Bill Mundy

WATER, NEW SECRETS REVEAL

WORLD CHANGING POSSIBILITIES
Basic Explanation of Waters World Changing Properties for Green Energy and More

1. INTRODUCTION
It is hard to believe that something as ubiquitous as water could hold a surprise
that could change the world. Beyond the life giving applications, water holds secrets to
creating energy that could save our planet.
There are plenty of mysteries that still abound about water and opportunities to
spend money chasing after them. A friend of mine actually bought a water energizer; it
claimed it would electrically boost the energy in the water she drank, providing a
healthier fluid to operate her physical functions. The design was straightforward:
electrodes providing electrical energy at a low level. The documentation explained that
it proved its effect by reducing the size of the hydrogen bonded molecule bundles. It
claimed that it could verify its claims that the water coming from the device had less
hydrogen bonding than the water put into it, asserting this was a measure of the more
energy contained within the water. On the one hand, energy was added to the water and
produced the effect, so it should be more energized. However, this makes no sense if you
take the traditional explanation of hydrogen bonding. The stronger the bonds (+ to -),
the more energy and the larger the clumped molecules. Right? So, whats up? Why
would more energized water have less hydrogen bonding?
It turns out this idea of energized water isnt new. An alchemist1 I know has said
that they have known that all water is not the same for a very long time. If they distill
water, they only use the first 2/5 of the water that they condense. The rest of it is too
dense to offer any of the alchemical properties they need from water. This is an
interesting notion, which obviously must have some basis, or it would not have survived
as a practical step for hundreds of years. But who can say if that is better for you or not?
And how could this be possible? And what does this have to do with world changing
energy production?
This paper will take a new look at water, and shift the perspective of what you
were taught in school. This isnt new age or even alchemical lore, but observational

Think of alchemists as independent experimenters that are very results oriented and willing to
question accepted dogma if it failed to produce results.
1

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015

science and a chronical of repeated demonstrations that validate this new view of what
water can be and do.
Surprisingly, and fundamentally the most remarkable thing about water is that
it can actually become a gas that wont liquefy until it reaches -178C in the open
atmosphere, and this gas explosively implodes (condensing back into the liquid we
drink) if compressed to 6 atmospheres or exposed to a spark. But the world changing
applications are even more astounding. If youd like to know more, read on.

2. BRIEF REVIEW OF THE PHENOMENON

Water has done some really strange things of late:
In the 1970s an inventor named Yule Brown patented a commercial cutting
torch by treating specially conditioned water with electricity. His water-gas, called
Browns Gas, was able to outperform an oxygen-acetylene torch. His torch required only
water (plus electricity of course) to fuel it, completely safe compared to tanks of oxygen
or acetylene. The gas also burned at 54C. The torch tube never got hot enough to burn
anything if set down after shutting it off, or if touched while in operation.
The cool burning flame when kept on any metal would heat up and melt, then
vaporize that metal. Magically, the flame raised its temperature only where it contacted
the metal. Making it capable of soldering two dissimilar metals together with its one
flame. In fact, it could burn through fire brick, charcoal, anything, even materials
requiring 10s of thousands of degrees. But wait, theres more. Yule demonstrated that
when it burned radioactive materials, they lost their radiation, completely neutralized,
no longer radioactive. He demonstrated this effect to congress, but got no traction with
the government on bringing his technology into the regulated industries that could take
full advantage of these special properties.
Prior to that, in the late 60s, another inventor, Paul Pantone, created a unique
fuel delivery system for an internal combustion engine. Paul was not a product of the
institutional educational system. Somehow he came up with an idea that combined the
intake and exhaust system for his engine to condition his fuel. First he vaporized his fuel
mixture, then he preheated it with exhaust in a venturi-like tube, and then he ran his
motor. He called it a GEET reactor. After being denied a patent, he published his original
design, and now is seeking copy-write protection, having been shut down by the patent
office.
The surprising thing was he added water to his fuels and found he could run his
engines on anything that would vaporize with the water. Running his engine on rootbeer was a glorious moment for this young man back in the day. However, he had no
idea how it really worked at the time, and his approach over the years has been to offer
huge gas savings with his invention by watering down your gas. The scientists who
have looked at it have validated that it produces reactions consistent with both plasma
Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 2

