Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This research program was conducted for the determination of packaging efficiency of Norflu
(Fluphenazine-Nortriptyline) products. We have done this experiment in various conditions
(sunlight, dark, 25 watt & 40 watt bulb) exposure. It was observed that the concentration of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride was decreased 65.41%, 8.77%, 9.19% and 20.55% and Nortriptyline
hydrochloride was decreased 51.59%, 21.35%, 21.71%, and 3.03% for sunlight, dark, 25 watt
and 40 watt light exposure respectively. The results showed degradation of the sample. One
reason for this could be for transparent packaging. However, because of contradictory results the
reason could be other than packaging.
Keywords: Fluphenazine hydrochloride, Nortriptyline hydrochloride, Norflu, Batch, Potency.
Chapter One
INTRODUCTION
People with schizophrenia and other psychotic illnesses often have an imbalance in certain
natural chemicals in the brain, especially dopamine. Antipsychotic medications help the brain to
restore its usual chemical balance and so reduce symptoms (Sane Australia, 2014a).
They dont change the patients personality. While the patient might notice changes in his/her
mood and the way he/she cope with stress, antipsychotics will not change the personality.
Antipsychotics can relieve the symptoms of psychosis-related disorders; they do not stop people
from feeling the normal ups and downs of life. People may find it easier to think more clearly
(Sane Australia, 2014).These medications can help to control symptoms, but they do not cure the
underlying condition (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 2009).
Antipsychotics, like many medications, change the way one feels. This means that if a person
stops taking the medication he/she may start to feel the way he/she did before the treatment.
However, antipsychotic medications are not addictive, and one will not become dependent on
them (one does not need to take higher and higher doses to get the same benefits) (Sane
Australia, 2014a).
While antipsychotic medications can help some people with psychosis and mood disorders, at the
same time these drugs can have serious side-effects. The aim of medication treatment is to
reduce and control symptoms while keeping side-effects at a minimum. Taking antipsychotic
medication is one important step in getting better but is rarely enough on its own. As well as
medication, effective treatment for schizophrenia and related disorders usually includes ongoing
clinical support in the community, psychological therapies, education about the illness and how
to deal with it, psychosocial rehabilitation, and accommodation and employment support (Sane
Australia, 2014a).
sometimes other parts of the body over which the person has no control
Some evidence suggests that the newer medications may be effective in improving
overall mood, thinking and motivation (Sane Australia, 2014a).
While the atypical antipsychotic medications are used more than the typical, some people find
that the typical medications suit them better (Sane Australia, 2014a).
Indications
Chlorpromazine
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder (mania)
Hyperactivity
Loxapine
Perphenazine
Pimozide
Prochlorperazine
Thiothixene
Thioridazine
Trifluoperazine
Agitation
Psychotic disorders
Schizophrenia
Tourette syndrome
Hyperactivity
Severe childhood behavioral problems
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia
Tourette syndrome
Schizophrenia
>20 pounds
Adults
Adults and children 12 years
Adults and children
Adults and children 6 years
Adults
Indications
Aripiprazole
Schizophrenia
Approved
Adults and adolescents (13
5
Generic Name
Indications
Approved
17years)
Adults and children (1017 years)
Adults
depressive disorder
Irritability associated with autistic
disorder
Acute treatment of agitation
Adults
Asenapine
Acute schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder type 1 (manic/mixed)
Adults
Clozapine
Adults
Adults
IIoperidone
Olanzapine
Paliperidone
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder (manic/mixed)
Bipolar disorder (depressive episode)
Treatment-resistant depression
Agitation associated with schizophrenia
and bipolar I mania
Schizophrenia
Schizoaffective disorder
Schizophrenia
Quetiapine
Adults
Adults and adolescents (1317
years)
Adults, children and adolescents
(1017 years)
Adults
Generic Name
Indications
Schizophrenia
Bipolar disorder (manic/mixed)
Ziprasidone
Adults
dosages of several hundred milligrams. The latter have a greater degree of anticholinergic and
antihistaminergic activity, which can counteract dopamine-related side-effects (Stahl, 2003).
Atypical antipsychotic drugs have a similar blocking effect on D2 receptors, however, most also
act on serotonin receptors, especially 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. Both clozapine and
quetiapine appear to bind just long enough to elicit antipsychotic effects but not long enough to
induce extrapyramidal side effects and prolactin hypersecretion. 5-HT 2A antagonism increases
dopaminergic activity in the nigrostriatal pathway, leading to a lowered extrapyramidal side
effect liability among the atypical antipsychotics (Stahl, 2003).
Dry mouth, blurred vision, flushing and constipation. These may ease off when you get used
to the medicine.
Drowsiness (sedation), which is also common but may be an indication that the dose is too
high. A reduced dose may be an option.
Weight gain which some people develop. Weight gain may increase the risk of developing
diabetes and heart problems in the longer term. This appears to be a particular problem with
the atypical antipsychotics - notably, clozapine and olanzapine (ok and Gaebel, 2008).
Movement disorders which develop in some cases. These include:
Parkinsonism - this can cause symptoms similar to those that occur in people with
All antipsychotics can make people put on weight, although not everyone does. The older
'typical' antipsychotics cause a rise in the level of the hormone prolactin, which can lead to a
lowered sex drive and breast tissue growth in both men and women, and affect womens periods.
Atypical antipsychotic medicines are thought to be less likely to cause movement disorder sideeffects than typical antipsychotic medicines. This reduced incidence of movement disorder is the
main reason why an atypical antipsychotic is often used first-line. Being on antipsychotic
medication increases the risk of developing diabetes, and that risk is greater in younger people.
There is also the risk of cardiovascular problems and high blood pressure. People who are on
antipsychotics should have regular physical health checks and doctors should monitor for
diabetes and cardiovascular disease at least once a year.
The higher the dose of antipsychotic medication, the more severe the side effects seem to be.
Antidepressants help relieve the symptoms of depression and associated anxiety. They do not
make the patient euphoric, but simply help the patient to react more realistically in his/her
emotional responses. Taking antidepressant medication is one important step in getting better but
is rarely enough on its own. As well as medication, effective treatment for depression and
anxiety-related disorders may include education about the illness and how to deal with it, and
psychological therapies such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT).
