Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EN~
FUNDS MANAGEMENT OF
DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANKS IN KERALA
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
_der tlte Facalty of Social Scieaces
BY
PADMlnl,
f.'. I.
COCHln
1997
CERTIFICATE
Cochin-22
JI-r, )/. '17
CONTENTS
Chapter
Title
Page No.
INTRODUCTION
1-10
11
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
11-43
III
44-65
IV
66-84
85-113
114-144
VI
VII
145-205
VIII
206-237
IX
238-254
BIBLIOGRAPHY
i-xvii
APPENDICES
LIST OF TABLES
Table No.
Title
Page No.
3.1
48
3.2
50
3.3
55
3.4
58
3.5
61
3.6
64
5.1
86
5.2
87
5.3
89
5.4
91
5.5
Deposits
of
selected DCBs
for
triennia ended 1981-82 and 1993-94
93
the
Table No.
Title
Page No.
5.6
95
5.7
the
96
5.8
99
5.9
100
5.10
101
5.11
103
5.12
105
5.13
107
5.14
5.15
5.16
6.1
6.2
the
the
Exponential
trend
equations
investments of selected DCBs for
period 1979-80 to 1993-94
in
the
109
110
112
115
117
Table No.
Title
Page No.
6.3
118
6.4
119
6.5
120
6.6
121
6.7
122
6.8
124
6.9
126
6.10
127
6.11
128
6.12
129
6.13
130
131
.14
Table No.
Ti tIe
Page No.
6.15
133
135
6.17
137
6.18
138
6.19
140
6.20
141
6.21
143
7.1
148
7.2
7.3
6.16
152
158
7.4
164
7.5
166
Table No.
Title
7 . 18
192
7.19
194
7.20
198
7.21
8.1
of
8.2
of
8.3
8.4
Political
activities
Managers)
8.5
Political
interference
in
various
activities of selected DCBs (Head office
superintendents)
8.6
Political
activities
Managers)
interference
of selected
interference
of selected
Page No.
in
DCBs
in
DCBs
various
{General
various
{Branch
202
222
224
227
229
231
233
LIST OF CHARTS
Chart No.
Title
Page No.
4.1
69
4.2
70
4.3
72
4.4
74
4.5
78
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure No.
Title
4.1
Techniques of accounting
8.1
Page No.
82
211
Introduction
CHAPTER-I
INTRODUCTION
Financial
economic
development
of
country
broadly
roles
by
in the
promoting
Efficiency of
funds
resources.
but
also
in
the
effective
and
optimum
use
of
context because,
1.1
occupy a
between
the
Apex
Co-operative
in
fact
federation
of
and
the
Primary
Bank
Primary Agricultural
Credit
movement.
has
to
undertake
various
promotional
and
it
It
is
the
spokesman
for
not
only
the
primary
district.
1.2
limited attention.
the
1.3
1.
2.
3.
To
evaluate
the
management
practices
adopted
for
1.4
the present
utilisation
However,
of
the
funds
and
their
sources
management
concept of efficiency is
relative
and
efficiency.
and hence
1.5
1.
Hypotheses
The major parameters of funds management in the DCBs like
share
capital,
reserves
and
other
funds,
deposits,
time
and
the
magnitude
of
their
change
is
proportional.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1 .6 Methodology
a.
Sample selection
of
the
reference
period
(Wynad
DCB
on
25.5.82,
Hence,
In order to
select
the
sample
banks,
three
common
indicators
six
of
and profit
for
to
1990-91 for these banks were computed and they were arranged
in order of magnitude and ranked.
The selected
b.
15 years data
for
harnessing
the
and
uses
of
funds,
(i. e.
10 per cent
of
the
179 branches
of
these
c.
Where
Y
constant
= l+r
log b
r
= Time variable
2.
capital
ratio,
borrowings/working
1.7
Besides the
and Kerala.
The
theoretical
framework
of
funds
management
is
flow statements,
etc.
The
equations.
in detail.
It
also examines
the
composition of
in
chapter
seven
with
the
help
of
ratios,
a.
1.
The variations in
created
difficulties
in
making
necessary
solved
with
to
considerable
collecting details
from
extent
Form
IX,
the
the
form
help
used
of
for
2.
co-operative
banks.
Thus,
the
researcher
was
3.
10
4.
Review of Literature
CHAPTER-II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
central
financial
co-operative banks,
institutions.
However,
the
and
foreign
international
present
review
is
The
review
of
literature
is
presented
in
two
major
to
co-operative
classified
performance,
efficiency
into
banks.
These
review
relating
viability,
(2)
profitability,
cash management,
(3)
two
to
and
sections
(1)
are
general
operational
12
2.1
a.
Commercial Banks
(1990),
Pandey
(1990),
Agarwal
(1990),
Yadav (1990), Vipin Kumar Agarwal (1990) and Rajat Khater and
Sanjay Kumar Arora (1994).
budget' in
measures
standards
of
to
prevent
customer
qualitative
services,
deterioration
in
professionalisation
of
by Varsha
and
Sampat
Muralidharan (1987),
(1979),
Joshy
(1986),
Ojha
13
the
efforts
to
improve
profitability
They observed
should
include
few
detailed
studies
of
trend
and
operational
(1979),
Murthy
and
Varsha
Chattre
(1990),
of
is
these
studies
necessary
to
(1996).
include
eliminate
Toor
(2)
(1)
(1993)
and
The important
improved
avoidable
loss
cash
of
after nationalisation
banking has not taken roots in our rural and remote areas in
comparison with semi-urban and urban areas (3) investors are
sensitive
to
interest
nationalised banks
rates
is of a
(4)
the
business
mix
in
the
(5)
the
14
b.
Studies
Relating
Cash
to
Management,
Statutory
management
were
done
by
Narasirnhan
(1984),
Anil
(1993).
be
very
important
of
the
and
because
lead to
deposits
resource
in
excess
crunch.
They also
c.
(1990),
Subramaniam
Sengupata
(1993).
(1991),
and
15
funds
may
efficiency.
lead
to
deterioration
in
funds
management
(1994)
and Vijayakumar
(1995)
They opined
ensuring high
banks
were
made
by
Satya
Sundaram
(1991),
noted
that
lack
of
effective
credit
These
appraisal
The Governments'
policy of
compelling the
it would
16
The necessity of
banks
was
professionalisation and
studied by Bhatnagar
(1991),
training
Rajeswari
in
(1992),
management
the
quality
strategies
of
work
for
through
future
productivity
and
to
gains
improve
and
the
better
2.2
(1)
Co-operative Banks
Studies
Relating
to
Performance,
Viability,
India Rural
(1954).
The
new
arrangements,
the
Bombay
State
17
finance
of
fixing
to
all
credit
credit
limits
worthy
on
the
agriculturists.
basis
of
landed
Agricultural
disbursement
Credit
Societies
(PACS)
in
He also
credit
studied
strong resource
low
base,
borrowings,
high
high
rate
of
deposit
distribution
of
satisfaction to the
of
financial
(1984),
performance
of
Prakasam District
18
$:0
the
maximum possible
extent
to
make
these
operations
viable.
credit
of
Rajastan Central
Co-operative bank
(CCB).
credit
the CCBs
should re-orient
and
Varma
(1985)
in his
study observed
that
the
overall
a mixed one.
In his
opinion,
their weaknesses
are,
staff,
loan
lack
policies,
of
supervision,
defective
book
poor deposits,
adjustments,
19
of
the
institutions,
operandi
at
functioning
of
the
co-operative
credit
levels
of
management.
Planning
in
co-
entrepreneurial flair.
their
approach
in
marketing
and
selling
of
banking
services.
there
is
profitability,
vast
scope
of
increase
if proper attention
is
According to
in
profit
paid on areas
and
like
James
Paul
(1987) ,
discussed
and
evaluated
the
20
The liquidity
He was of
the opinion that the bank can improve its position by finding
out new avenues for investment, better cash management and by
taking all efforts to curtail the overdue position of the bank
and by forming an extension wing to study the problems of its
member societies.
Khusro Committee Report
(1989),
It was
21
He examined the
of
priority,
purpose
period,
classification of loans.
and
section
wise
recovery was low and was declining over the period under study
(1980-81 to 1987-88) .
Dhanarajan (1989), made an attempt to study the trend in
the profitability of Palakkad DeB (1977-78 to 1986-87) and to
evaluate the impact of primary and secondary factors on spread
and burden of Palakkad DeB.
for
managers
is
also
needed.
The
author
also
He
also
suggested
that
the
cost
of
22
by
Bobby
C.
John
(1991),
with
the
objective
of
The
The
their
growth
over
the
years.
They
suggested
the
23
(1993).
They also
five potentially
To promote
co-operatives,
inservice
training
to
inculcate
managerial
co-operatives,
~tatus
and
the
transformation
of
the
present
organisation.
24
Tucker
development
(1993),
(HRD)
productivity in co-operatives.
Muthupandian
(1995)
conducted a
able
to mobilise
He
have to encourage
supervision of
the
societies under
their
charge.
opined
profitability
was
that,
because
deteriorating
of
year
maintaining
after
overdues,
year
and
the
not
sufficient
In his
25
(2)
of
Trichur
DCB
and
highlighted
the
need
for
He also suggested
With this,
their liquidity
(1990),
26
ratio
(CRR)
and
statutory
liquidity
ratio
(SLR).
The
and to
estimate
the
opportunity
cost
of
excess
He found that
techniques.
He,
further,
recorrunended the
improvement
of branch
(3)
27
in the country.
It was
John
Winfred
co-operatives
in
(1974),
while
analysing
overdues
for prompt
in
recovery of
leadership
a
understand the
member
should
be
education
implications
mobilised.
programme
to
of prudent use of
He
also
make
them
credit,
to
farmers
and
to
organise
marketing
through
He was of the
opinion that the reasons for the rise in the level of overdues
were the failure of the DBCs to recover their dues and not due
to
any
repay.
The
28
and Primary
the
other
reasons
cited
for
higher
overdues
in
Varkey
(1976)
found
that
the
main
problem
faced
by
The
10.95
co-operatives
mobilisation
during
have
aspect
1973-74.
to
The
concentrate
instead
of
author noted
more
on
depending
that
the
on
the
deposit
government
contribution.
consumption expenditures
were
the
major
factors
29
the
loans
capacity
of
supervised
the
borrower
resulting
into
in
mind
They reported
keeping the
and
diversion
were
of
repayment
not
loan
properly
either
for
Trivandrum
(1977),
of
the
programme
had
surpassed
even
the
best
Bhaskar
investment
is
Rao
not
(1978),
observed
that
the
adequately supplemented by
growth
in
satisfactory
Credit Societies .
Desai and Narayana Rao (1978), are of the view that the
default rate in co-operative credit
is very high.
It is
relatively high for short - term loans than for long term loans.
Excepting
few
states
like
Tamil
Nadu,
Andhra
Pradesh,
Kerala, Punjab and Haryana all the other states have more than
30 to 35 per cent
default rate.
30
important reasons.
For
interrelated.
the most
solving
these
problems,
the
study
Pancras
co-operative
studied
(1978) ,
banks
and
came
the
to
funds
the
management
conclusion
that
in
the
apex banks.
banks
is
factor
of
efficient
management
of
funds-
Further, he stressed
that
it
should
be
the
objective
of
bank
to
increase
study
Co-operative
on
Bank
the
in
performance
of
Trichur
District
during
the
deposit
mobilisation
increase
campaign
in
31
Sharma
(1985),
conducted a
case
study of
short-term
should
be
proper
linkage
between
advancing
and
that mobilisation of
functions of CCBs.
resources
is
one
of
the
core
but
also
borrowings.
to
reduce
their
dependence
on
outside
should be
so
as
expenditure.
calls
for
to
derive
Again,
a
maximum
benefits
with
minimum
developmental
approach
in
the
diversified
liquidity,
safety
and
profitability.
Lastly,
he
income
earning
capacity of
the
banks
but
also
32
They found
to
Rajeevkumar
the
state
Saxena
level
co-operative
1987),
Central
form an important
bank
and
the
Colink
primary
He noted that in
the
central
administratively
co-operative
strong
and
banks
viable
financially
units.
and
Effective
on
the efforts
made by
the bank
to identify the
33
quality of
schemes
the
introduced
service offered,
and
their
the
type
attractiveness
of
deposit
and
branch
(60),
medium
(60)
and
small
farmers
(60)
during
management
leadership.
suggested that
He
and
lack
the
of
right
type
of
(deposits from
individuals,
and external
co-operatives,
other
34
He further highlighted
varied
from bank
to
bank depending
upon
their
co-operative
membership,
share
credit
societies
capital,
deposits,
in
respect
loans
of
and
advances,
that
the main
reasons
for
the
large
their
They
amount
of
(1989),
conducted a
study on co-
from co-
35
amount
of
overdues
and
it
calls
for
very
careful
Bhatt et al.
its
inter-relationship with
towards
credit
efficient and
of DCBs
~tl
test.
other
with
the
components
help
of
contributing
correlation co-
judging
the
additional
deposits
mobilised
the
impact
of
during
deposit
these
additional
He observed that
the credit-
deployment
mobilisation
of
funds,
was
lower
during
the
deposit
36
the staff
for
as the
taken for
reducing
farm co-operative
(1990),
tried
to
examine
the
effect
of
types of
deposits,
share of
deposits
to working
Further,
loans,
credit-deposit
ratio,
incremental
efficiency
in resource
the proportion of
37
and
neglect
of
the
achievement
obsession of
in
deposit
the
staff
mobilisation
with
the
and
the
part
of
the
new
deposits
immediately.
credibility
and
social
acceptance
of
the
working
of
eventhough the
proj ect
John Winfred
(1990),
made
an attempt
to measure
the
of
the
societies
followed
by
strict
38
through out
the year
instead of
initiating it
of
loans
on
scheduled dates
and for
improving
to
the borrowers
scheduled dates.
on repayment
of
loans
on the
the State
39
overdues and
They
factors
It
and the
Accordingly,
compared to
capacity,
40
(1990),
While
However,
41
since 1971-72.
deposits
of
co-operatives
they
noted
that
the
extent
of
deposit
mobilisation,
deployment
and
the
He
defaulted
in
the
repayment
of
dues
and
the
42
all the rules and regulations were framed from above and
mostly
they
were
ill-timed
and
unsuited
to
the
varied
He
The author
According to him
and
Government.
frequent
transfer
since
they
are
from
the
(1995),
But, he
43
discipline.
maintenance
of
required
experienced a
reserves
cash
deficit
and
in the
assets
liquid
(1980-81 to 1992-93)
and was
Toomkuzhy
environment
of
made
co-operativies
review
and
of
the
examined
the
changing
need
for
He noted
mobilisation,
management.
deployment
and
other
aspects
of
funds
This
Palakkad,
etc.
They were
Jl~ .. "'"O
in India -
CHAPTER-Ill
In continuation of that,
3.1
Origin
The history of co-operative movement in India is about a
century old.
encourage
and
promote
thrift
and
mutual
help
for
the
concentrating
the
efforts
in
releasing
the
exploited
Keeping
1896.
Eng~ish
Friendly
45
societies
were
permitted
to
register
and
non-credit
and
Societies
1912.
Act,
This
Act
paved
the
way
for
the
the requirements of
those
states where
co-operative
3.2
and
medium
tier
one
with
primary
46
certain states.
co-operative
banks
agricultural
credit
was
mainly
sector,
for
they
the
benefit
serve
of
the
non-agricultural
societies too.
3.3
Primary Agricultural
Credit
Societies
(PACS)
are
the
Most of
the
most
important
element
units,
of
Borrowings
their
working
according
to
their
liability.
Punctuality
in
the
47
3.4
In India,
repaying
considerably,
capacity
as
of
result
the
PACS
mounted
has
been
overdues
in
dwindled
the
loan
and
dormant
societies,
uneven
existence of
growth
of
Figures in
Figures in
Statistical statements relating to Co-operative Movement in India for the period 1975-76 to
1990-91
(1)
(2)
(1)
(2
Note
Source:
1295.03
(55.73)
[0.0145]
434.30
(46.68)
[0.0048]
1361. 98
(138.11)
[0.0153]
571.98
(23.29)
[0.0061]
8135.53
(107.15)
[0.0914]
3927.22
(24.13)
[0.0424]
84869
(17.68)
[0.9544]
296.08
(25.55)
[0.0032]
3163.73
(174.04)
[0.0342]
4777.30
(52.12)
[0.0537]
3140.37
(25.64)
[0.0339]
2499.31
(144.20)
[0.0270]
43.50
41.8
43.6
41.4
88921
(-3.77)
831. 54
(15.37)
[0.0089]
463.93
(309.43)
[0.0033]
1023.44
[0.0075]
1990-91
72117
(8.17)
[0.7804]
235.81
(115.25)
[0.0025]
1154.44
[0.0085]
Percentage
of overdue
to demand
92408
(-0.09)
720.75
(120.20)
[0.0077]
113.31
[0.0008]
Loans
issued
1985-86
66669
(68.69)
[0.7207]
109.55
[0.0008]
Borrowings
92496
(-31.40 )
327.31
[0.0024]
Deposits
1983-84
39521
[0.2930]
Reserves
134838
Share
capital
1975-76
Membership
(in'OOO)
(Rupees in crores)
Number of
societies
Year
Table 3.1
CD
49
It
(1975 -76)
the number of
to
88,921
societies
(1990 - 91)
due
to
But
to Rs .1530000
loans
issued has
3.5
their counterparts
in the rest
of
the
country is
remarkable.
coverage,
borrowing
members,
loans
and
advances,
E.,
1993.
p. 43) .
The
rank
with
regard
to
15B3
(0. 1B)
(1)
(2)
(1) AdnUnistration report of the Department of Co-operation for the period 1970-71 to 1993-94
(2) Handbook on Co-operative Movement in xerala for the period 1970-71 to 1993-94
1993-94
Note
Source.
