George Washington University Poll

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.
Battleground 57 #14750: Weighted Tables

May 3-6, 2015
RDIRECT DIRECTION THINGS IN
COUNTRY ARE GOING/C
RDIRECT
Right
direction
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Wrong track
26%
10%
65%
1001
Northeast
30%
8%
62%
195
Midwest
23%
12%
66%
181
South
26%
8%
66%
235
South Central
27%
4%
69%
96
Central Plains
26%
17%
57%
83
Mountain States
15%
10%
74%
70
West
28%
12%
61%
141
California
28%
10%
62%
89
Florida
27%
2%
71%
58
Texas
29%
4%
66%
71
New York
31%
5%
64%
56
Rest of country
25%
11%
64%
727
GOP held seat up in 2014
25%
11%
64%
217
DEM held seat up in 2014
26%
12%
62%
320
No Senate election
26%
7%
67%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
24%
9%
67%
405
29%
11%
61%
366
No Gubernatorial election
25%
10%
65%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
Competitive statewide
race
24%
7%
69%
241
Other
26%
11%
63%
760
Male
24%
10%
66%
480
Female
27%
10%
63%
521
Male / employed
25%
10%
65%
324
Male / not employed
23%
8%
68%
157
Female / employed
29%
11%
61%
281
Female / not employed
25%
9%
65%
240
Not employed
29%
7%
64%
133
Employed
27%
10%
63%
605
Retired
22%
9%
69%
252
Refused
27%
22%
51%
11
18-34
32%
17%
51%
200
35-44
27%
6%
67%
280
45-64
27%
8%
66%
310
65 or over
17%
11%
72%
200
5%
10%
85%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
Unsure / refused
(cont.)
Page 1

May 3-6, 2015
COUNTRY ARE GOING/C
RDIRECT
Right
direction
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Unsure
TOTAL
Wrong track
18-44
29%
10%
60%
480
45-64
27%
8%
66%
310
65+
17%
11%
72%
200
Unsure / refused
5%
10%
85%
10
Male / under 55
29%
9%
62%
302
Male / 55+
17%
10%
73%
179
Female / under 55
32%
9%
59%
315
Female / 55+
20%
11%
70%
205
White
22%
8%
70%
751
Black / African American
48%
10%
42%
120
Hispanic / Latino
31%
19%
50%
90
Other
22%
13%
64%
40
White millenials 18-34
31%
12%
57%
128
White older voters 35+
20%
8%
72%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
47%
26%
27%
24
African American older

voters 35+
48%
6%
46%
96
Hispanic millenials 18-34
28%
28%
44%
41
Hispanic older voters 35+
33%
12%
55%
49
Other races millenials

18-34
33%
15%
52%
Other races older voters

35+
20%
13%
67%
32
White seniors
17%
9%
75%
255
Other
29%
10%
61%
746
White men
22%
7%
71%
368
White women
22%
9%
69%
382
Black men
43%
14%
43%
50
Black women
52%
7%
41%
70
Hispanic men
32%
25%
42%
42
Hispanic women
29%
14%
56%
48
Republican
8%
5%
87%
390
Independent
18%
12%
70%
190
Democrat
46%
13%
41%
420
Male / GOP
9%
5%
86%
214
Female / GOP
6%
6%
88%
176
Male / DEM
48%
15%
37%
161
Female / DEM
44%
12%
44%
259
Male / IND
19%
11%
71%
105
Female / IND
17%
13%
70%
85
(cont.)
Page 2

May 3-6, 2015
COUNTRY ARE GOING/C
RDIRECT
Right
direction
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Unsure
TOTAL
Wrong track
Under 55 / GOP
9%
6%
85%
223
55 & over / GOP
6%
5%
90%
168
Under 55 / DEM
52%
11%
37%
269
55 & over / DEM
35%
17%
48%
151
Under 55 / IND
21%
12%
67%
125
55 & over / IND
13%
10%
77%
65
8%
4%
88%
448
Ticket splitter
14%
22%
64%
61
Democrat
43%
13%
43%
492
Hard GOP
7%
4%
88%
360
Soft GOP
7%
7%
86%
92
Ticket splitter
21%
17%
62%
64
Soft DEM
26%
16%
58%
84
Hard DEM
47%
13%
40%
401
Conservative
12%
5%
83%
536
Moderate
16%
20%
64%
76
Liberal
46%
14%
40%
389
Republican
Very conservative
8%
3%
88%
187
Somewhat conservative
14%
7%
79%
348
Moderate / liberal
41%
15%
44%
465
Republican
8%
5%
87%
390
Independent
18%
12%
70%
190
Conservative DEM
35%
5%
60%
103
Mod / lib DEM
49%
16%
35%
318
Liberal DEM
50%
14%
36%
335
Mod / conservative DEM
30%
11%
59%
157
Independent
14%
22%
64%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
18%
6%
77%
69
Conservative GOP
6%
4%
90%
379
Yes / strongly
7%
3%
89%
93
Yes
3%
2%
95%
68
No / unsure
30%
11%
59%
840
Less than high school
28%
18%
54%
53
High school graduate
19%
13%
68%
227
Some college
25%
9%
66%
219
College graduate
29%
8%
63%
503
Male college graduates
27%
8%
65%
248
Male non-college
graduates
21%
12%
67%
232
Female college graduates
30%
8%
61%
254
Female non-college
graduates
24%
12%
64%
266
(cont.)
Page 3

May 3-6, 2015
COUNTRY ARE GOING/C
RDIRECT
Right
direction
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
Unsure
TOTAL
Wrong track
White non-college
graduate
16%
10%
74%
349
Minority non-college
graduate
38%
16%
46%
149
Others
29%
8%
63%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
30%
8%
63%
127
Non-union household
25%
10%
65%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
32%
14%
54%
215
Married
25%
7%
67%
607
No longer married
21%
12%
67%
179
Dad
25%
9%
67%
171
Mom
30%
9%
61%
203
Married / children
28%
9%
64%
299
Married / no children
23%
6%
71%
308
Divorced / children
14%
19%
67%
22
Divorced / no children
29%
8%
63%
60
Single / children
34%
6%
60%
42
Single / no children
31%
16%
53%
173
Other / mixed
18%
13%
69%
97
Single women
34%
16%
49%
98
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
27%
7%
66%
304
No longer married women
20%
12%
68%
118
Single men
29%
12%
58%
117
Married men
23%
8%
69%
302
No longer married men
22%
12%
66%
61
White single men
23%
8%
70%
75
White single women
27%
15%
58%
46
White married men
21%
6%
72%
244
White married women
23%
8%
69%
243
White no longer married

men
22%
10%
68%
49

women
16%
11%
73%
93
Other
38%
14%
48%
250
Single mothers
38%
8%
54%
30
Married mothers
30%
9%
61%
150
No longer married
mothers
21%
12%
67%
23
Non-mothers
25%
10%
65%
798
(cont.)
Page 4

May 3-6, 2015
COUNTRY ARE GOING/C
RDIRECT
Right
direction
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Unsure
TOTAL
Wrong track
Upper class
42%
4%
54%
73
Middle class
26%
8%
66%
696
Low income
22%
16%
62%
205
Working class
11%
22%
68%
Refused
16%
21%
63%
20
Middle class whites
22%
7%
71%
551
Middle class African

Americans
50%
6%
44%
63
Middle class Hispanics
30%
15%
55%
57
Middle class other races
28%
17%
55%
25
Other
26%
13%
60%
305
Roman Catholic
28%
8%
64%
198
Baptist / Evangelical
17%
8%
75%
185
Mainline Protestant
20%
9%
71%
280
Other
30%
17%
53%
45
None
36%
11%
53%
262
At least once a week
18%
8%
74%
336
At least once a month
24%
8%
68%
157
Infrequently
30%
7%
63%
191
Never
19%
21%
60%
44
Active Roman Catholics
28%
11%
61%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
11%
6%
83%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
16%
8%
76%
131
Active other
26%
10%
64%
17
Other
30%
11%
60%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
19%
5%
76%
133
Male not evangelical
26%
11%
62%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
21%
7%
72%
179
Female not evangelical
30%
11%
58%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
12%
6%
82%
222
Non-white Evangelical
40%
7%
53%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
7%
4%
88%
166
69%
51
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Non-white conservative
Christians
31%
White non-conservative
Christians
25%
11%
64%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
53%
16%
31%
39
(cont.)
Page 5

May 3-6, 2015
COUNTRY ARE GOING/C
RDIRECT
Right
direction
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
51%
13%
36%
453
Unsure
20%
30%
50%
62
3%
5%
93%
487
Jobs
37%
12%
51%
135
Economy
30%
5%
65%
228
Health care
46%
10%
45%
99
Illegal immigration
15%
4%
81%
78
Foreign threats
16%
11%
73%
116
Deficit
16%
17%
67%
76
Other
19%
12%
69%
268
Cutting taxes
11%
7%
82%
71
Reducing deficit
15%
6%
79%
126
Creating jobs
28%
12%
60%
203
Increase wages
42%
10%
48%
132
Healthcare costs
25%
11%
64%
98
Retirement
21%
20%
59%
41
Higher education
42%
15%
43%
101
9%
5%
86%
65
Regulations
Combination
21%
6%
72%
141
None
42%
2%
56%
11
6%
17%
78%
12
Views close to own
31%
5%
63%
352
Most effective person
22%
11%
67%
571
Both
27%
12%
61%
48
Unsure
21%
37%
42%
30
Very worried
10%
6%
84%
318
Somewhat worried
25%
10%
65%
405
Not too worried
45%
13%
41%
214
Not at all worried
43%
13%
44%
56
42%
58%
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Wrong track
Approve
Disapprove
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Unsure
TOTAL
Combination
Unsure
36%
34%
30%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
48%
10%
42%
245
Unsure
29%
30%
42%
63
No
18%
8%
75%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
36%
12%
52%
510
Unsure
23%
20%
57%
85
Disapprove
14%
5%
82%
406
(cont.)
Page 6

May 3-6, 2015
COUNTRY ARE GOING/C
RDIRECT
Right
direction
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Very worried
6%
86%
112
Somewhat worried
14%
7%
79%
283
Not too worried
31%
10%
59%
341
Not at all worried
40%
13%
47%
258
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
49%
15%
37%
Yes
27%
6%
67%
645
No
23%
16%
61%
356
Approve
48%
9%
43%
295
Unsure
15%
19%
66%
45
9%
2%
89%
306
Yes
33%
10%
57%
628
No
12%
8%
81%
245
Not sure
17%
10%
73%
128
4 of 4
70%
6%
24%
26
3 of 4
64%
11%
25%
112
2 of 4
46%
11%
43%
221
1 of 4
20%
14%
65%
214
0 of 4
5%
7%
88%
427
5-7 of 7
7%
2%
91%
150
4 of 7
12%
3%
84%
96
3 of 7
11%
6%
84%
91
2 of 7
20%
8%
72%
87
Disapprove
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Wrong track
8%
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Unsure
TOTAL
1 of 7
24%
15%
61%
164
0 of 7
41%
13%
46%
413
26%
10%
65%
1001
Page 7

May 3-6, 2015
RBHOJA BARACK OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RBHOJA
Approve
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
45%
6%
49%
1001
Northeast
53%
4%
42%
195
Midwest
46%
5%
49%
181
South
40%
6%
54%
235
South Central
45%
6%
49%
96
Central Plains
39%
13%
48%
83
Mountain States
30%
4%
66%
70
West
53%
7%
40%
141
California
52%
6%
42%
89
Florida
49%
3%
48%
58
Texas
50%
4%
45%
71
New York
61%
3%
36%
56
Rest of country
42%
7%
51%
727
41%
8%
51%
217
45%
6%
49%
320
No Senate election
47%
5%
47%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
42%
7%
51%
405
50%
6%
44%
366
43%
5%
52%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
41%
5%
53%
241
Other
47%
6%
47%
760
Male
40%
6%
54%
480
Female
50%
6%
44%
521
Male / employed
39%
6%
55%
324
Male / not employed
43%
6%
52%
157
Female / employed
50%
6%
44%
281
50%
7%
44%
240
Not employed
54%
6%
40%
133
Employed
44%
6%
50%
605
Retired
44%
5%
51%
252
Refused
24%
34%
43%
11
18-34
52%
11%
37%
200
35-44
44%
5%
51%
280
45-64
48%
5%
47%
310
65 or over
36%
5%
59%
200
Unsure / refused
20%
11%
68%
10
18-44
47%
7%
45%
480
45-64
48%
5%
47%
310
65+
36%
5%
59%
200
Unsure / refused
20%
11%
68%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 8

May 3-6, 2015
APPROVAL/C
RBHOJA
Approve
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Male / under 55
42%
6%
51%
302
Male / 55+
37%
5%
58%
179
Female / under 55
53%
7%
40%
315
Female / 55+
44%
6%
50%
205
White
37%
6%
57%
751
90%
3%
7%
120
Hispanic / Latino
57%
12%
32%
90
Other
46%
8%
46%
40
43%
10%
47%
128
35%
5%
60%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
84%
10%
6%
24

voters 35+
92%
1%
7%
96
57%
16%
27%
41
56%
8%
36%
49

18-34
63%
6%
31%

35+
42%
8%
50%
32
White seniors
34%
6%
61%
255
Other
49%
6%
45%
746
White men
34%
5%
61%
368
White women
39%
6%
54%
382
Black men
86%
14%
50
Black women
93%
5%
2%
70
Hispanic men
47%
14%
39%
42
Hispanic women
64%
10%
26%
48
Republican
9%
6%
85%
390
Independent
35%
8%
57%
190
Democrat
84%
5%
11%
420
Male / GOP
10%
6%
85%
214
8%
7%
85%
176
Male / DEM
87%
5%
9%
161
Female / DEM
82%
5%
13%
259
Male / IND
32%
8%
60%
105
Female / IND
39%
9%
52%
85
Under 55 / GOP
11%
8%
82%
223
55 & over / GOP
6%
4%
89%
168
Under 55 / DEM
85%
5%
11%
269
55 & over / DEM
82%
6%
12%
151
Under 55 / IND
35%
9%
56%
125
55 & over / IND
34%
8%
58%
65
Female / GOP
(cont.)
Page 9

May 3-6, 2015
APPROVAL/C
RBHOJA
Approve
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Republican
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Disapprove
9%
5%
86%
448
Ticket splitter
25%
18%
56%
61
Democrat
80%
6%
14%
492
Hard GOP
8%
5%
87%
360
Soft GOP
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Unsure
TOTAL
8%
8%
84%
92
Ticket splitter
31%
18%
50%
64
Soft DEM
66%
5%
29%
84
Hard DEM
85%
5%
10%
401
Conservative
22%
5%
73%
536
Moderate
38%
12%
50%
76
Liberal
79%
6%
15%
389
Very conservative
17%
3%
80%
187
25%
6%
69%
348
Moderate / liberal
72%
7%
21%
465
Republican
9%
6%
85%
390
Independent
35%
8%
57%
190
Conservative DEM
74%
5%
21%
103
Mod / lib DEM
87%
5%
8%
318
Liberal DEM
86%
5%
9%
335
68%
8%
25%
157
Independent
25%
18%
56%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
23%
10%
68%
69
Conservative GOP
7%
4%
89%
379
Yes / strongly
8%
4%
88%
93
Yes
6%
2%
91%
68
No / unsure
52%
7%
41%
840
42%
12%
46%
53
41%
7%
52%
227
Some college
45%
6%
50%
219
College graduate
48%
5%
47%
503
42%
6%
52%
248
Male non-college
graduates
38%
6%
56%
232
53%
5%
42%
254
Female non-college
graduates
47%
8%
46%
266
White non-college
graduate
29%
7%
64%
349
graduate
75%
6%
19%
149
Others
48%
5%
47%
503
Union household
57%
6%
38%
127
Non-union household
44%
6%
50%
874
(cont.)
Page 10

May 3-6, 2015
APPROVAL/C
RBHOJA
Approve
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Single
63%
9%
28%
215
Married
38%
6%
57%
607
No longer married
50%
5%
46%
179
Dad
31%
9%
60%
171
Mom
51%
6%
43%
203
Married / children
40%
8%
53%
299
36%
4%
61%
308
Divorced / children
39%
61%
22
59%
1%
40%
60
Single / children
62%
5%
33%
42
63%
10%
27%
173
Other / mixed
46%
8%
46%
97
Single women
68%
13%
19%
98
Married women
44%
5%
52%
304
49%
6%
45%
118
Single men
59%
5%
36%
117
Married men
31%
7%
62%
302
50%
2%
48%
61
White single men
52%
4%
44%
75
White single women
50%
15%
34%
46
White married men
26%
6%
67%
244
White married women
37%
4%
59%
243

men
45%
3%
52%
49

women
39%
7%
54%
93
Other
71%
7%
22%
250
Single mothers
73%
3%
23%
30
Married mothers
49%
6%
44%
150
No longer married
mothers
36%
3%
62%
23
Non-mothers
44%
6%
50%
798
Upper class
54%
1%
45%
73
Middle class
43%
5%
52%
696
Low income
51%
8%
41%
205
Working class
38%
22%
40%
Refused
39%
29%
32%
20
Middle class whites
35%
5%
60%
551

Americans
92%
2%
6%
63
57%
9%
34%
57
59%
3%
38%
25
Other
50%
8%
41%
305
(cont.)
Page 11

May 3-6, 2015
APPROVAL/C
RBHOJA
Approve
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Roman Catholic
43%
7%
50%
198
33%
6%
60%
185
Mainline Protestant
36%
5%
58%
280
Other
50%
1%
49%
45
None
64%
6%
29%
262
34%
6%
60%
336
41%
5%
55%
157
Infrequently
46%
6%
48%
191
Never
44%
6%
50%
44
45%
9%
46%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
25%
6%
69%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
33%
5%
61%
131
Active other
35%
65%
17
Other
51%
6%
43%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
27%
2%
71%
133
45%
7%
47%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
36%
7%
57%
179
57%
6%
37%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
16%
5%
79%
222
73%
5%
22%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
7%
4%
89%
166
Christians
66%
1%
33%
51
Christians
44%
8%
48%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
81%
10%
8%
39
Jobs
62%
8%
30%
135
Economy
54%
5%
41%
228
Health care
68%
3%
29%
99
Illegal immigration
20%
5%
75%
78
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Foreign threats
32%
6%
62%
116
Deficit
22%
13%
65%
76
Other
40%
6%
54%
268
(cont.)
Page 12

May 3-6, 2015
APPROVAL/C
RBHOJA
Approve
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Disapprove
Cutting taxes
35%
3%
62%
71
Reducing deficit
20%
10%
70%
126
Creating jobs
51%
7%
42%
203
Increase wages
79%
5%
16%
132
Healthcare costs
35%
6%
59%
98
Retirement
53%
4%
42%
41
Higher education
72%
2%
26%
101
Regulations
12%
4%
85%
65
Combination
36%
9%
55%
141
None
63%
37%
11
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unsure
TOTAL
5%
10%
85%
12
Views close to own
46%
4%
49%
352
45%
7%
48%
571
Both
43%
4%
52%
48
Unsure
39%
17%
44%
30
Very worried
26%
6%
68%
318
Somewhat worried
45%
5%
50%
405
Not too worried
69%
9%
22%
214
61%
3%
36%
56
Not at all worried

Combination
100%
Unsure
65%
5%
30%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
69%
7%
25%
245
Unsure
53%
12%
35%
63
No
36%
5%
58%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
59%
7%
34%
510
Unsure
57%
15%
28%
85
Disapprove
25%
3%
72%
406
Very worried
25%
4%
71%
112
Somewhat worried
34%
7%
58%
283
Not too worried
46%
4%
50%
341
Not at all worried
65%
7%
28%
258
100%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Unsure
49%
21%
31%
Yes
44%
4%
51%
645
No
47%
10%
44%
356
Approve
76%
6%
18%
295
Unsure
40%
6%
54%
45
Disapprove
14%
2%
84%
306
(cont.)
Page 13

May 3-6, 2015
APPROVAL/C
RBHOJA
Approve
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Yes
55%
7%
38%
628
No
25%
4%
71%
245
Not sure
37%
6%
57%
128
4 of 4
96%
4%
3 of 4
94%
5%
1%
112
2 of 4
79%
5%
16%
221
1 of 4
52%
9%
39%
214
0 of 4
8%
5%
86%
427
5-7 of 7
8%
2%
90%
150
4 of 7
8%
7%
85%
96
3 of 7
18%
2%
80%
91
2 of 7
37%
6%
57%
87
1 of 7
48%
8%
44%
164
0 of 7
74%
8%
18%
413
45%
6%
49%
1001
26
Page 14

May 3-6, 2015
RMIIP MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FOR NEXT PRESIDENT/C
RMIIP
Jobs
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
Economy
Health care
Illegal
immigration
Foreign
threats
Deficit
TOTAL
Other
13%
23%
10%
8%
12%
8%
27%
1001
Northeast
11%
24%
12%
4%
11%
9%
30%
195
Midwest
14%
22%
8%
7%
12%
8%
30%
181
South
16%
18%
14%
6%
14%
9%
24%
235
South Central
6%
31%
7%
11%
10%
3%
33%
96
Central Plains
18%
25%
9%
8%
14%
2%
23%
83
Mountain States
20%
28%
1%
14%
7%
10%
20%
70
West
11%
22%
9%
12%
11%
10%
25%
141
California
15%
18%
5%
17%
11%
11%
22%
89
Florida
20%
18%
11%
2%
11%
9%
29%
58
Texas
1%
37%
6%
11%
8%
4%
33%
71
New York
10%
36%
6%
1%
17%
4%
26%
56
Rest of country
14%
21%
11%
7%
12%
8%
27%
727
10%
24%
11%
9%
11%
8%
26%
217
13%
26%
12%
7%
13%
5%
24%
320
No Senate election
16%
20%
8%
8%
11%
9%
29%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
13%
23%
9%
10%
11%
8%
26%
405
13%
25%
8%
7%
13%
7%
28%
366
15%
20%
15%
5%
11%
7%
27%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
14%
20%
11%
5%
15%
7%
28%
241
Other
13%
24%
9%
9%
11%
8%
26%
760
Male
14%
22%
8%
8%
10%
9%
29%
480
Female
13%
23%
12%
8%
13%
6%
25%
521
Male / employed
13%
23%
8%
7%
10%
10%
28%
324
Male / not employed
15%
20%
7%
10%
9%
8%
30%
157
Female / employed
14%
25%
13%
6%
13%
8%
21%
281
12%
21%
12%
10%
13%
4%
29%
240
Not employed
13%
25%
13%
8%
10%
4%
27%
133
Employed
14%
24%
10%
7%
12%
9%
25%
605
Retired
14%
18%
8%
11%
13%
6%
31%
252
Refused
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
6%
25%
16%
5%
5%
18%
25%
11
18-34
12%
26%
7%
5%
12%
13%
23%
200
35-44
13%
29%
12%
5%
10%
6%
25%
280
45-64
15%
20%
11%
9%
13%
6%
27%
310
65 or over
13%
17%
8%
12%
12%
6%
32%
200
Unsure / refused
30%
7%
18%
6%
40%
10
18-44
13%
28%
10%
5%
11%
9%
24%
480
45-64
15%
20%
11%
9%
13%
6%
27%
310
65+
13%
17%
8%
12%
12%
6%
32%
200
Unsure / refused
30%
7%
18%
6%
40%
10
(cont.)
Page 15

May 3-6, 2015
RMIIP
Jobs
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
TOTAL
Other
6%
10%
10%
27%
302
Male / 55+
13%
17%
8%
11%
10%
9%
32%
179
Female / under 55
13%
28%
14%
6%
13%
8%
18%
315
Female / 55+
14%
16%
9%
10%
13%
4%
35%
205
White
12%
21%
10%
8%
13%
8%
27%
751
20%
33%
13%
3%
3%
5%
23%
120
Hispanic / Latino
15%
20%
7%
8%
14%
8%
28%
90
9%
34%
9%
10%
5%
3%
29%
40
11%
25%
9%
4%
17%
15%
19%
128
13%
20%
10%
9%
12%
7%
29%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
20%
43%
16%
20%
24

voters 35+
20%
30%
16%
4%
4%
2%
24%
96
13%
18%
4%
12%
5%
9%
38%
41
16%
21%
9%
4%
22%
7%
20%
49
6%
45%
15%
6%
29%

35+
10%
32%
8%
12%
7%
2%
29%
32
White seniors
13%
16%
8%
12%
13%
6%
32%
255
Other
14%
25%
11%
6%
11%
8%
25%
746
White men
14%
21%
7%
8%
10%
10%
30%
368
White women
11%
21%
13%
9%
16%
6%
24%
382
Black men
22%
30%
12%
6%
6%
4%
20%
50
Black women
19%
34%
13%
1%
2%
5%
25%
70
6%
25%
10%
2%
17%
10%
30%
42
23%
15%
4%
13%
12%
6%
27%
48
Republican
9%
19%
6%
12%
18%
9%
26%
390
Independent
10%
23%
7%
7%
11%
12%
32%
190
Democrat
19%
26%
15%
4%
6%
4%
26%
420
Male / GOP
12%
19%
3%
12%
15%
11%
28%
214
7%
19%
9%
13%
23%
7%
23%
176
Male / DEM
21%
26%
14%
3%
4%
4%
28%
161
Female / DEM
18%
26%
16%
5%
7%
4%
24%
259
Female / GOP
Male / IND
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Deficit
7%
Hispanic women
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Foreign
threats
26%
Hispanic men
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Illegal
immigration
14%

18-34
WHITE SENIORS
Health care
Male / under 55
Other
AGE AND RACE
Economy
8%
23%
7%
7%
10%
13%
33%
105
Female / IND
12%
23%
6%
7%
11%
10%
30%
85
Under 55 / GOP
10%
24%
6%
9%
19%
11%
22%
223
55 & over / GOP
9%
13%
6%
17%
18%
7%
31%
168
Under 55 / DEM
18%
30%
16%
4%
6%
6%
20%
269
55 & over / DEM
20%
19%
15%
4%
5%
2%
35%
151
Under 55 / IND
10%
25%
9%
6%
10%
11%
29%
125
55 & over / IND
9%
20%
2%
8%
12%
13%
36%
65
(cont.)
Page 16

May 3-6, 2015
RMIIP
Jobs
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Health care
Illegal
immigration
8%
20%
5%
13%
17%
11%
26%
448
Ticket splitter
15%
14%
6%
6%
10%
4%
45%
61
Democrat
18%
27%
15%
4%
7%
5%
25%
492
Hard GOP
8%
19%
6%
13%
19%
9%
26%
360
Soft GOP
10%
16%
4%
10%
15%
15%
31%
92
Ticket splitter
17%
29%
2%
7%
8%
6%
32%
64
Soft DEM
10%
26%
12%
2%
8%
13%
29%
84
Hard DEM
19%
26%
16%
4%
6%
4%
25%
401
Conservative
12%
21%
7%
10%
15%
9%
26%
536
Moderate
16%
18%
8%
7%
6%
9%
36%
76
Liberal
15%
26%
15%
4%
8%
6%
26%
389
Very conservative
13%
13%
7%
12%
15%
11%
29%
187
11%
25%
6%
10%
15%
8%
24%
348
Moderate / liberal
Republican
Foreign
threats
Deficit
TOTAL
Economy
Other
15%
25%
14%
5%
7%
6%
28%
465
Republican
9%
19%
6%
12%
18%
9%
26%
390
Independent
10%
23%
7%
7%
11%
12%
32%
190
Conservative DEM
22%
24%
15%
8%
5%
4%
23%
103
Mod / lib DEM
18%
27%
15%
3%
6%
4%
27%
318
Liberal DEM
16%
28%
16%
3%
7%
5%
26%
335
23%
24%
12%
6%
7%
5%
23%
157
Independent
15%
14%
6%
6%
10%
4%
45%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
9%
25%
5%
15%
11%
9%
27%
69
Conservative GOP
8%
19%
5%
12%
18%
11%
26%
379
Yes / strongly
13%
19%
1%
15%
15%
6%
32%
93
Yes
10%
23%
10%
19%
15%
23%
68
No / unsure
14%
23%
12%
7%
11%
7%
26%
840
27%
19%
7%
7%
13%
4%
22%
53
13%
15%
10%
10%
15%
7%
30%
227
Some college
13%
24%
9%
10%
12%
8%
24%
219
College graduate
12%
26%
11%
6%
10%
8%
27%
503
13%
22%
12%
6%
8%
10%
29%
248
Male non-college
graduates
15%
22%
3%
11%
13%
8%
29%
232
12%
29%
9%
6%
13%
6%
24%
254
Female non-college
graduates
14%
17%
15%
9%
13%
6%
25%
266
White non-college
graduate
12%
18%
9%
11%
15%
8%
27%
349
graduate
21%
24%
9%
7%
9%
4%
26%
149
Others
12%
26%
11%
6%
10%
8%
27%
503
Union household
18%
17%
6%
6%
15%
6%
33%
127
Non-union household
13%
24%
11%
8%
11%
8%
26%
874
(cont.)
Page 17

May 3-6, 2015
RMIIP
Jobs
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Economy
Health care
Illegal
immigration
Foreign
threats
Deficit
TOTAL
Other
Single
17%
30%
8%
5%
8%
7%
25%
215
Married
13%
22%
10%
8%
13%
8%
26%
607
No longer married
13%
18%
11%
9%
11%
7%
31%
179
Dad
12%
19%
7%
8%
10%
10%
34%
171
Mom
11%
27%
15%
6%
15%
7%
19%
203
Married / children
11%
22%
11%
8%
14%
8%
26%
299
14%
21%
10%
9%
12%
8%
27%
308
Divorced / children
13%
10%
35%
21%
22%
22
17%
17%
8%
12%
13%
3%
30%
60
Single / children
12%
33%
7%
3%
9%
4%
32%
42
18%
30%
8%
5%
8%
8%
23%
173
Other / mixed
10%
20%
8%
10%
13%
6%
33%
97
Single women
21%
30%
8%
5%
7%
5%
24%
98
Married women
11%
24%
12%
8%
16%
7%
23%
304
12%
16%
15%
9%
12%
5%
31%
118
Single men
13%
31%
8%
5%
9%
9%
25%
117
Married men
14%
19%
8%
9%
10%
9%
30%
302
14%
21%
4%
10%
10%
10%
31%
61
White single men
13%
26%
10%
5%
6%
10%
31%
75
White single women
23%
34%
6%
4%
9%
2%
21%
46
White married men
14%
18%
8%
9%
11%
10%
30%
244
White married women
11%
22%
12%
8%
17%
7%
22%
243

men
14%
23%
11%
12%
12%
27%
49

women
7%
12%
18%
11%
14%
6%
32%
93
Other
17%
28%
10%
6%
8%
6%
26%
250
Single mothers
13%
33%
10%
4%
7%
5%
29%
30
Married mothers
11%
26%
14%
7%
18%
7%
17%
150
No longer married
mothers
8%
23%
33%
4%
3%
9%
21%
23
Non-mothers
14%
22%
9%
8%
11%
8%
29%
798
Upper class
5%
41%
17%
6%
4%
3%
24%
73
Middle class
13%
23%
9%
8%
12%
9%
26%
696
Low income
17%
18%
13%
6%
13%
4%
29%
205
Working class
22%
11%
68%
Refused
18%
14%
2%
14%
7%
13%
32%
20
Middle class whites
13%
21%
9%
9%
14%
10%
25%
551

Americans
14%
36%
13%
4%
2%
4%
27%
63
12%
19%
4%
11%
14%
12%
28%
57
7%
35%
12%
4%
5%
3%
34%
25
14%
23%
13%
7%
10%
4%
29%
305
Other
(cont.)
Page 18

May 3-6, 2015
RMIIP
Jobs
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Health care
Illegal
immigration
15%
18%
11%
11%
14%
9%
22%
198
9%
18%
8%
9%
15%
6%
35%
185
Mainline Protestant
14%
22%
10%
8%
13%
10%
22%
280
Other
14%
27%
7%
10%
6%
36%
45
None
16%
30%
11%
6%
5%
5%
26%
262
13%
19%
10%
10%
16%
8%
25%
336
9%
25%
9%
4%
14%
10%
30%
157
Infrequently
13%
22%
10%
10%
11%
8%
26%
191
Never
24%
9%
15%
7%
5%
2%
38%
44
15%
13%
10%
13%
21%
10%
17%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
10%
19%
7%
9%
18%
7%
31%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
14%
21%
12%
10%
12%
8%
24%
131
Active other
10%
26%
12%
10%
14%
27%
17
Other
14%
25%
10%
7%
10%
7%
28%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
10%
19%
5%
12%
14%
12%
29%
133
15%
24%
9%
7%
9%
8%
29%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
10%
19%
13%
10%
13%
6%
28%
179
15%
26%
11%
6%
13%
6%
23%
342
7%
17%
10%
11%
17%
9%
29%
222
19%
23%
9%
10%
6%
7%
27%
90
5%
16%
8%
12%
18%
12%
29%
166
Christians
19%
19%
11%
13%
4%
2%
32%
51
Christians
12%
22%
17%
8%
12%
2%
28%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
18%
28%
6%
7%
9%
13%
20%
39
Approve
18%
27%
15%
4%
8%
4%
24%
453
Unsure
17%
19%
4%
6%
12%
17%
26%
62
8%
19%
6%
12%
15%
10%
30%
487
Roman Catholic
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
Disapprove
Foreign
threats
Deficit
TOTAL
Economy
Other
(cont.)
Page 19

May 3-6, 2015
RMIIP
Jobs
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Health care
Illegal
immigration
14%
25%
4%
11%
18%
2%
26%
71
7%
17%
3%
11%
19%
26%
17%
126
Creating jobs
24%
30%
10%
8%
9%
3%
17%
203
Increase wages
23%
28%
16%
3%
5%
4%
22%
132
Healthcare costs
5%
15%
25%
14%
13%
4%
24%
98
Retirement
8%
17%
10%
9%
30%
1%
25%
41
Higher education
11%
26%
14%
4%
15%
11%
19%
101
Regulations
13%
20%
9%
12%
12%
14%
20%
65
Combination
7%
17%
2%
4%
3%
4%
63%
141
None
2%
41%
39%
11
Unsure
3%
12%
2%
16%
17%
5%
46%
12
Views close to own
13%
22%
11%
9%
13%
8%
24%
352
14%
23%
10%
8%
11%
7%
27%
571
Cutting taxes
Reducing deficit
Both
Foreign
threats
18%
6%
34%
3%
2%
9%
5%
41%
48
15%
10%
15%
3%
11%
6%
40%
30
Very worried
13%
19%
8%
9%
12%
8%
31%
318
Somewhat worried
12%
24%
9%
8%
14%
7%
25%
405
Not too worried
17%
24%
14%
6%
9%
7%
23%
214
8%
31%
13%
6%
6%
14%
22%
56
42%
96%
8
245
Combination
Unsure
58%
3%
2%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
No
12%
21%
10%
9%
13%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
14%
27%
13%
6%
9%
Unsure
15%
26%
10%
3%
Disapprove
12%
17%
6%
11%
Very worried
13%
12%
11%
Somewhat worried
11%
19%
7%
Not too worried
15%
26%
Not at all worried
15%
29%
Unsure
18%
26%
11%
7%
10%
6%
22%
9%
29%
3%
4%
9%
4%
42%
63
9%
27%
693
8%
22%
510
6%
8%
32%
85
16%
7%
31%
406
13%
9%
8%
34%
112
10%
18%
6%
29%
283
10%
7%
12%
8%
23%
341
13%
5%
6%
9%
24%
258
100%
91%
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Other
Unsure
Not at all worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Deficit
TOTAL
Economy
9%
Yes
14%
24%
8%
8%
14%
7%
25%
645
No
12%
21%
14%
7%
7%
9%
30%
356
Approve
18%
28%
11%
3%
9%
6%
24%
295
Unsure
27%
12%
9%
4%
9%
7%
33%
45
9%
21%
5%
14%
20%
8%
25%
306
Disapprove
(cont.)
Page 20

May 3-6, 2015
RMIIP
Jobs
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Economy
Health care
Illegal
immigration
Foreign
threats
Deficit
TOTAL
Other
Yes
13%
28%
11%
6%
11%
7%
23%
628
No
12%
13%
8%
13%
13%
7%
34%
245
Not sure
17%
15%
9%
7%
12%
10%
30%
128
4 of 4
21%
42%
15%
5%
17%
26
3 of 4
20%
23%
22%
2%
4%
6%
23%
112
2 of 4
15%
33%
14%
4%
6%
4%
25%
221
1 of 4
19%
16%
9%
8%
15%
9%
25%
214
0 of 4
7%
20%
5%
12%
16%
10%
30%
427
5-7 of 7
9%
16%
2%
12%
22%
11%
27%
150
4 of 7
4%
20%
6%
11%
10%
15%
34%
96
3 of 7
10%
21%
10%
11%
17%
10%
22%
91
2 of 7
12%
17%
9%
14%
11%
5%
32%
87
1 of 7
18%
22%
11%
8%
13%
10%
19%
164
0 of 7
17%
28%
13%
4%
6%
4%
28%
413
13%
23%
10%
8%
12%
8%
27%
1001
Page 21

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE NEXT PRESIDENT SHOULD FOCUS ON
MEIP
Cutting taxes
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
Reducing
deficit
Creating jobs
Increase
wages
Healthcare
costs
Retirement
Higher
education
Regulations Combination
7%
13%
20%
13%
10%
4%
10%
7%
14%
Northeast
9%
15%
16%
15%
10%
3%
10%
4%
17%
Midwest
7%
12%
22%
7%
9%
6%
10%
8%
16%
South
7%
8%
23%
14%
9%
4%
7%
10%
15%
South Central
11%
17%
15%
13%
11%
2%
13%
1%
12%
Central Plains
2%
10%
27%
18%
13%
2%
8%
4%
14%
Mountain States
9%
18%
16%
15%
12%
7%
7%
4%
11%
West
4%
15%
20%
13%
8%
4%
17%
9%
10%
California
5%
18%
22%
10%
8%
4%
14%
7%
11%
Florida
9%
4%
18%
8%
8%
9%
9%
10%
22%
Texas
9%
13%
13%
12%
12%
3%
14%
2%
16%
15%
13%
12%
12%
10%
3%
11%
Rest of country
6%
13%
22%
14%
10%
4%
9%
7%
13%
8%
13%
19%
16%
9%
3%
9%
6%
14%
6%
12%
27%
12%
11%
4%
10%
7%
10%
No Senate election
8%
13%
16%
13%
9%
5%
11%
6%
17%
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
9%
11%
18%
14%
11%
4%
9%
5%
15%
6%
13%
23%
11%
8%
4%
10%
8%
16%
5%
14%
20%
15%
10%
4%
11%
8%
10%
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
8%
11%
24%
14%
9%
5%
6%
8%
14%
Other
7%
13%
19%
13%
10%
4%
11%
6%
14%
Male
8%
16%
20%
10%
8%
4%
9%
8%
14%
Female
6%
10%
20%
16%
11%
4%
11%
5%
14%
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
New York
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Male / employed
22%
10%
17%
18%
13%
8%
4%
6%
9%
12%
Male / not employed
6%
13%
25%
6%
7%
3%
14%
7%
19%
Female / employed
5%
10%
18%
20%
12%
5%
10%
6%
11%
7%
9%
22%
11%
11%
4%
13%
3%
17%
Not employed
8%
7%
18%
9%
2%
4%
25%
7%
19%
Employed
7%
14%
18%
16%
10%
5%
8%
8%
12%
Retired
6%
13%
26%
9%
13%
3%
7%
4%
17%
Refused
5%
1%
13%
4%
22%
34%
5%
15%
18-34
4%
16%
18%
12%
8%
5%
22%
4%
9%
35-44
10%
9%
17%
18%
9%
4%
8%
8%
15%
45-64
7%
12%
20%
13%
10%
4%
8%
8%
15%
65 or over
5%
16%
26%
9%
12%
3%
6%
4%
16%
Unsure / refused
4%
5%
16%
10%
11%
5%
5%
14%
22%
18-44
8%
12%
18%
15%
9%
4%
14%
6%
12%
45-64
7%
12%
20%
13%
10%
4%
8%
8%
15%
65+
5%
16%
26%
9%
12%
3%
6%
4%
16%
Unsure / refused
4%
5%
16%
10%
11%
5%
5%
14%
22%
(cont.)
Page 22

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP
Cutting taxes
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
Male / under 55
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Retirement
Higher
education
16%
17%
12%
8%
3%
10%
9%
13%
15%
26%
8%
8%
4%
7%
8%
17%
Female / under 55
6%
8%
19%
19%
9%
5%
15%
6%
11%
Female / 55+
6%
12%
21%
11%
15%
3%
7%
3%
19%
White
7%
15%
19%
12%
11%
4%
8%
7%
14%
6%
4%
29%
23%
2%
2%
17%
4%
11%
Hispanic / Latino
8%
7%
19%
13%
9%
6%
16%
2%
19%
10%
4%
19%
13%
9%
5%
8%
7%
17%
4%
21%
17%
12%
12%
7%
18%
4%
3%
8%
14%
19%
12%
11%
3%
7%
8%
16%
10%
20%
11%
39%
10%
11%
3%
11%

voters 35+
8%
2%
31%
26%
2%
3%
11%
7%
8%
17%
11%
4%
4%
24%
9%
6%
22%
14%
13%
8%
10%
4%
15%
24%
11%
27%
6%
11%
24%

18-34
10%

35+
10%
5%
17%
13%
11%
6%
4%
7%
19%
White seniors
5%
14%
23%
9%
12%
4%
7%
6%
17%
Other
8%
12%
19%
15%
9%
4%
11%
7%
13%
White men
7%
19%
19%
10%
9%
3%
7%
10%
14%
White women
7%
12%
19%
13%
13%
5%
10%
5%
13%
12%
3%
31%
11%
6%
12%
3%
16%
Black women
2%
5%
27%
31%
3%
20%
5%
7%
Hispanic men
10%
12%
18%
14%
9%
9%
22%
6%
3%
21%
12%
9%
4%
11%
4%
30%
Republican
10%
20%
16%
4%
12%
3%
6%
12%
15%
Independent
7%
14%
17%
9%
13%
5%
12%
5%
15%
Democrat
5%
5%
26%
24%
6%
5%
13%
2%
13%
Hispanic women
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Healthcare
costs
5%
Black men
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Increase
wages
10%
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
Creating jobs
Male / 55+
Other
AGE AND RACE
Reducing
deficit
Male / GOP
7%
11%
21%
16%
4%
9%
4%
4%
15%
15%
Female / GOP
8%
18%
16%
4%
16%
3%
9%
9%
14%
Male / DEM
6%
8%
30%
21%
4%
4%
11%
2%
12%
Female / DEM
4%
3%
23%
26%
8%
5%
13%
3%
13%
Male / IND
7%
16%
15%
7%
13%
4%
13%
5%
16%
Female / IND
6%
12%
19%
11%
13%
5%
11%
4%
15%
Under 55 / GOP
12%
18%
11%
6%
11%
3%
8%
14%
13%
55 & over / GOP
6%
22%
22%
2%
13%
3%
4%
9%
17%
Under 55 / DEM
6%
6%
25%
26%
4%
5%
14%
3%
10%
55 & over / DEM
4%
4%
27%
19%
10%
5%
11%
1%
17%
Under 55 / IND
5%
16%
15%
10%
13%
6%
17%
5%
12%
55 & over / IND
9%
11%
21%
7%
14%
3%
4%
4%
23%
(cont.)
Page 23

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP
Cutting taxes
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
Republican
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
Increase
wages
Healthcare
costs
Retirement
4%
11%
20%
15%
4%
11%
2%
12%
20%
5%
15%
Democrat
5%
6%
25%
23%
8%
Hard GOP
10%
19%
14%
4%
Soft GOP
Higher
education
6%
12%
14%
15%
1%
24%
5%
13%
2%
13%
12%
3%
6%
13%
15%
4%
8%
9%
13%
13%
1%
19%
11%
22%
17%
3%
7%
Ticket splitter
6%
16%
28%
5%
10%
Soft DEM
4%
7%
17%
15%
18%
6%
19%
Hard DEM
4%
5%
26%
25%
6%
5%
12%
2%
13%
7%
10%
14%
Conservative
11%
10%
18%
18%
7%
9%
4%
Moderate
6%
9%
24%
13%
12%
2%
6%
3%
21%
Liberal
3%
6%
22%
22%
10%
5%
15%
2%
13%
13%
21%
17%
6%
6%
1%
3%
14%
18%
9%
17%
19%
7%
11%
5%
10%
8%
12%
Moderate / liberal
13%
2%
14%
Very conservative
4%
6%
22%
21%
10%
4%
Republican
10%
20%
16%
4%
12%
3%
6%
12%
15%
Independent
7%
14%
17%
9%
13%
5%
12%
5%
15%
Conservative DEM
8%
9%
27%
16%
6%
6%
13%
1%
12%
Mod / lib DEM
4%
4%
25%
26%
6%
4%
12%
3%
13%
Liberal DEM
3%
5%
23%
25%
9%
5%
14%
2%
12%
8%
7%
29%
17%
7%
6%
12%
1%
13%
Independent
2%
12%
20%
5%
15%
15%
1%
24%
Mod / liberal GOP
7%
9%
20%
4%
16%
6%
16%
3%
14%
Conservative GOP
11%
22%
14%
4%
10%
3%
5%
14%
14%
Yes / strongly
14%
13%
12%
3%
11%
3%
4%
19%
19%
Yes
13%
22%
11%
9%
22%
16%
6%
12%
22%
15%
10%
5%
11%
4%
13%
15%
4%
24%
9%
9%
6%
15%
0%
13%
9%
7%
19%
12%
11%
7%
8%
5%
19%
Some college
3%
16%
20%
11%
11%
1%
16%
6%
14%
College graduate
7%
15%
21%
15%
9%
4%
8%
8%
12%
7%
19%
19%
12%
7%
4%
7%
10%
13%
10%
12%
22%
8%
8%
3%
10%
7%
16%
7%
11%
22%
18%
10%
4%
9%
7%
12%
Female non-college
graduates
5%
9%
18%
14%
13%
5%
14%
3%
16%
White non-college
graduate
7%
13%
19%
9%
13%
4%
11%
6%
15%
graduate
8%
5%
22%
16%
5%
5%
16%
3%
17%
Male non-college
graduates
Others
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Creating jobs
Ticket splitter
No / unsure
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
Reducing
deficit
Union household
Non-union household
4%
7%
15%
21%
15%
9%
4%
8%
8%
12%
11%
10%
17%
16%
7%
5%
10%
5%
14%
7%
13%
21%
13%
10%
4%
10%
7%
14%
(cont.)
Page 24

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP
Cutting taxes
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Retirement
Higher
education
10%
22%
15%
5%
4%
20%
5%
11%
9%
13%
20%
12%
11%
4%
6%
8%
15%
No longer married
6%
14%
18%
14%
13%
5%
10%
4%
14%
11%
17%
18%
10%
9%
4%
4%
9%
13%
Dad
7%
7%
19%
18%
8%
6%
11%
8%
14%
11%
12%
19%
15%
10%
4%
5%
8%
14%
7%
14%
22%
9%
11%
3%
8%
7%
16%
Divorced / children
5%
21%
3%
36%
6%
10%
5%
14%
7%
7%
16%
17%
12%
5%
15%
1%
18%
Single / children
2%
4%
19%
3%
3%
6%
30%
6%
12%
5%
11%
23%
18%
5%
4%
18%
5%
11%
Other / mixed
6%
16%
22%
8%
15%
3%
10%
6%
12%
Single women
5%
6%
25%
15%
6%
4%
27%
1%
12%
Married women
8%
10%
20%
15%
11%
4%
8%
7%
14%
2%
13%
16%
18%
17%
5%
9%
4%
13%
Single men
4%
13%
20%
16%
4%
5%
15%
9%
10%
Married men
9%
17%
20%
9%
10%
4%
5%
9%
15%
5%
4%
13%
5%
17%
12%
11%
Married / children
13%
15%
21%
7%
White single men
3%
16%
17%
17%
6%
3%
12%
White single women
3%
7%
18%
16%
11%
7%
19%
White married men
8%
19%
20%
8%
11%
3%
4%
10%
16%
White married women
17%
9%
11%
21%
13%
13%
4%
8%
6%
11%

men
10%
18%
18%
9%
5%
3%
16%
6%
13%

women
3%
16%
14%
14%
16%
7%
9%
5%
16%
Other
7%
5%
24%
17%
5%
4%
15%
4%
15%
9%
42%
Single mothers
Married mothers
27%
10%
18%
7%
19%
20%
11%
5%
6%
7%
14%
18%
4%
30%
6%
9%
6%
18%
9%
4%
10%
6%
14%
17%
9%
9%
Non-mothers
7%
14%
21%
12%
10%
Upper class
7%
7%
23%
19%
8%
Middle class
7%
14%
21%
11%
9%
4%
10%
8%
14%
Low income
8%
8%
17%
18%
12%
7%
10%
3%
15%
Working class
8%
Refused
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Healthcare
costs
4%
No longer married
mothers
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Increase
wages
Married

GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
Creating jobs
Single
Mom
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Reducing
deficit
32%
60%
20%
29%
10%
10%
10%
3%
1%
17%
Middle class whites
7%
17%
21%
10%
10%
4%
7%
8%
14%

Americans
7%
2%
26%
18%
3%
2%
22%
8%
7%
2%
8%
20%
13%
8%
6%
4%
17%
16%
9%
4%
20%
2%
23%
12%
8%
19%
Other
8%
9%
19%
17%
11%
11%
4%
14%
5%
(cont.)
Page 25

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP
Cutting taxes
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
Roman Catholic
Increase
wages
Healthcare
costs
Retirement
Higher
education
10%
11%
25%
10%
10%
4%
10%
7%
12%
6%
12%
21%
11%
7%
5%
11%
7%
20%
Mainline Protestant
8%
16%
21%
10%
14%
4%
7%
8%
12%
Other
9%
16%
15%
19%
3%
8%
5%
2%
18%
None
5%
11%
17%
20%
9%
2%
15%
4%
12%
7%
15%
23%
10%
8%
5%
9%
9%
13%
9%
11%
18%
12%
13%
3%
10%
7%
16%
10%
12%
21%
12%
10%
5%
8%
5%
15%
Never
1%
6%
24%
18%
16%
4%
3%
1%
22%
6%
13%
29%
9%
8%
9%
13%
7%
6%
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
9%
14%
19%
11%
7%
3%
11%
9%
15%
Active Mainline
Protestants
6%
16%
25%
8%
10%
3%
4%
12%
14%
14%
24%
1%
11%
10%
10%
7%
11%
19%
15%
10%
4%
11%
5%
14%
17%
14%
18%
8%
4%
5%
7%
13%
14%
5%
16%
21%
11%
9%
3%
9%
7%
15%
Female born again /

evangelicals
5%
12%
22%
13%
13%
4%
8%
6%
16%
6%
8%
19%
17%
11%
5%
13%
4%
13%
12%
16%
18%
6%
11%
5%
5%
10%
16%
6%
5%
26%
22%
4%
3%
14%
7%
13%
Active other
Other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Creating jobs
Infrequently
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
Reducing
deficit
Male born again /

evangelicals
25%
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
14%
20%
16%
5%
9%
4%
4%
12%
15%
Christians
10%
5%
30%
19%
3%
4%
9%
7%
13%
Christians
5%
4%
26%
12%
18%
6%
8%
2%
18%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
2%
6%
20%
26%
6%
1%
19%
6%
14%
Approve
5%
6%
23%
23%
8%
5%
16%
2%
11%
Unsure
4%
21%
22%
11%
10%
3%
3%
4%
20%
Disapprove
9%
18%
18%
4%
12%
4%
5%
11%
16%
Jobs
7%
7%
35%
22%
4%
2%
8%
6%
7%
Economy
8%
10%
27%
16%
6%
3%
11%
6%
11%
Health care
3%
4%
20%
21%
24%
4%
14%
6%
3%
Illegal immigration
10%
17%
20%
4%
18%
5%
5%
10%
7%
Foreign threats
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
11%
20%
15%
6%
11%
10%
13%
7%
3%
Deficit
2%
43%
9%
7%
5%
1%
15%
12%
7%
Other
7%
8%
13%
11%
9%
4%
7%
5%
33%
(cont.)
Page 26

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP
Cutting taxes
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Reducing
deficit
Creating jobs
Increase
wages
Healthcare
costs
Retirement
Higher
education
Views close to own
7%
14%
17%
19%
9%
4%
7%
10%
11%
7%
11%
23%
11%
11%
4%
12%
5%
15%
13%
15%
14%
8%
3%
7%
8%
30%
Unsure
1%
20%
7%
21%
8%
13%
4%
15%
Very worried
8%
13%
20%
10%
9%
3%
6%
7%
17%
Somewhat worried
8%
14%
21%
11%
9%
6%
12%
7%
12%
Not too worried
5%
8%
20%
21%
12%
3%
12%
4%
13%
Not at all worried
1%
21%
18%
18%
9%
2%
11%
9%
8%
Both
Combination
100%
Unsure
24%
2%
38%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
8%
8%
20%
21%
7%
6%
13%
4%
12%
Unsure
9%
7%
22%
3%
11%
2%
16%
6%
18%
No
7%
15%
20%
11%
11%
4%
8%
7%
15%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
7%
12%
20%
16%
10%
5%
12%
4%
13%
Unsure
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
8%
28%
13%
4%
22%
7%
10%
4%
16%
4%
18%
Disapprove
6%
15%
20%
11%
10%
3%
7%
10%
15%
Very worried
10%
11%
20%
8%
12%
5%
5%
7%
19%
Somewhat worried
8%
14%
21%
8%
11%
5%
8%
8%
14%
Not too worried
9%
10%
23%
9%
9%
5%
10%
8%
15%
Not at all worried
3%
15%
17%
27%
8%
2%
14%
3%
10%
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Unsure
9%
Yes
6%
No
Approve
Unsure
Disapprove
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
60%
15%
21%
15%
10%
3%
8%
8%
13%
8%
9%
20%
10%
10%
5%
14%
5%
16%
2%
11%
21%
27%
9%
5%
11%
1%
11%
7%
11%
28%
1%
6%
1%
9%
7%
29%
11%
18%
19%
5%
11%
3%
6%
14%
12%
Yes
6%
11%
21%
15%
10%
4%
14%
5%
12%
No
8%
17%
22%
10%
10%
3%
4%
9%
15%
10%
12%
16%
9%
8%
5%
3%
11%
24%
10%
13%
49%
4%
9%
2%
14%
1%
9%
Not sure
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
31%
4 of 4
8%
17%
3 of 4
2%
6%
20%
36%
2 of 4
7%
5%
28%
14%
8%
4%
18%
2%
12%
1 of 4
5%
9%
27%
11%
10%
7%
11%
3%
15%
0 of 4
10%
20%
14%
6%
11%
3%
5%
12%
16%
(cont.)
Page 27

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP
Cutting taxes
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
5-7 of 7
Reducing
deficit
Creating jobs
Increase
wages
Healthcare
costs
Retirement
Higher
education
14%
20%
14%
0%
11%
4%
3%
16%
16%
4 of 7
9%
29%
12%
2%
4%
3%
3%
15%
18%
3 of 7
6%
24%
23%
3%
13%
3%
6%
9%
10%
2 of 7
8%
14%
21%
7%
15%
2%
11%
4%
16%
1 of 7
6%
8%
24%
11%
8%
5%
17%
5%
11%
0 of 7
5%
5%
22%
25%
10%
5%
12%
2%
14%
7%
13%
20%
13%
10%
4%
10%
7%
14%
(cont.)
Page 28

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE
NEXT PRESIDENT
None
Unsure
MEIP
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
1%
1%
1001
Northeast
1%
1%
195
Midwest
2%
1%
181
South
0%
1%
235
South Central
4%
1%
96
Central Plains
1%
1%
83
2%
70
0%
141
Mountain States
West
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
TOTAL
0%
California
89
Florida
Texas
5%
New York
2%
58
1%
71
2%
56
Rest of country
1%
1%
727
2%
1%
217
1%
1%
320
No Senate election
1%
1%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
2%
1%
405
1%
1%
366
1%
2%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
1%
241
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
Other
1%
1%
760
Male
2%
1%
480
Female
1%
2%
521
Male / employed
2%
1%
324
Male / not employed
0%
1%
157
Female / employed
0%
2%
281
1%
2%
240
Not employed
1%
0%
133
Employed
1%
1%
605
Retired
1%
2%
252
Refused
2%
11
18-34
1%
200
35-44
1%
1%
280
45-64
1%
2%
310
65 or over
1%
2%
200
8%
10
Unsure / refused
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
18-44
1%
0%
480
45-64
1%
2%
310
65+
1%
2%
200
8%
10
Unsure / refused
(cont.)
Page 29

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE
NEXT PRESIDENT
None
Unsure
MEIP
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
Male / under 55
2%
1%
302
Male / 55+
1%
1%
179
Female / under 55
1%
1%
315
Female / 55+
1%
2%
205
White
1%
1%
751
3%
120
Hispanic / Latino
AGE AND RACE
90
Other
5%
1%
1%
3%

voters 35+
2%
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
623
24
3%
96
41
49

18-34
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
40
128
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
TOTAL
10%

35+
3%
4%
32
White seniors
1%
2%
255
Other
1%
1%
746
White men
1%
1%
368
White women
1%
2%
382
Black men
6%
50
Black women
70
Hispanic men
42
Hispanic women
48
Republican
1%
2%
390
Independent
1%
2%
190
Democrat
1%
0%
420
Male / GOP
1%
0%
214
Female / GOP
1%
3%
176
Male / DEM
2%
0%
161
Female / DEM
1%
0%
259
Male / IND
1%
2%
105
Female / IND
1%
3%
85
Under 55 / GOP
1%
1%
223
55 & over / GOP
0%
2%
168
Under 55 / DEM
2%
55 & over / DEM
1%
1%
151
Under 55 / IND
1%
2%
125
55 & over / IND
2%
3%
65
269
(cont.)
Page 30

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE
NEXT PRESIDENT
None
Unsure
MEIP
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Republican
0%
2%
448
Ticket splitter
4%
1%
61
Democrat
1%
0%
492
Hard GOP
0%
2%
360
Soft GOP
2%
3%
92
Ticket splitter
1%
Soft DEM
1%
2%
84
Hard DEM
1%
0%
401
Conservative
0%
1%
536
Moderate
2%
2%
76
Liberal
2%
1%
389
Very conservative
0%
2%
187
0%
1%
348
Moderate / liberal
2%
1%
465
Republican
1%
2%
390
Independent
1%
2%
190
0%
103
Conservative DEM
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
2%
0%
318
Liberal DEM
2%
0%
335
0%
157
1%
61
4%
69

4%
Mod / liberal GOP

Conservative GOP
0%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
1%
2%
93
3%
68
1%
840
5%
53
Yes
No / unsure
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
64
Mod / lib DEM
Independent
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
TOTAL
1%

2%
2%
227
Some college
1%
1%
219
College graduate
1%
0%
503
2%
0%
248
Male non-college
graduates
1%
1%
232
0%
1%
254
Female non-college
graduates
1%
2%
266
White non-college
graduate
1%
2%
349
graduate
1%
1%
149
Others
1%
0%
503
Union household
2%
3%
127
Non-union household
1%
1%
874
(cont.)
Page 31

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE
NEXT PRESIDENT
None
Unsure
MEIP
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Single
3%
1%
215
Married
1%
2%
607
No longer married
1%
1%
179
Dad
3%
1%
171
Mom
0%
2%
203
Married / children
0%
1%
299
1%
2%
308
Divorced / children
Single / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
22
60
2%
12%
1%
Other / mixed
0%
Single women
3%
1%
97
1%
98
Married women
1%
2%
304
1%
1%
118
Single men
5%
Married men
0%
1%
White single men
3%
White single women
117
1%
302
61
75
3%
46
White married men
0%
1%
244
White married women
1%
2%
243

men
1%

women
0%
1%
93
Other
2%
0%
250
4%
30
2%
150
Single mothers
Married mothers
Non-mothers
1%
49
23
1%
Upper class
1%
798
1%
73
Middle class
1%
1%
696
Low income
1%
2%
205
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
42
173
No longer married
mothers
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
TOTAL
Refused
1%
Middle class whites
1%

Americans
5%
20
1%
551
63
57
6%
4%
25
Other
1%
1%
305
(cont.)
Page 32

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE
NEXT PRESIDENT
None
Unsure
MEIP
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
Roman Catholic
1%
198
1%
185
Mainline Protestant
0%
1%
280
Other
3%
0%
45
None
3%
1%
262
1%
1%
336
0%
0%
157
Infrequently
1%
2%
191
4%
44
Never
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
Active Mainline
Protestants
1%
Active other
4%
Other
1%
Male born again /

evangelicals
2%
Female born again /

evangelicals
1%
106
1%
131
17
1%
667
1%
133
1%
348
1%
179
2%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
1%
222
0%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
1%
166
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
1%
Christians
51
Christians
2%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
1%
39
0%
453
2%
62
Approve
2%
Unsure
Disapprove
1%
2%
487
Jobs
0%
0%
135
Economy
2%
1%
228
Health care
0%
99
Illegal immigration
2%
78
2%
116
Foreign threats
2%
Deficit
Other
2%
1%
76
2%
268
(cont.)
Page 33

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE
NEXT PRESIDENT
None
Unsure
MEIP
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Views close to own
1%
1%
352
1%
1%
571
Both
2%
1%
48
Unsure
2%
9%
30
Very worried
3%
2%
318
Somewhat worried
0%
1%
405
Not too worried
1%
1%
214
Not at all worried
2%
1%
56
Combination
Unsure
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
0%
1%
245
Unsure
5%
2%
63
No
1%
1%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
1%
1%
510
Unsure
2%
0%
85
Disapprove
1%
2%
406
Very worried
2%
2%
112
Somewhat worried
2%
1%
283
Not too worried
0%
1%
341
Not at all worried
1%
0%
258
100%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Yes
1%
1%
645
No
1%
1%
356
Approve
2%
0%
295
Unsure
1%
1%
45
Disapprove
0%
2%
306
Yes
1%
1%
628
No
1%
1%
245
2%
128
Not sure
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
4 of 4
26
3 of 4
2%
2 of 4
2%
0%
221
1 of 4
2%
0%
214
0 of 4
0%
2%
427
112
(cont.)
Page 34

May 3-6, 2015
MEIP ECONOMIC ISSUE
NEXT PRESIDENT
None
Unsure
MEIP
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
5-7 of 7
4 of 7
1%
3 of 7
TOTAL
2%
150
3%
96
3%
91
2 of 7
0%
1%
87
1 of 7
3%
2%
164
0 of 7
1%
0%
413
1%
1%
1001
Page 35

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCID HILLARY CLINTON NAME ID/C
RHRCID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
47%
48%
4%
1%
1001
Northeast
56%
41%
3%
1%
195
Midwest
45%
51%
4%
1%
181
South
46%
50%
2%
1%
235
South Central
38%
59%
3%
96
Central Plains
43%
47%
10%
83
Mountain States
42%
57%
1%
70
West
52%
42%
5%
California
54%
41%
5%
Florida
45%
51%
Texas
41%
57%
3%
New York
54%
42%
3%
1%
56
Rest of country
47%
49%
4%
0%
727
45%
53%
2%
0%
217
48%
46%
5%
1%
320
No Senate election
48%
48%
3%
1%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
44%
53%
2%
1%
405
51%
45%
5%
0%
366
49%
46%
4%
0%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
45%
51%
3%
1%
241
Other
48%
48%
4%
0%
760
Male
41%
54%
4%
1%
480
Female
54%
43%
3%
0%
521
Male / employed
39%
56%
5%
1%
324
Male / not employed
45%
50%
3%
2%
157
Female / employed
53%
43%
4%
54%
43%
3%
0%
240
Not employed
58%
38%
3%
1%
133
Employed
45%
50%
4%
0%
605
Retired
46%
50%
2%
1%
252
Refused
55%
34%
11%
18-34
56%
38%
5%
35-44
49%
47%
4%
45-64
47%
49%
3%
1%
310
65 or over
37%
59%
3%
1%
200
Unsure / refused
18%
70%
9%
3%
10
18-44
52%
43%
4%
0%
480
45-64
47%
49%
3%
1%
310
65+
37%
59%
3%
1%
200
Unsure / refused
18%
70%
9%
3%
10
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
0%
141
89
4%
58
71
281
11
1%
200
280
(cont.)
Page 36

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
43%
52%
5%
1%
302
Male / 55+
37%
58%
3%
2%
179
Female / under 55
59%
38%
3%
Female / 55+
45%
51%
3%
0%
205
White
40%
57%
3%
1%
751
82%
13%
4%
1%
120
Hispanic / Latino
61%
28%
12%
90
Other
48%
48%
4%
40
48%
51%
1%
1%
128
39%
58%
3%
1%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
80%
10%
11%

voters 35+
83%
13%
2%
65%
18%
17%
41
57%
36%
8%
49

18-34
79%
21%

35+
40%
55%
5%
White seniors
34%
62%
3%
1%
255
Other
52%
44%
4%
0%
746
White men
36%
61%
3%
1%
368
White women
44%
53%
3%
0%
382
Black men
76%
14%
8%
3%
50
Black women
87%
12%
1%
70
Hispanic men
46%
39%
15%
42
Hispanic women
73%
18%
9%
48
Republican
11%
86%
2%
0%
390
Independent
39%
51%
8%
1%
190
Democrat
84%
12%
3%
0%
420
Male / GOP
12%
85%
2%
1%
214
Female / GOP
11%
87%
2%
Male / DEM
83%
11%
5%
1%
161
Female / DEM
85%
13%
2%
0%
259
Male / IND
34%
56%
7%
2%
105
Female / IND
45%
46%
9%
85
Under 55 / GOP
14%
83%
2%
223
55 & over / GOP
7%
90%
2%
1%
168
Under 55 / DEM
84%
12%
3%
1%
269
55 & over / DEM
85%
12%
3%
0%
151
Under 55 / IND
44%
46%
9%
1%
125
55 & over / IND
29%
62%
7%
2%
65
315
24
1%
96
8
32
176
(cont.)
Page 37

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
11%
86%
3%
0%
448
Ticket splitter
35%
49%
12%
3%
61
Democrat
82%
14%
4%
1%
492
Hard GOP
9%
88%
2%
0%
360
Soft GOP
14%
82%
3%
0%
92
Ticket splitter
41%
46%
9%
4%
64
Soft DEM
66%
23%
10%
0%
84
Hard DEM
86%
11%
3%
1%
401
Conservative
25%
72%
3%
1%
536
Moderate
46%
48%
6%
Liberal
79%
16%
4%
0%
389
Very conservative
15%
81%
4%
1%
187
30%
66%
3%
1%
348
Moderate / liberal
74%
22%
4%
0%
465
Republican
11%
86%
2%
0%
390
Independent
39%
51%
8%
1%
190
Conservative DEM
74%
19%
6%
1%
103
Mod / lib DEM
88%
10%
2%
0%
318
Liberal DEM
87%
10%
3%
0%
335
72%
21%
5%
1%
157
Independent
35%
49%
12%
3%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
20%
74%
5%
1%
69
Conservative GOP
9%
89%
2%
0%
379
19%
76%
4%
1%
93
7%
91%
2%
No / unsure
54%
42%
4%
1%
840
52%
36%
10%
3%
53
45%
47%
7%
1%
227
Some college
45%
52%
2%
1%
219
College graduate
49%
49%
2%
0%
503
42%
55%
3%
1%
248
Male non-college
graduates
39%
53%
6%
1%
232
56%
43%
1%
Female non-college
graduates
51%
44%
5%
0%
266
White non-college
graduate
36%
60%
3%
1%
349
graduate
68%
20%
11%
1%
149
Others
49%
49%
2%
0%
503
Union household
55%
41%
4%
Non-union household
46%
49%
4%
Yes / strongly
Yes
76
68
254
127
1%
874
(cont.)
Page 38

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
62%
31%
5%
2%
215
Married
41%
55%
3%
0%
607
No longer married
51%
46%
3%
179
Dad
36%
59%
5%
171
Mom
58%
38%
4%
203
Married / children
44%
51%
4%
299
38%
59%
2%
Divorced / children
73%
21%
6%
22
54%
42%
4%
60
Single / children
63%
33%
5%
42
62%
31%
5%
Other / mixed
44%
54%
3%
Single women
71%
26%
3%
Married women
49%
49%
3%
304
52%
43%
5%
118
Single men
55%
36%
7%
3%
117
Married men
34%
62%
4%
1%
302
48%
51%
1%
White single men
51%
45%
2%
2%
75
White single women
56%
41%
2%
1%
46
White married men
29%
67%
3%
1%
244
White married women
42%
56%
2%
243

men
46%
53%
1%
49

women
44%
51%
5%
93
Other
69%
24%
7%
Single mothers
68%
25%
7%
30
Married mothers
55%
41%
3%
150
No longer married
mothers
61%
33%
6%
23
Non-mothers
45%
51%
4%
Upper class
56%
42%
2%
Middle class
45%
52%
2%
1%
696
Low income
52%
39%
8%
1%
205
Working class
60%
40%
Refused
45%
44%
11%
Middle class whites
37%
60%
2%
1%
551

Americans
86%
10%
1%
2%
63
66%
27%
7%
57
60%
38%
2%
25
Other
53%
40%
7%
1%
2%
308
173
97
1%
98
61
1%
1%
250
798
73
8
20
0%
305
(cont.)
Page 39

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
43%
53%
3%
0%
198
41%
56%
2%
1%
185
Mainline Protestant
38%
59%
2%
1%
280
Other
52%
43%
5%
None
66%
28%
5%
1%
262
34%
62%
2%
1%
336
41%
56%
3%
0%
157
Infrequently
55%
41%
4%
0%
191
Never
40%
56%
4%
44
38%
57%
4%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
32%
65%
2%
1%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
33%
63%
3%
1%
131
Active other
35%
65%
Other
54%
41%
4%
0%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
25%
70%
3%
2%
133
47%
48%
5%
1%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
40%
58%
2%
45
17
179
61%
36%
4%
0%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
21%
77%
2%
0%
222
66%
29%
3%
2%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
10%
88%
1%
0%
166
Christians
61%
34%
2%
3%
51
Christians
51%
43%
6%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
72%
22%
5%
39
Approve
83%
12%
4%
1%
453
Unsure
45%
35%
18%
2%
62
Disapprove
14%
84%
2%
0%
487
Jobs
65%
30%
3%
1%
135
Economy
57%
41%
2%
Health care
75%
23%
1%
Illegal immigration
26%
73%
2%
78
Foreign threats
24%
71%
5%
116
Deficit
34%
64%
2%
76
7%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
40%
52%
228
1%
1%
99
(cont.)
Page 40

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Cutting taxes
32%
60%
8%
Reducing deficit
23%
74%
2%
Creating jobs
62%
36%
2%
203
Increase wages
77%
21%
2%
132
Healthcare costs
42%
51%
5%
2%
98
Retirement
36%
49%
11%
4%
41
Higher education
66%
31%
2%
101
Regulations
11%
88%
1%
65
Combination
38%
55%
6%
None
74%
17%
9%
Unsure
13%
82%
2%
3%
12
Views close to own
48%
50%
2%
1%
352
48%
47%
5%
1%
571
Both
40%
57%
2%
Unsure
36%
49%
11%
3%
30
Very worried
30%
64%
6%
1%
318
Somewhat worried
50%
47%
2%
1%
405
Not too worried
69%
28%
3%
1%
214
46%
52%
2%
Not at all worried

Combination
Never heard
of
71
1%
0%
126
141
11
48
56
1
100%
Unsure
41%
30%
29%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
63%
32%
4%
1%
Unsure
63%
33%
3%
1%
63
No
41%
56%
4%
0%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
60%
36%
4%
1%
510
Unsure
60%
30%
9%
1%
85
Disapprove
29%
68%
2%
0%
406
Very worried
34%
58%
7%
0%
112
Somewhat worried
38%
59%
2%
1%
283
Not too worried
47%
47%
5%
1%
341
Not at all worried
63%
34%
2%
1%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
8
245
100%
Unsure
55%
40%
6%
Yes
43%
54%
3%
0%
645
No
55%
39%
5%
1%
356
Approve
70%
26%
3%
0%
295
Unsure
38%
58%
4%
Disapprove
18%
79%
2%
0%
306
45
(cont.)
Page 41

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
57%
40%
2%
0%
628
No
30%
66%
4%
1%
245
Not sure
32%
55%
11%
2%
128
4 of 4
89%
11%
3 of 4
97%
1%
2%
2 of 4
88%
9%
3%
0%
221
1 of 4
61%
33%
5%
1%
214
0 of 4
4%
91%
4%
1%
427
5-7 of 7
7%
92%
1%
0%
150
4 of 7
7%
91%
2%
96
3 of 7
25%
73%
3%
2 of 7
39%
57%
4%
1%
87
1 of 7
53%
43%
4%
0%
164
0 of 7
76%
18%
5%
1%
413
47%
48%
4%
1%
1001
26
112
91
Page 42

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBID JOE BIDEN NAME ID/C
RJOEBID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
39%
43%
12%
6%
1001
Northeast
49%
34%
12%
4%
195
Midwest
42%
42%
11%
5%
181
South
34%
48%
11%
7%
235
South Central
28%
55%
14%
3%
96
Central Plains
37%
37%
19%
7%
83
Mountain States
25%
54%
12%
10%
70
West
44%
40%
11%
5%
141
California
42%
40%
11%
6%
89
Florida
29%
52%
12%
7%
58
Texas
32%
52%
13%
3%
71
New York
58%
33%
8%
1%
56
Rest of country
38%
43%
13%
6%
727
34%
47%
12%
7%
217
39%
41%
15%
4%
320
No Senate election
40%
43%
10%
6%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
34%
47%
11%
8%
405
45%
39%
12%
3%
366
37%
44%
14%
6%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
33%
51%
10%
6%
241
Other
41%
41%
13%
5%
760
Male
34%
50%
11%
5%
480
Female
43%
37%
13%
7%
521
Male / employed
35%
50%
12%
4%
324
Male / not employed
33%
50%
10%
7%
157
Female / employed
42%
37%
16%
6%
281
44%
38%
10%
8%
240
Not employed
42%
33%
12%
13%
133
Employed
38%
44%
14%
5%
605
Retired
38%
49%
9%
4%
252
Refused
48%
35%
15%
2%
11
18-34
41%
31%
20%
8%
200
35-44
38%
44%
12%
7%
280
45-64
40%
46%
9%
5%
310
65 or over
36%
51%
9%
3%
200
Unsure / refused
29%
60%
9%
2%
10
18-44
39%
38%
15%
7%
480
45-64
40%
46%
9%
5%
310
65+
36%
51%
9%
3%
200
Unsure / refused
29%
60%
9%
2%
10
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 43

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
34%
47%
13%
5%
302
Male / 55+
34%
54%
8%
4%
179
Female / under 55
43%
33%
16%
9%
315
Female / 55+
43%
45%
9%
3%
205
White
34%
50%
11%
5%
751
65%
15%
13%
7%
120
Hispanic / Latino
41%
28%
21%
11%
90
Other
41%
47%
8%
4%
40
38%
36%
17%
10%
128
33%
53%
10%
4%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
46%
6%
37%
11%
24

voters 35+
70%
17%
6%
7%
96
42%
29%
25%
4%
41
40%
26%
17%
17%
49

18-34
63%
31%
6%

35+
36%
51%
10%
3%
32
White seniors
34%
55%
9%
3%
255
Other
40%
40%
13%
7%
746
White men
32%
55%
9%
4%
368
White women
37%
44%
14%
5%
382
Black men
52%
17%
20%
11%
50
Black women
75%
13%
7%
5%
70
Hispanic men
38%
33%
23%
5%
42
Hispanic women
43%
23%
18%
16%
48
Republican
10%
73%
14%
3%
390
Independent
34%
48%
12%
6%
190
Democrat
68%
14%
11%
7%
420
Male / GOP
11%
75%
11%
3%
214
8%
70%
18%
4%
176
Male / DEM
65%
16%
12%
7%
161
Female / DEM
69%
13%
10%
7%
259
Male / IND
34%
51%
10%
5%
105
Female / IND
34%
44%
13%
9%
85
Under 55 / GOP
9%
70%
16%
5%
223
55 & over / GOP
11%
76%
11%
2%
168
Under 55 / DEM
65%
13%
14%
8%
269
55 & over / DEM
72%
16%
6%
6%
151
Under 55 / IND
35%
44%
12%
8%
125
55 & over / IND
32%
54%
10%
3%
65
Female / GOP
(cont.)
Page 44

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
11%
74%
12%
3%
448
Ticket splitter
22%
36%
25%
17%
61
Democrat
66%
16%
11%
7%
492
Hard GOP
8%
74%
14%
3%
360
Soft GOP
16%
75%
6%
4%
92
Ticket splitter
34%
36%
19%
12%
64
Soft DEM
56%
28%
12%
4%
84
Hard DEM
68%
13%
11%
8%
401
Conservative
20%
65%
10%
5%
536
Moderate
27%
37%
23%
14%
76
Liberal
67%
15%
13%
6%
389
Very conservative
12%
72%
11%
5%
187
24%
61%
10%
4%
348
Moderate / liberal
60%
19%
14%
7%
465
Republican
10%
73%
14%
3%
390
Independent
34%
48%
12%
6%
190
Conservative DEM
50%
27%
12%
11%
103
Mod / lib DEM
73%
10%
11%
6%
318
Liberal DEM
73%
11%
11%
5%
335
50%
28%
10%
12%
157
Independent
22%
36%
25%
17%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
24%
45%
24%
7%
69
Conservative GOP
9%
79%
10%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
11%
77%
5%
7%
93
Yes
10%
86%
3%
1%
68
No / unsure
44%
36%
14%
6%
840
32%
33%
16%
19%
53
33%
42%
14%
11%
227
Some college
38%
48%
9%
5%
219
College graduate
43%
43%
12%
2%
503
37%
49%
12%
2%
248
Male non-college
graduates
31%
51%
11%
7%
232
48%
37%
13%
2%
254
Female non-college
graduates
38%
38%
14%
11%
266
White non-college
graduate
28%
52%
11%
8%
349
graduate
50%
24%
14%
12%
149
Others
43%
43%
12%
2%
503
Union household
46%
35%
11%
7%
127
Non-union household
38%
45%
12%
5%
874
(cont.)
Page 45

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
51%
27%
14%
8%
215
Married
34%
48%
13%
5%
607
No longer married
39%
46%
8%
6%
179
Dad
27%
59%
9%
5%
171
Mom
43%
32%
16%
10%
203
Married / children
35%
46%
13%
6%
299
34%
51%
12%
3%
308
Divorced / children
26%
50%
10%
14%
22
40%
42%
10%
8%
60
Single / children
43%
26%
16%
14%
42
53%
27%
14%
6%
173
Other / mixed
41%
48%
7%
4%
97
Single women
54%
23%
14%
9%
98
Married women
39%
41%
15%
5%
304
44%
41%
8%
7%
118
Single men
48%
30%
15%
6%
117
Married men
30%
56%
10%
4%
302
29%
57%
9%
6%
61
White single men
50%
35%
9%
6%
75
White single women
42%
41%
7%
10%
46
White married men
27%
61%
9%
4%
244
White married women
35%
44%
17%
5%
243

men
28%
58%
10%
4%
49

women
39%
46%
10%
5%
93
Other
53%
25%
15%
8%
250
Single mothers
42%
20%
23%
14%
30
Married mothers
44%
32%
16%
9%
150
No longer married
mothers
35%
47%
9%
9%
23
Non-mothers
38%
46%
11%
5%
798
Upper class
52%
37%
10%
1%
73
Middle class
39%
47%
9%
4%
696
Low income
34%
33%
20%
13%
205
Working class
11%
8%
54%
27%
Refused
27%
40%
31%
1%
20
Middle class whites
34%
53%
9%
4%
551

Americans
81%
13%
5%
1%
63
46%
34%
12%
8%
57
53%
35%
9%
3%
25
Other
37%
34%
19%
10%
305
(cont.)
Page 46

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
34%
49%
11%
6%
198
33%
49%
11%
7%
185
Mainline Protestant
31%
52%
13%
4%
280
Other
39%
37%
18%
5%
45
None
55%
25%
13%
7%
262
27%
53%
14%
6%
336
36%
52%
8%
4%
157
Infrequently
43%
40%
11%
6%
191
Never
28%
46%
22%
4%
44
29%
50%
15%
6%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
28%
56%
12%
4%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
26%
51%
16%
7%
131
Active other
14%
58%
17%
10%
17
Other
45%
39%
11%
5%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
21%
62%
12%
5%
133
39%
45%
11%
5%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
32%
46%
16%
6%
179
48%
33%
12%
7%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
19%
63%
14%
5%
222
50%
27%
15%
8%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
12%
75%
10%
2%
166
Christians
46%
36%
7%
11%
51
Christians
40%
25%
23%
12%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
55%
16%
26%
3%
39
Approve
73%
11%
10%
6%
453
Unsure
28%
32%
31%
10%
62
9%
75%
12%
5%
487
Jobs
53%
27%
11%
9%
135
Economy
49%
37%
9%
5%
228
Health care
49%
26%
19%
6%
99
Illegal immigration
16%
71%
7%
6%
78
Foreign threats
23%
59%
16%
2%
116
Deficit
24%
56%
17%
3%
76
7%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
Disapprove
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
36%
45%
12%
(cont.)
Page 47

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
27%
57%
9%
7%
71
Reducing deficit
17%
66%
14%
3%
126
Creating jobs
45%
34%
12%
9%
203
Increase wages
66%
21%
9%
4%
132
Healthcare costs
33%
50%
10%
7%
98
Retirement
46%
36%
9%
9%
41
Higher education
56%
21%
19%
3%
101
Regulations
16%
80%
4%
Combination
29%
47%
17%
7%
141
None
68%
11%
4%
17%
11
Unsure
15%
78%
6%
2%
12
Views close to own
43%
44%
10%
3%
352
37%
43%
13%
7%
571
Both
36%
46%
12%
6%
48
Unsure
31%
45%
21%
3%
30
Very worried
21%
60%
11%
8%
318
Somewhat worried
39%
43%
13%
6%
405
Not too worried
62%
25%
12%
2%
214
55%
34%
9%
2%
56
Not at all worried

Combination
Unsure
65
100%
8%
2%
57%
33%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
60%
27%
11%
2%
Unsure
38%
22%
25%
15%
63
No
31%
51%
12%
6%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
51%
33%
12%
4%
510
Unsure
46%
22%
12%
20%
85
Disapprove
22%
61%
13%
5%
406
Very worried
18%
59%
10%
13%
112
Somewhat worried
30%
55%
11%
5%
283
Not too worried
41%
40%
15%
5%
341
Not at all worried
56%
30%
10%
4%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
13%
Yes
41%
No
51%
36%
49%
9%
2%
645
35%
34%
18%
13%
356
Approve
68%
20%
9%
2%
295
Unsure
33%
52%
13%
2%
45
Disapprove
15%
75%
8%
2%
306
(cont.)
Page 48

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
47%
37%
11%
5%
628
No
25%
54%
13%
8%
245
Not sure
26%
52%
17%
5%
128
4 of 4
92%
3 of 4
90%
4%
7%
2 of 4
75%
12%
11%
1%
221
1 of 4
33%
31%
17%
18%
214
0 of 4
6%
79%
12%
3%
427
5-7 of 7
26
8%
112
7%
88%
5%
150
4 of 7
15%
76%
9%
96
3 of 7
18%
68%
12%
2%
91
2 of 7
25%
56%
16%
2%
87
1 of 7
48%
30%
15%
8%
164
0 of 7
60%
17%
14%
10%
413
39%
43%
12%
6%
1001
Page 49

