Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of
Contents
Agriculture
and
Forest
Products
...........................................................
5
Protecting
Animals
from
Abuse
and
Neglect
............................................................................................................
5
Managing
Agricultural
Runoff
into
Lakes
and
Rivers
...........................................................................................
5
Expanding
Market
Opportunities
for
Raw
Milk
.....................................................................................................
5
Appropriations
...........................................................................................
6
A
New
Budget
Strategy
.....................................................................................................................................................
6
Stability
Through
Restraint
.............................................................................................................................................
6
Compassion
for
our
Common
Future
.........................................................................................................................
7
Greater
Oversight
and
Accountability
........................................................................................................................
8
Making
Tough
Decisions
...................................................................................................................................................
9
Education
...................................................................................................
15
Creating
A
More
Equitable
&
Sustainable
Education
System
........................................................................
15
Cost
Constraint
and
Financial
Accountability
......................................................................................................
15
Health
Care
Costs
in
Education
Spending
...............................................................................................................
16
Vermont
State
Colleges
..................................................................................................................................................
16
Universal
Childrens
Savings
Account
.....................................................................................................................
16
Improving
Education
Quality
Evaluations
.............................................................................................................
17
Education
Tax
Rates
and
Education
Tax
by
its
Yield
.........................................................................................
17
Supporting
Afterschool
Programs
............................................................................................................................
17
Municipal
Planning
..........................................................................................................................................................
19
Carbon
Tax
...........................................................................................................................................................................
19
Universal
Recycling
and
Solid
Waste
Disposal
....................................................................................................
20
Judiciary
.....................................................................................................
33
Protecting
Life,
Liberty,
and
Property
......................................................................................................................
33
Fighting
Off
Fraud
.............................................................................................................................................................
34
Repairing
our
Criminal
Justice
System
...................................................................................................................
34
Collateral
Consequences
of
Conviction
(long)
......................................................................................................
35
Collateral
Consequences
of
Conviction
(short)
....................................................................................................
35
Internet
Protections
I
.....................................................................................................................................................
35
Internet
Protections
II
....................................................................................................................................................
36
Sex
Offender
Registry
.....................................................................................................................................................
37
Juvenile
Justice
..................................................................................................................................................................
37
Firearm
Possession
...........................................................................................................................................................
38
Access
to
Weapons
...........................................................................................................................................................
38
Forfeiture
.............................................................................................................................................................................
38
Collection
of
Child
Support
............................................................................................................................................
39
Child
Protection
................................................................................................................................................................
39
Transportation
........................................................................................
39
Changing
our
Transportation
Habits
.......................................................................................................................
39
Amtrak
Trains,
the
Ethan
Allen
Express
and
the
Vermonter
........................................................................
40
Commuter
Train
Study
...................................................................................................................................................
40
Transparency
in
Road
Maintenance
Projects
.......................................................................................................
40
concern
if
visitors
unknowingly
introduced
harmful
pathogens,
bacteria,
or
viruses
to
the
farm
animals.
Also
included
in
the
bill
is
a
relaxation
of
testing
requirements
for
certain
diseases
that
have
been
eradicated
in
Vermont,
increase
in
Tier
2
production
limits
(from
280
to
350
gallons
per
week),
permitted
use
of
the
small
plastic
vials
used
by
conventional
dairies
to
deliver
milk
samples
to
FDA-accredited
labs,
and
codification
of
the
current
Agency
of
Agriculture's
bacteria
and
cell
count
testing
policy.
Appropriations
New
Budget
Strategy
(Mary
Hooper)
The
fiscal
year
(FY)
2016
budget
is
the
beginning
of
a
multiyear
process
to
bend
the
growth
in
state
spending
and
create
long-term
budget
sustainability.
This
session,
we
made
significant
progress
in
reducing
the
rate
of
increase
in
Corrections,
Buildings
and
General
Services,
and
Public
Safety.
Continuing
reductions
in
federal
support,
growing
demand
for
services
and
investment
in
public
infrastructure,
and
slower
economic
growth
has
spurred
the
Legislature
to
adopt
five
new
fiscal
goals:
1. Reduce
reliance
on
the
use
of
onetime
money.
The
FY2016
budget
used
$25
million
in
onetime
moneyless
than
half
of
what
was
used
in
FY2015.
2. Move
toward
budgeting
less
than
100%
of
projected
revenue.
3. Include
assessment
of
future
year
costs
as
part
of
assessing
programs
and
budget
proposals.
4. Explore
moving
to
a
two-year
budget
process.
5. Expand
the
use
of
Results
Based
Accountability
measurements
throughout
state
government.
The
framework
presented
by
these
goals
earned
wide
tripartisan
and
bicameral
support.
Stability
through
Restraint
(Sarah
Buxton,
Mitzi
Johnson)
Since
the
recession,
revenue
growth
nationwide
has
slowed
and
federal
funding
for
a
number
of
important
programs
continues
to
shrink.
Unlike
previous
recessions
where
short-term
cuts
or
short-term
revenue
could
get
us
through
the
difficulty,
we
are
facing
a
new
normal.
Bending
spending
growth
towards
sustainability
compounded
the
already-
difficult
budget
building
process
this
year.
The
states
economists
announced
a
$40
million
revenue
downgrade
in
July
2014.
Shortly
after
the
Governor
presented
his
budget,
another
$18
million
downgrade
was
announced
leaving
the
House
create
a
responsible
budget
that
addressed
the
now
$113.2
million
shortfall.
After
four
months
of
detailed
analysis,
scrutiny,
and
review,
the
Legislature
approved
a
balanced
budget.
By
carefully
including
reductions
($56
million),
funding
changes
($31.8
million),
and
one-time
resources
($25
million),
the
2016
budget
avoids
the
most
draconian
cuts
and
aligns
state
expenditures
with
more
sustainable
financing.
Compassion
for
our
Common
Future
(Mary
Hooper,
Matt
Trieber,
Diane
Lanpher)
This
year,
Legislators
wrestled
with
difficult
choices
that
transcended
party,
geography,
demographics,
and
interests.
The
needs
of
all
Vermonters
and
our
communities
were
balanced
carefully
with
compassion
for
our
common
future.
That
is
clearly
reflected
in
the
unanimous
and
bipartisan
vote
from
the
House
Appropriations
Committee.
These
responsible
investments
represent
our
collective
commitment
to
a
stable
future.
We
continued
our
commitment
to
existing
healthcare
programs,
which
are
seeing
direct
and
immediate
cost
savings
for
Vermonters
who
are
choosing
to
stay
home
during
illness
and
in
the
last
months
of
their
lives.
We
significantly
increased
the
child
protection
workforce
to
keep
our
children
safe.
We
modified
the
Reach
Ahead
program
to
provide
a
second
year
of
100%
childcare
subsidy
to
help
people
move
out
of
poverty
and
relying
on
public
assistance
to
self-
sufficiency.
We
continued
our
commitment
to
the
rural
economy
by
funding
our
working
lands
initiative.
We
continued
investments
in
tourism
to
enable
this
sector
of
the
economy
to
grow.
We
fully
funded
the
Education
Fund
transfer
to
prevent
additional
burdens
on
property
tax
payers.
We
provided
communities
with
an
opportunity
to
manage
the
future
of
the
services
delivered
through
Public
Safety
Answering
Points
(PSAPs)
and
created
more
equity
in
funding
of
dispatch
services
by
postponing
the
elimination
of
two
public
safety
answering
points.
(We
rejected
the
Governors
proposal
to
eliminate
PSAPs
without
the
engagement
of
impacted
communities.)
We
increased
Judiciary
funding
by
over
$2
million
to
assure
that
our
courthouse
doors
will
be
open
every
day.
We
committed
to
work
with
the
judicial
branch
to
consider
reforms
that
bring
about
greater
efficiency
and
effectiveness
including
the
way
security
is
funded
and
provided
and
individuals
in
custody
are
transported.
We
created
a
partnership
between
the
Department
of
Buildings
and
General
Services
(the
largest
property
owner
in
the
state)
and
Efficiency
Vermont
to
reduce
energy
use
at
state-owned
properties.
This
creates
long-term,
sustainable
savings
in
the
operation
of
property
and
helps
reduce
our
carbon
footprint.
We
made
investments
in
the
criminal
justice
system
to
reduce
the
number
of
people
incarcerated
or
detained
and
increase
the
success
of
individuals
leaving
incarceration.
One
hundred
fewer
people
were
sent
to
out
of
state
prisons
in
the
current
fiscal
year
and
we
have
set
a
goal
of
reducing
that
number
by
another
100.
We
provided
funding
for
additional
housing
and
continued
funding
of
successful
programs
slated
for
elimination.
We
accomplished
these
aims
and
saved
$2.6
million
in
Department
spending.
Greater
Oversight
and
Accountability
(Sarah
Buxton)
The
Legislature
created
and
charged
two
commissions
with
recommending
changes
to
important
aspects
of
management,
delivery,
and
oversight
in
state
government.
Each
commission
will
have
nongovernmental
members
with
expertise
in
specific
and
relevant
areas
of
practice.
The
first
is
a
Government
Restructuring
and
Operations
Review
Commission,
tasked
with
identifying
opportunities
for
increasing
government
efficiency
and
productivity
in
order
to
reduce
spending
trends
and
related
resource
needs.
The
oversight,
use,
and
expansion
of
public-private
partnerships
will
be
among
the
topics
this
group
reviews.
The
second
commission
will
be
charged
with
evaluating
the
governance
and
management
structure
of
the
State
of
Vermonts
overall
IT
system
and
programs.
Prompted
by
series
of
underperforming
technology
projects,
this
group
will
take
inventory
of
the
States
current
resources,
expertise,
and
need
for
updated
structures.
Making
Tough
Decisions
(Matt
Trieber)
The
FY
2016
budget
was
unprecedented
in
its
difficulty
for
the
legislature.
In
addition
to
the
cuts
proposed
by
the
Governor,
underperforming
taxes
resulted
in
less
state
money
than
anticipated.
As
the
Governor
also
stated
that
he
would
not
raise
progressive
taxes
to
help
support
programs
for
the
neediest
Vermonters,
we
were
left
with
no
choice
other
than
cutting
programs.
We
pushed
back
on
the
administration's
initial
plan
for
the
layoff
of
state
workers
by
implementing
a
retirement
incentive
program
to
protect
these
middle
class
jobs.
Recently
the
Governor
proposed
an
additional
$3
million
of
cuts,
which
would
have
likely
resulted
in
a
loss
of
more
state
jobs.
This
proposal
was
rejected.
This
budget
created
a
new
program
that
will
allow
working
families
to
receive
an
additional
year
of
childcare
at
the
100%
subsidy
rate.
This
program
will
help
working
Vermonters
struggling
to
move
ahead
when
they
need
this
assistance
most.
The
budget
crisis
necessitated
the
removal
of
the
state
funding
of
LIHEAP.
We
feel
strongly
that
in
our
state,
with
such
cold,
harsh
winters,
ALL
Vermonters
deserve
to
be
warm.
As
such,
we
mandated
that
the
first
$5
million
of
end
of
the
year
surplus
is
dedicated
to
heating
assistance
for
needy
Vermonters.
Although
this
budget
crisis
was
difficult,
we
fought
hard
to
ensure
that
needy
Vermonters
are
cared
for.
This
budget
embodies
our
obligations
to
our
neighbors
and
friends.
As
economic
times
improve
in
Vermont,
we
will
continue
to
fight
to
help
people
move
forward,
and
to
make
Vermont
an
even
better
state.
Transparency
in
corporate
governance
structures
of
insurance
companies
that
are
domiciled
in
Vermont.
The
Commissioner
of
DFR
will
now
have
access
to
a
summary
of
the
companys
corporate
governance
structure,
policies
and
practices,
along
with
the
requirements
of
their
annual
disclosure,
and
the
confidential
treatment
of
these
disclosures.
Simplification
and
realignment
of
governance
structure
and
reserve
requirements
for
captive
insurance
companies.
We
work
very
hard
to
keep
Vermont
reputation
as
the
gold
standard
of
domiciles
for
the
captive
insurance
industry
and
we
are
rightfully
proud
of
the
work
we
have
done
over
the
last
several
decades
to
be
sure
that
position.
In
that
effort,
we
made
small
tweaks
to
our
laws
and
regulations
this
year,
with
appreciation
from
the
industry
for
our
efforts.
Working
with
the
Secretary
of
State
and
the
Vermont
Bar
Association
we
updated
Vermonts
LLC
(Limited
Liability
Corporations)
law.
The
revisions
make
Vermont
law
consistent
with
other
states,
simplify
the
creation
and
dissolution
of
LLCs
and
keep
Vermont
at
the
forefront
of
e-commerce
legislation.
Protecting
Vermonts
Consumers
(Maureen
Dakin)
The
Legislature
adopted
a
suite
of
consumer
protections
that
address
current
needs
and
looks
proactively
at
the
future
of
commerce
in
Vermont.
Rent-to-Own
businesses:
This
business
model
provides
a
segment
of
consumers
a
path
to
ownership.
Because
few
agreements
result
in
actual
ownership
of
the
merchandise
it
is
incumbent
to
provide
protections
from
unreasonable
interest
rates
while
providing
reasonable
rates
of
return
for
the
business.
Financial
Literacy:
Saving,
planning,
budgeting,
and
navigating
the
financial
world
are
competencies
necessary
for
peoples
economic
well-being
and
protection.
A
Financial
Literacy
Commission
and
Fund
were
created
based
on
the
recommendations
of
the
Vermont
Financial
Literacy
Task
Force
convened
by
the
Center
for
Financial
Literacy
at
Champlain
College
in
2014.