and nuclear reactors. It was originally made out of an iron rod that was supported by a
double iron tube with the fuel mix in the inside tube and exhaust in the outside tube.
Not high tech or expensive to convert traditional carbureted engines. Paul repeatedly
demonstrated his exhaust was so clean, you could breathe it.2
For some reason he and those that have publicly promoted his work have been
harassed as a frauds ever since, despite multiple replications by independent
experimenters and even endorsements by scientists. Currently hes working on a new
text to explain the process to a level that goes much deeper than this paper. His reactor
is capable of turning any vaporized material mixed with water completely into energy.
No expelled exhaust from the internal combustion engine using his fuel delivery system
is one configuration option for his converted engines. Maybe California would stop
getting pollution blowing in from China if they put these devices on their cars which are
free of all pollution abatement devices.
But, the 70s produced a number of inventors who did the impossible with
water. They actually drove their cars on water alone. Water that was electrolyzed by the
power of the alternator run by the engine. This, as Wikipedia is currently claiming, is
not possible because it takes more energy to electrically split water into Hydrogen and
Oxygen than you will get back when it burns. They are overlooking the problem of the
explosive nature of burning hydrogen, its way faster and hotter than gasoline. Also the
nuance of how voltage affects electrolysis vs. current in multiple plate systems and the
addition of catalysts, completely changing the power calculations. Even so, something
else clearly must be going on. The engines run cooler, not hotter using water-gas. Its not
fake, many people have duplicated the work, and breathing the exhaust, drinking the
clear condensed vapors is a pretty strong endorsement of what is going on. No one in
their right mind will run a gas powered motor inside a room today. True fraud can be
quickly exposed simply by closing the door on the garage.
Before we get into that, Daniel Dingle in The Philippines demonstrated his water
powered car for decades before being jailed at 82 years of age a few years ago. His
government explained the economics of losing the tax dollars from oil sales was too
much of a cost to give the country pollution free fuel when he first demonstrated his
water powered car to their President. It took a well-funded plastics conglomerate to set
him up for that take-down. But he is quoted to prefer jail over the fate of Stan Meyers.
Stan Meyers drove his dune buggy from Kansas to Washington DC on water with his
patented equipment before he was poisoned during the celebration dinner over a
production deal that never happened.

Paul is still alive after multiple attempts on his life. His invention, when properly modified, has
also been able to produce some interesting phenomenon which could lead to ways of stopping
tornadoes in their tracks, new ways of scanning the body similar but safer than x-rays, and
inexpensive ways to examine particle physical phenomenon. Scientists from around the world
have examined and been impressed by his device.
2

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 3

Multiple garage hacks have duplicated their work and made torches or run cars
on water. One, Denny Klein, even raced his car on water power alone, his original
designs, like Stans pulsed the DC through Stainless Steel plates. Stan was an
accomplished inventor and filed patents that disclose how he did it. Others have
compared their working designs in public disclosures. Its real, even if Wikipedia cant
explain it. The ironic part of this is the people doing it dont really know whats going on
for the most part. And multiple theories abound because the fundamental research is
not being done. So, are you interested in how it works? I have some insights Id like to
share. I think you will find them very compelling.