Amitriptyline
Clomipramine (Anafranil)
Doxepin (Silenor, Zonalon)
Imipramine (Tofranil, Tofranil-PM)
Trimipramine (Surmontil)
Desipramine (Norpramin)
Nortriptyline (Pamelor, Aventyl)
Protriptyline (Vivactil)
Amoxapine
Maprotiline
Isocarboxazid (Marplan)
Phenelzine (Nardil)
Tranylcypromine (Parnate)
Selegiline (Emsam, Eldepryl, Zelapar)
Citalopram (Celexa)
Escitalopram (Lexapro)
Fluoxetine (Prozac, Prozac Weekly, Sarafem)
Fluvoxamine (Luvox, Luvox CR)
Paroxetine (Paxil, Paxil CR, Pexeva)
Sertraline (Zoloft)
o Duloxetine (Cymbalta)
5) NaSSAs (Noradrenaline and Specific Serotoninergic Antidepressants):
o
o
o
o
o
Aptazapine (CGS-7525A)
Esmirtazapine (ORG-50,081)
Mianserin (Bolvidon, Norval, Tolvon)
Mirtazapine (Remeron, Avanza, Zispin)
Setiptiline (Tecipul)
1.2.2 Mechanism of action of antidepressants (Yldz et al., 2002, Stimmel et al., 1997)
MAOIs were the first class of antidepressants to be developed. They fell out of favor because of
concerns about interactions with certain foods and numerous drug interactions. MAOIs elevate
the levels of norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine by inhibiting an enzyme called
monoamine oxidase. Monoamine oxidase breaks down norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine.
When monoamine oxidase is inhibited, norepinephrine, serotonin, and dopamine are not broken
down, increasing the concentration of all three neurotransmitters in the brain.
TCAs have been in use since the 1950s when imipramine (Tofranil) was shown to be effective
for treating depression. TCAs primarily work by increasing the level of norepinephrine in the
brain and to a lesser extent serotonin levels. Some TCAs also are antihistamines (block the action
of histamine) or anticholinergic (block the action of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter), and these
additional actions allow for uses of TCAs other than for treating depression as well as additional
side effects.
SSRIs were developed after TCAs and are the most widely used class of antidepressants. They
work by increasing the level of serotonin in the brain. Unlike MAOIs and TCAs, they do not
significantly affect norepinephrine levels in the brain. SSRIs also have fewer and milder side
effects, fewer drug interactions, and are much less likely to be effective for committing suicide
than TCAs.
SNRIs are the newest class of antidepressants. SNRIs work by increasing the levels of serotonin
and norepinephrine in the brain. Drug interactions and side effects associated with SNRIs are
similar to those seen with SSRIs.
11
NaSSAs act by antagonizing the 2-adrenergic receptor and certain serotonin receptors such as
5-HT2A and 5-HT2C, but also 5-HT3, 5-HT6, and/or 5-HT7 in some cases. By blocking 2adrenergic autoreceptors and heteroreceptors, NaSSAs enhance adrenergic and serotonergic
neurotransmission in the brain involved in mood regulation, notably 5-HT1A-mediated
transmission. In addition, due to their blockade of certain serotonin receptors, serotonergic
neurotransmission is not facilitated in unwanted areas, which prevents the incidence of many
side effects often associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants;
hence, in part, the "specific serotonergic" label of NaSSAs.
adolescents. Antidepressants increased the risk of suicidal thinking, and suicidal behavior in
short-term studies in children and adolescents with depression and other psychiatric disorders.
Anyone considering the use of antidepressant in a child or adolescent must balance this risk of
suicide with the clinical need for the drug. Patients who are started on therapy should be closely
observed for clinical worsening, suicidal thoughts or unusual changes in behavior.
1.3.1 Fluphenazine synthesis (Cusic, 1956; Yale and Sowinski, 1960; Merrilland Yale, 1968)
13
Fluphenazine
(4-[3-[2-(trifluoromethyl)phenothiazin-10-yl]propyl]-1-piperazineethanol),
is
synthesized by any of the methods described already for the preparation of trifluoperazine and
related antipsychotics. Alkylation of 2-trifluoromethylphenothiazine using 4-formyl-1piperazineylpropylchloride in the presence of sodamide synthesizes 2-trifluoromethyl-10-[3-(4formyl-1-piperazinyl)propyl]phenothiazine. Further alkaline hydrolysis removes the N-formyl
group, giving 2-trifluoromethyl-10-[3-(1-piperazinyl)propyl]phenothiazine. This is alkylated by
2-bromoethanol-1 acetate, which upon further acidic hydrolysis removes the protecting acetyl
group, yielding fluphenazine.
Molecular
formula
of
Fluphenazine
is
C22H26F3N3OS2HCL.
Molecular
weight
of
two
neurotransmitters,
and
blocks
the
action
of
acetylcholine,
another
is
5-(3-methylaminopropyliden)-10,11-dihydrodibenzcycloheptene.
In
nortriptyline, the nitrogen atom in the central part of the tricyclic system of desipramine is
replaced by a carbon atom, which is bound to a side chain by a double bond. Two suggested
methods of nortriptyline synthesis are based on the N-demethylation of amitriptyline. The third
15
16
antidepressant, anxiolytic and activating properties and mutually neutralizes side effects. A chart
is given showing the brand names and corresponding price of each combination FluphenazineNortriptyline drug that is sold by the pharmaceutical companies in Bangladesh (Square
Pharmaceuticals Ltd., 2014).
Dosage
Fluphenazine
Amico
Formulation
Tablet
0.5mg+10
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Amival-f Fluphenazine
Anflu
Apresin
Ateval
Euphor
Amico
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Alco
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Beximco
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Ziska
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Bio-
Quantity
Packaging Price
100's pack
mg/Tab
Tablet
0.5mg+10
BDT
100's pack
mg/Tab
Tablet
0.5mg+10
0.5mg+10
100's pack
0.5mg+10
100's pack
0.5mg+10
105
BDT
100's pack
mg/Tab
Tablet
75
BDT
mg/Tab
Tablet
201
BDT
mg/Tab
Tablet
80
100
BDT
100's pack
80
18
Flutrip
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
General
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
Ltd.
mg/Tab
Tablet
0.5mg+10
BDT
100's pack
mg/Tab
71
BDT
nortriptylinehy
Fresh
Moodon
Norflu
Norz1n
drochloride
Fluphenazine
Nipa
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
IbnSina
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Acme
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Aristo
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Permival Fluphenazine
Sanit
Tripnor
Opsonin
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Square
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
Fluphenazine
Somatec
hydrochloride
Pharmaceuticals
Tablet
0.5mg+10
100's pack
mg/Tab
Tablet
0.5mg+10
BDT
200's pack
mg/Tab
Tablet
0.5mg+10
0.5mg+10
100's pack
0.5mg+10
250's pack
0.5mg+10
200's pack
0.5mg+10
mg/Tab
150
BDT
100's pack
mg/Tab
Tablet
200
BDT
mg/Tab
Tablet
80
BDT
mg/Tab
Tablet
170
BDT
mg/Tab
Tablet
80
79
BDT
100's pack
75
BDT
19
+ nortriptyline
Ltd.
hydrochloride
In this research project experiment conducted on sample which was manufactured by ACME
Pharmaceuticals (Trade name: Noflu).
20
21
hypertensive effect of an adrenergic blocking agent and could potentiate the pressor response to
locally injected sympathomimetic agents.
22
Chapter Two
LITERATURE REVIEW
23
(1993). Sensors 14 were also used for determination of both drugs in their pharmaceutical
dosage forms and in the presence of their degrades. It is noteworthy to mention that tetrakis (4chlorophenyl) borate affects significantly the life time of the fabricated sensors of both drugs (ElRagehya et al., 2000).