There
is
no
appropriation
to
the
fund
since
monies
will
be
raised
privately
through
foundations,
grants
and
other
sources.
The
funds
will
reside
with
the
State
Treasurer
for
disbursement
upon
recommendation
of
the
Commission.
Disclosure
of
Fee
for
Automatic
Dialing
Service:
If
youve
purchased
or
leased
a
security
system,
for
example,
you
may
not
have
realized
at
the
time
that
there
are
likely
to
be
additional
fees
from
a
provider
such
as
a
police
or
fire
department.
This
piece
requires
the
seller
of
the
system
to
disclose
in
writing
the
possibility
for
these
fees
for
service.
Consumer
Litigation
Funding:
Consumer
Litigation
Funding
is
a
financial
product
for
consumers
to
quickly
access
monies
for
immediate
needs
while
litigation
proceeds.
It
is
a
relatively
new
but
burgeoning
industry
in
VT
that,
like
rent-to-own
agreements,
doesnt
fall
10
into
the
traditional
regulated
financial
services.
With
little
experience
and
really
no
history
with
them
we
ask
the
Department
of
Financial
Regulation
to
make
recommendations
while
prohibiting
the
business
until
July
1,
2016.
Discount
Membership
Programs:
If
youve
ever
been
invited
to
a
free
seminar
at
a
hotel
or
conference
center
that
ends
with
an
offer
of
a
free
trip,
for
example,
and
all
you
have
to
do
is
become
a
member
it
is
often
misunderstood
that
there
are
several
other
entities
up
the
ladder
that
are
involved.
This
clearly
excludes
entities
who
have
only
incidental
business
with
the
membership
discounter.
Security
Breach
Notice:
This
sets
forth
the
various
ways
including
electronically
a
provider
can
notify
consumers
when
a
security
breach
is
suspected
or
has
occurred.
Limitation
of
Liability
for
Advertisers:
This
amends
9
VSA
sec
2452
by
applying
the
same
protections
from
liability
to
interactive
computer
services
that
other
media
enjoys
for
advertisement
content
they
publish
as
part
of
their
businesses.
Rent-to-Own
Regulations
(Jean
OSullivan)
After
many
years
of
effort,
Vermont
has
joined
31
other
states
in
regulating
the
practices
of
the
rent-to-own
industry.
Stores
using
this
business
model
advertise
no
credit
checks
and
rent
new
or
used
merchandise
at
a
premium
to
Vermonters
with
bad
or
no
credit.
They
set
low
weekly
payments
that
can
stretch
out
for
years
before
you
own
the
item.
75%
of
their
customers
never
own
anything,
making
multiple
payments
with
nothing
to
show.
Rent-to-Own
Stores
are
now
prohibited
from
advertising
no
credit
checks
and
their
prices
are
capped.
They
must
post
all
price
options
clearly
and
conspicuously
in
their
advertising,
signage,
and
rental
agreements.
The
merchants
cost
is
the
actual
cost
to
the
merchant.
Total
cost
is
the
sum
of
the
all
payments,
charges
and
fees
paid
to
own
the
merchandise
under
the
agreement.
Cash
price
is
now
capped
and
determined
by
multiplying
the
merchants
cost
by
a
factor
set
in
law
by
the
type
of
item.
An
option
to
purchase
may
occur
anytime
by
paying
the
cash
price
minus
50%
of
previous
payments
made.
To
further
ensure
that
consumers
are
not
mislead
while
contracting
with
the
companies,
agreements
will
include
cost
disclosures
printed
and
grouped
in
a
specified
manner.
All
warranties
repair
and
maintenance,
and
service
obligations
of
the
parties
must
be
disclosed.
Fees
and
charges
will
be
clearly
explained,
reinstatement
periods
will
be
defined
based
on
weekly
or
monthly
payment
plans,
and
collection
practices
will
be
outlined
with
prohibited
acts
clearly
defined.
If
an
item
is
used,
the
number
of
times
it
has
been
rented
out
will
be
disclosed
and
late
fees
are
limited
to
one
missed
payment.
Notice
of
default
is
now
set
at
14
days
prior
to
commencing
civil
action
and
a
customers
right
to
take
the
unsigned
agreement
with
them
to
review
or
to
comparison
shop
has
been
established.
11
Telecommunications
(Steve
Carr)
For
several
years,
the
Legislature
has
worked
very
hard
with
private
industry,
federal
partners,
and
regulatory
authorities
to
make
high-speed
internet
and
cellular
service
available
to
all
regions
of
the
state.
Last
year,
a
new
Division
for
Connectivity
was
created.
The
Secretary
of
Administration
has
since
recommended
that
it
be
combined
with
an
existing
division
in
the
Department
of
Public
Service,
now
named
the
Division
for
Telecommunications
and
Connectivity
(DTC).
To
help
Vermont
meet
our
statewide
telecommunications
and
connectivity
goals,
the
Legislature
instituted
new
governance,
duties,
and
oversight
within
DTC.
We
established
a
Telecommunications
and
Connectivity
Board
to
review
and
advise
the
Commissioner
on:
Grant
awards
under
the
Connectivity
Initiative,
Development
of
state
policy
and
planning,
Recommendations
for
the
apportionment
of
Connectivity
Funds
between
the
High-
Cost
Program
and
the
Connectivity
Initiative,
and
Recommendations
for
appropriate
Internet
access
speeds
for
publicly-funded
telecommunication
and
connectivity
projects.
In
addition,
the
Public
Service
Department
(rather
than
the
Board)
will
now
oversee
the
Universal
Service
Fund
(USF),
which
will
be
used
to
continue
promoting
higher
speed
broadband
to
unserved
and
underserved
areas
in
Vermont.
The
Legislature
also
approved
a
measure
that
would
increase
(to
55%)
use
of
USF
money
to
fund
the
Connectivity
initiative.
Finally,
the
Legislature
approved
the
creation
of
Communications
Union
Districts
(CUDs).
These
are
groups
of
municipalities
that
have
voted
to
join
together
for
the
purpose
of
delivering
communication
services
to
member
municipalities
and
seek
funding
from
the
Vermont
Economic
Development
Authority
(VEDA).
Districts
will
have
the
power
to
operate,
own,
manage,
and
finance
a
communications
plant.
A
number
of
financial
regulations
and
protections
were
adopted
to
ensure
that
CUDs
are
operated
within
optimal
parameters.
Economic
Development
(Jean
OSullivan,
Bill
Botzow)
The
well
being
of
Vermonters
depends
on
quality
employers
and
an
excellent
workforce.
This
years
economic
development
bill
focuses
on
connecting
employees
and
employers
to
build
our
economy.
The
development
of
our
states
workforce
is
of
paramount
importance.
Many
Vermonters
do
not
have
the
skills
for
current
career
track
job
openings,
and
employers
are
challenged
filling
good
paying
jobs.
The
Legislature
began
honing
our
support
for
workforce
readiness
from
multiple
angles.
Here
are
a
few
of
the
approaches
we
adopted:
12
Creating
more
jobs
and
on-the-job
training
by
reforming
the
Vermont
Economic
Growth
Initiative
(VEGI).
We
lowered
the
qualifying
wage
threshold
for
employers
seeking
the
incentive
in
areas
of
the
state
with
higher
than
average
unemployment,
expanding
job
opportunities
in
rural
areas.
Though
the
wage
threshold
is
lowered,
companies
must
include
benefits
in
their
compensation
packages.
We
approved
enhanced
on-the-job
training
for
new
employees,
frontloading
incentives
for
VEGI
participant
employers
as
they
create
qualifying
jobs,
and
removing
barriers
for
companies
claiming
credits
when
circumstances
beyond
their
control
keep
them
from
meeting
program
deadlines.
Our
economic
development
bill
also
moves
Vermont
forward
by:
Helping
first
time
homebuyers
with
a
down
payment
assistance
transferable
tax
credit.
Too
often
young
families
with
college
and
other
debt
are
stopped
from
buying
homes
and
putting
down
roots
because
of
down
payment
costs.
This
initiative
will
also
help
stimulate
the
housing
market.
Creating
the
Southern
Vermont
Economic
Development
Zone
as
a
pilot
program
to
create
opportunities
between
counties
and
strengthen
collaboration
between
hard
hit
areas
and
state
government
by
deferring
to
local
and
regional
planning
efforts.
Modernizing
Vermonts
liquor
control
system
to
be
more
efficient,
effective,
and
profitable
and
a
permitting
the
sale
of
fortified
wine
wine
and
beer.
13
Supporting
our
tech
sector
by
repealing
the
sales
tax
on
remotely
accessed
prewritten
software.
This
is
the
cloud
tax
and
repeal
will
give
us
a
competitive
advantage
with
neighboring
states
while
helping
Vermonts
growing
tech
sector.
The
Building
Communities
Grants
program
is
one
of
the
most
tangible
ways
that
we
contribute
to
our
cultural
legacy
through
support
for
a
variety
of
projects
in
communities
throughout
the
state.
These
projects
help
fund
capital
projects
on
historic
preservation,
historic
barns
and
agriculture,
cultural
facilities,
recreational
facilities,
human
service
and
educational
facilities,
and
agricultural
fairs.
14
state
construction
dollars.
These
changes
ensure
that
those
we
hire
to
do
our
work
will
be
paid
fair
wages,
have
good
and
usable
benefits
and
that
their
employers
will
know
that
they
are
competing
for
work
on
a
level-playing
field.
Education
Creating
A
More
Equitable
&
Sustainable
Education
System
(Emily
Long,
Sarah
Buxton)
Sustainability,
accountability,
and
equity
are
key
elements
of
our
education
reform
bill
this
year.
Expanding
school
district
size
and
oversight
will
encourage
improvements
in
quality
and
diversity
of
educational
opportunities
for
students
at
a
cost
that
taxpayers
can
afford.
Broad
goals
designed
to
encourage
and
support
local
decisions
and
action
that,
among
other
things,
meet
the
States
Education
Quality
Standards
stand
at
the
forefront
of
the
bill.
The
bill
passed
by
the
Legislature
defines
preferred
governance
structures
that
would
serve
900+
students
through
one
of
our
four
most
common
forms.
New
pre-K
to
grade
12
districts
will
be
managed
by
a
board
responsible
for
providing
comprehensive
education
to
all
resident
students.
Acknowledging
that
one
of
the
preferred
structures
may
not
be
possible
in
some
regions
of
the
state,
the
bill
provides
for
alternative
structures
if
a
different
structure
would
best
achieve
specific
quality,
equity,
and
accountability
goals.
The
Secretary
of
Education
will
review
governance
structures
of
districts
as
they
are
anticipated
to
be
and
by
June
1,
2018,
will
publishes
a
proposal
that
meets
the
education
delivery
goals
set
out.
Districts
that
agree
to
merge
under
certain
models
on
an
accelerated
timeline
will
receive
enhanced
property
tax
reductions
for
five
years.
If
a
district
merges
into
a
preferred
structure
by
July
1,
2019
local
small
school
grant
become
a
merger
support
grant
for
the
whole
district
unless
the
small
school
is
closed
unless
closure
occurs
because
consolidation
with
other
districts
into
a
new
or
renovated
school.
If
a
school
that
currently
receives
a
small
school
grant
is
not
part
of
a
merged
district,
it
may
retain
eligibility
for
the
grant
if
is
geographically
isolated
or
if
it
demonstrates
academic
excellence
and
operational
efficiency.
The
State
Board
of
Education
will
adopt
and
publish
metrics
that
schools
must
meet
for
eligibility.
Schools
that
have
been
experiencing
declining
enrollment
and
have
met
the
criteria
for
the
3.5%
hold-harmless
provision
(a.k.a.
having
phantom
students)
will
experience
a
phase
out
over
a
3-year
transition
period.
Cost
Constraint
and
Financial
Accountability
(Sarah
Buxton)
For
fiscal
years
2017
and
2018
only,
the
way
the
excess
spending
penalty
is
triggered
will
be
changed.
If
a
district
exceeds
its
allowable
growth
in
spending
for
either
of
those
years,
then
any
spending
above
the
allowable
growth
will
be
counted
twice
for
purposes
of
calculating
tax
rates.
Allowable
growth
is
determined
on
a
sliding
scale,
from
zero
to
5.5%,
depending
on
how
much
the
district
spent
in
the
prior
year.
The
more
the
district
spent
in
the
prior
year,
the
less
its
allowable
growth
will
be
the
following
year.
15
In
addition,
if
a
supervisory
union
or
district
fails
to
comply
with
current
statutes
requiring
the
performance
of
specified
duties
the
tax
rates
for
each
district
is
increased
by
5
%
until
compliance.
While
the
law
becomes
effective
on
July
1,
2016,
the
tax
rates
are
not
subject
to
increase
until
fiscal
year
2018.
Health
Care
Costs
in
Education
Spending
(Ann
Manwaring)
The
Legislature
recognizes
the
burden
that
escalating
health
care
costs
has
on
schools
and
total
education
spending
statewide.
The
Director
of
Health
Care
Reform,
working
with
stakeholders,
will
be
required
to
consider
alternatives
available
to
school
districts,
supervisory
unions,
and
their
employees
to
address
the
high
cost
of
health
care
and
recommend
options
that
do
not
trigger
the
federal
tax
on
high-cost,
employer-sponsored
insurance
plans
(referred
to
as
the
Cadillac
Tax).