Figures in
Figures in
4267516
14947987
(12.17)
(20.93)
[2700.95] [9460.75]
807
(-1.34)
80042
(65.3B)
[50.98]
728
(-1.62)
3227425
26790943
663
(24.96)
(20.99)
(-6.88)
[2042.67] [16956.29]
529411
(-1.76)
[33.50]
53B900
(212.B1)
[340.86]
17227B
(240.25)
[109.73]
50633
(12B.00)
[32.17]
22207
(102.1B)
[13.49]
109B4
[5.82]
Amount
Rs.
258999
7B4
508935
( 52.57)
(-10.29) (B61.32)
[163.61]
[ 321. 50]
169756
874
(6.76)
(B.03)
[ 107.44]
22142400
712
159000
B09
(177.85)
(-11.77) (98.65)
(11.13)
[14005.31]
[100.57]
7969199
(90.86)
[5075.92]
1119350 18912273
4539304
18404B81
3051496
32441278
764
(11.52)
(25.54)
(6.36)
(23.12)
(-5.45)
(21.09)
(15.23)
[707.10] [11947.10] [2867.53] [11626.58] [1927.66] [20493.54]
1003657 15064690
(20.05)
(27.93)
[635.22) [9534.61)
25B2700
(136.80)
[1633.59]
10.85446 1347810
(3.16)
(16.41)
[6560.61] [B51.42]
10066705 1157715
(9.36)
(13.29)
[6371.33] [732.73]
3804600
12360900
(52.02)
(102.00)
[2406.45] [781B.4]
733
(-3.17)
757
No.
4175315
818
48398
740
( 176.81)
(-10.31) (137.30) (0.95)
[2652.68 ]
[30.75]
1580
(-0.06)
836000
11775700
(133.95) (158.95)
[528.78) [7448.26)
13B26
[7.32]
Amount
Rs.
in tlnlsarrls)
No. of societies
incurring loss
(~pees
912
20395
(-13.31) (47.51)
[12.39]
1052
1992-93
9205073
1021900
(35.00)
(81.90)
[5822.31] [646.36]
525246
(128.19)
[333.70]
2502621
6119012
1090678
(98.64)
(152.42)
(107.65)
[1594.03] [3897.46] [694.70]
2424120
(219.00)
[1540.1]
150B386
(212.72)
[916.39]
48350
[25.61]
No.
No. of societies
earning profit
1581
(0.70)
357385
4577408
(113.03) (197.68)
[227.63) [2915.55)
1259849
(167.87)
[800.41]
230175
(115.77)
[139.84]
106677
[56.50 ]
Rs.
working
capi tal
1991-92
6818647
561785
(46.11)
(66.40)
[4343.09] [357.82]
167764
1527607
(98.81)
(260.15)
[106.58) [970.53)
759920
(110.98)
[461.68]
360182
[190.77]
Rs.
Loans
overdue
1570
(-0.25)
4666521
337615
(B8.95)
(98.61)
[2964.75] [214.49]
470328
(77.93)
[285.74]
364338
[192.98]
Rs.
Loans
outstanding
Rs.
19B6-B7
93754
[49.66]
84386
424159
(177.93) (352.42)
[51.27)
[257.69]
30362
[16.28]
Rs.
Rs.
Borrcwings
1574
(-4.37)
93896
[49.73]
Deposits
Reserves
19B1-B2
1659885
[879.18]
Paid up
share
capital
Rs.
1646
2469745
169988
(-12.82) (48.79)
(81.04)
[1500.45] [103.27]
1888
No. of
No. of
societies members
1976-77
1970-71
Year
Table 3.2
U'I
51
From Table
3.2,
it
is
observed
that
the
number
of
from
1970-71
to
92.05
lakh by
the
end
of
1991-92.
only
764
societies
(48.26
per
cent)
could make
It
is
further
noted
that
per
society paid up
share
1993 - 94.
There was
considerable
Deposits per
and
advances
has
increased
from
Rs.1.90
lakh
to
3.6
(DCBs)
52
As a
primary
societies
form
federation
for
ensuring
exchange
of
ideas
and
co-operative
experience.
The
In
1906,
forerunner
of
the
first
DCB
was
At Ajmer
But the
banks
individuals
wherein
or
in
membership
which
consists
societies
entirely
of
are admitted
as
53
any
special
provision
for
their
adequate
The Maclagan
at present.
2.
Banking
Unions
wherein
only
primary
societies
are
As the
the
3.
separate
directors.
it
provides
population.
representation
in
the
board
of
combination
of
both
rural
and
urban
this type.
credit
requirements
of
member
societies.
As
an
54
societies
societies
for
for
marketing
supply operations
operations,
and
other
industrial
societies
for
to act as a
to convene
for
to open
53960000
(352.09)
[160118.69]
1935698
(238.45)
[5676.53]
3526547
(486.64)
[9112.52]
Basic data on performance of District Central Cooperative Banks for the period
1970-71 to 1991-92
(2 )
93384700
51582600
167665200
(237.11)
(236.07)
(210.72)
[261581.79] [144489.07] [469650.42]
15348736
(282.67)
[45545.21]
4010993
(141.06)
[11762.44]
1663910
(1278.28)
[4299.51]
8297300
7163700
(113.61)
(-45.44)
[23241.74] [20066.39]
27701307
(443.45)
[82199.72]
5097337
(309.55)
[14948.20]
1244629
(225.52)
[3216.69]
601139
[1181. 02]
Rs.
Working
capital
369434
(34.16)
[1034.83]
3884321
13130800
(146.42)
(1830.28)
[11526.18] [38963.80]
680253
(381.00)
[1994.88]
141426
(-67.50)
[365.44]
120724
[237.18]
Rs.
Borrowings
(1)
357
(4.45)
1991-92
275363
(-13.68)
[817.10]
1576320
(230.75)
[4622.64]
476584
(-2.90)
[1231. 48]
382347
[751.17]
Rs.
Rs.
435148
[854.91]
Deposits
Reserves
Source:
337
(-1.17)
1986-87
319000
(-19.44)
[935.48]
Figures in [
Figures in (
341
(-11.89)
1981-82
396000
(71.19)
[1023.26]
490814
[964.27]
Paid up
share
capital
Rs.
( 1)
(2 )
387
(-23.97)
1976-77
231318
[454.46]
No. of
members
(Rupees in thousands)
Note
509
No. of
banks
1970-71
Year
Tab1e 3.3
U'I
lJl
56
357
in 1991-92.
But
different picture.
the
number
of
members
showed a
Paid
up
capital
and
reserves
also
showed
an
crores
and
Rs. 716.37
crores
during
borrowings
also
the
showed
latter
the
from
same
considerable
Rs. 43.51
period.
crores
Deposits
increase.
to
and
There was
There
also
boosted
which
increased
as
whole
there
Rs .11 . 81
lakh
to
were
tremendous
increase
in
all
components of funds.
3.7
organised separately in
the
erstwhile
states
57
and
the
respectively.
Madras
Co-operative
Societies
Act
1932
in force
in the
in the
1969. p.1).
table 3.4.
State of
Kerala"
(Government
of
Kerala,
14
(0 )
14
(0 )
14
1991-92
1992-93
1993 -9 4
( 1)
(2 )
14
(27.27 )
1986 -87
Source.
11
(0 )
1981-82
418
(0.72)
[29.85)
415
(1. 22)
[29.64)
410
(28.53)
[29.28)
319
(30.74)
[22.78)
244
(37.85)
[22.18)
177
(115.85 )
[16.09)
82
[8.2)
No. of
branchee
including
H.O
7903
(3.34 )
[564.5)
7647
(23.26)
[546.2)
6204
(25.16 )
[443.14)
4957
(13.85)
[354.07)
4354
(17.04)
[395.81)
3720
(10.35)
[338.18)
3771
[377.1)
No. of
membere
34060
(195.28)
[3096.36)
532258
(251.33)
[48387.09)
151496
[15149.6)
Re.
Deposit 15
196392
(367.04)
[17853.81)
428400
(-3.32)
(30600 )
443100
(-6.99)
(31650)
1637397
(184.99 )
[148854.2)
574555
(928.86 )
[52232.27)
55844
[5584.4)
Re.
Loans
advanced
1491
[149.1)
Re.
Profit!
101515
8034
129309
(438.83)
(85.20)
[11755.36) [738.36)
69820
[6982)
Re.
Loane
overdue
16069
1806723
244444
(100.01)
(89.04)
(170.73)
[164247.54) [22222.58) [1460.81)
667353
(369.62 )
[60668.47)
142105
[ 14210.5)
Re.
Loan 15
outetanding
(Rupeee in thoueande)
11700
6736900
1128200
(151.40 )
(75.88 )
(82.08)
[481207.14) [80585.71) [835.71)
Administration Report of the Department of Co-operation for the period 1970-71 to 1993-94
Handbook on Co-operative Movement in Kerala for the period 1970-71 to 1993-94
10643700
37500
13792900
9136500
1106200
(22.74)
(30.19)
(13 .(3)
(-13.44 )
(131.48)
[985207.14) [760264.28) [652607.14) [79014.28) [2678.57]
8175100
8054100
1278100
16200
(53.49)
(13.29 )
(38.46)
(19.55)
[583935.71) [575292.85) [91292.85) [1157.14)
5326300
3853800
10015900
(198.84)
(89.44 )
(56.51)
[275271. 42) [715421. (2) [380(50)
5287148
3403234
448768
6652
3699951
(101.86)
(-58.60)
(107.84 )
(104.79 )
(83.59)
[317653.42) [243088.14) [264282.21) [32054.85) [475.14)
2458500
11237100
8400400
(-36.21)
(12.19 )
(21.35 )
[600028.57) [175607.14) [802650)
6922300
(110.80)
[494450)
3283780
1289581
476381
(147.34)
(79.53 )
(260.60 )
[34027.21) [234555.71) [92112.92)
2619176
(180.56)
[238106.9)
933541
(400.13)
[84867.36)
186660
[18666)
Re.
Re.
42050
[4205.0)
Working
capital
Borrowinge
1327649
718324
132107
(265.76 )
(143.47 )
(149.44)
[12009.72) [120695.36) [65302.18)
54261
(349.93)
[9932.81)
12060
[1206.0)
Reeervee
and
other
funde
Re.
2503300
10735800
144700
677 400
441300
(1.82 )
(27.80 )
(10.57 )
(4.62 )
(58.12)
[31521.42) [10335.71) [48385.71) [766842.71) [17880.71)
138300
399100
( 11.95)
(16.81)
[28507.14) [9878.57)
118400
356500
(54.71)
(63.41 )
[25464.28) [8457.14)
230430
72454
(57.33 )
(41.19)
[16459.28) [5175.28)
46052
163201
(53.97)
(35.21)
[ 14836 45) [ 4 186 .54 )
105992
(111.87)
[9635.63)
11535
[1157.5)
Re.
Re.
50026
[5002.6)
Of which
Govt.
Paid up
ehare
capital
11
(10 )
1976-77
( 1)
(2 )
10
1970-71
Note
No. of
banke
Year
Table 3.4
U'I
CO
59
In 1970-71,
The
during
advanced also
the
same
increased
period.
Similarly
considerably.
The
average
loans
average
loans
RS.1.49
1970-71
lakh
in
to
Rs.26.78
lakh
in
1993-94.
it is not
60
3.8
crucial
position in the
structure
in
Co-operative Banks
state.
The
apex
India.
are
three
tier co-operative
These
formed by
banks
(SCBs)
assume
apex
banks
or
federating DCBs
a
key-position
State
in each
in
the
Table 3.5
27
(-12.90)
1990-91
Source:
6727.88
(98.73)
[249.18]
3385.41
(102.20)
[109.20]
1674.25
(131. 37)
[62.00]
723.68
[27.83]
Deposits
3575.07
(191.36)
[132.41]
1227.00
(101.65)
[39.58]
608.47
(70.01)
[22.53]
343.73
[13.22]
Borrowings
5378.97
(39.61)
[199.22]
3852.79
(109.79)
[124.28]
1836.45
(105.51)
[68.01]
893.60
[34.36]
Loans &
advances
outstanding
987.31
(238.39)
[36.56]
291. 76
(80.38)
[9.41]
161. 74
(270.90)
[5.99]
43.60
[1.67]
Overdues
18.0
(95.65)
[0.66]
9.2
(-8.00)
[0.29]
10.0
(42.85)
[0.37]
7.0
[0.26]
Percentage
of overdue
to demand
(2)
Figures in
Figures in
(1)
(2)
(1)
Data in respect of four SCBs ie., Jammu and Kashmir, Manipur, Andaman and Nicobar
Island and Chandigarh are not available for the year 1990-91.
31
(14.81)
1985-86
Note:
27
(3.84)
1983-84
Number
(Rupees in crores)
Progress of state co-operative Banks in India for the period 1975-76 to 1990-91
26
3.5
1975-76
Year
Tabl.e
....0'1
62
1990-91.
In
absolute
terms
deposits
increased
from
yardsticks
of
of
performance
co-operative
institutions
during
the
reference
declining efficiency of
disbursed in the
period.
the
SCBs
appropriate
This
indicates
in collecting the
time.
As
the
loans
consequence,
the
Overdues has
3.9
In 1954
transformed as
the
63
This
functioning
wide. network
at
has
the village
enabled
level
the
(on
District
15
(25)
15
(0 )
15
( 0)
15
1986-87
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
127706
( 1.67)
125600
(3.80)
121000
(66.76)
72558
(71. 29)
42360
(104.57)
210020
(5.91)
198300
(-8.62)
217000
(49.09)
145545
(149.87)
58248
(115.40)
27032
(119.56)
5025160
(40.88)
3566800
( 31.63)
2709800
( 121. 45)
1223673
(142.27)
505085
( 163.33)
191810
( 348.71 )
42747
1773536
(15.00)
1542200
( 1. 44)
1520300
( 128.90)
664184
(40.30)
473397
(389.94)
96623
(-35.86)
150635
Rs.
1189828
(27.19)
935400
(25.37)
746100
(92.58)
387423
(179.12)
138802
(154.29)
54584
(229.37)
16572
Rs.
Investments
4113289
(19.82)
3432800
(22.73)
2797100
(76.12)
1588210
( 87 .71)
846090
(236.44)
251483
(27.87)
196671
Loans
outstanding
Rs.
99506
(-9.04)
109400
(12.32)
97400
(458.71)
17433
(13.76)
15324
( 1162.27)
1214
(-8.52)
1327
Rs
Loans
overdue
7098000
(30.65)
5432800
(20.02)
4526400
(97.44)
2292508
(97.01)
1163640
(229.17)
353506
(60.97)
219609
Rs
working
capital
(1) Administration Report of the Department of co-operation for the period 1970-71 to 1991-92
(2) Handbook on co-operative Movement in Kerala for the period 1970-71 to 1993-94
12
(0 )
1981-82
20707
(48.81)
12312
Rs.
Rs.
Borrowings
SOurce:
12
(9.09)
1976-77
13915
Deposits
Reserves
11
1970-71
paid up
share
capital
Rs.
Note
No. of
members
8402
(5.02)
8000
(15.11)
6950
(56.53)
4440
(14.48)
5192
(192.84)
1773
(-20.78)
2238
Rs.
Profit/
loss
(RUpees in thousands)
Progress of state Co-operative Bank in Kerala for the period 1970-71 to 1993-94
Year
Table 3.6
0'1
,c:.
65
an
increasing
trend.
11 in 1970-71 to 15 in 1993-94.
increase
Rs.4.27
1993-94.
compared
crore
in
case
during
of
deposits
1970-71
to
There was
which
increased
Rs.502.51
crore
Investments
deposits,
by
the
increase
Bank
in
increased
borrowings
from
from
during
However,
was
Rs.l. 65
less.
crore
in
It has
The
share capital,
reserves,
Funds Mll1IIlgI!IIIent -
A Theoretical PerspedWe
CHAPTER-IV
th=
in
commercial
banks
and
co-operative
banks,
4.1
that part of total capital which is used for carrying out the
routine or regular business operations.
of
working
capital.
cash at bank,
67
4.2
If a
funds,
in
planning
sound
investment
policy,
in
It also
68
funds
from
operations
and
the
causes
for
the
financial
4.3
The preparation of
preparation
of
schedule
funds
flow
statement
of
changes
in
involves the
working
capital,
4.4
The
schedule
of
changes
in
working
capital
is
the
Since
to
beginning
ascertain
and
at
the
the
working
end
of
it is necessary,
capital
the
period,
or
funds
in
at
the
to measure
the
of
changes
in
working
capital.
A proforma
of
69
Chart 4.1
Previous
year
Current
year
Effect on working
capital
Rs.
Rs.
Increase Decrease
Rs.
Rs.
Stock
al
Cl
a l - Cl
= el
Debtors
a2
c2
a2
C2
e2
Cash
al
Cl
a l - Cl
= el
Bank
a4
c4
a 4 - c4
= e4
Bills receivable
as
Cs
as - Cs
= es
Prepaid expenses
a6
C6
a 6 - C6
= e6
Total ( a) Rs.
Ea i
EC i
Creditors
bl
dl
b l - dl
Bills payable
b2
d2
b2 - d2
f2
Outstanding expenses
b3
dl
b 3 - d3
fl
Eb i
Ed i
Items
a. Current Assets
Ee i
b. Current Liabilities
c. Working Capital
Difference between
(a) and (b)
Increase/decrease
in working capital
(Ea i - Eb i
(Ee i - Ed;)
fl
Efi
70
4.5
The current
operations
of
the business
are
the most
important single source of funds and over the long run they
are the largest source of funds.
can
be
ascertained
statement
of
funds
by
preparing
from operations.
statement
called
A proforma of
the
this
Chart 4.2.
xxx
xxx
xxx
Less non-fund and/or non-operating credit items
or incomes which have increased the net
profits, but do not increase the fund from
operations (All the items given on the
credit side of the adjusted profit and loss
account)
xxx
xxx
xxx
71
4.6
the
operating
statement.
losses
Above all,
would
appear
in
the
funds
flow
also
should appear
in the
funds
flow
statement.
sale of
fixed assets,
long-term
etc.
will
72
Chart 4.3.
