You are on page 1of 21

HOW TO MEASURE DIASPORAS

USING ABSENTEE VOTER CENSUSES


Victoria Prieto Rosas
Best Participant Essays Series 2010/42
CARIM V Summer School on Euro-Mediterranean
Migration and Development
2009

Cooperation project on the social integration of


immigrants, migration, and the movement of
persons (CARIM)
Co-financed by the European University Institute and
the European Union (AENEAS Programme)

CARIM
Euro-Mediterranean Consortium
for Applied Research on International Migration

CARIM IV Summer School on


Euro-Mediterranean Migration and Development (2009)
Best Participant Essays Series
AS 2010/42

How to Measure Diasporas


Using Absentee Voter Censuses
Victoria Prieto Rosas*
European University Institute, Florence, Italy

This publication is part of Best participant essays series, written by participants of the V
Summer School on Euro-Mediterranean Migration and Development, part of CARIM project.

This essay is presented as a final Essay for the V Summer School on Euro-Mediterranean Migration of the RSCAS
European University Institute (Florence, July 2009), and is based on previous and current research carried out under the
direction of Ph.D. Joaquin Recao as part of a Research Project directed by Ph.D Anna Cabr, The future of activity, health
and dependence in Spain. A cohort based approach from Demography (El futuro de la actividad, la salud y la dependencia
en Espaa. Una aproximacin generacional desde la Demografa) financed by the Ministerio de Educacin y Ciencia
(SEJ2006-002686/GEOG).

2010, European University Institute


Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies
This text may be downloaded only for personal research purposes. Any additional reproduction for
other purposes, whether in hard copies or electronically, requires the consent of the Robert Schuman
Centre for Advanced Studies.
Requests should be addressed to forinfo@eui.eu
If cited or quoted, reference should be made as follows:
[Full name of the author(s)], [title], CARIM AS [series number], Robert Schuman Centre for
Advanced Studies, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI): European University Institute, [year of publication].
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS PUBLICATION CANNOT IN ANY CIRCUMSTANCES BE REGARDED AS THE
OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

European University Institute


Badia Fiesolana
I 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI)
Italy
http://www.eui.eu/RSCAS/Publications/
http://www.carim.org
http://cadmus.eui.eu

CARIM
The Consortium for Applied Research on International Migration (CARIM) was created at the
European University Institute (EUI, Florence), in February 2004 and co-financed by the European
Commission, DG AidCo, currently under the Thematic programme for the cooperation with third
countries in the areas of migration and asylum.
Within this framework, CARIM aims, in an academic perspective, to observe, analyse, and forecast
migration in Southern & Eastern Mediterranean and Sub- Saharan Countries (hereafter Region).
CARIM is composed of a coordinating unit established at the Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced
Studies (RSCAS) of the European University Institute (EUI, Florence), and a network of scientific
correspondents based in the 17 countries observed by CARIM: Algeria, Chad, Egypt, Israel, Jordan,
Lebanon, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Palestine, Senegal, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, and
Turkey.
All are studied as origin, transit and immigration countries. External experts from the European Union
and countries of the Region also contribute to CARIM activities.
CARIM carries out the following activities:
-

Mediterranean and Sub-Saharan migration database;


Research and publications;
Meetings of academics and between experts and policy makers;
Migration Summer School;
Outreach.

The activities of CARIM cover three aspects of international migration in the Region: economic and
demographic, legal, and socio-political.
Results of the above activities are made available for public consultation through the website of the
project: www.carim.org
For more information:
Euro-Mediterranean Consortium for Applied Research on International Migration

Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (EUI)


Convento
Via delle Fontanelle 19
50014 San Domenico di Fiesole
Italy
Tel: +39 055 46 85 878
Fax: + 39 055 46 85 755
Email: carim@eui.eu

Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies


http://www.eui.eu/RSCAS/

Abstract
Availability of data is probably one of the most important determinants of progress in the social
sciences and in demography in particular. Extra-territorial voting introduces a new data source for
diaspora studies, a source that opens the way to the analysis of both dispersion over territory and
political participation. Here we discuss the advantages and drawbacks of censuses for absentee voters
as a data source in the territorial and demographic approach to diasporas, paying special attention to
the Spanish Census for absentee voters.

Rsum
La disponibilit de donnes est probablement un des plus importants facteurs de progrs dans le
domaine des sciences sociales et de la dmographie en particulier. Lintroduction du vote ltranger
a ouvert de nouvelles perspectives dans le cadre de ltude des diasporas. Cet article discute les
avantages et les inconvnients des recensements des lecteurs absents en tant que source de donnes
dans une approche territoriale et dmographique des diasporas. Il prte galement une attention
particulire au recensement espagnol des lecteurs absents.

