Professional Documents
Culture Documents
for
Aerospace Applications
By
S . Ramamurthy
National Aerospace Laboratories
Bangalore-560 017
9 November2011
CONTENTS
OBJECTIVE
WORLD SENARIO ON POLLUTION
EFFECTS OF POLLUTION
COMPONENTS PRODUCING POLLUTION
CHARCATERIZATION OF AIRCRAFT COMBUSTOR
TECHNOLOGIES TO REDUCE POLLUTION
ALTERNATE FUELS
NAL ROLE IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIO FUELS
ALTERNATE ENERGY SOURCES
ENVIORNMENTAL PROTECTION MEASURES DGCA
CONCLUSIONS
OBJECTIVE
DO WE NEED ALTERNATE GREEN FUEL ???
YES
WHY WE NEED???
JUSTIFIED
WHAT FUEL???
CENTURY DIFFERENCE
THE PROBLEM
THE PROBLEM
Many areas of the world
are experiencing climate
change believed to be
caused by the blanket of
GHGs surrounding the
Earths atmosphere
Greenland
Losing ice faster than it can be replaced
THE PROBLEM
Aircraft CO emissions
account for only 2% of
total global CO
emissions but have
increased by 87% since
1990
2
THE PROBLEM
Projection: rise in
aircraft emissions will
accompany rise in
passengers
228 million passengers in 2005
465 million passengers in 2030
Carbon Dioxide
Known global warmer: released in large quantities that linger longer
than others
Nitrogen Oxides
Produces harmful ozone with sunlight but beneficially reduces
methane
Water Vapor
Helps form condensation trails at high altitudes
Sulphate Particles
Reflect radiation
Soot Particles
Absorb heat
Aircraft Pollution
Aircraft pollute more than any other mode of transportation per passenger
Aircraft
191 grams of CO2
Car
143 grams of CO2
Train
43 grams of CO2
CO2 emissions released during round-trip flight = heating a home for a year
AEROENGINE
COMPONENTS OF EMISSIONS
Five major components
Smoke
Carbon Dioxide (CO2),
Carbon monoxide(CO),
Unburned hydrocarbons (UHC),
Nitrogen oxides (Nox)
Composition
TYPICAL
NOX
CO2
UHC
SMOKE
620
850
360
10
34
46
20
<1
NOx Emissions
FUEL BURN
TRUST
LIFT
(aerodynamic)
FUTURE
AIRCRAFT
DRAG
(aerodynamic)
(propusion efficiency)
Advanced Systems:
More Electric
Advanced Avionics and
Flight Control
Aerodynamics:
CFD
MDO
Wing/Fuselage Design
WEIGHT
(structural efficiency)
Advanced Structures:
Composites
Metallic
Advanced Materials
Environmentally sustainable
Not compete with existing food resources
Drop-in replacement for traditional jet fuel
Cost competitive
The airline industry seeks to develop non-food bio fuel which will offer
aircraft cheaper fuel without affecting global food supplies
Alternate fuels will play a key role in reducing CO2 / GHG reduction
4.1
11.7
Naptha
1.1
2.2
Available
US Yields
in gallon
from a
Barrel of
Crude oil
Bio Fuel
Feed Stock Growth
Flight
Flight
Distribution
At Airports
Transport
Transport
Refining
Transport
Processing
Distribution
At Airports
Refining
Extraction
GHG
Recovery
H2O
Jet Fuel
Processing
Aircraft Tank
Operation
Combustion
Transport
GHG
PM,NOX,SO2,H2O
CO2
Bio jet
F-T Bio mass ?
??
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
ULS-Ultra Low Sulpher, SPK-Synthetic Paraffin Kerosene, HRJ-Hydra treated Renewable Kerosene
Process
Principal
Customers
Aviation Fuel
Status
*Fisher Tropsch
*Syngas (CO,H2) followed by
hydroprocessing to jet fuel
*US Military
Certified by ASTM
Fuel production ramp up
underway
*Potential applications in
niche markets(e.g. Brazil,
China, India etc.)
*Military commercial
*20% introduction by 2020 is
the goal
*Being investigated by
aviation companies ASTM
and demonstrator programs
* Certification of
process(ASTM) underway
Although Algae requires the most energy to grow and refine, it requires the least amount
of land and its refinement produces the least amount of greenhouse gas.
Conclusion- algae is the most viable bio-fuel for aerospace application
CONCLUSIONS
1. Need for alternate fuels
2. Bio fuels are being used in aerospace industries
3. Debating and discussions look for the following