Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S. Das
Background:
Composite materials from man-made fibres (i.e. glass fibre, carbon fibre etc.) are
already available as products for consumer and industrial uses. A relatively newer
concept is to consider natural fibres as a reinforcing material. Stringent
environmental legislation and consumer awareness has forced industries to
support long term sustainable growth and develop new technology based on
renewable feedstock that are independent of fossil fuels. As the current status
quo, the main reinforcement for the composite industry is glass fibres; 22.3 million
tons (metric) are produced globally on an annual basis. Although glass fibre
products have somewhat superior mechanical properties, their life cycle
performance is very questionable.
consume huge energy but their disposal at the end of their life cycle is also very
difficult since there is virtually no recycling option.
Annual industrial crops grown for fibre, have the potential to supply enough
renewable biomass for various bio-products including composites. The scope of
possible uses of natural fibres is enormous.
declaration of United Nation for 2009 as International Year of Natural Fibres (IYNF).
All over the world, the bio-composite industry is developing at a significant pace to
meet growing consumer awareness and follow new environmental regulations. A
survey done by Canadian Agri-Food Research Council (CARC) in 2003 showed
that the European automotive industry has already taken the lead and uses
approximately 22,000 tons of natural plant fibre in low stress applications in cars.
In 2005, 19000 tones of natural fibres were used in Germany for automotive
composite. Lignocellulosic bio-fibre derived from various origins such as leaf, bast,
fruit, grass or cane; contribute to the strength of bio as well as synthetic polymer
composites in various applications. These fibres are renewable, non-abrasive to
process equipment, and can be incinerated at the end of their life cycle for energy
recovery as they possess a good deal of calorific value. They are also very safe
during handling, processing and use. Major natural fibres of vegetative origin used
as reinforcement are shown in Table- 1. Both thermoset and thermoplastic
matrices are used for development of natural fibre reinforced composite, the
comparative study of these two type of matrices are shown in Table- 2
Type
Cane
Grass
Stem
Fruit
Bast
Bast
Bast
Bast
Leaf
Stem
Thermoset
Complex
Very low
Easy
Poor
Long
Low to moderate high
Thermoplastics
Simple
High
Difficult
Excellent
Short to long
High
temperature / pressure
Environmental durability
Solvent resistance
Database
Good
Excellent
Very large
Unknown
Poor to good
Small
Moisture Sorption
Ultraviolet Degradation
Hemicellulose
Hemicellulose
Lignin
Accessible Cellulose
Accessible Cellulose
Hemicellulose
Non-Crystalline Cellulose
Non-Crystalline Cellulose
Accessible Cellulose
Lignin
Non-Crystalline Cellulose
Crystalline Cellulose
Crystalline Cellulose
Thermal Degradation
Strength
Hemicellulose
Crystalline Cellulose
Cellulose
Lignin
Ref: Chemical modification of agro-resources for property enhancement, Paper
Lignin
and Composites from Agro-based resources. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1996
Fire Degradation
Enzymatic Reactions
Pyrolysis Reactions
Chemical Reactions
Water Degradation
Weather Degradation
Water Interactions
Mechanical Degradation
Chemical Reactions
Samples
Flexural Strength
Flexural Modulus
Strain
Jute non-woven* +
(MPa)
31.84
(MPa)
1433
%
8.013
LDPE film
*Jute nonwoven- unidirectional & 400 gsm (nominal) *LDPE film- 50 gsm
Ref: Studies on jute composite from jute nonwoven, 16 th Technological
conference, IJIRA, 11th 12th Feb, 1993
Table: 6 Properties of jute composite from jute nonwoven and low density
polyethylene as matrix for packaging end- uses. (IIP- Kolkata)
Material
Gram/m
Jute non-
1470
Puncture
Tensile
Mod. of
resistance
absorption
str.
str.
elasticity
oz-inch
(surface)
Kg/cm2
(MPa)
(MPa)
tear inch
24 hrs at 30
577.1
C, gm/m2
20.7
45.3
31.36
1756
woven +
LDPE film
Ref: Studies on jute composite from jute nonwoven, 16 th Technological
conference, IJIRA, 11th 12th Feb, 1993
Lignocellulosic fibres are favourably bonded with phenolic resin to have better
water resistance rather than urea or melamine resin. Hence, water soluble phenol
formaldehyde resin was selected for the development of rigid jute board for good
serviceable mechanical properties. To achieve better wetability of jute with resin
and to improve strength properties, fibre pre-treatment is necessary. Simple pretreatment is done with low-condensed resins like melamine resin, phenolic resin
and CNSL modified phenol formaldehyde resin. Indicative physical properties of
jute composites from untreated & pre treated jute nonwoven with PF resin are
shown in Table-7.
