downward, spread quickly, first to the entire U.S. financial sector and
then to financial markets overseas. The casualties in the United States included :a) the entire investment banking industry
b) the biggest insurance company
c) the two enterprises chartered by the government to facilitate mortgage lending
d) the largest mortgage lender
e) the largest savings and loan
f) two of the largest commercial banks.
The carnage was not limited to the financial sector, however, as companies that normally rely on
credit suffered heavily. The American auto industry, which pleaded for a federal bailout, found
itself at the edge of an abyss. Still more ominously, banks, trusting no one to pay them back,
simply stopped making the loans that most businesses need to regulate their cash flows and
without which they cannot do business. Share prices plunged throughout the worldthe Dow
Jones Industrial Average in the U.S. lost 33.8% of its value in 2008and by the end of the year,
a deep recession had enveloped most of the globe. In December the National Bureau of
Economic Research, the private group recognized as the official arbiter of such things,
determined that a recession had begun in the United States in December 2007, which made this
already the third longest recession in the U.S. since World War II.
Each in its own way, economies abroad marched to the American drummer. By the end of the
year, Germany, Japan, and China were locked in recession, as were many smaller countries.
Many in Europe paid the price for having dabbled in American real estate securities. Japan and
China largely avoided that pitfall, but their export-oriented manufacturers suffered as recessions
in their major marketsthe U.S. and Europecut deep into demand for their products. Lessdeveloped countries likewise lost markets abroad, and their foreign investment, on which they
had depended for growth capital, withered. With none of the biggest economies prospering, there
Page 5
was no obvious engine to pull the world out of its recession, and both government and private
economists predicted a rough recovery.
LITERATURE REVIEW
DEFINITIONS OF CONCEPTS INVOLVED
Securitization
The process through which an issuer creates a financial instrument by combining other financial
assets and then marketing different tiers of the repackaged instruments to investors. The process
can encompass any type of financial asset and promotes liquidity in the marketplace.
Mortgage-backed securities are a perfect example of securitization. By combining mortgages
into one large pool, the issuer can divide the large pool into smaller pieces based on each
individual mortgage's inherent risk of default and then sell those smaller pieces to investors.
The process creates liquidity by enabling smaller investors to purchase shares in a larger asset
pool. Using the mortgage-backed security example, individual retail investors are able to
purchase portions of a mortgage as a type of bond.
Subprime Mortgage
A type of mortgage that is normally made out to borrowers with lower credit ratings. As a result
of the borrower's lowered credit rating, a conventional mortgage is not offered because the lender
views the borrower as having a larger-than-average risk of defaulting on the loan. Lending
institutions often charge interest on subprime mortgages at a rate that is higher than a
conventional mortgage in order to compensate themselves for carrying more risk.
Borrowers with credit ratings below 600 often will be stuck with subprime mortgages and the
higher interest rates that go with those mortgages. Making late bill payments or declaring
personal bankruptcy could very well land borrowers in a situation where they can only qualify
for a subprime mortgage. Therefore, it is often useful for people with low credit scores to wait
for a period of time and build up their scores before applying for mortgages to ensure they are
eligible for a conventional mortgage.
Bailout package
Page 6
OBJECTIVE
The study was conducted keeping in mind the following two broad objectives:1. To study the causes and consequences of financial crisis of 2008.
2. To research what should we do in order to prevent it from happening again.
ORIGIN
What is the credit crisis?
It is a worldwide financial fiasco involving terms you have probably heard like subprime
mortgages, collateralized debt obligations, frozen credit markets and credit default swaps.
Who is affected by this credit crisis?
It is everyone, here is how. The credit crisis brings two types of people together- homeowners
and investors. Homeowners represented mortgages and investors represent their money. These
mortgages represent houses and money represented the large institutions like pension funds
insurance company sovereign funds etc.
These groups are brought together through the financial systems that is a bunch of banks and
brokers which are commonly known as the Wall Street. Well it may not seem like this but these
banks on the Wall Street are connected to the houses on the main street. Let us understand how
and in order to understand how let's start from the beginning.
Page 7
Many years ago investors were sitting on their pile of money looking for investment so that they
can earn more money. Traditionally, they will go to the US Federal Reserve where they will buy
the treasury bills. But in the wake of the dot-com bubble in the late nineties the US federal
chairman Alan Greenspan lowered the interest rates to 1 % in order to keep the economy strong.
1 % is a very low return on investment, so that's why the investor didn't invest in US treasury
bills. On the other hand, the banks on Wall Street can borrow from the Federal Reserve at the
rate of just 1 % and it was supplemented by additional surpluses from Japan, China and Middle
East so there was an abundance of cheap credit which made borrowing money easy for bank
which made them go easy with leverage.
What is leverage?