Sources
of funds
,
Rs.
Uses of Funds
Rs.
1.
1.
Funds lost in
operations
2.
Non-operating or
non-trading income
2.
Non-operating
or non-trading
expenses
3.
Issue of shares
3.
Redemption of
redemable
preference
shares
4.
Issue of debentures
et
4.
Redemption of
debentures
ft
5.
es
5.
Repayment of
long-term and
medium-term
loans
fs
6.
e6
6.
Repayment of
long-term and
medium-term
deposits
f6
7.
Sale of long-term
investments
e7
7.
Purchase of
long-term
investments
f7
8.
Sale of fixed
assets
ea
8.
A equisition or
purchase of
fixed assets
fa
9.
Decrease in
working capital
as per statement
of changes in
working capital
9.
Increase in
working capital
as per statement
of changes in
working capital
Ee i -Efi
Efi-Ee i
73
4.7
80,
their net
Earning a
satisfactory return on
capital and meeting the demands for money when they occur are
the dual tasks of funds management in banks.
In other words,
4.8
is
reflected
in
the
pattern
assets
acquired
by
reserves,
deposits, borrowings
(Toor,
N. 8.,
1994,
pp.265-269) .
The flow
Chart 4.4.
of
funds
in commercial banks
is
exhibited in
74
Chart 4.4
rlo~
USES
,SOURCES
Share capital ---------.
:---,
1_________
Reser.es
~_D_e_p_o_s_i_t_s ~I---------.
__
Borrowings
L i ab i lit i es
Provisions
~---
Restryes
and
surplus
--- -----
-.
---------.
Het
.-- incoMe
Fund,
_________ Statutory
Reserye
--------,
_________ Loans I
Advances
------,
---------. InvestMents
- - --,
Interest expense
~-- and Hon interest
expense
- -,
Interest inCOMe
~-------- and Hon interest
inCOMe
75
(paid-up capital)
is contributed by
This capital is
and
other
reserve,
undistributed profits.
which
are
created
out
of
According to
through borrowings.
They also
76
As
(RBI),
different assets.
RBI
in
current
and
other
accounts,
balance
with
and/or
joint
shares,
ventures
and
others;
advances
not collected,
4.9
As
per
the
"statistical
operative movement
in
India"
statements
relating
(Government
of
India,
to
co-
1942,
debentures,
But it
77
profit.
funds,
paid-up
share
capital,
loans
and
deposits
is
the
amount
operations
requirements.
and
of
working
for
funds
meeting
available
the
for
day-to-day
institutions,
co-operative banks
maximum balance of
maintenance of
78
4.10
SOURCES
r---1
R.s.ry.s
\-- -- -----~
D.posits
\--- ------~
BorroINin9s
---------
RtStrYfS
~--- and
surplus
H.t
~-- inooM'
Funds
..
---------~
Statutory
Rl?sl?rvl?
--------,
---------~
Loans l
Advances
------,
lra,>,,,,stMents
----,
---------~
I
I
Int.r.st .xp.nse
~-- and Hon Int.r.st
Int.r.st InCOM'
~-------- and Hon int.r.st
inOOM'
79
and other
funds,
deposits
from members
and non-
The
share
capital
of
DCB
is
subscribed
shares
varies
from
Rs.50
to
Rs.IOO.
by
the
affiliated
Since
claim on it.
Government,
maximum
bye-laws.
limit
of
loans
RBI/NABARD
borrowings
of
and
DCBs
is
fixed
banks.
in
The
their
80
4.11
assets
and
for
investing
in
for purchase of
different
types
of
securities.
these
time
liabilities
(DTL)
in the
form of
liquid
resources
remaining
is
72
available
per
to
it
cent
for
of
the
lending
bank's
or
deposit
investment,
according to priorities.
loans
upto
12
months
for
financing
seasonal
pump sets,
improvement of land.
and
fixtures,
vehicles,
library
and
quarters
81
in Government securities.
In
Kerala,
the
present
there
are
scenario
two
main
of
Co-operative
Banking
Primarily,
problems
in
the
satisfactory.
is not
fully
The income
made.
there
is
sufficient
scope
for
further
In the
following
chapters
an attempt
is made
to
4.12
of DCBs
At
present,
there
is
no
field
significance
management
of
accounting
processes
such
of
where
techniques
as
management
to
the various
organising,
planning,
accounting
82
Source:
Kulsrestha N.K., Theory and practice of Management Accounting, Aligarh,
Navman Prakashan, 1989-90, P.8.
83
4.13
Ratio analysis
Ratio
analysis
involves
an
analysis
of
the
inter-
It
is
a very useful
tool
in
strength,
but
will
also
pin-point
areas
which
banks are:
1.
2.
Credit/deposit ratio
3.
Borrowings/deposits ratio
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
84
In
this
theoretical
chapter
framework
we
made
behind
an
funds
at tempt
to
management.
review
the
In
the
CHAPTER-V
Hence, in
further
classified
into two
average values for these phases for each variable were worked
out and compared with overall average of the selected DCBs.
For computing the overall growth, exponential model
was found suitable (high
by estimating
R~
(y=ab
model.
5.1
Sources of funds
86
5.1.1
Share capital
Table 5.1
B class
Total
1981-82 1993-94
1981-82 1993-94
1981-82 1993-94
Banks
Ernakulam
8913
34996
1943
2943
10856
37939
Kottayam
11233
29002
2190
7643
13423
36645
Palakkad
8136
20140
3533
16981
11669
37121
Kozhikode
10221
10687
2694
11093
12915
21780
Kollam
9458
12413
5970
10998
15428
23411
Idukki
9727
20274
3942
12833
13669
33107
Average
9615
21252
3379
10415
12993
31667
Source:
in the
first
average
(Rs .154. 2S
phase.
lakh)
closely
followed
by
the highest
Idukki
DCB.
The
87
(Rs.217.30 lakh).
It was the
are presented in
Table 5.2.
Table 5.2
Bank
B=log b
R2
CGR
Ernakulam
3.95
0.04
0.97
11.06
Kottayam
4.12
0.03
0.91
8.63
Palakkad
4.02
0.04
0.98
9.99
KO~,hikode
4.04
0.02
0.84
5.31
Kollam
4.14
0.01
0.74
3.81
Idukki
4.11
0.03
0.96
7.44
88
(11.06%)
probably
be
due
to
the
agricultural
and
industrial
5.1.2
equalisation
fund
and
other
funds.
Table
5.3
phase.
But in the
89
90
DCB was highest in the first phase (Rs.20.68 lakh) and that of
Kozhikode DCB the lowest (Rs.9.48 lakh).
DCB topped the list with Rs.4S.0S lakh during the first phase,
whereas in the second phase, Kottayam DCB with Rs.4S.0S lakh
and Kozhikode DCB with Rs.8.S7 lakh occupied the first and
least positions respectively.
amount
maintained the
during
least.
the
first
However,
phase
during
and
the
Palakkad
DCB
second phase,
Ernakulam DCB came to the top of the list (Rs.72.8l lakh) with
Palakkad DCB (Rs.l.S3 lakh) stepping down to the bottom.
the highest
91
Kottayam DCB had the highest amount of Rs.2.76 lakh and Kollam
DCB had only Rs.0.71 lakh, the minimum, in the second phase.
it was
Palakkad DCB
which kept the highest amount (Rs.147.67 lakh) and Idukki DCB
maintained the lowest amount
phase.
(Rs .11. 69
lakh)
in the first
lakh and Idukki DCB had the lowest with Rs.175.39 lakh in the
second phase.
between
it is a
the
utilisation
of
reserves
and
the
profitability.
Table 5.4
Bank
B=log b
R2 .
CGR
Ernakulam
3.89
0.05
0.80
12.88
Kottayam
3.83
0.05
0.94
12.31
Palakkad
4.33
0.02
0.40
6.34
Kozhikode
3.56
0.06
0.97
16.31
Kollam
4.13
0.01
0.37
4.69
Idukki
3.49
0.07
0.97
17.68
92
5.1.3
Deposits
deposits.
Table
5.5
exhibits
growth
of
deposits
of
Table
5.5
suggests
that
in general,
all
these banks
Total deposits
and
averages.
Kollam
DCBs
were
higher
than
the
overall
the
respectively).
least
(Rs.514.37
lakh
were
But in the
45054
45914
41344
14106
38771
Palakkad
Kozhikode
Kollam
Idukki
Average
393567
154861
424272
248071
288745
635082
610372
32686
11461
57877
24226
18973
40423
43156
137236
56628
172896
107717
107994
163139
215040
1981-82 1993-94
SB
14957
15060
11221
13653
7563
26916
15326
44074
36844
38214
47278
33589
54585
54033
1981-82 1993-94
Current
Call
21881
10810
14717
4384
36649
25133
39594
96621
72558
2945
30652
57653
109155
306763
1981-82 1993-94
43537
Kottayam
Source:
42668
1981-82 1993-94
FD
108294
51437
125159
88177
108239
136009
671498
320890
638327
433718
487881
961961
140744 1186208
1981-82 1993-94
Total
(Ra. in thousands)
Deposits of selected DCBs for the triennia ended 1981-82 and 1993-94
Ernakulam
Banks
Table 5.5
\0
W
94
lakh)
lakh).
In
the
second
phase,
the
averages
of
Ernakulam,
lakh
in
the
first
phase.
The
Kottayam and
in Kozhikode DCB
(Rs. 43.84
highest
amount
(Rs.395.94 lakh)
lakh).
In the
95
Table 5.6
Exponential
trend equations
in deposits
of
selected DCBs for the period 1979-80 to 1993-94
Bank
A=log a
B=log b
R2
CGR
Ernakulam
5.03
0.07
0.98
19.84
Kottayam
5.07
0.07
0.98
17.96
Palakkad
4.99
0.05
0.97
13.01
Kozhikode
4.85
0.05
0.95
14.18
Kollam
4.99
0.05
0.93
14.34
Idukki
4.63
0.06
0.97
16.35
This may be
5.1.4
Borrowings
Borrowings of varied types, constitute the last item of
Housing
Corporation,
Conunercial
Bank,
Housing
Banks,
etc.
and
Housing
Urban
Different
Development
Development
types
of
Finance
Corporation,
borrowings
of
48863
55172
23283
31045
27962
Palakkad
Kozhikode
Kollam
Idukki
Average
90740
200082
25950
194257
34721
68204
21225
7212
10579
8270
1026
1364
21464
567
17212
9006
20243
10322
15387
38631
9681
1981-82 1993-94
MT
5065
1865
12350
7163
681
1191
7138
49518
32427
60668
73150
62586
28286
39991
1981-82 1993-94
LT
Others
817
4898
16622
474
63302
35957
1981-82 1993-94
3438
Kottayam
Source:
5967
1981-82 1993-94
ST
40488
43488
43903
59965
50908
30991
13673
174091
241515
106860
277729
113168
198423
106853
1981-82 1993-94
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Borrowings of selected DCBs for the triennia ended 1981-82 and 1993-94
Ernakulam
Banks
Table 5.7
'"
10
97
of
borrowings
in
the
first
phase
The lowest
was
recorded at
The
same
The
pattern
was
seen
in
the
second
phase
also.
Rs.27.77
crore
at
Kozhikode
DCB.
Hence,
it
is
(borrowings) is
In
Kottayam
DCB
Ernakulam DeB
(Rs. 214.64
lakh)
it was
and
minimum
amount
at
In the
the least
maximum borrowings
minimum
amount
(Rs. 731. 50
(Rs. 282.86
lakh)
lakh).
the
pattern
the
is
98
5.2
Uses of funds
Usually, banks as a
99
Table 5.8
Banks
Bank
1981-82 1993-94
Total
1981-82 1993-94
1981-82 1993-94
Ernakulam
8880
163846
33801
376631
42681
540477
Kottayam
11603
49180
8081
275908
19684
325088
Palakkad
5351
46476
25964
134895
31315
181371
Kozhikode
6144
135818
17984
112067
24128
247884
Kollam
11312
31201
37429
154366
48741
285567
Idukki
3263
21631
12177
38496
15440
60127
Average
7759
74692
22573
198727
30332
273419
Source:
Of
this,
Kottayam
DCB
kept
the
maximum
amount
amount (Rs.16.38 crore) and Idukki DCB kept the lowest amount
(Rs.2.16 crore) during this phase.
100
(Rs.3.38 crore)
(Rs.1.21 crore).
stood above
the
overall
average
Table 5.9
Table 5.9.
6ank
B=log b
R2
CGR
Ernakulam
4.47
0.09
0.96
23.77
Kottayam
4.22
0.09
0.89
25.69
Palakkad
4.42
0.06
0.97
14.81
Kozhikode
4.24
0.07
0.92
19.83
Ko 11 am
4.55
0.05
0.87
14.67
Idukki
4.17
0.04
0.88
12.26
was
101
5.2.2
considerably
in
during
this
type
the
period
of
investment
1979 - 80
to
has
1993 - 94.
varied
The
Table 5.10
1993-94
Ernakulam
18600
63167
Kottayam
28000
89333
Palakkad
3800
5667
Kozhikode
3667
32000
Kollam
1333
8333
Idukki
2900
31000
Average
9717
38250
Banks
Source:
102
lakh.
The highest
average was
recorded at
lakh.
lakh)
Kottayam
DCB
had
the
highest
least
average
average
On the basis of
ST
383660
337465
384964
311932
390694
390493
486409
1993-94
28288
13347
39098
15007
13969
52846
35462
120799
100990
89157
54883
50152
177290
252324
1981-82 1993-94
MT
7970
3137
14561
9226
1747
5894
13252
101838
84527
57992
93699
98444
164010
112354
1981-82 1993-94
LT
132744
109938
144393
147660
144175
134609
115690
606297
522981
532114
460514
539290
731793
851088
1993-94
Total
1981-82
96487
Average
Source:
93454
123428
Kozhikode
Idukki
128459
Palakkad
90735
75869
Kottayam
Kollam
66976
1981-82
Ernakulam
Banks
(Rs. in thousands)
Table 5.11 Loans and advances of selected DCBs for the triennia ended 1981-82 and 1993-94
104
In
the
first
phase,
all
DCBs
except
crore.
Maximum amount of
Ernakulam DCB' s
average
was
But in the
Rs. 85.10
crore
It is
inferred that the maximum loan granting banks were the ones
earning maximum profit.
In
the
case
of
short-term
loans,
two
DCBs
recorded
Rs.12.84 crore and Kollam DCB with Rs.9.07 crore occupied the
last position.
DCB (Rs. 48.64 crore) in the second phase which upgraded to the
first position from the 6th position and the lowest average by
Kozhikode DCB (Rs.31.19 crore) .
The
105
(Rs.1. 33 crore).
But,
with
Rs.1.45 crore and Palakkad DCB ranked last with Rs.17.47 lakh.
But in the second phase, Kottayam DCB rose from the fourth to
the first position.
A=log a
B=log b
R2
CGR
Ernakulam
4.96
0.07
0.99
18.55
Kottayam
5.09
0.06
0.96
15.60
Palakkad
5.12
0.04
0.96
11.44
Kozhikode
5.12
0.04
0.92
10.92
Kollam
5.06
0.04
0.96
11. 90
Idukki
5.00
0.05
0.99
13.85
106
(18.55%)
Kozhikode DCB
The reason for the maximum CGR 'of Ernakulam DCB may
Fixed assets
In the context of DCBs, fixed assets constitute a small
Palakkad DCB
DCB
(Rs.64.26
lakh)
may
be
due
to
the
2381
108
47
133
95
36
196
139
199
239
58
119
193
407
177
1081
1573
1718
2304
2399
2664
3630
Source:
F and F
V+L
2328
571
1367
673
464
2157
1154
Total
1878
828
2780
1394
764
3522
1979
4907
2726
6426
3233
7969
5279
3811
1981-82 1993-94
1.
2.
689
Average
915
4650
810
5377
2209
1981-82 1993-94
V+L
Note
110
626
Kozhikode
Idukki
265
Palakkad
1279
1169
Kottayam
Kollam
686
1981-82 1993-94
F and F
(Rs. in thousands)
1981-82 1993-94
s~lected
Premises
Fixed assets of
Ernakulam
Banks
Table 5.13
....
o
108
furniture
and
fixtures,
three DCBs
showed
lakh)
(Rs.4.64 lakh).
phase.
lowest
average
While
phase, only two DCBs had averages above the overall average of
RS.1.99 lakh.
109
The growth rate in fixed assets was not significant in
the DCBs of Ernakulam, Kottayam, Kozhikode and Kollam.
This
Table 5.14
Bank
A=log a
B=log b
RZ
CGR
Ernakulam
3.32
0.01
0.40
4.59
Kottayam
3.57
0.01
0.53
3.09
Palakkad
2.78
0.08
0.85
21. 67
Kozhikode
3.15
0.03
0.80
7.34
Kollam
3.44
0.02
0.70
6.77
Idukki
2.99
0.04
0.61
11.15
As
given
in
Table
5.14,
comparatively
high
CGR
in
5.2.5
Investments in securities
Banks utilise a
investment
in
portion of
Government
securities,
trustee
securities,
1920
1480
3218
441
1392
Palakkad
Kozhikode
Kollam
Idukki
Average
2974
567
1333
6217
8359
1347
623
188
456
231
2771
93
12810
6967
292
1232
58833
9533
1981-82 1993-94
Trustee
2685
2281
3475
3669
3477
1920
1288
8511
12885
7481
9672
8884
7066
5076
1981-82 1993-94
Shares
others
59
354
1026
2699
2667
84
708
1981-82 1993-94
609
Kottayam.