Jute as other lignocellulosic fibres consists of OH group which causes it
susceptible to moisture and directly impairs the properties of jute composite
specially dimensional stability. Due to this polar group, jute also is not efficiently
adhered to non polar matrices. To overcome this difficulties this fibre should be
modified chemically or hygrothermally. To improve the interface adhesion between
the non polar matrices and hydrophilic fibre, coupling agent or compatibiliser
should be used.
Some investigations were done by cyanoethylation and acetylation of jute fibre to
reduce the OH content.
stability. Cyanoethylation also improves the bonding between jute and non polar
matrix like unsaturated polyester resin.
Indicative properties of jute composites made from modified fibres with urea
formaldehyde resin & unsaturated polyester resin (USP) are given in Tables-8 & 9.
Samples
No.
Tensile
Flexural
Flexural strength
strength
strength (Dry)
(After 2 hrs.
(MPa)
(MPa)
boiling in water)
1.
Untreated non-
42.10
68.24
(MPa)
22.17
2.
woven* + PF resin
MF pretreated non-
49.99
73.97
27.50
3.
woven + PF resin
PF pretreated non-
47.70
72.32
26.13
4.
woven + PF resin
CNSL PF
62.21
90.03
58.27
Control
Tensile
Strength
(MPa)
Flexural
Strength
(MPa)
Flexural
Mod
(GPa)
74.24
84.81
12.97
Water absorption
%
Thickness swelling %
2hr in
boiling
water
24hr in
cold
water
2hr in
boiling
water
24hr in cold
water
48.09
49.76
62.31
31.94
MJC-4
108.60
136.90
18.05
12.46
5.45
12.97
10.36
Ref: Improvement of functional properties of jute based composite by acrylonitrile
pretreatment, J. of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 78, 495-506 (2000)
Samples
No.
Tensile
Flexural
Thickness
% Retention
% Retention of
strength strength
swelling %
of tensile
flexural strength
strength after
after 5 cyclic
5 cyclic test
test (immersion
(immersion &
oven dry)
30.35
50.25
29.35
48.77
55.70
61.12
24.12
50.34
26.25
49.47
55.12
59.33
(MPa)
(MPa)
1 hr
1.
CNa
62.92
39.13
29.00
2.
ANa
66.66
42.33
17.50
3.
CNH
56.25
37.12
23.5
4.
ANH
57.22
39.00
14.00
5.
CMF
49.58
40.21
17.00
6.
AMF
60.04
44.45
13.36
Jute sliver + 25% UF resin including additives
7 days
40.80
23.00
37.55
20.00
20.70
18.9
CNa- control jute sliver with NaCl and UF resin; ANa- acetylated jute sliver with NaCl and
UF resin;
CNH- control jute sliver with NH 4Cl and UF resin;ANH- control jute sliver with NH 4Cl and
UF resin;
CMF- control jute sliver with melamine and UF resin; AMF- control jute sliver with
melamine and UF resin;
Ref: Effect of acetylation on dimensional stability, mechanical and dynamic
properties of jute board, J. of Applied Polymer Science, vol.72, 935-944
(1999)
Hygrothermal pretreatment on jute fibre was done by spraying extra water on fibre
and was formed in square mat. The mat was placed in a closed mould and
pressed at 200 C for a few minutes to modify the fibre. These modified fibres
were moulded with PF resin as normal compression moulding process. Here the
dimensional properties have been improved but the other mechanical properties
have been reduced drastically due to thermal degradation of fibre and shown in
Table- 10.
Flex. Str.
kg/cm2
Flex. Mod.
