Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Types of
environmental
impact
EA activity
(I9
Evaluation
Reporting
Shaded area = (A) Stages of EA covered in this chapter; (8) focus of this chapter; and (C) primary target readers.
KEY QUESTIONS
E
M
ADDRESSED:
What are the basic criteria for defining the severity of environmental
impacts?
What is an indirect impact?
6.1
A HANDBOOK
IMPACT TYPES
Environmental impacts arising from road development projects fall into three categories:
i) direct impacts;
ii) indirect impacts; and
iii) cumulative impacts.
These three groups can be further broken down
according to their nature, into
positive and negative impacts;
0 random and predictable impacts;
l local and widespread
impacts;
* temporary and permanent impacts; and
l short- and long-term
impacts.
6.1.1
Direct impacts
Direct impacts are caused by the road itselfthat is to say, by road building processes such
as land consumption, removal of vegetation,
and severance of farmland. For example, the
removal of gravel material from a borrow pit,
for use in surfacing the road, is an obvious direct impact of road construction. In this case,
the land area in which the pit site is located has
been directly affected by activities associated
with the road project.
Direct impacts are generally easier to inventory, assess, and control than indirect im-
cause-effect
is
Indirect impacts
Indirect impacts (also known as secondary, tertiary, and chain impacts) are usually linked
closely with the project, and may have more
profound consequences
on the environment
than direct impacts. Indirect impacts are more
difficult to measure, but can ultimately be more
important. Over time they can affect larger
geographical areas of the environment
than
anticipated. Examples include degradation of
surface water quality by the erosion of land
cleared as a result of a new road (Figure 6.1),
and urban growth near a new road. Another
common indirect impact associated with new
roads is increased deforestation of an area,
stemming from easier (more profitable) transportation of logs to market, or the influx of settlers. In areas where wild game is plentiful,
such as Africa, new roads often lead to the
rapid depletion of animals due to poaching.
Environmental impacts should be considered not only as they pertain to road rights-ofway, but also to sites associated with the road
project, which include deposit and borrow
sites, materials treatment areas, quarries, access
roads, and facilities provided for project work-
FIGURE 6.1
Impairment of
downstream
quality of water
for the fauna
or for human
usage
60
relationship
TYPES OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
BOX 6.1
EXAMPLE OF POTENTIAL DIRECT AND INDIRECT ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACTS
Environmental impact study for the Guinea-Conakry Road Project (96 km road construction in a mangrove
swamp and rice-growing area). NOTE: Direct Impact (D); Indirect Impact (I).
Soils
Positive Impacts
Providing all weather road link for coastal population with major urban markets, institutions and goods
Sale of dried fish products (90 percent of national production) increased through quicker transport and access
More effective sale of rice from industrial growers (3,500 hectares) and small-scale growers
Creation of jobs
Improved access to medical help
Source: SETRA
61
A HANDBOOK
taking a holistic approach to impact assessment. It is especially important that any synergetic relationships between impacts be closely
examined, since indirect effects frequently lead
to synergetic impacts.
It is with indirect effects that impact linkages between the natural and social environment often take place. For example, the
appropriation of land to build a road may displace farmers, and may interfere with their
cropping pattern and force them to use another
water supply. This change could result in a depletion of a groundwater aquifer, intensification of new land clearing, erosion, water runoff
contamination with added fertilizers and pesticides, etc.
Good documentation of the assumptions
used in the determination of impacts is critical.
Margins of error and the quality of basic information must be indicated when assessing any
impacts that are difficult to quantify.
6.1.3
Cumulative
impacts
ii)
62
.
.
temporal and spatial boundaries for the assessment have been defined;
measurable variables have been chosen;
and
the relationships between the chosen variables have been established.
