College of Engineering and Computer Science

Mechanical Engineering Department

Mechanical Engineering 370

Thermodynamics
Fall 2010 Course Number: 14319
Instructor: Larry Caretto

Unit Seven Homework Solutions, October 26, 2010

1

A 600 MW steam power plant, which is cooled by a nearby river, has a

thermal efficiency of 40%. Determine the rate of heat transfer to the river
water. Will the actual heat transfer rate be higher or lower than this value?
Why?
From the basic definition of cycle efficiency,

W
Q H

W
QH

, we can compute
Q
H

600 MW
1500 MW . From the cycle relationship between |QH|, |QL|, and

0.4

|W|, |QH| = |QL| + |W|, we can write, for heat rates and power, Q
H Q L W . Thus we find

that the heat rejected to the river is Q

L Q H W =1500 MW 600 MW = 900 MW.
In the actual power plant there will be other sources of heat loss. These include heat transfer to
the surrounding air from the power plant and leaks of the working fluid. In addition, power plant
efficiency is usually determined as the power output divided by the equivalent heat from the fuel.
There is a significant contribution to the inefficiency from the exhaust gases.

An automobile engine consumes fuel at a rate of 28 L/h and delivers 60 kW

of power to the wheels. If the fuel has a heating value of 44,000 kJ/kg and
a density of 0.8 g/cm3, determine the efficiency of the engine.
We start with the basic definition of cycle efficiency,

W
QH

, and we have to
Q
H

compute the heat input rate as the product of the fuel rate, and the heating content of the fuel.
(We need the density to convert from a volume flow rate of fuel to a mass flow rate of fuel. Thus,
we compute the heat input as follows.

0.8 g 28 L 44,000 kJ 1 kg 1,000 cm 3

kJ
fuel ( HV ) fuel fuelV fuel ( HV ) fuel
Q H m
985,600
cm 3 h
kg
1,000 g
L
h

We divide this into the power (work rate) of 60 kW to compute the efficiency.
W
60 kW
1 kJ 3,600 s

= 21.9%

kJ
kW s
h
QH
985,600
h
A household refrigerator with a COP of 1.2 removes heat from the
refrigerated space at a rate of 60 kJ/min. Determine (a) the electric power
consumed by the refrigerator and (b) the rate of heat transfer to the
kitchen air.
From the basic definition of coefficient of performance, cop

compute W Q L

QL

Q
L

, we can
W

60 kJ
1 kW s 1 min = 0.83 kW..
min
cop
1.2
kJ
60 s

Jacaranda (Engineering) 3519

E-mail: lcaretto@csun.edu

Mail Code
8348

Phone: 818.677.6448
Fax: 818.677.7062

From the cycle relationship between |QH|, |QL|, and |W|, |QH| = |QL| + |W|, we can write, for heat

rates and power, Q

H Q L W . Thus we find that the heat rejected to the kitchen air is
Q
W 60 kJ 1 kW s 1 min 0.83 kW = 1.83 kW.
Q
H
L
min
kJ
60 s
4

A heat pump is used to maintain a house at a constant temperature of 23 oC.

The house is losing heat to the outside air through the walls and windows
at a rate of 60,000 kJ/h while the energy generated within the house from
people, lights and appliances amounts to 4,000 kJ/h. For a COP of 2.5,
determine the required power input to the heat pump.
The COP definition for a heat pump is different from the definition for the refrigerator. Here we
are interested in the amount of heat added to the house which is the high temperature heat
rejection from the refrigeration cycle. The COP for a heat pump is defined as follows:
COPHP

QH

Q
H

. We can solve this equation for the power input and plug in the
W

given data to compute the power required. Here we note that the heat supplied by the heat pump
to keep the room temperature constant is just the difference between the heat loss and the heat
generation. Thus, QH = 60,000 kJ/h 4000 kJ/h = 56,000 kJ/h. The power consumption is then
found to be

Q H

COPHP

56,0000 kJ
1 kW s 1 h = 6.22 kW
h

2.5
kJ
3,600 s

A heat engine is operating on a Carnot cycle and has a thermal efficiency of

55%. The waste heat from this engine is rejected to a nearby lake at 60 oF
at a rate of 800 Btu/min. Determine (a) the power output of the engine and
(b) the temperature of the heat source.
We can combine the basic definition of cycle efficiency,
relationship between |QH|, |QL|, and |W|,
W
Q H

W
QH

, and the cycle

Q
H

Q
.
H Q L W , to eliminate Q H

Q L W

Q L
1

800 Btu / min , and = 55%, we can find the power output as
For this problem, where Q
L

follows.

Q L
1

0.55 800 Btu

min
1 0.55

hp min = 23.1 hp.

42.41 Btu

For a Carnot cycle, the efficiency is given by the equation, Carnot = 1 TL/TH. We can rearrange
this equation and substitute the given data of = 55% and TL = 60oF = 519,67 R to obtain the
temperature of the heat source.