Kg/cm2
Water absorption
%
24 h. 2 h boiling
Control
127.32
18578.84 166.57
137.13
SB4
39.28
12682.42
95.6
90.94
SRB4
85.87
13963.74
64.3
64.5
SB8
24.46
7412.00
88.93
87.26
SRB8
77.68
8825.40
56.75
60.18
Control- board from jute fibre + 7% PF;
Thickness swelling
%
24 h.
2 h boiling
77.65
97.27
18.69
24.45
16.07
24.24
11.98
21.67
11.52
21.09
10
J600
Tensile
Strength(MPa)
33.5
Tensile
Modulus(GPa)
Flexural
Flexural
Strength(MPa) Mod(GPa)
10.35
J602
68
10.50
J600- Jute fibre 60%, Polypropylene 40%
Water Absorption
%
2hr in
boiling
water
24hr in
cold
water
57.50
10.02
3.06
1.86
109
10
2.22
0.91
Age old practice of fabrication of reinforced product is hand lay-up process. But
resin consumption is very high and productivity is very low due to long processing
time. New moulding technique, i.e. Resin Transfer Moulding, is used to replace
hand layup process for better productivity and quality.
Resin transfer moulding literally means the transfer of the matrix under pressure
to the closed mould containing the reinforcing substrate. This is the inverse
process of vacuum moulding. Mainly unsaturated polyester resin was used as
matrix. Work was done to evaluate the influence of jute as an additional substrate
with glass and some of the properties are shown in Table- 12
11
Weight of fibre
Flex. Str.
Flex. Mod.
%
(MPa)
(GPa)
Jute
Glass
Total
1
33
-33
95.65
6.65
2
28
-28
82.55
5.85
3
18
15
33
121.51
6.88
4
-33
-153.77
7.12
Ref: Jute composites by Resin Transfer Moulding- An improved alternatives for
hand lay up technique, 20th Technological Conference, April 18, 1998
Pultrusion is a modern technique used for producing continuous fibre reinforced
profile in which the orientation of the fibre is kept constant during cure. This
process is suitable for thermosetting resins like polyester, epoxy & phenolic resin
systems. An infinite number of profiles can be produced using appropriate dies
and includes rods, tubes, flat & angle sections. Pultrusion technique has been
utilized for making door frame using jute as reinforcement and phenol
formaldehyde resin as matrix. This has been evaluated by Central Building
Research Institute, Roorkee & shown in the Table- 13.
Table: 13 Physico-mechanical properties of pultruded jute profile
Property
Value
A.
Physical properties
Bulk density (Kg/m3)
873
Moisture content (%)
4.41
Water absorption (%)
I. 2 hrs.
3.61
II. 24 hrs.
12.31
Surface water absorption (24 hrs., %)
1.52
Change in swelling (%)
I. Thickness
0.37
II. Length
0.013
III. width
0.041
Due to surface absorption (%)
Negligible
B.
Mechanical properties
Flexural yield strength (MPa)
62.60
Modulus of elasticity (GPa)
5.31
Tensile strength (MPa)
33.0
Elongation (%)
0.86
Tensile modulus (GPa)
7.98
Internal bond strength (MPa)
0.66
Screw withdrawal strength (N), Face
1800
Ref: Suitability assessment of JRP Pultruded profile as door frame materials in
building, Report No. F(C) 0176, Feb. 1998, Organic Building Materials
Division, CBRI, Roorkee.
12
Advantages
Automobile industries
door panels
seat backs
headliners,
dash boards
trunk liners
Building Component
Door
Window
Wall partition
Ceiling
Floor
Furniture
Table
Chair
Kitchen cabinet etc.
Lighter in weight
Lesser raw material
Cost economic
Serviceable mechanical
properties
Use of renewable resource
Better physical properties
Fire, termite & better moisture
resistance properties
Available at semi finished /
finished state i.e. reduced
labour & finishing cost
Better physical properties
Fire, termite & better moisture
resistance properties
Available at semi finished /
finished state i.e. reduced
labour & finishing cost
Better physical properties
Fire, termite & better moisture
resistance properties
Available at semi finished /
finished state i.e. reduced
labour & finishing cost
13