3. THE MOLECULAR REVEAL

To reveal the secret of water, you have to go back to some of the things you were
taught in high school chemistry. You might recall orbital theory, how electrons fit
around atoms and between them in molecules. Keep in mind that this theory is
developed from observation. It is not developed from the actual structure of the atoms
and essence of electromagnetic theory. It was developed prior to the unification of the
theories of physics. So, instead of figuring out what is really going on, the science has
been in the mode of making exceptions when things dont work as predicted. The result
here is that there are multiple electron behavioral theories, and orbital with variations
is one of them. However, today, the observational reality is much more sophisticated
and can lend some insights that werent available when you were in high school.
Basically we were taught that Oxygen with 8 protons, and 8 neutrons was
balanced in charge with 8 electrons. However, electrons only gather around atoms in
pairs for each orbital, which is complicated because they tend to fill all the orbitals
way before pairing each orbital. So, Oxygen with 2 S1 electrons, 2S2 electrons, and 4 out
of 6 possible P3 electrons has two P orbitals that are filled.
The theory says Oxygen seeks to add two more electrons to stabilize the
electron shells, but without upsetting the charge ratio of protons to electrons. It does
this by bonding with another Oxygen atom, filling each of the two filled orbitals with
shared electrons; or bonding with two hydrogen atoms, who are seeking to fill their
filled 1S1 orbitals sharing with one Oxygen atoms two unpaired P3 electrons. The
reaction of burning hydrogen releases energy, so 2 H20 bonds have less energy (and
therefore is more stable) than the O2 and 2-H2 bonds.
The three P orbitals look like 3 crossed dumbbells on a Cartesian 3-D axis. When
Oxygen bonds with two Hydrogen atoms (to make water), we were told the S1 orbitals
of the Hydrogen hybridize with the 3P3 orbitals of the Oxygen and formed 4SP3 hybrid
orbitals in the form of a tetrahedron. The Hydrogens taking up two vertices locations of
the tetrahedron and the two paired electrons taking up the other two. This creates a
polar molecule that is mostly negative on one side and mostly positive on the other. This
+/- polarity of the individual molecules causes hydrogen bonding, similar to how
Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 4

magnets attract N-S. It turns out, both these assumptive explanations were not entirely
true.
The secret lies with the Oxygen atom. Oxygen does form O2, a stable gas we
breathe. But it also forms O3 (Ozone), a stable gas (although not as stable as O2) that
protects us from harmful radiation from the sun. One would expect O3 to be in the form
of an equilateral triangle. Sharing one electron from each of the bonding atoms. We
were led to believe all Oxygen atoms are the same. However, O3 always has one central
Oxygen atom and two attached atoms in an isosceles triangle configuration. Obviously
Oxygen is capable of holding different energy levels of electrons that are not so easily
simplified into a hybridized orbital theory. And for this to be the shape preferred by O3,
it would mean that Oxygen atoms are in fact not all the same all the time. At a nuclear
level they must be different, or flexible in how they organize their protons and neutrons,
or in the fundamental energy that the nucleus contains to maintain stability of the
different electron orbitals.
In fact, some of the more advanced theories that cant quite be confirmed
suggest that the position and energies of the Protons and Neutrons influence how the
electrons form and hold energy of electrons around an atom. This shared nuclear
influence has some merit and also could inspire some new experiments in nuclear
physics. The electron-nucleus connection may offer a new approach to plasma and
nuclear physics. This will impact both energy generation possibilities and our concept of
gravity3. But for now, lets get back to our topic at hand.
What remains clear is that the electrons can and do regularly change their
energy states in atoms and molecules. This happens in every chemical reaction,
producing or consuming light or radiated energy. Also in every solid state device, some
producing light, others significant changes in magnetic fields to operate the transistors
and power devices within your computer or cell phone. It appears that water is capable
of doing this, just like a semiconductor, but unlike a semiconductor that is solid and
remains relatively physically unchanged, water molecules change their shape with the
amount of energy that the electrons possess. But before I go there, lets complete our
review of electron orbital theory.
You might recall that when an electron in an orbital gives up energy, it is always
in a discrete amount, or quanta. Since the energy is always in the form of an
electromagnetic wave, this quanta corresponds to a specific wave length and equivalent

There are multiple inventions coming forward that seem to be able to pull huge amounts of
energy out of other substances with pulsed electricity. Project Dog Bone is one of them. There
clearly is something to the ability of substances with properly stimulated electrons, to influence
what the protons and neutrons are doing; changing them and producing energy. In the Unified
Theories of Physics this is an interaction of gravity and light on a nuclear level.
3