A simple, fast, robust, and accurate high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method is
described for simultaneous quantification of nortriptyline and fluphenazine in bulk powder and
dosage forms. The chromatographic separation was carried out in less than one minute on
Chromolith Performance RP-18e column, which consists of monolithic rods of highly porous
silica, using isocratic binary mobile phase of MeOH and 25 mM KH 2PO4 pH 4.5 in the ratio of
70:30 at 5 mL min1 flow rate and 40C. The high porosity of stationary phase enables it to be
used at high flow rates without problems concerning backpressure, these high flow rates in turn
lead to strong reduction of analysis time. A diode array detector was used at 254 nm for
detection. The method was validated for system suitability, linearity, precision, limits of
detection and quantitation, specificity, and robustness. LOD were found to be 0.40 and 0.78 g
mL1 for nortriptyline and fluphenazine, respectively. LOQ was 3.125 g mL 1 for both analytes.
Recovery values of this method were 98.50 and 98.00% for nortriptyline and fluphenazine,
respectively, and reproducibility was within 2.36%. Robustness study was done for small
changes in KH2PO4 concentration and pH, temperature, flow rate, wavelength of detection, % of
MeOH in mobile phase, and injection volume (Hashemab and Jirac, 2013).
Spectrophotometric and high performance liquid chromatographic procedures are described for
determination of nortriptyline hydrochloride and fluphenazine hydrochloride. The first procedure
is based on application of first derivative of ratio spectra ( 1DD) for quantitative determination of
nortriptyline hydrochloride in presence of fluphenazine hydrochloride. Secondly, an accurate,
sensitive and stability indicating method has been introduced for determination of nortriptyline
hydrochloride and fluphenazine hydrochloride in both bulk powder and in dosage form. In the
derivative ratio method, Beer's law is obeyed in the concentration ranges of 832 g mL 1 and 4
32 g mL1 of nortriptyline hydrochloride at wavelengths 271.4 and 284.2 nm, respectively. In
high performance liquid chromatographic method, linear relationship in the range of 0.63.6 g
mL1 and 1.24.2 g mL1 for nortriptyline hydrochloride and fluphenazine hydrochloride,
respectively, was obtained. The mobile phase used was 0.05 M ammonium acetate : methanol :
25
acetonitrile (4 : 1 : 5 v/v/v), and detection was done spectrophotometrically at 254 nm. Results
were statistically analyzed and compared with those obtained by applying the British
Pharmacopoeia (2000) method (El-Ragehya et al., 2002).
A novel method for the simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of
nortriptyline hydrochloride and fluphenazine hydrochloride was developed and validated.
Fluvastatin sodium was used as internal standard. The determination was performed on a
Hypersil Gold C8 column (250 mm 4.6 mm i.d., 5 m particle size) at 25C; the mobile phase,
consisting of a mixture of formic acid (0.1 M, pH 2.16)-methanol (33:67, v/v), was delivered at a
flow rate of 1.1 mL/min and detector wavelength at 251 nm. The retention time of nortriptyline,
fluphenazine and fluvastatin was found to be 5.11, 8.05 and 11.38 min, respectively. Linearity
ranges were 5.01350.0 and 10.01350.0 g/mL with limit of detection values of 0.72 and 0.31
g/mL, for nortriptyline and fluphenazine, respectively. Results of assay and recovery studies
were statistically evaluated for its accuracy and precision. Correlation coefficients (r2) of the
regression equations were greater than 0.999 in all cases. According to the validation results, the
proposed method was found to be specific, accurate, precise and could be applied to the
simultaneous quantitative analysis of nortriptyline and fluphenazine (Ashour and Kattan, 2012).
A controlled clinical trial on the efficacy of a nortriptyline-fluphenazine combination was carried
out in patients with painful diabetic polyneuropathy. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate
the relief of pain or paresthesia. Significant relief of both pain and paresthesia was obtained with
this combination. The differences were statistically significant. Side effects were frequent but not
usually severe enough to lead to cessation of these medications. (Gomez-Perez et al., 1985)
A novel method for the simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of
nortriptyline hydrochloride and fluphenazine hydrochloride was developed and validated.
Fluvastatin sodium was used as internal standard. Results of assay and recovery studies were
statistically evaluated for its accuracy and precision. According to the validation results, the
proposed method was found to be specific, accurate, precise and could be applied to the
simultaneous quantitative analysis of nortriptyline and fluphenazine (Nuha and Safwan, 2012).
26
306 nm. The calibration plots were linear in the range 100 to 500 ng L 1 with a correlation
coefficient of 0.998. The limits of detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) were 1.45 and 4.40
ng, respectively. Intra-assay and inter-assay precision, expressed as relative standard deviation
(RSD), were in the range 0.731.77% (n = 3) and 1.181.86% (n = 9), respectively. Recovery of
fluphenazine hydrochloride was between 98.29 and 101.53%, with RSD no higher than 1.87%.
The method was selective for fluphenazine hydrochloride and the preservatives in the injections.
Drug content was within the prescribed limits (95110% of the labeled content of the
formulations) when the method was used to quantify fluphenazine hydrochloride in real
pharmaceutical samples. Because the method is sensitive, precise, accurate, and selective for the
compound tested, it can be used for routine quality control testing of fluphenazine hydrochloride
in injections (Mennickent et al., 2010).
The electrochemical behaviour of fluphenazine based on its oxidation at platinum and glassy
carbon electrodes was investigated by linear sweep and cyclic voltammetry. The influence of pH,
concentration, nature of the buffer and scan rate was carefully examined. At both electrodes,
three anodic steps (representing an irreversible oxidation) were obtained. The method was
applied to the determination of fluphenazine in sugar-coated tablets (Sentrk et al., 1996).
Amber-coloured syringes designed for the distribution of unit-doses of oral drops were studied
for the efficiency of the photoprotectiveness and the possible binding of eleven phenothiazine
neuroleptics: alimemazine, chlorpromazine, cyamemazine, fluphenazine, levomepromazine,
periciazine, pipotiazine, prochlorperazine, thioproperazine, thioridazine, and trifluoperazine, all
very easily oxidized in solution in daylight. Spectrofluorimetry made it possible, in one
operation, to determine the remaining concentrations of drugs after storage and to verify the
absence of photo-oxidation. The storage was performed up to 13 days at 25 +/- 3 degrees C and
without any precaution from daylight. All the drugs studied were stable and none bound on the
syringes. However, the stability appeared to be due to the antioxidants in the drug preparations,
and not to the coloured material, since oral drops were also stable in uncoloured syringes
designed for injection. Nevertheless, the amber-coloured syringes efficiently protect the active
principles in pure aqueous solutions, without preservative, and thus this physical protection
reinforces the chemical one of the galenical formulation (Airaudo et al., 1995).