Leverage is borrowing money to amplify the outcome of a deal. For example in a normal deal
someone with 10000 dollar will buy up box worth 10,000 dollar and he will sell it to someone
else at let's suppose 11000 dollar making a profit of 1000 dollar which is a good deal. But using
leverage, someone with 10000 dollars would go borrow 9,90,000 dollars which will give him 1
million dollars in hand then he goes and buys 100 boxes with 1 million dollars and sells it to
someone else for 1,100,000 dollars then he pays back his 9,90,000 dollars + 10000 dollars
interest. And after subtracting his initial 10000 dollars he is left with 90,000 dollars. This is
phenomenal as compared to the first case in which the profit was 1000 dollars. Thus leverage
turns good deals into great deals.
This is the major way why the banks make the money so that Wall Street takes out at ton of
credit from the banks. Wall Street then makes a great deal and grows tremendously rich and then
it pays it back. The investors too want to join in and make huge profits. In this case, Wall Street
gets an idea that they can connect investors to the homeowners through mortgage risk.
Page 8
and by myriad such mortgages and combines them into a box. This box means the combined
mortgages of all the issues. This means that the investment banker will get money regularly from
the family as the down payment. This box is then converted into a financial instrument called
collateralized debt obligation and rated into three categories safe, ok and risky.
Here risky means that you will get a higher rate of return whereas the safe will receive low
return, but still it will be better than the US federals return and the bank insures this safe slice
for small fees called credit default swap. The credit agencies rate the safe as AAA. This is the
safest rating present. Ok is rated as BBB which is moderately good. But the credit agencies do
not bother to rate the risky ones. The investment bankers sell the safe slice to the investors who
want to invest in a safe investment.
The risky one is sold to the hedge funds and other risk takers. The investment banker makes
millions and then repays his loans. Finally, the investor has found a better investment than the
Federal Reserve investments. So, in greed they want more CDO slices so the investment banker
calls the lender wanting more mortgages. The lender call up the broker asking him to bring more
homeowners but the broker cant find anyone. Everyone who qualifies for the mortgages already
has one. Now they come up with an idea, when the homeowners default on the mortgages the
house becomes the property of the lenders and as the house rates are always going up this makes
them believe that they are covered to take more risk. So, the lender starts adding risk to the new
mortgages.
Since they are covered if the homeowner defaults lenders can start adding risk to new mortgages
by providing loans to people who cannot afford down payment, have no proof of income and no
documents at all. These loans were basically called NINA loans i.e. no income no asset loans.
That's exactly what that happened. So, instead of lending to the responsible homeowners call
prime mortgages they started lending to somewhat irresponsible homeowners called subprime
mortgages. This was the turning point. So just like always a mortgage broker connect the family
to the lender, Family buys a big house. The lender sells the mortgages to investment banker and
University Business School
Page 9
he turns it into a CDO and sells slices to the investor and others. This actually works out nicely
for everyone and makes them all rich. No one was worried because as soon as the mortgages
were sold to the next link in the chain it was not their problem. If the homeowners were to
default, it was not lenders problem as they have passed on the risk to the investment bankers.
Not surprisingly the homeowners started defaulting on the loans. This means that the banker
forecloses one of his monthly payments and it turns it into a house. He puts it up for sale. But
when more people started defaulting on the mortgages, more and more of his down payment
started getting converting into the houses. Now there were so many houses on the market that
supply exceeded demand. Eventually house prices started plummeting. As it can be seen in the
graph that house prices were on a rise since 1900, but in around 2008 the prices eventually took
a downward turn.
This created an interesting problem for responsible homeowners who were still paying the down
payment. As all the houses in the neighborhood went up for sale the value of even their houses
went down and they started to wonder why they were paying higher mortgages for an
undervalued asset. They decided that it doesn't make sense to keep paying even though they can
afford to pay the down payment of their house. The situation became disastrous as both prime
and subprime mortgages started defaulting and prices plummeted even more now. The
investment banker is holding onto the CDO which is nothing but worthless houses. He calls up
his party, the investor, to buy CDO but the investor is not stupid. The investor declines the offer.
The banker tries to sell it to everyone but everyone declines the offer. The situation becomes
worse because the banker has borrowed a lot of money to buy these CDOs and he cannot pay
them back. But he was not the only one as the investors have already bought thousands of CDOs.
Lender calls the banker trying to sell his mortgages but the banker wont foot the bill. And the
broker is out of work. Whole financial system is frozen and situation becomes dark. All of them
started going bankrupt the, homeowners whose house was nothing worth they paid for, the lender
University Business School
Page 10
who was holding onto thousands of mortgages could not bear the losses, the investment bankers
who had bought the mortgages were converted into houses which were worth less and the
investors who had bought bonds in the form of CDOs which won't give them any return. Thus
the whole financial system was on the verge of collapse and the GDP was now growing
negatively. You can begin to see how the crisis flows up in a cycle.
It was an economic 9/11 which took down major institutions like lehman brothers and AIG. On
September 15th2008, giant bank lehman brothers went bankrupt due to its monumental bets on
real estates. AIG, the largest insurance company in the world collapsed the very next day.
Suddenly, the banks stopped giving loans to any company or each other. Experts warned that the
economy is about to collapse.