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMID MARTIN O'MALLEY NAME ID/C
RMOMID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
5%
10%
14%
71%
1001
Northeast
11%
12%
15%
62%
195
Midwest
3%
4%
8%
85%
181
South
4%
15%
13%
68%
235
South Central
3%
5%
14%
78%
96
Central Plains
6%
10%
15%
70%
83
10%
10%
22%
57%
70
West
1%
6%
17%
75%
141
California
2%
9%
23%
67%
89
Florida
5%
23%
9%
63%
58
Texas
4%
6%
15%
75%
71
New York
8%
4%
13%
75%
56
Rest of country
6%
9%
13%
72%
727
3%
8%
13%
76%
217
8%
8%
14%
70%
320
No Senate election
5%
12%
14%
69%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
3%
9%
14%
73%
405
8%
10%
14%
69%
366
5%
9%
14%
71%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
4%
11%
14%
71%
241
Other
6%
9%
14%
71%
760
Male
5%
11%
14%
69%
480
Female
6%
8%
14%
73%
521
Male / employed
5%
9%
15%
71%
324
Male / not employed
5%
16%
14%
66%
157
Female / employed
5%
6%
16%
72%
281
6%
11%
11%
73%
240
Not employed
7%
9%
4%
80%
133
Employed
5%
7%
15%
72%
605
Retired
5%
16%
15%
64%
252
23%
77%
11
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
Mountain States
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
Refused
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
18-34
6%
6%
10%
78%
200
35-44
4%
6%
20%
71%
280
45-64
6%
13%
9%
72%
310
65 or over
6%
13%
17%
64%
200
Unsure / refused
3%
22%
13%
62%
10
18-44
5%
6%
16%
74%
480
45-64
6%
13%
9%
72%
310
65+
6%
13%
17%
64%
200
Unsure / refused
3%
22%
13%
62%
10
(cont.)
Page 50

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
4%
8%
14%
74%
302
Male / 55+
8%
16%
14%
61%
179
Female / under 55
5%
8%
13%
74%
315
Female / 55+
6%
9%
14%
71%
205
White
6%
9%
15%
71%
751
4%
16%
12%
69%
120
Hispanic / Latino
7%
7%
12%
73%
90
Other
2%
14%
9%
74%
40
6%
4%
12%
78%
128
6%
9%
15%
70%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
6%
10%
84%
24

voters 35+
3%
18%
15%
65%
96
4%
7%
13%
76%
41
9%
7%
12%
71%
49

18-34
9%
6%
9%
76%

35+
1%
16%
9%
74%
32
White seniors
8%
12%
16%
64%
255
Other
5%
9%
13%
73%
746
White men
6%
9%
15%
70%
368
White women
6%
8%
14%
72%
382
Black men
6%
20%
8%
65%
50
Black women
2%
13%
14%
71%
70
Hispanic men
4%
13%
14%
69%
42
10%
2%
11%
77%
48
Republican
4%
11%
17%
69%
390
Independent
5%
14%
10%
71%
190
Democrat
7%
7%
13%
73%
420
Male / GOP
2%
12%
18%
68%
214
Female / GOP
5%
10%
14%
71%
176
Male / DEM
9%
8%
13%
70%
161
Female / DEM
6%
6%
14%
75%
259
Male / IND
6%
14%
8%
71%
105
Female / IND
4%
13%
13%
70%
85
Under 55 / GOP
4%
7%
18%
70%
223
55 & over / GOP
2%
15%
15%
68%
168
Under 55 / DEM
4%
7%
13%
76%
269
55 & over / DEM
12%
7%
14%
66%
151
Under 55 / IND
5%
11%
9%
75%
125
55 & over / IND
5%
19%
13%
63%
65
Hispanic women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
(cont.)
Page 51

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
4%
12%
15%
69%
448
Ticket splitter
5%
7%
12%
77%
61
Democrat
7%
7%
13%
72%
492
Hard GOP
4%
11%
17%
68%
360
Soft GOP
2%
18%
6%
73%
92
Ticket splitter
6%
6%
12%
77%
64
Soft DEM
7%
9%
15%
68%
84
Hard DEM
7%
7%
13%
73%
401
Conservative
4%
12%
13%
71%
536
Moderate
4%
9%
19%
68%
76
Liberal
8%
6%
15%
72%
389
Very conservative
5%
17%
14%
64%
187
4%
9%
12%
75%
348
Moderate / liberal
7%
7%
15%
71%
465
Republican
4%
11%
17%
69%
390
Independent
5%
14%
10%
71%
190
Conservative DEM
5%
11%
11%
73%
103
Mod / lib DEM
8%
5%
14%
73%
318
Liberal DEM
8%
6%
15%
70%
335
5%
10%
9%
76%
157
Independent
5%
7%
12%
77%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
5%
6%
19%
70%
69
Conservative GOP
3%
14%
14%
69%
379
Yes / strongly
3%
22%
11%
65%
93
Yes
5%
15%
12%
69%
68
No / unsure
6%
8%
15%
72%
840
13%
8%
78%
53

6%
8%
8%
78%
227
Some college
5%
7%
13%
76%
219
College graduate
6%
11%
18%
65%
503
5%
11%
18%
65%
248
Male non-college
graduates
5%
11%
10%
74%
232
7%
11%
18%
65%
254
Female non-college
graduates
4%
6%
10%
80%
266
White non-college
graduate
5%
7%
10%
79%
349
graduate
5%
10%
11%
73%
149
Others
6%
11%
18%
65%
503
Union household
4%
7%
10%
79%
127
Non-union household
6%
10%
15%
70%
874
(cont.)
Page 52

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
5%
7%
10%
78%
215
Married
6%
10%
16%
68%
607
No longer married
5%
9%
12%
74%
179
Dad
3%
6%
19%
72%
171
Mom
5%
5%
15%
75%
203
Married / children
5%
6%
17%
72%
299
7%
14%
15%
64%
308
5%
16%
80%
22
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
4%
16%
11%
69%
60
Single / children
2%
1%
20%
78%
42
5%
9%
8%
78%
173
Other / mixed
7%
6%
12%
75%
97
Single women
5%
5%
14%
75%
98
Married women
6%
9%
13%
72%
304
6%
8%
14%
72%
118
Single men
5%
9%
7%
80%
117
Married men
6%
12%
18%
64%
302
5%
11%
9%
76%
61
White single men
5%
6%
7%
82%
75
White single women
9%
8%
13%
70%
46
White married men
6%
10%
19%
65%
244
White married women
6%
8%
15%
71%
243

men
5%
12%
10%
73%
49

women
4%
7%
14%
76%
93
Other
5%
13%
12%
71%
250
Single mothers
2%
28%
69%
30
Married mothers
7%
12%
74%
150
15%
85%
23
7%
No longer married
mothers
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Non-mothers
5%
11%
14%
70%
798
Upper class
5%
16%
11%
68%
73
Middle class
6%
10%
15%
70%
696
Low income
4%
8%
11%
77%
205
51%
49%
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
Refused
6%
3%
17%
74%
20
Middle class whites
6%
9%
16%
70%
551

Americans
4%
20%
10%
65%
63
4%
7%
12%
77%
57
3%
15%
8%
73%
25
Other
5%
9%
13%
74%
305
(cont.)
Page 53

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
5%
10%
12%
74%
198
5%
8%
12%
75%
185
Mainline Protestant
4%
14%
15%
68%
280
Other
14%
6%
23%
57%
45
None
6%
6%
16%
72%
262
4%
12%
15%
69%
336
3%
12%
11%
74%
157
Infrequently
8%
9%
13%
70%
191
Never
6%
11%
6%
76%
44
6%
9%
16%
69%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
2%
8%
15%
75%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
3%
15%
16%
65%
131
Active other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
17%
11%
10%
61%
17
Other
6%
9%
13%
72%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
3%
12%
17%
68%
133
6%
11%
13%
70%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
4%
11%
11%
74%
179
6%
7%
15%
72%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
2%
8%
14%
76%
222
6%
19%
14%
61%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
2%
10%
14%
74%
166
Christians
4%
23%
13%
59%
51
Christians
5%
4%
11%
81%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
9%
13%
15%
63%
39
Approve
8%
8%
14%
70%
453
Unsure
4%
2%
14%
80%
62
Disapprove
3%
12%
14%
71%
487
Jobs
6%
10%
13%
71%
135
Economy
7%
10%
12%
70%
228
Health care
7%
6%
20%
67%
99
Illegal immigration
2%
15%
14%
69%
78
Foreign threats
5%
8%
14%
74%
116
Deficit
2%
15%
17%
65%
76
75%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
5%
7%
13%
(cont.)
Page 54

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
3%
17%
5%
75%
71
Reducing deficit
5%
11%
10%
74%
126
Creating jobs
4%
9%
17%
70%
203
Increase wages
10%
10%
15%
65%
132
Healthcare costs
5%
4%
22%
69%
98
Retirement
7%
1%
18%
74%
41
Higher education
7%
5%
8%
80%
101
Regulations
3%
18%
19%
60%
65
Combination
5%
10%
14%
71%
141
89%
11
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
11%
Unsure
6%
17%
6%
72%
12
Views close to own
7%
10%
15%
68%
352
5%
8%
13%
74%
571
Both
3%
15%
14%
68%
48
Unsure
9%
16%
20%
56%
30
Very worried
3%
13%
11%
72%
318
Somewhat worried
4%
7%
15%
73%
405
Not too worried
10%
8%
15%
67%
214
Not at all worried
9%
13%
15%
Combination
Unsure
63%
56
100%
8%
28%
64%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
11%
7%
11%
71%
Unsure
10%
6%
19%
66%
63
No
3%
11%
15%
72%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
7%
8%
16%
70%
510
3%
8%
89%
85
13%
69%
406
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Unsure
Disapprove
5%
13%
Very worried
4%
19%
8%
69%
112
Somewhat worried
4%
11%
12%
73%
283
Not too worried
4%
7%
16%
73%
341
Not at all worried
9%
7%
16%
68%
258
100%
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
6%
31%
63%
Yes
7%
12%
16%
66%
645
No
3%
5%
11%
81%
356
Approve
10%
8%
17%
65%
295
Unsure
8%
5%
21%
67%
45
Disapprove
4%
17%
13%
66%
306
(cont.)
Page 55

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
6%
8%
15%
71%
628
No
5%
11%
11%
73%
245
Not sure
4%
14%
14%
69%
128
4 of 4
87%
8%
5%
3 of 4
7%
7%
22%
63%
112
2 of 4
6%
7%
14%
72%
221
1 of 4
1%
9%
10%
80%
214
0 of 4
2%
12%
14%
72%
427
5-7 of 7
3%
20%
18%
59%
150
4 of 7
2%
13%
16%
69%
96
3 of 7
8%
13%
17%
62%
91
2 of 7
6%
10%
17%
67%
87
1 of 7
4%
5%
11%
80%
164
0 of 7
7%
6%
12%
75%
413
5%
10%
14%
71%
1001
26
Page 56

May 3-6, 2015
REWID ELIZABETH WARREN NAME ID/C
REWID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
24%
19%
16%
40%
1001
Northeast
38%
19%
14%
29%
195
Midwest
22%
17%
18%
43%
181
South
20%
23%
16%
40%
235
South Central
21%
13%
16%
49%
96
Central Plains
17%
18%
21%
44%
83
Mountain States
14%
18%
16%
51%
70
West
27%
22%
12%
40%
141
California
30%
22%
9%
39%
89
Florida
18%
28%
18%
36%
58
Texas
26%
10%
15%
49%
71
New York
30%
21%
14%
35%
56
Rest of country
24%
19%
17%
40%
727
20%
17%
15%
48%
217
23%
20%
20%
37%
320
No Senate election
27%
20%
14%
39%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
20%
20%
17%
43%
405
30%
21%
16%
33%
366
23%
16%
13%
48%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
19%
22%
17%
42%
241
Other
26%
19%
15%
40%
760
Male
22%
24%
16%
38%
480
Female
26%
16%
16%
42%
521
Male / employed
22%
22%
17%
39%
324
Male / not employed
23%
27%
13%
37%
157
Female / employed
26%
13%
17%
44%
281
27%
18%
14%
40%
240
Not employed
24%
12%
8%
56%
133
Employed
24%
18%
17%
41%
605
Retired
27%
28%
15%
30%
252
Refused
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
6%
8%
45%
41%
11
18-34
18%
10%
16%
57%
200
35-44
23%
16%
19%
42%
280
45-64
28%
23%
12%
37%
310
65 or over
29%
27%
17%
27%
200
Unsure / refused
20%
31%
16%
33%
10
18-44
21%
13%
18%
48%
480
45-64
28%
23%
12%
37%
310
65+
29%
27%
17%
27%
200
Unsure / refused
20%
31%
16%
33%
10
(cont.)
Page 57

May 3-6, 2015
REWID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
18%
19%
17%
46%
302
Male / 55+
29%
32%
13%
26%
179
Female / under 55
26%
11%
15%
48%
315
Female / 55+
27%
22%
17%
33%
205
White
26%
21%
15%
37%
751
19%
12%
17%
52%
120
Hispanic / Latino
15%
12%
17%
56%
90
Other
25%
28%
14%
32%
40
23%
10%
16%
51%
128
27%
23%
15%
34%
623
10%
10%
80%
24
24%
12%
19%
44%
96
9%
7%
20%
65%
41
20%
17%
14%
49%
49

18-34
30%
19%
6%
46%

35+
24%
30%
16%
29%
32
White seniors
29%
29%
16%
26%
255
Other
23%
16%
16%
45%
746
White men
24%
25%
16%
36%
368
White women
29%
17%
15%
39%
382
Black men
20%
13%
13%
54%
50
Black women
19%
11%
21%
50%
70
Hispanic men
14%
20%
21%
45%
42
Hispanic women
16%
5%
13%
66%
48
Republican
11%
31%
20%
39%
390
Independent
21%
25%
13%
41%
190
Democrat
39%
7%
14%
41%
420
9%
34%
19%
37%
214
Female / GOP
12%
26%
20%
42%
176
Male / DEM
40%
6%
13%
40%
161
Female / DEM
38%
7%
14%
42%
259
Male / IND
21%
27%
12%
39%
105
Female / IND
22%
21%
13%
44%
85
Under 55 / GOP
9%
23%
19%
49%
223
55 & over / GOP
12%
41%
20%
26%
168
Under 55 / DEM
33%
6%
15%
46%
269
55 & over / DEM
49%
7%
12%
33%
151
Under 55 / IND
21%
19%
13%
47%
125
55 & over / IND
22%
36%
12%
31%
65
African American
millenials 18-34
voters 35+
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
Male / GOP
(cont.)
Page 58

May 3-6, 2015
REWID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
11%
33%
17%
39%
448
Ticket splitter
13%
15%
15%
57%
61
Democrat
39%
7%
15%
39%
492
Hard GOP
10%
31%
19%
41%
360
Soft GOP
16%
45%
12%
27%
92
Ticket splitter
10%
13%
14%
63%
64
Soft DEM
33%
9%
19%
39%
84
Hard DEM
40%
6%
14%
40%
401
Conservative
11%
30%
16%
44%
536
Moderate
20%
9%
20%
52%
76
Liberal
44%
7%
15%
34%
389
9%
38%
17%
35%
187
11%
25%
15%
48%
348
Moderate / liberal
40%
7%
16%
37%
465
Republican
11%
31%
20%
39%
390
Independent
21%
25%
13%
41%
190
9%
5%
17%
69%
103
Mod / lib DEM
48%
7%
13%
32%
318
Liberal DEM
50%
7%
14%
30%
335
14%
8%
17%
60%
157
Independent
13%
15%
15%
57%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
12%
12%
23%
53%
69
Conservative GOP
10%
37%
16%
37%
379
8%
52%
11%
29%
93
Yes
14%
37%
13%
35%
68
No / unsure
27%
14%
17%
42%
840
14%
16%
9%
61%
53
16%
15%
13%
56%
227
Some college
17%
20%
17%
45%
219
College graduate
33%
21%
17%
29%
503
29%
27%
17%
27%
248
Male non-college
graduates
16%
20%
14%
50%
232
36%
16%
17%
31%
254
Female non-college
graduates
17%
15%
15%
53%
266
White non-college
graduate
18%
19%
14%
49%
349
graduate
12%
13%
17%
59%
149
Others
33%
21%
17%
29%
503
Union household
29%
24%
17%
30%
127
Non-union household
24%
19%
16%
42%
874
Very conservative
Conservative DEM
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Yes / strongly
(cont.)
Page 59

May 3-6, 2015
REWID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
23%
11%
17%
49%
215
Married
25%
23%
16%
36%
607
No longer married
25%
17%
13%
46%
179
Dad
20%
22%
21%
37%
171
Mom
23%
10%
16%
51%
203
Married / children
24%
19%
17%
40%
299
25%
27%
16%
32%
308
5%
2%
21%
72%
22
28%
20%
8%
43%
60
Single / children
17%
3%
27%
53%
42
25%
14%
14%
47%
173
Other / mixed
27%
18%
14%
41%
97
Single women
22%
6%
21%
51%
98
Married women
29%
19%
16%
37%
304
24%
15%
11%
49%
118
Single men
25%
16%
13%
47%
117
Married men
21%
28%
17%
35%
302
25%
19%
17%
39%
61
White single men
31%
17%
13%
39%
75
White single women
36%
8%
8%
48%
46
White married men
22%
28%
17%
34%
244
White married women
29%
19%
18%
34%
243

men
24%
21%
16%
40%
49

women
24%
17%
12%
47%
93
Other
19%
15%
17%
50%
250
32%
65%
30
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
Single mothers
3%
Married mothers
30%
14%
12%
44%
150
No longer married
mothers
7%
2%
16%
76%
23
Non-mothers
25%
22%
16%
38%
798
Upper class
31%
25%
7%
36%
73
Middle class
26%
21%
16%
37%
696
Low income
17%
12%
17%
54%
205
Working class
29%
35%
35%
Refused
23%
30%
15%
33%
20
Middle class whites
28%
22%
16%
34%
551

Americans
20%
15%
21%
44%
63
14%
14%
13%
60%
57
32%
29%
6%
33%
25
Other
21%
16%
15%
48%
305
(cont.)
Page 60

May 3-6, 2015
REWID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
21%
23%
18%
39%
198
13%
27%
17%
42%
185
Mainline Protestant
20%
23%
18%
39%
280
Other
30%
14%
17%
40%
45
None
38%
8%
10%
43%
262
18%
23%
20%
39%
336
18%
32%
10%
41%
157
Infrequently
22%
19%
19%
39%
191
Never
31%
14%
18%
37%
44
21%
16%
20%
43%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
11%
30%
19%
40%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
21%
22%
22%
35%
131
Active other
22%
14%
12%
52%
17
Other
28%
18%
14%
41%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
12%
37%
14%
38%
133
26%
19%
17%
39%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
16%
18%
19%
47%
179
32%
14%
14%
40%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
16%
28%
17%
39%
222
12%
21%
15%
52%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
14%
35%
17%
34%
166
Christians
7%
27%
11%
54%
51
Christians
20%
9%
17%
55%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
18%
13%
20%
49%
39
Approve
40%
8%
15%
38%
453
Unsure
16%
4%
24%
56%
62
Disapprove
11%
32%
16%
41%
487
Jobs
29%
15%
14%
43%
135
Economy
31%
17%
10%
43%
228
Health care
34%
5%
19%
42%
99
Illegal immigration
18%
24%
15%
43%
78
Foreign threats
16%
32%
23%
29%
116
Deficit
14%
24%
16%
45%
76
40%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
21%
21%
18%
(cont.)
Page 61

May 3-6, 2015
REWID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
18%
34%
9%
38%
71
Reducing deficit
14%
23%
22%
41%
126
Creating jobs
23%
19%
19%
39%
203
Increase wages
50%
8%
8%
35%
132
Healthcare costs
18%
15%
22%
45%
98
Retirement
18%
9%
13%
60%
41
Higher education
31%
6%
13%
50%
101
Regulations
10%
53%
11%
26%
65
Combination
22%
19%
17%
42%
141
None
68%
17%
15%
11
45%
20%
35%
12
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Views close to own
33%
21%
16%
30%
352
19%
18%
16%
48%
571
Both
17%
27%
20%
35%
48
Unsure
38%
16%
11%
35%
30
Very worried
15%
29%
16%
40%
318
Somewhat worried
23%
15%
17%
45%
405
Not too worried
40%
14%
15%
31%
214
Not at all worried
28%
15%
5%
52%
56
Combination
42%
Unsure
58%
3%
5%
54%
38%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
35%
11%
11%
43%
Unsure
21%
14%
21%
45%
63
No
21%
23%
17%
39%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
33%
10%
18%
39%
510
Unsure
7%
8%
19%
67%
85
Disapprove
17%
33%
13%
37%
406
Very worried
13%
29%
17%
42%
112
Somewhat worried
14%
25%
22%
39%
283
Not too worried
28%
18%
11%
42%
341
Not at all worried
37%
11%
14%
38%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
6%
31%
63%
Yes
29%
26%
17%
28%
645
No
16%
7%
13%
64%
356
Approve
48%
10%
20%
23%
295
Unsure
17%
21%
28%
34%
45
Disapprove
12%
43%
14%
31%
306
(cont.)
Page 62

May 3-6, 2015
REWID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
32%
16%
14%
38%
628
No
11%
25%
17%
47%
245
Not sure
15%
25%
21%
39%
128
4 of 4
82%
3 of 4
90%
3%
5%
1%
112
2 of 4
24%
10%
20%
46%
221
1 of 4
16%
10%
14%
60%
214
0 of 4
8%
34%
17%
40%
427
5-7 of 7
26
18%
9%
60%
13%
18%
150
4 of 7
15%
32%
20%
34%
96
3 of 7
12%
23%
22%
43%
91
2 of 7
26%
12%
19%
43%
87
1 of 7
22%
9%
18%
51%
164
0 of 7
36%
7%
13%
45%
413
24%
19%
16%
40%
1001
Page 63

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBID JEB BUSH NAME ID/C
RJEBID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
35%
48%
11%
6%
1001
Northeast
28%
57%
12%
3%
195
Midwest
32%
48%
13%
6%
181
South
42%
44%
9%
5%
235
South Central
43%
34%
16%
7%
96
Central Plains
34%
55%
4%
7%
83
Mountain States
35%
37%
18%
10%
70
West
31%
53%
7%
10%
141
California
34%
54%
3%
8%
89
Florida
50%
39%
5%
5%
58
Texas
46%
26%
19%
9%
71
New York
35%
53%
10%
1%
56
Rest of country
33%
49%
12%
6%
727
39%
40%
13%
8%
217
31%
52%
12%
5%
320
No Senate election
36%
48%
10%
6%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
37%
42%
13%
8%
405
31%
57%
8%
4%
366
37%
44%
13%
6%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
38%
45%
11%
6%
241
Other
34%
49%
11%
6%
760
Male
40%
45%
10%
5%
480
Female
30%
51%
12%
7%
521
Male / employed
39%
46%
11%
5%
324
Male / not employed
43%
44%
8%
5%
157
Female / employed
25%
52%
16%
7%
281
36%
49%
8%
7%
240
Not employed
27%
52%
6%
14%
133
Employed
32%
49%
13%
6%
605
Retired
46%
44%
8%
1%
252
Refused
12%
56%
16%
16%
11
18-34
26%
43%
14%
17%
200
35-44
31%
52%
13%
3%
280
45-64
35%
52%
10%
3%
310
65 or over
47%
42%
7%
4%
200
Unsure / refused
53%
27%
18%
2%
10
18-44
29%
48%
14%
9%
480
45-64
35%
52%
10%
3%
310
65+
47%
42%
7%
4%
200
Unsure / refused
53%
27%
18%
2%
10
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 64

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
38%
44%
10%
7%
302
Male / 55+
43%
46%
10%
1%
179
Female / under 55
23%
54%
14%
10%
315
Female / 55+
42%
46%
9%
3%
205
White
40%
45%
11%
4%
751
16%
68%
12%
5%
120
Hispanic / Latino
27%
38%
12%
23%
90
Other
17%
70%
11%
3%
40
33%
38%
16%
12%
128
41%
46%
10%
3%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
11%
63%
6%
20%
24

voters 35+
17%
69%
13%
1%
96
17%
38%
13%
32%
41
36%
37%
12%
15%
49
6%
83%
6%
6%

35+
19%
67%
12%
2%
32
White seniors
49%
42%
7%
3%
255
Other
30%
50%
13%
7%
746
White men
44%
44%
9%
3%
368
White women
36%
46%
12%
6%
382
Black men
29%
54%
12%
5%
50
Black women
6%
78%
11%
5%
70
Hispanic men
30%
37%
11%
22%
42
Hispanic women
25%
38%
13%
24%
48
Republican
57%
26%
12%
4%
390
Independent
33%
48%
10%
9%
190
Democrat
15%
68%
11%
7%
420
Male / GOP
59%
28%
10%
4%
214
Female / GOP
55%
25%
16%
5%
176
Male / DEM
17%
66%
11%
5%
161
Female / DEM
13%
69%
11%
8%
259
Male / IND
37%
47%
9%
7%
105
Female / IND
29%
50%
10%
11%
85
Under 55 / GOP
52%
30%
13%
6%
223
55 & over / GOP
64%
22%
12%
1%
168
Under 55 / DEM
14%
65%
13%
9%
269
55 & over / DEM
16%
73%
8%
3%
151
Under 55 / IND
28%
50%
10%
12%
125
55 & over / IND
44%
44%
8%
3%
65

18-34
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
(cont.)
Page 65

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
55%
29%
12%
4%
448
Ticket splitter
33%
34%
10%
23%
61
Democrat
16%
67%
11%
6%
492
Hard GOP
58%
26%
12%
4%
360
Soft GOP
45%
38%
10%
8%
92
Ticket splitter
34%
35%
12%
19%
64
Soft DEM
25%
61%
9%
5%
84
Hard DEM
14%
69%
11%
6%
401
Conservative
49%
34%
11%
6%
536
Moderate
27%
44%
13%
17%
76
Liberal
17%
68%
11%
4%
389
Very conservative
49%
35%
9%
7%
187
49%
33%
13%
6%
348
Moderate / liberal
19%
64%
11%
6%
465
Republican
57%
26%
12%
4%
390
Independent
33%
48%
10%
9%
190
Conservative DEM
20%
54%
14%
12%
103
Mod / lib DEM
13%
72%
10%
5%
318
Liberal DEM
14%
74%
10%
3%
335
22%
53%
13%
12%
157
Independent
33%
34%
10%
23%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
39%
33%
16%
12%
69
Conservative GOP
58%
28%
11%
3%
379
Yes / strongly
38%
50%
8%
4%
93
Yes
61%
30%
5%
3%
68
No / unsure
32%
49%
12%
7%
840
38%
31%
7%
24%
53
33%
45%
10%
12%
227
Some college
35%
43%
16%
6%
219
College graduate
35%
53%
10%
2%
503
39%
49%
10%
2%
248
Male non-college
graduates
41%
41%
10%
8%
232
32%
57%
10%
1%
254
Female non-college
graduates
29%
44%
14%
13%
266
White non-college
graduate
41%
38%
13%
8%
349
graduate
20%
53%
11%
16%
149
Others
35%
53%
10%
2%
503
Union household
27%
55%
12%
5%
127
Non-union household
36%
47%
11%
6%
874
(cont.)
Page 66

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
25%
48%
12%
15%
215
Married
38%
47%
10%
4%
607
No longer married
35%
49%
13%
3%
179
Dad
41%
44%
11%
4%
171
Mom
24%
53%
14%
10%
203
Married / children
34%
51%
10%
5%
299
43%
44%
11%
3%
308
Divorced / children
10%
47%
38%
5%
22
29%
58%
10%
3%
60
Single / children
21%
35%
22%
22%
42
26%
51%
10%
13%
173
Other / mixed
44%
44%
8%
3%
97
Single women
18%
50%
14%
17%
98
Married women
32%
51%
11%
5%
304
34%
49%
14%
3%
118
Single men
31%
46%
10%
13%
117
Married men
44%
44%
10%
2%
302
37%
49%
11%
4%
61
White single men
30%
49%
14%
7%
75
White single women
34%
37%
16%
13%
46
White married men
49%
41%
8%
2%
244
White married women
36%
49%
11%
5%
243

men
39%
48%
8%
4%
49

women
38%
42%
16%
4%
93
Other
20%
57%
12%
11%
250
Single mothers
10%
35%
29%
26%
30
Married mothers
26%
57%
9%
8%
150
No longer married
mothers
25%
47%
27%
Non-mothers
38%
47%
10%
5%
798
Upper class
40%
52%
5%
3%
73
Middle class
38%
46%
12%
5%
696
Low income
26%
50%
11%
12%
205
Working class
11%
67%
22%
Refused
23%
56%
20%
2%
20
Middle class whites
42%
43%
12%
3%
551

Americans
13%
69%
13%
5%
63
30%
41%
11%
18%
57
15%
74%
9%
2%
25
Other
29%
52%
10%
10%
305
23
(cont.)
Page 67

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
38%
43%
12%
7%
198
38%
45%
11%
6%
185
Mainline Protestant
41%
44%
11%
4%
280
Other
30%
49%
14%
7%
45
None
24%
58%
10%
8%
262
38%
42%
14%
6%
336
41%
45%
7%
7%
157
Infrequently
37%
47%
11%
5%
191
Never
28%
69%
2%
1%
44
37%
41%
15%
7%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
41%
40%
12%
7%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
38%
45%
13%
4%
131
Active other
36%
26%
22%
16%
17
Other
33%
51%
10%
6%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
39%
46%
9%
6%
133
41%
45%
10%
5%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
40%
44%
11%
5%
179
25%
54%
13%
8%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
47%
38%
9%
6%
222
22%
61%
12%
5%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
54%
34%
9%
4%
166
Christians
27%
59%
11%
3%
51
Christians
25%
51%
12%
12%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
14%
65%
14%
7%
39
Approve
18%
65%
11%
6%
453
Unsure
35%
28%
14%
22%
62
Disapprove
50%
35%
11%
4%
487
Jobs
28%
59%
4%
9%
135
Economy
30%
56%
7%
7%
228
Health care
22%
55%
18%
5%
99
Illegal immigration
41%
47%
10%
2%
78
Foreign threats
51%
33%
12%
4%
116
Deficit
45%
28%
22%
5%
76
7%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
35%
45%
12%
(cont.)
Page 68

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
35%
50%
8%
6%
71
Reducing deficit
51%
34%
13%
2%
126
Creating jobs
39%
45%
9%
7%
203
Increase wages
11%
69%
12%
8%
132
Healthcare costs
46%
43%
7%
4%
98
Retirement
30%
47%
15%
7%
41
Higher education
20%
56%
11%
13%
101
Regulations
43%
52%
5%
Combination
35%
42%
18%
5%
141
None
34%
47%
2%
17%
11
Unsure
62%
24%
11%
2%
12
Views close to own
26%
61%
9%
4%
352
41%
40%
12%
8%
571
Both
36%
50%
12%
2%
48
Unsure
24%
44%
24%
9%
30
Very worried
38%
45%
10%
7%
318
Somewhat worried
33%
48%
12%
7%
405
Not too worried
34%
52%
11%
3%
214
Not at all worried
33%
53%
9%
5%
56
Combination
65
100%
Unsure
33%
8%
35%
24%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
30%
50%
14%
5%
245
Unsure
28%
43%
16%
13%
63
No
37%
47%
10%
6%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
29%
55%
13%
4%
510
Unsure
20%
43%
15%
22%
85
Disapprove
46%
40%
8%
6%
406
Very worried
42%
40%
9%
10%
112
Somewhat worried
40%
39%
15%
6%
283
Not too worried
34%
52%
10%
4%
341
Not at all worried
27%
57%
9%
7%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
45%
19%
36%
Yes
38%
52%
9%
2%
645
No
30%
40%
16%
14%
356
Approve
26%
64%
9%
1%
295
Unsure
33%
55%
12%
Disapprove
49%
40%
8%
3%
306
45
(cont.)
Page 69

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
31%
54%
9%
5%
628
No
40%
42%
11%
7%
245
Not sure
43%
27%
21%
8%
128
4 of 4
23%
69%
8%
3 of 4
11%
79%
8%
2%
112
2 of 4
23%
64%
10%
3%
221
1 of 4
27%
46%
11%
15%
214
0 of 4
52%
31%
13%
5%
427
5-7 of 7
72%
20%
8%
150
4 of 7
65%
27%
8%
96
3 of 7
53%
37%
10%
91
2 of 7
49%
34%
13%
4%
87
1 of 7
32%
44%
15%
9%
164
9%
70%
11%
10%
413
35%
48%
11%
6%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
26
Page 70

May 3-6, 2015
RTCID TED CRUZ NAME ID/C
RTCID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
25%
33%
16%
26%
1001
Northeast
18%
41%
20%
21%
195
Midwest
25%
29%
14%
32%
181
South
27%
27%
17%
29%
235
South Central
41%
34%
14%
11%
96
Central Plains
23%
27%
14%
36%
83
Mountain States
24%
28%
18%
30%
70
West
20%
43%
12%
25%
141
California
24%
45%
9%
22%
89
Florida
34%
26%
7%
33%
58
Texas
42%
38%
9%
11%
71
New York
17%
40%
18%
25%
56
Rest of country
23%
31%
18%
28%
727
30%
27%
15%
27%
217
24%
35%
18%
23%
320
No Senate election
23%
34%
15%
28%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
28%
28%
13%
30%
405
20%
42%
17%
22%
366
25%
28%
20%
26%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
25%
29%
18%
28%
241
Other
25%
34%
15%
26%
760
Male
28%
36%
15%
21%
480
Female
21%
31%
17%
31%
521
Male / employed
28%
37%
15%
21%
324
Male / not employed
30%
33%
15%
21%
157
Female / employed
18%
31%
17%
34%
281
25%
30%
17%
28%
240
Not employed
21%
27%
15%
38%
133
Employed
23%
34%
16%
27%
605
Retired
32%
34%
16%
18%
252
Refused
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
5%
21%
26%
47%
11
18-34
14%
25%
23%
37%
200
35-44
26%
34%
16%
25%
280
45-64
24%
38%
12%
26%
310
65 or over
34%
33%
16%
18%
200
Unsure / refused
42%
31%
10%
17%
10
18-44
21%
30%
19%
30%
480
45-64
24%
38%
12%
26%
310
65+
34%
33%
16%
18%
200
Unsure / refused
42%
31%
10%
17%
10
(cont.)
Page 71

May 3-6, 2015
RTCID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
25%
35%
16%
24%
302
Male / 55+
34%
37%
13%
16%
179
Female / under 55
18%
29%
18%
36%
315
Female / 55+
26%
34%
15%
24%
205
White
28%
32%
16%
24%
751
13%
37%
15%
35%
120
Hispanic / Latino
12%
35%
15%
37%
90
Other
29%
30%
22%
20%
40
19%
26%
21%
34%
128
30%
34%
15%
22%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
10%
10%
46%
34%
24

voters 35+
13%
44%
8%
35%
96
31%
16%
53%
41
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
22%
38%
15%
24%
49

18-34
21%
30%
28%
21%

35+
31%
30%
20%
19%
32
White seniors
32%
34%
17%
17%
255
Other
22%
33%
16%
29%
746
White men
31%
37%
14%
18%
368
White women
24%
28%
18%
30%
382
Black men
15%
34%
12%
39%
50
Black women
11%
40%
18%
31%
70
Hispanic men
16%
38%
20%
25%
42
9%
32%
11%
48%
48
Republican
45%
15%
20%
21%
390
Independent
26%
31%
14%
29%
190
Hispanic women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
5%
52%
13%
30%
420
Male / GOP
48%
18%
18%
16%
214
Female / GOP
42%
10%
21%
27%
176
Male / DEM
3%
61%
11%
25%
161
Female / DEM
6%
46%
15%
34%
259
Male / IND
27%
33%
14%
25%
105
Female / IND
25%
28%
14%
33%
85
Under 55 / GOP
40%
15%
20%
25%
223
55 & over / GOP
52%
14%
18%
15%
168
Under 55 / DEM
5%
47%
15%
32%
269
55 & over / DEM
4%
59%
10%
27%
151
Under 55 / IND
22%
28%
15%
34%
125
55 & over / IND
33%
35%
13%
18%
65
(cont.)
Page 72

May 3-6, 2015
RTCID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
47%
15%
18%
20%
448
Ticket splitter
11%
21%
19%
49%
61
Democrat
6%
51%
14%
29%
492
Hard GOP
47%
14%
19%
20%
360
Soft GOP
51%
15%
13%
21%
92
Ticket splitter
9%
37%
14%
40%
64
Soft DEM
6%
44%
18%
32%
84
Hard DEM
5%
52%
13%
30%
401
Conservative
41%
18%
15%
26%
536
Moderate
6%
27%
33%
34%
76
Liberal
6%
56%
13%
25%
389
Very conservative
55%
15%
13%
17%
187
34%
19%
17%
30%
348
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
6%
51%
17%
27%
465
Republican
45%
15%
20%
21%
390
Independent
26%
31%
14%
29%
190
Conservative DEM
8%
24%
15%
52%
103
Mod / lib DEM
4%
60%
13%
23%
318
Liberal DEM
4%
62%
11%
23%
335
9%
28%
20%
43%
157
Independent
11%
21%
19%
49%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
15%
15%
33%
36%
69
Conservative GOP
53%
15%
15%
17%
379
Yes / strongly
67%
6%
8%
19%
93
Yes
61%
11%
15%
14%
68
No / unsure
17%
38%
17%
28%
840
23%
11%
13%
52%
53
23%
19%
17%
41%
227
Some college
26%
31%
19%
25%
219
College graduate
25%
43%
15%
17%
503
30%
44%
13%
12%
248
Male non-college
graduates
27%
27%
17%
30%
232
20%
41%
16%
22%
254
Female non-college
graduates
22%
21%
18%
40%
266
White non-college
graduate
29%
22%
16%
33%
349
graduate
12%
26%
21%
41%
149
Others
25%
43%
15%
17%
503
Union household
21%
41%
15%
23%
127
Non-union household
25%
32%
16%
27%
874
(cont.)
Page 73

May 3-6, 2015
RTCID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
14%
39%
18%
30%
215
Married
30%
33%
15%
22%
607
No longer married
20%
28%
17%
35%
179
Dad
36%
30%
18%
16%
171
Mom
19%
21%
19%
42%
203
Married / children
29%
28%
16%
27%
299
30%
37%
15%
18%
308
5%
7%
40%
48%
22
18%
34%
13%
34%
60
Single / children
21%
12%
27%
39%
42
12%
45%
15%
28%
173
Other / mixed
25%
29%
14%
32%
97
Single women
11%
31%
24%
34%
98
Married women
25%
32%
14%
29%
304
20%
27%
18%
34%
118
Single men
16%
45%
13%
26%
117
Married men
35%
33%
16%
16%
302
21%
29%
14%
37%
61
White single men
21%
53%
10%
16%
75
White single women
16%
33%
19%
32%
46
White married men
36%
33%
15%
15%
244
White married women
27%
31%
15%
27%
243

men
23%
29%
14%
34%
49

women
23%
20%
22%
35%
93
Other
15%
35%
16%
33%
250
Single mothers
17%
3%
35%
44%
30
Married mothers
21%
26%
13%
40%
150
No longer married
mothers
7%
10%
33%
50%
23
Non-mothers
26%
36%
15%
22%
798
Upper class
23%
55%
8%
14%
73
Middle class
28%
33%
15%
24%
696
Low income
15%
25%
21%
39%
205
3%
40%
57%
Refused
17%
43%
20%
20%
20
Middle class whites
31%
32%
15%
22%
551

Americans
17%
40%
15%
28%
63
13%
36%
14%
37%
57
26%
40%
16%
18%
25
Other
17%
34%
18%
32%
305
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
(cont.)
Page 74

May 3-6, 2015
RTCID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
26%
31%
15%
29%
198
36%
19%
18%
27%
185
Mainline Protestant
32%
30%
17%
21%
280
Other
20%
42%
13%
25%
45
None
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
9%
45%
16%
30%
262
36%
23%
17%
24%
336
32%
26%
16%
26%
157
Infrequently
20%
40%
15%
25%
191
Never
25%
36%
14%
26%
44
25%
30%
18%
27%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
42%
21%
17%
20%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
37%
21%
18%
24%
131
Active other
40%
15%
18%
26%
17
Other
19%
38%
15%
27%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
44%
20%
12%
24%
133
23%
42%
16%
20%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
27%
20%
22%
31%
179
18%
36%
14%
31%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
41%
13%
19%
27%
222
18%
37%
14%
30%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
51%
10%
17%
22%
166
Christians
24%
30%
14%
33%
51
Christians
8%
23%
25%
43%
55
12%
46%
15%
28%
39
Approve
7%
54%
13%
27%
453
Unsure
7%
17%
24%
52%
62
Disapprove
43%
16%
18%
23%
487
Jobs
18%
41%
8%
33%
135
Economy
18%
47%
9%
26%
228
Health care
13%
43%
16%
28%
99
Illegal immigration
39%
20%
20%
21%
78
Foreign threats
39%
13%
23%
25%
116
Deficit
30%
23%
23%
24%
76
25%
268
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
26%
29%
20%
(cont.)
Page 75

May 3-6, 2015
RTCID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
43%
17%
7%
32%
71
Reducing deficit
44%
18%
18%
21%
126
Creating jobs
19%
39%
15%
27%
203
Increase wages
3%
62%
11%
24%
132
Healthcare costs
24%
29%
21%
27%
98
Retirement
10%
14%
26%
50%
41
Higher education
11%
43%
18%
28%
101
Regulations
56%
14%
18%
12%
65
Combination
26%
31%
17%
26%
141
9%
53%
8%
30%
11
Unsure
52%
3%
20%
25%
12
Views close to own
30%
40%
10%
20%
352
21%
29%
19%
30%
571
Both
25%
33%
18%
24%
48
Unsure
29%
23%
23%
26%
30
Very worried
38%
19%
14%
29%
318
Somewhat worried
21%
32%
18%
28%
405
Not too worried
15%
54%
14%
17%
214
Not at all worried
13%
45%
12%
30%
56
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Combination
100%
Unsure
3%
87%
10%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
15%
47%
7%
30%
Unsure
14%
30%
24%
32%
63
No
29%
29%
18%
24%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
14%
43%
16%
27%
510
Unsure
8%
23%
26%
42%
85
Disapprove
41%
23%
13%
22%
406
Very worried
34%
19%
12%
35%
112
Somewhat worried
37%
21%
17%
24%
283
Not too worried
19%
35%
18%
28%
341
Not at all worried
14%
50%
13%
23%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
19%
66%
15%
Yes
30%
42%
14%
13%
645
No
14%
17%
19%
50%
356
Approve
7%
69%
11%
12%
295
Unsure
26%
30%
12%
33%
45
Disapprove
53%
18%
17%
11%
306
(cont.)
Page 76

May 3-6, 2015
RTCID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
18%
43%
13%
25%
628
No
32%
17%
19%
32%
245
Not sure
41%
15%
23%
21%
128
4 of 4
8%
87%
5%
3 of 4
3%
88%
6%
3%
112
2 of 4
5%
47%
15%
32%
221
1 of 4
14%
21%
17%
48%
214
0 of 4
47%
14%
19%
20%
427
5-7 of 7
78%
11%
8%
4%
150
4 of 7
48%
22%
19%
11%
96
3 of 7
49%
14%
22%
15%
91
2 of 7
18%
28%
27%
27%
87
1 of 7
10%
32%
19%
39%
164
2%
49%
13%
35%
413
25%
33%
16%
26%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
26
Page 77

May 3-6, 2015
RSWID SCOTT WALKER NAME ID/C
RSWID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
22%
19%
12%
47%
1001
Northeast
14%
27%
17%
41%
195
Midwest
24%
22%
9%
46%
181
South
26%
14%
10%
51%
235
South Central
20%
15%
10%
56%
96
Central Plains
22%
21%
20%
37%
83
Mountain States
26%
15%
6%
53%
70
West
20%
17%
14%
48%
141
California
23%
17%
13%
48%
89
Florida
38%
17%
6%
40%
58
Texas
15%
16%
12%
57%
71
New York
13%
29%
15%
44%
56
Rest of country
22%
19%
13%
47%
727
19%
13%
10%
58%
217
25%
19%
15%
41%
320
No Senate election
21%
22%
11%
46%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
25%
17%
11%
47%
405
19%
24%
15%
41%
366
19%
15%
11%
55%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
28%
19%
11%
42%
241
Other
20%
19%
13%
49%
760
Male
28%
17%
13%
41%
480
Female
16%
20%
12%
52%
521
Male / employed
28%
18%
14%
40%
324
Male / not employed
27%
17%
12%
43%
157
Female / employed
13%
21%
12%
54%
281
19%
20%
11%
50%
240
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Not employed
9%
17%
8%
66%
133
Employed
21%
19%
13%
47%
605
Retired
30%
20%
14%
36%
252
Refused
7%
4%
13%
76%
11
18-34
8%
15%
14%
63%
200
35-44
19%
17%
14%
50%
280
45-64
24%
21%
9%
45%
310
65 or over
34%
22%
13%
31%
200
Unsure / refused
48%
9%
16%
27%
10
18-44
15%
16%
14%
55%
480
45-64
24%
21%
9%
45%
310
65+
34%
22%
13%
31%
200
Unsure / refused
48%
9%
16%
27%
10
(cont.)
Page 78

May 3-6, 2015
RSWID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
22%
15%
13%
50%
302
Male / 55+
38%
21%
13%
28%
179
Female / under 55
10%
19%
13%
58%
315
Female / 55+
25%
22%
10%
43%
205
White
25%
19%
14%
42%
751
7%
22%
6%
66%
120
Hispanic / Latino
12%
17%
10%
61%
90
Other
20%
13%
13%
54%
40
10%
18%
15%
58%
128
29%
19%
13%
39%
623
10%
16%
74%
24
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C

voters 35+
9%
25%
3%
64%
96
3%
14%
10%
74%
41
19%
20%
11%
50%
49

18-34
29%
6%
15%
51%

35+
17%
15%
13%
54%
32
White seniors
34%
24%
11%
30%
255
Other
17%
17%
13%
53%
746
White men
32%
18%
14%
36%
368
White women
19%
20%
13%
48%
382
Black men
13%
13%
5%
69%
50
Black women
2%
28%
7%
63%
70
Hispanic men
13%
19%
17%
51%
42
Hispanic women
10%
16%
4%
70%
48
Republican
39%
6%
13%
42%
390
Independent
26%
14%
10%
50%
190
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
3%
34%
13%
50%
420
Male / GOP
46%
6%
15%
33%
214
Female / GOP
31%
5%
10%
54%
176
Male / DEM
4%
35%
13%
48%
161
Female / DEM
13%
51%
259
3%
33%
Male / IND
28%
14%
9%
48%
105
Female / IND
23%
14%
12%
52%
85
Under 55 / GOP
29%
6%
13%
52%
223
55 & over / GOP
54%
4%
12%
30%
168
Under 55 / DEM
4%
29%
14%
54%
269
55 & over / DEM
2%
43%
11%
43%
151
Under 55 / IND
18%
12%
11%
58%
125
55 & over / IND
40%
18%
9%
34%
65
(cont.)
Page 79

May 3-6, 2015
RSWID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
42%
5%
11%
42%
448
Ticket splitter
7%
10%
15%
68%
61
Democrat
5%
33%
13%
49%
492
Hard GOP
41%
5%
12%
42%
360
Soft GOP
43%
4%
11%
41%
92
Ticket splitter
14%
11%
9%
67%
64
Soft DEM
10%
24%
14%
52%
84
Hard DEM
3%
35%
13%
49%
401
Republican
Conservative
36%
7%
10%
47%
536
Moderate
8%
17%
17%
58%
76
Liberal
4%
37%
15%
45%
389
Very conservative
50%
5%
8%
37%
187
29%
8%
11%
53%
348
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
5%
33%
15%
47%
465
Republican
39%
6%
13%
42%
390
Independent
26%
14%
10%
50%
190
Conservative DEM
6%
13%
8%
73%
103
Mod / lib DEM
3%
40%
14%
43%
318
Liberal DEM
3%
41%
16%
40%
335
10%
14%
8%
68%
157
7%
10%
15%
68%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
12%
7%
18%
63%
69
Conservative GOP
47%
5%
10%
38%
379
Yes / strongly
62%
2%
8%
27%
93
Yes
53%
2%
6%
39%
68
No / unsure
15%
22%
13%
50%
840
17%
7%
16%
60%
53
18%
10%
9%
63%
227
Some college
24%
19%
10%
47%
219
College graduate
23%
24%
14%
39%
503
32%
22%
15%
31%
248
Male non-college
graduates
24%
12%
11%
53%
232
13%
27%
14%
46%
254
Female non-college
graduates
18%
15%
9%
58%
266
White non-college
graduate
25%
13%
10%
52%
349
graduate
10%
15%
11%
64%
149
Others
23%
24%
14%
39%
503
Union household
20%
27%
16%
37%
127
Non-union household
22%
18%
12%
48%
874

Independent
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
(cont.)
Page 80

May 3-6, 2015
RSWID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
11%
20%
10%
60%
215
Married
26%
19%
14%
41%
607
No longer married
19%
18%
11%
51%
179
Dad
28%
12%
17%
43%
171
Mom
10%
19%
13%
59%
203
Married / children
21%
17%
16%
46%
299
31%
21%
11%
36%
308
8%
10%
11%
72%
22
22%
22%
6%
50%
60
7%
14%
10%
70%
42
12%
21%
10%
58%
173
Other / mixed
20%
18%
15%
47%
97
Single women
5%
21%
10%
64%
98
Married women
20%
21%
13%
46%
304
14%
19%
10%
57%
118
Single men
15%
19%
10%
56%
117
Married men
33%
17%
14%
36%
302
28%
18%
13%
41%
61
White single men
17%
24%
13%
46%
75
White single women
10%
26%
5%
60%
46
White married men
37%
17%
14%
32%
244
White married women
22%
20%
15%
43%
243

men
32%
16%
13%
39%
49

women
16%
17%
13%
53%
93
Other
11%
19%
9%
62%
250
Single mothers
2%
20%
11%
67%
30
Married mothers
13%
20%
14%
54%
150
No longer married
mothers
3%
9%
10%
78%
23
Non-mothers
25%
19%
12%
44%
798
Upper class
28%
35%
7%
29%
73
Middle class
24%
18%
13%
45%
696
Low income
12%
14%
15%
60%
205
3%
57%
40%
Refused
16%
29%
3%
51%
20
Middle class whites
28%
18%
14%
40%
551

Americans
9%
20%
9%
61%
63
8%
19%
7%
66%
57
18%
13%
13%
57%
25
Other
16%
21%
12%
51%
305
Divorced / children
Single / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
(cont.)
Page 81

May 3-6, 2015
RSWID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
27%
18%
11%
44%
198
27%
8%
13%
52%
185
Mainline Protestant
27%
15%
13%
45%
280
Other
17%
27%
11%
45%
45
None
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
8%
31%
13%
49%
262
28%
13%
11%
47%
336
28%
12%
13%
47%
157
Infrequently
20%
20%
14%
45%
191
Never
26%
20%
10%
44%
44
22%
24%
8%
46%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
33%
7%
12%
48%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
28%
11%
15%
46%
131
Active other
29%
15%
56%
17
Other
18%
22%
13%
47%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
41%
7%
10%
41%
133
23%
21%
14%
41%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
19%
12%
9%
60%
179
14%
25%
13%
48%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
35%
6%
12%
48%
222
12%
22%
3%
63%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
45%
4%
11%
40%
166
Christians
20%
11%
3%
66%
51
Christians
5%
9%
16%
70%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
3%
36%
2%
59%
39
Approve
5%
35%
14%
47%
453
Unsure
10%
12%
15%
64%
62
Disapprove
39%
5%
11%
45%
487
Jobs
13%
30%
14%
43%
135
Economy
18%
25%
10%
48%
228
5%
24%
16%
56%
99
Illegal immigration
39%
7%
6%
49%
78
Foreign threats
38%
9%
18%
36%
116
Deficit
36%
10%
12%
42%
76
51%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Health care
Other
19%
18%
12%
(cont.)
Page 82

May 3-6, 2015
RSWID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
43%
5%
7%
46%
71
Reducing deficit
37%
8%
16%
39%
126
Creating jobs
18%
20%
15%
47%
203
Increase wages
3%
49%
11%
36%
132
Healthcare costs
18%
14%
15%
53%
98
Retirement
9%
20%
9%
62%
41
Higher education
5%
21%
11%
63%
101
Regulations
58%
6%
5%
31%
65
Combination
21%
16%
13%
50%
141
None
12%
12%
6%
70%
11
Unsure
40%
1%
11%
48%
12
Views close to own
25%
25%
12%
38%
352
20%
15%
11%
54%
571
Both
18%
24%
22%
36%
48
Unsure
11%
13%
28%
47%
30
Very worried
31%
8%
11%
51%
318
Somewhat worried
19%
20%
12%
50%
405
Not too worried
17%
31%
17%
34%
214
Not at all worried
11%
33%
7%
48%
56
58%
Combination
42%
Unsure
8%
30%
62%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
14%
27%
11%
48%
Unsure
13%
18%
25%
44%
63
No
25%
16%
12%
47%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
13%
28%
13%
47%
510
Unsure
5%
9%
16%
70%
85
Disapprove
36%
11%
11%
43%
406
Very worried
28%
8%
7%
57%
112
Somewhat worried
31%
11%
12%
47%
283
Not too worried
20%
19%
14%
46%
341
Not at all worried
11%
33%
12%
44%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
6%
31%
63%
Yes
29%
24%
13%
34%
645
No
9%
10%
11%
70%
356
Approve
9%
43%
16%
32%
295
Unsure
24%
18%
12%
46%
45
Disapprove
48%
7%
11%
35%
306
(cont.)
Page 83

May 3-6, 2015
RSWID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
17%
26%
12%
45%
628
No
29%
4%
13%
54%
245
Not sure
33%
11%
13%
43%
128
4 of 4
8%
84%
5%
3%
26
3 of 4
5%
65%
15%
15%
112
2 of 4
5%
23%
11%
62%
221
1 of 4
12%
13%
16%
59%
214
0 of 4
41%
4%
11%
44%
427
5-7 of 7
79%
2%
7%
12%
150
4 of 7
43%
6%
8%
43%
96
3 of 7
29%
15%
15%
42%
91
2 of 7
13%
12%
19%
57%
87
1 of 7
5%
16%
13%
65%
164
3%
32%
13%
52%
413
22%
19%
12%
47%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Page 84

May 3-6, 2015
RMRID MARCO RUBIO NAME ID/C
RMRID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
31%
30%
13%
26%
1001
Northeast
24%
39%
14%
23%
195
Midwest
29%
28%
14%
30%
181
South
38%
24%
12%
26%
235
South Central
33%
30%
18%
19%
96
Central Plains
28%
28%
17%
28%
83
Mountain States
36%
22%
12%
31%
70
West
31%
35%
10%
25%
141
California
34%
34%
9%
23%
89
Florida
55%
29%
4%
12%
58
Texas
26%
35%
21%
18%
71
New York
23%
40%
14%
23%
56
Rest of country
30%
28%
14%
28%
727
27%
25%
18%
30%
217
31%
32%
13%
24%
320
No Senate election
33%
30%
12%
25%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
34%
27%
14%
25%
405
28%
38%
13%
22%
366
31%
22%
14%
33%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
38%
26%
10%
26%
241
Other
29%
31%
15%
26%
760
Male
38%
29%
14%
19%
480
Female
24%
30%
13%
32%
521
Male / employed
38%
29%
14%
19%
324
Male / not employed
37%
30%
13%
20%
157
Female / employed
22%
30%
14%
34%
281
27%
31%
12%
30%
240
Not employed
20%
30%
8%
42%
133
Employed
31%
30%
14%
26%
605
Retired
38%
31%
13%
18%
252
Refused
16%
18%
54%
12%
11
18-34
21%
23%
20%
37%
200
35-44
28%
29%
15%
27%
280
45-64
34%
36%
8%
22%
310
65 or over
39%
30%
13%
18%
200
Unsure / refused
54%
15%
8%
23%
10
18-44
25%
27%
17%
31%
480
45-64
34%
36%
8%
22%
310
65+
39%
30%
13%
18%
200
Unsure / refused
54%
15%
8%
23%
10
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 85

May 3-6, 2015
RMRID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
34%
28%
16%
22%
302
Male / 55+
45%
31%
10%
13%
179
Female / under 55
19%
29%
16%
36%
315
Female / 55+
33%
32%
9%
26%
205
White
35%
28%
14%
23%
751
8%
44%
7%
42%
120
Hispanic / Latino
25%
31%
15%
29%
90
Other
39%
25%
20%
16%
40
25%
23%
22%
31%
128
37%
29%
12%
22%
623
20%
6%
74%
24
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C

voters 35+
10%
50%
7%
33%
96
16%
24%
21%
39%
41
33%
37%
9%
21%
49

18-34
44%
15%
35%
6%

35+
37%
28%
17%
18%
32
White seniors
43%
30%
11%
15%
255
Other
27%
30%
14%
29%
746
White men
41%
29%
15%
15%
368
White women
29%
27%
13%
31%
382
Black men
16%
39%
2%
43%
50
Black women
2%
48%
10%
40%
70
Hispanic men
30%
31%
20%
20%
42
Hispanic women
21%
31%
10%
38%
48
Republican
56%
10%
16%
17%
390
Independent
34%
23%
10%
33%
190
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
6%
51%
12%
30%
420
Male / GOP
61%
11%
16%
11%
214
Female / GOP
50%
9%
17%
25%
176
Male / DEM
6%
56%
14%
23%
161
Female / DEM
11%
35%
259
6%
48%
Male / IND
39%
24%
9%
28%
105
Female / IND
27%
22%
11%
40%
85
Under 55 / GOP
49%
10%
20%
20%
223
55 & over / GOP
65%
10%
11%
13%
168
Under 55 / DEM
6%
48%
14%
32%
269
55 & over / DEM
6%
57%
10%
27%
151
Under 55 / IND
27%
20%
12%
40%
125
55 & over / IND
47%
28%
6%
20%
65
(cont.)
Page 86

May 3-6, 2015
RMRID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
57%
11%
15%
18%
448
Ticket splitter
23%
19%
17%
41%
61
Democrat
8%
49%
12%
31%
492
Hard GOP
57%
11%
16%
17%
360
Soft GOP
58%
10%
12%
20%
92
Ticket splitter
27%
18%
15%
41%
64
Soft DEM
15%
33%
16%
36%
84
Hard DEM
5%
53%
11%
30%
401
Conservative
49%
15%
12%
25%
536
Moderate
23%
20%
21%
36%
76
8%
53%
14%
25%
389
Very conservative
57%
14%
10%
19%
187
45%
15%
12%
28%
348
Moderate / liberal
10%
47%
16%
27%
465
Republican
56%
10%
16%
17%
390
Independent
34%
23%
10%
33%
190
Conservative DEM
11%
30%
9%
50%
103
5%
58%
13%
24%
318
Liberal
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Mod / lib DEM

PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Liberal DEM
6%
58%
12%
23%
335
13%
28%
12%
47%
157
Independent
23%
19%
17%
41%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
25%
11%
30%
34%
69
Conservative GOP
63%
11%
12%
15%
379
Yes / strongly
67%
13%
5%
15%
93
Yes
67%
11%
8%
14%
68
No / unsure
24%
33%
15%
28%
840
27%
12%
7%
53%
53
24%
23%
14%
39%
227
Some college
32%
29%
13%
26%
219
College graduate
34%
35%
14%
17%
503
42%
33%
14%
11%
248
Male non-college
graduates
34%
25%
13%
28%
232
26%
37%
14%
23%
254
Female non-college
graduates
23%
24%
12%
41%
266
White non-college
graduate
34%
22%
12%
32%
349
graduate
15%
31%
14%
41%
149
Others
34%
35%
14%
17%
503
Union household
25%
39%
18%
18%
127
Non-union household
32%
29%
13%
27%
874
(cont.)
Page 87

May 3-6, 2015
RMRID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
18%
38%
15%
29%
215
Married
36%
27%
14%
23%
607
No longer married
28%
28%
11%
32%
179
Dad
47%
25%
15%
13%
171
Mom
22%
28%
15%
35%
203
Married / children
37%
26%
15%
22%
299
36%
29%
12%
23%
308
Divorced / children
22%
17%
16%
45%
22
29%
34%
10%
27%
60
Single / children
11%
40%
18%
31%
42
19%
38%
14%
29%
173
Other / mixed
29%
28%
11%
32%
97
Single women
14%
36%
14%
36%
98
Married women
28%
30%
13%
30%
304
24%
29%
13%
35%
118
Single men
21%
41%
15%
24%
117
Married men
45%
25%
14%
16%
302
37%
28%
8%
27%
61
White single men
22%
45%
17%
17%
75
White single women
23%
28%
15%
34%
46
White married men
48%
23%
15%
14%
244
White married women
30%
28%
13%
28%
243

men
38%
30%
8%
23%
49

women
28%
24%
13%
36%
93
Other
19%
36%
12%
33%
250
Single mothers
9%
32%
18%
40%
30
Married mothers
25%
28%
14%
33%
150
No longer married
mothers
21%
19%
19%
41%
23
Non-mothers
33%
30%
13%
23%
798
Upper class
32%
43%
6%
18%
73
Middle class
35%
30%
14%
21%
696
Low income
17%
25%
15%
44%
205
3%
40%
57%
Refused
33%
26%
17%
24%
20
Middle class whites
39%
27%
14%
20%
551

Americans
9%
51%
12%
28%
63
31%
33%
12%
24%
57
36%
31%
19%
14%
25
Other
21%
29%
12%
37%
305
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
(cont.)
Page 88

May 3-6, 2015
RMRID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
40%
25%
10%
26%
198
36%
23%
12%
28%
185
Mainline Protestant
34%
24%
18%
25%
280
Other
41%
33%
6%
21%
45
None
16%
43%
14%
26%
262
40%
22%
13%
25%
336
38%
21%
17%
24%
157
Infrequently
29%
32%
12%
26%
191
Never
35%
35%
7%
23%
44
41%
25%
12%
22%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
43%
19%
11%
26%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
33%
22%
17%
28%
131
Active other
64%
15%
1%
20%
17
Other
27%
34%
14%
26%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
48%
20%
12%
20%
133
34%
33%
14%
19%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
30%
21%
15%
34%
179
21%
36%
12%
31%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
44%
13%
17%
26%
222
22%
37%
7%
34%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
56%
11%
13%
20%
166
Christians
30%
29%
4%
37%
51
Christians
10%
18%
28%
43%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
11%
48%
10%
31%
39
Approve
10%
51%
12%
26%
453
Unsure
17%
16%
16%
51%
62
Disapprove
52%
12%
14%
22%
487
Jobs
17%
42%
10%
32%
135
Economy
29%
34%
11%
26%
228
Health care
14%
39%
21%
26%
99
Illegal immigration
44%
26%
11%
19%
78
Foreign threats
50%
13%
17%
20%
116
Deficit
43%
13%
16%
28%
76
26%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
31%
31%
13%
(cont.)
Page 89

May 3-6, 2015
RMRID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
50%
13%
15%
22%
71
Reducing deficit
46%
19%
14%
21%
126
Creating jobs
28%
34%
12%
26%
203
Increase wages
9%
56%
7%
28%
132
Healthcare costs
29%
18%
28%
25%
98
Retirement
21%
18%
18%
43%
41
Higher education
16%
38%
14%
32%
101
Regulations
62%
16%
13%
9%
65
Combination
35%
29%
8%
29%
141
7%
62%
23%
8%
11
17%
32%
12
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unsure
52%
Views close to own
33%
35%
13%
18%
352
30%
26%
13%
31%
571
Both
28%
34%
20%
18%
48
Unsure
31%
27%
13%
29%
30
Very worried
44%
17%
12%
27%
318
Somewhat worried
26%
32%
15%
28%
405
Not too worried
25%
42%
12%
22%
214
Not at all worried
20%
45%
16%
20%
56
Combination
100%
Unsure
8%
54%
38%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
22%
40%
13%
25%
Unsure
13%
36%
15%
35%
63
No
36%
26%
13%
25%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
21%
39%
16%
24%
510
Unsure
6%
23%
18%
53%
85
Disapprove
48%
20%
9%
22%
406
Very worried
39%
19%
10%
32%
112
Somewhat worried
40%
23%
14%
23%
283
Not too worried
31%
29%
14%
26%
341
Not at all worried
19%
43%
13%
25%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
6%
31%
63%
Yes
38%
37%
13%
12%
645
No
17%
17%
14%
51%
356
Approve
17%
58%
14%
11%
295
Unsure
36%
21%
22%
22%
45
Disapprove
59%
19%
12%
10%
306
(cont.)
Page 90

May 3-6, 2015
RMRID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
26%
38%
13%
23%
628
No
36%
16%
15%
33%
245
Not sure
44%
17%
13%
26%
128
4 of 4
3%
26
21%
76%
3 of 4
7%
78%
9%
6%
112
2 of 4
10%
44%
18%
29%
221
1 of 4
20%
23%
11%
46%
214
0 of 4
54%
11%
14%
21%
427
5-7 of 7
91%
2%
6%
4 of 7
67%
11%
12%
9%
96
3 of 7
51%
18%
20%
11%
91
2 of 7
36%
26%
20%
18%
87
1 of 7
12%
33%
12%
44%
164
3%
47%
14%
36%
413
31%
30%
13%
26%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
150
Page 91

May 3-6, 2015
RRPID RAND PAUL NAME ID/C
RRPID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
32%
37%
13%
18%
1001
Northeast
27%
48%
11%
14%
195
Midwest
34%
31%
16%
19%
181
South
35%
38%
9%
18%
235
South Central
32%
23%
17%
28%
96
Central Plains
32%
30%
15%
23%
83
Mountain States
40%
23%
16%
21%
70
West
28%
48%
9%
15%
141
California
30%
47%
6%
17%
89
Florida
32%
39%
10%
19%
58
Texas
26%
26%
15%
33%
71
New York
29%
47%
10%
14%
56
Rest of country
33%
36%
14%
17%
727
32%
31%
12%
25%
217
34%
38%
14%
14%
320
No Senate election
31%
39%
12%
18%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
32%
31%
13%
24%
405
31%
45%
12%
13%
366
33%
36%
14%
17%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
36%
37%
12%
15%
241
Other
31%
37%
13%
19%
760
Male
38%
34%
15%
14%
480
Female
27%
40%
11%
22%
521
Male / employed
38%
35%
18%
10%
324
Male / not employed
37%
33%
8%
22%
157
Female / employed
28%
41%
10%
21%
281
26%
38%
11%
24%
240
Not employed
28%
26%
8%
38%
133
Employed
33%
38%
14%
15%
605
Retired
33%
40%
12%
16%
252
Refused
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
7%
54%
11%
28%
11
18-34
23%
32%
16%
28%
200
35-44
35%
33%
14%
18%
280
45-64
32%
42%
10%
15%
310
65 or over
36%
40%
10%
14%
200
Unsure / refused
44%
20%
19%
17%
10
18-44
30%
33%
15%
22%
480
45-64
32%
42%
10%
15%
310
65+
36%
40%
10%
14%
200
Unsure / refused
44%
20%
19%
17%
10
(cont.)
Page 92

May 3-6, 2015
RRPID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
37%
30%
17%
16%
302
Male / 55+
38%
41%
10%
11%
179
Female / under 55
26%
38%
11%
26%
315
Female / 55+
29%
43%
11%
18%
205
White
36%
37%
13%
14%
751
11%
43%
11%
35%
120
Hispanic / Latino
20%
30%
16%
33%
90
Other
40%
36%
9%
15%
40
25%
35%
19%
21%
128
39%
37%
11%
13%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
16%
10%
10%
64%
24

voters 35+
10%
51%
11%
28%
96
17%
34%
14%
36%
41
24%
27%
18%
31%
49

18-34
43%
45%
6%
6%

35+
39%
34%
10%
17%
32
White seniors
36%
42%
11%
12%
255
Other
31%
35%
13%
21%
746
White men
40%
36%
14%
10%
368
White women
33%
38%
11%
18%
382
Black men
17%
32%
8%
42%
50
Black women
6%
51%
12%
30%
70
Hispanic men
36%
23%
25%
16%
42
7%
36%
9%
49%
48
Republican
53%
20%
15%
11%
390
Independent
39%
30%
12%
19%
190
Hispanic women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
9%
56%
11%
25%
420
Male / GOP
56%
20%
16%
7%
214
Female / GOP
50%
21%
13%
17%
176
Male / DEM
8%
57%
12%
22%
161
Female / DEM
9%
55%
10%
26%
259
Male / IND
44%
27%
14%
15%
105
Female / IND
33%
34%
10%
24%
85
Under 55 / GOP
51%
18%
17%
14%
223
55 & over / GOP
56%
24%
12%
8%
168
Under 55 / DEM
11%
50%
12%
26%
269
55 & over / DEM
5%
65%
8%
22%
151
Under 55 / IND
38%
27%
12%
23%
125
55 & over / IND
41%
35%
13%
11%
65
(cont.)
Page 93

May 3-6, 2015
RRPID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
55%
22%
13%
10%
448
Ticket splitter
25%
16%
13%
47%
61
Democrat
12%
53%
12%
22%
492
Hard GOP
55%
20%
14%
11%
360
Soft GOP
54%
22%
12%
12%
92
Ticket splitter
30%
33%
11%
26%
64
Soft DEM
22%
41%
12%
25%
84
Hard DEM
9%
56%
11%
24%
401
Conservative
46%
24%
13%
17%
536
Moderate
24%
25%
17%
34%
76
Liberal
14%
58%
11%
17%
389
Very conservative
58%
15%
12%
15%
187
40%
29%
13%
18%
348
Moderate / liberal
16%
52%
12%
20%
465
Republican
53%
20%
15%
11%
390
Independent
39%
30%
12%
19%
190
Conservative DEM
9%
32%
14%
45%
103
Mod / lib DEM
9%
63%
10%
18%
318
Liberal DEM
12%
62%
11%
15%
335
14%
34%
13%
39%
157
Independent
25%
16%
13%
47%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
32%
21%
22%
26%
69
Conservative GOP
59%
22%
12%
7%
379
Yes / strongly
65%
13%
9%
14%
93
Yes
72%
13%
8%
7%
68
No / unsure
25%
42%
13%
20%
840
34%
13%
7%
46%
53
25%
31%
14%
30%
227
Some college
35%
32%
13%
19%
219
College graduate
33%
44%
12%
10%
503
37%
41%
16%
5%
248
Male non-college
graduates
38%
26%
13%
23%
232
29%
47%
9%
15%
254
Female non-college
graduates
25%
33%
13%
30%
266
White non-college
graduate
37%
30%
12%
21%
349
graduate
15%
29%
15%
40%
149
Others
33%
44%
12%
10%
503
Union household
23%
42%
19%
15%
127
Non-union household
33%
36%
12%
19%
874
(cont.)
Page 94

May 3-6, 2015
RRPID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
23%
40%
12%
26%
215
Married
37%
36%
13%
14%
607
No longer married
27%
36%
11%
26%
179
Dad
42%
24%
21%
12%
171
Mom
30%
34%
8%
28%
203
Married / children
39%
28%
16%
17%
299
35%
44%
11%
10%
308
Divorced / children
19%
48%
34%
22
26%
38%
10%
26%
60
Single / children
19%
33%
10%
38%
42
24%
41%
12%
23%
173
Other / mixed
29%
32%
15%
24%
97
Single women
13%
43%
12%
31%
98
Married women
33%
39%
10%
18%
304
23%
38%
12%
27%
118
Single men
31%
37%
11%
21%
117
Married men
41%
33%
17%
9%
302
34%
32%
11%
23%
61
White single men
34%
38%
15%
13%
75
White single women
22%
41%
10%
27%
46
White married men
43%
35%
15%
7%
244
White married women
36%
38%
10%
15%
243

men
35%
34%
11%
20%
49

women
28%
36%
13%
22%
93
Other
19%
37%
12%
31%
250
Single mothers
14%
32%
10%
44%
30
Married mothers
34%
33%
9%
24%
150
No longer married
mothers
25%
43%
32%
23
Non-mothers
32%
38%
14%
16%
798
Upper class
34%
47%
5%
14%
73
Middle class
35%
38%
12%
14%
696
Low income
21%
26%
16%
37%
205
Working class
11%
67%
22%
Refused
26%
52%
5%
16%
20
Middle class whites
40%
37%
13%
10%
551

Americans
15%
50%
5%
30%
63
18%
33%
15%
33%
57
38%
43%
4%
14%
25
Other
24%
34%
13%
29%
305
(cont.)
Page 95

May 3-6, 2015
RRPID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
33%
31%
14%
21%
198
37%
33%
10%
20%
185
Mainline Protestant
38%
32%
15%
15%
280
Other
36%
43%
7%
14%
45
None
19%
49%
12%
21%
262
40%
31%
14%
15%
336
37%
31%
15%
17%
157
Infrequently
29%
37%
10%
24%
191
Never
29%
43%
14%
14%
44
33%
35%
15%
17%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
42%
32%
9%
17%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
38%
29%
18%
15%
131
Active other
72%
23%
5%
Other
28%
40%
12%
20%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
46%
27%
12%
15%
133
34%
37%
16%
14%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
29%
35%
15%
21%
179
17
26%
42%
8%
23%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
42%
28%
15%
14%
222
21%
39%
11%
29%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
50%
26%
16%
8%
166
Christians
30%
36%
11%
23%
51
Christians
18%
33%
15%
33%
55
8%
44%
11%
37%
39
Approve
12%
55%
11%
21%
453
Unsure
16%
23%
27%
34%
62
Disapprove
52%
22%
12%
14%
487
Jobs
25%
46%
9%
21%
135
Economy
28%
43%
11%
18%
228
Health care
18%
46%
13%
22%
99
Illegal immigration
49%
26%
8%
17%
78
Foreign threats
42%
29%
16%
12%
116
Deficit
46%
24%
21%
9%
76
22%
268
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
31%
34%
13%
(cont.)
Page 96

May 3-6, 2015
RRPID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
46%
24%
6%
24%
71
Reducing deficit
56%
21%
14%
8%
126
Creating jobs
26%
47%
9%
18%
203
Increase wages
11%
59%
11%
19%
132
Healthcare costs
29%
28%
19%
25%
98
Retirement
24%
32%
16%
29%
41
Higher education
14%
46%
13%
27%
101
Regulations
66%
21%
12%
Combination
32%
32%
17%
19%
141
None
21%
56%
4%
19%
11
Unsure
72%
10%
5%
14%
12
Views close to own
39%
40%
11%
10%
352
27%
36%
13%
24%
571
Both
34%
38%
16%
12%
48
Unsure
43%
21%
18%
18%
30
Very worried
41%
24%
12%
23%
318
Somewhat worried
31%
40%
14%
15%
405
Not too worried
24%
50%
11%
14%
214
Not at all worried
24%
37%
9%
29%
56
58%
Combination
42%
Unsure
65
8%
30%
62%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
22%
44%
11%
23%
Unsure
18%
35%
15%
32%
63
No
37%
35%
13%
15%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
27%
45%
14%
14%
510
Unsure
9%
28%
16%
48%
85
Disapprove
43%
29%
10%
17%
406
Very worried
40%
22%
9%
29%
112
Somewhat worried
34%
33%
16%
17%
283
Not too worried
34%
36%
13%
17%
341
Not at all worried
23%
50%
10%
17%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
6%
31%
63%
Yes
37%
44%
11%
8%
645
No
24%
25%
15%
36%
356
Approve
19%
62%
11%
8%
295
Unsure
37%
39%
14%
10%
45
Disapprove
54%
27%
11%
8%
306
(cont.)
Page 97

May 3-6, 2015
RRPID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
28%
44%
11%
17%
628
No
38%
26%
15%
22%
245
Not sure
40%
25%
16%
19%
128
4 of 4
26
20%
72%
8%
3 of 4
8%
80%
10%
2%
112
2 of 4
13%
51%
13%
23%
221
1 of 4
22%
28%
12%
37%
214
0 of 4
53%
20%
14%
12%
427
5-7 of 7
77%
14%
7%
1%
150
4 of 7
72%
13%
12%
4%
96
3 of 7
56%
26%
12%
6%
91
2 of 7
30%
42%
17%
11%
87
1 of 7
23%
34%
17%
26%
164
5%
53%
12%
29%
413
32%
37%
13%
18%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Page 98

May 3-6, 2015
RMHID MIKE HUCKABEE NAME ID/C
RMHID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
34%
33%
17%
16%
1001
Northeast
24%
44%
18%
14%
195
Midwest
31%
29%
21%
19%
181
South
42%
30%
11%
16%
235
South Central
48%
22%
18%
11%
96
Central Plains
36%
28%
21%
15%
83
Mountain States
29%
34%
14%
23%
70
West
26%
40%
20%
14%
141
California
24%
46%
16%
14%
89
Florida
48%
23%
4%
26%
58
Texas
49%
25%
15%
11%
71
New York
29%
40%
18%
13%
56
Rest of country
33%
33%
18%
16%
727
41%
29%
15%
15%
217
33%
32%
20%
15%
320
No Senate election
31%
36%
16%
17%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
39%
27%
16%
19%
405
26%
44%
17%
12%
366
36%
27%
19%
17%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
39%
27%
14%
21%
241
Other
32%
35%
18%
14%
760
Male
39%
32%
17%
12%
480
Female
28%
34%
17%
20%
521
Male / employed
38%
32%
19%
10%
324
Male / not employed
41%
32%
12%
15%
157
Female / employed
23%
38%
21%
18%
281
35%
31%
13%
21%
240
Not employed
25%
29%
15%
31%
133
Employed
31%
35%
20%
14%
605
Retired
44%
33%
10%
12%
252
Refused
30%
15%
33%
22%
11
18-34
23%
25%
28%
24%
200
35-44
27%
39%
21%
13%
280
45-64
36%
35%
12%
17%
310
65 or over
48%
33%
9%
10%
200
Unsure / refused
63%
16%
15%
6%
10
18-44
25%
33%
24%
18%
480
45-64
36%
35%
12%
17%
310
65+
48%
33%
9%
10%
200
Unsure / refused
63%
16%
15%
6%
10
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 99

May 3-6, 2015
RMHID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
34%
31%
22%
13%
302
Male / 55+
48%
35%
7%
10%
179
Female / under 55
20%
36%
22%
22%
315
Female / 55+
41%
33%
11%
15%
205
White
39%
33%
17%
11%
751
11%
36%
19%
34%
120
Hispanic / Latino
24%
25%
16%
35%
90
Other
27%
47%
19%
8%
40
27%
28%
28%
18%
128
41%
34%
15%
10%
623
6%
20%
47%
27%
24

voters 35+
13%
40%
12%
35%
96
21%
16%
20%
44%
41
27%
33%
14%
27%
49

18-34
31%
44%
10%
15%

35+
26%
47%
21%
6%
32
White seniors
50%
34%
8%
8%
255
Other
28%
33%
20%
19%
746
White men
43%
32%
17%
8%
368
White women
34%
34%
17%
15%
382
Black men
18%
28%
16%
37%
50
Black women
7%
41%
21%
31%
70
Hispanic men
31%
35%
16%
19%
42
Hispanic women
18%
16%
17%
49%
48
Republican
58%
16%
17%
9%
390
Independent
38%
31%
15%
17%
190
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
9%
50%
19%
22%
420
Male / GOP
59%
18%
19%
5%
214
Female / GOP
58%
14%
14%
13%
176
Male / DEM
12%
52%
15%
21%
161
Female / DEM
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
6%
50%
21%
23%
259
Male / IND
41%
31%
16%
12%
105
Female / IND
34%
30%
13%
23%
85
Under 55 / GOP
46%
20%
23%
11%
223
55 & over / GOP
75%
11%
8%
5%
168
Under 55 / DEM
9%
45%
24%
21%
269
55 & over / DEM
8%
60%
9%
23%
151
Under 55 / IND
31%
31%
16%
21%
125
55 & over / IND
50%
30%
11%
9%
65
(cont.)
Page 100

May 3-6, 2015
RMHID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Republican
59%
17%
16%
8%
448
Ticket splitter
30%
14%
20%
36%
61
Democrat
11%
51%
17%
21%
492
Hard GOP
60%
16%
16%
8%
360
Soft GOP
56%
19%
19%
6%
92
Ticket splitter
27%
23%
17%
33%
64
Soft DEM
18%
47%
13%
21%
84
Hard DEM
9%
51%
18%
21%
401
Conservative
54%
18%
13%
15%
536
Moderate
16%
24%
38%
22%
76
Liberal
10%
56%
18%
16%
389
Very conservative
63%
14%
10%
13%
187
48%
20%
15%
16%
348
Moderate / liberal
11%
51%
21%
17%
465
Republican
58%
16%
17%
9%
390
Independent
38%
31%
15%
17%
190
Conservative DEM
17%
27%
14%
42%
103
6%
58%
20%
16%
318
Mod / lib DEM

PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
Liberal DEM
6%
62%
18%
14%
335
22%
27%
17%
34%
157
Independent
30%
14%
20%
36%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
28%
17%
36%
19%
69
Conservative GOP
64%
17%
13%
6%
379
Yes / strongly
67%
13%
7%
13%
93
Yes
66%
15%
18%
1%
68
No / unsure
27%
37%
18%
17%
840
32%
11%
16%
41%
53
32%
20%
18%
30%
227
Some college
37%
28%
20%
16%
219
College graduate
33%
45%
16%
7%
503
40%
40%
15%
5%
248
Male non-college
graduates
38%
24%
19%
19%
232
26%
49%
17%
8%
254
Female non-college
graduates
31%
20%
18%
31%
266
White non-college
graduate
41%
22%
19%
19%
349
graduate
19%
24%
17%
40%
149
Others
33%
45%
16%
7%
503
Union household
28%
43%
21%
9%
127
Non-union household
34%
32%
17%
17%
874
(cont.)
Page 101

May 3-6, 2015
RMHID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
18%
36%
22%
24%
215
Married
38%
34%
16%
12%
607
No longer married
38%
27%
14%
20%
179
Dad
39%
30%
22%
8%
171
Mom
24%
33%
22%
21%
203
Married / children
34%
32%
20%
14%
299
41%
36%
13%
10%
308
Divorced / children
15%
21%
47%
17%
22
43%
28%
13%
16%
60
Single / children
15%
33%
31%
22%
42
19%
37%
20%
25%
173
Other / mixed
41%
28%
8%
23%
97
Single women
8%
33%
28%
31%
98
Married women
32%
37%
15%
16%
304
36%
29%
16%
20%
118
Single men
27%
38%
16%
18%
117
Married men
43%
32%
18%
7%
302
44%
24%
12%
20%
61
White single men
29%
42%
18%
11%
75
White single women
6%
41%
28%
25%
46
White married men
47%
31%
18%
5%
244
White married women
37%
36%
14%
13%
243

men
46%
26%
11%
17%
49

women
40%
27%
19%
14%
93
Other
18%
34%
18%
30%
250
Single mothers
7%
24%
44%
25%
30
Married mothers
28%
37%
14%
21%
150
No longer married
mothers
17%
22%
43%
17%
23
Non-mothers
36%
33%
16%
15%
798
Upper class
30%
48%
14%
9%
73
Middle class
37%
36%
16%
11%
696
Low income
24%
20%
22%
34%
205
Working class
11%
40%
49%
Refused
44%
40%
14%
1%
20
Middle class whites
42%
34%
16%
8%
551

Americans
11%
49%
20%
20%
63
21%
24%
17%
39%
57
27%
53%
13%
7%
25
Other
26%
28%
19%
26%
305
(cont.)
Page 102