28
resolve the spectral overlapping of the three components and was applied successfully for the
determination of these drugs in synthetic mixtures and in commercial dosage forms (El-Yazbi et
al., 2006).
A simple, rapid, and sensitive spectrofluorometric method has been developed for the
determination of olanzapine (OLZ) and fluphenazine hydrochloride (FPZ HCl). The proposed
method is based on the quantitative quenching effect of the studied drugs on the native
fluorescence of eosin at pH 3.4 and 3.2 for OLZ and FPZ HCl, respectively. The fluorescence
was measured at 547 nm after excitation at 323 nm. The fluorescence-concentration plots were
rectilinear over the range of 0.05-1.0 and 0.10-1.0 g/mL, with lower detection limits of 1.8 10 -3
and 1.2 10-3 g/mL, for OLZ and FPZ HCl, respectively. The proposed method was successfully
applied to the analysis of commercial tablets and ampules containing the drugs, and the results
were in good agreement with those obtained with reference methods. The proposed method was
further applied to the determination of OLZ in spiked human plasma. The mean recovery was
98.62 +/- 0.24% (n = 4). The method was also used for stability studies of FPZ HCl upon
oxidation with hydrogen peroxide, and the kinetics of the reaction were studied. A proposal for
the reaction pathway was postulated (Belal et al., 2008).
The aim of the present study was to develop rapid disintegrating tablets of Flupentixol
dihydrochloride, a slightly bitter antipsychatric drug. An attempt has been made to prepare
bitterless rapid disintegrating tablet using Eudragit E100 as a taste masking agent. The tablet was
prepared with three super disintegrants e.g. sodium starch glycolate, cross carmellose sodium
and crospovidone, each one was added in three different concentration 2%, 3% and 4%; mass
extrusion was the technique used for the preparation of these tablets. The blend was examined
for angle of repose, bulk density, tapped density, compressibility index and Hausners ratio. The
compressed tablets were evaluated for hardness, drug content, friability, disintegration time invitro and in-vivo, wetting time and dissolution rate. The contents of the prepared tablets were
characterized by X-ray diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Different
nine formulas showed in-vitro disintegration times ranges from 11.8 sec to 61 sec , but it was 150
sec for F1 ( formula without any super disintegrant) .These results were nearly correlated with in
vivo disintegration times for the ten formulas. In vitro dissolution studies showed the release in
the following descending order of super disintegrants: Crospovidone>Croscarmellose sodium>
30
Sodium Starch Glycolate. Maximum in vitro dissolution rate was found to be with formulation
F10 which contains crospovidone (4%). Thus, F10 was considered the best among the other
formulations. The stability study was conducted as the International Conference on
Harmonization (ICH) guidelines and the formulations subjected again for changes in hardness,
friability, drug content, wetting time and disintegration time. Crospovidone at a concentration of
4% w/w is suitable for preparing rapid disintegrating tablet of Flupentixol dihydrocloride (Elbary
et al., 2011).
In the year of 1999 a study was performed to check the comparative effectiveness of
Fluphenazine decanoate. Dose reduction strategies for the maintenance treatment of
schizophrenia are designed to maintain the benefits of antipsychotic drug therapy while reducing
risks. Previous strategies with decanoate preparations have been based on the use of lower doses
per injection to achieve dose reduction; these strategies have achieved dose reduction but have
resulted in some increase in symptoms. The authors tested a new dose reduction approach:
increasing the interval between injections during intramuscular decanoate antipsychotic
treatment. The two dose regimens did not differ significantly in relapse, symptom, or side effect
measures. The every-6-weeks regimen was associated with a significant reduction in total
antipsychotic exposure. The use of injections every 6 weeks instead of every 2 weeks may
increase compliance and improve patients comfort as well as decrease cumulative antipsychotic
exposure, without increasing relapse rates or symptoms. (Carpenter et al., 1999)
In another study determination of Fluphenazine Dihydrochloride was done by using simple and
cost effective UV-spectroscopy method in pure form and in pharmaceutical formulations.
Methanol was selected as the solvent as the drug is highly soluble in it. The result was accurate
and precise and there was no interference of the excipients (Yunus et al., 2011).
law is obeyed in the concentration range of 24-216 mug ml -1 of nortriptyline hydrochloride, with
mean percentage recoveries of 100.22 +- 0.870 and 100.66 +- 0.642% for both maxima, 619 and
655 nm, respectively. Results were statistically analyzed and compared with those obtained by
applying the British Pharmacopoeia (1993) method (El-Ragehya et al., 2001).
Two simple, fast, and sensitive extractive spectrophotometric methods for determination of
nortriptyline hydrochloride (NTPH) in pure and pharmaceutical formulations have been
developed. These methods are based on the formation of chloroform-soluble ion-association
complexes of NTPH and bromophenol blue (BPB) and bromopyrogallol red (BPR) in NaOAcHCl buffer of pH 3.29. Absorption maxima of both complexes were recorded at 410 nm and at
425 nm, respectively for BPB and BPR. Reaction conditions were optimized to obtain the
maximum color intensity. The systems obeyed Beers law in the analytes concentration ranges of
0.1-7.2 mg mL-1 and 0.5-23.4 mg mL-1 for BPB and BPR, respectively. The proposed methods
are simple, accurate, and suitable for analysis of pharmaceutical formulations (Kumar et al.,
2007).
Two simple, sensitive and rapid extractive spectrophotometric methods have been developed for
the assay of the antidepressant drug nortriptyline (NOR) hydrochloride in pure form and in
different dosage forms. The methods involve the formation of colored ion-pairs between the drug
and the complex of niobium(V)-thiocyanate (Nb-SCN) or iron(III)-thiocyanate (Fe-SCN)
followed by their extraction with butanol or a mixture of butanol and chloroform and quantitative
determination at 360 nm and 490 nm, using Nb-SCN and Fe-SCN, respectively. The
experimental conditions were optimized to obtain the maximum colour intensity. The methods
permit the determination of nortriptyline over a concentration range of 15-100 microg/ml and 524 microg/ml with the detection limit of 0.84 microg/ml and 0.32 microg/ml, using Nb-SCN and
Fe-SCN, respectively. The proposed methods are applicable for the assay of the investigated drug
in different dosage forms and the results are in good agreement with those obtained by the
official and HPLC methods. No interference was observed from common excipients present in
pharmaceutical formulations. The proposed procedures were applied to determine the amount of
nortriptyline hydrochloride as active ingredient in the presence of its degradation product,
dibenzosuberone. The extractive spectrophotometric methods can also be used to determine the
33
amount of nortriptyline hydrochloride in tablets after its solid phase extraction (SPE) (Misiuk
and Tykocka, 2007).