Introduction
It has been stated that in the last decades the social sciences, and demography in particular, are
enjoying much greater research production thanks to the development of new statistical methods and
the emergence of newly available socio-demographic data sources.
In the diaspora approach the dispersion in time and space of a group of people relatively
established across a certain territory, sharing different elements is particularly important: be these
elements a nationality, a religion, an ethnicity or other forms of self-identification (Safran 1991;
Cohen 1999). However, this condition of dispersion is difficult to measure, since the most intensive
and extensive databases are the ones provided by censuses. Despite its advantages (universality,
accurate approach for counting population, data availability for a large number of geographical scales
and questions on nationality and country of birth), such data suffers from some weaknesses when it
comes to international comparisons (censuses are carried out around every 5 to 10 years, there are
different years and dates of data collection, often there is a lack of information concerning year of
arrival in the country of residence, etc). Even though some recent Integrated Data Census Projects for
different countries (IPUMS or IMILA) have facilitated the measuring of diasporas, it is still not simple
to count all the nationals of one country in all the countries of the world.
As a result of diasporas and transnational citizenship institutionalization, alternative databases, like
the ones provided by the Absentee Voters Census become of critical importance. These censuses are
carried out by countries that have introduced the migrant vote abroad, and need to keep an up-to-date
register of their nationals abroad.
In spite of not yet having an exhaustive record of the countries that have data available from their
absentee voters register, we can hypothesize about the kind of questions that such data would allow
us to address.
Our purpose here is to explore the pros and cons of these data sources by beginning with a short
demographic and geographical description of the diaspora for one Euro-Mediterranean country that led
the Age of Mass Migration (Hatton & Williamson 1998), namely Spain. From this description we
will move on to some inferences and warnings that may be useful for further diaspora research based
on absentee voters censuses.

1. Diasporas and extra-territorial voting, a good combination to approach the spatial


dimension of Diasporas.
1.1 Diaspora.
Robin Cohen (1996) wisely stated that it is hard to understand the diaspora ignoring its victim
tradition, particularly the Jewish experience, but also of the experiences of four other groups that
suffered massive forced migrations: namely African slaves, Armenian, Irish and Palestinian migrants.
Even now when diaspora has changed its sense to a more contemporary, comprehensive way of
understanding political, ethnic or religious identities linked by a certain sociability and/or extraterritorial citizenship, it is still necessary to understand its original meaning before that meaning can be
transcended (Cohen 1996: 507).
To sow widely was the words sense when it was employed for the first time in the Greek
translation of the Bible, describing the displacement of Jews to the Mediterranean and Asia Minor
between 800 and 600 B.C. It is this sense, the one regarding the dispersal from an original homeland,
that is useful for our approach to diasporas.

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

Victoria Prieto Rosas

But, there are many other characteristics that have been stressed by different scholars, most of
them coming from the point of view of Transnationalism, which concerns the political participation
and cultural expression of diasporas. Authors with a Transnationalist background naturally favour
one characteristic over another, but as Vertovec (1999) noted, there are some key features that are
common to all definitions of diaspora namely: a) the global dispersion of a collectively selfidentified ethnic or national group, and the development of sociability in the form of networks; b) a
type of consciousness marked by double identities, with a feeling of being away from home,
sometimes named the transnational imaginary (Wilson and Dissanayake 1996; In: Vertovec 1999);
c) a model for cultural reproduction; d) an avenue for capital, especially in the form of remittances;
and e) political participation.
It is fair to say that the above-mentioned attributes of diasporas are of concern for Transnationalists
who define Diasporas as relationships that can be developed despite great distances and international
borders, passing over the regulations and national narratives they represent, and building networks that
assure capital and non-material information flows (Vertovec 1999; Hannerz 1996; Castells 1996).
In spite of being one of the most frequently mentioned characteristics of Diasporas, dispersion over
space is little studied due to a lack of good data for describing this feature.
1.2. Extraterritorial Voting and its main patterns.
Despite the arguments for and against extra-territorial citizenship, migrant voting in its different forms
has become increasingly common due to the growing power of emigrants in their communities of
origin and destination. A recent study, carried out by Michael Collyer and Zana Vathi (2007), states
that contrary to the general belief, extra-territorial voting is usual for 80% of countries considered in
their study, including liberal democracies and also newly-established systems in Africa.
Changes in this direction started in 1985. Then between 1995 and 2007, there is a very dynamic
period for the introduction of emigrant voting for a special emigrant representationi. In Collyers
(2007) study, they recognize the existence of at least three systems allowing expatriate vote: a) voting
in home district: it means that emigrants can vote in their countrys elections but only if they return to
vote there; b) vote abroad for home district: this is normally implemented by postal or embassy
balloting (Grace, 2006); c) vote abroad for direct representatives: this allows emigrants to have their
own directly elected representatives at legislative elections.
In system (a), votes are cast and counted internally, which implies an extra-territorial regime that is
not particularly strict. System (b) is mixed where the casting of vote is external (generally at polling
stations abroad) but votes are counted as if they were collected from an electoral district within the
country of origin. Finally, system (c) is an ideal type of extraterritorial voting where both counting and
casting take place outside the territory.
Unexpectedly there was no clear association between the economic dependence of countries on
migrants remittances or the population size of diasporas and the implementation of extra-territorial
voting in the study carried out by Collyer et al (2007). Political reasons are still useful here for
understanding the timing and reasons for the introduction of these regimes (generally almost
immediately before the election campaign.
1.3 - Conceivably measurable dimensions of diasporas
Much progress has been made in the field of methodologies, in adapting them to take into account the
multiplicity of links and exchanges within diasporas, and to study their political claims and the means
available for political participation. However, little attention has been given over to the study of their
dispersion in space.
External voting is far more widespread than has previously been imagined, and it is still causing
new interest in different countries as democracy is spreading and become better established. Given this
2

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

How to Measure Diasporas Using Absentee Voter Censuses

we might consider that a new line of research could emerge, based on the use of census for absentee
voters or registers as long as these are administrated as public databases.
Spain is a good example of available data bases for absentee voters since 2007, when the annually
refreshed Census for Absentee Voters became a free-to-use micro-dataset with records from 1997 to
the present. Let us consider this case to infer or at least hypothesize what this kind of data source
might bring to the study of diasporas.