Source:
684
1981-82 1993-94
Government
4746
25770
23118
11481
6882
3076
16264
18475
69307
15976
5606
5695
5300
1915
1981-82 1993-94
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Investments of selected DCBs for the triennia ended 1981-82 and 1993-94
Ernakulam.
Banks
Table 5.15
~
~
111
all
except
Ernakulam and
Idukki had
at Kollam DCB
and
the
lowest
amount
lakh)
at
Ernakulam DCB.
second position and Kollam DCB ranked the last with Rs.1.14
crore.
Hence,
it
may
be
inferred
that
preference
for
Kottayam DCB
In
crore
with
only
Kottayam
DCB
(Rs.S.88
crore)
112
the
the
The averages
in 'other
However, another
The overall
average
of
this
type of
A=log a
B=log b
R2
CGR
0.91
0.95
20.94
25.11
0.93
10.76
Ernakulam
Kottayam
3.20
3.62
Palakkad
3.74
0.08
0.09
0.04
Kozhikode
3.67
0.04
0.93
10.39
Kollam
3.79
0.03
0.43
7.56
Idukki
3.51
0.06
0.98
15.90
113
analysed.
CHAPTER-VI
6.1
Sources of funds
Reserves
and other funds were also not accounted because they were
transferred only once in a year.
composition of these items over the years and are not included
in the detailed study.
115
6.2
Monthly
Table
6.1
Banks
Current
deposits
Savings
Bank
deposits
Ernakulam
62694
(6.86)
182413
(19.95)
Kottayam
102229
(12.72)
Palakkad
Fixed
deposits
Total
218455
(23.89)
450770
(49.30)
914332
(100)
165306
(20.57)
260936
(32.48)
275008
(34.23)
803479
(100)
27156
(6.24)
73035
(16.79)
123110
(28.30)
211767
(48.67)
435068
(100)
Kozhikode
42385
(12.27)
95987
(27.78)
49420
(14.30)
157720
(45.65)
345512
(100)
Kollam
26743
(5.43)
137824
(27.98)
13116
(2.66)
314818
(63.93)
492501
(100)
Idukki
27215
(12.35)
45066
(20.45)
51122
(23.20)
96953
(44.00)
220356
(100)
Average
48070
(9.31)
116605
(22.25)
119360
(20.80)
251173
(47.64)
535208
(100)
Note
Source:
Call
deposits
116
It
is
made
clear
from Table
6.1
that
Ernakulam DCB
Ernakulam
during
Rs. 9143.32
DCB
the
period
1989-90
to
93-94
was
Fixed
(about 48%)
it
Ernakulam
(49.3%).
Current
117
Table 6.2
Year
Current
deposits
Savings
Bank
deposits
Call
deposits
Fixed
deposits
Total
1989-90
45936
(8.09)
147932
(26.06)
128177
(22.58)
245654
(43.27)
567699
(100)
1990-91
46923
(6.91)
165557
(24.37)
165876
(24.42)
300930
(44.30)
679286
(100)
1991-92
63059
(6.31)
185002
(18.53)
243219
(24.36)
507288
(50.80)
998568
(100)
1992-93
70682
(6.81)
192412
(18.53)
251305
(24.19)
524230
(50.47)
1038629
(100)
1993-94
86869
(6.75)
221161
(17.18)
303700
(23.58)
675750
(52.49)
1287480
(100)
Average
62694
(6.86)
182413
(19.95)
218455
(23.89)
450770
(49.30)
914332
(100)
Note
Source:
Kottayam
As disclosed by Table 6.3, the average of total deposits
of Kottayam DCB has increased from Rs.5745.56 lakh in 1989-90
to Rs.11189.57 lakh in 1993-94.
118
Table 6.3
Year
Current
deposits
Savings
Bank
deposits
1989-90
68634
(11.95)
108765
(18.93)
1990-91
87394
(13.62)
1991-92
Call
deposits
Fixed
deposits
Total
199094
(34.65)
198063
(34.47)
574556
(100)
112888
(17.60)
233223
(36.35)
208085
(32.43)
641590
(100)
91584
(11.62)
150415
(19.09)
304552
(38.64)
241562
(30.65)
788113
(100)
1992-93
110053
(12.31)
170731
(19.09)
313010
(35.01)
300380
(33.59)
894174
(100)
1993-94
153478
(13.72)
283729
(25.36)
254802
(22.77)
426948
(38.15)
1118957
(100)
Average
102229
(12.72)
165306
(20.57)
260936
(32.48)
275008
(34.23)
803479
(100)
Note
Source:
Palakkad
Table 6.4 exposed that monthly average of total deposits
of Palakkad DCB
period.
Rs.1125.56
lakh
(35.40%
to
total)
in
in 1993-94.
1989-90
to
Of the total
119
(Rs.2117.67 lakh) followed by call deposit.
Current account
Table 6.4
Year
Current
deposits
Savings
Bank
deposits
Call
deposits
Fixed
deposits
Total
1989-90
16732
(5.26)
49530
(15.58)
139094
(43.76)
112556
(35.40)
317912
(100)
1990-91
18231
(5.22)
65275
(18.67)
137647
(39.38)
128403
(36.73)
349556
(100)
1991-92
30719
(7.13)
75236
(17.47)
128479
(29.84)
196146
(45.56)
430580
(100)
1992-93
36460
(7.04)
83153
(16.06)
101534
(19.62)
296548
(57.28)
517695
(100)
1993-94
33637
(6.01)
91982
(16.44)
108796
(19.44)
325180
(58.11)
559595
(100)
Average
,
27156
(6.24)
73035
(16.79)
123110
(28.30)
211767
(48.67)
435068
(100)
Note
Source:
120
Kozhikode
It came to light from Table 6.5 that monthly average of
deposits
mobilised
by
Kozhikode
DCB
has
boosted
from
lakh in 1993-94.
This DCB has mobilised more amount as fixed deposits which was
46.66 per cent in 89-90 and 44.97 per cent in 93-94.
Current
Savings
Bank
deposits
Call
deposits
Fixed
deposits
Total
1989-90
31213
(12.98)
77506
(32.23)
19542
(8.13)
112188
(46.66)
240449
(100)
1990-91
33343
(12.07)
87982
(31.85)
29864
(10.82)
125023
(45.26)
276212
(100)
1991-92
44565
(13.01)
93605
(27.32)
46120
(13.46)
158346
(46.21)
342636
(100)
1992-93
46039
(11.29)
109438
(26.85)
66284
(16.26)
185892
(45.60)
407653
(100)
1993-94
56762
(12.32)
111406
(24.19)
85289
(18.52)
207149
(44.97)
460606
(100)
Average
42385
(12.27)
95987
(27.78)
49420
(14.30)
157720
(45.65)
345512
(100)
Year
Note
Source:
121
Kollam
Table 6.6 revealed that Kollam DCB's monthly average of
total deposits increased from Rs. 3281.11 lakh in 89-90 to
Rs.6940.33 lakh in 93-94.
Deposits mobilised by
Table 6.6
Year
Current
deposits
Savings
Bank
deposits
Call
deposits
Fixed
deposits
Total
1989-90
20905
(6.37)
103928
(31.68)
12112
(3.69)
191166
(58.26)
328111
(100)
1990-91
21475
(5.78)
116557
(31.37)
11699
(3.15)
221788
(59.70)
371519
(100)
1991-92
28075
(5.87)
140000
(29.28)
11943
(2.50)
298102
(62.35)
478120
(100)
1992-93
27676
(4.69)
153862
(26.04)
13500
(2.29)
395682
(66.98)
590720
(100)
1993-94
35583
(5.13)
174774
(25.18)
16325
(2.35)
467351
(67.34)
694033
(100)
Average
26743
(5.43)
137824
(27.98)
13116
(2.66)
314818
(63.93)
492501
(100)
Note
Source:
122
Idukki
also
the
fixed
deposits
recorded
major
in this DCB
portion
of
total
deposits.
Table 6.7
Savings
Bank
deposits
Fixed
deposits
Total
1989-90
24603
(16.84)
36979
(25.31)
32133
(22.00)
52362
(35.85)
146077
(100)
1990-91
31034
(16.67)
43371
(23.29)
45976
(24.69)
65804
(35.34)
186185
(100)
1991-92
19843
(10.66)
44807
(24.06)
48004
(25.78)
90223
(48.46)
202877
(100)
1992-93
30101
(12.48)
47882
(19.85)
50063
(20.75)
113193
(46.92)
241239
(100)
1993-94
30497
(9.37)
52288
(16.07)
79433
(24.41)
163185
(50.15)
325403
(100)
Average
27215
(12.35)
45066
(20.45)
51122
(23.20)
96953
(44.00)
220356
(100)
Year
Call
deposits
Note
Source:
123
6.3
important
borrowings.
constituent
of
working
capital
is
Housing
and
Urban
Development
Corporation,
viz.,
Co-operative
(National
Bank I
~other
banks I
~Kerala
Bank
State
for
~Others
(Government,
National
Housing Bank,
Housing
124
Table 6.8
KSCB
Banks
Ernakulam
Other Banks
88441 (90.72)
Kottayam
168620 (97.03)
Palakkad
107269 (93.17)
1371
(1.41)
Others
7673
Total
97485 (100)
(7.87)
(0.70)
7063
230993 (100)
Ko 11 am
99278 (100)
99278 (100)
Idukki
227621 (100)
227621 (100)
Average
153704 (96.82)
157381 (100)
Note
Source:
~other
banks' and
~others'
and
the rest i. e., Kozhikode, Kollam and Idukki DCBs borrowed from
KSCB
only.
Borrowings
of
Kozhikode
DCB
was
highest
125
(KSCB),
other
Monthly
KSCB which was more than 93.67 per cent in all years except
93-94.
64.98 per cent, from other banks (State Bank of India, State
Bank of Travancore) 0.04 per cent and from others,
(Greater
126
Monthly average of the composition of borrowings
of Ernakulam DeB for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
Table 6.9
(Rs. in thousands)
Other Banks
KSCB
Year
Others
Total
1989-90
91018 (93.67)
5114
(5.26)
1040
(1. 07)
1990-91
106445 (98.57)
349
(0.32)
1202
1991-92
106114 (97.62)
1353
(1.25)
1231
1992-93
76487 (98.15)
(0.00)
1439
(1. 85)
77927 (100)
1993-94
62143 (64.98)
36
95634 (100)
Average
88441 (90.72)
1371
7673
97485 (100)
(1.41)
97172 (100)
(7.87)
Note
Source:
Books and
1993-94
accounts
of
DCBs
for
the
period
1989-90 to
Kottayam
As exhibited in Table 6.10,
from KSCB and others.
Of
maximum borrowings from KSCB which was more than 95.75 per
cent in all years.
highest
in
1992 - 93
lakh)
and
lowest
in
89 - 90
127
Other Banks
KSCB
Others
Total
1989-90
154224 (98.39)
2524
1990-91
176902 (98.19)
3258
1991-92
152220 (97.02)
4675
1992-93
181744 (96.07)
7437
1993-94
178011 (95.75)
7893
Average
168620 (97.03)
Note
Source:
Books and
1993-94
accounts
of
DCBs
for
the
period
1989-90
to
Palakkad
As disclosed in Table 6.11 Palakkad DCB borrowed from all
the three sources during the period 1989-90 to 1993-94.
The
In all the
which
borrowings.
was
always
more
Next to KSCB,
than
90
per
cent
of
total
The lowest
128
Table 6.11
(Rs. in thousands)
Year
KSCB
Other Banks
Others
Total
1989-90
100045 (97.62)
33
(0.03)
2404
1990-91
97661 (96.31)
788
(0.78)
2955
1991-92
99934 (90.95)
2823
(2.57)
7124
1992-93
115865 (90.30)
252
(0.20) 12185
1993-94
122841 (91.95)
108
(0.08) 10647
Average
107269 (93.17)
801
(0.70)
7063
Note
Source:
for
1993-94
Kozhikode
As per Table 6.12 the borrowings position of Kozhikode
DCB has varied considerably during this
of
borrowings
was
followed by 1991-92
(Rs .1388.20 lakh) .
in
1992-93
(Rs.3320.21
lakh)
closely
129
Table 6.12
KSCB
Year
Others
Total
1989-90
217812 (100)
217812 (100)
1990-91
192006 (100)
192006 (100)
1991-92
274306 (100)
274306 (100)
1992-93
332021 (100)
332021 (100)
1993-94
138820 (100)
138820 (100)
Average
230993 (100)
230993 (100)
Note
Source:
Books and
1993-94
accounts
of
DCBs
for
the
period
1989-90
to
Kollam
The position of monthly average borrowings of Kollam DCB
is exhibited in Table 6.13.
KSCB.
period.
130
Table 6.13
Year
KSCB
Other Banks
Others
Total
1989-90
139074 (100)
139074 (100)
1990-91
87227 (100)
87227 (100)
1991-92
94653 (lOO)
94653 (100)
1992-93
98423 (100)
98423 (100)
1993-94
77011 (100)
77011 (100)
Average
99278 (100)
99278 (100)
Note
Source:
of
DCBs
for
the
period
1989-90
to
Idukki
It was also
seen
quantum
that
borrowings.
there
was
no
consistency
in
the
of
(Rs.1985.41 lakh) .
131
KSCB
Other Banks
Others
Total
1989-90
198541 (100)
198541 (100)
1990-91
218475 (100)
218475 (100)
1991-92
258515 (100)
258515 (100)
1992-93
237631 (100)
237631 (100)
1993-94
224941 (100)
224941 (100)
Average
227621 (100)
227621 (100)
Note
Source:
Books and
1993-94
6.4
accounts
of
DCBs
for
the
period
1989-9p
to
Uses of funds
The uses of funds include cash in hand and at bank, money
at bank including money at call and short notice were done for
the period 1989-90 to 1993-94 and its opportunity cost is also
worked out (Chapter 7).
132
types
of
loans
like
overdraft
facilities,
cash
loans,
individuals,
integrated
loan
bills
for
consumer
discounting
co-operative
durables,
facilities,
development
gold
loan
assistance
project,
loan
to
for
for
were
operations,
pu~oses,
classified
marketing
of
crops,
weavers societies,
"other purposes'.
into
seasonal
medium
term
agricultural
agricultural
monthly
average
of
loans
and
advances
of
all
119879
(28.28)
108326
(29.16)
138657
(27.75)
Kollam
Idukki
Average
3897
(0.82)
4740
(1. 27)
6059
( 1. 39 )
15799
(3.13 )
8939
(2.40)
14695
(3.46 )
13598
(3.12 )
15203
(3.29 )
18204
(3.68 )
16002
(4.31)
16548
(3.91)
13498
(3.09 )
16501
(3.57)
19838
(3.14 )
20243
(4.15)
17608
(4.74)
13420
(3.16 )
22557
(5.17)
21005
(4.55)
28294
(4.47)
112192
(25.71)
Kozhikode
4705
(1.03)
17943
(2.84)
18574
(2.79)
Other
industrial
purposes
of
Source:
120442
(26.08)
Palakkad
7880
(1.25)
26836
(4.03)
Weavers
societies
190777
(30.16)
Kottayam
24413
(3.67 )
Medium term
agricultural
purposes
of
Note
180507
(27.11)
t h e composition
1993-94
Marketing
of crops
to
average o f
period 1989-90
Month1y
Seasonal
agricultural
operations
6.15
Ernakulam
Banks
Tab1."
for
the
301809
(60.47)
215920
(58.12)
259372
(61. 19)
268387
(61.52)
284038
(61.48)
367733
(58.14)
415405
(62.40)
Other
purposes
498639
(100)
371535
(100)
423914
(100)
436291
(100)
461894
(100)
632465
(100)
665735
(100)
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
s e 1 e c t e d DCBs
w
w
134
DCB
(61.52%) .
For
'seasonal
agricultural
The minimum
Only
have granted
loans for this group and the amount granted by these banks was
very nominal.
Bank wise details of borrowings are shown in Tables 6.16
to 6.21.
ErnaJrulam
small amount for other industrial purposes and has not granted
any amount for marketing of crops.
187202
(23.87)
219630
(25.40)
180507
(27.11)
1992-93
1993-94
Average
Source:
Marketing
of crops
24413
(3.67 )
25062
(2.90)
26672
(3.40 )
25171
(4.02)
25824
(4.46)
19335
(4.06)
Medium term
agricultural
purposes
26836
(4.03)
29692
(3.43 )
29488
(3.76 )
27615
(4.41)
25826
(4.47)
21559
(4.53)
Weavers
societies
18574
(2.79)
20163
(2.33)
18871
(2.41)
17323
(2.77)
20906
(3.62)
15605
(3.28 )
Other
industrial
purposes
164220
(26.24)
1991-92
185696
(32.13)
1990-91
Note
145786
(30.65)
Seasonal
agricultural
operations
415405
(62.40)
570409
(65.94)
521988
(66.56)
391474
(62.56)
319743
(55.32)
273411
(57.48)
Other
purposes
665735
(100)
864956
(100)
784221
(100)
625803
(100)
577995
(100)
475696
(100)
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Month1y average of the composition 'of 10ans and advances of Ernakulam DCB for the
period 1989-90 to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Tab1e 6.16
W
11'I
...
136
Kottayam
The monthly average of the composition of loans and
advances of Kottayam DCB is presented in Table 6.17.
clear from this table that,
It was
granted, the maximum share was for 'other purposes' which was
60.23 per cent
in1992-93
~Seasonal
agricultural
operations'
stood
next
to
other
purposes.