Among
other
options,
the
Director
is
required
to
consider
the
possibility
of
transitioning
to
plans
offered
through
Vermont
Health
Connect,
the
Vermont
Education
Health
Initiative,
and
other
mechanisms.
A
report
on
these
findings
will
be
submitted
by
November
15
of
this
year.
Vermont
State
Colleges
(Tim
Jerman)
Currently,
the
fifteen
member
Vermont
State
College
Board
consists
of
the
Governor,
a
student
trustee
chosen
annually
by
the
Student
Association,
four
legislative
trustees
elected
by
the
General
Assembly,
and
nine
gubernatorial
appointees.
The
Legislature
changed
this
to
five
gubernatorial
appointments
with
an
additional
four
chosen
by
the
existing
board.
This
will
more
closely
mirror
similar
other
Vermont
higher
education
boards
and
allow
the
inclusion
of
new
trustees
with
specific
skill
sets,
geographic
diversity,
or
other
criteria
which
would
add
to
the
boards
effectiveness.
A
separate
bill
now
allows
three
of
the
Vermont
State
Colleges
to
apportion
their
numbers
of
the
very
successful
early
college
program
among
the
colleges
without
an
individual
quota
for
each.
Initial
legislation
limited
the
number
of
participants
at
each
college,
but
practice
has
shown
that
some
colleges
have
slightly
higher
enrollments
than
others.
This
change
means
no
eligible
student
will
be
denied
access
to
one
of
our
state
colleges
if
there
space
is
available.
Universal
Childrens
Savings
Account
Program
(Sarah
Buxton)
Universal
college
savings
accounts
for
children
is
one
strategy
we
can
use
to
knock
down
barriers
to
higher
education
and
help
end
generational
poverty
in
Vermont.
This
year,
the
Legislature
created
a
special
fund
that
would
provide
every
Vermont
child
with
college
savings
account
with
seed
money
at
birth.
The
Vermont
Student
Assistance
Corporation
(VSAC)
will
administer
and
manage
the
program,
including
working
with
private
foundations,
philanthropists
and
other
donors
to
fund
the
accounts.
VSAC
will
also
work
with
families
and
children
to
provide
financial
counseling,
education,
and
support
for
future
investment.
Children
of
low-income
families
may
receive
additional
initial
deposits
if
the
money
is
available.
Families
will
be
invited
to
match
contributions
and
participate
in
savings
programs.
16
Improving
Educational
Quality
Evaluation
(Ann
Manwaring)
Public
education
is
among
the
most
important
investments
we
make
as
a
society.
Not
only
does
it
enhance
the
lives
of
all
Vermonters,
but
also
serves
as
the
foundation
for
the
common
good
of
our
communities.
This
session,
the
Legislature
emphasized
the
importance
of
using
solid
and
consistent
evaluation
tools
to
chart
continuous
progress
schools
are
making
toward
better
outcomes
for
all
our
children.
We
codified
criteria
for
tiered
systems
of
support,
helping
schools
realize
the
individual
needs
of
each
student.
In
our
major
education
reformation
bill,
we
focused
on
governance
changes
and
cost
containment
while
supporting
the
vital
work
done
to
meet
our
recently
revised
Education
Quality
Standards.
These
are
principles
that
help
guide
curriculum
and
student
learning.
Education
Tax
Rates
&
Reporting
Education
Tax
by
its
Yield
(Sarah
Buxton)
The
fiscal
year
2016
property
tax
rates
have
been
set
as
follows:
Nonresidential
rate
$1.535
Homestead
Rate
$0.99
Base
Income
Rate:
1.80
%
Base
Education
Amount:
$9,459.00
Our
current
tax
system
requires
the
state
to
recommend
a
base
homestead
tax
rate
and
base
education
amount
each
December.
Depending
on
state
education
spending,
projections
and
the
economic
condition
of
the
education
fund
sources,
the
base
homestead
rate
is
generally
adjusted
by
the
legislature.
This
gives
the
appearance
that
the
state
is
increasing
or
decreasing
taxes.
The
statutorily
set
base
amount
is
designed
to
allow
per
pupil
spending
to
grow
annually
by
the
New
England
Economic
Project
(NEEP)
index
without
raising
tax
rates.
However,
the
NEEP
index
and
the
Ed
Fund
sources
dont
change
at
the
same
rate.
The
NEEP
index
is
based
on
the
purchase
of
goods
and
services
by
state
and
local
government
and
Ed
Fund
sources
are
based
on
economic
conditions.
If
spending
grows
when
the
economic
conditions
decline,
rates
need
to
go
up.
The
current
system
makes
this
hard
to
see.
The
Yield
Proposal
changes
our
formula
so
that
rather
than
announcing
a
base
per
pupil
spending
amount
and
a
base
homestead
tax
rate
each
year,
we
announce
what
a
unit
of
the
homestead
property
tax
rate
will
produce.
This
better
reflects
what
the
economic
conditions
will
allow
and
the
state
does
not
need
to
change
the
homestead
rate.
If
districts
increase
per
pupil
spending
beyond
the
yield
amount,
it
will
be
more
clear
to
voters
how
their
budgets
impact
their
local
tax
rate.
Supporting
Afterschool
Programs
(Ann
Manwaring)
Research
shows
the
value
of
extended
learning
opportunities,
both
after
school
and
during
the
summer,
resulting
in
a
higher
level
of
retaining
what
a
child
has
learned
in
school
and
showing
long
term
savings
in
the
cost
of
public
education.
This
year,
the
Legislature
approved
a
bill
that
sets
up
a
special
fund
within
the
Agency
of
Education
for
the
purpose
of
seeking
private
funding
to
support
grants
to
the
many
existing
private
and
school
based
programs
and
to
expand
the
capacity
to
serve
more
children.
17
Establishes
a
renewable
energy
standard
that
will
protect
the
value
of
in-state
sources
of
renewable
energy
and
requires
total
renewables,
including
hydro,
to
grow
from
55%
of
total
retail
electric
sales
in
2017
to
75%
in
2032.
Incentivizes
construction
of
new
distributed
renewable
energy
from
1%
of
total
retail
electric
sales
in
2017
to
10%
in
2032,
growing
local
jobs
and
promoting
energy
independence.
Requires
utilities
to
offer
products
and
services,
such
as
heat
pumps
and
home
weatherization,
that
will
reduce
Vermonters
fossil
fuel
consumption
and
greenhouse
gas
emissions.
Through
energy
conservation,
efficiency
and
local
generation,
our
energy
transformation
programs
are
projected
to
save
Vermonters
$275
million
on
energy
costs
over
15
years,
and
exert
downward
pressure
on
electricity
rates
resulting
in
a
half-percent
reduction
in
electricity
costs
by
2032.
Solar
Siting
(Rebecca
Ellis)
Going
forward,
communities
will
have
greater
say
in
the
siting
of
ground-mounted
solar
projects.
Municipalities
and
planning
commissions
will
have
automatic
party
status
in
permit
proceedings
before
the
public
service
board.
They
will
be
empowered
to
adopt
screening
requirements
for
solar
projects,
either
as
a
zoning
bylaw
or
standalone
ordinance,
which
must
be
adhered
to
by
the
public
service
board.
In
addition,
the
public
service
board
must
follow
the
recommendations
of
the
town
regarding
screening
unless
the
recommendations
would
have
the
effect
of
prohibiting
the
project.
And
finally,
solar
projects
will
be
required
to
comply
with
minimum
statewide
setback
requirements.
Towns
can
request
larger
setbacks
if
they
feel
the
minimum
setbacks
are
inadequate.
18
Urban
Development
Soils
(Rebecca
Ellis)
A
new
program
that
provides
for
safe
and
cost-effective
management
of
contaminated
urban
soils
that
are
excavated
during
construction
projects
will
promote
Vermonts
traditional
pattern
of
village
and
urban
centers
surrounded
by
rural
countryside.
Only
soils
that
qualify
for
treatment
as
solid
waste
will
be
eligible
for
this
program.
This
bill
will
promote
downtown
development,
reduce
construction
costs,
and
save
space
at
Vermonts
only
lined
landfill.
Air
Pollution
(Rebecca
Ellis)
The
House
made
changes
to
Vermonts
air
pollution
statutes
this
session.
Under
present
law,
sources
of
air
pollution
are
required
to
register
with
the
state
only
if
they
emit
more
than
5
tons
of
pollutants
per
year.
Going
forward,
the
Agency
of
Natural
Resources
would
have
the
authority
to
require
registration
of
smaller
sources
of
emissions,
which
will
help
the
Agency
track
and
monitor
air
pollution
across
Vermont.
The
Senate
is
expected
to
review
and
consider
the
proposal
next
session.
Municipal
Planning
(Rebecca
Ellis)
The
House
adopted
a
bill
to
extend
the
expiration
date
for
municipal
plans
from
5
years
to
10
years.
This
change
would
give
municipalities
more
time
to
engage
the
public
and
do
better
planning,
and
more
time
to
implement
their
plans.
Towns
would
be
required
to
check-in
with
their
regional
planning
commissions
halfway
through
the
10-year
period
to
review
progress
on
implementation
of
their
plans.
During
the
10-year
period,
towns
could
also
amend
their
plans,
or
re-write
chapters,
without
changing
the
expiration
date.
Carbon
Tax
(Rebecca
Ellis)
The
House
Natural
Resources
and
Energy
Committee
began
taking
testimony
on
a
proposal
for
a
carbon
pollution
tax
developed
by
Energy
Independent
Vermont
(EIV).
Although
the
Legislature
did
not
take
action
on
a
carbon
tax
proposal
this
year,
the
committee
took
testimony
to
learn
how
a
pollution
tax
might
reduce
carbon
emissions
and,
at
the
same
time,
promote
economic
growth
in
Vermont.
The
EIV
proposal
would
tax
retail
sales
of
gasoline,
diesel
and
home
heating
fuels
based
on
their
carbon
emissions
at
one
of
three
potential
prices:
LOW
(a
tax
peaking
at
$50
per
metric
ton
of
carbon
dioxide),
MEDIUM
($100
per
metric
ton)
and
HIGH
($150
per
metric
ton).
For
a
gallon
of
gasoline,
this
translates
to
a
tax
of
$.45/gallon,
$.90/gallon
or
$1.35/gallon.
The
proposal
is
90%
revenue
neutral,
meaning
that
90%
of
the
revenues
would
be
returned
directly
to
taxpayers,
including
a
proposed
reduction
in
the
sales
tax,
a
tax
credit
for
filers,
a
tax
rebate
for
low-income
people,
and
a
per-employee
rebate
to
companies.
The
remaining
10%
of
revenues
would
be
used
for
carbon-reducing
programs
such
as
weatherization.
19
Under
the
proposed
tax,
taxpayers
would
end
up
with
roughly
the
same
amount
of
money
in
their
pocket
before
and
after
the
tax
but
the
relative
prices
of
goods
would
change,
with
carbon-based
products
becoming
more
expensive.
Economists
predict
that
consumers
would
modify
their
behavior
to
consume
less
carbon-based
goods
(e.g.
carpool
one
day
a
week)
and
use
that
money
to
buy
other
goods
(e.g.
renovate
the
kitchen).
British
Columbia
imposed
a
revenue-neutral
carbon
pollution
tax
in
2008
and
has
seen
both
economic
growth
and
a
substantial
reduction
in
carbon
emissions.
In
contrast,
the
rest
of
Canada
saw
carbon
emissions
grow
slightly.
If
nothing
else,
the
British
Columbia
experience
justifies
a
close
look
at
a
carbon
pollution
tax
here
in
Vermont.
Universal
Recycling
and
Solid
Waste
Disposal
(Rebecca
Ellis)
This
summer,
key
components
of
our
Universal
Recycling
Law
will
take
effect.
Beginning
on
July
1,
residential
trash
charges
must
be
based
on
volume
or
weight,
recyclables
are
banned
from
the
landfill,
transfer
stations/drop-off
facilities
must
accept
leaf
and
yard
debris,
haulers
must
offer
residential
recycling
collection
at
no
separate
charge,
public
buildings
must
provide
recycling
containers
alongside
all
trash
containers
in
public
spaces
(exception
for
restrooms),
and
food
scrap
generators
of
52
tons/year
(1
ton/week)
must
divert
material
to
any
certified
facility
within
20
miles.
The
Legislature
adopted
a
waiver
process
from
parallel
collection
or
haulers
and
municipalities
that
are
attaining
the
state's
disposal
and
diversion
goals
through
alternative
means.
The
Agency
of
Natural
Resources
will
work
with
municipalities
that
want
to
take
advantage
of
this
waiver
process.
20
certification.
The
enforcement
provisions
with
regard
to
agriculture
and
water
quality
will
be
enhanced
to
provide
a
defined
path
to
resolve
conflicts
and
violations.
All
commercial
development
will
be
required
to
implement
and
maintain
best
management
practices
(BMPs),
especially
in
impaired
watersheds.
Regulations
will
be
determined
by
size
and
impact,
and
will
be
further
guided
by
regional
basin
plans.
Rules
adopted
to
manage
regulated
stormwater
runoff
will
focus
on
compliance
with
Vermont
water
quality
standards
and
the
maintenance
of
predevelopment
runoff
characteristics.
State
residual
designation
authority
(RDA)
as
outlined
in
the
federal
Clean
Water
Act
will
allow
a
case-by-
case
determination
of
a
permit
requirement
based
on
the
basin
planning
process.
Municipalities
will
also
be
required
to
obtain
a
stormwater
general
permit
for
discharges
from
town
roads.
Towns
will
have
to
inventory
all
their
roads
and
develop
a
prioritized
implementation
plan
for
improvements,
which
will
need
to
comply
with
BMPs.