2 - Exploring the territorial and demographic dimension of diasporas: A study of the


Spanish scenario based on the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad.
2.1 - A Diaspora inherited from a long history of emigration and the idea of strong citizenship.
We shall start by assuming that it is possible to talk about Diaspora to make reference to the group of
Spanish citizens residing abroad. Spain has historically been characterized by a strong tradition of
emigration, and from this the country has inherited a wide Diaspora spread around the world.
Thinking of the definition of Cohen (1996), it should be said that the Spanish diaspora is neither a
Diaspora related to the victim tradition of Diasporas, nor a group connected by ethnic bonds. Rather
it is a group sharing nationality and citizenship recognized by the Spanish Government in its
Constitution and Electoral Laws.
The emigration history of this country and the latent nature of Spanish nationality established by
legislation, are two key ideas for understanding the nature of this Diaspora.
Contemporary Spanish migrations started at the end of the 19th Century. The era of mass migration
began with emigration to northern Africa in 1830, and was followed at the end of the 19th Century by
an important population flow to the Americas. In the 20th Century departures were mainly directed to
Latin America, which became the destination for 85% of the emigrants during the first half of that
century, and in the second half of the century the departures headed towards other regions of Europe
(Reques Velasco and Cos Guerra 2003). According to the estimations made by Rueda Herranz
between the 19th and the 20th Century, there were approximately five million Spanish emigrants. Half
of them returned in the same period, leaving 2,800,000 Spanish nationals permanently established in
Latin America (Rueda Herranz 2000: 17).
However, a Diaspora is not only formed by a first generation of emigrants, but also by their
descendants. In the Spanish case, the attribute that unifies the expatriate-generations is an idea of
nationality governed by the principle of ius sanguinis: i.e. nationality is transmitted from parents to
their children, no matter where these children are born. Under Spanish law nationality is established as
follows: a) having been born in Spain with a Spanish parent or two Spanish parents; b) having been
born in Spain with foreign parentsii; c) acquisition of Spanish nationality due to residence in Spain,
having been born abroad; or d) by having Spanish parents or grandparents, having been born abroadiii.
These last two modalities are acquisition modes that correspond to the new Spanish nationals,
that is to say, those born outside Spain.
This legislation establishes Spanish nationality as a strong citizenship that is related to the interest
in combining two fundamental principles of Spain's foreign policies. According to Aguilar Bentez
(1996), these are: The idea of community beneath the general spirit of the legislation and the idea of
protecting the emigrant Spanish worker (Aguilar Bentez 1996: 21). This last interest is not the
stronger today, since bilateral agreements in the last couple of years have emphasized the children and
grandchildren of Spanish citizens abroad rather than Spanish emigrants. For Cano (2006), these
agreements, instead of establishing a double nationality regime in a strict sense, integrate a mechanism
by which, in order to acquire Spanish nationality the old requirement of renouncing ones prior

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

Victoria Prieto Rosas

nationality is eliminated.iv Rather, an especially favorable way of recovering this latent nationality is
introduced (Cano 2006: 1908).
Traditionally, studies of Spanish emigration have been based on sources which record outflows and
inflows to the destination countries. Even though, during the 1990s, comprehensive efforts were made
in order to reconcile at the historical level the sources which recorded departures from Spain in the
twentieth century (Yaez 1994), their scope does not cover all the departures of Spanish citizens but
only those whose destination was Latin America. Other authors, have either worked with stocks based
on censuses carried out by foreign countries where Spanish nationals now live (Palazn1995;
Izquierdo Escribano 1992), or have become interested in assessing the dimension of migration
movements through the study of net migration understood as the difference between immigrants and
emigrants in an area in a given period mostly approximated as the difference between the total and
natural population growth. The biggest weakness of this method is that the final outcomes not only
collect migratory movements but also the sum of errors accumulated by the different sources used,
which undermines the results (Recao et al 1997). In fact, any of the available sources (net migration,
departures by sea, assisted emigration and consular absences) present a high percentage of error, and
what is worse, of uncertainty (Blanes et al 1996: 45).
2.2 - Extra-territorial vote of Spanish Nationals.
Since 1985, Spanish nationals living abroad have enjoyed the right to vote with the Organic Law
5/1985 established within the General Electoral Regime. It is there noted that the right of emigrants to
vote shall be exercised within the vote abroad for home district system (Collyer, 2007) through either
postal vote or embassy balloting.
The requirements determined by this Organic Law, establish that Spanish nationals living abroad
must be registered in CERA (the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad) for which each resident
(those who declare that they have been abroad for at least one year) or non-resident (those who declare
that they have been abroad for less than a year) shall have registered as residing abroad in the Register
of Consular Registration at the Consulate of Spain corresponding to their domicile. At the moment of
each election the voting procedure establishes that the Provincial Delegation of the Electoral Census
Office is in charge of sending the necessary documentation to those who are 18 years of age or older
and who are registered in the Register of Consular Inscription. Also the Consulate is responsible for
returning the votes to the elections board in the diplomatic pouch or by urgent mail.
The systematization of the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad corresponds to the
Electoral Census Office which depends on the National Institute of Statistics. There, the information,
sent by each Consulate of Spain abroad, is centralized.
When registering in the Census Service of the Consulate one should provide the following
information: the province and city council where one wants to be registered, data concerning residence
abroad, ID card number or passport number, date and place of birth (the province for those born in
Spain and the country for those born abroad), gender, age, and level of schooling. These, except for
name and passport, are available on the dataset from the National Institute of Statistics in Spain
It is true that this source does not include those younger than 18 and also that it is made up of
emigrants who left Spain from the early twentieth century to the present time. However, this source
reveals a country by country picture of residence for all Spanish citizens: those born in Spain or
abroad and those who have acquired Spanish nationality due to birth, residence in Spain, marriage to a
Spanish person or from their parents or grandparents.
The use of this register for the provincial elections ensures information availability with a high
level of disaggregation (at provincial and regional level) which none of the other stock statistics have,
not even the censuses of the countries where Spanish people currently live. Besides, it is a continuous