Palakkad
As per Table 6.18 monthly average of loans granted by
Palakkad DCB for 'other purposes' recorded the maximum amount
of total loans.
accounted more than 60 per cent in all the five years under
the study period.
'seasonal
agricultural
agricultural
purposes',
operations'.
'weavers
For
societies'
'medium-term
and
'other
278018
(32.27)
190777
(30.16)
1993-94
Average
7880
( 1. 25)
14480
(1.68)
9342
(1. 53 )
17943
(2.84)
24616
(2.86)
14013
(2.29)
19644
(3.30)
19838
(3.14)
23168
(2.69)
21019
(3.44)
18241
(3.06 )
21671
(3.72)
28294
(4.47)
37648
(4.37)
18684
(3.06 )
25256
(4.25)
30958
(5.32)
28925
(5.64)
Other
industrial
purposes
179831
(29.45)
1992-93
8419
(1.42)
20123
(2.46)
15091
(2.94)
Weavers
societies
Source:
171181
(28.77)
1991-92
4644
(0.80)
11318
(2.21)
Medi um term.
agricultural
purposes
176461
(30.32)
1990-91
2515
(0.49)
Marketing
of crops
Note
148396
(28.92)
Seasonal
agricultural
operations
367733
(58.14)
483637
(56.13)
367836
(60.23)
352184
(59.20)
328156
(56.38)
306854
(59.80)
Other
purposes
632465
(100)
861567
(100)
610725
(100)
594925
(100)
582013
(100)
513099
(100)
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Monthly average of the composition of loans and advances of Kottayam DCB for the
period 1989-90 to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Table 6.17
....
w
...J
152997
(26.89)
120442
(26.08)
1993-94
Average
4705
(1. 03)
8137
(1. 43)
5567
(1.14 )
15203
(3.29 )
19110
(3.36)
18274
(3.73)
15279
(3.58 )
16501
(3.57 )
22004
(3.87)
17532
(3.58)
15802
(3.71)
13587
(3.28)
21005
(4.55)
19858
(3.49 )
18793
(3.84 )
20663
(4.85)
21944
(5.31)
23769
(5.78)
Other
industrial
purposes
119462
(24.41)
1992-93
4510
( 1. 06 )
12033
(2.91)
13582
(3.31)
Weavers
societies
Source:
111783
(26.21)
1991-92
4178
(1. 01)
11319
(2.75)
Medium term
agricultural
purposes
104782
(25.32)
1990-91
1132
(0.28)
Marketing
of crops
Note
113186
(27.55)
Seasonal
agricultural
operations
284038
(61.48)
346918
(60.96)
309764
(63.30)
258389
(60.59)
257239
(62.17)
247878
(60.33)
Other
purposes
461894
(100)
569024
(100)
489392
(100)
426426
(100)
413763
(100)
410866
(100)
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Monthly average of the composition of loans and advances of Palakkad DeB for the
period 1989-90 to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Table 6.18
00
139
Kozhikode
Monthly average of the composition of loans and advances
of Kozhikode DCB is exhibited in Table 6.19.
Maximum amount
of loans granted for the study period was for 'other purposes'
which was 62.99 per cent in 89-90 and 60.16 per cent in 93-94.
Next to 'other purposes', this DCB has granted highest amount
of loan to 'seasonal agricultural operations' which was above
25.25 per cent in all years.
The second
which accounted to 30.85 per cent in 89-90 and 27.16 per cent
in 93-94.
124546
(25.85)
112192
(25.71)
1993-94
Average
6059
( 1. 39)
6478
(1.34)
6335
(1. 34)
13598
(3.12)
16193
(3.36)
15385
(3.24 )
11696
(2.83)
13498
(3.09)
16432
(3.41)
16289
(3.44 )
12569
(3.04 )
12315
(3.01)
22557
(5.17)
28338
(5.88)
27149
(5.73)
20315
(4.92)
19192
(4.69)
17792
(4.41)
Other
industrial
purposes
123030
(25.94)
1992-93
5848
(1.41)
10877
(2.66)
9884
(2.45)
Weavers
societies
Source:
106704
(25.82)
1991-92
5702
( 1. 39)
13838
(3.43 )
Medium term
agricul t'~1.ral
purposes
104874
(25.64)
1990-91
5930
(1.47)
Marketing
of crops
Note
101808
(25.25)
Seasonal
agricultural
operations
268387
(61. 52 )
289764
(60.16)
286015
(60.31)
256118
(61.98)
256012
(62.61)
254026
(62.99
Other
purposes
436291
(100)
481751
(100)
474203
(100)
413250
(100)
408972
(100)
403278
(100)
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Month1y average of the composition of 10ans and advances of Kozhikode DCB for the
period 1989-90 to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Tab1e 6.19
oP-
141526
(27.16)
119879
(28.28)
1993-94
Average
14695
(3.46 )
15490
(2.97)
15534
(3.42 )
16548
(3.91)
17602
(3.38)
16241
(3.57 )
14887
(3.77 )
13420
(3.16)
15491
(2.98)
14122
(3.11)
13289
(3.36 )
11876
(3.08)
12321
(3.40)
Other
industrial
purposes
124983
(27.48)
1992-93
14487
(3.67 )
17071
(4.41)
16941
(4.68)
Weavers
societies
Source:
108407
(27.43)
1991-92
14103
(3.65 )
13861
(3.83 )
Medium term
agricultural
purposes
112820
(29.17)
1990-91
Marketing
of crops
Note
111659
(30.85)
Seasonal
agricultural
operations
259372
(61. 19 )
330930
(63.51)
283859
(62.42)
244090
(61.77)
230835
(59.69)
207147
(57.24)
Other
purposes
423914
(100)
521039
(100)
454739
(100)
395160
(100)
386705
(100)
361929
(100)
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Monthly average of the composition of loans and advances of Kollam DCB for the
period 1989-90 to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Table 6.20
....
....
142
Idukki
~other
~other
~Seasonal
agricultural
purposes loan'.
This
The analysis
which
is quite natural
in a
banking
institution.
This
sample DeBs ranged between Rs. 9.74 crore to Rs. 23.09 crore.
The extent of borrowings is found to be low in Ernakulam and
122412
(26.90)
108326
(29.16)
1993-94
Average
4740
(1. 27)
5354
( 1. 18)
4939
(1. 20)
8939
(2.40)
13768
(3.02 )
9454
(2.29)
9232
(2.59)
16002
(4.31)
17592
(3.87)
15758
(3.82 )
17625
(4.95)
15736
(4.79)
17608
(4.74)
19858
(4.36)
19696
(4.79)
19303
(5.42)
15484
(4.71)
13698
(4.47)
Other
industrial
purposes
107154
(26.00)
1992-93
5036
(1. 42)
6994
(2.13)
13298
(4.35)
Weavers
societies
Source:
107427
(30.19)
1991-92
4622
(1.41)
5249
(1.72)
Medium term
agricultural
purposes
104905
(31.91)
1990-91
3749
(1. 22)
Marketing
of crops
Note
99733
(32.60)
Seasonal
agricultural
operations
1989-90
Year
215920
(58.12)
276124
(60.67)
255068
(61.90)
197229
(55.43)
180960
(55.05)
170221
(55.64)
Other
purposes
371535
(100)
455108
(100)
412069
(100)
355852
(100)
328701
(100)
305948
(100)
Total
(Rs. in thousands)
Table 6.21 Monthly average of the composition of loans and advances of Idukki DCB for the
period 1989-90 to 1993-94
144
highest in Kozhikode.
deposits.
CHAPTER-VII
in
mobilisation
selected DCBs.
and
deployment
of
funds
in
in
co-operative
enterprise
operative
institution has
to meet
financial
financial
objectives
as
co-operative
dual
because
objectives,
coviz.,
enterprise.
The
social
require
measurement
of
non-economic
parameters
and
Efficiency of co-operatives
Efficiency
of
different angles.
co-operatives
have
been
analysed
from
(Eberhard
146
Madane attempted
Efficiency of DCBs
147
efficiency is measured
ratio,
borrowed funds/owned
ratio,
funds
borrowings/
ratio,
liquid
ratio
and
overdue/total
total
demand
ratio.
of
working
funds
per
employee,
opportunity
cost
7.1
.analysis
improved.
As absolute
(1983)
They
have
designed
framework
for
the
profit
148
management
two instruments of
Part
Difference
R = Interest earned
S = Spread
S = (R-K)
Expenditure
K = Interest paid
Il
B = Burden
B = (M+O-C)
N = Non-interest
expenses (M+O)
III
E = Total expenses
(M+O+K)
Source:
I = Total income
(R+C)
P = Profit
P = (I-E) or
P = (S-B)
Non-interest
interest paid
(cost of audit,
security services,
special
149
7.2
(manpower
and
other
(discount,
commission,
'burden'.
termed as profit
expenses)
and
non-interest
service charges,
(or loss)
of a bank.
the
etc.)
income
constitutes
Manpower and
These are
(V)
The
after deducting the above said contra entries from the balance
sheet total.
When each of the factors in the above table is related to
the common base V, then
P
= s-b
150
where,
s
= B/V
S/V
and
it would
7.3
DCBs
confidence
depends
on
need
of
profit
the
for
several
investing public
profitability.
reasons
in
Secondly,
Firstly,
co-operative banks
expanding
scale
of
Profit can
is
facilities
business.
required
which
to
would
Fifthly,
it
create
help
would
necessary
on
increasing
lead
to
Fourthly,
infrastructural
the
volume
effective
of
customer
Sixthly, it
would
help
in
solving financial
set
back
if any.
151
the
shock
of
unforeseen
losses.
Therefore,
1987, pp.210-215).
In
order to
113845
103568
56871
66516
74016
53302
78020
Kottayam
Pa1akad
Kozhikode
Kollam
Idukki
Average
Interest
earned
R
55806
35812
47467
43322
50035
76256
81943
Interest
paid
K
22214
17490
26549
23196
6836
27312
31903
S(R-K)
Spread
13522
8938
17233
14078
12670
14199
14011
Manpower
expense
M
29406
29525
19867
21525
26711
48160
30649
Other
expense
42861
38463
37100
35603
39382
62359
44260
Noninterest
expense
N(M+O)
21712
21781
11877
12711
32938
36657
14310
Noninterest
income
C
21150
16682
25223
22892
6444
25702
29955
Burden
B
B=N-C
98667
74275
84567
78925
89417
138615
126203
10
Total
expense
E(M+O+K)
99732
75083
85893
79229
89809
140225
128151
11
Total
irx::ome
I(R+C)
1065
808
1326
303
392
1610
1948
12
Profit
I-E
1065
808
1326
303
392
1610
1948
13
Profit
S-B
917383
626346
785366
750099
743004
1221894
1375589
14
Volume
of 1I)rking fund
(Total
of B/SContra
V
(Rs. in thousaoos)
Averages of spread, burden and profit of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
Ernakulam
Banks
Table 7.2
l1'I
.....
153
lakh)
and
Kottayam DCB
(Rs.I035.68
lakh)
had
The table
the
period
Ernakulam and
average
which
respectively.
1989-90
to
Kottayam DCBs I
were
1993-94.
were
Rs.819.43
The
more
lakh
than
and
averages
the
of
overall
Rs.762.56
lakh
Ernakulam DCB
DCBs other than that of Palakkad and Kozhikode were above the
154
With an
Of
lakh.
the
six
selected
DCBs',
Ernakulam,
Kottayam and Idukki DCB stood above the overall average with
regard to other expenses.
average of Rs.481.60 lakh and Kottayam DCB had the lowest with
Rs.198.67 lakh.
income'
which
is
another
Kottayam,
component
of
Average of three
Kottayam
155
period.
Rs.64.44 lakh.
Kottayam
DCBs
have
mobilised
more
funds
for
their
business.
Kottayam
had
averages
below
the
overall
average
of
clear
that
DCBs
with
highest
total
It is
income
are
Profit
earned
by
bank
which
is
an
indicator
of
highest
in Ernakulam DCB
with
RS.19.48 lakh
closely
156
Kozhikode DCB
the
the overall
lakh.
Only
The
7.4
x 100
Volume of working fund
Total interest paid
2.
x 100
Volume of working fund
Total spread
3.
x 100
Volume of working fund
157
Manpower expenses
ratio (m)
x 100
Volume of working fund
Other expense
5.
x 100
Volume of working fund
Non-interest expense
6.
Non-interest expense
ratio (n)
Non-interest income
ratio (c)
x 100
Volume of working fund
Non-interest income
7.
x 100
Volume of working fund
Total burden
8.
x 100
Volume of working fund
Total expense
9.
Profitability ratio
(p)
x 100
Volume of working fund
Total income
10.
x 100
Volume of working fund
Total profit
11.
x 100
Volume of working fund
V.W.F.)
V.W.F. )
6.02
4.62
5.33
7.70
7.16
7.71
10.39
7.68
8.05
8.28
6.91
9.21
9.39
7.51
7.99
5.97
8.84
7.82
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1999-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
6.75
6.34
7.02
7.35
5.51
5.98
7.29
5.22
5.91
8.08
1990-91
4.93
7.35
( Interest
paid/
(Interest
earned/
Interest
paid
ratio
Interest
earned
ratio
1989-90
Year
0.66
1.14
0.64
1.14
1.17
2.37
1.86
2.19
2.26
2.54
1. 70
3.10
2.49
2.17
2.42
V.W.F.)
(Spread
Spread
ratio
1.57
1. 75
1.37
2.01
1.97
1.24
1.19
1.10
1.13
1.09
0.91
1.16
0.88
1.10
1.16
V.W.F. )
(Manpower
expense/
Manpower
expense
ratio
4.25
3.99
3.00
3.16
3.13
4.19
3.96
4.46
3.70
3.22
1.81
2.99
2.72
1. 77
1.68
V.W.F. )
5.82
5.73
4.37
5.17
5.10
Palakltad
5.43
5.15
5.56
4.83
4.31
Kottayam
2.72
4.14
3.60
2.87
2.84
5.22
4.61
3.75
4.18
3.95
3.21
3.44
3.52
2.64
1. 87
1.15
1.18
1.24
0.85
0.62
V.W.F.)
V.W.F.)
Noninterest
incorre
ratio
(Noninterest
incorre/
Noninterest
expense
ratio
(Noninterest
expense/
Ernakulam
(Other
expense/
Other
expense
ratio
Total
expense
ratio
0.60
1.12
0.62
0.99
1.15
2.22
1. 71
2.03
2.19
2.44
1. 57
2.96
2.36
2.02
2.22
12.98
13.42
9.70
11.9l
11.44
12.45
12.49
10.19
10.85
9.81
8.71
11.43
8.82
8.77
7.79
10
(Burden/ (Total
V .W.F. ) expense/
V.W.F.)
Burden
ratio
13.04
13.44
9.72
12.06
11.46
12.60
12.64
10.34
10.92
9.91
8.83
11.57
8.95
8.92
7.98
11
V.W.F.)
(Total
income/
Total
income
ratio
0.06
0.02
0.02
0.15
0.02
0.15
0.15
0.16
0.07
0.10
0.13
0.14
0.13
0.15
0.20
12
V.W.F. )
(Profit/
Profitability
ratio
Contd.
0.061
0.023
0.017
0.154
0.013
0.153
0.149
0.161
0.074
0.099
0.124
0.134
0.127
0.145
0.197
13
(profit/
V.W.F. )
Profitability
ratio
Tab1e 7.3 Ratios of various components of P&L account to vo1ume of working fund of se1ected DCBs
for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
(]')
l1'
....
4.64
4.22
6.54
10.33
8.30
9.15
7.65
10.59
10.48
8.09
9.01
7.00
9.39
8.84
1993-94
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Source:
( 2)
: ( 1)
5.92
8.40
1992-93
Note
4.01
4.00
1991-92
2.33
2.21
3.62
3.19
3.09
2.85
2.78
2.16
2.93
3.78
3.45
3.01
1.37
1.44
1.47
1.42
1.46
2.21
2.32
2.00
2.20
1.67
3.02
3.23
1.62
1.98
3.54
2.47
1. 78
2.79
5.32
5.10
4.42
3.79
4.58
6.69
6.54
5.89
5.21
6.04
l:dukki
5.19
4.69
2.37
2.98
4.37
4.78
2.58
2.37
4.33
Kollam
6.04
4.53
3.91
4.45
4.65
2.12
3.71
2.86
2.29
2.47
2.87
Ko zh ikocie
3.68
3.01
2.71
2.71
3.18
3.71
1.72
2.93
3.48
3.28
2.84
3.15
3.16
3.53
2.96
2.45
3.53
2.78
3.49
3.11
1. 71
1.41
1. 53
1.63
1.17
2.51
1. 57
1.46
0.92
1. 87
12.44
13.09
11. 51
12.06
12.52
13.17
11.58
12.50
11.19
12.20
11.90
11.19
11.99
9.17
10.78
9.47
12.84
9.97
7.93
10.83
11. 40
11. 82
9.01
10.70
9.44
12.75
9.91
7.92
10.82
11. 39
0.440
0.066
0.078
0.086
0.44
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.304
0.30
0.002
0.170
0.17
0.00
0.165
0.17
0.087
0.09
0.080
0.060
0.06
0.08
0.014
0.02
0.028
0.008
0.01
0.03
0.009
0.01
= Volume
of working fund
Compiled from the annual reports of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
V.W.F.
The last column and last but one column are profitability ratios. The last column figures are obtained by dividing profit
by volume of working fund. But the value of the previous column is arrived at by deducdting 'b' from's'.
5.75
6.85
5.16
6.70
7.14
5.11
6.71
5.38
6.37
6.38
1990-91
6.74
9.53
(Contd.)