May 3-6, 2015
RMHID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
38%
31%
16%
15%
198
44%
24%
18%
15%
185
Mainline Protestant
40%
30%
18%
12%
280
Other
31%
39%
7%
23%
45
None
16%
46%
18%
20%
262
46%
22%
19%
14%
336
40%
35%
8%
16%
157
Infrequently
28%
37%
21%
14%
191
Never
33%
38%
12%
18%
44
42%
26%
15%
17%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
52%
19%
20%
10%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
43%
20%
22%
15%
131
Active other
51%
30%
3%
16%
17
Other
27%
39%
16%
17%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
50%
22%
15%
13%
133
35%
36%
18%
11%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
42%
20%
15%
23%
179
21%
42%
19%
18%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
55%
18%
14%
13%
222
22%
28%
18%
33%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
69%
15%
8%
7%
166
Christians
33%
19%
9%
39%
51
Christians
14%
27%
30%
30%
55
7%
38%
29%
26%
39
Approve
13%
50%
16%
21%
453
Unsure
15%
23%
26%
36%
62
Disapprove
55%
19%
17%
9%
487
Jobs
25%
39%
15%
22%
135
Economy
24%
43%
16%
17%
228
Health care
19%
40%
24%
16%
99
Illegal immigration
44%
33%
14%
8%
78
Foreign threats
57%
13%
15%
15%
116
Deficit
35%
30%
28%
6%
76
17%
268
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
38%
30%
15%
(cont.)
Page 103

May 3-6, 2015
RMHID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
51%
25%
10%
14%
71
Reducing deficit
51%
23%
21%
5%
126
Creating jobs
28%
35%
15%
21%
203
Increase wages
11%
59%
12%
17%
132
Healthcare costs
41%
30%
15%
15%
98
Retirement
21%
26%
27%
26%
41
Higher education
15%
37%
27%
21%
101
Regulations
56%
33%
8%
4%
65
Combination
38%
23%
21%
18%
141
None
14%
53%
9%
24%
11
Unsure
64%
7%
18%
11%
12
Views close to own
36%
39%
14%
11%
352
31%
31%
19%
19%
571
Both
31%
27%
28%
14%
48
Unsure
51%
22%
12%
15%
30
Very worried
45%
21%
14%
20%
318
Somewhat worried
32%
32%
22%
14%
405
Not too worried
22%
52%
13%
13%
214
Not at all worried
30%
45%
11%
14%
56
42%
58%
8%
68%
24%
8
245
Combination
Unsure
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
23%
44%
12%
21%
Unsure
18%
25%
29%
27%
63
No
39%
30%
18%
13%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
23%
44%
20%
13%
510
Unsure
16%
22%
27%
36%
85
Disapprove
51%
23%
12%
15%
406
Very worried
49%
17%
10%
25%
112
Somewhat worried
47%
21%
18%
13%
283
Not too worried
27%
36%
20%
16%
341
Not at all worried
21%
51%
14%
14%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
6%
13%
81%
Yes
39%
41%
13%
7%
645
No
24%
20%
26%
31%
356
Approve
15%
63%
14%
8%
295
Unsure
46%
25%
14%
15%
45
Disapprove
62%
22%
11%
6%
306
(cont.)
Page 104

May 3-6, 2015
RMHID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
25%
44%
17%
14%
628
No
48%
16%
17%
19%
245
Not sure
51%
14%
17%
18%
128
4 of 4
3%
26
12%
85%
3 of 4
5%
84%
8%
3%
112
2 of 4
14%
41%
22%
22%
221
1 of 4
24%
24%
21%
31%
214
0 of 4
58%
17%
16%
9%
427
5-7 of 7
90%
6%
4%
150
4 of 7
57%
23%
20%
96
3 of 7
53%
28%
18%
1%
91
2 of 7
42%
34%
14%
9%
87
1 of 7
24%
34%
19%
23%
164
5%
46%
21%
27%
413
34%
33%
17%
16%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Page 105

May 3-6, 2015
RCFID CARLY FIORINA NAME ID/C
RCFID
TOTAL
Favorable
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
13%
15%
13%
60%
1001
Northeast
9%
21%
15%
55%
195
Midwest
9%
9%
11%
70%
181
South
14%
11%
14%
60%
235
South Central
11%
10%
15%
64%
96
Central Plains
10%
12%
12%
65%
83
Mountain States
17%
11%
11%
62%
70
West
20%
27%
9%
44%
141
California
26%
32%
10%
32%
89
Florida
24%
12%
13%
51%
58
Texas
11%
12%
13%
65%
71
New York
11%
28%
10%
51%
56
Rest of country
10%
12%
13%
64%
727
11%
11%
10%
68%
217
12%
13%
18%
58%
320
No Senate election
14%
18%
11%
57%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
12%
9%
13%
66%
405
14%
22%
14%
50%
366
12%
13%
12%
63%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
15%
11%
16%
58%
241
Other
12%
16%
12%
60%
760
Male
15%
16%
14%
55%
480
Female
10%
14%
12%
64%
521
Male / employed
15%
16%
14%
56%
324
Male / not employed
17%
16%
15%
52%
157
Female / employed
8%
15%
14%
63%
281
12%
12%
10%
66%
240
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C

EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Not employed
6%
10%
9%
75%
133
Employed
12%
15%
14%
59%
605
Retired
19%
16%
13%
52%
252
Refused
5%
14%
81%
11
18-34
7%
7%
8%
78%
200
35-44
11%
13%
17%
59%
280
45-64
15%
18%
13%
55%
310
65 or over
18%
20%
12%
50%
200
Unsure / refused
31%
16%
12%
41%
10
18-44
9%
11%
13%
67%
480
45-64
15%
18%
13%
55%
310
65+
18%
20%
12%
50%
200
Unsure / refused
31%
16%
12%
41%
10
(cont.)
Page 106

May 3-6, 2015
RCFID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Male / under 55
12%
12%
14%
62%
302
Male / 55+
21%
23%
15%
42%
179
7%
13%
13%
68%
315
Female / 55+
16%
15%
11%
59%
205
White
14%
15%
14%
57%
751
10%
13%
9%
68%
120
9%
17%
7%
67%
90
13%
14%
9%
64%
40
7%
4%
11%
79%
128
15%
17%
15%
53%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
12%
10%
78%
24

voters 35+
10%
14%
11%
65%
96
3%
15%
4%
78%
41
14%
19%
10%
57%
49
9%
6%
9%
76%

35+
14%
16%
8%
61%
32
White seniors
18%
20%
13%
49%
255
Other
11%
13%
13%
63%
746
White men
16%
16%
16%
52%
368
White women
11%
14%
13%
62%
382
Black men
13%
14%
6%
67%
50
Black women
8%
13%
11%
68%
70
Hispanic men
11%
20%
14%
55%
42
6%
15%
2%
77%
48
Republican
20%
9%
13%
57%
390
Independent
17%
11%
13%
59%
190
Female / under 55
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
Hispanic / Latino
Other
AGE AND RACE

18-34
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Hispanic women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Favorable
4%
22%
13%
62%
420
Male / GOP
24%
9%
14%
53%
214
Female / GOP
16%
9%
12%
63%
176
Male / DEM
3%
28%
14%
55%
161
Female / DEM
4%
18%
12%
66%
259
Male / IND
18%
11%
13%
58%
105
Female / IND
16%
10%
12%
61%
85
Under 55 / GOP
15%
7%
15%
63%
223
55 & over / GOP
28%
12%
11%
50%
168
Under 55 / DEM
3%
19%
13%
65%
269
55 & over / DEM
4%
28%
12%
56%
151
Under 55 / IND
14%
8%
10%
69%
125
55 & over / IND
23%
16%
19%
42%
65
(cont.)
Page 107

May 3-6, 2015
RCFID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
23%
9%
14%
54%
448
Ticket splitter
9%
5%
7%
79%
61
Democrat
4%
22%
13%
62%
492
Hard GOP
21%
9%
14%
56%
360
Soft GOP
29%
7%
14%
50%
92
6%
9%
10%
75%
64
Soft DEM
11%
14%
10%
66%
84
Hard DEM
3%
23%
13%
61%
401
Republican
Ticket splitter
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Conservative
20%
8%
12%
60%
536
Moderate
6%
15%
11%
68%
76
Liberal
4%
24%
15%
57%
389
Very conservative
26%
7%
11%
56%
187
17%
9%
12%
62%
348
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
4%
22%
14%
59%
465
Republican
20%
9%
13%
57%
390
Independent
17%
11%
13%
59%
190
Conservative DEM
7%
7%
9%
77%
103
Mod / lib DEM
2%
27%
14%
57%
318
Liberal DEM
3%
27%
16%
55%
335
6%
10%
7%
77%
157
Independent
9%
5%
7%
79%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
12%
8%
14%
66%
69
Conservative GOP
25%
9%
14%
52%
379
Yes / strongly
39%
5%
15%
41%
93
Yes
29%
8%
12%
52%
68
9%
16%
13%
62%
840
13%
10%
7%
71%
53
10%
8%
7%
75%
227
Some college
14%
11%
11%
64%
219
College graduate
13%
20%
17%
49%
503
14%
19%
19%
48%
248
Male non-college
graduates
17%
12%
9%
62%
232
12%
21%
16%
51%
254
8%
7%
8%
77%
266
White non-college
graduate
13%
10%
8%
69%
349
graduate
11%
9%
9%
72%
149
Others
13%
20%
17%
49%
503
Union household
11%
20%
15%
54%
127
Non-union household
13%
14%
13%
60%
874
No / unsure
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Female non-college
graduates
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Favorable
(cont.)
Page 108

May 3-6, 2015
RCFID
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Single
10%
11%
10%
68%
215
Married
14%
16%
15%
54%
607
No longer married
10%
14%
9%
66%
179
Dad
14%
13%
19%
54%
171
Mom
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
9%
15%
15%
61%
203
Married / children
11%
16%
17%
57%
299
17%
16%
14%
52%
308
Divorced / children
10%
6%
84%
22
8%
14%
12%
67%
60
19%
5%
25%
52%
42
8%
13%
6%
72%
173
Other / mixed
12%
18%
8%
62%
97
Single women
7%
7%
12%
74%
98
Married women
11%
16%
13%
60%
304
10%
14%
9%
67%
118
Single men
13%
15%
9%
63%
117
Married men
17%
16%
17%
49%
302
12%
15%
8%
65%
61
White single men
Single / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Favorable
15%
16%
10%
59%
75
White single women
6%
9%
9%
76%
46
White married men
17%
16%
19%
48%
244
White married women
12%
14%
16%
59%
243

men
13%
15%
8%
64%
49

women
10%
16%
10%
64%
93
Other
10%
15%
8%
67%
250
Single mothers
20%
6%
28%
45%
30
Married mothers
7%
17%
13%
62%
150
No longer married
mothers
12%
9%
6%
73%
23
Non-mothers
14%
15%
12%
59%
798
Upper class
29%
24%
4%
44%
73
Middle class
14%
15%
15%
56%
696
Low income
4%
11%
11%
75%
205
Working class
3%
29%
68%
Refused
11%
15%
7%
66%
20
Middle class whites
15%
14%
17%
54%
551

Americans
9%
17%
8%
66%
63
11%
20%
4%
65%
57
10%
13%
9%
68%
25
Other
10%
14%
9%
67%
305
(cont.)
Page 109

May 3-6, 2015
RCFID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Roman Catholic
16%
12%
13%
59%
198
16%
11%
11%
61%
185
Mainline Protestant
14%
13%
15%
58%
280
Other
12%
29%
14%
44%
45
None
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
7%
18%
12%
62%
262
17%
12%
13%
58%
336
14%
13%
12%
61%
157
Infrequently
13%
16%
15%
57%
191
Never
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Favorable
6%
17%
15%
63%
44
18%
13%
15%
53%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
21%
8%
10%
60%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
15%
13%
13%
59%
131
Active other
14%
14%
12%
61%
17
Other
10%
16%
13%
60%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
23%
10%
14%
53%
133
13%
18%
14%
55%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
10%
10%
10%
71%
179
10%
16%
13%
61%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
16%
7%
13%
64%
222
13%
18%
9%
60%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
21%
7%
14%
59%
166
Christians
14%
9%
11%
65%
51
Christians
4%
7%
9%
80%
55
12%
30%
6%
53%
39
Approve
6%
21%
13%
61%
453
Unsure
6%
7%
9%
78%
62
20%
10%
13%
56%
487
9%
18%
7%
66%
135
12%
19%
13%
56%
228
1%
12%
18%
69%
99
Illegal immigration
19%
15%
15%
51%
78
Foreign threats
22%
12%
14%
51%
116
Deficit
21%
11%
10%
58%
76
62%
268
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
Disapprove
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Jobs
Economy
Health care
Other
11%
13%
14%
(cont.)
Page 110

May 3-6, 2015
RCFID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Cutting taxes
25%
7%
20%
48%
71
Reducing deficit
24%
12%
12%
53%
126
Creating jobs
10%
17%
16%
58%
203
Increase wages
2%
28%
10%
59%
132
Healthcare costs
6%
13%
21%
60%
98
Retirement
1%
19%
9%
71%
41
Higher education
10%
10%
4%
76%
101
Regulations
33%
15%
10%
42%
65
Combination
12%
12%
12%
65%
141
92%
11
18%
65%
12
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Favorable
8%
Unsure
17%
Views close to own
15%
20%
12%
53%
352
11%
12%
13%
63%
571
Both
12%
10%
20%
58%
48
Unsure
18%
9%
9%
65%
30
Very worried
17%
10%
11%
63%
318
Somewhat worried
12%
16%
12%
60%
405
Not too worried
8%
18%
19%
55%
214
Not at all worried
13%
23%
7%
57%
56
58%
Combination
42%
Unsure
8%
28%
64%
9%
18%
12%
61%
245
12%
10%
21%
58%
63
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
14%
14%
13%
59%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
8%
19%
14%
59%
510
Unsure
4%
5%
11%
81%
85
Disapprove
20%
12%
13%
55%
406
Very worried
15%
11%
11%
63%
112
Somewhat worried
18%
7%
11%
64%
283
Not too worried
12%
18%
13%
57%
341
Not at all worried
7%
21%
14%
57%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Unsure
No
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
31%
69%
Yes
17%
20%
14%
49%
645
No
5%
5%
10%
79%
356
Approve
8%
29%
15%
47%
295
6%
13%
21%
61%
45
27%
12%
12%
48%
306
Unsure
Disapprove
(cont.)
Page 111

May 3-6, 2015
RCFID
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unfavorable
No opinion
Never heard
of
Yes
11%
18%
13%
57%
628
No
14%
9%
11%
65%
245
Not sure
17%
10%
14%
59%
128
4 of 4
7%
60%
15%
19%
26
3 of 4
6%
39%
19%
37%
112
2 of 4
8%
12%
14%
67%
221
1 of 4
7%
12%
6%
75%
214
0 of 4
20%
8%
15%
57%
427
5-7 of 7
50%
10%
15%
25%
150
4 of 7
17%
10%
18%
56%
96
3 of 7
11%
17%
21%
52%
91
2 of 7
8%
12%
11%
68%
87
1 of 7
8%
12%
8%
73%
164
2%
19%
12%
68%
413
13%
15%
13%
60%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
TOTAL
Favorable
Page 112

May 3-6, 2015
RHRCYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR
HILLARY CLINTON/C
RHRCYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
47%
51%
2%
995
Northeast
56%
43%
1%
194
Midwest
43%
56%
1%
180
South
45%
53%
2%
232
South Central
44%
54%
2%
96
Central Plains
42%
50%
8%
83
Mountain States
37%
62%
1%
70
West
54%
46%
140
California
57%
43%
89
Florida
40%
57%
3%
56
Texas
49%
49%
3%
71
New York
53%
46%
1%
56
Rest of country
46%
52%
2%
724
49%
49%
2%
216
46%
52%
2%
318
No Senate election
47%
51%
1%
460
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
46%
53%
2%
401
51%
48%
1%
365
45%
53%
2%
229
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
44%
54%
2%
239
Other
48%
50%
2%
757
Male
40%
57%
3%
475
Female
53%
46%
1%
520
Male / employed
39%
59%
3%
322
Male / not employed
44%
54%
3%
153
Female / employed
53%
46%
1%
281
54%
45%
1%
239
Not employed
54%
43%
2%
132
Employed
45%
53%
2%
603
Retired
47%
51%
1%
249
Refused
66%
33%
1%
11
18-34
55%
43%
2%
199
35-44
46%
52%
2%
280
45-64
49%
50%
1%
308
65 or over
39%
60%
1%
198
Unsure / refused
19%
68%
13%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 113

May 3-6, 2015
HILLARY CLINTON/C
RHRCYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
18-44
50%
48%
2%
479
45-64
49%
50%
1%
308
65+
39%
60%
1%
198
Unsure / refused
19%
68%
13%
10
Male / under 55
42%
56%
3%
299
Male / 55+
38%
59%
2%
176
Female / under 55
57%
42%
1%
315
Female / 55+
48%
51%
1%
205
White
40%
58%
2%
746
80%
20%
Hispanic / Latino
66%
31%
4%
90
Other
47%
51%
2%
40
49%
50%
1%
126
38%
60%
2%
620
African American
millenials 18-34
63%
37%
24

voters 35+
85%
15%
95
67%
26%
7%
41
65%
34%
1%
49

18-34
73%
27%

35+
41%
57%
3%
32
White seniors
36%
62%
2%
252
Other
51%
47%
2%
743
White men
37%
61%
3%
364
White women
43%
56%
1%
382
Black men
72%
28%
49
Black women
86%
14%
70
Hispanic men
43%
51%
6%
42
Hispanic women
85%
13%
2%
48
Republican
11%
87%
2%
389
Independent
37%
59%
3%
188
Democrat
85%
14%
1%
418
Male / GOP
11%
86%
3%
213
Female / GOP
12%
88%
0%
176
Male / DEM
84%
13%
3%
160
Female / DEM
85%
15%
Male / IND
33%
65%
2%
103
Female / IND
43%
52%
5%
85
119
258
(cont.)
Page 114

May 3-6, 2015
HILLARY CLINTON/C
RHRCYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
15%
83%
2%
223
55 & over / GOP
6%
93%
1%
166
Under 55 / DEM
82%
16%
2%
268
55 & over / DEM
90%
9%
1%
150
Under 55 / IND
40%
57%
3%
124
55 & over / IND
32%
63%
5%
64
Republican
11%
88%
2%
447
Ticket splitter
31%
60%
9%
59
Democrat
83%
16%
1%
489
Hard GOP
9%
89%
2%
359
Soft GOP
12%
86%
1%
92
Ticket splitter
39%
55%
6%
61
Soft DEM
67%
28%
4%
84
Hard DEM
86%
13%
1%
399
Conservative
24%
74%
2%
531
Moderate
44%
55%
1%
76
Liberal
80%
18%
2%
387
Very conservative
15%
83%
2%
186
28%
70%
2%
345
Moderate / liberal
74%
24%
2%
464
Republican
11%
87%
2%
389
Independent
37%
59%
3%
188
Conservative DEM
79%
19%
2%
101
Mod / lib DEM
87%
12%
1%
317
Liberal DEM
87%
12%
1%
334
74%
25%
2%
154
Independent
31%
60%
9%
59
Mod / liberal GOP
28%
71%
1%
69
Conservative GOP
7%
91%
2%
378
15%
83%
1%
92
Yes / strongly
Yes
5%
94%
1%
68
No / unsure
54%
44%
2%
835
56%
39%
5%
52
46%
52%
2%
225
Some college
42%
55%
3%
217
College graduate
49%
50%
1%
500
45%
53%
2%
246
Male non-college
graduates
35%
61%
4%
229
53%
47%
0%
254
Female non-college
graduates
54%
44%
2%
266
(cont.)
Page 115

May 3-6, 2015
HILLARY CLINTON/C
RHRCYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
35%
62%
3%
347
graduate
71%
27%
2%
148
Others
49%
50%
1%
500
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
57%
41%
2%
127
Non-union household
46%
53%
2%
868
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
63%
36%
2%
212
Married
40%
58%
2%
604
No longer married
52%
46%
2%
179
Dad
36%
61%
3%
171
Mom
58%
41%
1%
203
Married / children
43%
55%
2%
299
38%
61%
1%
305
Divorced / children
73%
27%
52%
44%
Single / children
76%
24%
59%
39%
2%
169
Other / mixed
47%
52%
1%
97
Single women
73%
26%
1%
97
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
22
4%
60
42
Married women
46%
53%
1%
304
55%
44%
1%
118
Single men
54%
44%
2%
114
Married men
34%
63%
3%
300
46%
51%
4%
61
White single men
54%
45%
1%
73
White single women
57%
43%
White married men
30%
67%
3%
242
White married women
39%
60%
1%
243

men
42%
53%
5%
49

women
45%
53%
1%
93
Other
70%
29%
2%
249
Single mothers
85%
15%
Married mothers
51%
47%
No longer married
mothers
64%
36%
Non-mothers
45%
54%
46
30
2%
150
23
2%
792
(cont.)
Page 116

May 3-6, 2015
HILLARY CLINTON/C
RHRCYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
55%
43%
2%
73
Middle class
44%
54%
2%
691
Low income
54%
45%
1%
204
Working class
60%
40%
Refused
45%
49%
6%
20
Middle class whites
37%
62%
2%
547

Americans
86%
14%
68%
27%
5%
59%
39%
2%
25
2%
304
61
57
Other
54%
44%
Roman Catholic
45%
55%
41%
57%
2%
184
Mainline Protestant
37%
62%
1%
278
Other
49%
50%
1%
45
None
64%
32%
4%
260
36%
63%
1%
333
43%
57%
1%
156
Infrequently
52%
46%
2%
191
Never
45%
55%
44
46%
54%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
32%
68%
105
Active Mainline
Protestants
33%
66%
Active other
35%
65%
Other
53%
Male born again /

evangelicals
197
2%
130
45%
2%
665
26%
72%
2%
131
46%
51%
3%
344
Female born again /

evangelicals
43%
57%
0%
179
59%
40%
1%
341
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
21%
79%
1%
221
73%
25%
2%
88
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
11%
89%
0%
166
Christians
66%
34%
Christians
50%
49%
1%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
82%
13%
5%
39
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
17
50
(cont.)
Page 117

May 3-6, 2015
HILLARY CLINTON/C
RHRCYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Don't know /
refused
Approve
83%
14%
2%
449
Unsure
51%
40%
9%
61
Disapprove
13%
86%
0%
486
Jobs
64%
32%
4%
133
Economy
56%
43%
1%
228
Health care
75%
24%
1%
98
Illegal immigration
27%
73%
Foreign threats
22%
77%
1%
Deficit
34%
66%
1%
76
3%
264
78
116
Other
42%
56%
Cutting taxes
32%
68%
Reducing deficit
23%
75%
Creating jobs
60%
40%
Increase wages
75%
24%
1%
132
Healthcare costs
42%
55%
2%
96
Retirement
48%
50%
2%
39
Higher education
64%
32%
4%
101
Regulations
11%
87%
2%
65
4%
140
71
2%
125
203
Combination
41%
55%
None
74%
26%
11
7%
93%
11
Views close to own
46%
54%
1%
351
49%
48%
2%
567
Both
39%
60%
1%
48
Unsure
35%
58%
7%
29
Very worried
32%
66%
2%
316
Somewhat worried
49%
50%
1%
403
Not too worried
65%
33%
2%
212
Not at all worried
49%
47%
3%
56
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
No
TOTAL
Combination
100%
Unsure
41%
30%
29%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
63%
35%
2%
241
Unsure
59%
39%
1%
62
No
41%
58%
2%
692
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
61%
37%
2%
507
Unsure
64%
33%
3%
84
Disapprove
26%
73%
1%
404
(cont.)
Page 118

May 3-6, 2015
HILLARY CLINTON/C
RHRCYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
36%
62%
2%
111
Somewhat worried
38%
61%
1%
281
Not too worried
48%
50%
2%
338
Not at all worried
60%
37%
3%
256
55%
40%
6%
Yes
44%
55%
1%
643
No
52%
45%
3%
352
Approve
73%
26%
1%
294
Unsure
47%
48%
4%
45
Disapprove
16%
83%
0%
304
Yes
56%
42%
2%
626
No
32%
67%
0%
243
31%
65%
4%
126
4 of 4
100%
3 of 4
99%
1%
2 of 4
90%
9%
1%
220
1 of 4
63%
36%
1%
213
97%
3%
424
0 of 4
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
Not sure
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
26
112
5-7 of 7
7%
93%
150
4 of 7
6%
94%
94
3 of 7
23%
77%
91
2 of 7
39%
61%
86
1 of 7
53%
44%
3%
164
0 of 7
76%
21%
3%
411
47%
51%
2%
995
Page 119

May 3-6, 2015
RJOEBYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR JOE
BIDEN/C
RJOEBYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
38%
59%
3%
944
Northeast
47%
50%
3%
186
Midwest
39%
58%
2%
172
South
35%
62%
3%
220
South Central
33%
65%
3%
93
Central Plains
35%
61%
4%
78
Mountain States
24%
72%
4%
63
West
42%
55%
3%
133
California
39%
56%
5%
84
Florida
32%
65%
4%
54
Texas
37%
60%
4%
69
New York
58%
41%
1%
56
Rest of country
37%
60%
3%
682
35%
62%
3%
202
41%
57%
3%
307
No Senate election
38%
59%
3%
435
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
33%
64%
3%
374
43%
54%
3%
354
39%
58%
3%
217
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
34%
65%
1%
226
Other
40%
57%
3%
719
Male
34%
63%
3%
458
Female
43%
55%
3%
487
Male / employed
36%
60%
4%
311
Male / not employed
29%
69%
2%
146
Female / employed
41%
56%
3%
265
44%
53%
3%
222
Not employed
47%
50%
3%
116
Employed
38%
58%
3%
576
Retired
35%
63%
2%
241
Refused
33%
67%
18-34
41%
56%
3%
183
35-44
42%
55%
3%
261
45-64
38%
60%
2%
296
65 or over
33%
65%
2%
194
Unsure / refused
16%
70%
15%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
11
(cont.)
Page 120

May 3-6, 2015
BIDEN/C
RJOEBYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
18-44
41%
55%
3%
445
45-64
38%
60%
2%
296
65+
33%
65%
2%
194
Unsure / refused
16%
70%
15%
10
Male / under 55
36%
60%
4%
286
Male / 55+
30%
67%
2%
172
Female / under 55
45%
52%
2%
288
Female / 55+
39%
58%
3%
199
White
32%
65%
3%
715
73%
27%
Hispanic / Latino
45%
50%
5%
80
Other
35%
61%
5%
39
34%
63%
3%
115
32%
65%
3%
600
African American
millenials 18-34
63%
37%
21

voters 35+
75%
25%
90
48%
45%
7%
39
43%
55%
2%
41

18-34
45%
55%

35+
32%
62%
6%
31
White seniors
31%
67%
3%
248
Other
41%
56%
3%
697
White men
31%
66%
3%
353
White women
34%
63%
3%
361
Black men
64%
36%
45
Black women
78%
22%
67
Hispanic men
32%
63%
5%
40
Hispanic women
58%
37%
5%
40
Republican
11%
87%
3%
377
Independent
26%
70%
5%
178
Democrat
71%
27%
2%
390
Male / GOP
11%
87%
3%
208
Female / GOP
11%
86%
3%
169
Male / DEM
71%
26%
4%
150
Female / DEM
71%
28%
2%
240
Male / IND
26%
70%
4%
100
Female / IND
25%
69%
5%
78
111
(cont.)
Page 121

May 3-6, 2015
BIDEN/C
RJOEBYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
13%
84%
3%
212
55 & over / GOP
8%
90%
2%
165
Under 55 / DEM
70%
27%
2%
247
55 & over / DEM
71%
26%
2%
143
Under 55 / IND
27%
68%
4%
115
55 & over / IND
24%
72%
5%
63
Republican
10%
87%
3%
436
Ticket splitter
35%
57%
8%
51
Democrat
65%
32%
3%
458
Hard GOP
10%
88%
3%
349
Soft GOP
6%
93%
1%
88
Ticket splitter
44%
52%
4%
56
Soft DEM
45%
48%
8%
81
Hard DEM
71%
27%
2%
370
Conservative
20%
78%
2%
511
Moderate
36%
56%
8%
66
Liberal
64%
33%
4%
367
Very conservative
11%
86%
3%
178
26%
74%
1%
333
Moderate / liberal
60%
36%
4%
433
Republican
11%
87%
3%
377
Independent
26%
70%
5%
178
Conservative DEM
65%
33%
2%
92
Mod / lib DEM
72%
25%
3%
298
Liberal DEM
69%
28%
3%
320
57%
41%
2%
138
Independent
35%
57%
8%
51
Mod / liberal GOP
29%
63%
9%
64
Conservative GOP
7%
91%
1%
371
11%
86%
3%
86
Yes / strongly
Yes
67
6%
94%
No / unsure
44%
53%
3%
791
40%
54%
6%
43
40%
58%
3%
202
Some college
33%
65%
2%
208
College graduate
40%
57%
3%
492
37%
60%
3%
243
Male non-college
graduates
30%
67%
3%
215
42%
54%
3%
249
Female non-college
graduates
43%
55%
2%
237
(cont.)
Page 122

May 3-6, 2015
BIDEN/C
RJOEBYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
28%
69%
3%
321
graduate
58%
40%
3%
132
Others
40%
57%
3%
492
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
50%
48%
2%
118
Non-union household
37%
60%
3%
827
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
53%
44%
3%
198
Married
34%
63%
3%
578
No longer married
35%
63%
2%
168
Dad
28%
69%
3%
161
Mom
46%
52%
2%
184
Married / children
36%
61%
3%
281
32%
64%
3%
297
Divorced / children
39%
61%
34%
62%
Single / children
52%
48%
54%
43%
3%
162
Other / mixed
35%
64%
1%
94
Single women
57%
41%
1%
89
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
19
4%
55
36
Married women
39%
58%
3%
287
41%
56%
3%
110
Single men
50%
46%
4%
110
Married men
30%
67%
4%
291
23%
77%
White single men
49%
49%
3%
70
White single women
40%
58%
2%
41
White married men
26%
69%
4%
236
White married women
33%
65%
3%
232

men
25%
75%

women
35%
61%
4%
88
Other
57%
41%
2%
230
Single mothers
58%
42%
Married mothers
44%
54%
No longer married
mothers
42%
58%
Non-mothers
37%
60%
57
47
25
2%
137
21
3%
761
(cont.)
Page 123

May 3-6, 2015
BIDEN/C
RJOEBYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
40%
56%
4%
72
Middle class
37%
60%
3%
669
Low income
42%
55%
3%
178
Working class
45%
51%
4%
Refused
37%
53%
10%
20
Middle class whites
32%
66%
2%
530

Americans
77%
23%
43%
52%
5%
48%
49%
3%
24
62
52
Other
41%
55%
4%
276
Roman Catholic
35%
64%
1%
186
35%
64%
2%
173
Mainline Protestant
29%
66%
4%
269
Other
37%
54%
8%
43
None
54%
44%
2%
243
29%
68%
3%
316
34%
64%
1%
150
Infrequently
39%
57%
4%
180
Never
43%
50%
7%
42
28%
72%
74
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
31%
69%
102
Active Mainline
Protestants
28%
64%
Active other
24%
76%
Other
43%
Male born again /

evangelicals
7%
122
54%
3%
631
25%
72%
4%
127
37%
60%
3%
331
Female born again /

evangelicals
32%
65%
3%
167
48%
50%
2%
319
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
19%
77%
3%
211
54%
43%
3%
83
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
11%
88%
1%
162
Christians
51%
49%
Christians
47%
43%
10%
49
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
57%
36%
7%
38
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
16
45
(cont.)
Page 124

May 3-6, 2015
BIDEN/C
RJOEBYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Don't know /
refused
Approve
70%
27%
3%
425
Unsure
38%
56%
6%
55
Disapprove
10%
88%
2%
464
Jobs
57%
39%
4%
122
Economy
46%
51%
3%
217
Health care
62%
35%
3%
93
Illegal immigration
16%
84%
Foreign threats
20%
79%
1%
Deficit
18%
81%
1%
74
73
114
Other
34%
61%
5%
250
Cutting taxes
27%
72%
1%
67
Reducing deficit
13%
85%
1%
123
Creating jobs
48%
50%
2%
185
Increase wages
67%
33%
1%
127
Healthcare costs
31%
65%
5%
91
Retirement
41%
53%
6%
37
Higher education
55%
43%
2%
99
Regulations
13%
85%
2%
65
7%
131
Combination
31%
61%
None
69%
31%
6%
91%
3%
12
Views close to own
41%
57%
2%
340
37%
60%
3%
530
Both
38%
56%
6%
45
Unsure
31%
61%
8%
29
Very worried
21%
76%
3%
292
Somewhat worried
37%
60%
3%
383
Not too worried
60%
38%
2%
209
Not at all worried
58%
41%
1%
54
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
No
TOTAL
Combination
Unsure
100%
4%
10%
86%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
54%
43%
3%
241
Unsure
51%
39%
10%
53
No
31%
66%
2%
650
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
49%
48%
2%
490
Unsure
54%
34%
12%
68
Disapprove
21%
76%
2%
386
(cont.)
Page 125

May 3-6, 2015
BIDEN/C
RJOEBYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
20%
78%
2%
97
Somewhat worried
28%
70%
2%
270
Not too worried
40%
56%
4%
325
Not at all worried
54%
43%
2%
247
29%
Yes
38%
No
71%
60%
2%
633
39%
57%
4%
311
Approve
64%
33%
4%
289
Unsure
36%
56%
8%
44
Disapprove
13%
86%
1%
300
Yes
45%
53%
2%
597
No
28%
68%
4%
226
26%
68%
5%
122
4 of 4
100%
3 of 4
96%
4%
2 of 4
84%
15%
1%
218
1 of 4
26%
70%
4%
175
96%
4%
413
8%
92%
0%
150
4 of 7
12%
87%
1%
96
3 of 7
19%
81%
2 of 7
24%
73%
0 of 4
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
Not sure
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
5-7 of 7
1 of 7
46%
0 of 7
62%
38%
26
112
89
3%
85
50%
4%
152
33%
5%
373
59%
3%
944
Page 126

May 3-6, 2015
RMOMYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR
MARTIN O'MALLEY/C
RMOMYN
Yes
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
18%
57%
25%
290
Northeast
27%
57%
16%
75
Midwest
13%
63%
24%
28
25%
76
South
9%
66%
South Central
27%
68%
5%
21
Central Plains
16%
49%
34%
25
Mountain States
20%
28%
51%
30
West
18%
53%
29%
35
California
15%
58%
28%
30
Florida
17%
65%
18%
22
Texas
29%
65%
6%
17
New York
30%
46%
24%
14
Rest of country
17%
56%
27%
207
21%
56%
23%
52
20%
57%
23%
96
No Senate election
16%
57%
27%
142
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
16%
55%
28%
108
24%
56%
20%
115
11%
61%
28%
66
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
13%
59%
28%
71
Other
20%
56%
24%
219
Male
17%
56%
27%
147
Female
19%
58%
23%
143
Male / employed
20%
55%
25%
93
Male / not employed
12%
58%
30%
54
Female / employed
23%
52%
25%
77
15%
64%
21%
65
Not employed
22%
60%
19%
27
Employed
21%
53%
25%
170
Retired
12%
64%
24%
90
100%
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
Refused
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
18-34
27%
51%
22%
43
35-44
14%
51%
35%
82
45-64
21%
61%
18%
87
65 or over
14%
61%
25%
73
Unsure / refused
14%
71%
15%
(cont.)
Page 127

May 3-6, 2015
MARTIN O'MALLEY/C
RMOMYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
19%
51%
30%
126
45-64
21%
61%
18%
87
65+
14%
61%
25%
73
Unsure / refused
14%
71%
15%
Male / under 55
16%
53%
31%
78
Male / 55+
19%
59%
22%
69
Female / under 55
20%
56%
24%
83
Female / 55+
18%
60%
22%
60
White
18%
55%
27%
218
11%
68%
20%
38
Hispanic / Latino
36%
42%
21%
24
7%
80%
13%
10
24%
55%
21%
28
17%
55%
28%
190
African American
millenials 18-34
39%
61%
8%
69%
23%
34
35%
29%
35%
10
37%
52%
11%
14

voters 35+

18-34
35+
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Don't know /
refused
18-44
Other
AGE AND RACE
No
TOTAL
100%
8%
76%
16%
White seniors
19%
58%
24%
91
Other
18%
56%
26%
199
White men
16%
53%
31%
112
White women
20%
58%
23%
106
Black men
17%
75%
8%
17
Black women
6%
63%
31%
20
Hispanic men
31%
50%
19%
13
Hispanic women
43%
33%
24%
11
Republican
9%
59%
32%
120
Independent
22%
65%
14%
55
Democrat
26%
51%
23%
114
Male / GOP
6%
54%
39%
69
Female / GOP
13%
64%
23%
51
Male / DEM
30%
48%
22%
48
Female / DEM
23%
53%
24%
66
Male / IND
22%
72%
7%
30
Female / IND
21%
57%
22%
25
(cont.)
Page 128

May 3-6, 2015
MARTIN O'MALLEY/C
RMOMYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
12%
51%
38%
66
55 & over / GOP
6%
68%
26%
54
Under 55 / DEM
20%
57%
23%
63
55 & over / DEM
34%
43%
24%
51
Under 55 / IND
29%
57%
14%
31
55 & over / IND
12%
75%
13%
24
9%
62%
29%
139
Ticket splitter
37%
48%
15%
14
Democrat
26%
52%
22%
137
Hard GOP
9%
58%
33%
114
Soft GOP
7%
83%
10%
24
Ticket splitter
24%
61%
15%
15
Soft DEM
40%
45%
16%
27
Hard DEM
24%
52%
24%
109
Conservative
11%
64%
25%
154
Moderate
13%
52%
35%
25
Liberal
29%
48%
23%
111
Republican
Very conservative
7%
77%
16%
67
15%
54%
31%
88
Moderate / liberal
26%
48%
26%
135
Republican
9%
59%
32%
120
Independent
22%
65%
14%
55
Conservative DEM
20%
60%
20%
28
Mod / lib DEM
28%
48%
24%
87
Liberal DEM
29%
48%
23%
99
17%
65%
19%
38
Independent
37%
48%
15%
14
Mod / liberal GOP
21%
35%
43%
21
Conservative GOP
7%
67%
27%
118
Yes / strongly
5%
82%
14%
33
Yes
9%
68%
23%
21
No / unsure
21%
52%
27%
236
36%
41%
23%
12
21%
52%
28%
50
Some college
18%
63%
19%
53
College graduate
16%
57%
26%
175
15%
55%
29%
86
Male non-college
graduates
20%
57%
23%
61
18%
59%
23%
89
Female non-college
graduates
22%
55%
24%
54
(cont.)
Page 129

May 3-6, 2015
MARTIN O'MALLEY/C
RMOMYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
18%
53%
28%
75
graduate
25%
61%
14%
40
Others
16%
57%
26%
175
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
23%
55%
22%
27
Non-union household
18%
57%
25%
263
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
21%
60%
19%
48
Married
17%
56%
27%
194
No longer married
21%
56%
23%
47
Dad
7%
56%
37%
47
Mom
16%
58%
26%
51
Married / children
11%
55%
34%
85
22%
56%
22%
110
Divorced / children
48%
23%
29%
14%
71%
15%
19
91%
9%
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Single / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
26%
53%
21%
39
Other / mixed
22%
51%
27%
24
Single women
21%
54%
25%
24
Married women
17%
58%
25%
86
22%
59%
19%
33
Single men
21%
66%
13%
24
Married men
16%
54%
29%
108
18%
51%
31%
15
White single men
13%
65%
23%
14
White single women
37%
38%
25%
14
White married men
17%
51%
32%
85
White married women
17%
60%
23%
70

men
15%
53%
32%
13

women
18%
61%
20%
23
Other
19%
61%
20%
72
91%
9%
56%
28%
38
38%
25%
239
Single mothers
Married mothers
16%
No longer married
mothers
62%
Non-mothers
19%
56%
(cont.)
Page 130

May 3-6, 2015
MARTIN O'MALLEY/C
RMOMYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
19%
64%
17%
23
Middle class
18%
54%
28%
209
Low income
19%
65%
16%
48
57%
43%
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
Refused
23%
42%
35%
Middle class whites
18%
54%
29%
167

Americans
12%
58%
29%
22
37%
42%
20%
13
7%
83%
10%
Other
18%
63%
19%
81
Roman Catholic
14%
67%
19%
52
11%
56%
33%
46
Mainline Protestant
12%
71%
17%
91
Other
40%
37%
22%
19
None
25%
39%
36%
73
12%
63%
25%
105
12%
73%
15%
41
Infrequently
23%
56%
21%
58
Never
36%
57%
7%
10
18%
61%
21%
24
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
13%
46%
41%
27
Active Mainline
Protestants
3%
79%
18%
46
Active other
45%
28%
27%
Other
22%
53%
25%
186
Male born again /

evangelicals
12%
64%
24%
42
19%
53%
28%
105
Female born again /

evangelicals
13%
68%
19%
46
22%
53%
25%
97
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
11%
57%
32%
53
14%
80%
6%
35
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
8%
64%
29%
43
Christians
10%
83%
6%
21
Christians
25%
30%
46%
11
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
20%
74%
6%
14
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
(cont.)
Page 131

May 3-6, 2015
MARTIN O'MALLEY/C
RMOMYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Don't know /
refused
Approve
27%
51%
22%
134
Unsure
18%
34%
47%
12
Disapprove
10%
64%
26%
144
Jobs
20%
54%
26%
40
Economy
24%
55%
21%
69
Health care
15%
59%
26%
33
Illegal immigration
5%
72%
23%
24
Foreign threats
7%
75%
17%
31
Deficit
26%
57%
17%
26
Other
19%
45%
36%
67
Cutting taxes
10%
82%
8%
18
Reducing deficit
30%
59%
11%
32
Creating jobs
8%
69%
23%
61
Increase wages
29%
44%
27%
46
Healthcare costs
12%
50%
38%
30
Retirement
28%
55%
17%
11
Higher education
38%
46%
16%
21
Regulations
7%
59%
33%
26
Combination
14%
48%
38%
41
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
No
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
20%
50%
30%
Views close to own
21%
55%
24%
112
16%
60%
25%
149
Both
17%
48%
34%
16
Unsure
26%
43%
31%
13
Very worried
13%
66%
21%
89
Somewhat worried
16%
58%
26%
108
Not too worried
25%
45%
30%
70
Not at all worried
32%
56%
13%
21
8%
14%
79%
3
71
Unsure
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
35%
42%
24%
Unsure
24%
37%
40%
22
No
12%
64%
24%
197
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
21%
51%
28%
155
Unsure
7%
37%
56%
10
Disapprove
16%
65%
20%
126
Very worried
12%
74%
13%
35
Somewhat worried
13%
69%
18%
78
Not too worried
14%
59%
27%
93
Not at all worried
31%
36%
32%
81
16%
84%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Unsure
(cont.)
Page 132

May 3-6, 2015
MARTIN O'MALLEY/C
RMOMYN
Yes
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
18%
59%
22%
222
No
18%
48%
34%
67
Approve
30%
49%
22%
103
Unsure
11%
48%
42%
15
9%
72%
20%
105
Yes
24%
51%
25%
184
No
8%
66%
25%
65
Not sure
7%
66%
27%
40
4 of 4
100%
3 of 4
22%
44%
34%
41
2 of 4
23%
56%
22%
61
1 of 4
8%
71%
21%
44
69%
31%
118
0 of 4
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
5-7 of 7
26
4%
76%
20%
62
4 of 7
24%
61%
14%
30
3 of 7
20%
43%
36%
34
2 of 7
22%
51%
26%
29
1 of 7
15%
53%
31%
33
0 of 7
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Yes
Disapprove
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
No
TOTAL
24%
51%
25%
102
18%
57%
25%
290
Page 133

May 3-6, 2015
REWYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR
ELIZABETH WARREN/C
REWYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
36%
51%
13%
596
Northeast
48%
43%
9%
138
Midwest
29%
54%
17%
104
South
29%
59%
13%
140
South Central
38%
46%
15%
49
Central Plains
32%
45%
23%
47
Mountain States
32%
54%
15%
34
West
39%
54%
8%
85
California
42%
52%
7%
54
Florida
30%
69%
2%
37
Texas
48%
36%
16%
36
New York
49%
38%
13%
37
Rest of country
33%
52%
15%
433
36%
46%
18%
112
33%
51%
17%
201
No Senate election
38%
53%
9%
283
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
33%
53%
13%
232
40%
47%
13%
246
32%
55%
13%
119
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
30%
60%
11%
139
Other
38%
49%
14%
457
Male
31%
58%
11%
296
Female
40%
45%
15%
300
Male / employed
29%
58%
13%
198
Male / not employed
36%
57%
7%
99
Female / employed
43%
39%
18%
157
37%
51%
12%
143
Not employed
39%
49%
11%
58
Employed
35%
50%
15%
355
Retired
36%
55%
9%
177
Refused
12%
60%
27%
18-34
42%
42%
16%
86
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
35-44
30%
52%
18%
164
45-64
40%
51%
8%
194
65 or over
33%
56%
12%
146
Unsure / refused
23%
54%
23%
(cont.)
Page 134

May 3-6, 2015
ELIZABETH WARREN/C
REWYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Don't know /
refused
18-44
34%
49%
17%
250
45-64
40%
51%
8%
194
65+
33%
56%
12%
146
Unsure / refused
23%
54%
23%
Male / under 55
28%
58%
14%
164
Male / 55+
35%
57%
7%
133
Female / under 55
44%
39%
17%
162
Female / 55+
36%
52%
13%
138
White
36%
52%
13%
472
33%
45%
21%
58
Hispanic / Latino
44%
48%
8%
40
Other
31%
57%
11%
27
46%
38%
15%
63
34%
54%
12%
409
50%
50%
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
No
TOTAL

voters 35+
36%
45%
19%
53
36%
52%
12%
15
49%
46%
5%
25

18-34
38%
52%
10%

35+
30%
58%
12%
23
White seniors
35%
54%
11%
188
Other
36%
50%
14%
408
White men
33%
56%
11%
238
White women
38%
47%
15%
234
Black men
26%
64%
10%
23
Black women
38%
33%
29%
35
Hispanic men
26%
60%
13%
23
Hispanic women
69%
31%
Republican
10%
73%
17%
237
Independent
34%
55%
11%
111
Democrat
61%
29%
10%
248
Male / GOP
16
9%
77%
14%
136
Female / GOP
12%
67%
21%
102
Male / DEM
62%
30%
8%
97
Female / DEM
60%
28%
12%
151
Male / IND
33%
58%
9%
64
Female / IND
35%
51%
14%
47
(cont.)
Page 135

May 3-6, 2015
ELIZABETH WARREN/C
REWYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
6%
73%
21%
114
55 & over / GOP
14%
73%
14%
124
Under 55 / DEM
59%
29%
12%
146
55 & over / DEM
65%
29%
7%
102
Under 55 / IND
36%
50%
13%
66
55 & over / IND
30%
62%
8%
45
Republican
10%
75%
15%
272
Ticket splitter
28%
60%
13%
26
Democrat
60%
29%
11%
298
Hard GOP
9%
73%
18%
214
Soft GOP
15%
78%
7%
67
Ticket splitter
28%
60%
12%
24
Soft DEM
56%
26%
18%
52
Hard DEM
62%
28%
10%
240
Conservative
12%
75%
13%
301
Moderate
37%
43%
21%
37
Liberal
63%
25%
12%
258
Very conservative
7%
80%
13%
121
15%
72%
13%
180
Moderate / liberal
60%
27%
13%
295
Republican
10%
73%
17%
237
Independent
34%
55%
11%
111
Conservative DEM
32%
60%
8%
32
Mod / lib DEM
65%
24%
10%
216
Liberal DEM
67%
22%
11%
236
34%
56%
10%
62
Independent
28%
60%
13%
26
Mod / liberal GOP
30%
43%
27%
33
Conservative GOP
7%
79%
14%
239
Yes / strongly
5%
84%
11%
66
Yes
10%
77%
13%
44
No / unsure
42%
44%
13%
486
25%
56%
20%
21
25%
59%
16%
99
Some college
30%
60%
10%
120
College graduate
41%
46%
13%
357
36%
55%
10%
181
Male non-college
graduates
25%
62%
13%
116
47%
37%
16%
176
Female non-college
graduates
30%
56%
14%
124
(cont.)
Page 136

May 3-6, 2015
ELIZABETH WARREN/C
REWYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
28%
58%
14%
177
graduate
27%
60%
13%
62
Others
41%
46%
13%
357
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
42%
47%
11%
89
Non-union household
35%
52%
14%
507
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
42%
40%
18%
111
Married
34%
55%
11%
389
No longer married
37%
48%
15%
97
Dad
23%
64%
13%
108
Mom
42%
38%
20%
100
Married / children
32%
52%
16%
179
35%
58%
7%
210
Divorced / children
46%
23%
31%
44%
52%
4%
34
Single / children
28%
53%
19%
20
45%
37%
18%
91
Other / mixed
31%
48%
21%
57
Single women
45%
25%
29%
48
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
38%
50%
12%
192
42%
43%
15%
60
Single men
40%
51%
10%
62
Married men
29%
60%
10%
197
29%
55%
16%
37
White single men
47%
46%
7%
46
White single women
58%
20%
22%
24
White married men
29%
60%
10%
162
White married women
35%
51%
13%
161

men
31%
51%
18%
30

women
37%
47%
15%
49
Other
36%
49%
15%
125
Single mothers
29%
35%
36%
10
Married mothers
43%
41%
16%
84
No longer married
mothers
48%
7%
45%
Non-mothers
34%
54%
12%
497
(cont.)
Page 137

May 3-6, 2015
ELIZABETH WARREN/C
REWYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
45%
47%
8%
46
Middle class
35%
51%
14%
436
Low income
32%
58%
10%
95
Working class
79%
5%
16%
Refused
42%
45%
14%
14
Middle class whites
34%
53%
13%
362

Americans
34%
37%
29%
35
42%
47%
10%
23
39%
50%
12%
17
Other
38%
52%
10%
160
Roman Catholic
31%
58%
11%
121
20%
59%
20%
108
Mainline Protestant
23%
61%
16%
172
Other
52%
37%
12%
27
None
62%
32%
6%
149
24%
58%
18%
204
23%
67%
10%
93
Infrequently
34%
50%
16%
116
Never
45%
45%
10%
27
44%
50%
6%
45
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
21%
59%
21%
63
Active Mainline
Protestants
13%
64%
23%
86
Active other
56%
44%
Other
42%
48%
11%
394
Male born again /

evangelicals
16%
68%
16%
83
38%
54%
9%
214
Female born again /

evangelicals
23%
60%
17%
95
48%
38%
14%
205
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
17%
64%
19%
135
28%
62%
11%
43
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
12%
73%
16%
110
Christians
17%
83%
Christians
39%
29%
33%
25
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
40%
37%
23%
20
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
23
(cont.)
Page 138

May 3-6, 2015
ELIZABETH WARREN/C
REWYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Don't know /
refused
Approve
61%
27%
12%
282
Unsure
38%
54%
8%
27
Disapprove
11%
75%
15%
287
Jobs
46%
38%
15%
77
Economy
43%
46%
12%
131
Health care
58%
36%
6%
58
Illegal immigration
24%
62%
14%
45
Foreign threats
21%
63%
16%
83
Deficit
24%
64%
12%
42
Other
31%
55%
14%
162
Cutting taxes
10%
86%
4%
44
Reducing deficit
21%
65%
15%
75
Creating jobs
36%
47%
18%
124
Increase wages
72%
19%
9%
86
Healthcare costs
34%
48%
18%
54
Retirement
21%
56%
24%
17
Higher education
61%
28%
10%
51
Regulations
4%
92%
4%
48
Combination
36%
50%
15%
82
None
30%
59%
10%
70%
30%
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
No
TOTAL
Views close to own
44%
46%
11%
248
29%
56%
15%
298
Both
28%
58%
14%
31
Unsure
43%
44%
13%
19
Very worried
17%
70%
12%
192
Somewhat worried
38%
46%
16%
224
Not too worried
55%
37%
8%
148
Not at all worried
49%
40%
11%
27
Combination
42%
58%
Unsure
4%
8%
87%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
56%
35%
9%
141
Unsure
42%
40%
18%
35
No
28%
58%
14%
421
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
49%
37%
14%
312
Unsure
27%
42%
30%
28
Disapprove
20%
70%
10%
256
(cont.)
Page 139

May 3-6, 2015
ELIZABETH WARREN/C
REWYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
10%
74%
16%
65
Somewhat worried
15%
68%
17%
172
Not too worried
44%
45%
10%
196
Not at all worried
59%
31%
10%
160
51%
13%
468
No
36%
51%
13%
129
Approve
61%
24%
15%
228
Unsure
25%
42%
33%
29
9%
82%
9%
210
Yes
47%
43%
10%
387
No
12%
68%
20%
130
19%
64%
18%
79
4 of 4
100%
3 of 4
98%
2%
2 of 4
39%
41%
20%
1 of 4
37%
49%
14%
86
0 of 4
TOTAL
84%
36%
Not sure
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
16%
Yes
Disapprove
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
100%
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
26
110
119
83%
17%
255
8%
86%
7%
124
4 of 7
13%
79%
8%
64
3 of 7
26%
57%
17%
51
2 of 7
34%
54%
12%
49
1 of 7
40%
40%
20%
81
0 of 7
58%
27%
15%
227
36%
51%
13%
596
5-7 of 7
Page 140

May 3-6, 2015
DEMCON WILLING TO CONSIDER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
DEMCON
4 of 4
TOTAL
3 of 4
2 of 4
1 of 4
TOTAL
0 of 4
3%
11%
22%
21%
43%
1001
Northeast
5%
18%
24%
22%
30%
195
Midwest
1%
7%
25%
23%
44%
181
South
1%
9%
22%
22%
46%
235
South Central
4%
9%
22%
15%
50%
96
Central Plains
4%
7%
20%
22%
48%
83
Mountain States
4%
9%
12%
15%
60%
70
West
2%
16%
22%
24%
37%
141
California
2%
17%
20%
23%
38%
89
Florida
5%
7%
16%
19%
52%
58
Texas
4%
11%
27%
13%
45%
71
New York
6%
19%
25%
17%
33%
56
Rest of country
2%
10%
22%
23%
43%
727
2%
9%
24%
21%
43%
217
3%
10%
25%
21%
42%
320
No Senate election
3%
13%
19%
22%
43%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
2%
10%
20%
20%
48%
405
4%
14%
25%
21%
37%
366
1%
9%
22%
24%
43%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
2%
9%
19%
22%
47%
241
Other
3%
12%
23%
21%
41%
760
Male
3%
9%
18%
19%
50%
480
Female
2%
13%
26%
24%
36%
521
Male / employed
4%
8%
20%
17%
51%
324
Male / not employed
2%
13%
14%
23%
49%
157
Female / employed
1%
14%
26%
22%
36%
281
3%
12%
25%
25%
36%
240
Not employed
4%
7%
26%
29%
35%
133
Employed
3%
11%
23%
20%
44%
605
Retired
2%
15%
17%
21%
45%
252
33%
40%
27%
11
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
Refused
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
18-34
2%
10%
24%
29%
35%
200
35-44
2%
9%
27%
19%
43%
280
45-64
4%
13%
22%
21%
41%
310
65 or over
3%
13%
14%
19%
50%
200
Unsure / refused
2%
9%
1%
17%
70%
10
18-44
2%
9%
26%
23%
40%
480
45-64
4%
13%
22%
21%
41%
310
65+
3%
13%
14%
19%
50%
200
Unsure / refused
2%
9%
1%
17%
70%
10
(cont.)
Page 141

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
DEMCON
4 of 4
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
3 of 4
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
0 of 4
2%
7%
22%
21%
48%
302
Male / 55+
5%
14%
12%
16%
53%
179
Female / under 55
1%
13%
29%
25%
32%
315
Female / 55+
4%
13%
20%
21%
42%
205
White
2%
11%
17%
19%
50%
751
2%
12%
48%
28%
11%
120
Hispanic / Latino
6%
9%
26%
31%
28%
90
Other
1%
10%
25%
22%
43%
40
1%
13%
18%
26%
42%
128
3%
11%
17%
18%
51%
623
36%
53%
11%
24

voters 35+
2%
15%
51%
22%
11%
96
4%
8%
35%
22%
31%
41
8%
10%
19%
38%
26%
49
9%
34%
42%
16%

18-34
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
1 of 4
Male / under 55
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
2 of 4
TOTAL

35+
1%
10%
23%
17%
50%
32
White seniors
5%
13%
12%
17%
54%
255
Other
2%
11%
26%
23%
39%
746
White men
3%
10%
16%
16%
55%
368
White women
2%
12%
18%
23%
45%
382
Black men
1%
11%
36%
35%
16%
50
Black women
2%
13%
56%
23%
7%
70
Hispanic men
8%
2%
16%
26%
48%
42
Hispanic women
4%
15%
35%
35%
11%
48
Republican
0%
1%
7%
13%
79%
390
Independent
2%
8%
15%
26%
49%
190
Democrat
5%
22%
39%
27%
6%
420
Male / GOP
0%
1%
6%
14%
79%
214
1%
9%
12%
78%
176
Female / GOP
Male / DEM
8%
23%
36%
24%
10%
161
Female / DEM
4%
22%
41%
29%
4%
259
Male / IND
2%
7%
16%
23%
53%
105
Female / IND
2%
9%
14%
31%
44%
85
1%
10%
12%
77%
223
Under 55 / GOP
55 & over / GOP
0%
1%
3%
14%
81%
168
Under 55 / DEM
3%
19%
42%
30%
6%
269
55 & over / DEM
9%
28%
33%
23%
7%
151
Under 55 / IND
2%
6%
18%
28%
45%
125
55 & over / IND
1%
11%
9%
23%
56%
65
(cont.)
Page 142

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
DEMCON
4 of 4
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Republican
0%
Ticket splitter
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
1 of 4
0 of 4
1%
6%
14%
79%
448
6%
20%
24%
51%
61
5%
22%
37%
28%
8%
492
Hard GOP
0%
1%
6%
13%
81%
360
1%
5%
16%
77%
92
Ticket splitter
2%
4%
23%
26%
45%
64
Soft DEM
4%
17%
28%
33%
18%
84
Hard DEM
5%
23%
39%
27%
5%
401
Conservative
1%
2%
14%
16%
67%
536
Moderate
2%
8%
15%
35%
40%
76
Liberal
5%
25%
34%
26%
9%
389
Very conservative
1%
6%
15%
78%
187
1%
3%
18%
16%
62%
348
Moderate / liberal
5%
22%
31%
28%
14%
465
Republican
0%
1%
7%
13%
79%
390
Independent
2%
8%
15%
26%
49%
190
Conservative DEM
3%
5%
48%
28%
16%
103
Mod / lib DEM
6%
28%
36%
27%
3%
318
Liberal DEM
6%
29%
36%
26%
3%
335
3%
7%
38%
33%
19%
157
6%
20%
24%
51%
61
Independent
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
2 of 4
Democrat
Soft GOP
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
3 of 4
TOTAL
Mod / liberal GOP
1%
2%
17%
28%
52%
69
Conservative GOP
0%
0%
4%
11%
84%
379
Yes / strongly
8%
15%
77%
93
Yes
3%
14%
83%
68
No / unsure
3%
13%
25%
23%
36%
840
3%
4%
25%
31%
38%
53
1%
5%
23%
31%
40%
227
Some college
3%
9%
19%
17%
52%
219
College graduate
3%
16%
23%
18%
41%
503
4%
14%
19%
16%
47%
248
Male non-college
graduates
2%
5%
17%
23%
53%
232
2%
18%
26%
20%
35%
254
Female non-college
graduates
2%
8%
25%
27%
37%
266
White non-college
graduate
2%
7%
14%
22%
55%
349
graduate
3%
5%
39%
32%
21%
149
Others
3%
16%
23%
18%
41%
503
Union household
2%
19%
24%
24%
31%
127
Non-union household
3%
10%
22%
21%
44%
874
(cont.)
Page 143

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
DEMCON
4 of 4
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
36%
21%
29%
215
Married
3%
11%
18%
19%
49%
607
No longer married
2%
11%
20%
29%
38%
179
Dad
2%
6%
17%
18%
56%
171
Mom
1%
12%
28%
28%
31%
203
Married / children
2%
10%
20%
22%
47%
299
4%
12%
16%
17%
51%
308
8%
30%
45%
17%
22
12%
16%
33%
36%
60
5%
47%
25%
23%
42
3%
3%
13%
33%
20%
31%
173
Other / mixed
2%
11%
20%
24%
43%
97
Single women
2%
9%
46%
22%
20%
98
Married women
2%
14%
20%
20%
43%
304
2%
12%
22%
33%
31%
118
Single men
3%
13%
27%
20%
37%
117
Married men
3%
8%
15%
18%
55%
302
3%
9%
15%
22%
51%
61
White single men
2%
19%
25%
13%
40%
75
White single women
5%
14%
24%
22%
35%
46
White married men
4%
8%
13%
16%
59%
244
White married women
2%
13%
17%
19%
49%
243

men
2%
9%
19%
16%
54%
49

women
1%
10%
19%
33%
38%
93
Other
3%
11%
36%
28%
22%
250
3%
53%
29%
15%
30
14%
23%
26%
36%
150
8%
31%
39%
23%
23
Single mothers
Married mothers
1%
No longer married
mothers
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Non-mothers
3%
11%
20%
20%
46%
798
Upper class
1%
17%
25%
22%
35%
73
Middle class
3%
12%
21%
18%
47%
696
Low income
2%
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
0 of 4
11%
Single / children
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
1 of 4
3%
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
2 of 4
Single
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
3 of 4
TOTAL
6%
26%
33%
34%
205
22%
11%
57%
11%
Refused
5%
11%
19%
24%
41%
20
Middle class whites
3%
12%
16%
16%
53%
551

Americans
3%
16%
52%
21%
9%
63
6%
8%
28%
29%
29%
57
1%
14%
32%
24%
30%
25
Other
2%
9%
25%
30%
34%
305
(cont.)
Page 144

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
DEMCON
4 of 4
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
2 of 4
1 of 4
0 of 4
Roman Catholic
1%
8%
24%
22%
44%
198
1%
6%
22%
22%
49%
185
Mainline Protestant
1%
6%
19%
22%
52%
280
Other
11%
18%
6%
22%
42%
45
None
4%
21%
28%
20%
27%
262
2%
7%
17%
20%
55%
336
1%
7%
22%
25%
46%
157
Infrequently
3%
8%
27%
25%
37%
191
Never
8%
14%
13%
25%
41%
44
3%
12%
14%
28%
44%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
7%
20%
17%
57%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
5%
17%
18%
59%
131
20%
59%
17
Active other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
3 of 4
TOTAL
17%
4%
Other
3%
13%
25%
22%
37%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
1%
4%
14%
19%
62%
133
4%
12%
20%
19%
45%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
1%
3%
21%
31%
43%
179
2%
18%
28%
20%
32%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
1%
1%
10%
23%
64%
222
1%
9%
38%
32%
20%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
0%
7%
15%
77%
166
Christians
3%
4%
33%
32%
28%
51
Christians
4%
5%
20%
45%
27%
55
15%
44%
32%
9%
39
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
Approve
6%
23%
39%
25%
8%
453
Unsure
2%
9%
20%
33%
37%
62
0%
7%
17%
76%
487
Disapprove
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Jobs
4%
17%
25%
30%
24%
135
Economy
5%
11%
32%
15%
37%
228
Health care
4%
25%
30%
19%
21%
99
Illegal immigration
2%
3%
11%
21%
64%
78
Foreign threats
4%
10%
27%
59%
116
Deficit
9%
11%
24%
56%
76
48%
268
Other
2%
9%
21%
20%
(cont.)
Page 145

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
DEMCON
4 of 4
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Cutting taxes
3 of 4
3%
20%
16%
61%
71
5%
8%
16%
69%
126
Creating jobs
2%
11%
31%
28%
29%
203
Increase wages
10%
31%
24%
17%
18%
132
Healthcare costs
1%
10%
19%
21%
49%
98
7%
20%
39%
34%
41
15%
39%
23%
20%
101
2%
8%
10%
81%
65
7%
19%
22%
48%
141
16%
34%
38%
11%
11
6%
7%
87%
12
2%
Regulations
Combination
3%
None
Unsure
Views close to own
4%
17%
18%
18%
42%
352
2%
8%
25%
24%
42%
571
Both
3%
8%
24%
14%
51%
48
Unsure
2%
18%
11%
16%
52%
30
Very worried
2%
3%
11%
25%
58%
318
Somewhat worried
2%
10%
25%
21%
42%
405
Not too worried
4%
26%
30%
16%
24%
214
Not at all worried
5%
10%
35%
22%
28%
56
42%
58%
Combination
Unsure
3%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
6%
19%
Unsure
2%
18%
No
1%
8%
20%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
3%
18%
27%
Unsure
1%
7%
Disapprove
2%
Very worried
Somewhat worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
1
38%
59%
29%
18%
28%
245
22%
29%
30%
63
22%
49%
693
22%
29%
510
27%
38%
27%
85
3%
15%
17%
63%
406
2%
1%
12%
27%
58%
112
1%
5%
19%
20%
54%
283
Not too worried
1%
15%
23%
22%
40%
341
Not at all worried
7%
18%
29%
19%
27%
258
100%
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
0 of 4
2%
Higher education
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
1 of 4
Reducing deficit
Retirement
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
2 of 4
TOTAL
19%
36%
45%
Yes
4%
14%
21%
14%
47%
645
No
0%
6%
25%
34%
35%
356
Approve
8%
29%
29%
16%
18%
295
Unsure
3%
4%
31%
16%
46%
45
Disapprove
0%
1%
11%
12%
75%
306
(cont.)
Page 146

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
DEMCON
4 of 4
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
3 of 4
2 of 4
1 of 4
TOTAL
0 of 4
Yes
4%
16%
25%
22%
33%
628
No
1%
2%
18%
21%
58%
245
Not sure
2%
5%
15%
19%
60%
128
5-7 of 7
0%
2%
4%
9%
85%
150
4 of 7
1%
1%
8%
8%
81%
96
3 of 7
4%
2%
9%
23%
62%
91
2 of 7
2%
8%
22%
16%
53%
87
1 of 7
1%
11%
28%
25%
35%
164
0 of 7
4%
20%
32%
29%
15%
413
3%
11%
22%
21%
43%
1001
Page 147

May 3-6, 2015
RJEBYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR JEB
BUSH/C
RJEBYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
36%
60%
4%
940
Northeast
27%
68%
5%
189
Midwest
34%
64%
2%
170
South
41%
54%
6%
224
South Central
46%
53%
1%
90
Central Plains
33%
60%
7%
78
Mountain States
43%
53%
4%
63
West
34%
64%
1%
127
California
38%
61%
1%
82
Florida
47%
49%
4%
55
Texas
50%
48%
2%
65
New York
38%
53%
9%
56
Rest of country
33%
63%
4%
683
42%
55%
4%
200
31%
65%
4%
305
No Senate election
37%
60%
4%
435
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
39%
58%
4%
372
31%
65%
4%
352
38%
58%
4%
216
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
38%
58%
3%
228
Other
35%
61%
4%
713
Male
42%
55%
4%
457
Female
30%
66%
4%
483
Male / employed
41%
55%
4%
308
Male / not employed
43%
54%
4%
149
Female / employed
24%
71%
5%
260
37%
60%
3%
223
Not employed
27%
70%
3%
114
Employed
33%
62%
5%
568
Retired
45%
52%
3%
248
Refused
39%
49%
12%
10
18-34
24%
70%
6%
166
35-44
33%
62%
5%
271
45-64
36%
62%
2%
300
65 or over
48%
48%
3%
193
Unsure / refused
52%
25%
23%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 148

May 3-6, 2015
BUSH/C
RJEBYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
29%
65%
5%
437
45-64
36%
62%
2%
300
65+
48%
48%
3%
193
Unsure / refused
52%
25%
23%
10
Male / under 55
40%
57%
4%
280
Male / 55+
45%
51%
4%
176
Female / under 55
23%
73%
5%
285
Female / 55+
41%
56%
3%
199
White
41%
55%
5%
717
14%
85%
1%
114
Hispanic / Latino
31%
66%
3%
69
Other
18%
77%
6%
39
29%
64%
7%
112
43%
53%
4%
606
8%
92%

voters 35+
15%
84%
1%
95
19%
75%
6%
28
39%
59%
1%
41
6%
94%

35+
20%
73%
7%
32
White seniors
49%
48%
3%
248
Other
31%
65%
4%
692
White men
45%
51%
5%
357
White women
37%
59%
5%
361
Black men
26%
72%
2%
47
Black women
5%
95%
67
Hispanic men
38%
62%
33
Hispanic women
25%
69%
6%
37
Republican
59%
36%
5%
375
Independent
35%
60%
5%
173
Democrat
14%
84%
2%
392
Male / GOP
60%
35%
5%
206
Female / GOP
59%
36%
5%
168
Male / DEM
19%
79%
2%
152
Female / DEM
10%
87%
3%
239
Male / IND
38%
58%
4%
98
Female / IND
32%
63%
5%
76

18-34
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Don't know /
refused
18-44
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
No
TOTAL
19
(cont.)
Page 149

May 3-6, 2015
BUSH/C
RJEBYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
52%
41%
7%
209
55 & over / GOP
68%
28%
4%
166
Under 55 / DEM
13%
84%
2%
246
55 & over / DEM
14%
83%
3%
146
Under 55 / IND
30%
65%
4%
110
55 & over / IND
44%
51%
5%
63
Republican
56%
38%
5%
428
Ticket splitter
47%
44%
9%
47
Democrat
16%
82%
2%
465
Hard GOP
59%
35%
6%
347
Soft GOP
48%
50%
2%
85
Ticket splitter
46%
45%
8%
52
Soft DEM
25%
70%
5%
80
Hard DEM
12%
86%
2%
376
Conservative
51%
45%
4%
504
Moderate
25%
62%
13%
64
Liberal
17%
80%
3%
372
Very conservative
48%
47%
5%
175
53%
44%
3%
329
Moderate / liberal
18%
78%
4%
436
Republican
59%
36%
5%
375
Independent
35%
60%
5%
173
Conservative DEM
21%
78%
1%
90
Mod / lib DEM
11%
86%
3%
302
Liberal DEM
13%
84%
2%
327
21%
77%
2%
138
Independent
47%
44%
9%
47
Mod / liberal GOP
42%
52%
6%
61
Conservative GOP
59%
36%
5%
367
Yes / strongly
44%
54%
2%
90
Yes
55%
38%
6%
66
No / unsure
33%
63%
4%
785
57%
38%
5%
40
37%
59%
4%
199
Some college
35%
62%
3%
206
College graduate
34%
62%
4%
494
40%
55%
5%
243
Male non-college
graduates
43%
54%
3%
213
28%
68%
4%
251
Female non-college
graduates
33%
63%
4%
233
(cont.)
Page 150

May 3-6, 2015
BUSH/C
RJEBYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
44%
52%
4%
320
graduate
22%
76%
1%
126
Others
34%
62%
4%
494
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
28%
65%
7%
120
Non-union household
37%
60%
4%
820
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
28%
71%
2%
183
Married
38%
57%
5%
583
No longer married
37%
59%
4%
173
Dad
44%
52%
4%
164
Mom
22%
71%
7%
184
Married / children
32%
62%
6%
284
43%
53%
4%
300
Divorced / children
21%
69%
10%
21
33%
63%
4%
58
Single / children
34%
66%
26%
72%
2%
151
Other / mixed
43%
54%
2%
94
Single women
20%
79%
1%
81
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
33
Married women
32%
63%
5%
287
34%
63%
4%
115
Single men
34%
64%
2%
102
Married men
44%
52%
5%
296
44%
52%
4%
59
White single men
34%
62%
4%
70
White single women
35%
65%
White married men
47%
47%
5%
240
White married women
36%
59%
5%
231

men
47%
52%
1%
47

women
39%
56%
5%
90
Other
20%
78%
2%
223
Single mothers
19%
81%
Married mothers
21%
71%
7%
138
No longer married
mothers
31%
60%
9%
23
Non-mothers
39%
58%
3%
756
40
22
(cont.)
Page 151

May 3-6, 2015
BUSH/C
RJEBYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
39%
60%
1%
70
Middle class
38%
57%
5%
664
Low income
28%
71%
1%
180
Working class
14%
86%
Refused
34%
56%
9%
20
Middle class whites
43%
52%
5%
533

Americans
11%
87%
2%
60
30%
65%
5%
47
9%
84%
8%
24
Other
31%
68%
2%
276
Roman Catholic
43%
53%
3%
184
41%
53%
6%
174
Mainline Protestant
36%
60%
4%
268
Other
35%
64%
1%
42
None
24%
72%
3%
242
41%
55%
4%
314
39%
57%
4%
146
Infrequently
37%
58%
5%
182
Never
27%
71%
1%
43
41%
57%
2%
73
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
52%
44%
4%
99
Active Mainline
Protestants
35%
59%
6%
126
Active other
30%
70%
Other
33%
63%
4%
628
Male born again /

evangelicals
41%
55%
4%
125
42%
54%
4%
332
Female born again /

evangelicals
36%
59%
5%
169
27%
69%
4%
314
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
47%
47%
6%
208
18%
82%
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
54%
42%
Christians
23%
77%
Christians
21%
64%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
11%
89%
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
15
85
4%
160
50
14%
49
36
(cont.)
Page 152

May 3-6, 2015
BUSH/C
RJEBYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Approve
17%
81%
2%
427
Unsure
41%
49%
11%
48
Disapprove
52%
43%
5%
465
Jobs
30%
67%
2%
123
Economy
28%
70%
3%
212
Health care
21%
75%
4%
94
Illegal immigration
48%
51%
1%
76
Foreign threats
49%
47%
4%
112
Deficit
51%
41%
7%
73
Other
37%
58%
6%
249
Cutting taxes
43%
56%
1%
67
Reducing deficit
55%
41%
5%
123
Creating jobs
38%
60%
2%
189
Increase wages
12%
85%
3%
122
Healthcare costs
39%
54%
7%
93
Retirement
32%
66%
1%
38
Higher education
31%
68%
2%
88
Regulations
35%
60%
5%
65
9%
134
Combination
32%
59%
None
43%
57%
Unsure
67%
29%
4%
12
Views close to own
30%
68%
2%
338
40%
55%
5%
528
Both
34%
58%
8%
47
Unsure
25%
63%
12%
27
Very worried
40%
55%
5%
296
Somewhat worried
36%
60%
4%
378
Not too worried
33%
65%
2%
207
Not at all worried
25%
70%
5%
53
Combination
100%
Unsure
54%
46%
31%
67%
3%
232
33%
57%
9%
54
No
38%
58%
4%
654
Approve
28%
68%
4%
490
Unsure
31%
63%
6%
67
Disapprove
47%
50%
3%
383
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
Unsure
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
(cont.)
Page 153

May 3-6, 2015
BUSH/C
RJEBYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
43%
54%
3%
101
Somewhat worried
44%
52%
5%
265
Not too worried
33%
62%
5%
327
Not at all worried
29%
70%
1%
240
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
55%
45%
Yes
37%
60%
3%
634
No
33%
62%
6%
306
Approve
24%
74%
2%
291
Unsure
24%
59%
17%
45
Disapprove
52%
46%
2%
298
Yes
30%
67%
3%
593
No
45%
51%
4%
229
Not sure
45%
46%
9%
118
4 of 4
21%
77%
3%
26
3 of 4
9%
89%
1%
110
2 of 4
24%
74%
2%
214
1 of 4
27%
69%
5%
182
0 of 4
54%
41%
5%
408
5-7 of 7
80%
18%
2%
150
4 of 7
66%
33%
2%
96
3 of 7
53%
45%
2%
91
2 of 7
55%
45%
84
56%
5%
149
93%
7%
371
60%
4%
940
1 of 7
39%
0 of 7
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
36%
Page 154

May 3-6, 2015
RTCYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR TED
CRUZ/C
RTCYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
35%
55%
10%
738
Northeast
24%
63%
13%
154
Midwest
37%
54%
8%
123
South
35%
50%
15%
168
South Central
53%
42%
5%
86
Central Plains
37%
51%
12%
53
Mountain States
35%
53%
12%
48
West
35%
61%
4%
106
California
36%
62%
2%
70
Florida
49%
38%
12%
39
Texas
49%
47%
4%
63
New York
31%
58%
11%
42
Rest of country
33%
55%
12%
525
38%
49%
13%
157
35%
58%
7%
246
No Senate election
34%
55%
11%
335
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
40%
49%
11%
282
30%
62%
8%
287
36%
52%
12%
170
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
36%
52%
12%
174
Other
35%
55%
10%
564
Male
38%
54%
8%
380
Female
32%
55%
13%
358
Male / employed
37%
55%
8%
257
Male / not employed
40%
51%
9%
123
Female / employed
29%
58%
13%
186
36%
52%
12%
172
Not employed
32%
57%
11%
83
Employed
34%
56%
10%
443
Retired
41%
50%
10%
206
Refused
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
9%
43%
48%
18-34
24%
57%
19%
126
35-44
38%
53%
9%
210
45-64
33%
60%
7%
230
65 or over
43%
47%
9%
164
Unsure / refused
33%
56%
11%
(cont.)
Page 155

May 3-6, 2015
CRUZ/C
RTCYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
33%
54%
13%
336
45-64
33%
60%
7%
230
65+
43%
47%
9%
164
Unsure / refused
33%
56%
11%
Male / under 55
37%
54%
9%
229
Male / 55+
39%
54%
7%
151
Female / under 55
29%
57%
15%
203
Female / 55+
37%
53%
10%
156
White
39%
51%
10%
571
18%
67%
15%
79
Hispanic / Latino
24%
69%
7%
56
Other
32%
56%
12%
32
30%
57%
13%
85
40%
50%
9%
487
African American
millenials 18-34
15%
30%
55%
16

voters 35+
19%
76%
5%
63
82%
18%
19
36%
62%
2%
37

18-34
27%
61%
12%

35+
34%
55%
12%
26
White seniors
41%
50%
9%
210
Other
33%
56%
11%
528
White men
41%
52%
7%
302
White women
37%
51%
12%
269
Black men
26%
61%
13%
30
Black women
13%
71%
16%
48
Hispanic men
23%
71%
6%
31
Hispanic women
25%
66%
9%
25
Republican
61%
27%
11%
310
Independent
36%
54%
10%
135
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Don't know /
refused
18-44
WHITE SENIORS
No
TOTAL
7%
84%
9%
293
Male / GOP
62%
28%
10%
181
Female / GOP
61%
27%
12%
129
3%
90%
6%
121
Female / DEM
10%
79%
12%
172
Male / IND
37%
58%
5%
78
Female / IND
36%
48%
16%
57
Male / DEM
(cont.)
Page 156

May 3-6, 2015
CRUZ/C
RTCYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
60%
28%
12%
167
55 & over / GOP
63%
27%
10%
143
Under 55 / DEM
8%
82%
11%
183
55 & over / DEM
6%
87%
7%
110
Under 55 / IND
36%
52%
12%
82
55 & over / IND
37%
56%
7%
54
Republican
62%
28%
10%
358
Ticket splitter
26%
59%
14%
31
Democrat
9%
81%
10%
349
Hard GOP
63%
26%
11%
288
Soft GOP
59%
34%
6%
73
Ticket splitter
25%
61%
14%
38
9%
77%
14%
57
Hard DEM
7%
84%
9%
282
Conservative
58%
33%
9%
398
Moderate
10%
63%
27%
51
9%
83%
9%
290
Very conservative
66%
25%
9%
155
53%
38%
9%
242
9%
80%
11%
341
Republican
61%
27%
11%
310
Independent
36%
54%
10%
135
Conservative DEM
14%
76%
10%
49
Liberal
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
Soft DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
No
TOTAL
Mod / lib DEM
6%
85%
9%
244
Liberal DEM
6%
86%
8%
260
17%
66%
17%
89
Independent
26%
59%
14%
31
Mod / liberal GOP
26%
53%
21%
44
Conservative GOP
67%
25%
9%
314
Yes / strongly
80%
12%
8%
75
Yes
66%
27%
7%
59
No / unsure
27%
62%
11%
605
52%
44%
4%
25
35%
48%
17%
134
Some college
36%
54%
10%
164
College graduate
34%
57%
9%
415
39%
55%
6%
218
Male non-college
graduates
37%
52%
11%
163
28%
60%
12%
198
Female non-college
graduates
37%
49%
13%
160
(cont.)
Page 157

May 3-6, 2015
CRUZ/C
RTCYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
43%
46%
11%
236
graduate
21%
64%
15%
88
Others
34%
57%
9%
415
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
33%
57%
10%
98
Non-union household
36%
54%
10%
640
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
17%
68%
14%
151
Married
42%
50%
8%
471
No longer married
31%
57%
13%
116
Dad
46%
48%
7%
143
Mom
33%
50%
17%
118
Married / children
43%
47%
10%
219
41%
51%
7%
252
Divorced / children
25%
39%
37%
11
24%
66%
9%
39
Single / children
22%
66%
12%
26
16%
69%
15%
125
Other / mixed
35%
54%
11%
66
Single women
13%
68%
19%
64
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
39%
51%
10%
216
30%
55%
16%
78
Single men
20%
68%
11%
86
Married men
45%
48%
7%
256
32%
61%
7%
39
White single men
23%
69%
8%
63
White single women
25%
63%
11%
31
White married men
47%
46%
7%
207
White married women
41%
49%
11%
177

men
34%
59%
7%
32

women
32%
50%
18%
60
Other
23%
65%
12%
167
Single mothers
21%
59%
19%
16
Married mothers
36%
51%
14%
90
No longer married
mothers
32%
30%
38%
12
Non-mothers
36%
55%
9%
620
(cont.)
Page 158

May 3-6, 2015
CRUZ/C
RTCYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
32%
67%
2%
63
Middle class
39%
51%
10%
531
Low income
23%
64%
13%
125
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
7%
93%
Refused
16%
55%
29%
16
Middle class whites
42%
48%
10%
430

Americans
23%
64%
12%
45
26%
63%
12%
36
32%
58%
10%
20
Other
25%
65%
10%
207
Roman Catholic
44%
48%
8%
141
47%
39%
14%
136
Mainline Protestant
39%
47%
14%
222
Other
31%
68%
1%
34
None
17%
77%
7%
184
48%
39%
12%
257
45%
46%
10%
116
Infrequently
28%
59%
13%
144
Never
32%
64%
3%
32
48%
45%
7%
57
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
56%
35%
10%
85
Active Mainline
Protestants
43%
37%
20%
99
Active other
42%
58%
Other
28%
63%
9%
484
Male born again /

evangelicals
56%
34%
10%
101
31%
61%
7%
280
Female born again /

evangelicals
39%
43%
18%
123
29%
61%
10%
235
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
54%
30%
15%
161
27%
61%
12%
62
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
65%
24%
11%
130
Christians
39%
55%
6%
34
Christians
12%
58%
31%
31
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
13%
68%
19%
28
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
13
(cont.)
Page 159

May 3-6, 2015
CRUZ/C
RTCYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Approve
9%
83%
8%
332
Unsure
28%
53%
19%
30
Disapprove
59%
30%
11%
377
Jobs
27%
64%
9%
90
Economy
26%
67%
6%
169
Health care
18%
74%
8%
72
Illegal immigration
50%
36%
14%
61
Foreign threats
55%
36%
9%
87
Deficit
38%
43%
19%
58
Other
39%
50%
12%
201
Cutting taxes
70%
27%
3%
48
Reducing deficit
54%
34%
12%
100
Creating jobs
12%
148
26%
63%
Increase wages
6%
87%
7%
100
Healthcare costs
31%
54%
15%
72
Retirement
33%
55%
12%
20
Higher education
17%
74%
9%
73
Regulations
67%
25%
9%
57
Combination
41%
47%
12%
104
None
13%
84%
3%
Unsure
63%
31%
7%
Views close to own
37%
57%
6%
281
35%
52%
13%
398
Both
32%
61%
7%
37
Unsure
30%
51%
20%
22
Very worried
54%
35%
11%
225
Somewhat worried
35%
57%
9%
290
Not too worried
18%
73%
9%
176
Not at all worried
12%
76%
12%
39
Combination
Unsure
100%
2%
3%
95%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
22%
73%
5%
170
Unsure
24%
57%
20%
43
No
40%
48%
11%
525
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
20%
70%
10%
374
Unsure
23%
51%
26%
49
Disapprove
55%
37%
8%
315
(cont.)
Page 160

