The FBI Is Using "Aggressive Deception" To Cover Up Saudi Links To 9/11 Attack

By Tyler Durden
Created 04/13/2015 - 23:15

Submitted by Mike Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog [14],

Former Democratic Sen. Bob Graham, who in 2002 chaired the
congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11, maintains the FBI is covering up a
Saudi support cell in Sarasota for the hijackers. He says the al-Hijjis
urgent pre-9/11 exit suggests someone may have tipped them off
about the coming attacks.

Graham has been working with a 14-member group in Congress to urge

President Obama to declassify 28 pages of the final report of his inquiry
which were originally redacted, wholesale, by President George W.
Bush.

The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a
very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier, he
said, adding, I am speaking of the kingdom, or government, of Saudi
Arabia, not just wealthy individual Saudi donors.

Sources who have read the censored Saudi section say it cites CIA and
FBI case files that directly implicate officials of the Saudi Embassy in
Washington and its consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks which, if
true, would make 9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war by a
foreign government.

From the New York Post article: How the FBI is Whitewashing the Saudi
Connection to 9/11 [15]
One of the strangest aspects of the post 9/11 period has been the number of
very intelligent people who intimately appreciate and fight against the

innumerable crimes and thefts committed by the American oligarchy, yet

simply cant comes to terms with the fact that the official story of September
11, 2001 is a heaping pile of bullshit. At the end of the day, I think its just a
function of managing career risk. Having already achieved some level of
public success, not many people will want to give the mainstream media the
opportunity to attach 9/11 truther to their name, thus tarnishing all the other
work they do in the mind of the general public.
Ive never claimed to know exactly what happened on that day. The only thing
Ive said is that we arent being told anything close to the whole story, and
without the real story, the entire war on terror becomes a gigantic scam. I
simply dont believe that a few guys pulled off these attacks and brought down
the World Trade Center without state backing. Once state backing enters the
equation, the entire thing does indeed become a very real conspiracy. One
that takes on special significance if the state sponsor is one of Americas
closest allies in the Middle East. An ally that is unquestionably a ruthless,
medieval-style monarchy that was itching to rid itself of Saddam Hussein in
Iraq.
Over the past few years, it has become increasingly obvious that elements
within the Saudi government were directly responsible for 9/11. I suggest
familiarizing yourself with the following:
Must Watch Video Congressman Thomas Massie Calls for Release of
Secret 9/11 Documents Upon Reading Them [16]
Two Congressmen Push for Release of 28-Page Document Showing
Saudi Involvement in 9/11 [17]
Moving along, the New York Post reports [15] that the FBI is going out of its way
to cover up this involvement, despite extremely suspicious events that were
called into question immediately after 9/11. For example:
Just 15 days before the 9/11 attacks, a well-connected Saudi family
suddenly abandoned their luxury home in Sarasota, Fla., leaving behind
jewelry, clothes, opulent furniture, a driveway full of cars including a
brand new Chrysler PT Cruiser and even a refrigerator full of food.

About the only thing not left behind was a forwarding address. The
occupants simply vanished without notifying their neighbors, realtor or
even mail carrier.
Perfectly normal, particularly when you combine it with the fact that 15 of the
18 hijackers were Saudi citizens.
The 3,300-square-foot home on Escondito Circle belonged to Esam
Ghazzawi, a Saudi adviser to the nephew of then-King Fahd. But at the
time, it was occupied by his daughter and son-in-law, who beat a hasty retreat
back to Saudi Arabia just two weeks before the attacks after nearly a six-year
stay here.

Neighbors took note of the troubling coincidence and called the FBI, which
opened an investigation that led to the startling discovery that at least one
family member trained at the same flight school as some of the 9/11
hijackers in nearby Venice, Fla.

The Saudi-9/11 connection in Florida was no small part of the overall

9/11 investigation. Yet it was never shared with Congress. Nor was it
mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Some report
Now its being whitewashed again, in a newly released report by the 9/11
Review Commission, set up last year by Congress to assess any
evidence now known to the FBI that was not considered by the 9/11
Commission. Though the FBI acknowledges the Saudi family was
investigated, it maintains the probe was a dead end.

The review panel highlighted one local FBI report generated from the
investigation that said Abdulaziz and Anoud al-Hijji, the prominent Saudi
couple who fled their home, had many connections to individuals
associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.

But: The FBI told the Review Commission that the communication was
poorly written and wholly unsubstantiated, the panel noted in its 128-page
report. When questioned later by others in the FBI, the special agent who
wrote (it) was unable to provide any basis for the contents of the document or
explain why he wrote it as he did.

How strange. Yet panelists did not interview the unidentified agent for
themselves. They just accepted headquarters impeachment of his work.

The panels report also doesnt explain why visitor security logs for the
gated Sarasota community and photos of license tags matched vehicles
driven by the hijackers, including 9/11 ringleader Mohamed Atta.

Former Democratic Sen. Bob Graham, who in 2002 chaired the congressional
Joint Inquiry into 9/11, maintains the FBI is covering up a Saudi support cell in
Sarasota for the hijackers. He says the al-Hijjis urgent pre-9/11 exit
suggests someone may have tipped them off about the coming attacks.

Graham has been working with a 14-member group in Congress to urge

President Obama to declassify 28 pages of the final report of his inquiry which
were originally redacted, wholesale, by President George W. Bush.

The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very
strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier, he said, adding,
I am speaking of the kingdom, or government, of Saudi Arabia, not just
wealthy individual Saudi donors.

Sources who have read the censored Saudi section say it cites CIA and FBI
case files that directly implicate officials of the Saudi Embassy in Washington
and its consulate in Los Angeles in the attacks which, if true, would make

9/11 not just an act of terrorism, but an act of war by a foreign government.
The section allegedly identifies high-level Saudi officials and intelligence
agents by name, and details their financial transactions and other dealings
with the San Diego hijackers. It zeroes in on the Islamic Affairs Department of
the Saudi Embassy, among other Saudi entities.

The review commission, however, concludes there is no evidence that any

Saudi official provided assistance to the hijackers, even though the panel
failed to interview Graham or his two key investigators former Justice
Department attorney Dana Lesemann and FBI investigator Michael Jacobson
who ran down FBI leads tying Saudi officials to the San Diego hijackers
and documented their findings in the 28 pages.

Graham smells a rat: This is a pervasive pattern of covering up the role

of Saudi Arabia in 9/11 by all of the agencies of the federal government
which have access to information that might illuminate Saudi Arabias
role in 9/11.
If the 9/11 attacks were indeed orchestrated by Saudi Arabia, then its not a
stretch to ask who else may have been involved or aware of it ahead of time
considering the extremely close relationship between the U.S. and the desert
monarchy. The apparent cover-up makes everything look even more
suspicious.
Oh, and in the event that the New York Post isnt sophisticated enough for
you, this was also covered the by the New York Times in the article, Florida
Ex-Senator Pursues Claims of Saudi Ties to Sept. 11 Attacks [18]. Heres an
excerpt:
One thing that irritates me is that the F.B.I. has gone beyond just
covering up, trying to avoid disclosure, into what I call aggressive
deception, Mr. Graham said during an interview in a family office in this
Miami suburb, which rose on what was a sprawling dairy farm operated
by Mr. Grahams father, also political leader in Florida.
Conspiracy theory indeed.