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 5

energy. This is most common in LEDs, very narrow wavelengths for single compound
emitters4. Water is no exception.
For centuries there is a peculiar event witnessed in water. It is called cavitation
and sonoluminescence.5 The energy in the light given off has been measured to be
equivalent to tens of thousands of degrees. Beating and compressing the water
apparently charges the electrons in the water up and bubbles form. When the bubbles
collapse, or the gas condenses, light is emitted of a very high energy value or quanta.
Adding substances to the water increases the energy released in the flashes of light.6
People have studied this for years, because it routinely dissolved propellers and pump
blades. Simple water disintegrates titanium propellers. The scientists have promoted
that this was due to the localized implosive force of the collapsing bubble, a micro-burst
of extreme pressure. Ill go out on a limb here and suggest the electron energy discharge
may have had something to do with the vaporization, and sound may not be responsible
for the light that is emitted.7
But to credit the electrons for the transmutation of titanium, you need a little
more clarity on what is happening to the water molecule. It turns out that today they
can measure the energy state and position of the orbitals of some molecules. And one
scientist measured the water molecule and found a different state than the classic 4-SP3
structure. He found a fully energized P orbital orthogonally positioned to the triangular
plane of three SP2 orbitals. The other paired electrons in the hybrid orbital were only
80% of their expected potential with the Hydrogen atoms forming the other two
corners of the triangle with hybridized SP2 orbital potential. This water molecule was
holding more energy on its own than typical/historically explained water, it had
changed its characteristic shape and polarity configuration. However, it was not holding
all the energy that it could have held. It proves without doubt that water is able to hold
more energy than has been taught for centuries. And water will reconfigure its orbital
organization to accommodate the energy variations. A big surprise to institutional
science with a huge impact for the world.
Now dont get ahead of me, and yes, youve probably got it figured out. But,
before we go there, lets debunk hydrogen bonding.

LEDs are a great example. You put low frequency electricity of a certain voltage in, and out
comes high frequency light radiation. Way more efficiently than bulk heating of metal filaments
as in traditional lighting. Most substances will also energize their electrons with heat, to the
point of release at the higher energy state compatible with their electron orbitals.
5 Another misnomer. It isnt the sound that generates the light, but what can you do?
6 This is a cascade effect of one electron emitting an energy that stimulates a higher energy from
another substances electron is often used in laser technology to pump up the power.
7With this being a common method of disintegrating metals (through electrical discharge), one
wonders why micro-pressure would be used to explain the effect. Is it because fluid scientists
dont understand electricity? Does this confusion all come down to the specialization and
departmental politics of scientific disciplines? This reminds me of archeologists pretending to be
civil engineers.
4

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 6

Water is special. In fact, the clumping of water is what makes life as we know it
possible. It gives water surface tension. It slows the mixing of substances in water, the
diffusion rate is impossibly slow due to water molecules clumping together. It enables
trees to grow tall with the benefit of capillary action, and all kinds of bodily functions to
happen. It enables ice to float and protects all kinds of life during winter with this
phenomenon. Some cultures are taught that the ocean is one big molecule of clumped
water molecules. But, its not hydrogen bonding that forms the clumps. Its actually
those paired electrons in the SP3 (and now potentially SP2) orbitals. Those orbitals can
hold so much more energy than we thought. In point of fact they seek out more energy
than they get in single molecule SP3 orbitals. They satisfy this need by clumping
together with other water molecules. This is what makes water a liquid at room
temperature and what makes it so slow to boil or a very good cooling agent for
evaporative cooling.
The heat you put into water is shared by all the interconnected electrons, and
they simply absorb it into their collective orbitals until eventually the electrons pick up
so much energy that they break free of the collective clump. Frankly, the images of
molecular clumping does not support the formation you might expect with a + to
organization.8 The new age water energizer is correct in the effect of adding energy to
water, it reduces the clumping. The ionic or +/- clumping only comes into play when the
energy is drained from the molecules and minimal excess energy is present as happens
when water is close to freezing. Thats when water expands by orienting + to between
the molecules, not clumps together. Sorry, but hydrogen bonding is a complete
misnomer, and the explanation is completely bogus.9
So, now lets bring the final reveal. The collective non-bonded pairs of electrons
can absorb energy from friction (as in cavitation) or heat or electricity. Different
frequencies and conditions will have different effective transfer rates and result in
differing molecular behavior. Straight heat usually always boils water. Beating it
violently will heat it, but also produces cavitation with the resulting energized gas
expansion followed by an energy release and collapsing condensation. Boiled water, or
water vapor is not fully energized water, it simply is energized enough to overcome the
shared electron bondings liquefying effects. In cavitation, the water is often cold, but
also may contain electrolytes that facilitate the exchange of electrical energy, increasing
the efficiency of the energy transfer into the electron orbitals.10

Yes they have scanned the organization of hydrogen bonds in water.