Two simple, rapid and sensitive extractive spectrophotometric methods have been developed for
the assay of nortriptyline hydrochloride (NTPH) in pure and pharmaceutical formulations. These
methods are based on the formation of chloroform soluble ion-association complexes of NTPH
with bromocresol green (BCG) and with methyl orange (MO) in KCl-HCl buffer of pH 2. The
colored species exhibited absorption maxima at 416 and 422 nm for BCG and MO with molar
absorptivity values of 2.88 104 and 2.29 104 L/mol cm, respectively. Reaction conditions
were optimized to obtain the maximum color intensity. Various analytical parameters have been
evaluated and the results have been validated by statistical data. The methods were successfully
applied to the analysis of NTPH in pharmaceutical formulations (Manjunatha et al., 2009).
Three simple and selective methods are proposed for the determination of nortriptyline
hydrochloride in bulk form and in tablets. The first two methods are based on the formation of
charge-transfer complexes between the drug base as a n-donor and quinhydrone or p-chloranil as
pi-acceptor. The products exhibit absorption maxima at 497 and 560 nm in acetonitrile for
quinhydrone and p-chloranil, respectively. The third method is based on the interaction of Nalkylvinylamine formed from the condensation of the free secondary amine group and
acetaldehyde with p-chloranil to give a vinylamino substituted quinone. The coloured product
exhibits an absorption maximum at 650 nm in dioxane. All variables were studied to optimize
reaction conditions. Beer's law was obeyed and the relative standard deviations were found to be
less than 1.5%. The methods have been applied to the analysis of nortriptyline hydrochloride in
the bulk drug and in tablets (Attia, 2000).
The effect of adding surface active agents to electrolytes containing nortriptyline hydrochloride
on the voltammetric response of a hanging mercury drop electrode (HMDE) was studied. The
current signal due to the reduction process was a function of the amount of nortriptyline
hydrochloride, pH of the medium, type of the surfactant, and accumulation time at the electrode
surface. Addition of Tween-20 to the nortriptyline hydrochloride containing electrolyte enhances
the reduction current signal. Voltammograms of the drug with Tween-20 in Britton Robinson
buffers of pH 2-11 exhibit a single well-defined reduction peak, which may be due to the
reduction of -C horizontal line C group. The reduction process was irreversible over the entire
34
pH range, and the mechanism of reduction was postulated on the basis of controlled potential
electrolysis and coulometry. Application of Tween-20 in the electrochemical determination of
nortriptyline hydrochloride using square-wave voltammetry at the HMDE enhanced the detection
limit of the analyte concentration from 8.24 ng/mL in the absence of surfactant to 0.92 ng/mL
when present (Jain et al., 2009).
The release of nortritptyline hydrochloride from oil-in-water (o/w) microemulsions (isopropyl
myristate as oil, propylene glycol as cosurfactant, polysorbate 80 as surfactant and phosphate
buffer, pH 7.4, as the continuous phase) containing increasing concentrations of polyethylene
glycol 400, used to facilitate the diffusion of a drug from the inner oily phase of the
microemulsion to the outer aqueous phase of such a dispersion system, was studied by
determining the permeability constants of the drug through hydrophilic and lipophilic
membranes separating the o/w microemulsions from the receiving aqueous phase (phosphate
buffer pH 7.4). The permeability of nortriptyline hydrochloride from microemulsions through the
lipophilic membrane increased as the concentration of polyethylene glycol 400 in the disperse
system increased. The apparent permeability constant for nortriptyline hydrochloride, from the
microemulsion without polyethylene glycol, was 1.36 x 10(-3) cm x h(-1), it increased up to 7.80
x 10(-3) cm x h(-1) in the presence of polyethylene glycol at a concentration of 50% (v/v) of the
initial volume of the aqueous phase (Moreno et al., 2000).
In this work a novel method for the determination of nortriptyline in flow-injection systems has
been developed. The proposed method was used for the fast determination of nortriptyline in its
pharmaceutical formulations. The developed technique is very simple, precise, accurate, time
saving, and economical, compared to all of the previously reported methods. The effects of
various parameters on the sensitivity of the method were investigated. The best performance
obtained at pH value of 2, scan rate value of 30 V/s, accumulation potential of 400 mV, and
accumulation time of 0.5 s. The proposed method has some advantages over other reported
methods such as, no need for the removal of oxygen from the test solution, a subnanomolar
detection limit, and finally the method is sufficiently fast for the determination of any such
compound, in a wide variety of chromatographic methods. The potential waveform, consisting of
the potential steps for cleaning, accumulation and potential ramp of analyte, was continuously
applied on an Au disk microelectrode (12.5 microm in radius). The detection limit of the method
35
was 2.0 x 10(-11) M. The relative standard deviation of the method at 1.2 x 10(-8) M was 2.1%
for eight runs (Norouzi et al., 2007).
36
Chapter Three
MATERIALS & METHODS
3.1 MATERIALS
37
Batch No.
Norflu tablets
T1094007
3.1.3 Reagents
Table 3.2: Reagents used in the experiment including source
3.1.4
Reagents Name
Concentrated Hydrochloric
Acid (35 % )
Distilled Water
MERK, Germany
Laboratory (East West University)
Equipments
Source
(Supplier
Name)
Origin
UVSpectrophotometer
Shimadzu UV1800
Japan
SMIC
China
Electronic Balance
Precisa
XB120A
Switzerland
Some images of important instruments those were used in different tests during research work.
Figure 3.1: [Left to right] Shimadzu UV-1800 Double Beam Spectrophotometer and Electronic
Balance
Apparatus
Beakers
Thermometer
Test tubes
Volumetric Flasks (25ml,50 ml & 100 ml)
Electric Bulb (25 Watt&40watt)
Plastic Containers
Aluminum foil paper
Filter Papers
Mortar & Pestles
Spatula
Glass Rod
Pipette pumper
39
Serial No.
15
16
17
Apparatus
Pipette (5 ml & 10 ml)
Glass and Plastic Funnel
Lamp
3.2 METHOD
3.2.1. Preparation of the solvent (0.1N HCL)
1) Lab solvent (HCL) stock solution was collected and its strength was found to be 35%
2) Then the concentration of the lab solvent stock solution was determined in Normality
Determination of the Concentration of the Lab Solvent (HCL) in Normality (N):
100 ml of the lab solvent stock solution contains --- 35 gm of HCL
1 ml of the lab solvent stock solution contains ------ (35 / 100) gm of HCL
1000 ml of the lab solvent stock solution contains -- ((35 x 1000) / 100) gm of HCL
= 350 gm of HCL
So, we know that
36.5 gm of HCL present in 1000 ml
=1N
1 gm of HCL present in 1000 ml
= (1 / 36.5) N
350 gm of HCL present in 1000 ml
= ((1 x 350) / 36.5) N
= 9.589 N (~ 9.6 N)
3) After the determination of the concentration of the lab solvent stock solution in
Normality (N), the amount of lab solvent (9.7N HCL) stock solution required to make
250 ml of 0.1N HCL solvent was calculated as below.
Determination of the amount of 9.7N HCL required to make 250 ml of 0.1N HCL:
Using the V1S1 = V2S2,
where,
S1 = Conc. of lab solvent (HCL) stock solution = 9.6 N
S2 = Final concentration of the solvent (HCL) = 0.1 N
V1 = Volume of the lab solvent (HCL) stock solution = ?