A
key
part
of
ensuring
that
we
remain
accountable
for
improving
our
water
quality
is
to
fund
meaningful
efforts
to
achieve
our
goal.
A
special
fund
will
be
created
as
a
mechanism
to
assist
municipalities
in
complying
with
requirements
and
implementation
schedules.
Non-profits,
regional
organizations,
and
other
entities
will
also
be
able
to
contribute
to
this
fund.
Money
from
this
source
will
also
support
the
required
staffing
of
the
Agency
of
Agriculture,
Food,
and
Markets
and
the
Agency
of
Natural
Resources
to
administer
and
implement
technical
assistance
and
enforcement.
Improving
the
Quality
of
the
States
Water
(Bob
Krebs)
(short)
Our
lakes,
rivers
and
ponds
are
struggling
from
pollution
and
our
efforts
over
the
decades
have
not
kept
pace
with
the
impact
of
stormwater
runoff,
agricultural
use,
and
high
water
events.
This
year,
a
comprehensive
and
far-reaching
water
quality
bill
passed
the
Legislature.
It
engages
all
land
use
sectors,
including
roads
and
highways,
agricultural
operations,
developed
land
and
urban
areas,
treatment
plants,
and
forestlands.
All
will
be
required
to
improve
practices
and
participate
in
providing
resources
to
fund
and
finance
a
sustained,
dedicated
effort.
A
key
part
of
ensuring
that
we
remain
accountable
for
improving
our
water
quality
is
to
fund
meaningful
efforts
to
achieve
our
goal.
A
special
fund
will
be
created
as
a
mechanism
to
assist
municipalities
in
complying
with
requirements
and
implementation
schedules.
Money
from
this
source
will
also
support
the
required
staffing
of
the
Agency
of
Agriculture,
Food,
and
Markets
and
the
Agency
of
Natural
Resources
to
administer
and
implement
technical
assistance
and
enforcement.
Healthy
Water;
Healthy
Fish
(Banning
Microbeads)
(Bob
Krebs)
Microbeads
are
pinhead-sized
plastic
orbs
found
in
personal
care
products,
household
cleaners,
and
over-the-counter
drugs.
Approved
by
the
FDA
in
1972
and
in
wide
use
in
the
1990s,
microbeads
were
seen
as
the
cheaper
alternative
to
almond
meal.
The
original
designers
of
these
products
have
since
realized
that
they
failed
to
take
the
long
view
and
follow
these
products
to
the
end
of
life.
Microbeads
are
often
too
small
to
be
captured
by
21
wastewater
management
facilities
and
are
not
broken
down
in
septic
system
processes.
Once
on
land
or
in
water,
they
persist
for
decades
acting
as
sponges
for
toxic
chemicals
and
pollutants,
and
damage
the
health
of
aquatic
life
that
confuses
them
for
food.
Numerous
alternatives
are
already
available.
The
House
passed
bill
to
prohibit
the
sale
of
products
containing
microbeads
beginning
in
2019.
Manufacturers
are
currently
finding
alternatives
to
microbeads
and
phasing
them
out
of
products,
partially
due
to
legislation
like
ours.
Expanding
Responsible
Fishing,
Hunting,
and
Trapping
in
Vermont
(Bob
Krebs)
Fishing,
hunting,
and
trapping
are
an
inextricable
part
of
our
heritage
and
culture.
This
year,
the
Legislature
passed
measures
that
support
these
widespread
activities
in
Vermont.
First,
we
eliminated
the
origination
fee
for
businesses
that
sell
Vermont
licenses.
Second,
we
granted
more
access
to
free
hunting
and
fishing
licenses
for
people
with
disabilities
and
expanded
eligibility
for
moose
hunting
permits
to
all
members
of
the
US
Armed
forces.
Third,
we
expanded
methods
of
enforcement
regarding
the
threatened
and
endangered
species
in
Vermont
so
that
our
wildlife
populations
remain
strong
and
balanced.
Finally,
we
repealed
the
prohibition
on
the
manufacture
of
suppressors
(a.k.a.
silencers)
and
additionally
approved
their
sale
and
use
by
citizens
only
at
shooting
ranges,
not
for
hunting.
Suppressors
reduce
noise
levels
by
an
average
of
20-35
dB,
about
the
same
as
wearing
earmuffs.
They
also
reduce
rifle
recoil
and
help
mitigate
some
noise
complaints
from
those
living
near
shooting
ranges.
37
other
states
allow
the
use
of
suppressors
by
citizens,
though
strict
federal
regulations
for
suppressors
also
exist.
Municipal
Permitting
(Bob
Krebs)
Currently,
Vermont
towns
and
cities
may
work
with
the
state
to
administer
water
and
wastewater
permits,
including
on-site
disposal.
Only
two
towns
have
elected
to
accept
that
authority,
however.
This
year
the
House
passed
a
bill
that
will
allow
partial
delegation
of
permitting
for
land
subdivisions,
buildings
or
structures,
or
campgrounds
served
by
public
water
and
sewer.
The
connections
must
be
owned
and
controlled
by
the
delegated
municipality
and
there
must
be
sufficient
capacity
to
accept
new
flows
or
demands.
The
Senate
will
have
an
opportunity
to
review
and
consider
the
changes
next
session.
Petroleum
Cleanup
Assistance
(Bob
Krebs)
The
House
amended
the
Petroleum
Cleanup
Fund
to
allow
for
increased
financial
assistance
regarding
underground
and
aboveground
fuel
oil
storage
tanks.
Grant
limits
for
replacement
or
upgrade
were
increased
to
$3000
for
an
aboveground
tank
and
$4000
for
an
underground
tank.
The
bill
also
provides
for
a
$50,000
increase
in
transfer
between
the
two
cleanup
funds.
The
Senate
will
have
an
opportunity
to
review
and
consider
the
changes
next
session.
22
23
New
Tools
for
Resolving
Grievances
(Gabrielle
Luke)
Last
session,
the
Legislature
established
a
study
committee
to
assess
the
relative
merits
of
various
grievance
procedures
for
state
employees.
The
current
process
takes
place
before
the
Vermont
Labor
Relations
Board.
This
is
a
relatively
formal
process,
typically
involving
lawyers
and
publication
of
decisions.
State
employees
sought
access
to
a
less
formal,
more
private
binding
arbitration
process.
Relying
on
the
study
committees
recommendations,
this
year
the
Legislature
added
a
tool
to
the
toolbox
of
the
State
and
the
Vermont
State
Employees
Association.
We
gave
them
the
right
to
bargain
during
contract
negotiations
for
binding
arbitration
or
the
Vermont
Labor
Relations
Board
process.
Our
goal
is
to
ensure
that
grievance
protocols
are
economical,
timely,
just,
and
provide
for
appropriate
privacy
protections
for
the
parties.
Military
Suicide
Prevention
(Tommy
Walz)
An
average
of
22
military
veterans
commit
suicide
each
day
across
the
country.
According
to
news
reports,
the
national
military
hotline
receives
22,000
calls
a
year.
This
year,
the
Legislature
passed
a
resolution
calling
for
full
backing
and
expansion
of
the
existing
support
systems
for
our
veterans,
including
the
Vermont
Veterans
Legal
Assistance
Project,
Vermont
Vet
to
Vet,
and
the
provisions
in
the
Clay
Hunt
Suicide
Prevention
for
American
Veterans
Act.
In
addition,
we
asked
the
Secretary
of
Veterans
Affairs
to
designate
Vermont
as
one
of
five
pilot
programs
in
the
treatment
of
Post
Traumatic
Stress
Disorder
(PTSD).
It
is
our
hope
that
both
raising
awareness
and
increasing
our
efforts
to
help
these
veterans
will
save
the
precious
lives
of
those
who
have
protected
ours.
Green
Burials
(Tommy
Walz)
Green
burials
are
increasingly
in
demand
and
represent
an
extension
of
what
we
can
already
choose
for
burial
in
Vermont.
A
green
or
natural
burial
does
not
involve
embalming
or
a
casket,
unless
it
is
biodegradable,
and
often
does
not
include
a
marker
or
groomed
lawn.
Input
from
green
burial
proponents,
funeral
directors,
town
clerks,
and
bankers
spurred
action
to
encourage
cemeteries
to
create
natural
burial
areas.
This
would
require
the
formulation
of
basic
guidelines:
distance
from
water
sources,
depth
of
graves,
registration
of
the
exact
location
of
the
grave,
and
the
identity
of
the
person
buried
therein.
This
bill
is
a
reasonable
solution
that
protects
the
public
and
allows
a
clear
path
for
those
who
choose
a
green
burial.
Protecting
Teachers
Collective
Bargaining
Rights
(Tom
Stevens)
Education
reform
was
a
top
priority
this
session.
In
that
context,
the
House
took
a
hard
look
at
the
role
of
collective
bargaining
between
school
boards
and
teachers
through
proposals
to
end
strikes
and
impositions.
Our
work
was
guided
by
concerns
that
changing
the
status
quo
would
require
replacing
it
with
a
mechanism
that
created
a
fair
bargaining
process,
including
a
level
of
finality.
In
the
end,
we
made
no
changes
to
the
law
and
anticipate
continuing
the
discussion
regarding
outcomes
for
students,
parents,
taxpayers,
teachers,
and
school
boards.
24
Government Operations
25
Finally,
the
Legislature
took
decisive
action
to
prevent
the
perception
of
improper
lobbyist
influence
by
prohibiting
them
from
contributing
to
certain
political
committees
when
the
Legislature
is
in
session.
On
a
nearly
unanimous
vote,
lawmakers
sent
a
clear
message
to
Vermonters
that
the
will
of
the
people
is
and
will
always
be
the
driving
force
in
our
work.
Protecting
Forests
and
their
Stewards
(Maida
Townsend)
The
health
and
long-term
economic
viability
of
our
forests
is
of
critical
importance
to
all
Vermonters.
We
depend
on
our
forestland
for
critical
flora
and
fauna
habitat
and
to
support
an
array
of
products,
jobs,
and
recreational
activities.
To
ensure
that
our
forests
are
appropriately
maintainedand
to
safeguard
private
landowners
from
bad
practices
the
House
passed
a
law
requiring
the
licensure
of
professional
foresters.
The
work
of
a
professional
forester
encompasses
more
than
identifying
which
trees
should
be
cut,
and
which
not.
Their
work
is
based
on
science:
biology,
chemistry,
zoology,
entomology,
plant
pathology,
plant
physiology,
and
genetics.
The
level
of
education,
training,
and
experience
that
professional
licensure
requires
will
protect
landowners,
help
foresters
stay
informed
on
evolving
best
management
practices,
ensure
that
foresters
understand
applicable
regulations,
and
provide
a
basic
level
of
accountability
for
the
profession.
Once
licensing
is
in
effect,
an
aggrieved
landowner
will
be
able
to
file
a
complaint
with
the
Office
of
Professional
Regulation,
with
investigation
and
adjudication
to
follow
as
appropriate.
Individual
landowners
and
institutions
of
higher
learning
may
continue
to
practice
forestry
on
their
own
land.
In
addition,
a
professional
foresters
employee
may
still
carry
out
forest
practices
when
the
forester
is
off-site,
so
long
as
the
licensee
remains
involved
in
and
accepts
responsibility
for
the
forest
work
performed
by
the
employee.
The
Senate
will
likely
take
up
the
bill
in
January
2016.
Upgrading
Our
Emergency
Call
System
(Debbie
Evans)
The
Vermont
State
Police
currently
operate
four
Public
Safety
Answering
Points
(PSAPs)
located
in
Derby,
Williston,
Rutland
and
Rockingham.
The
current
911
system
in
Vermont
relies
on
call
taking
services
provided
by
these
PSAPS
and
four
others,
operated
by
local
police
departments
and
a
sheriffs
department
in
Lamoille,
St.
Albans,
Hartford
and
Shelburne.
This
year,
the
Administration
set
forth
a
proposal
to
close
two
state
PSAPs
(in
Rutland
and
Derby),
saving
approximately
$250,000.
The
Commissioner
of
Public
Safety
testified
that
advances
in
technology
would
allow
for
the
same
services
to
be
provided
without
threat
to
public
safety.
Because
the
elimination
required
the
elimination
of
jobs
and
generated
widespread
concern
about
the
impact
on
dispatch
services,
the
Legislature
decided
to
delay
consolidation
until
September
15,
2015.
This
time
extension
will
give
the
municipalities
in
these
areas
the
time
to
consider
and
review
how
dispatch
centers
operated
by
local
police
and
sheriff's
departments
are
managed.
This
compromise
demonstrates
how
receptive
and
responsive
legislators
were
to
the
needs
and
concerns
of
Vermonters.
26
Building
Smarter
Money
Habits
(Debbie
Evans)
Many
Vermonters
are
not
learning
the
basics
of
personal
finance
in
school
or
through
life
experience.
Lack
of
knowledge
and
skill
can
result
in
severe,
negative
consequences
to
their
own
financial
security
and
also
to
Vermont's
economy.
Financial
illiteracy
affects
everyonemen
and
women,
young
and
oldand
crosses
all
racial
and
socio-economic
boundaries.
Vermont
needs
to
hone
its
focus
on
helping
Vermonters
become
wiser
consumers,
savers,
and
investors.
To
better
support
Vermonters
and
decrease
the
likelihood
that
bad
money
decisions
will
result
in
need
for
public
safety
nets,
the
Legislature
created
a
Financial
Literacy
Commission.
Only
10%
of
high
schools
in
Vermont
have
a
financial
literacy
graduation
requirement.
