Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literary Review
RES/320
Date
Instructor
LITERARY REVIEW
Literary Review
Many companies tend to focus heavily on customer satisfaction, which
is important for maintaining customer loyalty, but they tend to forget about
those who interact with customers on a day-to-day basis. Front-line
employees are the face of the company and their actions, or lack thereof,
are representative of the company as a whole. For this reason it is imperative
that companies not only focus on customer satisfaction, but also on the
satisfaction of their employees. In this literary review we will focus on the
retail giant, Wal-Mart, and discuss how they can measure and improve their
employee satisfaction. The articles in this review will provide a snapshot of
Wal-Marts troublesome treatment of employees and its effect on customer
satisfaction, offer an approach to measure employee satisfaction, and
recommend answers to the managerial question: How do we improve
employee satisfaction in Wal-Mart stores, thereby improving the customer
experience at the stores?
Wal-Mart: Employee Satisfaction Snapshot
While Wal-Mart has been one of the nations top retailers for the past
several decades, but they are now starting to experience the demands of a
customer base that is not just looking for a good deal. The retailer has been
trying to win customers on low-costs alone, but the consumer public just isnt
buying it. According to Gogoi (2007), many of Wal-Marts workers feel
outright hostility toward the company, and, by extension, they often treat
LITERARY REVIEW
LITERARY REVIEW
LITERARY REVIEW
LITERARY REVIEW
LITERARY REVIEW
bi-annually, or annually at the very least. This way, companies can get a
snapshot of employee engagement throughout major changes such as
layoffs, mergers, and product incentives (Kruse, 2012).
The survey results should not only be shared with senior executives,
but with all managers as well. This way, managers can be held accountable
for their individual results and take the necessary steps for improvement.
Most of the emotion of employee engagement comes from ones
relationship with their manager; not informing each manager of their own
individual results (and how it compares against the companys overall
results) takes away the important tool of self-awareness. Without an
individual score, engagement becomes some abstract company initiative
(or worse, an HR issue) instead of an everyday metric for improvement
(Kruse, 2012, para. 3)
Finally, Kruse states that individual managers should conduct action
planning meetings with employees to inform them of the survey results.
Employees are then responsible for the formulation of ideas that will solve
issues reported in the survey. Managers will facilitate the action planning
meetings in order to ensure action is taken on suggestions (Kruse, 2012).
Including employees in the solution-finding process makes them feel valued,
thereby increasing employee satisfaction.
This article is relevant to the topic of employee satisfaction at Wal-Mart
because it gives a basic framework of how to conduct successful surveys
LITERARY REVIEW
that produce tangible results. Including these three elements in our research
findings will assist us in providing our overall recommendation to Wal-Mart
for the improvement of employee satisfaction.
Happy Employees, Happy Customers
Consumer satisfaction is an important element of business in modern
commerce. Wal-Mart has always been interested in the opinions of their
customers, as any other retailer should. As stated on a few researches WalMart has received very low ratings if not the lowest in the past few years.
The information in this analysis could be helpful to point the areas where
Wal-Mart could focus their efforts to improve their customer satisfaction
ratings. Dirk Dusharme, the editor in chief of Quality Digest Magazine
compared Wal-Mart and Target in their 2007 retailer customer satisfaction
survey. The results of his comparison showed how customers prefer Target
for their service, wider aisles, layouts, lightning, but mostly for the
employees helpfulness and cordiality. Most of the positive feedback about
Wal-Mart was in regards of convenience and price.
A significant 27 percent of the complaints are related to poor customer
service, unknowledgeable or inattentive staff, and even rudeness. In that
same survey 15 percent complained about poor quality and overseas
products that does not necessarily comply with federal regulations that all
products manufactured in the US has to comply with. This means that
according to the article published by Quality Digest magazine, Wal-Mart
LITERARY REVIEW
LITERARY REVIEW
10
LITERARY REVIEW
11
LITERARY REVIEW
12
LITERARY REVIEW
13
References
Dusharme, D. (2007). Customer Satisfaction Survey. Quality Digest.
Retrieved from
http://www.qualitydigest.com/may07/articles/06_article.shtml
Gogoi, P. (2007, October). Wal-Mart: A Snap Inspection. Bloomberg
Businessweek. Retrieved from
http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-10-02/wal-mart-a-snapinspectionbusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financialadvice
LITERARY REVIEW
14
Hess, A. (2013). 9 retailers with the worst customer service. USA Today.
Retrieved from
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/03/16/9-retailersworst-customer-service/1991519/
Kruse, K. (2012, September 18). Employee Survey Success: The 3 A's of
Employee Satisfaction Surveys. Forbes. Retrieved from
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2012/09/18/employee-survey/
Marshall, J. (n.d.). The High Price of Low Cost. Retrieved from
http://makingchangeatwalmart.org/files/2011/10/The-High-Price-ofLow-Cost.pdf
Mustafa, H. & Sylvia, R. D. (1975). A factor-analysis approach to job
satisfaction. Public Personnel Management, 165-172.
N.A. (SIS International). (ND). 8 Ways to Boost Customer Satisfaction in
Retail. Retrieved from
http://www.greenbook.org/marketing-research.cfm/boost-customersatisfaction-in-retail
Ochalla, B. (2004). Improve Employee Satisfaction. Credit Union
Management, 27(1), 6. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/227771859?accountid=458
Oldham, G. R., & Rotchford, N. L. (1983). Relationships between Office
Characteristics and Employee Reactions: A Study of the Physical
Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 542-556.
LITERARY REVIEW
15