V2 = Final volume of the solvent (HCL) = 250 ml
V1 = (V2S2) / S1
=> V1 = (250 ml x 0.1 N) / 9.6 N
=> V1 = 2.604 ml (~ 2.6 ml) of lab solvent (HCL) stock solution
Thus 2.6 ml of 9.6 N HCL is required to be dissolved in 250 ml of water to dilute its
concentration to 0.1 N HCL.
4) Then 2.6 ml of 9.6 N HCL was transferred from the lab solvent stock solution to a
250 ml volumetric flask which was then filled with water up to mark to make 250 ml
of 0.1 N HCL.
40
Then 0.5 ml of that 2 mg/ml Fluphenazine hydrochloride solution was taken and
dissolved in 50ml of 0.1N HCL
41
Then 5 ml of that 0.02 mg/ml Fluphenazine hydrochloride solution was taken and
dissolved in 50ml of 0.1N HCL
That 0.5 ml contained 1 mg of Melitracen hydrochloride. So the concentration final turned out to
be:
Concentration of the stock solution = amount of substance added / volume
= 1 / 50 = 0.02 mg/ml
Preparation of five serial concentrations of solution for both Fluphenazine hydrochloride and
Nortriptyline hydrochloride:
-
Fluphenazine
Nortriptyline
Sample no.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Concentration (mg/ml)
0.0001
0.0002
0.0003
0.0004
0.0005
0.0006
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
The solution that were required from the stock solution to prepare the above
concentrations were calculated using S1V1=S2V2 formula, where S1= initial
strength or concentration, S2= final strength or concentration, V1= initial
volume and V2= final volume.
Thus the following concentrations were prepared as such for Fluphenazine
hydrochloride and Nortriptyline hydrochloride as per the calculations
provided below.
43
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.0003 x 10) / 0.002 = 1.5 ml of stock solution required to make 0.003 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (1.5ml of stock solution + 8.5 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.0004 x 10) / 0.002 = 2 ml of stock solution required to make 0.004 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (2 ml of stock solution + 8 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.0005 x 10) / 0.002 = 2.5 ml of stock solution required to make 0.005 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (2.5 ml of stock solution + 7.5 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.0006x 10) / 0.002 = 3 ml of stock solution required to make 0.006 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (3 ml of stock solution + 7 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride.
For Nortriptyline hydrochloride
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.001 x 10) / 0.02 = 0.5 ml of stock solution required to make 0.001 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (0.5 ml of stock solution + 9.5 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.002 x 10) / 0.02 = 1 ml of stock solution required to make 0.002 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (1 ml of stock solution + 9 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.003 x 10) / 0.02 = 1.5 ml of stock solution required to make 0.003 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (1.5 ml of stock solution + 8.5 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.004 x 10) / 0.02 = 2 ml of stock solution required to make 0.004 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (2 ml of stock solution + 8 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.005 x 10) / 0.02 = 2.5 ml of stock solution required to make 0.005 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (2.5 ml of stock solution + 7.5 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.006 x 10) / 0.02 = 3 ml of stock solution required to make 0.006 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (3 ml of stock solution + 7 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride.
V1= S2V2 / S1 = (0.007 x 10) / 0.02 = 3.5 ml of stock solution required to make 0.007 mg/ml
concentration of the final solution of 10 ml (3.5 ml of stock solution + 6.5 ml of 0.1N HCL) of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride.
44
36
Sample
collection
Interval
(hrs)
Temperature (0C)
1.5
37
34
4.5
32
30
45
2. After every 1.5 hours 9 tablets were collected and wrapped up with foil paper to
prevent any further exposure to the lighting condition and the temperature noted
using a thermometer.
3. The foil papers should be labeled to identify the intervals at which the drugs were
collected.
4. The tablets were then used for potency determination to see the effect of the
exposure of sunlight to the drug components, fluphenazine and nortriptyline.
5. For potency determination, laboratory analysis was done by using UV
spectroscopy technique:
a. First, three tablets from those sampled tablets were taken.
b. Then the total weight of those three tablets was noted using an analytical
balance and the average weight (which is equal to the weight for one tablet
containing both active ingredients and excipients) was calculated using the
formula given below:
c.
Then
the
6. Then using the absorbance value obtained from UV spectrophotometer, the value
was plotted into the standard curve to obtain the total amount of the drug that is
present in one tablet
7. Steps 5 to 6 were repeated again for another sampling hour.
8. Under Dark Condition
1. 36 tablets were kept in dark condition for 7 hours at a stretch.
Table 3.7: Dark Condition Sample List
1)
Total Number of
Sample collection
Interval (hrs)
Sample
36
1.5
4.5
2)
2. After every 1.5 hours 9 tablets were collected and wrapped up with foil paper to
prevent any further exposure to the lighting condition and the temperature was noted
using a thermometer.
3. The foil papers should be labeled to identify the intervals at which the drugs were
collected.
4. The tablets were then used for potency determination to see the effect of the
exposure of sunlight to the drug components, fluphenazine and nortriptyline.
5. For potency determination, laboratory analysis was done by using UV
spectroscopy technique:
47
c.
Then
the
48
Total Number of
Sample
36
Sample
collection
Interval
(hrs)
Temperature (0C)
1.5
27
27
4.5
28
28
2) After every 1.5 hours 9 tablets were collected and wrapped up with foil paper to
prevent any further exposure to the lighting condition and the temperature was
noted using a thermometer.
3) The foil papers should be labeled to identify the intervals at which the drugs were
collected.
4) The tablets were then used for potency determination to see the effect of the
exposure of 25 W bulbs lighting condition to drug ingredients: fluphenazine and
Nortriptyline.
5) For potency determination, laboratory analysis was done by using UV
spectroscopy technique:
a. First, three tablets from those sampled tablets were taken.
b. Then the total weight of those three tablets was noted using an analytical
balance and the average weight (which is equal to the weight for one tablet
containing both active ingredients and excipients) was calculated using the
formula given below:
c. T
c. Then the three tablets were crushed by using mortar and pestle.
d. Next, approximately the weight of 1 tablet of crushed tablet powder was
taken and dissolved in 50 ml of the solvent (0.1N HCl) (leading to 50
times dilution).
49
36
Sample
collection
Interval
(hrs)
Temperature (0C)
1.5
32
34
4.5
34
34
50
2) After every 1.5 hours 9 tablets were collected and wrapped up with foil paper to
prevent any further exposure to the lighting condition and the temperature was
noted using a thermometer.
3) The foil papers should be labeled to identify the intervals at which the drugs were
collected.
4) The tablets were then used for potency determination to see the effect of the
exposure of 25 W bulbs lighting condition to drug ingredients: fluphenazine and
nortriptyline.