TH TH TL

Jacaranda (Engineering) 3519

E-mail: lcaretto@csun.edu

TH

TL
519.67 R

= 1156 R.
1 1 0.55

Mail Code
8348

Phone: 818.677.6448
Fax: 818.677.7062

A homeowner is trying to decide between a high-efficiency natural gas

furnace with an efficiency of 97% and a ground-source heat pump with a
COP of 3.5. The unit costs of electricity and natural gas are $0.092/kWh
and $1.42/therm (1 therm = 105 Btu = 105,505.6 kJ). Determine which
system will have a lower energy cost.
The cost of each fuel can be compared for an equivalent amount of energy delivered to the
house. With the furnace, 97% of the energy in the natural gas will be delivered to the house.
Thus the cost to provide 1 kJ of heating with the gas furnace is
C gas

1
therm
$1.42
$0.0000139

0.97 105505.6 kJ therm

kJ

For the heat pump, the amount of heat delivered to the house is 3.5 times the electric power
input. The cost to provide 1 kJ of heating with the heat pump is

C hp

1 $0.092 kW s
hr
$0.0000073

3.5 kWh 1 kJ 3600 s )

kJ

Thus, the energy cost of the heat pump is lower. However, the heat pump will have a higher
initial cost and the homeowner would have to do a financial analysis to see if the savings was
worth the extra cost of the heat pump.
7

Water, initially at a temperature of 500oC and a pressure of 1 MPa is cooled

at constant pressure to a mixture of liquid and vapor with a quality of 70%.
What is the entropy change.
Entropy is a property. The entropy at the initial state is found from the superheat
table A-6 on page 919: s(1 MPa, 500oC) = 7.7643 kJ/kgK. At the final state we have
to compute the entropy using the saturation values at the final pressure, P2, = P1 = 1
MPa. At this pressure we find sf = 2.1381 kJ/kgK and sfg = 4.4470 kJ/kgK. Since the
final quality x2 = 0.7 we have s2 = sf + x2sfg = (2.1381 kJ/kgK) + (0.7)(4.4470 kJ/kgK)
= 5.2510 kJ/kgK.
The entropy change s2 s1 = 5.2510 kJ/kgK 7.7643 kJ/kgK = 2.5133 kJ/kgK

The inlet to an R-134a compressor is a saturated vapor at 15 psia. The

outlet of the compressor has a pressure of 300 psia. The entropy of the
outlet state is the same as that of the inlet. What is the enthalpy change
between the inlet and outlet states?
The properties at the inlet state are found from table A-12E on page 977: s in = sg(15
psia) = 0.22715 Btu/lbmR and hin = hg(15 psia) = 93.155 Btu/lbm. At the final state
we know Pout = 300 psia and sout = sin = 0.22715 Btu/lbmR. At 300 psia the entropy of
0.22715 Btu/lbmR lies between table values of 0.21745 Btu/lbmR and 0.22802
Btu/lbmR. Interpolating the enthalpy value at the outlet condition gives the following
result.

hout

128.60 Btu 121.95 Btu

lbm
lbm
121.95 Btu

0.22802 Btu 0.21745 Btu

lbm

lbm R
lbm R

0.22715 Btu 0.21745 Btu

128.05 Btu

lbm R
lbm R
lbm

The enthalpy change hout hin = 93.155 kJ/kg 128.05 kJ/kg = 34.90 kJ/kg

Jacaranda (Engineering) 3519

E-mail: lcaretto@csun.edu

Mail Code
8348

Phone: 818.677.6448
Fax: 818.677.7062

Conventional coal fired power plants cost $1,300 per kW to construct and
have an efficiency of 34%. Advanced plants use the clean burning
Integrated Coal Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) in which the coal is
subjected to heat and pressure to gasify it while removing sulfur and
particulate matter from it. The gaseous coal is then burned in a gas
turbine, and part of the waste heat form the exhaust gases is recovered to
generate steam for the steam turbine. Currently the construction of IGCC
plants costs about $1,500 per kW, but their efficiency is about 45%. The
average heating value of coal is about 28,000,000 kJ per ton (that is,
28,000,000 kJ of heat is released when one ton of coal is burned.) If the
IGCC plant is to recover its cost difference from fuel savings in five years,
determine what the cost of coal should be in $ per ton.
Here we assume that the economic analysis is based on a payback period where we do not
account for the time value of money. The construction cost difference is $200 per kW. The
amount of electricity, in kWh, generated in five years, per kW of capacity is equal to the time that
the plant is used times the fraction of its average capacity that is used. If we assume for the best
case to justify the IGCC plant that both plants are operated at full capacity for five years, the total
hours of operation, assuming only one leap year in five years, will be (24 hours/day)(4*365+366
days) or a total of 43,824 hours. Thus each kW of capacity will produce a total of 43,824 kWh
over the five-year period.
The amount of coal to produce this energy (from each kW of generating capacity) is determined
by the efficiency of the plant and the heating value of the coal. For the conventional plant, the
total coal use over five years (for each kW of generating capacity) is

mcoal

QH
W

( HV ) coal ( HV ) coal

1 kJ 3,600 s
kW s hr 16.57 tons
28,000,000 kJ
(0.34)
ton

( 43,824 kW h )

For the IGCC plant, the total coal use over five years (for each kW of generating capacity) is

mcoal

QH
W

( HV ) coal ( HV ) coal

1 kJ 3,600 s
kW s hr 12.52 tons
28,000,000 kJ
(0.45)
ton

(43,824 kW h )

Thus the IGCC plant will save 16.57 12.52 = 4.05 tons over the five year period for each kW of
plant capacity. Since the IGCC plant costs an extra $200 to build, we will be able to pay off this
cost difference in five years if the price of coal is at least $200/(4.05 tons) =$49.37/ton.
We see that the amount of coal saved is directly proportional to the amount of time the plant runs.
If the plant only produced 75% of the maximum possible kilowatt hours over a give year period,
the coal savings would be only 3.04 tons and coal would have to cost about $65.83 to make the
IGCC plant pay off in five years. (The average price of coal in the US for the 2008 was $32.05
per ton.1)

http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/coal/page/acr/table33.html

Jacaranda (Engineering) 3519

E-mail: lcaretto@csun.edu

Mail Code
8348

Phone: 818.677.6448
Fax: 818.677.7062