1989-90
Table 7.3
ID
1.11
160
It is clear from Table 7.3 that interest earned and paid
ratio of Ernakulam DCB was highest in 1992-93 and lowest in
1989-90 during the period 1989-90 to 1993-94.
70%) .
(2.96%)
The
and
(0.197%)
in 1993-94
(9.39%)
lowest
in 1991-92
(1.17%)
The spread
161
In Kozhikode DCB, interest earned ratio and spread ratio
were the highest in 1993-94 and the lowest in 1991-92.
burden ratio was the highest in two years
and
1993-94)
and
the
lowest
in
(i.e.,
1991-92.
The
in 1990-91
The
ratio
of
But
the spread and burden ratios were the highest in 1993-94 and
the. lowest in 1991-92.
1993-94,
(0.304%)
The
ratio.
increase
in
spread
ratio
was
the
result
of
The
spread ratio and burden ratio were the highest in 1993-94 and
the lowest in 1990-91.
like
auditor
cost,
special
arbitrators'
incomes
like
commission,
cost,
interest on investments.
DCB
(3.19%-3.16%)
and
the
lowest
in
Palakkad
162
(1.17%-1.15%).
(2.22%)
bu~den
ratio
was
the
result
of
low
(2.42%).
manpower
This low
and
other
expenses.
In
the
year
1990-91,
Kozhikode
DCB
had
the
highest
ratio (1.14%-0.99%).
in Idukki
(0.44%)
the
highest
3.45%-3.28%
and
spread-burden
3.78%-3.48%
ratio,
and
viz.,
Palakkad
the
3.01%-2.84%,
lowest
one
This increase in
spread
the
of
Kollam DCB
was
mainly
due
to
increase
in
163
of working
funds)
and
'c'
(interest earned to
(non-interest
income to
7.5
Other Ratios
In
addition
to
the
spread,
burden
and profitability
funds
liabilities
ratio,
ratio,
demand
deposits/working capital
ratio,
liquid
ratio,
capital
assets/demand
deposits/term
assets/working
advances/working
capital ratio.
liquid
and
deposits
time
ratio,
borrowings/working capital
capital
ratio
and
ratio,
loans
and
investments/working
7.5.1
Credit/deposit ratio
banks,
this
ratio
expresses
In the case of
the
relationship
structure of
cost.
The
961688/1718844
(55.95)
751611/1145518
(65.61)
1993-94
Average
673059/1053966
(63.85)
779773/1418834
(54.96)
765473/1161300
(65.92)
403789/584985
(69.02)
6262091764915
(81.87 )
533507/643628
(82.89)
458155/577836
(79.29)
439307/625955
(70.18 )
501489/661702
(75.79)
454576/807894
(56.27)
425478/664745
(64.01)
407296/511278
(79.66)
873481/1156769
(75.51)
1992-93
650134/945996
(68.72)
401077/486729
(82.40)
Kozhikode
407697/484156
(84.21)
SOurce:
718094/1003570
(71.55 )
1991-92
590098/895546
(65.89)
373608/451818
(82.69)
Palakkad
641670/979073
(65.54 )
1990-91
579818/848156
(68.36)
Kottayam
Note
563126/869338
(64.78)
Ernakulam
419340/468522
(89.50)
462796/510141
(90.72)
519630/542286
(95.82)
379966/541127
(70.22)
444189/616244
(72.08)
535482/7 51203
( 71.28)
468896/658592
(71.19)
468712/509946
( 91.91)
586519/664750
(88.23)
355275/364031
(97.59)
368176/516242
(71.32)
616671/868146
(71.03)
Idukki
Kollam
(Rs. in thousands)
1989-90
Year
Table 7.4
0'1
165
that
credit to
deposit was the highest in Idukki DCB (91.91%) and the lowest in
Kottayam DCB (63.85%).
per cent
(1993-94).
credit/deposit ratio.
probably be due
to
lowest
earnest
effort
to make
use of
the
Borrowings/deposits ratio
Another ratio used for analysing profitability is borrowings
bank.
7.5.3
163734/684422
(23.92)
125725/743613
(16.91)
144833/834240
(17.36)
145158/858412
(16.91)
65880/1090889
(6.04 )
109521/1609323
( 6.81)
11822311027295
(11.50 )
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Average
Kozhikode
SOurce:
246017/379937
(64.75)
142639/519063
(27.48)
378828/429066
(88.29)
311720/353025
(88.30)
194766/316512
(61.54)
202135/282021
(71.67 )
105108/479877
(21. 90)
127265/637650
(19.96)
111521/532107
(20.96)
96719/481117
(20.10)
93209/393520
(23.69)
96826/354992
(27.28)
Palakkad
Note
180454/873512
(20.65)
192468/1226366
(15.69)
215564/945736
(22.79)
187236/758760
(24.68)
143268/752278
(19.04)
Kottayam
113750/544841
(20.87)
96177/771969
(12.46)
113571/637632
(17.81)
240105/269841
(88.98)
236128/428622
(55.09)
247234/295052
(83.79)
271182/238959
(113.48)
241102/227420
(106.02)
105634/435493
(24.26)
110863/505381
(21.94)
204879/159152
(128.73)
Idukki
14 2508 /373734
(38.13)
Kollam
(Rs. in thousands)
Ernakulam
Year
Table 7.S
0\
0\
1718844/107105
(1604.82)
1145518/74746
( 1778.86)
1993-94
Average
1053966/61741
(1695.88)
1418834/73709
(1925.00)
1161300/65927
( 1761.49)
584985/71962
(811.83)
764915/93468
(818.37)
643628/79227
(812.38)
577836/69946
(826.11)
625955/44445
( 1403.98)
661702/52557
(1259.01)
807894/47689
(1694.08)
664745/42835
(1551.87)
511278/39977
( 1278.93)
1156769/94725
(1221.98)
1992-93
945996/63119
(1498.74)
486729/60664
(802.33)
Kozhikode
484156/39170
(1236.03)
SOurce:
1003570/69913
(1435.45)
1991-92
895546/55385
(1616.94)
451818/56509
(800.00)
Palakkad
979073/55109
(1777 .61)
1990-91
848156/50568
(1677 .25)
Kottayam
Note
869338/46879
(1854.42)
Ernakulam
1989-90
Year
542286/57563
(942.07)
751203/54128
(1387.82)
658592/49698
(1329.32)
509946/52567
(964.46)
664750/63000
(1055.15)
510141/50620
(1007.78)
616244/49423
(1246.87)
868146/66859
(1298.47)
468522/45716
(1024.85)
364031/45936
(792.47 )
Idukki
541127/41254
(1311.69 )
516242/36828
(1402.76 )
Ko 11 am
(Rs. in thousands)
Table 7.6 Borrowed funds/OWned funds ratio in selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
.....J
....
0\
168
Throughout
the period,
7.5.4
Liquid assets
at
call
and
short
notice
account)
ratio
shows
the
As
per
statutory
provisions,
DCBs
are
expected
to
be
required
Therefore,
for
meeting
contingencies
and
expenses.
may be sufficient.
959037/1609323
(59.59)
548629/1027296
( 53.40)
1993-94
Average
362376/873500
(41.48)
591504/1226306
(48.23)
162765/479877
(33.91)
229839/637650
(36.04)
183657/532107
(34.52)
147618/481117
(30.68)
(33.03)
210872/379937
(55.50)
201896/519063
(38.90)
38137"3/429066
(88.88)
256383/353025
(72.62)
121569/316512
( 38.41)
363179/1090889
(33.29)
1992-93
277665/758760
(36.59)
133697/393520
(33.97)
Kozhikode
931391282021
SOurce:
388716/858412
(45.28)
1991-92
301512/752278
(40.08)
119014/354992
(33.53)
Palakkad
602157/834240
(72.18)
1990-91
267106/684422
(39.03)
Kottayarn
Note
430057/743613
(57.83)
Ernakularn
249377/544841
(45.77
358068/771969
(46.38)
291845/637632
(45.77)
231789/505381
(45.87)
198758/435493
(45.64 )
166428/373734
(44.53)
Kollam
83043/269841
(30.77)
123251/428622
(28.76)
74156/295052
(25.13)
75972/238959
(31.79 )
72275/227420
(31.78)
69564/159152
(43.71)
Idukki
(Rs. in thousands)
Liquid Assets/DTL Ratio in selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Table 7.7
0\
\0
170
Table 7.7 points out that during the study period all the
DCBs
had maintained
excess
take
steps
maintained.
to
reduce
liquid
assets
which
adversely
quantum
of
liquid
assets
7.5.5
The
relationship
between
demand
deposits
and
term
(116.95%)
(58.27%).
The
384116/374644
(10:2.53)
:296154/64958:2
(45.59 )
345347/881019
(39.:20)
384164/489348
(78.50)
490795/343445
(14:2.90 )
4480:20/41039:2
(109.17)
4559:20/634969
(71.80 )
8:23569/785754
(104.81)
5:27771/497724
(106.03)
1990-91
1991-9:2
199:2-93
1993-94
Average
Kozhikode
SOurce:
1752:20/204716
(85.59)
210318/308745
(68.12)
17541:2/:253654
(69.15)
171:211/181814
(94.17)
169798/146714
(115.73)
149364/13:2657
( 11:2.59)
225158/255317
(88.18)
248175/389475
(63.72)
186471/3456:28
(53.95)
(117.57)
:2599851:2:2113:2
:2:25531/170989
(131. 90)
:205631/149361
(137.67)
Palakkad
Note
(154.40)
4565741:295704
(178.45)
4386:291:245793
Kottayarn
4 :20553/314060
(133.91)
Ernakulam
1989-90
Year
143344/84076
(170.49)
1385901100369
(138.08)
134:206/160846
(83.44)
2:25:254/:203368
(110.76)
191807/:243686
(78.71)
194866/310515
(6:2.76)
197604/4400:28
(44.91)
:249696/5:22273
(47.81)
145570/124470
(116.95)
85458/73694
(115.96)
168998/:204736
(8:2.54)
:200594/3444:27
(58.27)
Idukki
Kollarn
(Rs. in thousands)
Table 7.8 Demand Deposit/Ter.m Deposit Ratio in selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
...J
~
172
7.5.6
in Table 7.9.
selected banks.
increased during the five year period, from 39.26 per cent to
59.22 per cent, this was the lowest compared to other banks.
rhe general increase in this ratio in the sample banks may be
attributed to their success in deposit mobilisation policy.
1609323/1821658
(88.34 )
1027295/1216618
(84.43)
1993-94
Average
873512/1110210
(78.67)
1226366/1487509
(82.44)
94573611221870
(77.40)
479877/640838
(74.88)
637650/854751
(74.60 )
532107/676612
(78.64 )
481117/637397
(75.48)
379937/667218
(56.94)
519063/711172
(72.99)
429066/852397
(50.34)
353025/704153
(50.13)
316512/547961
(57.76)
1090889/1248063
(87.41)
1992-93
758760/1003668
(75.60)
393520/537289
(73.24 )
Kozhikode
282021/520408
(54.19)
SOurce:
858412/1069772
(80.24)
1991-92
752278/945161
(79.59 )
354992/498142
(71. 26)
Palakkad
834240/1030591
(80.95)
1990-91
684422/892843
(76.66 )
Kottayam
Note
743613/913007
(81.45)
Ernakulam
2950521597953
(49.34)
428622/723714
(59.22)
269841/559388
(48.23)
637632/798922
(79.81)
771969/928704
(83.12)
544841/702258
(77.58)
238959/558514
(42.78)
227420/511357
(44.47)
435493/575870
(75.62)
505381/659069
(76.68)
159152/405403
(39.26)
Idukki
373734/548725
(68.11 )
Ko 11 am
(As. in thousands)
Deposit/working capital ratio of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Table 7.9
...J
.....
174
7.5.7
of funds.
143268/945161
(15.16)
144833/1030591
(14.05 )
145158/1069772
(13.57)
65880/1248063
( 5.27)
109521/1821658
( 6.01)
118223/1216618
(9.71)
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Average
SOurce:
246017/667218
(36.87)
142639/711172
(20.06)
378828/852397
(44.44)
311720/704153
(44.27)
194766/547961
(35.54)
202135/520408
(38.84)
Kozhiltode
selected DCBs
105108/640838
(16.40)
127265/854751
(14.89)
111521/676612
(16.48)
96719/637397
(15.17)
93209/537289
(17.35)
96826/498142
(19.44)
Palaltltad
ratio of
Note
180454/1110210
(16.25)
192468/1487509
(12.94)
215564/1221870
(17.64 )
187236/1003668
(18.66)
163734/892843
(18.34)
Kottayam
125725/913007
(13.77)
Ernaltulam
Borrowings/working capital
1993-94
1989-90
Year
Table 7.10
Kollam
113750/702258
(16.19)
96177/928704
(10.36)
113571 /7 98922
(14.22)
110863/659069
(16.82)
105634/575870
(18.34)
to
240105/702258
(42.92)
236128/723714
(32.63)
247234/597953
( 41.35)
271182/558514
(48.55)
241102/511357
(47.15)
204879/405403
(50.54)
Idultlti
(As. in thousands)
14 2508/548725
(25.97)
for
c..n
-..J
176
7.5.8
Idukki during
to 1993-94.
Ernakulam DCB had the highest liquidity ratio and Idukki DCB
had the lowest.
7.5.9
This
ratio
shows
the
relationship between
loans
and
(60.62%).
The average of
(81.04%)
and the
which was 87.64 per cent in 1989-90 was reduced to 82.01 per
cent in 1990-91 which again increased to 82.86 per cent in
1991-92.
in 1993-94,
267106/892843
(29.92)
301512/945161
(31.90)
277 665/1003668
(27.67)
374095/1221870
(30.62)
430057/913007
(47.10)
602157/1030591
(58.43)
388716/106977 2
(36.34 )
363179/1248063
(29.10)
959037/1821658
(52.65)
471218/1216618
(38.73)
1989-90
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
Average
SOurce:
210872/667218
(31. 60)
201896/711172
(28.39)
229839/854751
(26.89)
162765/640838
(25.39)
381373/852397
(44.74)
83043/559388
(14.84)
123251/723714
(17.03)
358068/928704
(38.56)
249377/702258
(35.51)
74156/597953
( 12.40)
7597:2/558514
(13.60)
291845/798922
(36.53)
231789/659069
(35.17)
72275/511357
(14.13)
198758/575870
(34.51)
121569/547961
(22.19)
256383/704153
(36.41)
69564/405403
(17.16)
Idukki
166428/548725
(30.33)
Kollam
93139/520408
(17. 90)
Kozhikode
183657/676612
(27.14)
147618/637397
(23.16)
133697/537289
(24.88)
119014/498142
(23.89)
Palakkad
Note
36237611110210
(32.64)
59150411487509
(39.76)
Kottayam
(Rs. in thousands)
Liquid assets/working capital ratio of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to
1993-94
Ernakulam
Year
Table 7.11
-.J
-.J
...
961688/1821658
(52.79)
751611/1216618
(61.77)
1993-94
Average
673059/1110210
(60.62)
765473/1221870
(62.65)
478511/640838
(74.67 )
626209/854751
(73.26)
533507/676612
(78.85)
458155/637397
(71. 88)
439307/667218
(65.84)
501489/711172
(70.52)
454576/852397
(53.33)
425478/704153
(60.42)
407296/547961
(74.33 )
873481/1248063
(69.99)
1992-93
650134/1003668
(64.78)
401077/537289
(74.65 )
Kozhikode
407697/520408
(78.34 )
Source:
718094/1069772
(67.12)
1991-92
590098/945161
(62.43)
373608/498142
(75.00)
Palakkad
641670/1030591
(62.26)
1990-91
579818/892843
(64.94 )
Kottayam
Note
563126/913007
(61. 68)
Ernakulam
468890/702258
(66.77)
616671/928704
(66.40)
535482/798922
(67.03)
444159/659069
(67.40)
379966/575870
(65.98)
368176/548725
(67.10)
Kollam
468712/559388
(83.79)
586519/723714
(81.04)
519630/597953
(86.90)
462796/558514
(82.86)
419340/511357
(82.01)
355275/405403
(87.64)
Idukki
(Rs. in thousands)
Loans and advnaces/working capital ratio of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90
to 1993-94
1989-90
Year
Table 7.12
..J
CD
179
This
per cent
Eventhough
in 1989 - 90
idukki
DCB's
to
52.42
position
per cent
was
in 1993 - 94.
satisfactory,
its
7.5.10
It
is
observed
from
Table
7.13
that
was
no
It
there
Kottayam DCB
showed the peak ratio which varied from 5.12 per cent in
1989-90 to 5.76 per cent in 1993-94.
Ernakulam DCB where it was 1.34 per cent in 1989-90 and 1.02
per cent in 1993-94.
18576/1821658
(1.02)
14834/1216618
(1.21)
1993-94
Average
61875/931641
( 6.64 )
8563911487509
(5.76)
66566/1221870
(5.45)
11481/928704
(1.24)
16272/702258
(2.31)
17761/711172
(2.50)
15298/667218
(2.29)
18355/854751
( 2. 15 )
17962/640838
(2.80)
11481/798922
(1.44)
16056/852397
(1. 88)
19080/676612
(2.82)
19443/559388
(3.47)
24972/723714
(3.45)
23618/597953
(3.95)
20761/558514
(3.72)
11481/659069
(1.74)
14975/704153
(2.13)
17991/637397
(2.82)
15176/1248063
( 1. 22)
1992-93
55717/1003668
(5.55)
15389/511357
(3.01)
18836/575870
(3.27)
14356/547961
(2.62)
17485/537289
(3.25)
SOurce:
14176/1069772
( 1.33)
1991-92
55727/945161
(5.90)
Idu Iclci
12476/405403
(3.08)
13344/520408
(2.56)
16900/498142
(3.39)
Kollam
(Rs. in thousands)
28081/548725
(5.12)
Kozhilcode
Palalclcad
13976/1030591
(1.36)
1990-91
45727/892843
( 5. 12)
Kottayarn
selected DCBs
Note
12270/913007
(1. 34 )
Ernalcularn
1989-90
Year
Table 7.13
CD
181
This analysis
DCBs
much
is
better
in
relation
to
other
sample
banks.