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

How to Measure Diasporas Using Absentee Voter Censuses

register that is updated on a monthly basis, with a closing date for the first day of each month and an
annual closing date on 1st May.
From this perspective the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad seems, at first, an
appropriate source for the study of the Spanish Diaspora, or at least might seem a good data source to
balance the classical sources and their limitations.
As already mentioned in our introduction, a more accurate source for the Spanish population living
abroad would be the censuses of each one of the countries where Spanish people presently reside.
However, attaining this information would involve a number of countries and corresponding censuses
with consequential difficulties (e.g. different dates for different countries).
Despite all these advantages over other censuses sources, the Census of Absentee Voters Residing
Abroad has two limitations in statistical terms. The first of these is that, as has already been noted,
there is no register of those younger than18 years old as it is an Electoral Census. The second
restriction is that the inscription in the Register of Consular Inscription, from which the inscription in
the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad is derived, is voluntary as is the vote, and for this
reason not all Spanish Nationals are registered there.
2.3 - Considerations about the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad for Demographic Research
purposes.
As mentioned before, it is important to go into the possible estimation errors of the Census of
Absentee Voters Residing Abroad. However, official information about the level of omission of this
register is not available and it has not been possible to estimate the degree of error either by country or
by year. It would be opportune to have a quantification of the error, but for the time being we will
limit ourselves to noting some possible problems. We suspect that these observations may be extended
to other censuses of absentee voters and it would be important that researchers planning to use similar
data bear these in mind.
- Over-counting
Over-counting is a potential bias of the CERA and other similar data sources. Individuals can be
double-counted in the case of death or those returning to Spain between elections. Even if the census
has a monthly update, and the Electoral Census Office attempts to eliminate double registrations, it is
possible that demographic events, such as death or change of residence, will not be registered.
- Under-counting
As in any census or voluntary register, some individuals will not be counted. This is likely to be the
most common bias for the Spanish residents in countries neighbouring Spain or among temporary or
seasonal emigrants. In these cases the motivation to register in the Census of Absentee Voters
Residing Abroad will be low for the following reasons.

The vote in Spain is not compulsory, so registration is left up to the voter.

Those who leave the country for short periods of time, knowing the date of return, especially if
no elections will be held in their period away from home, will likely not be interested in
registering for the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad. They may even be quite
ignorant of the same.

Also those who are in a neighbouring country such as Portugal or Andorra, do not necessarily
consider the extra-territorial vote and these may simply travel back to Spain for elections. If
we compare the number of people who are aged over 18, born in Spain with Spanish
nationality and residing in Portugal according to the Portuguese 2001 census, with the figures
for the same group provided by the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad, we find that
the Census has an omission of 27.8%.

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

Victoria Prieto Rosas

Some people may feel discouraged to register if they lose certain rights from no longer being
registered in their City Council, as happens, for example when one registers oneself in the
Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad. There is, for example, the right to collect
unemployment insurance. Another issue is the loss of seniority for continued residence in the
same city council, which is necessary for access to certain social benefits from municipality or
regional government including the possibility of renting a flat from the state.

2.4 - Spanish Diaspora. Some results using the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad.
Some of the results obtained from the spatial and demographic analysis of the Spanish Diaspora from
the Census of Absentee Residents will be presented here. The analyzed period corresponds to the years
1997 to 2007, for which we present the main characteristics of Spanish citizens born in Spain and
those born abroad.
2.4.1 - A growing Diaspora.
Numbers of Spanish nationals increase from 794,366 in 1997 to 1,162,427 in 2007, with important
annual absolute increases, over 70,000 in 1997and 2001. From 2002, the Diaspora has numbered more
than one million members. Its growth though is less dramatic now than in the past.
Table 1.- Spanish population abroad by regions of residence, 2007.
1997
Regions
Europe
Africa

2007

Spanish
Percentage
Spanish population abroad Percentage Distribution
population
Distribution
abroad
427,425
53.8%
466,439
40.1%
9,152

1.2%

8,367

0.7%

Latin America

292,612

36.8%

563,719

48.5%

North America

52,821

6.6%

103,125

8.9%

Asia

3,921

0.5%

8,378

0.7%

Oceania

8,435

1.1%

12,399

1.1%

794,366

100.0%

1,162,427

100.0%

Total

Source: Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad, 1997 and 2007. Own elaboration.