5) For potency determination, laboratory analysis was done by using UV
spectroscopy technique:
a. First, three tablets from those sampled tablets were taken.
b. Then the total weight of those three tablets was noted using an analytical
balance and the average weight (which is equal to the weight for one tablet
containing both active ingredients and excipients) was calculated using the
formula given below:
c. T
c. Then the three tablets were crushed by using mortar and pestle.
d. Next, approximately the weight of 1 tablet of crushed tablet powder was
taken and dissolved in 50 ml of the solvent (0.1N HCl) (leading to 50
times dilution).
e. Afterwards that 50 ml solution was filtered and 10 ml of that filtered
solution was taken from that 50ml of the solution of tablet powder and
solvent and was dissolved in 25ml of the solvent (leading to another 2.5
times dilution; total dilution factor 125 times).
f. Next, 5ml of the solution was taken from that 125 times diluted solution
and was dissolved in another 25ml of the solvent (0.1N HCl) (leading to 5
times dilution; total dilution factor = 50 x 2.5 x 5 = 625 times).
51
g. Then from there the solution was poured into a cuvette/container and was
inserted into the UV spectrophotometer to observe the absorbance value
for both Fluphenazine hydrochloride and Nortriptyline hydrochloride).
6) Then using the absorbance value obtained from UV spectrophotometer, the value
was plotted into the standard curve to obtain the total amount of the drug that is
present in one tablet
7) Steps 5 to 6 were repeated again for another sampling hour.
52
Chapter Four
RESULT AND ANALYSIS
0.001
0.218
0.002
0.277
0.003
0.332
53
0.004
0.362
0.005
0.404
0.006
0.466
0.007
0.534
Figure 4.1: Plot showing straight line for Absorbance with respect to Concentration for
Nortriptyline
4.1.1 Result from sample that was exposed to sunlight
For our research purpose we have exposed tablets to the sunlight condition. We found 4 different
absorbance of Nortriptyline hydrochloride for four samples exposed to the sunlight and the
temperature was recorded respectively 37C, 34C, 32C and 30C each for 1.5 hour time
interval and it was observed that the concentration of Fluphenazine hydrochloride was declined
in each 1.5 hour time interval.
54
Table 4.1.1: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 Hour time interval for
Nortriptyline hydrochloride
Time
Absorbance
Diluted Concentration
Original Amount
Interval
of Drug present
(mg)
Potency (%)
0 hour
1.000
0.0157
9.81
98.13
1.5 hour
0.803
0.0126
7.875
78.75
3 hour
0.785
0.0123
7.687
76.88
4.5 hour
0.691
0.0104
6.50
65.00
6 hour
0.476
0.0061
3.812
38.12
Figure 4.1.1: Graph showing the difference in Concentration after each 1.5 hours time interval
for Nortriptyline hydrochloride
4.1.2 Result from sample that was kept in dark
For our research purpose we have kept the tablets in dark condition. We found 4 different
absorbance of Nortriptyline hydrochloride for four samples kept in dark condition covering the
strips with foil paper, each for 1.5 hour time interval and it was observed that the concentration
of Fluphenazine hydrochloride remains average in each 1.5 hour time interval.
Table 4.1.2: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 hours time interval for
Nortriptyline hydrochloride
55
Time
Absorbance (at
Diluted
Original
Interval
239 nm)
Concentration from
Amount of
Samples in mg/ml
Drug present
(mg)
Potency (%)
0 hour
0.954
0.0155
9.69
96.95
1.5 hour
0.899
0.0146
9.13
91.3
3 hour
0.834
0.0133
8.31
83.10
4.5 hour
0.774
0.012
7.5
75
6 hour
0.748
0.115
7.18
71.8
Figure 4.1.2: Graph showing the Concentration after each 1.5 hours time interval for
Nortriptyline hydrochloride
4.1.3 Result from Samples that were exposed to under Lamp (25 watt)
We found four different absorbance of Fluphenazine hydrochloride for four samples exposed to
the lamp (25 watt), each for 1.5 hour time interval and it was observed that the concentration of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride was declined in each 1.5 hour time interval.
Table 4.1.3: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 hours time interval for
Nortriptyline hydrochloride
56
Time
Absorbance (at
Diluted
Original
Interval
260nm)
Concentration from
Amount of
Samples in mg/ml
Drug present
Potency (%)
(mg)
0 hour
0.872
0.0137
8.63
86.38
1.5 hour
0.812
0.0128
8.037
80.37
3 hour
0.684
0.0102
6.435
64.35
4.5 hour
0.676
0.0101
6.335
63.35
6 hour
0.552
0.0084
5.233
52.33
Figure 4.1.3: Graph showing the difference in Concentration after each 1.5 hours time interval
for Nortriptyline hydrochloride
4.1.4 Result from Samples that were exposed to under Lamp (40 watt)
We found four different absorbance of Fluphenazine hydrochloride for four samples exposed to
the lamp (40 watt), each for 1.5 hour time interval and it was observed that the concentration of
Nortriptyline hydrochloride was declined in each 1.5 hour time interval
Table 4.1.4: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 hours time interval for
Nortriptyline hydrochloride
57
Time
Absorbance
Diluted Concentration
Original Amount of
Interval
(at 239nm)
Potency (%)
0.850
0.0135
8.46
84.68
1.5 hour
0.829
0.0132
8.250
82.50
3 hour
0.826
0.0131
8.187
81.87
4.5 hour
0.808
0.0128
8.00
80.00
6 hour
0.789
0.0124
7.75
77.50
Figure 4.1.4: Graph showing the difference in Concentration after each 1.5 hours time interval
for Nortriptyline hydrochloride
4.2 Standard curve preparation for Fluphenazine Hydrochloride
The standard curve was made from Sanit, which is produced by Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
For different concentration of Fluphenazine hydrochloride and we found different absorption.
The results are as follows:
Table 4.2: Concentration and Respective Absorbance for Standard Curve of Fluphenazine
Hydrochloride
58
Concentration (mg/ml)
0.0001
0.048
0.0002
0.079
0.0003
0.135
0.0004
0.172
0.0005
0.22
0.0006
0.279
Figure 4.2: Plot showing straight line for absorbance with respect to concentration for
Fluphenazine
4.2.1 Result from sample that was exposed to sunlight
59
For our research purpose we have exposed tablets to the sunlight condition. We found 4 different
absorbance of Fluphenazine hydrochloride for four samples exposed to the sunlight and the
temperature was recorded respectively 37C, 34C, 32C and 30C each for 1.5 hour time
interval and it was observed that the concentration of Fluphenazine hydrochloride was declined
in each 1.5 hour time interval.