Although completely off the top of my head, it would make more sense to say the gravity of the
Oxygen atom is stronger than the balancing electrons in the paired SP3 orbitals, so it pulls on the
energy of neighboring SP3 paired orbitals and finds balance with the shared energy of multiple
electrons spread across multiple molecules.
10 So here it is, for centuries weve been seeing a higher state of water, a gas incapable of
liquefying at room or water temperatures. It happens to have an energy threshold higher or
rather requiring a more concentrated energy infusion than normal heating methods.
8
9

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 7

Lets take just a paragraph and look at cavitation. It turns out a man patented a
process for heating water with cavitation. He demonstrated it was 30% more efficient at
making steam than by just heating water. He started his business with a patented
energy saving burner-less water-beater heater. However, he also discovered the process
disintegrated his beater. Now his companys cavitation systems only heat chemical
slurries with his 30% more efficient cavitating heating and blending process. No
measurable loss of elements have resulted from that process. (But I doubt anyone has
looked for it in the slurries.) The cost of replacing the beaters was more than the energy
savings in heating water alone.
Using electricity to energize water usually generates Hydrogen and Oxygen, but
you can actually form an energized water gas if you set it up right. Cavitate the water
with the generated gas, by getting it hot and pressurized with properly spaced DC
powered plates, or pulse the DC on the order of 40,000 Hz and magically, the water also
transforms into a gas that is heavier than air. The conversion rates were measured to be
exponential at these frequencies by Stan Meyers (electrical energy in to gas out). This
was how he was able to have a slug-bug engine (which typically can barely light the
headlights) provide the electricity needed to turn water into fuel in excess of what was
needed to drive the car at 300 miles to the gallon of water.
I assert that the two paired electron SP3 orbitals will pick up enough energy to
form two orthogonal P orbitals, and the Hydrogen atoms will form a linear molecule
with the remaining two SP orbitals, completely changing the shape and eliminating the
regular electron orbital clumping characteristics of the water molecule. There is still an
electromagnetic interaction of the gas molecules, as this lighter molecule forms a gas
that is denser than air (principally N2)11.
This energized water molecule now behaves as most molecules that size with a
polar configuration of positive ends and negative center. Gas at room temperature,
liquefying at -178C. And also, like Ozone, very reactive to spark or flame. And also very
reactive to magnetic fields. The quanta of the release of the energy when this 2P with
2SP orbitals H-O-H linear configuration drops to 4-SP3 orbital tetrahedral formation is
extremely powerful. So powerful and at such a high frequency, that it can initiate a
plasma or low temperature nuclear reaction with elements that are susceptible to the
energy and proximal to the emissions. Although the burning gas flame wont ever boil
water, it will heat any metal to plasma temperatures and deconstruct the nuclear fabric
of the material if in contact long enough.
If the gas burns on its own, it is an implosive reaction at 54C, where the release
has little effect on air or water12 in proximate location due to their transparent nature

N2 has a mass of 28, H2O, 18.

Other than the ~1,800 to 1 implosive compression. Note. Steam locomotives used the
quenching of steam in cylinders to power the wheels with the implosive compression.
11
12