Latin America and Europe were both preferred-destinations in the 20th Century. Latin America
was the main migratory destination from the 19th Century until the middle of the 20th Century. But,
from the 1960s onwards, Europe became the main Spanish emigrant-receiving region. However, the
number of Spanish nationals in Latin America have exceeded those in Europe outside of Spain, since
2004 in terms of subscription in the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad. In 2007, Spanish
nationals in Latin America represented almost half of the total amount of Spanish nationals abroad
(48,5%), while Spanish residents in Europe despite having increased in number lost importance
because of the increase in registration in other regions between 1997 and 2007 (Table 1).
Undoubtedly, Latin America has been the driving force behind most of this positive growth, since
its growth rates shows higher values than the one observed for the Diaspora as a whole. In strong
contrast, Europe decreased in two periods, going from almost 6% annual growth rate in 1998 to -1.6%
in 2007. In 2001 and 2002 the subscription growth rate recovered, exceeding the value of the growth
rate for Latin America in that year. But these values were not sustained and the following year
subscriptions fell again, reaching a value of -1.9% in 2007. What we are probably seeing here is the
end of the active age of the Spanish population who emigrated during the sixties for occupational

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

How to Measure Diasporas Using Absentee Voter Censuses

reasons and who are now returning to Spain: in this sense, the stock of those born in Spain has
decreased. Asia displays the highest sustained annual growth during the whole period. Economic
development in this region especially in the Asian Tigers, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan and
South Korea may partially explain why they have become such an attractive area for Spanish
nationals. The economic growth of Spain during the nineties, as well as the internationalization of
their enterprises and capital, also explains the Spanish interest in the most dynamic Asian countries.
Undoubtedly, Africa has had the biggest loss of Spanish population in these years, and this has
happened in an accelerated and sustained manner since 2002.
2.4.2 - Recent Geography of the Spanish Diaspora.
80% of Spanish residents abroad were concentrated in only ten countries in 2007: Argentina (22%),
France (13.6%), Venezuela (10%), Germany (7.2%), Switzerland (6.2%), Brazil (5.3%), Mexico
(4.3%), the United Kingdom (3.8%), the U.S. (3.8%) and Uruguay (3.5%).
In 1997, France was the main country of residence for Spanish citizens abroad with 20.6%,
followed by Argentina where 15.2% resided and by Germany with 10%. From 2000 to 2007, the most
important country in terms of reception was Argentina. Venezuela is placed third within the main
countries of residence, from 2002, when it overtook Argentina for the first time.
From the map in figure 1 it is possible to see the countries where the Spanish presence has
decreased (in blue), and the countries where it has increased (in yellow and orange shades).
Brazil and Mexico have increased their relative weight together with Chile and Cuba. Europe, the
United Kingdom, Italy, Switzerland and Belgium have lost importance in relation to other countries.
The United States, Australia and Uruguay slightly lost importance, but they remain within the main
group of countries.
The highest growth rates correspond to the countries located in Southeastern Asia, the Persian Gulf,
Mongolia and some small islands in Oceania. Latin America has also seen the number of Spanish
nationals registered in the Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad increase: Mexico, Bolivia,
Chile, and the Caribbean countries such as Costa Rica, Cuba and the Dominican Republic, or those
located in the Andean region such as Bolivia and Chile. In some Latin American countries where the
Spanish population has traditionally settled, this group has reached historical highs: Venezuela,
Argentina or Brazil, growing at a rate of more than 50 per thousand annually (figure 1).
Figure 1.- Annual growth of the Spanish population per countries of residence, 1997 2007.

Annual Growth rate (per thousand)