The major
ratio,
interest
paid
ratio,
etc.
Thus
other
for
the
and
other
examination
of
banks.
the
other
This
analysis
backward
together
linkage
with
factors
an
like
DCBs
quality
management
and RBI
decisions,
182
7.6
the
ratio,
problem of
mounting
overdues,
low
Some of them
credit/deposit
etc.
The
the loan
When
22.52
per
cent
of
overdue
to demand,
in 1991-92,
it
Hence,
an
of the
at tempt
is
made
to
assess
the
overdue
1989-90 to 1993-94.
183
Table 7.14
Year
Loans overdue
Percentage of overdue
to demand
1982-83
3026
NA
1983 -84
2339
17.66
1984-85
2775
NA
1985-86
3007
16.83
1986-87
4488
22.52
1987-88
4755
20.30
1988-89
5837
19.13
1989-90
12848
41.73
1990-91
12658
32.00
1991-92
11282
35.00
1992-93
12781
24.00
1993-94
11062
23.69
Source:
Kerala,
Handbook on Co-operative
Department of Co-operation,
Trivandrum (1982-83 to 1993-94)
Government
Movement
in
of
Kerala,
184
Short-term loan
Ernakulam
Kottayam
7.34
3.76
Palakkad
21. 90
2.85
Kozhikode
Kollam
Idukki
36.54
43.16
26.63
15.23
5.16
9.92
2.63
0.73
Ordinary loan
others
Overdraftsocieties
1. 97
IRDP
0.48
Consumer loanindividual
1. 57
1.44
Working capital-
0.57
7.65
5.56
0.50
1. 39
0.74
2.45
1. 30
0.0.
Overdraft individual s
5.63
2.28
Decree
2.17
Loan to
individuals
2.90
Suit
3.35
2.54
8.05
Other loan
Other loan societies
1.37
Contd.
185
2.27
Composit
1. 81
Medium-term
conversion
1. 31
3.16
0.91
11.89
1. 86
1.12
Award
1.53
Medium-term
3 years - agrl.
Medium-term
non-agrl.
General loan to
socs . & urban
banks
1.44
Unrecovered cash
credit
4.84
Unencumered
overdraft
2.95
House loan
1.01
5.17
0.88
6.47
10.41
1. 66
0.49
Rehabilitation
1.20
0.57
Depos i t loan
0.78
7.19
Special term
loan
13.40
Loan to weaker
section
Others
Total
67.45
85.23
62.14
20.53
35.45
53.68
100.00
100.00
100.00
Note
Source:
186
selected DCBs.
all
the
selected banks.
The
percentage of
draft
(individuals),
house
loans,
integrated
rural
of
DCBs.
However,
before
pronouncing
on
the
to
ascertain
the
extent
of
this
problem in the
selected DCBs.
(36)
277808
(38.69)
(42)
(35)
93346
104063
72091
136627
56239
104571
86487
Overdue
289233
(32.27)
184378
(56.44)
240303
(30.00)
364047
(37.53)
166526
(33.77)
445362
(23.48)
334787
(25.83)
Demand
(37)
(24)
105332
146925
88690
115368
73128
115364
92519
Overdue
366317
(28.75)
342642
(42.88)
385609
(23.00)
505114
(22.84)
190429
(38.40)
4974 73
(23.19)
276635
(33.44)
Demand
(34)
(23.69)
103163
136570
84960
105061
60809
84089
147470
Overdue
391488
(26.35)
336960
(40.53)
386181
(22.00)
495104
(21. 22)
209246
(29.06)
596799
(14.09)
324640
(45.43)
Demand
1993-94
(53.00)
(32)
107491
238662
(51.36)
210150
(42.00)
406391
(40.12)
178006
(42.00)
417668
(26.44 )
215976
( 39.75)
Demand
1992-93
Source:
(41.73)
State ratio
275872
(37.84)
122577
88263
163044
74759
110445
85858
Overdue
1991-92
104409
Average
235418
(61.57)
235548
(37.80)
443583
(47.72)
237695
(23.59)
315806
(24.51)
187186
(25.27)
Demand
1990-91
Note
144947
211678
Kozhikode
Idukki
56075
Palakkad
89037
77 416
Kottayam
Kollam
47305
Overdue
1989-90
(As. in thousands)
Total overdue to total demand ratio of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to
1993-94
Ernakulam
Name of bank
Table 7.16
CD
...J
188
In
reason
for
this
seems
to
be
the
passing of
(Government of Kerala,
1995,
P .10) .
The
Kerala
Scheme on
The general
in both cases,
1991-92.
there was a
However,
in other
three
years
ie.
in
1990-91,
1992-93 and 1993-94 this ratio was more in the selected DCBs
than for the state as a whole.
189
7.8
effect divided into sub samples that produce the same level
and mix of outputs and face similar input prices.
In each sub
sample, the bank that incurs the lowest total cost is deemed
'to provide best practice for that sub sample.
practice,
The best
'X
efficiency'
190
(total
cost/total
Practitioners of TFA
TFA
limited to
these banks.
Disperson in
'x'
7.17
shows
that
the
revealed
inter-quartile
(421. 25)
and
7.9
33.80
35.08
103.30
46.23
22.74
Idukki
(Mean ATC, fourth quartile - Mean ATC, first quartile)/mean ATC first quartile) x 100
88.77
19.84
10.51
Kollam
2.
65.93
20.37
6.73
421.25
Kozhikode
Palakkad
39.50
39.78
19.94
Kottayam
1.
71.89
48.49
Percentage difference 2
between mean ATC of
first and fourth ATC
quartiles
28.21
Ernakulam
Table 7.17
ID
18482
(61.81)
14150
(45.94)
1993-94
Average
308
299
305
14199
(45.95)
20012
(66.93)
16062
(52.84)
12157
(39.47)
309
299
304
308
316
12670
(46.58)
15441
(58.94)
14607
( 54 .71 )
9977
(36.45)
12399
(44.60)
11028
(38.83)
Manpower
expense
272
262
267
271
279
284
No. of
staff
14077
(53.72)
19078
(73.95)
15754
(59.90)
12750
(47.40)
12277
(45.14)
10530
( 37.74 )
262
258
263
269
272
249
No. of
staff
Kozhikode
Manpower
expense
16939
(55.53)
1992-93
311
12028
(38.06)
319
No. of
staff
SOurce:
10609
(34.11)
1991-92
314
10738
(33.66)
Manpower
expense
Palakkad
12701
(40.45)
1990-91
315
No. of
staff
Kottayam
Note
12024
(38.17)
Manpower
expense
Ernakulam
17233
(55.77)
23217
(77.13)
20941
(69.33)
14657
(47.33)
14061
(44.78)
13391
(42.24)
Manpower
expense
309
301
305
309
314
317
No. of
staff
Ko 11 am
8937
(43.59)
11047
(57.54 )
9674
(49.61)
9071
(45.81)
7691
(35.94)
7206
(32.90)
Manpower
expense
205
192
195
198
214
219
No. of
staff
Idukki
(Rs. in thousands)
1989-90
Year
Table 7.18
IV
...
..0
193
thousand in 1993-94.
this respect.
thousand
(89-90)
to Rs.77.13
7.10
Higher volume of
Table 7.19
DCBs.
Table 7.19
per employee
2026484
(6777.54)
1375604
(4454.68)
1993-94
Average
308
299
305
1221894
(3951.79)
1608809
(5380.63)
1350371
(4442.01)
1100656
(3573.56)
309
299
304
308
316
743004
(2727.62)
980969
(3744.16)
835706
(3129.99)
720188
(2657.51 )
616962
(2219.29)
561195
(1976.04)
272
262
267
271
278
284
752099
(2804.25)
818391
(3172.06)
943826
(3588.69)
787359
(2926.99)
620030
(2279.52)
590889
(2117.88)
1455119
(4770.88)
1992-93
311
1060831
(3357.06)
319
268
258
263
269
272
279
Volume of No. of
working staff
fund
Kozhikode
SOurce:
1204829
(3874.05)
1991-92
314
988803
(3099.70)
Volume of No. of
working staff
fund
Palakkad
1154428
(3676.52)
1990-91
315
Volume of No. of
working staff
fund
Kottayam
785365
(2539.99)
1050851
(3491. 20)
898499
(2945.90)
731857
(2368.47)
639844
(2037.72)
605778
(1910.97)
309
301
305
309
314
317
Volume of No. of
working staff
fund
Kollam
626346
(3076.36)
809083
(4213.97)
669656
(3434.13)
617542
(3118.90 )
543160
(2538.13)
492289
(2247.89)
203
192
195
198
214
219
Volume of No. of
working staff
fund
Idukki
(Rs. in thousands)
Note
1037163
(3292.58)
Volume of No. of
working staff
fund
Ernakularn
1989-90
Year
Table 7.19
ID
195
DCBs
have
to
consider
the
number,
seniority,
In addition to
7.11
of
reserves
of
DCBs.
It
depends
on
the
ratio
and
attempt
is made
to
statutory
estimate
liquidity
the
ratio.
excess
Hence,
reserves
and
an
the
funds
appendix 3)
interest
rates
(see
rates are varied for different banks and for different years.
7.11.1
Money
196
banks
in
order
to meet
These are
Reserves are
the depositors
public,
the
Reserve
Bank
of
India
itself
had
initiated
Section
Banking
Regulation
Act
1949
contain
the
necessary
In 1966, the
to keep 3 per cent and 25 per cent of their demand and time
liabilities
In practice,
as liquidity is related to
the
required
minimum.
For
meeting
unforeseen
is
regulations.
treated
as
excess
reserves
as
eRR above 3
per
statutory
197
day to day
operations of
the
banks,
an allowance of 1.5
It is
management
reduced
the
Assuming
policy,
extent
that
these
of
loss
banks
they
due
are
could
to
have
keeping
following
considerably
excess
CRR.
efficient
cash
134915.5
108318.7
39895.1
53193.5
eRR Actual
Difference
4.5% of DTL
6% of DTL
14940.8
13100.6
11247.3
1072 .8
2602.7
-3637.6
8464 .4
20566.5
48408.1
36306.0
20566.5
44770.5
24204.0
806801.3
Kottayam
1064.7
1099.1
1972.2
1411.0
8063.0
14715.0
26608.0
19956.0
14715.0
28019.0
13303.8
443466.9
Palakkad
577 .3
1218.8
1860.0
4804.2
10065.6
15325.2
21040.1
15778.7
15325.2
25844.3
10519.1
350637.5
Kozhikode
81722.1
SOurce:
95020.4
108318.7
26596.8
3% of DTL
886558.5
Ernakulam
395.6
986.7
1834.0
1392.4
8884.7
16377.1
29969.3
22477.0
16377.1
31361.7
14984.6
499488.3
Kollam
30670.5
184022.8
459.9
14024.1
18089.8
24196.2
986.5
611.8
14643.7
87862.2
2170.1
2337.4
3015.0
4032.7
22657.2
135943.3
5445.2
8720.3
32053.2
192319.4
13100.4
24039.7
30670.5
144238.1
184022.8
46696.9
16026.4
529215.5
Average of
six ceBs
9825.3
8720.3
280181.5
96158.5
6550.2
15270.5
3205293.2
Total
218340.7
Idukki
(Rs. in thousands)
Average of CRR and opportunity cost of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to
1993-94
Total DTL
Table 7.20
(l)
\0
199
Table 7.20, made clear the amount of excess CRR kept and
the extent of loss incurred by all these banks for keeping
excess reserves under CRR for five years.
Again,
reserves
of
if
Rs .1359.43
lakh at
4.5
per
cent
the excess
for
lending
Further,
interest of Rs.140.24
lakh could have been earned by these banks if they had made
worthwhile use of excess reserves of Rs.878.62 lakh at 6 per
cent for granting loans and advances.
Kottayam
DCB was keeping the lowest total CRR i.e., 5.55 per cent of
DTL.
cent,
minimum.
level
lakh.
If
200
Idukki DCB at first two levels, i.e., at 3 per cent level Rs.87.20 lakh and at 4.5 per cent level - RS.54.45 lakh.
As
At 6
per cent level, this reserve was lowest in Kottayam DCB which
was Rs.-36.37 lakh.
DCBs follow
201
as
reserves
under
ideal
conditions.
Hence,
the periods during which they are maintained may vary from
bank to bank depending on factors such as composition of
'deposits, number of branches, conditions of the area in which
they operate, availability of remittance facilities, avenues
for quick borrowing arrangements,
etc.
In view of these
excess SLR kept by the DCBs is given in Table 7.21 (Bank wise
details are presented in appendix-4) .
securities
b.
c.
221870.4
242040.4
104619.7
243803.6
265967.5
156807.1
134643.1
108879.2
108318.7
27.5% of DTL
30% of DTL
48488.4
26324.4
20566.5
64279.6
84449.7
104619.7
306320.1
378446.7
156807.1
86605.6
199148.0
262553.4
7574.6
20566.5
Total SLR
Excess CRR
a.
108318.7
201700.4
221639.6
25% of DTL
Assets
806801.3
Kottayam
886558.5
Ernakulam
103725.3
94104.6
-42563.8
-31477.1
14715.0
-38935.5
-27848.8
-16762.1
133040.1
121953.4
-16762.1
-8025.1
740.8
15325.2
-1465.9
7300.0
16066.0
105191.2
96425.3
16066.0
4002.4
4861.5
8153.6
43734.1
56221.0
16377.1
47623.9
60111.1
72598.1
149846.5
137359.3
72598.1
197470.3
177090.8
71146.0
83538.6
124872.0
499488.3
Kollam
16377.1
87659.4
350637.5
Kozhikode
15325.2
14715.0
110866.7
443466.9
Palakkad
-6837.8
-590.0
8720.3
-3576.1
1882.5
7341.0
65502.2
60043.7
7341.0
61926.1
5150.1
48055.8
8720.3
54585.1
218340.7
Idukki
19391.3
116347.7
75915.0
157436.3
184022.7
176805.2
260537.6
340669.8
961587.9
881455.7
340669.8
Contd.
12652.5
26239.4
30670.5
29467.5
43422.9
56778.3
160264.7
146909.3
56778.3
190332.2
140255.4
841532.6
1141993.1
30670.5
133553.9
529215.5
Average of
six ceBs
184022.8
801323.2
3205293.2
Total
(As. in thousands)
Average of SLR and opportunity cost of selected DCBs for the period 1989-90 to
1993-94
Total DTL
Table 7.21
3940.1
4570.6
5263.2
1337.4
1967.9
2660.5
2602.7
43713.2
Kott ay am
1972.2
1976.1
2099.0
Nil
3.9
126.8
1972.2
-53650.5
Palakkad
1860.1
1927.2
2059.7
Nil
67.1
199.6
1860.1
-16791.1
Kozhikode
15192 .3
SOurce:
16153.0
238.5
1199.2
2243.1
14953.8
560.5
Ernakulam
2584.0
2832.8
3090.6
750.0
998.8
1256.6
1834.0
31246.8
Kollam
986.5
986.5
1028.0
Nil
Nil
41.5
986.5
-11304.2
Idukki
26535.2
28446.2
4422.5
4741.0
5122.9
387.7
2325.9
30737.4
706.2
1088.0
6528.1
4236.9
4034.9
25173.5
Average of
six OCBs
24209.3
75520.5
Total
204
If
these banks had made use of this amount for granting loans and
advances at weighted average lending rate,
it would have
(27.5
per
cent),
there
was
an
excess
At the second
reserve
of
Again,
respectively.
Lower
reserves
were
recorded
due
to
the
delay
in getting
at
the
205
The other
Estimates
It however,
can be
Management practiees in
District Co-operati.e Btm1cs
CHAPTER-VIII
physical
improve
their
The concept of
207
of
them,
for
their growth,
promoting
their
of
the
top
For
managing
this
for
increasing alienation,
DCB
is
the
absence
of
any
planned
effort
towards
should
Therefore, a DCB
208
respect
of
his
bank's
business
which
can
be
summarily
discussed as under.
The important sources of funds of a DCB is the deposits
mobilised
from
institutions.
the
public
and
borrowings
from
other
the
stone.
For
attaining
the
targets
of
deposit
Knowledge
The
the
the
priorities
specified
in
credit
policies.
209
care.
customer
service
rather
than
bringing
in
the
The
more the services that the banker renders, the more the inflow
of funds.
means
obeying
by
the
personnel
to
the
Banking,
There
the
skills
and abilities
of
his
subordinates by
210
In addition
Over
8.1
the
necessary.
The
President and
the Vice-President
are
The
8.2
Organisational structure
211
Figure 8.1
General Body
I
I
President
Board of Directors
Vice-President
I
I
Deputy General Manager
General Manager
I
I
Clerk/Cashier/Typist/Telephone Operator
Accountant/Inspector
I
I
Operator/Despatch Assistant
212
8.2.1
The representative of
The
Executive committee
The Executive Committee takes decisions regarding routine
management
and
administration
(which
are
subject
to
the
213
8.3
constitution of
India,
The
Development
National
(NABARD)
Bank
and
the
for
Agriculture
Registrar
of
and
Rural
Co-operative
the
statutory
reserves.
The
NABARD
inspects
the
Kerala
Co-operative
inspection is over,
Societies
Act,
1969.
When
the
rectifications
therein.
suggestions made
the DCBs
inspect the
214
8.4
System of Audit
Concurrent auditor
audit
schedules.