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 8

and the lack of physical forces to couple the discharge to the nucleus of the neighboring
atoms13. Ignition happens when compressed to 6 atmospheres, or when exposed to an
energy discharge of spark or flame. These Low Temperature Nuclear Reactions or
Plasma Reactions only seem to happen in contact with electrically conductive and
visibly dense materials. These materials respond with absorption of heat and/or are
energized to plasma states (when noble gasses or when the targets are sufficiently
energized). Metals, Noble Gasses, and Organic Compounds all becoming compatible
reaction partners. In these reactions, water behaves as a catalyst in that the molecule
itself does not participate in the reaction, it simply changes state from energized gas to
deenergized liquid after injecting its high energy quantum burst.
In support of that the GEET reactor has demonstrated operation without an
exhaust port. The imploded volume of gas measures extremely pure and breathable
regardless of what is mixed with the water, even crude oil. However, as noted above, the
exhaust can also be recycled fully into the air intake, demonstrating the complete
conversion of matter to energy with his system running a gasoline and water mixture
for fuel.
Water powered, and clean burning water supplemented cars that dont pollute
have been viable since the late 60s. Something else the government has been made
aware of, but fails to see the importance of promoting this in its regulatory role to curb
pollution and global warming.

4. SUMMARY
Pulling this together in an elevator pitch sounds pretty fantastical. However, it is
true that water has another physical state with independent properties.14
Water typically forms ice at 0C, liquid up to 100C, and a vapor above that.
However, when properly energized, water can convert to a higher energized state that
boils at -178C, is relatively stable, and is denser than air. This energized, gaseous state
of water will release a very high energy plasma-like burst of energy in condensing to its
more common liquid form. This energy burst is capable of causing localized, biologically
safe, low temperature nuclear reactions with other elements. Complete non-selfsustaining conversion of matter to energy and transmutation of elements have been
demonstrated, replication of other elements has been reported.

It could also be that since this is a normal discharge frequency for Oxygen atoms, it wont
directly affect water or Oxygen.
14 Some of you may recall a science fiction story that spoke of the world ending discovery of Ice
Nine. Ice nine was a form of water that crystalized at room temperature, introduction to the
worlds ocean ended all life on the planet. Its not that dire, or is it? See the implications and
applications section below.
13

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 9

Other properties of this H-O-H, a linear molecule of energized-water-gas are that

it ignites with spark, flame, or compression above 6 atmospheres. It burns at 54C, but
actually this is a condensation state change and physical realignment of the molecule.
While in the energized gas state, the ionic properties appear to cause the gas to be
denser than would normally be expected for a molecule of the same mass. The energy
that is released when it burns has demonstrated to produce not only heat, but electricity
too. The spark of the burn itself is of a characteristic similar to plasma arcing, although it
creates a flame in open air with visible characteristics similar to burning butane.
Continuous exposure to the flame tends to end in the nuclear deconstruction of the
target substance.
There are currently three dominant ways to create the gas for useful purposes.
One being to accelerate water vapor to supersonic speeds within an electrically and
magnetically charged chamber (the GEET reactor), another to pulse the common liquid
form of water with 40KHz DC with the appropriate voltage and spacing between
electrodes of stainless steel; and also through cavitation or physical agitation of the
water with an appropriate DC voltage and properly conditioned stainless electrodes15.

5. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS
Proven applications exist as fuel for automobiles and trucks and generators: it
can be configured to fire gasoline, diesel, and natural gas engines as mixing the gas with
various other substances from regular water vapor, to regular fuels, organic and
metallic compounds, even Nobel gasses will change the octane and burn rate of the
combustion to match the original fuel. The energy generated in explosive power or heat
from clean fuel mixture reactions far exceeds the energy expended in generating the
water-gas. The exhaust is breathable, or can be completely recycled into the engine for
application in closed environments or areas where pollution abatement is a concern.
This gas has proven itself as both a source of energy and a key element in a
process that can eliminate all pollution. It does this by neutralizing radiation and/or
converting any material into energy. This includes applications like under water (the
flame does not require oxygen to burn, as it is a condensation reaction, not a typical
oxidation reaction) toxic events like uncapped oil wells under the ocean or
contamination from nuclear reactor meltdowns, the exhaust from normal combustion
sources, or toxic chemical disposal from industrial reactions. There have been some
claims that under the right condition, similar to what is seen in plasma reactions, matter

The electrolysis options usually require a catalyst such as KOH be added to the water in small
amounts. After this, only water is needed to be replaced as the KOH is not consumed. Often
Hydrogen and Oxygen are also produced. More study is required to determine how to optimize
the electrolysis methods. Proper blending of the three gasses is how water alone powers an
engine without modifying the timing.
15