The
commission
will
work
with
the
Agency
of
Education
to
build
financial
literacy
components
into
math
and
social
studies
so
that
Vermont
high
school
graduates
should,
at
a
minimum,
understand
how
credit
works,
how
to
budget,
and
how
to
save
and
invest.
In
addition,
the
Commission
will
make
policy
recommendations
on
issues
related
to
Vermonters'
fiscal
wellbeing,
identify
ways
to
equip
Vermonters
with
the
training,
information,
skills,
and
tools
they
need
to
make
sound
financial
decisions,
and
create
incentives
for
Vermont'
schools,
businesses,
community
organizations,
and
governmental
agencies
to
implement
financial
literacy
programs.
Data
Driven
Decision-Making
(Debbie
Evans)
One
of
our
key
tasks
in
Montpelier
is
to
move
from
problem
analysis
to
developing
solutions
that
produce
measurable
change
in
peoples
lives.
Results-based
Accountability
(RBA)
is
a
disciplined,
data-driven
way
of
approaching
policy
matters
that
keeps
us
focused
on
three
main
accountability
questions:
1. How
much
did
we
do?
2. How
well
did
we
do
it?
3. Is
anyone
better
off?
This
is
an
improved
way
of
doing
business
in
state
government
and
in
the
public
sector.
As
agencies,
departments,
and
partners
become
adept
at
sharing
knowledge
using
this
data-
driven
process,
we
can
more
accurately
monitor
progress,
revise
policy,
and
evaluate
the
impact
of
our
investments.
The
Legislature
formally
amended
our
statutes
this
year
to
reflect
the
language
of
RBA
and
assure
that
our
program
performance
analysis
is
consistent
throughout
state
government.
While
this
action
did
not
make
substantive
changes
to
our
laws,
it
did
make
us
considerably
more
accountable
for
the
policies
concerning
public
health,
safety,
and
welfare
improvements.
27
Health
Care
Accountability
of
Vermont
Health
Connect
Exchange
(Tim
Briglin)
Only
3%
of
Vermonters
are
uninsured
one
of
the
lowest
in
the
nation.
Many
individuals
and
families
are
finding
affordable
coverage
through
Vermont
Health
Connect,
the
states
health
care
exchange.
Though
improvements
continue
to
be
made,
many
Vermonters
have
been
unacceptably
caught
in
a
bureaucratic
backlog
as
they
seek
to
change
their
circumstances
or
overall
coverage.
This
session,
the
Legislature
established
clear
performance
benchmarks
for
Vermont
Health
Connect,
while
making
contingency
plans
in
the
event
the
exchanges
performance
continues
to
lag.
Among
these
benchmarks
will
be
delivery
of
functioning
technology
by
May
31,
2015.
This
will
include
addressing
the
account
paralysis
when
a
change
of
circumstance
occurs
and
delivering
a
fully
automated
system
by
October
1,
2015in
time
for
2016
enrollment.
We
required
the
Agency
of
Administration
to
explore
alternatives
to
the
Exchange
should
the
General
Assembly
decide
to
seek
an
alternate
path
In
the
meantime,
the
Legislature
responded
to
the
very
real
frustrations
of
Vermonters
by
insisting
that
individuals
be
allowed
to
purchase
health
insurance
policies
directly
from
insurance
carriers
(Blue
Cross/Blue
Shield
or
MVP),
bypassing
the
Exchange
website
and
telephone
system.
Improving
Health
Outcomes
&
Access
to
Care
(Tim
Briglin)
The
Legislature
took
measurable
steps
to
address
two
key
components
of
our
health
care
reform
agenda
this
session:
access
to
care
and
improvement
in
health
outcomes.
By
investing
additional
resources
in
our
Blueprint
for
Health,
expanding
the
responsibilities
and
support
of
the
Green
Mountain
Care
Board,
sustaining
Medicaid
funding
for
underinsured
Vermonters,
and
increasing
support
for
educational
loan
forgiveness
for
primary
care
doctors,
weve
made
an
appreciable
difference
for
all
Vermonters.
Additional
detail
on
the
major
provisions
in
the
bill:
Strengthening
the
Blueprint
for
Health
(B4H):
Increases
B4H
funding
by
$2.45
million
in
FY16
($1.1
million
state
funding
supplemented
by
a
$1.35
million
federal
match).
B4H
directs
health
care
resources
at
the
community
level
to
better
coordinate
patient
services
with
a
focus
on
primary
care
and
preventative
medicine.
B4H
moves
Vermont
from
reactive
to
proactive
health
care.
It
is
proven
to
save
money
and
improve
outcomes,
and
is
currently
being
promoted
at
the
national
level
as
a
model
program
for
enhancing
community
health.
Expanding
the
work
of
the
Green
Mountain
Care
Board
(GMCB):
Funding
provides
the
resources
for
the
GMCB
to
establish
the
rate
setting
mechanisms
necessary
to
pursue
the
All-Payer
Model.
The
All-Payer
Model
is
a
system
whereby
health
providers
are
paid
to
improve
patient
outcomes
rather
than
for
the
quantity
28
of
care
they
provide.
The
GMCB
has
proven
to
be
effective
at
curbing
costs
in
Vermonts
hospital
system,
and
capitalizing
on
this
effectiveness
will
be
critical
to
reducing
health
care
cost
inflation
and
moving
toward
universal
coverage
for
Vermonters.
Increasing
Medicaid
reimbursement
rates:
Directed
$2
million
in
FY16
($930,000
state
funding
and
$1.15million
federal
match)
to
doctors
treating
Medicaid
patients.
Increasing
these
reimbursement
rates
enhances
access
to
the
health
care
system
for
Medicaid
patients
and
supports
providers
in
treating
some
of
our
most
vulnerable
citizens.
Restoring
funding
to
support
the
underinsured:
Sustained
funding
to
help
reduce
deductibles
and
the
out-of-pocket
costs
for
middle-income
Vermonters.
Focus
on
primary
care:
Strengthening
the
Blueprint
for
Health
and
increasing
the
Medicaid
reimbursement
directs
resources
to
the
most
cost-effective
element
in
our
health
care
system
primary
care.
In
addition
we
provided
$700,000
of
annual
educational
loan
forgiveness
to
encourage
primary
care
doctors
to
practice
in
VT.
29
After
significant
testimony,
the
eleven
members
of
the
House
Health
Care
Committee
had
developed
varying
opinions
on
what
the
fate
of
the
PE
should
be.
However,
there
was
unanimity
on
one
goal:
increasing
Vermonts
immunization
rates.
Vermonts
vaccination
rates
of
about
90
percent
for
children
starting
school
are
not
catastrophically
low,
though
our
rates
are
the
lowest
in
New
England
while
Vermonts
use
of
non-medical
exemptions
is
the
second
highest
in
the
nation.
The
real
alarm
is
from
the
many
pockets
of
very
low
immunization
rates
we
have
in
our
state.
While
there
are
a
few
public
schools
that
have
vaccination
rates
below
80-85
percent,
there
are
several
private
schools
with
vaccination
rates
of
below
70
percent.
Human
Services
Expanding
Treatment
Options
for
Alcohol
and
Substance
Abuse
(Chip
Troiano)
(long)
Addiction
is
a
complex
disorder,
impacting
individuals
in
very
different
ways.
Specialists
in
substance
abuse
and
mental
health
are
a
key
component
of
diagnosis,
treatment,
and
recovery.
With
over
10%
of
Vermonters
coping
with
alcohol
and
substance
abuse
problems,
Medicaid
patients
are
often
put
on
long
waiting
lists
to
access
appropriate
treatment.
The
Legislature
took
action
this
year
to
offers
more
choice
and
availability
of
treatment
to
patients
by
allowing
licensed
alcohol
and
drug
abuse
counselors
(LACDs),
who
are
in
private
practice,
to
participate
in
the
Medicaid
program,
regardless
of
whether
they
are
employed
by
a
preferred
substance
abuse
provider.
Medicaid
recipients
currently
have
access
to
mental
health
care
provided
by
private
practitioners
such
as
Licensed
Independent
Clinical
Social
Workers
(LICSW)
and
Licensed
Clinical
Mental
Health
Counselors
(LCMHC).
This
bill
will
ensure
that
Medicaid
recipients
have
access
to
substance
abuse
treatment
services
from
any
private
practitioner
licensed
as
a
Licensed
Alcohol
and
Drug
Counselors
(LADC).
Licensed
Alcohol
and
Drug
Counselors
have
similar
educational
and
professional
requirements
for
licensure
as
private
practitioners,
including
a
master's
degree
in
a
relevant
field,
successful
passage
of
an
exam
and
documentation
of
over
3000
hours
of
supervised
practice.
This
bill
takes
an
important
bill
to
address
parity,
access
to
treatment,
and
appropriate
service
delivery.
It
allows
LADC
professionals
to
be
afforded
the
same
billing
privileges
as
other
behavioral
health
professionals.
It
provides
appropriate
compensation
and
will
increase
treatment
access
for
Vermonters
with
primary
substance
abuse
disorders.
Expanding
Treatment
Options
for
Alcohol
and
Substance
Abuse
(Chip
Troiano)
(short)
Addiction
is
a
complex
disorder,
impacting
individuals
in
very
different
ways.
Specialists
in
substance
abuse
and
mental
health
are
a
key
component
of
diagnosis,
treatment,
and
recovery.
The
Legislature
took
action
this
year
to
offers
more
choice
and
availability
of
treatment
to
patients
by
allowing
licensed
alcohol
and
drug
abuse
counselors
(LACDs),
who
are
in
private
practice,
to
participate
in
the
Medicaid
program,
regardless
of
whether
they
are
employed
by
a
preferred
substance
abuse
provider.
Medicaid
recipients
currently
have
30
access
to
mental
health
care
provided
by
private
practitioners
such
as
Licensed
Independent
Clinical
Social
Workers
(LICSW)
and
Licensed
Clinical
Mental
Health
Counselors
(LCMHC).
This
bill
will
ensure
that
Medicaid
recipients
have
access
to
substance
abuse
treatment
services
from
any
private
practitioner
licensed
as
a
Licensed
Alcohol
and
Drug
Counselors
(LADC).
This
bill
takes
an
important
bill
to
address
parity,
access
to
treatment,
and
appropriate
service
delivery.
It
provides
appropriate
compensation
and
will
increase
treatment
access
for
Vermonters
with
primary
substance
abuse
disorders.
Organ
and
Tissue
Donation
(Chip
Troiano)
In
2013,
the
Organ
and
Tissue
Donation
Working
Group
was
formed
to
make
recommendations
to
the
Governor
and
the
General
Assembly
about
increasing
and
facilitating
these
life-saving
donations.
At
the
time,
the
rate
of
organ
and
tissue
donations
was
at
4%.
Because
of
the
work
of
this
group
and
collaboration
with
the
Department
of
Motor
Vehicles
(allowing
for
an
individual
to
check
a
box
on
driver
license
renewal
applications
to
indicate
consent
to
organ
and
tissue
donation)
this
rate
has
increased
to
31%.
Driver
license
renewals
come
in
four-year
intervals,
so
the
rate
of
increase
comes
at
the
half
way
mark
of
license
renewals.
Realizing
the
value
of
the
Working
Group,
the
Legislature
acted
to
extend
its
charge
to
2020
and
provide
it
the
administrative,
technical,
and
legal
assistance
of
the
Department
of
Health.
The
group
will
submit
a
report
on
its
findings
and
recommendations
to
appropriate
legislative
committees
by
January
15,
2017.
Reportable
Disease
Registry
(Patsy
French)
Since
1994,
the
Department
of
Health
has
collected
information
on
patients
with
cancer,
patients
with
HIV
or
AIDS,
and
immunizations
of
adults
and
children.
This
is
important
data,
used
to
support
and
improve
public
health.
The
Legislature
approved
minor
changes
to
support
the
work
of
those
collecting,
keeping,
and
using
the
data
mainly
to
allow
greater
reporting
time,
information
sharing
privileges
with
Vermonts
Ladies
First,
and
an
annual
evaluation
of
confidentiality
procedures.
Information
from
Vermonts
immunization
registry,
maintained
by
the
Department
of
Health,
already
allows
information
on
a
particular
child
to
be
provided
to
a
school
nurse,
and
now
a
school
administrator
when
the
school
does
not
have
a
nurse.
The
Department
may
now
share
registry
information
with
other
states,
provide
it
to
health
care
provider
networks,
and
to
certain
researchers.
All
this
information,
and
the
limited
allowable
sharing
of
it,
falls
under
the
umbrella
of
HIPPA
regulations
to
protect
the
privacy
of
our
health
information.
31
Emergency
Involuntary
Procedures
(Ann
Pugh)
An
integral
guiding
principle
for
Vermonts
mental
health
system
is
to
reduce
the
use
of
coercion
and
legislation
this
year
reiterated
this;
nevertheless
when
an
individual
in
a
psychiatric
crisis
is
in
immediate
danger
of
inflicting
harm
on
themselves
or
others,
for
the
protection
of
themselves
and
others,
emergency
involuntary
procedures
(seclusion,
restraint
and
emergency
involuntary
medication)
may
be
utilized.
Emergency
involuntary
medication
is
NOT
court-ordered
medication.
Its
only
allowed
when
there
is
an
immediate
threat
to
the
patient
or
others,
it
is
short
term,
and
its
purpose
is
to
calm/sedate,
and
not
to
treat
the
underlying
problem.
It
is
not
administered
in
outpatient
settings.