May 3-6, 2015
CRUZ/C
RTCYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
53%
36%
10%
73
Somewhat worried
50%
40%
10%
214
Not too worried
33%
58%
9%
246
Not at all worried
17%
73%
9%
198
22%
78%
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Yes
37%
55%
8%
561
No
31%
52%
17%
177
Approve
9%
84%
7%
259
Unsure
43%
46%
12%
30
Disapprove
62%
29%
9%
272
Yes
27%
65%
7%
470
No
49%
32%
19%
167
Not sure
9%
101
50%
42%
4 of 4
5%
95%
3 of 4
6%
92%
2%
109
2 of 4
8%
80%
11%
150
1 of 4
26%
55%
19%
111
0 of 4
62%
28%
10%
342
5-7 of 7
89%
8%
2%
145
4 of 7
75%
22%
3%
85
3 of 7
55%
30%
15%
77
2 of 7
20%
66%
15%
63
66%
22%
101
90%
10%
267
55%
10%
738
1 of 7
12%
0 of 7
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
35%
26
Page 161

May 3-6, 2015
RSWYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR
SCOTT WALKER/C
RSWYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
37%
50%
13%
531
Northeast
24%
57%
19%
115
Midwest
39%
54%
7%
98
South
50%
43%
8%
116
South Central
40%
50%
11%
43
Central Plains
30%
49%
21%
53
Mountain States
50%
37%
13%
33
West
34%
49%
17%
73
California
40%
42%
18%
47
Florida
58%
37%
5%
35
Texas
32%
53%
15%
31
New York
22%
60%
18%
32
Rest of country
37%
51%
13%
387
41%
47%
12%
90
39%
48%
14%
188
No Senate election
35%
52%
13%
252
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
43%
46%
10%
213
29%
54%
17%
215
41%
49%
10%
103
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
46%
45%
9%
140
Other
34%
51%
14%
391
Male
44%
42%
14%
281
Female
30%
58%
12%
249
Male / employed
43%
44%
13%
193
Male / not employed
46%
40%
15%
89
Female / employed
24%
66%
10%
130
35%
50%
15%
120
Not employed
25%
63%
13%
45
Employed
36%
53%
12%
322
Retired
44%
41%
15%
161
Refused
27%
16%
58%
18-34
21%
60%
19%
74
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
35-44
37%
50%
13%
142
45-64
37%
55%
9%
169
65 or over
47%
40%
14%
139
Unsure / refused
54%
13%
33%
(cont.)
Page 162

May 3-6, 2015
SCOTT WALKER/C
RSWYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
31%
53%
15%
215
45-64
37%
55%
9%
169
65+
47%
40%
14%
139
Unsure / refused
54%
13%
33%
Male / under 55
42%
44%
15%
152
Male / 55+
47%
41%
13%
129
Female / under 55
21%
65%
14%
131
Female / 55+
39%
50%
11%
118
White
40%
46%
14%
436
14%
78%
8%
41
Hispanic / Latino
21%
66%
13%
35
Other
46%
45%
9%
18
26%
53%
22%
53
42%
45%
13%
383
62%
38%
81%
2%
35

voters 35+
17%
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
11
100%
30%
52%
19%
25

18-34
40%
49%
11%

35+
48%
44%
8%
15
White seniors
46%
42%
12%
178
Other
33%
53%
14%
353
White men
47%
38%
14%
236
White women
32%
55%
13%
200
Black men
33%
67%
Black women
3%
84%
13%
26
Hispanic men
15
9%
73%
17%
21
Hispanic women
37%
56%
6%
15
Republican
66%
21%
13%
225
Independent
45%
40%
14%
95
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Don't know /
refused
18-44
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
No
TOTAL
3%
85%
12%
210
Male / GOP
67%
17%
16%
143
Female / GOP
65%
26%
9%
82
Male / DEM
2%
84%
14%
84
Female / DEM
3%
86%
11%
126
Male / IND
48%
44%
8%
54
Female / IND
42%
35%
23%
41
(cont.)
Page 163

May 3-6, 2015
SCOTT WALKER/C
RSWYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
62%
22%
16%
107
55 & over / GOP
70%
19%
11%
118
Under 55 / DEM
3%
84%
13%
125
55 & over / DEM
2%
87%
11%
85
Under 55 / IND
40%
47%
13%
52
55 & over / IND
51%
33%
16%
43
Republican
69%
19%
12%
260
Ticket splitter
22%
70%
9%
20
Democrat
5%
80%
15%
252
Hard GOP
68%
19%
13%
210
Soft GOP
71%
21%
8%
54
Ticket splitter
30%
53%
17%
21
Soft DEM
15%
63%
22%
40
2%
85%
13%
205
Conservative
64%
26%
10%
283
Moderate
17%
53%
31%
32
5%
80%
15%
216
Very conservative
74%
18%
8%
118
57%
32%
11%
165
7%
76%
17%
248
Republican
66%
21%
13%
225
Independent
45%
40%
14%
95
Conservative DEM
12%
74%
14%
28
Liberal
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
Hard DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
No
TOTAL
Mod / lib DEM
1%
87%
12%
183
Liberal DEM
2%
83%
15%
202
18%
68%
14%
50
Independent
22%
70%
9%
20
Mod / liberal GOP
33%
24%
43%
25
Conservative GOP
73%
18%
8%
234
Yes / strongly
77%
12%
10%
68
Yes
83%
8%
9%
42
No / unsure
26%
60%
14%
421
33%
45%
22%
21
44%
42%
14%
85
Some college
43%
46%
11%
116
College graduate
33%
54%
13%
309
41%
46%
13%
171
Male non-college
graduates
48%
37%
15%
110
23%
64%
13%
137
Female non-college
graduates
37%
51%
12%
112
(cont.)
Page 164

May 3-6, 2015
SCOTT WALKER/C
RSWYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
50%
36%
14%
168
graduate
20%
68%
11%
54
Others
33%
54%
13%
309
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
24%
63%
12%
79
Non-union household
40%
47%
13%
451
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
20%
66%
13%
86
Married
42%
46%
13%
357
No longer married
36%
50%
14%
87
Dad
50%
37%
14%
97
Mom
24%
60%
15%
84
Married / children
38%
47%
14%
161
44%
44%
12%
197
Divorced / children
28%
51%
21%
45%
53%
3%
30
Single / children
39%
54%
7%
13
17%
69%
14%
73
Other / mixed
33%
48%
19%
51
Single women
16%
69%
15%
35
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
33%
55%
11%
163
27%
59%
14%
51
Single men
23%
65%
12%
51
Married men
48%
37%
14%
195
50%
37%
13%
36
White single men
23%
62%
15%
40
White single women
14%
76%
10%
18
White married men
52%
34%
15%
165
White married women
36%
52%
12%
138

men
53%
34%
13%
30

women
30%
54%
16%
44
Other
23%
67%
10%
95
Single mothers
30%
61%
9%
10
Married mothers
24%
61%
14%
69
No longer married
mothers
13%
42%
45%
Non-mothers
40%
48%
13%
447
(cont.)
Page 165

May 3-6, 2015
SCOTT WALKER/C
RSWYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
35%
56%
9%
51
Middle class
41%
47%
12%
383
Low income
26%
54%
21%
83
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
5%
95%
Refused
32%
60%
8%
10
Middle class whites
44%
44%
12%
328

Americans
15%
72%
13%
24
21%
70%
10%
19
39%
51%
9%
11
Other
29%
56%
15%
148
Roman Catholic
48%
44%
8%
110
49%
38%
13%
89
Mainline Protestant
45%
41%
14%
155
Other
30%
55%
16%
25
None
14%
71%
15%
133
52%
37%
12%
178
43%
48%
10%
83
Infrequently
36%
48%
15%
104
Never
33%
58%
9%
24
48%
47%
5%
43
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
58%
27%
14%
55
Active Mainline
Protestants
49%
36%
15%
71
Active other
58%
42%
Other
30%
56%
14%
354
Male born again /

evangelicals
68%
20%
12%
78
35%
51%
14%
204
Female born again /

evangelicals
42%
43%
14%
71
25%
64%
11%
178
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
62%
22%
16%
116
32%
65%
3%
33
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
70%
19%
11%
100
Christians
48%
52%
Christians
16%
39%
45%
17
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
15%
79%
6%
16
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
17
(cont.)
Page 166

May 3-6, 2015
SCOTT WALKER/C
RSWYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Approve
7%
79%
14%
241
Unsure
21%
57%
22%
22
Disapprove
65%
23%
12%
268
Jobs
17%
66%
16%
77
Economy
31%
55%
14%
120
Health care
10%
75%
15%
44
Illegal immigration
69%
24%
7%
40
Foreign threats
55%
36%
9%
75
Deficit
65%
20%
16%
44
Other
35%
53%
13%
132
Cutting taxes
74%
19%
7%
39
Reducing deficit
55%
21%
23%
77
Creating jobs
16%
108
25%
58%
Increase wages
1%
92%
7%
84
Healthcare costs
35%
47%
19%
46
Retirement
22%
74%
4%
15
Higher education
14%
76%
10%
38
Regulations
83%
13%
4%
45
Combination
43%
42%
15%
70
None
21%
79%
Unsure
84%
11%
6%
Views close to own
38%
52%
9%
219
40%
47%
13%
265
Both
20%
47%
33%
31
Unsure
18%
65%
17%
16
Very worried
59%
29%
11%
157
Somewhat worried
31%
52%
16%
202
Not too worried
26%
64%
11%
140
Not at all worried
19%
77%
5%
29
Combination
100%
Unsure
20%
80%
24%
66%
10%
127
20%
45%
35%
35
No
43%
45%
12%
369
Approve
22%
63%
15%
273
Unsure
14%
47%
39%
25
Disapprove
57%
35%
8%
233
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
Unsure
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
(cont.)
Page 167

May 3-6, 2015
SCOTT WALKER/C
RSWYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
53%
32%
14%
48
Somewhat worried
55%
33%
13%
151
Not too worried
32%
52%
16%
183
Not at all worried
20%
72%
8%
145
16%
84%
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Yes
41%
48%
11%
423
No
22%
57%
21%
107
Approve
13%
74%
13%
199
Unsure
39%
42%
19%
24
Disapprove
69%
23%
8%
200
Yes
28%
60%
11%
344
No
54%
28%
18%
114
Not sure
53%
33%
14%
73
4 of 4
8%
89%
3%
26
3 of 4
2%
88%
9%
96
2 of 4
12%
69%
19%
84
1 of 4
24%
55%
21%
88
0 of 4
68%
21%
11%
238
5-7 of 7
95%
4%
1%
132
4 of 7
62%
28%
9%
55
3 of 7
40%
36%
23%
53
2 of 7
24%
51%
24%
38
1 of 7
13%
64%
23%
57
86%
14%
197
50%
13%
531
0 of 7
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
37%
Page 168

May 3-6, 2015
RMRYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR
MARCO RUBIO/C
RMRYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
42%
50%
8%
743
Northeast
33%
57%
11%
150
Midwest
39%
54%
7%
127
South
47%
44%
9%
174
South Central
44%
52%
4%
78
Central Plains
37%
47%
16%
60
Mountain States
63%
27%
10%
48
West
40%
58%
2%
106
California
45%
54%
1%
69
Florida
55%
37%
8%
51
Texas
34%
62%
4%
58
New York
32%
53%
15%
43
Rest of country
42%
49%
9%
522
40%
53%
7%
153
39%
54%
7%
243
No Senate election
44%
46%
10%
347
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
45%
49%
6%
302
37%
56%
8%
287
45%
42%
13%
154
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
50%
43%
7%
179
Other
39%
52%
8%
564
Male
47%
45%
8%
389
Female
36%
56%
8%
354
Male / employed
47%
45%
8%
264
Male / not employed
46%
45%
9%
126
Female / employed
33%
58%
9%
187
40%
53%
7%
167
Not employed
40%
57%
3%
78
Employed
41%
50%
8%
450
Retired
45%
48%
7%
205
Refused
11%
25%
64%
10
18-34
31%
53%
15%
127
35-44
42%
49%
10%
204
45-64
43%
54%
3%
241
65 or over
48%
46%
7%
164
Unsure / refused
65%
18%
17%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 169

May 3-6, 2015
MARCO RUBIO/C
RMRYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Don't know /
refused
18-44
38%
50%
12%
331
45-64
43%
54%
3%
241
65+
48%
46%
7%
164
Unsure / refused
65%
18%
17%
Male / under 55
45%
46%
10%
235
Male / 55+
50%
44%
5%
155
Female / under 55
32%
59%
9%
201
Female / 55+
42%
51%
6%
153
White
46%
45%
9%
576
12%
88%
Hispanic / Latino
35%
58%
8%
64
Other
42%
45%
13%
34
36%
47%
16%
89
48%
45%
7%
487
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
No
TOTAL
70
100%
6
64

voters 35+
14%
86%
21%
65%
14%
25
44%
53%
3%
39

18-34
33%
45%
22%

35+
44%
45%
11%
27
White seniors
49%
43%
7%
217
Other
39%
53%
8%
527
White men
50%
42%
8%
311
White women
42%
48%
10%
264
Black men
28%
72%
28
Black women
2%
98%
42
Hispanic men
34%
53%
13%
34
Hispanic women
36%
62%
2%
30
Republican
68%
23%
9%
323
Independent
48%
42%
10%
127
Democrat
10%
83%
6%
293
Male / GOP
70%
21%
9%
190
Female / GOP
66%
27%
8%
133
Male / DEM
10%
84%
6%
124
Female / DEM
10%
83%
7%
170
Male / IND
50%
42%
8%
76
Female / IND
44%
42%
14%
51
(cont.)
Page 170

May 3-6, 2015
MARCO RUBIO/C
RMRYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
64%
26%
10%
177
55 & over / GOP
73%
21%
7%
145
Under 55 / DEM
12%
80%
8%
183
55 & over / DEM
7%
88%
4%
110
Under 55 / IND
43%
45%
13%
75
55 & over / IND
55%
37%
7%
52
Republican
68%
23%
9%
368
Ticket splitter
37%
51%
12%
36
Democrat
14%
80%
7%
339
Hard GOP
69%
23%
9%
299
Soft GOP
67%
25%
8%
73
Ticket splitter
44%
40%
17%
38
Soft DEM
26%
61%
13%
54
9%
85%
5%
279
Conservative
65%
28%
8%
402
Moderate
29%
49%
21%
49
Liberal
13%
81%
6%
292
Very conservative
69%
25%
5%
152
62%
29%
9%
250
Moderate / liberal
15%
77%
8%
341
Republican
68%
23%
9%
323
Independent
48%
42%
10%
127
Conservative DEM
26%
67%
7%
51
Mod / lib DEM

PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
Hard DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
No
TOTAL
7%
87%
6%
242
Liberal DEM
10%
85%
5%
257
25%
63%
11%
82
Independent
37%
51%
12%
36
Mod / liberal GOP
38%
45%
17%
46
Conservative GOP
72%
20%
8%
322
Yes / strongly
75%
22%
3%
79
Yes
76%
21%
3%
58
No / unsure
34%
57%
9%
606
57%
42%
1%
25
41%
49%
10%
138
Some college
39%
52%
8%
163
College graduate
42%
50%
8%
418
49%
45%
6%
222
Male non-college
graduates
44%
46%
10%
168
34%
56%
9%
196
Female non-college
graduates
38%
55%
7%
158
(cont.)
Page 171

May 3-6, 2015
MARCO RUBIO/C
RMRYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
47%
44%
9%
237
graduate
25%
67%
8%
88
Others
42%
50%
8%
418
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
32%
60%
8%
105
Non-union household
43%
49%
8%
639
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
22%
68%
10%
152
Married
49%
44%
7%
469
No longer married
40%
50%
10%
122
Dad
54%
40%
7%
149
Mom
36%
53%
11%
132
Married / children
49%
42%
8%
232
48%
47%
5%
237
Divorced / children
41%
28%
31%
12
36%
54%
10%
43
Single / children
17%
82%
2%
29
24%
65%
12%
123
Other / mixed
42%
51%
7%
66
Single women
18%
77%
4%
63
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
41%
51%
8%
214
37%
51%
12%
77
Single men
25%
61%
13%
89
Married men
55%
39%
6%
256
45%
48%
7%
44
White single men
28%
60%
12%
62
White single women
36%
59%
5%
30
White married men
57%
36%
7%
211
White married women
43%
48%
9%
174

men
45%
47%
8%
38

women
41%
44%
15%
60
Other
27%
68%
6%
168
Single mothers
18%
82%
Married mothers
39%
50%
10%
100
No longer married
mothers
36%
36%
28%
14
Non-mothers
43%
49%
7%
612
18
(cont.)
Page 172

May 3-6, 2015
MARCO RUBIO/C
RMRYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
37%
61%
2%
59
Middle class
45%
46%
9%
551
Low income
31%
62%
6%
115
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
7%
93%
Refused
35%
64%
2%
15
Middle class whites
50%
40%
10%
440

Americans
11%
89%
34%
56%
10%
38%
47%
15%
21
45
44
Other
33%
62%
5%
193
Roman Catholic
55%
38%
7%
147
47%
45%
9%
133
Mainline Protestant
45%
44%
10%
211
Other
48%
49%
3%
36
None
24%
69%
7%
193
54%
38%
8%
250
46%
48%
7%
119
Infrequently
41%
46%
12%
141
Never
33%
67%
55%
41%
4%
61
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
58%
35%
7%
78
Active Mainline
Protestants
48%
40%
12%
95
Active other
80%
20%
Other
35%
56%
8%
495
Male born again /

evangelicals
56%
38%
6%
107
44%
48%
9%
283
Female born again /

evangelicals
43%
47%
10%
117
33%
60%
7%
237
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
56%
34%
10%
165
30%
67%
3%
59
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
67%
27%
6%
133
Christians
44%
56%
Christians
11%
63%
26%
32
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
11%
81%
8%
27
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
33
14
32
(cont.)
Page 173

May 3-6, 2015
MARCO RUBIO/C
RMRYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
14%
79%
6%
334
Unsure
41%
42%
18%
30
Disapprove
66%
25%
9%
379
Jobs
23%
65%
12%
92
Economy
37%
55%
8%
169
Health care
23%
69%
8%
73
Illegal immigration
57%
36%
7%
63
Foreign threats
60%
31%
9%
94
Deficit
62%
26%
12%
55
Other
42%
52%
5%
198
Cutting taxes
60%
36%
4%
56
Reducing deficit
60%
30%
10%
99
Creating jobs
35%
59%
6%
150
Increase wages
10%
81%
9%
95
Healthcare costs
43%
45%
12%
73
Retirement
53%
47%
Higher education
22%
67%
12%
Regulations
66%
24%
10%
59
42%
7%
100
93%
7%
10
52%
None
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Don't know /
refused
Approve
Combination
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
No
TOTAL
23
69
Unsure
76%
20%
4%
Views close to own
40%
55%
6%
287
44%
47%
10%
395
Both
39%
56%
5%
39
Unsure
40%
45%
15%
21
Very worried
58%
34%
8%
232
Somewhat worried
37%
54%
8%
294
Not too worried
34%
62%
5%
167
Not at all worried
26%
65%
9%
44
Combination
100%
Unsure
13%
87%
32%
65%
3%
183
21%
68%
11%
40
No
47%
43%
10%
519
Approve
30%
59%
11%
388
Unsure
19%
68%
13%
40
Disapprove
59%
37%
4%
315
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
Unsure
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
(cont.)
Page 174

May 3-6, 2015
MARCO RUBIO/C
RMRYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
55%
42%
3%
76
Somewhat worried
52%
42%
6%
217
Not too worried
40%
50%
11%
253
Not at all worried
29%
63%
8%
194
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
16%
84%
Yes
43%
50%
7%
571
No
38%
50%
12%
173
Approve
19%
75%
6%
262
Unsure
38%
37%
25%
35
Disapprove
67%
28%
5%
274
Yes
35%
59%
6%
483
No
52%
33%
15%
164
Not sure
58%
35%
6%
95
4 of 4
17%
81%
3%
26
3 of 4
10%
90%
1%
105
2 of 4
18%
74%
8%
157
1 of 4
34%
51%
15%
116
0 of 4
67%
24%
9%
340
5-7 of 7
96%
4%
0%
150
4 of 7
83%
14%
2%
87
3 of 7
57%
32%
11%
81
2 of 7
51%
42%
7%
71
1 of 7
13%
71%
16%
92
89%
11%
263
50%
8%
743
0 of 7
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
42%
Page 175

May 3-6, 2015
RRPYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR RAND
PAUL/C
RRPYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
39%
55%
6%
817
Northeast
28%
66%
6%
169
Midwest
42%
51%
7%
147
South
40%
54%
6%
194
South Central
51%
40%
9%
69
Central Plains
44%
40%
16%
64
Mountain States
53%
45%
2%
55
West
32%
66%
2%
120
California
36%
64%
0%
74
Florida
43%
48%
9%
47
Texas
45%
49%
6%
47
New York
36%
60%
3%
49
Rest of country
38%
54%
7%
600
45%
50%
6%
163
37%
55%
8%
274
No Senate election
37%
57%
5%
380
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
44%
50%
6%
307
33%
61%
6%
320
40%
54%
6%
190
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
42%
52%
5%
206
Other
37%
56%
7%
612
Male
43%
51%
6%
414
Female
34%
59%
7%
403
Male / employed
42%
52%
6%
291
Male / not employed
47%
47%
6%
122
Female / employed
34%
58%
7%
222
34%
60%
6%
181
Not employed
41%
53%
6%
83
Employed
38%
55%
7%
514
Retired
39%
55%
6%
213
Refused
26%
58%
16%
18-34
34%
61%
6%
143
35-44
42%
49%
9%
230
45-64
36%
59%
5%
263
65 or over
42%
52%
5%
172
Unsure / refused
47%
41%
13%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 176

May 3-6, 2015
PAUL/C
RRPYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
18-44
39%
53%
8%
373
45-64
36%
59%
5%
263
65+
42%
52%
5%
172
Unsure / refused
47%
41%
13%
Male / under 55
44%
49%
8%
254
Male / 55+
42%
54%
3%
160
Female / under 55
33%
60%
7%
234
Female / 55+
35%
58%
7%
169
White
43%
51%
6%
645
18%
78%
4%
78
Hispanic / Latino
28%
63%
9%
60
Other
32%
64%
4%
34
29%
63%
8%
101
45%
49%
6%
544
African American
millenials 18-34
73%
27%

voters 35+
11%
84%
39%
61%
19%
65%
17%
34

18-34
27%
67%
6%

35+
34%
63%
3%
27
White seniors
43%
52%
5%
225
Other
37%
56%
7%
592
White men
45%
49%
6%
332
White women
40%
53%
7%
313
Black men
28%
65%
8%
29
Black women
13%
86%
2%
49
Hispanic men
36%
58%
6%
35
Hispanic women
15%
70%
15%
25
Republican
62%
31%
7%
346
Independent
45%
50%
5%
154
Democrat
10%
84%
6%
317
Male / GOP
63%
29%
8%
199
Female / GOP
61%
32%
7%
147
8%
88%
4%
125
Female / DEM
12%
81%
7%
192
Male / IND
50%
46%
5%
89
Female / IND
38%
56%
6%
65
Male / DEM
9
4%
69
26
(cont.)
Page 177

May 3-6, 2015
PAUL/C
RRPYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
63%
27%
10%
192
55 & over / GOP
60%
36%
4%
154
Under 55 / DEM
12%
82%
6%
200
55 & over / DEM
8%
87%
5%
118
Under 55 / IND
45%
51%
4%
96
55 & over / IND
44%
49%
7%
58
Republican
61%
32%
7%
403
Ticket splitter
50%
42%
8%
33
Democrat
14%
81%
5%
382
Hard GOP
63%
29%
8%
321
Soft GOP
58%
38%
4%
81
Ticket splitter
41%
51%
8%
47
Soft DEM
28%
69%
3%
64
Hard DEM
10%
84%
6%
305
Conservative
56%
37%
7%
444
Moderate
31%
58%
11%
50
Liberal
16%
79%
5%
323
Very conservative
67%
28%
5%
159
50%
42%
8%
285
Moderate / liberal
18%
76%
6%
374
Republican
62%
31%
7%
346
Independent
45%
50%
5%
154
Conservative DEM
12%
74%
13%
56
Mod / lib DEM
10%
86%
4%
261
Liberal DEM
13%
83%
4%
287
19%
73%
8%
95
Independent
50%
42%
8%
33
Mod / liberal GOP
40%
45%
15%
52
Conservative GOP
64%
30%
6%
351
Yes / strongly
75%
18%
6%
80
Yes
73%
22%
5%
63
No / unsure
31%
62%
6%
673
60%
35%
5%
29
36%
53%
11%
159
Some college
40%
56%
3%
176
College graduate
38%
56%
6%
453
43%
51%
6%
236
Male non-college
graduates
44%
51%
5%
178
32%
62%
6%
217
Female non-college
graduates
36%
56%
8%
186
(cont.)
Page 178

May 3-6, 2015
PAUL/C
RRPYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
46%
48%
6%
275
graduate
21%
71%
8%
89
Others
38%
56%
6%
453
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
29%
65%
6%
108
Non-union household
40%
53%
6%
709
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
30%
65%
5%
160
Married
42%
52%
6%
524
No longer married
37%
53%
10%
133
Dad
49%
46%
5%
149
Mom
36%
56%
8%
146
Married / children
45%
48%
7%
248
39%
56%
5%
277
Divorced / children
14%
67%
19%
15
42%
54%
4%
44
Single / children
27%
71%
2%
26
30%
64%
6%
134
Other / mixed
39%
49%
12%
74
Single women
20%
79%
1%
67
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
38%
56%
6%
250
34%
52%
14%
86
Single men
37%
55%
8%
93
Married men
46%
49%
6%
274
43%
54%
2%
47
White single men
38%
56%
6%
65
White single women
25%
75%
White married men
47%
46%
6%
228
White married women
42%
52%
5%
207

men
46%
51%
3%
39

women
39%
45%
16%
73
Other
24%
70%
6%
172
Single mothers
21%
79%
Married mothers
38%
54%
8%
114
No longer married
mothers
39%
44%
17%
16
Non-mothers
39%
55%
6%
671
34
17
(cont.)
Page 179

May 3-6, 2015
PAUL/C
RRPYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
40%
60%
Middle class
40%
53%
6%
600
Low income
29%
63%
8%
130
Working class
33%
29%
38%
Refused
51%
48%
1%
17
Middle class whites
44%
49%
7%
497

Americans
18%
80%
2%
44
22%
71%
7%
38
27%
68%
5%
21
62
Other
34%
60%
6%
217
Roman Catholic
44%
52%
4%
156
46%
48%
6%
149
Mainline Protestant
43%
49%
9%
238
Other
31%
60%
9%
39
None
26%
69%
5%
208
48%
45%
7%
284
46%
47%
7%
130
Infrequently
31%
61%
8%
146
Never
24%
72%
4%
37
45%
52%
3%
65
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
60%
38%
3%
88
Active Mainline
Protestants
41%
48%
11%
111
Active other
53%
35%
12%
17
Other
34%
60%
6%
535
Male born again /

evangelicals
58%
36%
6%
113
38%
56%
6%
301
Female born again /

evangelicals
37%
56%
7%
140
32%
61%
7%
263
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
51%
40%
8%
190
31%
67%
2%
64
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
56%
37%
7%
153
Christians
38%
62%
Christians
30%
55%
15%
37
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
20%
76%
4%
24
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
39
(cont.)
Page 180

May 3-6, 2015
PAUL/C
RRPYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Approve
14%
81%
6%
356
Unsure
39%
49%
12%
40
Disapprove
60%
34%
6%
421
Jobs
30%
67%
3%
107
Economy
32%
63%
5%
187
Health care
27%
64%
9%
77
Illegal immigration
52%
45%
3%
64
Foreign threats
50%
40%
10%
102
Deficit
54%
38%
8%
69
7%
210
Other
39%
55%
Cutting taxes
58%
42%
Reducing deficit
61%
35%
4%
115
Creating jobs
27%
71%
2%
165
Increase wages
10%
84%
6%
107
Healthcare costs
38%
51%
11%
74
Retirement
44%
45%
11%
29
Higher education
26%
66%
8%
74
Regulations
72%
20%
7%
65
13%
114
54
Combination
37%
51%
None
15%
85%
Unsure
74%
22%
3%
10
Views close to own
42%
55%
3%
317
36%
56%
7%
433
Both
32%
55%
13%
43
Unsure
47%
29%
24%
24
Very worried
50%
44%
5%
246
Somewhat worried
38%
55%
7%
346
Not too worried
29%
66%
5%
183
Not at all worried
19%
75%
6%
39
Combination
100%
Unsure
20%
80%
27%
68%
5%
189
36%
58%
7%
42
No
43%
51%
7%
586
Approve
31%
63%
6%
436
Unsure
14%
67%
19%
45
Disapprove
52%
43%
5%
336
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
Unsure
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
(cont.)
Page 181

May 3-6, 2015
PAUL/C
RRPYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
55%
39%
6%
79
Somewhat worried
44%
49%
7%
236
Not too worried
40%
54%
6%
284
Not at all worried
27%
68%
5%
215
1
100%
Unsure
16%
Yes
40%
No
84%
56%
4%
591
36%
52%
12%
227
Approve
20%
77%
3%
270
Unsure
44%
41%
15%
40
Disapprove
58%
38%
4%
280
Yes
35%
60%
5%
521
No
47%
44%
9%
192
Not sure
41%
50%
9%
104
4 of 4
19%
70%
10%
26
3 of 4
13%
86%
1%
110
2 of 4
15%
81%
5%
171
1 of 4
34%
56%
9%
134
0 of 4
60%
32%
7%
375
5-7 of 7
86%
11%
2%
148
4 of 7
73%
26%
1%
92
3 of 7
61%
34%
5%
85
2 of 7
38%
57%
4%
77
57%
10%
121
90%
10%
293
55%
6%
817
1 of 7
33%
0 of 7
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
39%
Page 182

May 3-6, 2015
RMHYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR MIKE
HUCKABEE/C
RMHYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
37%
54%
8%
842
Northeast
22%
67%
10%
169
Midwest
39%
53%
8%
146
South
45%
46%
9%
197
South Central
55%
38%
7%
85
Central Plains
39%
51%
10%
71
Mountain States
38%
60%
2%
53
West
32%
63%
6%
121
California
33%
62%
5%
77
Florida
63%
33%
4%
43
Texas
52%
42%
5%
63
New York
22%
63%
15%
49
Rest of country
36%
56%
9%
610
45%
46%
9%
185
36%
54%
10%
273
No Senate election
35%
59%
6%
385
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
45%
48%
7%
329
26%
65%
9%
322
44%
47%
9%
191
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
48%
43%
8%
191
Other
34%
58%
8%
651
Male
43%
50%
7%
424
Female
32%
59%
9%
418
Male / employed
42%
51%
7%
291
Male / not employed
45%
47%
8%
133
Female / employed
25%
63%
11%
229
40%
54%
6%
189
Not employed
32%
66%
1%
92
Employed
35%
56%
9%
520
Retired
46%
45%
9%
221
Refused
38%
40%
21%
18-34
25%
62%
12%
152
35-44
33%
57%
10%
244
45-64
40%
55%
5%
256
65 or over
49%
45%
6%
180
Unsure / refused
47%
34%
19%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 183

May 3-6, 2015
HUCKABEE/C
RMHYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Don't know /
refused
18-44
30%
59%
11%
396
45-64
40%
55%
5%
256
65+
49%
45%
6%
180
Unsure / refused
47%
34%
19%
Male / under 55
39%
53%
9%
263
Male / 55+
49%
45%
5%
161
Female / under 55
24%
65%
11%
244
Female / 55+
43%
51%
5%
174
White
41%
52%
8%
667
17%
73%
11%
80
Hispanic / Latino
36%
53%
12%
59
Other
26%
67%
7%
37
26%
63%
11%
105
43%
50%
7%
562
African American
millenials 18-34
14%
58%
28%
17

voters 35+
18%
77%
6%
62
28%
65%
7%
23
41%
45%
14%
36

18-34
25%
63%
11%

35+
26%
68%
6%
30
White seniors
49%
46%
5%
235
Other
33%
58%
9%
608
White men
45%
48%
7%
340
White women
36%
55%
8%
327
Black men
25%
63%
12%
31
Black women
11%
79%
9%
48
Hispanic men
39%
51%
10%
34
Hispanic women
31%
55%
14%
25
Republican
62%
29%
9%
356
Independent
40%
52%
8%
158
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
No
TOTAL
9%
83%
8%
328
Male / GOP
65%
26%
9%
204
Female / GOP
58%
34%
8%
153
8%
86%
5%
128
Female / DEM
10%
81%
9%
200
Male / IND
42%
52%
6%
93
Female / IND
38%
53%
9%
66
Male / DEM
(cont.)
Page 184

May 3-6, 2015
HUCKABEE/C
RMHYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
53%
35%
12%
197
55 & over / GOP
73%
22%
5%
159
Under 55 / DEM
10%
81%
10%
212
55 & over / DEM
9%
87%
4%
116
Under 55 / IND
36%
58%
7%
99
55 & over / IND
48%
43%
9%
60
Republican
62%
30%
8%
412
Ticket splitter
38%
49%
13%
39
Democrat
12%
81%
8%
391
Hard GOP
64%
27%
8%
331
Soft GOP
52%
41%
7%
87
Ticket splitter
35%
50%
14%
42
Soft DEM
24%
70%
6%
66
Hard DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
No
TOTAL
8%
84%
8%
316
Conservative
58%
35%
7%
456
Moderate
25%
52%
23%
59
Liberal
11%
82%
7%
327
Very conservative
67%
28%
5%
164
53%
39%
8%
293
Moderate / liberal
13%
77%
9%
386
Republican
62%
29%
9%
356
Independent
40%
52%
8%
158
Conservative DEM
26%
66%
8%
60
Mod / lib DEM
6%
87%
8%
268
Liberal DEM
7%
87%
6%
288
24%
64%
12%
103
Independent
38%
49%
13%
39
Mod / liberal GOP
43%
40%
18%
56
Conservative GOP
65%
29%
7%
356
Yes / strongly
65%
28%
7%
81
Yes
63%
27%
9%
68
No / unsure
32%
60%
8%
694
48%
42%
10%
31
41%
48%
11%
158
Some college
41%
51%
8%
184
College graduate
34%
59%
7%
469
42%
53%
5%
236
Male non-college
graduates
44%
46%
10%
189
26%
65%
9%
233
Female non-college
graduates
39%
52%
9%
185
(cont.)
Page 185

May 3-6, 2015
HUCKABEE/C
RMHYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
47%
44%
9%
284
graduate
25%
65%
10%
89
Others
34%
59%
7%
469
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
30%
58%
12%
116
Non-union household
39%
54%
7%
727
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
23%
69%
8%
164
Married
40%
53%
7%
535
No longer married
43%
45%
12%
143
Dad
45%
48%
7%
156
Mom
26%
59%
15%
161
Married / children
37%
53%
9%
257
43%
52%
6%
278
Divorced / children
30%
40%
30%
18
41%
55%
4%
50
Single / children
20%
73%
7%
33
24%
68%
8%
130
Other / mixed
49%
39%
12%
75
Single women
12%
81%
8%
68
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
34%
59%
7%
255
40%
45%
14%
95
Single men
31%
61%
8%
96
Married men
45%
47%
8%
280
49%
44%
6%
48
White single men
32%
62%
6%
67
White single women
14%
75%
11%
34
White married men
47%
45%
8%
233
White married women
38%
57%
6%
212

men
51%
46%
3%
41

women
43%
43%
15%
80
Other
25%
65%
10%
175
Single mothers
16%
74%
10%
22
Married mothers
27%
62%
12%
119
No longer married
mothers
32%
28%
40%
19
Non-mothers
40%
53%
7%
682
(cont.)
Page 186

May 3-6, 2015
HUCKABEE/C
RMHYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
37%
58%
5%
66
Middle class
39%
54%
7%
617
Low income
32%
56%
12%
135
Working class
22%
78%
Refused
39%
50%
11%
20
Middle class whites
42%
51%
7%
509

Americans
16%
74%
11%
50
35%
55%
10%
35
22%
68%
9%
23
Other
34%
56%
10%
225
Roman Catholic
46%
45%
9%
168
53%
37%
10%
158
Mainline Protestant
39%
54%
8%
246
Other
32%
68%
None
18%
74%
7%
210
53%
40%
7%
290
41%
52%
7%
132
Infrequently
30%
58%
12%
164
Never
35%
65%
50%
44%
6%
66
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
63%
30%
7%
96
Active Mainline
Protestants
47%
44%
9%
111
Active other
51%
49%
Other
29%
62%
9%
555
Male born again /

evangelicals
60%
33%
7%
116
36%
56%
8%
309
Female born again /

evangelicals
46%
45%
9%
138
25%
66%
9%
280
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
59%
33%
8%
194
32%
58%
10%
60
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
67%
28%
5%
155
Christians
47%
51%
2%
31
Christians
26%
53%
21%
39
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
15%
67%
18%
29
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
35
36
15
(cont.)
Page 187

May 3-6, 2015
HUCKABEE/C
RMHYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Approve
13%
80%
7%
360
Unsure
26%
56%
19%
39
Disapprove
58%
33%
8%
443
Jobs
29%
65%
5%
106
Economy
26%
65%
9%
189
Health care
29%
64%
7%
83
Illegal immigration
46%
48%
6%
71
Foreign threats
56%
35%
9%
99
Deficit
39%
54%
6%
72
Other
42%
48%
10%
222
Cutting taxes
47%
44%
9%
62
Reducing deficit
57%
37%
6%
120
Creating jobs
4%
160
33%
62%
Increase wages
9%
83%
8%
109
Healthcare costs
43%
45%
12%
83
Retirement
38%
58%
4%
30
Higher education
14%
80%
6%
80
Regulations
60%
29%
10%
63
14%
116
Combination
44%
42%
None
11%
89%
Unsure
54%
27%
18%
10
Views close to own
40%
57%
4%
313
36%
54%
10%
463
Both
33%
53%
14%
42
Unsure
48%
40%
11%
25
Very worried
51%
42%
7%
254
Somewhat worried
36%
54%
10%
348
Not too worried
22%
73%
5%
186
Not at all worried
38%
58%
4%
48
Combination
100%
Unsure
10%
90%
23%
74%
3%
194
32%
45%
23%
46
No
43%
49%
8%
603
Approve
24%
66%
10%
442
Unsure
22%
64%
14%
55
Disapprove
57%
38%
5%
345
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
Unsure
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
(cont.)
Page 188

May 3-6, 2015
HUCKABEE/C
RMHYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
56%
42%
2%
84
Somewhat worried
51%
42%
7%
245
Not too worried
31%
57%
12%
284
Not at all worried
25%
71%
4%
221
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
100%
6%
13%
81%
Yes
39%
56%
5%
597
No
34%
50%
17%
245
Approve
15%
81%
4%
272
Unsure
51%
38%
11%
38
Disapprove
60%
36%
4%
288
Yes
26%
67%
7%
538
No
57%
32%
11%
199
Not sure
58%
32%
10%
105
4 of 4
17%
83%
3 of 4
5%
94%
2%
109
2 of 4
15%
77%
8%
171
1 of 4
29%
58%
14%
147
0 of 4
61%
30%
9%
388
5-7 of 7
93%
7%
0%
150
4 of 7
67%
30%
3%
96
3 of 7
54%
41%
5%
89
2 of 7
43%
51%
6%
79
65%
12%
127
87%
13%
301
54%
8%
842
1 of 7
23%
0 of 7
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
TOTAL
37%
26
Page 189

May 3-6, 2015
RCFYN CONSIDER VOTING FOR CARLY
FIORINA/C
RCFYN
Yes
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
32%
51%
17%
405
Northeast
23%
52%
26%
88
Midwest
32%
47%
21%
54
South
37%
47%
16%
93
South Central
39%
55%
7%
35
Central Plains
27%
48%
25%
29
Mountain States
34%
61%
6%
26
West
34%
53%
13%
79
California
37%
52%
12%
61
Florida
40%
44%
16%
29
Texas
41%
57%
3%
25
New York
21%
53%
25%
27
Rest of country
30%
51%
19%
263
35%
54%
10%
70
32%
50%
18%
134
No Senate election
31%
50%
19%
201
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
33%
49%
18%
139
28%
52%
19%
182
38%
51%
11%
84
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
36%
46%
18%
101
Other
30%
53%
17%
304
Male
37%
45%
18%
218
Female
25%
58%
16%
187
Male / employed
36%
46%
17%
143
Male / not employed
40%
41%
19%
75
Female / employed
19%
65%
16%
105
34%
49%
17%
82
Not employed
38%
46%
17%
34
Employed
29%
55%
17%
248
Retired
36%
46%
17%
121
Refused
26%
74%
18-34
15%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
22%
44
48%
18%
116
50%
16%
139
34%
51%
15%
100
32%
51%
17%
35-44
34%
45-64
34%
65 or over
Unsure / refused
63%
(cont.)
Page 190

May 3-6, 2015
FIORINA/C
RCFYN
Yes
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
29%
52%
19%
160
45-64
34%
50%
16%
139
65+
34%
51%
15%
100
Unsure / refused
32%
51%
17%
Male / under 55
40%
41%
20%
114
Male / 55+
35%
49%
16%
104
Female / under 55
18%
65%
17%
102
Female / 55+
34%
50%
16%
85
White
34%
47%
19%
321
26%
64%
9%
39
Hispanic / Latino
12%
76%
12%
30
Other
32%
55%
13%
15
13%
55%
32%
27
36%
46%
18%
294
African American
millenials 18-34
56%
44%

voters 35+
22%
68%
17%
34
9
66%
17%
21
62%
38%
37%
54%
9%
13
White seniors
33%
51%
16%
131
Other
31%
51%
18%
274
White men
39%
41%
20%
176
White women
28%
54%
18%
145
Black men
41%
50%
8%
16
Black women
16%
75%
10%
23
Hispanic men
14%
72%
14%
19
9%
83%
8%
11
Republican
50%
36%
14%
167
Independent
43%
39%
18%
77
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
11%

35+
Hispanic women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
100%

18-34
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Don't know /
refused
18-44
WHITE SENIORS
No
TOTAL
8%
72%
21%
161
Male / GOP
56%
31%
13%
101
Female / GOP
40%
44%
15%
66
4%
71%
25%
73
Female / DEM
10%
72%
17%
89
Male / IND
49%
32%
19%
44
Female / IND
35%
48%
17%
33
Male / DEM
(cont.)
Page 191

May 3-6, 2015
FIORINA/C
RCFYN
Yes
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Don't know /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
47%
37%
16%
82
55 & over / GOP
52%
36%
12%
85
Under 55 / DEM
8%
71%
21%
95
55 & over / DEM
8%
73%
19%
66
Under 55 / IND
46%
38%
16%
39
55 & over / IND
39%
40%
20%
38
Republican
51%
34%
15%
204
Ticket splitter
53%
40%
7%
13
Democrat
9%
70%
20%
188
Hard GOP
51%
35%
14%
158
Soft GOP
53%
32%
15%
46
Ticket splitter
30%
57%
12%
16
Soft DEM
31%
49%
20%
29
Hard DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
No
TOTAL
6%
73%
21%
156
Conservative
49%
35%
16%
215
Moderate
23%
59%
17%
24
Liberal
11%
71%
19%
166
Very conservative
59%
29%
12%
82
43%
39%
18%
132
Moderate / liberal
12%
69%
19%
190
Republican
50%
36%
14%
167
Independent
43%
39%
18%
77
Conservative DEM
20%
58%
23%
24
Mod / lib DEM
6%
74%
20%
137
Liberal DEM
8%
71%
21%
152
14%
67%
19%
36
Independent
53%
40%
7%
13
Mod / liberal GOP
34%
56%
9%
23
Conservative GOP
53%
31%
16%
181
Yes / strongly
67%
19%
14%
55
Yes
57%
21%
22%
33
No / unsure
23%
60%
17%
317
35%
58%
7%
15
29%
57%
14%
56
Some college
43%
41%
16%
78
College graduate
29%
52%
19%
255
34%
45%
21%
130
Male non-college
graduates
42%
45%
13%
88
24%
60%
16%
125
Female non-college
graduates
29%
55%
17%
62
(cont.)
Page 192

May 3-6, 2015
FIORINA/C
RCFYN
Yes
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
No
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
White non-college
graduate
39%
46%
15%
107
graduate
31%
57%
12%
42
Others
29%
52%
19%
255
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
26%
61%
13%
58
Non-union household
33%
49%
18%
347
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
27%
56%
17%
68
Married
34%
50%
16%
276
No longer married
29%
49%
22%
60
Dad
37%
45%
17%
78
Mom
23%
60%
17%
79
Married / children
32%
51%
17%
130
35%
50%
15%
147
Divorced / children
62%
38%
26%
49%
25%
20
Single / children
16%
70%
14%
20
31%
50%
18%
48
Other / mixed
28%
53%
18%
37
Single women
14%
70%
15%
25
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Married women
27%
58%
15%
123
26%
52%
22%
39
Single men
34%
48%
18%
43
Married men
39%
44%
17%
154
36%
43%
21%
21
White single men
37%
41%
22%
31
White single women
20%
60%
20%
11
White married men
40%
42%
19%
128
White married women
30%
54%
16%
101

men
39%
36%
25%
18

women
27%
51%
22%
34
Other
22%
67%
11%
84
Single mothers
20%
75%
5%
16
Married mothers
22%
58%
19%
57
No longer married
mothers
45%
34%
21%
Non-mothers
34%
49%
17%
326
(cont.)
Page 193

May 3-6, 2015
FIORINA/C
RCFYN
Yes
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
Don't know /
refused
Upper class
42%
52%
6%
41
Middle class
33%
48%
19%
303
Low income
17%
67%
16%
51
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
100%
Refused
37%
51%
13%
Middle class whites
36%
44%
20%
254

Americans
20%
63%
17%
21
16%
75%
10%
20
27%
54%
19%
Other
28%
61%
12%
102
Roman Catholic
37%
56%
8%
81
45%
36%
19%
71
Mainline Protestant
35%
45%
21%
117
Other
12%
77%
10%
25
None
22%
57%
21%
99
34%
48%
18%
141
43%
47%
10%
62
Infrequently
32%
53%
15%
83
Never
25%
47%
28%
16
27%
65%
8%
37
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
51%
22%
27%
42
Active Mainline
Protestants
30%
52%
18%
54
Active other
9%
71%
20%
Other
30%
53%
17%
265
Male born again /

evangelicals
46%
35%
19%
63
34%
49%
18%
155
Female born again /

evangelicals
22%
63%
15%
53
26%
57%
17%
134
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
41%
35%
24%
79
22%
75%
2%
36
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
46%
30%
24%
68
Christians
40%
60%
Christians
13%
64%
23%
11
5%
90%
5%
18
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
18
(cont.)
Page 194

May 3-6, 2015
FIORINA/C
RCFYN
Yes
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Don't know /
refused
Approve
13%
68%
19%
179
Unsure
36%
47%
17%
14
Disapprove
47%
37%
16%
213
Jobs
22%
61%
17%
46
Economy
28%
51%
21%
99
7%
67%
26%
30
Illegal immigration
36%
55%
9%
38
Foreign threats
38%
51%
11%
57
Deficit
56%
23%
21%
32
Health care
Other
34%
49%
16%
102
Cutting taxes
45%
45%
10%
37
Reducing deficit
49%
35%
16%
60
Creating jobs
21%
63%
16%
86
Increase wages
2%
83%
14%
54
Healthcare costs
21%
43%
36%
39
Retirement
20%
69%
11%
12
Higher education
30%
58%
12%
25
Regulations
58%
29%
13%
38
Combination
42%
37%
22%
50
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
No
TOTAL
100%
Unsure
64%
8%
28%
Views close to own
36%
49%
15%
165
26%
55%
19%
209
Both
41%
40%
18%
20
Unsure
56%
24%
20%
11
Very worried
47%
42%
11%
118
Somewhat worried
29%
54%
18%
163
Not too worried
23%
51%
26%
97
Not at all worried
19%
81%
24
100%
Combination
Unsure
21%
79%
17%
65%
17%
96
47%
27%
26%
26
No
35%
48%
16%
282
Approve
20%
62%
19%
207
Unsure
22%
49%
29%
17
Disapprove
46%
39%
15%
181
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
Unsure
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
(cont.)
Page 195

May 3-6, 2015
FIORINA/C
RCFYN
Yes
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
No
38%
49%
13%
41
Somewhat worried
45%
41%
14%
103
Not too worried
32%
51%
18%
147
Not at all worried
17%
63%
19%
110
1
100%
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
100%
Yes
32%
51%
17%
331
No
30%
51%
19%
74
Approve
15%
65%
20%
155
Unsure
18%
41%
41%
18
Disapprove
51%
38%
11%
158
Yes
28%
55%
17%
267
No
40%
42%
18%
85
Not sure
36%
45%
19%
53
4 of 4
10%
81%
9%
21
3 of 4
10%
67%
24%
71
2 of 4
27%
53%
20%
73
1 of 4
16%
72%
12%
54
0 of 4
49%
35%
16%
186
5-7 of 7
76%
18%
6%
113
4 of 7
45%
41%
14%
42
3 of 7
29%
52%
19%
44
2 of 7
22%
59%
19%
28
1 of 7
12%
64%
24%
44
75%
25%
134
51%
17%
405
0 of 7
TOTAL
Don't know /
refused
Very worried
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
32%
Page 196

May 3-6, 2015
GOPCON WILLING TO CONSIDER DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE
GOPCON
5-7 of 7
TOTAL
4 of 7
3 of 7
2 of 7
1 of 7
TOTAL
0 of 7
15%
10%
9%
9%
16%
41%
1001
Northeast
9%
8%
8%
8%
15%
52%
195
Midwest
15%
9%
9%
9%
17%
42%
181
South
19%
8%
9%
9%
21%
35%
235
South Central
22%
16%
9%
10%
9%
34%
96
Central Plains
12%
7%
13%
12%
16%
41%
83
Mountain States
19%
6%
14%
8%
23%
30%
70
West
13%
15%
5%
5%
13%
48%
141
California
18%
13%
7%
5%
15%
42%
89
Florida
30%
8%
9%
8%
10%
35%
58
Texas
19%
14%
12%
10%
9%
37%
71
New York
16%
3%
3%
13%
21%
43%
56
Rest of country
13%
9%
10%
9%
17%
42%
727
16%
10%
9%
11%
21%
35%
217
15%
10%
8%
9%
16%
43%
320
No Senate election
15%
9%
10%
8%
15%
43%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
19%
9%
8%
9%
16%
39%
405
12%
10%
7%
8%
15%
47%
366
13%
10%
13%
8%
20%
36%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
21%
8%
8%
9%
17%
36%
241
Other
13%
10%
9%
9%
16%
43%
760
Male
21%
11%
10%
8%
16%
34%
480
Female
10%
8%
8%
9%
17%
48%
521
Male / employed
20%
13%
10%
7%
18%
33%
324
Male / not employed
23%
8%
9%
11%
13%
37%
157
Female / employed
8%
7%
7%
9%
18%
51%
281
12%
9%
10%
9%
15%
45%
240
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C

EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Not employed
6%
11%
7%
8%
15%
53%
133
Employed
14%
10%
9%
8%
18%
41%
605
Retired
22%
8%
11%
11%
14%
34%
252
Refused
5%
1%
15%
10%
2%
66%
11
18-34
5%
5%
9%
9%
18%
54%
200
35-44
15%
14%
8%
4%
19%
41%
280
45-64
16%
9%
8%
11%
15%
41%
310
65 or over
24%
8%
12%
13%
14%
30%
200
Unsure / refused
23%
14%
17%
5%
19%
23%
10
18-44
11%
10%
8%
6%
19%
46%
480
45-64
16%
9%
8%
11%
15%
41%
310
65+
24%
8%
12%
13%
14%
30%
200
Unsure / refused
23%
14%
17%
5%
19%
23%
10
(cont.)
Page 197

May 3-6, 2015
GOPCON
5-7 of 7
RR96FL AGE / SEX
5%
18%
36%
302
Male / 55+
27%
8%
8%
13%
13%
31%
179
5%
9%
6%
9%
18%
53%
315
Female / 55+
17%
7%
12%
10%
14%
40%
205
White
18%
12%
10%
9%
16%
36%
751
5%
1%
4%
3%
16%
71%
120
Hispanic / Latino
5%
3%
9%
13%
25%
45%
90
11%
6%
11%
14%
13%
45%
40
7%
9%
8%
9%
17%
50%
128
20%
13%
10%
9%
15%
33%
623
16%
68%
24
16%
6%
1%
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
1%
4%
17%
71%
96
4%
13%
28%
55%
41
13%
13%
22%
37%
49
21%
6%
63%
10%

18-34
10%

35+
12%
7%
8%
16%
16%
41%
32
White seniors
25%
9%
11%
11%
13%
30%
255
Other
11%
10%
8%
8%
18%
45%
746
White men
24%
13%
10%
8%
15%
30%
368
White women
12%
11%
9%
10%
16%
42%
382
Black men
10%
3%
3%
6%
19%
60%
50
4%
1%
15%
79%
70
10%
14%
22%
39%
42
8%
12%
27%
50%
48
Black women
1%
Hispanic men
8%
Hispanic women
3%
5%
6%
Republican
31%
18%
16%
10%
14%
11%
390
Independent
16%
8%
10%
13%
19%
34%
190
2%
2%
6%
17%
73%
420
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
TOTAL
0 of 7
11%

voters 35+
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
1 of 7
13%
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
2 of 7
17%
Other
AGE AND RACE
3 of 7
Male / under 55
Female / under 55
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
4 of 7
Male / GOP
37%
20%
16%
7%
12%
9%
214
Female / GOP
24%
17%
15%
14%
17%
15%
176
Male / DEM
1%
1%
7%
20%
70%
161
Female / DEM
2%
3%
4%
16%
74%
259
Male / IND
21%
9%
9%
11%
20%
30%
105
Female / IND
10%
8%
11%
15%
19%
38%
85
Under 55 / GOP
23%
22%
16%
8%
15%
16%
223
55 & over / GOP
41%
13%
15%
13%
12%
5%
168
Under 55 / DEM
3%
2%
5%
19%
71%
269
55 & over / DEM
0%
3%
7%
15%
74%
151
Under 55 / IND
12%
8%
9%
11%
22%
38%
125
55 & over / IND
23%
10%
11%
16%
14%
26%
65
(cont.)
Page 198

May 3-6, 2015
GOPCON
5-7 of 7
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Republican
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
1 of 7
TOTAL
0 of 7
15%
10%
13%
12%
448
Ticket splitter
4%
8%
8%
20%
18%
42%
61
Democrat
1%
3%
4%
6%
19%
68%
492
Hard GOP
33%
18%
16%
10%
13%
11%
360
Soft GOP
29%
15%
13%
13%
16%
13%
92
Ticket splitter
6%
11%
6%
18%
22%
39%
64
Soft DEM
2%
4%
8%
12%
25%
48%
84
2%
3%
5%
17%
74%
401
536
Conservative
27%
15%
13%
9%
15%
21%
Moderate
1%
8%
8%
9%
18%
55%
76
Liberal
2%
2%
4%
8%
18%
67%
389
Very conservative
36%
16%
14%
7%
7%
20%
187
22%
14%
12%
11%
20%
21%
348
1%
3%
5%
8%
18%
65%
465
Republican
31%
18%
16%
10%
14%
11%
390
Independent
16%
8%
10%
13%
19%
34%
190
Conservative DEM
4%
4%
7%
23%
61%
103
Mod / lib DEM
1%
2%
5%
16%
76%
318
Liberal DEM
0%
2%
4%
6%
16%
72%
335
2%
5%
4%
5%
26%
59%
157
Independent
4%
8%
8%
20%
18%
42%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
7%
9%
14%
14%
26%
31%
69
Conservative GOP
37%
19%
15%
10%
11%
9%
379
Yes / strongly
46%
11%
14%
7%
11%
10%
93
Yes
36%
28%
9%
12%
7%
8%
68
No / unsure
10%
8%
8%
9%
18%
47%
840
14%
6%
12%
8%
26%
34%
53
10%
10%
7%
10%
16%
47%
227
Some college
18%
7%
9%
10%
15%
41%
219
College graduate
16%
11%
10%
8%
16%
39%
503
24%
11%
12%
7%
16%
30%
248
Male non-college
graduates
18%
11%
7%
9%
16%
38%
232
9%
10%
8%
9%
16%
48%
254
Female non-college
graduates
10%
6%
9%
10%
17%
48%
266
White non-college
graduate
18%
11%
10%
10%
16%
35%
349
5%
3%
5%
9%
17%
61%
149
Others
16%
11%
10%
8%
16%
39%
503
Union household
11%
11%
6%
6%
15%
51%
127
Non-union household
16%
9%
9%
9%
17%
40%
874
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
2 of 7
17%
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
3 of 7
32%
Hard DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
4 of 7
graduate
(cont.)
Page 199

May 3-6, 2015
GOPCON
5-7 of 7
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
2 of 7
1 of 7
TOTAL
0 of 7
7%
4%
6%
8%
20%
55%
215
Married
18%
12%
10%
8%
15%
36%
607
No longer married
14%
7%
8%
11%
18%
42%
179
Dad
23%
14%
16%
5%
18%
25%
171
Mom
7%
10%
7%
7%
19%
51%
203
Married / children
16%
13%
12%
6%
17%
36%
299
20%
12%
9%
10%
13%
36%
308
5%
10%
9%
5%
8%
64%
22
60
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
3 of 7
Single
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
4 of 7
18%
2%
7%
9%
19%
45%
Single / children
6%
2%
9%
5%
25%
52%
42
7%
4%
6%
9%
18%
56%
173
Other / mixed
13%
10%
9%
13%
19%
36%
97
Single women
2%
6%
10%
19%
63%
98
Married women
12%
11%
9%
9%
15%
44%
304
10%
9%
8%
9%
19%
45%
118
Single men
10%
7%
7%
7%
21%
48%
117
Married men
25%
14%
11%
7%
15%
28%
302
22%
5%
8%
14%
15%
37%
61
White single men
13%
10%
7%
5%
22%
44%
75
11%
19%
16%
49%
46
16%
12%
7%
13%
25%
244
14%
13%
9%
9%
14%
41%
243

men
25%
5%
7%
13%
15%
34%
49

women
11%
11%
9%
8%
22%
38%
93
Other
6%
3%
7%
8%
19%
57%
250
Single mothers
6%
6%
6%
21%
61%
30
Married mothers
7%
10%
7%
8%
18%
50%
150
No longer married
mothers
3%
18%
6%
26%
47%
23
Non-mothers
17%
10%
10%
9%
16%
39%
798
Upper class
19%
10%
10%
5%
14%
41%
73
Middle class
17%
12%
9%
8%
15%
38%
696
Low income
6%
3%
8%
12%
20%
52%
205
Working class
3%
22%
67%
White single women
5%
White married men
27%
White married women
8%
Refused
15%
10%
7%
8%
21%
40%
20
Middle class whites
20%
14%
10%
9%
15%
32%
551

Americans
6%
2%
5%
4%
11%
73%
63
7%
3%
9%
9%
23%
49%
57
11%
3%
12%
10%
10%
54%
25
Other
10%
5%
8%
10%
18%
49%
305
(cont.)
Page 200

May 3-6, 2015
GOPCON
5-7 of 7
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
4 of 7
3 of 7
2 of 7
1 of 7
TOTAL
0 of 7
Roman Catholic
20%
12%
9%
9%
19%
31%
198
21%
11%
11%
8%
15%
35%
185
Mainline Protestant
17%
10%
11%
10%
16%
35%
280
Other
8%
10%
22%
19%
41%
45
None
6%
5%
4%
9%
16%
60%
262
19%
12%
16%
9%
18%
27%
336
18%
15%
8%
9%
15%
35%
157
Infrequently
16%
7%
5%
8%
16%
47%
191
Never
15%
1%
13%
10%
8%
53%
44
19%
9%
15%
8%
23%
26%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
27%
15%
13%
7%
18%
20%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
15%
11%
15%
11%
16%
33%
131
Active other
14%
6%
44%
15%
21%
17
Other
13%
8%
6%
9%
16%
49%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
29%
13%
10%
6%
22%
20%
133
18%
10%
10%
9%
14%
39%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
11%
9%
12%
13%
16%
39%
179
9%
8%
6%
7%
17%
53%
342
22%
15%
13%
11%
17%
22%
222
9%
2%
7%
7%
22%
52%
90

RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
29%
19%
15%
12%
15%
10%
166
Christians
17%
4%
7%
6%
21%
45%
51
Christians
2%
2%
6%
9%
24%
58%
55
7%
7%
24%
62%
39
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Approve
3%
2%
4%
7%
18%
67%
453
Unsure
5%
11%
3%
9%
20%
52%
62
Disapprove
28%
17%
15%
10%
15%
16%
487
Jobs
10%
3%
7%
8%
22%
51%
135
Economy
11%
8%
8%
6%
16%
51%
228
3%
6%
9%
8%
17%
56%
99
Illegal immigration
24%
13%
12%
15%
16%
19%
78
Foreign threats
29%
8%
13%
8%
19%
23%
116
Deficit
22%
19%
12%
6%
21%
20%
76
43%
268
Health care
Other
15%
12%
7%
10%
12%
(cont.)
Page 201

May 3-6, 2015
GOPCON
5-7 of 7
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
2 of 7
1 of 7
13%
8%
10%
14%
26%
71
Reducing deficit
23%
22%
18%
10%
10%
17%
126
Creating jobs
11%
6%
10%
9%
19%
46%
203
Increase wages
0%
2%
2%
5%
14%
77%
132
Healthcare costs
17%
4%
12%
13%
14%
40%
98
Retirement
15%
7%
6%
5%
20%
47%
41
4%
3%
6%
9%
28%
50%
101
Regulations
37%
22%
13%
6%
12%
10%
65
Combination
17%
12%
6%
10%
13%
41%
141
2%
42%
50%
11
Unsure
26%
22%
20%
8%
21%
2%
12
Views close to own
20%
11%
7%
6%
15%
42%
352
13%
8%
10%
11%
18%
41%
571
Both
10%
13%
16%
5%
7%
49%
48
Unsure
10%
14%
8%
11%
29%
29%
30
Very worried
22%
13%
12%
7%
18%
29%
318
Somewhat worried
13%
10%
9%
9%
14%
45%
405
Not too worried
12%
5%
7%
9%
20%
47%
214
Not at all worried
2%
9%
7%
15%
17%
6%
50%
56
100%
2%
98%
8
245
Combination
Unsure
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
18%
11%
10%
9%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
7%
8%
8%
9%
Unsure
3%
1%
6%
Disapprove
28%
13%
11%
Very worried
16%
16%
Somewhat worried
26%
9%
Not too worried
13%
Not at all worried
6%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Unsure
No
7%
6%
7%
9%
20%
50%
15%
5%
2%
8%
12%
58%
63
16%
37%
693
17%
51%
510
4%
28%
58%
85
9%
14%
26%
406
13%
5%
18%
31%
112
9%
11%
13%
32%
283
10%
7%
9%
17%
44%
341
7%
9%
7%
20%
51%
258
Combination
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
100%
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
0 of 7
29%
None
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
3 of 7
Cutting taxes
Higher education
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
4 of 7
6%
94%
Yes
21%
10%
10%
8%
14%
37%
645
No
5%
9%
7%
9%
21%
50%
356
Approve
4%
6%
7%
7%
16%
60%
295
Unsure
18%
8%
8%
13%
16%
38%
45
Disapprove
37%
14%
14%
10%
11%
14%
306
Yes
11%
9%
7%
7%
16%
49%
628
No
19%
11%
13%
11%
20%
27%
245
Not sure
26%
9%
10%
10%
12%
32%
128
(cont.)
Page 202

May 3-6, 2015
GOPCON
5-7 of 7
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
4 of 7
3 of 7
2 of 7
1 of 7
TOTAL
0 of 7
4 of 4
3%
5%
14%
5%
8%
65%
26
3 of 4
2%
1%
2%
6%
15%
73%
112
2 of 4
3%
4%
4%
8%
21%
60%
221
1 of 4
6%
3%
10%
6%
19%
55%
214
0 of 4
30%
18%
13%
11%
13%
14%
427
15%
10%
9%
9%
16%
41%
1001
Page 203

May 3-6, 2015
CAND2016 VIEW ON VOTE FOR PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
CAND2016
Views close
to own
TOTAL
Most
effective
person
Both
TOTAL
Unsure
35%
57%
5%
3%
1001
Northeast
37%
55%
4%
4%
195
Midwest
39%
51%
8%
3%
181
South
36%
57%
5%
2%
235
South Central
31%
61%
4%
3%
96
Central Plains
35%
57%
5%
3%
83
Mountain States
19%
69%
4%
8%
70
West
38%
59%
3%
0%
141
California
43%
55%
3%
Florida
31%
62%
5%
1%
58
Texas
27%
65%
5%
3%
71
New York
36%
57%
3%
4%
56
Rest of country
35%
56%
5%
3%
727
35%
57%
5%
3%
217
36%
56%
6%
2%
320
No Senate election
35%
58%
4%
3%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
36%
56%
5%
3%
405
36%
57%
5%
2%
366
32%
60%
4%
4%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
40%
52%
7%
2%
241
Other
34%
59%
4%
3%
760
Male
37%
55%
5%
3%
480
Female
34%
59%
4%
3%
521
Male / employed
41%
52%
5%
2%
324
Male / not employed
28%
62%
5%
5%
157
Female / employed
38%
56%
3%
3%
281
29%
62%
5%
4%
240
Not employed
35%
56%
7%
2%
133
Employed
40%
54%
4%
2%
605
Retired
25%
66%
5%
5%
252
Refused
40%
46%
2%
12%
11
18-34
34%
60%
1%
4%
200
35-44
43%
51%
6%
1%
280
45-64
36%
56%
6%
2%
310
65 or over
24%
65%
4%
6%
200
Unsure / refused
28%
56%
5%
10%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
89
(cont.)
Page 204

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
CAND2016
Views close
to own
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Most
effective
person
Both
TOTAL
Unsure
18-44
39%
55%
4%
2%
480
45-64
36%
56%
6%
2%
310
65+
24%
65%
4%
6%
200
Unsure / refused
28%
56%
5%
10%
10
Male / under 55
37%
54%
6%
3%
302
Male / 55+
35%
57%
4%
3%
179
Female / under 55
40%
55%
3%
2%
315
Female / 55+
25%
64%
6%
5%
205
White
38%
54%
5%
3%
751
26%
69%
3%
1%
120
Hispanic / Latino
25%
66%
5%
4%
90
Other
28%
61%
6%
5%
40
37%
58%
1%
3%
128
39%
53%
6%
3%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
27%
73%

voters 35+
26%
68%
4%
2%
96
31%
57%
3%
10%
41
19%
74%
7%

18-34
21%
74%

35+
30%
58%
White seniors
31%
Other
White men
White women
24
49
6%
8%
5%
32
60%
4%
5%
255
37%
56%
5%
2%
746
39%
52%
6%
2%
368
37%
55%
4%
3%
382
Black men
30%
68%
2%
50
Black women
23%
70%
6%
1%
70
Hispanic men
22%
61%
10%
7%
42
Hispanic women
27%
70%
1%
2%
48
Republican
34%
58%
5%
3%
390
Independent
36%
54%
5%
5%
190
Democrat
37%
57%
4%
2%
420
Male / GOP
37%
56%
6%
2%
214
Female / GOP
29%
62%
5%
4%
176
Male / DEM
36%
57%
5%
2%
161
Female / DEM
37%
57%
3%
3%
259
Male / IND
37%
51%
5%
6%
105
Female / IND
34%
57%
6%
3%
85
(cont.)
Page 205

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
CAND2016
Views close
to own
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
Most
effective
person
Both
TOTAL
Unsure
Under 55 / GOP
35%
59%
5%
1%
223
55 & over / GOP
32%
58%
6%
5%
168
Under 55 / DEM
40%
54%
5%
2%
269
55 & over / DEM
31%
63%
3%
3%
151
Under 55 / IND
42%
48%
4%
6%
125
55 & over / IND
23%
65%
8%
4%
65
Republican
36%
56%
6%
2%
448
Ticket splitter
30%
50%
6%
14%
61
Democrat
35%
59%
4%
2%
492
Hard GOP
34%
57%
6%
2%
360
Soft GOP
42%
50%
4%
4%
92
Ticket splitter
25%
57%
9%
9%
64
Soft DEM
30%
62%
3%
4%
84
Hard DEM
37%
57%
4%
2%
401
Conservative
32%
61%
5%
2%
536
Moderate
28%
55%
9%
8%
76
Liberal
41%
52%
4%
3%
389
Very conservative
39%
53%
8%
1%
187
29%
65%
3%
3%
348
Moderate / liberal
38%
52%
5%
4%
465
Republican
34%
58%
5%
3%
390
Independent
36%
54%
5%
5%
190
Conservative DEM
15%
79%
5%
1%
103
Mod / lib DEM
43%
50%
4%
3%
318
Liberal DEM
43%
50%
3%
3%
335
18%
78%
4%
1%
157
Independent
30%
50%
6%
14%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
26%
58%
13%
2%
69
Conservative GOP
38%
55%
5%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
44%
44%
10%
2%
93
Yes
43%
50%
4%
3%
68
No / unsure
34%
59%
4%
3%
840
19%
65%
7%
9%
53
29%
63%
6%
2%
227
Some college
31%
62%
4%
3%
219
College graduate
41%
51%
5%
3%
503
(cont.)
Page 206

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
CAND2016
Views close
to own
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
Most
effective
person
Both
TOTAL
Unsure
42%
49%
6%
3%
248
Male non-college
graduates
31%
62%
5%
3%
232
41%
53%
3%
3%
254
Female non-college
graduates
27%
64%
5%
4%
266
White non-college
graduate
31%
61%
5%
3%
349
graduate
23%
68%
6%
3%
149
Others
41%
51%
5%
3%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
43%
48%
6%
2%
127
Non-union household
34%
58%
5%
3%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
30%
63%
4%
3%
215
Married
41%
52%
6%
2%
607
No longer married
24%
67%
4%
6%
179
Dad
39%
53%
6%
2%
171
Mom
44%
51%
3%
2%
203
Married / children
46%
47%
4%
2%
299
35%
56%
7%
2%
308
Divorced / children
30%
61%
10%
27%
69%
1%
Single / children
22%
78%
32%
60%
5%
3%
173
Other / mixed
20%
68%
4%
8%
97
Single women
23%
71%
5%
2%
98
Married women
44%
50%
4%
2%
304
18%
71%
4%
7%
118
Single men
36%
57%
3%
3%
117
Married men
37%
54%
7%
2%
302
35%
60%
3%
3%
61
White single men
42%
50%
4%
4%
75
White single women
29%
67%
1%
3%
46
White married men
38%
53%
7%
2%
244
White married women
47%
47%
4%
2%
243

men
39%
54%
3%
3%
49

women
17%
70%
5%
8%
93
Other
26%
67%
4%
3%
250
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
22
3%
60
42
(cont.)
Page 207

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
CAND2016
Views close
to own
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
Most
effective
person
Both
TOTAL
Unsure
Single mothers
16%
84%
Married mothers
52%
43%
2%
No longer married
mothers
28%
62%
11%
Non-mothers
33%
58%
5%
3%
Upper class
49%
48%
3%
1%
73
Middle class
36%
56%
4%
3%
696
Low income
27%
66%
5%
2%
205
Working class
43%
22%
35%
Refused
31%
42%
15%
30
2%
150
23
798
8
13%
20
5%
3%
551
74%
2%
1%
63
26%
64%
3%
7%
57
21%
66%
7%
6%
25
Other
33%
59%
6%
2%
305
Roman Catholic
34%
59%
4%
2%
198
34%
58%
5%
4%
185
Mainline Protestant
32%
62%
4%
1%
280
Other
49%
41%
3%
7%
45
Middle class whites
39%
53%

Americans
23%
None
38%
53%
5%
4%
262
35%
57%
6%
3%
336
33%
60%
4%
2%
157
Infrequently
35%
62%
2%
2%
191
Never
45%
43%
5%
7%
44
28%
61%
9%
2%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
43%
49%
5%
3%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
29%
64%
5%
2%
131
Active other
54%
32%
3%
10%
17
Other
36%
57%
4%
3%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
40%
48%
9%
3%
133
35%
58%
4%
3%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
31%
62%
4%
3%
179
35%
57%
4%
4%
342
White Evangelical
39%
50%
8%
4%
222
25%
71%
3%
1%
90
(cont.)
Page 208

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
CAND2016
Views close
to own
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Both
Unsure
White conservative
Christians
39%
52%
6%
Christians
25%
71%
4%
Christians
37%
43%
12%
8%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
25%
72%
1%
2%
39
Approve
36%
57%
5%
3%
453
Unsure
25%
63%
4%
8%
62
Disapprove
36%
56%
5%
3%
487
Jobs
35%
60%
2%
3%
135
Economy
34%
58%
7%
1%
228
Health care
38%
56%
2%
5%
99
Illegal immigration
40%
58%
1%
1%
78
Foreign threats
38%
55%
4%
3%
116
Deficit
39%
55%
3%
2%
76
Other
32%
57%
7%
4%
268
Cutting taxes
34%
57%
9%
0%
71
2%
166
51
Reducing deficit
40%
50%
6%
5%
126
Creating jobs
30%
66%
3%
1%
203
Increase wages
50%
48%
3%
Healthcare costs
32%
62%
Retirement
34%
57%
3%
6%
41
Higher education
26%
67%
4%
4%
101
Regulations
52%
41%
6%
2%
65
Combination
27%
59%
10%
3%
141
None
38%
48%
9%
6%
11
Unsure
35%
40%
4%
22%
12
Very worried
34%
58%
5%
3%
318
Somewhat worried
36%
56%
5%
3%
405
Not too worried
38%
57%
2%
2%
214
Not at all worried
29%
56%
12%
3%
56
Combination
42%
Unsure
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Most
effective
person
TOTAL
132
6%
98
58%
88%
5%
7%
8
245
Yes
33%
60%
5%
3%
Unsure
35%
50%
6%
8%
63
3%
693
No
36%
57%
5%
(cont.)
Page 209

May 3-6, 2015
CANDIDATE
CAND2016
Views close
to own
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Unsure
35%
58%
5%
2%
510
Unsure
23%
63%
9%
5%
85
Disapprove
38%
54%
4%
3%
406
Very worried
28%
63%
5%
4%
112
Somewhat worried
33%
60%
4%
3%
283
Not too worried
39%
55%
4%
2%
341
Not at all worried
37%
53%
6%
4%
258
1
100%
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Both
Approve
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Most
effective
person
TOTAL
6%
4%
2%
645
7%
5%
356
50%
3%
1%
295
24%
64%
8%
4%
45
37%
58%
4%
2%
306
37%
56%
5%
3%
628
No
38%
54%
6%
2%
245
Not sure
22%
70%
3%
4%
128
4 of 4
56%
35%
6%
3%
26
88%
Yes
40%
55%
No
27%
61%
Approve
45%
Unsure
Disapprove
Yes
6%
3 of 4
53%
38%
3%
5%
112
2 of 4
29%
64%
5%
1%
221
1 of 4
30%
65%
3%
2%
214
0 of 4
35%
56%
6%
4%
427
5-7 of 7
46%
49%
3%
2%
150
4 of 7
41%
48%
7%
4%
96
3 of 7
26%
62%
9%
3%
91
2 of 7
23%
71%
3%
4%
87
1 of 7
31%
62%
2%
5%
164
0 of 7
36%
56%
6%
2%
413
35%
57%
5%
3%
1001
Page 210

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR1 BETTER DEALING / ECONOMY
IHPAR1
GOP
TOTAL
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
49%
44%
1%
4%
2%
1001
Northeast
41%
50%
2%
4%
3%
195
Midwest
46%
48%
2%
2%
2%
181
South
53%
40%
0%
3%
3%
235
South Central
60%
35%
5%
0%
96
Central Plains
49%
39%
4%
8%
83
Mountain States
57%
34%
1%
7%
1%
70
West
41%
52%
0%
6%
2%
141
California
40%
52%
0%
6%
2%
89
Florida
53%
40%
1%
1%
5%
58
Texas
55%
39%
New York
44%
44%
2%
5%
5%
56
Rest of country
49%
44%
1%
4%
2%
727
53%
41%
5%
2%
217
48%
45%
2%
3%
2%
320
No Senate election
47%
45%
1%
4%
3%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
52%
41%
0%
4%
2%
405
41%
51%
1%
5%
3%
366
53%
40%
2%
3%
3%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
50%
43%
1%
4%
3%
241
Other
48%
44%
1%
4%
2%
760
Male
55%
37%
1%
5%
2%
480
Female
42%
51%
1%
4%
3%
521
Male / employed
57%
36%
1%
6%
1%
324
Male / not employed
53%
40%
1%
2%
4%
157
Female / employed
42%
51%
1%
4%
3%
281
43%
50%
1%
3%
2%
240
Not employed
39%
55%
2%
2%
2%
133
Employed
50%
43%
1%
5%
2%
605
Retired
52%
41%
0%
3%
3%
252
Refused
19%
56%
11%
14%
11
18-34
41%
52%
1%
4%
2%
200
35-44
49%
43%
1%
6%
1%
280
45-64
48%
47%
1%
3%
2%
310
65 or over
56%
36%
1%
3%
5%
200
Unsure / refused
66%
17%
5%
9%
3%
10
18-44
45%
47%
1%
5%
2%
480
45-64
48%
47%
1%
3%
2%
310
65+
56%
36%
1%
3%
5%
200
Unsure / refused
66%
17%
5%
9%
3%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
71
6%
(cont.)
Page 211

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR1
GOP
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Male / under 55
54%
38%
1%
6%
2%
302
Male / 55+
57%
36%
2%
2%
3%
179
Female / under 55
38%
55%
1%
3%
2%
315
Female / 55+
48%
43%
1%
4%
4%
205
White
55%
37%
1%
4%
3%
751
16%
80%
Hispanic / Latino
38%
54%
2%
3%
2%
90
Other
43%
45%
3%
5%
4%
40
50%
44%
1%
4%
2%
128
56%
36%
1%
4%
3%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
10%
84%
6%
24

voters 35+
18%
79%
3%
96
32%
54%
3%
5%
43%
53%
2%
1%

18-34
31%
69%

35+
45%
39%
4%
7%
4%
32
White seniors
57%
35%
1%
3%
4%
255
Other
45%
47%
1%
4%
2%
746
White men
61%
32%
1%
3%
3%
368
White women
50%
42%
1%
5%
3%
382
Black men
25%
66%
Black women
10%
90%
Hispanic men
41%
47%
Hispanic women
36%
59%
Republican
90%
5%
1%
Independent
43%
36%
Democrat
12%
Male / GOP
120
4%
5%
41
49
8
50
9%
70
5%
42
7%
4%
48
4%
1%
390
3%
10%
8%
190
84%
0%
2%
1%
420
92%
3%
1%
3%
1%
214
Female / GOP
87%
7%
0%
4%
2%
176
Male / DEM
11%
84%
0%
3%
2%
161
Female / DEM
13%
84%
1%
1%
1%
259
Male / IND
48%
34%
3%
10%
5%
105
Female / IND
38%
39%
2%
10%
11%
85
Under 55 / GOP
88%
7%
55 & over / GOP
92%
2%
1%
2%
3%
168
Under 55 / DEM
14%
83%
0%
2%
1%
269
55 & over / DEM
9%
86%
1%
1%
2%
151
Under 55 / IND
40%
40%
3%
10%
8%
125
55 & over / IND
51%
29%
3%
9%
8%
65
223
5%
(cont.)
Page 212

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR1
GOP
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Republican
89%
6%
1%
3%
1%
448
Ticket splitter
33%
29%
1%
21%
16%
61
Democrat
14%
81%
1%
3%
2%
492
Hard GOP
92%
4%
0%
2%
1%
360
Soft GOP
78%
8%
3%
5%
5%
92
Ticket splitter
35%
28%
21%
15%
64
Soft DEM
19%
66%
4%
9%
3%
84
Hard DEM
11%
86%
0%
1%
1%
401
Conservative
72%
22%
1%
4%
2%
536
Moderate
39%
43%
3%
9%
6%
76
Liberal
18%
75%
1%
4%
2%
389
Very conservative
81%
17%
1%
1%
187
67%
24%
1%
5%
3%
348
Moderate / liberal
22%
70%
1%
5%
2%
465
Republican
90%
5%
1%
4%
1%
390
Independent
43%
36%
3%
10%
8%
190
Conservative DEM
16%
78%
2%
3%
103
Mod / lib DEM
11%
86%
1%
2%
1%
318
Liberal DEM
12%
84%
1%
3%
1%
335
18%
73%
2%
5%
3%
157
Independent
33%
29%
1%
21%
16%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
75%
17%
4%
2%
2%
69
Conservative GOP
91%
4%
0%
3%
1%
379
Yes / strongly
84%
11%
4%
1%
93
Yes
95%
5%
0%
No / unsure
41%
51%
1%
4%
3%
840
55%
30%
7%
2%
7%
53
47%
44%
1%
5%
3%
227
Some college
47%
45%
1%
4%
3%
219
College graduate
49%
45%
0%
4%
1%
503
57%
37%
0%
4%
1%
248
Male non-college
graduates
53%
37%
2%
5%
3%
232
41%
53%
0%
3%
2%
254
Female non-college
graduates
43%
49%
1%
4%
4%
266
White non-college
graduate
58%
32%
1%
4%
4%
349
graduate
24%
69%
2%
4%
2%
149
Others
49%
45%
0%
4%
1%
503
Union household
39%
54%
0%
3%
3%
127
Non-union household
50%
43%
1%
4%
2%
874
68
(cont.)
Page 213

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR1
GOP
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Single
34%
57%
2%
5%
1%
215
Married
54%
39%
0%
4%
3%
607
No longer married
46%
47%
1%
3%
3%
179
Dad
65%
29%
0%
6%
0%
171
Mom
39%
54%
1%
4%
2%
203
Married / children
53%
41%
0%
4%
2%
299
56%
37%
1%
4%
3%
308
Divorced / children
29%
62%
3%
6%
39%
54%
Single / children
40%
46%
33%
60%
Other / mixed
54%
Single women
Married women
22
60
3%
4%
5%
7%
2%
42
2%
5%
1%
173
39%
1%
2%
4%
97
25%
69%
2%
2%
3%
98
47%
46%
0%
4%
3%
304
44%
48%
1%
4%
3%
118
Single men
42%
47%
2%
8%
Married men
62%
32%
1%
4%
2%
302
49%
45%
1%
1%
4%
61
White single men
51%
44%
2%
3%
White single women
36%
55%
3%
4%
3%
46
White married men
66%
27%
0%
4%
3%
244
White married women
52%
40%
0%
5%
3%
243

men
52%
40%
1%
1%
5%
49

women
50%
40%
1%
5%
3%
93
Other
28%
65%
1%
4%
1%
250
Single mothers
27%
62%
7%
3%
30
Married mothers
41%
53%
3%
150
No longer married
mothers
42%
50%
3%
6%
Non-mothers
51%
42%
1%
4%
Upper class
45%
52%
0%
2%
Middle class
54%
39%
1%
4%
3%
696
Low income
33%
56%
2%
6%
3%
205
Working class
11%
89%
Refused
47%
43%
Middle class whites
60%
33%