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 10

transmutation can result during the creation of the gas turning water into other
substances contained within the generating vessel. Testimony includes the replication
of inorganic and organic compounds. One application using these combined properties
would be purifying polluted water while generating energy.
This gas has also proven itself as an excellent medium for deep diving breathing
units (replacing nitrogen or helium) as it does not have the drawback of creating
bubbles in the blood upon decompression. Apparently when it goes into solution in the
blood, it turns back into regular water. There may be other applications related to
hyperbaric treatments or sterile atmospheres that may benefit healing due to the high
energy content of the molecules which may be beneficial in the treatment of diseases,
similar to some of the effects noted in the use of Ozone.
Although it is easy to generate on demand, it has been demonstrated to be stable
when compressed below 6 atmospheres. The properties of the liquid or solid forms of
this configuration are currently unknown but could offer unique applications in
multiple fields of study due to the unique electromagnetic properties of the molecules
which have only partially been investigated to date.

6. IMPLICATIONS
The first and major implication of this gas is that it threatens the economics of
the oil and gas industries as well as the other industries that compete with these for
energy production (nuclear, solar, wind, geothermal, wave, etc.). Water, by comparison,
is free and available to everyone. Clean generation would make local energy production
more practical than the current grid structure. Establishing viable and available
machines that process water into energy for home, business, and travel will create
major economic failures and massive reduction of cost of manufacture and delivery for
all the industries that support the current petroleum based and battery based fueled
vehicles (including planes and ships). Engines that utilize this technology, with todays
standard of manufacture, will run orders of magnitude longer due to cooler operating
temperatures and no pollution to treat or foul mechanisms. The flexibility of using
water gas with additives offers the opportunity to convert any fuel burning engine to
water-gas without major investments.
Obviously the tax dollars associated with gas and oil would need to be replaced,
although environmental protection expenses would see a shift from just reporting to
clean up and then near extinction of pollution concerns beyond processing methods and
other waste disposal issues. Also, a responsible crossover utilizing the detoxification of
past pollution for energy would make sense for the general public. Plus, the thousands
of jobs that would be eliminated would need to be accommodated for those who are
capable of retraining and employment in other capacities. Finally, the impact to costs
will give competitive advantages to the first adaptors, eventually resetting the value of
money on a global scale. Cooperative trade agreements and protection and support for
Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 11

late adaptors may be required to avoid chaotic shortages in secondary industries. Of

course it goes without saying that the financial markets will need some sort of
protection as the current top rated energy industries will all see a stock valuation
collapse that was worse than the last mortgage collapse. It is doubtful the world
economy will be able to support the losses that those financial institutions will incur,
some sort of cooperative world agreement similar to writing off the debts will have to
be made. Especially since the current governments are deeply involved in the financial
operations of the oil industry throughout the world economy.
On the bright side, global warming and toxic impact to the environment will take
a huge hit, as CO2 will no longer be generated by the major energy users and producers
today. No nitrogen related emissions, no radioactive waste or contamination problems,
no need to drill for oil beyond the existing wells as their productive life will be extended
beyond the foreseeable future due to decreased demand. The cost of oil may bottom out
with the reduced demands and no longer the need to explore or drill in exotic locations
like the Arctic Ocean.
Current and future spills of any kind could be completely cleaned with the right
application of this technology. Although the need to drill and exploit the environment
may actually be eliminated beyond the current sources in operation.
Additionally, if the reactions can be sufficiently studied and perfected,
replicators that create the raw materials we need are also possible. Eliminating the need
for environmental destruction for the pursuit of raw materials. This would benefit the
planet, but eliminate the mining and have a major impact on the raw materials
processing industries.
The major issue preventing this from coming to a car near you is the oligarchs
and their sponsors who produce oil or other competing industries. So far, since the late
60s, they have compromised or killed with the aid of corrupt governments or in the
name of national security everyone who came close to putting this in the hands of
people at large.
This is one of the most disruptive technologies on the planet and has the power
to impact every business, and every person in the world. Any geographically influenced
industry could be transplanted to any location with just the investment of generating
equipment. All carbon emissions could be eliminated. All toxic sites could be cleaned,
even the nuclear wastes that are still being stockpiled by the nuclear industry.
Energy will essentially be free, enabling bio-domes in any location to duplicate
the environment of any other location at only the cost of construction. Greenland could
become the worlds top producer of grass skirts and coconut bras, as well as a tropical
escape with longer days than your traditional beach getaway. Of course the cost of
getting there would be limited to the material cost of the mechanisms and people
staffing the transportation services, their largest expense, fuel, would be zero. We might
even be able to join Captain Nemo in our undersea cities.
Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 12

