Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE
TRAUMA CENTER SITE VISIT REPORT
APRIL 30, 2015
Introduction
Skyline Medical Center was site visited on April 30, 2015. This hospital was designated
as a provisional Level II Trauma Center in May of 2015. The site visit was conducted as
required by the Board of Licensing Health Care Facilities as a performance based
review using the Trauma Center rules 1200-08-12 (revised May 2013). Generation of
this report was accomplished by: Interviews with key personnel (hospital
administrators, the Trauma Medical Director, the Trauma Program Manager and other
involved personnel), direct evaluation of care via review of individual medical records,
analysis of trauma registry data and reports, review of the quality assurance program,
and other supporting documents.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
The trauma surgeon call panel has stabilized with four surgeons dedicated to this
trauma facility
There has been approval for two additional trauma surgeons
Two additional mid-level providers have been added
There is complete ophthalmology coverage
A second trauma QI nurse and registrar have been added
There is a new telemedicine psychiatry service
TEG assays have been implemented
Rural Trauma Team Development Course was offered in January 2015
A service line case manager has been added
There is approval for two additional registrars and one QI nurse
There has been expansion of sub-specialty service coverage
2014/2015
Total
Admits
1602
ISS
0-15
1521
95%
ISS
16-25
62
3.8%
ISS
26-40
17
1%
ISS
41+
2
.1%
Ave
ISS
6.8
Ave
RTS
11.7
RTS
<10
117
Financial summary of patients over the past several years reveals the following
SelfPay
14%
19%
16%
Commercial
Medicare
Medicaid
32%
33%
34%
44%
34%
32%
2%
3%
5%
Tenn
Care
4%
7%
8%
Work.
Comp
4%
4%
5%
Hospital Organization
Primary Trauma Service Personnel
Position
Trauma PI Coordinator/Injury
Prevention
Trauma Education/EMS
Liaison
Trauma Mid-Level Providers
Trauma Surgeons
Name
Roger Nagy, M. D.
Sheryl Forman, R. N.
Roger Nagy, M. D.
% Time
Committed
to Program
100%
100%
Jason Boyd
Paula Griner
Erin Svarda
Kim Bartlett
TBD funded, but not filled
David Kerley
25%
100%
100%
100%
Howard Evans
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
graded activation criteria were presented to the site survey team and a check sheet for
activation is available in the Emergency Department for all trauma encodes from EMS.
There were no apparent problems with response times by the trauma physicians. The
organizational chart for the institution was reviewed and interviews with administration,
as well as other documentation, demonstrate support for the Trauma Program.
An annual budget outlining salaries and positions specific to the trauma service were
provided.
Surgical Specialty Availability. Surgical specialty call schedules were reviewed and
24/7 coverage of all required specialties was documented. Review of records revealed
problems with neurosurgical response times and timely interventions, generating
concerns for adverse outcomes.
Non-Surgical Specialty Availability. Non-Surgical specialty call schedules were
reviewed and documented 24/7 coverage of all required specialties. Review of Trauma
Performance Documents did not reveal any problems with Non-Surgical Specialty
coverage or availability.
Organized Burn Care. Skyline does not have a burn center. Transfer
Agreements with regional Burn Centers were provided to the site review team.
Trauma Registry
The trauma registry is staffed by 3 full-time registrars, each of which has completed four
hours of education through the state in April 2015. An additional FTE has been
approved, but not yet filled. Data is obtained from retrospective chart review for registry
entry. All patients with ICD-9 discharge codes of 800-959.9 are placed in the registry
with the following exclusions: 905-909.9 (late effects of injury), 910-924.9 (superficial
injuries), and 930-939.0 (foreign bodies). Also excluded are hypo- and hyperthermia,
barotrauma, and lightning. Strangulation, drowning, and electrocution are only included
if there is an associated injury diagnosis. Trauma registry data is electronically
submitted to the state database quarterly.
2.
3.
4.
There are many processes for review in place at this institution. Nonetheless, the site
team determined that loop closure was inadequate. There must be clear documentation
that loop closure occurred, tracking or trending of repeated issues performed, and that a
plan for action is undertaken when performance issues are identified. The plan of
action needs to be clearly documented and then reviewed until there is resolution of the
issue.
Outreach/Training/Public Education/Research
Skyline offers a variety of in-house training events, as well as community training
events. These include TNCC, disaster classes, trauma case reviews, skills fairs, and a
variety of trauma-related lectures. There is a Trauma Education and Training Plan and
area-specific clinical skills and competencies are identified and taught. Skyline also
teaches the Rural Trauma Team Development Course.
Skyline has several Injury Prevention endeavors including Battle of the Belt, lectures to
area schools on binge drinking/distracted driving and craniofacial trauma/seatbelt use.
They have programs geared towards seniors as well, including Senior Medical
University 101 Presentation on SLIP, and a fall prevention program.
CONCLUSIONS
In the one year since provisional verification, Skyline has demonstrated ongoing support
for the trauma program. An enormous amount of work and commitment is evident, and
the volume of patients treated has exceeded original expectations. The trauma call
panel has been stabilized and is now filled with dedicated local trauma surgeons.
However, review of patient care did reveal several deficiencies. Given these
deficiencies, a corrective action plan must be presented to the board within 60 days.
The institution will remain on provisional status for one more year in order to correct
these issues.
DEFICIENCIES
1.
2.
3.
AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT
1.
2.
3.
There is not a dedicated critical care unit for patients with traumatic injuries. This
complex care needs to be aggregated in a location that allows specialty nursing
care to maximize efficiencies, patient safety, and outcomes.
Trauma patients not in the intensive care unit are scattered throughout the
facility. Again, given the complexity and multi-disciplinary nature of this care,
identifying a common unit to care for these patients enhances processes of care
and patient safety.
There is difficulty following the hemodynamic status of patients given the current
constraints of the electronic health record. It is advised that these measures be
located in a continuous form in one location within the record to enhance tracking
of these parameters to ensure appropriate and timely intervention.
EXIT INTERVIEW
Following the site visit, the team held a meeting to evaluate the findings and make
conclusions. An exit interview was then held and the conclusions and
recommendations as stated in this report were presented to the hospital administrative,
medical and nursing staff present.