Americans
18%
77%
43%
52%
36%
59%
Other
36%
55%
4%
117
75
23
2%
798
73
1%
5%
5%
20
4%
3%
551
5%
2%
2%
63
2%
2%
57
1%
4%
25
5%
2%
305
(cont.)
Page 214

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR1
GOP
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Roman Catholic
50%
41%
1%
5%
2%
198
60%
33%
0%
5%
1%
185
Mainline Protestant
54%
39%
1%
2%
3%
280
Other
46%
52%
2%
1%
None
34%
58%
1%
4%
3%
262
60%
34%
1%
3%
2%
336
56%
40%
0%
3%
1%
157
Infrequently
43%
48%
2%
5%
2%
191
Never
44%
47%
5%
4%
44
54%
41%
2%
2%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
66%
28%
5%
0%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
58%
35%
2%
4%
131
Active other
67%
30%
Other
43%
49%
1%
4%
2%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
71%
22%
1%
3%
3%
133
49%
43%
1%
5%
2%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
57%
38%
0%
2%
2%
179
1%
1%
45
17
2%
34%
57%
1%
4%
3%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
74%
19%
1%
3%
3%
222
36%
62%
1%
1%
0%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
84%
10%
0%
3%
2%
166
Christians
38%
58%
2%
2%
Christians
44%
46%
1%
4%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
33%
66%
Approve
15%
80%
1%
Unsure
41%
37%
Disapprove
81%
Jobs
Economy
Health care
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
51
6%
55
1%
39
2%
2%
453
0%
11%
10%
62
12%
1%
5%
2%
487
32%
61%
1%
3%
4%
135
43%
51%
6%
1%
228
28%
67%
1%
2%
2%
99
Illegal immigration
70%
19%
2%
8%
1%
78
Foreign threats
68%
26%
1%
3%
2%
116
Deficit
68%
23%
5%
4%
76
3%
268
Other
49%
43%
2%
3%
(cont.)
Page 215

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR1
GOP
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
DEM
Both equal
68%
28%
2%
2%
1%
71
Reducing deficit
78%
15%
1%
5%
1%
126
Creating jobs
40%
54%
1%
4%
2%
203
Increase wages
19%
75%
1%
5%
Healthcare costs
49%
39%
Retirement
38%
58%
5%
Higher education
35%
60%
0%
Regulations
83%
15%
Combination
48%
41%
None
38%
32%
Unsure
71%
2%
11%
Views close to own
45%
48%
1%
50%
43%
1%
Both
53%
41%
Unsure
57%
20%
Very worried
64%
Somewhat worried
7%
0%
5%
98
2%
4%
101
2%
1%
65
5%
5%
141
2%
11
16%
12
5%
1%
352
4%
2%
571
3%
4%
48
2%
4%
18%
30
28%
1%
4%
2%
318
48%
45%
1%
4%
2%
405
Not too worried
31%
61%
1%
4%
3%
214
Not at all worried
31%
59%
1%
4%
5%
56
1
100%
59%
36%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
32%
60%
1%
Unsure
40%
51%
1%
No
55%
38%
1%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
38%
55%
1%
Unsure
26%
63%
Disapprove
66%
27%
Very worried
63%
Somewhat worried
61%
Not too worried

Not at all worried
Combination
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
132
41
28%
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
Unsure
Cutting taxes
Combination
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Neither
5%
3%
3%
245
5%
3%
63
4%
2%
693
4%
2%
510
3%
7%
85
1%
4%
2%
406
30%
1%
3%
3%
112
31%
1%
5%
2%
283
46%
47%
1%
3%
2%
341
32%
60%
1%
4%
3%
258
1
100%
Unsure
31%
55%
Yes
52%
41%
1%
No
42%
50%
Approve
24%
68%
Unsure
46%
45%
Disapprove
80%
14%
0%
Yes
40%
52%
No
64%
Not sure
60%
15%
5%
1%
645
1%
2%
5%
356
2%
5%
1%
295
6%
3%
45
5%
1%
306
1%
5%
3%
628
29%
1%
4%
2%
245
35%
1%
2%
3%
128
(cont.)
Page 216

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR1
GOP
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
4 of 4
3%
96%
2%
3 of 4
10%
89%
0%
1%
1%
112
2 of 4
17%
77%
0%
5%
0%
221
1 of 4
41%
52%
1%
3%
2%
214
0 of 4
81%
9%
1%
5%
4%
427
5-7 of 7
97%
1%
2%
4 of 7
86%
8%
5%
3 of 7
73%
20%
1%
6%
2 of 7
59%
31%
3%
5%
2%
87
1 of 7
37%
47%
2%
8%
6%
164
0 of 7
19%
75%
1%
2%
3%
413
49%
44%
1%
4%
2%
1001
26
150
1%
96
91
Page 217

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR2 BETTER DEALING / TAXES
IHPAR2
GOP
TOTAL
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
47%
44%
0%
5%
4%
1001
Northeast
36%
52%
0%
7%
5%
195
Midwest
44%
49%
1%
3%
2%
181
South
53%
40%
0%
4%
3%
235
South Central
50%
41%
1%
6%
2%
96
Central Plains
48%
41%
2%
9%
83
Mountain States
61%
29%
10%
West
46%
47%
0%
4%
3%
141
California
49%
43%
0%
4%
4%
89
Florida
61%
37%
2%
58
Texas
47%
43%
1%
6%
2%
71
New York
37%
48%
4%
11%
56
Rest of country
46%
45%
1%
5%
3%
727
51%
39%
1%
5%
3%
217
43%
47%
0%
6%
3%
320
No Senate election
47%
45%
0%
4%
4%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
49%
42%
1%
5%
4%
405
44%
47%
0%
4%
4%
366
46%
44%
1%
5%
3%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
53%
40%
3%
3%
241
Other
45%
46%
1%
5%
4%
760
Male
53%
39%
0%
5%
3%
480
Female
41%
49%
1%
4%
5%
521
Male / employed
53%
38%
0%
7%
2%
324
Male / not employed
53%
40%
0%
3%
4%
157
Female / employed
42%
47%
0%
5%
5%
281
41%
52%
1%
3%
3%
240
Not employed
40%
53%
0%
3%
4%
133
Employed
48%
42%
0%
6%
3%
605
Retired
51%
43%
0%
3%
3%
252
Refused
18%
66%
4%
12%
11
18-34
39%
53%
4%
4%
200
35-44
45%
45%
0%
6%
4%
280
45-64
47%
44%
0%
6%
3%
310
65 or over
56%
36%
1%
3%
4%
200
Unsure / refused
63%
20%
5%
12%
18-44
43%
48%
0%
5%
4%
480
45-64
47%
44%
0%
6%
3%
310
65+
56%
36%
1%
3%
4%
200
Unsure / refused
63%
20%
5%
12%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
70
10
10
(cont.)
Page 218

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR2
GOP
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Male / under 55
49%
42%
0%
6%
3%
302
Male / 55+
60%
33%
1%
4%
2%
179
Female / under 55
39%
52%
0%
4%
5%
315
Female / 55+
45%
46%
1%
5%
4%
205
White
52%
38%
0%
5%
4%
751
21%
76%
0%
3%
Hispanic / Latino
39%
55%
Other
40%
50%
44%
47%
54%
36%
African American
millenials 18-34
27%
73%

voters 35+
20%
76%
32%
57%
5%
46%
53%
2%

18-34
31%
69%

35+
42%
46%
2%
7%
4%
32
White seniors
57%
34%
1%
4%
4%
255
Other
43%
48%
0%
5%
3%
746
White men
56%
35%
0%
5%
3%
368
White women
48%
40%
1%
5%
5%
382
Black men
35%
57%
1%
7%
Black women
11%
89%
Hispanic men
41%
54%
5%
Hispanic women
38%
56%
2%
4%
48
Republican
82%
8%
1%
7%
2%
390
Independent
47%
37%
1%
6%
9%
190
Democrat
14%
81%
0%
2%
2%
420
Male / GOP
84%
8%
0%
6%
1%
214
Female / GOP
80%
9%
1%
7%
3%
176
Male / DEM
15%
79%
0%
3%
3%
161
Female / DEM
13%
82%
2%
2%
259
Male / IND
48%
39%
1%
8%
5%
105
Female / IND
47%
34%
2%
4%
13%
85
Under 55 / GOP
77%
12%
9%
2%
223
55 & over / GOP
89%
4%
3%
3%
168
Under 55 / DEM
16%
79%
2%
3%
269
55 & over / DEM
11%
85%
0%
3%
2%
151
Under 55 / IND
45%
41%
1%
4%
9%
125
55 & over / IND
52%
28%
1%
12%
8%
65
1%
1%
120
3%
2%
90
5%
3%
40
4%
4%
128
5%
4%
623
24
0%
4%
96
5%
41
49
8
50
70
1%
42
(cont.)
Page 219

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR2
GOP
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Republican
82%
10%
1%
5%
2%
448
Ticket splitter
38%
26%
2%
13%
21%
61
Democrat
16%
78%
0%
3%
2%
492
Hard GOP
83%
9%
0%
5%
2%
360
Soft GOP
78%
8%
2%
7%
5%
92
Ticket splitter
38%
25%
1%
15%
21%
64
Soft DEM
25%
67%
3%
6%
84
Hard DEM
13%
83%
0%
2%
2%
401
Conservative
68%
22%
0%
5%
4%
536
Moderate
36%
45%
1%
11%
7%
76
Liberal
19%
75%
0%
3%
3%
389
Very conservative
81%
16%
1%
2%
2%
187
62%
26%
0%
7%
5%
348
Moderate / liberal
22%
70%
1%
4%
4%
465
Republican
82%
8%
1%
7%
2%
390
Independent
47%
37%
1%
6%
9%
190
Conservative DEM
17%
76%
1%
6%
103
Mod / lib DEM
13%
83%
0%
3%
1%
318
Liberal DEM
13%
82%
0%
3%
2%
335
22%
69%
4%
4%
157
Independent
38%
26%
2%
13%
21%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
69%
20%
2%
3%
6%
69
Conservative GOP
84%
8%
1%
6%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
87%
8%
0%
1%
4%
93
Yes
89%
7%
3%
1%
68
No / unsure
39%
51%
1%
5%
4%
840
50%
38%
4%
2%
6%
53
48%
47%
2%
3%
227
Some college
45%
43%
0%
7%
5%
219
College graduate
47%
44%
0%
5%
3%
503
53%
38%
1%
6%
2%
248
Male non-college
graduates
53%
39%
5%
3%
232
42%
50%
5%
4%
254
Female non-college
graduates
41%
49%
1%
3%
6%
266
White non-college
graduate
55%
34%
1%
5%
5%
349
graduate
28%
68%
2%
2%
149
Others
47%
44%
0%
5%
3%
503
Union household
38%
54%
0%
5%
2%
127
Non-union household
48%
43%
0%
5%
4%
874
(cont.)
Page 220

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR2
GOP
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Single
34%
57%
1%
7%
2%
215
Married
53%
39%
0%
4%
3%
607
No longer married
41%
48%
1%
4%
7%
179
Dad
61%
31%
0%
6%
1%
171
Mom
40%
50%
1%
3%
6%
203
Married / children
51%
40%
0%
5%
3%
299
55%
37%
1%
4%
3%
308
Divorced / children
32%
49%
19%
22
37%
52%
5%
6%
60
Single / children
40%
47%
7%
2%
42
33%
59%
7%
2%
173
Other / mixed
46%
45%
1%
4%
4%
97
Single women
31%
63%
1%
2%
3%
98
Married women
47%
44%
4%
4%
304
36%
52%
4%
7%
118
Single men
37%
52%
10%
1%
117
Married men
59%
34%
4%
2%
302
52%
40%
2%
7%
61
White single men
40%
51%
8%
2%
75
White single women
45%
44%
3%
5%
3%
46
White married men
62%
30%
0%
5%
3%
244
White married women
51%
39%
5%
5%
243

men
53%
37%
2%
8%
49

women
44%
42%
1%
5%
8%
93
Other
31%
64%
0%
4%
1%
250
Single mothers
37%
55%
4%
3%
30
Married mothers
41%
50%
5%
150
No longer married
mothers
39%
43%
18%
23
Non-mothers
49%
43%
0%
5%
3%
798
Upper class
49%
46%
0%
4%
1%
73
Middle class
50%
41%
0%
5%
3%
696
Low income
37%
54%
1%
3%
5%
205
Working class
33%
67%
Refused
54%
30%
2%
12%
1%
20
Middle class whites
55%
36%
0%
5%
4%
551

Americans
18%
76%
6%
42%
52%
4%
2%
57
34%
60%
1%
1%
5%
25
Other
40%
51%
1%
4%
4%
305
3%
1%
1%
5%
63
(cont.)
Page 221

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR2
GOP
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Roman Catholic
50%
40%
0%
7%
3%
198
57%
38%
1%
2%
2%
185
Mainline Protestant
53%
38%
1%
4%
4%
280
Other
39%
51%
None
33%
58%
0%
4%
5%
262
59%
35%
1%
3%
2%
336
52%
39%
0%
5%
4%
157
Infrequently
41%
48%
1%
8%
3%
191
Never
35%
52%
8%
5%
44
59%
39%
1%
1%
1%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
64%
30%
2%
3%
1%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
55%
38%
2%
5%
131
Active other
60%
27%
13%
Other
41%
49%
0%
6%
4%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
67%
27%
1%
4%
1%
133
47%
43%
0%
6%
3%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
53%
41%
1%
2%
4%
179
45
10%
17
36%
54%
0%
5%
5%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
70%
22%
1%
3%
4%
222
31%
67%
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
78%
14%
Christians
42%
55%
Christians
47%
44%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
17%
83%
Approve
16%
78%
0%
3%
2%
453
Unsure
38%
42%
1%
9%
10%
62
Disapprove
76%
13%
1%
6%
4%
487
Jobs
37%
54%
1%
3%
6%
135
Economy
41%
51%
6%
1%
228
Health care
25%
69%
1%
1%
4%
99
Illegal immigration
61%
26%
2%
8%
3%
78
Foreign threats
62%
28%
1%
5%
4%
116
Deficit
62%
28%
5%
5%
76
4%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
49%
42%
90
2%
1%
4%
2%
4%
1%
1%
166
51
8%
55
39
0%
5%
(cont.)
Page 222

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR2
GOP
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
DEM
Cutting taxes
63%
33%
Reducing deficit
67%
18%
Creating jobs
44%
49%
Increase wages
20%
Healthcare costs
Retirement
Both equal
3%
71
1%
11%
4%
126
1%
4%
2%
203
73%
5%
2%
132
46%
43%
5%
7%
98
41%
55%
4%
41
Higher education
32%
64%
3%
101
Regulations
84%
12%
2%
2%
65
Combination
46%
43%
5%
7%
141
None
35%
27%
36%
2%
11
Unsure
60%
14%
11%
8%
7%
12
Views close to own
47%
45%
0%
5%
2%
352
47%
44%
0%
4%
4%
571
Both
47%
48%
4%
1%
48
Unsure
42%
32%
2%
6%
17%
30
Very worried
63%
27%
1%
6%
3%
318
Somewhat worried
45%
47%
0%
4%
3%
405
Not too worried
31%
60%
0%
5%
4%
214
Not at all worried
30%
4%
10%
56
0%
56%
100%
Unsure
35%
60%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
34%
59%
Unsure
39%
53%
No
52%
38%
1%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
36%
57%
0%
Unsure
33%
56%
Disapprove
64%
Very worried
Somewhat worried
5%
3%
3%
245
4%
3%
63
5%
4%
693
4%
3%
510
1%
3%
7%
85
26%
1%
6%
3%
406
67%
26%
1%
3%
3%
112
59%
33%
0%
6%
2%
283
Not too worried
42%
48%
1%
4%
4%
341
Not at all worried
31%
60%
5%
4%
258
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
TOTAL
Unsure
1%
Combination
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Neither
0%
100%
Unsure
31%
49%
Yes
49%
42%
No
43%
Approve
Unsure
Disapprove
6%
15%
1%
6%
2%
645
49%
0%
2%
6%
356
24%
68%
0%
6%
2%
295
39%
48%
7%
6%
45
75%
15%
1%
7%
2%
306
Yes
40%
52%
0%
5%
3%
628
No
58%
31%
1%
6%
3%
245
Not sure
60%
33%
0%
2%
5%
128
(cont.)
Page 223

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR2
GOP
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
DEM
4 of 4
8%
86%
3 of 4
9%
88%
2 of 4
22%
1 of 4
0 of 4
5-7 of 7
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
26
6%
1%
2%
112
71%
5%
1%
221
39%
55%
3%
3%
214
76%
11%
1%
6%
6%
427
92%
3%
0%
4%
1%
150
4 of 7
77%
11%
1%
6%
4%
96
3 of 7
76%
16%
2%
6%
2 of 7
52%
37%
0%
5%
5%
87
1 of 7
40%
46%
0%
8%
6%
164
0 of 7
19%
74%
0%
3%
4%
413
47%
44%
0%
5%
4%
1001
0%
91
Page 224

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR3 BETTER DEALING / HEALTH CARE
IHPAR3
GOP
TOTAL
DEM
1001
61%
4%
3%
195
38%
53%
5%
4%
181
South
43%
48%
5%
4%
235
South Central
50%
44%
5%
0%
96
Central Plains
41%
49%
2%
8%
83
Mountain States
53%
39%
8%
West
31%
62%
6%
1%
141
California
33%
61%
5%
1%
89
Florida
39%
54%
4%
3%
58
Texas
46%
49%
5%
New York
32%
57%
2%
9%
56
Rest of country
40%
51%
0%
5%
3%
727
45%
46%
0%
6%
3%
217
39%
54%
0%
4%
3%
320
No Senate election
37%
54%
5%
3%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
42%
49%
6%
3%
405
32%
59%
5%
4%
366
46%
48%
4%
2%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
45%
48%
5%
2%
241
Other
37%
54%
0%
5%
4%
760
Male
43%
49%
0%
6%
2%
480
Female
36%
56%
0%
4%
4%
521
Male / employed
42%
49%
7%
2%
324
Male / not employed
45%
48%
4%
3%
157
Female / employed
37%
55%
5%
4%
281
35%
57%
3%
4%
240
Not employed
29%
62%
3%
6%
133
Employed
39%
51%
6%
3%
605
Retired
45%
49%
3%
3%
252
Refused
29%
56%
13%
2%
11
18-34
32%
61%
3%
4%
200
35-44
37%
51%
8%
4%
280
45-64
37%
56%
4%
2%
310
65 or over
51%
41%
0%
3%
4%
200
Unsure / refused
68%
20%
3%
6%
3%
10
18-44
35%
55%
6%
4%
480
45-64
37%
56%
4%
2%
310
65+
51%
41%
0%
3%
4%
200
Unsure / refused
68%
20%
3%
6%
3%
10
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Northeast
31%
Midwest
0%
TOTAL
Unsure
3%
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
52%
Neither
5%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
39%
Both equal
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
70
71
(cont.)
Page 225

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR3
GOP
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Male / under 55
39%
51%
Male / 55+
49%
45%
Female / under 55
32%
60%
Female / 55+
42%
50%
White
46%
45%
7%
91%
3%
Hispanic / Latino
28%
62%
6%
4%
90
Other
33%
54%
9%
4%
40
42%
52%
2%
4%
128
6%
4%
623
7%
4%
302
5%
1%
179
5%
4%
315
0%
3%
4%
205
0%
5%
4%
751
0%
0%
120
47%
44%
African American
millenials 18-34
6%
94%

voters 35+
7%
90%
3%
21%
64%
8%
7%
41
34%
59%
5%
2%
49

18-34
21%
73%
6%

35+
35%
50%
11%
4%
32
White seniors
53%
40%
4%
3%
255
Other
35%
57%
5%
3%
746
White men
48%
44%
0%
5%
3%
368
White women
44%
47%
0%
5%
4%
382
Black men
14%
80%
Black women
2%
98%
Hispanic men
29%
60%
11%
Hispanic women
27%
63%
2%
8%
48
Republican
77%
13%
0%
7%
3%
390
Independent
38%
47%
0%
9%
6%
190
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
DEM
24
0%
96
50
6%
70
42
5%
92%
1%
2%
420
Male / GOP
74%
16%
7%
3%
214
Female / GOP
79%
8%
8%
4%
176
Male / DEM
4%
92%
2%
2%
161
Female / DEM
0%
2%
259
0%
6%
92%
Male / IND
38%
48%
11%
3%
105
Female / IND
37%
46%
7%
10%
85
Under 55 / GOP
72%
14%
9%
4%
223
55 & over / GOP
83%
10%
4%
3%
168
Under 55 / DEM
6%
91%
1%
2%
269
55 & over / DEM
5%
93%
1%
1%
151
Under 55 / IND
35%
51%
8%
6%
125
55 & over / IND
43%
40%
11%
6%
65
0%
0%
1%
(cont.)
Page 226

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR3
GOP
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
DEM
Republican
76%
14%
Ticket splitter
24%
Democrat
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
7%
3%
448
47%
16%
13%
61
8%
88%
2%
2%
492
Hard GOP
79%
11%
0%
6%
3%
360
Soft GOP
64%
24%
0%
8%
4%
92
Ticket splitter
23%
43%
20%
15%
64
Soft DEM
20%
73%
4%
3%
84
Hard DEM
4%
93%
1%
2%
401
Conservative
60%
30%
6%
3%
536
Moderate
32%
46%
13%
8%
76
Liberal
12%
85%
2%
2%
389
Very conservative
74%
20%
3%
3%
187
53%
35%
8%
4%
348
Moderate / liberal
15%
78%
4%
3%
465
Republican
77%
13%
0%
7%
3%
390
Independent
38%
47%
0%
9%
6%
190
Conservative DEM
9%
88%
1%
2%
103
Mod / lib DEM
4%
93%
1%
2%
318
Liberal DEM
0%
0%
0%
6%
92%
1%
1%
335
13%
78%
4%
5%
157
Independent
24%
47%
16%
13%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
62%
28%
4%
7%
69
Conservative GOP
79%
12%
7%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
81%
15%
3%
2%
93
Yes
81%
12%
6%
1%
68
No / unsure
31%
60%
5%
4%
840
49%
43%
2%
6%
53
40%
52%
4%
4%
227
Some college
41%
49%
8%
3%
219
College graduate
37%
55%
0%
5%
3%
503
41%
49%
0%
6%
3%
248
Male non-college
graduates
44%
48%
6%
2%
232
33%
61%
3%
2%
254
Female non-college
graduates
39%
51%
5%
5%
266
White non-college
graduate
52%
39%
6%
4%
349
graduate
17%
76%
4%
3%
149
Others
37%
55%
5%
3%
503
Union household
27%
66%
4%
2%
127
Non-union household
41%
50%
5%
3%
874
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
(cont.)
Page 227

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR3
GOP
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
DEM
Single
25%
67%
Married
44%
47%
No longer married
39%
Dad
Mom
Married / children
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
6%
1%
215
5%
3%
607
52%
4%
5%
179
49%
41%
7%
3%
171
33%
57%
5%
5%
203
42%
49%
5%
5%
299
47%
46%
5%
2%
308
Divorced / children
32%
62%
6%
32%
60%
3%
5%
Single / children
35%
54%
10%
1%
42
23%
70%
6%
1%
173
Other / mixed
45%
45%
3%
6%
97
Single women
23%
71%
4%
2%
98
Married women
40%
51%
4%
4%
304
36%
55%
4%
5%
118
Single men
27%
64%
8%
Married men
48%
43%
45%
White single men

White single women
0%
0%
0%
22
60
117
6%
3%
302
46%
2%
6%
61
33%
62%
5%
36%
55%
6%
3%
46
White married men
53%
39%
0%
5%
3%
244
White married women
46%
45%
0%
5%
4%
243

men
49%
40%
3%
8%
49

women
43%
47%
5%
5%
93
Other
19%
74%
5%
2%
250
Single mothers
32%
64%
3%
1%
30
Married mothers
34%
56%
4%
7%
150
No longer married
mothers
27%
58%
15%
Non-mothers
41%
51%
0%
5%
Upper class
37%
58%
1%
4%
Middle class
43%
49%
0%
5%
3%
696
Low income
29%
61%
6%
4%
205
Working class
11%
89%
Refused
37%
52%
Middle class whites
49%
43%

Americans
11%
84%
5%
30%
61%
3%
6%
57
29%
65%
3%
3%
25
Other
31%
60%
6%
3%
305
0%
75
23
3%
798
73
0%
0%
8%
3%
20
5%
3%
551
63
(cont.)
Page 228

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR3
GOP
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
DEM
Both equal
Neither
Roman Catholic
46%
48%
3%
3%
198
48%
44%
5%
4%
185
Mainline Protestant
46%
45%
4%
5%
280
Other
33%
60%
6%
1%
45
None
24%
69%
5%
2%
262
53%
40%
4%
4%
336
44%
50%
3%
4%
157
Infrequently
35%
58%
6%
1%
191
Never
35%
51%
6%
8%
44
49%
48%
2%
1%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
58%
33%
7%
3%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
50%
40%
3%
6%
131
Active other
56%
41%
2%
Other
33%
59%
6%
3%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
55%
33%
7%
4%
133
38%
54%
0%
6%
2%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
47%
45%
0%
3%
4%
179
4%
4%
342
6%
6%
222
2%
0%
90
7%
5%
166
0%
0%
1%
30%
62%
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
61%
26%
24%
74%
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
71%
17%
Christians
30%
67%
3%
Christians
33%
54%
5%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
15%
84%
Approve
6%
91%
0%
Unsure
24%
50%
1%
Disapprove
72%
17%
Jobs
24%
67%
Economy
30%
62%
Health care
25%
70%
Illegal immigration
66%
27%
8%
Foreign threats
60%
34%
2%
Deficit
54%
38%
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
TOTAL
Unsure
Other
39%
50%
0%
0%
0%
1%
17
51
8%
55
1%
39
1%
2%
453
14%
11%
62
8%
4%
487
3%
6%
135
5%
2%
228
1%
3%
99
78
5%
116
8%
76
7%
4%
268
(cont.)
Page 229

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR3
GOP
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Both equal
41%
5%
2%
71
Reducing deficit
52%
35%
12%
2%
126
Creating jobs
28%
63%
3%
5%
203
Increase wages
13%
84%
3%
Healthcare costs
56%
36%
5%
Retirement
35%
62%
3%
Higher education
29%
65%
2%
4%
101
Regulations
76%
19%
5%
1%
65
Combination
41%
47%
5%
8%
141
28%
2%
11
9%
12
5%
1%
352
5%
4%
571
5%
6%
48
7%
13%
30
6%
2%
318
0%
3%
98
41
9%
61%
78%
10%
Views close to own
39%
55%
39%
52%
Both
40%
49%
Unsure
45%
34%
Very worried
57%
35%
Somewhat worried
36%
55%
0%
5%
4%
405
Not too worried
23%
70%
0%
4%
4%
214
Not at all worried
23%
6%
3%
56
3%
0%
1%
68%
100%
30%
65%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
24%
69%
Unsure
26%
58%
No
46%
46%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
28%
65%
Unsure
26%
62%
Disapprove
56%
34%
Very worried
59%
34%
Somewhat worried
52%
40%
0%
Not too worried
37%
53%
0%
Not at all worried
20%
73%
Combination
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
132
Unsure
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
Unsure
52%
Combination
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Neither
Cutting taxes
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
DEM
5%
3%
4%
245
7%
9%
63
6%
2%
693
4%
3%
510
0%
6%
6%
85
0%
6%
3%
406
3%
4%
112
5%
3%
283
6%
3%
341
5%
3%
258
0%
100%
Unsure
31%
49%
Yes
42%
50%
No
34%
56%
Approve
14%
81%
Unsure
43%
46%
Disapprove
69%
21%
Yes
31%
62%
No
54%
32%
Not sure
49%
42%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
15%
6%
2%
645
4%
6%
356
4%
1%
295
8%
3%
45
7%
2%
306
4%
2%
628
7%
6%
245
5%
4%
128
(cont.)
Page 230

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR3
GOP
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
DEM
4 of 4
3%
97%
3 of 4
2%
98%
2 of 4
11%
83%
1 of 4
27%
67%
0 of 4
72%
5-7 of 7
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
26
1%
112
5%
1%
221
0%
3%
2%
214
15%
0%
7%
6%
427
87%
9%
0%
3%
0%
150
4 of 7
64%
20%
13%
2%
96
3 of 7
64%
30%
4%
2%
91
2 of 7
51%
42%
4%
2%
87
1 of 7
33%
50%
9%
8%
164
0 of 7
11%
84%
3%
3%
413
39%
52%
5%
3%
1001
0%
0%
Page 231

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR4 BETTER DEALING / JOBS
IHPAR4
GOP
TOTAL
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
42%
49%
2%
4%
3%
1001
Northeast
34%
59%
1%
3%
2%
195
Midwest
44%
46%
3%
5%
2%
181
South
48%
43%
2%
4%
4%
235
South Central
47%
44%
2%
6%
1%
96
Central Plains
39%
46%
3%
6%
5%
83
Mountain States
58%
35%
6%
1%
70
West
33%
60%
0%
3%
3%
141
California
30%
60%
0%
5%
4%
89
Florida
49%
42%
3%
1%
6%
58
Texas
41%
49%
3%
6%
1%
71
New York
38%
53%
3%
2%
3%
56
Rest of country
44%
48%
2%
5%
3%
727
45%
46%
1%
5%
3%
217
44%
47%
3%
4%
2%
320
No Senate election
40%
52%
1%
4%
3%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
45%
44%
2%
6%
3%
405
34%
57%
2%
4%
3%
366
51%
43%
2%
3%
2%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
46%
46%
1%
4%
3%
241
Other
41%
50%
2%
4%
3%
760
Male
50%
41%
3%
5%
1%
480
Female
35%
56%
1%
3%
4%
521
Male / employed
52%
38%
3%
7%
1%
324
Male / not employed
46%
48%
2%
3%
1%
157
Female / employed
34%
58%
0%
3%
4%
281
37%
54%
2%
3%
4%
240
Not employed
34%
61%
1%
3%
1%
133
Employed
43%
47%
2%
5%
3%
605
Retired
45%
46%
2%
3%
4%
252
Refused
23%
55%
4%
13%
5%
11
18-34
36%
58%
1%
3%
2%
200
35-44
39%
48%
2%
8%
2%
280
45-64
43%
50%
2%
3%
2%
310
65 or over
51%
39%
2%
2%
6%
200
Unsure / refused
66%
15%
10%
6%
3%
10
18-44
38%
53%
1%
6%
2%
480
45-64
43%
50%
2%
3%
2%
310
65+
51%
39%
2%
2%
6%
200
Unsure / refused
66%
15%
10%
6%
3%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 232

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR4
GOP
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
49%
41%
3%
7%
1%
302
Male / 55+
52%
41%
3%
3%
2%
179
Female / under 55
30%
62%
0%
4%
4%
315
Female / 55+
43%
47%
2%
3%
5%
205
White
49%
42%
2%
4%
3%
751
13%
82%
1%
4%
0%
120
Hispanic / Latino
30%
64%
1%
3%
3%
90
Other
36%
49%
1%
9%
5%
40
47%
48%
1%
2%
2%
128
49%
40%
2%
5%
3%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
11%
83%

voters 35+
13%
81%
17%
73%
40%
56%

18-34
25%
75%

35+
39%
43%
2%
11%
6%
32
White seniors
53%
38%
2%
3%
4%
255
Other
39%
52%
2%
5%
2%
746
White men
54%
37%
3%
4%
1%
368
White women
44%
46%
1%
5%
4%
382
Black men
29%
61%
1%
9%
Black women
1%
96%
2%
Hispanic men
39%
53%
2%
Hispanic women
22%
73%
Republican
79%
11%
3%
Independent
41%
38%
6%
2%
1%
24
3%
1%
96
5%
5%
41
1%
1%
49
8
50
1%
70
42
7%
6%
48
5%
1%
390
3%
10%
9%
190
8%
89%
0%
1%
1%
420
Male / GOP
80%
10%
4%
5%
0%
214
Female / GOP
79%
12%
2%
5%
2%
176
Male / DEM
13%
84%
3%
0%
161
2%
259
Female / DEM
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Both equal
Male / under 55
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
DEM
6%
92%
1%
0%
Male / IND
45%
37%
4%
10%
4%
105
Female / IND
35%
38%
1%
10%
16%
85
Under 55 / GOP
76%
14%
2%
8%
55 & over / GOP
85%
7%
3%
2%
3%
168
Under 55 / DEM
10%
88%
1%
1%
269
55 & over / DEM
5%
90%
1%
1%
2%
151
Under 55 / IND
36%
41%
3%
10%
10%
125
55 & over / IND
49%
31%
3%
9%
9%
65
223
(cont.)
Page 233

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR4
GOP
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Republican
79%
12%
3%
4%
1%
448
Ticket splitter
25%
28%
3%
20%
24%
61
Democrat
11%
84%
1%
2%
1%
492
Hard GOP
81%
11%
2%
4%
1%
360
Soft GOP
71%
14%
5%
6%
4%
92
Ticket splitter
30%
31%
2%
19%
17%
64
Soft DEM
20%
64%
2%
6%
8%
84
Hard DEM
7%
90%
0%
1%
1%
401
Conservative
63%
27%
2%
5%
3%
536
Moderate
36%
46%
5%
9%
4%
76
Liberal
14%
79%
0%
3%
3%
389
Very conservative
76%
19%
2%
2%
2%
187
57%
32%
3%
6%
3%
348
Moderate / liberal
18%
74%
1%
4%
3%
465
Republican
79%
11%
3%
5%
1%
390
Independent
41%
38%
3%
10%
9%
190
Conservative DEM
14%
81%
1%
1%
2%
103
7%
91%
0%
1%
1%
318
Mod / lib DEM

PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
DEM
Liberal DEM
8%
87%
0%
2%
2%
335
17%
79%
2%
2%
0%
157
Independent
25%
28%
3%
20%
24%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
71%
22%
4%
1%
2%
69
Conservative GOP
80%
11%
2%
5%
1%
379
Yes / strongly
79%
12%
4%
5%
0%
93
Yes
83%
14%
1%
2%
No / unsure
35%
56%
2%
4%
3%
840
49%
39%
4%
2%
7%
53
42%
49%
1%
5%
4%
227
Some college
41%
51%
2%
4%
3%
219
College graduate
43%
49%
2%
5%
2%
503
51%
39%
3%
6%
0%
248
Male non-college
graduates
49%
43%
2%
4%
2%
232
34%
59%
1%
3%
3%
254
Female non-college
graduates
36%
54%
1%
3%
5%
266
White non-college
graduate
52%
39%
2%
4%
4%
349
graduate
20%
73%
1%
4%
3%
149
Others
43%
49%
2%
5%
2%
503
Union household
27%
62%
6%
4%
1%
127
Non-union household
45%
47%
1%
4%
3%
874
68
(cont.)
Page 234

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR4
GOP
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Single
33%
59%
1%
6%
2%
215
Married
47%
44%
2%
5%
2%
607
No longer married
39%
52%
2%
2%
5%
179
Dad
58%
29%
4%
8%
1%
171
Mom
29%
63%
0%
4%
4%
203
Married / children
44%
46%
3%
5%
2%
299
49%
43%
2%
4%
3%
308
Divorced / children
14%
71%
6%
10%
22
39%
55%
2%
5%
60
Single / children
42%
48%
7%
2%
42
31%
62%
1%
5%
1%
173
Other / mixed
45%
46%
4%
1%
5%
97
Single women
26%
68%
3%
3%
98
Married women
39%
53%
1%
4%
3%
304
33%
54%
2%
3%
7%
118
Single men
39%
52%
2%
8%
Married men
54%
35%
3%
5%
49%
48%
1%
White single men
41%
54%
2%
White single women
44%
47%
White married men
59%
31%
White married women
45%

men
117
2%
302
1%
61
75
3%
6%
3%
46
4%
5%
2%
244
47%
1%
4%
3%
243
51%
45%
1%
2%
49

women
42%
44%
1%
4%
9%
93
Other
23%
70%
1%
4%
2%
250
Single mothers
31%
65%
3%
30
Married mothers
29%
62%
4%
4%
150
No longer married
mothers
25%
60%
6%
9%
23
Non-mothers
46%
45%
2%
5%
2%
798
Upper class
41%
54%
1%
4%
Middle class
45%
46%
2%
4%
3%
696
Low income
34%
55%
1%
6%
3%
205
Working class
11%
89%
Refused
33%
54%
2%
10%
1%
20
Middle class whites
51%
39%
2%
4%
3%
551

Americans
8%
84%
2%
5%
1%
63
33%
62%
2%
3%
57
32%
60%
1%
2%
5%
25
Other
35%
56%
1%
6%
2%
305
1%
73
(cont.)
Page 235

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR4
GOP
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Roman Catholic
44%
46%
3%
4%
4%
198
47%
42%
2%
7%
3%
185
Mainline Protestant
47%
45%
1%
4%
3%
280
Other
49%
48%
3%
1%
None
31%
60%
2%
4%
2%
262
53%
38%
2%
4%
3%
336
44%
47%
0%
6%
2%
157
Infrequently
36%
55%
2%
4%
3%
191
Never
40%
49%
3%
2%
5%
44
47%
43%
4%
2%
3%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
54%
35%
2%
8%
2%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
54%
39%
1%
2%
4%
131
Active other
66%
30%
1%
2%
Other
37%
54%
2%
5%
3%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
58%
30%
3%
6%
2%
133
47%
45%
2%
5%
1%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
47%
47%
1%
2%
4%
179
45
17
29%
61%
1%
4%
4%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
62%
27%
3%
5%
4%
222
25%
72%
1%
1%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
72%
18%
5%
2%
166
Christians
34%
63%
2%
1%
51
Christians
34%
52%
3%
9%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
14%
85%
1%
39
Approve
13%
83%
1%
2%
2%
453
Unsure
28%
42%
5%
14%
10%
62
Disapprove
71%
18%
2%
5%
3%
487
Jobs
28%
64%
4%
2%
2%
135
Economy
39%
54%
1%
5%
1%
228
Health care
28%
66%
1%
4%
2%
99
Illegal immigration
56%
30%
5%
7%
2%
78
Foreign threats
58%
34%
5%
3%
116
Deficit
50%
37%
5%
7%
76
4%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
44%
45%
3%
2%
1%
2%
4%
(cont.)
Page 236

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR4
GOP
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
DEM
Both equal
44%
43%
5%
6%
1%
71
Reducing deficit
63%
24%
3%
6%
3%
126
Creating jobs
39%
55%
2%
2%
2%
203
Increase wages
17%
79%
0%
4%
0%
132
Healthcare costs
44%
38%
4%
10%
5%
98
Retirement
39%
58%
3%
Higher education
27%
68%
Regulations
79%
18%
Combination
42%
47%
None
39%
31%
Unsure
77%
8%
Views close to own
42%
51%
0%
42%
49%
Both
43%
Unsure
3%
101
2%
1%
1%
65
0%
4%
6%
141
2%
11
15%
12
4%
2%
352
2%
5%
2%
571
42%
7%
1%
6%
48
48%
31%
4%
4%
12%
30
Very worried
59%
30%
2%
6%
3%
318
Somewhat worried
40%
52%
2%
4%
2%
405
Not too worried
26%
67%
1%
3%
3%
214
Not at all worried
24%
64%
1%
2%
9%
56
28%
100%
30%
65%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
24%
70%
2%
Unsure
31%
55%
2%
No
50%
41%
2%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
29%
62%
2%
Unsure
28%
59%
Disapprove
62%
Very worried
Somewhat worried
5%
3%
2%
245
6%
6%
63
5%
3%
693
5%
2%
510
3%
2%
7%
85
29%
1%
5%
2%
406
64%
27%
3%
2%
5%
112
52%
38%
2%
5%
3%
283
Not too worried
38%
54%
1%
5%
2%
341
Not at all worried
27%
63%
2%
5%
3%
258
Combination
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
41
3%
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
Unsure
Cutting taxes
Combination
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Neither
100%
Unsure
31%
55%
Yes
46%
46%
1%
No
36%
54%
Approve
19%
Unsure
Disapprove
15%
6%
2%
645
3%
2%
5%
356
74%
1%
4%
1%
295
36%
42%
5%
11%
6%
45
73%
19%
0%
6%
1%
306
Yes
34%
57%
1%
5%
3%
628
No
58%
34%
2%
4%
3%
245
Not sure
53%
37%
4%
2%
4%
128
(cont.)
Page 237

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR4
GOP
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
DEM
4 of 4
5%
95%
3 of 4
6%
90%
2 of 4
15%
77%
1 of 4
31%
0 of 4
5-7 of 7
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
26
2%
2%
112
1%
6%
2%
221
61%
3%
2%
3%
214
73%
14%
3%
6%
4%
427
90%
6%
1%
3%
0%
150
4 of 7
69%
18%
2%
8%
3%
96
3 of 7
63%
25%
5%
4%
2%
91
2 of 7
51%
36%
2%
4%
7%
87
1 of 7
36%
51%
2%
8%
3%
164
0 of 7
15%
78%
1%
3%
3%
413
42%
49%
2%
4%
3%
1001
Page 238

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR5 BETTER DEALING / FOREIGN AFFAIRS
IHPAR5
GOP
TOTAL
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
50%
40%
1%
4%
5%
1001
Northeast
41%
48%
0%
4%
7%
195
Midwest
52%
38%
4%
6%
181
South
57%
33%
3%
4%
235
South Central
59%
33%
5%
3%
96
Central Plains
46%
38%
2%
11%
83
Mountain States
57%
32%
7%
4%
70
West
40%
49%
7%
4%
141
California
39%
52%
6%
3%
89
Florida
55%
36%
Texas
54%
38%
New York
38%
45%
Rest of country
51%
38%
53%
37%
55%
36%
No Senate election
45%
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
2%
3%
3%
58
5%
4%
71
1%
3%
13%
56
1%
4%
5%
727
5%
6%
217
1%
4%
4%
320
43%
1%
4%
6%
464
53%
37%
1%
4%
5%
405
41%
47%
1%
4%
6%
366
58%
33%
1%
4%
5%
230
race
54%
38%
2%
3%
4%
241
Other
48%
40%
1%
5%
6%
760
Male
55%
34%
1%
5%
5%
480
Female
45%
45%
0%
4%
6%
521
Male / employed
57%
33%
1%
5%
4%
324
Male / not employed
52%
36%
2%
4%
6%
157
Female / employed
45%
44%
4%
7%
281
44%
46%
1%
4%
5%
240
Not employed
40%
50%
2%
3%
6%
133
Employed
51%
38%
1%
4%
5%
605
Retired
52%
38%
1%
4%
5%
252
Refused
28%
46%
13%
13%
11
18-34
42%
46%
1%
4%
8%
200
35-44
50%
39%
1%
5%
4%
280
45-64
51%
40%
1%
4%
4%
310
65 or over
55%
35%
0%
3%
7%
200
Unsure / refused
69%
17%
6%
8%
10
18-44
47%
42%
1%
5%
6%
480
45-64
51%
40%
1%
4%
4%
310
65+
55%
35%
0%
3%
7%
200
Unsure / refused
69%
17%
6%
8%
10
6%
(cont.)
Page 239

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR5
GOP
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Male / under 55
54%
35%
1%
5%
5%
302
Male / 55+
57%
33%
2%
4%
4%
179
Female / under 55
43%
47%
0%
4%
6%
315
Female / 55+
48%
41%
0%
3%
7%
205
White
55%
35%
1%
4%
6%
751
26%
64%
2%
5%
3%
120
Hispanic / Latino
41%
49%
6%
4%
90
Other
48%
40%
1%
6%
5%
40
43%
46%
1%
2%
8%
128
57%
32%
1%
4%
6%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
26%
57%
6%
11%
24

voters 35+
26%
66%
4%
1%
96
44%
41%
8%
7%
41
39%
55%
4%
1%
49

18-34
51%
43%
6%

35+
47%
40%
1%
8%
4%
32
White seniors
56%
35%
0%
3%
5%
255
Other
48%
41%
1%
5%
5%
746
White men
58%
33%
1%
3%
5%
368
White women
51%
37%
0%
5%
7%
382
Black men
35%
43%
6%
11%
5%
50
Black women
20%
80%
1%
70
Hispanic men
50%
42%
8%
Hispanic women
34%
55%
4%
7%
48
Republican
86%
8%
1%
3%
3%
390
Independent
47%
29%
1%
11%
11%
190
Democrat
18%
74%
1%
2%
5%
420
Male / GOP
86%
9%
1%
2%
2%
214
Female / GOP
85%
7%
4%
4%
176
Male / DEM
17%
71%
4%
7%
161
Female / DEM
18%
76%
1%
5%
259
Male / IND
51%
29%
1%
12%
7%
105
Female / IND
43%
28%
2%
11%
16%
85
Under 55 / GOP
83%
11%
1%
4%
1%
223
55 & over / GOP
89%
5%
2%
4%
168
Under 55 / DEM
21%
72%
1%
6%
269
55 & over / DEM
12%
77%
2%
4%
5%
151
Under 55 / IND
46%
29%
1%
12%
12%
125
55 & over / IND
51%
28%
2%
9%
11%
65
3%
2%
42
(cont.)
Page 240

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR5
GOP
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
DEM
Republican
84%
10%
Ticket splitter
37%
20%
Democrat
20%
69%
Hard GOP
87%
8%
Soft GOP
72%
Ticket splitter
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
3%
3%
448
19%
24%
61
1%
4%
5%
492
1%
2%
2%
360
16%
4%
8%
92
42%
18%
18%
22%
64
Soft DEM
27%
50%
3%
12%
8%
84
Hard DEM
17%
75%
1%
2%
5%
401
Conservative
71%
19%
1%
4%
5%
536
Moderate
42%
39%
8%
11%
76
Liberal
23%
68%
1%
4%
5%
389
Very conservative
80%
15%
1%
1%
3%
187
66%
22%
1%
6%
6%
348
Moderate / liberal
26%
63%
1%
4%
6%
465
Republican
86%
8%
1%
3%
3%
390
Independent
47%
29%
1%
11%
11%
190
Conservative DEM
26%
60%
3%
2%
9%
103
Mod / lib DEM
15%
78%
0%
2%
4%
318
Liberal DEM
16%
76%
1%
3%
4%
335
30%
55%
2%
5%
8%
157
Independent
37%
20%
19%
24%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
70%
21%
2%
6%
69
Conservative GOP
87%
8%
1%
3%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
83%
9%
1%
4%
3%
93
Yes
89%
9%
No / unsure
43%
46%
1%
4%
6%
840
47%
36%
1%
3%
13%
53
48%
39%
1%
5%
7%
227
Some college
56%
36%
1%
4%
4%
219
College graduate
48%
42%
1%
4%
5%
503
52%
37%
1%
5%
5%
248
Male non-college
graduates
58%
31%
2%
4%
4%
232
45%
47%
0%
3%
5%
254
Female non-college
graduates
45%
42%
0%
5%
7%
266
White non-college
graduate
58%
30%
1%
4%
7%
349
graduate
35%
55%
2%
5%
4%
149
Others
48%
42%
1%
4%
5%
503
Union household
41%
46%
3%
3%
7%
127
Non-union household
51%
39%
1%
4%
5%
874
1%
68
2%
(cont.)
Page 241

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR5
GOP
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
DEM
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
Single
34%
54%
0%
7%
5%
215
Married
56%
34%
1%
3%
5%
607
No longer married
47%
42%
1%
4%
6%
179
Dad
63%
26%
2%
3%
6%
171
Mom
45%
44%
4%
7%
203
Married / children
58%
32%
1%
3%
6%
299
55%
36%
1%
4%
5%
308
Divorced / children
35%
49%
6%
10%
22
42%
48%
4%
6%
60
Single / children
28%
54%
10%
8%
42
36%
54%
0%
6%
4%
173
Other / mixed
53%
37%
1%
3%
6%
97
Single women
26%
62%
1%
4%
7%
98
Married women
52%
39%
0%
3%
6%
304
43%
46%
5%
6%
118
Single men
42%
47%
9%
3%
117
Married men
60%
29%
2%
4%
5%
302
54%
35%
2%
1%
7%
61
White single men
41%
55%
3%
1%
75
White single women
31%
48%
1%
7%
13%
46
White married men
64%
25%
1%
3%
6%
244
White married women
57%
33%
0%
4%
6%
243

men
55%
35%
2%
8%
49

women
47%
39%
6%
7%
93
Other
35%
55%
5%
3%
250
Single mothers
25%
60%
3%
11%
30
Married mothers
51%
39%
4%
5%
150
No longer married
mothers
31%
54%
6%
9%
23
Non-mothers
51%
39%
4%
5%
798
Upper class
39%
54%
6%
1%
73
Middle class
54%
37%
1%
3%
5%
696
Low income
41%
44%
2%
6%
7%
205
Working class
25%
57%
19%
Refused
39%
38%
17%
6%
20
Middle class whites
59%
31%
3%
6%
551

Americans
32%
63%
5%
1%
63
35%
55%
4%
6%
57
39%
53%
2%
1%
6%
25
Other
40%
47%
1%
7%
6%
305
1%
1%
1%
(cont.)
Page 242

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR5
GOP
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
DEM
Roman Catholic
56%
35%
60%
30%
Mainline Protestant
60%
Other
None
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
3%
6%
198
0%
5%
5%
185
30%
1%
3%
6%
280
39%
57%
1%
1%
2%
45
30%
57%
1%
6%
6%
262
64%
28%
1%
4%
4%
336
55%
36%
1%
3%
6%
157
Infrequently
50%
41%
0%
3%
6%
191
Never
38%
43%
9%
11%
44
59%
37%
2%
2%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
67%
25%
5%
3%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
65%
22%
4%
7%
131
Active other
58%
39%
Other
43%
46%
1%
4%
6%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
71%
18%
3%
5%
3%
133
49%
40%
1%
5%
5%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
55%
37%
3%
5%
179
2%
17
2%
40%
49%
0%
4%
7%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
73%
17%
0%
5%
5%
222
34%
60%
4%
2%
1%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
83%
9%
5%
3%
166
Christians
40%
50%
5%
3%
1%
51
Christians
42%
42%
1%
5%
10%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
25%
73%
1%
1%
39
Approve
21%
71%
1%
3%
5%
453
Unsure
43%
34%
4%
10%
10%
62
Disapprove
78%
12%
0%
5%
5%
487
Jobs
36%
51%
3%
2%
8%
135
Economy
43%
46%
1%
7%
3%
228
Health care
32%
57%
3%
8%
99
Illegal immigration
75%
18%
6%
2%
78
Foreign threats
78%
17%
1%
4%
116
Deficit
61%
30%
3%
6%
76
7%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
46%
41%
0%
5%
(cont.)
Page 243

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR5
GOP
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
DEM
Both equal
66%
30%
2%
2%
1%
71
Reducing deficit
69%
20%
2%
4%
6%
126
Creating jobs
47%
43%
2%
3%
5%
203
Increase wages
19%
76%
0%
4%
1%
132
Healthcare costs
59%
24%
7%
9%
98
Retirement
46%
50%
3%
Higher education
31%
58%
2%
9%
101
Regulations
82%
16%
2%
1%
65
Combination
51%
32%
7%
10%
141
None
21%
50%
Unsure
74%
2%
Views close to own
48%
44%
51%
38%
Both
52%
38%
Unsure
41%
30%
Very worried
68%
23%
Somewhat worried
47%
Not too worried
32%
Not at all worried
34%
1%
2%
11
12
4%
4%
352
1%
4%
6%
571
3%
4%
2%
48
7%
23%
30
1%
4%
4%
318
44%
1%
4%
5%
405
56%
0%
5%
6%
214
6%
10%
56
50%
100%
54%
8%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
34%
58%
Unsure
34%
46%
No
57%
33%
1%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
40%
50%
1%
Unsure
30%
50%
Disapprove
66%
Very worried
Somewhat worried
38%
3%
5%
245
4%
16%
63
5%
5%
693
4%
5%
510
1%
6%
13%
85
25%
0%
5%
5%
406
66%
24%
1%
3%
5%
112
63%
27%
1%
5%
5%
283
Not too worried
48%
42%
1%
4%
5%
341
Not at all worried
31%
59%
4%
6%
258
Combination
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
41
24%
28%
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
Unsure
Cutting taxes
Combination
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Neither
1%
100%
Unsure
31%
13%
Yes
55%
37%
No
40%
Approve
Unsure
Disapprove
6%
51%
0%
4%
3%
645
44%
2%
4%
10%
356
28%
65%
0%
4%
3%
295
48%
37%
4%
10%
45
83%
11%
0%
5%
2%
306
Yes
41%
49%
1%
4%
5%
628
No
65%
23%
2%
5%
6%
245
Not sure
65%
26%
3%
5%
128
(cont.)
Page 244

May 3-6, 2015
IHPAR5
GOP
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
DEM
4 of 4
16%
84%
3 of 4
9%
85%
2 of 4
25%
64%
1 of 4
39%
0 of 4
5-7 of 7
Both equal
Neither
TOTAL
Unsure
26
3%
3%
112
1%
5%
5%
221
48%
2%
3%
7%
214
81%
8%
0%
5%
6%
427
95%
3%
1%
1%
150
4 of 7
82%
12%
3%
4%
96
3 of 7
77%
13%
5%
5%
91
2 of 7
66%
25%
3%
6%
87
1 of 7
39%
40%
1%
9%
11%
164
0 of 7
21%
68%
1%
4%
5%
413
50%
40%
1%
4%
5%
1001
1%
Page 245

May 3-6, 2015
IHGOP PREFER GOP ON ISSUE HANDLING
IHGOP
TOTAL
GOP on 4 of GOP on 3 of GOP on 2 of GOP on 1 of GOP on 0 of

4
4
4
4
4
TOTAL
29%
10%
10%
12%
39%
1001
Northeast
22%
8%
10%
12%
48%
195
Midwest
28%
8%
10%
17%
37%
181
South
31%
13%
10%
11%
34%
235
South Central
36%
15%
5%
6%
37%
96
Central Plains
31%
5%
13%
13%
38%
83
Mountain States
45%
8%
9%
9%
29%
70
West
21%
12%
9%
10%
47%
141
California
21%
14%
8%
8%
49%
89
Florida
36%
9%
11%
7%
36%
58
Texas
29%
18%
6%
6%
41%
71
New York
22%
7%
15%
12%
44%
56
Rest of country
30%
9%
10%
13%
38%
727
32%
14%
8%
10%
37%
217
28%
10%
11%
13%
39%
320
No Senate election
28%
9%
10%
12%
41%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
32%
11%
9%
11%
38%
405
23%
9%
10%
13%
45%
366
32%
11%
12%
11%
34%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
34%
10%
9%
11%
37%
241
Other
27%
10%
10%
12%
40%
760
Male
33%
11%
11%
11%
33%
480
Female
25%
9%
8%
13%
45%
521
Male / employed
33%
13%
12%
10%
32%
324
Male / not employed
35%
9%
9%
11%
35%
157
Female / employed
23%
9%
9%
16%
43%
281
26%
9%
8%
9%
48%
240
Not employed
19%
12%
8%
13%
48%
133
Employed
28%
11%
11%
13%
37%
605
Retired
36%
8%
8%
9%
39%
252
Refused
12%
3%
15%
1%
68%
11
18-34
17%
11%
13%
21%
38%
200
35-44
26%
9%
13%
10%
41%
280
45-64
29%
11%
8%
10%
42%
310
65 or over
41%
10%
6%
7%
36%
200
Unsure / refused
57%
5%
9%
3%
26%
10
18-44
23%
10%
13%
15%
40%
480
45-64
29%
11%
8%
10%
42%
310
65+
41%
10%
6%
7%
36%
200
Unsure / refused
57%
5%
9%
3%
26%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 246

May 3-6, 2015
IHGOP
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Male / under 55
30%
12%
13%
9%
36%
302
Male / 55+
38%
11%
8%
14%
29%
179
Female / under 55
18%
9%
10%
18%
45%
315
Female / 55+
34%
8%
6%
6%
46%
205
White
35%
11%
10%
10%
34%
751
4%
2%
7%
19%
67%
120
Hispanic / Latino
13%
15%
12%
16%
45%
90
Other
28%
5%
9%
8%
51%
40
24%
14%
15%
17%
30%
128
37%
11%
9%
9%
34%
623
11%
32%
57%
24
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER

voters 35+
5%
3%
6%
16%
70%
96
9%
9%
8%
27%
48%
41
17%
20%
15%
7%
42%
49

18-34
16%
15%
15%
54%

35+
31%
6%
7%
6%
50%
32
White seniors
44%
9%
6%
8%
34%
255
Other
24%
11%
11%
13%
41%
746
White men
38%
11%
11%
10%
29%
368
White women
31%
11%
9%
11%
38%
382
Black men
10%
6%
17%
11%
56%
50
24%
76%
70
Black women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Hispanic men
14%
20%
8%
15%
42%
42
Hispanic women
12%
10%
15%
16%
47%
48
Republican
62%
16%
14%
4%
4%
390
Independent
21%
15%
13%
16%
35%
190
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
2%
2%
5%
17%
74%
420
Male / GOP
63%
16%
15%
3%
4%
214
Female / GOP
61%
18%
12%
6%
4%
176
Male / DEM
1%
2%
9%
16%
73%
161
Female / DEM
2%
18%
75%
259
2%
3%
Male / IND
22%
18%
9%
19%
32%
105
Female / IND
19%
11%
18%
13%
39%
85
Under 55 / GOP
55%
17%
18%
5%
5%
223
55 & over / GOP
71%
16%
8%
3%
3%
168
Under 55 / DEM
2%
3%
5%
18%
71%
269
55 & over / DEM
2%
1%
4%
14%
80%
151
Under 55 / IND
17%
14%
14%
17%
38%
125
55 & over / IND
28%
16%
11%
14%
31%
65
(cont.)
Page 247

May 3-6, 2015
IHGOP
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Republican
61%
17%
12%
4%
5%
448
Ticket splitter
7%
14%
15%
16%
47%
61
Democrat
2%
3%
7%
18%
70%
492
Hard GOP
65%
16%
13%
3%
3%
360
Soft GOP
46%
26%
12%
7%
9%
92
Ticket splitter
11%
10%
16%
19%
44%
64
Soft DEM
2%
8%
14%
25%
51%
84
Hard DEM
1%
2%
5%
17%
76%
401
Conservative
47%
15%
11%
10%
18%
536
Moderate
20%
12%
9%
8%
51%
76
5%
3%
9%
15%
67%
389
Very conservative
66%
11%
6%
3%
14%
187
37%
17%
13%
13%
19%
348
Liberal
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
8%
5%
9%
14%
65%
465
Republican
62%
16%
14%
4%
4%
390
Independent
21%
15%
13%
16%
35%
190
Conservative DEM
2%
5%
7%
20%
66%
103
Mod / lib DEM
1%
2%
4%
16%
77%
318
Liberal DEM
1%
2%
7%
16%
75%
335
3%
6%
8%
23%
60%
157
Independent
7%
14%
15%
16%
47%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
44%
18%
21%
6%
12%
69
Conservative GOP
64%
17%
11%
4%
4%
379
Yes / strongly
74%
8%
5%
4%
10%
93
Yes
70%
16%
9%
1%
4%
68
No / unsure
20%
10%
10%
14%
46%
840
35%
8%
12%
12%
33%
53
32%
8%
7%
10%
43%
227
Some college
26%
13%
10%
12%
40%
219
College graduate
28%
10%
11%
13%
38%
503
34%
11%
13%
9%
34%
248
Male non-college
graduates
33%
12%
10%
12%
33%
232
22%
10%
8%
17%
43%
254
Female non-college
graduates
27%
8%
8%
9%
47%
266
White non-college
graduate
38%
12%
9%
10%
31%
349
graduate
10%
6%
8%
13%
62%
149
Others
28%
10%
11%
13%
38%
503
Union household
17%
8%
12%
12%
50%
127
Non-union household
30%
11%
9%
12%
38%
874
(cont.)
Page 248

May 3-6, 2015
IHGOP
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Single
14%
12%
8%
17%
49%
215
Married
34%
10%
11%
11%
35%
607
No longer married
28%
9%
9%
10%
45%
179
Dad
42%
11%
14%
6%
28%
171
Mom
18%
10%
10%
18%
44%
203
Married / children
31%
9%
12%
13%
34%
299
37%
11%
9%
8%
35%
308
Divorced / children
11%
15%
6%
6%
62%
22
28%
6%
2%
12%
52%
60
Single / children
20%
13%
11%
14%
42%
42
13%
12%
7%
18%
50%
173
Other / mixed
31%
9%
14%
9%
37%
97
Single women
12%
7%
8%
21%
53%
98
Married women
29%
9%
9%
12%
41%
304
23%
12%
7%
8%
51%
118
Single men
16%
17%
9%
14%
45%
117
Married men
39%
11%
12%
9%
29%
302
37%
3%
13%
14%
34%
61
White single men
19%
20%
8%
10%
42%
75
White single women
21%
10%
15%
19%
35%
46
White married men
44%
10%
12%
8%
25%
244
White married women
34%
10%
9%
11%
37%
243

men
39%
3%
12%
17%
29%
49

women
29%
15%
7%
6%
44%
93
Other
11%
7%
9%
16%
57%
250
Single mothers
15%
7%
12%
20%
46%
30
Married mothers
19%
9%
11%
19%
41%
150
No longer married
mothers
14%
23%
3%
6%
55%
23
Non-mothers
31%
10%
10%
10%
38%
798
Upper class
29%
10%
6%
15%
41%
73
Middle class
32%
11%
10%
10%
37%
696
Low income
17%
8%
12%
15%
47%
205
Working class
11%
22%
67%
Refused
29%
3%
7%
29%
32%
20
Middle class whites
37%
12%
10%
9%
32%
551

Americans
7%
1%
4%
16%
72%
63
14%
17%
12%
16%
41%
57
24%
5%
5%
10%
56%
25
Other
21%
8%
10%
16%
45%
305
(cont.)
Page 249

May 3-6, 2015
IHGOP
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Roman Catholic
33%
12%
5%
11%
39%
198
37%
11%
11%
9%
32%
185
Mainline Protestant
33%
10%
10%
16%
30%
280
Other
32%
3%
11%
8%
46%
45
None
15%
9%
13%
10%
54%
262
41%
10%
10%
9%
30%
336
33%
12%
5%
19%
31%
157
Infrequently
22%
11%
10%
14%
44%
191
Never
24%
8%
11%
12%
45%
44
36%
15%
5%
9%
34%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
46%
10%
11%
6%
27%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
40%
8%
12%
12%
29%
131
Active other
55%
1%
11%
4%
29%
17
Other
22%
10%
10%
13%
44%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
43%
14%
13%
11%
19%
133
30%
10%
11%
10%
39%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
34%
14%
8%
9%
35%
179
20%
6%
9%
15%
51%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
48%
16%
11%
7%
18%
222
12%
11%
8%
16%
52%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
56%
18%
10%
6%
10%
166
Christians
21%
13%
5%
11%
50%
51
Christians
23%
8%
15%
11%
43%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
1%
10%
12%
23%
55%
39
Approve
3%
3%
7%
16%
71%
453
Unsure
13%
10%
15%
20%
42%
62
Disapprove
55%
17%
12%
7%
10%
487
Jobs
19%
4%
8%
14%
54%
135
Economy
24%
7%
12%
14%
44%
228
Health care
12%
10%
9%
9%
59%
99
Illegal immigration
48%
15%
5%
9%
24%
78
Foreign threats
38%
20%
12%
11%
19%
116
Deficit
38%
13%
13%
15%
20%
76
40%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
31%
9%
9%
10%
(cont.)
Page 250

May 3-6, 2015
IHGOP
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Cutting taxes
38%
14%
10%
12%
25%
71
Reducing deficit
41%
15%
18%
11%
14%
126
Creating jobs
21%
11%
9%
16%
43%
203
Increase wages
9%
3%
6%
11%
71%
132
Healthcare costs
30%
12%
13%
12%
33%
98
Retirement
31%
2%
3%
19%
46%
41
Higher education
11%
16%
8%
14%
50%
101
Regulations
69%
10%
4%
8%
9%
65
Combination
35%
5%
9%
5%
46%
141
32%
6%
12%
50%
11
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Unsure
50%
9%
26%
6%
9%
12
Views close to own
33%
6%
7%
8%
46%
352
26%
13%
11%
14%
36%
571
Both
29%
9%
14%
9%
38%
48
Unsure
32%
10%
12%
11%
35%
30
Very worried
46%
9%
12%
9%
24%
318
Somewhat worried
26%
11%
10%
11%
41%
405
Not too worried
13%
11%
6%
14%
56%
214
Not at all worried
9%
7%
16%
20%
Combination
Unsure
30%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
14%
Unsure
23%
No
34%
11%
10%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
18%
9%
10%
Unsure
17%
6%
Disapprove
45%
Very worried
Somewhat worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
56
1
5%
24%
41%
8%
10%
13%
54%
245
7%
6%
12%
52%
63
11%
33%
693
14%
50%
510
8%
11%
58%
85
13%
10%
9%
23%
406
49%
8%
11%
9%
23%
112
40%
13%
8%
9%
30%
283
Not too worried
24%
10%
12%
14%
40%
341
Not at all worried
13%
9%
8%
14%
55%
258
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
48%
100%
100%
Unsure
31%
Yes
33%
10%
9%
No
21%
11%
Approve
8%
Unsure
Disapprove
69%
10%
38%
645
11%
15%
42%
356
6%
9%
12%
65%
295
26%
7%
14%
13%
41%
45
57%
14%
9%
8%
12%
306
(cont.)
Page 251

May 3-6, 2015
IHGOP
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Yes
21%
10%
9%
13%
47%
628
No
43%
12%
9%
9%
27%
245
Not sure
39%
9%
14%
10%
28%
128
8%
89%
26
4 of 4
3%
3 of 4
1%
1%
6%
10%
83%
112
2 of 4
4%
6%
7%
18%
65%
221
1 of 4
17%
9%
13%
18%
43%
214
0 of 4
57%
16%
12%
6%
10%
427
5-7 of 7
81%
10%
4%
4%
1%
150
4 of 7
52%
21%
10%
5%
12%
96
3 of 7
48%
13%
17%
11%
11%
91
2 of 7
27%
22%
14%
14%
24%
87
1 of 7
17%
11%
12%
20%
40%
164
0 of 7
TOTAL
5%
4%
9%
13%
69%
413
29%
10%
10%
12%
39%
1001
Page 252

May 3-6, 2015
IHDEM PREFER DEM ON ISSUE HANDLING
IHDEM
TOTAL
DEM on 4 of DEM on 3 of DEM on 2 of DEM on 1 of DEM on 0 of

4
4
4
4
4
TOTAL
32%
12%
8%
10%
38%
1001
Northeast
40%
13%
8%
7%
32%
195
Midwest
32%
16%
5%
11%
36%
181
South
27%
12%
8%
11%
42%
235
South Central
30%
6%
7%
11%
46%
96
Central Plains
28%
12%
11%
9%
41%
83
Mountain States
20%
12%
5%
9%
54%
70
West
41%
7%
11%
11%
29%
141
California
40%
7%
11%
14%
29%
89
Florida
32%
6%
8%
10%
43%
58
Texas
33%
6%
8%
12%
40%
71
New York
38%
6%
15%
2%
39%
56
Rest of country
31%
14%
7%
10%
39%
727
27%
12%
7%
12%
42%
217
33%
13%
6%
10%
38%
320
No Senate election
34%
11%
10%
9%
37%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
29%
12%
7%
10%
42%
405
39%
12%
8%
9%
33%
366
27%
12%
11%
11%
40%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
31%
9%
8%
9%
43%
241
Other
32%
13%
8%
10%
37%
760
Male
27%
9%
8%
12%
43%
480
Female
37%
14%
8%
8%
34%
521
Male / employed
26%
8%
9%
13%
44%
324
Male / not employed
29%
12%
5%
12%
41%
157
Female / employed
36%
15%
8%
8%
33%
281
38%
13%
8%
7%
34%
240
Not employed
37%
19%
7%
13%
24%
133
Employed
31%
11%
9%
10%
39%
605
Retired
32%
9%
7%
7%
44%
252
Refused
55%
1%
11%
33%
11
18-34
32%
19%
14%
12%
24%
200
35-44
32%
12%
8%
10%
38%
280
45-64
36%
10%
7%
11%
37%
310
65 or over
28%
8%
5%
7%
52%
200
Unsure / refused
12%
10%
5%
74%
10
18-44
32%
15%
10%
11%
32%
480
45-64
36%
10%
7%
11%
37%
310
65+
28%
8%
5%
7%
52%
200
Unsure / refused
12%
10%
5%
74%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 253

May 3-6, 2015
IHDEM
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Male / under 55
29%
8%
9%
14%
40%
302
Male / 55+
25%
12%
5%
10%
48%
179
Female / under 55
37%
18%
10%
9%
27%
315
Female / 55+
37%
7%
5%
6%
45%
205
White
26%
10%
8%
11%
45%
751
63%
19%
7%
4%
7%
120
Hispanic / Latino
38%
15%
13%
12%
23%
90
Other
36%
10%
9%
5%
39%
40
25%
16%
14%
14%
30%
128
26%
9%
6%
10%
48%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
57%
26%
11%
6%

voters 35+
65%
17%
6%
3%
9%
96
35%
25%
12%
9%
19%
41
41%
6%
13%
15%
26%
49

18-34
54%
10%
21%
16%

35+
32%
10%
7%
7%
45%
32
White seniors
26%
9%
4%
6%
54%
255
Other
34%
13%
9%
11%
33%
746
White men
24%
8%
7%
13%
48%
368
White women
29%
12%
8%
9%
42%
382
Black men
49%
9%
16%
9%
17%
50
Black women
74%
26%
1%
Hispanic men
34%
18%
3%
17%
28%
42
Hispanic women
41%
12%
21%
8%
18%
48
Republican
1%
2%
7%
13%
76%
390
Independent
18%
14%
13%
17%
38%
190
Democrat
24
70
68%
20%
6%
3%
3%
420
Male / GOP
1%
1%
7%
16%
75%
214
Female / GOP
1%
2%
8%
11%
78%
176
Male / DEM
67%
17%
8%
4%
4%
161
Female / DEM
68%
21%
5%
3%
2%
259
Male / IND
19%
14%
10%
20%
37%
105
Female / IND
16%
15%
17%
14%
38%
85
Under 55 / GOP
1%
2%
10%
16%
70%
223
55 & over / GOP
1%
1%
4%
9%
84%
168
Under 55 / DEM
65%
21%
7%
4%
3%
269
55 & over / DEM
73%
18%
4%
2%
3%
151
Under 55 / IND
20%
16%
14%
17%
33%
125
55 & over / IND
14%
11%
11%
18%
46%
65
(cont.)
Page 254

May 3-6, 2015
IHDEM
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Republican
2%
3%
6%
15%
74%
448
Ticket splitter
14%
7%
20%
14%
45%
61
Democrat
62%
20%
8%
5%
4%
492
Hard GOP
1%
2%
7%
13%
77%
360
Soft GOP
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
2%
4%
6%
22%
66%
92
Ticket splitter
15%
9%
15%
12%
50%
64
Soft DEM
33%
28%
20%
14%
5%
84
Hard DEM
70%
19%
6%
3%
2%
401
Conservative
13%
8%
7%
13%
60%
536
Moderate
31%
10%
5%
16%
38%
76
Liberal
59%
17%
10%
4%
9%
389
Very conservative
11%
4%
3%
8%
74%
187
13%
10%
9%
16%
52%
348
Moderate / liberal
55%
16%
9%
6%
14%
465
Republican
1%
2%
7%
13%
76%
390
Independent
18%
14%
13%
17%
38%
190
Conservative DEM
58%
21%
10%
8%
3%
103
Mod / lib DEM
71%
19%
5%
2%
3%
318
Liberal DEM
67%
19%
9%
3%
3%
335
51%
24%
7%
9%
9%
157
Independent
14%
7%
20%
14%
45%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
7%
5%
12%
19%
57%
69
Conservative GOP
1%
2%
5%
14%
77%
379
Yes / strongly
6%
3%
3%
6%
82%
93
Yes
3%
6%
12%
79%
68
No / unsure
37%
14%
9%
10%
30%
840
16%
17%
11%
12%
44%
53
36%
8%
7%
9%
40%
227
Some college
31%
11%
8%
14%
36%
219
College graduate
32%
13%
8%
9%
38%
503
28%
8%
8%
10%
46%
248
Male non-college
graduates
26%
11%
8%
15%
40%
232
36%
17%
8%
7%
30%
254
Female non-college
graduates
37%
10%
8%
8%
37%
266
White non-college
graduate
22%
9%
7%
14%
48%
349
graduate
55%
13%
9%
6%
17%
149
Others
32%
13%
8%
9%
38%
503
Union household
44%
12%
8%
9%
27%
127
Non-union household
30%
12%
8%
10%
40%
874
(cont.)
Page 255

May 3-6, 2015
IHDEM
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Single
41%
16%
9%
12%
23%
215
Married
29%
10%
7%
9%
45%
607
No longer married
33%
12%
10%
10%
35%
179
Dad
21%
6%
9%
11%
53%
171
Mom
35%
19%
9%
10%
28%
203
Married / children
28%
12%
8%
10%
42%
299
29%
8%
7%
9%
47%
308
Divorced / children
37%
16%
13%
23%
11%
22
41%
14%
4%
8%
33%
60
Single / children
30%
15%
9%
13%
33%
42
43%
17%
8%
11%
20%
173
Other / mixed
28%
10%
13%
9%
41%
97
Single women
47%
20%
9%
6%
19%
98
Married women
33%
13%
8%
7%
39%
304
37%
11%
8%
10%
33%
118
Single men
36%
13%
8%
16%
26%
117
Married men
24%
7%
7%
12%
50%
302
26%
13%
14%
9%
38%
61
White single men
36%
11%
7%
18%
28%
75
White single women
28%
16%
16%
8%
32%
46
White married men
21%
6%
6%
11%
55%
244
White married women
29%
12%
6%
8%
45%
243

men
20%
15%
13%
12%
40%
49

women
29%
10%
7%
13%
41%
93
Other
50%
16%
9%
7%
18%
250
Single mothers
39%
21%
10%
7%
23%
30
Married mothers
34%
19%
9%
8%
29%
150
No longer married
mothers
31%
15%
9%
22%
23%
23
Non-mothers
32%
10%
8%
10%
41%
798
Upper class
38%
13%
4%
10%
35%
73
Middle class
30%
9%
8%
10%
42%
696
Low income
37%
16%
9%
11%
27%
205
Working class
67%
22%
11%
Refused
12%
39%
7%
1%
41%
20
Middle class whites
25%
8%
8%
11%
48%
551

Americans
64%
18%
5%
1%
11%
63
36%
12%
17%
13%
22%
57
47%
12%
7%
5%
29%
25
Other
36%
17%
8%
9%
29%
305
(cont.)
Page 256

May 3-6, 2015
IHDEM
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Roman Catholic
30%
10%
7%
9%
43%
198
24%
11%
8%
12%
45%
185
Mainline Protestant
25%
14%
8%
8%
45%
280
Other
43%
9%
1%
9%
38%
45
None
44%
12%
11%
12%
21%
262
24%
9%
8%
8%
51%
336
26%
17%
6%
10%
42%
157
Infrequently
35%
13%
8%
13%
30%
191
Never
37%
9%
11%
4%
40%
44
29%
11%
5%
12%
43%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
19%
8%
9%
9%
55%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
24%
10%
9%
4%
52%
131
Active other
27%
4%
11%
59%
17
Other
36%
13%
8%
11%
32%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
14%
10%
8%
12%
56%
133
32%
9%
8%
13%
38%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
29%
10%
7%
11%
43%
179
41%
16%
9%
6%
29%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
11%
8%
6%
12%
62%
222
51%
15%
10%
10%
15%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
5%
6%
5%
11%
73%
166
Christians
49%
8%
8%
10%
26%
51
Christians
30%
13%
10%
16%
31%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
53%
24%
12%
10%
1%
39
Approve
64%
18%
9%
4%
6%
453
Unsure
19%
18%
14%
15%
35%
62
4%
5%
7%
15%
69%
487
Jobs
45%
17%
3%
8%
27%
135
Economy
38%
12%
11%
8%
31%
228
Health care
52%
12%
9%
11%
16%
99
Illegal immigration
14%
6%
6%
13%
60%
78
Foreign threats
13%
10%
11%
17%
49%
116
Deficit
11%
15%
11%
16%
47%
76
44%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
Disapprove
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
32%
11%
6%
7%
(cont.)
Page 257

May 3-6, 2015
IHDEM
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Cutting taxes
21%
14%
6%
8%
52%
71
8%
8%
9%
20%
55%
126
Creating jobs
37%
17%
8%
7%
31%
203
Increase wages
63%
13%
7%
5%
12%
132
Healthcare costs
24%
8%
14%
11%
44%
98
Retirement
41%
21%
3%
35%
41
Higher education
44%
14%
8%
20%
13%
101
Regulations
8%
7%
3%
7%
76%
65
Combination
33%
6%
10%
4%
46%
141
None
20%
12%
6%
23%
39%
11
28%
70%
12
Reducing deficit
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
2%
Views close to own
39%
8%
6%
8%
39%
352
29%
14%
9%
12%
36%
571
Both
33%
10%
4%
7%
45%
48
Unsure
17%
6%
10%
10%
56%
30
Very worried
16%
9%
9%
10%
56%
318
Somewhat worried
35%
12%
7%
10%
36%
405
Not too worried
49%
13%
6%
12%
20%
214
37%
18%
21%
5%
20%
56
Not at all worried

Combination
100%
Unsure
36%
24%
5%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
48%
13%
9%
Unsure
40%
13%
8%
No
26%
11%
8%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
42%
14%
9%
Unsure
45%
15%
Disapprove
17%
Very worried
Somewhat worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
35%
9%
21%
245
5%
35%
63
11%
45%
693
10%
25%
510
6%
3%
31%
85
8%
8%
12%
56%
406
17%
9%
6%
9%
59%
112
22%
9%
8%
10%
50%
283
Not too worried
33%
14%
9%
9%
34%
341
Not at all worried
48%
13%
7%
11%
21%
258
100%
45%
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Unsure
49%
Yes
31%
10%
8%
9%
42%
645
No
34%
15%
9%
12%
31%
356
Approve
56%
14%
9%
7%
14%
295
Unsure
31%
14%
8%
2%
46%
45
7%
6%
6%
12%
69%
306
Disapprove
6%
(cont.)
Page 258

May 3-6, 2015
IHDEM
TOTAL

4
4
4
4
4
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Yes
39%
13%
9%
11%
29%
628
No
20%
9%
4%
11%
56%
245
Not sure
21%
12%
10%
5%
51%
128
4 of 4
84%
12%
2%
3%
26
3 of 4
77%
13%
8%
1%
1%
112
2 of 4
57%
18%
10%
7%
8%
221
1 of 4
35%
20%
12%
12%
22%
214
0 of 4
3%
4%
6%
14%
74%
427
2%
3%
7%
88%
150
5-7 of 7
4 of 7
6%
2%
5%
19%
68%
96
3 of 7
9%
6%
13%
14%
59%
91
2 of 7
15%
14%
14%
16%
41%
87
1 of 7
28%
17%
10%
13%
33%
164
0 of 7
60%
16%
7%
6%
10%
413
32%
12%
8%
10%
38%
1001
Page 259

May 3-6, 2015
ECONW WORRY ABOUT US ECONOMY SUFFERING DOWNTURN
ECONW
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
32%
40%
21%
6%
Northeast
31%
42%
23%
Midwest
30%
42%
South
37%
South Central
Central Plains
TOTAL
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
1%
1001
3%
1%
195
21%
7%
0%
181
37%
17%
7%
1%
235
39%
41%
12%
7%
2%
96
31%
37%
28%
4%
Mountain States
28%
36%
31%
4%
1%
West
25%
46%
24%
5%
0%
0%
141
California
27%
44%
24%
5%
0%
0%
89
Florida
36%
38%
18%
8%
Texas
36%
41%
13%
7%
New York
21%
54%
25%
Rest of country
32%
39%
22%
6%
35%
42%
16%
6%
33%
37%
24%
6%
No Senate election
30%
43%
22%
5%
0%
1%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
31%
43%
19%
5%
0%
1%
405
29%
42%
24%
5%
0%
1%
366
37%
34%
21%
7%
0%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
32%
43%
19%
5%
0%
241
Other
32%
40%
22%
6%
0%
1%
760
Male
33%
40%
19%
7%
0%
1%
480
Female
31%
41%
23%
4%
0%
1%
521
Male / employed
32%
40%
20%
6%
0%
1%
324
Male / not employed
33%
40%
18%
7%
2%
157
Female / employed
27%
39%
28%
4%
1%
281
36%
42%
17%
5%
0%
240
Not employed
33%
43%
18%
5%
Employed
30%
40%
24%
5%
Retired
35%
40%
17%
6%
Refused
43%
53%
18-34
23%
46%
22%
7%
2%
200
35-44
29%
39%
27%
4%
1%
280
45-64
37%
38%
17%
6%
0%
310
65 or over
35%
40%
19%
6%
0%
200
Unsure / refused
45%
34%
11%
7%
3%
10
18-44
27%
42%
25%
5%
1%
480
45-64
37%
38%
17%
6%
0%
310
65+
35%
40%
19%
6%
0%
200
Unsure / refused
45%
34%
11%
7%
3%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
0%
TOTAL
Unsure
83
70
58
0%
3%
71
1%
56
1%
727
2%
217
320
0%
133
0%
1%
605
1%
252
11
5%
0%
0%
(cont.)
Page 260

May 3-6, 2015
ECONW
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Male / under 55
30%
42%
20%
6%
Male / 55+
37%
37%
19%
7%
Female / under 55
27%
41%
27%
4%
Female / 55+
37%
40%
17%
White
32%
42%
27%
42%
Hispanic / Latino
33%
Other
Combination
TOTAL
Unsure
1%
302
0%
179
1%
315
5%
0%
205
21%
5%
0%
751
21%
8%
2%
120
34%
21%
9%
1%
2%
90
36%
23%
29%
9%
1%
2%
40
23%
52%
21%
3%
34%
40%
21%
5%
0%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
21%
42%
16%
10%
11%
24

voters 35+
28%
42%
22%
8%
27%
32%
22%
14%
38%
36%
20%
4%

18-34
17%
36%
38%
10%

35+
41%
20%
27%
9%
White seniors
34%
41%
18%
6%
Other
31%
40%
22%
5%
White men
31%
43%
21%
6%
White women
34%
41%
22%
3%
1%
382
Black men
41%
33%
12%
8%
5%
50
Black women
16%
48%
27%
9%
Hispanic men
36%
31%
16%
13%
Hispanic women
31%
37%
25%
5%
Republican
39%
43%
14%
3%
Independent
42%
33%
18%
6%
Democrat
20%
42%
29%
7%
Male / GOP
38%
42%
17%
3%
Female / GOP
40%
44%
12%
3%
Male / DEM
19%
44%
24%
10%
Female / DEM
21%
40%
32%
6%
Male / IND
44%
30%
18%
8%
Female / IND
41%
36%
19%
3%
Under 55 / GOP
34%
46%
16%
3%
55 & over / GOP
45%
40%
13%
3%
Under 55 / DEM
18%
43%
31%
6%
55 & over / DEM
25%
39%
26%
10%
Under 55 / IND
41%
32%
20%
7%
55 & over / IND
46%
34%
14%
5%
0%
0%
128
96
4%
41
49
1%
8
1%
0%
2%
32
0%
255
1%
746
368
70
4%
42
48
1%
1%
390
0%
0%
190
0%
1%
420
214
0%
1%
1%
176
3%
161
0%
259
0%
105
0%
85
1%
223
168
0%
2%
269
0%
151
125
0%
1%
65
(cont.)
Page 261