Negative growth

50.01 to 100

0 to 10

More than 100

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

Victoria Prieto Rosas

The central and western region of Sub-Saharan Africa has lost its Spanish populations, especially
Niger and to a lesser extent Mali and Nigeria. In the southeast Madagascar and the Central
Republic of Congo have registered important decreases, at a rate of more than 50 per thousand
annually. However, there are areas in Africa, such as Angola and Namibia, where the presence of
Spanish citizens increased. In countries like Botswana where it rapidly decreased or in Burkina Faso
and Guinea (former Spanish colony) where on the contrary it increased rapidly, this variation, which is
apparently important, is related to the fact that the initial population in 1997 was practically inexistent
and the growth rates are particularly sensitive then to small changes in populations. The same happens
in Eastern Europe countries such as Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia, Slovakia, Macedonia and Albania,
where the presence of Spanish populations at the beginning of the period was much reduced.
The central and western region of Sub-Saharan Africa has lost its Spanish populations, especially
Niger and to a lesser extent Mali and Nigeria. In the southeast Madagascar and the Central
Republic of Congo have registered important decreases, at a rate of more than 50 per thousand
annually. However, there are areas in Africa, such as Angola and Namibia, where the presence of
Spanish citizens increased. In countries like Botswana where it rapidly decreased or in Burkina Faso
and Guinea (former Spanish colony) where on the contrary it increased rapidly, this variation, which is
apparently important, is related to the fact that the initial population in 1997 was practically inexistent
and the growth rates are particularly sensitive then to small changes in populations. The same happens
in Eastern Europe countries such as Bosnia-Herzegovina, Slovenia, Slovakia, Macedonia and Albania,
where the presence of Spanish populations at the beginning of the period was much reduced.
2.4.3 - Socio-demographic characterization of the Spanish Diaspora.
We have considered the population at the beginning and the end of the study period (1997-2007) and
we observed important transformations in the gender and age structures of the Spanish population
abroad in young and adult ages.
Results point to a feminization of the Spanish population residing abroad, as indicated by the sex
ratio going from 108.5 to 95.3 males per 100 females, between 1997 and 2007. The age specific sex
ratio in 1997 indicated a preeminence of males between 30 and 74 years of age and preeminence in
women at older ages.
Figure 2. Population Pyramids of the total number of Spanish people residing abroad.
1997 and 2007.
99
96

Hombres

93

Mujeres

90
87
84
81
78
75
72
69
66
63
60
57
54
51
48
45
42
39
36
33
30
27
24
21
18

1 ,2

1 ,0

0 ,8

0 ,6

0 ,4

0 ,2

0 ,0

1997

02,

0,4

0,6

0,8

1,0

1,2

2007

Source: Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad, 1997 - 2007. Own elaboration

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

How to Measure Diasporas Using Absentee Voter Censuses

In 2007, the structure of ages and gender (figure 2) presents a wider base than the equivalent in
1997, which indicates an increase in the number of registrations of young people between 18 and 25
years old. The age groups between 18 and 45 years old grow intensively for both sexes. Finally, the
population pyramid corresponding to 2007 clearly shows an increase in the female population,
particularly between 29 and 50 years old.
Figure 3.- Population Pyramids representing Spanish people abroad according to regions of
residence, 1997 and 2007.

Source: Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad, 1997 and 2007. Own elaboration

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

Victoria Prieto Rosas

Despite the cessation of the Spanish migratory flow, the population pyramid keeps on renewing
itself in younger ages where the number of registrations increases. A feminization process is also
observed as a result of the recent increase in the number of women and because of their improved
survival at old ages.
With regards to the population structures seen in each region, important differences are observed
(figure3). Europe stands out due to an aged structure in which people over 65 years of age represent
more than 20% of the population, and because of a certain growth in the female population in middle
age (30 to 50 years old). In Latin America, we find one of the biggest transformations in the Spanish
population abroad, the reversion of the aging process: people over 65 years old, who used to be
46.2% of the population in 1997, represented 37.5% in 2007.
In figure 3 it is possible to observe an increase in the number of young people residing in North
America, likely the children of those who in 2007 were between 40 and 55 years old. However, this
did not inhibit the expected increase in the average age that went from 46.7 to 48 years old, and the
increase in the proportion of people over 65 years old which went from 16% to 20%.
In the same figure, it is observed that Spanish residents in Asia are mostly young people between
25 and 50 years old, with a gender distribution which indicates a male predominance in working ages
(85.5% of people under 65 years old). There is no young population since Asia is a recently chosen
destination by emigrants (in the nineties) it is still too early to find the offspring of this population.
The proportion of people over 65 years old in this region is the lowest of all those found among the
Spanish residing abroad, only 14.5% in 2007, even lower than the percentage observed in 1997 which
was 16.5%. It may also be the destination of temporary emigration, and entrepreneurs and young
professionals, who do not intend to settle for a long period.
Spanish populations abroad have lost more than 5 years in average age (59.8 in 1997 but 54.4 in
2007), due to the recent registration of young people between 18 and 25 years old and adults between
30 and 50 years old. Both groups are of age to migrate and there may be too a population that acquires
Spanish citizenship while considering a migratory project.
2.4.4 Spanish nationals born in Spain and abroad: Territorial and demographic analysis
considering the place of birth.
Here we will observe how the main characteristics of the Spanish living abroad have changed
dramatically between 1997-2007among those who were born in Spain and those who were born abroad.
In 2007 the Spanish born persons continued to be the majority of residents abroad, at 619,289
people, while those born abroad amounted to 543,141 in the same year. However, despite the fact that
those born in Spain retain their predominance, the number of people born abroad increased
considerably in ten years, from 296,437 in 1997 to over 500,000 in 2007 (figure 4). Its relative weight
within the group of Spanish people abroad went from 37.3% to 46.7% in the same period.
Correlatively, despite its growth in absolute terms, those born in Spain lost representation, dropping
from 62.7% to 52.3% in this same period. This change in the composition of the Diaspora has been
observable since 2002.

10

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

How to Measure Diasporas Using Absentee Voter Censuses

Figure 4. - Evolution of the number of Spanish Nationals born in Spain and those born abroad.
1997 - 2007.
700.000
600.000
500.000
400.000
300.000
200.000
100.000
0
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Nacidos en Espaa

Nacidos en el Exterior

Source: Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad, 1997 - 2007. Own elaboration.