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
It all started in 2007 in the United States where over optimistic banks went bankrupt because of
bad lending in the mortgage market. In September2008, the world's fourth largest bank lehman
brothers collapsed. The crisis has since spread to the rest of the world, vicious circle developed,
banks stopped lending to each other and the credit dried up in order to prevent the lapses of the
banking system.
European governments came to the rescue of the banks with urgent support on an unprecedented
scale. A number of European countries have attempted different measures (as they seemed to
have failed to come up with a united response). 4.5 trillion euros which is equivalent to 37 % of
the annual GDP were committed between 2008 and 2011. European Union also launched a your
wide recovery program to safeguard jobs and social protection level in order to protect economic
investment. In this way the bankruptcy was avoided and the European savings were protected.
The euro broadly maintained its value and successfully shielded European countries from the
worst effect of economic crisis by providing stable playing field to European companies for
international trade and investment. But this effort took its toll especially since the most of the
money had to be borrowed. From late 2009, the most exposed European zone countries begun to
have problem financing their debts leading to a new problem called Sovereign Debt Crisis. With
increasing deficits and spiraling debt the markets lost confidence in governments ability to pay
back what they owed. Interest rates on government bonds soon became unsustainable and since
many of these European bonds were held by other European countries and banks. This turned
into a problem for the whole Europe, especially for the countries which shared euro as their
common currency. This loss of confidence forced the banks to reduce lending to businesses and
University Business School
Page 14
private households. In 2009, the European union economies suffered its worst financial recession
since its creation. After a brief recovery in 2012 it again went into a mild recession. As a result
unemployment reached unprecedented levels creating hardships and increasing the poverty
levels for the common people.
Page 15
But this contraction was not sufficient to contract overall output given the relative low share
export in the total output of Indian economy. So, overall the impact on India was that it put in the
mind of the people fear and uncertainty resulting in slow down and definitely impacting exports
for a short period of six months. The impact in fallout could have been greater and deeper both
for the world economy and India if there was no timely and collective government intervention
by Indian government and RBI.
Some of the steps taken by Indian government, with the help of RBI, in order to minimize the
effects of financial crisis on Indian economy were :1. RBI allowing banks to restructure their loan accounts, reschedule loan installments, as
preventive measures to prevent build up of bad loans.
2. It also went for Quantitative easing by lowering CRR, to improve liquidity.
3. It advised banks to shed their risk averseness, as it was a problem not a solution, to the
slowdown in the economy.
4. It also ran up a high fiscal deficit by increasing spending in the economy, even at the risk
of inflationary pressures and compromising on the compulsions under the FRBM |act. In
fact, India ran the highest fiscal deficit in the last 16 years.
5. Export concessions were extended and new strategies of incentives were given to
diversify to Afro Asian countries impacted lesser by the crisis
Overall, it was a combination of all, which limited the impact, without the need for any
bailout as no financial institution had collapsed.
University Business School
Page 16
Figure 1: Showing the Debt taken by US govt has been increasing since 1981
Page 17
Figure 2 :- Showing the origin and rate of increase in subprime mortgage volumes.
Page 18
Page 19
Figure 3:- Unemployment rate across US and Europe during & after crisis.
Page 20
Page 21
CONCLUSIONS
All the measures that have been taken to save the US economy- the low interest rates, the
massive debts, the safety net for the financial industry - the very things that led to the crisis in the
first place. We have been saved by the consequences of one bubble buy inflating another hundred
new bubbles all over the world.
The u s government has launched bailout stimulus packages and guarantees to the tune of 10,000
billion dollars, which is much more than the cost of the Vietnam war, world war 1, world war 2,
University Business School
Page 22
the invasion of Iraq and the NASAs martial plan. Loans are given by the governments of
different countries at a very low interest rate in order to contain the financial crisis but this is
aggravating the situation even more.
As said by Raghuram Rajan, in his interview at St. Gyllian Symposium that the government will
have to start raising rates in order to improve the efficiency of the economic system. But
increasing the rates now will create more and more pressure on the government as they will have
to shell out huge amount of money in order to pay back their debts. For example if the US
government increases the rate by 1 % it will increase the US interest payments by 100 billion
dollars per year. Even the illustrious credit rating institutes like S&P, Moody have lost the
ingrained trust in them because of the high rating given by them to the CDOs were undermined
by their defaults.
But the question that needs an answer now is how will the world react if the next entity to
declare bankruptcy is a nation and who is next in line if that were to happen. The government
could save the banks but who will save the government. Some countries have already started
falling for example in Iceland which was until recently one of the richest countries in the world
but when the crisis hit Iceland, the Icelands banks collapsed, Icelands stock market crashed,
leaving the debt to the small population.
When the next bubble bursts we cannot use the same emergency measures i.e. can't lower the
interest rates that are already hitting rock bottom, cannot stimulate the economy with the
borrowed money if the excessive national debt is the cost of the crisis. We need is a strong
financial framework that is free of greed and the regulatory measures that concentrate on the
long term goal and objectives.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Johan Norberg(2009). Financial Fiasco. Masscheutes, Washington : Cato Institute
Page 23
Page 24