The
audit
report
is
to
be
Finally,
8.5
The
Secretary
of
the
respective
primaries
of
the
applications
the
respective books
and
215
Suits for amounts upto Rs.S lakhs are filed with the
Joint Registrar and those above Rs.S lakh are filed with the
Registrar of Co-operative Societies.
8.6
An attempt
is made
in
this
section to examine
the
of funds.
General Manager
General
managers
of
these
selected
DCBs
were
co-
They motivate
They
216
used
to
appreciate
efficiently.
the
staff
members
who
have
worked
all general
managers were males and they fall in the age group of 50 plus
wi t;.h more than 25 years of experience.
qualifications of
The educational
frequently
deputed
for
training
programmes
in
With regard to
217
less than four years experience in the present post and all
have
attended
training
programmes
in
co-operation
in
pioneering institutes.
8.6.3
Branch Managers
For collecting information from branch managers of DCBs,
Only
four managers were below 50 years and all others were above
50 years.
1.
Ernakulam
Kozhikode
218
8.7
The management
of
head
office
superintendents
and
branch
of
such
relating
reserves
were
to
the
maintenance
collected
from
the
and management
head
office
219
superintendents.
profit)
like
statutory
reserve,
(set apart
agricultural
credit
education
fund,
conunon good
DeBs
were
Co-operative Bank.
were
keeping
for
giving
these
reserves
in
State
these
Co-operative Bank.
keeping
fund
reserves
internally
and
in
State
to reserves and
other funds.
8.7.3
Deposits
administered
superintendents.
to
branch
They
depicted
for
managers
in the
that
and
all
form of
head
these
office
selected
current account,
different
types
of
deposits.
Other
banks'
220
8.7.4
attainment
of
mobilised
during
enquired
from
managers.
deposit
head
targets,
withdrawal
mobilisation
office
of
campaign
superintendents
deposits
were
and
also
branch
methods
personal
for
popularising
canvassing,
giving
deposit
mobilisation
advertisement
in
are
magazines,
(20.1.94 to 5.3.94)
in
there
221
Out
of
18
branch managers,
fourteen
branch managers
two managers
are
of
the
opinion that
savings bank
accounts were more and the remaining two found that all types
of deposits were increasing. With regard to the question of
immediate withdrawal of major portion of deposits mobilised
during DMC,
these
deposits
are
not
remaining
four
managers
withdrawn
immediately.
withdrawn
opined
Out
managers
pointed out
deposits
are withdrawn
of
immediately,
while
the
that
these
deposits
are
these
four
managers,
two
of
'46
the
days'
fixed
remaining two
this withdrawal.
8.7.5
Determinants of Deposits
Security
Others (specify)
3.
4.
Field data
Better service
2.
Source:
1.
Determinants
Ernakulam
Kottayam
Palakkad
3 personal
contact
Kozhikode
Kollam
Table 8.1
Idukki
N
N
N
223
Personal
investigated.
Table
8.2
not
planning
their
loan mix
(combination
of
loan).
purposes
like
betelvine
cultivation,
pineapple
Better
service
Security
others
(specify)
2.
3.
4.
Field data
High
interest
rate
Source.
Kottayam
Palakkad
Kozhikode
Ko 11 am
Idukki
1.
Determinants
Ernakulam
Branch Managers
Table 8.2
..
N
N
225
rearing,
bio/gobar
gas
production,
pig
rearing,
Out
Supervision of loan
Management
practices
followed
by
DCBs
regarding
They stated
These
226
Out of 18 branches,
only in five
Investments
The determinants of investing money in securities by head
The order
priority for one bank, second priority for three banks and
third
priority
for
two
banks.
The
third
factor
i.e.
for
two
remaining
three.
banks
and
Only
two
third
banks
preference
follow
for
the
government
state
co-operative
banks,
post
office
savings
bank
Profitability
Government
instructions
All of these
None of these
3.
4.
5.
6.
Field data
Safety
2.
Source:
Liquidity
1.
Ernakulam
Kottayam
Palakkad
Kozhikode
Kollam
Determinants
Table 8.3
Idukki
'"
...J
'"
228
like lack of liquidity, low rate of interest, long duration,
delay in claiming periodical
facilities
for
cash
and
interest,
getting
lack of
prior
remittance
sanction
from
the
management
of
Registrar.
8.8 Political
interference
in
the
of
the banks,
it
appeared
that
there was
examine
this
administered
issue
to
the
further,
general
eleven
questions
managers,
head
were
office
8.8.1
General managers
interference
in various activities of
about
employees,
political
interference
in
the
selection
of
neutral
because
they
are
of
political
e. Writing off
of loans
(1 )
(2)
SOurce I
Notel
]I;
]I;
]I;
]I;
SDA
....
'
Field surve.,
SA = strongly agree, A
'x' denotes 'response'
k. Other areas
( specify)
j. Giving
membership
to societies
i. Controlling
primary
societies
h. Policy
forrrulation
g. Establishing
branches
]I;
d. Giving loans
f. Recovery of
loans
c. Transfer of
enployee
DA
b. ProlTOtion
SA
Ernakularn
A
Agree,
SA
]I;
]I;
SDA
SA
No opinion,
DA
Kottayarn
DA
SDA
]I:
]I;
DA
SDA
SA
]I:
]I;
]I;
]I;
]I:
]I:
]I;
]I;
DA
Kollam
strongly Disagree
]I;
SDA
and
SA
Disagree
DA
Kozhikode
]I;
]I;
]I;
]I;
Palakkad
SDA
]I;
]I;
]I:
]I;
]I;
SA
]I:
]I;
]I:
DA
Idukki
a. Selection
of employee
Level of
interference
Tabl.e 8.4
SDA
\0
N
N
230
them.
info~mal
Thi s
argumen t
is
managers.
Similarly questions were raised regarding transfer of
employees, sanctioning of loans and advances, writing off of
loans,
recovery
formulations,
of
loans,
establishing
branches,
societies, etc.
policy
membership of
Among the
six banks, general manager of only one bank openly stated the
element of political interference.
8.8.2
c. Transfer of
elTployeex
d. Giving loans
e. Writing off
of loans
f. Recovery of
loans
g. Establishing
branches
h. Policy
f orlllllation
i. Controlli ng
j. Giving
(1 )
(2 )
Source.
Note.
Field survey
SA = Strongly agree, A
'x' denotes 'response'
k. Other areas
( specify)
membership
to societies
b. Pronotion
primary
societies
Ernakularn
Agree,
of
DA
Disagree
and
SDA
selected
DCBs
(Head
Kollam
Strongly Disagree
Kozhikode
activities
Palakkad
various
No opinion,
Kottayarn
in
][
Idukki
office
a. Selection
of employee
Level of
interference
....
N
W
232
the
However,
one
Branch managers
k. Other areas
( specify)
j. Giving
membership
to societies
i. Controlling
primary
societies
h. policy
forrrulation
g. Establishing
branches
f. Recovery of
loans
e. writing off
of loans
d. Giving loans
c. Transfer of
errployee
b. Prorrotion
a. Selection
of emPloyee
Level of
interference
Table 8.6
SA
][
][
][
][
SA
SDA
][
][
][
][
][
DA
][
][
][
][
][
DA
SDA
Palarivattom
][
][
Aluva
SA
][
][
][
]I:
][
][
][
][
][
DA
Place road
SDA
][
][
][
DA
SDA
SA
][
][
][
][
][
]I:
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
SA
][
SDA
DA
][
][
][
][
SDA
Contd.
DA
Puthupally
Kanjikuzhi
][
][
][
][
SA
Kottayam Main
I\J
k. Other areas
( specify)
membership
to societies
j. Giving
i. Controlling
primary
societies
h. Policy
forll1.llation
g. Establishing
branches
f. Recovery of
loans
e. Writing off
of loans
d. Giving loans
c. Transfer of
errployee
b. ProllOtion
a. Selection
of employee
Level of
interference
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
DA
SDA
Thiruvathukkal
SA
SA
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
DA
Palakkad
][
][
SDA
SA
A
][
][
][
DA
][
][
][
SDA
Palakkad (H&E)
][
SA
][
][
][
][
][
][
DA
XOyalmannam
][
][
SDA
SA
A
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
][
DA
XOzhikode
][
SDA
SA
A
][
][
][
][
][
][
SDA
Contd.
DA
Kozhikode (Evening)
..
IV
W
]I:
Source.
(2 )
Note. (1)
]I:
SOA
Strongly agree, A
denotes 'response'
Field survey
']I:'
SA
k. Other areas
( specify)
j. Giving
membership
to societies
]I:
primary
societies
i. Controlling
h. Policy
forlTUlation
g. Establishing
branches
loans
f. Recovery of
e. Writing off
of loans
d. Giving loans
]I:
N DA
c. Transfer of
ercployee
]I:
SA
Balusserry
b. P rOlTOt ion
a. Selection
of employee
Level of
interference
Agree,
SA
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
SDA
SA
No opinion,
N DA
Quilon
DA
SDA
Disagree
DA
and
SA
SDA
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
SDA
SA
]I:
]I:
]I:
x
x
N DA
Idukki
Strongly Disagree
N DA
Xilikollur
]I:
]I:
]I:
SDA
SA
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
]I:
N DA
Tbodupuzha
SDA
Ut
236
and
interference.
one
strongly
nine respondents
disagreed
with
political
With
regard
to
the
question
of
having
political
of
loans,
the
issue was
Only
Regarding recovery of
disagreement
and
seven
loans,
managers
strong
disagreement
only
no
opinion
about
managers
strongly
237
Eight managers
political
expressed no
interference
in
opinion with
establishment
of
regard
branches
to
and
the
issue
of
membership to societies,
policy
formulation
and giving
in management
is
not
upto
the
required
level
in DCBs.
But during
CHAPTER-IX
In this
chapter,
an attempt
for
policy
formulations
relevant
to
improve
the
efficiency in the funds management of DCBs and to the cooperative banking sector.
1.
2.
3.
To
evaluate
the
management
practices
adopted
for
1.
capital,
reserves
and
other
funds,
deposits,
239
2.
3.
4.
5.
chapter.
in the
second
there were a
management
reviewed
of
number of general
DCBs
in
India.
studies
But very
relating to funds
few
studies have
240
in particular.
decreasing
The
trend
in
study made
the
in this
number
of
chapter showed a
PACS
in
India
which
membership,
share
capital,
borrowings
and
loans
and
borrowing
capital contribution.
decline
population coverage,
in
the
number
of
profit
making
societies,
which
member societies.
credit
requirements of
in
1991-92
and
the
number
of
members
per
DCB
paid-up
241
Rs.716.37 crore.
RS.933.84 crore and deposit per DCB shot up from RS.7.51 lakh
to
Rs.26.51
crore
during
this
time
span.
There
were
In short,
The
However,
considerable
improvement
in
deposits
and
loans
and
to
RS.6727.88
crore
and
loans
and
advances
from
The
242
Compared
to
was
growth
in
significant.
deposits,
increase
in
borrowings
in-
The
theoretical
described
in
different
concepts
statement,
perspective
chapter
funds
operative banks,
four
of
and
funds,
management
of
the
funds
management
is
chapter
explained
the
preparation
in
of
commercial
funds
banks
flow
and
co-
of
share
capital,
the
averages
of
all
DCBs
except
On the other
in this
It is
chapter that
243
other Districts.
Ernakulam
the
utilisation
of
reserves
and
profitability.
Total deposits
Ernakulam
phase,
deposits
mobilised
by
Ernakulam
In the
DCB
was
It can be
244
profits.
relatively
better
industrial
activities
of
the
district
Regarding
borrowings,
all
DCBs
except
Ernakulam
and
highest
amount
at
Kozhikode
DCB.
The
same
pattern
averages
Rs.27.24 crore.
were
higher
than
the
overall
three
average
Rs.54~04
of
crore,
245
lakh)
(Rs.56.67 lakh).
and
Palakkad
DCB
had
the
least
average
Ernakulam DCBs'
average
was
In the
Rs. 85.10
crore
It is
inferred that the maximum loan granting banks were the ones
earning maximum profit.
Ernakulam DCB
(18.55%)
the
minimum
at
Kozhikode
DCB
(10.92%).
Rs.49.07 lakh.
(Rs. 79.69
lakh)
followed by
Kollam DCB
(Rs. 64.26
Idukki DCB
buildings
(11.15%)
for
respectively.
their
offices
in
1984-85
and
1989-90
246
The
analysis
made
in
this
chapter
also
showed
that
phase
to
the
second phase.
In
the
second phase,
Idukki DCB
secured the second position and Kollam DCB ranked the last.
time.
parameters
Hence,
of
funds
the
first
management
hypothesis
are
that
presumed
the
to
major
be
an
there were
The average of
247
Bank',
'other
banks'
'Kerala State
(National
Bank
for
'others'
(Government,
National
Housing
Bank,
Housing
Kozhikode,
Thus,
248
loans)
for
'other
purposes',
closely
(about 60% of
followed
by
The
detailed
management
in
DCBs
examination
made
in
of
efficiency
chapter
seven
in
funds
revealed
the
profitability
of
DCBs
spread-burden approach
found
analysed
that
only
by
applying
three DCBs
the
earned
Profit earned
period.
(deposits and
p~rmitted
limit specified in
249
high
assets.
as
these
banks
were
maintaining
excess
liquid
It was
also evident from the study that when the ratio of borrowings
to working capital in all banks was decreasing,
assets/working
capital
ratio
was
the liquid
increasing.
Another
"
the
apriori
belief
that
the
profitability of
the
constituted
the
major
portion
of
overdues
of
all
It was
250
(421.25)
and
total cost (ATC) in the first quartile and fourth quartile was
felt to be due to inefficiencies in the funds management.
Further,
computations
of
efficiency measures
such as
showed that
expenses
per
Comparing
the
employee
volume
and
of
Idukki
business
the
DCB
and
highest manpower
had
the
manpower
lowest.
expenses,
It
also made clear that the CRR amount varied in different banks
and in different years.
251
1979-80 to 1993-94 also had established this point.
Hence,
criteria
instead
Professionalisation
is
of
almost
scientific
absent
in
principles.
DCBs.
This
is
in
co-operative
banking
in
the
Thus,
9.2
Conclusion
The present study leads to the conclusion that though
funds
mobilisation
is done
reasonably well
in most DCBs,
lag behind.
252
management
practices
seems
to
be
responsible
for
this
situation.
9.3
Suggestions
are offered.
1.
2.
an
facilities
arrangement
with
nationalised
banks
is
suggested.
3.
253
5.
6.
7.
overdraft
which
are
repayable
within
8.
Restriction
imposed
on
non-priority
lending
may
be
9.
10.
Setting up
of
desirable
to
remittance
and
National
have
an
transfer
Co-operative
effective
Bank
is
also
co-ordination
It will
help
in
of
funds.
to
~h
254
11.
so
that
idle
funds
in
certain
areas
can
be
12.
Regarding
maintenance
of
accounts,
to
bring
about
13.
14.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ARTICLES
Abdul
Agarwal,
N. K. , "Working capital
concepts, planning and
financing", The Chartered Accountant, Vol.XXXV, No .10,
April 1987.
V. B . ,
" Integrated
Approach
to
Study
Banks
profitability", Prajnan, Vol.XVI, No.4, Oct.-Dec.
1987.
Anil Kishora,
Indian Banks
Capital
Management
11
Bhairu,
Bharat
J.
Metha,
"Working
Capital
Management
Under
Inflationary Condition", The Chartered Accountant,
Vol.XXIX, No.10, April 1981.
111
iv
K.P. and Letha, T.P., "Reserve Management of Cooperative Banks - A case study of Trichur District
Co-operative
Bank,
Indian
Co-operative Review,
Vol.XXVIII, No.2, October 1990.
vi
Obul
Ojha,
vii
in
Co-
of
Co-
viii
Shanker,
R.,
Mix in Banks",
The
Sharma,
ix
Sudhir
C.
Bhave,
"Training
Organisational Health",
Tomorrow, Vol.1a, NO.7.
The
Indian
Best
Medicine
Banking
Today
for
and
Thakker,
A. ,
"Cost
The
S.K.,
"Role of Education and Human Resource
Development
in
Improving
Productivity
in
Cooperatives",
Co-operative
Perspective,
Vol.XXII,
No.23, September 1993.
M.,
"Central Co-operative Banks and Short-term
Agricultural Credit",
The Co-operator, Vol.XXII,
NO.23, June 1985.
Varkey,
Varsha
V.O.,
Voore,
"Banking For Profits", Punjab National Bank Monthly Review, October 1991.
R.R.,
BOOKS
xi
Kumar, 'Analytical Study of the working of Nonnationalised Banks in U.P. since 1969, In: Saeed, M.,
(ed) : A Survey of Research in Commerce and Management,
Vol.51, Anmol Publications, New Delhi, 1990.
Dulfer,
T.N., Principles, Problems and Practice of Cooperation, Shivalal Aggarwal and Company, Agra, 1988.
xii
Indian Council
for
Social
James V. Van Horne, Financial Management and Policy, PrenticeHall of India Private Limited, New Delhi, 1993.
Krishnaswamy, O. R., Fundamentals of Co-operation, S. Chand and
Company, New Delhi, 1985.
Kulandaiswamy, V., Principles and Practices of Co-operative
Management, Rainbow Publications, Coimbatore, 1987.
Kulkarni, P. V., Financial Management,
House, Bombay, 1994.
Kulsrestha,
N.K.,
Himalaya Publishing
~awrence
D.
in
India,
Rainbow
Nakkiran,
S. ,
Co-operative Banking
Publications, Coimbatore, 1980.
in
India,
Rainbow
xiii
xiv
xv
xvi
Bank of
India,
11 Report
of the
Co-operation in India", Bombay, 1957.
Conunittee
on
xvii