May 3-6, 2015
ECONW
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
TOTAL
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Republican
41%
42%
12%
4%
1%
448
Ticket splitter
39%
24%
20%
12%
4%
61
Democrat
22%
41%
30%
6%
1%
492
Hard GOP
39%
45%
13%
3%
1%
360
Soft GOP
57%
28%
12%
3%
0%
92
Ticket splitter
31%
35%
21%
12%
1%
64
Soft DEM
30%
33%
28%
6%
1%
3%
84
Hard DEM
21%
42%
30%
7%
0%
1%
401
Conservative
39%
40%
16%
5%
0%
536
Moderate
34%
39%
11%
9%
1%
6%
76
Liberal
22%
42%
30%
6%
0%
1%
389
Very conservative
47%
35%
11%
6%
0%
187
34%
43%
19%
4%
0%
348
Moderate / liberal
24%
41%
27%
7%
2%
465
Republican
39%
43%
14%
3%
1%
390
Independent
42%
33%
18%
6%
0%
190
Conservative DEM
31%
30%
26%
13%
Mod / lib DEM
17%
45%
30%
6%
0%
2%
318
Liberal DEM
19%
42%
32%
6%
0%
0%
335
29%
38%
24%
8%
0%
2%
157
Independent
39%
24%
20%
12%
4%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
38%
39%
9%
11%
3%
69
Conservative GOP
42%
43%
13%
2%
0%
379
Yes / strongly
64%
29%
8%
Yes
35%
48%
12%
4%
No / unsure
28%
41%
24%
6%
53%
32%
14%
39%
42%
Some college
31%
39%
College graduate
27%
0%
0%
0%
Unsure
103
93
1%
68
1%
840
1%
0%
53
12%
6%
1%
227
22%
7%
1%
219
42%
26%
5%
0%
0%
503
30%
41%
24%
6%
0%
Male non-college
graduates
36%
40%
15%
8%
24%
43%
28%
4%
Female non-college
graduates
38%
39%
18%
White non-college
graduate
39%
41%
graduate
33%
Others
0%
248
2%
232
1%
254
5%
0%
266
15%
4%
0%
349
34%
19%
11%
3%
149
27%
42%
26%
5%
0%
503
Union household
35%
40%
21%
4%
Non-union household
31%
41%
21%
6%
0%
0%
127
0%
1%
874
(cont.)
Page 262

May 3-6, 2015
ECONW
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Single
22%
46%
23%
7%
Not at all
worried
Married
34%
40%
22%
No longer married
37%
36%
Dad
38%
Mom
Married / children
Combination
TOTAL
Unsure
2%
215
4%
0%
607
18%
8%
0%
179
40%
18%
4%
29%
43%
24%
3%
1%
203
33%
40%
23%
3%
1%
299
34%
40%
21%
5%
0%
308
Divorced / children
50%
28%
8%
13%
26%
45%
23%
6%
Single / children
27%
54%
19%
21%
44%
23%
9%
Other / mixed
42%
32%
17%
9%
Single women
19%
49%
26%
5%
Married women
33%
39%
24%
4%
1%
304
36%
38%
19%
6%
0%
118
Single men
25%
43%
19%
9%
4%
117
Married men
35%
41%
20%
5%
40%
31%
16%
13%
White single men
18%
52%
21%
9%
White single women
26%
44%
30%
White married men
33%
42%
21%
4%
White married women
34%
41%
20%
4%

men
38%
34%
18%
10%

women
36%
38%
20%
5%
Other
30%
36%
22%
9%
Single mothers
17%
61%
22%
Married mothers
31%
39%
26%
2%
No longer married
mothers
33%
48%
10%
9%
Non-mothers
32%
40%
21%
6%
Upper class
28%
38%
25%
9%
Middle class
30%
42%
23%
5%
Low income
39%
37%
14%
8%
3%
86%
11%
Refused
52%
24%
21%
3%
1%
20
Middle class whites
30%
42%
24%
4%
0%
551

Americans
24%
53%
17%
6%
39%
34%
16%
7%
1%
3%
57
19%
25%
42%
9%
2%
2%
25
Other
37%
38%
17%
7%
1%
305
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Not too
worried
0%
171
22
1%
60
42
1%
3%
173
0%
97
98
1%
0%
302
0%
61
75
46
244
1%
243
49
0%
0%
93
2%
250
30
2%
150
23
0%
1%
798
73
0%
1%
696
1%
205
8
63
(cont.)
Page 263

May 3-6, 2015
ECONW
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
TOTAL
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Unsure
Roman Catholic
32%
40%
22%
6%
40%
45%
11%
3%
1%
185
Mainline Protestant
31%
40%
22%
6%
2%
280
Other
32%
52%
13%
3%
None
28%
37%
28%
7%
0%
0%
262
31%
45%
18%
5%
0%
1%
336
40%
35%
22%
3%
0%
157
Infrequently
31%
44%
17%
7%
1%
191
Never
40%
38%
14%
9%
32%
44%
19%
4%
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
36%
51%
11%
2%
Active Mainline
Protestants
26%
40%
23%
8%
Active other
31%
45%
22%
1%
Other
32%
38%
23%
6%
Male born again /

evangelicals
35%
45%
11%
7%
32%
38%
22%
6%
Female born again /

evangelicals
35%
42%
18%
4%
198
0%
45
44
79
1%
106
3%
131
17
0%
0%
1%
667
1%
133
1%
348
1%
179
0%
342
29%
40%
26%
5%
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
39%
46%
11%
4%
1%
222
27%
37%
25%
9%
2%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
37%
48%
12%
3%
0%
166
Christians
34%
28%
29%
9%
Christians
43%
40%
9%
5%
4%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
17%
48%
20%
11%
5%
39
Approve
18%
40%
33%
7%
1%
453
Unsure
32%
35%
30%
3%
1%
62
Disapprove
44%
41%
10%
4%
0%
487
Jobs
31%
37%
28%
3%
0%
135
Economy
27%
43%
22%
8%
228
Health care
25%
39%
29%
7%
99
Illegal immigration
38%
42%
16%
4%
Foreign threats
32%
48%
17%
3%
Deficit
33%
37%
20%
10%
76
5%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
37%
37%
18%
0%
51
0%
0%
0%
78
116
0%
3%
(cont.)
Page 264

May 3-6, 2015
ECONW
Somewhat
worried
Cutting taxes
37%
46%
16%
1%
71
Reducing deficit
34%
44%
14%
9%
126
Creating jobs
32%
41%
21%
5%
Increase wages
24%
34%
34%
8%
Healthcare costs
30%
37%
26%
5%
Retirement
25%
56%
16%
3%
Higher education
17%
49%
26%
6%
2%
101
Regulations
36%
42%
14%
7%
0%
65
Combination
39%
36%
19%
3%
2%
141
None
73%
4%
14%
9%
11
Unsure
61%
19%
14%
7%
12
Views close to own
31%
42%
23%
5%
32%
40%
21%
5%
Both
30%
44%
10%
14%
Unsure
36%
40%
17%
5%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
19%
30%
42%
9%
0%
Unsure
21%
46%
23%
2%
1%
No
37%
44%
14%
5%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
23%
43%
27%
6%
Unsure
29%
47%
14%
4%
Disapprove
44%
35%
16%
5%
Very worried
78%
17%
2%
3%
Somewhat worried
41%
47%
9%
2%
0%
Not too worried
23%
50%
24%
3%
0%
Not at all worried
14%
32%
40%
14%
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
TOTAL
Very worried
0%
Unsure
0%
203
132
2%
98
41
352
0%
1%
1%
571
1%
48
2%
30
245
9%
63
0%
693
0%
0%
510
0%
6%
85
0%
406
112
0%
283
341
1%
258
1
100%
9%
6%
13%
Yes
33%
38%
23%
5%
No
29%
45%
18%
6%
Approve
17%
39%
38%
6%
0%
Unsure
41%
39%
16%
3%
1%
Disapprove
48%
37%
10%
5%
Yes
29%
41%
25%
5%
No
38%
41%
13%
Not sure
34%
37%
4 of 4
23%
3 of 4
2 of 4
0%
72%
0%
645
2%
356
1%
295
45
0%
306
0%
628
7%
2%
245
21%
6%
1%
128
33%
33%
10%
1%
26
10%
36%
49%
5%
0%
112
16%
46%
29%
9%
0%
221
1 of 4
38%
39%
16%
6%
1%
214
0 of 4
43%
40%
12%
4%
1%
427
0%
(cont.)
Page 265

May 3-6, 2015
ECONW
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
TOTAL
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Unsure
5-7 of 7
46%
36%
17%
1%
150
4 of 7
42%
41%
12%
5%
96
3 of 7
41%
39%
15%
4%
91
2 of 7
26%
43%
22%
9%
87
1 of 7
34%
34%
26%
6%
0%
164
0 of 7
22%
44%
25%
7%
0%
2%
413
32%
40%
21%
6%
0%
1%
1001
Page 266

May 3-6, 2015
RECONFUT NEXT GENERATION
BETTER OFF ECONOMICALLY/C
RECONFUT
Yes
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
No
24%
6%
69%
1001
Northeast
29%
9%
62%
195
Midwest
21%
7%
73%
181
South
19%
4%
77%
235
South Central
24%
4%
71%
96
Central Plains
34%
5%
61%
83
Mountain States
20%
10%
70%
70
West
29%
6%
65%
141
California
30%
6%
64%
89
Florida
28%
2%
70%
58
Texas
27%
6%
67%
71
New York
24%
15%
61%
56
Rest of country
23%
6%
71%
727
20%
7%
73%
217
25%
5%
69%
320
No Senate election
26%
7%
68%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
21%
7%
72%
405
29%
8%
63%
366
24%
3%
73%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
22%
2%
76%
241
Other
25%
7%
67%
760
Male
25%
6%
69%
480
Female
24%
7%
69%
521
Male / employed
24%
6%
70%
324
Male / not employed
28%
4%
67%
157
Female / employed
23%
5%
72%
281
24%
9%
67%
240
Not employed
33%
7%
60%
133
Employed
23%
6%
71%
605
Retired
24%
7%
69%
252
Refused
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
5%
2%
93%
11
18-34
32%
8%
60%
200
35-44
21%
8%
71%
280
45-64
25%
3%
72%
310
65 or over
22%
7%
72%
200
Unsure / refused
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
7%
9%
84%
10
18-44
26%
8%
66%
480
45-64
25%
3%
72%
310
65+
22%
7%
72%
200
7%
9%
84%
10
Unsure / refused
(cont.)
Page 267

May 3-6, 2015
RECONFUT
Yes
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Unsure
TOTAL
No
Male / under 55
26%
7%
67%
302
Male / 55+
25%
3%
72%
179
Female / under 55
27%
7%
66%
315
Female / 55+
18%
7%
75%
205
White
21%
5%
74%
751
38%
10%
52%
120
Hispanic / Latino
33%
9%
58%
90
Other
29%
8%
63%
40
30%
7%
63%
128
19%
5%
76%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
17%
21%
62%
24

voters 35+
43%
7%
50%
96
44%
7%
49%
41
24%
10%
66%
49

18-34
45%
6%
49%

35+
25%
9%
66%
32
White seniors
18%
5%
77%
255
Other
27%
7%
67%
746
White men
23%
4%
72%
368
White women
19%
6%
75%
382
Black men
39%
16%
45%
50
Black women
37%
5%
57%
70
Hispanic men
26%
4%
70%
42
Hispanic women
39%
12%
48%
48
Republican
16%
5%
78%
390
Independent
20%
5%
75%
190
Democrat
34%
8%
58%
420
Male / GOP
16%
4%
80%
214
Female / GOP
17%
7%
76%
176
Male / DEM
41%
8%
51%
161
Female / DEM
30%
8%
62%
259
Male / IND
21%
6%
74%
105
Female / IND
19%
4%
77%
85
Under 55 / GOP
17%
7%
76%
223
55 & over / GOP
15%
3%
82%
168
Under 55 / DEM
36%
8%
55%
269
55 & over / DEM
30%
7%
63%
151
Under 55 / IND
22%
4%
74%
125
55 & over / IND
17%
5%
78%
65
(cont.)
Page 268

May 3-6, 2015
RECONFUT
Yes
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Unsure
TOTAL
No
Republican
15%
5%
81%
448
Ticket splitter
25%
10%
65%
61
Democrat
33%
7%
59%
492
Hard GOP
15%
5%
80%
360
Soft GOP
12%
4%
83%
92
Ticket splitter
34%
6%
60%
64
Soft DEM
26%
4%
70%
84
Hard DEM
34%
8%
58%
401
Conservative
20%
4%
76%
536
Moderate
21%
17%
62%
76
Liberal
32%
7%
62%
389
Very conservative
16%
6%
78%
187
22%
3%
74%
348
Moderate / liberal
30%
8%
62%
465
Republican
16%
5%
78%
390
Independent
20%
5%
75%
190
Conservative DEM
39%
4%
57%
103
Mod / lib DEM
32%
9%
59%
318
Liberal DEM
33%
7%
60%
335
34%
8%
59%
157
Independent
25%
10%
65%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
19%
6%
75%
69
Conservative GOP
14%
4%
82%
379
Yes / strongly
19%
6%
75%
93
9%
4%
87%
68
No / unsure
26%
6%
67%
840
39%
10%
51%
53
29%
8%
63%
227
Some college
24%
5%
71%
219
College graduate
21%
6%
73%
503
22%
5%
73%
248
Male non-college
graduates
29%
6%
65%
232
20%
6%
73%
254
Female non-college
graduates
27%
7%
66%
266
White non-college
graduate
20%
5%
75%
349
graduate
45%
11%
44%
149
Others
21%
6%
73%
503
Union household
23%
10%
68%
127
Non-union household
25%
6%
70%
874
Yes
(cont.)
Page 269

May 3-6, 2015
RECONFUT
Yes
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Unsure
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
35%
8%
57%
215
Married
21%
6%
72%
607
No longer married
23%
4%
73%
179
Dad
21%
9%
70%
171
Mom
22%
8%
70%
203
Married / children
22%
9%
69%
299
20%
4%
76%
308
100%
22
31%
3%
65%
60
Single / children
26%
13%
61%
42
37%
6%
56%
173
Other / mixed
23%
5%
71%
97
Single women
38%
9%
54%
98
Married women
19%
7%
73%
304
23%
5%
73%
118
Single men
33%
7%
60%
117
Married men
23%
6%
72%
302
24%
3%
73%
61
White single men
33%
3%
64%
75
White single women
36%
5%
58%
46
White married men
21%
5%
74%
244
White married women
16%
7%
77%
243

men
20%
3%
77%
49

women
16%
5%
79%
93
Other
35%
9%
56%
250
Single mothers
34%
13%
54%
30
Married mothers
21%
8%
70%
150
No longer married
mothers
12%
88%
23
Non-mothers
25%
6%
69%
798
Upper class
28%
6%
65%
73
Middle class
24%
6%
70%
696
Low income
28%
7%
Working class
Refused
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
Single
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
TOTAL
65%
205
100%
9%
9%
82%
20
Middle class whites
21%
6%
73%
551

Americans
33%
8%
58%
63
34%
7%
58%
57
32%
8%
60%
25
Other
26%
7%
67%
305
(cont.)
Page 270

May 3-6, 2015
RECONFUT
Yes
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Unsure
TOTAL
No
Roman Catholic
28%
3%
69%
198
18%
8%
73%
185
Mainline Protestant
22%
6%
72%
280
Other
33%
67%
45
None
25%
9%
66%
262
22%
5%
73%
336
22%
7%
71%
157
Infrequently
28%
4%
68%
191
Never
15%
7%
78%
44
34%
66%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
17%
7%
76%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
19%
7%
74%
131
Active other
24%
76%
17
Other
26%
7%
67%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
22%
4%
74%
133
27%
6%
67%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
23%
5%
72%
179
24%
8%
68%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
14%
4%
81%
222
43%
7%
51%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
14%
3%
83%
166
Christians
41%
3%
55%
51
Christians
17%
6%
77%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
45%
11%
44%
39
Approve
37%
7%
56%
453
Unsure
26%
12%
62%
62
Disapprove
12%
4%
83%
487
Jobs
33%
4%
63%
135
Economy
28%
8%
64%
228
Health care
27%
2%
71%
99
Illegal immigration
21%
3%
76%
78
Foreign threats
20%
5%
75%
116
Deficit
19%
3%
78%
76
70%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
20%
10%
(cont.)
Page 271

May 3-6, 2015
RECONFUT
Yes
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
28%
8%
64%
71
Reducing deficit
15%
4%
82%
126
Creating jobs
24%
7%
69%
203
Increase wages
38%
1%
60%
132
Healthcare costs
18%
7%
75%
98
Retirement
34%
3%
63%
41
Higher education
32%
10%
58%
101
Regulations
15%
6%
80%
65
Combination
20%
8%
71%
141
7%
26%
67%
11
Unsure
21%
9%
70%
12
Views close to own
23%
6%
71%
352
26%
6%
69%
571
Both
26%
8%
66%
48
Unsure
21%
17%
62%
30
Very worried
14%
4%
81%
318
Somewhat worried
18%
7%
75%
405
Not too worried
48%
7%
46%
214
Not at all worried
42%
2%
57%
56
Combination
58%
42%
Unsure
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
73%
27%
8
510
Approve
31%
6%
64%
Unsure
21%
15%
64%
85
Disapprove
18%
5%
77%
406
Very worried
20%
6%
74%
112
Somewhat worried
18%
8%
74%
283
Not too worried
22%
5%
73%
341
Not at all worried
37%
4%
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
No
Cutting taxes
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unsure
TOTAL
59%
258
100%
Unsure
13%
81%
6%
Yes
25%
4%
71%
645
No
23%
10%
67%
356
Approve
39%
4%
57%
295
Unsure
17%
4%
79%
45
Disapprove
13%
4%
83%
306
Yes
26%
5%
69%
628
No
18%
7%
75%
245
Not sure
30%
8%
62%
128
(cont.)
Page 272

May 3-6, 2015
RECONFUT
Yes
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
No
4 of 4
56%
5%
39%
26
3 of 4
43%
10%
48%
112
2 of 4
32%
6%
62%
221
1 of 4
21%
8%
71%
214
0 of 4
16%
4%
80%
427
5-7 of 7
12%
6%
82%
150
4 of 7
16%
3%
81%
96
3 of 7
19%
2%
79%
91
2 of 7
26%
6%
68%
87
1 of 7
30%
5%
66%
164
0 of 7
30%
9%
62%
413
24%
6%
69%
1001
Page 273

May 3-6, 2015
RISAPP US EFFORTS AGAINST ISIS/C
RISAPP
Approve
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
51%
9%
41%
1001
Northeast
64%
6%
30%
195
Midwest
45%
8%
47%
181
South
47%
8%
45%
235
South Central
47%
10%
43%
96
Central Plains
61%
5%
34%
83
Mountain States
47%
4%
49%
70
West
46%
17%
37%
141
California
49%
16%
35%
89
Florida
51%
0%
48%
58
Texas
49%
12%
38%
71
New York
71%
3%
26%
56
Rest of country
50%
8%
42%
727
49%
13%
37%
217
50%
6%
44%
320
No Senate election
53%
8%
40%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
47%
10%
42%
405
56%
8%
36%
366
49%
6%
45%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
49%
8%
43%
241
Other
52%
9%
40%
760
Male
50%
7%
43%
480
Female
52%
10%
38%
521
Male / employed
50%
6%
44%
324
Male / not employed
50%
8%
41%
157
Female / employed
54%
9%
36%
281
49%
11%
40%
240
Not employed
52%
14%
34%
133
Employed
52%
8%
40%
605
Retired
48%
8%
44%
252
Refused
44%
7%
49%
11
18-34
52%
12%
36%
200
35-44
49%
10%
40%
280
45-64
57%
5%
39%
310
65 or over
44%
8%
49%
200
Unsure / refused
47%
11%
41%
10
18-44
50%
11%
38%
480
45-64
57%
5%
39%
310
65+
44%
8%
49%
200
Unsure / refused
47%
11%
41%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 274

May 3-6, 2015
RISAPP
Approve
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Male / under 55
49%
8%
43%
302
Male / 55+
51%
5%
44%
179
Female / under 55
53%
12%
35%
315
Female / 55+
50%
7%
43%
205
White
49%
8%
43%
751
61%
9%
31%
120
Hispanic / Latino
60%
9%
31%
90
Other
45%
9%
46%
40
52%
10%
38%
128
48%
8%
44%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
36%
36%
27%
24

voters 35+
67%
2%
31%
96
57%
8%
35%
41
62%
10%
28%
49

18-34
70%
30%

35+
39%
11%
50%
32
White seniors
46%
7%
47%
255
Other
53%
9%
38%
746
White men
49%
7%
44%
368
White women
49%
10%
42%
382
Black men
55%
9%
36%
50
Black women
65%
9%
27%
70
Hispanic men
60%
40%
42
Hispanic women
59%
16%
24%
48
Republican
38%
5%
57%
390
Independent
46%
7%
47%
190
Democrat
65%
13%
23%
420
Male / GOP
41%
4%
54%
214
Female / GOP
35%
6%
60%
176
Male / DEM
63%
12%
25%
161
Female / DEM
66%
13%
21%
259
Male / IND
48%
4%
48%
105
Female / IND
44%
11%
45%
85
Under 55 / GOP
44%
6%
51%
223
55 & over / GOP
31%
4%
64%
168
Under 55 / DEM
60%
16%
24%
269
55 & over / DEM
73%
7%
20%
151
Under 55 / IND
46%
6%
48%
125
55 & over / IND
47%
8%
44%
65
(cont.)
Page 275

May 3-6, 2015
RISAPP
Approve
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Republican
37%
5%
57%
448
Ticket splitter
44%
10%
45%
61
Democrat
64%
11%
25%
492
Hard GOP
38%
5%
57%
360
Soft GOP
34%
2%
64%
92
Ticket splitter
50%
19%
31%
64
Soft DEM
57%
7%
35%
84
Hard DEM
66%
12%
22%
401
Conservative
41%
5%
53%
536
Moderate
45%
19%
36%
76
Liberal
65%
11%
24%
389
Very conservative
30%
6%
64%
187
47%
5%
48%
348
Moderate / liberal
62%
12%
26%
465
Republican
38%
5%
57%
390
Independent
46%
7%
47%
190
Conservative DEM
60%
11%
29%
103
Mod / lib DEM
66%
13%
21%
318
Liberal DEM
67%
10%
23%
335
58%
13%
29%
157
Independent
44%
10%
45%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
45%
16%
40%
69
Conservative GOP
36%
3%
61%
379
Yes / strongly
28%
6%
65%
93
Yes
25%
4%
70%
68
No / unsure
56%
9%
35%
840
42%
12%
46%
53
46%
11%
42%
227
Some college
51%
7%
42%
219
College graduate
54%
7%
39%
503
53%
8%
38%
248
Male non-college
graduates
47%
5%
48%
232
55%
6%
39%
254
Female non-college
graduates
49%
13%
38%
266
White non-college
graduate
45%
9%
46%
349
graduate
53%
11%
35%
149
Others
54%
7%
39%
503
Union household
61%
12%
28%
127
Non-union household
50%
8%
42%
874
(cont.)
Page 276

May 3-6, 2015
RISAPP
Approve
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Single
51%
10%
39%
215
Married
52%
7%
40%
607
No longer married
46%
11%
44%
179
Dad
51%
8%
41%
171
Mom
51%
13%
35%
203
Married / children
54%
10%
37%
299
51%
5%
44%
308
Divorced / children
25%
22%
52%
22
50%
7%
42%
60
Single / children
48%
11%
41%
42
52%
10%
38%
173
Other / mixed
48%
10%
42%
97
Single women
49%
13%
39%
98
Married women
56%
8%
36%
304
44%
12%
44%
118
Single men
53%
8%
39%
117
Married men
49%
6%
45%
302
50%
8%
42%
61
White single men
59%
8%
33%
75
White single women
39%
9%
52%
46
White married men
46%
7%
47%
244
White married women
54%
8%
38%
243

men
44%
6%
49%
49

women
40%
14%
46%
93
Other
58%
9%
33%
250
Single mothers
47%
16%
37%
30
Married mothers
55%
12%
34%
150
No longer married
mothers
38%
17%
45%
23
Non-mothers
51%
7%
42%
798
Upper class
62%
9%
29%
73
Middle class
53%
7%
40%
696
Low income
42%
12%
46%
205
Working class
22%
35%
43%
Refused
57%
15%
28%
20
Middle class whites
51%
7%
42%
551

Americans
66%
10%
24%
63
54%
6%
39%
57
53%
7%
40%
25
Other
47%
12%
41%
305
(cont.)
Page 277

May 3-6, 2015
RISAPP
Approve
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Roman Catholic
53%
10%
37%
198
45%
9%
46%
185
Mainline Protestant
48%
6%
46%
280
Other
48%
11%
41%
45
None
56%
10%
34%
262
50%
7%
43%
336
52%
8%
40%
157
Infrequently
46%
9%
45%
191
Never
33%
7%
60%
44
52%
13%
35%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
45%
7%
48%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
52%
4%
44%
131
Active other
56%
44%
17
Other
51%
9%
39%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
43%
6%
52%
133
53%
8%
40%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
53%
7%
40%
179
51%
11%
37%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
40%
9%
51%
222
69%
1%
31%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
38%
6%
55%
166
Christians
56%
44%
51
Christians
47%
16%
38%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
85%
2%
14%
39
Approve
67%
11%
22%
453
Unsure
57%
20%
22%
62
Disapprove
35%
5%
60%
487
Jobs
54%
10%
36%
135
Economy
59%
10%
31%
228
Health care
67%
9%
25%
99
Illegal immigration
42%
3%
55%
78
Foreign threats
40%
4%
56%
116
Deficit
54%
9%
37%
76
47%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
43%
10%
(cont.)
Page 278

May 3-6, 2015
RISAPP
Approve
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Cutting taxes
49%
15%
36%
71
Reducing deficit
47%
3%
50%
126
Creating jobs
50%
9%
40%
203
Increase wages
63%
5%
32%
132
Healthcare costs
51%
8%
40%
98
Retirement
64%
8%
27%
41
Higher education
59%
14%
28%
101
Regulations
32%
5%
63%
65
Combination
46%
11%
43%
141
None
56%
12%
32%
11
Unsure
25%
3%
72%
12
Views close to own
51%
6%
44%
352
52%
9%
39%
571
Both
49%
17%
35%
48
Unsure
39%
15%
46%
30
Very worried
36%
8%
56%
318
Somewhat worried
55%
10%
35%
405
Not too worried
64%
5%
30%
214
Not at all worried
59%
6%
35%
56
Combination
58%
42%
Unsure
27%
67%
7%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
64%
7%
29%
245
Unsure
47%
20%
33%
63
No
47%
8%
45%
693
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Very worried
32%
8%
60%
112
Somewhat worried
43%
9%
49%
283
Not too worried
60%
6%
34%
341
Not at all worried
57%
10%
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
33%
258
100%
Unsure
19%
72%
9%
Yes
52%
3%
45%
645
No
49%
18%
33%
356
Approve
74%
4%
22%
295
Unsure
54%
7%
39%
45
Disapprove
31%
2%
67%
306
Yes
56%
9%
35%
628
No
40%
9%
51%
245
Not sure
44%
8%
48%
128
(cont.)
Page 279

May 3-6, 2015
RISAPP
Approve
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
4 of 4
63%
3%
35%
26
3 of 4
84%
5%
11%
112
2 of 4
63%
10%
27%
221
1 of 4
53%
15%
32%
214
0 of 4
34%
5%
60%
427
5-7 of 7
24%
2%
74%
150
4 of 7
42%
1%
57%
96
3 of 7
47%
6%
48%
91
2 of 7
56%
4%
40%
87
1 of 7
52%
14%
34%
164
0 of 7
62%
12%
26%
413
51%
9%
41%
1001
Page 280

May 3-6, 2015
TERRW WORRY ABOUT TERRORIST ATTACK
TERRW
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
11%
28%
34%
26%
Northeast
11%
27%
38%
Midwest
9%
33%
South
14%
South Central
Central Plains
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
Mountain States
West
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
California
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
0%
TOTAL
Unsure
1%
1001
22%
2%
195
34%
24%
0%
181
30%
33%
21%
1%
235
13%
38%
27%
21%
0%
96
10%
23%
38%
29%
83
6%
19%
36%
39%
70
11%
22%
33%
34%
141
0%
7%
23%
39%
31%
89
Florida
12%
43%
28%
17%
58
Texas
12%
40%
29%
20%
71
5%
27%
43%
23%
Rest of country
12%
27%
34%
27%
12%
30%
34%
23%
12%
28%
35%
25%
No Senate election
10%
28%
33%
28%
1%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
10%
33%
32%
24%
1%
405
9%
26%
39%
26%
1%
366
17%
24%
30%
29%
0%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
10%
34%
35%
21%
Other
11%
27%
34%
27%
Male
8%
29%
33%
30%
14%
28%
35%
22%
8%
26%
33%
32%
Male / not employed
10%
33%
31%
24%
2%
157
Female / employed
11%
22%
41%
25%
1%
281
16%
35%
29%
18%
0%
240
Not employed
12%
29%
32%
27%
1%
133
9%
24%
37%
29%
0%
605
Retired
15%
38%
28%
17%
2%
252
Refused
8%
19%
44%
29%
18-34
9%
24%
33%
33%
1%
200
35-44
8%
17%
42%
32%
1%
280
45-64
14%
34%
30%
22%
65 or over
14%
39%
30%
17%
Unsure / refused
New York
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
Female
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
Male / employed
Employed
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
24%
48%
18%
11%
18-44
8%
20%
38%
32%
45-64
14%
34%
30%
22%
65+
14%
39%
30%
17%
Unsure / refused
24%
48%
18%
11%
0%
2%
56
1%
727
2%
217
320
0%
0%
241
0%
0%
1%
760
1%
480
1%
521
324
0%
0%
11
310
0%
1%
200
10
1%
480
310
0%
1%
200
10
(cont.)
Page 281

May 3-6, 2015
TERRW
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Somewhat
worried
7%
27%
31%
34%
1%
302
Male / 55+
12%
32%
35%
22%
0%
179
Female / under 55
10%
22%
41%
27%
1%
315
Female / 55+
19%
38%
28%
15%
0%
1%
205
White
10%
27%
36%
26%
0%
0%
751
13%
34%
26%
24%
2%
120
Hispanic / Latino
14%
29%
35%
22%
Other
15%
29%
28%
26%
6%
25%
31%
38%
11%
28%
36%
24%
African American
millenials 18-34
11%
26%
36%
16%

voters 35+
14%
37%
24%
26%
96
13%
24%
34%
28%
41
14%
33%
35%
18%
49

18-34
21%
18%
45%
15%

35+
14%
32%
24%
28%
White seniors
14%
34%
32%
19%
Other
10%
26%
35%
7%
26%
White women
14%
Black men
Male / under 55
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
TOTAL
Very worried
Unsure
90
2%
40
128
0%
1%
623
11%
24
3%
32
1%
255
28%
1%
746
35%
32%
0%
368
28%
36%
21%
1%
382
20%
40%
22%
13%
5%
50
Black women
8%
30%
29%
32%
70
Hispanic men
10%
31%
24%
35%
42
Hispanic women
17%
27%
44%
12%
48
Republican
15%
35%
34%
16%
Independent
14%
28%
30%
Democrat
7%
22%
Male / GOP
8%
White men
0%
0%
1%
390
27%
0%
190
36%
34%
1%
420
35%
35%
22%
23%
35%
32%
9%
Male / DEM
7%
19%
32%
40%
Female / DEM
Female / GOP
0%
214
1%
2%
176
2%
161
259
7%
24%
39%
31%
Male / IND
12%
31%
28%
29%
0%
105
Female / IND
17%
26%
33%
24%
0%
85
Under 55 / GOP
12%
30%
37%
20%
1%
223
55 & over / GOP
18%
41%
29%
10%
0%
168
Under 55 / DEM
5%
18%
38%
38%
1%
269
55 & over / DEM
10%
29%
32%
28%
151
Under 55 / IND
10%
27%
30%
33%
125
55 & over / IND
23%
31%
32%
14%
1%
1%
65
(cont.)
Page 282

May 3-6, 2015
TERRW
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Republican
15%
34%
34%
16%
Ticket splitter
14%
24%
29%
Democrat
7%
23%
Hard GOP
15%
Soft GOP
Ticket splitter
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
1%
61
35%
34%
1%
492
35%
35%
15%
1%
360
18%
32%
30%
20%
11%
23%
28%
36%
Soft DEM
10%
28%
28%
35%
Hard DEM
7%
22%
37%
34%
Conservative
14%
35%
31%
19%
Moderate
10%
19%
36%
29%
8%
21%
37%
34%
Very conservative
22%
41%
23%
13%
10%
32%
36%
22%
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
92
1%
64
84
0%
1%
401
0%
536
7%
76
389
1%
1%
187
348
1%
390
27%
0%
190
23%
34%
1%
103
19%
40%
34%
1%
318
37%
33%
15%
35%
34%
16%
Independent
14%
28%
30%
Conservative DEM
11%
31%
5%
0%
335
6%
19%
40%
35%
10%
32%
25%
30%
2%
157
Independent
14%
24%
29%
32%
1%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
12%
24%
32%
28%
3%
69
Conservative GOP
16%
36%
34%
14%
0%
0%
379
Yes / strongly
27%
46%
16%
10%
1%
Yes
11%
36%
43%
10%
9%
26%
35%
29%
1%
840
21%
34%
28%
17%
1%
53
2%
227
0%
219
1%
503
93
68
19%
32%
27%
21%
Some college
7%
34%
32%
27%
College graduate
9%
24%
39%
29%
7%
25%
33%
35%
Male non-college
graduates
10%
33%
32%
24%
2%
232
10%
22%
45%
22%
1%
254
Female non-college
graduates
17%
33%
26%
22%
0%
0%
266
White non-college
graduate
12%
34%
30%
23%
0%
0%
349
graduate
19%
30%
26%
22%
2%
149
9%
24%
39%
29%
1%
503
Union household
12%
30%
34%
23%
0%
127
Non-union household
11%
28%
34%
26%
1%
874
Others
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
0%
465
20%
Liberal DEM
0%
1%
8%
Republican
No / unsure
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
TOTAL
Unsure
32%
Mod / lib DEM

PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
Combination
448
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Not at all
worried
1%
Liberal
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Not too
worried
0%
248
0%
(cont.)
Page 283

May 3-6, 2015
TERRW
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Single
10%
24%
30%
34%
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Married
11%
27%
37%
24%
No longer married
12%
36%
28%
Dad
9%
30%
Mom
9%
Married / children
9%
Divorced / children
Combination
TOTAL
Unsure
215
1%
607
23%
1%
179
28%
33%
1%
171
21%
48%
22%
1%
203
23%
39%
28%
1%
299
14%
32%
36%
19%
10%
31%
22%
37%
8%
38%
30%
23%
Single / children
7%
38%
41%
15%
11%
21%
28%
39%
1%
173
Other / mixed
16%
36%
28%
19%
1%
97
Single women
8%
23%
37%
31%
Married women
15%
27%
38%
20%
16%
35%
27%
Single men
11%
25%
Married men
8%

White single men
White single women
White married men
0%
308
0%
22
1%
60
42
98
1%
304
22%
1%
118
25%
37%
2%
117
28%
36%
28%
0%
302
6%
38%
30%
25%
1%
61
7%
23%
24%
45%
75
5%
14%
47%
34%
46
6%
25%
39%
29%
244
243
24%
1%
49
26%
22%
1%
93
32%
30%
24%
1%
250
30%
53%
17%
28%
37%
19%
7%
36%
33%

women
17%
34%
Other
14%
Single mothers
0%
1%
15%

men
0%
30
Married mothers
10%
19%
47%
22%
No longer married
mothers
9%
20%
43%
28%
Non-mothers
12%
30%
31%
27%
Upper class
15%
25%
40%
20%
Middle class
9%
29%
35%
26%
Low income
17%
27%
28%
27%
3%
11%
59%
27%
17%
27%
25%
29%
2%
20
Middle class whites
9%
28%
36%
27%
1%
551

Americans
8%
43%
26%
23%
63
11%
26%
40%
23%
57
16%
21%
31%
28%
Other
16%
26%
31%
25%
Working class
Refused
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Not at all
worried
1%
White married women
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
Not too
worried
1%
150
23
0%
1%
798
73
0%
1%
696
1%
205
8
0%
4%
25
1%
305
(cont.)
Page 284

May 3-6, 2015
TERRW
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Roman Catholic
14%
33%
33%
20%
15%
37%
30%
17%
Mainline Protestant
10%
28%
39%
22%
Other
11%
21%
37%
31%
None
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
Not at all
worried
Combination
TOTAL
Unsure
198
1%
2%
185
1%
280
45
7%
20%
33%
39%
0%
262
14%
31%
33%
21%
1%
336
10%
31%
40%
20%
0%
157
Infrequently
12%
31%
33%
22%
1%
191
Never
14%
29%
34%
21%
1%
44
20%
30%
32%
18%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
13%
38%
32%
17%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
12%
27%
36%
23%
Active other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Not too
worried
7%
17%
36%
39%
Other
10%
27%
34%
28%
Male born again /

evangelicals
10%
32%
35%
8%
27%
Female born again /

evangelicals
17%
2%
2%
131
17
1%
667
22%
0%
133
31%
32%
1%
348
32%
33%
17%
1%
179
0%
342
1%
222
0%
12%
26%
37%
25%
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
14%
34%
34%
17%
14%
29%
33%
24%
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
13%
37%
35%
14%
Christians
21%
27%
27%
25%
Christians
15%
22%
32%
26%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
5%
31%
42%
23%
Approve
6%
21%
35%
37%
1%
453
Unsure
8%
34%
25%
31%
2%
62
Disapprove
16%
34%
35%
15%
0%
487
Jobs
10%
23%
37%
29%
6%
23%
39%
32%
Health care
13%
20%
35%
32%
99
Illegal immigration
18%
36%
30%
16%
78
9%
45%
34%
13%
116
12%
22%
37%
29%
76
23%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Economy
Foreign threats
Deficit
Other
14%
31%
29%
0%
90
0%
166
51
5%
55
39
0%
135
0%
0%
2%
228
(cont.)
Page 285

May 3-6, 2015
TERRW
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Somewhat
worried
Cutting taxes
15%
33%
41%
10%
Reducing deficit
10%
32%
28%
30%
126
Creating jobs
11%
29%
39%
21%
203
Increase wages
7%
16%
24%
53%
132
Healthcare costs
13%
32%
33%
20%
Retirement
13%
33%
38%
15%
41
6%
23%
34%
36%
101
Regulations
12%
34%
43%
12%
65
Combination
15%
28%
36%
18%
None
23%
39%
7%
32%
Unsure
19%
33%
34%
6%
9%
26%
38%
27%
12%
30%
33%
24%
Both
12%
23%
31%
Unsure
14%
32%
Very worried
27%
Somewhat worried
Higher education
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Views close to own
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
2%
3%
71
98
141
11
12
8%
352
34%
1%
48
18%
34%
1%
30
37%
25%
11%
0%
318
5%
33%
42%
20%
0%
405
Not too worried
1%
12%
38%
48%
0%
214
Not at all worried
6%
10%
19%
65%
58%
42%
7%
56
67%
8
245
12%
30%
36%
22%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
7%
24%
40%
29%
Unsure
10%
28%
25%
31%
Disapprove
17%
34%
28%
21%
Yes
11%
32%
32%
25%
No
12%
22%
37%
27%
Approve
4%
22%
34%
Unsure
12%
32%
Disapprove
No
0%
27%
Yes
Unsure
0%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
1%
571
Unsure
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Unsure
1%
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Combination
TOTAL
Very worried
9%
21%
31%
38%
0%
11%
34%
27%
18%
9%
63
0%
693
0%
510
6%
85
0%
406
0%
645
2%
356
39%
0%
295
40%
14%
1%
45
0%
0%
0%
17%
41%
30%
13%
306
Yes
8%
25%
36%
31%
628
No
17%
34%
28%
17%
Not sure
13%
33%
37%
16%
4 of 4
9%
10%
10%
71%
3 of 4
1%
13%
46%
40%
2 of 4
6%
24%
35%
34%
1%
221
1 of 4
14%
27%
35%
23%
1%
214
0 of 4
15%
36%
32%
16%
1%
427
0%
3%
245
0%
128
26
112
0%
(cont.)
Page 286

May 3-6, 2015
TERRW
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Not too
worried
Not at all
worried
Combination
TOTAL
Very worried
Somewhat
worried
Unsure
5-7 of 7
12%
49%
30%
10%
150
4 of 7
19%
25%
37%
19%
96
3 of 7
16%
28%
28%
26%
2 of 7
7%
37%
34%
21%
1 of 7
12%
22%
34%
31%
0 of 7
8%
22%
36%
32%
11%
28%
34%
26%
91
1%
0%
87
164
0%
2%
413
1%
1001
Page 287

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT IRAN
NUCLEAR AGREEMENT/C
RIDEAL
Yes
TOTAL
TOTAL
No
64%
36%
1001
Northeast
69%
31%
195
Midwest
58%
42%
181
South
65%
35%
235
South Central
66%
34%
96
Central Plains
67%
33%
83
Mountain States
59%
41%
70
West
66%
34%
141
California
67%
33%
89
Florida
61%
39%
58
Texas
65%
35%
71
New York
71%
29%
56
Rest of country
64%
36%
727
62%
38%
217
68%
32%
320
No Senate election
63%
37%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
61%
39%
405
68%
32%
366
64%
36%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
62%
38%
241
Other
65%
35%
760
Male
72%
28%
480
Female
58%
42%
521
Male / employed
75%
25%
324
Male / not employed
66%
34%
157
Female / employed
55%
45%
281
61%
39%
240
Not employed
46%
54%
133
Employed
65%
35%
605
Retired
73%
27%
252
Refused
45%
55%
11
18-34
54%
46%
200
35-44
60%
40%
280
45-64
70%
30%
310
65 or over
73%
27%
200
Unsure / refused
65%
35%
10
18-44
57%
43%
480
45-64
70%
30%
310
65+
73%
27%
200
Unsure / refused
65%
35%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 288

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR AGREEMENT/C
RIDEAL
Yes
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
No
Male / under 55
68%
32%
302
Male / 55+
78%
22%
179
Female / under 55
50%
50%
315
Female / 55+
69%
31%
205
White
67%
33%
751
53%
47%
120
Hispanic / Latino
51%
49%
90
Other
73%
27%
40
63%
37%
128
68%
32%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
26%
74%
24

voters 35+
60%
40%
96
38%
62%
41
61%
39%
49

18-34
71%
29%

35+
74%
26%
32
White seniors
76%
24%
255
Other
61%
39%
746
White men
75%
25%
368
White women
60%
40%
382
Black men
52%
48%
50
Black women
54%
46%
70
Hispanic men
65%
35%
42
Hispanic women
38%
62%
48
Republican
70%
30%
390
Independent
68%
32%
190
Democrat
57%
43%
420
Male / GOP
75%
25%
214
Female / GOP
64%
36%
176
Male / DEM
66%
34%
161
Female / DEM
52%
48%
259
Male / IND
74%
26%
105
Female / IND
61%
39%
85
Under 55 / GOP
64%
36%
223
55 & over / GOP
78%
22%
168
Under 55 / DEM
53%
47%
269
55 & over / DEM
66%
34%
151
Under 55 / IND
63%
37%
125
55 & over / IND
79%
21%
65
(cont.)
Page 289

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR AGREEMENT/C
RIDEAL
Yes
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
No
Republican
70%
30%
448
Ticket splitter
52%
48%
61
Democrat
61%
39%
492
Hard GOP
70%
30%
360
Soft GOP
74%
26%
92
Ticket splitter
55%
45%
64
Soft DEM
66%
34%
84
Hard DEM
59%
41%
401
Conservative
67%
33%
536
Moderate
43%
57%
76
Liberal
66%
34%
389
Very conservative
70%
30%
187
65%
35%
348
Moderate / liberal
62%
38%
465
Republican
70%
30%
390
Independent
68%
32%
190
Conservative DEM
41%
59%
103
Mod / lib DEM
63%
37%
318
Liberal DEM
67%
33%
335
48%
52%
157
Independent
52%
48%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
50%
50%
69
Conservative GOP
74%
26%
379
Yes / strongly
74%
26%
93
Yes
75%
25%
68
No / unsure
63%
37%
840
38%
62%
53
54%
46%
227
Some college
66%
34%
219
College graduate
71%
29%
503
77%
23%
248
Male non-college
graduates
66%
34%
232
65%
35%
254
Female non-college
graduates
51%
49%
266
White non-college
graduate
61%
39%
349
graduate
50%
50%
149
Others
71%
29%
503
Union household
62%
38%
127
Non-union household
65%
35%
874
(cont.)
Page 290

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR AGREEMENT/C
RIDEAL
Yes
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
No
Single
61%
39%
215
Married
68%
32%
607
No longer married
58%
42%
179
Dad
72%
28%
171
Mom
48%
52%
203
Married / children
63%
37%
299
72%
28%
308
Divorced / children
36%
64%
22
71%
29%
60
Single / children
54%
46%
42
63%
37%
173
Other / mixed
55%
45%
97
Single women
53%
47%
98
Married women
60%
40%
304
56%
44%
118
Single men
68%
32%
117
Married men
75%
25%
302
62%
38%
61
White single men
72%
28%
75
White single women
68%
32%
46
White married men
78%
22%
244
White married women
61%
39%
243

men
66%
34%
49

women
55%
45%
93
Other
56%
44%
250
Single mothers
44%
56%
30
Married mothers
53%
47%
150
No longer married
mothers
26%
74%
23
Non-mothers
69%
31%
798
Upper class
73%
27%
73
Middle class
69%
31%
696
Low income
47%
53%
205
Working class
40%
60%
Refused
59%
41%
20
Middle class whites
72%
28%
551

Americans
64%
36%
63
51%
49%
57
69%
31%
25
Other
54%
46%
305
(cont.)
Page 291

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR AGREEMENT/C
RIDEAL
Yes
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
No
Roman Catholic
61%
39%
198
63%
37%
185
Mainline Protestant
65%
35%
280
Other
71%
29%
45
None
65%
35%
262
61%
39%
336
67%
33%
157
Infrequently
68%
32%
191
Never
59%
41%
44
55%
45%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
64%
36%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
63%
37%
131
Active other
58%
42%
17
Other
66%
34%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
70%
30%
133
73%
27%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
54%
46%
179
59%
41%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
61%
39%
222
60%
40%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
70%
30%
166
Christians
62%
38%
51
Christians
35%
65%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
59%
41%
39
Approve
63%
37%
453
Unsure
44%
56%
62
Disapprove
68%
32%
487
Jobs
67%
33%
135
Economy
67%
33%
228
Health care
51%
49%
99
Illegal immigration
69%
31%
78
Foreign threats
78%
22%
116
Deficit
56%
44%
76
39%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
61%
(cont.)
Page 292

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR AGREEMENT/C
RIDEAL
Yes
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
No
Cutting taxes
58%
42%
71
Reducing deficit
74%
26%
126
Creating jobs
66%
34%
203
Increase wages
73%
27%
132
Healthcare costs
63%
37%
98
Retirement
53%
47%
41
Higher education
52%
48%
101
Regulations
75%
25%
65
Combination
58%
42%
141
None
63%
37%
11
Unsure
59%
41%
12
Views close to own
73%
27%
352
62%
38%
571
Both
49%
51%
48
Unsure
38%
62%
30
Very worried
67%
33%
318
Somewhat worried
60%
40%
405
Not too worried
70%
30%
214
62%
38%
56
Not at all worried

Combination
100%
Unsure
28%
72%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
66%
34%
245
Unsure
41%
59%
63
No
66%
34%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
66%
34%
510
Unsure
26%
74%
85
Disapprove
71%
29%
406
Very worried
62%
38%
112
Somewhat worried
72%
28%
283
Not too worried
61%
39%
341
Not at all worried
63%
37%
258
100%
81%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Unsure
19%
Approve
100%
295
Unsure
100%
45
Disapprove
100%
306
Yes
65%
35%
628
No
66%
34%
245
Not sure
58%
42%
128
(cont.)
Page 293

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR AGREEMENT/C
RIDEAL
Yes
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
No
4 of 4
96%
4%
26
3 of 4
81%
19%
112
2 of 4
60%
40%
221
1 of 4
43%
57%
214
0 of 4
71%
29%
427
5-7 of 7
89%
11%
150
4 of 7
68%
32%
96
3 of 7
72%
28%
91
2 of 7
63%
37%
87
1 of 7
55%
45%
164
0 of 7
57%
43%
413
64%
36%
1001
Page 294

May 3-6, 2015
RAPPR US SENATE VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
RAPPR
Approve
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
46%
7%
47%
645
Northeast
56%
3%
40%
135
Midwest
43%
9%
49%
105
South
38%
9%
53%
153
South Central
46%
3%
51%
64
Central Plains
42%
15%
43%
55
Mountain States
39%
6%
55%
41
West
51%
5%
44%
93
California
47%
7%
46%
60
Florida
41%
8%
51%
35
Texas
46%
1%
52%
46
New York
64%
3%
33%
40
Rest of country
44%
8%
48%
464
41%
8%
50%
134
44%
6%
50%
219
No Senate election
49%
7%
44%
292
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
41%
8%
51%
248
52%
5%
43%
248
44%
7%
48%
148
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
45%
8%
47%
150
Other
46%
7%
48%
495
Male
43%
8%
49%
345
Female
49%
5%
46%
300
Male / employed
44%
9%
47%
242
Male / not employed
41%
7%
52%
103
Female / employed
56%
5%
39%
154
40%
6%
54%
146
Not employed
43%
11%
46%
61
Employed
49%
7%
44%
396
Retired
39%
5%
56%
182
Refused
64%
36%
18-34
54%
8%
38%
108
35-44
49%
8%
43%
168
45-64
45%
6%
49%
216
65 or over
38%
7%
55%
147
Unsure / refused
36%
64%
18-44
51%
8%
41%
275
45-64
45%
6%
49%
216
65+
38%
7%
55%
147
Unsure / refused
36%
64%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 295

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
RAPPR
Approve
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Male / under 55
47%
9%
44%
206
Male / 55+
38%
7%
55%
139
Female / under 55
55%
7%
38%
158
Female / 55+
41%
4%
55%
142
White
42%
8%
50%
506
63%
2%
35%
64
Hispanic / Latino
62%
9%
29%
46
Other
46%
3%
52%
29
53%
7%
40%
80
52%
426
38%
40%
African American
millenials 18-34
62%

voters 35+
63%
2%
34%
58
57%
18%
25%
16
64%
4%
32%
30

18-34
50%
50%

35+
45%
3%
52%
24
White seniors
39%
6%
55%
193
Other
49%
7%
44%
453
White men
41%
10%
49%
276
White women
43%
5%
51%
230
Black men
57%
43%
26
Black women
67%
3%
29%
38
Hispanic men
55%
4%
41%
27
Hispanic women
72%
16%
12%
18
Republican
20%
7%
74%
274
Independent
42%
8%
50%
130
Democrat
77%
7%
16%
241
Male / GOP
20%
8%
73%
161
Female / GOP
20%
5%
75%
113
Male / DEM
80%
7%
13%
106
Female / DEM
75%
7%
18%
135
Male / IND
42%
11%
47%
78
Female / IND
42%
3%
55%
52
Under 55 / GOP
26%
9%
65%
143
55 & over / GOP
13%
4%
83%
131
Under 55 / DEM
79%
7%
15%
142
55 & over / DEM
75%
7%
18%
99
Under 55 / IND
45%
8%
47%
79
55 & over / IND
38%
8%
54%
51
8%
(cont.)
Page 296

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
RAPPR
Approve
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Republican
19%
6%
75%
314
Ticket splitter
42%
14%
43%
32
Democrat
74%
7%
19%
299
Hard GOP
19%
7%
75%
253
Soft GOP
16%
4%
80%
68
Ticket splitter
48%
16%
35%
35
Soft DEM
70%
8%
22%
55
Hard DEM
77%
7%
16%
235
Conservative
22%
8%
70%
357
Moderate
49%
17%
34%
33
Liberal
78%
4%
18%
255
Very conservative
12%
9%
79%
130
28%
8%
65%
226
Moderate / liberal
75%
6%
20%
288
Republican
20%
7%
74%
274
Independent
42%
8%
50%
130
Conservative DEM
46%
19%
35%
42
Mod / lib DEM
84%
4%
12%
199
Liberal DEM
82%
5%
13%
224
50%
14%
36%
75
Independent
42%
14%
43%
32
Mod / liberal GOP
36%
3%
61%
35
Conservative GOP
17%
6%
77%
280
Yes / strongly
14%
3%
83%
69
Yes
14%
8%
79%
51
No / unsure
53%
7%
40%
525
18%
7%
75%
20
33%
9%
58%
123
Some college
44%
7%
49%
145
College graduate
52%
6%
42%
357
48%
8%
44%
192
Male non-college
graduates
37%
9%
55%
153
56%
5%
39%
165
Female non-college
graduates
39%
6%
55%
135
White non-college
graduate
32%
8%
60%
213
graduate
54%
7%
39%
74
Others
52%
6%
42%
357
Union household
56%
8%
36%
79
Non-union household
44%
7%
49%
566
(cont.)
Page 297

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
RAPPR
Approve
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Disapprove
Single
64%
3%
34%
131
Married
40%
9%
50%
410
No longer married
44%
4%
53%
104
Dad
39%
9%
51%
123
Mom
48%
9%
44%
98
Married / children
41%
10%
48%
188
40%
8%
52%
222
Divorced / children
30%
70%
46%
5%
49%
42
Single / children
56%
4%
40%
23
65%
3%
32%
108
Other / mixed
44%
3%
53%
54
Single women
66%
3%
31%
52
Married women
44%
7%
48%
182
46%
2%
51%
66
Single men
62%
3%
35%
79
Married men
37%
10%
52%
228
39%
6%
55%
38
White single men
66%
2%
32%
54
White single women
60%
3%
37%
31
White married men
34%
12%
53%
190
White married women
40%
7%
53%
147

men
38%
7%
55%
33

women
42%
3%
55%
51
Other
59%
4%
37%
139
Single mothers
57%
7%
35%
13
Married mothers
45%
10%
45%
79
No longer married
mothers
55%
45%
Non-mothers
45%
7%
48%
547
Upper class
50%
1%
48%
53
Middle class
45%
8%
47%
481
44%
4%
52%
96
Low income
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Unsure
TOTAL
100%
Refused
45%
15%
40%
12
Middle class whites
42%
9%
50%
395

Americans
67%
3%
29%
40
56%
10%
34%
29
55%
45%
17
Other
47%
49%
164
4%
(cont.)
Page 298

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
RAPPR
Approve
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Roman Catholic
41%
5%
54%
121
34%
12%
55%
117
Mainline Protestant
34%
6%
60%
183
Other
53%
5%
41%
32
None
66%
7%
27%
169
33%
9%
58%
206
30%
4%
66%
106
Infrequently
51%
4%
45%
129
Never
50%
20%
30%
26
41%
7%
52%
43
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
31%
12%
57%
68
Active Mainline
Protestants
29%
7%
64%
82
Active other
46%
10%
43%
10
Other
52%
6%
42%
441
Male born again /

evangelicals
22%
11%
67%
93
51%
7%
42%
252
Female born again /

evangelicals
32%
3%
64%
97
56%
7%
37%
203
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
18%
9%
73%
136
50%
3%
47%
54
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
11%
10%
79%
116
Christians
38%
4%
57%
31
Christians
58%
2%
40%
20
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
66%
2%
32%
23
Approve
79%
6%
15%
286
Unsure
66%
10%
24%
27
Disapprove
16%
7%
77%
332
Jobs
58%
13%
29%
91
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Economy
55%
3%
42%
153
Health care
63%
8%
29%
51
Illegal immigration
18%
3%
79%
54
Foreign threats
30%
4%
65%
91
Deficit
39%
7%
54%
43
47%
163
Other
44%
9%
(cont.)
Page 299

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
RAPPR
Approve
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
Cutting taxes
15%
7%
78%
41
Reducing deficit
34%
5%
60%
94
Creating jobs
47%
9%
44%
133
Increase wages
83%
1%
16%
96
Healthcare costs
41%
5%
54%
62
Retirement
63%
1%
36%
22
Higher education
60%
8%
32%
53
Regulations
9%
6%
85%
49
Combination
41%
16%
44%
82
None
77%
9%
14%
7%
4%
90%
Views close to own
52%
4%
44%
257
42%
8%
50%
353
Both
36%
15%
49%
24
Unsure
32%
17%
51%
11
Very worried
23%
9%
68%
213
Somewhat worried
47%
7%
46%
244
Not too worried
75%
5%
20%
150
Not at all worried
49%
4%
47%
35
Combination
42%
58%
Unsure
94%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
71%
Unsure
48%
No
37%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
65%
Unsure
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
1
6%
5%
25%
163
7%
45%
26
8%
56%
456
7%
28%
336
58%
13%
29%
22
Disapprove
22%
6%
72%
287
Very worried
19%
8%
73%
69
Somewhat worried
32%
7%
61%
204
Not too worried
48%
9%
44%
209
Not at all worried
72%
4%
24%
161
Unsure
68%
32%
Yes
46%
7%
47%
645
Yes
58%
5%
37%
409
No
26%
8%
66%
161
Not sure
23%
16%
61%
75
(cont.)
Page 300

May 3-6, 2015
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
RAPPR
Approve
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Disapprove
4 of 4
90%
5%
5%
25
3 of 4
94%
2%
4%
91
2 of 4
65%
10%
25%
132
1 of 4
51%
8%
41%
93
0 of 4
17%
7%
76%
303
5-7 of 7
10%
6%
85%
134
4 of 7
27%
6%
67%
65
3 of 7
30%
5%
65%
65
2 of 7
35%
10%
54%
54
1 of 7
54%
8%
39%
90
0 of 7
75%
7%
18%
236
46%
7%
47%
645
Page 301

May 3-6, 2015
SAMEA ATTEND SAME SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
SAMEA
Yes
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
No
TOTAL
Not sure
63%
24%
13%
1001
Northeast
73%
15%
12%
195
Midwest
63%
28%
9%
181
South
47%
37%
16%
235
South Central
68%
24%
8%
96
Central Plains
66%
25%
9%
83
Mountain States
57%
18%
25%
70
West
72%
15%
12%
141
California
71%
16%
13%
89
Florida
63%
20%
17%
58
Texas
71%
20%
9%
71
New York
75%
19%
7%
56
Rest of country
60%
27%
13%
727
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
No Senate election
52%
34%
14%
217
63%
25%
12%
320
68%
20%
13%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY DEM held seat up in 2014
STATE
59%
27%
14%
405
70%
18%
12%
366
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE
RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
58%
30%
12%
230
race
60%
27%
13%
241
Other
64%
24%
13%
760
Male
58%
28%
14%
480
Female
67%
21%
12%
521
Male / employed
61%
26%
13%
324
Male / not employed
53%
31%
16%
157
Female / employed
73%
20%
8%
281
60%
24%
16%
240
Not employed
68%
20%
12%
133
Employed
66%
23%
11%
605
Retired
51%
30%
19%
252
Refused
72%
28%
18-34
74%
17%
9%
200
35-44
71%
18%
11%
280
45-64
57%
30%
12%
310
65 or over
49%
31%
20%
200
Unsure / refused
35%
35%
30%
10
18-44
72%
18%
10%
480
45-64
57%
30%
12%
310
65+
49%
31%
20%
200
Unsure / refused
35%
35%
30%
10
11
(cont.)
Page 302

May 3-6, 2015
CEREMONY
SAMEA
Yes
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
No
TOTAL
Not sure
Male / under 55
62%
25%
13%
302
Male / 55+
51%
32%
17%
179
Female / under 55
73%
17%
9%
315
Female / 55+
57%
28%
15%
205
White
64%
25%
11%
751
51%
29%
20%
120
Hispanic / Latino
67%
16%
18%
90
Other
57%
31%
12%
40
73%
19%
7%
128
63%
26%
12%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
69%
11%
20%
24

voters 35+
47%
33%
20%
96
80%
12%
7%
41
55%
18%
27%
49

18-34
73%
21%
6%

35+
54%
33%
13%
32
White seniors
55%
27%
18%
255
Other
65%
23%
11%
746
White men
61%
26%
13%
368
White women
68%
23%
9%
382
Black men
36%
41%
23%
50
Black women
62%
20%
18%
70
Hispanic men
68%
17%
15%
42
Hispanic women
66%
14%
20%
48
Republican
49%
35%
16%
390
Independent
66%
25%
10%
190
Democrat
74%
15%
11%
420
Male / GOP
50%
33%
17%
214
Female / GOP
48%
36%
16%
176
Male / DEM
68%
20%
12%
161
Female / DEM
78%
12%
10%
259
Male / IND
59%
29%
12%
105
Female / IND
73%
19%
8%
85
Under 55 / GOP
56%
31%
12%
223
55 & over / GOP
40%
39%
22%
168
Under 55 / DEM
78%
12%
10%
269
55 & over / DEM
67%
20%
12%
151
Under 55 / IND
67%
22%
10%
125
55 & over / IND
62%
29%
9%
65
(cont.)
Page 303

May 3-6, 2015
CEREMONY
SAMEA
Yes
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER
AND EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
No
TOTAL
Not sure
Republican
50%
35%
15%
448
Ticket splitter
66%
17%
17%
61
Democrat
74%
15%
10%
492
Hard GOP
48%
36%
16%
360
Soft GOP
56%
30%
14%
92
Ticket splitter
61%
26%
13%
64
Soft DEM
74%
17%
9%
84
Hard DEM
75%
15%
11%
401
Conservative
48%
34%
18%
536
Moderate
51%
40%
9%
76
Liberal
85%
9%
7%
389
Very conservative
29%
47%
25%
187
59%
27%
14%
348
Moderate / liberal
79%
14%
7%
465
Republican
49%
35%
16%
390
Independent
66%
25%
10%
190
Conservative DEM
47%
31%
23%
103
Mod / lib DEM
83%
10%
7%
318
Liberal DEM
87%
7%
6%
335
47%
35%
18%
157
Independent
66%
17%
17%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
59%
34%
7%
69
Conservative GOP
48%
36%
17%
379
Yes / strongly
34%
46%
20%
93
Yes
58%
27%
16%
68
No / unsure
66%
22%
12%
840
50%
29%
21%
53
47%
36%
17%
227
Some college
59%
24%
17%
219
College graduate
73%
19%
8%
503
69%
23%
9%
248
Male non-college
graduates
47%
33%
20%
232
77%
15%
8%
254
Female non-college
graduates
57%
28%
15%
266
White non-college
graduate
54%
31%
15%
349
graduate
49%
29%
23%
149
Others
73%
19%
8%
503
Union household
69%
19%
12%
127
Non-union household
62%
25%
13%
874
(cont.)
Page 304

May 3-6, 2015
CEREMONY
SAMEA
Yes
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
TOTAL
Not sure
Single
73%
16%
11%
215
Married
61%
27%
13%
607
No longer married
57%
27%
16%
179
Dad
61%
28%
11%
171
Mom
74%
18%
8%
203
Married / children
66%
24%
10%
299
55%
30%
15%
308
Divorced / children
56%
38%
6%
22
61%
19%
21%
60
Single / children
83%
6%
11%
42
71%
19%
11%
173
Other / mixed
54%
30%
16%
97
Single women
80%
7%
13%
98
Married women
64%
25%
11%
304
64%
24%
13%
118
Single men
68%
23%
9%
117
Married men
57%
28%
14%
302
43%
35%
23%
61
White single men
68%
26%
6%
75
White single women
88%
2%
9%
46
White married men
62%
25%
14%
244
White married women
66%
26%
8%
243

men
47%
34%
19%
49

women
61%
25%
14%
93
Other
58%
24%
18%
250
Single mothers
84%
16%
30
Married mothers
71%
21%
8%
150
No longer married
mothers
80%
20%
Non-mothers
60%
26%
14%
798
Upper class
77%
17%
6%
73
Middle class
65%
24%
11%
696
Low income
48%
31%
21%
205
Working class
81%
19%
Refused
62%
16%
21%
20
Middle class whites
66%
24%
10%
551

Americans
57%
20%
23%
63
71%
18%
10%
57
56%
32%
13%
25
Other
57%
26%
17%
305
23
(cont.)
Page 305

May 3-6, 2015
CEREMONY
SAMEA
Yes
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
No
TOTAL
Not sure
Roman Catholic
71%
17%
11%
198
37%
45%
19%
185
Mainline Protestant
57%
28%
16%
280
Other
59%
26%
15%
45
None
82%
11%
7%
262
40%
42%
18%
336
66%
22%
12%
157
Infrequently
76%
13%
12%
191
Never
71%
13%
16%
44
63%
23%
14%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
24%
55%
21%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
38%
46%
16%
131
Active other
45%
31%
24%
17
Other
74%
15%
10%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
33%
50%
17%
133
68%
19%
13%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
40%
42%
18%
179
81%
11%
8%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
34%
49%
18%
222
45%
37%
18%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
31%
49%
20%
166
Christians
30%
52%
18%
51
Christians
42%
48%
10%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
66%
17%
18%
39
Approve
76%
13%
11%
453
Unsure
71%
17%
12%
62
Disapprove
49%
36%
15%
487
Jobs
62%
21%
16%
135
Economy
77%
14%
9%
228
Health care
69%
20%
12%
99
Illegal immigration
48%
41%
11%
78
Foreign threats
59%
28%
14%
116
Deficit
61%
22%
16%
76
14%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
55%
31%
(cont.)
Page 306

May 3-6, 2015
CEREMONY
SAMEA
Yes
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
No
TOTAL
Not sure
Cutting taxes
52%
29%
19%
71
Reducing deficit
55%
33%
12%
126
Creating jobs
64%
26%
10%
203
Increase wages
73%
18%
9%
132
Healthcare costs
66%
24%
10%
98
Retirement
63%
20%
17%
41
Higher education
86%
10%
4%
101
Regulations
45%
34%
21%
65
Combination
52%
26%
22%
141
None
79%
21%
Unsure
65%
15%
21%
12
Views close to own
65%
27%
8%
352
61%
23%
16%
571
Both
62%
29%
9%
48
Unsure
64%
18%
18%
30
Very worried
57%
29%
14%
318
Somewhat worried
64%
25%
12%
405
Not too worried
72%
15%
13%
214
55%
30%
15%
56
Not at all worried

Combination
11
100%
Unsure
27%
63%
10%
RECONFUT NEXT
Yes
GENERATION BETTER
Unsure
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
No
67%
18%
16%
245
55%
29%
16%
63
62%
26%
12%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
69%
19%
11%
510
Unsure
63%
25%
12%
85
Disapprove
54%
31%
15%
406
Very worried
47%
38%
15%
112
Somewhat worried
56%
29%
15%
283
Not too worried
66%
20%
14%
341
Not at all worried
76%
16%
8%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
94%
6%
Yes
63%
25%
12%
645
No
61%
24%
15%
356
Approve
80%
14%
6%
295
Unsure
45%
28%
26%
45
Disapprove
50%
35%
15%
306
(cont.)
Page 307

May 3-6, 2015
CEREMONY
SAMEA
Yes
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
No
TOTAL
Not sure
4 of 4
86%
6%
8%
26
3 of 4
90%
5%
5%
112
2 of 4
71%
20%
8%
221
1 of 4
64%
24%
12%
214
0 of 4
49%
33%
18%
427
5-7 of 7
47%
31%
22%
150
4 of 7
61%
27%
12%
96
3 of 7
50%
36%
14%
91
2 of 7
54%
31%
15%
87
1 of 7
61%
29%
10%
164
0 of 7
74%
16%
10%
413
63%
24%
13%
1001
Page 308

May 3-6, 2015
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RAGEBG2
18-44
TOTAL
45-64
65+
TOTAL
Unsure /
refused
48%
31%
20%
1%
1001
Northeast
49%
30%
20%
1%
195
Midwest
53%
29%
16%
1%
181
South
40%
37%
22%
1%
235
South Central
48%
32%
19%
1%
96
Central Plains
59%
26%
15%
Mountain States
47%
26%
25%
2%
70
West
48%
29%
22%
1%
141
California
39%
32%
28%
1%
89
Florida
28%
48%
20%
3%
58
Texas
50%
31%
18%
2%
71
New York
56%
20%
23%
1%
56
Rest of country
50%
30%
19%
1%
727
49%
31%
19%
1%
217
47%
33%
20%
0%
320
No Senate election
48%
30%
20%
1%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
46%
33%
19%
2%
405
48%
30%
21%
1%
366
50%
29%
21%
0%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
45%
34%
20%
1%
241
Other
49%
30%
20%
1%
760
Male
48%
34%
18%
1%
480
Female
48%
29%
22%
1%
521
Male / employed
62%
33%
4%
0%
324
Male / not employed
19%
34%
45%
2%
157
Female / employed
66%
30%
4%
0%
281
28%
28%
43%
2%
240
Not employed
64%
28%
7%
1%
133
Employed
63%
32%
4%
0%
605
Retired
1%
31%
65%
2%
252
Refused
63%
19%
7%
11%
11
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
18-34
100%
200
35-44
100%
280
45-64
310
100%
65 or over
Male / under 55
100%
76%
Male / 55+
Female / under 55
Female / 55+
200
100%
Unsure / refused
RR96FL AGE / SEX
83
80%
302
24%
50%
48%
3%
179
315
20%
42%
10
56%
2%
205
(cont.)
Page 309

May 3-6, 2015
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RAGEBG2
18-44
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
29%
23%
1%
751
43%
45%
12%
0%
120
Hispanic / Latino
64%
28%
8%
0%
90
Other
59%
25%
12%
3%
40
35%
28%
1%
100%
35%
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
29%
100%
33%

35+
50%
623
24
56%
15%
0%
96
41
51%
15%
1%
100%
White seniors
49
8
31%
15%
4%
32
29%
68%
3%
255
Other
64%
32%
3%
0%
746
White men
49%
30%
20%
1%
368
White women
44%
29%
27%
1%
382
Black men
27%
60%
11%
1%
50
Black women
54%
34%
12%
Hispanic men
55%
32%
12%
Hispanic women
71%
24%
5%
Republican
43%
30%
26%
1%
390
Independent
52%
29%
17%
2%
190
Democrat
51%
33%
16%
1%
420
Male / GOP
50%
29%
21%
1%
214
Female / GOP
35%
32%
32%
1%
176
Male / DEM
41%
42%
16%
1%
161
Female / DEM
57%
27%
16%
0%
259
Male / IND
53%
30%
15%
2%
105
Female / IND
51%
27%
20%
2%
85
Under 55 / GOP
76%
24%
55 & over / GOP

Under 55 / DEM
38%
79%
55 & over / DEM

Under 55 / IND
80%
70
1%
42
48
223
60%
3%
45%
2%
168
269
21%
54%
55 & over / IND

RPARTY USUAL VOTE
BEHAVIOR/C
128
100%

18-34
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
TOTAL
Unsure /
refused
46%

voters 35+
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
65+
White
African American
millenials 18-34
WHITE SENIORS
45-64
151
125
20%
45%
49%
5%
65
Republican
43%
32%
24%
1%
448
Ticket splitter
57%
14%
26%
3%
61
Democrat
52%
32%
16%
0%
492
(cont.)
Page 310

May 3-6, 2015
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RAGEBG2
18-44
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
45-64
65+
TOTAL
Unsure /
refused
Hard GOP
42%
32%
25%
1%
360
Soft GOP
44%
29%
25%
2%
92
Ticket splitter
62%
20%
16%
2%
64
Soft DEM
57%
26%
16%
1%
84
Hard DEM
50%
34%
16%
0%
401
Conservative
43%
31%
25%
1%
536
Moderate
53%
31%
14%
2%
76
Liberal
54%
31%
15%
0%
389
Very conservative
37%
28%
34%
2%
187
46%
33%
20%
1%
348
Moderate / liberal
54%
31%
15%
1%
465
Republican
43%
30%
26%
1%
390
Independent
52%
29%
17%
2%
190
Conservative DEM
40%
40%
18%
1%
103
Mod / lib DEM
54%
30%
15%
0%
318
Liberal DEM
55%
30%
15%
0%
335
45%
37%
17%
1%
157
Independent
57%
14%
26%
3%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
51%
36%
12%
0%
69
Conservative GOP
41%
31%
26%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
25%
47%
26%
2%
93
Yes
47%
29%
24%
1%
68
No / unsure
51%
29%
19%
1%
840
41%
26%
29%
5%
53
44%
36%
20%
0%
227
Some college
39%
38%
23%
0%
219
College graduate
54%
27%
18%
1%
503
52%
30%
16%
1%
248
Male non-college
graduates
43%
37%
19%
1%
232
56%
23%
19%
1%
254
Female non-college
graduates
41%
34%
25%
1%
266
White non-college
graduate
38%
34%
27%
1%
349
graduate
50%
39%
10%
1%
149
Others
54%
27%
18%
1%
503
Union household
40%
43%
15%
1%
127
Non-union household
49%
29%
21%
1%
874
(cont.)
Page 311

May 3-6, 2015
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RAGEBG2
18-44
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
45-64
65+
TOTAL
Unsure /
refused
Single
72%
22%
5%
1%
215
Married
48%
33%
17%
1%
607
No longer married
19%
34%
46%
1%
179
Dad
72%
27%
1%
1%
171
Mom
83%
16%
1%
Married / children
78%
21%
0%
0%
299
19%
45%
34%
2%
308
Divorced / children
77%
23%
11%
49%
39%
1%
60
Single / children
85%
12%
2%
1%
42
69%
25%
6%
1%
173
Other / mixed
11%
27%
61%
1%
97
Single women
75%
18%
7%
0%
98
Married women
50%
33%
17%
1%
304
23%
27%
49%
1%
118
Single men
70%
26%
3%
1%
117
Married men
46%
34%
18%
1%
302
12%
46%
42%
0%
61
White single men
69%
26%
5%
1%
75
White single women
67%
23%
10%
White married men
50%
30%
18%
1%
244
White married women
47%
33%
19%
1%
243

men
12%
41%
47%

women
24%
21%
54%
1%
93
Other
53%
36%
10%
1%
250
Single mothers
87%
10%
3%
Married mothers
83%
17%
No longer married
mothers
82%
15%
3%
Non-mothers
39%
35%
25%
1%
798
Upper class
41%
31%
27%
1%
73
Middle class
49%
30%
20%
1%
696
Low income
46%
33%
20%
0%
205
Working class
78%
22%
Refused
31%
47%
203
22
46
49
30
150
23
8
13%
9%
20
(cont.)
Page 312

May 3-6, 2015
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RAGEBG2
18-44
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
45-64
65+
TOTAL
Unsure /
refused
Middle class whites
48%
29%
22%

Americans
48%
39%
13%
63
61%
31%
7%
57
63%
26%
8%
4%
25
Other
45%
33%
21%
1%
305
Roman Catholic
47%
29%
22%
1%
198
34%
40%
25%
0%
185
Mainline Protestant
45%
30%
23%
1%
280
Other
57%
25%
18%
0%
45
1%
551
None
61%
27%
12%
0%
262
40%
32%
26%
1%
336
50%
33%
17%
1%
157
Infrequently
49%
31%
20%
0%
191
Never
31%
37%
33%
41%
27%
29%
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
34%
40%
26%
Active Mainline
Protestants
42%
29%
27%
Active other
65%
27%
44
3%
79
106
1%
131
8%
17
Other
52%
30%
17%
1%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
42%
35%
22%
1%
133
50%
33%
16%
1%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
34%
37%
29%
1%
179
56%
24%
18%
1%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
37%
30%
32%
1%
222
38%
50%
11%
1%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
35%
29%
35%
1%
166
Christians
34%
57%
9%
0%
51
Christians
44%
33%
23%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
42%
42%
15%
1%
39
Approve
50%
33%
16%
0%
453
Unsure
58%
23%
17%
2%
62
Disapprove
44%
30%
24%
1%
487
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
55
(cont.)
Page 313

May 3-6, 2015
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RAGEBG2
18-44
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
45-64
65+
TOTAL
Unsure /
refused
Jobs
45%
34%
19%
Economy
58%
27%
15%
Health care
50%
34%
16%
1%
99
Illegal immigration
32%
36%
30%
2%
78
Foreign threats
44%
34%
21%
0%
116
Deficit
57%
26%
17%
Other
44%
31%
24%
2%
268
Cutting taxes
53%
32%
15%
1%
71
Reducing deficit
45%
29%
25%
0%
126
Creating jobs
42%
31%
26%
1%
203
Increase wages
55%
31%
13%
1%
132
Healthcare costs
43%
31%
25%
1%
98
Retirement
52%
33%
13%
1%
41
Higher education
65%
23%
11%
0%
101
Regulations
47%
38%
13%
2%
65
Combination
42%
33%
23%
2%
141
None
59%
31%
10%
Unsure
16%
41%
37%
7%
12
Views close to own
53%
32%
14%
1%
352
46%
30%
23%
1%
571
Both
40%
40%
19%
1%
48
Unsure
37%
16%
43%
3%
30
Very worried
40%
37%
22%
1%
318
Somewhat worried
50%
29%
20%
1%
405
Not too worried
56%
25%
18%
1%
214
Not at all worried
42%
36%
21%
1%
56
Combination
2%
135
228
76
11
100%
Unsure
85%
5%
5%
4%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
50%
32%
18%
0%
245
Unsure
61%
16%
21%
1%
63
No
46%
32%
21%
1%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
47%
34%
17%
1%
510
Unsure
64%
17%
18%
1%
85
Disapprove
45%
30%
24%
1%
406
Very worried
35%
38%
25%
2%
112
Somewhat worried
34%
37%
27%
2%
283
Not too worried
54%
28%
18%
1%
341
Not at all worried
61%
26%
13%
0%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
100%
79%
21%
(cont.)
Page 314

May 3-6, 2015
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RAGEBG2
18-44
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
45-64
65+
TOTAL
Unsure /
refused
Yes
43%
34%
23%
1%
645
No
58%
26%
15%
1%
356
Approve
48%
33%
19%
1%
295
Unsure
48%
28%
24%
Disapprove
37%
35%
27%
1%
306
Yes
55%
28%
16%
1%
628
No
35%
38%
26%
1%
245
Not sure
37%
30%
31%
2%
128
4 of 4
32%
43%
24%
1%
26
45
3 of 4
41%
35%
23%
1%
112
2 of 4
57%
31%
13%
0%
221
1 of 4
52%
30%
18%
1%
214
0 of 4
45%
30%
24%
2%
427
5-7 of 7
34%
33%
32%
2%
150
4 of 7
51%
31%
17%
1%
96
3 of 7
45%
28%
26%
2%
91
2 of 7
32%
38%
30%
1%
87
1 of 7
55%
27%
17%
1%
164
0 of 7
54%
31%
14%
1%
413
48%
31%
20%
1%
1001
Page 315

May 3-6, 2015
REDUC RESPONDENT'S EDUCATION/C
REDUC
High school
graduate
5%
23%
22%
50%
1001
Northeast
5%
22%
18%
56%
195
Midwest
4%
26%
25%
44%
181
South
7%
26%
20%
47%
235
South Central
7%
13%
25%
55%
96
Central Plains
7%
22%
16%
55%
83
Mountain States
9%
16%
30%
45%
70
West
1%
24%
23%
52%
141
California
1%
21%
22%
56%
89
Florida
7%
26%
19%
48%
58
Texas
6%
10%
28%
56%
71
New York
7%
17%
18%
57%
56
Rest of country
5%
24%
22%
49%
727
7%
22%
23%
48%
217
6%
21%
24%
50%
320
No Senate election
4%
24%
20%
52%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
5%
23%
25%
47%
405
4%
22%
19%
56%
366
7%
24%
21%
48%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
6%
28%
22%
44%
241
Other
5%
21%
22%
52%
760
Male
6%
22%
21%
52%
480
Female
5%
23%
23%
49%
521
Male / employed
3%
21%
17%
58%
324
Male / not employed
11%
23%
28%
39%
157
Female / employed
3%
19%
16%
63%
281
8%
29%
31%
32%
240
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
Not employed
College
graduate
11%
29%
34%
26%
133
Employed
3%
20%
17%
60%
605
Retired
8%
26%
27%
39%
252
Refused
6%
19%
35%
41%
11
18-34
6%
28%
23%
43%
200
35-44
3%
16%
14%
66%
280
45-64
4%
26%
26%
43%
310
65 or over
8%
23%
25%
44%
200
Unsure / refused
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Some
college
TOTAL
Less than
high school
24%
7%
3%
66%
10
18-44
5%
21%
18%
57%
480
45-64
4%
26%
26%
43%
310
65+
8%
23%
25%
44%
200
24%
7%
3%
66%
10
Unsure / refused
(cont.)
Page 316

May 3-6, 2015
REDUC
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
High school
graduate
Male / under 55
5%
23%
19%
54%
302
Male / 55+
7%
20%
24%
48%
179
Female / under 55
5%
21%
19%
55%
315
Female / 55+
5%
27%
28%
39%
205
White
5%
21%
21%
53%
751
5%
27%
32%
36%
120
Hispanic / Latino
8%
35%
17%
39%
90
Other
7%
20%
17%
56%
40
5%
25%
20%
49%
128
5%
20%
21%
54%
623
38%
26%
36%
24
6%
24%
34%
36%
96
12%
32%
28%
28%
41
5%
38%
9%
49%
49

18-34
6%
15%
31%
48%

35+
7%
21%
13%
58%
32
White seniors
6%
21%
27%
45%
255
Other
5%
23%
20%
52%
746
White men
5%
19%
21%
56%
368
White women
5%
22%
21%
51%
382
Black men
7%
36%
23%
33%
50
Black women
3%
20%
39%
38%
70
Hispanic men
African American
millenials 18-34
voters 35+
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Some
college
TOTAL
Less than
high school
College
graduate
10%
29%
22%
39%
42
Hispanic women
6%
40%
14%
40%
48
Republican
6%
22%
23%
49%
390
Independent
7%
19%
23%
50%
190
Democrat
4%
25%
20%
51%
420
Male / GOP
5%
21%
23%
50%
214
Female / GOP
7%
23%
23%
47%
176
Male / DEM
6%
24%
19%
51%
161
Female / DEM
2%
25%
21%
51%
259
Male / IND
6%
20%
19%
55%
105
Female / IND
9%
18%
29%
44%
85
Under 55 / GOP
7%
20%
18%
55%
223
55 & over / GOP
5%
25%
29%
41%
168
Under 55 / DEM
2%
23%
18%
56%
269
55 & over / DEM
6%
28%
23%
43%
151
Under 55 / IND
7%
22%
22%
49%
125
55 & over / IND
8%
15%
26%
51%
65
(cont.)
Page 317

May 3-6, 2015
REDUC
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
High school
graduate
5%
21%
23%
51%
448
21%
27%
26%
27%
61
Democrat
4%
24%
20%
52%
492
Hard GOP
5%
22%
23%
50%
360
Republican
Ticket splitter
Soft GOP
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
9%
19%
22%
50%
92
26%
26%
38%
64
Soft DEM
6%
18%
25%
50%
84
Hard DEM
4%
25%
19%
52%
401
Conservative
6%
23%
25%
45%
536
Moderate
5%
35%
21%
39%
76
Liberal
4%
20%
17%
59%
389
Very conservative
8%
22%
28%
43%
187
6%
24%
24%
47%
348
Moderate / liberal
4%
22%
18%
56%
465
Republican
6%
22%
23%
49%
390
Independent
7%
19%
23%
50%
190
Conservative DEM
8%
37%
30%
26%
103
Mod / lib DEM
2%
21%
17%
60%
318
Liberal DEM
3%
18%
16%
63%
335
6%
35%
29%
30%
157
21%
27%
26%
27%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
6%
31%
22%
40%
69
Conservative GOP
4%
19%
24%
53%
379
Yes / strongly
9%
22%
22%
47%
93
Yes
3%
18%
35%
44%
68
No / unsure
5%
23%
21%
51%
840
100%
248
Independent
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND
EDUCATION