With
legislation
passed
this
session,
the
Department
of
Mental
Health
to
promulgate
rules
that
identify
1)
Who
can
prescribe
emergency
involuntary
medication
-a
psychiatrist,
advanced
practice
nurse
practitioner
licensed
as
a
nurse
practitioner
in
psychiatric
nursing
or
a
certified
physician
assistant
licensed
and
supervised
by
a
psychiatrist
and
2)
To
Whom:
Adults
who
are
in
the
custody
or
temporary
custody
of
the
Commissioner
of
DMH
who
are
admitted
to
a
psychiatric
inpatient
unit.
Patient
Choices
at
End
of
Life
(Patsy
French)
The
Legislature
voted
to
continue
the
procedural
safeguards
in
Vermonts
end
of
life
bill,
which
took
effect
two
years
ago.
As
passed
in
2013,
the
explicit
procedure
set
forth
in
the
Patient
Choice
at
End
of
Life
act
was
set
to
sunset
(be
repealed)
in
2016
and
be
replaced
by
provisions
giving
much
less
guidance
to
doctors
and
less
protection
for
patients.
The
Legislature
removed
the
sunset
to
assure
that
those
patient
safeguards
will
stay
in
place.
Available
only
to
patients
with
a
terminal
illness
and
a
prognosis
of
six
months
or
less
to
live,
the
law
sets
up
a
procedure
for
the
patient
to
obtain
a
prescription
for
lethal
medication
to
be
self-administered.
The
patient
must
request
the
medication
three
separate
times,
including
once
in
writing
(with
disinterested
witnesses)
and
wait
at
least
17
days
from
the
first
request
to
receipt
of
the
prescription.
The
doctor
writing
the
prescription
must
report
to
the
Vermont
Department
of
Health
and
affirm
that
all
the
requirements
in
the
law
have
been
satisfied
including
that
the
patient
is
a
Vermont
resident,
does
not
have
impaired
judgment,
made
the
request
voluntarily,
and
was
offered
all
end
of
life
services
(e.g.
palliative
care
and
hospice).
Participation
under
the
law
is
completely
voluntary
for
all
parties
the
patient,
the
doctor,
the
consulting
doctor,
the
pharmacist
and
any
facility
where
the
patient
may
reside.
Clarification
that
the
safeguards
will
continue
assures
that
this
law
will
work
properly
for
the
small
number
of
Vermonters
who
choose
to
use
it.
Child
Protection
Bill
(Ann
Pugh)
The
Protection
of
Children
is
one
of
the
most
basic
and
important
functions
of
a
society.
In
the
past
year
the
number
of
reports
of
child
abuse
and
neglect
has
continued
to
increase
and
has
led
to
an
increase
in
the
number
of
child
safety
investigations
and
more
children
in
32
the
custody
of
the
Department
of
Children
and
Families
(DCF).
There
has
been
an
82%
increase
in
the
number
of
children
under
6
who
are
in
custody.
Serious
child
maltreatment
associated
with
adult
substance
abuse
has
challenged
our
system
as
well.
These
increased
pressures
are
not
just
on
DCF.
In
the
past
year,
prosecutors
and
the
judiciary
have
seen
an
increase
in
the
number
of
petitions
filed
for
both
children
in
need
of
supervision
(CHINS)
and
termination
of
parental
rights
(TPR).
No
single
agency
or
system
can
keep
all
children
safe
from
harm.
Child
Protection
is
a
community
responsibility
requiring
collaboration
among
the
various
departments
within
DCF,
families,
the
courts,
treatment
providers,
other
stakeholders,
and
the
public.
Legislation
that
we
passed
this
session
will
go
far
in
improving
how
we
in
Vermont
protect
our
children
by
requiring
better
communication
between
these
stakeholders,
clarifying
and
strengthening
the
mandatory
child
abuse
reporting
law,
focusing
on
the
best
interests
of
children
rather
than
a
rigid
placement
hierarchy,
and
enhancing
the
penalties
for
those
who
harm
children
with
death
resulting,
serious
bodily
injury
or
sexual
acts.
Judiciary
33
Fighting
off
Fraud
(Martin
LaLonde)
The
Legislature
enacted
a
law
that
penalizes
those
who
knowingly
submit
false
or
fraudulent
claims
to
the
state.
Full
enforcement
of
this
law
should
bring
revenues
to
the
state
while
also
providing
a
further
deterrent
to
those
who
would
defraud
the
government.
Addressing
a
separate
type
of
fraud,
the
Legislature
amended
laws
related
to
home
improvement,
making
it
easier
for
prosecutors
to
prove
that
a
contractor
has
engaged
in
home
improvement
fraud.
False
Claims
Act:
The
Vermont
False
Claims
Act
improves
the
states
ability
to
recover
penalties
from
businesses
and
others
who
defraud
state
government.
It
helps
detect
fraud
by
providing
incentives
to
individuals
to
bring
actions
against
companies
that
have
made
false
claims
in
their
dealings
with
the
state.
The
state
stands
to
collect
significant
money
should
the
Legislature
enact
the
law.
Our
law
is
modeled
after
the
federal
False
Claims
Act,
which
has
resulted
in
the
recovery
by
the
U.S.
of
billions
of
dollars.
The
federal
law
is
frequently
used
to
address
Medicaid
fraud,
including
in
Vermont.
Because
Medicaid
is
a
joint
federal
and
state
program,
approximately
46%
of
any
recovery
in
such
actions
is
shared
with
Vermont.
To
give
states
an
incentive
to
enact
their
own
False
Claims
Act,
and
thus
increase
recovery
of
funds,
the
U.S.
Congress
has
provided
that
any
state
adopting
such
an
act
would
receive
an
additional
10%
of
any
Medicaid-related
recoveries.
Home
Improvement
Fraud:
To
improve
consumer
protections
for
homeowners
contracting
for
home
improvement
services,
Act
13
makes
it
easier
for
prosecutors
to
prove
that
a
contractor
has
engaged
in
home
improvement
fraud.
It
had
been
nearly
impossible
to
prosecute
such
fraud
because
the
law
had
required
a
showing
that
a
contractor
had
promised
performance
that
he
or
she
did
not
intend
to
perform
or
knew
would
not
be
performed.
Proving
such
intent
was
an
obstacle
to
enforcing
this
law.
Act
13
instead
requires
only
that
the
contractor
has
failed
to
perform
the
contract
or
agreement
and
has
failed
to
refund
any
payment
made
by
the
owner.
Repairing
our
Criminal
Justice
System
(Martin
LaLonde)
House
Judiciary
took
testimony
on
an
important
bill
that
broadly
reforms
Vermonts
criminal
justice
system.
The
bill
would
reduce
the
number
of
crimes
punishable
as
felonies;
eliminate
jail
time
for
non-violent
offenders;
prevent
people
from
being
kept
in
jail
past
the
end
of
their
sentence
due
to
lack
of
housing;
expand
parole
eligibility
for
individuals
who
have
serious
medical
conditions,
were
sentenced
for
an
offense
committed
as
a
juvenile,
or
are
65
years
of
age
or
older;
and
eliminate
incarceration
for
violations
of
parole
conditions
that
are
not
new
crimes.
Although
the
bill
was
not
advanced
in
this
session,
such
issues
will
likely
be
at
the
forefront
of
the
committees
work
next
session,
as
it
continues
to
deliberate
on
the
penalties
for
the
various
crimes,
reduce
costly
incarceration
rates,
and
minimize
the
collateral
consequences
of
conviction.
34
Collateral
Consequences
of
Conviction
(Martin
LaLonde)
(long)
Criminal
convictions
often
result
in
consequences
for
Vermonters
beyond
court-imposed
penalties
and
sentences,
particularly
for
felons.
For
example,
even
after
serving
time
and
paying
penalties,
rehabilitated
or
former
youth
offenders
suffer
from
an
inability
to
obtain
housing
or
employment
because
of
their
criminal
record.
Incarceration
for
non-violent
offenders
is
often
costly
and
counterproductive.
Collateral
consequences
and
counterproductive
incarceration
are
particularly
problematic
for
juvenile
offenders.
Science
shows
that
our
brains
continue
to
change
and
mature
throughout
childhood
and
adolescence.
Adolescents
are
more
likely
to
act
on
impulse
and
misread
or
misinterpret
social
cues,
and
less
likely
to
pause
to
consider
the
consequences
of
their
actions,
making
them
more
likely
to
commit
crimes.
As
long
as
their
record
follows
them,
juvenile
offenders
will
suffer
the
consequences
of
their
errors
long
after
they
have
reached
adulthood
and
completed
the
punishment
for
the
crime.
The
Legislature
enacted
a
law
that
will
alleviate
the
problem
of
collateral
consequences
and
counterproductive
incarceration
for
juveniles
by
creating
a
quicker
path
to
criminal
record
expungement
for
those
who
committed
crimes
when
younger
than
25
years
old.
The
House
also
passed
a
bill
seeking
to
change
the
law
to
allow
States
Attorneys
to
file
more
cases
in
Family
Court
than
Criminal
Court
when
those
cases
involve
juveniles.
It
ensures
that
a
juveniles
record
will
not
be
public
and
fend
off
the
collateral
consequences
of
a
conviction
traveling
with
him
or
her
into
adulthood.
We
anticipate
that
the
Senate
will
address
this
bill
during
the
next
session.
Finally,
in
line
with
these
important
reforms
of
our
juvenile
justice
system,
we
prohibited
the
sentencing
of
life
in
prison
without
parole
for
minors.
Collateral
Consequences
of
Conviction
(Martin
LaLonde)
(Short)
To
reduce
the
adverse
collateral
consequences
for
individuals
who
have
committed
certain
nonviolent
crimes
and
who
have
served
their
time,
we
expanded
the
availability
of
expungement
in
a
comprehensive
bill.
It
allows
for
wiping
from
the
record
convictions
that
were
based
on
conduct
that
has
been
decriminalized,
such
as
convictions
for
possession
of
marijuana
in
an
amount
that
is
no
longer
criminal,
and
for
burglary.
In
addition,
the
bill
provides
an
alternative
avenue
for
expungement
of
crimes
committed
by
an
individual
who
was
25
years
old
or
younger
at
the
time
of
the
qualifying
offense.
Under
this
provision
such
a
person
can
petition
for
expungement
5
years
(as
opposed
to
10
to
20
years)
after
satisfying
the
terms
and
conditions
of
his
or
her
conviction
and
successfully
completing
a
term
of
public
service
programming
as
approved
by
the
Community
Justice
Network.
In
addition,
the
individual
has
to
have
paid
any
restitution
order
of
the
Court
and
cannot
have
been
convicted
of
a
later
crime.
The
Court
also
must
find
that
the
expungement
serves
the
interest
of
justice.
Internet
Protections
I
(Barbara
Rachelson)
After
several
years
of
debating
how
to
combat
the
growing
number
of
people
harmed
by
nonconsensual
disclosure
of
sexually
explicit
images,
the
Legislature
passed
a
law
that
35
would
make
the
act
unlawful.
The
crime
is
popularly
but
sometimes
misleadingly
referred
to
as
revenge
porn
because
not
all
perpetrators
are
motivated
by
vengeance.
Many
act
out
of
a
desire
for
profit,
notoriety,
or
entertainment.
Creating
explicit
images
within
the
context
of
a
private,
intimate
relationship
is
an
increasingly
common
practice,
but
often
occurs
with
the
expectation
of
privacy.
A
vengeful
ex-partner,
hacker,
or
rapist
may
upload
an
explicit
image
to
pornographic
websites
with
the
victims
name,
contact
information,
and
links
to
social
media
profiles.
Some
websites
charge
a
fee
to
have
the
materials
removed.
In
a
matter
of
days,
the
image
can
dominate
the
first
entries
of
search
engine
results
using
the
victims
name
and
remain
quite
publicly
exhibited
to
the
victims
family,
employers,
co-workers,
and
peers.
Victims
experience
a
loss
of
reputation
and
opportunity,
and
are
frequently
threatened
with
sexual
assault,
stalked,
harassed,
fired
from
jobs,
and
forced
to
change
schools.
Some
victims
have
committed
suicide.
Whether
images
were
made
with
or
without
a
victims
knowledge
and
even
if
they
were
selfies
sent
to
a
lover
the
nonconsensual
publication
of
private,
sexually
explicit
material
is
an
act
of
aggression
akin
to
sexual
harassment.
Like
other
forms
of
abuse,
this
phenomenon
has
become
another
way
for
someone
to
exert
power
and
control.
This
harmful
act
is
not
new,
but
its
prevalence
and
impact
have
increased
in
recent
years,
nationally
and
in
Vermont.
Sixteen
states
have
revenge
porn
laws
and
bills
have
been
introduced
in
another
21
this
year.
Senator
Patrick
Leahy
has
been
a
vocal
champion
for
criminalizing
revenge
porn
in
the
US
Senate.
The
revenge
porn
bill
creates
penalties
to
hold
perpetrators
accountable
for
their
actions,
ensures
that
the
victims
receive
remuneration
or
other
remedies,
and
serves
as
a
deterrent
to
those
who
would
otherwise
consider
harming
someone
in
this
way.
The
new
law
includes
a
misdemeanor
for
a
less
severe
offense
and
a
felony
for
posting
an
image
for
financial
gain
and
causing
harm.
There
are
exceptions
for
voluntary
exposure
in
public
or
commercial
settings
related
to
free
speech,
and
for
disclosures
made
in
the
public
interest
such
as
law
enforcement,
court
proceedings,
and
medical
treatment.
