The territorial dispute between Malaysia and the Philippines originates from the division of the Sulu Sultanate during colonial times. The British gained control of northern Borneo, now the Malaysian state of Sabah, while the remainder of the Sulu lands fell under Spanish and later American rule. Both Malaysia and the Philippines claim rights to Sabah, with Malaysia citing Sabah's entry into the Malaysian federation and the Philippines claiming as successor to the Sulu Sultanate. The dispute remains unresolved despite being brought before the United Nations and International Court of Justice.
The territorial dispute between Malaysia and the Philippines originates from the division of the Sulu Sultanate during colonial times. The British gained control of northern Borneo, now the Malaysian state of Sabah, while the remainder of the Sulu lands fell under Spanish and later American rule. Both Malaysia and the Philippines claim rights to Sabah, with Malaysia citing Sabah's entry into the Malaysian federation and the Philippines claiming as successor to the Sulu Sultanate. The dispute remains unresolved despite being brought before the United Nations and International Court of Justice.
The territorial dispute between Malaysia and the Philippines originates from the division of the Sulu Sultanate during colonial times. The British gained control of northern Borneo, now the Malaysian state of Sabah, while the remainder of the Sulu lands fell under Spanish and later American rule. Both Malaysia and the Philippines claim rights to Sabah, with Malaysia citing Sabah's entry into the Malaysian federation and the Philippines claiming as successor to the Sulu Sultanate. The dispute remains unresolved despite being brought before the United Nations and International Court of Justice.
The Malaysian-Philippines territorial dispute, also known as the North Borneo
dispute was a result of the Sulu Sultanates division. The British gaining control of Northern Borneo, while the remainder of the Sulu land fell under Spanish rule, and then subsequently to the United States of America. The problem at hand refers to the state of Sabah, which both parties lay claim on, Malaysia because of the Sabahs vote on joining the Malaysian federation, and Philippines, because of their presentation as the successor state of Sulu. Because of the connections between people living on both sides of the border, illegal immigration, incidents of cross border raiding and kidnappings have become a commonplace. The North Borneo dispute refers to the dispute between Malaysia and the Philippines over eastern Sabah. Prior to the foundation of the Malaysian Federation, Sabah was known as North Borneo, and was under the rule of the Sultanate of Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu was dissolved in 1915, and as previously stated, was separated into sectors. The British had control over North Borneo, whilst the Spanish had initial control over the remaining Sulu land. The Philippines presents itself as the successor state of the Sultanate of Sulu, and has preserved a dormant claim over Sabah on the claim that the land was only leased to the British. Malaysia, however, believes that the dispute is futile, as the residents of Sabah had willingly joined the Malaysian Federation in 1963. The North Borneo dispute has been presented to the United Nations multiple times, such as at the Manila Summit, the problem is still persisting. Since the United Nations General Assembly passed Resolution Number 1514 in December 1960 on the Declaration of the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples, Great Britain had handed North Borneo over to the Malaysian Federation. The ICJ had taken up the case regarding the dispute, and it had ruled in favor of Sabah being part of Malaysia. The United Nations does recognize Malaysia as being compromised of the Peninsula, Sabah, and Sarawak. If Malaysia were to agree to bring the matter to court again, that means that the claim made by the Philippines would be acknowledged.
The China-Philippines dispute in the East Sea
The dispute is characterized by diplomatic stalemate and the employment of
low-level military pressure techniques (such as military occupation of disputed territory) in the advancement of national territorial claims. All except Brunei occupy some of the maritime features. Most of the "maritime features" in this area have at least six names: The "International name", usually in English; the "Chinese name", sometimes different for PRC and ROC, (and also in different character-sets); the Vietnamese, Philippine and Malaysian names, and also, there are alternate names, (e.g. Spratly Island is also known as Storm Island), and sometimes names with "colonial" origins (French, Portuguese, Spanish, British, etc.). No doubt the Japanese also named features during their occupation / control of the islands during World War II. The Spratly Islands are important for economic and strategic reasons. The Spratly area holds potentially significant, but largely unexplored, reserves of oil and natural gas; it is a productive area for world fishing; it is one of the busiest areas of commercial shipping traffic; and surrounding countries would get an extended continental shelf if their claims were recognized. In addition to economic incentives, the Spratlys sit astride major maritime trade routes to Northeast Asia, giving them added significance as positions from which to monitor maritime activity in the South China Sea and to potentially base and project military force from. In 2014, China drew increased international attention due to its dredging activities within the Spratlys, amidst speculation it is planning to further develop its military presence in the area. Only China (PRC), Taiwan (ROC), and Vietnam have made claims based on historical sovereignty of the islands. The Philippines, however, claims part of the area as its territory under UNCLOS, an agreement parts of which
[3]
dispute.
have been ratified by the countries involved in the Spratly islands