In the following table, important changes in the observation period related to the territorial
distribution of both groups are displayed.
Table 2. Percentage distribution of Spanish Nationals born in Spain and abroad according to
regions of residence, 1997 and 2007.
Regions of residence
Europe
Africa
Latin America
North America
Asia
Oceania
Total
Regions
of residence
Europe
Africa
Latin America
North America
Asia
Oceania
Total

Born in Spain
1997
Percentage Distribution
274,930
55.2%
4,375
0.9%
179,874
36.1%
31,672
6.4%
1,739
0.3%
5,357
1.1%
497,947
100.0%

2007
Percentage Distribution
328,003
53.0%
5,303
0.9%
219,266
35.4%
53,205
8.6%
4,854
0.8%
8,655
1.4%
619,286
100.0%

Born Abroad
1997
Percentage Distribution
152,513
51.4%
4,777
1.6%
112,738
38.0%
21,149
7.1%
2,182
0.7%
3,078
1.0%
296,437
100.0%

2007
Percentage Distribution
138,414
25.5%
3,064
0.6%
344,475
63.4%
49,920
9.2%
3,524
0.6%
3,744
0.7%
543,141
100.0%

Source: Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad, 1997 and 2007. Own elaboration.

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

11

Victoria Prieto Rosas

Those Spanish nationals born in Spain have remained dominant in Europe, while Spanish nationals
born abroad have dramatically modified their territorial distribution. These have lost their European
predominance, 51.4% of those born abroad in 1997 changed to 25.5% of Spanish people in this region
in 2007. This very same year 63.4% of Spanish nationals born abroad lived in Latin America, while at
the beginning of the period this group only represented 38% of the total.
Among those born in Spain, the proportion of residents in Latin America has also decreased from
36.1% to 35.4%, even though an absolute growth in registrations is observed. In this group, on the
other hand, the percentage of those in Asia and Oceania has increased. A small increase of more than
two points in the Spanish presence for both groups according to place of birth (table 2) in North
America is observed.
Important observations were not noticed in the territorial distribution of those born in Spain at a
country level. Those born in Spain maintained their predominance between 1997 and 2007 in
countries like France and Argentina. In 2007, 18% and 15% of those born in Spain and abroad,
respectively, resided in the countries mentioned, followed by Germany (8%) and Venezuela (7%). The
United Kingdom (5.6%) and Uruguay (2%) lost their predominance, despite the fact that both
countries represent historical destinations for Spanish emigration.
Figure 5.- Percentage distribution of Spanish people born abroad by country of residence.
Years 1997 and 2007.

12

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

How to Measure Diasporas Using Absentee Voter Censuses

Source: Census of Absentee Voters Residing Abroad, 1997 and 2007. Own elaboration

When contrasting the territorial distribution by country of those born abroad, there are also other
important changes. In 2007, France ceased to be the main country of residence for Spanish nationals
born abroad to be replaced by Argentina where 28.7% of those born abroad reside. The proportion of
residents in all European countries lost ground to those living in Latin America.
It is within the main residence countries preferred by the Spanish population that these changes in
the composition of the Diaspora by birthplace occurred. Among the first ten residence countries of
those born in Spain, the increase in the proportion of those born in the current countries of residence is
observed among Latin American countries, especially in Mexico, Argentina, Venezuela and Brazil. In
European countries like France or the United Kingdom, the increase in descendants has been low or
even lower than those observed in other European countries such as Switzerland, Germany or
Belgium, where the percentage of those born there has strongly increased, especially since 1999.

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

13

Victoria Prieto Rosas

3 Discussion
This paper showed that the Spanish Census of Absentee Voters is an extraordinarily useful tool for
describing the geography and the main demographic transformations of the Spanish diaspora in terms
of cross-sectional analysis, while also setting out some of the problems involved in using this
administrative record of data originally collected for non-research purposes.
Being aware of the future emergence of similar datasets given the trend in extra-territorial voting,
we would like to finish by pointing out the advantages and drawbacks of the use of this kind of data
for the general study of diasporas.
The advantages of census of absentee voters
A demographic description of Diasporas can be made taking a nationality criterion. This concept
of citizenship includes migrants and their second or even third generation descendants, and not merely
those who once left their country of origin.
The presence of some core demographic variables could help in establishing the demographic
characteristics of the diaspora (ageing, changes in sex ratio, differences in demographic structure by
country of birth, etc.). Quite interesting work might be developed in the geography of diasporas,
looking for clusters of countries that represent the main destination of migration waves, as well as for
the migrants sex and age profile using data sets that might include the year of arrival or departure.
Also, it might be possible to think of different geographies within each Diaspora, distinguishing those
born in the country of origin from those born abroad (second and third generation).
Drawbacks of Census of Absentee Voters
The accuracy of the data determines the whole scope of research opportunities. For countries where
voting might not be mandatory this kind of data will suffer from several biases of underestimation.
Stimulus for registration in the country of arrival might be required if all the citizens of a country that
were living abroad were expected to be counted in these kinds of registers
These sources of bias do not hinder further research, but caution is needed when interpreting the
results and inferring from them.