TYPES
OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
FIGURE 6.2
CUMULATIVE IMPACTS: THE EXAMPLE OF A STREAM
Elementary
actions
WF
II
Road operation
Works
II
---7--Direct effects
Synergy effect
Increase in
water speed
* Reduction of
diversity
l Discontinuity
due to water
works
Opening up
to light
Rise In
temperature
0 Riskof chronic,
seasonal,
accidental
pollution
High rate of
suspended
matter
Riskof
Each elementary action produces a certain effect or a risk that can be limited, but the combination of such
actions and therefore their consequences may be the source of significant effects. In this example, steps
can be envisaged with reference to each elementary action, in order to avoid the synergy effect.
positive outcomes can be designed into a project, for example, improving water retention for
local use, flood control, or providing better facilities for pedestrians and bicycles (see Box
6.2). In some cases, positive impacts can ap
pear without having been initially foreseen by
the road agency, such as the use of borrow sites
to water livestock in dry areas.
6.1.6
impacts
BOX 6.2
ENHANCING WATER MANAGEMENT THROUGH INNOVATIVE ROAD DESIGN
In dry climates, millions of liters of rainwater are lost through conventional road drainage designs, which treat
runoff as a nuisance, not as a resource to be captured. In a survey conducted by the World Bank, it was established that simple small-scale water retention structures along large and small rural roads could make a significant difference to water supplies during the dry periods. The study identified three basic types of structures along
roads that, with minor modifications, could become retention areas, with water useable for agricultural purposes.
These were:
standard stormwater catchbasins - deepened and with controlled drainage added;
i)
ii) various forms of check-dams or fords, to slow drainage, creating pending; and
iii) various other damming devices, such as sluice gates, raised box culverts and dams.
A study resulted in the preparation of a general design manual to assist engineers in planning for the inclusion of
such structural modifications during the design of the roadway.
An important cautionary note: such retention structures should be avoided in high use corridors, since the runoff
water may be contaminated with heavy metals and oil. Such waters are not potable by people or animals, can
contaminate leafy vegetables, and, if stored in deep basins, can contaminate groundwater aquifers.
Source: La&an,
64
1995.
TYPES OF ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
such as destruction of a
building, or restricted access to a farm. Widespread impacts can occur many kilometers
from the project. These impacts are often linked
to indirect effects that arise over the mediumor long-term existence of the project and include the influx of settlers, deforestation, and
the development of new industries. While the
focus of most road EAs has been on relatively
narrow
corridors
measuring
lOO-500m in
width, impacts can extend much further, particularly in new road projects which traverse
isolated areas. Major habitat conversion can
take place up to 10 km on either side of the
cleared ROW. Road planners and EA practitioners should be aware of this possibility and address it explicitly in the project scoping activity
(see Section 3.2 and Chapter 10).
vicinity
6.1.8
of a road,
6.3
REFERENCES
IMPACT SEVERITY
AND BIBLIOGRAPHY
Lane, P.A., R.R. Wallace, R.J. Johnson and D. Bernard. 1988. A Reference Guide to CumuZative Ef/ects Assessment in
Canada, Volume 2. Hull, Canada: Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council.
Lantran, Jean Marie. 1995. Water Management and Road Design in the Sahel Region. World Bank Transportation,
Water and Urban Development Department; Infrastructure Note RD-20. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Preston, E.M. and B.L. Bedford. 1988. Evaluating Cumulative Effects on Wetland Functions: A Conceptual
Overview and Generic Framework. Environmental Management. 12:5:565-583.
Spaling, H. and B. Smit. 1994. Classification and Evaluation of Methods for Cumulative Effects Assessment.
Paper presented at the Conference on Cumulative Effects in Canada: From Concept to Practice. April 13-14,
Calgary, Canada: Canadian Societies of Professional Biologists.
Spaling, H. and B. Smit. 1993. Cumulative Environmental Change: Conceptual Frameworks,
proaches, and Institutional Perspectives. Environmental Management, 17:5:587-600.
Evaluation Ap-
World Bank. 1991. EA Sourcebook, Volume II. Rural Roads (pg. 113), and Roads and Highways (pg. 168).
Washington, DC: World Bank, Environment Department.
65