The Worlds First

Compressed Natural Gas (CNG)

Ship in Indonesia
Jakarta, 04 Desember 2013

PT. Pelayaran Bahtera Adhiguna

CNG STORAGE & TRANSPORTATION FOR DISTRIBUTED SMALL SCALE

POWER PLANTS
Bima Putrajaya
President Director of PT Pelayaran Bahtera Adhiguna
2nd Annual LNG Shipping Conference
Singapore 27th November 2014
1

COMPANY PROFILE
Ministry of State Owned
Enterprises (MSOE)
Ministry of Energy and Mineral
Resources (MEMR)
Ministry of Finance (MoF)

100% Owned by Government of

Indonesia

Ministry of the Environment

National Development Planning
Authority (BAPPENAS

PT PLN (Persero)
Oversight

PT Indonesia Power

PT Pembangkitan Jawa
Bali

Power Generation
and OM

Power Generation and

OM

Majapahit BV

PT Indonesia
Comnets Plus

Financial
Institution

IT and
Telecommunications

PT Prima Layanan
Nasional Enjiniring
Engineering and
Construction Services

PT PLN Batam

PT PLN Tarakan

Regional Fully
Integrated Electric
Utility

Regional Fully
Integrated Electric
Utility

PT PLN Batubara
Coal Supplier for
PLN

PT Pelayaran
Bahtera Adhiguna
Shipping Activities

PT PLN
Geothermal
Geothermal Energy
Generation

PT Haleyora Power
Distribution
Maintenance

2
Note: Excludes Joint Ventures.

2008 2014 FUELMIX

100%

90%

2.3%
14.9%
22.7%

20.6%

6.5%

70%

4.9%

10.5%
5.6%

50%

22.4%

6.1%

7.7%

4.7%

4.4%

23.3%

24.1%

50.6%

51.4%

2012

2013

4.5%

6.8%
5.1%

60%
22.0%

9.2%

23.1%

80%
7.3%

12.4%

22.4%

20.8%

40%

30%

20%

43.1%

40.9%

2009

2010

Biofuel

FUEL OIL

55.5%

44.1%

10%

0%

2011

HYDRO

GEOTHERMAL

2014

GAS

COAL

PRODUCTION COST AND REVENUE

1600.00
Sales
1400.00

Fuel Cost

1308.85
1244.76

Production Cost

1338.68

1224.09

(in Rp/kWh)

1200.00
1005.16
934.45

1000.00

919.70

1012.29

908.76
823.92

800.00

710.29
628.14

596.53

629.20

653.00

670.02

784.73

818.41

699.09
714.24

728.32

2011

2012

787.21

600.00
581.76

590.91

563.02

626.30

621.80

2009

2010

540.74

400.00
349.01
200.00

244.67

0.00

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2013

FUEL AND OPERATION COST

FUEL COST
1.9%

FUEL MIX (%)

0.3%

8.0%

4.4%

19.3%
COAL

GAS

51.6%

27.0%

COAL

12.3%
51.4%

FUEL OIL
GEOTHERMAL

24.0%

HYDRO

GAS
FUEL OIL
GEOTHERMAL
HYDRO

OPERATION COST (Trilyun Rp)

15.6

5.5

FUEL OIL

21.9

POWER PURCHASE
19.8

147.6
8.1
2.4

RENT

Total Production Cost reaching

220 Trilyun Rp. in 2013

OM
HR

Hydro

ADMIN
DEPRESIATION

PRODUCING ELECTRICITY TO MEET DEMAND

ROLE OF A GAS POWER IN ELECTRICITY SUPPLY SYSTEM

200
180
160

mmscfd

140
120
100
80
60

40
20
0
0

Baseloader

10

11

Load Follower

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Peaker

Typical drawback of piped natural gas in Indonesia :

Limited opportunity for swing rate
Still not integrated
Gas reservoir decline earlier than what has been forecasted.
7

LNG VS CNG: VALUE CHAINS

Loading :Treat, liquefy, store

Terminals: Jetty or regas offshore
Ships
: Sophisticated, efficient
Receiving : Store, regasify