Male non-college
graduates
12%
45%
43%
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
College
graduate
10%
Ticket splitter
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Some
college
TOTAL
Less than
high school
232
100%
254
Female non-college
graduates
10%
46%
44%
266
White non-college
graduate
11%
44%
45%
349
graduate
11%
48%
41%
149
Others
100%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
1%
18%
20%
60%
127
Non-union household
6%
23%
22%
49%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
10%
20%
29%
42%
215
Married
3%
23%
17%
57%
607
No longer married
8%
26%
30%
37%
179
(cont.)
Page 318

May 3-6, 2015
REDUC
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
High school
graduate
Dad
3%
20%
14%
63%
171
Mom
5%
22%
18%
55%
203
Married / children
3%
21%
10%
65%
299
3%
24%
23%
49%
308
Divorced / children
44%
37%
19%
22
26%
33%
36%
60
13%
13%
39%
34%
42
9%
21%
26%
44%
173
Other / mixed
11%
21%
26%
42%
97
Single women
11%
10%
34%
45%
98
Married women
3%
25%
17%
55%
304
6%
31%
28%
35%
118
Single men
8%
28%
25%
39%
117
Married men
3%
21%
17%
59%
302
11%
15%
33%
40%
61
4%
22%
25%
48%
75
White single women
15%
8%
24%
53%
46
White married men
3%
19%
17%
61%
244
White married women
Single / children

GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
White single men
3%
22%
20%
55%
243

men
12%
12%
32%
44%
49

women
6%
30%
24%
40%
93
Other
6%
29%
24%
40%
250
Single mothers
18%
3%
51%
28%
30
Married mothers
3%
24%
10%
63%
150
37%
25%
38%
23
798
No longer married
mothers
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Non-mothers
5%
23%
23%
49%
Upper class
5%
8%
10%
78%
73
Middle class
3%
18%
22%
56%
696
Low income
11%
43%
27%
19%
205
69%
Working class
Refused
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
College
graduate
5%
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
Some
college
TOTAL
Less than
high school
31%
11%
20%
19%
50%
20
Middle class whites
3%
18%
21%
58%
551

Americans
6%
8%
34%
52%
63
7%
33%
17%
43%
57
6%
13%
18%
63%
25
10%
33%
22%
36%
305
Other
(cont.)
Page 319

May 3-6, 2015
REDUC
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
High school
graduate
Roman Catholic
4%
19%
18%
59%
198
8%
29%
24%
40%
185
Mainline Protestant
4%
21%
22%
52%
280
Other
12%
18%
12%
59%
45
None
5%
24%
24%
48%
262
4%
22%
22%
51%
336
8%
21%
14%
57%
157
Infrequently
5%
23%
24%
49%
191
Never
9%
28%
17%
46%
44
2%
19%
17%
62%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
6%
27%
28%
40%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
3%
20%
21%
56%
131
21%
21%
20%
38%
17
6%
23%
22%
50%
667
10%
25%
17%
48%
133
4%
21%
22%
53%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
5%
29%
26%
40%
179
Active other
Other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Male born again /

evangelicals
Some
college
TOTAL
Less than
high school
College
graduate
5%
20%
21%
53%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
6%
28%
20%
45%
222
8%
26%
27%
39%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
4%
26%
21%
49%
166
Christians
7%
34%
38%
22%
51
Christians
12%
35%
18%
35%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
9%
16%
12%
62%
39
Approve
5%
21%
22%
53%
453
Unsure
11%
25%
20%
44%
62
5%
24%
22%
49%
487
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
Disapprove
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Jobs
11%
22%
21%
46%
135
Economy
4%
15%
23%
57%
228
Health care
4%
23%
19%
54%
99
Illegal immigration
5%
29%
29%
37%
78
Foreign threats
6%
28%
22%
44%
116
Deficit
3%
20%
22%
55%
76
50%
268
Other
4%
25%
20%
(cont.)
Page 320

May 3-6, 2015
REDUC
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
High school
graduate
11%
30%
10%
49%
71
Reducing deficit
2%
12%
27%
59%
126
Creating jobs
6%
21%
22%
51%
203
Increase wages
4%
20%
19%
57%
132
Healthcare costs
5%
26%
24%
45%
98
Retirement
8%
41%
4%
47%
41
Higher education
8%
17%
35%
40%
101
Regulations
0%
17%
20%
63%
65
Combination
5%
30%
21%
44%
141
35%
15%
50%
11
22%
34%
24%
19%
12
Views close to own
3%
18%
20%
59%
352
6%
25%
24%
45%
571
Both
7%
27%
18%
48%
48
17%
18%
20%
46%
30
Very worried
9%
28%
21%
42%
318
Somewhat worried
4%
23%
21%
52%
405
Not too worried
4%
12%
23%
61%
214
Not at all worried
1%
25%
29%
Cutting taxes
None
Unsure
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unsure
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Some
college
TOTAL
Less than
high school
Combination
College
graduate
45%
56
100%
Unsure
2%
38%
29%
31%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
8%
26%
22%
43%
245
Unsure
9%
29%
17%
45%
63
No
4%
21%
22%
53%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
4%
21%
22%
53%
510
Unsure
7%
30%
19%
44%
85
Disapprove
6%
24%
23%
48%
406
Very worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
10%
39%
13%
38%
112
Somewhat worried
6%
25%
26%
42%
283
Not too worried
4%
18%
21%
57%
341
Not at all worried
3%
18%
23%
56%
258
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
6%
49%
6%
40%
Yes
3%
19%
22%
55%
645
No
9%
29%
21%
41%
356
Approve
1%
14%
22%
63%
295
Unsure
3%
24%
23%
50%
45
Disapprove
5%
23%
23%
49%
306
(cont.)
Page 321

May 3-6, 2015
REDUC
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Some
college
TOTAL
Less than
high school
High school
graduate
College
graduate
Yes
4%
17%
20%
58%
628
No
6%
33%
22%
38%
245
Not sure
9%
30%
29%
32%
128
4 of 4
7%
13%
23%
57%
26
3 of 4
2%
9%
17%
72%
112
2 of 4
6%
23%
19%
51%
221
1 of 4
8%
33%
18%
42%
214
0 of 4
5%
21%
27%
48%
427
5-7 of 7
5%
15%
26%
54%
150
4 of 7
3%
24%
17%
56%
96
3 of 7
7%
17%
22%
54%
91
2 of 7
5%
26%
24%
45%
87
1 of 7
8%
23%
20%
49%
164
0 of 7
4%
26%
22%
48%
413
5%
23%
22%
50%
1001
Page 322

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEOL RESPONDENT'S IDEOLOGY/C
RIDEOL
Conservative
TOTAL
Moderate
TOTAL
Liberal
54%
8%
39%
1001
Northeast
43%
7%
50%
195
Midwest
55%
9%
36%
181
South
61%
9%
30%
235
South Central
61%
5%
34%
96
Central Plains
51%
6%
44%
83
Mountain States
65%
11%
23%
70
West
46%
5%
49%
141
California
47%
8%
45%
89
Florida
64%
3%
33%
58
Texas
57%
3%
40%
71
New York
51%
5%
43%
56
Rest of country
53%
9%
38%
727
57%
9%
34%
217
51%
7%
42%
320
No Senate election
53%
8%
39%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
59%
8%
33%
405
47%
8%
45%
366
54%
6%
39%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
57%
8%
35%
241
Other
52%
7%
40%
760
Male
59%
11%
30%
480
Female
49%
5%
47%
521
Male / employed
58%
10%
32%
324
Male / not employed
60%
12%
28%
157
Female / employed
42%
6%
52%
281
56%
4%
40%
240
Not employed
51%
8%
42%
133
Employed
51%
8%
41%
605
Retired
63%
6%
31%
252
Refused
16%
20%
64%
11
18-34
45%
9%
47%
200
35-44
50%
8%
42%
280
45-64
54%
8%
38%
310
65 or over
66%
5%
29%
200
Unsure / refused
74%
15%
12%
10
18-44
48%
8%
44%
480
45-64
54%
8%
38%
310
65+
66%
5%
29%
200
Unsure / refused
74%
15%
12%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 323

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEOL
Conservative
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Moderate
TOTAL
Liberal
Male / under 55
56%
13%
32%
302
Male / 55+
64%
8%
28%
179
Female / under 55
42%
5%
53%
315
Female / 55+
58%
5%
37%
205
White
56%
7%
36%
751
47%
7%
46%
120
Hispanic / Latino
39%
8%
53%
90
Other
50%
11%
39%
40
52%
6%
42%
128
57%
8%
35%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
33%
21%
46%
24

voters 35+
51%
4%
45%
96
31%
10%
59%
41
46%
6%
48%
49

18-34
37%
63%

35+
54%
13%
33%
32
White seniors
64%
6%
31%
255
Other
50%
8%
42%
746
White men
61%
10%
28%
368
White women
52%
5%
44%
382
Black men
46%
16%
38%
50
Black women
48%
1%
51%
70
Hispanic men
46%
8%
46%
42
Hispanic women
33%
7%
59%
48
Republican
87%
7%
7%
390
Independent
50%
14%
36%
190
Democrat
24%
5%
70%
420
Male / GOP
85%
9%
5%
214
Female / GOP
88%
3%
9%
176
Male / DEM
26%
7%
67%
161
Female / DEM
24%
4%
72%
259
Male / IND
56%
19%
26%
105
Female / IND
43%
9%
48%
85
Under 55 / GOP
83%
10%
7%
223
55 & over / GOP
91%
3%
6%
168
Under 55 / DEM
21%
6%
73%
269
55 & over / DEM
30%
5%
65%
151
Under 55 / IND
47%
12%
41%
125
55 & over / IND
55%
19%
26%
65
(cont.)
Page 324

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEOL
Conservative
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
85%
6%
9%
448
Ticket splitter
48%
31%
21%
61
Democrat
26%
6%
68%
492
Hard GOP
88%
5%
7%
360
Soft GOP
76%
13%
11%
92
Ticket splitter
49%
25%
26%
64
Soft DEM
29%
11%
60%
84
Hard DEM
24%
5%
71%
401
Very conservative
100%
100%
348
16%
84%
465
87%
7%
7%
390
Independent
50%
14%
36%
190
103
100%
Mod / lib DEM
7%
Liberal DEM
93%
318
100%
335
81%
19%
Independent
48%
31%
21%
41%
59%
Mod / liberal GOP

Conservative GOP
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
187
Republican
Conservative DEM
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
TOTAL
Liberal
Republican
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Moderate
157
61
69
379
100%
Yes / strongly
90%
2%
8%
93
Yes
93%
3%
4%
68
No / unsure
46%
9%
45%
840
64%
8%
28%
53
54%
12%
34%
227
Some college
62%
7%
31%
219
College graduate
48%
6%
46%
503
57%
7%
37%
248
Male non-college
graduates
61%
15%
24%
232
41%
5%
54%
254
Female non-college
graduates
56%
4%
39%
266
White non-college
graduate
60%
10%
30%
349
graduate
54%
8%
37%
149
Others
48%
6%
46%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
40%
7%
53%
127
Non-union household
55%
8%
37%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
45%
9%
46%
215
Married
56%
7%
37%
607
No longer married
56%
8%
36%
179
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
(cont.)
Page 325

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEOL
Conservative
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Moderate
TOTAL
Liberal
Dad
62%
13%
25%
171
Mom
42%
6%
52%
203
Married / children
53%
8%
39%
299
59%
6%
35%
308
Divorced / children
22%
27%
51%
22
58%
7%
36%
60
Single / children
51%
7%
42%
42
43%
9%
47%
173
Other / mixed
63%
4%
33%
97
Single women
43%
4%
53%
98
Married women
49%
5%
47%
304
53%
5%
42%
118
Single men
47%
13%
40%
117
Married men
63%
10%
28%
302
62%
13%
24%
61
White single men
50%
10%
41%
75
White single women
46%
2%
52%
46
White married men
64%
10%
26%
244
White married women
51%
5%
44%
243

men
66%
13%
22%
49

women
56%
6%
39%
93
Other
45%
8%
47%
250
Single mothers
56%
3%
41%
30
Married mothers
40%
5%
54%
150
No longer married
mothers
40%
11%
49%
23
Non-mothers
56%
8%
36%
798
Upper class
46%
8%
46%
73
Middle class
55%
6%
39%
696
Low income
52%
13%
35%
205
Working class
40%
3%
57%
Refused
36%
20%
44%
20
Middle class whites
59%
6%
35%
551

Americans
46%
2%
51%
63
32%
7%
61%
57
45%
6%
49%
25
Other
49%
12%
39%
305
(cont.)
Page 326

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEOL
Conservative
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Moderate
TOTAL
Liberal
Roman Catholic
56%
7%
37%
198
70%
9%
21%
185
Mainline Protestant
62%
6%
31%
280
Other
52%
1%
47%
45
None
30%
10%
60%
262
71%
8%
21%
336
62%
2%
36%
157
Infrequently
47%
8%
45%
191
Never
39%
11%
50%
44
64%
8%
28%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
77%
9%
14%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
69%
9%
22%
131
Active other
80%
1%
19%
17
Other
45%
7%
48%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
78%
8%
14%
133
52%
12%
37%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
64%
8%
29%
179
41%
3%
56%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
75%
9%
16%
222
57%
4%
39%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
100%
166
Christians
100%
51
Christians
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
38%
62%
55
9%
91%
39
Approve
26%
6%
68%
453
Unsure
45%
15%
40%
62
Disapprove
80%
8%
12%
487
Jobs
47%
9%
44%
135
Economy
49%
6%
45%
228
Health care
36%
6%
58%
99
Illegal immigration
71%
7%
22%
78
Foreign threats
70%
4%
25%
116
Deficit
63%
9%
28%
76
38%
268
Other
52%
10%
(cont.)
Page 327

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEOL
Conservative
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Moderate
TOTAL
Liberal
Cutting taxes
77%
7%
17%
71
Reducing deficit
77%
5%
18%
126
Creating jobs
48%
9%
43%
203
Increase wages
27%
8%
65%
132
Healthcare costs
50%
10%
40%
98
Retirement
51%
3%
46%
41
Higher education
39%
5%
56%
101
Regulations
83%
4%
13%
65
Combination
54%
11%
35%
141
None
17%
17%
66%
11
Unsure
65%
11%
24%
12
Views close to own
49%
6%
45%
352
57%
7%
35%
571
Both
52%
14%
34%
48
Unsure
36%
21%
42%
30
Very worried
66%
8%
26%
318
Somewhat worried
53%
7%
40%
405
Not too worried
41%
4%
55%
214
Not at all worried
45%
13%
42%
56
58%
42%
7%
62%
32%
8
245
Combination
Unsure
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
43%
7%
50%
Unsure
38%
20%
42%
63
No
58%
7%
35%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
44%
7%
50%
510
Unsure
33%
17%
50%
85
Disapprove
70%
7%
23%
406
Very worried
67%
7%
26%
112
Somewhat worried
66%
5%
29%
283
Not too worried
49%
8%
43%
341
Not at all worried
40%
8%
52%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
100%
Unsure
28%
72%
Yes
55%
5%
40%
645
No
50%
12%
38%
356
Approve
27%
5%
68%
295
Unsure
64%
12%
24%
45
Disapprove
82%
4%
15%
306
Yes
41%
6%
53%
628
No
74%
12%
14%
245
Not sure
75%
5%
20%
128
(cont.)
Page 328

May 3-6, 2015
RIDEOL
Conservative
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Moderate
TOTAL
Liberal
4 of 4
17%
6%
77%
26
3 of 4
9%
5%
86%
112
2 of 4
34%
5%
60%
221
1 of 4
39%
13%
48%
214
0 of 4
84%
7%
8%
427
5-7 of 7
95%
1%
4%
150
4 of 7
84%
6%
10%
96
3 of 7
76%
7%
17%
91
2 of 7
58%
8%
34%
87
1 of 7
50%
8%
41%
164
0 of 7
27%
10%
63%
413
54%
8%
39%
1001
Page 329

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTYID PARTY IDENTIFICATION/C
RPARTYID
TOTAL
Republican
Independent
Democrat
39%
19%
42%
1001
Northeast
29%
23%
48%
195
Midwest
41%
17%
42%
181
South
40%
20%
39%
235
South Central
49%
14%
37%
96
Central Plains
41%
20%
39%
83
Mountain States
54%
19%
26%
70
West
32%
16%
52%
141
California
32%
18%
50%
89
Florida
36%
22%
42%
58
Texas
48%
10%
43%
71
New York
33%
18%
49%
56
Rest of country
40%
20%
40%
727
43%
18%
39%
217
40%
20%
40%
320
No Senate election
37%
19%
45%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
43%
18%
38%
405
33%
19%
48%
366
41%
21%
38%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
39%
21%
41%
241
Other
39%
18%
42%
760
Male
45%
22%
34%
480
Female
34%
16%
50%
521
Male / employed
47%
21%
32%
324
Male / not employed
40%
23%
37%
157
Female / employed
35%
15%
50%
281
33%
17%
50%
240
Not employed
26%
24%
50%
133
Employed
41%
19%
40%
605
Retired
42%
16%
42%
252
Refused
8%
45%
46%
11
18-34
29%
26%
45%
200
35-44
39%
17%
44%
280
45-64
38%
18%
44%
310
65 or over
50%
16%
34%
200
Unsure / refused
43%
34%
23%
10
18-44
35%
21%
44%
480
45-64
38%
18%
44%
310
65+
50%
16%
34%
200
Unsure / refused
43%
34%
23%
10
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 330

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTYID
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Independent
Democrat
Male / under 55
44%
23%
32%
302
Male / 55+
45%
19%
36%
179
Female / under 55
28%
17%
55%
315
Female / 55+
43%
15%
42%
205
White
47%
19%
34%
751
5%
12%
83%
120
Hispanic / Latino
23%
21%
56%
90
Other
34%
27%
39%
40
39%
28%
33%
128
48%
18%
34%
623
19%
81%
24
6%
10%
84%
96
17%
24%
59%
41
28%
19%
53%
49

18-34
19%
34%
46%

35+
37%
26%
37%
32
White seniors
51%
17%
32%
255
Other
35%
20%
45%
746
White men
52%
21%
28%
368
White women
42%
18%
40%
382
Black men
10%
14%
76%
50
Black women
1%
10%
89%
70
Hispanic men
23%
35%
42%
42
Hispanic women
23%
8%
68%
48
African American
millenials 18-34
voters 35+
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
TOTAL
Republican
Male / GOP
100%
214
Female / GOP
100%
176
Male / DEM
100%
161
Female / DEM
100%
259
Male / IND
100%
105
Female / IND
100%
85
Under 55 / GOP
100%
55 & over / GOP
100%
223
168
Under 55 / DEM
100%
269
55 & over / DEM
100%
151
Under 55 / IND
100%
55 & over / IND
100%
65
125
Republican
80%
17%
2%
448
Ticket splitter
25%
61%
14%
61
3%
15%
81%
492
Democrat
(cont.)
Page 331

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTYID
Republican
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Independent
Hard GOP
100%
Soft GOP
17%
83%
Ticket splitter
24%
59%
17%
64
90%
10%
84
100%
401
Soft DEM
360
Hard DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
92
Conservative
63%
18%
19%
536
Moderate
34%
36%
30%
76
7%
17%
76%
389
Very conservative
68%
17%
14%
187
60%
18%
22%
348
Moderate / liberal
11%
20%
68%
465
Liberal
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
TOTAL
Democrat
Republican
390
100%
Independent
190
100%
Conservative DEM
100%
103
Mod / lib DEM
100%
318
Liberal DEM
0%
15%
85%
335
9%
17%
73%
157
Independent
25%
61%
14%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
64%
25%
11%
69
Conservative GOP
83%
16%
1%
379
Yes / strongly
69%
21%
10%
93
Yes
82%
14%
4%
68
No / unsure
32%
19%
49%
840
44%
27%
29%
53
38%
16%
46%
227
Some college
41%
20%
39%
219
College graduate
38%
19%
43%
503
43%
23%
33%
248
Male non-college
graduates
46%
20%
34%
232
33%
15%
52%
254
Female non-college
graduates
35%
18%
47%
266
White non-college
graduate
51%
20%
29%
349
graduate
15%
16%
69%
149
Others
38%
19%
43%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
30%
17%
52%
127
Non-union household
40%
19%
40%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
26%
26%
48%
215
Married
44%
18%
38%
607
No longer married
37%
15%
48%
179
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
(cont.)
Page 332

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTYID
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Independent
Democrat
Dad
56%
20%
25%
171
Mom
28%
14%
58%
203
Married / children
43%
16%
41%
299
46%
20%
34%
308
Divorced / children
14%
20%
66%
22
33%
16%
51%
60
Single / children
29%
25%
46%
42
25%
26%
49%
173
Other / mixed
45%
13%
43%
97
Single women
20%
24%
56%
98
Married women
38%
15%
47%
304
34%
13%
53%
118
Single men
30%
28%
42%
117
Married men
51%
21%
29%
302
42%
17%
40%
61
White single men
42%
28%
30%
75
White single women
34%
31%
35%
46
White married men
56%
19%
25%
244
White married women
44%
17%
39%
243

men
43%
17%
39%
49

women
40%
16%
45%
93
Other
16%
18%
66%
250
Single mothers
22%
26%
52%
30
Married mothers
30%
12%
58%
150
No longer married
mothers
23%
13%
65%
23
Non-mothers
42%
20%
38%
798
Upper class
35%
18%
47%
73
Middle class
43%
18%
39%
696
Low income
29%
23%
48%
205
22%
78%
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Republican
Refused
31%
27%
42%
20
Middle class whites
50%
18%
32%
551

Americans
4%
12%
84%
63
23%
18%
59%
57
26%
20%
53%
25
Other
30%
22%
48%
305
(cont.)
Page 333

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTYID
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Republican
Independent
Democrat
Roman Catholic
44%
15%
41%
198
46%
19%
35%
185
Mainline Protestant
48%
19%
33%
280
Other
41%
12%
47%
45
None
20%
22%
58%
262
52%
18%
30%
336
42%
19%
39%
157
Infrequently
39%
16%
45%
191
Never
29%
24%
47%
44
49%
16%
34%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
55%
19%
26%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
51%
18%
30%
131
Active other
60%
13%
27%
17
Other
32%
20%
48%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
59%
18%
23%
133
39%
23%
38%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
44%
18%
38%
179
28%
16%
56%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
64%
20%
16%
222
18%
13%
69%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
75%
18%
7%
166
Christians
25%
15%
61%
51
Christians
29%
27%
44%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
10%
10%
80%
39
Approve
8%
15%
78%
453
Unsure
40%
26%
35%
62
Disapprove
68%
22%
10%
487
Jobs
27%
14%
59%
135
Economy
33%
19%
48%
228
Health care
23%
13%
65%
99
Illegal immigration
62%
16%
22%
78
Foreign threats
62%
17%
21%
116
Deficit
47%
30%
23%
76
40%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
37%
22%
(cont.)
Page 334

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTYID
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Republican
Independent
Democrat
Cutting taxes
53%
18%
29%
71
Reducing deficit
61%
22%
18%
126
Creating jobs
31%
16%
54%
203
Increase wages
12%
13%
76%
132
Healthcare costs
48%
25%
27%
98
Retirement
30%
22%
48%
41
Higher education
24%
23%
52%
101
Regulations
72%
13%
15%
65
Combination
41%
21%
38%
141
None
32%
17%
51%
11
Unsure
55%
36%
8%
12
Views close to own
37%
19%
44%
352
40%
18%
42%
571
Both
43%
22%
36%
48
Unsure
36%
32%
31%
30
Very worried
48%
25%
27%
318
Somewhat worried
41%
15%
43%
405
Not too worried
26%
16%
58%
214
Not at all worried
23%
21%
57%
56
58%
42%
Combination
Unsure
28%
7%
65%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
26%
16%
59%
245
Unsure
34%
14%
52%
63
No
44%
21%
35%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
29%
17%
53%
510
Unsure
23%
15%
62%
85
Disapprove
55%
22%
23%
406
Very worried
51%
24%
25%
112
Somewhat worried
48%
19%
33%
283
Not too worried
39%
17%
44%
341
Not at all worried
24%
20%
56%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
100%
Unsure
40%
12%
49%
Yes
42%
20%
37%
645
No
33%
17%
50%
356
Approve
18%
19%
63%
295
Unsure
41%
23%
36%
45
Disapprove
66%
21%
13%
306
Yes
31%
20%
50%
628
No
55%
19%
26%
245
Not sure
50%
15%
35%
128
(cont.)
Page 335

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTYID
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Republican
Independent
Democrat
4 of 4
3%
14%
83%
26
3 of 4
4%
13%
83%
112
2 of 4
12%
13%
75%
221
1 of 4
23%
23%
53%
214
0 of 4
72%
22%
6%
427
5-7 of 7
80%
20%
4 of 7
74%
17%
9%
96
3 of 7
68%
21%
11%
91
2 of 7
45%
28%
27%
87
1 of 7
33%
22%
45%
164
0 of 7
11%
16%
74%
413
39%
19%
42%
1001
150
Page 336

May 3-6, 2015
RTEAMEM IDENTIFY WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
RTEAMEM
Yes
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
No
16%
8%
76%
1001
Northeast
8%
9%
83%
195
Midwest
17%
10%
73%
181
South
23%
8%
69%
235
South Central
23%
7%
71%
96
Central Plains
10%
14%
76%
83
Mountain States
13%
7%
80%
70
West
15%
5%
80%
141
California
16%
6%
78%
89
Florida
28%
7%
65%
58
Texas
22%
8%
70%
71
New York
14%
2%
85%
56
Rest of country
15%
9%
76%
727
21%
10%
69%
217
14%
8%
78%
320
No Senate election
15%
8%
77%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
20%
9%
70%
405
12%
7%
81%
366
14%
9%
76%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
21%
9%
70%
241
Other
15%
8%
77%
760
Male
19%
8%
73%
480
Female
13%
9%
78%
521
Male / employed
18%
6%
76%
324
Male / not employed
23%
11%
66%
157
Female / employed
11%
5%
84%
281
16%
14%
71%
240
Not employed
17%
12%
72%
133
Employed
14%
6%
80%
605
Retired
20%
13%
67%
252
Refused
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
16%
14%
70%
11
18-34
8%
5%
87%
200
35-44
14%
8%
78%
280
45-64
20%
7%
73%
310
65 or over
20%
14%
66%
200
Unsure / refused
22%
27%
50%
10
18-44
12%
7%
82%
480
45-64
20%
7%
73%
310
65+
20%
14%
66%
200
Unsure / refused
22%
27%
50%
10
(cont.)
Page 337

May 3-6, 2015
MOVEMENT/C
RTEAMEM
Yes
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
No
Male / under 55
17%
8%
75%
302
Male / 55+
24%
7%
69%
179
Female / under 55
10%
6%
84%
315
Female / 55+
17%
14%
69%
205
White
17%
9%
74%
751
10%
7%
83%
120
Hispanic / Latino
12%
6%
82%
90
Other
20%
10%
70%
40
8%
4%
88%
128
19%
10%
71%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
16%
11%
73%
24

voters 35+
9%
6%
85%
96
4%
5%
91%
41
19%
7%
75%
49

18-34
10%
90%

35+
22%
12%
65%
32
White seniors
21%
11%
68%
255
Other
15%
7%
78%
746
White men
20%
7%
73%
368
White women
14%
11%
75%
382
Black men
18%
11%
71%
50
Black women
5%
3%
92%
70
Hispanic men
13%
9%
78%
42
Hispanic women
12%
3%
85%
48
Republican
31%
9%
60%
390
Independent
15%
9%
75%
190
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
Unsure
TOTAL
3%
7%
90%
420
Male / GOP
34%
7%
59%
214
Female / GOP
28%
12%
61%
176
Male / DEM
4%
7%
89%
161
Female / DEM
2%
7%
90%
259
Male / IND
15%
10%
75%
105
Female / IND
15%
9%
76%
85
Under 55 / GOP
27%
7%
66%
223
55 & over / GOP
36%
12%
52%
168
Under 55 / DEM
2%
5%
93%
269
55 & over / DEM
4%
11%
85%
151
Under 55 / IND
13%
10%
77%
125
55 & over / IND
20%
7%
73%
65
(cont.)
Page 338

May 3-6, 2015
MOVEMENT/C
RTEAMEM
Yes
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Republican
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
9%
59%
448
Ticket splitter
8%
17%
75%
61
Democrat
3%
7%
91%
492
Hard GOP
33%
10%
57%
360
Soft GOP
27%
6%
67%
92
Ticket splitter
7%
14%
79%
64
Soft DEM
2%
5%
93%
84
Hard DEM
3%
7%
90%
401
Conservative
27%
9%
64%
536
Moderate
6%
24%
70%
76
Liberal
3%
5%
93%
389
Very conservative
47%
8%
45%
187
17%
9%
74%
348
3%
8%
89%
465
Republican
31%
9%
60%
390
Independent
15%
9%
75%
190
Conservative DEM
8%
11%
81%
103
Mod / lib DEM
1%
6%
93%
318
Liberal DEM
1%
5%
94%
335
6%
11%
83%
157
Independent
8%
17%
75%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
13%
14%
73%
69
Conservative GOP
35%
8%
57%
379
Yes / strongly
100%
93
Yes
100%
68
No / unsure
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
No
32%
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Unsure
TOTAL
10%
90%
840
19%
18%
63%
53
14%
17%
69%
227
Some college
20%
8%
72%
219
College graduate
15%
4%
81%
503
16%
4%
80%
248
Male non-college
graduates
23%
12%
65%
232
13%
4%
83%
254
Female non-college
graduates
13%
14%
74%
266
White non-college
graduate
19%
14%
68%
349
graduate
15%
11%
75%
149
Others
15%
4%
81%
503
Union household
14%
4%
82%
127
Non-union household
16%
9%
75%
874
(cont.)
Page 339

May 3-6, 2015
MOVEMENT/C
RTEAMEM
Yes
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
12%
4%
84%
215
Married
18%
8%
74%
607
No longer married
13%
15%
72%
179
Dad
18%
7%
74%
171
Mom
11%
6%
83%
203
Married / children
16%
7%
78%
299
21%
9%
70%
308
2%
14%
84%
22
12%
13%
75%
60
Single / children
10%
3%
88%
42
13%
4%
83%
173
Other / mixed
17%
16%
67%
97
Single women
8%
2%
90%
98
Married women
15%
8%
77%
304
12%
18%
70%
118
Single men
16%
5%
79%
117
Married men
22%
8%
70%
302
16%
9%
75%
61
White single men
17%
1%
82%
75
White single women
7%
4%
90%
46
White married men
22%
8%
70%
244
White married women
15%
8%
76%
243

men
16%
10%
74%
49

women
15%
21%
64%
93
Other
13%
7%
81%
250
Single mothers
8%
4%
88%
30
Married mothers
11%
6%
83%
150
No longer married
mothers
14%
9%
77%
23
Non-mothers
17%
9%
74%
798
Upper class
23%
2%
74%
73
Middle class
17%
7%
76%
696
Low income
11%
14%
75%
205
97%
Working class
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
No
Single
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
Unsure
TOTAL
3%
Refused
14%
30%
56%
20
Middle class whites
18%
7%
74%
551

Americans
12%
4%
84%
63
10%
5%
86%
57
21%
5%
74%
25
Other
14%
12%
74%
305
(cont.)
Page 340

May 3-6, 2015
MOVEMENT/C
RTEAMEM
Yes
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
18%
8%
74%
198
27%
14%
59%
185
Mainline Protestant
17%
7%
76%
280
6%
3%
91%
45
None
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
7%
6%
87%
262
24%
11%
66%
336
16%
6%
78%
157
Infrequently
13%
7%
80%
191
Never
15%
14%
71%
44
19%
7%
74%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
33%
15%
51%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
21%
11%
68%
131
Active other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
No
Roman Catholic
Other
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
Unsure
TOTAL
3%
1%
95%
17
Other
12%
7%
80%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
34%
11%
55%
133
14%
6%
80%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
19%
13%
69%
179
10%
7%
83%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
30%
14%
56%
222
14%
7%
79%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
36%
11%
52%
166
Christians
21%
5%
74%
51
Christians
9%
23%
68%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
6%
9%
85%
39
Approve
3%
6%
92%
453
Unsure
9%
17%
74%
62
Disapprove
30%
10%
61%
487
Jobs
14%
6%
80%
135
Economy
15%
5%
80%
228
1%
8%
91%
99
Illegal immigration
26%
12%
62%
78
Foreign threats
23%
7%
71%
116
Deficit
21%
8%
71%
76
71%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Health care
Other
17%
12%
(cont.)
Page 341

May 3-6, 2015
MOVEMENT/C
RTEAMEM
Yes
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
31%
5%
64%
71
Reducing deficit
22%
5%
74%
126
Creating jobs
9%
5%
86%
203
Increase wages
2%
8%
90%
132
Healthcare costs
13%
14%
72%
98
6%
20%
74%
41
Higher education
10%
5%
86%
101
Regulations
50%
6%
44%
65
Combination
20%
14%
66%
141
9%
8%
83%
11
Unsure
33%
17%
50%
12
Views close to own
20%
6%
74%
352
13%
9%
78%
571
Both
24%
17%
59%
48
Unsure
12%
21%
67%
30
Very worried
26%
10%
64%
318
Somewhat worried
15%
8%
77%
405
Not too worried
7%
4%
89%
214
Not at all worried
5%
8%
None
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
No
Cutting taxes
Retirement
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Unsure
TOTAL
Combination
Unsure
87%
56
100%
7%
67%
27%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
10%
7%
83%
Unsure
14%
20%
67%
63
19%
8%
74%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
9%
7%
85%
510
Unsure
11%
19%
70%
85
Disapprove
27%
8%
65%
406
Very worried
29%
13%
57%
112
Somewhat worried
24%
11%
66%
283
Not too worried
13%
5%
81%
341
Not at all worried
6%
6%
88%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
No
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
81%
19%
Yes
19%
4%
77%
645
No
12%
16%
73%
356
Approve
6%
3%
91%
295
Unsure
14%
10%
76%
45
Disapprove
32%
5%
63%
306
(cont.)
Page 342

May 3-6, 2015
MOVEMENT/C
RTEAMEM
Yes
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
No
Yes
11%
4%
84%
628
No
25%
17%
59%
245
Not sure
23%
12%
65%
128
3%
97%
26
4 of 4
3 of 4
1%
99%
112
2 of 4
4%
5%
91%
221
1 of 4
11%
11%
78%
214
0 of 4
30%
11%
59%
427
5-7 of 7
45%
9%
46%
150
4 of 7
31%
7%
63%
96
3 of 7
21%
8%
70%
91
2 of 7
17%
6%
76%
87
1 of 7
9%
10%
81%
164
4%
8%
88%
413
16%
8%
76%
1001
0 of 7
TOTAL
Unsure
TOTAL
Page 343

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTY USUAL VOTE BEHAVIOR/C
RPARTY
Republican Ticket splitter
TOTAL
TOTAL
Democrat
45%
6%
49%
1001
Northeast
34%
4%
62%
195
Midwest
46%
6%
47%
181
South
48%
7%
45%
235
South Central
55%
7%
39%
96
Central Plains
45%
10%
45%
83
Mountain States
61%
3%
36%
70
West
36%
6%
58%
141
California
36%
7%
57%
89
Florida
45%
10%
46%
58
Texas
51%
6%
42%
71
New York
32%
8%
60%
56
Rest of country
46%
6%
48%
727
51%
6%
43%
217
44%
6%
51%
320
No Senate election
43%
6%
51%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
50%
7%
43%
405
36%
6%
58%
366
49%
5%
46%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
48%
7%
45%
241
Other
44%
6%
51%
760
Male
52%
7%
41%
480
Female
38%
6%
56%
521
Male / employed
54%
7%
40%
324
Male / not employed
49%
7%
44%
157
Female / employed
39%
4%
57%
281
37%
7%
56%
240
Not employed
31%
8%
62%
133
Employed
47%
5%
48%
605
Retired
48%
6%
46%
252
Refused
30%
25%
45%
11
18-34
33%
9%
57%
200
35-44
45%
6%
49%
280
45-64
46%
3%
51%
310
65 or over
53%
8%
38%
200
Unsure / refused
60%
19%
20%
10
18-44
40%
7%
53%
480
45-64
46%
3%
51%
310
65+
53%
8%
38%
200
Unsure / refused
60%
19%
20%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 344

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTY
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Male / under 55
51%
7%
41%
302
Male / 55+
53%
6%
41%
179
Female / under 55
33%
5%
62%
315
Female / 55+
46%
6%
48%
205
White
53%
6%
41%
751
5%
3%
92%
120
Hispanic / Latino
31%
10%
59%
90
Other
37%
15%
47%
40
45%
6%
49%
128
55%
6%
40%
623
6%
94%
24
6%
2%
92%
96
21%
20%
59%
41
40%
1%
59%
49

18-34
16%
6%
79%

35+
43%
17%
40%
32
White seniors
56%
7%
37%
255
Other
41%
6%
53%
746
White men
60%
5%
35%
368
White women
47%
6%
47%
382
Black men
11%
6%
83%
50
1%
99%
70
African American
millenials 18-34
voters 35+
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Black women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Hispanic men
34%
14%
52%
42
Hispanic women
29%
6%
65%
48
Republican
92%
4%
4%
390
Independent
40%
20%
40%
190
Democrat
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Democrat
3%
2%
95%
420
Male / GOP
91%
4%
5%
214
Female / GOP
93%
4%
3%
176
Male / DEM
4%
3%
93%
161
Female / DEM
2%
1%
97%
259
Male / IND
46%
19%
35%
105
Female / IND
33%
21%
46%
85
Under 55 / GOP
92%
4%
4%
223
55 & over / GOP
93%
4%
3%
168
Under 55 / DEM
3%
2%
95%
269
55 & over / DEM
1%
3%
96%
151
Under 55 / IND
36%
20%
44%
125
55 & over / IND
49%
19%
32%
65
(cont.)
Page 345

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTY
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Hard GOP
100%
Soft GOP
83%
17%
Ticket splitter
17%
59%
24%
64
10%
90%
84
100%
401
Soft DEM
360
Hard DEM
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
92
Conservative
71%
6%
24%
536
Moderate
37%
25%
38%
76
Liberal
10%
3%
86%
389
Very conservative
79%
4%
17%
187
66%
7%
27%
348
Moderate / liberal
15%
7%
78%
465
Republican
92%
4%
4%
390
Independent
40%
20%
40%
190
Conservative DEM
4%
4%
92%
103
Mod / lib DEM
2%
1%
96%
318
Liberal DEM
100%
335
100%
157
Independent
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
TOTAL
Democrat
61
100%
Mod / liberal GOP
100%
69
Conservative GOP
100%
379
Yes / strongly
85%
3%
11%
93
Yes
94%
2%
4%
68
No / unsure
36%
7%
57%
840
40%
24%
37%
53
41%
7%
51%
227
Some college
48%
7%
45%
219
College graduate
45%
3%
51%
503
54%
4%
42%
248
Male non-college
graduates
50%
10%
40%
232
37%
3%
60%
254
Female non-college
graduates
39%
8%
53%
266
White non-college
graduate
55%
9%
36%
349
graduate
17%
10%
73%
149
Others
45%
3%
51%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
32%
6%
61%
127
Non-union household
47%
6%
47%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
32%
8%
61%
215
Married
51%
5%
43%
607
No longer married
38%
7%
55%
179
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
(cont.)
Page 346

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTY
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Democrat
Dad
59%
7%
34%
171
Mom
32%
7%
61%
203
Married / children
48%
6%
46%
299
55%
5%
41%
308
Divorced / children
11%
10%
79%
22
37%
5%
58%
60
Single / children
31%
13%
56%
42
32%
6%
62%
173
Other / mixed
46%
7%
47%
97
Single women
23%
7%
70%
98
Married women
44%
5%
51%
304
35%
7%
58%
118
Single men
39%
8%
53%
117
Married men
58%
6%
35%
302
46%
6%
48%
61
White single men
54%
5%
41%
75
White single women
40%
7%
54%
46
White married men
64%
6%
31%
244
White married women
50%
5%
45%
243

men
49%
4%
46%
49

women
41%
8%
51%
93
Other
20%
7%
73%
250
Single mothers
30%
12%
58%
30
Married mothers
34%
5%
61%
150
No longer married
mothers
23%
9%
68%
23
Non-mothers
48%
6%
46%
798
Upper class
44%
4%
53%
73
Middle class
50%
4%
46%
696
Low income
28%
12%
59%
205
Working class
11%
89%
Refused
48%
17%
35%
20
Middle class whites
57%
4%
38%
551

Americans
4%
2%
93%
63
35%
9%
57%
57
35%
5%
61%
25
Other
33%
10%
57%
305
(cont.)
Page 347

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTY
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Democrat
Roman Catholic
48%
5%
46%
198
53%
6%
40%
185
Mainline Protestant
57%
5%
38%
280
Other
46%
54%
45
None
23%
8%
69%
262
62%
5%
34%
336
48%
8%
44%
157
Infrequently
40%
5%
55%
191
Never
37%
3%
60%
44
61%
4%
35%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
65%
4%
31%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
59%
6%
35%
131
Active other
70%
30%
17
Other
36%
7%
57%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
69%
7%
25%
133
46%
7%
47%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
53%
6%
41%
179
30%
6%
64%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
75%
7%
18%
222
22%
5%
73%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
85%
5%
10%
166
Christians
29%
5%
66%
51
Christians
45%
12%
43%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
13%
5%
82%
39
Approve
9%
3%
87%
453
Unsure
36%
18%
45%
62
Disapprove
79%
7%
14%
487
Jobs
28%
7%
66%
135
Economy
39%
4%
58%
228
Health care
23%
4%
73%
99
Illegal immigration
73%
4%
23%
78
Foreign threats
66%
5%
29%
116
Deficit
63%
3%
34%
76
46%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
44%
10%
(cont.)
Page 348

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTY
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Democrat
Cutting taxes
66%
2%
32%
71
Reducing deficit
72%
6%
22%
126
Creating jobs
34%
6%
60%
203
Increase wages
13%
2%
84%
132
Healthcare costs
50%
9%
41%
98
Retirement
39%
61%
41
Higher education
28%
9%
63%
101
Regulations
85%
1%
15%
65
Combination
46%
10%
44%
141
None
15%
25%
60%
11
Unsure
82%
6%
13%
12
Views close to own
46%
5%
49%
352
44%
5%
51%
571
Both
56%
8%
36%
48
Unsure
35%
29%
36%
30
Very worried
58%
7%
35%
318
Somewhat worried
47%
4%
49%
405
Not too worried
26%
6%
68%
214
Not at all worried
29%
14%
Combination
57%
56
100%
Unsure
30%
34%
36%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
27%
6%
67%
245
Unsure
34%
9%
57%
63
No
52%
6%
42%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
33%
5%
62%
510
Unsure
28%
7%
65%
85
Disapprove
63%
7%
30%
406
Very worried
60%
7%
33%
112
Somewhat worried
55%
5%
40%
283
Not too worried
44%
5%
51%
341
Not at all worried
28%
8%
64%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
100%
Unsure
40%
12%
49%
Yes
49%
5%
46%
645
No
37%
8%
54%
356
Approve
20%
5%
75%
295
Unsure
43%
10%
47%
45
Disapprove
77%
4%
18%
306
Yes
35%
6%
58%
628
No
65%
4%
31%
245
Not sure
53%
8%
39%
128
(cont.)
Page 349

May 3-6, 2015
RPARTY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
4 of 4
7%
3 of 4
2%
2 of 4
TOTAL
Democrat
93%
26
3%
95%
112
13%
5%
82%
221
1 of 4
28%
7%
65%
214
0 of 4
83%
7%
10%
427
5-7 of 7
96%
2%
2%
150
4 of 7
81%
5%
14%
96
3 of 7
74%
5%
21%
91
2 of 7
53%
14%
33%
87
1 of 7
36%
7%
58%
164
0 of 7
13%
6%
81%
413
45%
6%
49%
1001
Page 350

May 3-6, 2015
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
RUNION
Union
household
Non-union
household
13%
87%
1001
Northeast
20%
80%
195
Midwest
14%
86%
181
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
South
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
TOTAL
4%
96%
235
South Central
10%
90%
96
Central Plains
12%
88%
83
Mountain States
10%
90%
70
West
19%
81%
141
California
17%
83%
89
Florida
8%
92%
58
Texas
10%
90%
71
New York
25%
75%
56
Rest of country
12%
88%
727
7%
93%
217
11%
89%
320
No Senate election
17%
83%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
11%
89%
405
17%
83%
366
9%
91%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
7%
93%
241
Other
15%
85%
760
Male
11%
89%
480
Female
14%
86%
521
Male / employed
13%
87%
324
Male / not employed
8%
92%
157
Female / employed
18%
82%
281
9%
91%
240
Not employed
4%
96%
133
Employed
15%
85%
605
Retired
11%
89%
252
Refused
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
14%
86%
11
18-34
8%
92%
200
35-44
12%
88%
280
45-64
18%
82%
310
65 or over
10%
90%
200
Unsure / refused
15%
85%
10
(cont.)
Page 351

May 3-6, 2015
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
RUNION
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
Union
household
Non-union
household
18-44
11%
89%
480
45-64
18%
82%
310
65+
10%
90%
200
Unsure / refused
15%
85%
10
Male / under 55
10%
90%
302
Male / 55+
13%
87%
179
Female / under 55
12%
88%
315
Female / 55+
16%
84%
205
White
13%
87%
751
13%
87%
120
Hispanic / Latino
17%
83%
90
Other
7%
93%
40
9%
91%
128
13%
87%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
10%
90%
24

voters 35+
13%
87%
96
7%
93%
41
25%
75%
49
100%
9%
91%
32
White seniors
11%
89%
255
Other
13%
87%
746
White men
12%
88%
368
White women
13%
87%
382
9%
91%
50
Black women
15%
85%
70
Hispanic men

18-34
35+
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Black men
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
TOTAL
9%
91%
42
Hispanic women
23%
77%
48
Republican
10%
90%
390
Independent
12%
88%
190
Democrat
16%
84%
420
Male / GOP
10%
90%
214
9%
91%
176
Male / DEM
11%
89%
161
Female / DEM
19%
81%
259
Male / IND
14%
86%
105
9%
91%
85
Female / GOP
Female / IND
(cont.)
Page 352

May 3-6, 2015
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
RUNION
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
Union
household
Non-union
household
Under 55 / GOP
8%
92%
223
55 & over / GOP
12%
88%
168
Under 55 / DEM
15%
85%
269
55 & over / DEM
18%
82%
151
Under 55 / IND
10%
90%
125
55 & over / IND
14%
86%
65
9%
91%
448
Ticket splitter
13%
87%
61
Democrat
16%
84%
492
Hard GOP
9%
91%
360
Soft GOP
10%
90%
92
9%
91%
64
Soft DEM
15%
85%
84
Hard DEM
16%
84%
401
9%
91%
536
Moderate
12%
88%
76
Liberal
17%
83%
389
Republican
Ticket splitter
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
Conservative
Very conservative
9%
91%
187
10%
90%
348
Moderate / liberal
16%
84%
465
Republican
10%
90%
390
Independent
12%
88%
190
Conservative DEM
10%
90%
103
Mod / lib DEM
18%
82%
318
Liberal DEM
19%
81%
335
10%
90%
157
Independent
61
13%
87%
Mod / liberal GOP
8%
92%
69
Conservative GOP
9%
91%
379
13%
87%
93
9%
91%
68
Yes / strongly
Yes
No / unsure
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
TOTAL
13%
87%
840
3%
97%
53
10%
90%
227
Some college
12%
88%
219
College graduate
15%
85%
503
12%
88%
248
Male non-college
graduates
11%
89%
232
18%
82%
254
Female non-college
graduates
10%
90%
266
(cont.)
Page 353

May 3-6, 2015
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
RUNION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Union
household
Non-union
household
9%
91%
349
graduate
14%
86%
149
Others
15%
85%
503
Single
11%
89%
215
Married
15%
85%
607
9%
91%
179
Dad
17%
83%
171
Mom
14%
86%
203
Married / children
17%
83%
299
12%
88%
308
3%
97%
22
14%
86%
60
Single / children
White non-college
graduate
No longer married
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
TOTAL
16%
84%
42
9%
91%
173
Other / mixed
7%
93%
97
Single women
16%
84%
98
Married women
15%
85%
304
8%
92%
118
Single men
6%
94%
117
Married men
14%
86%
302
10%
90%
61
75
White single men
9%
91%
White single women
18%
82%
46
White married men
14%
86%
244
White married women
15%
85%
243

men
7%
93%
49

women
5%
95%
93
Other
13%
87%
250
Single mothers
16%
84%
30
Married mothers
16%
84%
150
No longer married
mothers
3%
97%
23
Non-mothers
12%
88%
798
Upper class
10%
90%
73
Middle class
15%
85%
696
Low income
7%
93%
205
Working class
Refused
17%
100%
83%
20
(cont.)
Page 354

May 3-6, 2015
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
RUNION
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Union
household
Non-union
household
Middle class whites
15%
85%
551

Americans
17%
83%
63
15%
85%
57
6%
94%
25
Other
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
8%
92%
305
23%
77%
198
7%
93%
185
Mainline Protestant
9%
91%
280
16%
84%
45
Roman Catholic
Other
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
None
13%
87%
262
11%
89%
336
17%
83%
157
Infrequently
13%
87%
191
Never
12%
88%
44
19%
81%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
6%
94%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
9%
91%
131
11%
89%
17
Active other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Other
14%
86%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
11%
89%
133
11%
89%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
6%
94%
179
18%
82%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
9%
91%
222
7%
93%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
9%
91%
166
Christians
5%
95%
51
Christians
8%
92%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
9%
91%
39
Approve
16%
84%
453
Unsure
11%
89%
62
Disapprove
10%
90%
487
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
(cont.)
Page 355

May 3-6, 2015
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
RUNION
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Union
household
Non-union
household
17%
83%
135
Economy
9%
91%
228
Health care
7%
93%
99
Illegal immigration
Jobs
9%
91%
78
Foreign threats
16%
84%
116
Deficit
10%
90%
76
Other
15%
85%
268
Cutting taxes
19%
81%
71
Reducing deficit
11%
89%
126
Creating jobs
11%
89%
203
Increase wages
15%
85%
132
Healthcare costs
9%
91%
98
Retirement
15%
85%
41
Higher education
12%
88%
101
Regulations
10%
90%
65
Combination
13%
87%
141
None
26%
74%
11
Unsure
33%
67%
12
Views close to own
16%
84%
352
11%
89%
571
Both
16%
84%
48
Unsure
10%
90%
30
Very worried
14%
86%
318
Somewhat worried
12%
88%
405
Not too worried
13%
87%
214
Not at all worried
9%
91%
56
100%
Combination
Unsure
100%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
12%
88%
245
Unsure
20%
80%
63
No
12%
88%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
15%
85%
510
Unsure
18%
82%
85
Disapprove
9%
91%
406
Very worried
14%
86%
112
Somewhat worried
14%
86%
283
Not too worried
13%
87%
341
Not at all worried
11%
89%
258
100%
94%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
6%
(cont.)
Page 356

May 3-6, 2015
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
RUNION
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Union
household
Non-union
household
Yes
12%
88%
645
No
13%
87%
356
Approve
15%
85%
295
Unsure
14%
86%
45
Disapprove
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
9%
91%
306
Yes
14%
86%
628
No
10%
90%
245
Not sure
12%
88%
128
4 of 4
10%
90%
26
3 of 4
22%
78%
112
2 of 4
14%
86%
221
1 of 4
14%
86%
214
0 of 4
9%
91%
427
5-7 of 7
10%
90%
150
4 of 7
14%
86%
96
3 of 7
9%
91%
91
2 of 7
8%
92%
87
1 of 7
11%
89%
164
0 of 7
16%
84%
413
13%
87%
1001
Page 357

May 3-6, 2015
RMARITAL MARITAL STATUS/C
RMARITAL
Single
TOTAL
Married
TOTAL
No longer
married
22%
61%
18%
1001
Northeast
19%
64%
16%
195
Midwest
27%
52%
21%
181
South
16%
64%
20%
235
South Central
26%
56%
19%
96
Central Plains
21%
63%
16%
83
Mountain States
18%
65%
18%
70
West
26%
60%
14%
141
California
21%
60%
18%
89
Florida
15%
64%
20%
58
Texas
30%
54%
16%
71
New York
19%
66%
15%
56
Rest of country
21%
60%
18%
727
24%
56%
20%
217
22%
62%
17%
320
No Senate election
20%
62%
18%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
21%
60%
20%
405
23%
61%
16%
366
20%
62%
18%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
18%
64%
18%
241
Other
23%
59%
18%
760
Male
24%
63%
13%
480
Female
19%
58%
23%
521
Male / employed
26%
68%
6%
324
Male / not employed
21%
52%
27%
157
Female / employed
22%
66%
12%
281
15%
50%
35%
240
Not employed
30%
57%
13%
133
Employed
24%
67%
9%
605
Retired
9%
49%
42%
252
Refused
40%
32%
29%
11
18-34
51%
46%
3%
200
35-44
19%
71%
10%
280
45-64
15%
65%
19%
310
6%
53%
41%
200
Unsure / refused
12%
77%
11%
10
18-44
32%
61%
7%
480
45-64
15%
65%
19%
310
6%
53%
41%
200
12%
77%
11%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
65 or over
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
65+
Unsure / refused
(cont.)
Page 358

May 3-6, 2015
RMARITAL
Single
RR96FL AGE / SEX
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
No longer
married
Male / under 55
33%
61%
6%
302
Male / 55+
10%
67%
23%
179
Female / under 55
25%
62%
12%
315
Female / 55+
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
Married
9%
52%
39%
205
White
16%
65%
19%
751
45%
34%
21%
120
Hispanic / Latino
33%
61%
6%
90
Other
25%
59%
16%
40
43%
54%
2%
128
11%
67%
22%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
80%
20%

voters 35+
37%
38%
26%
96
54%
42%
4%
41
15%
77%
8%
49

18-34
66%
24%
10%

35+
15%
68%
17%
32
7%
57%
35%
255
Other
26%
62%
12%
746
White men
20%
66%
13%
368
White women
12%
64%
24%
382
Black men
46%
40%
14%
50
Black women
45%
29%
26%
70
Hispanic men
37%
60%
3%
42
Hispanic women
30%
61%
9%
48
Republican
14%
69%
17%
390
Independent
29%
57%
14%
190
Democrat
25%
55%
21%
420
Male / GOP
17%
71%
12%
214
Female / GOP
11%
66%
23%
176
Male / DEM
31%
54%
15%
161
Female / DEM
21%
55%
24%
259
Male / IND
31%
59%
10%
105
Female / IND
28%
54%
18%
85
Under 55 / GOP
22%
72%
6%
223
55 & over / GOP
3%
65%
31%
168
Under 55 / DEM
30%
56%
14%
269
55 & over / DEM
15%
51%
33%
151
Under 55 / IND
39%
55%
6%
125
55 & over / IND
11%
61%
28%
65
White seniors
24
(cont.)
Page 359

May 3-6, 2015
RMARITAL
Single
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Married
TOTAL
No longer
married
Republican
15%
69%
15%
448
Ticket splitter
27%
53%
20%
61
Democrat
27%
54%
20%
492
Hard GOP
14%
69%
17%
360
Soft GOP
18%
70%
12%
92
Ticket splitter
26%
61%
12%
64
Soft DEM
37%
43%
20%
84
Hard DEM
25%
55%
21%
401
Conservative
18%
63%
19%
536
Moderate
25%
57%
19%
76
Liberal
26%
58%
16%
389
Very conservative
15%
63%
22%
187
20%
63%
17%
348
Moderate / liberal
25%
58%
17%
465
Republican
14%
69%
17%
390
Independent
29%
57%
14%
190
Conservative DEM
22%
45%
34%
103
Mod / lib DEM
26%
58%
16%
318
Liberal DEM
26%
57%
16%
335
27%
45%
28%
157
Independent
27%
53%
20%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
19%
65%
15%
69
Conservative GOP
15%
70%
15%
379
Yes / strongly
15%
71%
14%
93
Yes
18%
66%
16%
68
No / unsure
22%
59%
18%
840
38%
36%
26%
53
19%
61%
20%
227
Some college
29%
47%
24%
219
College graduate
18%
69%
13%
503
19%
72%
10%
248
Male non-college
graduates
31%
54%
16%
232
17%
66%
16%
254
Female non-college
graduates
20%
51%
29%
266
White non-college
graduate
17%
59%
24%
349
graduate
43%
37%
20%
149
Others
18%
69%
13%
503
Union household
18%
69%
13%
127
Non-union household
22%
59%
19%
874
(cont.)
Page 360

May 3-6, 2015
RMARITAL
Single
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Married
Dad
7%
87%
5%
171
Mom
15%
74%
12%
203
Married / children
100%
299
100%
308
Divorced / children
100%
22
100%
60
Single / children
100%
42
100%
173
Other / mixed
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
Single women
100%
Married women
Single men
100%
100%
61
100%
75
White single women
100%
46
White married men
100%
244
White married women
100%
243

men
100%
49

women
100%
93
15%
250
Single mothers
38%
48%
30
100%
Married mothers
150
100%
No longer married
mothers
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
302
100%
White single men
Other
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
118
117
100%
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
304
100%
Married men
97
98
100%
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
TOTAL
No longer
married
100%
23
798
Non-mothers
23%
57%
20%
Upper class
13%
77%
10%
73
Middle class
18%
67%
15%
696
Low income
34%
35%
31%
205
Working class
32%
40%
27%
Refused
25%
54%
22%
20
Middle class whites
14%
70%
16%
551

Americans
43%
44%
13%
63
28%
69%
3%
57
26%
61%
13%
25
Other
28%
46%
25%
305
(cont.)
Page 361

May 3-6, 2015
RMARITAL
Single
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
23%
64%
14%
198
19%
58%
23%
185
Mainline Protestant
18%
62%
21%
280
Other
14%
81%
4%
45
None
27%
56%
17%
262
17%
66%
17%
336
17%
69%
15%
157
Infrequently
26%
53%
21%
191
Never
30%
49%
21%
44
18%
69%
12%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
14%
66%
20%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
17%
63%
21%
131
Active other
25%
73%
1%
17
Other
24%
58%
18%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
17%
73%
10%
133
27%
59%
14%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
13%
58%
29%
179
22%
59%
19%
342
9%
70%
21%
222
29%
50%
21%
90
8%
71%
21%
166
Christians
26%
53%
22%
51
Christians
11%
68%
21%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
34%
48%
19%
39
Approve
30%
50%
20%
453
Unsure
30%
57%
13%
62
Disapprove
12%
71%
17%
487
Jobs
26%
56%
17%
135
Economy
29%
57%
14%
228
Health care
17%
62%
20%
99
Illegal immigration
13%
65%
21%
78
Foreign threats
15%
68%
17%
116
Deficit
21%
64%
15%
76
21%
268
White Evangelical
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
TOTAL
No longer
married
Roman Catholic
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
Married
Other
20%
59%
(cont.)
Page 362

May 3-6, 2015
RMARITAL
Single
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
Married
TOTAL
No longer
married
Cutting taxes
13%
72%
15%
71
Reducing deficit
17%
64%
20%
126
Creating jobs
23%
61%
16%
203
Increase wages
25%
56%
19%
132
Healthcare costs
10%
66%
24%
98
Retirement
23%
56%
21%
41
Higher education
43%
39%
18%
101
Regulations
17%
71%
11%
65
Combination
17%
65%
18%
141
None
57%
31%
12%
11
Unsure
11%
80%
9%
12
Views close to own
18%
70%
12%
352
24%
55%
21%
571
Both
17%
69%
13%
48
Unsure
19%
47%
33%
30
Very worried
15%
64%
21%
318
Somewhat worried
24%
60%
16%
405
Not too worried
23%
62%
15%
214
28%
45%
27%
56
Not at all worried

Combination
100%
Unsure
57%
36%
7%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
31%
52%
17%
245
Unsure
26%
62%
12%
63
No
18%
63%
19%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
22%
62%
16%
510
Unsure
25%
52%
22%
85
Disapprove
21%
60%
19%
406
Very worried
19%
61%
20%
112
Somewhat worried
18%
59%
23%
283
Not too worried
19%
66%
15%
341
Not at all worried
29%
55%
16%
258
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
36%
43%
21%
Yes
20%
64%
16%
645
No
24%
55%
21%
356
Approve
28%
56%
15%
295
8%
83%
9%
45
14%
68%
18%
306
Unsure
Disapprove
(cont.)
Page 363

May 3-6, 2015
RMARITAL
Single
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Married
TOTAL
No longer
married
Yes
25%
59%
16%
628
No
14%
66%
20%
245
Not sure
18%
59%
23%
128
4 of 4
22%
65%
13%
26
3 of 4
21%
61%
18%
112
2 of 4
35%
49%
16%
221
1 of 4
21%
54%
25%
214
0 of 4
15%
70%
16%
427
5-7 of 7
9%
74%
16%
150
4 of 7
9%
77%
14%
96
3 of 7
15%
69%
16%
91
2 of 7
21%
58%
22%
87
1 of 7
26%
55%
19%
164
0 of 7
29%
53%
18%
413
22%
61%
18%
1001
Page 364

May 3-6, 2015
RCHILD HAVE CHILDREN
LIVING AT HOME/C
RCHILD
Yes
TOTAL
TOTAL
No
37%
63%
1001
Northeast
38%
62%
195
Midwest
37%
63%
181
South
36%
64%
235
South Central
39%
61%
96
Central Plains
42%
58%
83
Mountain States
32%
68%
70
West
37%
63%
141
California
36%
64%
89
Florida
29%
71%
58
Texas
39%
61%
71
New York
39%
61%
56
Rest of country
38%
62%
727
40%
60%
217
36%
64%
320
No Senate election
37%
63%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
39%
61%
405
35%
65%
366
38%
62%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
35%
65%
241
Other
38%
62%
760
Male
36%
64%
480
Female
39%
61%
521
Male / employed
49%
51%
324
Male / not employed
9%
91%
157
Female / employed
52%
48%
281
23%
77%
240
Not employed
41%
59%
133
Employed
50%
50%
605
Retired
5%
95%
252
Refused
15%
85%
11
18-34
46%
54%
200
35-44
71%
29%
280
45-64
25%
75%
310
1%
99%
200
Unsure / refused
13%
87%
10
18-44
61%
39%
480
45-64
25%
75%
310
1%
99%
200
13%
87%
10
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
65 or over
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
65+
Unsure / refused
(cont.)
Page 365

May 3-6, 2015
LIVING AT HOME/C
RCHILD
Yes
RR96FL AGE / SEX
Male / under 55
Male / 55+
Female / under 55
Female / 55+
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
No
52%
48%
302
8%
92%
179
62%
38%
315
4%
96%
205
White
37%
63%
751
31%
69%
120
Hispanic / Latino
41%
59%
90
Other
52%
48%
40
48%
52%
128
35%
65%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
36%
64%
24

voters 35+
30%
70%
96
41%
59%
41
41%
59%
49

18-34
64%
36%

35+
49%
51%
32
2%
98%
255
Other
49%
51%
746
White men
37%
63%
368
White women
37%
63%
382
Black men
22%
78%
50
Black women
38%
62%
70
Hispanic men
28%
72%
42
Hispanic women
53%
47%
48
Republican
39%
61%
390
Independent
33%
67%
190
Democrat
38%
62%
420
Male / GOP
44%
56%
214
Female / GOP
32%
68%
176
Male / DEM
26%
74%
161
Female / DEM
46%
54%
259
Male / IND
32%
68%
105
Female / IND
34%
66%
85
Under 55 / GOP
64%
36%
223
55 & over / GOP
6%
94%
168
Under 55 / DEM
56%
44%
269
55 & over / DEM
7%
93%
151
Under 55 / IND
47%
53%
125
55 & over / IND
6%
94%
65
White seniors
(cont.)
Page 366

May 3-6, 2015
LIVING AT HOME/C
RCHILD
Yes
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
No
Republican
37%
63%
448
Ticket splitter
42%
58%
61
Democrat
37%
63%
492
Hard GOP
38%
62%
360
Soft GOP
36%
64%
92
Ticket splitter
41%
59%
64
Soft DEM
30%
70%
84
Hard DEM
38%
62%
401
Conservative
36%
64%
536
Moderate
44%
56%
76
Liberal
38%
62%
389
Very conservative
32%
68%
187
38%
62%
348
Moderate / liberal
39%
61%
465
Republican
39%
61%
390
Independent
33%
67%
190
Conservative DEM
34%
66%
103
Mod / lib DEM
39%
61%
318
Liberal DEM
38%
62%
335
35%
65%
157
Independent
42%
58%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
44%
56%
69
Conservative GOP
36%
64%
379
Yes / strongly
32%
68%
93
Yes
35%
65%
68
No / unsure
38%
62%
840
28%
72%
53
35%
65%
227
Some college
28%
72%
219
College graduate
44%
56%
503
43%
57%
248
Male non-college
graduates
27%
73%
232
44%
56%
254
Female non-college
graduates
34%
66%
266
White non-college
graduate
31%
69%
349
graduate
30%
70%
149
Others
44%
56%
503
Union household
46%
54%
127
Non-union household
36%
64%
874
(cont.)
Page 367

May 3-6, 2015
LIVING AT HOME/C
RCHILD
Yes
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
20%
80%
215
Married
49%
51%
607
No longer married
18%
82%
179
Dad
100%
171
Mom
100%
203
Married / children
100%
299
100%
Single / children
100%
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
60
42
100%
308
22
100%
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
No
Single
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
TOTAL
100%
173
Other / mixed
11%
89%
97
Single women
30%
70%
98
Married women
49%
51%
304
20%
80%
118
Single men
11%
89%
117
Married men
49%
51%
302
15%
85%
61
White single men
11%
89%
75
White single women
24%
76%
46
White married men
51%
49%
244
White married women
44%
56%
243

men
13%
87%
49

women
23%
77%
93
Other
38%
62%
250
Single mothers
100%
30
Married mothers
100%
150
No longer married
mothers
100%
23
Non-mothers
21%
79%
798
Upper class
38%
62%
73
Middle class
40%
60%
696
Low income
29%
71%
205
Working class
35%
65%
Refused
17%
83%
20
Middle class whites
39%
61%
551

Americans
44%
56%
63
45%
55%
57
56%
44%
25
Other
30%
70%
305
(cont.)
Page 368

May 3-6, 2015
LIVING AT HOME/C
RCHILD
Yes
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
No
Roman Catholic
37%
63%
198
36%
64%
185
Mainline Protestant
34%
66%
280
Other
64%
36%
45
None
41%
59%
262
36%
64%
336
41%
59%
157
Infrequently
40%
60%
191
Never
15%
85%
44
36%
64%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
34%
66%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
35%
65%
131
Active other
65%
35%
17
Other
38%
62%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
36%
64%
133
35%
65%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
29%
71%
179
44%
56%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
31%
69%
222
35%
65%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
29%
71%
166
Christians
39%
61%
51
Christians
38%
62%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
30%
70%
39
Approve
35%
65%
453
Unsure
43%
57%
62
Disapprove
39%
61%
487
Jobs
31%
69%
135
Economy
38%
62%
228
Health care
44%
56%
99
Illegal immigration
35%
65%
78
Foreign threats
41%
59%
116
Deficit
41%
59%
76
63%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
37%
(cont.)
Page 369

May 3-6, 2015
LIVING AT HOME/C
RCHILD
Yes
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
No
Cutting taxes
47%
53%
71
Reducing deficit
35%
65%
126
Creating jobs
34%
66%
203
Increase wages
41%
59%
132
Healthcare costs
34%
66%
98
Retirement
45%
55%
41
Higher education
29%
71%
101
Regulations
48%
52%
65
Combination
35%
65%
141
None
52%
48%
11
Unsure
48%
52%
12
Views close to own
44%
56%
352
34%
66%
571
Both
32%
68%
48
Unsure
24%
76%
30
Very worried
39%
61%
318
Somewhat worried
38%
62%
405
Not too worried
37%
63%
214
Not at all worried
22%
Combination
78%
56
100%
Unsure
33%
67%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
33%
67%
245
Unsure
50%
50%
63
No
38%
62%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
37%
63%
510
Unsure
47%
53%
85
Disapprove
35%
65%
406
Very worried
29%
71%
112
Somewhat worried
33%
67%
283
Not too worried
42%
58%
341
Not at all worried
39%
61%
258
100%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
Unsure
43%
57%
Yes
34%
66%
645
No
43%
57%
356
Approve
32%
68%
295
Unsure
44%
56%
45
Disapprove
35%
65%
306
(cont.)
Page 370

May 3-6, 2015
LIVING AT HOME/C
RCHILD
Yes
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
No
Yes
40%
60%
628
No
34%
66%
245
Not sure
28%
72%
128
4 of 4
20%
80%
26
3 of 4
31%
69%
112
2 of 4
40%
60%
221
1 of 4
41%
59%
214
0 of 4
37%
63%
427
5-7 of 7
35%
65%
150
4 of 7
45%
55%
96
3 of 7
45%
55%
91
2 of 7
25%
75%
87
1 of 7
42%
58%
164
0 of 7
36%
64%
413
37%
63%
1001
Page 371

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOM RESPONDENT'S CHURCH/C
RDENOM
Roman
Catholic
Mainline
Protestant
20%
19%
29%
5%
27%
970
Northeast
24%
10%
25%
7%
34%
191
Midwest
20%
13%
34%
2%
31%
173
South
13%
39%
29%
3%
17%
226
South Central
22%
29%
31%
1%
16%
92
Central Plains
27%
7%
38%
2%
26%
82
Mountain States
22%
12%
20%
18%
28%
68
West
21%
11%
25%
5%
37%
137
California
24%
13%
28%
5%
30%
87
Florida
27%
22%
24%
6%
21%
52
Texas
16%
32%
33%
1%
18%
68
New York
25%
2%
16%
12%
45%
56
Rest of country
20%
20%
30%
4%
27%
708
10%
38%
32%
2%
18%
212
24%
18%
29%
4%
25%
308
No Senate election
23%
11%
27%
6%
33%
450
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
19%
25%
28%
3%
24%
388
23%
11%
31%
4%
31%
357
19%
22%
26%
8%
26%
225
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
24%
23%
28%
3%
22%
232
Other
19%
18%
29%
5%
29%
738
Male
19%
18%
28%
5%
30%
465
Female
22%
20%
29%
4%
24%
505
Male / employed
19%
17%
28%
6%
30%
315
Male / not employed
17%
19%
28%
4%
31%
151
Female / employed
25%
14%
30%
5%
26%
271
18%
28%
29%
4%
21%
234
Not employed
13%
17%
26%
7%
37%
130
Employed
22%
16%
29%
5%
28%
586
Retired
20%
29%
31%
2%
18%
245
Refused
28%
16%
6%
50%
10
18-34
21%
14%
23%
7%
35%
198
35-44
19%
13%
30%
4%
34%
272
45-64
19%
25%
29%
4%
23%
298
65 or over
23%
24%
34%
4%
16%
195
Unsure / refused
35%
8%
40%
2%
15%
18-44
20%
14%
27%
5%
34%
470
45-64
19%
25%
29%
4%
23%
298
65+
23%
24%
34%
4%
16%
195
Unsure / refused
35%
8%
40%
2%
15%
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Other
TOTAL
Baptist /
Evangelical
None
(cont.)
Page 372

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOM
Roman
Catholic
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Other
TOTAL
None
18%
17%
24%
6%
35%
297
Male / 55+
20%
19%
36%
4%
22%
168
Female / under 55
22%
15%
29%
5%
29%
306
Female / 55+
23%
28%
30%
3%
16%
199
White
21%
17%
31%
5%
27%
731
5%
42%
28%
25%
117
Hispanic / Latino
39%
9%
15%
7%
30%
88
Other
20%
19%
31%
5%
25%
34
18%
8%
24%
8%
41%
126
21%
18%
32%
4%
24%
605
African American
millenials 18-34
10%
49%
30%
11%
24
3%
40%
28%
29%
93
39%
7%
13%
9%
33%
41
39%
11%
17%
6%
27%
47

18-34
15%
30%
36%
10%
9%

35+
21%
16%
30%
3%
29%
27
White seniors
22%
22%
34%
4%
19%
245
Other
20%
18%
27%
5%
30%
726
White men
20%
15%
30%
5%
30%
360
White women
22%
18%
31%
5%
24%
371
47%
25%
28%
49
38%
31%
23%
68
Black men
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
Mainline
Protestant
Male / under 55

voters 35+
WHITE SENIORS
Baptist /
Evangelical
Black women
8%
Hispanic men
32%
7%
16%
11%
34%
40
Hispanic women
45%
11%
14%
4%
27%
48
Republican
23%
23%
36%
5%
14%
378
Independent
16%
20%
29%
3%
32%
183
Democrat
20%
16%
23%
5%
37%
410
Male / GOP
22%
21%
34%
5%
18%
210
Female / GOP
24%
24%
38%
5%
8%
167
Male / DEM
15%
12%
22%
6%
45%
154
Female / DEM
23%
18%
23%
4%
32%
256
Male / IND
17%
20%
27%
4%
33%
101
Female / IND
16%
20%
30%
1%
32%
82
Under 55 / GOP
22%
20%
32%
8%
18%
215
55 & over / GOP
25%
26%
40%
1%
8%
163
Under 55 / DEM
21%
12%
22%
5%
40%
266
55 & over / DEM
17%
22%
24%
6%
31%
144
Under 55 / IND
14%
19%
27%
2%
38%
122
55 & over / IND
22%
20%
32%
6%
21%
61
(cont.)
Page 373

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOM
Roman
Catholic
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Baptist /
Evangelical
Mainline
Protestant
Republican
22%
23%
37%
Ticket splitter
19%
20%
26%
Democrat
19%
16%
22%
Hard GOP
22%
24%
Soft GOP
20%
Ticket splitter
24%
Soft DEM
Other
TOTAL
None
14%
435
35%
57
5%
38%
478
36%
5%
13%
349
19%
36%
2%
22%
90
18%
23%
35%
58
17%
14%
27%
4%
38%
83
Hard DEM
19%
16%
22%
5%
38%
391
Conservative
22%
25%
34%
5%
15%
518
Moderate
19%
22%
24%
1%
35%
74
Liberal
19%
10%
23%
6%
42%
378
Very conservative
18%
29%
38%
3%
11%
180
23%
23%
31%
5%
18%
339
Moderate / liberal
19%
12%
23%
5%
41%
452
Republican
23%
23%
36%
5%
14%
378
Independent
16%
20%
29%
3%
32%
183
Conservative DEM
21%
27%
24%
3%
25%
101
Mod / lib DEM
19%
12%
22%
6%
41%
309
Liberal DEM
20%
9%
20%
6%
44%
325
18%
29%
26%
2%
25%
153
Independent
19%
20%
26%
35%
57
Mod / liberal GOP
18%
11%
39%
0%
32%
69
Conservative GOP
23%
25%
36%
6%
11%
366
Yes / strongly
19%
35%
33%
3%
10%
91
Yes
27%
29%
29%
16%
65
No / unsure
20%
17%
28%
5%
30%
815
15%
28%
24%
10%
23%
51
17%
24%
27%
4%
28%
221
Some college
17%
21%
29%
2%
30%
210
College graduate
24%
15%
30%
5%
26%
488
21%
16%
27%
6%
30%
241
Male non-college
graduates
16%
20%
30%
4%
31%
224
26%
15%
33%
5%
22%
247
Female non-college
graduates
18%
26%
26%
4%
26%
258
White non-college
graduate
15%
20%
30%
4%
31%
339
graduate
22%
30%
22%
3%
23%
143
Others
24%
15%
30%
5%
26%
488
Union household
37%
10%
20%
6%
27%
124
Non-union household
18%
20%
30%
4%
27%
846
5%
(cont.)
Page 374

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOM
Roman
Catholic
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Mainline
Protestant
Other
TOTAL
None
Single
22%
17%
24%
3%
34%
207
Married
21%
18%
29%
6%
25%
590
No longer married
16%
24%
33%
1%
26%
174
Dad
19%
19%
24%
9%
29%
170
Mom
21%
17%
27%
7%
29%
201
Married / children
22%
17%
27%
9%
26%
299
21%
20%
32%
4%
24%
291
Divorced / children
10%
14%
19%
3%
54%
22
16%
18%
42%
1%
24%
60
8%
26%
22%
4%
39%
42
25%
14%
25%
3%
33%
164
Other / mixed
17%
31%
31%
1%
20%
92
Single women
24%
19%
25%
4%
28%
94
Married women
24%
17%
30%
5%
24%
295
17%
29%
32%
1%
21%
116
Single men
20%
15%
24%
2%
39%
113
Married men
19%
20%
29%
7%
26%
295
14%
14%
35%
1%
36%
58
White single men
24%
8%
26%
2%
40%
73
White single women
20%
13%
29%
8%
30%
44
White married men
20%
18%
30%
7%
26%
239
White married women
23%
16%
32%
6%
23%
236

men
14%
13%
33%
1%
39%
49

women
19%
26%
30%
1%
23%
91
Other
19%
27%
24%
3%
27%
239
Single mothers
7%
35%
20%
6%
31%
30
Married mothers
23%
12%
31%
7%
26%
150
No longer married
mothers
23%
21%
12%
3%
41%
21
Non-mothers
20%
20%
29%
4%
27%
769
Upper class
21%
11%
34%
10%
23%
71
Middle class
22%
19%
28%
5%
26%
673
Low income
14%
22%
29%
3%
31%
201
Working class
22%
11%
11%
57%
Refused
17%
15%
40%
28%
17
Middle class whites
22%
16%
30%
26%
534

Americans
7%
54%
17%
22%
61
39%
12%
18%
4%
26%
56
22%
14%
31%
5%
28%
22
Other
16%
19%
31%
5%
30%
297
Single / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
Baptist /
Evangelical
5%
(cont.)
Page 375

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOM
Roman
Catholic
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
Baptist /
Evangelical
Mainline
Protestant
24%
32%
39%
5%
334
27%
23%
44%
6%
156
Infrequently
38%
18%
33%
10%
1%
191
Never
10%
21%
36%
1%
31%
43
79
100%
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
100%
106
100%
Active other
Other
23%
4%
8%
45%
47%
1%
23%
7%
21%
7%
Female born again /

evangelicals
10%
43%
46%
2%
29%
8%
20%
6%
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
17
100%
12%
White Evangelical
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
131
19%
Male born again /

evangelicals
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
TOTAL
None
Active Mainline
Protestants
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Other
41%
637
133
42%
333
177
37%
327
8%
42%
48%
2%
222
11%
46%
42%
0%
88
White conservative
Christians
8%
46%
46%
Christians
4%
53%
42%
1%
51
Christians
8%
32%
54%
6%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
20%
37%
43%
Approve
19%
14%
23%
5%
38%
439
Unsure
25%
21%
25%
0%
29%
58
Disapprove
21%
24%
35%
5%
16%
473
Jobs
22%
13%
29%
5%
32%
134
Economy
16%
15%
28%
5%
35%
222
Health care
22%
15%
29%
3%
31%
98
Illegal immigration
29%
21%
30%
19%
76
Foreign threats
25%
25%
34%
4%
12%
112
Deficit
25%
16%
37%
3%
19%
74
27%
254
Other
17%
25%
24%
166
37
6%
(cont.)
Page 376

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOM
Roman
Catholic
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Baptist /
Evangelical
Mainline
Protestant
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
29%
16%
32%
6%
17%
70
Reducing deficit
17%
18%
36%
6%
24%
123
Creating jobs
25%
19%
29%
3%
23%
198
Increase wages
15%
16%
21%
7%
41%
126
Healthcare costs
20%
14%
40%
1%
25%
96
Retirement
20%
24%
29%
10%
17%
37
Higher education
20%
20%
19%
2%
39%
101
Regulations
22%
21%
37%
2%
18%
62
Combination
18%
27%
25%
6%
24%
136
9%
14%
78%
10
Unsure
23%
24%
29%
1%
23%
11
Views close to own
20%
18%
26%
6%
29%
342
21%
19%
31%
3%
25%
555
Both
19%
21%
27%
3%
31%
44
Unsure
17%
23%
14%
10%
35%
28
Very worried
20%
24%
28%
5%
24%
310
Somewhat worried
20%
21%
29%
6%
24%
395
Not too worried
22%
10%
30%
3%
36%
203
Not at all worried
21%
11%
30%
3%
35%
53
Combination
58%
42%
5%
28%
233
Unsure
34%
61%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
24%
15%
27%
Unsure
11%
25%
26%
No
20%
20%
30%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
21%
17%
27%
Unsure
23%
20%
Disapprove
19%
Very worried
Somewhat worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
6%
38%
61
4%
26%
676
4%
30%
491
19%
6%
32%
82
21%
33%
5%
23%
397
26%
25%
27%
5%
18%
108
24%
25%
28%
4%
19%
273
Not too worried
20%
17%
33%
5%
26%
334
Not at all worried
16%
12%
24%
6%
42%
247
Combination
100%
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
None
Cutting taxes
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Other
42%
45%
13%
Yes
19%
19%
29%
5%
27%
623
No
22%
20%
28%
4%
27%
348
Approve
18%
14%
22%
6%
40%
280
Unsure
14%
32%
23%
4%
27%
43
Disapprove
22%
21%
37%
4%
15%
299
(cont.)
Page 377

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOM
Roman
Catholic
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Baptist /
Evangelical
Mainline
Protestant
Other
TOTAL
None
Yes
23%
11%
26%
4%
35%
610
No
15%
35%
33%
5%
12%
234
Not sure
18%
27%
35%
5%
15%
126
4 of 4
11%
5%
16%
21%
46%
24
3 of 4
15%
11%
16%
7%
51%
108
2 of 4
22%
19%
24%
1%
34%
216
1 of 4
21%
20%
30%
5%
25%
211
0 of 4
21%
22%
35%
5%
17%
412
5-7 of 7
27%
27%
33%
3%
10%
146
4 of 7
26%
22%
31%
5%
16%
90
3 of 7
19%
22%
35%
11%
12%
89
2 of 7
20%
18%
34%
28%
84
1 of 7
24%
17%
28%
5%
26%
161
0 of 7
15%
16%
25%
5%
39%
400
20%
19%
29%
5%
27%
970
Page 378

May 3-6, 2015
RDENOMFR HOW OFTEN DO YOU ATTEND
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR
At least once At least once Infrequently

a week
a month
TOTAL
TOTAL
Never
46%
22%
26%
6%
728
Northeast
31%
25%
38%
6%
129
Midwest
44%
20%
28%
8%
124
South
53%
22%
20%
5%
194
South Central
57%
18%
18%
7%
80
Central Plains
55%
28%
14%
4%
62
Mountain States
54%
11%
33%
1%
49
West
36%
23%
33%
8%
89
California
36%
21%
34%
9%
62
Florida
53%
12%
24%
11%
44
Texas
58%
17%
19%
7%
57
New York
22%
17%
53%
7%
31
Rest of country
47%
23%
25%
5%
533
57%
23%
16%
4%
178
43%
21%
31%
4%
234
No Senate election
42%
21%
29%
8%
316
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
53%
19%
22%
6%
305
37%
22%
34%
7%
249
48%
25%
23%
5%
173
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
51%
22%
22%
5%
185
Other
44%
21%
28%
6%
542
Male
44%
20%
28%
7%
337
Female
48%
23%
25%
5%
391
Male / employed
47%
21%
24%
7%
231
Male / not employed
37%
19%
36%
8%
106
Female / employed
45%
25%
27%
3%
204
51%
20%
22%
7%
187
Not employed
42%
27%
24%
7%
86
Employed
46%
23%
26%
5%
434
Retired
48%
17%
28%
7%
202
Refused
20%
47%
33%
18-34
42%
21%
30%
6%
137
35-44
42%
27%
28%
3%
183
45-64
46%
22%
25%
7%
235
65 or over
52%
16%
23%
9%
166
Unsure / refused
74%
15%
11%
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
(cont.)
Page 379