Table 4.2.1: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 hours time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
Time
Absorbance (at
Diluted Concentration
Original Amount
Potency (%)
Interval
260nm)
from Samples in
of Drug present
mg/ml(625 times
(mg)
0.471
94.41
0 hour
0.340
diluted)
0.00074
1.5 hour
0.260
0.00057
0.360
72.06
3 hour
0.251
0.00051
0.348
69.62
4.5 hour
0.214
0.00047
0.298
59.60
6 hour
0.086
0.00019
0.124
24.92
60
Figure 4.2.1Graph showing the difference in Concentration after each 1.5 hour time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
4.2.2 Result from sample that was kept in dark
For our research purpose we have kept the tablets in dark condition. We found 4 different
absorbance of Fluphenazine hydrochloride for four samples kept in dark condition covering the
strips with foil paper, each for 1.5 hour time interval and it was observed that the concentration
of Fluphenazine hydrochloride remains average in each 1.5 hour time interval.
Table 4.2.2: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 hours time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
Time
Absorbance (at
Diluted Concentration
Original Amount
Interval
260nm)
of Drug present
(mg)
Potency (%)
0 hour
0.265
0.00058
0.367
73.68
1.5 hour
0.256
0.00056
0.354
70.97
3 hour
0.253
0.00056
0.350
70.16
4.5 hour
0.249
0.00055
0.345
69.08
6 hour
0.233
0.00051
0.323
64.74
61
Figure 4.2.2: Graph showing the Concentration after each 1.5 hour time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
4.2.3 Result from Samples that were exposed to under Lamp (25 watt)
We found four different absorbance of Fluphenazine hydrochloride for four samples exposed to
the lamp (25 watt), each for 1.5 hour time interval and it was observed that the concentration of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride was declined in each 1.5 hour time interval.
Table 4.2.3: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 hours time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
Time
Absorbance (at
Diluted
Original
Interval
260nm)
Concentration from
Amount of
Samples in mg/ml
Drug present
(mg)
Potency (%)
0 hour
0.265
0.00058
0.367
73.68
1.5 hour
0.255
0.00056
0.353
70.70
3 hour
0.253
0.00056
0.350
70.16
4.5 hour
0.242
0.00053
0.335
67.18
6 hour
0.231
0.00051
0.321
64.20
62
Figure 4.2.3:Graph showing the difference in Concentration after each 1.5 hour time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
4.2.4 Result from Samples that were exposed to under Lamp (40 watt)
We found four different absorbance of Fluphenazine hydrochloride for four samples exposed to
the lamp (40 watt), each for 1.5 hour time interval and it was observed that the concentration of
Fluphenazine hydrochloride was declined in each 1.5 hour time interval.
Table 4.2.5: Difference in Concentration and Absorbance in each 1.5 hours time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
Time
Absorbance (at
Diluted Concentration
Original
Interval
260nm)
Amount of
Drug present
Potency (%)
(mg)
0 hour
0.267
0.00058
0.369
74.09
1.5 hour
0.247
0.00054
0.342
68.54
3 hour
0.236
0.00052
0.327
65.56
4.5 hour
0.224
0.00049
0.311
62.31
6 hour
0.195
0.00043
0.272
54.45
63
Figure 4.10: Graph showing the difference in Concentration after each 1.5 hour time interval for
Fluphenazine hydrochloride
Chapter Five
64
DICUSSION
65
Chapter Six
REFERENCE
66
Airaudo, C. B., Gayte-Sorbier, A., Froissart, M., Machou, C. and Pion, B. (1995) Disposable
devices for the dispensing of oral drops.Study of photoprotectiveness and compatibility.Journal
of biomaterials science.Polymer edition, 7 (5), 381-388.
Allen, A. (2011) Coping With Side Effects of Depression Treatment. WebMD Feature[Online]
Available from: http://www.webmd.com/depression/features/coping-with-side-effects-of-depre
ssion-treatment [Accessed 18thOctober 2014].
Ashour, S. and Kattan N. (2012) Simultaneous determination of nortriptyline hydrochloride and
fluphenazine hydrochloride in microgram quantities from low dosage forms by liquid
chromatographyUV detection.Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2 (6), 437-442.
Attia, F. M. A. (2000) Use of charge-transfer complex formation for the spectrophotometric
determination of nortriptyline. Farmaco, 55 (11-12), 659-664.
Belal, F., El-Brashy, A., El-Enany, N. and El-Bahay, N. (2008) Spectrofluorometric
determination of olanzapine and fluphenazine hydrochloride in pharmaceutical preparations and
67
piperazine:
US
Services,
[Online]
Available
from:
http://www.cms.gov/Medicare-Medicaid-
Coordination/Fraud-Prevention/Medicaid-Integrity-Education/Pharmacy-Education-Materials
/Downloads/atyp-antipsych-adult-dosingchart.pdf[Accessed 17th October 2014].
Education Medicaid Integrity Contractor (2013b) Antidepressant Medications: U.S. Food and
Drug Administration-Approved Indications and Dosages for Use in Adults. Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services, [Online] Available from: http://www.cms.gov/Medicare-MedicaidCoordination/Fraud-Prevention/Medicaid-Integrity-Education/Pharmacy-Education-Materials
/Downloads/ad-adult-dosingchart.pdf [Accessed 18thOctober 2014].
Elbary, A. A., Ramadan, A. A.,Bendas, I. R. and Mostafa, D. A. E. (2011) Formulation and
evaluation
of
taste
masked
rapidly
disintegrating
tablet
containing
El-Ragehya, N. A., El-Kosasyb, A. M., Abbasa, S. S. and El-Khateeba, S.Z. (2000) Polymeric
membrane electrodes for selective determination of the central nervous system acting drugs
fluphenazine hydrochloride and nortriptyline hydrochloride. AnalyticaChimicaActa, 418 (1), 93100.
El-Ragehya, N. A.,Abbasa,S. S. and El-Khateeba, S. Z. (2002)Spectrophotometric and stability
indicating
high
performance
liquid
chromatographic
determination
of
Nortriptyline
Khatoon, A., Setapar, S. H. M., Ahmad, A. and Nian-Yian, L. (2013) Analytical methodologies
for determination of amitriptyline and its metabolite nortriptyline: A review. Der
PharmaChemica, 5 (3), 79-85.
Kumar, R. S., Manjunatha, D. H., Seetharamappa, J., Harikrishna, K. andShaikh, S. M. T. (2007)
Determination
of
Nortriptyline
hydrochloride
in
bulk
and
pharmaceutical
70
Health
Service
(2013)Antidepressants
Dosage.[Online]
Available
from:
hydrochloride
in
pharmaceutical
formulations.International
Journal
of
[Accessed
18th
October 2014].
71
Schmidt, C. J., Sorensen, S. M., Kehne, J. H., Carr, A. A. andPalfreyman, M. G. (1995) The role
of 5HT2A receptors in antipsychotic activity. Life Sciences, 56 (25), 2209-2222.
Seida, J. C., Schouten, J. R.,Mousavi, S. S., Hamm, M., Beaith, A., Vandermeer, B., Dryden, D.
M., Boylan, K., Newton, A. S. and Carrey, N. (2012) First- and Second-Generation
Antipsychotics for Children and Young Adults. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,
11(12)[Online]
Available
from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0040944/
72
electrophoresis
coupled
with
tris
(2,2'-bipyridyl)
ruthenium
(II)
73
74