More practically speaking, any location could produce any food they needed
under glass that would cost nothing to condition beyond the hardware, which would
cost less without the cost of the energy to make and transport it. Energy distribution
could be easier to provide and mange with smaller, local production units better able to
predict and respond to the needs of local consumers without harm to the environment.
Polluted water could be turned into clean water while generating energy.

7. FINAL WORDS
Of course with this technology on the radar of governments from the late 60s
its pretty obvious that they prefer the status quo to disruptive innovation that reduces
the cost of living, feeds the world, fuels the growth of third world nations, and saves the
planet.
It will take a revolution of social consciousness to bring this technology into
public use. Consider that all three nuclear melt downs (Three Mile Island, Chernobyl,
Japan) and the major Gulf of Mexico oil disaster could have all been cleaned up as they
happened or never would have been built, if the government had taken action to utilize
this tech when it first surfaced.
Whats even more interesting, is that as great as this tech is, and there is clearly
a place for it in our collective future, when it comes to energy production, its old school
and not as good as it gets.
There are ways to amplify electricity that have been consistently ignored by the
establishment since the mid 70s when a US Scientist demonstrated and broadcast how
he did it on US television. The earliest patent Ive found was made in 1977 by a team of
engineers.
Today that tech has been proven to power an electric car that doesnt need
recharging. This developed by a current scientist, Thane C. Heins. His work, which he
patented in Canada, amplifies standard household power 4 times with solid state
hardware. No moving parts. (Although now he says hes greatly improved that factor.)
Heins uses the same method, although with different application, described in the mid
70s, and patented by a team of scientists in 1977 here in the US. This of course is a
hugely compact fuel source that would enable personal flying machines with unlimited
range, never have to land, and so much more.
But Thane Heins still hasnt gotten any traction for production. All it took was
looking fresh at the old school conventions of using electricity and taking advantage of
observed phenomenon that caused problems in new ways to create solutions.
Several independent and even teams of scientists have produced similar results
with slight variations on the basic theme. Its repeatable, proven, and easily
implemented with todays technology already in use.

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 13

Retooling is required, but self-powered electric motors and circuits make a

whole lot more sense than water-gas powered ones to generate electricity. In fact, the
noise comparison would make electric generating-motors more practical in nearly
every application, except where the benefits of matter transmutation make sense.
Let me know if you want a report on this technology. Its much simpler. Im
convinced that a couple guys in Brazil have used it to run a printing factory with
multiple presses for a day just on a small bank of batteries. But like most of the guys
who have duplicated the water-gas efforts, they arent explaining how it works that
gives anyone an idea of whats going on. Their Brazilian patent is woefully lacking in
details.
These two technologies could assure us a much better life for us, or at least our
children. That is until we crack the relationship between electrons and protons. Then
we just might see another revolution: making matter and moving objects with light and
the practical implementation of anti-gravity. That will totally revolutionize everything
again, if it ever sees the light of day.
If you want to save your habitat for your grandchildren, spread the word. Only
through education and group effort will the world become a better place. Simple garage
level technology can do it, we just have to work together to make it happen. Get familiar
with the science and the technology, impress the need and possibilities to your
government officials. Just one country taking on this tech will bring a competitive
advantage that will require the rest of the world to catch up.
We survived the switch from sail to powered boats, from horses to autos, from
POTs(Plain Old Telephones) to internet. We can survive the switch from paying for
energy to getting it for free. The options not to, as we have for the last 40 some odd
years, dont look so good.

Copywrited All Rights Reserved Bill Mundy 2015 pg. 14