May 3-6, 2015
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR

a week
a month
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
TOTAL
Never
18-44
42%
24%
29%
4%
320
45-64
46%
22%
25%
7%
235
65+
52%
16%
23%
9%
166
Unsure / refused
74%
15%
11%
Male / under 55
44%
23%
28%
6%
202
Male / 55+
45%
17%
29%
9%
134
Female / under 55
44%
26%
28%
2%
221
Female / 55+
53%
19%
20%
9%
170
White
44%
22%
28%
6%
546
56%
23%
17%
4%
89
Hispanic / Latino
51%
17%
24%
7%
67
Other
44%
24%
23%
9%
27
45%
22%
30%
3%
78
44%
22%
28%
6%
468
African American
millenials 18-34
40%
18%
30%
12%
21

voters 35+
60%
24%
13%
2%
67
37%
20%
32%
11%
31
64%
15%
17%
4%
36

18-34
46%
32%
22%

35+
43%
22%
24%
11%
20
White seniors
48%
16%
26%
11%
202
Other
46%
24%
26%
4%
526
White men
43%
20%
30%
7%
259
White women
46%
23%
26%
5%
286
Black men
56%
21%
16%
7%
35
Black women
55%
24%
19%
2%
54
Hispanic men
41%
19%
29%
10%
30
Hispanic women
60%
16%
19%
5%
37
Republican
53%
20%
23%
4%
328
Independent
46%
23%
24%
8%
130
Democrat
38%
23%
32%
8%
270
Male / GOP
47%
20%
29%
4%
174
Female / GOP
61%
19%
15%
4%
154
Male / DEM
40%
21%
28%
11%
89
Female / DEM
36%
24%
34%
6%
180
Male / IND
43%
19%
26%
12%
74
Female / IND
49%
27%
20%
3%
56
(cont.)
Page 380

May 3-6, 2015
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR

a week
a month
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
TOTAL
Never
Under 55 / GOP
53%
24%
22%
1%
178
55 & over / GOP
54%
15%
23%
8%
150
Under 55 / DEM
36%
23%
36%
5%
164
55 & over / DEM
40%
23%
25%
12%
105
Under 55 / IND
41%
27%
23%
9%
81
55 & over / IND
53%
16%
25%
6%
49
Republican
55%
20%
20%
4%
375
Ticket splitter
39%
31%
26%
3%
39
Democrat
36%
22%
33%
8%
314
Hard GOP
56%
19%
21%
4%
306
Soft GOP
47%
27%
21%
5%
73
Ticket splitter
41%
31%
27%
2%
37
Soft DEM
37%
22%
30%
12%
57
Hard DEM
37%
22%
33%
8%
254
Conservative
54%
22%
20%
4%
442
Moderate
55%
7%
29%
9%
50
Liberal
30%
24%
37%
9%
236
Very conservative
61%
19%
15%
4%
160
50%
23%
23%
4%
281
Moderate / liberal
34%
21%
35%
9%
286
Republican
53%
20%
23%
4%
328
Independent
46%
23%
24%
8%
130
Conservative DEM
54%
24%
18%
4%
77
Mod / lib DEM
31%
23%
38%
9%
193
Liberal DEM
28%
22%
40%
10%
197
50%
22%
23%
5%
116
Independent
39%
31%
26%
3%
39
Mod / liberal GOP
58%
21%
16%
6%
47
Conservative GOP
55%
20%
21%
4%
328
Yes / strongly
59%
17%
19%
5%
82
Yes
57%
22%
17%
4%
55
No / unsure
43%
22%
28%
6%
591
37%
31%
22%
10%
41
46%
20%
27%
7%
164
Some college
50%
15%
30%
5%
149
College graduate
46%
24%
25%
5%
374
47%
24%
22%
6%
174
Male non-college
graduates
41%
16%
35%
9%
163
45%
23%
27%
5%
200
Female non-college
graduates
51%
22%
22%
5%
191
(cont.)
Page 381

May 3-6, 2015
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR

a week
a month
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
TOTAL
Never
White non-college
graduate
44%
18%
30%
8%
241
graduate
50%
21%
24%
5%
113
Others
46%
24%
25%
5%
374
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
39%
29%
27%
6%
92
Non-union household
47%
21%
26%
6%
635
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
39%
18%
34%
9%
145
Married
49%
24%
22%
5%
452
No longer married
44%
18%
31%
7%
130
Dad
47%
24%
25%
4%
125
Mom
44%
24%
31%
1%
144
Married / children
45%
28%
25%
2%
223
53%
20%
19%
7%
229
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
7%
10
93%
35%
28%
26%
11%
46
Single / children
47%
10%
35%
7%
29
36%
20%
34%
9%
116
Other / mixed
55%
13%
26%
5%
74
Single women
42%
24%
30%
5%
70
Married women
50%
25%
21%
4%
228
47%
16%
31%
6%
93
Single men
36%
13%
39%
13%
75
Married men
48%
23%
24%
5%
224
38%
21%
32%
9%
37
White single men
34%
14%
42%
10%
49
White single women
33%
33%
29%
5%
31
White married men
46%
23%
26%
6%
181
White married women
48%
24%
24%
4%
184

men
37%
14%
37%
12%
30

women
44%
17%
33%
7%
71
Other
52%
21%
21%
6%
182
Single mothers
49%
11%
36%
5%
20
Married mothers
43%
29%
28%
1%
112
No longer married
mothers
44%
Non-mothers
47%
56%
21%
25%
12
7%
583
(cont.)
Page 382

May 3-6, 2015
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR

a week
a month
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
Never
Upper class
38%
25%
33%
3%
55
Middle class
47%
22%
25%
5%
513
Low income
45%
16%
30%
9%
144
Working class
93%
Refused
32%
50%
13%
6%
12
Middle class whites
46%
21%
27%
5%
401

Americans
53%
26%
19%
3%
48
49%
25%
15%
10%
46
49%
26%
17%
8%
17
7%
Other
43%
20%
29%
7%
215
Roman Catholic
40%
22%
36%
2%
198
57%
19%
19%
5%
185
Mainline Protestant
47%
25%
23%
6%
280
Other
38%
20%
41%
1%
45
15%
85%
16
None
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
TOTAL
100%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
100%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
100%
131
Active other
100%
17
Other
1%
40%
49%
11%
394
Male born again /

evangelicals
67%
21%
9%
3%
133
29%
20%
41%
11%
204
Female born again /

evangelicals
64%
20%
12%
4%
179
35%
25%
36%
5%
212
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
64%
20%
11%
4%
222
67%
22%
9%
2%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
70%
17%
9%
4%
166
Christians
64%
31%
4%
1%
51
Christians
46%
30%
19%
5%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
72%
10%
15%
4%
39
Approve
40%
22%
31%
7%
284
Unsure
48%
17%
28%
6%
42
Disapprove
50%
21%
23%
5%
402
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
(cont.)
Page 383

May 3-6, 2015
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR

a week
a month
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Never
Jobs
46%
16%
28%
11%
93
Economy
42%
26%
29%
3%
147
Health care
46%
19%
26%
9%
71
Illegal immigration
54%
10%
32%
5%
61
Foreign threats
55%
23%
21%
2%
99
Deficit
46%
26%
27%
1%
60
Other
43%
24%
25%
8%
196
Cutting taxes
42%
25%
32%
1%
58
Reducing deficit
54%
18%
25%
3%
94
Creating jobs
49%
18%
26%
7%
154
Increase wages
39%
23%
28%
9%
83
Healthcare costs
37%
27%
26%
10%
75
Retirement
50%
15%
29%
5%
31
Higher education
47%
27%
24%
2%
62
Regulations
60%
21%
18%
1%
51
Combination
41%
24%
26%
9%
107
None
48%
15%
37%
Unsure
36%
3%
39%
5
22%
26%
8%
255
28%
4%
422
21%
11%
7%
33
49%
17%
17%
16%
18
43%
26%
24%
7%
243
49%
18%
27%
5%
304
Not too worried
46%
26%
24%
4%
136
Not at all worried
42%
13%
35%
10%
37
Views close to own
46%
21%
45%
22%
Both
62%
Unsure
Very worried
Somewhat worried
Combination
100%
Unsure
56%
6%
39%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
44%
20%
32%
4%
170
Unsure
42%
29%
21%
8%
39
No
47%
21%
25%
7%
518
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
48%
23%
25%
4%
352
Unsure
42%
23%
30%
5%
56
Disapprove
45%
20%
27%
8%
320
Very worried
51%
17%
25%
7%
92
Somewhat worried
46%
21%
27%
6%
224
Not too worried
45%
25%
25%
6%
252
Not at all worried
46%
20%
28%
6%
152
100%
7%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
46%
6%
41%
(cont.)
Page 384

May 3-6, 2015
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR

a week
a month
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Never
Yes
44%
23%
28%
5%
467
No
50%
20%
24%
7%
261
Approve
38%
18%
37%
7%
179
Unsure
55%
13%
16%
16%
33
Disapprove
47%
27%
23%
3%
255
Yes
32%
25%
35%
7%
413
No
69%
17%
12%
3%
207
Not sure
55%
18%
21%
7%
108
4 of 4
35%
8%
36%
21%
16
3 of 4
42%
19%
28%
11%
55
2 of 4
38%
24%
35%
4%
149
1 of 4
41%
24%
29%
7%
164
0 of 4
53%
21%
21%
5%
344
5-7 of 7
50%
22%
24%
5%
131
4 of 7
52%
31%
17%
1%
76
3 of 7
65%
16%
12%
7%
80
2 of 7
46%
22%
25%
7%
62
1 of 7
51%
19%
26%
3%
120
0 of 7
35%
21%
35%
9%
258
46%
22%
26%
6%
728
Page 385

May 3-6, 2015
BORN BORN-AGAIN / EVANGELICAL
BORN
TOTAL
Born-again /
evangelical
Not
born-again
43%
51%
6%
728
Northeast
25%
71%
4%
129
Midwest
37%
55%
8%
124
South
61%
35%
4%
194
South Central
52%
41%
7%
80
Central Plains
38%
52%
10%
62
Mountain States
33%
60%
7%
49
West
37%
58%
6%
89
California
40%
55%
5%
62
Florida
43%
50%
8%
44
Texas
58%
36%
6%
57
New York
17%
76%
7%
31
Rest of country
43%
51%
6%
533
65%
28%
6%
178
37%
56%
7%
234
No Senate election
35%
60%
5%
316
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
51%
42%
7%
305
32%
62%
6%
249
44%
52%
4%
173
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
48%
47%
5%
185
Other
41%
53%
6%
542
Male
39%
54%
7%
337
Female
46%
49%
5%
391
Male / employed
39%
55%
6%
231
Male / not employed
40%
52%
8%
106
Female / employed
39%
57%
4%
204
53%
40%
7%
187
Not employed
48%
43%
9%
86
Employed
39%
56%
5%
434
Retired
48%
45%
7%
202
Refused
47%
47%
5%
18-34
30%
63%
7%
137
35-44
41%
55%
5%
183
45-64
48%
46%
6%
235
65 or over
49%
45%
7%
166
Unsure / refused
33%
57%
10%
18-44
36%
58%
5%
320
45-64
48%
46%
6%
235
65+
49%
45%
7%
166
Unsure / refused
33%
57%
10%
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Refused
(cont.)
Page 386

May 3-6, 2015
BORN
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Born-again /
evangelical
Not
born-again
Refused
Male / under 55
39%
54%
6%
202
Male / 55+
40%
53%
7%
134
Female / under 55
41%
56%
3%
221
Female / 55+
51%
40%
9%
170
White
41%
55%
5%
546
66%
26%
9%
89
Hispanic / Latino
31%
54%
15%
67
Other
41%
55%
4%
27
29%
67%
4%
78
43%
53%
5%
468
African American
millenials 18-34
33%
48%
19%
21

voters 35+
76%
18%
6%
67
28%
66%
6%
31
34%
44%
22%
36

18-34
44%
50%
6%

35+
39%
57%
4%
20
White seniors
45%
50%
5%
202
Other
42%
52%
6%
526
White men
37%
58%
5%
259
White women
44%
52%
4%
286
Black men
64%
22%
14%
35
Black women
67%
28%
5%
54
Hispanic men
27%
60%
14%
30
Hispanic women
35%
50%
15%
37
Republican
48%
48%
4%
328
Independent
43%
48%
8%
130
Democrat
36%
57%
7%
270
Male / GOP
45%
51%
4%
174
Female / GOP
51%
44%
5%
154
Male / DEM
34%
58%
8%
89
Female / DEM
37%
56%
7%
180
Male / IND
33%
55%
12%
74
Female / IND
57%
39%
4%
56
Under 55 / GOP
45%
54%
1%
178
55 & over / GOP
51%
40%
9%
150
Under 55 / DEM
33%
60%
6%
164
55 & over / DEM
40%
51%
8%
105
Under 55 / IND
44%
46%
10%
81
55 & over / IND
43%
51%
6%
49
(cont.)
Page 387

May 3-6, 2015
BORN
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Born-again /
evangelical
Not
born-again
Refused
Republican
50%
46%
5%
375
Ticket splitter
47%
38%
15%
39
Democrat
34%
59%
7%
314
Hard GOP
49%
47%
4%
306
Soft GOP
48%
46%
7%
73
Ticket splitter
51%
38%
11%
37
Soft DEM
36%
56%
8%
57
Hard DEM
34%
59%
7%
254
Conservative
49%
45%
5%
442
Moderate
49%
32%
19%
50
Liberal
30%
66%
5%
236
Very conservative
64%
31%
5%
160
41%
54%
6%
281
Moderate / liberal
33%
60%
7%
286
Republican
48%
48%
4%
328
Independent
43%
48%
8%
130
Conservative DEM
55%
34%
11%
77
Mod / lib DEM
29%
66%
5%
193
Liberal DEM
23%
73%
4%
197
52%
37%
11%
116
Independent
47%
38%
15%
39
Mod / liberal GOP
64%
27%
9%
47
Conservative GOP
48%
48%
4%
328
Yes / strongly
60%
32%
9%
82
Yes
53%
45%
2%
55
No / unsure
39%
54%
6%
591
53%
37%
11%
41
52%
36%
12%
164
Some college
46%
49%
5%
149
College graduate
36%
60%
3%
374
37%
60%
4%
174
Male non-college
graduates
42%
48%
10%
163
36%
61%
3%
200
Female non-college
graduates
56%
36%
8%
191
White non-college
graduate
50%
44%
6%
241
graduate
48%
36%
16%
113
Others
36%
60%
3%
374
Union household
27%
64%
9%
92
Non-union household
45%
49%
6%
635
(cont.)
Page 388

May 3-6, 2015
BORN
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Born-again /
evangelical
Not
born-again
Refused
Single
31%
63%
6%
145
Married
44%
50%
6%
452
No longer married
50%
42%
8%
130
Dad
38%
57%
5%
125
Mom
37%
59%
5%
144
Married / children
38%
56%
6%
223
51%
44%
6%
229
Divorced / children
28%
72%
52%
40%
Single / children
33%
67%
31%
62%
7%
116
Other / mixed
52%
39%
9%
74
Single women
33%
66%
0%
70
Married women
45%
49%
6%
228
56%
37%
8%
93
Single men
30%
60%
10%
75
Married men
43%
52%
5%
224
36%
55%
9%
37
White single men
26%
70%
4%
49
White single women
22%
78%
White married men
40%
55%
5%
181
White married women
45%
52%
4%
184

men
33%
59%
8%
30

women
52%
41%
7%
71
Other
49%
40%
10%
182
Single mothers
32%
68%
Married mothers
37%
56%
No longer married
mothers
35%
65%
Non-mothers
44%
49%
6%
583
Upper class
38%
55%
7%
55
Middle class
41%
54%
5%
513
Low income
49%
42%
9%
144
Working class
18%
82%
Refused
68%
30%
2%
12
Middle class whites
40%
56%
4%
401

Americans
59%
33%
8%
48
36%
53%
11%
46
36%
59%
5%
17
Other
47%
45%
8%
215
10
8%
46
29
31
20
6%
112
12
(cont.)
Page 389

May 3-6, 2015
BORN
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
Not
born-again
Roman Catholic
14%
79%
7%
198
73%
20%
7%
185
Mainline Protestant
51%
45%
4%
280
8%
82%
10%
45
Other
None
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
Refused
80%
20%
16
60%
33%
6%
336
41%
54%
5%
157
Infrequently
17%
79%
3%
191
Never
26%
54%
20%
44
26%
66%
8%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
85%
8%
7%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
68%
27%
4%
131
6%
79%
16%
17
28%
66%
6%
394
Active other
Other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Born-again /
evangelical
Male born again /

evangelicals
100%

Female born again /
evangelicals
133
89%
11%
100%
204
179
90%
10%
212
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
100%
222
100%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
100%
166
Christians
100%
51
Christians
100%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
100%
39
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Approve
35%
58%
7%
284
Unsure
37%
53%
10%
42
Disapprove
49%
46%
5%
402
Jobs
35%
59%
7%
93
Economy
40%
53%
7%
147
Health care
42%
50%
8%
71
Illegal immigration
55%
42%
3%
61
Foreign threats
43%
54%
4%
99
Deficit
45%
53%
2%
60
7%
196
Other
45%
48%
(cont.)
Page 390

May 3-6, 2015
BORN
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Not
born-again
Cutting taxes
55%
41%
5%
58
Reducing deficit
43%
54%
3%
94
Creating jobs
41%
52%
8%
154
Increase wages
41%
55%
4%
83
Healthcare costs
38%
54%
9%
75
Retirement
43%
50%
7%
31
Higher education
38%
58%
4%
62
Regulations
54%
46%
Combination
43%
46%
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Born-again /
evangelical
Refused
51
10%
107
5
100%
Unsure
35%
47%
18%
Views close to own
43%
51%
7%
255
42%
53%
5%
422
Both
58%
35%
7%
33
Unsure
47%
39%
14%
18
Very worried
45%
46%
9%
243
Somewhat worried
44%
53%
3%
304
Not too worried
34%
57%
8%
136
Not at all worried
44%
53%
3%
37
Combination
100%
1
7
Unsure
61%
39%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
41%
50%
8%
Unsure
38%
45%
17%
39
No
44%
52%
4%
518
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
43%
51%
6%
352
Unsure
35%
48%
16%
56
Disapprove
44%
51%
5%
320
Very worried
47%
45%
8%
92
Somewhat worried
45%
50%
6%
224
Not too worried
42%
51%
7%
252
Not at all worried
39%
57%
4%
152
100%
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
170
Unsure
48%
52%
Yes
41%
54%
6%
467
No
47%
47%
7%
261
Approve
29%
64%
8%
179
Unsure
42%
46%
12%
33
Disapprove
49%
47%
4%
255
(cont.)
Page 391

May 3-6, 2015
BORN
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Born-again /
evangelical
Not
born-again
Refused
Yes
28%
68%
4%
413
No
68%
25%
7%
207
Not sure
51%
38%
11%
108
4 of 4
24%
48%
28%
16
3 of 4
20%
74%
7%
55
2 of 4
38%
57%
5%
149
1 of 4
49%
44%
7%
164
0 of 4
47%
48%
5%
344
5-7 of 7
44%
52%
4%
131
4 of 7
45%
51%
4%
76
3 of 7
44%
49%
7%
80
2 of 7
50%
43%
7%
62
1 of 7
48%
44%
9%
120
0 of 7
37%
57%
6%
258
43%
51%
6%
728
Page 392

May 3-6, 2015
RACE RESPONDENT'S RACE
RACE
White
Hispanic /
Latino
Asian /
Pacific
American
Native
American
77%
13%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
1001
Northeast
80%
9%
4%
2%
1%
2%
3%
195
Midwest
81%
15%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
181
South
72%
18%
4%
1%
1%
1%
2%
235
South Central
65%
20%
11%
1%
Central Plains
94%
1%
1%
Mountain States
75%
11%
10%
West
73%
8%
California
67%
Florida
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
TOTAL
Black /
African
American
Other
Unsure /
refused
1%
2%
96
1%
2%
2%
83
1%
0%
1%
2%
70
10%
1%
1%
3%
4%
141
7%
14%
2%
5%
6%
89
67%
14%
11%
4%
2%
2%
58
Texas
62%
22%
15%
1%
New York
79%
6%
5%
3%
2%
1%
3%
56
Rest of country
80%
13%
3%
1%
1%
1%
2%
727
70%
20%
7%
0%
1%
0%
2%
217
77%
14%
4%
1%
1%
1%
2%
320
No Senate election
80%
8%
5%
2%
1%
2%
2%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
76%
14%
6%
1%
1%
0%
2%
405
76%
11%
6%
2%
0%
2%
3%
366
80%
13%
2%
1%
1%
1%
2%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
76%
13%
5%
1%
1%
2%
2%
241
Other
77%
13%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
760
Male
79%
10%
5%
1%
0%
1%
3%
480
Female
75%
15%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
521
Male / employed
80%
9%
6%
1%
0%
1%
3%
324
Male / not employed
77%
13%
3%
0%
1%
2%
3%
157
Female / employed
76%
13%
6%
1%
1%
2%
2%
281
73%
17%
4%
2%
1%
1%
2%
240
Not employed
72%
15%
6%
3%
1%
1%
2%
133
Employed
78%
11%
6%
1%
1%
2%
2%
605
Retired
78%
16%
3%
0%
1%
1%
2%
252
Refused
47%
15%
16%
22%
11
18-34
67%
13%
14%
1%
4%
1%
200
35-44
80%
11%
2%
2%
1%
1%
4%
280
45-64
73%
18%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
310
65 or over
88%
7%
1%
0%
1%
1%
1%
200
Unsure / refused
79%
5%
3%
3%
9%
10
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
1%
71
0%
(cont.)
Page 393

May 3-6, 2015
RACE
White
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
Hispanic /
Latino
Asian /
Pacific
American
Native
American
12%
7%
2%
1%
2%
3%
480
45-64
73%
18%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
310
65+
88%
7%
1%
0%
1%
1%
1%
200
Unsure / refused
79%
5%
3%
3%
9%
10
Male / under 55
77%
11%
6%
1%
0%
2%
3%
302
Male / 55+
82%
10%
3%
0%
1%
1%
3%
179
Female / under 55
69%
17%
7%
2%
1%
2%
2%
315
Female / 55+
83%
11%
3%
0%
1%
0%
1%
205
White
751
100%
120
100%
21%
7%
58%
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
3%
20%
16%
7%
5%
90
19%
44%
40
100%
128
100%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
100%
24

voters 35+
100%
96
18%
4%
67%
22%
9%
50%
41
11%
5%
3%
9%
49

18-34
34%
39%
27%

35+
17%
14%
48%
32
White seniors
Other
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Unsure /
refused
75%
Other
WHITE SENIORS
Other
18-44
Hispanic / Latino
AGE AND RACE
TOTAL
Black /
African
American
20%
255
100%
69%
17%
7%
1%
1%
2%
3%
746
White men
100%
368
White women
100%
382
Black men
100%
50
Black women
100%
70
Hispanic men
29%
Hispanic women
13%
Republican
59%
1%
7%
4%
42
13%
56%
4%
7%
6%
48
92%
2%
2%
0%
1%
1%
2%
390
Independent
80%
7%
6%
1%
0%
2%
4%
190
Democrat
62%
24%
7%
2%
1%
2%
2%
420
Male / GOP
92%
2%
1%
0%
0%
1%
3%
214
Female / GOP
91%
3%
4%
0%
2%
0%
0%
176
Male / DEM
63%
23%
9%
1%
0%
1%
2%
161
Female / DEM
61%
25%
6%
3%
1%
2%
2%
259
Male / IND
77%
7%
8%
1%
1%
2%
4%
105
Female / IND
83%
8%
4%
0%
1%
3%
85
(cont.)
Page 394

May 3-6, 2015
RACE
White
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
TOTAL
Black /
African
American
Hispanic /
Latino
Asian /
Pacific
American
Native
American
Other
Unsure /
refused
Under 55 / GOP
89%
4%
3%
0%
1%
1%
2%
223
55 & over / GOP
95%
1%
2%
0%
0%
1%
1%
168
Under 55 / DEM
58%
25%
9%
3%
0%
3%
2%
269
55 & over / DEM
68%
23%
4%
0%
1%
1%
3%
151
Under 55 / IND
76%
8%
8%
1%
0%
2%
4%
125
55 & over / IND
87%
7%
2%
0%
1%
1%
3%
65
Republican
91%
2%
4%
0%
1%
0%
2%
448
Ticket splitter
73%
6%
12%
1%
2%
7%
61
Democrat
65%
23%
6%
2%
0%
2%
2%
492
Hard GOP
92%
2%
3%
0%
1%
0%
2%
360
Soft GOP
88%
1%
5%
1%
1%
2%
3%
92
Ticket splitter
75%
5%
12%
2%
6%
64
Soft DEM
76%
14%
5%
1%
1%
2%
2%
84
Hard DEM
61%
25%
7%
2%
0%
2%
2%
401
Conservative
81%
11%
4%
1%
1%
1%
2%
536
Moderate
76%
13%
6%
1%
1%
0%
4%
76
Liberal
72%
15%
7%
2%
0%
2%
2%
389
Very conservative
79%
12%
4%
0%
1%
1%
3%
187
82%
10%
4%
1%
1%
1%
1%
348
Moderate / liberal
73%
15%
7%
2%
0%
2%
3%
465
Republican
92%
2%
2%
0%
1%
1%
2%
390
Independent
80%
7%
6%
1%
0%
2%
4%
190
Conservative DEM
42%
42%
10%
2%
1%
2%
2%
103
Mod / lib DEM
68%
19%
7%
2%
0%
2%
2%
318
Liberal DEM
71%
16%
6%
2%
0%
2%
2%
335
51%
37%
5%
2%
1%
2%
1%
157
Independent
73%
6%
12%
1%
2%
7%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
87%
5%
6%
1%
1%
0%
69
Conservative GOP
92%
2%
3%
0%
1%
0%
2%
379
Yes / strongly
75%
13%
6%
1%
2%
1%
2%
93
Yes
92%
3%
3%
1%
1%
68
No / unsure
76%
13%
5%
0%
1%
2%
840
72%
11%
12%
1%
2%
3%
53
70%
15%
9%
1%
1%
1%
3%
227
Some college
73%
18%
6%
1%
0%
1%
1%
219
College graduate
82%
9%
2%
1%
1%
2%
2%
503
86%
7%
2%
1%
0%
1%
2%
248
Male non-college
graduates
72%
14%
8%
1%
1%
1%
3%
232
78%
12%
2%
2%
1%
2%
2%
254
Female non-college
graduates
72%
17%
8%
1%
0%
1%
1%
266
1%
(cont.)
Page 395

May 3-6, 2015
RACE
White
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
White non-college
graduate
graduate
Black /
African
American
Hispanic /
Latino
Asian /
Pacific
American
TOTAL
Native
American
Other
Unsure /
refused
100%
349
5%
53%
27%
3%
2%
3%
7%
149
Others
82%
9%
2%
1%
1%
2%
2%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
76%
13%
7%
1%
0%
1%
2%
127
Non-union household
77%
13%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
58%
26%
10%
1%
2%
2%
215
Married
82%
7%
4%
1%
1%
1%
2%
607
No longer married
80%
14%
2%
0%
1%
1%
2%
179
Dad
83%
7%
5%
0%
0%
1%
4%
171
Mom
71%
15%
5%
3%
2%
3%
2%
203
Married / children
80%
7%
5%
2%
1%
2%
3%
299
85%
8%
3%
0%
1%
1%
2%
308
Divorced / children
95%
2%
3%
78%
20%
Single / children
46%
43%
3%
61%
22%
12%
1%
Other / mixed
78%
14%
4%
0%
Single women
48%
34%
12%
1%
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
60
5%
42
2%
1%
173
1%
1%
3%
97
3%
2%
98
82%
8%
4%
2%
1%
1%
2%
304
79%
16%
3%
0%
1%
1%
1%
118
Single men
67%
19%
9%
1%
1%
2%
117
Married men
83%
7%
5%
0%
1%
3%
302
83%
11%
1%
4%
61
1%
1%
White single men
100%
75
White single women
100%
46
White married men
100%
244
White married women
100%
243

men
100%
49

women
100%
93
Other
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
1%
3%
0%
Married women

GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
1%
22
7%
50%
21%
Single mothers
38%
52%
3%
Married mothers
75%
9%
6%
No longer married
mothers
91%
6%
Non-mothers
78%
12%
5%
4%
4%
1%
6%
9%
250
4%
3%
30
2%
3%
2%
150
2%
2%
0%
1%
3%
23
2%
798
(cont.)
Page 396

May 3-6, 2015
RACE
White
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
Hispanic /
Latino
Asian /
Pacific
American
Native
American
10%
2%
0%
1%
0%
1%
73
Middle class
80%
10%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
696
Low income
63%
23%
7%
1%
1%
2%
3%
205
Working class
65%
11%
22%
68%
14%
Middle class whites
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
3%
17%

Americans
100%
15%
20
551
100%
11%
63
60%
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
Unsure /
refused
85%
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
Other
Upper class
Refused
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
TOTAL
Black /
African
American
1%
31%
15%
57
7%
6%
22%
32%
25
Other
69%
19%
6%
1%
1%
1%
3%
305
Roman Catholic
78%
4%
12%
1%
1%
2%
2%
198
66%
29%
2%
1%
1%
2%
185
Mainline Protestant
81%
12%
3%
1%
1%
2%
1%
280
Other
86%
4%
8%
2%
45
None
79%
11%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
262
73%
16%
6%
1%
1%
1%
1%
336
76%
13%
4%
1%
1%
4%
1%
157
Infrequently
82%
9%
6%
1%
0%
1%
2%
191
Never
78%
9%
8%
3%
1%
2%
44
74%
3%
18%
2%
2%
1%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
69%
29%
1%
1%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
75%
16%
4%
Active other
87%
Other
78%
11%
5%
Male born again /

evangelicals
72%
17%
82%
Female born again /

evangelicals
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
1%
1%
1%
1%
131
1%
1%
2%
3%
667
6%
1%
1%
1%
3%
133
8%
5%
1%
0%
1%
3%
348
71%
23%
4%
0%
0%
1%
1%
179
77%
10%
6%
2%
1%
2%
2%
342
1%
17
13%
222
100%
1%
71%
16%
1%
2%
4%
6%
100%
Christians
1%
Christians
100%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
0%
90
166
70%
12%
2%
2%
5%
7%
51
55
71%
20%
2%
3%
4%
39
(cont.)
Page 397

May 3-6, 2015
RACE
White
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Black /
African
American
Hispanic /
Latino
Asian /
Pacific
American
Native
American
Approve
62%
25%
7%
2%
0%
Unsure
74%
6%
15%
1%
0%
Disapprove
91%
2%
3%
0%
1%
Jobs
70%
20%
5%
1%
Economy
70%
18%
5%
2%
Health care
78%
15%
1%
3%
Illegal immigration
84%
5%
7%
0%
Foreign threats
86%
5%
5%
1%
Deficit
82%
8%
7%
Unsure /
refused
2%
453
4%
62
1%
2%
487
1%
3%
135
1%
3%
228
2%
1%
99
0%
2%
2%
78
1%
1%
1%
116
2%
1%
76
1%
Other
78%
11%
6%
Cutting taxes
76%
12%
6%
Reducing deficit
93%
4%
2%
0%
1%
Creating jobs
71%
18%
6%
1%
1%
Increase wages
68%
22%
5%
2%
Healthcare costs
88%
2%
6%
0%
Retirement
80%
7%
7%
1%
1%
Higher education
65%
22%
7%
1%
1%
Regulations
87%
8%
1%
0%
1%
1%
Other
2%
1%
2%
2%
268
0%
1%
5%
71
0%
126
1%
2%
203
0%
1%
2%
132
0%
2%
2%
98
4%
41
4%
0%
101
1%
2%
65
4%
141
2%
11
8%
12
Combination
75%
10%
None
56%
28%
Unsure
90%
Views close to own
83%
10%
3%
1%
0%
1%
2%
352
73%
15%
7%
1%
1%
1%
2%
571
Both
81%
9%
4%
2%
4%
2%
48
Unsure
80%
6%
7%
1%
6%
30
Very worried
77%
11%
6%
0%
1%
2%
3%
318
Somewhat worried
79%
13%
5%
1%
0%
1%
1%
405
Not too worried
77%
12%
3%
3%
1%
2%
3%
214
Not at all worried
62%
18%
13%
0%
2%
4%
56
Combination
58%
7%
2%
1%
2%
14%
2%
42%
Unsure
34%
33%
24%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
65%
21%
8%
3%
Unsure
65%
19%
9%
0%
No
82%
9%
4%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
74%
15%
Unsure
74%
Disapprove
81%
4%
2%
2%
245
1%
1%
4%
63
1%
1%
1%
2%
693
6%
1%
0%
2%
2%
510
13%
6%
0%
1%
0%
5%
85
9%
4%
1%
1%
1%
2%
406
5%
(cont.)
Page 398

May 3-6, 2015
RACE
White
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Hispanic /
Latino
Asian /
Pacific
American
Native
American
Other
Unsure /
refused
Very worried
72%
16%
7%
0%
1%
1%
3%
112
Somewhat worried
74%
15%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
283
Not too worried
80%
10%
5%
1%
0%
2%
2%
341
Not at all worried
78%
11%
5%
2%
1%
1%
2%
258
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
Black /
African
American
100%
Unsure
51%
36%
Yes
80%
11%
4%
1%
1%
No
71%
16%
8%
1%
Approve
73%
16%
5%
2%
Unsure
95%
3%
Disapprove
85%
7%
3%
1%
1%
Yes
79%
10%
5%
1%
No
76%
15%
4%
Not sure
66%
19%
4 of 4
71%
7%
3 of 4
78%
14%
2%
2%
0%
2 of 4
61%
28%
6%
2%
1 of 4
69%
16%
8%
0 of 4
89%
3%
5-7 of 7
90%
4 of 7
13%
1%
3%
645
1%
2%
2%
356
0%
1%
3%
295
1%
45
1%
2%
306
1%
2%
2%
628
1%
1%
1%
3%
245
8%
3%
1%
1%
3%
128
11%
8%
3%
26
3%
2%
112
0%
2%
2%
221
1%
1%
2%
3%
214
4%
0%
1%
0%
2%
427
4%
2%
0%
1%
0%
2%
150
95%
1%
1%
0%
1%
1%
0%
96
3 of 7
86%
5%
2%
3%
1%
1%
2%
91
2 of 7
81%
4%
8%
1%
2%
4%
87
1%
1 of 7
73%
14%
7%
1%
2%
3%
164
0 of 7
67%
21%
7%
1%
1%
2%
2%
413
77%
13%
5%
1%
1%
1%
2%
1001
Page 399

May 3-6, 2015
ECONCLA2 ECONOMIC CLASS
ECONCLA2
Upper class Middle class Low income
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
TOTAL
Refused
7%
69%
20%
1%
2%
1001
Northeast
6%
75%
16%
1%
2%
195
Midwest
10%
60%
26%
1%
2%
181
South
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
Working
class
5%
66%
26%
0%
3%
235
South Central
11%
72%
14%
1%
2%
96
Central Plains
5%
77%
18%
Mountain States
3%
74%
19%
2%
2%
70
West
9%
71%
18%
0%
2%
141
3%
89
California
83
10%
69%
18%
Florida
7%
70%
23%
Texas
11%
76%
11%
New York
7%
82%
11%
Rest of country
7%
68%
22%
1%
2%
727
6%
69%
20%
0%
4%
217
9%
66%
23%
1%
1%
320
No Senate election
7%
72%
18%
1%
2%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
8%
68%
20%
1%
2%
405
7%
71%
20%
1%
2%
366
7%
69%
21%
0%
2%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
5%
68%
24%
1%
2%
241
Other
8%
70%
19%
1%
2%
760
Male
7%
71%
19%
1%
2%
480
Female
8%
68%
22%
1%
2%
521
Male / employed
7%
73%
17%
1%
2%
324
Male / not employed
7%
67%
23%
3%
157
Female / employed
7%
75%
15%
2%
281
8%
60%
30%
2%
240
2%
133
2%
605
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
EMPSTAT
Not employed
71
56
1%
10%
58%
30%
7%
74%
16%
Retired
7%
65%
26%
1%
252
59%
20%
21%
11
1%
18-34
2%
69%
26%
1%
2%
200
35-44
9%
73%
15%
2%
1%
280
45-64
7%
67%
22%
1%
3%
310
10%
68%
21%
1%
200
Unsure / refused
5%
67%
10%
18%
10
18-44
6%
72%
20%
1%
1%
480
45-64
7%
67%
22%
1%
3%
310
10%
68%
21%
1%
200
5%
67%
10%
18%
10
65 or over
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
2%
Employed
Refused
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
58
0%
65+
Unsure / refused
(cont.)
Page 400

May 3-6, 2015
ECONCLA2
RR96FL AGE / SEX
Male / under 55
AGE AND RACE
302
3%
179
2%
315
2%
205
1%
2%
751
1%
2%
120
25%
2%
2%
90
62%
25%
1%
6%
40
1%
73%
27%
9%
74%
15%
African American
millenials 18-34
6%
52%
32%

voters 35+
6%
52%
40%
4%
65%
23%
10%
62%
27%
83%
17%
8%
57%
27%
10%
70%
18%
Other
6%
69%
21%
White men
6%
77%
White women
9%
Black men
73%
20%
12%
68%
17%
Female / under 55
8%
68%
21%
Female / 55+
7%
68%
23%
White
7%
73%
17%
6%
52%
39%
Hispanic / Latino
7%
63%
Other
6%


18-34
35+
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
TOTAL
Refused
2%
4%
Male / 55+
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
Working
class
1%
1%
128
2%
623
10%
24
1%
0%
96
4%
3%
41
2%
49
1%
8
8%
32
2%
255
1%
2%
746
14%
1%
2%
368
70%
19%
1%
2%
382
9%
45%
44%
2%
1%
50
Black women
4%
57%
35%
3%
70
Hispanic men
3%
42
2%
48
2%
390
White seniors
1%
11%
61%
26%
Hispanic women
4%
66%
25%
Republican
7%
77%
15%
Independent
7%
65%
25%
1%
3%
190
Democrat
8%
65%
23%
1%
2%
420
Male / GOP
7%
78%
13%
1%
214
Female / GOP
6%
75%
17%
2%
176
Male / DEM
6%
65%
26%
1%
2%
161
Female / DEM
9%
65%
22%
1%
2%
259
Male / IND
7%
68%
20%
2%
4%
105
Female / IND
7%
61%
31%
2%
85
Under 55 / GOP
4%
78%
17%
1%
223
55 & over / GOP
10%
75%
13%
2%
168
Under 55 / DEM
8%
67%
20%
2%
269
55 & over / DEM
7%
62%
29%
1%
151
Under 55 / IND
5%
65%
27%
2%
125
55 & over / IND
11%
64%
20%
5%
65
4%
2%
1%
(cont.)
Page 401

May 3-6, 2015
ECONCLA2
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Republican
7%
78%
13%
Ticket splitter
5%
49%
41%
Democrat
8%
65%
25%
Hard GOP
7%
78%
13%
Soft GOP
5%
68%
25%
Ticket splitter
6%
58%
27%
Soft DEM
6%
65%
27%
Hard DEM
8%
64%
Conservative
6%
Moderate
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
448
6%
61
1%
492
2%
360
1%
92
9%
64
1%
1%
84
24%
2%
2%
401
72%
20%
1%
1%
536
8%
53%
34%
0%
5%
76
Liberal
8%
69%
19%
1%
2%
389
Very conservative
9%
69%
20%
2%
187
5%
74%
20%
1%
1%
348
Moderate / liberal
8%
67%
21%
1%
3%
465
Republican
7%
77%
15%
2%
390
Independent
7%
65%
25%
1%
3%
190
Conservative DEM
3%
57%
38%
2%
0%
103
1%
1%
10%
68%
19%
1%
3%
318
9%
69%
18%
1%
2%
335
4%
55%
39%
2%
0%
157
Independent
5%
49%
41%
6%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
5%
65%
24%
0%
5%
69
Conservative GOP
7%
80%
11%
0%
2%
379
12%
65%
20%
0%
3%
93
Yes
8%
86%
6%
0%
68
No / unsure
7%
69%
22%
2%
840
6%
45%
44%
4%
53
3%
56%
39%
2%
227
Some college
3%
70%
25%
2%
219
College graduate
11%
78%
8%
1%
2%
503
10%
78%
9%
2%
2%
248
3%
64%
30%
0%
2%
232
12%
78%
7%
1%
2%
254
Female non-college
graduates
3%
58%
36%
1%
2%
266
White non-college
graduate
4%
66%
28%
1%
2%
349
graduate
3%
48%
47%
0%
2%
149
11%
78%
8%
1%
2%
503
Union household
6%
81%
11%
3%
127
Non-union household
7%
68%
22%
2%
874
Yes / strongly
Male non-college
graduates
Others
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
0%
Liberal DEM
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
TOTAL
Refused
2%
Mod / lib DEM

PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
Working
class
1%
1%
1%
(cont.)
Page 402

May 3-6, 2015
ECONCLA2
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
4%
60%
32%
1%
2%
215
Married
9%
77%
12%
1%
2%
607
No longer married
4%
57%
35%
1%
2%
179
Dad
3%
80%
15%
0%
1%
171
Mom
11%
71%
17%
1%
1%
203
Married / children
9%
78%
11%
0%
1%
299
9%
75%
12%
1%
2%
308
45%
46%
10%
58%
38%
74%
26%
3%
Single / children
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
5%
56%
34%
Other / mixed
6%
59%
32%
Single women
2%
59%
34%
Married women
60
42
1%
2%
3%
173
4%
97
3%
98
2%
304
75%
12%
3%
57%
36%
2%
2%
118
Single men
6%
60%
31%
1%
2%
117
Married men
7%
79%
11%
1%
2%
302
6%
56%
34%
4%
61
White single men
5%
68%
26%
1%
75
White single women
2%
60%
38%
White married men
6%
83%
8%
46
1%
2%
244
12%
75%
11%
2%
243

men
6%
64%
28%
2%
49

women
4%
61%
31%
2%
2%
93
Other
7%
58%
32%
1%
3%
250
70%
30%
73%
11%
57%
34%
9%
69%
21%
1%
Single mothers
Married mothers
Non-mothers
15%
6%
30
1%
150
23
2%
798
Middle class whites
100%
551

Americans
100%
63
100%
57
100%
25
Other
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
1%
11%
No longer married
mothers
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
22
White married women
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
TOTAL
Refused
Single
Divorced / children
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
Working
class
24%
67%
3%
7%
305
Roman Catholic
8%
75%
15%
1%
1%
198
4%
70%
24%
0%
1%
185
Mainline Protestant
9%
68%
21%
0%
2%
280
Other
16%
70%
14%
None
6%
66%
24%
45
2%
2%
262
(cont.)
Page 403

May 3-6, 2015
ECONCLA2
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
6%
72%
19%
9%
73%
15%
10%
67%
22%
Never
4%
64%
30%
5%
73%
18%
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
6%
70%
Active Mainline
Protestants
8%
Active other
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Refused
1%
336
4%
157
1%
191
2%
44
2%
1%
79
22%
1%
2%
106
74%
17%
1%
1%
131
4%
70%
26%
Other
8%
68%
21%
1%
2%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
7%
73%
17%
0%
2%
133
7%
71%
20%
1%
2%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
7%
64%
26%
3%
179
Infrequently
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
Working
class
1%
0%
17
8%
70%
20%
1%
1%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
6%
72%
19%
0%
2%
222
8%
57%
31%
4%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
6%
76%
16%
1%
166
Christians
5%
55%
41%
Christians
8%
59%
26%
7%
55
11%
61%
19%
9%
39
Approve
9%
66%
23%
1%
2%
453
Unsure
1%
59%
28%
3%
9%
62
Disapprove
7%
74%
17%
1%
1%
487
Jobs
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
0%
51
3%
68%
26%
1%
3%
135
Economy
13%
69%
16%
0%
1%
228
Health care
12%
61%
26%
0%
99
Illegal immigration
6%
74%
17%
4%
78
Foreign threats
2%
73%
23%
1%
116
Deficit
3%
82%
11%
3%
76
2%
268
Other
6%
67%
22%
2%
(cont.)
Page 404

May 3-6, 2015
ECONCLA2
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Cutting taxes
7%
65%
22%
Reducing deficit
4%
78%
13%
Creating jobs
8%
72%
18%
Increase wages
11%
60%
Healthcare costs
6%
Retirement
6%
71
5%
126
1%
203
28%
1%
132
67%
25%
2%
98
66%
33%
1%
41
1%
1%
13%
67%
20%
Regulations
10%
81%
10%
Combination
5%
69%
21%
77%
21%
6%
67%
27%
10%
71%
16%
1%
2%
352
6%
69%
24%
0%
1%
571
Both
4%
62%
22%
6%
6%
48
Unsure
2%
77%
12%
8%
30
Very worried
6%
65%
25%
0%
3%
318
Somewhat worried
7%
71%
19%
2%
1%
405
Not too worried
9%
76%
13%
0%
2%
214
Not at all worried
11%
59%
29%
1%
56
Unsure
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TOTAL
Refused
Higher education
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Working
class
Views close to own
Combination
101
3%
0%
65
2%
141
2%
11
12
100%
Unsure
60%
38%
2%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
8%
68%
23%
1%
Unsure
7%
67%
23%
3%
63
No
7%
70%
19%
1%
2%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
9%
72%
17%
0%
2%
510
Unsure
7%
57%
29%
3%
4%
85
Disapprove
5%
69%
23%
1%
1%
406
Very worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
10%
56%
31%
0%
3%
112
Somewhat worried
6%
72%
19%
0%
2%
283
Not too worried
9%
72%
17%
1%
1%
341
Not at all worried
6%
70%
21%
1%
2%
258
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
100%
Unsure
53%
42%
6%
Yes
8%
75%
15%
0%
2%
645
No
5%
60%
31%
1%
2%
356
Approve
9%
74%
14%
1%
2%
295
Unsure
1%
87%
8%
4%
45
Disapprove
8%
74%
16%
2%
306
(cont.)
Page 405

May 3-6, 2015
ECONCLA2
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Working
class
TOTAL
Refused
Yes
9%
72%
16%
1%
2%
628
No
5%
67%
26%
1%
1%
245
Not sure
3%
60%
33%
3%
128
4 of 4
4%
78%
14%
4%
26
3 of 4
11%
75%
11%
2%
2%
112
2 of 4
8%
66%
24%
0%
2%
221
1 of 4
7%
57%
31%
2%
2%
214
0 of 4
6%
76%
16%
0%
2%
427
5-7 of 7
9%
81%
8%
0%
2%
150
4 of 7
8%
85%
5%
2%
96
3 of 7
8%
72%
18%
2%
91
2 of 7
4%
67%
28%
2%
87
1 of 7
6%
66%
25%
1%
3%
164
0 of 7
7%
64%
26%
1%
2%
413
7%
69%
20%
1%
2%
1001
1%
Page 406

May 3-6, 2015
RSEXEMP RESPONDENT'S SEX / EMPLOYMENT/C
RSEXEMP
TOTAL
Male /
employed
Male / not
employed
Female /
employed
Female / not
employed
32%
16%
28%
24%
1001
Northeast
29%
16%
37%
18%
195
Midwest
33%
14%
26%
27%
181
South
28%
20%
25%
28%
235
South Central
42%
10%
21%
27%
96
Central Plains
33%
14%
34%
18%
83
Mountain States
34%
14%
27%
25%
70
West
36%
15%
25%
24%
141
California
33%
17%
24%
26%
89
Florida
22%
32%
18%
27%
58
Texas
37%
11%
22%
30%
71
New York
31%
21%
38%
10%
56
Rest of country
33%
14%
29%
24%
727
31%
13%
28%
28%
217
35%
14%
26%
24%
320
No Senate election
31%
18%
29%
22%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
30%
16%
25%
28%
405
32%
17%
30%
21%
366
37%
12%
30%
21%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
30%
18%
25%
27%
241
Other
33%
15%
29%
23%
760
Male
67%
33%
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
Female
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
54%
521
74%
133
605
46%
45%
55%
252
Refused
63%
37%
11
18-34
39%
9%
38%
14%
200
35-44
43%
4%
39%
14%
280
45-64
35%
17%
27%
21%
310
7%
35%
6%
51%
200
16%
35%
11%
39%
10
Unsure / refused
18-44
42%
6%
38%
14%
480
45-64
35%
17%
27%
21%
310
7%
35%
6%
51%
200
Unsure / refused
16%
35%
11%
39%
10
Male / under 55
86%
14%
302
Male / 55+
37%
63%
179
65+
RR96FL AGE / SEX
26%
46%
Retired
65 or over
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
54%
Not employed
Employed
480
Female / under 55
72%
28%
315
Female / 55+
26%
74%
205
(cont.)
Page 407

May 3-6, 2015
RSEXEMP
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Male / not
employed
Female /
employed
Female / not
employed
White
33%
16%
28%
23%
751
24%
17%
26%
32%
120
Hispanic / Latino
32%
14%
33%
20%
90
Other
36%
14%
22%
27%
40
41%
8%
38%
12%
128
32%
17%
26%
25%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
27%
17%
36%
20%
24

voters 35+
23%
18%
24%
36%
96
37%
10%
41%
12%
41
28%
18%
27%
26%
49

18-34
41%
27%
31%

35+
35%
18%
21%
26%
32
White seniors
14%
31%
11%
45%
255
Other
39%
10%
34%
17%
746
White men
68%
32%
White women
Black men
Hispanic men
58%
70
42
31%
63%
37%
48
39%
16%
25%
20%
390
Independent
36%
19%
23%
22%
190
Democrat
25%
14%
33%
28%
420
Male / GOP
71%
29%
Female / GOP
Male / IND
214
55%
64%
46%
259
105
34%
Female / IND
176
161
54%
66%
45%
36%
Female / DEM
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
56%
Republican
Male / DEM
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
382
50
44%
69%
45%
42%
Hispanic women
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
368
55%
Black women
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
TOTAL
Male /
employed
51%
49%
85
Under 55 / GOP
55%
6%
31%
8%
223
55 & over / GOP
18%
30%
17%
36%
168
Under 55 / DEM
30%
6%
45%
19%
269
55 & over / DEM
15%
27%
11%
46%
151
Under 55 / IND
45%
12%
28%
16%
125
55 & over / IND
20%
33%
13%
34%
65
Republican
39%
17%
25%
20%
448
Ticket splitter
35%
18%
18%
29%
61
Democrat
26%
14%
32%
27%
492
(cont.)
Page 408

May 3-6, 2015
RSEXEMP
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Male /
employed
Male / not
employed
Female /
employed
Female / not
employed
Hard GOP
38%
16%
26%
20%
360
Soft GOP
42%
19%
17%
22%
92
Ticket splitter
39%
18%
21%
22%
64
Soft DEM
31%
19%
28%
23%
84
Hard DEM
24%
13%
34%
29%
401
Conservative
35%
18%
22%
25%
536
Moderate
43%
25%
20%
11%
76
Liberal
26%
11%
38%
25%
389
Very conservative
33%
20%
17%
29%
187
36%
16%
25%
23%
348
Moderate / liberal
29%
13%
35%
23%
465
Republican
39%
16%
25%
20%
390
Independent
36%
19%
23%
22%
190
Conservative DEM
21%
19%
18%
41%
103
Mod / lib DEM
26%
12%
38%
24%
318
Liberal DEM
26%
11%
38%
26%
335
27%
21%
21%
31%
157
Independent
35%
18%
18%
29%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
38%
18%
30%
13%
69
Conservative GOP
39%
17%
24%
21%
379
Yes / strongly
34%
26%
20%
21%
93
Yes
38%
18%
17%
27%
68
No / unsure
32%
14%
30%
24%
840
19%
31%
14%
36%
53
31%
16%
23%
31%
227
Some college
26%
20%
20%
34%
219
College graduate
37%
12%
35%
15%
503
76%
24%
248
Male non-college
graduates
59%
41%
232
69%
31%
254
Female non-college
graduates
39%
61%
266
White non-college
graduate
27%
20%
22%
31%
349
graduate
29%
18%
17%
35%
149
Others
37%
12%
35%
15%
503
Union household
33%
10%
40%
16%
127
Non-union household
32%
16%
26%
25%
874
(cont.)
Page 409

May 3-6, 2015
RSEXEMP
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
Male / not
employed
Female /
employed
Female / not
employed
Single
39%
15%
29%
17%
215
Married
36%
14%
30%
20%
607
No longer married
10%
24%
19%
47%
179
Dad
92%
8%
72%
28%
203
Married / children
46%
3%
36%
14%
299
27%
23%
25%
25%
308
Divorced / children
19%
9%
64%
8%
22
Mom
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
9%
33%
13%
45%
60
29%
1%
49%
21%
42
42%
18%
24%
16%
173
9%
21%
13%
57%
97
Single women
63%
37%
98
Married women
61%
39%
304
29%
71%
118
Single men
72%
28%
117
Married men
73%
27%
302
30%
70%
61
White single men
73%
27%
White single women

White married men

men
75%
46
244
61%
27%
33%
25%
39%
73%

women
243
49
34%
66%
93
28%
27%
250
Single mothers
70%
30%
30
Married mothers
72%
28%
150
No longer married
mothers
80%
20%
23
Other
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
75
67%
White married women
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
171
Single / children
Other / mixed
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
TOTAL
Male /
employed
29%
16%
Non-mothers
41%
20%
17%
23%
798
Upper class
30%
14%
28%
27%
73
Middle class
34%
15%
30%
21%
696
Low income
27%
18%
20%
35%
205
Working class
51%
Refused
27%
49%
25%
29%
20%
20
(cont.)
Page 410

May 3-6, 2015
RSEXEMP
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Male /
employed
Male / not
employed
Female /
employed
Female / not
employed
Middle class whites
36%
16%
29%
20%
551

Americans
19%
17%
37%
27%
63
35%
10%
34%
21%
57
29%
11%
35%
25%
25
Other
28%
17%
23%
32%
305
Roman Catholic
31%
13%
35%
21%
198
29%
16%
20%
35%
185
Mainline Protestant
32%
15%
29%
24%
280
Other
39%
13%
29%
18%
45
None
36%
18%
27%
19%
262
32%
12%
27%
28%
336
31%
13%
33%
24%
157
Infrequently
29%
20%
29%
22%
191
Never
39%
19%
12%
31%
44
29%
14%
32%
26%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
34%
12%
18%
36%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
33%
12%
30%
24%
131
Active other
38%
4%
37%
21%
17
22%
667
Other
32%
18%
Male born again /

evangelicals
68%
32%
133
67%
33%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
28%
44%
56%
179
59%
41%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
30%
13%
25%
32%
222
27%
15%
25%
33%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
33%
13%
22%
31%
166
Christians
33%
19%
15%
33%
51
Christians
20%
13%
34%
33%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
19%
9%
39%
33%
39
Approve
28%
15%
31%
26%
453
Unsure
31%
14%
29%
26%
62
Disapprove
36%
17%
25%
22%
487
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
(cont.)
Page 411

May 3-6, 2015
RSEXEMP
TOTAL
Male /
employed
Male / not
employed
Female /
employed
Female / not
employed
Jobs
32%
17%
29%
22%
135
Economy
33%
14%
31%
22%
228
Health care
25%
11%
35%
28%
99
Illegal immigration
29%
20%
22%
29%
78
Foreign threats
29%
13%
32%
27%
116
Deficit
42%
16%
30%
12%
76
Other
34%
18%
22%
26%
268
Cutting taxes
44%
13%
20%
23%
71
Reducing deficit
44%
16%
23%
18%
126
Creating jobs
29%
19%
25%
27%
203
Increase wages
31%
7%
43%
20%
132
Healthcare costs
27%
11%
35%
26%
98
Retirement
34%
11%
34%
21%
41
Higher education
19%
22%
28%
31%
101
Regulations
44%
18%
27%
12%
65
Combination
28%
21%
22%
29%
141
None
63%
6%
9%
22%
11
Unsure
19%
10%
38%
33%
12
Views close to own
38%
12%
30%
20%
352
30%
17%
27%
26%
571
Both
36%
18%
19%
27%
48
Unsure
19%
25%
27%
29%
30
Very worried
33%
16%
24%
27%
318
Somewhat worried
32%
16%
27%
25%
405
Not too worried
31%
13%
37%
19%
214
Not at all worried
37%
21%
22%
20%
56
Combination
42%
Unsure
26%
33%
33%
8%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
32%
18%
26%
24%
245
Unsure
32%
11%
23%
34%
63
No
33%
15%
29%
23%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
32%
15%
30%
23%
510
Unsure
24%
16%
31%
30%
85
Disapprove
35%
16%
25%
24%
406
Very worried
22%
14%
29%
35%
112
Somewhat worried
30%
18%
21%
30%
283
Not too worried
32%
14%
34%
21%
341
Not at all worried
41%
14%
28%
17%
258
100%
15%
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
Unsure
58%
55%
31%
(cont.)
Page 412

May 3-6, 2015
RSEXEMP
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Male /
employed
Male / not
employed
Female /
employed
Female / not
employed
Yes
37%
16%
24%
23%
645
No
23%
15%
35%
26%
356
Approve
36%
14%
30%
20%
295
Unsure
47%
16%
17%
20%
45
Disapprove
37%
18%
19%
26%
306
Yes
31%
13%
33%
23%
628
No
35%
20%
22%
23%
245
Not sure
34%
19%
17%
30%
128
4 of 4
46%
13%
14%
27%
26
3 of 4
23%
17%
34%
25%
112
2 of 4
30%
10%
34%
27%
221
1 of 4
26%
17%
29%
28%
214
0 of 4
39%
18%
24%
20%
427
5-7 of 7
43%
24%
14%
19%
150
4 of 7
43%
13%
21%
23%
96
3 of 7
37%
15%
21%
27%
91
2 of 7
24%
20%
30%
25%
87
1 of 7
35%
12%
31%
22%
164
0 of 7
26%
14%
35%
26%
413
32%
16%
28%
24%
1001
Page 413

May 3-6, 2015
GENDER GENDER
GENDER
Male
TOTAL
TOTAL
Female
48%
52%
1001
Northeast
45%
55%
195
Midwest
47%
53%
181
South
47%
53%
235
South Central
52%
48%
96
Central Plains
47%
53%
83
Mountain States
48%
52%
70
West
51%
49%
141
California
50%
50%
89
Florida
54%
46%
58
Texas
48%
52%
71
New York
51%
49%
56
Rest of country
47%
53%
727
45%
55%
217
49%
51%
320
No Senate election
49%
51%
464
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
47%
53%
405
49%
51%
366
49%
51%
230
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
race
47%
53%
241
Other
48%
52%
760
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS TWO
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
EMPSTAT
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
Male / employed
100%
324
Male / not employed
100%
157
Female / employed
100%
281
100%
240
Not employed
26%
74%
133
Employed
54%
46%
605
Retired
45%
55%
252
Refused
63%
37%
11
18-34
48%
52%
200
35-44
47%
53%
280
45-64
52%
48%
310
65 or over
43%
57%
200
Unsure / refused
51%
49%
10
18-44
48%
52%
480
45-64
52%
48%
310
65+
43%
57%
200
Unsure / refused
51%
49%
10
(cont.)
Page 414

May 3-6, 2015
GENDER GENDER
GENDER
Male
RR96FL AGE / SEX
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
WHITE SENIORS
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
Male / under 55
100%
302
Male / 55+
100%
179
Female / under 55
100%
315
Female / 55+
100%
205
White
49%
51%
751
42%
58%
120
Hispanic / Latino
47%
53%
90
Other
50%
50%
40
50%
50%
128
49%
51%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
44%
56%
24

voters 35+
41%
59%
96
47%
53%
41
46%
54%
49

18-34
41%
59%

35+
53%
47%
32
White seniors
45%
55%
255
Other
49%
51%
746
White men
100%
100%
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
100%
48
Republican
55%
45%
390
Independent
55%
45%
190
Democrat
38%
62%
420
Male / GOP
100%
100%
259
105
100%
Female / IND
176
161
100%
Female / DEM
Male / IND
214
100%
Female / GOP
Male / DEM
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
70
42
100%
Hispanic women
382
50
100%
Black women
Hispanic men
368
100%
White women
Black men
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
TOTAL
Female
100%
85
Under 55 / GOP
60%
40%
223
55 & over / GOP
48%
52%
168
Under 55 / DEM
36%
64%
269
55 & over / DEM
43%
57%
151
Under 55 / IND
56%
44%
125
55 & over / IND
53%
47%
65
(cont.)
Page 415

May 3-6, 2015
GENDER GENDER
GENDER
Male
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
TOTAL
Female
Republican
56%
44%
448
Ticket splitter
53%
47%
61
Democrat
40%
60%
492
Hard GOP
54%
46%
360
Soft GOP
61%
39%
92
Ticket splitter
57%
43%
64
Soft DEM
49%
51%
84
Hard DEM
38%
62%
401
Conservative
53%
47%
536
Moderate
68%
32%
76
Liberal
37%
63%
389
Very conservative
54%
46%
187
52%
48%
348
Moderate / liberal
42%
58%
465
Republican
55%
45%
390
Independent
55%
45%
190
Conservative DEM
40%
60%
103
Mod / lib DEM
38%
62%
318
Liberal DEM
37%
63%
335
48%
52%
157
Independent
53%
47%
61
Mod / liberal GOP
57%
43%
69
Conservative GOP
56%
44%
379
Yes / strongly
59%
41%
93
Yes
56%
44%
68
No / unsure
46%
54%
840
50%
50%
53
46%
54%
227
Some college
46%
54%
219
College graduate
49%
51%
503
100%
248
Male non-college
graduates
100%
232
100%
254
Female non-college
graduates
100%
266
White non-college
graduate
46%
54%
349
graduate
47%
53%
149
Others
49%
51%
503
Union household
43%
57%
127
Non-union household
49%
51%
874
(cont.)
Page 416

May 3-6, 2015
GENDER GENDER
GENDER
Male
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
MOMDAD PARENTS
Single
54%
46%
215
Married
50%
50%
607
No longer married
34%
66%
179
Dad
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
100%
203
50%
50%
299
50%
50%
308
Divorced / children
28%
72%
22
42%
58%
60
Single / children
30%
70%
42
60%
40%
173
Other / mixed
30%
70%
97
Single women
100%
98
Married women
100%
304
100%
118
Married / children
Single men
100%
117
Married men
100%
302
100%
61
White single men
100%
White single women

White married men

men
100%
100%
243
49
100%
93
55%
250
Single mothers
100%
30
Married mothers
100%
150
No longer married
mothers
100%
23
Other
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
46
244
100%

women
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
75
100%
White married women
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
171
100%
Mom
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
TOTAL
Female
45%
Non-mothers
60%
40%
798
Upper class
44%
56%
73
Middle class
49%
51%
696
Low income
44%
56%
205
Working class
51%
49%
Refused
51%
49%
20
Middle class whites
52%
48%
551

Americans
36%
64%
63
45%
55%
57
40%
60%
25
Other
45%
55%
305
(cont.)
Page 417

May 3-6, 2015
GENDER GENDER
GENDER
Male
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
TOTAL
Female
Roman Catholic
44%
56%
198
45%
55%
185
Mainline Protestant
47%
53%
280
Other
53%
47%
45
None
54%
46%
262
44%
56%
336
44%
56%
157
Infrequently
50%
50%
191
Never
57%
43%
44
42%
58%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
45%
55%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
45%
55%
131
Active other
42%
58%
17
Other
50%
50%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
100%
133
100%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
100%
179
100%
342
RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
43%
57%
222
42%
58%
90
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
46%
54%
166
Christians
52%
48%
51
Christians
33%
67%
55
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
29%
71%
39
Approve
43%
57%
453
Unsure
45%
55%
62
Disapprove
53%
47%
487
Jobs
49%
51%
135
Economy
47%
53%
228
Health care
37%
63%
99
Illegal immigration
49%
51%
78
Foreign threats
41%
59%
116
Deficit
59%
41%
76
48%
268
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Other
52%
(cont.)
Page 418

May 3-6, 2015
GENDER GENDER
GENDER
Male
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
TOTAL
Female
Cutting taxes
57%
43%
71
Reducing deficit
60%
40%
126
Creating jobs
48%
52%
203
Increase wages
37%
63%
132
Healthcare costs
39%
61%
98
Retirement
45%
55%
41
Higher education
41%
59%
101
Regulations
61%
39%
65
Combination
49%
51%
141
None
69%
31%
11
Unsure
29%
71%
12
Views close to own
50%
50%
352
47%
53%
571
Both
54%
46%
48
Unsure
44%
56%
30
Very worried
49%
51%
318
Somewhat worried
48%
52%
405
Not too worried
44%
56%
214
Not at all worried
58%
42%
56
Combination
42%
58%
Unsure
59%
41%
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
50%
50%
245
Unsure
43%
57%
63
No
48%
52%
693
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
47%
53%
510
Unsure
39%
61%
85
Disapprove
51%
49%
406
Very worried
36%
64%
112
Somewhat worried
49%
51%
283
Not too worried
46%
54%
341
Not at all worried
55%
45%
258
100%
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Combination
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT

IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
SAMEA ATTEND SAME
SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
Unsure
55%
45%
Yes
53%
47%
645
No
38%
62%
356
Approve
51%
49%
295
Unsure
63%
37%
45
Disapprove
55%
45%
306
Yes
44%
56%
628
No
54%
46%
245
Not sure
53%
47%
128
(cont.)
Page 419

May 3-6, 2015
GENDER GENDER
GENDER
Male
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
TOTAL
Female
4 of 4
59%
41%
26
3 of 4
40%
60%
112
2 of 4
40%
60%
221
1 of 4
43%
57%
214
0 of 4
56%
44%
427
5-7 of 7
67%
33%
150
4 of 7
56%
44%
96
3 of 7
52%
48%
91
2 of 7
44%
56%
87
1 of 7
47%
53%
164
0 of 7
40%
60%
413
48%
52%
1001
Page 420

May 3-6, 2015
RG2 GEOGRAPHIC AREAS TWO
RG2
California
TOTAL
RG1 GEOGRAPHIC
AREAS ONE
9%
Florida
6%
1001
29%
71%
195
100%
181
75%
235
25%
96
83
Mountain States
100%
70
37%
141
67%
217
100%
320
56%
464
68%
405
60%
366
100%
230
76%
241
74%
63%
33%
COMPST STATES
WITH COMPETITIVE
STATEWIDE
ELECTIONS
GENDER GENDER
race
19%
12%
14%
12%
18%
24%
15%
24%
Other
12%
Male
9%
Female
Male / employed
9%
7%
72%
760
7%
7%
6%
71%
480
9%
5%
7%
5%
74%
521
9%
4%
8%
5%
73%
324
Male / not employed
10%
12%
5%
7%
66%
157
Female / employed
8%
4%
6%
8%
75%
281
RR96FL AGE / SEX
73%
26%
GOVEL
GUBERNATORIAL
ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
RAGEBG2 AGE/C
6%
100%
No Senate election
RAGE RESPONDENT'S
AGE/C
TOTAL
Rest of
country
Central Plains
West
EMPSTAT
New York
Midwest
South Central
RSEXEMP
RESPONDENT'S SEX /
EMPLOYMENT/C
7%
Northeast
South
SENEL U.S. SENATE

ELECTION STATUS BY
STATE
Texas
10%
7%
9%
2%
73%
240
Not employed
7%
7%
9%
4%
73%
133
Employed
8%
4%
7%
6%
74%
605
Retired
11%
9%
7%
5%
69%
252
Refused
11%
16%
10%
63%
11
18-34
7%
3%
8%
7%
76%
200
35-44
7%
4%
7%
7%
75%
280
45-64
9%
9%
7%
4%
71%
310
65 or over
13%
6%
6%
7%
69%
200
Unsure / refused
11%
20%
11%
3%
55%
10
18-44
7%
3%
7%
7%
76%
480
45-64
9%
9%
7%
4%
71%
310
65+
13%
6%
6%
7%
69%
200
Unsure / refused
11%
20%
11%
3%
55%
10
Male / under 55
8%
4%
8%
6%
74%
302
11%
10%
6%
6%
66%
179
7%
5%
6%
6%
77%
315
11%
6%
9%
5%
70%
205
Male / 55+
Female / under 55
Female / 55+
(cont.)
Page 421

May 3-6, 2015
RG2
California
RRACE
RESPONDENT'S
RACE/C
AGE AND RACE
GENRACE RACE BY
GENDER
RPARTYID PARTY
IDENTIFICATION/C
RPTYID89 SEX /
PARTY ID
RPARTY USUAL VOTE

BEHAVIOR/C
New York
TOTAL
Rest of
country
8%
5%
6%
6%
75%
751
5%
7%
11%
3%
75%
120
Hispanic / Latino
22%
10%
14%
3%
50%
90
Other
12%
5%
3%
14%
66%
40
3%
1%
5%
8%
82%
128
9%
6%
6%
5%
74%
623
African American
millenials 18-34
6%
74%
24

voters 35+
5%
9%
8%
4%
75%
96
19%
9%
13%
4%
56%
41
25%
11%
16%
2%
46%
49
9%
85%
20%
6%

35+
13%
6%
3%
16%
61%
32
White seniors
12%
8%
7%
6%
68%
255
Other
8%
5%
7%
6%
74%
746
White men
9%
5%
6%
7%
74%
368
White women
7%
5%
6%
5%
77%
382
Black men
6%
17%
14%
1%
62%
50
Black women
4%
8%
4%
84%
70
Hispanic men
17%
10%
14%
2%
57%
42
Hispanic women
27%
10%
15%
4%
45%
48
Republican
7%
5%
9%
5%
74%
390
Independent
8%
7%
4%
5%
76%
190
Democrat
11%
6%
7%
7%
70%
420
Male / GOP
10%
6%
5%
5%
74%
214
Female / GOP
5%
4%
13%
4%
74%
176
Male / DEM
9%
8%
11%
7%
65%
161
Female / DEM
RPTY90FL AGE /
PARTY
IDENTIFICATION
Texas
White

18-34
WHITE SENIORS
Florida
12%
4%
5%
6%
73%
259
Male / IND
9%
5%
6%
6%
75%
105
Female / IND
7%
9%
1%
5%
78%
85
Under 55 / GOP
6%
4%
9%
4%
77%
223
55 & over / GOP
9%
7%
8%
6%
70%
168
Under 55 / DEM
9%
5%
7%
8%
72%
269
55 & over / DEM
14%
8%
7%
4%
67%
151
Under 55 / IND
8%
5%
2%
4%
81%
125
55 & over / IND
8%
10%
7%
8%
67%
65
Republican
7%
6%
8%
4%
75%
448
Ticket splitter
11%
9%
7%
7%
66%
61
Democrat
10%
5%
6%
7%
71%
492
(cont.)
Page 422

May 3-6, 2015
RG2
California
PARTISAN PARTISAN
RIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
PARIDEOL PARTY /
IDEOLOGY
REDUC
RESPONDENT'S
EDUCATION/C
SEXED2 GENDER AND

EDUCATION
TOTAL
Rest of
country
6%
9%
4%
74%
360
Soft GOP
7%
6%
4%
5%
78%
92
Ticket splitter
9%
9%
3%
10%
69%
64
Soft DEM
12%
4%
4%
5%
75%
84
Hard DEM
10%
6%
7%
7%
70%
401
Conservative
8%
7%
8%
5%
72%
536
Moderate
9%
2%
2%
4%
83%
76
10%
5%
7%
6%
71%
389
Very conservative
8%
7%
9%
4%
72%
187
8%
7%
7%
6%
72%
348
10%
4%
7%
6%
73%
465
Republican
7%
5%
9%
5%
74%
390
Independent
8%
7%
4%
5%
76%
190
Conservative DEM
11%
10%
9%
7%
64%
103
Mod / lib DEM
11%
4%
7%
7%
72%
318
Liberal DEM
12%
5%
6%
7%
71%
335
8%
7%
7%
7%
71%
157
61

Independent
RRTEAMEM IDENTIFY
WITH TEA PARTY
MOVEMENT/C
New York
7%
Moderate / liberal
RPTYID98 TARGET
GROUPS
Texas
Hard GOP
Liberal
RRIDEOL
RESPONDENT'S
IDEOLOGY/C
Florida
11%
9%
7%
7%
66%
Mod / liberal GOP
3%
3%
10%
4%
81%
69
Conservative GOP
8%
6%
8%
4%
74%
379
10%
13%
9%
3%
65%
93
Yes
7%
7%
10%
7%
69%
68
No / unsure
9%
5%
7%
6%
74%
840
2%
8%
8%
8%
74%
53
8%
7%
3%
4%
78%
227
Some college
9%
5%
9%
5%
73%
219
College graduate
10%
6%
8%
6%
70%
503
Yes / strongly
11%
6%
7%
7%
69%
248
Male non-college
graduates
8%
7%
7%
5%
73%
232
9%
5%
9%
6%
71%
254
Female non-college
graduates
8%
5%
6%
5%
77%
266
White non-college
graduate
7%
5%
5%
4%
79%
349
graduate
10%
9%
9%
6%
66%
149
Others
10%
6%
8%
6%
70%
503
RUNION MEMBER OF
LABOR UNION/C
Union household
12%
4%
6%
11%
67%
127
Non-union household
8%
6%
7%
5%
73%
874
RMARITAL MARITAL
STATUS/C
Single
9%
4%
10%
5%
72%
215
Married
9%
6%
6%
6%
72%
607
No longer married
9%
7%
6%
5%
73%
179
SEXEDWH
NON-COLLEGE
GRADUATES
(cont.)
Page 423

May 3-6, 2015
RG2
California
MOMDAD PARENTS
BUNDY MARITAL
STATUS / CHILDREN
GENMAR1 GENDER
AND MARITAL
MOMMAR MOTHERS
BY MARITAL STATUS
ECONCLA2
ECONOMIC CLASS
New York
TOTAL
Rest of
country
10%
4%
8%
4%
74%
171
Mom
8%
5%
7%
7%
73%
203
Married / children
8%
4%
6%
6%
75%
299
10%
8%
6%
6%
70%
308
Divorced / children
15%
85%
22
4%
10%
5%
2%
79%
60
Single / children
9%
4%
22%
7%
58%
42
9%
4%
7%
4%
76%
173
Other / mixed
11%
6%
8%
8%
67%
97
Single women
8%
4%
8%
4%
76%
98
Married women
8%
5%
6%
6%
75%
304
12%
6%
9%
3%
70%
118
Single men
9%
4%
12%
5%
69%
117
Married men
10%
7%
6%
6%
70%
302
4%
8%
1%
8%
79%
61
White single men
9%
9%
8%
74%
75
White single women
6%
4%
7%
1%
82%
46
White married men
10%
6%
5%
6%
73%
244
White married women
5%
5%
5%
6%
79%
243

men
5%
6%
2%
7%
80%
49

women
13%
7%
8%
4%
68%
93
Other
250
12%
8%
11%
5%
65%
Single mothers
7%
4%
21%
10%
58%
30
Married mothers
7%
5%
5%
8%
76%
150
No longer married
mothers
15%
9%
75%
23
Non-mothers
9%
6%
7%
5%
72%
798
Upper class
13%
6%
11%
6%
65%
73
Middle class
9%
6%
8%
7%
71%
696
Low income
8%
6%
4%
3%
79%
205
97%
79%
20
Working class
Refused
CLARAC ECONOMIC
CLASS AND RACE
Texas
Dad
GENMAR2 GENDER,
MARITAL, AND RACE
Florida
3%
14%
7%
Middle class whites
7%
5%
6%
6%
75%
551

Americans
7%
7%
17%
5%
64%
63
23%
9%
20%
5%
43%
57
11%
6%
3%
20%
60%
25
9%
6%
6%
3%
76%
305
Other
(cont.)
Page 424

May 3-6, 2015
RG2
California
RDENOM
RESPONDENT'S
CHURCH/C
RDENOMFR HOW
OFTEN DO YOU
ATTEND CHURCH/C
ACTIVE ACTIVE
CHURCH ATTENDEES
SEXBORN GENDER
AND BORN AGAIN
Roman Catholic
Florida
Texas
New York
TOTAL
Rest of
country
11%
7%
5%
7%
70%
198
6%
6%
12%
1%
75%
185
Mainline Protestant
9%
4%
8%
3%
76%
280
Other
10%
7%
2%
15%
66%
45
None
10%
4%
5%
9%
72%
262
7%
7%
10%
2%
74%
336
8%
3%
6%
3%
79%
157
Infrequently
11%
6%
6%
9%
69%
191
Never
13%
11%
9%
5%
62%
44
13%
8%
9%
2%
68%
79
Active Baptists /
Evangelicals
1%
8%
13%
1%
77%
106
Active Mainline
Protestants
8%
6%
8%
2%
77%
131
Active other
5%
12%
6%
14%
63%
17
Other
10%
5%
6%
7%
72%
667
Male born again /

evangelicals
10%
9%
8%
2%
71%
133
9%
6%
7%
8%
71%
348
Female born again /

evangelicals
7%
4%
12%
2%
76%
179
10%
6%
4%
7%
73%
342
7%
6%
8%
2%
77%
222
11%
7%
18%
64%
90
75%
166
72%
51
83%
55
54%
39

RACEVANG RACE /
EVANGELICAL
White Evangelical
IDEOVAN IDEOLOGY /
EVANGELICAL
CHRISTIANS
White conservative
Christians
8%
6%
8%
Christians
9%
12%
8%
Christians
4%
4%
8%
Non-white
non-conservative
Christians
14%
1%
30%
Approve
10%
6%
8%
8%
68%
453
Unsure
9%
3%
5%
3%
81%
62
Disapprove
8%
6%
7%
4%
76%
487
RBHOJA BARACK
OBAMA JOB
APPROVAL/C
RMIIP MOST
IMPORTANT ISSUE
FOR NEXT
PRESIDENT/C
Jobs
3%
1%
10%
9%
1%
4%
76%
135
Economy
7%
5%
12%
9%
68%
228
Health care
5%
6%
4%
4%
81%
99
20%
1%
10%
1%
68%
78
8%
5%
5%
8%
74%
116
13%
7%
3%
3%
74%
76
72%
268
Illegal immigration
Foreign threats
Deficit
Other
7%
6%
9%
6%
(cont.)
Page 425

May 3-6, 2015
RG2
California
MEIP ECONOMIC
ISSUE NEXT
PRESIDENT SHOULD
FOCUS ON
Cutting taxes
Florida
9%
12%
65%
71
Reducing deficit
13%
2%
7%
6%
72%
126
Creating jobs
10%
5%
5%
3%
77%
203
Increase wages
7%
4%
7%
5%
78%
132
Healthcare costs
7%
5%
9%
6%
74%
98
Retirement
8%
13%
4%
4%
70%
41
Higher education
13%
5%
10%
6%
66%
101
Regulations
10%
9%
2%
79%
65
Combination
7%
9%
8%
67%
141
65%
11
9%
35%
10%
6%
9%
75%
12
11%
5%
5%
6%
73%
352
9%
6%
8%
6%
71%
571
Both
5%
6%
7%
4%
78%
48
2%
7%
7%
83%
30
7%
7%
8%
4%
74%
318
Somewhat worried
10%
5%
7%
7%
70%
405
Not too worried
10%
5%
4%
7%
75%
214
9%
8%
10%
74%
56
58%
Views close to own
Unsure
Very worried
Not at all worried

Combination
Unsure
42%
3%
24%
5%
68%
8
245
RECONFUT NEXT
GENERATION BETTER
OFF
ECONOMICALLY/C
Yes
No
8%
6%
7%
RISAPP US EFFORTS
AGAINST ISIS/C
Approve
9%
6%
7%
Unsure
17%
0%
Disapprove
8%
7%
Very worried
6%
Somewhat worried
7%
Not too worried

Not at all worried
TERRW WORRY
ABOUT TERRORIST
ATTACK
Unsure
11%
7%
8%
6%
69%
9%
2%
7%
13%
69%
63
5%
74%
693
8%
71%
510
10%
2%
71%
85
7%
4%
75%
406
6%
7%
3%
78%
112
9%
10%
5%
69%
283
10%
5%
6%
7%
72%
341
11%
4%
5%
5%
75%
258
100%
13%
87%
Combination
Unsure
RIDEAL SRH ABOUT
IRAN NUCLEAR
AGREEMENT/C
RAPPR US SENATE
VOTE ON IRAN
NUCLEAR DEAL/C
TOTAL
Rest of
country
7%
Unsure
ECONW WORRY
ABOUT US ECONOMY
SUFFERING
DOWNTURN
New York
7%
None
CAND2016 VIEW ON
VOTE FOR
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
Texas
Yes
9%
5%
7%
6%
72%
645
No
8%
6%
7%
5%
74%
356
Approve
10%
5%
7%
9%
69%
295
Unsure
10%
7%
1%
3%
80%
45
9%
6%
8%
4%
73%
306
Disapprove
(cont.)
Page 426

May 3-6, 2015
RG2
California
SAMEA ATTEND SAME

SEX MARRIAGE
CEREMONY
DEMCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
GOPCON WILLING TO
CONSIDER
DEMOCRATIC
PRESIDENTIAL
CANDIDATE
TOTAL
Florida
Texas
New York
TOTAL
Rest of
country
Yes
10%
6%
8%
7%
69%
628
No
6%
5%
6%
4%
80%
245
Not sure
9%
7%
5%
3%
75%
128
4 of 4
8%
11%
11%
13%
56%
26
3 of 4
14%
4%
7%
10%
66%
112
2 of 4
8%
4%
9%
6%
73%
221
1 of 4
9%
5%
4%
4%
77%
214
0 of 4
8%
7%
8%
4%
73%
427
5-7 of 7
11%
12%
9%
6%
63%
150
4 of 7
12%
5%
10%
2%
71%
96
3 of 7
6%
6%
9%
2%
77%
91
2 of 7
6%
5%
8%
8%
73%
87
1 of 7
8%
3%
4%
7%
77%
164
0 of 7
9%
5%
6%
6%
74%
413
9%
6%
7%
6%
73%
1001
Page 427

George Washington University Poll

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

George Washington University Poll

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.

Battleground 57 #14750: Weighted Tables

GOP held seat up in 2014

DEM held seat up in 2014

GOP held seat up in 2014

DEM held seat up in 2014

Male / not employed

Female / not employed

SENEL U.S. SENATE

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.

RR96FL AGE / SEX

AGE AND RACE

Black / African American

White millenials 18-34

White older voters 35+

African American older

Hispanic millenials 18-34

Hispanic older voters 35+

Other races millenials

Other races older voters

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.

RPARTY USUAL VOTE

SEXED2 GENDER AND

55 & over / GOP

55 & over / DEM

55 & over / IND

Mod / lib DEM

Mod / conservative DEM

Mod / liberal GOP

Less than high school

High school graduate

Male college graduates

Female college graduates

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.

No longer married women

No longer married men

White single men

White single women

White married men

White married women

White no longer married

White no longer married

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.

Middle class whites

Middle class African

Middle class Hispanics

Middle class other races

At least once a week

At least once a month

Active Roman Catholics

Male born again /

Male not evangelical

Female born again /

Female not evangelical

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.

Views close to own

Most effective person

Not too worried

Not at all worried

THE TARRANCE GROUP, INC.

Not too worried

Not at all worried

RIDEAL SRH ABOUT