Loading :Dehydrate, compress

Terminals: Jetty or buoy
Ships
: Simple like bulk-carrier
Receiving : Heat & decompress utilize
energy released

PIPELINES, CNG AND LNG SCENARIO

Stephen and Cano, 2004

CNG STORAGE NEAR PIPELINE RECEIVING FACILITY

GRESIK Gas Fired Power Plant :
National Electricity Company

GAS
SUPLIER

Before : gas supply during off peak is surpressing operation of coal fired power
plant nearby, and fuel oil still required during peaking time

CNG STORAGE SOLUTION

Problem :
National Electricity Company
1. Take or pay penalty with limited swing rate offered, make the operation
of gas fired power plants not optimum and tend to suppress the
operation of coal fired power plants which assigned as baseloader.
2. Remote location with no gas resources, still need gas fired power plants
to replace oil fueled power plants operated for intermediate and peaker
units.

Solution :
1. Gas supply are sent at relatively flat rate, and diverted between power
plants and storage.
2. CNG Marine technology

11

IMPLEMENTATION CNG MARINE

1. No natural gas resources or allocation for the location
2. Marine transportation distance less than 500 NM
3. More economic than Mini LNG (ie. less complexity)

National Electricity Company

12

CNG MARINE WITH CONTAINERIZED

CNG TUBE AND LCT BARGE
Small amount of existing
gas supply in Batam island
(4 BBTUD) is compressed
and transported to Bintan
island using truck and
Landing Craft Tank Barge to
suppy 6 MW Gas engine.

13

CNG MARINE WITH VESSEL

Gresik

28 mmscf existing gas supply

in Gresik is compressed and
transported to Lombok using
Vessel installed with CNG
tubes, to supply a 90 MW
Peaking Unit.

Lombok

14

CNG SOLUTION FOR GRESIK LOMBOK PROJECT

Compression station
in Gresik

Storage loading
compressors
Onshore CNG
storage
CNG ship loading
compressors
Storage loading
rate 5.20 MMscfd
Storage capacity
19.94 MMscf
Carrier loading rate
26.40 MMscfd

CNG Carrier Fleet

Carrier Capacity
22.43 MMscf
Design Speed 14
knots
Length overall
110.00 m
Breadth (moulded)
21.60 m
Depth (moulded)
12.75 m
Operating Draught
5.60 m
Installed Power
5400 kW

Decompression
Station in Lombok
CNG offloading
compressors
CNG buffer storage
Carrier offloading
rate 36.00 MMscfd
Storage capacity
21.18 MMscf

15

THE CNG VESSEL PROJECT

16

DESIGN OF CNG CARRIER

Technical Requirements in the Bid Documents
Storage Capacity : 23.38 MMSCF

Medium Speed Dual Fuel Main Engine

(1) Annually average temperature
Gresik : 22.3 - 33.3 and Lombok : 22.5 - 32.25

(2) Annually Relative Humidity

Gresik : 48.1 - 95 % and Lombok : 79.8 - 80.9 %
Classification Society : IACS member
Minimum Cruise Speed: 13 knots at 85% MCR and 20% Sea-margin
Round trip : 4 days with Distance : 300 nm

17

DESIGN OF CNG CARRIER

General Description General Arrangement

Life Boat

Mooring Winches
&Anchors

cargo
hold 4

cargo
hold 3

cargo
hold 2

cargo
hold 1

segregation

18

CLOSING REMARKS
1.

Implementation of CNG/LNG technology is SIGNIFICANT as solution to

replace current Power Plants fuel oil consumption..

2.

CNG Storage will be installed to match fluctuative gas demand by load

follower type gas power plant, when gas supplier unable to provide wider
swing rate.

3.

CNG Marine technology using barge feasible for short distance and very low
gas demand (< 5mmscfd). Higher demand require CNG Vessel.

4.

Benefit gained through implementation of CNG Storage :

a. To avoid the use of fuel oil during peaking time lower fuel cost
b. Cleaner power plants emission

19

Thank you

www.bahteradhiguna.co.id
20