Professional Documents
Culture Documents
likely
direction
is
of
extreme
importance
to
Business Cycle
National Bureau Economic Research
Monitors economic indicators
Dates business cycle when possible
Composite indexes of general economic activity
Series of leading, coincident, and lagging indicators of economic
activity to assess the status of the business cycle
2
Historically, the most sensitive indicator
Stock prices consistently turn before the economy
How reliable is the relationship?
The ability of the market to predict recoveries is much better than
its ability to predict recessions
3
Favored by most institutional investors and money managers
4
Steps in estimating earnings stream
Estimate GDP, corporate sales, corporate earnings before taxes, and
finally corporate earnings after taxes
The earnings multiplier
More volatile than earnings component
Difficult to predict
Cannot simply extrapolate from past P/E ratios, because changes
can and do occur
1920-2001 average for S&P 500: 17
P/E ratios tend to be high when inflation and interest rates are low
Put earnings estimate and multiplier together
that
future
cannot
be predicted
based
on past
5
Based on past, the market P/E usually rises just before the end of
the slump
FEDs Approach
Asset allocation changes imply the returns on equity and fixed-income
securities are related
Compare 10-yr. Treasury yields with the earnings yield (E/P) on the S&P
500
E/P > (<) T-note yield implies stocks are attractive (unattractive)
relatively
Problems: Loses reliability when rates low, earnings estimated into future
Conclusions
Market forecasts are not easy, and are subject to error
Investors should count on the unexpected occurring
Intelligent and useful forecasts of the market can be made at certain
times, at least as to the likely direction of the market
Q.3 How have business cycle expansions and contractions changed since
WWII?
Ans: Since WWII expansions have typically been longer than before, and
contractions shorter.
7
(b)Stock prices often drop suddenly as the business cycle enters into the
initial phase of recovery. Prices stabilize, or even decline, as the economy
moves ahead.
Q.7 If an investor can determine when the bottoming out of the economy
will occur, when should stocks be purchased-before, during or after such
a bottom? Would stock prices be expected to continue to rise as the
economy recovers (based on historical experience)?
Ans:
Stocks should be purchased before a bottoming of the economy occurs
because prices almost always rise before the trough.
As the economy recovers, be prepared for a leveling off, or even a decline.
Q.9 What is the historical relationship between the markets P/E ratio
and recessions?
Ans: The market P/E is higher at the end of the slump than at its low point of
the slump; in other words, the P/E ratio usually rises toward the end of each
slump relative to its low point during the downturn. It then remains roughly
unchanged over the next year.
Q.10 What was the primary cause of the rise in stock prices in 1982?
Ans: The primary cause of a rise in stock prices in 1982 was a dramatic decline
in interest rates, and therefore discount rates. While it is not likely that many
investors caught the exact bottom, a sizeable number did benefit by expecting
such a decline sometime in 1982.
Q.11 Suppose that you know with certainity that corporate earnings next
year will rise 15 % above this years level of corporate earnings. Based
on this information , should you buy stock?
Ans: You cannot answer this question with the information provided. The
reason is that the value of stocks is dependent upon both components of the
valuation model-- returns and risk. Therefore, while you may know with
certainty what corporate earnings will do, you do not know what the discount
rate (or, alternatively, the P/E ratio) will do. It could easily change more than
enough to negate the favorable impact of the increase in corporate earnings.
Q.12 What does a steeping yield curve suggests about the economy?
What about an invested yield curve?
Ans: A steepening yield curve suggests that the economy is accelerating in
terms of activity as monetary policy stimulates the economy. An invested yield
curve carries expectations of an economic slowdown. Virtually every recession
since WWII has been preceded by a downward-sloping yield curve.
Q.14 Using the so called Fed Model relating the earnings yield on the
S&P 500 Index to Treasury bond yields, when would stocks be
considered an attractive investment?
Ans: Using the so-called Fed model, stocks are relatively attractive when the
earnings yield on the S&P 500 is greater than the 10-year Treasury yield.
Alternatively, estimate the fair value level of the S&P 500 Index by dividing the
estimated earnings for this index by the current 10-year Treasury bond yield. If
the estimated fair value of the market is greater than the current level of the
market, stocks are undervalued.
Problems
Q.1 During 1 week in late December 2008, the Nasdaq Composite
went from 1564.32 to 1530.24. while the Nasdaq 100 Index went
from 1217.19 to 1185.44. Which Index showed the greater loss?
Ans:
Nasdaq Composite
Nasdaq 100
1564.32
1217.19
-1530.24
- 1185.44
-34.08
- 31.75
-34.08/1564.32 = - 0.02179 x 100 - 31.75/1217.19 = - 0.026085 x 100
= - 2.179%
= - 2.6085%
Nasdaq 100 Showed a greater loss
Q.2 The Nasdaq Index lost more than 75% of its value in the early
years of the twenty first century. Assuming a 80% loss, What
return is needed on this index to make up for the 80% loss?
Ans: A 75 percent loss will require a 400% gain to make up for the loss.
Assume an index value of 100. A 75% loss reduces the index to 25. A
400% gain is required to return the index to 100.
Computational Problem
The following annual data are available for a stock market Index:
Year
End of
Year
Price (P)
107.21
200
4
200
121.02
5
200
154.45
6
200
137.12
7
200
157.62
8
200
186.24
9
The 2009 values in
Earning
(E)
Dividend
s (D)
P/E
(D/E)100
%
(D/P)100
%
13.12
5.35
8.17
40.78
4.99
16.08
6.04
7.53
37.56
4.99
16.13
6.55
9.58
40.61
4.24
16.70
7.00
8.21
41.92
5.11
13.2
17.18
11.93
54.35
4.56
15.24
6.97
10
Solution
NOTE:
The earnings ($15.24) and dividends ($6.97) for 2009 are given, as is the year- end price of 186.24.
a) P/E = 186.24/15.24 = 12.2204
D/E (100) = 100(6.97/15.24) = 45.73%
D/P (100) = 100(6.97/186.24) = 3.742%
As an additional piece of information,
TR2006 = 100[(186.24-157.62+6.97)/157.62] = 22.58%
b) k = 6.97/186.24 + .095 = .132425
c) Calculated in a) above.
d) Expected Earning E2010 = (1.25) (15.24) = 19.05
e)Projected Dividend D= (.40) (19.05) = 7.62
g) P = 7.62/.037425 = 203.61, or
P = Projected Earning (P/E) x Expected Earning (E) = 10.69(19.05) =
203.64
h)
11