Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT: This study concerns the flow control using a new vortex generators (VGs) shape with counter-rotating vortices,
obtained by modifying a configuration already investigated. The experiments were performed in order to determine the VGs
answer when they were placed at 10% from the leading edge on the suction face of an airfoil Naca 0015 to improve the lift and
drag coefficients. An optimized geometry form is given in this paper by using the experimental designs method. The
aerodynamic measurements were accomplished in wind tunnel for several Reynolds numbers. The obtained results are analyzed
according to several parameters such as the VG height, the aperture, the space between the same VG pair and the additional
factor. A three-dimensional controlled flow pressure field was also displayed at different velocities, attack angles and taking into
account the additional element effect. The results show a profit brought by the passive devices estimated at about 14% in relative
lift increase and 16% of drag decrease.
KEY WORDS: Vortex Generators (VGs); Airfoil; Lift; Drag; Design of Experiments (DoE); Pressure coefficient.
1
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
Wind tunnel and acquisition system
3219
Airfoil
Where:
1 : Displacement thickness (m), 2 : momentum thickness
(m), U : Freestream velocity (m/s), u : velocity component
tangential to the surface (m/s).
These quantities (2 and 3) were determined by integration
up to the tangential speed maximum value of the calculated
profile [12].
The dimensionless coordinate normal to the airfoil y + is
similar to local Reynolds number, often used in CFD to
describe how coarse or fine a mesh is for a particular flow.
The non-dimensional wall parameter is defined as:
y+ =
yU C f 2
(4)
Where:
y : Normal distance to the profile (m), C f : Skin friction
coefficient, : Kinematic viscosity (m2s-1).
By assimilating the airfoil to a flat plate, the skin friction
coefficient can be estimated from the following empiric
relation [13]:
C f 2 0.037ReL0.2
(5)
CL =
The use of shape factor (H12) informs us about the state of the
boundary layer. It allows the determination of the turbulent
laminar transition as well as precise positioning from the
location of turbulent boundary layer separation; its expression
is given by:
H12 =
1
2
(1)
(2)
u
u
1
dy
U U
0
2 =
3220
Cd =
U 2 S
(6)
(3)
Fx
1 U 2 S
2
(7)
With:
Fx : Drag force (N), Fy : Lift force (N), : Volumic weight
(Kg/m3), S : Surface profile (m2).
The pressure coefficient Cp is provided by the expression:
Cp =
P P0
2
2 U
(8)
With:
P : Wall static pressure,
P0 : Upstream reference pressure.
4
With:
u
1 = 1
dy
U
0
And
Fy
H12
2.4
2.2
2
1.8
1.6
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
X/L
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
X/L
0.187
U (ms1)
(m)
1 104 (m)
2 104 (m)
H12
24.84
0.010
9.906
5.080
1.95
-4
Cp
-3
-2
-1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
X/L
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
Code
A
B
C
D
5.2
Factor
a/
c/
h/
Level 1
0.55
0.30
0.35
30
Level 2
0.70
0.45
0.55
48
Units
()
3221
Level 1:-1
Level 2:+1
Exp. no.
Variables
A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
B
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
C
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
D
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
1.1
CL
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
3222
5.4
B
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
C
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
D
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Answer
YCL
0.8699
1.0479
1.1267
1.0846
1.1668
1.1810
1.2113
1.2370
1.0220
1.0693
0.9416
1.1439
1.1259
1.1157
1.1198
1.1457
E=
Tests procedure
0.5
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Variables
A
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
1 t
X y
N
(9)
With:
E: Effect-vector,
N: Number of experiments,
Xt: The transposed matrix of the effects calculation,
y: Response-vector.
By calculating the effects values of principal factors and
interactions, it is possible to make a relative factors study with
respect to their influence to the response. Thus, simply, by the
effects examination, the factors can be classified according to
their capacity to vary the studied answer. This study is often
translated graphically, by histograms. The Paretos law is a
simple mean to classify the phenomenon [18]. In this case,
34.78% of causes represent 80% of effects; the Pareto law can
be used [19] with precaution.