14

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

How to Measure Diasporas Using Absentee Voter Censuses

REFERENCES
AGUILAR BENTEZ, M. (1996) Doble Nacionalidad. Boletn de la Facultad de Derecho de la
UNED, 10-11, pp. 219-262.
BLANES, A.; GIL, F.; PREZ, J. (1996) Poblacin y actividad en Espaa: evolucin y perspectivas.
Coleccin de Estudios e Informes del CED, 5, pp. 43 90.
CANO, E. (2006) La doble nacionalidad con los pases iberoamericanos y la Constitucin de 1978. In:
CARRASCO DURN (ed.) Derecho constitucional para el siglo XXI. Actas del VIII Congreso
Iberoamericano de Derecho Constitucional, Sevilla, pp. 1905 1908.
CASTELLS, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Blackwell, Oxford.
COHEN, R. (1999) Global Diasporas: An introduction. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
COHEN, R. (1996) Diasporas and Nation-State: From Victims to Challengers. International Affairs,
72 (3), pp. 507-520.
COLLYER, M. & VATHI, Z. (2007): Patterns on Extra-territorial Voting. Working paper of Sussex
Centre for Migration Research, 22.
GIMENEZ, M (2009) El voto en el exterior consagra un progreso de la Democracia.
http://www.renacerbol.com.ar/edicion172/bolivia06.htm accessed 10/11/2009
GRACE, J. (2006) Challenging the norms and standards of Election Administration. Standards for
External and Absentee Voting. IFES draft.
http://www.ifes.org/publication/3dd9c7573d5b38d597a995a5533d456e/ 3 IFES Challenging Election
Norms and Standards WP EXTVOT.pdf accessed 22/07/2009.
HANNERZ, U. (1996) Transnational Connections: Culture, People, Places. Routledge, London.
HATTON, T.; WILLIAMSON, J.G. (1998) The Age of Mass Migration: Causes and Economic
Impact. Oxford University Press, New York.
PALAZN FERRANDO, S. (1995) Los espaoles en Amrica Latina (1850 1990). Centro Espaol
de Estudios sobre Amrica Latina (CEDEAL), Madrid.
PREZ VERA & ABARCA JUNCO (1998) Derecho de la Nacionalidad. Universidad de Educacin a
Distancia, Madrid.
PRIETO, V. (2009) Transformaciones recientes de la poblacin espaola residente en el exterior, 1997
2007. Papers de Demografia, 347. (IN PRESS)
RECAO, R.; VINUESA, J.; ZAMORA, F. et al (1997) Demografa. Anlisis y proyecciones.
Sntesis, Madrid.
REQUES VELASCO, P.; COS GUERRA, O. (2003) La emigracin olvidada: la dispora espaola en
la actualidad. Papeles de Geografa, 37 (October 2003), pp. 199-216.
RUEDA HERRANZ, G. (2000) Espaoles emigrantes en Amrica (siglos XVI-XX). Cuadernos de
Historia, 82.
SAFRAN, W. (1991) Diasporas in Modern Societies: Myths of Homeland and Return. Diaspora, 1 (1),
pp. 83-99.
VERTOVEC, S. (1999) Conceiving and Researching Transnationalism. IN PRESS:Ethnic and Racial
Studies, 22 (2).

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

15

Victoria Prieto Rosas

The Countries that introduced the vote abroad for emigrant representatives are: Italy, France, Croatia, Portugal, Morocco,
Mozambique, Haiti, Guinea Bissau, Cook Islands, Colombia, Cape Verde, Angola and Algeria (Collyer, 2007: 17).
ii By 3 different means, namely: i) if at least one of the parents was also born in Spain; ii) if none of them had the Spanish
nationality; and iii) if the legislation of the countries of origin of any of them assigned a nationality to the child (Art. 17
of the Spanish Civil Code)
iii

Regarding the last one (d), before 2002 there was an age limit to exercise the right of applying for nationality (18 years
old), but since then said age limit has been eliminated and any son or daughter of a Spanish national may apply for
nationality at any age (Law 36/2002). Grandchildren can also have access to Spanish nationality after having resided legally
and continuously for at least one year in Spain. In December 2006, the Statute of Spanish Citizenship Abroad (Law 40/2006)
was passed, allowing access to Spanish nationality to all the grandchildren of Spanish nationals, with no age limit, even
though none of the parents was born in Spain and without any residence requirement in said country. From the beginning of
2009, the recently approved Historical Memory Law recognizes the right of grandchildren of Spanish nationals to acquire
Spanish nationality if their grandparents were economic or political refugees who left the country between 1936 and 1955.
iv

Spain has signed Double Nationality Agreements with: Argentina April 1969; Bolivia October 1961; Chile May 1958;
Colombia 1980; Costa Rica June 1964; Ecuador March 1964; Honduras June 1966; Nicaragua July 1961; Paraguay June
1959; Peru May 1959; Dominican Republic March 1968 (BOE, In: Website of the Ministry of Work and Social Affairs,
2008). Other countries in Latin America, such as Brazil, Uruguay or Venezuela, do not have double nationality
agreements since their constitutions do not consider dual nationality.

16

CARIM-AS No.2010/42 2010 EUI, RSCAS

You might also like