The
bill
also
creates
a
private
cause
of
action
against
a
defendant
who
violates
the
law
and
causes
the
plaintiff
emotional
distress
or
economic
loss.
Internet
Protections
II
(Martin
LaLonde)
The
Legislature
took
steps
to
enhance
public
safety
by
creating
criminal
sanctions
and
civil
remedies
for
knowingly
disclosing
a
visual
image
of
an
identifiable
person
who
is
nude
or
who
is
engaged
in
sexual
conduct,
without
his
or
her
consent,
with
the
intent
to
harm,
harass,
intimidate,
threaten,
or
coerce
the
person
depicted.
The
bill
creates
exceptions
for
voluntary
exposure
in
public
or
commercial
settings,
and
disclosures
made
in
the
public
interest
such
as
law
enforcement,
court
proceedings
and
medical
treatment.
The
act
also
prohibits
a
website
from
charging
a
fee
for
the
removal
of
such
images
or
for
the
removal
of
booking
photographs
(mug
shots).
Finally,
the
act
amends
2014
Acts
and
Resolves
No.
141
to
expand
the
scope
of
practice
for
Level
II
certified
law
enforcement
officers.
36
Sex
Offender
Registry
(Martin
LaLonde)
The
General
Assembly
passed
two
bills
related
to
the
Sex
Offender
Registry
that
assist
in
protecting
public
safety.
Act
1
requires
inmates
to
report
to
the
Sex
Offender
Registry
prior
to
their
release
from
a
correctional
facility.
It
addresses
offenders
who
are
"maxing
out"
their
sentences
and
are
leaving
a
corrections
facility
without
any
further
supervision
or
contact
with
the
Department
of
Corrections.
It
ensures
that
Vermonters
know
when
these
sex
offenders
have
come
into
their
community
so
that
precautions
can
be
taken.
The
General
Assembly
also
passed
a
bill
that
will
modify
procedures
related
to
placement
on
the
Sex
Offender
Registry.
Currently,
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
administers
the
Registry,
making
decisions
as
to
the
posting
of
an
offenders
information
to
the
Registry
before
his
or
her
release
from
incarceration.
The
bill
will
instead
have
a
court
make
determinations
related
to
an
offenders
inclusion
on
the
Registry
at
the
time
of
sentencing,
deciding
whether
the
offender
should
be
placed
on
the
Registry
and,
if
so,
for
how
long.
The
bill
protects
the
rights
of
individuals
by
providing
a
procedure
to
allow
individuals
to
challenge
the
information
on,
or
to
request
removal
from,
the
Registry.
These
changes
were
prompted
by
audits
of
the
Registrys
error-rate,
which
were
performed
to
determine
whether
address
information
would
be
included
on
the
Internet
version
of
the
Registry.
The
bill
imposes
a
high
standard
of
accuracy
before
an
individuals
address
information
can
be
placed
on
the
Internet
Registry,
which
would
be
widely
available
to
the
public.
Juvenile
Justice
(Martin
LaLonde)
Science
shows
that
the
brain
continues
to
change
and
mature
throughout
childhood
and
adolescence.
Due
to
the
stage
of
their
brain
development,
adolescents
are
more
likely
to
act
on
impulse
and
misread
or
misinterpret
social
cues,
and
less
likely
to
think
twice,
change
their
mind,
or
pause
to
consider
the
consequences
of
their
actions.
The
Judiciary
Committee
has
recognized
this
as
it
has
delved
into
issues
related
to
juvenile
justice.
The
Legislature
passed
a
bill
that
prohibits
sentences
of
life
without
parole
for
a
person
who
committed
his
or
her
offense
as
a
minor.
The
United
States
is
the
only
country
in
the
world
that
sentences
its
children
to
life
imprisonment
without
the
possibility
of
release
or
parole.
No
inmates
are
currently
serving
such
a
sentence
in
Vermont.
Nevertheless,
this
bill
recognizes
that,
because
their
brains
are
not
fully
developed,
juvenile
offenders
are
less
culpable
and
have
the
unique
ability
to
be
rehabilitated.
The
bill
does
not
guarantee
release.
Rather,
it
provides
the
opportunity
for
an
offender
to
demonstrate
rehabilitation
to
a
parole
board.
This
bill
will
ensure
that
Vermont
is
in
compliance
with
a
series
of
recent
U.S.
Supreme
Court
decisions
related
to
the
Eighth
Amendment,
which
prohibits
cruel
and
unusual
punishment.
It
promotes
a
common
sense
policy
that
protects
public
safety
and
recognizes
that
juvenile
offenders
are
different
than
adult
offenders.
In
addition,
the
House
passed
H.95,
which
relates
to
jurisdiction
over
delinquency
proceedings
by
the
Family
Division
of
the
Superior
Court.
The
objective
of
the
bill
is
to
ensure
that
States
Attorneys
file
more
cases
involving
juveniles
in
the
Family
Division
of
37
state
court,
where
certain
confidentiality
and
other
procedural
protections
are
in
place,
rather
than
in
adult
criminal
court,
which
lacks
such
protections.
The
Senate
has
not
taken
action
on
this
bill.
Firearm
Possession
(Martin
LaLonde)
Act
14
enhances
public
safety
by
prohibiting
violent
felons
from
owning
firearms
and
requiring
state
courts
to
submit
to
the
National
Instant
Criminal
Background
Check
System
the
names
of
those
whom
a
court
has
adjudged
to
be
a
danger
to
themselves
or
others
due
to
mental
illness.
In
addition,
it
protects
individual
liberties
by
establishing
a
process
for
individuals
who
are
no
longer
adjudged
to
be
a
danger
to
themselves
or
others
to
regain
their
rights
to
purchase
and
possess
firearms.
The
act
both
respects
the
Second
Amendment
and
protects
public
safety.
Access
to
Weapons
(Sam
Young)
The
Legislature
approved
a
bill
that
places
restrictions
on
the
possession
or
purchase
of
guns
by
certain
persons.
The
bill
makes
it
illegal
under
state
law
for
people
convicted
of
violent
felonies
to
possess
a
gun.
This
is
already
illegal
under
federal
law,
and
this
would
make
Vermont
the
final
state
to
adopt
a
parallel
law
to
allow
State's
Attorneys
to
charge
it
as
a
crime.
The
bill
also
requires
that
anyone
who
has
been
adjudicated
mentally
ill
be
reported
to
the
federal
background
check
database.
This
should
not
be
confused
with
just
anyone
who
has
sought
help
for
a
mental
illness.
This
would
only
be
in
cases
where
someone
who
has
been
found
Not
Guilty
by
Reason
of
Insanity,
Incompetent
to
Stand
Trial,
or
has
been
adjudicated
by
a
judge
to
be
a
danger
to
themselves
or
others.
Finally,
the
bill
also
creates
a
process
by
which
those
who
have
been
adjudicated
mentally
ill
at
one
point
in
their
life
to
apply
to
have
their
ability
to
possess
a
firearm
restored.
The
issues
around
mental
health
were
intensely
personal
and
were
debated
at
length.
After
changes
were
made
to
the
bill
in
the
House,
the
Vermont
Federation
of
Sportsmen's
Clubs
(Vermont
Chapter
of
the
NRA)
removed
their
opposition
and
remained
neutral
on
the
legislation.
Forfeiture
(Martin
LaLonde)
The
Legislature
passed
a
bill
that
will
offset
certain
law
enforcement
costs
and
provide
revenue
to
the
State
through
creating
a
procedure
for
forfeiture
of
property
associated
with
certain
regulated
drug
possession,
sale,
and
trafficking
violations
and
with
dog
fighting.
The
bill
allows
the
state
to
seek
forfeiture
of
such
property
after
an
individual
has
been
convicted
of
the
underlying
crime.
Proceeds
from
the
forfeiture
are
first
used
to
cover
expenses
related
to
the
storage,
care,
or
sale
of
the
property.
Of
the
remaining
proceeds,
40%
is
provided
to
the
Governors
Criminal
Justice
and
Substance
Abuse
Cabinet
for
disbursement
to
law
enforcement
agencies
and
60%
is
deposited
into
the
general
fund.
The
bill
also
creates
a
crime
for
the
possession
of
equipment
and
paraphernalia
possessed
for
the
purpose
of
dog
fighting.
38
Collection
of
Child
Support
(Martin
LaLonde)
By
amending
the
Uniform
Interstate
Family
Support
Act
(UIFSA),
Act
16
improves
the
enforcement
of
Vermont
child
support
orders
abroad
and
ensures
that
children
residing
in
Vermont
will
receive
the
financial
support
due
from
parents,
wherever
they
reside.
UIFSA,
originally
enacted
in
Vermont
in
1996,
establishes
uniform
rules
for
interstate
enforcement
of
both
child
support
and
spousal
support
orders.
The
law
has
two
overall
goals:
first,
only
one
support
order
should
control
the
parties
obligations
at
any
given
point
in
time,
and
second,
the
terms
of
the
support
order
should
be
readily
enforceable
in
any
state.
UIFSA
helps
ensure
that
children
are
being
supported
when
a
noncustodial
parent
owing
support
resides
in
a
different
state
than
the
child.
There
are
roughly
15
million
child
support
cases
nationwide
and
about
half
of
these
involve
parents
in
different
states
or
countries.
Increasingly,
it
is
important
to
have
uniformity
not
just
among
states,
but
also
among
countries.
To
that
end,
in
November
2007,
the
United
States
signed
a
treaty
establishing
uniform
procedures
for
processing
international
child
support
cases,
which
the
Uniform
Law
Commission
incorporated
into
proposed
amendments
to
UIFSA.
This
bill
incorporates
those
changes
into
Vermonts
UIFSA.
Child
Protection
(Martin
LaLonde)
To
better
ensure
that
our
laws
protect
children,
the
Legislature
revised
the
law
to
designate
lewd
and
lascivious
conduct
with
a
child
as
a
violent
offense
for
the
purpose
of
bail
determination.
This
change
ensures
that
denial
of
bail
is
an
option
in
cases
where
the
defendant
is
charged
with
lewd
and
lascivious
acts
with
a
child,
the
evidence
of
guilt
is
great,
and
the
Court
finds
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
the
persons
release
poses
a
substantial
threat
of
physical
violence
to
any
person
and
that
no
conditions
of
release
will
reasonably
prevent
the
physical
violence.
The
bill
also
restricts
the
Courts
ability
to
order
release
to
the
custody
of
a
responsible
adult
as
a
pretrial
condition
to
cases
where
the
defendant
is
charged
with
a
violent
offense.
Transportation
Changing
our
Transportation
Habits
(Curt
MacCormack)
The
Vermont
Transportation
Board
commissioned
a
study
of
the
Millennial
Generation
(people
aged
22
39)
and
transportation.
The
results
are
very
encouraging.
New
drivers
licenses,
new
car
registrations
and
miles
driven
per
person
have
all
been
on
a
decline
since
2005
for
all
ages
in
the
U.S.
But
the
change
has
been
driven
by
young
people.
The
study
of
Vermont
Millennials
finds
that
our
youth
are
consistent
with
this
trend.
Clearly,
this
is
related
to
the
21%
increase
in
public
transit
we
have
seen
in
the
State
in
the
last
ten
years.
This
moment
in
time
needs
to
be
exploited
for
all
it
is
worth.
Thanks
to
the
Millennials,
it
is
time
to
begin
a
great
shift
from
almost
exclusive
automobile
transportation
to
mass
transit
and
walkable,
bikable
communities
with
infrastructure
that
encourages
these
modes,
not
the
present
infrastructure
that
discourages
it.
39
Amtrak
Trains,
the
Ethan
Allen
Express,
and
the
Vermonter
(Curt
MacCormack)
Ridership
numbers
on
both
trains
continues
to
grow.
The
more
fares
the
trains
receive,
to
lower
the
State
subsidy.
It
is
the
State
that
benefits
from
increased
revenues
from
fares,
not
as
much,
Amtrak.
The
Vermonter
no
longer
travels
through
Palmer,
MA
where
it
used
to
have
to
turn
around
and
add
17
miles
to
the
trip.
The
new
route
stops
at
Northampton
and
Greenfield,
MA,
Holyoke
will
be
added
soon
as
well.
The
only
lost
stop
was
Amherst,
which
is
not
far
from
Northampton.
There
is
more
track
work
needed
on
the
new
route
and
until
that
work
is
completed
the
schedule
times
are
the
same
as
they
were
however,
when
the
work
is
finished,
the
new
route
will
shave
about
25
minutes
off
of
the
schedule.
Negotiations
continue
with
Montreal
to
terminate
the
train
there
instead
of
St.
Albans.
Commuter
Train
Study
(Curt
MacCormack)
A
commuter
train
that
would
run
from
Burlington
and
St.
Albans
to
Montpelier
is
in
the
2015
(FY
16)
Transportation
Construction
bill.
Ridership
on
public
transit
and
Amtrak
has
been
on
the
rise
for
the
past
ten
years
and
studies
indicate
this
trend
is
going
to
continue.
The
proposal
has
never
had
a
comprehensive
study
before.
Stops
could
include
Winooski,
Essex
Jct,
IBM
plant,
Richmond
and
Waterbury.
Future
extensions
could
include
Barre,
Middlebury,
Shelburne
and
South
Burlington.
The
State
is
responsible
for
maintaining
over
3,200
miles
of
pavement,
4,000
bridges,
advancing
hundreds
of
projects,
and
fixing
thousands
of
smaller
infrastructure
projects
each
year.
To
learn
more
about
where
specific
roads
(or
segments),
bridges,
or
projects
are
in
the
queue
for
attention,
visit
http://vtrans.vermont.gov/projects.