The Pareto diagram is used here to identify the relative
importance of the different factors in order to focus on some
key cases that have the greatest impact, rather than getting lost
in the treatment of a variety causes that have less effect. To
solve the problem with maximum efficiency, we will act on
80% of the effects, so it was deemed necessary to take into
account only the influence of the following elements (C, A, B,
ABD, BD, ABCD, CD, AC and D) and neglect the rest.
Graphical analysis highlighted the importance of the C-factor,
represented by the vortex generators height, which means the
most influential factor with a contribution ratio of 22%.
Following the analysis of the results (Table 4), the C-values
taken on +1 (h = 0.55) perform better than those on -1
(h = 0.35) . Moreover, the sixteen configurations tested
have confirmed the great role of the C-factor.
With a single contribution of 10%, the factor A is also
considered a major element. Several researchers have
0.07
100%
0.06
0.05
70%
0.04
60%
0.03
50%
0.02
40%
0.01
30%
ABD BD ABCD CD
AC
AB
6.2.1
80%
Cumulated ratio
Effects contribution
6.2
90%
20%
The lift and drag coefficients resulting from the flow around
the airfoil without vortex generators versus the incidence
angle (uncorrected for wind tunnel blockage) are shown in
figure 8 at two Reynolds numbers. We observe that at low
incidence both CL and Cd evolutions have a linear behavior.
Its also noted that the progressive incidence increase causes
a sudden drop in the lift related to a profile stall. This fall is
accompanied by an expansion of the induced drag caused by
the fluid separation.
1.4
6
6.1
a/
0.70
c/
0.45
h/
0.55
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
0
CL
Cd
1.2
CL,Cd
Factors
Levels
10
15
20
10
15
20
30
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Position of the vortex generators
3223
0.5
-5
Re=1.58x105
Re=2.6x105
-4
Baseline
VG Control
0.45
0.4
0.35
-3
Cd
Cp
0.3
-2
0.25
0.2
-1
0.15
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
X/L
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
10
15
20
10
15
20
study
of
the
added
B-factor
Baseline
VGs with factor "B"
VGs without factor "B"
1.1
1
CL
(D)
6.2.3
6.2.2
(C)
0.1
0.05
0
0.9
0.8
Reynolds number (C) and 11% for the high speed (D).
However, the C L C d ratio is increased by 28.3% for
0.7
0.6
[Re=1.58x105]
0.5
0
10
15
20
1.3
Baseline
VG Control
1.2
1.3
1.1
1.2
0.9
1.1
0.8
1
CL
CL
0.7
(A)
0.6
0.5
0
Baseline
VGs with factor "B"
VGs without factor "B"
0.9
0.8
(B)
0.7
10
15
20
10
15
20
0.6
[Re=2.60x105]
0.5
0
10
15
20
3224
Z/h
-1
0
1
2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
X/L
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
-3.74
-2 -3.48
-3.22
-2.97
-2.71-2.19
-1.68
Z/h
Z/h
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
-0.9
-2.45
-1.93
-2.71
-3.22
-2.97
-3.48
-3.74
0.3
0.4
0.5
X/L
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.3
0.4
-2.01
-3.14-2.58
-3.42
-1.45
-1.17
-2
-1.73
-2.86-2.3
2
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
-1.45
0.5
X/L
0.6
-0.889 -0.326
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
-3.42
-1.64
-3.12
-2.83-2.23
-0.461
-0.757
-1.35
0
1
0
1
-4.01
-1
-0.607
-1
-3.99
0.5
X/L
-0.845
Z/h
-3.7
-1.37
-0.585
-0.383
-1.11
-2.41 -1.89
-1.42
Z/h
-3.19
-2.93
-3.71 -3.45
2
0
0
1
-1.16 -0.642
-1
-3.45
-3.19
-2.93
-1
-1.63
-2.67
-2.15
-3.71
-2
-2.83
-3.12
-2.53
-3.42
-4.01 -4.3 -3.71
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
-1.35
-1.94
0.4
0.5
X/L
0.6
-1.05
0.7
0.8
-0.461
0.9
3225
CONCLUSION
3226