Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Page 73
DESIGN PROCEDURES
100
9.259
10.8
d
178
31.22
tw
5.7
KL l x 1950
23.43
rx
rx 83.2
Page 74
90.69
ry
ry 21.5
COMPARATIVE STUDY
In this study we have compared Columns fixed at
Step 4: Determination of Non Dimensional
both ends, column fixed at one end and hinged at
other, column pinned at both ends for a column
length of 2m, 2.25m, 2.5m, 2.75m, 3m, 3.25m, 3.5m,
2
KL
3.75m & 4m and also Graphical study has done for
fy
fy
250 x 23.432
r
the Strength Vs Section and Strength Weight Ratio
0.2638
2
2
5
Vs Section. The Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3 show the
f cc
E
x 2 x10
comparative study of columns fixed at both ends of
2m, 3m, and 4m length. The Fig. 4, Fig. 5 and Fig. 6
2
show the comparison between the S/w ratio Vs
KL
fy
2
Section for a length of 2m, 3m and 4m. Similarly the
fy
250 x 90.69
r
Fig.7 and Fig. 8 shows the section Vs the constants
y
1
.
020
f cc
2E
2 x 2 x10 5
like stress reduction factor, and effective
slenderness ratio.
Step 5: Calculation of
0.51 0.2 2
0.5 1 .341.02 0.2 1.02 2 1.16
1
2
2 0.5
1
0.58
[1.16 (1.16 2 1.02 2 )]
f cd
f y / mo
2 2
0.5
Fig.1
fy
f
y 132.64
mo
mo
Step 8: Determination of Compressive stress Pd
Pd A f cd 428.82kN
WSM (As per IS: 800-1984)
Fig.2
Fig.3
COMPARISON BETWEEN THE STRENGTH
WEIGHT RATIO VS SECTION
Page 75
Fig: 7
Fig: 5
Fig: 8
CONCLUSION
Fig: 6
From the chart it was found that the best fit curve for
describing the behavior of steel sections with respect
strength is two degree binomial. On comparison of
the strength of sections calculated using old and new
code, it was found that the strength increases with
Page 76
Page 77