Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ganc
House Bill 50 will simply codify what is already a parents right, as per the
14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Therefore, not supporting this legislation is equal to saying, The State of
Delaware has more rights over a child than his/her own parent. In other
words, the child is owned by the state.
According to the U.S Constitution, specifically the 14th Amendment, parental rights
are broadly protected by Supreme Court decisions (Meyer and Pierce), especially
in the area of education. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that parents
possess the fundamental right to direct the upbringing and education of their
children. Furthermore, the Court declared that the child is not the mere creature
of the State: those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right coupled
with the high duty to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations. (Pierce
v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-35) The Supreme Court criticized a state
legislature for trying to interfere with the power of parents to control the education
of their own. (Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 402.) In Meyer, the Supreme
Court held that the right of parents to raise their children free from unreasonable
state interferences is one of the unwritten liberties protected by the Due Process
Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (262 U.S. 399). In recognition of both the
right and responsibility of parents to control their childrens education, the Court
has stated, It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child
reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation
for the obligations the State can neither supply nor hinder. (Prince v.
Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158).
One might argue that if parents have this right, then they will have the right to optout their children from other educational things. Well, guess what? They already
do! As a teacher, I consistently get requests from different religious groups and
other groups to allow their children to read a different book than what Ive chosen.
I have parents opt-out their children from participating in class parties, physical
education, and other classes. I have parents opt-out their children from saying the
Pledge of Allegiance. These are all parental rights.
2.)
House Bill 50 would put all the school districts and charter schools in the
state on the same level playing field based on a clear and distinct law.
Right now, Delawares many districts and charter schools each have their own
protocol for how a parent may opt-out their children from the statewide
assessment. This poses a problem for parents who have children in local district
schools as well as having children in charter schools. For example, a member of
the Delaware PTA stated that she had children in both Polytech High School and
Smyrna High School. Each school had its own protocol for giving parents
information regarding this. Having ambiguous policies/protocols across districts
and charter schools would be rectified by this legislation.
2|Page
3.)
As a teacher, I could go on and on about the fallacies and injustices associated with this
test, as Ive just given the English Language Arts portion to my 5 th grade students this
week, and its taken each student, on average, about 6 hours to complete. However,
that is another battle for another time.
In conclusion, if you believe that parents know what is best for their children and have
the right to make informed decisions for them, then you MUST support this bill. Both
the Delaware PTA and the DSEA support this bill. Your stakeholders and constituents
have spoken! Now, please represent our voice with your support for this bill.
Respectfully,
Natalie D. Ganc
Natalie D. Ganc
VIP Member of Delaware PTA
Delaware Teacher of Exceptional Children
DSEA Member
ATTACHMENTS
4|Page
HB 50 in a Nutshell:
5|Page