Ways
and
Means
Paying
for
Promises
We
Keep
(Sam
Young)
(short)
We
began
the
session
facing
a
substantial
gap
between
revenue
and
appropriations,
creating
real
challenges
in
sustaining
the
states
commitments
to
Vermonters.
After
more
than
a
half-dozen
years
of
cautious
budgeting,
the
opportunities
to
trim
redundancy
or
excess
in
the
states
budget
had
largely
disappeared.
In
partnership
with
members
from
all
parties,
we
developed
the
most
fiscally
conservative
revenue
package
possible
so
that
the
most
severe
and
ill-advised
budget
cuts
could
be
avoided.
The
House
opted
to
raise
the
necessary
funds
by
capping
income
tax
deductions
at
2.5
times
the
standard
deduction.
This
only
raised
taxes
on
those
who
itemize
deductions
and
increased
the
progressively
of
our
income
tax
and
the
burden
was
significantly
born
by
the
wealthiest
Vermonters.
After
long
negotiations
and
veiled
veto
threats
by
the
Governor
a
40
compromise
was
reached.
The
changes
to
the
income
tax
still
only
affect
those
who
itemize
their
deductions.
The
changes
removed
the
deductibility
of
prior
years
state
income
taxes
and
capped
other
deductions
at
2.5
times
the
standard
deduction.
Medical
expenses
and
charitable
contributions
are
exempted
from
this
cap.
This
reduced
the
overall
progressively
of
the
tax
package.
It
also
established
a
3%
minimum
tax
for
taxpayers
making
over
$150,000
per
year
as
a
percentage
of
their
adjusted
gross
income.
These
changes
raised
a
total
of
$22.9
million
dollars.
The
remainder
of
the
necessary
funds
were
raised
by
applying
the
sales
tax
to
soft
drinks
($5.1M)
and
applying
a
meals
tax
to
purchases
from
vending
machines
($1M)
as
is
done
in
many
other
states.
Our
revenue
package
promotes
long-term
sustainability
by
making
structural
changes
to
the
income
tax
that
should
result
in
increasing
revenue
from
the
income
tax
in
subsequent
years
and
help
minimize
subsequent
budget
gaps.
Paying
for
Promises
We
Keep
(Sam
Young,
Sarah
Buxton)
(long)
We
began
the
session
facing
a
substantial
gap
between
revenue
and
appropriations,
creating
real
challenges
in
sustaining
the
states
commitments
to
Vermonters.
After
more
than
a
half-dozen
years
of
cautious
budgeting,
the
opportunities
to
trim
redundancy
or
excess
in
the
states
budget
had
largely
disappeared.
In
partnership
with
members
from
all
parties,
we
developed
the
most
fiscally
conservative
revenue
package
possible
so
that
the
most
severe
and
ill-advised
budget
cuts
could
be
avoided.
The
House
opted
to
raise
the
necessary
funds
by
capping
income
tax
deductions
at
2.5
times
the
standard
deduction.
This
only
raised
taxes
on
those
who
itemize
deductions
and
increased
the
progressively
of
our
income
tax
and
the
burden
was
significantly
born
by
the
wealthiest
Vermonters.
By
limiting
the
ability
of
taxpayers
to
deduct
certain
expenses,
more
money
remains
in
the
taxable
portion
of
the
formula,
resulting
in
higher
returns
for
the
State.
Typically,
changes
of
this
kind
are
considered
progressive
(as
opposed
to
regressive)
because
they
tend
to
impact
taxpayers
in
the
highest
tax-brackets
and
mean
that
their
proportional
tax
contribution
is
boosted.
After
long
negotiations
and
veiled
veto
threats
by
the
Governor
a
compromise
was
reached.
The
changes
to
the
income
tax
still
only
affect
those
who
itemize
their
deductions.
The
changes
removed
the
deductibility
of
prior
years
state
income
taxes
and
capped
other
deductions
at
2.5
times
the
standard
deduction.
Medical
expenses
and
charitable
contributions
are
exempted
from
this
cap.
When
applied
to
actual
numbers,
the
impact
is
easier
to
grasp.
For
example,
a
typical
married
couple
would
still
be
eligible
to
deduct
about
$30,000
from
their
taxes
for
qualifying
items.
The
amount
a
taxpayer
paid
in
Vermont
income
taxes
from
the
previous
year
will
also
no
longer
be
deductible
from
current
year
income.
The
revenue
bill
also
established
a
3%
minimum
tax
for
taxpayers
making
over
$150,000
per
year
as
a
percentage
of
their
adjusted
gross
income.
These
changes
raised
a
total
of
$22.9
million
dollars.
The
remaining
funds
needed
to
balance
the
budget
were
raised
by
applying
the
sales
tax
to
soft
drinks
($5.1M)
and
applying
the
meals
tax
to
purchases
from
41
vending
machines
($1M).
Note
that
vending
machine
sales
are
not
taxed
twice;
they
incur
the
meals
tax,
but
not
the
sales
tax.
Our
revenue
package
promotes
long-term
sustainability
by
making
structural
changes
to
the
income
tax
that
should
result
in
increasing
revenue
from
the
income
tax
in
subsequent
years
and
help
minimize
subsequent
budget
gaps.
Current
Use
(Alison
Clarkson,
Sarah
Buxton)
(short)
Current
Use
is
among
the
most
successful
conservation
program
in
Vermont.
Over
one
third
of
Vermonts
6
million
acres
of
land
is
enrolled
in
our
Current
Use
program.
Nearly
two-thirds
of
the
acres
are
forestland
while
the
remaining
third
is
in
active
agricultural
use.
These
acres
represent
about
18,000
parcels
and
14,500
owners,
75%
of
who
are
Vermont
residents.
Enacted
in
1978,
this
program
allows
the
tax
rate
for
lands
in
active
agriculture
and
forestry
to
be
calculated
on
their
use
value
rather
than
their
real
estate
development
value.
This
has
helped
Vermont
maintain
open
landscapes
and
scenic
beauty
upon
which
our
dairy,
forestry,
specialty
foods,
furniture
and
tourism
industries
have
been
built.
Given
the
current
pressure
on
the
property
tax,
the
Legislature
acted
this
year
to
make
sure
the
program
is
used
for
its
intended
purpose
and
not
abused.
We
reinstated
a
meaningful
penalty
when
owners
withdraw
land
for
development
and
adopted
measures
to
forge
more
consistent
methods
for
assessing
conserved
land
value.
In
addition,
we
subjected
Current
Use
owners
of
agricultural
lands
that
continue
to
be
in
violation
of
agricultural
water
quality
standards
to
removal
from
the
program.
Putting
the
teeth
back
into
the
programs
penalties
will
help
rebalance
the
finances
of
this
program
and
reduce
abuse
of
Current
Use.
Current
Use
(Alison
Clarkson)
(long)
Current
Use
is
among
the
most
successful
conservation
program
in
Vermont.
Over
one
third
of
Vermonts
6
million
acres
of
land
is
enrolled
in
our
Current
Use
program.
Nearly
two-thirds
of
the
acres
are
forestland
while
the
remaining
third
is
in
active
agricultural
use.
These
acres
represent
about
18,000
parcels
and
14,500
owners,
75%
of
who
are
Vermont
residents.
Enacted
in
1978,
this
program
allows
the
tax
rate
for
lands
in
active
agriculture
and
forestry
to
be
calculated
on
their
use
value
rather
than
their
real
estate
development
value.
This
has
helped
Vermont
maintain
open
landscapes
and
scenic
beauty
upon
which
our
dairy,
forestry,
specialty
foods,
furniture
and
tourism
industries
have
been
built.
Its
success
has
helped
VT
maintain
its
open
landscape
and
scenic
beauty
upon
which
our
dairy,
forestry,
specialty
foods,
furniture
and
tourism
industries
have
been
built.
It
is
estimated
that
Current
Use
has
an
over
$4
billion
impact
in
VT
from
dairy,
to
specialty
foods
(meats,
cheeses
and
maple
syrup)
to
the
wood
that
heats
our
office
buildings,
homes
and
schools
or
is
used
in
making
furniture,
to
the
jobs
that
are
sustained
(butchers,
loggers,
farmers,
truckers,
feed
and
seed
businesses,
vets,
foresters,
artists,
furniture
makers),
to
the
huge
economic
impact
on
our
tourism
industry.
42
Given
the
current
pressure
on
the
property
tax,
the
Legislature
acted
this
year
to
make
sure
the
program
is
used
for
its
intended
purpose
and
not
abused.
We
reinstated
a
meaningful
penalty
when
owners
withdraw
land
for
development
and
adopted
measures
to
forge
more
consistent
methods
for
assessing
conserved
land
value.
In
addition,
we
subjected
Current
Use
owners
of
agricultural
lands
that
continue
to
be
in
violation
of
agricultural
water
quality
standards
to
removal
from
the
program.
Each
year
we
see
between
3,000
to
5,000
acres
removed
from
our
Current
Use
program,
incurring
penalties
of
about
$500,000.
In
the
future,
with
the
new
fair
market
value
penalty
in
place,
we
expect
to
see
an
increase
in
revenue
from
penalties
and
the
land
use
change
tax
of
between
$2.7
to
$3
million
a
year.
When
coupled
with
the
fiscal
impact
of
properties
withdrawn
under
our
short-term
easy
out
provision,
the
FY2016
revenue
from
the
program
is
expected
to
increase
by
$1.5
million
increase.
Finding
the
governors
proposal
on
Current
Use
unacceptable
(enact
a
3
year
moratorium
on
the
program
and
tax
farm
buildings
at
30%
of
their
value)
the
Legislature
proposed
our
own
plan
to
make
the
program
more
fair
and
financially
sustainable.
We
reinstated
a
meaningful
penalty
of
10%
of
fair
market
value
when
owners
withdraw
land
for
development.
Immediate
family
members
will
still
be
able
to
step
into
the
shoes
of
the
previous
owner
allowing
the
land
to
be
continuously
enrolled.
New
owners
may
keep
the
land
in
Current
Use
but
would
have
to
re-enroll
it
and
start
the
clock
afresh.
Putting
the
teeth
back
into
the
penalty
will
help
rebalance
the
finances
of
this
program
and
reduce
abuse
of
Current
Use
by
deterring
short-term
enrollment
of
land
not
intended
for
long-term
agricultural
and
forestry
use.
Our
reform
provides
an
easy
out,
that
allows
a
landowner
to
remove
all
or
parcel
of
a
property
from
the
program.
Having
discovered
that
the
rate
at
which
the
state
reimburses
towns
is
wildly
inequitable,
even
among
similar
towns,
the
Legislature
developed
a
process
to
look
at
the
municipal
reimbursement
rates
and
create
a
consistent
method
of
assessing
enrolled
land.
Funding
Clean
Water
(Jim
Masland,
Janet
Ancel)
A
key
part
of
ensuring
that
we
meet
our
water
quality
improvement
goals
rests
in
our
commitment
to
adequately
fund
these
efforts.
Approximately
$8
million
will
be
raised
through
a
myriad
of
sources
to
help
assist
municipalities
in
complying
with
requirements
and
implementation
schedules
and
support
the
required
staffing
to
administer
and
implement
technical
assistance
and
enforcement.
The
largest
revenue
source
for
this
effort
is
a
surcharge
on
the
property
transfer
tax
of
.20%
of
the
purchase
price
of
the
property,
raising
$6
million
each
year.
The
Legislature
chose
this
funding
source
because
it
is
paid
throughout
the
state,
uses
an
existing
tax
(the
property
transfer
tax),
and
therefore
doesnt
require
any
new
infrastructure
or
rules
to
implement.
It
is
a
surcharge
and
will
sunset
in
a
few
years.
We
also
raised
existing
agricultural
fees
and
environmental
fees
(e.g.
potable
water,
stormwater,
and
fees
for
medium
and
large
farms,
etc.)
to
pay
for
positions
in
the
Agency
of
Agriculture
and
Agency
of
Natural
Resources
to
help
farmers
and
municipalities
reduce
pollutant
runoff.
The
43
Legislature
rejected
a
proposal
to
add
a
$15
fee
to
every
parcel
of
land,
which
would
have
been
collected
as
an
additional
property
tax.
Investing
in
Health
Care
(Sarah
Buxton)
At
the
start
of
the
session,
the
Governor
proposed
a
new
.07%
payroll
tax
on
employers
that
would
raise
$90
million
to
increase
Medicaid
reimbursements
and
other
healthcare
related
initiatives.
Alternative
proposals
for
funding
health
care
included
a
tiered
increase
in
employer
assessments,
the
expansion
of
products
subject
to
sales
tax,
an
increase
and
expansion
of
the
tobacco
tax,
and
a
per-ounce
tax
on
sugar-sweetened
beverages.
Advocates
for
each
proposal
argued
the
importance
of
creating
an
adequate,
sustainable
source
of
funding
that
has
a
clear
nexus
with
our
broad
health
care
reform
goals.
After
arduous
deliberation
in
each
chamber,
in
the
committee
of
conference,
and
with
the
Administration,
the
Legislature
agreed
to
increase
the
tobacco
tax
on
cigarettes
by
$
.33
per
pack.
A
proportional
increase
on
the
tax
on
other
tobacco
products
was
also
approved.
The
taxing
of
electronic
cigarettes
(e-cigs)
was
not
included
in
agreed
upon
package.
In
total,
these
changes
will
raise
$3.2
million
to
support
important
health
care
reform
initiatives
and
lessen
the
impact
of
out-of-pocket
health
care
costs
on
the
under-insured.
44